sv4
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 18, 2007
Registration
No. 333-
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933
El Paso Natural Gas
Company
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
4922
|
|
74-0608280
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
|
|
|
El Paso Building
1001 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 420-2600
(Address, including
zip code, and telephone number,
including area code, of registrants principal executive
offices)
|
|
Marguerite Woung-Chapman
El Paso Building
1001 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 420-2600
(Name, address,
including zip code, and telephone
number, including area code, of agent for
service)
|
Copies to:
|
|
|
Charles H. Still, Jr.
Bracewell & Giuliani LLP
711 Louisiana Street, Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 221-3309
|
|
Lara Mason, Esq.
El Paso Building
1001 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 420-2600
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale of the
securities to the public: As soon as practicable
after this registration statement becomes effective.
If the securities being registered on this Form are being
offered in connection with the formation of a holding company
and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the
following box. o
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same offering. o
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering. o
CALCULATION
OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Proposed Maximum
|
|
|
Amount of
|
Title of Each Class of
|
|
|
Amount to be
|
|
|
Offering Price
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Registration
|
Securities to be Registered
|
|
|
Registered
|
|
|
per
Unit(1)
|
|
|
Offering
Price(1)
|
|
|
Fee
|
5.95% Senior Notes Due 2017
|
|
|
$
|
355,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
$
|
355,000,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,899
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The registration fee was calculated pursuant to Rule 457(f)
under the Securities Act of 1933. For purposes of this
calculation, the Offering Price per Note was assumed to be the
stated principal amount of each original note that may be
received by the Registrant in the exchange transaction in which
the notes will be offered. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission,
acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this prospectus is not complete and may be
changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration
statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these
securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these
securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED
SEPTEMBER 18, 2007
PROSPECTUS
El Paso Natural Gas
Company
$355,000,000
Offer to Exchange
Registered 5.95% Senior
Notes Due 2017
for
All Outstanding
5.95% Senior Notes Due 2017
THE EXCHANGE OFFER WILL EXPIRE
AT 5:00 P.M., NEW YORK
CITY TIME,
ON ,
2007, UNLESS EXTENDED
The
Notes
We are offering to exchange registered 5.95% Senior Notes
Due 2017 for all of our outstanding 5.95% Senior Notes Due
2017. In this prospectus, we call the original notes the
Old Notes and the registered notes the New
Notes. The Old Notes and New Notes are collectively
referred to in this prospectus as the notes.
TERMS OF THE EXCHANGE OFFER:
|
|
|
|
|
The terms of the New Notes will be substantially identical to
those of the Old Notes, except that the New Notes will not be
subject to the transfer restrictions or registration rights
relating to the Old Notes. The New Notes will represent the same
debt as the Old Notes, and will be issued under the same
indenture as the Old Notes.
|
|
|
|
Subject to certain customary conditions, which we may waive, the
exchange offer is not conditioned upon a minimum aggregate
principal amount of Old Notes being tendered.
|
|
|
|
Interest on the New Notes will accrue from April 4, 2007 at
the rate of 5.95% per annum, payable semi-annually in arrears on
each April 15 and October 15, beginning October 15,
2007.
|
|
|
|
Each New Note issued in exchange for an Old Note will have the
same principal amount, optional redemption terms, interest
payment dates and maturity as the Old Note for which it is
exchanged.
|
|
|
|
You may withdraw tenders of Old Notes at any time prior to the
expiration of the exchange offer. We do not currently intend to
extend the exchange offer.
|
|
|
|
The exchange of Old Notes for New Notes will not be a taxable
event for United States federal income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
We will not receive any proceeds from this exchange offer.
|
|
|
|
The New Notes will not be listed on any securities exchange or
the Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.
|
See the section entitled Description of the Notes
that begins on page 43 for more information about the New
Notes issued in this exchange offer and the Old Notes.
PARTICIPATING IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER INVOLVES RISKS. SEE THE
SECTION ENTITLED RISK FACTORS THAT BEGINS ON
PAGE 6 FOR A DISCUSSION OF THE RISKS THAT YOU SHOULD
CONSIDER BEFORE PARTICIPATING IN THE EXCHANGE OFFER.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
Each broker-dealer that receives New Notes for its own account
pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it will
deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such New
Notes. The letter of transmittal states that by so acknowledging
and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer will not be
deemed to admit that it is an underwriter within the
meaning of the Securities Act. This prospectus, as it may be
amended or supplemented from time to time, may be used by a
broker-dealer in connection with resales of New Notes received
in exchange for Old Notes where such Old Notes were acquired by
such broker-dealer as a result of market-making activities or
other trading activities. See Plan of Distribution.
The date of this prospectus
is ,
2007.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
WHERE
YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed a registration statement on
Form S-4
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act,
that registers the issuance and sale of the securities offered
by this prospectus. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of
that registration statement, does not contain all of the
information set forth in the registration statement, certain
parts of which are omitted in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the SEC. We refer you to the registration
statement and to its exhibits for further information with
respect to us and the New Notes. The statements contained in
this prospectus concerning the provisions of any document are
not necessarily complete, and, in each instance, we refer you to
the copy of such document filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement or otherwise filed with the SEC. Each
such statement is qualified in its entirety by such reference.
This prospectus incorporates important business and financial
information about us that is not included in or delivered with
the prospectus. This information is available without charge to
holders of the notes upon written or oral request to the
Corporate Secretary, El Paso Building, 1001 Louisiana
Street, Houston, Texas 77002, telephone number
(713) 420-2600.
In order to obtain timely delivery, you must request documents
from us no later than five business days before the expiration
of the exchange offer.
We are subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange
Act, and, in accordance therewith, file annual, quarterly and
current reports and other information with the SEC. Such reports
and other information may be read and copied at the SEC Public
Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also obtain copies of such
material by mail from the Public Reference Section of the SEC at
100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549 at
prescribed rates. Please call the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330
for more information on the public reference room.
i
The SEC also maintains an internet web site that contains
reports and other information about us that we file
electronically with the SEC. The address of the site is http:
//www.sec.gov.
We have not authorized anyone to give any information or make
any representation that differs from, or adds to, the
information in this document or in our documents that are
publicly filed with the SEC. Therefore, if anyone does give you
different or additional information, you should not rely on
it.
If you are in a jurisdiction where it is unlawful to offer to
exchange or sell, or to ask for offers to exchange or buy, the
securities offered by this document, or if you are a person to
whom it is unlawful to direct these activities, then the offer
presented by this document does not extend to you.
The information contained in this document speaks only as of
its date unless the information specifically indicates that
another date applies.
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Such forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and
beliefs that we believe to be reasonable; however, assumed facts
almost always vary from actual results, and the differences
between assumed facts and actual results can be material,
depending upon the circumstances. Where we or our management
express an expectation or belief as to future results, that
expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and based on
assumptions believed to have a reasonable basis. We cannot
assure you, however, that the stated expectation or belief will
occur or be achieved or accomplished. The words
believe, expect, estimate,
anticipate, and similar expressions will generally
identify forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking
statements, whether written or oral, are expressly qualified by
these cautionary statements and any other cautionary statements
that may accompany those statements. In addition, we disclaim
any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to
reflect events or circumstances after the date of this
prospectus.
With this in mind, you should consider the risks discussed under
the heading Risk Factors beginning on page 6 of
this document and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
beginning on page 16 of this document, which include or
refer to important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking
statement made by us or on our behalf.
Below is a list of terms that are common to our industry and
used in this document.
|
|
|
/d =
per day
BBtu = billion British thermal units
Bcf = billion cubic feet
|
|
LNG = liquified natural
gas
MMcf = million cubic feet
|
When we refer to cubic feet measurements, all measurements are
at a pressure of 14.73 pounds per square inch.
ii
This summary highlights some basic information appearing in
other sections of this prospectus to help you understand our
business and the exchange offer. This summary does not contain
all the information that you should consider before exchanging
Old Notes for New Notes. You should carefully read this
prospectus to understand fully the terms of the exchange offer
and the New Notes, as well as the tax and other considerations
that may be important to you. You should pay special attention
to the Risk Factors section beginning on page 6
of this prospectus and the section entitled Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements on page ii.
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
information that is different. This document may only be used
where it is legal to sell these securities. The information in
this document may only be accurate on the date of this document.
For purposes of this prospectus, unless the context otherwise
indicates, when we refer to El Paso Natural
Gas, us, we, our,
ours, or EPNG we are describing
El Paso Natural Gas Company, together with its
subsidiaries. References to El Paso mean
El Paso Corporation.
Our
Company
We are a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1928, and an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of El Paso. Our primary
business consists of the interstate transportation and storage
of natural gas. We conduct our business activities through our
natural gas pipeline systems and a storage facility as discussed
below.
Each of our pipeline systems and our storage facility operates
under tariffs approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission that establish rates, cost recovery mechanisms and
other terms and conditions of service to our customers. The fees
or rates established under our tariffs are a function of our
costs of providing services to our customers, including a
reasonable return on our invested capital.
Our strategy is to protect and enhance the value of our
transmission and storage business by:
|
|
|
|
|
Successfully recontracting expiring transportation capacity;
|
|
|
|
Developing storage capacity to serve our market area;
|
|
|
|
Focusing on cost efficiencies, especially fuel use;
|
|
|
|
Successfully completing expansion projects; and
|
|
|
|
Attracting new supply and transporting natural gas to new
markets.
|
Below is a further discussion of our pipeline systems and
storage facility.
The EPNG System. The EPNG pipeline system
consists of approximately 10,300 miles of pipeline with a
winter sustainable west-flow capacity of 4,850 MMcf/d and
approximately 800 MMcf/d of east-end deliverability. During
2006, 2005 and 2004, average throughput was 4,179 BBtu/d, 4,053
BBtu/d and 4,074 BBtu/d, respectively. This system delivers
natural gas from the San Juan, Permian and Anadarko basins
to markets in California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma,
Texas and northern Mexico.
The Mojave Pipeline Company (Mojave)
System. The Mojave system consists of
approximately 400 miles of pipeline with a design capacity
of approximately 407 MMcf/d. During 2006, 2005 and 2004,
average throughput was 461 BBtu/d (including 385 BBtu/d
transported for the EPNG system), 161 BBtu/d and 161 BBtu/d,
respectively. This system connects with the EPNG system near
Cadiz, California, the EPNG and Transwestern systems at Topock,
Arizona and the Kern River Gas Transmission Company system in
California. This system also extends to customers in the
vicinity of Bakersfield, California.
Storage Facility. Prior to 2006, we utilized
our Washington Ranch underground storage facility located in New
Mexico, which has up to approximately 44 Bcf of underground
working natural gas storage capacity, solely to manage our
system transportation needs. In 2006, we also began using this
facility to offer interruptible storage services.
Our principal offices are in the El Paso building, located
at 1001 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002, and our
telephone number at that address is
(713) 420-2600.
1
Summary
of the Terms of the Exchange Offer
|
|
|
Initial Offering of Old Notes |
|
On April 4, 2007, we issued in a private placement
$355 million amount of 5.95% Senior Notes Due 2017. We
refer to these notes as the Old Notes in this prospectus. |
|
Registration Rights Agreement |
|
Pursuant to the registration rights agreement between us and the
initial purchasers entered into in connection with the private
placement of the Old Notes, we agreed to offer to exchange the
Old Notes for up to $355 million principal amount of
5.95% Senior Notes Due 2017 that are being offered hereby.
We refer to the notes issued for the Old Notes in this exchange
offer as the New Notes. We have filed the registration statement
of which this prospectus is a part of to meet our obligations
under the registration rights agreement. If we fail to satisfy
our obligations under the registration rights agreement, we will
be required to pay additional interest to holders of the Old
Notes under specified circumstances. |
|
The Exchange Offer |
|
We are offering to exchange all Old Notes for the same aggregate
principal amount of the New Notes, which have been registered
under the Securities Act. The Old Notes may be tendered only in
$1,000 increments. We will exchange New Notes for all Old Notes
that are validly tendered and not withdrawn prior to the
expiration of the exchange offer. We will cause the exchange to
be effected promptly after the expiration date of the exchange
offer. The New Notes will evidence the same debt as the Old
Notes and will be issued under and entitled to the benefits of
the same indenture that governs the Old Notes. Because we have
registered the New Notes, the New Notes will not be subject to
transfer restrictions, and holders of Old Notes that have
tendered and had their outstanding notes accepted in the
exchange offer will have no registration rights. |
|
If You Fail to Exchange Your Old Notes
|
|
If you do not exchange your Old Notes for New Notes in the
exchange offer, you will continue to be subject to the
restrictions on transfer provided in the Old Notes and the
indenture governing those notes. In general, you may not offer
or sell your Old Notes unless they are registered under the
federal securities laws or are sold in a transaction exempt from
or not subject to the registration requirements of the federal
securities laws and applicable state securities laws. |
|
Procedures for Tendering Your Old Notes
|
|
If you wish to tender your Old Notes for New Notes, you must: |
|
|
|
complete and sign the enclosed letter of transmittal
by following the related instructions, and
|
|
|
|
send the letter of transmittal, as directed in the
instructions, together with any other required documents, to the
exchange agent either (1) with the Old Notes to be
tendered, or (2) in compliance with the specified
procedures for guaranteed delivery of the Old Notes.
|
|
|
|
Brokers, dealers, commercial banks, trust companies and other
nominees may also effect tenders by book-entry transfer. |
2
|
|
|
|
|
By executing the letter of transmittal (or, in the case of the
Old Notes tendered by book-entry transfer, by transmitting an
agents message in lieu thereof) you will represent to us
that, among other things: |
|
|
|
the New Notes you receive will be acquired in the
ordinary course of your business;
|
|
|
|
you are not participating, and you have no
arrangement with any person or entity to participate, in the
distribution of the New Notes;
|
|
|
|
you are not our affiliate, as defined in
Rule 405 under the Securities Act, or a broker-dealer
tendering Old Notes acquired directly from us for resale
pursuant to Rule 144A or any other available exemption
under the Securities Act; and
|
|
|
|
if you are not a broker-dealer, that you are not
engaged in and do not intend to engage in the distribution of
the New Notes.
|
|
|
|
If your Old Notes are registered in the name of a broker,
dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other nominee, we urge
you to contact that person promptly if you wish to tender your
Old Notes pursuant to this exchange offer. See The
Exchange Offer Procedures for Tendering Old
Notes. Please do not send your letter of transmittal or
certificates representing your Old Notes to us. Those documents
should be sent only to the exchange agent. Questions regarding
how to tender and requests for information should be directed to
the exchange agent. See The Exchange Offer
Exchange Agent. |
|
Resale of the New Notes |
|
Except as provided below, we believe that the New Notes may be
offered for resale, resold and otherwise transferred by you
without compliance with the registration and prospectus delivery
provisions of the Securities Act provided that: |
|
|
|
the New Notes are being acquired in the ordinary
course of business,
|
|
|
|
you are not participating, do not intend to
participate, and have no arrangement or understanding with any
person to participate in the distribution of the New Notes
issued to you in the exchange offer,
|
|
|
|
you are not our affiliate, and
|
|
|
|
you are not a broker-dealer tendering Old Notes
acquired directly from us for your account.
|
|
|
|
Our belief is based on interpretations by the staff of the SEC,
as set forth in no-action letters issued to third parties that
are not related to us. The SEC has not considered this exchange
offer in the context of a no-action letter, and we cannot assure
you that the SEC would make similar determinations with respect
to this exchange offer. If any of these conditions are not
satisfied, or if our belief is not accurate, and you transfer
any New Notes issued to you in the exchange offer without
delivering a resale prospectus meeting the requirements of the
Securities Act or without an |
3
|
|
|
|
|
exemption from registration of your New Notes from those
requirements, you may incur liability under the Securities Act.
We will not assume, nor will we indemnify you against, any such
liability. Each broker-dealer that receives New Notes for its
own account in exchange for Old Notes, where the Old Notes were
acquired by such broker-dealer as a result of market-making or
other trading activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver
a prospectus in connection with any resale of such New Notes.
See Plan of Distribution. |
|
Expiration Date |
|
The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York City
time,
on ,
2007, unless we decide to extend the expiration date. We do not
currently intend to extend the exchange offer. |
|
Conditions to the Exchange Offer |
|
The exchange offer is not subject to any conditions other than
that it does not violate applicable law or any applicable
interpretation of the staff of the SEC. |
|
Exchange Agent |
|
We have appointed Wilmington Trust Company, as exchange
agent for the exchange offer. You can reach the exchange agent
at the address set forth on the back cover of this prospectus.
For more information with respect to the exchange offer, you may
call the exchange agent at (302) 636-6470. |
|
Withdrawal Rights |
|
You may withdraw the tender of your Old Notes at any time before
the expiration date of the exchange offer. You must follow the
withdrawal procedures as described under the heading The
Exchange Offer Withdrawal of Tenders. |
|
Federal Income Tax Considerations |
|
The exchange of Old Notes for the New Notes in the exchange
offer will not be a taxable event for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. See Material United States Federal Income Tax
Considerations. |
|
Acceptance of Old Notes and Delivery of New Notes
|
|
We will accept for exchange any and all Old Notes that are
properly tendered in the exchange offer prior to the expiration
date. See The Exchange Offer Procedures for
Tendering Old Notes. The New Notes issued pursuant to the
exchange offer will be delivered promptly following the
expiration date. |
4
Summary
of Terms of New Notes
|
|
|
Issuer |
|
El Paso Natural Gas Company |
|
New Notes |
|
$355 million aggregate principal amount of
5.95% Senior Notes Due 2017. |
|
Maturity Date |
|
April 15, 2017. |
|
Interest Rate |
|
5.95% per annum, accruing from April 4, 2007. |
|
Interest Payment Dates |
|
April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning October 15,
2007. |
|
Optional Redemption |
|
We may redeem the New Notes, in whole or in part, at any time
prior to their maturity at the redemption price described in
this prospectus under Description of the Notes
Optional Redemption of Notes, which will include a
make-whole premium. The notes will not be subject to any sinking
fund provision. |
|
Ranking |
|
The New Notes will: |
|
|
|
be our senior unsecured indebtedness, ranking
equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future
unsecured senior indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
be senior in right of payment to any of our future
subordinated indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
be effectively junior to any of our future secured
indebtedness to the extent of the assets securing such
indebtedness; and
|
|
|
|
not be guaranteed by any of our subsidiaries,
unconsolidated affiliates or parent companies, and accordingly,
will be effectively junior to all existing and future
indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries and
unconsolidated affiliates. See Description of the
Notes General.
|
|
|
|
Our consolidated subsidiaries have no outstanding indebtedness.
We have no secured debt. |
|
Covenants |
|
The indenture governing the notes contains covenants, including,
but not limited to, covenants limiting (1) the creation of
liens securing indebtedness, (2) the entry into certain
sale-leaseback transactions, and (3) certain mergers and
consolidations and transfers of assets. For a more detailed
description, see Description of Notes
Covenants. |
|
Use of Proceeds |
|
We will not receive any proceeds from the exchange of the
outstanding Old Notes for the New Notes. See Use of
Proceeds. |
|
Risk Factors |
|
You should read the Risk Factors section beginning
on page 6, as well as the other cautionary statements
throughout this prospectus, to ensure you understand the risks
associated with the exchange of the outstanding Old Notes for
the New Notes. |
|
Further Issuances |
|
We may, from time to time, without notice to or the consent of
the holders of the New Notes, increase the principal amount of
this series of notes under the indenture and issue such
increased principal amount (or any portion thereof), in which
case any additional notes so issued will have the same form and
terms (other than the date of issuance and, under certain
circumstances, the date from which interest thereon will begin
to accrue), and will carry the same right to receive accrued and
unpaid interest, as the New Notes previously issued, and such
additional notes will form a single series with the notes. |
5
Before you decide to participate in the exchange offer, you
should read the following risks, uncertainties and factors that
may adversely affect us.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
success depends on factors beyond our control.
Our business is the transportation and storage of natural gas
for third parties. Our results of operations are driven by the
volumes of natural gas we transport or store and the prices we
are able to charge for doing so. The volumes of natural gas we
are able to transport and store depends on the actions of those
third parties, and is beyond our control. Further, the following
factors, most of which are beyond our control, may unfavorably
impact our ability to maintain or increase current throughput,
to renegotiate existing contracts as they expire or to remarket
unsubscribed capacity:
|
|
|
|
|
service area competition;
|
|
|
|
expiration or turn back of significant contracts;
|
|
|
|
changes in regulation and actions of regulatory bodies;
|
|
|
|
weather conditions that impact throughput and storage levels;
|
|
|
|
price competition;
|
|
|
|
drilling activity and availability of natural gas;
|
|
|
|
continued development of additional sources of gas supply that
can be accessed;
|
|
|
|
decreased natural gas demand due to various factors, including
increases in prices and the increased availability or popularity
of alternative energy sources such as hydroelectric, nuclear,
wind, coal and fuel oil;
|
|
|
|
availability and increased cost of capital to fund ongoing
maintenance and growth projects;
|
|
|
|
opposition to energy infrastructure development, especially in
environmentally sensitive areas;
|
|
|
|
adverse general economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
expiration or renewal of existing interests in real property
including real property on Native American lands; and
|
|
|
|
unfavorable movements in natural gas prices in supply and demand
areas.
|
The
revenues of our pipeline businesses are generated under
contracts that must be renegotiated periodically, some of which
are for a substantial portion of our firm transportation
capacity.
Our revenues are generated under transportation and storage
contracts that expire periodically and must be renegotiated,
extended or replaced. Although we actively pursue the
renegotiation, extension or replacement of these contracts, we
may not be able to extend or replace these contracts when they
expire or may only be able to do so on terms that are not as
favorable as existing contracts. If we are unable to renew,
extend or replace these contracts or if we renew them on less
favorable terms, we may suffer a material reduction in our
revenues and earnings.
For additional information on our contracts with our major
customers, see Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements on
page F-23.
The loss of these customers or a decline in their
creditworthiness could adversely affect our results of
operations, financial position and cash flows.
6
Fluctuations
in energy commodity prices could adversely affect our
business.
Revenues generated by our transportation and storage contracts
depend on volumes and rates, both of which can be affected by
the price of natural gas. Increased natural gas prices could
result in a reduction of the volumes transported by our
customers, including power companies that may not dispatch
natural gas-fired power plants if natural gas prices increase.
Increased prices could also result in industrial plant shutdowns
or load losses to competitive fuels as well as local
distribution companies loss of customer base. The success
of our transmission and storage operations is subject to
continued development of additional gas supplies to offset the
natural decline from existing wells connected to our systems,
which requires the development of additional oil and gas
reserves and obtaining additional supplies from interconnecting
pipelines. A decline in energy prices could cause a decrease in
these development activities and could cause a decrease in the
volume of natural gas available for transmission and storage
through our systems. We retain a fixed percentage of natural gas
transported. This retained natural gas is used as fuel and to
replace lost and unaccounted for natural gas. Pricing volatility
may, in some cases, impact the value of under or over recoveries
of this retained natural gas, as well as imbalances and system
encroachments. If natural gas prices in the supply basins
connected to our pipeline systems are higher than prices in
other natural gas producing regions, our ability to compete with
other transporters and our long-term recontracting efforts may
be negatively impacted. Furthermore, fluctuations in pricing
between supply sources and market areas could negatively impact
our transportation revenues. Fluctuations in energy prices are
caused by a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
regional, domestic and international supply and demand;
|
|
|
|
availability and adequacy of transportation facilities;
|
|
|
|
energy legislation;
|
|
|
|
federal and state taxes, if any, on the transportation and
storage of natural gas;
|
|
|
|
abundance of supplies of alternative energy sources; and
|
|
|
|
political unrest among oil producing countries.
|
The
agencies that regulate us and our customers affect our
profitability.
Our business is regulated by the FERC, the U.S. Department
of Transportation, the U.S. Department of the Interior and
various state and local regulatory agencies. Regulatory actions
taken by these agencies have the potential to adversely affect
our profitability. In particular, the FERC regulates the rates
we are permitted to charge our customers for our services. In
setting authorized rates of return in recent FERC decisions, the
FERC has utilized a proxy group of companies that includes local
distribution companies that are not faced with as much
competition or risk as interstate pipelines. The inclusion of
these lower risk companies may create downward pressure on
tariff rates when subjected to review by the FERC in future rate
proceedings. Pursuant to FERCs jurisdiction over rates,
existing rates may be challenged by complaint and proposed rate
increases may be challenged by protest. A successful complaint
or protest against our rates could have an adverse impact on our
revenues associated with providing transportation and storage
services. On July 19, 2007, FERC issued a proposed policy
statement addressing the issue of the proxy groups it will use
to decide the return on equity of natural gas pipelines. FERC
uses a discounted cash flow model that incorporates the use of
proxy groups to develop a range of reasonable returns earned on
equity interests in companies with corresponding risks. FERC
then assigns a rate of return on equity within that range to
reflect specific risks of that pipeline when compared to the
proxy group companies. The proposed policy statement describes
FERCs intention to allow the use of master limited
partnerships in proxy groups, with certain restrictions that
could lower the return that would otherwise be allowed. FERC has
requested comments on the proposed policy.
In addition, increased regulatory requirements relating to the
integrity of our pipelines requires additional spending in order
to maintain compliance with these requirements. Any additional
requirements that are enacted could significantly increase the
amount of these expenditures.
Further, state agencies that regulate our local distribution
company customers could impose requirements that could impact
demand for our services.
7
Environmental
compliance and remediation costs and the costs of environmental
liabilities could exceed our estimates.
Our operations are subject to various environmental laws and
regulations that establish compliance and remediation
obligations. Compliance obligations can result in significant
costs to install and maintain pollution controls, fines and
penalties resulting from any failure to comply and potential
limitations on our operations. Remediation obligations can
result in significant costs associated with the investigation
and remediation of contaminated properties (some of which have
been designated as Superfund sites by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency under the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ), as
well as damage claims arising out of the contamination of
properties or impact on natural resources. It is not possible
for us to estimate exactly the amount and timing of all future
expenditures related to environmental matters because of:
|
|
|
|
|
The uncertainties in estimating pollution control and clean up
costs, including sites where preliminary site investigation or
assessments have been completed;
|
|
|
|
The discovery of new sites or additional information at existing
sites;
|
|
|
|
The uncertainty in quantifying liability under environmental
laws that impose joint and several liability on all potentially
responsible parties; and
|
|
|
|
The nature of environmental laws and regulations, including the
interpretation and enforcement thereof.
|
Currently, various legislative and regulatory measures to
address greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions (including carbon dioxide
and methane) are in various phases of discussion or
implementation. These include the Kyoto Protocol (which is
impacting proposed domestic legislation), proposed federal
legislation and state actions to develop statewide or regional
programs, each of which have imposed or would impose reductions
in GHG emissions. These actions could result in increased costs
to (i) operate and maintain our facilities,
(ii) install new emission controls on our facilities and
(iii) administer and manage any GHG emissions program.
These actions could also impact the consumption of natural gas,
thereby affecting our operations.
Although we believe we have established appropriate reserves for
our environmental liabilities, we could be required to set aside
additional amounts due to these uncertainties which could
significantly impact our future results of operations, cash
flows or financial position. For additional information
concerning our environmental matters, see Note 6 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on
page F-16.
Our
operations are subject to operational hazards and uninsured
risks.
Our operations are subject to the inherent risks normally
associated with pipeline operations, including pipeline
ruptures, explosions, pollution, release of toxic substances,
fires, adverse weather conditions and other hazards, each of
which could result in damage to or destruction of our facilities
or damages or injuries to persons. In addition, our operations
and assets face possible risks associated with acts of
aggression or terrorism. If any of these events were to occur,
we could suffer substantial losses.
While we maintain insurance against many of these risks to the
extent and in amounts we believe are reasonable, this insurance
does not cover all risks. Many of our insurance coverages have
material deductibles as well as limits on our maximum recovery.
As a result, our results of operations, cash flows or financial
condition could be adversely affected if a significant event
occurs that is not fully covered by insurance.
The
expansion of our business by constructing new facilities
subjects us to construction and other risks that may adversely
affect our financial results.
We may expand the capacity of our existing pipelines or our
storage facility by constructing additional facilities.
Construction of these facilities is subject to various
regulatory, development and operational risks, including:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain necessary approvals and permits by
regulatory agencies on a timely basis and on terms that are
acceptable to us;
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
the ability to obtain continued access to sufficient capital to
fund expansion projects;
|
|
|
|
potential changes in federal, state and local statutes and
regulations, including environmental requirements, that prevent
a project from proceeding or increase the anticipated cost of
the project;
|
|
|
|
impediments on our ability to acquire rights-of-way or land
rights on a timely basis on terms that are acceptable to us;
|
|
|
|
our ability to construct projects within anticipated costs,
including the risk that we may incur cost overruns resulting
from inflation or increased costs of equipment, materials or
labor, or other factors beyond our control, that may be material;
|
|
|
|
lack of anticipated future growth in natural gas supply; and
|
|
|
|
lack of transportation, storage or throughput commitments.
|
Any of these risks could prevent a project from proceeding,
delay its completion or increase its anticipated costs. As a
result, new facilities may not achieve our expected investment
return, which could adversely affect our results of operations,
cash flows or financial position.
Our
business requires the retention and recruitment of a skilled
workforce and the loss of employees could result in the failure
to implement our business plan.
Our business requires the retention and recruitment of a skilled
workforce. If we are unable to retain and recruit employees such
as engineers and other technical positions, our business could
be negatively impacted.
Risks
Related to Our Affiliation with El Paso
El Paso files reports, proxy statements and other
information with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. Each prospective investor should consider this
information and the matters disclosed therein in addition to the
matters described in this report. Such information is not
included herein or incorporated by reference into this
prospectus.
Our
relationship with El Paso and its financial condition
subjects us to potential risks that are beyond our
control.
Due to our relationship with El Paso, adverse developments
or announcements concerning El Paso or its other
subsidiaries could adversely affect our financial condition,
even if we have not suffered any similar development. The
ratings assigned to El Pasos senior unsecured
indebtedness are investment grade, currently rated Ba3 by
Moodys Investor Service, BB- by Standard &
Poors and BB+ by Fitch Ratings. The ratings assigned to
our senior unsecured indebtedness are currently rated Baa3 by
Moodys Investor Service, BB by Standard &
Poors and BBB- by Fitch Ratings. We and El Paso are
(i) on a positive outlook with Moodys Investor
Service and Standard & Poors and (ii) on a
stable outlook with Fitch Ratings. Downgrades of our or
El Pasos credit ratings could increase our cost of
capital and collateral requirements, and could impede our access
to capital markets.
El Paso provides cash management and other corporate
services for us. Pursuant to El Pasos cash management
program, we transfer surplus cash to El Paso in exchange
for an affiliated receivable. In addition, we conduct commercial
transactions with some of our affiliates. If El Paso or
such affiliates are unable to meet their respective liquidity
needs, we may not be able to access cash under the cash
management program, or our affiliates may not be able to pay
their obligations to us. However, we might still be required to
satisfy affiliated company payables. Our inability to recover
any affiliated receivables owed to us could adversely affect our
financial position. For a further discussion of these matters,
see Note 10 to our Consolidated Financial Statements on
page F-24.
We may
be subject to a change of control if an event of default occurs
under El Pasos credit agreement.
Under El Pasos $1.75 billion credit agreement,
our common stock and the common stock of several of our
affiliates are pledged as collateral. As a result, our ownership
is subject to change if there is a default
9
under the credit agreement and El Pasos lenders
exercise rights over their collateral, even if we do not have
any borrowings outstanding under the credit agreement.
A
default under El Pasos $1.75 billion credit
agreement by any party could accelerate our future borrowings,
if any, under the credit agreement and our long-term debt, which
could adversely affect our liquidity position.
We are a party to El Pasos $1.75 billion credit
agreement. We are only liable, however, for our borrowings under
the credit agreement, which were zero at June 30, 2007.
Under the credit agreement, a default by El Paso, or any
other borrower could result in the acceleration of all
outstanding borrowings, including the borrowings of any
non-defaulting party. The acceleration of our future borrowings,
if any, or the inability to borrow under the credit agreement,
could adversely affect our liquidity position and, in turn, our
financial condition.
Furthermore, the indentures governing some of our long-term debt
contain cross-acceleration provisions, the most restrictive of
which is $25 million. Therefore, if we borrow
$25 million or more under El Pasos
$1.75 billion credit agreement and such borrowings are
accelerated for any reason, including the default of another
party under the credit agreement, our long-term debt that
contains these provisions could also be accelerated. The
acceleration of our long-term debt could also adversely affect
our liquidity position and, in turn, our financial condition.
We are
an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
El Paso.
As an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of El Paso, subject
to limitations in our credit agreements and indentures,
El Paso has substantial control over:
|
|
|
|
|
our payment of dividends;
|
|
|
|
decisions on our financing and capital raising activities;
|
|
|
|
mergers or other business combinations;
|
|
|
|
our acquisitions or dispositions of assets; and
|
|
|
|
our participation in El Pasos cash management program.
|
El Paso may exercise such control in its interests and not
necessarily in the interests of us or the holders of our
long-term debt.
Risks
Associated with the Exchange Offer
If you
fail to follow the exchange offer procedures, your Old Notes
will not be accepted for exchange.
We will not accept your Old Notes for exchange if you do not
follow the exchange offer procedures. We will issue New Notes as
part of this exchange offer only after timely receipt of your
Old Notes, a properly completed and duly executed letter of
transmittal and all other required documents or if you comply
with the guaranteed delivery procedures for tendering your Old
Notes. Therefore, if you want to tender your Old Notes, please
allow sufficient time to ensure timely delivery. If we do not
receive your Old Notes, letter of transmittal, and all other
required documents by the expiration date of the exchange offer,
or you do not otherwise comply with the guaranteed delivery
procedures for tendering your Old Notes, we will not accept your
Old Notes for exchange. We are under no duty to give
notification of defects or irregularities with respect to the
tenders of Old Notes for exchange. If there are defects or
irregularities with respect to your tender of Old Notes, we will
not accept your Old Notes for exchange unless we decide in our
sole discretion to waive such defects or irregularities.
10
If you
fail to exchange your Old Notes for New Notes, they will
continue to be subject to the existing transfer restrictions and
you may not be able to sell them.
We did not register the Old Notes, nor do we intend to do so
following the exchange offer. Old Notes that are not tendered
will therefore continue to be subject to the existing transfer
restrictions and may be transferred only in limited
circumstances under the securities laws. As a result, if you
hold Old Notes after the exchange offer, you may not be able to
sell them. To the extent any Old Notes are tendered and accepted
in the exchange offer, the trading market, if any, for the Old
Notes that remain outstanding after the exchange offer may be
adversely affected due to a reduction in market liquidity.
Risks
Related to the Notes
Our
substantial indebtedness could impair our financial condition
and our ability to fulfill our debt obligations, including our
obligations under the notes.
We have substantial indebtedness. As of June 30, 2007, we
had total indebtedness of approximately $1.2 billion
(including the Old Notes), all of which was senior unsecured
indebtedness.
Our indebtedness could have important consequences to you. For
example, it could:
|
|
|
|
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with
respect to the notes and our other indebtedness, which could in
turn result in an event of default on such other indebtedness or
the notes;
|
|
|
|
impair our ability to obtain additional financing in the future
for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, general
corporate purposes or other purposes;
|
|
|
|
diminish our ability to withstand a downturn in our business or
the economy generally;
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to debt service payments, thereby reducing the
availability of cash for working capital, capital expenditures,
acquisitions, general corporate purposes or other purposes;
|
|
|
|
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
in our business and the industry in which we operate; and
|
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have proportionately less debt.
|
If we are unable to meet our debt service obligations, we could
be forced to restructure or refinance our indebtedness, seek
additional equity capital or sell assets. We may be unable to
obtain financing or sell assets on satisfactory terms, or at all.
We are not prohibited under the indenture governing the notes
from incurring additional indebtedness. Our incurrence of
significant additional indebtedness would exacerbate the
negative consequences mentioned above, and could adversely
affect our ability to repay the notes.
A
default under El Pasos $1.75 billion credit
agreement by any party could accelerate our future borrowings,
if any, under the credit agreement and our long-term debt, which
could adversely affect our liquidity position.
We are a party to El Pasos $1.75 billion credit
agreement. We are only liable, however, for our borrowings under
the credit agreement, which were zero as of June 30, 2007.
Under the credit agreement, a default by El Paso, or any
other borrower, could result in the acceleration of all
outstanding borrowings, including the borrowings of any
non-defaulting party. The acceleration of our future borrowings,
if any, or the inability to borrow under the credit agreement,
could adversely affect our liquidity position and, in turn, our
financial condition.
Furthermore, the indentures governing some of our long-term debt
contain cross-acceleration provisions, the most restrictive of
which is $25 million. Therefore, if we borrow
$25 million or more under El Pasos
$1.75 billion credit agreement and such borrowings are
accelerated for any reason, including the default of
11
another party under the credit agreement, our long-term debt
that contains these provisions could also be accelerated. The
acceleration of our long-term debt could also adversely affect
our liquidity position and, in turn, our financial condition.
We may
be subject to a change of control if an event of default occurs
under El Pasos credit agreement.
Under El Pasos $1.75 billion credit agreement,
our common stock and the common stock of several of our
affiliates are pledged as collateral. As a result, our ownership
is subject to change if there is a default under the credit
agreement and El Pasos lenders exercise rights over
their collateral, even if we do not have any borrowings
outstanding under the credit agreement.
The
notes will be effectively subordinated to liabilities and
indebtedness of our subsidiaries and subordinated to any of our
secured indebtedness to the extent of the assets securing such
indebtedness.
We currently have no secured indebtedness outstanding, but
holders of any secured indebtedness that we may incur in the
future would have claims with respect to our assets constituting
collateral for such indebtedness that are prior to your claims
under the notes. In the event of a default on such secured
indebtedness or our bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization,
those assets would be available to satisfy obligations with
respect to the indebtedness secured thereby before any payment
could be made on the notes. Accordingly, any such secured
indebtedness would effectively be senior to the notes to the
extent of the value of the collateral securing the indebtedness.
While the indenture governing the notes places some limitations
on our ability to create liens, there are significant exceptions
to these limitations that will allow us to secure some kinds of
indebtedness without equally and ratably securing the notes. To
the extent the value of the collateral is not sufficient to
satisfy the secured indebtedness, the holders of that
indebtedness would be entitled to share with the holders of the
notes and the holders of other claims against us with respect to
our other assets. In addition, the notes are not guaranteed by
our subsidiaries and our subsidiaries are not prohibited under
the indenture from incurring additional indebtedness. As a
result, holders of the notes will be effectively subordinated to
claims of third party creditors, including holders of
indebtedness, of these subsidiaries. Claims of those other
creditors, including trade creditors, secured creditors,
governmental authorities, and holders of indebtedness or
guarantees issued by the subsidiaries, will generally have
priority as to the assets of the subsidiaries over claims by the
holders of the notes. As a result, rights of payment of holders
of our indebtedness, including the holders of the notes, will be
effectively subordinated to all those claims of creditors of our
subsidiaries.
Because
there is no public market for the New Notes, you may not be able
to resell them.
Although the issuance of the New Notes will be registered under
the Securities Act, they will constitute a new issue of
securities with no established trading market. We cannot assure
you that an active market will exist for the New Notes or that
any trading market that does develop will be liquid. We do not
intend to apply to list the New Notes for trading on any
securities exchange or to arrange for quotation on any automated
dealer quotation system. The trading market for the New Notes
may be adversely affected by:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in the overall market for non-investment grade
securities;
|
|
|
|
changes in our financial performance or prospects;
|
|
|
|
the prospects for companies in our industry generally;
|
|
|
|
the number of holders of the New Notes;
|
|
|
|
the interest of securities dealers in making a market for the
New Notes; and
|
|
|
|
prevailing interest rates and general economic conditions.
|
12
This exchange offer is intended to satisfy our obligations under
the registration rights agreement relating to the Old Notes. We
will not receive any proceeds from the issuance of the New Notes
and we have agreed to pay the expenses of this exchange offer.
In exchange for issuing New Notes, we will receive a like
principal amount of Old Notes. The Old Notes surrendered in
exchange for New Notes will be retired and canceled and will not
be reissued. Accordingly, issuing New Notes will not result in
any increase in our outstanding debt.
13
SELECTED
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
You should read the following selected historical financial and
operating data together with Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations beginning on page 16 of this prospectus
and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes
beginning on
page F-1.
The historical consolidated operating data for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2006 and the
financial position data as of December 31, 2006 and 2005
were derived from the audited consolidated financial statements
included in this prospectus. We derived the historical
consolidated operating results data for each of the two years in
the period ended December 31, 2003 and the financial
position data as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 from
our accounting records. The historical consolidated financial
data as of June 30, 2007 and for each of the six month
periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2007 were derived from the
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included
in this prospectus. Our selected historical results are not
necessarily indicative of results to be expected in future
periods and results for interim periods are not necessarily
indicative of full year results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Operating Results
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
588
|
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
|
$
|
508
|
|
|
$
|
526
|
|
|
$
|
564
|
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation and maintenance
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Western Energy settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Taxes, other than income taxes
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
385
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Interest and debt expense
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Affiliated interest income, net
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
(154
|
)
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
47
|
|
|
$
|
(99
|
)
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Position
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and
equipment, net
|
|
$
|
2,306
|
|
|
$
|
2,224
|
|
|
$
|
2,133
|
|
|
$
|
2,041
|
|
|
$
|
1,908
|
|
|
$
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,631
|
|
|
$
|
3,378
|
|
|
$
|
3,225
|
|
|
$
|
3,724
|
|
|
$
|
3,189
|
|
|
$
|
3,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,111
|
|
|
$
|
1,110
|
|
|
$
|
1,110
|
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
$
|
758
|
|
|
$
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,726
|
|
|
$
|
1,578
|
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
|
$
|
1,322
|
|
|
$
|
1,153
|
|
|
$
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput volumes
(BBtu/d)(1)
|
|
|
4,255
|
|
|
|
4,214
|
|
|
|
4,235
|
|
|
|
4,066
|
|
|
|
4,065
|
|
|
|
4,157
|
|
|
|
4,093
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Throughput volumes exclude
throughput transported by Mojave on behalf of EPNG.
|
14
RATIO
OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
2002
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
|
|
|
3.51
|
x
|
|
|
2.13
|
x
|
|
|
2.82
|
x
|
|
|
1.82
|
x
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
3.18
|
x
|
|
|
3.33x
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Earnings were inadequate to cover
fixed charges by $160 million.
|
For purposes of this computation, earnings represents income
from continuing operations before income taxes, interest
expense, amortization of debt costs and that portion of rental
expense which represents an interest factor. Fixed charges means
that sum of interest costs, amortization of debt costs and that
portion of rental expense which represents an interest factor.
15
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our results of
operations and financial condition (MD&A) should be read in
conjunction with Business, Selected Historical
Financial and Operating Data and the Consolidated
Financial Statements and related notes beginning on
page F-1
of this prospectus. MD&A includes forward-looking
statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that may
result in actual results differing from the statements we make.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ include those
risks and uncertainties that are discussed in Risk
Factors.
Overview
Our business consists of the interstate transportation and
storage of natural gas. Each of these businesses faces varying
degrees of competition from existing and proposed pipelines, as
well as from alternative energy sources used to generate
electricity, such as hydroelectric, nuclear, wind, coal and fuel
oil. Our revenues from transportation and storage services
consist of the following types.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
Type
|
|
Description
|
|
Revenues in 2006
|
|
|
Reservation
|
|
Reservation revenues are from
customers (referred to as firm customers) that reserve capacity
on our pipeline systems and storage facilities. These firm
customers are obligated to pay a monthly reservation or demand
charge, regardless of the amount of natural gas they transport
or store, for the term of their contracts.
|
|
|
90
|
|
Usage and Other
|
|
Usage revenues are from both firm
customers and interruptible customers (those without reserved
capacity) who pay charges based on the volume of gas actually
transported, injected or withdrawn.
|
|
|
10
|
|
Because of our regulated nature and the high percentage of our
revenues attributable to reservation charges, our revenues have
historically been relatively stable. However, our financial
results can be subject to volatility due to factors such as
changes in natural gas prices, market conditions, regulatory
actions, competition, the creditworthiness of our customers and
weather. On January 1, 2006, we adopted a fuel tracker on
our EPNG system related to the actual costs of fuel lost and
unaccounted for and other gas balancing costs, such as
encroachments against our system gas supply and imbalance cash
out price adjustments, with a
true-up
mechanism for amounts over or under retained.
Our ability to extend existing customer contracts or remarket
expiring contracted capacity is dependent on competitive
alternatives, the regulatory environment at the federal, state
and local levels and the market supply and demand factors at the
relevant dates these contracts are extended or expire. The
duration of new or renegotiated contracts will be affected by
current prices, competitive conditions and judgments concerning
future market trends and volatility. Subject to regulatory
requirements, we attempt to recontract or remarket our capacity
at the rates allowed under our tariffs, although at times, we
discount these rates to remain competitive. Our existing
contracts mature at various times and in varying amounts of
throughput capacity. We continue to manage our recontracting
process to mitigate the risk of significant impacts on our
revenues. The weighted average remaining contract term for our
contracts is approximately four years as of December 31,
2006.
We successfully recontracted approximately 85 percent of
the 1,600 BBtu/d of capacity that expired in 2006 to various
customers for terms ranging from one to three years. The
remaining capacity that expired in 2006 was recontracted for
terms less than one year. We attempt to sell all our capacity
under long-term contracts and market any remaining open position
under shorter terms as market demand permits. Beginning in 2007,
approximately 81 percent of our firm contracts were
long-term agreements and we are continuing to remarket our
available capacity to serve either existing customers, electric
merchant generators, California
16
non-core customers or new customers. At this time, we are
uncertain how much of the available capacity will be
recontracted, and if so, at what rates and term.
Below is the contract expiration portfolio and the associated
revenue expirations for our firm transportation contracts as of
December 31, 2006, including those with terms beginning in
2007 or later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
|
Reservation
|
|
|
Percent of Total
|
|
|
|
BBtu/d(1)
|
|
|
Contracted Capacity
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Reservation Revenue
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1,079
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
2009
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
2010
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
2012 and beyond
|
|
|
974
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,158
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
479
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes EPNG capacity on the
Mojave system.
|
Results
of Operations
Our management uses earnings before interest expense and income
taxes (EBIT) to assess the operating results and effectiveness
of our business. We believe EBIT is useful to our investors
because it allows them to more effectively evaluate our
operating performance using the same performance measure
analyzed internally by our management. We define EBIT as net
income adjusted for (i) items that do not impact our income
from continuing operations, (ii) income taxes,
(iii) interest and debt expense and (iv) affiliated
interest income. We exclude interest and debt expense from this
measure so that our investors may evaluate our operating results
independently from our financing methods. EBIT may not be
comparable to measurements used by other companies.
Additionally, EBIT should be considered in conjunction with net
income and other performance measures such as operating income
or operating cash flows. Below is a reconciliation of EBIT to
net income for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except volume amounts)
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
588
|
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
|
$
|
508
|
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(161
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Interest and debt expense
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Affiliated interest income
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Throughput volumes
(BBtu/d)(1)
|
|
|
4,255
|
|
|
|
4,214
|
|
|
|
4,235
|
|
|
|
4,157
|
|
|
|
4,093
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Throughput volumes exclude
throughput transported by Mojave on behalf of EPNG.
|
17
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Six Months Ended
June 30, 2006
The following items contributed to our overall EBIT decrease of
$8 million for the six month period ended June 30,
2007 compared to the same period in 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
|
Favorable/(Unfavorable)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Transportation revenues
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
Operational gas and revaluations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impact on EBIT
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of individually
insignificant items.
|
Transportation Revenues. For the six months
ended June 30, 2007, our reservation revenues were lower
compared to the same period in 2006, primarily as a result of a
higher provision recorded in 2007 for EPNGs rate refund
and lower reservation revenues for the Mojave system due to a
decrease in tariff rates and expiration of certain firm
contracts, both effective March 1, 2007. Listed below are
EPNG and Mojaves rate proceedings which are further
discussed in Note 4 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements beginning on
page F-30.
|
|
|
|
|
EPNG In August 2007, we received approval of
the settlement of our rate case from the FERC. The settlement
provides benefits for both us and our customers for a three year
period ending December 31, 2008. Under the terms of the
settlement, EPNG is required to file a new rate case to be
effective January 1, 2009. Our financial statements reflect
the proposed rates and we have reserved sufficient amounts to
meet our refund obligations under this settlement. We have asked
FERC for approval to begin billing the settlement rates on
October 1, 2007 and we will make refunds, with interest,
within 120 days of that date. Our financial statements
reflect the proposed rates and we have estimated and reserved a
sufficient amount to meet our obligations under this settlement.
The refunds will be funded by drawing amounts under our cash
management program with El Paso.
|
|
|
|
Mojave In February 2007, as required by its
prior rate case settlement, Mojave filed with the FERC a general
rate case proposing a 33 percent decrease in its base
tariff rates resulting from a variety of factors, including a
decline in rate base and various changes in rate design since
its last rate case. No new services were proposed. These
proposed rates would result in a decrease in revenues of
approximately $13 million annually. The new base rates were
effective March 1, 2007 and are subject to further
adjustment upon the outcome of the rate case proceeding. Mojave
is actively engaged in settlement negotiations with its
customers. The participants have reached an agreement in
principle and, in September 2007, the procedural schedule was
suspended to enable the participants to prepare and present a
formal offer of settlement to the Presiding Judge in this
proceeding, and to the FERC.
|
We periodically file for changes in our rates subject to the
approval of the FERC. Changes in rates and other tariff
provisions resulting from these regulatory proceedings have the
potential to positively or negatively impact our profitability.
Operational Gas and Revaluations. During the
six months ended June 30, 2006, our EBIT was negatively
impacted by lower prices used to revalue net gas imbalance
receivables from customers on our Mojave system.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. During
the six months ended June 30, 2007, our depreciation and
amortization expense was lower as a result of changes to
depreciation and amortization rates that were proposed in both
our EPNG and Mojave rate cases.
18
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2005
The following items contributed to our overall EBIT increase of
$116 million for the year ended December 31, 2006 as
compared to 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
|
Favorable/(Unfavorable)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
EPNG reservation and other
services revenues
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
Lower litigation accruals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Enron bankruptcy settlement
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Lower general and administrative
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Higher depreciation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Higher rights-of-way expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impact on EBIT
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of individually
insignificant items.
|
The following discusses some of the significant items listed
above as well as events that may affect our operations in the
future.
EPNG Reservation and Other Services
Revenues. Our reservation and other services
revenues on the EPNG pipeline system were higher for the year
ended December 31, 2006 compared to 2005, primarily due to
the combined effect of (i) the termination, effective
December 31, 2005, of reduced tariff rates to certain
customers under the terms of our FERC-approved systemwide
capacity allocation proceeding, (ii) an increase in tariff
rates, which were effective January 1, 2006 and subject to
refund, and (iii) revenues from various interruptible
services provided under our tariffs.
Lower Litigation Accruals. Our litigation
accruals were lower during the year ended December 31, 2006
as compared to December 31, 2005, due to amounts accrued
during 2005 for our outstanding legal claims. For a further
discussion of our legal matters, see Note 6 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on
page F-16.
Enron Bankruptcy Settlement. During the third
quarter of 2006, we recorded income of approximately
$17 million, net of amounts potentially owed to certain
customers as a result of the Enron bankruptcy settlement. We may
receive additional amounts in the future as settlement proceeds
are released by the Bankruptcy Court. For a further discussion
of this matter, see Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements beginning on
page F-16.
Lower General and Administrative
Expense. During the year ended December 31,
2006, our general and administrative expenses were lower than in
2005, primarily due to a decrease in accrued benefits costs,
lower insurance and lower allocated costs from El Paso.
Higher Depreciation Expense. On
January 1, 2006, the effective date of EPNGs rate
case, EPNG began applying higher depreciation rates to its
property, plant and equipment which, along with an increase in
depreciable plant, resulted in higher depreciation expense for
the year ended December 31, 2006.
Higher Rights-Of-Way Expense. EPNGs
rights-of-way expense was higher for the year ended
December 31, 2006 as a result of the interim agreement
reached with the Navajo Nation in January 2006. For a further
discussion of this matter, see Note 6 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements beginning on
page F-16.
19
Year
Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2004
The following items contributed to our overall EBIT decrease of
$79 million for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
compared to 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
|
|
Favorable/(Unfavorable)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Higher litigation accruals
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
Gas not used in operations and
revaluations
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
Higher general and administrative
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Other(1)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impact on EBIT
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Consists of individually
insignificant items.
|
The following provides further discussions on some of the
significant items listed above as well as events that may affect
our operations in the future.
Higher Litigation Accruals. During the year
ended December 31, 2005, our litigation accrual was higher
than in 2004 due to the settlement and continuing negotiations
of several of our outstanding legal claims. We believe our
current accruals for our remaining legal matters are adequate.
However, the ultimate outcome of the remaining claims could
adversely affect our financial results. For further discussion
of our legal matters, see Note 6 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements beginning on
page F-16.
Gas Not Used in Operations and
Revaluations. The financial impact of operational
gas is based on the amount of natural gas we are allowed to
retain, relative to the amounts of natural gas we use for
operating purposes and the price of natural gas. Gas not needed
for operations results in revenues to us, which are impacted by
volumes and prices during a given period and by factors such as
system throughput, facility enhancements and the ability to
operate the systems in the most efficient and safe manner.
Revenues from gas not used in operations are recognized at the
time volumes are retained. Accordingly, we experienced
variability in our results based on the volumes and changing
prices of these retained volumes. We also experienced
variability in our operating results from revaluations of net
natural gas imbalances owed to customers and from encroachments
against our system gas. These volumetric obligations were
recognized as they occurred and were impacted by changing prices
each period.
During 2004, we retained, fairly consistently, volumes of
natural gas that were not used in operations. During 2005, we
experienced a net usage of natural gas in excess of amounts we
retained under our tariff. This, along with a steadily
increasing natural gas price environment during this timeframe,
resulted in unfavorable impacts on our operating results in 2005
versus 2004.
On January 1, 2006, we adopted a fuel tracker related to
the actual costs of fuel lost and unaccounted for and other gas
balancing costs, such as encroachments against our system gas
supply and imbalance cash out price adjustments, with a
true-up
mechanism for amounts over or under retained.
Higher General and Administrative
Expenses. During the year ended December 31,
2005, our general and administrative expenses were higher than
in 2004, primarily due to an increase in benefits accrued under
retirement plans, higher insurance and professional fees. We
were also allocated higher costs from Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company (TGP), our affiliate, associated with our shared
pipeline services. In addition, we allocate certain costs to
Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG), also our affiliate.
Accounting for Pipeline Integrity Costs. In
December 2005, we adopted the provisions of a FERC accounting
release that requires us to expense certain pipeline integrity
costs instead of our previous practice of capitalizing them as
part of our property, plant and equipment. The adoption of the
release did not have a material impact to our income statement
for the year ended December 31, 2005.
20
Affiliated
Interest Income
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2007 Compared to Six Months Ended
June 30, 2006
Affiliated interest income, net for the six months ended
June 30, 2007, was $7 million higher than the same
period in 2006 due to higher average short-term interest rates
and higher average advances to El Paso under its cash
management program. The average short-term interest rate for the
six months increased from 5.5% in 2006 to 5.9% for the same
period in 2007. In addition, the average advances due from
El Paso of $902 million for the six months of 2006
increased to $1.1 billion for the same period in 2007.
Year
Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2005
Affiliated interest income, net for the year ended
December 31, 2006, was $21 million higher than in 2005
due to higher average short-term interest rates and higher
average advances to El Paso under its cash management
program. The average short-term interest rate increased from
4.2% in 2005 to 5.7% in 2006. In addition, the average advances
due from El Paso of $779 million in 2005 increased to
$947 million in 2006.
Year
Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2004
Affiliated interest income, net for the year ended
December 31, 2005, was $13 million higher than in 2004
due primarily to higher average short-term interest rates and
slightly higher average advances to El Paso under its cash
management program. The average short-term interest rate
increased from 2.4% in 2004 to 4.2% in 2005. In addition, the
average advances due from El Paso of $778 million in
2004 increased to $779 million in 2005.
Income
Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In millions, except for rates)
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Our effective tax rate for 2006 and for the six month period
ended June 30, 2007 was different than the statutory rate
of 35 percent primarily due to the effect of state income
taxes. Our effective tax rate for 2005 was different than the
statutory rate of 35 percent primarily due to the effect of
state income taxes and non-deductible expenses. Our effective
tax rate for 2004 was lower than the statutory rate of
35 percent due to a state income tax adjustment related to
the Western Energy Settlement and an adjustment to consolidated
deferred taxes related to the Mojave pipeline system. For a
reconciliation of the statutory rate to the effective rates for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2006, see Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements
beginning on
page F-13.
Liquidity
and Capital Expenditures
Liquidity
Overview
Our liquidity needs are provided by cash flows from operating
activities. In addition, we participate in El Pasos
cash management program and depending on whether we have
short-term cash surpluses or requirements, we either provide
cash to El Paso or El Paso provides cash to us in
exchange for an affiliated note receivable or payable that is
due upon demand. We have historically provided cash advances to
El Paso, which we reflect in investing activities in our
statement of cash flows. At June 30, 2007, we had a note
receivable from El Paso of approximately $1.2 billion
of which approximately $69 million was classified as
current based on the anticipated settlement of this amount
within twelve months. See Note 6 to our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements on
page F-34,
for a further discussion of El Pasos cash management
program.
21
In addition to the cash management program, we are eligible to
borrow amounts available under El Pasos
$1.75 billion credit agreement. We are only liable for
amounts we directly borrow. As of June 30, 2007, we had no
borrowings under the agreement and approximately
$0.9 billion of borrowing capacity was available to all
eligible borrowers under the agreement. For a further discussion
of this credit agreement, see Note 5 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements beginning on
page F-15.
We believe that cash flows from operating activities combined
with amounts available to us under El Pasos cash
management program and its $1.75 billion credit agreement,
if necessary, will be adequate to meet our short-term capital
requirements for our existing operating needs and planned
expansion opportunities. Additionally, El Paso is currently
pursuing the formation of a master limited partnership in 2007
to enhance the value and financial flexibility of its pipeline
assets and to provide a lower cost source of capital for new
projects.
Debt. In April 2007, we issued
$355 million of 5.95% senior notes due in April 2017.
A portion of the net proceeds were used to repurchase
approximately $301 million of our $355 million,
7.625% notes due in August 2010. The remaining proceeds
were used for general corporate purposes.
In March 2007, Moodys Investor Services upgraded our
senior unsecured debt rating to an investment grade rating of
Baa3 and upgraded El Pasos senior unsecured debt
rating to Ba3 while maintaining a positive outlook.
Additionally, in March 2007, (i) Standard and Poors
upgraded our senior unsecured debt ratings to BB and upgraded
El Pasos senior unsecured debt rating to BB-
maintaining a positive outlook and (ii) Fitch Ratings
initiated coverage on us and assigned an investment grade rating
of BBB- on our senior unsecured debt and a rating of BB+ on
El Pasos senior unsecured debt.
Capital
Expenditures
We have relatively high maintenance capital requirements due, in
part, to the requirements of the 2002 Pipeline Safety Act and
our continued commitment to maintain and improve the total
integrity of our pipeline systems. Under our current plan, we
expect to spend between approximately $123 million and
$128 million in each of the next three years beginning
January 1, 2007, for capital expenditures to maintain the
integrity of our pipelines, to comply with clean air regulations
and to ensure the safe and reliable delivery of natural gas to
our customers. In addition, we have budgeted to spend between
approximately $24 million and $74 million in each of
the next three years to expand the capacity of our pipeline
systems contingent, in part, upon customer commitments to the
projects.
Our capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30,
2007, and the amount we expect to spend for the remainder of
2007 to expand and maintain our businesses are listed below. We
expect to fund these capital expenditures through a combination
of internally generated funds and repayments by El Paso of
amounts we advanced under its cash management program.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
Expansion
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
Legal
Proceedings
For a description of our material legal proceedings, see
Business Legal Proceedings.
22
Environmental
Matters
For a discussion of our environmental matters, see Note 6
to our Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on
page F-16.
Critical
Accounting Policies
A critical accounting policy involves the use of complicated
processes, assumptions
and/or
judgments in the preparation of our financial statements. Below
is a discussion of our critical accounting policies.
Cost-Based Regulation. We account for our
regulated operations under the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71,
Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of
Regulation The economic effects of regulation can
result in a regulated company recording assets for costs that
have been or are expected to be approved for recovery from
customers or recording liabilities for amounts that are expected
to be returned to customers in the rate-setting process in a
period different from the period in which the amounts would be
recorded by an unregulated enterprise. Accordingly, we record
assets and liabilities that result from the regulated ratemaking
process that would not be recorded under GAAP for non-regulated
entities. Management continually assesses whether regulatory
assets are probable of future recovery by considering factors
such as applicable regulatory changes and recent rate orders
applicable to other regulated entities. Based on this continual
assessment, management believes the existing regulatory assets
are probable of recovery. We periodically evaluate the
applicability of SFAS No. 71, and consider factors such as
regulatory changes and the impact of competition. If cost-based
regulation ends or competition increases, we may have to reduce
certain of our asset balances to reflect a market basis lower
than cost and write-off the associated regulatory assets. We had
no regulatory liabilities for the periods included in the
financial statements.
Accounting for Legal and Environmental
Reserves. We accrue legal and environmental
reserves when our assessments indicate that it is probable that
a liability has been incurred or an asset will not be recovered
and an amount can be reasonably estimated. Estimates of our
liabilities are based on our evaluation of potential outcomes,
currently available facts, and in the case of environmental
reserves, existing technology and presently enacted laws and
regulations taking into consideration the likely effects of
societal and economic factors, estimates of associated onsite,
offsite and groundwater technical studies and legal costs.
Actual results may differ from our estimates, and our estimates
can be, and often are, revised in the future, either negatively
or positively, depending upon actual outcomes or changes in
expectations based on the facts surrounding each matter. As of
December 31, 2006, we had accrued approximately
$24 million for environmental matters and approximately
$16 million for outstanding legal matters.
Contractual
Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2006, for each of the years presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Long-term
obligations:(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
355
|
(2)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
760
|
|
|
$
|
1,115
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
90
|
(2)
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
Capital
commitments(3)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Operating lease
obligations(1)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
1,735
|
|
|
$
|
2,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Notes 5 and 6 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on
page F-15.
|
(2) |
|
In April 2007, approximately $301
million of this debt was refinanced with the 5.95% senior notes
registered in this prospectus.
|
23
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Amount relates to planned capital
projects that are discretionary in nature, with no substantial
contractual capital commitments made in advance of the actual
expenditure.
|
Guarantees
We or El Paso are or have been involved in various
ownership and other contractual arrangements that sometimes
require us to provide additional financial support that results
in our issuance of financial and performance guarantees. In a
financial guarantee, we are obligated to make payments if the
guaranteed party fails to make payments under, or violates the
terms of, the financial arrangement. In a performance guarantee,
we provide assurance that the guaranteed party will execute on
the terms of the contract. If they do not, we are required to
perform on their behalf. As of December 31, 2006, we had
approximately $11 million of financial and performance
guarantees not otherwise reflected in our financial statements.
New
Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Adopted
As of June 30, 2007, there were several accounting
standards and interpretations that had not yet been adopted by
us. For more information, see Note 1 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements beginning on
page F-8
and Note 1 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements beginning on Page F-29.
Quantitative
And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our primary market risk is exposure to changing interest rates.
The table below shows the carrying value and related weighted
average effective interest rates of our interest bearing
securities by expected maturity dates and the fair value of
those securities. The fair values of our fixed rate long-term
debt securities have been estimated based on quoted market
prices for the same or similar issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Fiscal Year of Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Carrying Amounts
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except for rates)
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt fixed
rate
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
1,113
|
|
|
$
|
1,166
|
|
|
$
|
1,276
|
|
|
$
|
1,111
|
|
|
$
|
1,273
|
|
Average effective interest rate
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Overview
and Strategy
We are a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1928, and an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of El Paso Corporation
(El Paso). Our primary business consists of the interstate
transportation and storage of natural gas. We conduct our
business activities through our natural gas pipeline systems and
a storage facility as discussed below.
Each of our pipeline systems and our storage facility operates
under tariffs approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) that establish rates, cost recovery mechanisms
and other terms and conditions of service to our customers. The
fees or rates established under our tariffs are a function of
our costs of providing services to our customers, including a
reasonable return on our invested capital.
Our strategy is to protect and enhance the value of our
transmission and storage business by:
|
|
|
|
|
Successfully recontracting expiring transportation capacity;
|
|
|
|
Developing storage capacity to serve our market area;
|
|
|
|
Focusing on cost efficiencies, especially fuel use;
|
|
|
|
Successfully completing expansion projects; and
|
|
|
|
Attracting new supply and transporting natural gas to new
markets.
|
Below is a further discussion of our pipeline systems and
storage facility.
The EPNG System. The EPNG system consists of
approximately 10,300 miles of pipeline with a winter
sustainable west-flow capacity of 4,850 MMcf/d and
approximately 800 MMcf/d of east-end deliverability. During
2006, 2005 and 2004, average throughput was 4,179 BBtu/d, 4,053
BBtu/d and 4,074 BBtu/d. This system delivers natural gas from
the San Juan, Permian and Anadarko basins to markets in
California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and
northern Mexico.
The Mojave Pipeline Company (Mojave)
System. The Mojave system consists of
approximately 400 miles of pipeline with a design capacity
of approximately 407 MMcf/d. During 2006, 2005 and 2004,
average throughput was 461 BBtu/d (including 385 BBtu/d
transported for the EPNG system), 161 BBtu/d and 161 BBtu/d.
This system connects with the EPNG system near Cadiz,
California, the EPNG and Transwestern systems at Topock, Arizona
and the Kern River Gas Transmission Company system in
California. This system also extends to customers in the
vicinity of Bakersfield, California.
Storage Facility. Prior to 2006, we utilized
our Washington Ranch underground storage facility located in New
Mexico, which has up to approximately 44 Bcf of underground
working natural gas storage capacity solely to manage our system
transportation needs. In 2006, we also began using this facility
to offer interruptible storage services.
Markets
and Competition
Our customers consist of natural gas distribution and industrial
companies, electric generation companies, natural gas producers,
other natural gas pipelines, and natural gas marketing and
trading companies. We provide transportation service in our
natural gas supply and market areas and provide storage services
in our supply areas. Our pipeline systems connect with multiple
pipelines that provide our customers with access to diverse
sources of supply and various natural gas markets.
Imported LNG is one of the fastest growing supply sectors of the
natural gas market. LNG terminals and other regasification
facilities can serve as important sources of supply for
pipelines, enhancing their delivery capabilities and operational
flexibility and complementing traditional supply transported
into market areas. However, these LNG delivery systems also may
compete with us for transportation of gas into market areas we
serve.
25
Electric power generation is the fastest growing demand sector
of the natural gas market. The growth of the electric power
industry potentially benefits the natural gas industry by
creating more demand for natural gas turbine generated electric
power. This effect is offset, in varying degrees, by increased
generation efficiency, the more effective use of surplus
electric capacity, increased natural gas prices and the use and
availability of other fuel sources for power generation. In
addition, in several regions of the country, new additions in
electric generating capacity have exceeded load growth and
electric transmission capabilities out of those regions. These
developments may inhibit owners of new power generation
facilities from signing firm contracts with us.
We provide transportation services in the southwestern
U.S. and to the Mexican border through connections to other
pipelines. These have recently been among the fastest growing
regions in the U.S. and in Mexico; therefore, the market
demand for natural gas distribution as well as gas-fired
electric generation capacity has experienced considerable growth
in these areas. The combined capacity of all pipeline companies
serving California, our largest market, is approximately
8.5 Bcf/d and we provide approximately 39 percent of
this capacity. In 2006, the demand for interstate pipeline
capacity to California averaged 5.2 Bcf/d, equivalent to
approximately 61 percent of the total interstate pipeline
capacity serving that state. Natural gas shipped to California
on our system represented approximately 29 percent of the
natural gas consumed in that state in 2006.
Our existing transportation and storage contracts mature at
various times and in varying amounts of throughput capacity. Our
ability to extend our existing contracts or remarket expiring
capacity is dependent on competitive alternatives, the
regulatory environment at the federal, state and local levels
and market supply and demand factors at the relevant dates these
contracts are extended or expire. The duration of new or
renegotiated contracts will be affected by current prices,
competitive conditions and judgments concerning future market
trends and volatility. Subject to regulatory requirements, we
attempt to recontract or remarket our capacity at the rates
allowed under our tariffs, although at times, we discount these
rates to remain competitive.
26
The following table details our customers, contracts and
competition on our pipeline systems as of December 31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
System
|
|
Customer Information
|
|
Contract Information
|
|
Competition
|
|
EPNG
|
|
Approximately 160 firm and
interruptible customers
|
|
Approximately 190 firm
transportation contracts. Weighted average remaining contract
term of approximately four years.
|
|
EPNG faces competition in the west
and southwest from other existing and proposed pipelines, from
California storage facilities, and alternative energy sources
that are used to generate electricity such as hydroelectric,
nuclear, wind, coal and fuel oil. In addition, construction of
facilities to bring LNG into California and northern Mexico are
underway.
|
|
|
Major Customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southern California
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas
Company (SoCal)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101
BBtu/d)
|
|
Expires in 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
(187
BBtu/d)
|
|
Expires in 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
(561
BBtu/d)
|
|
Expire in 2010-2011.
|
|
|
|
|
Southwest Gas
Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11
BBtu/d)
|
|
Expires in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
(476
BBtu/d)
|
|
Expire in 2011-2015.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mojave
|
|
Approximately 20 firm and
interruptible customers
|
|
Approximately six firm
transportation contracts. Weighted average remaining contract
term of approximately seven years.
|
|
Mojave faces competition from other
existing and proposed pipelines and alternative energy sources
that are used to generate electricity such as hydroelectric,
nuclear, wind, coal and fuel oil. In addition, construction of
facilities to bring LNG into California and northern Mexico are
underway.
|
|
|
Major Customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles Department
of Water and Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50
BBtu/d)
|
|
Expires in 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
EPNG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(312
BBtu/d)
|
|
Expires in 2015.
|
|
|
Regulatory
Environment
Our interstate natural gas transmission systems and storage
operations are regulated by the FERC under the Natural Gas Act
of 1938, the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 and the Energy
Policy Act of 2005. We operate under tariffs approved by the
FERC that establish rates, cost recovery mechanisms, terms and
conditions of service to our customers. Generally, the
FERCs authority extends to:
|
|
|
|
|
rates and charges for natural gas transportation and storage;
|
|
|
|
certification and construction of new facilities;
|
|
|
|
extension or abandonment of services and facilities;
|
|
|
|
maintenance of accounts and records;
|
|
|
|
relationships between pipelines and certain affiliates;
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
terms and conditions of services;
|
|
|
|
depreciation and amortization policies;
|
|
|
|
acquisition and disposition of facilities; and
|
|
|
|
initiation and discontinuation of services.
|
Our interstate pipeline systems are also subject to federal,
state and local statutes and regulations regarding pipeline
safety and environmental matters. We have ongoing inspection
programs designed to keep all of our facilities in compliance
with pipeline safety and environmental requirements and we
believe that our systems are in material compliance with the
applicable requirements.
We are subject to U.S. Department of Transportation
regulations that establish safety requirements in the design,
construction, operation and maintenance of our interstate
natural gas transmission systems and storage facility. Our
operations on U.S. government land are regulated by the
U.S. Department of the Interior.
Environmental
A description of our environmental activities is included in
Note 6 to our Consolidated Financial Statements beginning
on
page F-16.
Employees
As of September 12, 2007, we had approximately
840 full-time employees, none of whom are subject to a
collective bargaining arrangement.
Properties
We believe that we have satisfactory title to the properties
owned and used in our businesses, subject to liens for taxes not
yet payable, liens incident to minor encumbrances, liens for
credit arrangements and easements and restrictions that do not
materially detract from the value of these properties, our
interests in these properties or the use of these properties in
our businesses. We believe that our properties are adequate and
suitable for the conduct of our business in the future.
Legal
Proceedings
Sierra Pacific Resources and Nevada Power Company v.
El Paso et al. In April 2003, Sierra Pacific
Resources and Nevada Power Company filed a suit in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada against us,
our affiliates and unrelated third parties, alleging that the
defendants conspired to manipulate prices and supplies of
natural gas in the California-Arizona border market from 1996 to
2001. In January 2004, the court twice dismissed the lawsuit.
The plaintiffs have appealed that dismissal to the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The appeal has
been fully briefed and argued. Our costs and legal exposure
related to this lawsuit are not currently determinable.
Carlsbad. In August 2000, a main transmission
line owned and operated by us ruptured at the crossing of the
Pecos River near Carlsbad, New Mexico. Twelve individuals at the
site were fatally injured. In June 2001, the
U.S. Department of Transportations (DOT) Office of
Pipeline Safety issued a Notice of Probable Violation and
Proposed Civil Penalty to us. The Notice alleged violations of
DOT regulations, proposed fines totaling $2.5 million and
proposed corrective actions. In April 2003, the National
Transportation Safety Board issued its final report on the
rupture, finding that the rupture was probably caused by
internal corrosion that was not detected by our corrosion
control program. In December 2003, this matter was referred by
the DOT to the Department of Justice (DOJ). We have resolved
this matter with the DOT and the DOJ, paying a fine of
$15.5 million in July 2007 and entering into a consent
decree that covers our implementation of certain capital,
maintenance, and other programs, the majority of which were
already included in our normal pipeline integrity and
maintenance plans.
28
In addition, a lawsuit entitled Baldonado et al. v. EPNG
was filed in June 2003, in state court in Eddy County, New
Mexico, on behalf of 26 firemen and emergency medical service
personnel who responded to the fire and who allegedly have
suffered psychological trauma. This case was dismissed by the
trial court, but was appealed to the New Mexico Court of
Appeals. In June 2006, the New Mexico Court of Appeals affirmed
the dismissal of the plaintiffs claims for negligent
infliction of emotional distress but reversed the dismissal of
the claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress. In
April 2007, the New Mexico Supreme Court upheld the appellate
courts dismissal of the claims for negligent infliction of
emotional distress, but is still reviewing the claims for
intentional infliction of emotional distress. Our costs and
legal exposure related to the Baldonado lawsuit are
currently not determinable; however, we believe these matters
will be fully covered by insurance.
Gas Measurement Cases. We and a number of our
affiliates were named defendants in actions that generally
allege mismeasurement of natural gas volumes
and/or
heating content resulting in the underpayment of royalties. The
first set of cases was filed in 1997 by an individual under the
False Claims Act, which has been consolidated for pretrial
purposes (In re: Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam Litigation,
U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming). These
complaints allege an industry-wide conspiracy to underreport the
heating value as well as the volumes of the natural gas produced
from federal and Native American lands. In October 2006, the
U.S. District Judge issued an order dismissing all claims
against all defendants. An appeal has been filed.
Similar allegations were filed in a second set of actions
initiated in 1999 in Will Price, et al. v. Gas Pipelines
and Their Predecessors, et al., in the District Court of
Stevens County, Kansas. The plaintiffs currently seek
certification of a class of royalty owners in wells on
non-federal and non-Native American lands in Kansas, Wyoming and
Colorado. Motions for class certification have been briefed and
argued in the proceedings and the parties are awaiting the
courts ruling. The plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount
of monetary damages in the form of additional royalty payments
(along with interest, expenses and punitive damages) and
injunctive relief with regard to future gas measurement
practices. Our costs and legal exposure related to this lawsuit
and claim are not currently determinable.
Bank of America. We are a named
defendant, along with Burlington Resources, Inc. (Burlington),
now a subsidiary of ConocoPhillips, in a class action lawsuit
styled Bank of America, et al. v. El Paso Natural
Gas and Burlington Resources Oil and Gas Company, L.P.,
filed in October 2003 in the District Court of Kiowa County,
Oklahoma asserting royalty underpayment claims as to specified
shallow wells in Oklahoma, Texas and New Mexico. Plaintiffs
assert that royalties were underpaid starting in the 1980s when
the purchase price of gas was lowered below the Natural Gas
policy Act maximum lawful prices. Plaintiffs assert that
royalties were further underpaid by Burlington as a result of
post-production cost deductions taken starting in the late
1990s. This action was transferred to Washita County District
Court in 2004. A tentative settlement reached in November 2005
was disapproved by the Court in June 2007. A class certification
hearing has been scheduled for January 2008. A companion case
styled Bank of America v. El Paso Natural Gas
involving similar claims made as to certain wells in
Oklahoma was settled in 2006.
In addition to the above matters, we and our subsidiaries and
affiliates are also named defendants in numerous lawsuits and
governmental proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of
our business. For each of our outstanding legal matters, we
evaluate the merits of the case, our exposure to the matter,
possible legal or settlement strategies and the likelihood of an
unfavorable outcome. If we determine that an unfavorable outcome
is probable and can be estimated, we establish the necessary
accruals. While the outcome of these matters, including those
discussed above, cannot be predicted with certainty, and there
are still uncertainties related to the costs we may incur, based
upon our evaluation and experience to date, we believe we have
established appropriate reserves for these matters. However, it
is possible that new information or future developments could
require us to reassess our potential exposure related to these
matters and adjust our accruals accordingly, and these
adjustments could be material. At June 30, 2007, we had
accrued approximately $16 million for our outstanding legal
matters.
29
Executive
Officers and Directors
The following provides biographical information for each of our
executive officers and directors as of August 28, 2007.
Directors are elected annually by our parent, and hold office
until their successors are elected and duly qualified. Each
executive officer named in the following table has been elected
to serve until his successor is duly appointed or elected or
until his earlier removal or resignation from office.
There are no family relationships among any of our executive
officers or directors, and, unless described herein, no
arrangement or understanding exists between any executive
officer and any other person pursuant to which he was or is to
be selected as an officer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
Officer Since
|
|
James J. Cleary
|
|
52
|
|
President and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
2004
|
James C. Yardley
|
|
55
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
2006
|
John R. Sult
|
|
48
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer
and Financial Officer)
|
|
2005
|
Daniel B. Martin
|
|
51
|
|
Senior Vice President and Director
|
|
2000
|
Thomas L. Price
|
|
52
|
|
Vice President and Director
|
|
2002
|
James J. Cleary has been President and Director since
January 2004. He also serves as President and Director of our
affiliate Colorado Interstate Gas Company since January 2004.
Mr. Cleary served as Chairman of the Board from May 2005 to
August 2006 and Chairman of the Board of our affiliate Colorado
Interstate Gas Company during the same period. From January 2001
through December 2003, he served as President of our affiliate
ANR Pipeline Company. Prior to that time, Mr. Cleary served
as Executive Vice President of our affiliate Southern Natural
Gas Company from May 1998 to January 2001. Mr. Cleary also
worked for Southern Natural Gas Company and its affiliates in
various capacities beginning in 1979.
James C. Yardley has been Chairman of the Board since
August 2006. Mr. Yardley also serves as Executive Vice
President of El Paso and Chairman of the Board of
El Pasos Pipeline Group since August 2006. He has
been Chairman of the Board and President of Southern Natural Gas
Company since May 2005, and a director and President of Southern
Natural Gas Company since May 1998. He served as Vice President,
Marketing and Business Development for Southern Natural Gas
Company from April 1994 to April 1998. Prior to that time,
Mr. Yardley worked in various capacities with Southern
Natural Gas and Sonat Inc. since 1978.
John R. Sult has been Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Controller since November 2005.
Mr. Sult also serves as Senior Vice President and
Controller (Chief Accounting Officer) of our parent El Paso
and as Senior Vice President of our affiliates Southern Natural
Gas Company, Colorado Interstate Gas Company, and Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company. He held the position of Vice President and
Controller at Halliburton Energy Services Company from August
2004 until joining El Paso in October 2005. He was an
independent consultant from December 2002 until August 2004.
From 1994 until December 2002 he was an Audit Partner with
Arthur Andersen LLP.
30
Daniel B. Martin has been a Director since May 2005 and
Senior Vice President since February 2000. Mr. Martin also
serves as Senior Vice President of our affiliates Southern
Natural Gas Company and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company since
2000 and Senior Vice President of our affiliate Colorado
Interstate Gas Company since 2001. He also serves as a director
Southern Natural Gas Company, Colorado Interstate Gas Company,
and Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company. Prior to that time,
Mr. Martin worked in various capacities with Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company since 1978.
Thomas L. Price has been a Director since November, 2005
and Vice President since June, 2002. Mr. Price also serves
as Vice President of our affiliate Colorado Interstate Gas
Company since February 2002 and as a director since 2005. Prior
to that time, Mr. Price worked in various capacities with
Colorado Interstate Gas Company since 1980.
We are a wholly owned subsidiary of El Paso and rely on
El Paso for certain support services. As a result, we do
not have a separate audit committee or audit committee financial
expert. Also, we have not adopted a separate code of ethics.
However, our executives are subject to El Pasos Code
of Business Conduct which is available for your review at
El Pasos website, www.elpaso.com. Information
from El Pasos website is not part of this prospectus.
31
All of our executive officers are officers or employees of
El Paso or one or more of its other subsidiaries and devote
a substantial portion of their time to El Paso or such
other subsidiaries and affiliates. None of our executive
officers receives any compensation from EPNG or its subsidiaries.
32
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
None of our common stock is held by any director or executive
officer. No family relationship exists between any of our
directors or executive officers. The following information
relates to the only entity known to us to be the beneficial
owner, as of August 28, 2007, of more than five percent of our
voting securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of
|
|
|
|
Title of Class
|
|
Name
|
|
Beneficial Ownership
|
|
Percent of Class
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
El Paso EPNG Investments,
L.L.C.(1)
1001 Louisiana Street
Houston, Texas 77002
|
|
1,000 shares
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We are a direct wholly-owned
subsidiary of El Paso EPNG Investments, L.L.C. which is a
direct wholly-owned subsidiary of El Paso Corporation.
|
The following table sets forth, as of August 28, 2007, the
number of shares of common stock of El Paso owned by each
of our executive officers and directors and all of our directors
and executive officers as a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
|
Total Shares
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
of Common
|
|
|
of Common
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
|
Directly or
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Indirectly
|
|
|
60
Days(1)
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Owned(2)
|
|
|
James J. Cleary
|
|
|
62,808
|
|
|
|
205,562
|
|
|
|
268,370
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
James C. Yardley
|
|
|
176,947
|
|
|
|
273,280
|
|
|
|
450,227
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
John R. Sult
|
|
|
54,657
|
|
|
|
33,413
|
|
|
|
88,070
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Daniel B. Martin
|
|
|
123,889
|
|
|
|
242,565
|
|
|
|
366,454
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Thomas L. Price
|
|
|
52,592
|
|
|
|
54,189
|
|
|
|
106,781
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
All directors and executive
officers as a group (five persons)
|
|
|
470,893
|
|
|
|
809,008
|
|
|
|
1,279,902
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Less than 1%.
|
|
(1) |
|
The shares indicated represent
stock options granted under El Pasos current or
previous stock option plans, which are currently exercisable or
which will become (1) exercisable within 60 days of
August 28, 2007. Shares subject to options cannot be voted.
|
|
(2) |
|
Based on 700,543,326 shares
outstanding as of July 31, 2007.
|
33
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Cash Management Program. We participate in
El Pasos cash management program which matches
short-term cash surpluses and needs of participating affiliates,
thus minimizing total borrowings from outside sources. We have
historically provided cash to El Paso in exchange for an
affiliated note receivable that is due upon demand. At
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we have a note
receivable from El Paso of approximately $1.2 billion
and $1.1 billion. We classified $69 million of this
receivable as current on our balance sheet at June 30,
2007, based on the anticipated settlement of this amount within
twelve months. The interest rate on this note at June 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006 was 6.1% and 5.3%.
Taxes. El Paso files consolidated
U.S. federal and certain state tax returns which include
our taxable income. In certain states, we file and pay taxes
directly to the state taxing authorities. At June 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006, we have income taxes payable of
$82 million and $81 million. The majority of these
balances, as well as our deferred income taxes, will become
payable to El Paso.
During the first quarter of 2007, we amended our tax sharing
agreement and intercompany tax billing policy with El Paso
to clarify the billing of taxes and tax related items to
El Pasos subsidiaries. El Paso billed us
$40 million for certain tax attributes previously reflected
as deferred income taxes in our financial statements. As of
June 30, 2007, these amounts had been settled through
intercompany accounts.
Other Affiliate Balances. At June 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006, we had contractual deposits
with our affiliates of $7 million, included in other
current liabilities on our balance sheets.
Affiliate Revenues and Expenses. We provide
natural gas transportation services to an affiliate under
long-term contracts. We entered into these contracts in the
normal course of business and the services are based on the same
terms as non-affiliates.
El Paso bills us directly for certain general and
administrative costs and allocates a portion of its general and
administrative costs to us. In addition to allocations from
El Paso, we are also allocated costs from TGP associated
with our pipelines services. We also allocate costs to Colorado
Interstate Gas Company for its share of our pipeline services.
The allocations from El Paso and TGP are based on the
estimated level of effort devoted to our operations and the
relative size of our EBIT, gross property and payroll.
The following table shows revenues and charges from our
affiliates for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues from affiliates
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
Operation and maintenance expenses
from affiliates
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Reimbursements of operating
expenses charged to affiliates
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
34
Exchange
Terms
Old Notes in an aggregate principal amount of $355 million
are currently issued and outstanding. The maximum aggregate
principal amount of New Notes that will be issued in exchange
for Old Notes is $355 million. The terms of the New Notes
and the Old Notes are substantially the same in all material
respects, except that the New Notes will not contain terms with
respect to transfer restrictions, registration rights and
payments of additional interest.
The New Notes will bear interest at a rate of 5.95% per year,
payable semi-annually on April 15 and October 15 of each year,
beginning on October 15, 2007. Interest on the Old Notes
for the period from April 4, 2007 to October 1, 2007
will be paid on October 1, 2007 to the holders of record of
the Old Notes as of the close of business on September 15,
2007. Holders of New Notes will receive interest from the date
of the original issuance of the Old Notes or from the date of
the last payment of interest on the Old Notes, whichever is
later. Holders of New Notes will not receive any interest on Old
Notes tendered and accepted for exchange. In order to exchange
your Old Notes for transferable New Notes in the exchange offer,
you will be required to make the following representations,
which are included in the letter of transmittal:
|
|
|
|
|
any New Notes that you receive will be acquired in the ordinary
course of your business;
|
|
|
|
you are not participating, and have no arrangement or
understanding with any person or entity to participate, in the
distribution of the New Notes;
|
|
|
|
you are not our affiliate, as defined in
Rule 405 under the Securities Act, or a broker-dealer
tendering Old Notes acquired directly from us for resale
pursuant to Rule 144A or any other available exemption
under the Securities Act; and
|
|
|
|
if you are not a broker-dealer, that you are not engaged in and
do not intend to engage in the distribution of the New Notes.
|
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this
prospectus and in the letter of transmittal, we will accept for
exchange any Old Notes properly tendered in the exchange offer,
and the exchange agent will deliver the New Notes promptly after
the expiration date of the exchange offer.
If you tender your Old Notes, you will not be required to pay
brokerage commissions or fees or, subject to the instructions in
the letter of transmittal, transfer taxes with respect to the
exchange of the Old Notes in connection with the exchange offer.
We will pay all charges, expenses and transfer taxes in
connection with the exchange offer, other than the taxes
described below under Transfer Taxes.
We make no recommendation to you as to whether you should
tender or refrain from tendering all or any portion of your
existing Old Notes into this exchange offer. In addition, no one
has been authorized to make this recommendation. You must make
your own decision whether to tender into this exchange offer
and, if so, the aggregate amount of Old Notes to tender after
reading this prospectus and the letter of transmittal and
consulting with your advisors, if any, based on your financial
position and requirements.
Expiration
Date; Extensions; Termination; Amendments
The exchange offer expires at 5:00 p.m., New York City
time,
on ,
2007, unless we extend the exchange offer, in which case the
expiration date will be the latest date and time to which we
extend the exchange offer.
We expressly reserve the right, so long as applicable law allows:
|
|
|
|
|
to delay our acceptance of Old Notes for exchange;
|
|
|
|
to terminate the exchange offer if any of the conditions set
forth under Conditions of the Exchange
Offer exist;
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
to waive any condition to the exchange offer;
|
|
|
|
to amend any of the terms of the exchange offer; and
|
|
|
|
to extend the expiration date and retain all Old Notes tendered
in the exchange offer, subject to your right to withdraw your
tendered Old Notes as described under
Withdrawal of Tenders.
|
Any waiver or amendment to the exchange offer will apply to all
Old Notes tendered, regardless of when or in what order the Old
Notes were tendered. If the exchange offer is amended in a
manner that we think constitutes a material change, or if we
waive a material condition of the exchange offer, we will
promptly disclose the amendment or waiver by means of a
prospectus supplement that will be distributed to the registered
holders of the Old Notes, and we will extend the exchange offer
to the extent required by
Rule 14e-1
under the Exchange Act.
We will promptly follow any delay in acceptance, termination,
extension or amendment by oral or written notice of the event to
the exchange agent, followed promptly by oral or written notice
to the registered holders. Should we choose to delay, extend,
amend or terminate the exchange offer, we will have no
obligation to publish, advertise or otherwise communicate this
announcement, other than by making a timely release to an
appropriate news agency.
In the event we terminate the exchange offer, all Old Notes
previously tendered and not accepted for payment will be
returned promptly to the tendering holders.
In the event that the exchange offer is withdrawn or otherwise
not completed, New Notes will not be given to holders of Old
Notes who have validly tendered their Old Notes.
Resale of
New Notes
Based on existing interpretations of the Securities Act by the
staff of the SEC set forth in several no action letters issued
to third parties, we believe that New Notes issued under the
exchange offer in exchange for Old Notes may be offered for
resale, resold and otherwise transferred by you without further
compliance with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act, if:
|
|
|
|
|
you are acquiring New Notes in the ordinary course of your
business;
|
|
|
|
you are not participating, and have no arrangement or
understanding with any person to participate, in the
distribution of the New Notes;
|
|
|
|
you are not our affiliate within the meaning of
Rule 405 under the Securities Act; and
|
|
|
|
you are not a broker-dealer who purchased Old Notes directly
from us for resale pursuant to Rule 144A or any other
available exemption under the Securities Act.
|
If you tender Old Notes in the exchange offer with the intention
of participating in any manner in a distribution of the New
Notes:
|
|
|
|
|
you cannot rely on the interpretation of the staff of the SEC
set forth in those letters, and
|
|
|
|
you must comply with the registration and prospectus delivery
requirements of the Securities Act in connection with a
secondary resale transaction and that such a secondary resale
transaction must be covered by an effective registration
statement containing the selling security holder information
required by Item 507 or 508, as applicable, of
Regulation S-K.
|
Only broker-dealers that acquired the Old Notes as a result of
market-making activities or other trading activities may
participate in the exchange offer. Each broker-dealer that
receives New Notes for its own account in exchange for Old
Notes, where such Old Notes were acquired by such broker-dealer
as a result of market-making activities or other trading
activities, must acknowledge that it will deliver a prospectus
in connection with any resale of the New Notes. Please read the
section captioned Plan of Distribution for more
details regarding the transfer of New Notes.
36
Acceptance
of Old Notes for Exchange
We will accept for exchange Old Notes validly tendered pursuant
to the exchange offer, or defectively tendered, if such defect
has been waived by us. We will not accept Old Notes tendered for
exchange subsequent to the expiration date of the exchange
offer. Tenders of Old Notes will be accepted only in
denominations of $1,000 and integral multiples thereof.
We expressly reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to:
|
|
|
|
|
delay acceptance for exchange of Old Notes tendered under the
exchange offer, subject to
Rule 14e-1
under the Exchange Act, which requires that an offeror pay the
consideration offered or return the securities deposited by or
on behalf of the holders promptly after the termination or
withdrawal of a tender offer, or
|
|
|
|
terminate the exchange offer and not accept for exchange any Old
Notes not theretofore accepted for exchange, if any of the
conditions set forth below under Conditions of
the Exchange Offer have not been satisfied or waived by us
or in order to comply in whole or in part with any applicable
law. In all cases, New Notes will be issued only after timely
receipt by the exchange agent of certificates representing Old
Notes, a properly completed and duly executed letter of
transmittal, or a manually signed facsimile thereof and any
other required documents. Alternatively, in the case of Old
Notes tendered by book-entry transfer, New Notes will be issued
after timely receipt by the exchange agent of an agents
message, as defined below under Procedures for Tendering
Old Notes Tendering Old Notes Held Through
Depository Trust Company. For purposes of the exchange
offer, we will be deemed to have accepted for exchange validly
tendered Old Notes, or defectively tendered Old Notes with
respect to which we have waived such defect, if, as and when we
give oral, confirmed in writing, or written notice to the
exchange agent. Promptly after the expiration date, we will
deposit the New Notes with the exchange agent, who will act as
agent for the tendering holders for the purpose of receiving the
New Notes and transmitting them to the holders. The exchange
agent will deliver the New Notes to holders of Old Notes
accepted for exchange after the exchange agent receives the New
Notes.
|
If, for any reason, we delay acceptance for exchange of validly
tendered Old Notes or we are unable to accept for exchange
validly tendered Old Notes, then the exchange agent may,
nevertheless, on our behalf, retain tendered Old Notes, without
prejudice to our rights described under
Expiration Date; Extensions; Termination;
Amendments, Conditions of the Exchange
Offer and Withdrawal of Tenders,
subject to
Rule 14e-1
under the Exchange Act, which requires that an offeror pay the
consideration offered or return the securities deposited by or
on behalf of the holders thereof promptly after the termination
or withdrawal of a tender offer.
If any tendered Old Notes are not accepted for exchange for any
reason, or if certificates are submitted evidencing more Old
Notes than those that are tendered, certificates evidencing Old
Notes that are not exchanged will be returned, without expense,
to the tendering holder, or, in the case of Old Notes tendered
by book-entry transfer into the exchange agents account at
a book-entry transfer facility under the procedure set forth
under Procedures for Tendering Old
Notes Book-Entry Transfer, such Old Notes will
be credited to the account maintained at such book-entry
transfer facility from which such Old Notes were delivered,
unless otherwise requested by such holder under Special
Delivery Instructions in the letter of transmittal,
promptly following the expiration date or the termination of the
exchange offer.
Tendering holders of Old Notes exchanged in the exchange offer
will not be obligated to pay brokerage commissions or transfer
taxes with respect to the exchange of their Old Notes other than
as described in Transfer Taxes or in
Instruction 7 to the letter of transmittal. We will pay all
other charges and expenses in connection with the exchange offer.
Procedures
for Tendering Old Notes
Any beneficial owner whose Old Notes are registered in the name
of a broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust company or other
nominee or held through a book-entry transfer facility and who
wishes to tender Old
37
Notes should contact such registered holder promptly and
instruct such registered holder to tender Old Notes on such
beneficial owners behalf.
Tender
of Old Notes Held Through Depository
Trust Company
The exchange agent and Depository Trust Company
(DTC) have confirmed that the exchange offer is
eligible for the DTCs automated tender offer program.
Accordingly, DTC participants may electronically transmit their
acceptance of the exchange offer by causing DTC to transfer Old
Notes to the exchange agent in accordance with DTCs
automated tender offer program procedures for transfer. DTC will
then send an agents message to the exchange agent.
The term agents message means a message
transmitted by DTC, received by the exchange agent and forming
part of the book-entry confirmation, which states that DTC has
received an express acknowledgment from the participant in DTC
tendering Old Notes that are the subject of that book-entry
confirmation that the participant has received and agrees to be
bound by the terms of the letter of transmittal, and that we may
enforce such agreement against such participant. In the case of
an agents message relating to guaranteed delivery, the
term means a message transmitted by DTC and received by the
exchange agent which states that DTC has received an express
acknowledgment from the participant in DTC tendering Old Notes
that they have received and agree to be bound by the notice of
guaranteed delivery.
Tender
of Old Notes Held in Certificated Form
For a holder to validly tender Old Notes held in certificated
form:
|
|
|
|
|
the exchange agent must receive at its address set forth in this
prospectus a properly completed and validly executed letter of
transmittal, or a manually signed facsimile thereof, together
with any signature guarantees and any other documents required
by the instructions to the letter of transmittal, and
|
|
|
|
the exchange agent must receive certificates for tendered Old
Notes at such address, or such Old Notes must be transferred
pursuant to the procedures for book-entry transfer described
below.
|
A confirmation of such book-entry transfer must be received by
the exchange agent prior to the expiration date of the exchange
offer. A holder who desires to tender Old Notes and who cannot
comply with the procedures set forth herein for tender on a
timely basis or whose Old Notes are not immediately available
must comply with the procedures for guaranteed delivery set
forth below.
Letters of Transmittal and Old Notes should be sent only to
the exchange agent, and not to us or to DTC.
The method of delivery of Old Notes, Letters of Transmittal
and all other required documents to the exchange agent is at the
election and risk of the holder tendering Old Notes. Delivery of
such documents will be deemed made only when actually received
by the exchange agent. If such delivery is by mail, we suggest
that the holder use properly insured, registered mail with
return receipt requested, and that the mailing be made
sufficiently in advance of the expiration date of the exchange
offer to permit delivery to the exchange agent prior to such
date. No alternative, conditional or contingent tenders of Old
Notes will be accepted.
Signature
Guarantee
Signatures on the letter of transmittal must be guaranteed by an
eligible institution unless:
|
|
|
|
|
the letter of transmittal is signed by the registered holder of
the Old Notes tendered therewith, or by a participant in one of
the book-entry transfer facilities whose name appears on a
security position listing it as the owner of those Old Notes, or
if any Old Notes for principal amounts not tendered are to be
issued directly to the holder, or, if tendered by a participant
in one of the book-entry transfer facilities, any Old Notes for
principal amounts not tendered or not accepted for exchange are
to be credited to the participants account at the
book-entry transfer facility, and neither the Special
Issuance Instructions nor the Special Delivery
Instructions box on the letter of transmittal has been
completed, or
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
the Old Notes are tendered for the account of an eligible
institution.
|
An eligible institution is a firm that is a member of a
registered national securities exchange or of the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., a commercial bank or a
trust company having an office or correspondent in the United
States or an eligible guarantor institution within
the meaning of
Rule 17Ad-15
under the Exchange Act.
Book-Entry
Transfer
The exchange agent will seek to establish a new account or
utilize an existing account with respect to the Old Notes at DTC
promptly after the date of this prospectus. Any financial
institution that is a participant in the DTC system and whose
name appears on a security position listing as the owner of the
Old Notes may make book-entry delivery of Old Notes by causing
DTC to transfer such Old Notes into the exchange agents
account. However, although delivery of Old Notes may be
effected through book-entry transfer into the exchange
agents account at DTC, (i) a properly completed and
validly executed Letter of Transmittal, or a manually signed
facsimile thereof or (ii) an agents message (as defined
above in Procedures for Tendering Old
Notes Tendering of Old Notes Held Through Depository
Trust Company) instead of the letter of transmittal, must
be received by the exchange agent at one of its addresses set
forth in this prospectus on or prior to the expiration date of
the exchange offer, or else the guaranteed delivery procedures
described below must be complied with. The confirmation of a
book-entry transfer of Old Notes into the exchange agents
account at DTC is referred to in this prospectus as a
book-entry confirmation. Delivery of documents to
DTC in accordance with DTCs procedures does not constitute
delivery to the exchange agent.
Guaranteed
Delivery
If you wish to tender your Old Notes and:
(1) certificates representing your Old Notes are not lost
but are not immediately available,
(2) time will not permit your letter of transmittal,
certificates representing your Old Notes and all other required
documents to reach the exchange agent on or prior to the
expiration date of the exchange offer, or
(3) the procedures for book-entry transfer cannot be
completed on or prior to the expiration date of the exchange
offer,
you may nevertheless tender if all of the following conditions
are complied with:
|
|
|
|
|
your tender is made by or through an eligible
institution; and
|
|
|
|
on or prior to the expiration date of the exchange offer, the
exchange agent has received from the eligible institution a
properly completed and validly executed notice of guaranteed
delivery, by manually signed facsimile transmission, mail or
hand delivery, in substantially the form provided with this
prospectus. The notice of guaranteed delivery must:
|
(a) set forth your name and address, the registered
number(s) of your Old Notes and the principal amount of Old
Notes tendered;
(b) state that the tender is being made thereby;
(c) guarantee that, within three New York Stock Exchange
trading days after the expiration date, the letter of
transmittal or facsimile thereof properly completed and validly
executed, together with certificates representing the Old Notes,
or a book-entry confirmation, and any other documents required
by the letter of transmittal and the instructions thereto, will
be deposited by the eligible institution with the exchange
agent; and
(d) the exchange agent receives the properly completed and
validly executed letter of transmittal or facsimile thereof with
any required signature guarantees, together with certificates
for all Old Notes in
39
proper form for transfer, or a book-entry confirmation, and any
other required documents, within three New York Stock Exchange
trading days after the expiration date.
Other
Matters
New Notes will be issued in exchange for Old Notes accepted for
exchange only after timely receipt by the exchange agent of:
|
|
|
|
|
certificates for (or a timely book-entry confirmation with
respect to) your Old Notes,
|
|
|
|
a properly completed and duly executed letter of transmittal or
facsimile thereof with any required signature guarantees, or, in
the case of a book-entry transfer, an agents
message, and
|
|
|
|
any other documents required by the letter of transmittal.
|
We will determine, in our sole discretion, all questions as to
the form of all documents, validity, eligibility, including time
of receipt, and acceptance of all tenders of Old Notes. Our
determination will be final and binding on all parties.
Alternative, conditional or contingent tenders of Old Notes
will not be considered valid. We reserve the absolute right to
reject any or all tenders of Old Notes that are not in proper
form or the acceptance of which, in our opinion, would be
unlawful. We also reserve the right to waive any defects,
irregularities or conditions of tender as to particular Old
Notes.
Our interpretation of the terms and conditions of the exchange
offer, including the instructions in the letter of transmittal,
will be final and binding.
Any defect or irregularity in connection with tenders of Old
Notes must be cured within the time we determine, unless waived
by us. We will not consider the tender of Old Notes to have been
validly made until all defects and irregularities have been
waived by us or cured. Neither we, the exchange agent, or any
other person will be under any duty to give notice of any
defects or irregularities in tenders of Old Notes, or will incur
any liability to holders for failure to give any such notice.
Withdrawal
of Tenders
Except as otherwise provided in this prospectus, you may
withdraw your tender of Old Notes at any time prior to the
expiration date.
For a withdrawal to be effective:
|
|
|
|
|
the exchange agent must receive a written notice of withdrawal
at one of the addresses set forth below under
Exchange Agent, or
|
|
|
|
you must comply with the appropriate procedures of DTCs
automated tender offer program system.
|
Any notice of withdrawal must:
|
|
|
|
|
specify the name of the person who tendered the Old Notes to be
withdrawn, and
|
|
|
|
identify the Old Notes to be withdrawn, including the principal
amount of the Old Notes.
|
If Old Notes have been tendered pursuant to the procedure for
book-entry transfer described above, any notice of withdrawal
must specify the name and number of the account at DTC to be
credited with the withdrawn Old Notes and otherwise comply with
the procedures of DTC.
We will determine all questions as to validity, form,
eligibility and time of receipt of any withdrawal notices. Our
determination will be final and binding on all parties. We will
deem any Old Notes so withdrawn not to have been validly
tendered for exchange for purposes of the exchange offer.
Any Old Notes that have been tendered for exchange but that are
not exchanged for any reason will be returned to their holder
without cost to the holder or, in the case of Old Notes tendered
by book-entry transfer into the exchange agents account at
DTC according to the procedures described above, such Old Notes
will be credited to an account maintained with DTC for the Old
Notes. This return or crediting will take place as
40
soon as practicable after withdrawal, rejection of tender or
termination of the exchange offer. You may retender properly
withdrawn Old Notes by following one of the procedures described
under Procedures for Tendering Old Notes
at any time on or prior to the expiration date.
Conditions
of the Exchange Offer
Notwithstanding any other provisions of the exchange offer, if,
on or prior to the expiration date, we determine, in our
reasonable judgment, that the exchange offer, or the making of
an exchange by a holder of Old Notes, would violate applicable
law or any applicable interpretation of the staff of the SEC, we
will not be required to accept for exchange, or to exchange, any
tendered Old Notes. We may also terminate, waive any conditions
to or amend the exchange offer. In addition, we may postpone the
acceptance for exchange of tendered Old Notes, subject to
Rule 14e-1
under the Exchange Act, which requires that an offeror pay the
consideration offered or return the securities deposited by or
on behalf of the holders thereof promptly after the termination
or withdrawal of the exchange offer.
Transfer
Taxes
We will pay all transfer taxes applicable to the transfer and
exchange of Old Notes pursuant to the exchange offer. If,
however:
|
|
|
|
|
delivery of the New Notes
and/or
certificates for Old Notes for principal amounts not exchanged,
are to be made to any person other than the record holder of the
Old Notes tendered;
|
|
|
|
tendered certificates for Old Notes are recorded in the name of
any person other than the person signing any letter of
transmittal; or
|
|
|
|
a transfer tax is imposed for any reason other than the transfer
and exchange of Old Notes to us or our order,
|
the amount of any such transfer taxes, whether imposed on the
record holder or any other person, will be payable by the
tendering holder prior to the issuance of the New Notes.
Consequences
of Failing to Exchange
If you do not exchange your Old Notes for New Notes in the
exchange offer, you will remain subject to the restrictions on
transfer of the Old Notes:
|
|
|
|
|
as set forth in the legend printed on the Old Notes as a
consequence of the issuance of the Old Notes pursuant to the
exemptions from, or in transactions not subject to, the
registration requirements of the Securities Act and applicable
state securities laws; and
|
|
|
|
otherwise set forth in the offering circular distributed in
connection with the private offering of the Old Notes.
|
In general, you may not offer or sell the Old Notes unless they
are registered under the Securities Act, or if the offer or sale
is exempt from registration under the Securities Act and
applicable state securities laws. Except as required by the
registration rights agreement, we do not intend to register
resales of the Old Notes under the Securities Act.
Accounting
Treatment
The New Notes will be recorded at the same carrying value as the
Old Notes, as reflected in our accounting records on the date of
the exchange. Accordingly, we will not recognize any gain or
loss for accounting purposes upon the consummation of the
exchange offer. We will amortize the expenses of the exchange
offer over the term of the New Notes.
41
Exchange
Agent
Wilmington Trust Company has been appointed as exchange
agent for the exchange offer. You should direct questions and
requests for assistance, requests for additional copies of this
prospectus, the letter of transmittal or any other documents to
the exchange agent. You should send certificates for Old Notes,
letters of transmittal and any other required documents to the
exchange agent addressed as follows:
The exchange agent for the exchange offers is:
Wilmington Trust Company
By Certified or Registered Mail:
Wilmington Trust Company
Rodney Square North
1100 North Market Street
Wilmington, DE
19890-1626
Attention: Alisha Clendaniel
By Overnight Courier or Hand:
Wilmington Trust Company
Rodney Square North
1100 North Market Street
Wilmington, DE
19890-1626
Attention: Alisha Clendaniel
By Facsimile Transmission:
(302) 636-4139
Attention: Exchanges
Confirm by Telephone:
(302) 636-6470
For Information Call:
(302) 636-6470
42
The New Notes will be, and the Old Notes are, our direct,
unsecured and unsubordinated general obligations. The New Notes
will be issued, and the Old Notes were issued, under an
indenture, dated as of November 13, 1996, between us and
Wilmington Trust Company, as successor in interest to
JPMorgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The Chase Manhattan
Bank), as indenture trustee (trustee), and a
supplemental indenture thereto dated as of April 4, 2007
(as so supplemented, the indenture). You may obtain
a copy of the indenture from the trustee at its corporate trust
office in Wilmington, Delaware. The terms of the notes include
those stated in the indenture and made a part thereof by
reference to the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended,
and in effect on the date of the indenture.
We have summarized selected provisions of the indenture below.
This summary of the material terms of the notes and the
indenture does not purport to be complete and is subject to, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the indenture,
including the definitions of terms therein, and the
Trust Indenture Act. We have included at the end of this
section a summary of capitalized terms used in this section.
Terms used in this section and not otherwise defined in this
section have the respective meanings assigned to them in the
indenture. We urge you to read the indenture because it, and not
this description, defines your rights as holders of the notes.
General
The notes:
|
|
|
|
|
are our general unsecured obligations;
|
|
|
|
rank equally with all of our other existing and future senior,
unsecured and unsubordinated debt;
|
|
|
|
rank senior to any of our future subordinated debt; and
|
|
|
|
constitute a new series of our senior unsecured obligations
under the indenture.
|
As June 30, 2007, we had total indebtedness of
approximately $1.2 billion, all of which was senior
unsecured indebtedness.
Principal,
Maturity and Interest
The notes will mature on April 15, 2017. We may issue
additional notes of this series from time to time in the future
which would contain the same terms as the notes offered hereby,
without the consent of the holders of the notes.
Interest on the notes will:
|
|
|
|
|
accrue at the rate of 5.95% per year;
|
|
|
|
be payable semiannually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of
each year , commencing October 15, 2007;
|
|
|
|
be payable to the person in whose name the notes are registered
at the close of business on the relevant April 1 and October 1
(whether or not a business day) preceding the applicable
interest payment date;
|
|
|
|
be computed on the basis of a
360-day year
comprised of twelve
30-day
months; and
|
|
|
|
be payable on overdue interest to the extent permitted by law at
the same rate as interest is payable on principal.
|
If any interest payment date, maturity date or redemption date
falls on a day that is not a business day, the payment will be
made on the next business day (and without any interest or other
payment in respect of such delay), except that if such business
day is in the next succeeding calendar year, then the payment
will be made on the immediately preceding business day, in each
case with the same force and effect as if made on the relevant
interest payment date, maturity date or redemption date. Unless
we default on a payment, no
43
interest will accrue for the period from and after the
applicable interest payment date, maturity date or redemption
date.
Denominations
The notes will be issued in registered form in denominations of
$2,000 each or integral multiples of $1,000 thereof.
Optional
Redemption of Notes
The notes will be redeemable, in whole or in part, at our option
at any time in whole, or from time to time in part, prior to
their maturity date, at the Make-Whole Price, on not less than
30 calendar days nor more than 60 calendar days notice prior to
the date of redemption and in accordance with the provisions of
the indenture.
The notice of redemption will set forth the manner of
calculation of the Make-Whole Price, but not necessarily its
amount. We will notify the trustee of the amount of the
Make-Whole Price with respect to any redemption promptly after
the calculation thereof, and the trustee will not be responsible
for the accuracy of the calculation.
We may purchase notes in the open market, by tender or
otherwise. Notes so purchased may be held, resold or surrendered
to the trustee for cancellation. If applicable, we will comply
with the requirements of
Rule 14e-1
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and other
securities laws and regulations in connection with any such
purchase. The notes may be defeased in the manner provided in
the indenture.
Additional
Notes
We may, without the consent of the holders of the notes, create
and issue additional notes of this series ranking equally with
these notes in all respects, so that such additional notes shall
be consolidated and form a single series with these notes and
shall have the same terms as to status, redemption or otherwise
as these notes. No additional notes may be issued if an event of
default under the indenture has occurred and is continuing with
respect to the notes.
Sinking
Fund
We are not required to make mandatory redemption or sinking fund
payments with respect to the notes.
Consolidation,
Merger or Sale
Under the indenture, we may not consolidate with or merge into
any other person or entity or sell, lease or transfer all or
substantially all of our properties and assets to any other
person or entity unless:
|
|
|
|
|
in the case of a merger, we are the surviving entity, or the
entity formed by the consolidation or into which we are merged
expressly assumes, by execution and delivery to the trustee of a
supplemental indenture, the due and punctual payment of the
principal, any premium and interest on the notes and the
performance of every covenant and condition in the indenture;
|
|
|
|
in the case of the sale, lease or transfer of all or
substantially all of our properties and assets, the person or
entity which acquires our properties and assets expressly
assumes, by execution and delivery to the Trustee of a
supplemental indenture, the due and punctual payment of the
principal, any premium and interest on the notes and the
performance of every covenant and condition in the indenture;
|
|
|
|
immediately after giving effect to the transaction, no default
or event of default under the indenture exists; and
|
|
|
|
we have delivered to the trustee an officers certificate
and an opinion of counsel each stating that the consolidation,
merger, sale, transfer or lease and the supplemental indenture
required in connection with
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
the transaction comply with the terms of the indenture and that
we have complied with all conditions precedent.
|
After any consolidation or merger or any sale, lease or transfer
of our properties and assets, the successor person or entity
formed by such consolidation or into which we are merged or to
which such sale, lease or transfer is made shall succeed to and
be substituted for us under the indenture as if the successor
person or entity had been originally named in the indenture and
may exercise every one of our rights and powers under the
indenture. Thereafter, except in the case of a lease, we shall
be relieved of all obligations and covenants under the indenture
and the notes.
Modification
of Indenture
At any time and without the consent of the holders of the notes,
we and the trustee may modify the indenture and enter into one
or more supplemental indentures for any of the following
purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
to secure the notes;
|
|
|
|
to evidence the succession of another person or entity under the
indenture and the assumption by the succeeding person or entity
of our covenants;
|
|
|
|
to add to our covenants or events of default for the benefit of
the holders of the notes or to surrender any of our rights and
powers under the indenture;
|
|
|
|
to add to, change or eliminate any of the provisions of the
indenture provided there is no outstanding security entitled to
the benefit of such provision;
|
|
|
|
to establish the general forms and terms of securities of any
series as permitted under the indenture;
|
|
|
|
to cure any ambiguity, to correct or supplement any provision
which may be inconsistent with any other provision; to comply
with any applicable mandatory provisions of law, provided that
any such actions shall not materially adversely affect the
interest of the holders of the notes;
|
|
|
|
to evidence and provide for the acceptance of the appointment of
a successor trustee and to add to or change any provisions
necessary to provide for or facilitate the administration of the
trusts by more than one trustee; and
|
|
|
|
to modify, eliminate or add to the provisions of the indenture
to the extent necessary to comply with the Trust Indenture
Act.
|
With the consent of the holders of a majority in aggregate
principal amount of the outstanding notes, we and the trustee
may add, change or eliminate any provision of the indenture or
modify in any manner the rights of the holders of the notes;
provided, however, we and the trustee may not, without the
consent of each holder of the notes:
|
|
|
|
|
change the stated maturity of the principal of, or any
installment of principal or interest on, the notes, or reduce
the principal amount of, the premium on or the rate of interest
on the notes;
|
|
|
|
reduce the percentage in principal amount of the notes required
to consent to any supplemental indenture or waive compliance
with the indenture or waive defaults under it;
|
|
|
|
change our obligation to maintain an office or agency as
specified in the indenture; or
|
|
|
|
modify any provisions of the indenture governing modifications,
waiver of past defaults and waiver of certain covenants, except
to increase any percentages required under such provisions or to
provide that other provisions of the indenture cannot be
modified without the consent of each holder of the notes.
|
Events of
Default
Event of default when used in the indenture, means
any of the following with respect to the notes:
|
|
|
|
|
failure to pay the principal of or any premium on any note when
due;
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
failure to pay interest on any note for 30 days;
|
|
|
|
failure to perform any other covenant in the indenture that
continues for 60 days after being given written notice;
|
|
|
|
if we commence a voluntary case in bankruptcy, consent to the
entry of any order of relief against us in an involuntary
bankruptcy case, consent to the appointment of a custodian over
us or all or substantially all of our assets or make a general
assignment for the benefit of creditors; or
|
|
|
|
if a court of competent jurisdiction enters a bankruptcy order
either for relief against us in an involuntary case, or
appointing a custodian over us or all or substantially all of
our assets, or ordering our liquidation; and the order or decree
remains unstayed and in effect for 90 days.
|
An event of default for the notes does not necessarily
constitute an event of default for any other series of debt
securities issued under the indenture. The trustee may withhold
notice to the holders of the notes of any default, except in the
payment of principal or interest, if it considers such
withholding of notice to be in the best interests of the holders.
If an event of default for the notes occurs and continues, the
trustee or the holders of at least 25% in the aggregate
principal amount of the notes of the series may declare the
entire principal of the notes to be due and payable immediately.
If this happens, subject to certain conditions, the holders of a
majority of the aggregate principal amount of the notes can void
the declaration.
Other than its duties in the case of a default, a trustee is not
obligated to exercise any of its rights or powers under the
indenture at the request, order or direction of any holders,
unless the holders offer the trustee reasonable indemnity. If
they provide this reasonable indemnification, the holders of a
majority in principal amount of the notes may direct the time,
method and place of conducting any proceeding or any remedy
available to the trustee, or exercising any power conferred upon
the trustee, for the notes.
Covenants
Under the indenture, we will:
|
|
|
|
|
pay the principal of, and interest and any premium on, the notes
when due;
|
|
|
|
maintain a place of payment;
|
|
|
|
deliver a report to the trustee at the end of each fiscal year
reviewing our obligations under the indenture; and
|
|
|
|
deposit sufficient funds with any paying agent on or before the
due date for any principal, interest or premium.
|
Limitation on Liens. The indenture provides
that we will not, nor will we permit any of our restricted
subsidiaries to, create, assume, incur or suffer to exist any
lien upon any principal property, whether owned or leased on the
date of the indenture or thereafter acquired, to secure any of
our debt or of any other person (other than the senior debt
securities issued under the indenture), without causing all of
the senior debt securities (including the notes) outstanding
under the indenture to be secured equally and ratably with, or
prior to, the new debt so long as the new debt is so secured.
This restriction does not prohibit us from creating the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
liens existing on the date of the indenture or created under an
after-acquired property clause;
|
|
|
|
purchase price liens created within one year after purchase;
|
|
|
|
liens already existing on newly acquired property or assets;
|
|
|
|
liens already existing on the property or assets of a new
restricted subsidiary;
|
|
|
|
liens already on property or assets when acquired by us or a
restricted subsidiary, or when we or a restricted subsidiary
acquire the owner of the property or asset;
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
liens securing construction or improvement incurred prior to or
up to one year after completion;
|
|
|
|
liens on oil, gas, mineral and processing and other plant
properties to secure costs associated with the properties and
their exploration, development, maintenance or operation;
|
|
|
|
liens connected with our conveyance (including conveyances by
our restricted subsidiaries) of a production payment relating to
oil, gas, natural gas or other natural resources;
|
|
|
|
liens in favor of us or our restricted subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
liens connected to the issuance of a tax-exempt debt to acquire
or construct property or assets;
|
|
|
|
liens of a foreign restricted subsidiary to secure its debt;
|
|
|
|
permitted liens (as defined below);
|
|
|
|
liens upon additions, improvements, replacements, repairs,
fixtures, appurtenances or component parts attaching to or
required to be attached to property or assets under the terms of
any mortgage, pledge agreement, security agreement or other
similar instrument, creating a lien upon such property or assets
permitted above; or
|
|
|
|
any extension, renewal, refinancing, refunding or replacement
(or successive extensions, renewals, refinancing, refundings or
replacements) of any lien, in whole or in part, that is referred
to above, or of any debt which it secures; provided, that the
principal amount of the debt secured shall not exceed the
greater of the principal amount of debt secured at the time of
such extension, renewal, refinancing, refunding or replacement
and the original principal amount of debt secured (plus in each
case the aggregate amount of premiums, other payments, costs and
expenses required to be paid or incurred in connection with such
extension, renewal, refinancing, refunding or replacement); and
further provided, that such extension, renewal, refinancing,
refunding or replacement shall be limited to all or a part of
the property (including improvements, alterations and repairs on
such property) subject to the encumbrance so extended, renewed,
refinanced, refunded or replaced (plus improvements, alterations
and repairs on such property).
|
In addition, this limitation on liens does not apply to other
liens, not otherwise excepted above, provided that the aggregate
principal amount of all debt then outstanding secured by such
other liens together will all net sale proceeds from
sale-leaseback transactions (other than the permitted
sale-leaseback transactions discussed below) does not exceed 15%
of our Consolidated Net Tangible Assets (as defined below).
Limitation on Sale-Leaseback Transactions. The
indenture also provides that we will not, nor will we permit any
restricted subsidiary to, engage in a sale-leaseback
transaction, unless:
|
|
|
|
|
such sale-leaseback transaction occurs within one year from the
date of acquisition of the principal property subject thereto or
the date of the completion of construction or commencement of
full operations on such principal property, whichever is later;
|
|
|
|
the sale-leaseback transaction involves a lease for a period,
including renewals, of not more than three years;
|
|
|
|
we or such restricted subsidiary would be entitled to incur debt
secured by a lien on the principal property subject thereto in a
principal amount equal to or exceeding the net sale proceeds
from such sale-leaseback transaction without securing the senior
debt securities; or
|
|
|
|
we or such restricted subsidiary, within a one-year period after
such sale-leaseback transaction, applies or causes to be applied
an amount not less than the net sale proceeds from such
sale-leaseback transaction to (A) the repayment, redemption
or retirement of our funded debt or funded debt of such
restricted subsidiary, or (B) investment in another
principal property.
|
In addition, this limitation on sale-leaseback transactions does
not apply to other sale-leaseback transactions, not otherwise
excepted above, provided that the net sale proceeds from such
other sale-leaseback transactions together with the aggregate
principal amount of outstanding debt secured by liens upon any
47
principal property (other than that debt secured by liens
excepted from the limitation on liens as discussed above) does
not exceed 15% of our Consolidated Net Tangible Assets (as
defined below).
Definitions
The following is a summary of capitalized terms used in this
summary description of the notes:
Comparable Treasury Issue means the United
States Treasury security selected by an Independent Investment
Banker as having a maturity comparable to the remaining term of
the notes to be redeemed that would be utilized, at the time of
selection and in accordance with customary financial practice,
in pricing new issues of corporate debt securities of comparable
maturity to the remaining term of the notes.
Comparable Treasury Price means, with respect
to any redemption date, (1) the average of four Reference
Treasury Dealer Quotations for such redemption date, after
excluding the highest and lowest of such Reference Treasury
Dealer Quotations, or (2) if the trustee obtains fewer than
four such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations, the average of
all such Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations.
Consolidated Net Tangible Assets means, at
any date of determination, the total amount of assets after
deducting therefrom (1) all current liabilities (excluding
(A) any current liabilities that by their terms are
extendable or renewable at the option of the obligor thereon to
a time more than 12 months after the time as of which the
amount thereof is being computed, and (B) current
maturities of long-term debt), and (2) the value (net of
any applicable reserves) of all goodwill, trade names,
trademarks, patents and other like intangible assets, all as set
forth on the consolidated balance sheet of us and our
consolidated subsidiaries for our most recently completed fiscal
quarter, prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles.
Funded debt means all debt maturing one year
or more from the date of the creation thereof, all debt directly
or indirectly renewable or extendible, at the option of the
debtor, by its terms or by the terms of any instrument or
agreement relating thereto, to a date one year or more from the
date of the creation thereof, and all debt under a revolving
credit or similar agreement obligating the lender or lenders to
extend credit over a period of one year or more.
Independent Investment Banker means Deutsche
Bank Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and their
respective successors, or, if any such firm or their successors,
if any, as the case may be, are unwilling or unable to select
the Comparable Treasury Issue, an independent investment banking
institution of national standing appointed by the trustee after
consultation with us.
Make-Whole Price means an amount equal to the
greater of:
(1) 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be
redeemed; and
(2) as determined by an Independent Investment Banker, the
sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of
principal and interest thereon (not including any portion of
such payments of interest accrued as of the redemption date)
discounted back to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis
(assuming a
360-day year
consisting of twelve
30-day
months) at the Treasury Rate
plus basis
points,
plus, in the case of both (1) and (2), accrued and unpaid
interest thereon to the date of redemption. Unless we default in
payment of the Make-Whole Price, on and after the applicable
redemption date, interest will cease to accrue on the notes to
be redeemed. If we redeem a note in part only, a new note of
like tenor for the unredeemed portion thereof and otherwise
having the same terms as the note partially redeemed will be
issued in the name of the holder of the note upon the
presentation and surrender thereof.
Permitted liens means (1) liens upon
rights-of-way for pipeline purposes; (2) any governmental
lien, mechanics, materialmens, carriers or
similar lien incurred in the ordinary course of business which
is not yet due or which is being contested in good faith by
appropriate proceedings and any undetermined lien which is
incidental to construction; (3) the right reserved to, or
vested in, any municipality or public authority by the terms of
any right, power, franchise, grant, license, permit or by any
provision of law, to purchase or recapture
48
or to designate a purchaser of, any property; (4) liens of
taxes and assessments which are (a) for the then current
year, (b) not at the time delinquent, or
(c) delinquent but the validity of which is being contested
at the time by us or any of our subsidiaries in good faith;
(5) liens of, or to secure performance of, leases;
(6) any lien upon, or deposits of, any assets in favor of
any surety company or clerk of court for the purpose of
obtaining indemnity or stay of judicial proceedings;
(7) any lien upon property or assets acquired or sold by us
or any of our restricted subsidiaries resulting from the
exercise of any rights arising out of defaults on receivables;
(8) any lien incurred in the ordinary course of business in
connection with workmens compensation, unemployment
insurance, temporary disability, social security, retiree health
or similar laws or regulations or to secure obligations imposed
by statute or governmental regulations; (9) any lien upon
any property or assets in accordance with customary banking
practice to secure any debt incurred by us or any of our
restricted subsidiaries in connection with the exporting of
goods to, or between, or the marketing of goods in, or the
importing of goods from, foreign countries; or (10) any
lien in favor of the United States or any state thereof, or any
other country, or any political subdivision of any of the
foregoing, to secure partial, progress, advance, or other
payments pursuant to any contract or statute, or any lien
securing industrial development, pollution control, or similar
revenue bonds.
Principal property means (1) any
pipeline assets owned by us or any of our subsidiaries,
including any related facilities employed in the transportation,
distribution or marketing of natural gas, that are located in
the United States or Canada, and (2) any processing or
manufacturing plant owned or leased by us or any of our
subsidiaries that are located within the United States or
Canada, except, in the case of either clause (1) or (2),
any such assets or plant which, in the opinion of our board of
directors, is not material in relation to the activities of us
and our subsidiaries as a whole.
Reference Treasury Dealer means Deutsche Bank
Securities Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and two
additional primary U.S. government securities dealers in
New York City selected by the trustee after consultation with
us, and their respective successors (provided, however, that if
any such firm or any such successor shall cease to be a primary
U.S. government securities dealer in New York City, the
trustee, after consultation with us, shall substitute therefor
another dealer).
Reference Treasury Dealer Quotations means,
with respect to each Reference Treasury Dealer and any
redemption date, the average, as determined by the trustee, of
the bid and asked prices for the Comparable Treasury Issue
(expressed in each case as a percentage of its principal amount)
quoted in writing to the Trustee by such Reference Treasury
Dealer at 5:00 p.m. on the third Business Day preceding
such redemption date.
Restricted subsidiary means any of our
subsidiaries owning or leasing any principal property.
Sale-leaseback transaction means the sale or
transfer by us or any of our restricted subsidiaries of any
principal property to a person (other than us or a subsidiary)
and the taking back by us or any of our restricted subsidiaries,
as the case may be, of a lease of such principal property.
Treasury Rate means, with respect to any
redemption date, (1) the yield, under the heading which
represents the average for the immediately preceding week,
appearing in the most recently published statistical release
designated H.15(519) or any successor publication
that is published weekly by the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System and that establishes yields on actively
traded United States Treasury securities adjusted to constant
maturity under the caption Treasury Constant
Maturities, for the maturity corresponding to the
Comparable Treasury Issue (if no maturity is within three months
before or after the stated maturity, yields for the two
published maturities most closely corresponding to the
Comparable Treasury Issue shall be determined, and the Treasury
Rate shall be interpolated or extrapolated from such yields on a
straight-line basis, rounding to the nearest month) or
(2) if the release (or any successor release) is not
published during the week preceding the calculation date or does
not contain such yields, the rate per annum equal to the
semi-annual equivalent yield to maturity of the Comparable
Treasury Issue, calculated using a price for the Comparable
Treasury Issue (expressed as a percentage of its principal
amount) equal to the Comparable Treasury Price for such
redemption date. The Treasury Rate will be calculated on the
third Business Day preceding the redemption date.
49
Defeasance
We will be discharged from our obligations on the notes at any
time if we deposit with the trustee sufficient cash or
government securities to pay the principal, interest, any
premium and any other sums due to the stated maturity date or a
redemption date of the notes. If this happens, the holders of
the notes will not be entitled to the benefits of the indenture
except for registration of transfer and exchange of notes and
replacement of lost, stolen or mutilated notes.
Methods
of Receiving Payments on the Notes
If a holder has given wire transfer instructions to us, we will
make all payments of principal of, premium, if any, and interest
and additional interest, if any, on the notes in accordance with
those instructions. All other payments on these notes will be
made at the office or agency of the paying agent and registrar
within the City and State of New York unless we elect to make
interest payments by check mailed to the holders at their
address set forth in the security register.
Paying
Agent and Registrar for the Notes
The trustee will initially act as paying agent and registrar. We
may change the paying agent or registrar without prior notice to
the holders of the notes, and we may act as paying agent or
registrar.
Governing
Law
The indenture and the notes will be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New York.
Notices
Notices to holders of the notes will be given by mail to the
addresses of such holders as they appear in the security
register. No periodic evidence is required to be furnished as to
the absence of default or as to compliance with the terms of the
indenture.
No
Personal Liability of Officers, Directors, Employees or
Stockholders
No director, officer, employee or stockholder, as such, of us or
any of our affiliates will have any personal liability in
respect of our obligations under the indenture or the notes by
reason of his, her or its status as such.
Concerning
the Trustee
Wilmington Trust Company is the trustee for the notes under
the indenture. In the ordinary course of business, Wilmington
Trust Company or its affiliates have provided and may in
the future continue to provide trust services and other
financial services to us and our subsidiaries, El Paso and
other affiliates of El Paso for which they have received
and will receive compensation. The trustee makes no
representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the
accuracy or completeness of any information contained or
incorporated by reference in this offering memorandum, except
for such information that specifically pertains to the trustee.
50
BOOK-ENTRY
AND SETTLEMENT; DEPOSITARY PROCEDURES
The New Notes will be issued in the form of a permanent global
certificate, which we refer to as a global note. The following
is a summary of the depository arrangements applicable to New
Notes issued in permanent global form and for which The
Depository Trust Company, or DTC, acts as depositary.
The global note will be deposited with, or on behalf of, DTC, as
depositary, and registered in the name of Cede & Co.,
as DTCs partnership nominee, or such other name as may be
requested by an authorized representative of DTC. One
fully-registered global note will be issued with respect to the
$355 million of principal amount of the New Notes. Except
under the limited circumstances described below, global notes
are not exchangeable for definitive certificated notes.
DTC has advised us that DTC is a limited-purpose trust company
organized under the New York Banking Law, a banking
organization within the meaning of the New York Banking
Law, a member of the Federal Reserve System, a clearing
corporation within the meaning of the New York Uniform
Commercial Code, and a clearing agency registered
pursuant to the provisions of Section 17A of the Exchange
Act. DTC holds securities that its participants deposit with
DTC. DTC also facilitates the post-trade settlement among direct
participants of sales and other securities transactions in
deposited securities, through electronic computerized book-entry
transfers and pledges between direct participants
accounts, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of
securities certificates. Direct participants include both
U.S. and
non-U.S. securities
brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies, clearing
corporations and certain other organizations. DTC is a wholly
owned subsidiary of The Depository Trust & Clearing
Corporation, or DTCC. DTCC, in turn, is owned by a number of DTC
participants and members of the National Securities Clearing
Corporation, Fixed Income Clearing Corporation and Emerging
Markets Clearing Corporation (NSCC, FICC, and EMCC, also
subsidiaries of DTCC), as well as by the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc., the American Stock Exchange LLC and the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. Access to DTCs
system is also available to others, such as both U.S. and
non-U.S. securities
brokers and dealers, banks, trust companies and clearing
corporations that clear through or maintain a custodial
relationship with a direct participant, either directly or
indirectly. The rules applicable to DTC and its participants are
on file with the SEC. More information about DTC can be found at
www.dtcc.com and www.dtc.org.
Purchases of New Notes under the DTC system must be made by or
through direct participants, which will receive a credit for the
New Notes on DTCs records. The ownership interest of each
actual purchaser of each New Note will be recorded on the direct
and indirect participants records. Beneficial owners will
not receive written confirmation from DTC of their purchase, but
beneficial owners are expected to receive written confirmations
providing details of the transaction, as well as periodic
statements of their holdings, from the participants through
which the beneficial owners entered the transaction. Transfers
of ownership interests in the New Notes are to be accomplished
by entries made on the books of the participants acting on
behalf of the beneficial owners. Beneficial owners will not
receive certificates representing their ownership interests in
New Notes, except in the event that use of the book-entry system
for the New Notes is discontinued. The laws of some
jurisdictions require that certain purchasers of securities take
physical delivery of such securities in definitive form. Such
laws may impair the ability to transfer beneficial interests in
a global note.
To facilitate subsequent transfers, all New Notes deposited by
direct participants with DTC are registered in the name of
DTCs partnership nominee, Cede & Co., or such
other name as may be requested by an authorized representative
of DTC. The deposit of New Notes with DTC and their registration
in the name of Cede & Co., or such other DTC nominee,
will not change the beneficial ownership of the New Notes. DTC
has no knowledge of the actual beneficial owners of the New
Notes; DTCs records reflect only the identity of the
direct participants to whose accounts the New Notes are
credited, which may or may not be the beneficial owners. The
direct and indirect participants will remain responsible for
keeping account of their holdings on behalf of their customers.
Delivery of notices and other communications by DTC to direct
participants, by direct participants to indirect participants,
and by direct participants and indirect participants to
beneficial owners will be governed by arrangements among them,
subject to any statutory or regulatory requirements as may be in
effect from time to time.
51
Redemption notices shall be sent to DTC. If less than all of the
New Notes are being redeemed, DTCs practice is to
determine by lot the amount of the interest of each direct
participant to be redeemed.
Neither DTC nor Cede & Co. (nor any other DTC nominee)
will consent or vote with respect to New Notes unless authorized
by a direct participant in accordance with DTCs
procedures. Under its usual procedures, DTC mails an omnibus
proxy to us as soon as possible after the record date. The
omnibus proxy assigns Cede & Co.s consenting or
voting rights to those direct participants to whose accounts the
New Notes are credited on the record date (identified in a
listing attached to the omnibus proxy).
Principal and interest payments, if any, on the New Notes will
be made to Cede & Co., or such other nominee as may be
requested by an authorized representative of DTC. DTC has told
us that its practice is to credit direct participants
accounts upon DTCs receipt of funds and corresponding
detail information from us or the Trustee on the applicable
payable date in accordance with their respective holdings shown
on DTCs records. Payments by participants to beneficial
owners will be governed by standing instructions and customary
practices, as is the case with securities held for the accounts
of customers in bearer form or registered in street
name, and will be the responsibility of that participant
and not of DTC, the Trustee or us, subject to any statutory or
regulatory requirements as may be in effect from time to time.
Payment of principal and interest to Cede & Co. (or
such other nominee as may be requested by an authorized
representative of DTC) is the responsibility of us or the
Trustee. Disbursement of payments from Cede & Co. to
direct participants is DTCs responsibility. Disbursement
of payments to beneficial owners is the responsibility of direct
and indirect participants.
A beneficial owner must give notice through a participant to a
tender agent to elect to have its New Notes purchased or
tendered. The beneficial owner must deliver New Notes by causing
the direct participant to transfer the participants
interest in the New Notes, on DTCs records, to a tender
agent. The requirement for physical delivery of New Notes in
connection with an optional tender or a mandatory purchase is
satisfied when the ownership rights in the New Notes are
transferred by direct participants on DTCs records and
followed by a book-entry credit of tendered New Notes to the
tender agents account. Neither we, any trustee nor any of
our respective agents will be responsible for any aspect of the
records of DTC, any nominee or any participant relating to, or
payments made on account of, beneficial interests in a permanent
global note or for maintaining, supervising or reviewing any of
the records of DTC, any nominee or any participant relating to
such beneficial interests.
DTC may discontinue providing its services as securities
depositary at any time by giving reasonable notice to us or the
Trustee, as agent. Under such circumstances, we would attempt to
obtain a successor securities depositary. If we were unable to
obtain a successor depositary, we would issue New Notes in
definitive form.
We may decide to discontinue use of the system of book-entry
transfers through DTC (or a successor securities depositary). In
that event, we would issue New Notes in definitive form.
The information in this section concerning DTC and DTCs
book entry system has been obtained from sources that we believe
to be reliable, but we take no responsibility for the accuracy
of such information.
52
Based on interpretations by the staff of the SEC set forth in no
action letters issued to third parties, we believe that you may
transfer New Notes issued under the exchange offer in exchange
for Old Notes unless you are:
|
|
|
|
|
our affiliate within the meaning of Rule 405
under the Securities Act;
|
|
|
|
a broker-dealer that acquired Old Notes directly from us; or
|
|
|
|
a broker-dealer that acquired Old Notes as a result of
market-making or other trading activities without compliance
with the registration and prospectus delivery provisions of the
Securities Act;
|
provided that you acquire the New Notes in the ordinary course
of your business and you are not engaged in, and do not intend
to engage in, and have no arrangement or understanding with any
person to participate in, a distribution of the New Notes.
Broker-dealers receiving New Notes in the exchange offer will be
subject to a prospectus delivery requirement with respect to
resales of the New Notes.
To date, the staff of the SEC has taken the position that
participating broker-dealers may fulfill their prospectus
delivery requirements with respect to transactions involving an
exchange of securities such as this exchange offer, other than a
resale of an unsold allotment from the original sale of the Old
Notes, with the prospectus contained in the exchange offer
registration statement.
Each broker-dealer that receives New Notes for its own account
pursuant to the exchange offer must acknowledge that it will
deliver a prospectus in connection with any resale of such New
Notes. This prospectus, as it may be amended or supplemented
from time to time, may be used by a broker-dealer in connection
with resales of New Notes received in exchange for Old Notes
where such Old Notes were acquired as a result of market-making
activities or other trading activities. In addition,
until ,
2007, all dealers effecting transactions in the New Notes may be
required to deliver a prospectus.
We will not receive any proceeds from any sale of New Notes by
brokers-dealers or any other persons. New Notes received by
broker-dealers for their own account pursuant to the exchange
offer may be sold from time to time in one or more transactions
in the over-the-counter market, in negotiated transactions,
through the writing of options on the New Notes or a combination
of such methods of resale, at market prices prevailing at the
time of resale, at prices related to such prevailing market
prices or negotiated prices. Any such resale may be made
directly to purchasers or to or through brokers or dealers who
may receive compensation in the form of commissions or
concessions from any such broker-dealer
and/or the
purchasers of any such New Notes. Any broker-dealer that resells
New Notes that were received by it for its own account pursuant
to the exchange offer and any broker or dealer that participates
in a distribution of such New Notes may be deemed to be an
underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act
and any profit of any such resale of New Notes and any
commissions or concessions received by any such persons may be
deemed to be underwriting compensation under the Securities Act.
The letter of transmittal states that by acknowledging that it
will deliver and by delivering a prospectus, a broker-dealer
will not be deemed to admit that it is an
underwriter within the meaning of the Securities Act.
We have agreed to pay all expenses incident to this exchange
offer other than commissions or concessions of any brokers or
dealers and will indemnify the holders of the Old Notes
(including any broker-dealers) against certain liabilities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act.
Each broker-dealer must acknowledge and agree that, upon receipt
of notice from us of the happening of any event which makes any
statement in the prospectus untrue in any material respect or
which requires the making of any changes in the prospectus to
make the statements in the prospectus not misleading, which
notice we agree to deliver promptly to the broker-dealer, the
broker-dealer will suspend use of the prospectus until we have
notified the broker-dealer that delivery of the prospectus may
resume and have furnished copies of any amendment or supplement
to the prospectus to the broker-dealer.
53
MATERIAL
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a discussion of the material United States
federal income tax considerations applicable to the exchange of
Old Notes for New Notes in the exchange offer and of owning and
disposing of the notes. This discussion applies only to holders
of the notes who hold the notes as capital assets within the
meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended.
In this discussion, we do not purport to address all tax
considerations that may be important to a particular holder in
light of the holders circumstances, or to certain
categories of investors that may be subject to special rules,
such as:
|
|
|
|
|
dealers in securities or currencies;
|
|
|
|
traders in securities;
|
|
|
|
U.S. holders whose functional currency is not the
U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
|
persons holding notes as part of a hedge, straddle, conversion
or other synthetic security or integrated
transaction;
|
|
|
|
certain U.S. expatriates;
|
|
|
|
financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
entities that are tax-exempt for U.S. federal income tax
purposes; and
|
|
|
|
partnerships and other pass-through entities.
|
This discussion does not address all of the aspects of
U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to you in
light of your particular investment or other circumstances. If a
partnership or other entity treated as a partnership for
U.S. federal income tax purposes holds notes, the tax
treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of
the partner and on the activities of the partnership. We
encourage partners of partnerships holding notes to consult
their tax advisors. In addition, this discussion does not
address any U.S. state or local income or foreign income or
other tax consequences.
This discussion is based on U.S. federal income tax law,
including the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, Treasury
regulations, administrative rulings and judicial authority, all
as in effect as of the date of this document. Subsequent
developments in U.S. federal income tax law, including
changes in law or differing interpretations, which may be
applied retroactively, could have a material effect on the
U.S. federal income tax consequences of owning and
disposing of notes as described in this discussion. We
encourage you to consult your own tax advisor regarding the
particular U.S. federal, state and local and foreign income
and other tax consequences of the exchange offer and of owning
and disposing of the notes that may be applicable to you.
The
Exchange Offer
The exchange of Old Notes for New Notes pursuant to the exchange
offer will not be a taxable event for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. Holders will not recognize any taxable gain or
loss as a result of the exchange and will have the same tax
basis and holding period in the New Notes as they had in the Old
Notes immediately before the exchange.
U.S.
Holders
The following summary applies to you only if you are a
U.S. holder. A U.S. holder is a beneficial
owner of notes who or which is for U.S. federal income tax
purposes:
|
|
|
|
|
an individual citizen or resident of the U.S.;
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
a corporation or other entity classified as a corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes created or organized in or
under the laws of the U.S. or of any political subdivision
of the U.S., including any state;
|
|
|
|
an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal
income taxation regardless of the source of that income; or
|
|
|
|
a trust, if, in general, a U.S. court is able to exercise
primary supervision over the trusts administration and one
or more U.S. persons, within the meaning of the Internal
Revenue Code, have the authority to control all of the
trusts substantial decisions, or the trust has a valid
election in effect under applicable Treasury regulations to be
treated as a U.S. person.
|
Payments
of Interest
Interest on your notes will be taxed as ordinary interest income
at the time it is paid or at the time it accrues in accordance
with your method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax
purposes.
Special rules governing the treatment of market discount and
amortizable premium are described below.
Market
Discount
If you purchase a note at a discount, you may be subject to the
market discount rules of the Internal Revenue Code.
These rules provide, in part, that gain on the sale or other
disposition of a note and partial principal payments on a note
are treated as ordinary income to the extent of accrued market
discount. The market discount rules also provide for deferral of
interest deductions with respect to debt incurred to purchase or
carry a note that has market discount.
Amortizable
Premium
If you purchase a note at a premium over the sum of all amounts
payable thereafter on the note that are treated as stated
redemption price at maturity, you may elect to offset the
premium against interest income over the remaining term of the
note in accordance with the premium amortization
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
Sale
or Other Disposition of Notes
When you sell or otherwise dispose of your notes in a taxable
transaction, you generally will recognize taxable gain or loss
equal to the difference, if any, between:
|
|
|
|
|
the amount realized on the sale or other disposition, less any
amount attributable to accrued interest, which will be taxable
in the manner described under Payments of
Interest; and
|
|
|
|
your adjusted tax basis in the notes.
|
Your adjusted tax basis in your notes generally will equal the
amount you paid for the notes, increased by the amount of any
market discount previously included in your gross income with
respect to the note, decreased by the portion of any premium
applied to reduce interest payments as described above and any
principal payments you receive. Your gain or loss generally will
be capital gain or loss except to the extent the gain represents
market discount on the note not previously included in gross
income, to which extent the gain would be treated as ordinary
income. This capital gain or loss will be long-term capital gain
or loss if at the time of the sale or other taxable disposition
you have held the notes for more than one year. Subject to
limited exceptions, your capital losses cannot be used to offset
your ordinary income. If you are a non-corporate
U.S. holder, your long-term capital gain generally is
subject to a current maximum tax rate of 15%.
55
Information
Reporting And Backup Withholding
Information reporting requirements apply to interest and
principal payments and to the proceeds of sales before maturity.
These amounts generally must be reported to the IRS. In general,
backup withholding may apply:
|
|
|
|
|
to any payments made to you of interest on your notes, and
|
|
|
|
to payment of the proceeds of a sale or other disposition of
your notes before maturity,
|
if you are a non-corporate U.S. holder and fail to provide
a correct taxpayer identification number, certified under
penalties of perjury, or otherwise fail to comply with
applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules.
The backup withholding rate is currently 28%. The backup
withholding tax is not an additional tax and may be credited
against your U.S. federal income tax liability if the
required information is provided to the IRS.
Non-U.S.
Holders
The following summary applies to you if you are a
non-U.S. holder.
The term
non-U.S. holder
means a beneficial owner of a note or notes that is for
U.S. federal income tax purposes either an individual who
is not a citizen or resident of the U.S. or a corporation,
estate or trust that is not a U.S. holder.
U.S.
Federal Withholding Tax
Under current U.S. federal income tax laws, and subject to
the discussion below, U.S. federal withholding tax will not
apply to payments by us or our paying agent, in its capacity as
such, of interest on your notes under the portfolio
interest exception of the Internal Revenue Code, provided
that:
|
|
|
|
|
you do not, directly or indirectly, actually or constructively,
own 10% or more of the total combined voting power of all
classes of our stock entitled to vote;
|
|
|
|
you are not a controlled foreign corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes that is related, directly
or indirectly, to us through sufficient stock ownership (as
provided in the Internal Revenue Code); and
|
|
|
|
you certify as to your foreign status by providing a properly
executed
Form W-8BEN
or appropriate substitute form to us or our paying agent, or a
securities clearing organization, bank or other financial
institution that holds customers securities in the
ordinary course of its trade or business and holds your notes on
your behalf and that certifies to us or our paying agent under
penalties of perjury that it, or the bank or financial
institution between it and you, has received from you your
signed, written statement and provides us or our paying agent
with a copy of this statement.
|
If you are a foreign partnership or a foreign trust, we
encourage you to consult your own tax advisor regarding your
status under these Treasury regulations and the certification
requirements applicable to you.
If you cannot satisfy the requirements described above, payments
of interest made to you will be subject to the 30%
U.S. federal withholding tax, unless you provide us with a
properly executed IRS
Form W-8BEN
or successor form claiming an exemption from or a reduction of
withholding under the benefit of a U.S. income tax treaty,
or you provide us with a properly executed IRS
Form W-8ECI
claiming that the payments of interest are effectively connected
with your conduct of a trade or business in the United States.
U.S.
Federal Income Tax
Except for the possible application of U.S. withholding tax
(please read U.S. Federal Withholding
Tax above) and backup withholding tax (please read
Backup Withholding and Information
Reporting below), you generally will not have to pay
U.S. federal income tax on payments of principal and
interest on your notes, or on any gain or income realized from
the sale, redemption, retirement at maturity or other
56
disposition of your notes if, in the case of proceeds
representing accrued interest, the conditions described in
U.S. Federal Withholding Tax
are met, unless:
|
|
|
|
|
in the case of gain, you are an individual who is present in the
United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year
of the sale or other taxable disposition of your notes and
specific other conditions are present; or
|
|
|
|
the income or gain is effectively connected with your conduct of
a U.S. trade or business, or, if a U.S. income tax
treaty applies, is generally attributable to a
U.S. permanent establishment maintained by you.
|
If you are engaged in a trade or business in the United States
and interest, gain or any other income regarding your notes is
effectively connected with the conduct of your trade or
business, or, if a U.S. income tax treaty applies, you
maintain a U.S. permanent establishment to
which the interest, gain or other income is generally
attributable, you may be subject to U.S. income tax on a
net income basis on such interest, gain or income. In this
instance, however, the interest on your notes will be exempt
from the 30% U.S. withholding tax discussed under the
caption U.S. Federal Withholding
Tax, if you provide a properly executed IRS
Form W-8ECI
or appropriate substitute form to us or our paying agent on or
before any payment date to claim the exemption.
In addition, if you are a foreign corporation, you may be
subject to a U.S. branch profits tax equal to 30% of your
effectively connected earnings and profits for the taxable year,
as adjusted for certain items, unless a lower rate applies to
you under a U.S. income tax treaty with your country of
residence. For this purpose, you must include interest, gain and
income on your notes in the earnings and profits subject to the
U.S. branch profits tax if these amounts are effectively
connected with the conduct of your U.S. trade or business.
Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting
Payments made to you of interest on the notes and amounts, if
any, withheld from such payments will be reported to the IRS and
to you. U.S. backup withholding tax generally will not
apply to payments of interest and principal on the notes if you
have provided the required certification that you are a
non-U.S. holder
as described in U.S. Federal Withholding
Tax above or otherwise established an exemption, and if
neither we nor our paying agent has actual knowledge or reason
to know that you are a U.S. holder or that the conditions
of any other exemptions are not in fact satisfied.
The gross proceeds from the disposition of your notes may be
subject to information reporting and backup withholding tax.
Payments of the proceeds of a sale of your notes effected
through a U.S. office of a broker, will be subject to both
U.S. backup withholding and information reporting unless
you provide an IRS
Form W-8BEN
certifying that you are a
non-U.S. person
and specific other conditions are met or you otherwise establish
an exemption. If you sell your notes outside the United States
through a
non-U.S. office
of a
non-U.S. broker
and the sales proceeds are paid to you outside the United
States, then the U.S. backup withholding and information
reporting requirements generally will not apply to that payment.
However, U.S. information reporting, but not backup
withholding, will apply to a payment of sales proceeds, even if
that payment is made outside the United States, if you sell your
notes through a
non-U.S. office
of a broker that:
|
|
|
|
|
is a United States person as defined in the Internal Revenue
Code;
|
|
|
|
derives 50% or more of its gross income in specific periods from
the conduct of a trade or business in the United States;
|
|
|
|
is a controlled foreign corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes; or
|
|
|
|
is a foreign partnership that, at any time during its taxable
year, has more than 50% of its income or capital interests owned
by U.S. persons or is engaged in the conduct of a
U.S. trade or business,
|
unless the broker has documentary evidence in its files that you
are a
non-U.S. person
and specific other conditions are met or you otherwise establish
an exemption.
57
We encourage you to consult your own tax advisor regarding
application of backup withholding in your particular
circumstances and the availability of and procedure for
obtaining an exemption from backup withholding under current
Treasury regulations. Any amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules from a payment to you will be allowed as a
refund or credit against your U.S. federal income tax
liability, provided that the required information is furnished
to the IRS.
The validity of the notes and certain other matters will be
passed upon for us by Bracewell & Giuliani LLP,
Houston, Texas.
The consolidated financial statements and schedule of
El Paso Natural Gas Company as of December 31, 2006
and for the year then ended, included in this registration
statement have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in
their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are
included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of
such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial
statement schedule of El Paso Natural Gas Company as of
December 31, 2005 and for each of the two years in the
period ended December 31, 2005 included in this
registration statement have been so included in reliance on the
report of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as
experts in auditing and accounting.
58
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Annual Financial Statements
(Audited)
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
F-8
|
|
|
F-25
|
|
|
|
Interim Period Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
|
|
|
F-27
|
|
|
F-28
|
|
|
F-29
|
F-1
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholder of El Paso Natural
Gas Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of
El Paso Natural Gas Company (the Company) as of
December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements
of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the
year then ended. Our audit also included the accompanying
financial statement schedule for the year ended
December 31, 2006. These financial statements and schedule
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of El Paso Natural Gas Company at
December 31, 2006, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective December 1, 2005, the Company adopted
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commissions accounting
release related to pipeline assessment costs and effective
December 31, 2006, the Company adopted the recognition
provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans An Amendment
of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R).
Houston, Texas
February 26, 2007
F-2
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of El Paso Natural Gas
Company:
In our opinion, the consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2005 and the related consolidated statements
of income, of stockholders equity and of cash flows for
each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position
of El Paso Natural Gas Company and its subsidiaries (the
Company) at December 31, 2005, and the
consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
2005 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion,
the consolidated financial statement schedule for each of the
two years in the period ended December 31, 2005 presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated
financial statements. These financial statements and the
financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and the financial
statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits
of these statements in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Houston, Texas
February 28, 2006
F-3
EL
PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
588
|
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
|
$
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation and maintenance
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Taxes, other than income taxes
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Interest and debt expense
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
Affiliated interest income, net
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-4
EL
PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except
|
|
|
|
share amounts)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer, net of allowance of $5
in 2006 and $18 in 2005
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Materials and supplies
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at
cost
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
3,417
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and
equipment, net
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note receivable from affiliate
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
872
|
|
Other
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,151
|
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,631
|
|
|
$
|
3,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
Other
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $1 per
share; 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,631
|
|
|
$
|
3,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-5
EL
PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Other non-cash income items
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset and liabilities changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Western Energy Settlement liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(538
|
)
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Taxes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
(143
|
)
|
|
|
(141
|
)
|
|
|
(148
|
)
|
Net change in note receivable from
affiliate
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
49
|
|
Net change in restricted cash
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
443
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of assets
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
investing activities
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments to retire debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in)
financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-6
EL
PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except share amounts)
|
|
|
January 1, 2004
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,194
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,322
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Western Energy Settlement
contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,513
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
Allocated tax benefit of
El Paso equity plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Adoption of SFAS No. 158,
net of income taxes of $3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,268
|
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-7
EL
PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis of
Presentation and Principles of Consolidation
We are a Delaware corporation incorporated in 1928, and an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of El Paso Corporation
(El Paso). Our primary business consists of the interstate
transportation and storage of natural gas. We conduct our
business activities through our natural gas pipeline systems and
a storage facility. Our consolidated financial statements are
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles and we include the accounts of all
majority owned and controlled subsidiaries after the elimination
of all significant intercompany accounts and transactions. We
consolidate entities when we either (i) have the ability to
control the operating and financial decisions and policies of
that entity or (ii) are allocated a majority of the
entitys losses
and/or
returns through our variable interests in that entity. The
determination of our ability to control or exert significant
influence over an entity and whether we are allocated a majority
of the entitys losses
and/or
returns involves the use of judgment.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of our financial statements requires the use of
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts we report as
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and our disclosures
in the financial statements. Actual results can, and often do,
differ from those estimates.
Regulated
Operations
Our natural gas transmission systems and storage operations are
subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) under the Natural Gas Act of 1938, the Natural
Gas Policy Act of 1978, and the Energy Policy Act of 2005. We
apply the regulatory accounting principles prescribed under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71,
Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of
Regulation. Under SFAS No. 71, we record
regulatory assets and liabilities that would not be recorded
under GAAP for non-regulated entities. Regulatory assets and
liabilities represent probable future revenues or expenses
associated with certain charges or credits that will be
recovered from or refunded to customers through the rate making
process. Items to which we apply regulatory accounting
requirements include certain postretirement employee benefit
plan costs, an equity return component on regulated capital
projects and certain items included in, or expected to be
included in, future rates.
Cash and
Cash Equivalents
We consider short-term investments with an original maturity of
less than three months to be cash equivalents.
We maintain cash on deposit with banks that is pledged for a
particular use or restricted to support a potential liability.
We classify these balances as restricted cash in other current
or non-current assets in our balance sheet based on when we
expect this cash to be used.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
We establish provisions for losses on accounts receivable and
for natural gas imbalances due from shippers and operators if we
determine that we will not collect all or part of an outstanding
receivable balance. We regularly review collectibility and
establish or adjust our allowance as necessary using the
specific identification method.
Materials
and Supplies
We value materials and supplies at the lower of cost or market
value with cost determined using the average cost method.
F-8
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Natural
Gas Imbalances
Natural gas imbalances occur when the actual amount of natural
gas delivered from or received by a pipeline system or storage
facility differs from the contractual amount of natural gas
delivered or received. We value these imbalances due to or from
shippers and operators at current index prices. Imbalances are
settled in cash or made up in-kind, subject to the terms of our
tariff.
Imbalances due from others are reported in our balance sheet as
either accounts receivable from customers or accounts receivable
from affiliates. Imbalances owed to others are reported in our
balance sheet as either trade accounts payable or accounts
payable to affiliates. In addition, we classify all imbalances
as current as we expect to settle them within a year.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Our property, plant and equipment is recorded at its original
cost of construction or, upon acquisition, at the fair value of
the assets acquired. For assets we construct, we capitalize
direct costs, such as labor and materials, and indirect costs,
such as overhead, an interest and an equity return component, as
allowed by the FERC. We capitalize major units of property
replacements or improvements and expense minor items. Prior to
December 1, 2005, we capitalized certain costs incurred
related to our pipeline integrity programs as part of our
property, plant and equipment. Beginning December 1, 2005,
we began expensing certain of these costs based on FERC
guidance. During the year ended December 31, 2006, we
expensed approximately $7 million of pipeline integrity
program costs, approximately $5 million of which was a
result of the adoption of this accounting release.
We use the composite (group) method to depreciate property,
plant and equipment. Under this method, assets with similar
lives and characteristics are grouped and depreciated as one
asset. We apply the
FERC-accepted
depreciation rate to the total cost of the group until its net
book value equals its salvage value. For certain general plant
and rights-of-way, we depreciate the asset to zero. The majority
of our property, plant and equipment is on our EPNG system.
Prior to EPNGs rate case filed in June 2005, the range of
our depreciation rates, including those for the Mojave system,
varied from two percent to 33 percent per year. Using these
rates, the remaining depreciable lives of our assets ranged from
three to 63 years. In December 2006, we filed a proposed
rate case settlement with the FERC, which included a further
modification of our depreciation rates resulting in depreciation
rates ranging from one to 20 percent and the depreciable
lives ranging from five to 92 years for assets on our EPNG
system. We re-evaluate depreciation rates each time we file with
the FERC for a change in our transportation service and storage
rates.
When we retire property, plant and equipment, we charge
accumulated depreciation and amortization for the original cost
of the assets in addition to the cost to remove, sell or dispose
of the assets, less their salvage value. We do not recognize a
gain or loss unless we sell an entire operating unit. We include
gains or losses on dispositions of operating units in operating
income.
Included in our property balances are additional acquisition
costs of $152 million which represent the excess of
allocated purchase costs over the historical costs of the
facilities. These costs are amortized on a straight-line basis
over 36 years, and we do not recover these excess costs in
our rates. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had
unamortized additional acquisition costs of $63 million and
$64 million.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had approximately
$89 million and $82 million of construction work in
progress included in our property, plant and equipment.
We capitalize a carrying cost (an allowance for funds used
during construction) on funds related to our construction of
long-lived assets. This carrying cost consists of a return on
the investment financed by debt and a return on the investment
financed by equity. The debt portion is calculated based on our
average cost of debt. Interest costs on debt amounts capitalized
during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
were $1 million, $3 million and $3 million. These
debt amounts are included as a reduction to interest and debt
expense in our income statement. The equity portion of
capitalized costs is calculated using the most recent
FERC-approved
F-9
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
equity rate of return. The equity amounts capitalized during the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, were
$2 million, $5 million and $4 million (exclusive
of any tax related impacts). These equity amounts are included
as other non-operating income on our income statement.
Capitalized carrying costs for debt and equity financed
construction are reflected as an increase in the cost of the
asset on our balance sheet.
Asset
Impairments
We evaluate assets for impairment when events or circumstances
indicate that their carrying values may not be recovered. These
events include market declines that are believed to be other
than temporary, changes in the manner in which we intend to use
a long-lived asset, decisions to sell an asset and adverse
changes in the legal or business environment such as adverse
actions by regulators. When an event occurs, we evaluate the
recoverability of our long-lived assets carrying values
based on their ability to generate future cash flows on an
undiscounted basis. If an impairment is indicated or if we
decide to sell a long-lived asset or group of assets, we adjust
the carrying value of these assets downward, if necessary, to
their estimated fair value. Our fair value estimates are
generally based on market data obtained through the sales
process or an analysis of expected discounted cash flows. The
magnitude of any impairment is impacted by a number of factors,
including the nature of the assets being sold and our
established time frame for completing the sales, among other
factors.
Revenue
Recognition
Our revenues are primarily generated from natural gas
transportation and storage services. Revenues for all services
are based on the thermal quantity of gas delivered or subscribed
at a price specified in the contract. For our transportation and
storage services, we recognize reservation revenues on firm
contracted capacity over the contract period regardless of the
amount of natural gas that is transported or stored. For
interruptible or volumetric-based services, we record revenues
when physical deliveries of natural gas are made at the agreed
upon delivery point or when gas is injected or withdrawn from
the storage facility. Gas not used in operations is based on the
volumes of natural gas we are allowed to retain relative to the
amounts we use for operating purposes. Prior to January 1,
2006, we recognized revenue on gas not used in operations on our
EPNG system when the volumes were retained under our tariff. On
January 1, 2006, we adopted a fuel tracker on our EPNG
system related to the actual costs of fuel, lost and unaccounted
for and other gas balancing costs, such as encroachments against
our system gas supply and imbalance cash out price adjustments,
with a
true-up
mechanism for amounts over or under retained. We are subject to
FERC regulations and, as a result, revenues we collect may be
subject to refund in a rate proceeding. We establish reserves
for these potential refunds.
Environmental
Costs and Other Contingencies
Environmental Costs. We record environmental
liabilities at their undiscounted amounts in our balance sheet
in other current and long-term liabilities when environmental
assessments indicate that remediation efforts are probable and
the costs can be reasonably estimated. Estimates of our
liabilities are based on currently available facts, existing
technology and presently enacted laws and regulations taking
into consideration the likely effects of other societal and
economic factors, and include estimates of associated legal
costs. These amounts also consider prior experience in
remediating contaminated sites, other companies
clean-up
experience and data released by the Environmental Protection
Agency or other organizations. Our estimates are subject to
revision in future periods based on actual costs or new
circumstances. We capitalize costs that benefit future periods
and we recognize a current period expense when
clean-up
efforts do not benefit future periods.
We evaluate any amounts paid directly or reimbursed by
government sponsored programs and potential recoveries or
reimbursements of remediation costs from third parties,
including insurance coverage, separately from our liability.
Recovery is evaluated based on the creditworthiness or solvency
of the third party, among other factors. When recovery is
assured, we record and report an asset separately from the
associated liability on our balance sheet.
F-10
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Other Contingencies. We recognize liabilities
for other contingencies when we have an exposure that, when
fully analyzed, indicates it is both probable that a liability
has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably
estimated. Where the most likely outcome of a contingency can be
reasonably estimated, we accrue a liability for that amount.
Where the most likely outcome cannot be estimated, a range of
potential losses is established and if no one amount in that
range is more likely than any other, the lower end of the range
is accrued.
Income
Taxes
El Paso maintains a tax accrual policy to record both
regular and alternative minimum taxes for companies included in
its consolidated federal and state income tax returns. The
policy provides, among other things, that (i) each company
in a taxable income position will accrue a current expense
equivalent to its federal and state income taxes, and
(ii) each company in a tax loss position will accrue a
benefit to the extent its deductions, including general business
credits, can be utilized in the consolidated returns.
El Paso pays all consolidated U.S. federal and state
income taxes directly to the appropriate taxing jurisdictions
and, under a separate tax billing agreement, El Paso may
bill or refund its subsidiaries for their portion of these
income tax payments.
Pursuant to El Pasos policy, we record current income
taxes based on our taxable income and we provide for deferred
income taxes to reflect estimated future tax payments and
receipts. Deferred taxes represent the tax impacts of
differences between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities and carryovers at each year end. We
account for tax credits under the flow-through method, which
reduces the provision for income taxes in the year the tax
credits first become available. We reduce deferred tax assets by
a valuation allowance when, based on our estimates, it is more
likely than not that a portion of those assets will not be
realized in a future period. The estimates utilized in the
recognition of deferred tax assets are subject to revision,
either up or down, in future periods based on new facts or
circumstances.
Accounting
for Asset Retirement Obligations
We account for our asset retirement obligations in accordance
with SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Interpretation (FIN) No. 47, Accounting for Conditional
Asset Retirement Obligations. We record a liability for
legal obligations associated with the replacement, removal and
retirement of our long-lived assets. Our asset retirement
liabilities are recorded at their estimated fair value with a
corresponding increase to property, plant and equipment. This
increase in property, plant and equipment is then depreciated
over the useful life of the long-lived asset to which that
liability relates. An ongoing expense is also recognized for
changes in the value of the liability as a result of the passage
of time, which we record as depreciation, depletion and
amortization expense in our income statement. Because we believe
it is probable that we will recover certain of these costs
through our rates, we have recorded an asset (rather than
expense) associated with certain of the depreciation of the
property, plant and equipment and certain of the accretion of
the liabilities described above.
We have legal obligations associated with our natural gas
pipeline and related transmission facilities and storage wells.
We have obligations to plug storage wells when we no longer plan
to use them and when we abandon them. Our legal obligations
associated with our natural gas transmission facilities relate
primarily to purging and sealing the pipeline if it is
abandoned. We also have obligations to remove hazardous
materials associated with our natural gas transmission
facilities if they are replaced. We accrue a liability for legal
obligations based on an estimate of the timing and amount of
their settlement.
We are required to operate and maintain our natural gas pipeline
and storage systems, and intend to do so as long as supply and
demand for natural gas exists, which we expect for the
foreseeable future. Therefore, we believe that the substantial
majority of our natural gas pipeline and storage system assets
have indeterminate lives. Accordingly, our asset retirement
liabilities as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, were not
material to our financial statements. We continue to evaluate
our asset retirement obligations and future developments could
impact the amounts we record.
F-11
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Pension
and Other Postretirement Benefits
In December 2006, we adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106, and 132(R). Under SFAS No. 158, we record
an asset or liability for our pension and other postretirement
benefit plans based on their funded or unfunded status. We also
record deferred amounts related to unrealized gains and losses
or changes in actuarial assumptions in accumulated other
comprehensive income, a component of stockholders equity,
until those gains and losses are recognized in the income
statement. For a further discussion of our adoption of
SFAS No. 158, see Note 7.
Evaluation
of Prior Period Misstatements in Current Financial
Statements
In December 2006, we adopted the provisions of the Securities
and Exchange Commissions (SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 108. Considering the Effects of Prior Year
Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year
Financial Statements. SAB No. 108 provides
guidance on how to evaluate the impact of financial statement
misstatements from prior periods that have been identified in
the current year. The adoption of these provisions did not have
any material impact on our financial statements.
New
Accounting Pronouncements Issued But Not Yet Adopted
As of December 31, 2006, the following accounting standards
and interpretations had not yet been adopted by us.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. In
July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting
for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. FIN No. 48
clarifies SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes, and requires us to evaluate our tax positions for all
jurisdictions and all years where the statute of limitations has
not expired. FIN No. 48 requires companies to meet a
more likely than not threshold (i.e. greater than a
50 percent likelihood of a tax position being sustained
under examination) prior to recording a benefit for their tax
positions. Additionally, for tax positions meeting this more
likely than not threshold, the amount of benefit is limited to
the largest benefit that has a greater than 50 percent
probability of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The
cumulative effect of applying this interpretation will be
recorded as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained
earnings, or other components of stockholders equity as
appropriate, in the period of adoption. This interpretation is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006, and we do not anticipate that it will have a material
impact on our financial statements.
Fair Value Measurements. In September 2006,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, which provides guidance on measuring the fair
value of assets and liabilities in the financial statements. We
will be required to adopt the provisions of this standard no
later than in 2008, and are currently evaluating the impact, if
any, that it will have on our financial statements.
Measurement Date of Other Postretirement
Benefits. In December 2006, we adopted the
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 158. This standard
will also require us to change the measurement date of our other
postretirement benefit plans from September 30, the date we
currently use, to December 31 beginning in 2008. We are
evaluating the impact, if any, that the measurement date
provisions of this standard will have on our financial
statements.
F-12
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Components of Income Taxes. The following
table reflects the components of income taxes included in net
income for each of the three years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
(99
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
State
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Tax Rate Reconciliation. Our income
taxes differ from the amount computed by applying the statutory
federal income tax rate of 35 percent for the following
reasons for each of the three years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except
|
|
|
|
for rates)
|
|
|
Income taxes at the statutory
federal rate of 35%
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
Increase (decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal
income tax effect
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
State tax valuation
allowance Western Energy Settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Non-deductible expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
42
|
%
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities. The
following are the components of our net deferred tax liability
at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
448
|
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
Employee benefits and deferred
compensation obligations
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Regulatory and other assets
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liability
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. net operating loss and tax
credit carryovers
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax asset
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liability
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Credits and Carryovers. As of
December 31, 2006, we had approximately $18 million of
alternative minimum tax credits that carryover indefinitely. We
also have approximately $179 million of net operating loss
carryovers that expire between 2018 and 2026. Usage of our
carryovers is subject to the limitations provided under
Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code as well
as the separate return limitation year rules of IRS regulations.
Valuation Allowances. During 2003, we
maintained a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets related
to our ability to realize state tax benefits from the deduction
of the charge we took related to the Western Energy Settlement.
During 2004, we evaluated this allowance and determined that
these state tax benefits would be fully realized. Consequently,
we reversed this valuation allowance. Net of federal taxes, this
benefit totaled approximately $6 million.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our financial
instruments are as follows at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Balance sheet financial
instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt(1)
|
|
$
|
1,111
|
|
|
$
|
1,273
|
|
|
$
|
1,110
|
|
|
$
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
We estimated the fair value of our
debt with fixed interest rates based on quoted market prices for
the same or similar issues.
|
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the carrying amounts of
cash and cash equivalents and trade receivables and payables are
representative of their fair value because of the short-term
maturity of these instruments.
F-14
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
4.
|
Regulatory
Assets and Liabilities
|
Below are the details of our regulatory assets and liabilities
at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Non-current regulatory assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross-up
of deferred taxes on capitalized funds used during construction
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
Unamortized loss on reacquired debt
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Postretirement benefits
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Deferred fuel variance
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under-collected state income taxes
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current regulatory
assets(1)
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current regulatory liabilities
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Non-current regulatory liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and plant depreciation
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
Imbalance cashouts
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess deferred federal income
taxes
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total regulatory
liabilities(1)
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are included as other
non-current assets and other current and non-current liabilities
in our balance sheet.
|
|
|
5.
|
Debt and
Credit Facilities
|
Debt
Our long-term debt outstanding consisted of the following at
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
7.625% Notes due August 2010
|
|
$
|
355
|
|
|
$
|
355
|
|
8.625% Debentures due January
2022
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
7.50% Debentures due November
2026
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
8.375% Notes due June 2032
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
|
|
1,115
|
|
Less: Unamortized discount
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,111
|
|
|
$
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have the ability to call $655 million of our notes due
in August 2010 and June 2032 at any time prior to their stated
maturity date. If we were to exercise our option to call these
notes, we would be obligated to pay principal, accrued interest
and potentially a make-whole premium to redeem the debt.
Credit
Facilities
In July 2006, El Paso entered into a new $1.75 billion
credit agreement, consisting of a $1.25 billion three-year
revolving credit facility and a $500 million five-year
deposit letter of credit facility. We are an eligible borrower
under the credit agreement and are only liable for amounts we
directly borrow. We had no borrowings at
F-15
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
December 31, 2006 under the credit agreement. Our common
stock and the common stock of several of our affiliates are
pledged as collateral under the credit agreement. At
December 31, 2006, there was approximately
$0.6 billion of borrowing capacity available to all
eligible borrowers under the $1.75 billion credit agreement.
Under the $1.75 billion credit agreement and our
indentures, we are subject to a number of restrictions and
covenants. The most restrictive of these include
(i) limitations on the incurrence of additional debt, based
on a ratio of debt to EBITDA (as defined in the agreements), the
most restrictive of which shall not exceed 5 to 1;
(ii) limitations on the use of proceeds from borrowings;
(iii) limitations, in some cases, on transactions with our
affiliates; (iv) limitations on the incurrence of liens;
(v) potential limitations on our ability to declare and pay
dividends; (vi) potential limitations on our ability to
participate in the El Pasos cash management program
discussed in Note 10; and (vii) limitations on our
ability to prepay debt. For the year ended December 31,
2006, we were in compliance with our debt-related covenants.
Our long-term debt contains cross-acceleration provisions, the
most restrictive of which is a $25 million
cross-acceleration clause.
|
|
6.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Legal
Proceedings
Sierra Pacific Resources and Nevada Power Company v.
El Paso et al. In April 2003, Sierra Pacific
Resources and Nevada Power Company filed a suit in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada against us,
our affiliates and unrelated third parties, alleging that the
defendants conspired to manipulate prices and supplies of
natural gas in the California-Arizona border market from 1996 to
2001. In 2004, the courts twice dismissed the lawsuit. The
plaintiffs have appealed that dismissal to the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The appeal has been fully
briefed. Our costs and legal exposure related to this lawsuit
are not currently determinable.
Carlsbad. In August 2000, a main transmission
line owned and operated by us ruptured at the crossing of the
Pecos River near Carlsbad, New Mexico. Twelve individuals at the
site were fatally injured. In June 2001, the
U.S. Department of Transportations (DOT) Office of
Pipeline Safety issued a Notice of Probable Violation and
Proposed Civil Penalty to us. The Notice alleged violations of
DOT regulations, proposed fines totaling $2.5 million and
proposed corrective actions. In April 2003, the National
Transportation Safety Board issued its final report on the
rupture, finding that the rupture was probably caused by
internal corrosion that was not detected by our corrosion
control program. In December 2003, this matter was referred by
the DOT to the Department of Justice (DOJ). As a result of the
referral to the DOJ, the amount of the proposed fine may
increase substantially from the DOTs originally proposed
fine of $2.5 million and may also involve implementation of
additional operational and safety measures. Negotiations with
the DOJ are continuing.
In addition, a lawsuit entitled Baldonado et al. v. EPNG
was filed in June 2003, in state court in Eddy County, New
Mexico, on behalf of 26 firemen and emergency medical service
personnel who responded to the fire and who allegedly have
suffered psychological trauma. This case was dismissed by the
trial court, but was appealed to the New Mexico Court of
Appeals. In June 2006, the New Mexico Court of Appeals affirmed
the dismissal of the plaintiffs claims for negligent
infliction of emotional distress but reversed the dismissal of
the claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress. The
New Mexico Supreme Court has agreed to review the actions by the
Court of Appeals. Our costs and legal exposure related to the
Baldonado lawsuit are currently not determinable,
however, we believe these matters will be fully covered by
insurance.
Gas Measurement Cases. We and a number of our
affiliates were named defendants in actions that generally
allege mismeasurement of natural gas volumes
and/or
heating content resulting in the underpayment of royalties. The
first set of cases was filed in 1997 by an individual under the
False Claims Act, which has been consolidated for pretrial
purposes (In re: Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam Litigation,
U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming). These
complaints allege an industry-wide conspiracy to underreport the
heating value as well as the volumes of the natural gas produced
from federal and Native American lands. In May 2005, a
representative appointed by the court
F-16
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
issued a recommendation to dismiss most of the actions. In
October 2006, the U.S. District Judge issued an order
dismissing all measurement claims against all defendants. An
appeal has been filed.
Similar allegations were filed in a second set of actions
initiated in 1999 in Will Price, et al. v. Gas Pipelines
and Their Predecessors, et al., in the District Court of
Stevens County, Kansas. The plaintiffs currently seek
certification of a class of royalty owners in wells on
non-federal and non-Native American lands in Kansas, Wyoming and
Colorado. Motions for class certification have been briefed and
argued in the proceedings and the parties are awaiting the
courts ruling. The plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount
of monetary damages in the form of additional royalty payments
(along with interest, expenses and punitive damages) and
injunctive relief with regard to future gas measurement
practices. Our costs and legal exposure related to this lawsuit
and claim are not currently determinable.
Bank of America. We were a named defendant,
along with Burlington Resources, Inc. (Burlington), in two class
action lawsuits styled Bank of America, et al. v.
El Paso Natural Gas Company, et al., and Deane W.
Moore, et al. v. Burlington Northern, Inc., et al.,
each filed in 1997 in the District Court of Washita County,
Oklahoma and subsequently consolidated by the court. The
consolidated class action has been settled. Our settlement
contribution was approximately $30 million plus interest,
which was fully accrued and paid on August 1, 2006. A third
action, styled Bank of America, et al. v. El Paso
Natural Gas and Burlington Resources Oil and Gas Company, L.P.,
was filed in October 2003 in the District Court of Kiowa
County, Oklahoma asserting similar claims as to specified
shallow wells in Oklahoma, Texas and New Mexico. All the claims
in this action have also been settled subject to court approval,
after a fairness hearing yet to be scheduled. We filed an action
styled El Paso Natural Gas Company v. Burlington
Resources, Inc. and Burlington Resources Oil and Gas Company,
L.P. against Burlington in state court in Harris County,
Texas relating to the indemnity issues between Burlington and
us. That action was stayed by agreement of the parties and
settled in November 2005, subject to all the underlying class
settlements being finalized and approved by the court.
In addition to the above matters, we and our subsidiaries and
affiliates are also named defendants in numerous lawsuits and
governmental proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of
our business.
For each of our outstanding legal matters, we evaluate the
merits of the case, our exposure to the matter, possible legal
or settlement strategies and the likelihood of an unfavorable
outcome. If we determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable
and can be estimated, we establish the necessary accruals. As
further information becomes available, or other relevant
developments occur, we adjust our accrual amounts accordingly.
While there are still uncertainties related to the ultimate
costs we may incur, based upon our evaluation and experience to
date, we believe our current reserves are adequate. At
December 31, 2006, we had accrued approximately
$16 million for our outstanding legal matters.
Environmental
Matters
We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations
governing environmental quality and pollution control. These
laws and regulations require us to remove or remedy the effect
on the environment of the disposal or release of specified
substances at current and former operating sites. At
December 31, 2006, we had accrued approximately
$24 million for expected remediation costs and associated
onsite, offsite and groundwater technical studies and for
related environmental legal costs. This accrual includes
$21 million for environmental contingencies related to
properties we previously owned. Our accrual represents a
combination of two estimation methodologies. First, where the
most likely outcome can be reasonably estimated, that cost has
been accrued. Second, where the most likely outcome cannot be
estimated, a range of costs is established and if no one amount
in that range is more likely than any other, the lower end of
the expected range has been accrued. We estimate that our
exposure could be as high as $45 million. Our environmental
remediation projects are in various stages of completion. The
liabilities we have recorded reflect our current estimates of
amounts we will expend to remediate these sites. However,
depending on the stage of completion or assessment, the ultimate
extent of contamination or remediation required
F-17
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
may not be known. As additional assessments occur or remediation
efforts continue, we may incur additional liabilities.
Below is a reconciliation of our accrued liability from
January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2006 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2006
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
Additions/adjustments for
remediation activities
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Payments for remediation activities
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2006
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For 2007, we estimate that our total remediation expenditures
will be approximately $4 million, which will be expended
under government directed
clean-up
plans.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) Matters. We have received
notice that we could be designated, or have been asked for
information to determine whether we could be designated, as a
Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) with respect to four active
sites under CERCLA or state equivalents. We have sought to
resolve our liability as a PRP at these sites through
indemnification by third parties and settlements which provide
for payment of our allocable share of remediation costs. As of
December 31, 2006, we have estimated our share of the
remediation costs at these sites to be between $12 million
and $16 million. Because the
clean-up
costs are estimates and are subject to revision as more
information becomes available about the extent of remediation
required, and in some cases we have asserted a defense to any
liability, our estimates could change. Moreover, liability under
the federal CERCLA statute is joint and several, meaning that we
could be required to pay in excess of our pro rata share of
remediation costs. Our understanding of the financial strength
of other PRPs has been considered, where appropriate, in
estimating our liabilities. Accruals for these matters are
included in the environmental reserve discussed above.
State of Arizona Chromium Review. In April
2004, the State of Arizonas Department of Environmental
Quality (ADEQ) requested information from us regarding the
historical use of chromium in our operations. By June 2004, we
had responded fully to the request. We are currently working
with the State of Arizona on this matter and in 2006, we
commenced a study of our facilities in Arizona to determine if
there are any issues concerning the usage of chromium. We also
studied our facilities on tribal lands in Arizona and New Mexico
and our facility at the El Paso Station in El Paso,
Texas. Of the 12 sites that were studied, nine were found not to
have chromium contamination above regulatory thresholds. Of the
three remaining sites, one was already enrolled in
Arizonas Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP), one will be
entered into the VRP as soon as practicable, and additional
environmental studies will be conducted at the last site to
determine if the environmental conditions at the site warrant
entering it into the VRP as well.
It is possible that new information or future developments could
require us to reassess our potential exposure related to
environmental matters. We may incur significant costs and
liabilities in order to comply with existing environmental laws
and regulations. It is also possible that other developments,
such as increasingly strict environmental laws and regulations
and claims for damages to property, employees, other persons and
the environment resulting from our current or past operations,
could result in substantial costs and liabilities in the future.
As this information becomes available, or other relevant
developments occur, we will adjust our accrual amounts
accordingly. While there are still uncertainties related to the
ultimate costs we may incur, based upon our evaluation and
experience to date, we believe our reserves are adequate.
Rates and
Regulatory Matters
Rate Case. In June 2005, we filed a rate case
with the FERC proposing an increase in revenues of
10.6 percent or $56 million annually over current
tariff rates, new services and revisions to certain terms and
conditions of existing services on our EPNG system. On
January 1, 2006, the rates became effective, subject to
refund. In March 2006, the FERC issued an order that generally
approved our proposed new services, which were implemented on
F-18
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
June 1, 2006. In December 2006, we filed a settlement with
the FERC. The settlement provided benefits for both us and our
customers for a three year period ending December 31, 2008.
Only one party in the rate case contested the settlement. The
Administrative Law Judge has certified the settlement to the
FERC finding that the settlement could be approved for all
parties or in the alternative, that the contesting party could
be severed from the settlement. We have reserved sufficient
amounts to meet EPNGs refund obligations under the
settlement. Such refunds will be payable within 120 days
after approval by the FERC.
While the outcome of our outstanding rates and regulatory
matters cannot be predicted with certainty, based on current
information, we do not expect the ultimate resolution of these
matters to have a material adverse effect on our financial
position, operating results or cash flows. However, it is
possible that new information or future developments could
require us to reassess our potential exposure related to these
matters, which could have a material effect on our results of
operations, our financial position and our cash flows.
Other
Matters
Navajo Nation. Approximately 900 looped
pipeline miles of the north mainline of our EPNG pipeline system
are located on lands held in trust by the United States for the
benefit of the Navajo Nation. Our
rights-of-way
on lands crossing the Navajo Nation are the subject of a pending
renewal application filed in 2005 with the Department of the
Interiors Bureau of Indian Affairs. An interim agreement
with the Navajo Nation expired at the end of December 2006.
Negotiations on the terms of the long-term agreement are
continuing. In addition, we continue to preserve other legal,
regulatory and legislative alternatives, which includes
continuing to pursue our application with the Department of the
Interior for renewal of our rights-of-way on Navajo Nation
lands. It is uncertain whether our negotiation, or other
alternatives, will be successful, or if successful, what the
ultimate cost will be of obtaining the rights-of-way and whether
we will be able to recover these costs in our rates.
While the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted with
certainty, based on current information, we do not expect the
ultimate resolution of this matter to have a material adverse
effect on our financial position, operating results or cash
flows. It is possible that new information or future
developments could require us to reassess our potential exposure
related to this matter. The impact of these changes may have a
material effect on our results of operations, our financial
position, and our cash flows in the periods these events occur.
Enron Bankruptcy. In December 2001, Enron
Corp. (Enron), and a number of its subsidiaries including Enron
North America Corp. (ENA) and Enron Power Marketing, Inc., filed
for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. ENA had
transportation contracts on our system. The transportation
contracts were rejected and our proof of claim was filed in the
amount of approximately $128 million, which included
$18 million for amounts due for services provided through
the date the contracts were rejected and $110 million for
claims arising after the date the contracts were rejected. In
August 2006, the Bankruptcy Court approved a claim of
$58 million that is guaranteed by Enron up to
$25 million. In October 2006, we received cash of
approximately $21 million and 76,000 shares of
Portland General Electric Company common stock in connection
with the resolution of certain claims we filed in the Enron
bankruptcy proceeding. We may receive additional amounts in the
future as settlement proceeds are released by the Bankruptcy
Court.
Capital
Commitments
At December 31, 2006, we had capital commitments of
approximately $17 million. We have other planned capital
projects that are discretionary in nature, with no substantial
contractual capital commitments made in advance of the actual
expenditures.
F-19
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Operating
Leases
We lease property, facilities and equipment under various
operating leases. Minimum future annual rental commitments on
operating leases as of December 31, 2006, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2
|
|
2010
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our minimum future rental commitments have not been reduced by
minimum sublease rentals of approximately $1 million due to
us in the future under noncancelable subleases.
Included in our minimum future rental commitments above is our
remaining obligation under a terminated lease agreement. Rental
expense on our operating leases for each of the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $17 million,
$6 million and $3 million. These amounts include our
share of rent allocated to us from El Paso.
Other
Commercial Commitments
We also hold cancelable easements or rights-of-way arrangements
from landowners permitting the use of land for the construction
and operation of our pipeline systems. Currently, our
obligations under these easements are not material to the
results of our operations.
Guarantees
We are or have been involved in various joint ventures and other
ownership arrangements that sometimes require additional
financial support that results in the issuance of financial and
performance guarantees. In a financial guarantee, we are
obligated to make payments if the guaranteed party fails to make
payments under, or violates the terms of, the financial
arrangement. In a performance guarantee, we provide assurance
that the guaranteed party will execute on the terms of the
contract. If they do not, we are required to perform on their
behalf. As of December 31, 2006, we had approximately
$11 million of financial and performance guarantees not
otherwise reflected in our financial statements.
Pension and Retirement Benefits. El Paso
maintains a pension plan to provide benefits determined under a
cash balance formula. El Paso also maintains a defined
contribution plan covering its U.S. employees, including
our employees. El Paso matches 75 percent of
participant basic contributions up to 6 percent of eligible
compensation and can make additional discretionary matching
contributions. El Paso is responsible for benefits accrued
under its plans and allocates the related costs to its
affiliates.
Postretirement Benefits. We provide medical
benefits for a closed group of employees who retired on or
before March 1, 1986, and limited postretirement life
insurance for employees who retired after January 1, 1985.
As such, our obligation to accrue for other postretirement
employee benefits (OPEB) is primarily limited to the fixed
population of retirees who retired on or before March 1,
1986. The medical plan is pre-funded to the extent employer
contributions are recoverable through rates. To the extent
actual OPEB costs differ from amounts recovered in rates, a
regulatory asset or liability is recorded. We expect to make no
contributions to our postretirement benefit plan in 2007.
F-20
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
On December 31, 2006, we adopted the provisions of
SFAS No. 158, and upon adoption reflected the assets
related to our postretirement benefit plan based on its funded
status. The adoption of this standard decreased our other
non-current assets by approximately $7 million, our other
non-current deferred tax liabilities by approximately
$3 million, and our accumulated other comprehensive income
by approximately $4 million. We anticipate that less than
$1 million of our accumulated other comprehensive loss will
be recognized as a part of our net periodic benefit cost in 2007.
Change in Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation, Plan
Assets and Funded Status. Our benefits are
presented and computed as of and for the twelve months ended
September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Change in accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation at end of period
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at
beginning period
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end
of period
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of funded status:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at
September 30
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
Less: accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation end of period
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status at September 30
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Fourth quarter contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Unrecognized actuarial
losses(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset at December 31
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts were reclassified to
accumulated other comprehensive income upon adoption of
SFAS No. 158 in 2006.
|
F-21
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Expected Payment of Future Benefits. As of
December 31, 2006, we expect the following payments under
our plans (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
2008
|
|
|
9
|
|
2009
|
|
|
9
|
|
2010
|
|
|
8
|
|
2011
|
|
|
8
|
|
2012 - 2016
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of Net Benefit Cost. For each of
the years ended December 31, the components of net benefit
cost are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Amortization of transition
obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net postretirement benefit cost
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial Assumptions and Sensitivity
Analysis. Accumulated postretirement benefit
obligations and net benefit costs are based on actuarial
estimates and assumptions. The following table details the
weighted average actuarial assumptions used in determining our
postretirement plan obligations for 2006, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(Percent)
|
|
|
Assumptions related to benefit
obligations at September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions related to benefit
costs at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
|
|
5.75
|
|
|
|
6.00
|
|
Expected return on plan
assets(1)
|
|
|
8.00
|
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
7.50
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The expected return on plan assets
is a pre-tax rate (before a tax rate ranging from
15 percent to 16 percent on postretirement benefits)
that is primarily based on an expected risk-free investment
return, adjusted for historical risk premiums and specific risk
adjustments associated with our debt and equity securities.
These expected returns were then weighted based on the target
asset allocations of our investment portfolio.
|
Actuarial estimates for our postretirement benefits plan assumed
a weighted average annual rate of increase in the per capita
costs of covered health care benefits of 10.3 percent in
2006, gradually decreasing to 5.0 percent by the year 2015.
Assumed health care cost trends can have a significant effect on
the amounts reported for our postretirement benefit plan. A
one-percentage point change would not have had a significant
effect on interest costs
F-22
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
in 2006 or 2005. A one-percentage point change in these trends
would have the following increase (decrease) on our accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation as of September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
One percentage point increase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
One percentage point decrease:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
Plan Assets. The following table provides the
actual asset allocations in our postretirement plan as of
September 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Percent)
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The primary investment objective of our plan is to ensure that,
over the long-term life of the plan, an adequate pool of
sufficiently liquid assets exists to support the benefit
obligation to participants, retirees and beneficiaries. In
meeting this objective, the plan seeks to achieve a high level
of investment return consistent with a prudent level of
portfolio risk. Investment objectives are long-term in nature
covering typical market cycles of three to five years. Any
shortfall in investment performance compared to investment
objectives is the result of general economic and capital market
conditions.
The target allocation for the invested assets is 65 percent
equity and 35 percent fixed income. Other assets are held
in cash for payment of benefits upon presentment. Any
El Paso stock held by the plan is held indirectly through
investments in mutual funds.
|
|
8.
|
Transactions
with Major Customers
|
The following table shows revenues from our major customers for
each of the three years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006(1)
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
SoCal
|
|
$
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
Southwest Gas Corporation
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Revenues reflect rates subject to
refund.
|
|
|
9.
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
The following table contains supplemental cash flow information
for each of the three years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Interest paid, net of capitalized
interest
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
Income tax payments (refunds)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
F-23
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
10.
|
Transactions
with Affiliates
|
Cash Management Program. We participate in
El Pasos cash management program which matches
short-term cash surpluses and needs of participating affiliates,
thus minimizing total borrowings from outside sources. We have
historically provided cash to El Paso in exchange for an
affiliated note receivable that is due upon demand. However, we
do not anticipate settlement within the next twelve months and
therefore, classified this receivable as non-current on our
balance sheets. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had a
note receivable from El Paso of approximately
$1.1 billion and $872 million. The interest rate at
December 31, 2006 and 2005, was 5.3% and 5.0%.
Taxes. El Paso files consolidated
U.S. federal and certain state tax returns which include
our taxable income. In certain states, we file and pay taxes
directly to the state taxing authorities. We had income taxes
payable of $81 million and $26 million at
December 31, 2006 and 2005. The majority of these balances
will become payable to or receivable from El Paso. See
Note 1 for a discussion of our tax accrual policy.
Other Affiliate Balances. At December 31,
2006 and 2005, we had contractual deposits with our affiliates
of $7 million and $6 million, included in other
current liabilities on our balance sheets.
Affiliate Revenues and Expenses. We provide
natural gas transportation services to an affiliate under
long-term contracts. We entered into these contracts in the
normal course of business and the services are based on the same
terms as non-affiliates.
El Paso bills us directly for certain general and
administrative costs and allocates a portion of its general and
administrative costs to us. In addition to allocations from
El Paso, we are also allocated costs from Tennessee Gas
Pipeline Company (TGP) associated with our pipeline services. We
also allocate costs to Colorado Interstate Gas Company for its
share of our pipeline services. The allocations from
El Paso and TGP are based on the estimated level of effort
devoted to our operations and the relative size of our EBIT,
gross property and payroll.
The following table shows revenues and charges from our
affiliates for each of the three years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues from affiliates
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Operation and maintenance expenses
from affiliates
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
Reimbursements of operating
expenses charged to affiliates
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Supplemental
Selected Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
|
Our financial information by quarter is summarized below. Due to
the seasonal nature of our business, information for interim
periods may not be indicative of our results of operations for
the entire year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
588
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
F-24
SCHEDULE II
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
|
|
at End
|
|
Description
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Deductions
|
|
|
of Period
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Legal reserves
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
Environmental reserves
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
Regulatory reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Legal reserves
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
42
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Environmental reserves
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
29
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Valuation allowance on deferred
tax assets
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Legal reserves
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(538
|
)(2)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Environmental reserves
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
Regulatory reserves
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For a discussion of these matters,
see Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page
F-8.
|
|
(2) |
|
Relates to payments made pursuant
to the Western Energy Settlement.
|
F-25
EL
PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
281
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operation and maintenance
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Taxes, other than income taxes
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Interest and debt expense
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
Affiliated interest income, net
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
31
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-26
EL
PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except
|
|
|
|
share amounts)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer, net of allowance of $4
in 2007 and $5 in 2006
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Materials and supplies
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at
cost
|
|
|
3,638
|
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and
equipment, net
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable from affiliate
|
|
|
1,117
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
Other
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
1,151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,833
|
|
|
$
|
3,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
Affiliates
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Other
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Other
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current
maturities
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
412
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
Other
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $1 per
share; 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and
stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,833
|
|
|
$
|
3,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-27
EL
PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions) (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net
income to net cash from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Asset and liability changes
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating
activities
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and
equipment
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
Net change in notes receivable
from affiliate
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
Net change in restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing
activities
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of
long-term debt
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment to retire long-term debt
|
|
|
(314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing
activities
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of period
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-28
EL
PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
1.
|
Basis of
Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis of
Presentation
We are an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of El Paso
Corporation (El Paso). We prepared these historical
consolidated financial statements under the rules and
regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). Because these are an interim period financial
statements presented using a condensed format, they do not
include all of the disclosures required by U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. You should read these financial
statements along with our 2006 annual historical consolidated
financial statements, which includes a summary of our
significant accounting policies and other disclosures. The
financial statements as of June 30, 2007, and for the six
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, are unaudited. We
derived the balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, from the
audited balance sheet in our 2006 annual historical consolidated
financial statements included in this prospectus. In our
opinion, we have made all adjustments which are of a normal,
recurring nature to fairly present our interim period results.
Due to the seasonal nature of our business, information for
interim periods may not be indicative of our operating results
for the entire year.
Significant
Accounting Policies
The information below provides an update of our significant
accounting policies and accounting pronouncements issued but not
yet adopted discussed in our 2006 annual historical consolidated
financial statements included in this prospectus.
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. On
January 1, 2007, we adopted the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation (FIN) No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.
FIN No. 48 clarifies Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes, and requires us to evaluate our tax positions
for all jurisdictions and for all years where the statute of
limitations has not expired. FIN No. 48 requires
companies to meet a more-likely-than-not threshold (i.e. greater
than a 50 percent likelihood that a tax position would be
sustained under examination) prior to recording a benefit for
their tax positions. Additionally, for tax positions meeting
this more-likely-than-not threshold, the amount of benefit is
limited to the largest benefit that has a greater than
50 percent probability of being realized upon ultimate
settlement. To the extent these criteria have not been met, we
record unrecognized tax benefits (liabilities for uncertain tax
matters), which include any anticipated interest and penalties.
All interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits are
included as a component of income tax expense in our income
statement. The adoption of FIN No. 48 did not have a
material impact on our financial statements.
El Paso files consolidated U.S. federal and certain
state tax returns which include our taxable income. In certain
states, we file and pay taxes directly to the state taxing
authorities. With few exceptions, we and El Paso are no
longer subject to U.S. federal or state and local income
tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 1999.
Certain issues raised on examination by tax authorities on
El Pasos 2003 and 2004 federal tax years are
currently being appealed. For our open tax years, we have no
unrecognized tax benefits (liabilities for uncertain tax
matters).
|
|
3.
|
Debt and
Credit Facilities
|
Debt. In April 2007, we issued
$355 million of 5.95% senior notes due in April 2017.
A portion of the net proceeds were used to repurchase
approximately $301 million of our $355 million,
7.625% notes due in August 2010.
Credit Facilities. We are an eligible borrower
under El Pasos $1.75 billion credit agreement
and are only liable for amounts we directly borrow. As of
June 30, 2007, we have no borrowing under the agreement and
approximately $0.9 billion of borrowing capacity is
available to all eligible borrowers under the agreement. For a
further discussion of this credit agreement, see our 2006 annual
historical consolidated financial statements included in this
prospectus.
F-29
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
4.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Legal
Proceedings
Sierra Pacific Resources and Nevada Power Company v.
El Paso et al. In April 2003, Sierra Pacific
Resources and Nevada Power Company filed a suit in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada against us,
our affiliates and unrelated third parties, alleging that the
defendants conspired to manipulate prices and supplies of
natural gas in the California-Arizona border market from 1996 to
2001. In January 2004, the court twice dismissed the lawsuit.
The plaintiffs have appealed that dismissal to the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The appeal has
been fully briefed and argued. Our costs and legal exposure
related to this lawsuit are not currently determinable.
Carlsbad. In August 2000, a main transmission
line owned and operated by us ruptured at the crossing of the
Pecos River near Carlsbad, New Mexico. Twelve individuals at the
site were fatally injured. In June 2001, the
U.S. Department of Transportations (DOT) Office of
Pipeline Safety issued a Notice of Probable Violation and
Proposed Civil Penalty to us. The Notice alleged violations of
DOT regulations, proposed fines totaling $2.5 million and
proposed corrective actions. In April 2003, the National
Transportation Safety Board issued its final report on the
rupture, finding that the rupture was probably caused by
internal corrosion that was not detected by our corrosion
control program. In December 2003, this matter was referred by
the DOT to the Department of Justice (DOJ). We have resolved
this matter with the DOT and the DOJ, paying a fine of
$15.5 million in July 2007 and entering into a consent
decree that covers our implementation of certain capital,
maintenance, and other programs, the majority of which were
already included in our normal pipeline integrity and
maintenance plans.
In addition, a lawsuit entitled Baldonado et al. v. EPNG
was filed in June 2003, in state court in Eddy County, New
Mexico, on behalf of 26 firemen and emergency medical service
personnel who responded to the fire and who allegedly have
suffered psychological trauma. This case was dismissed by the
trial court, but was appealed to the New Mexico Court of
Appeals. In June 2006, the New Mexico Court of Appeals affirmed
the dismissal of the plaintiffs claims for negligent
infliction of emotional distress but reversed the dismissal of
the claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress. In
April 2007, the New Mexico Supreme Court upheld the appellate
courts dismissal of the claims for negligent infliction of
emotional distress, but is still reviewing the claims for
intentional infliction of emotional distress. Our costs and
legal exposure related to the Baldonado lawsuit are
currently not determinable; however, we believe these matters
will be fully covered by insurance.
Gas Measurement Cases. We and a number of our
affiliates were named defendants in actions that generally
allege mismeasurement of natural gas volumes
and/or
heating content resulting in the underpayment of royalties. The
first set of cases was filed in 1997 by an individual under the
False Claims Act, which has been consolidated for pretrial
purposes (In re: Natural Gas Royalties Qui Tam Litigation,
U.S. District Court for the District of Wyoming). These
complaints allege an industry-wide conspiracy to underreport the
heating value as well as the volumes of the natural gas produced
from federal and Native American lands. In October 2006, the
U.S. District Judge issued an order dismissing all claims
against all defendants. An appeal has been filed.
Similar allegations were filed in a second set of actions
initiated in 1999 in Will Price, et al. v. Gas Pipelines
and Their Predecessors, et al., in the District Court of
Stevens County, Kansas. The plaintiffs currently seek
certification of a class of royalty owners in wells on
non-federal and non-Native American lands in Kansas, Wyoming and
Colorado. Motions for class certification have been briefed and
argued in the proceedings and the parties are awaiting the
courts ruling. The plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount
of monetary damages in the form of additional royalty payments
(along with interest, expenses and punitive damages) and
injunctive relief with regard to future gas measurement
practices. Our costs and legal exposure related to this lawsuit
and claim are not currently determinable.
Bank of America. We are a named defendant,
along with Burlington Resources, Inc. (Burlington), now a
subsidiary of ConocoPhillips, in a class action lawsuit styled
Bank of America, et al. v. El Paso Natural Gas and
Burlington Resources Oil and Gas Company, L.P., filed in
October 2003 in the District Court of Kiowa County,
F-30
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Oklahoma asserting royalty underpayment claims as to specified
shallow wells in Oklahoma, Texas and New Mexico. Plaintiffs
assert that royalties were underpaid starting in the 1980s when
the purchase price of gas was lowered below the Natural Gas
policy Act maximum lawful prices. Plaintiffs assert that
royalties were further underpaid by Burlington as a result of
post-production cost deductions taken starting in the late
1990s. This action was transferred to Washita County District
Court in 2004. A tentative settlement reached in November 2005
was disapproved by the Court in June 2007. A class certification
hearing has been scheduled for January 2008. A companion case
styled Bank of America v. El Paso Natural Gas
involving similar claims made as to certain wells in
Oklahoma was settle in 2006.
In addition to the above matters, we and our subsidiaries and
affiliates are also named defendants in numerous lawsuits and
governmental proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of
our business. For each of our outstanding legal matters, we
evaluate the merits of the case, our exposure to the matter,
possible legal or settlement strategies and the likelihood of an
unfavorable outcome. If we determine that an unfavorable outcome
is probable and can be estimated, we establish the necessary
accruals. While the outcome of these matters, including those
discussed above, cannot be predicted with certainty, and there
are still uncertainties related to the costs we may incur, based
upon our evaluation and experience to date, we believe we have
established appropriate reserves for these matters. However, it
is possible that new information or future developments could
require us to reassess our potential exposure related to these
matters and adjust our accruals accordingly, and these
adjustments could be material. At June 30, 2007, we had
accrued approximately $16 million for our outstanding legal
matters.
Environmental
Matters
We are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations
governing environmental quality and pollution control. These
laws and regulations require us to remove or remedy the effect
on the environment of the disposal or release of specified
substances at current and former operating sites. At
June 30, 2007, we had accrued approximately
$25 million for expected remediation costs and associated
onsite, offsite and groundwater technical studies and for
related environmental legal costs; however, we estimate that our
exposure could be as high as $46 million. Our accrual
includes $22 million for environmental contingencies
related to properties we previously owned.
Our accrual represents a combination of two estimation
methodologies. First, where the most likely outcome can be
reasonably estimated, that cost has been accrued. Second, where
the most likely outcome cannot be estimated, a range of costs is
established and if no one amount in that range is more likely
than any other, the lower end of the expected range has been
accrued. Our environmental remediation projects are in various
stages of completion. The liabilities we have recorded reflect
our current estimates of amounts we will expend to remediate
these sites. However, depending on the stage of completion or
assessment, the ultimate extent of contamination or remediation
required may not be known. As additional assessments occur or
remediation efforts continue, we may incur additional
liabilities.
Below is a reconciliation of our accrued liability from
January 1, 2007 to June 30, 2007 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
Additions/adjustments for
remediation activities
|
|
|
3
|
|
Payments for remediation activities
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2007
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the remainder of 2007, we estimate that our total
remediation expenditures will be approximately $3 million,
which will be expended under government directed
clean-up
plans.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) Matters. We have received
notice that we could be designated, or have been asked for
information to determine whether we could be designated, as a
Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) with respect to three active
sites under the CERCLA or state equivalents. We have sought to
resolve our liability as a PRP at these sites through
indemnification by third parties and settlements which
F-31
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
provide for payment of our allocable share of remediation costs.
As of June 30, 2007, we have estimated our share of the
remediation costs at these sites to be between $12 million
and $17 million. Because the
clean-up
costs are estimates and are subject to revision as more
information becomes available about the extent of remediation
required, and in some cases we have asserted a defense to any
liability, our estimates could change. Moreover, liability under
the federal CERCLA statute is joint and several, meaning that we
could be required to pay in excess of our pro rata share of
remediation costs. Our understanding of the financial strength
of other PRPs has been considered, where appropriate, in
estimating our liabilities. Accruals for these matters are
included in the environmental reserve discussed above.
State of Arizona Chromium Review. In April
2004, the State of Arizonas Department of Environmental
Quality requested information from us regarding the historical
use of chromium in our operations. By June 2004, we had
responded fully to the request. We are currently working with
the State of Arizona on this matter and in 2005, we commenced a
study of our facilities in Arizona to determine if there were
any issues concerning the usage of chromium. We also studied our
facilities on tribal lands in Arizona and New Mexico and our
facility at the El Paso Station in El Paso, Texas. Of
the 12 sites that were studied, nine were found not to have
chromium contamination above regulatory thresholds and no
further action at these sites is anticipated. Of the three
remaining sites, one was already enrolled in Arizonas
Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP) and the second site has been
entered in the VRP. We are further investigating the chromium
levels at the third site. Additional work will be conducted at
these three sites as directed by the State of Arizona.
It is possible that new information or future developments could
require us to reassess our potential exposure related to
environmental matters. We may incur significant costs and
liabilities in order to comply with existing environmental laws
and regulations. It is also possible that other developments,
such as increasingly strict environmental laws and regulations
and claims for damages to property, employees, other persons and
the environment resulting from our current or past operations,
could result in substantial costs and liabilities in the future.
As this information becomes available, or other relevant
developments occur, we will adjust our accrual amounts
accordingly. While there are still uncertainties related to the
ultimate costs we may incur, based upon our evaluation and
experience to date, we believe our reserves are adequate.
Rates and
Regulatory Matters
EPNG Rate Case. In June 2005, we filed a rate
case with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)
proposing an increase in revenues of 10.6 percent or
$56 million annually over current tariff rates, new
services and revisions to certain terms and conditions of
existing services on our EPNG system. On January 1, 2006,
the rates became effective, subject to refund. In March 2006,
the FERC issued an order that generally approved our proposed
new services, which were implemented on June 1, 2006. In
December 2006, we filed a settlement with the FERC that provided
benefits for both us and our customers for a three year period
ending December 31, 2008. Only one party in the rate case
contested the settlement. The Administrative Law Judge has
certified the settlement to the FERC finding that the settlement
could be approved for all parties, or in the alternative, that
the contesting party could be severed from the settlement. We
have reserved sufficient amounts to meet EPNGs refund
obligations under the settlement. Such refunds will be payable
within 120 days after approval by the FERC.
Mojave Pipeline Company (Mojave) Rate Case. In
February 2007, as required by its prior rate case settlement,
Mojave filed with the FERC a general rate case proposing a
33 percent decrease in its base tariff rates resulting from
a variety of factors, including a decline in rate base and
various changes in rate design since the last rate case. No new
services were proposed. The new base rates were effective
March 1, 2007 and are subject to further adjustment upon
the outcome of the rate case proceeding. Mojave is actively
engaged in settlement negotiations with its customers, the
outcome of which cannot be predicted at this time.
While the outcome of our outstanding rates and regulatory
matters cannot be predicted with certainty, based on current
information, we do not expect the ultimate resolution of these
matters to have a material adverse effect on our financial
position, operating results or cash flows. However, it is
possible that new information or future
F-32
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
developments could require us to reassess our potential exposure
related to these matters, which could have a material effect on
our results of operations, our financial position and our cash
flows.
Other
Matter
Navajo Nation. Approximately 900 looped
pipeline miles of the north mainline of our EPNG pipeline system
are located on lands held in trust by the United States for the
benefit of the Navajo Nation. Our rights-of-way on lands
crossing the Navajo Nation are the subject of a pending renewal
application filed in 2005 with the Department of the
Interiors Bureau of Indian Affairs. An interim agreement
with the Navajo Nation expired at the end of December 2006.
Negotiations on the terms of the long-term agreement are
continuing. In addition, we continue to preserve other legal,
regulatory and legislative alternatives, which includes
continuing to pursue our application with the Department of the
Interior for renewal of our rights-of-way on Navajo Nation
lands. It is uncertain whether our negotiation, or other
alternatives, will be successful, or if successful, what the
ultimate cost will be of obtaining the rights-of-way and whether
we will be able to recover these costs in our rates.
Tuba City Uranium Milling Facility. For a
period of approximately ten years beginning in the mid to late
1950s, Rare Metals Corporation, an historical-affiliate of us,
conducted uranium mining and milling operations in the vicinity
of Tuba City, Arizona, under contract with the United States
Government as part of the Cold War nuclear weapons program. The
site of the Tuba City uranium mill, which is on land within the
Navajo Indian Reservation, reverted to the Navajo Nation after
the mill closed in 1966 and the mill site was cleaned up by the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the federal Uranium
Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978. In May 2007, we
filed suit against the DOE and other federal agencies requesting
a judicial determination that the DOE was fully and legally
responsible for any remediation of any waste associated with
historical uranium production activity at two sites in the
vicinity of the mill facilities near Tuba City, Arizona. We are
also cooperating with the Navajo Nation in join legislative
efforts to achieve appropriations for the DOE to assess and
remediate the sites. Pending the potential remedial response by
the United States government, we are undertaking certain interim
site control measures in coordination with the Navajo Nation.
While the outcome of this matter cannot be predicted with
certainty, based on current information, we do not expect the
ultimate resolution of this matter to have a material adverse
effect on our financial position, operating results or cash
flows. It is possible that new information or future
developments could require us to reassess our potential exposure
related to this matter. The impact of these changes may have a
material effect on our results of operations, our financial
position, and our cash flows in the periods these events occur.
Guarantees
We are or have been involved in various joint ventures and other
ownership arrangements that sometimes require additional
financial support that result in the issuance of financial and
performance guarantees. As of June 30, 2007, we had
approximately $11 million of financial and performance
guarantees not otherwise recorded in our financial statements.
In December 2006, we adopted the recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87,
88, 106, and 132(R), and began reflecting the assets and
liabilities related to our postretirement benefit plans based on
their funded or unfunded status and reclassifying all actuarial
deferrals as a component of accumulated other comprehensive
income. In March 2007, the FERC issued guidance requiring
regulated pipeline companies to recognize a regulatory asset or
liability for the funded status asset or liability that would
otherwise be recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income
under SFAS No. 158, if it is probable that amounts
calculated on the same basis as SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
Than Pensions, would be included in our rates in future
periods. Upon adoption of this FERC guidance, we reclassified
approximately $4 million of the beginning balance of
accumulated other comprehensive loss to other non-current assets
on our balance sheet.
F-33
EL PASO
NATURAL GAS COMPANY
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
6.
|
Transactions
with Affiliates
|
Cash Management Program. We participate in
El Pasos cash management program which matches
short-term cash surpluses and needs of participating affiliates,
thus minimizing total borrowings from outside sources. We have
historically provided cash to El Paso in exchange for an
affiliated note receivable that is due upon demand. At
June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, we had a note
receivable from El Paso of approximately $1.2 billion
and $1.1 billion. We classified $69 million of this
receivable as current on our balance sheet at June 30,
2007, based on the anticipated settlement of this amount within
twelve months. The interest rate on this note at June 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006 was 6.1% and 5.3%.
Taxes. El Paso files consolidated
U.S. federal and certain state tax returns which include
our taxable income. In certain states, we file and pay taxes
directly to the state taxing authorities. At June 30, 2007
and December 31, 2006, we had income taxes payable of
$82 million and $81 million. The majority of these
balances, as well as our deferred income taxes, will become
payable to or due from El Paso.
During the first quarter of 2007, we amended our tax sharing
agreement and intercompany tax billing policy with El Paso
to clarify the billing of taxes and tax related items to
El Pasos subsidiaries. El Paso billed us
$40 million for certain tax attributes previously reflected
as deferred income taxes in our financial statements. As of
June 30, 2007, these amounts were settled through
intercompany accounts.
Other Affiliate Balances. At June 30,
2007 and December 31, 2006, we had contractual deposits
with our affiliates of $7 million, included in other
current liabilities on our balance sheets.
Affiliate Revenues and Expenses. The following
table shows revenues and charges from our affiliates for the
periods ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Revenues from affiliates
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
Operation and maintenance expenses
from affiliates
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Reimbursements of operating
expenses charged to affiliates
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
F-34
EL PASO NATURAL GAS
COMPANY
$355,000,000
OFFER TO EXCHANGE
REGISTERED 5.95% Senior
Notes Due 2017
FOR
ALL OUTSTANDING
5.95% Senior Notes Due 2017
PROSPECTUS
Wilmington
Trust Company
By
Certified or Registered Mail,
Overnight Courier or by Hand Delivery:
Wilmington Trust Company
Rodney Square North
1100 North Market Street
Wilmington, Delaware
19890-1626
Attn: Alisha Clendaniel
By
Facsimile Transmission:
(302) 636-4139
Attention: Exchanges
To
Confirm by Telephone or for Information Call:
(302) 636-6470
UNTIL ,
2007, ALL DEALERS THAT EFFECT TRANSACTIONS IN THESE SECURITIES,
WHETHER OR NOT PARTICIPATING IN THIS OFFERING, MAY BE REQUIRED
TO DELIVER A PROSPECTUS. THIS IS IN ADDITION TO THE
DEALERS OBLIGATION TO DELIVER A PROSPECTUS WHEN ACTING AS
UNDERWRITERS AND WITH RESPECT TO THEIR UNUSED ALLOTMENTS OR
SUBSCRIPTIONS.
, 2007
PART II
INFORMATION
NOT REQUIRED IN THE PROSPECTUS
|
|
ITEM 20.
|
INDEMNIFICATION
OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
|
Section 102(b)(7) of the Delaware General Corporation Law
(the DGCL) permits a corporation to provide in its
certificate of incorporation that a director of the corporation
shall not be personally liable to the corporation or its
stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty
as a director, except for liability for (i) any breach of
the directors duty of loyalty to the corporation or its
stockholders, (ii) acts or omissions not in good faith or
which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of
law, (iii) payment of unlawful dividends or unlawful stock
purchases or redemptions, or (iv) any transaction from
which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
Section 145 of the DGCL provides that a corporation may
indemnify directors and officers as well as other employees and
individuals against expenses (including attorneys fees),
judgments, fines, and amounts paid in settlement in connection
with specified actions, suits, proceedings whether civil,
criminal, administrative, or investigative (other than action by
or in the right of the corporation a
derivative action), if they acted in good faith and
in a manner they reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to
the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any
criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to
believe their conduct was unlawful. A similar standard is
applicable in the case of derivative actions, except that
indemnification only extends to expenses (including
attorneys fees) incurred in connection with the defense or
settlement of such action, and the statute requires court
approval before there can be any indemnification where the
person seeking indemnification has been found liable to the
corporation. The statute provides that it is not exclusive of
other indemnification that may be granted by a
corporations charter, by-laws, disinterested director
vote, stockholder vote, agreement, or otherwise.
Article Seventh of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation contains a provision similar to that of
Section 145 of the DGCL. It also provides that to the full
extent that the DGCL, as it now exists or may hereafter be
amended, permits the limitation or elimination of the liability
of directors, a director of us shall not be liable to us or its
stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty
as a director. Any amendment, repeal or modification of such
Article Seventh shall not adversely affect any right or
protection of a director of us for or with respect to any acts
or omissions of such director occurring prior to such amendment
or repeal
Article VI, Section 4 of our by-laws requires
indemnification to the full extent permitted under Delaware law
for any person made a party to any action, suit or proceeding,
whether criminal, civil, administrative or investigative, for
expenses actually and reasonably incurred by reason of the fact
that such person or such persons testator or intestate, is
or was serving as a director, officer or employee of us or its
predecessor, or is or was serving at the request of us as a
director, officer or employee of another enterprise. Our by-laws
also provide that in the event that the board of directors or
stockholders refuse or fail to provide indemnity, a person may
seek indemnity from us in court and have the court substitute
its judgment as to the propriety of indemnity, or determine
whether indemnity is proper in the absence of such determination
by the board of directors or stockholders.
Certain directors and officers of us are directors, officers
and/or
employees of El Paso.
Article X of El Pasos by-laws requires
indemnification to the full extent permitted under Delaware law
as from time to time in effect. Subject to any restrictions
imposed by Delaware law, the by-laws of El Paso provide an
unconditional right to indemnification for all expense,
liability, and loss (including attorneys fees, judgments,
fines, ERISA excise taxes, or penalties and amounts paid in
settlement) actually and reasonably incurred or suffered by any
person in connection with any actual or threatened proceeding by
reason of the fact that such person is or was serving as a
director or officer of El Paso, such person is or was
serving at the request of El Paso as a director, officer,
employee, or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust, or other enterprise, including an employee
benefit plan. The by-laws of El Paso also provide that
El Paso may, by action of its board of directors, provide
indemnification to its employees and agents with the same scope
and effect as the foregoing indemnification of directors and
officers.
El Paso maintains directors and officers
liability insurance which provides for payment, on behalf of the
directors and officers of El Paso and its subsidiaries,
including us, of certain losses of such persons (other than
II-1
matters uninsurable under law) arising from claims, including
claims arising under the Securities Act, for acts or omissions
by such persons while acting as directors or officers of
El Paso
and/or its
subsidiaries, as the case may be.
|
|
ITEM 21.
|
EXHIBIT AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INDEX
|
(a) Exhibits:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.A
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation dated April 8, 2003 (Exhibit 3.A to our
2003 Second Quarter
Form 10-Q).
|
|
3
|
.B
|
|
By-laws dated June 24, 2002
(Exhibit 3.B to our 2002
Form 10-K).
|
|
4
|
.A
|
|
Indenture dated as of
January 1, 1992, between El Paso Natural Gas Company
and Wilmington Trust Company (as successor to Citibank,
N.A.), as Trustee, (Exhibit 4.A to our 2004
Form 10-K).
|
|
4
|
.B
|
|
Indenture dated as of
November 13, 1996, between El Paso Natural Gas Company
and Wilmington Trust Company (as successor to JPMorgan
Chase Bank, formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), as
Trustee, (Exhibit 4.B to our 2004
Form 10-K).
|
|
4
|
.C
|
|
Indenture dated as of
July 21, 2003, between El Paso Natural Gas Company and
Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, (Exhibit 4.1 to
our Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on July 23, 2003).
|
|
4
|
.D
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated
as of June 10, 2002 between El Paso Natural Gas Company and
Wilmington Trust Company (as successor in interest to JPMorgan
Chase Bank, formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), as
Trustee, to indenture dated November 13, 1996
(Exhibit 4.2 to our
Form S-4
(Registration
No. 333-97017)
filed on July 24, 2002).
|
|
4
|
.E
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture
dated as of April 4, 2007 between El Paso Natural Gas
Company and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, to
indenture dated November 13, 1996 (Exhibit 4.A to our
Current Report on Form
8-K, filed
with the SEC on April 9, 2007).
|
|
4
|
.F
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated
as of April 4, 2007 between El Paso Natural Gas Company and
Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, to indenture dated as of
July 23, 2003 (Exhibit 4.C to our Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on April 9, 2007).
|
|
4
|
.G
|
|
Form of 5.95% Senior Note due 2017
(included in Exhibit 4.E).
|
|
5*
|
|
|
Opinion of Bracewell &
Giuliani LLP regarding the validity of the securities registered
hereby.
|
|
8*
|
|
|
Opinion of Bracewell &
Giuliani LLP regarding tax matters.
|
|
10
|
.A
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of July 31, 2006, among El Paso
Corporation, Colorado Interstate Gas Company, El Paso
Natural Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, the several
banks and other financial institutions from time to time parties
thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent
and as collateral agent. (Exhibit 10.A to our Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on August 2, 2006.)
|
|
10
|
.A.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated as of
January 19, 2007 to the Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of July 31, 2006 among El Paso
Corporation, Colorado Interstate Gas Company, El Paso
Natural Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, the several
banks and other financial institutions from time to time parties
thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent
and as collateral agent (Exhibit 10.A.1 to our 2006
Form 10-K).
|
|
10
|
.B
|
|
Amended and Restated Security
Agreement dated as of July 31, 2006, among El Paso
Corporation, Colorado Interstate Gas Company, El Paso
Natural Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, the
Subsidiary Guarantors and certain other credit parties thereto
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., not in its individual capacity,
but solely as collateral agent for the Secured Parties and as
the depository bank. (Exhibit 10.B to our Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on August 2, 2006.)
|
|
10
|
.C+
|
|
El Paso Corporation 2005
Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.B to El Paso Corporations Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
File
No. 1-14365,
filed May 31, 2005); Amendment No. 1 effective as of
December 2, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.HH.1 to El Paso Corporations 2005
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
II-2
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.D+
|
|
2005 Supplemental Benefits Plan
effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.KK to El Paso Corporations 2005
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.E+
|
|
2004 Key Executive Severance
Protection Plan effective as of March 9, 2004 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.P to El Paso
Corporations 2003
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.F+
|
|
Severance Pay Plan Amended and
Restated effective as of October 1, 2002; Supplement
No. 1 effective as of January 1, 2003; and Amendment
No. 1 to Supplement No. 1 effective as of
March 21, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.Z to El Paso Corporations 2003 First
Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 to Supplement No. 1 effective as of
June 1, 2003; (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.Z.1 to El Paso Corporations 2003
Second Quarter
Form 10-Q);
Amendment No. 3 to Supplement No. 1 effective as of
September 2, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.Z.1 to El Paso Corporations 2003
Third Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 4 to Supplement No. 1 effective as of
October 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.W.1 to El Paso Corporations 2003
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 5 to Supplement No. 1 effective as of
February 2, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.W.2 to El Paso Corporations 2003
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Supplement No. 2 dated April 1, 2005 effective as of
October 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.S.1 to El Paso Corporations 2005
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.G+
|
|
2001 Omnibus Incentive
Compensation Plan effective as of January 29, 2001
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to El Paso
Corporations
Form S-8,
File
No. 1-14365,
filed June 29, 2001); Amendment No. 1 effective as of
February 7, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.J.1 to El Paso Corporations 2001
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of April 1, 2001
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.J.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2002 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 3 effective as of July 17, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.J.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2002 Second Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 4 effective as of May 1, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.J.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2003 Second Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 5 effective as of March 8, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.K.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2003 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.H+
|
|
Supplemental Benefits Plan Amended
and Restated effective December 7, 2001 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.K to El Paso
Corporations 2001 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 1 effective as of November 7, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.K.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2002 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of June 1, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.L.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 3 effective December 17, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.UU to El Paso
Corporations 2004 Third Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 4 effective as of December 31, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.I.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.I+
|
|
1999 Omnibus Incentive
Compensation Plan dated January 20, 1999 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to El Paso
Corporations
Form S-8,
File
No. 1-14365,
filed May 20, 1999); Amendment No. 1 effective as of
February 7, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.V.1 to El Paso Corporations 2001
First Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of May 1, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.I.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2003 Second Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.J+
|
|
Strategic Stock Plan Amended and
Restated effective as of December 3, 1999 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to El Paso
Corporations
Form S-8,
File
No. 1-14365,
filed January 14, 2000); Amendment No. 1 effective as
of February 7, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.M.1 to El Paso Corporations 2001
First Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of November 7, 2002;
Amendment No. 3 effective as of December 6, 2002 and
Amendment No. 4 effective as of January 29, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.P.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2002 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
II-3
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.K+
|
|
Omnibus Plan for Management
Employees Amended and Restated effective as of December 3,
1999; Amendment No. 1 effective as of December 1, 2000
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.A to El Paso
Corporations
Form S-8,
File
No. 1-14365,
filed December 18, 2000); Amendment No. 2 effective as
of February 7, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.U.1 to El Paso Corporations 2001
First Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 3 effective as of December 7, 2001
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to El Paso
Corporations
Form S-8,
File
No. 1-14365,
filed February 11, 2002); Amendment No. 4 effective as
of December 6, 2002 to (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.T.1 to El Paso Corporations 2002
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.L+
|
|
Key Executive Severance Protection
Plan Amended and Restated effective as of August 1, 1998
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.N to El Paso
Corporations 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 1 effective as of February 7, 2001
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.K.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2001 First Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of November 7, 2002;
Amendment No. 3 effective as of December 6, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.N.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2002 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 4 effective as of September 2, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.N.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2003 Third Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.M+
|
|
Executive Award Plan of Sonat Inc.
Amended and Restated effective as of July 23, 1998, as
amended May 27, 1999 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.S to El Paso Corporations 2004 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Termination of the Executive Award Plan of Sonat Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.K.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2000 Second Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.N+
|
|
Senior Executive Survivor Benefit
Plan Amended and Restated effective as of August 1, 1998
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.M to El Paso
Corporations 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 1 effective as of February 7, 2001
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.I.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2001 First Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of October 1, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.L.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2002 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.O+
|
|
1995 Omnibus Compensation Plan
Amended and Restated effective as of August 1, 1998
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.I to El Paso
Corporations 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 1 effective as of December 3, 1998
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.I.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of January 20, 1999
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.I.2 to
El Paso Corporations 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.P+
|
|
Agreement and General Release
dated May 4, 2005, by and between El Paso Corporation
and John W. Somerhalder II.(incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.A to El Paso Corporations
Form 8-K,
filed May 4, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.Q+
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
executed by El Paso Corporation for the benefit of each
officer listed in Schedule A thereto, (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.X to El Paso
Corporations 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.R
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of April 4, 2007, among El Paso Natural Gas
Company and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Citigroup Global
Markets Inc., ABN AMRO Incorporated, Goldman, Sachs & Co,
Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and
SG Americas Securities, LLC (Exhibit 10.A to our Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on April 9, 2007).
|
|
12*
|
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings
to Fixed Charges.
|
|
21*
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of El Paso
Natural Gas Company.
|
|
23
|
.A*
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young
LLP.
|
|
23
|
.B*
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP.
|
|
23
|
.C*
|
|
Consent of Bracewell &
Giuliani LLP (included in Exhibits 5 and 8).
|
II-4
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
25*
|
|
|
Form T-1
Statement of Eligibility and Qualification under the
Trust Indenture Act of 1939 of Wilmington
Trust Company, to act as trustee under the Indenture.
|
|
99
|
.A**
|
|
Form of Letter of Transmittal.
|
|
99
|
.B**
|
|
Form of Guidelines for
Certification of Taxpayer Identification Number on Substitute
Form W-9.
|
|
99
|
.C**
|
|
Form of Notice of Guaranteed
Delivery.
|
|
99
|
.D**
|
|
Form of Letter to Brokers,
Dealers, Commercial Banks, Trust Companies and Other
Nominees.
|
|
99
|
.E**
|
|
Form of Letter to Clients.
|
|
99
|
.F**
|
|
Form of Exchange Agent Agreement.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates exhibits filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Indicates exhibits to be filed by amendment. |
|
+ |
|
Indicates a management plan or a compensatory plan or
arrangement. |
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for
purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act,
each filing of the registrants annual report pursuant to
section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act
(and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit
plans annual report pursuant to section 15(d) of the
Exchange Act) that is incorporated by reference in the
registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration
statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the
offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be
the initial bona fide offering thereof.
(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising
under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers
and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the
foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been
advised that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange
Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as
expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore,
unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification
against such liabilities (other than the payment by the
registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer
or controlling person of the registrant in the successful
defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such
director, officer or controlling person in connection with the
securities being registered, the registrant will, unless, in the
opinion of its counsel, the matter has been settled by
controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate
jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is
against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and
will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(c) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to respond
to requests for information that is incorporated by reference
into the prospectus pursuant to Items 4, 10(b), 11, or 13
of
Form S-4,
within one business day of receipt of such request, and to send
the incorporated documents by first class mail or other equally
prompt means. This includes information contained in documents
filed subsequent to the effective date of the registration
statement through the date of responding to the request.
(d) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to supply
by means of a post-effective amendment all information
concerning a transaction, and the company being acquired
involved therein, that was not the subject of and included in
the registration statement when it became effective.
II-5
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, El
Paso Natural Gas Company has duly caused this registration
statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunder duly authorized, in the City of Houston, State of
Texas on September 18, 2007.
EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY
Name: John R. Sult
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this
registration statement has been signed below by the following
persons in the capacities indicated as of September 18,
2007:
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
C. Yardley
James
C. Yardley
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
J. Cleary
James
J. Cleary
|
|
President and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
R. Sult
John
R. Sult
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial
Officer and Controller
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Daniel
B. Martin
Daniel
B. Martin
|
|
Senior Vice President and Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas
L. Price
Thomas
L. Price
|
|
Vice President and Director
|
II-6
EXHIBITS INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
3
|
.A
|
|
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation dated April 8, 2003 (Exhibit 3.A to our
2003 Second Quarter
Form 10-Q).
|
|
3
|
.B
|
|
By-laws dated June 24, 2002
(Exhibit 3.B to our 2002
Form 10-K).
|
|
4
|
.A
|
|
Indenture dated as of
January 1, 1992, between El Paso Natural Gas Company
and Wilmington Trust Company (as successor to Citibank,
N.A.), as Trustee, (Exhibit 4.A to our 2004
Form 10-K).
|
|
4
|
.B
|
|
Indenture dated as of
November 13, 1996, between El Paso Natural Gas Company
and Wilmington Trust Company (as successor to JPMorgan
Chase Bank, formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), as
Trustee, (Exhibit 4.B to our 2004
Form 10-K).
|
|
4
|
.C
|
|
Indenture dated as of
July 21, 2003, between El Paso Natural Gas Company and
Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, (Exhibit 4.1 to
our Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on July 23, 2003).
|
|
4
|
.D
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated
as of June 10, 2002 between El Paso Natural Gas Company and
Wilmington Trust Company (as successor in interest to JPMorgan
Chase Bank, formerly known as The Chase Manhattan Bank), as
Trustee, to indenture dated November 13, 1996 (Exhibit 4.2
to our Form S-4 (Registration No. 333-97017) filed on
July 24, 2002).
|
|
4
|
.E
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture
dated as of April 4, 2007 between El Paso Natural Gas
Company and Wilmington Trust Company, as Trustee, to
indenture dated November 13, 1996 (Exhibit 4.A to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on April 9, 2007).
|
|
4
|
.F
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated
as of April 4, 2007 between El Paso Natural Gas Company and
Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee, to indenture dated as of
July 23, 2003 (Exhibit 4.C to our Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on April 9, 2007).
|
|
4
|
.G
|
|
Form of 5.95% Senior Note due 2017
(included in Exhibit 4.E).
|
|
5*
|
|
|
Opinion of Bracewell &
Giuliani LLP regarding the validity of the securities registered
hereby.
|
|
8*
|
|
|
Opinion of Bracewell &
Giuliani LLP regarding tax matters.
|
|
10
|
.A
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of July 31, 2006, among El Paso
Corporation, Colorado Interstate Gas Company, El Paso
Natural Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, the several
banks and other financial institutions from time to time parties
thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent
and as collateral agent. (Exhibit 10.A to our Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on August 2, 2006.)
|
|
10
|
.A.1
|
|
Amendment No. 1 dated as of
January 19, 2007 to the Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement dated as of July 31, 2006 among El Paso
Corporation, Colorado Interstate Gas Company, El Paso
Natural Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, the several
banks and other financial institutions from time to time parties
thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent
and as collateral agent (Exhibit 10.A.1 to our 2006
Form 10-K).
|
|
10
|
.B
|
|
Amended and Restated Security
Agreement dated as of July 31, 2006, among El Paso
Corporation, Colorado Interstate Gas Company, El Paso
Natural Gas Company, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, the
Subsidiary Guarantors and certain other credit parties thereto
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., not in its individual capacity,
but solely as collateral agent for the Secured Parties and as
the depository bank. (Exhibit 10.B to our Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed with the SEC on August 2, 2006.)
|
|
10
|
.C+
|
|
El Paso Corporation 2005
Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.B to El Paso Corporations Current
Report on
Form 8-K,
File
No. 1-14365,
filed May 31, 2005); Amendment No. 1 effective as of
December 2, 2005 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.HH.1 to El Paso Corporations 2005
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.D+
|
|
2005 Supplemental Benefits Plan
effective as of January 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.KK to El Paso Corporations 2005
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.E+
|
|
2004 Key Executive Severance
Protection Plan effective as of March 9, 2004 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.P to El Paso
Corporations 2003
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.F+
|
|
Severance Pay Plan Amended and
Restated effective as of October 1, 2002; Supplement
No. 1 effective as of January 1, 2003; and Amendment
No. 1 to Supplement No. 1 effective as of
March 21, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.Z to El Paso Corporations 2003 First
Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 to Supplement No. 1 effective as of
June 1, 2003; (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.Z.1 to El Paso Corporations 2003
Second Quarter
Form 10-Q);
Amendment No. 3 to Supplement No. 1 effective as of
September 2, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.Z.1 to El Paso Corporations 2003
Third Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 4 to Supplement No. 1 effective as of
October 1, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.W.1 to El Paso Corporations 2003
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 5 to Supplement No. 1 effective as of
February 2, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.W.2 to El Paso Corporations 2003
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Supplement No. 2 dated April 1, 2005 effective as of
October 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.S.1 to El Paso Corporations 2005
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.G+
|
|
2001 Omnibus Incentive
Compensation Plan effective as of January 29, 2001
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to El Paso
Corporations
Form S-8,
File
No. 1-14365,
filed June 29, 2001); Amendment No. 1 effective as of
February 7, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.J.1 to El Paso Corporations 2001
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of April 1, 2001
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.J.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2002 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 3 effective as of July 17, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.J.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2002 Second Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 4 effective as of May 1, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.J.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2003 Second Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-
14365); Amendment No. 5 effective as of March 8, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.K.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2003 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.H+
|
|
Supplemental Benefits Plan Amended
and Restated effective December 7, 2001 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.K to El Paso
Corporations 2001 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 1 effective as of November 7, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.K.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2002 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of June 1, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.L.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 3 effective December 17, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.UU to El Paso
Corporations 2004 Third Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 4 effective as of December 31, 2004
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.I.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.I+
|
|
1999 Omnibus Incentive
Compensation Plan dated January 20, 1999 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to El Paso
Corporations
Form S-8,
File
No. 1-14365,
filed May 20, 1999); Amendment No. 1 effective as of
February 7, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.V.1 to El Paso Corporations 2001
First Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of May 1, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.I.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2003 Second Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.J+
|
|
Strategic Stock Plan Amended and
Restated effective as of December 3, 1999 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to El Paso
Corporations
Form S-8,
File
No. 1-14365,
filed January 14, 2000); Amendment No. 1 effective as
of February 7, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.M.1 to El Paso Corporations 2001
First Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of November 7, 2002;
Amendment No. 3 effective as of December 6, 2002 and
Amendment No. 4 effective as of January 29, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.P.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2002 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.K+
|
|
Omnibus Plan for Management
Employees Amended and Restated effective as of December 3,
1999; Amendment No. 1 effective as of December 1, 2000
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.A to El Paso
Corporations
Form S-8,
File
No. 1-14365,
filed December 18, 2000); Amendment No. 2 effective as
of February 7, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.U.1 to El Paso Corporations 2001
First Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 3 effective as of December 7, 2001
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to El Paso
Corporations
Form S-8,
File
No. 1-14365,
filed February 11, 2002); Amendment No. 4 effective as
of December 6, 2002 to (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.T.1 to El Paso Corporations 2002
Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
|
10
|
.L+
|
|
Key Executive Severance Protection
Plan Amended and Restated effective as of August 1, 1998
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.N to El Paso
Corporations 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 1 effective as of February 7, 2001
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.K.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2001 First Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of November 7, 2002;
Amendment No. 3 effective as of December 6, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.N.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2002 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 4 effective as of September 2, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.N.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2003 Third Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.M+
|
|
Executive Award Plan of Sonat Inc.
Amended and Restated effective as of July 23, 1998, as
amended May 27, 1999 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.S to El Paso Corporations 2004 Annual
Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Termination of the Executive Award Plan of Sonat Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.K.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2000 Second Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.N+
|
|
Senior Executive Survivor Benefit
Plan Amended and Restated effective as of August 1, 1998
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.M to El Paso
Corporations 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 1 effective as of February 7, 2001
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.I.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2001 First Quarter
Form 10-Q,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of October 1, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.L.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2002 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.O+
|
|
1995 Omnibus Compensation Plan
Amended and Restated effective as of August 1, 1998
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.I to El Paso
Corporations 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 1 effective as of December 3, 1998
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.I.1 to
El Paso Corporations 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365);
Amendment No. 2 effective as of January 20, 1999
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.I.2 to
El Paso Corporations 2004 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.P+
|
|
Agreement and General Release
dated May 4, 2005, by and between El Paso Corporation
and John W. Somerhalder II.(incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.A to El Paso Corporations
Form 8-K,
filed May 4, 2005).
|
|
10
|
.Q+
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement
executed by El Paso Corporation for the benefit of each
officer listed in Schedule A thereto, (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.X to El Paso
Corporations 2005 Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
File
No. 1-14365).
|
|
10
|
.R
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of April 4, 2007, among El Paso Natural Gas
Company and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Citigroup Global
Markets Inc., ABN AMRO Incorporated, Goldman, Sachs & Co,
Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and
SG Americas Securities, LLC (Exhibit 10.A to our Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 9, 2007).
|
|
12*
|
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings
to Fixed Charges.
|
|
21*
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of El Paso
Natural Gas Company.
|
|
23
|
.A*
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young
LLP.
|
|
23
|
.B*
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP.
|
|
23
|
.C*
|
|
Consent of Bracewell &
Giuliani LLP (included in Exhibits 5 and 8).
|
|
25*
|
|
|
Form T-1
Statement of Eligibility and Qualification under the
Trust Indenture Act of 1939 of Wilmington
Trust Company, to act as trustee under the Indenture.
|
|
99
|
.A**
|
|
Form of Letter of Transmittal.
|
|
99
|
.B**
|
|
Form of Guidelines for
Certification of Taxpayer Identification Number on Substitute
Form W-9.
|
|
99
|
.C**
|
|
Form of Notice of Guaranteed
Delivery.
|
|
99
|
.D**
|
|
Form of Letter to Brokers,
Dealers, Commercial Banks, Trust Companies and Other
Nominees.
|
|
99
|
.E**
|
|
Form of Letter to Clients.
|
|
99
|
.F**
|
|
Form of Exchange Agent Agreement.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Indicates exhibits filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Indicates exhibits to be filed by amendment. |
|
+ |
|
Indicates a management plan or a compensatory plan or
arrangement. |