e10vq
Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
 
     
þ
  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
     
    For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
     
    or
     
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
     
    For the transition period from          to          
 
Commission file number 1-06732
COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
     
Delaware   95-6021257
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
     
40 Lane Road, Fairfield, NJ   07004
(Address of Principal Executive Office)   (Zip Code)
 
(973) 882-9000
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o     No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
             
Large accelerated filer þ
  Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o
  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting company o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ
 
Applicable Only to Corporate Issuers:
 
The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of the last practicable date.
 
     
Class
 
Outstanding at April 15, 2010
Common Stock, $0.10 par value
  155,651,325 shares
 


 

 
COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010
 
 
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
             
        Page
 
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements   3
  Item 1.     Financial Statements   4
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8
  8
  8
  8
  11
  11
  12
  13
  14
  16
  17
  17
  21
  21
  22
  Item 2.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   24
        Overview   24
        Results of Operations   31
        Liquidity and Capital Resources   35
  Item 3.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk   39
  Item 4.     Controls and Procedures   40
 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
           
  Item 1.     Legal Proceedings   41
  Item 1A.     Risk Factors   41
  Item 2.     Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds   41
  Item 3.     Defaults Upon Senior Securities   41
  Item 4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders   41
  Item 5.     Other Information   41
  Item 6.     Exhibits   41
 
OTHER
     
  42
         
   
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32


2


Table of Contents

 
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
 
Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may constitute “forward-looking” statements as defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “PSLRA”) or in releases made by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), all as may be amended from time to time. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Covanta Holding Corporation and its subsidiaries (“Covanta”) or industry results, to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Statements that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements can be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking language, such as the words “plan,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “project,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “seeks,” or “scheduled to,” or other similar words, or the negative of these terms or other variations of these terms or comparable language, or by discussion of strategy or intentions. These cautionary statements are being made pursuant to the Securities Act, the Exchange Act and the PSLRA with the intention of obtaining the benefits of the “safe harbor” provisions of such laws. Covanta cautions investors that any forward-looking statements made by Covanta are not guarantees or indicative of future performance. Important assumptions and other important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those forward-looking statements with respect to Covanta include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties affecting their businesses described in Item 1A. Risk Factors of Covanta’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and in other filings by Covanta with the SEC.
 
Although Covanta believes that its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, actual results could differ materially from a projection or assumption in any of its forward-looking statements. Covanta’s future financial condition and results of operations, as well as any forward-looking statements, are subject to change and inherent risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made only as of the date hereof and Covanta does not have or undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, subsequent events or otherwise, unless otherwise required by law.


3


Table of Contents

 
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
                 
    For the Three Months Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (Unaudited)
 
    (In thousands, except per share amounts)  
 
OPERATING REVENUES:
               
Waste and service revenues
  $ 242,000     $ 206,269  
Electricity and steam sales
    149,246       141,869  
Other operating revenues
    25,549       10,622  
                 
Total operating revenues
    416,795       358,760  
                 
OPERATING EXPENSES:
               
Plant operating expenses
    304,226       256,042  
Depreciation and amortization expense
    49,922       51,498  
Net interest expense on project debt
    10,977       12,769  
General and administrative expenses
    26,189       25,515  
Other operating expenses
    23,510       9,744  
                 
Total operating expenses
    414,824       355,568  
                 
Operating income
    1,971       3,192  
                 
Other income (expense):
               
Investment income
    586       1,028  
Interest expense
    (10,588 )     (7,916 )
Non-cash convertible debt related expense
    (8,247 )     (4,702 )
                 
Total other expenses
    (18,249 )     (11,590 )
                 
Loss before income tax benefit and equity in net income from unconsolidated investments
    (16,278 )     (8,398 )
Income tax benefit
    7,875       3,318  
Equity in net income from unconsolidated investments
    3,670       5,809  
                 
NET (LOSS) INCOME
    (4,733 )     729  
                 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
    (2,500 )     (1,380 )
                 
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION
  $ (7,233 )   $ (651 )
                 
                 
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
               
Basic
    153,894       153,467  
                 
Diluted
    153,894       153,467  
                 
Loss Per Share:
               
Basic
  $ (0.05 )   $  
                 
Diluted
  $ (0.05 )   $  
                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.


4


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
                 
    As of  
    March 31,
    December 31,
 
    2010     2009  
    (Unaudited)        
    (In thousands, except per
 
    share amounts)  
 
ASSETS
               
Current:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 329,363     $ 433,683  
Restricted funds held in trust
    154,956       131,223  
Receivables (less allowances of $3,060 and $2,978)
    261,140       306,631  
Unbilled service receivables
    30,996       37,692  
Deferred income taxes
    6,126       9,509  
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
    134,467       126,139  
                 
Total Current Assets
    917,048       1,044,877  
Property, plant and equipment, net
    2,587,143       2,582,841  
Investments in fixed maturities at market (cost: $30,972 and $27,500, respectively)
    31,635       28,142  
Restricted funds held in trust
    121,123       146,529  
Unbilled service receivables
    34,344       37,389  
Waste, service and energy contracts, net
    501,471       380,359  
Other intangible assets, net
    83,138       84,610  
Goodwill
    227,734       202,996  
Investments in investees and joint ventures
    122,935       120,173  
Other assets
    265,824       306,366  
                 
Total Assets
  $ 4,892,395     $ 4,934,282  
                 
                 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY                
                 
Current:
               
Current portion of long-term debt
  $ 6,801     $ 7,027  
Current portion of project debt
    229,028       191,993  
Accounts payable
    46,516       27,831  
Deferred revenue
    50,950       60,256  
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
    221,100       217,721  
                 
Total Current Liabilities
    554,395       504,828  
Long-term debt
    1,400,399       1,430,679  
Project debt
    726,880       767,371  
Deferred income taxes
    559,186       571,122  
Waste and service contracts
    98,187       101,353  
Other liabilities
    142,512       141,760  
                 
Total Liabilities
    3,481,559       3,517,113  
                 
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 14)
               
                 
Equity:
               
Covanta Holding Corporation stockholders’ equity:
               
Preferred stock ($0.10 par value; authorized 10,000 shares; none issued and outstanding)
           
Common stock ($0.10 par value; authorized 250,000 shares; issued 156,378 and 155,615 shares; outstanding 155,651 and 154,936 shares)
    15,638       15,562  
Additional paid-in capital
    911,628       909,205  
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    6,154       7,443  
Accumulated earnings
    443,631       450,864  
Treasury stock, at par
    (73 )     (68 )
                 
Total Covanta Holding Corporation stockholders’ equity
    1,376,978       1,383,006  
                 
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
    33,858       34,163  
                 
Total Equity
    1,410,836       1,417,169  
                 
Total Liabilities and Equity
  $ 4,892,395     $ 4,934,282  
                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.


5


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
                 
    For the Three Months Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
    (Unaudited)
 
    (In thousands)  
 
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
               
Net (loss) income
  $ (4,733 )   $ 729  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
Depreciation and amortization expense
    49,922       51,498  
Amortization of long-term debt deferred financing costs
    1,682       904  
Amortization of debt premium and discount
    (1,851 )     (2,082 )
Non-cash convertible debt related expense
    8,247       4,702  
Stock-based compensation expense
    3,500       3,907  
Equity in net income from unconsolidated investments
    (3,670 )     (5,809 )
Dividends from unconsolidated investments
    447       266  
Deferred income taxes
    (8,537 )     (5,643 )
Other, net
    278       462  
Increase in restricted funds held in trust
    (6,140 )     (9,413 )
Change in working capital, net of effects of acquisitions
    79,882       11,874  
                 
Net cash provided by operating activities
    119,027       51,395  
                 
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
               
Proceeds from the sale of investment securities
    1,228       3,405  
Purchase of investment securities
    (6,411 )     (3,779 )
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
    (37,982 )     (26,833 )
Purchase of equity interest
          (1,083 )
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
    (2,000 )      
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
    (128,254 )      
Loan issued to client community to fund certain facility improvements, net of repayments
    (400 )     (6,192 )
Other, net
    (10,440 )     (238 )
                 
Net cash used in investing activities
    (184,259 )     (34,720 )
                 
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
               
Principal payments on long-term debt
    (1,857 )     (1,675 )
Principal payments on project debt
    (47,357 )     (45,268 )
Proceeds from borrowings on project debt
    922        
Decrease in restricted funds held in trust
    15,488       4,321  
Proceeds from the exercise of options for common stock, net
    278       147  
Financings of insurance premiums, net
    (3,200 )     (3,112 )
Distributions to partners of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
    (3,054 )     (3,716 )
                 
Net cash used in financing activities
    (38,780 )     (49,303 )
                 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    (308 )     (293 )
                 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    (104,320 )     (32,921 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    433,683       192,393  
                 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 329,363     $ 159,472  
                 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.


6


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
 
                                                                         
    Covanta Holding Corporation Stockholders’ Equity              
                      Accumulated
                               
                Additional
    Other
                      Noncontrolling
       
    Common Stock     Paid-In
    Comprehensive
    Accumulated
    Treasury Stock     Interests in
       
    Shares     Amount     Capital     Income     Earnings     Shares     Amount     Subsidiaries     Total  
    (Unaudited, in thousands)  
 
Balance as of December 31, 2009
    155,615     $ 15,562     $ 909,205     $ 7,443     $ 450,864       679     $ (68 )   $ 34,163     $ 1,417,169  
Stock-based compensation expense
                    3,500                                               3,500  
Shares forfeited for terminated employees
                    5                       48       (5 )              
Exercise of options to purchase common stock
    37       3       275                                               278  
Shares issued in non-vested stock award
    726       73       (73 )                                              
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
                    (1,284 )                                     (716 )     (2,000 )
Distributions to partners of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
                                                            (3,054 )     (3,054 )
Comprehensive income, net of income taxes:
                                                                       
Net (loss) income
                                    (7,233 )                     2,500       (4,733 )
Foreign currency translation
                            (1,391 )                             965       (426 )
Pension and other postretirement plan unrecognized net loss, net of income tax benefit of $29
                            (74 )                                     (74 )
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities, net of income tax expense of $70
                            176                                       176  
                                                                         
Total comprehensive (loss) income
                            (1,289 )     (7,233 )                     3,465       (5,057 )
                                                                         
Balance as of March 31, 2010
    156,378     $ 15,638     $ 911,628     $ 6,154     $ 443,631       727     $ (73 )   $ 33,858     $ 1,410,836  
                                                                         
 
                                                                         
    Covanta Holding Corporation Stockholders’ Equity              
                      Accumulated
                               
                Additional
    Other
                      Noncontrolling
       
    Common Stock     Paid-In
    Comprehensive
    Accumulated
    Treasury Stock     Interests in
       
    Shares     Amount     Capital     Loss     Earnings     Shares     Amount     Subsidiaries     Total  
    (Unaudited, in thousands)  
 
Balance as of December 31, 2008
    154,797     $ 15,480     $ 832,595     $ (8,205 )   $ 349,219       517     $ (52 )   $ 35,014     $ 1,224,051  
Stock-based compensation expense
                    3,907                                               3,907  
Shares forfeited for terminated employees
                    1                       8       (1 )              
Shares repurchased for tax withholdings for vested stock awards
                    (1,911 )                     140       (14 )             (1,925 )
Exercise of options to purchase common stock
    25       3       144                                               147  
Shares issued in non-vested stock award
    684       68       (68 )                                              
Distributions to partners of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
                                                            (4,677 )     (4,677 )
Comprehensive income, net of income taxes:
                                                                       
Net (loss) income
                                    (651 )                     1,380       729  
Foreign currency translation
                            (1,801 )                             (530 )     (2,331 )
Pension and other postretirement plan unrecognized net loss, net of income tax benefit of $17
                            (42 )                                     (42 )
Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities, net of income tax benefit of $114
                            (284 )                                     (284 )
                                                                         
Total comprehensive (loss) income
                            (2,127 )     (651 )                     850       (1,928 )
                                                                         
Balance as of March 31, 2009
    155,506     $ 15,551     $ 834,668     $ (10,332 )   $ 348,568       665     $ (67 )   $ 31,187     $ 1,219,575  
                                                                         
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.


7


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
 
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
 
The terms “we,” “our,” “ours,” “us” and “Company” refer to Covanta Holding Corporation and its subsidiaries; the term “Covanta Energy” refers to our subsidiary Covanta Energy Corporation and its subsidiaries.
 
Organization
 
We are a leading developer, owner and operator of infrastructure for the conversion of waste to energy (known as “energy-from-waste”), as well as other waste disposal and renewable energy production businesses in the Americas, Europe and Asia. We conduct all of our operations through subsidiaries which are engaged predominantly in the businesses of waste and energy services. We also engage in the independent power production business outside the Americas.
 
We own, have equity investments in, and/or operate 65 energy generation facilities, 57 of which are in the Americas and eight of which are located outside the Americas. Our energy generation facilities use a variety of fuels, including municipal solid waste, wood waste (biomass), landfill gas, water (hydroelectric), natural gas, coal, and heavy fuel-oil. We also own or operate several businesses that are associated with our energy-from-waste business, including a waste procurement business, four landfills, which we use primarily for ash disposal, and several waste transfer stations. We have two reportable segments, Americas and International. The Americas segment is comprised of waste and energy services operations primarily in the United States and Canada. The International segment is comprised of international waste and energy services.
 
Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (including normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included in our financial statements. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Operating results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. This Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (“Form 10-K”).
 
We use the equity method to account for our investments for which we have the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee. Consolidated net income includes our proportionate share of the net income or loss of these companies. Such amounts are classified as “equity in net income from unconsolidated investments” in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Investments in companies in which we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence are carried at the lower of cost or estimated realizable value. We monitor investments for other than temporary declines in value and make reductions when appropriate.
 
NOTE 2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
 
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an accounting standard related to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements which we are required to adopt by January 1, 2011, although earlier application is permitted. The standard provides amendments to criteria for separating consideration in multiple element arrangements. As a result, multiple deliverable arrangements generally will be separated in more circumstances than under existing U.S. GAAP. We are currently evaluating the potential effects of this standard (which may be adopted either on a prospective or retrospective basis) on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
 
Our growth strategy includes the acquisition of waste and energy related businesses located in markets with significant growth opportunities and the development of new projects and expansion of existing projects. We will also consider acquiring or developing new technologies and businesses that are complementary with our existing renewable energy and waste services business. The results of operations reflect the period of ownership of the acquired businesses and business development projects. The acquisitions in the section below are not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements individually or in the aggregate and therefore, disclosures of pro forma financial information have not been presented.


8


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
Acquisitions and Business Development
 
Americas
 
Covanta Huntington Limited Partnership
 
In March 2010, for cash consideration of $2.0 million, we acquired a nominal limited partnership interest held by a third party in Covanta Huntington Limited Partnership, our subsidiary which owns and operates an energy-from-waste facility in Huntington, New York.
 
Honolulu Energy-from-Waste Facility
 
We operate and maintain the energy-from-waste facility located in and owned by the City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii. In December 2009, we entered into agreements with the City and County of Honolulu to expand the facility’s waste processing capacity from 2,160 tons per day (“tpd”) to 3,060 tpd and to increase gross electricity capacity from 57 megawatts (“MW”) to 90 MW. The agreements also extend the contract term by 20 years. The $302 million expansion project is a fixed-price construction contract which will be funded and owned by the City and County of Honolulu. Environmental and other project-related permits have been received and expansion construction has commenced.
 
Veolia Energy-from-Waste Businesses
 
We completed the following transactions with Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp. (collectively referred to as the “Veolia EfW Acquisition”). The acquired businesses have a combined capacity of 9,600 tpd. Each of the operations acquired includes a long-term operating contract with their respective municipal client. Six of the energy-from-waste facilities and the transfer station are publicly-owned facilities.
 
  •   Between August 2009 and February 2010, we acquired one transfer station business and seven energy-from-waste businesses located in New York, Pennsylvania, California, Florida and British Columbia. We paid cash consideration of $259.3 million in August 2009 for six energy-from-waste businesses and one transfer station, and in February 2010, we paid $128.3 million for the seventh energy-from-waste business.
  •   The businesses acquired in August 2009 included a majority ownership stake in one energy-from-waste facility and in November 2009, we acquired the remaining ownership stake in that facility for cash consideration of $23.7 million.
 
The cash consideration is subject to certain post-closing adjustments. The preliminary purchase price allocation included $139.8 million of property, plant and equipment, $329.2 million of intangible assets related to long-term operating contracts at each acquired Veolia business except for the facility which we own, $24.7 million related to goodwill and $113.9 million of assumed debt. The acquired intangible assets will be amortized over an average remaining useful facility life of 31 years. The preliminary purchase price allocation of the businesses acquired was based on estimates and assumptions, any changes to which could affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities resulting from this acquisition.
 
Detroit Michigan Energy-from-Waste Facility
 
On June 30, 2009, our long-term operating contract with the Greater Detroit Resource Recovery Authority (“GDRRA”) to operate the 2,832 tpd energy-from-waste facility located in Detroit, Michigan (the “Detroit Facility”) expired. Effective June 30, 2009, we entered into the following transactions, which extended our interest in the Detroit Facility:
 
  •     A newly-formed Covanta subsidiary purchased an undivided 30% owner-participant interest in the Detroit Facility for total cash consideration of $7.9 million.
  •     We entered into an operating and maintenance agreement with owners of the Detroit Facility, pursuant to which we will operate, maintain and provide certain other services for a term of one year. Under this agreement, we will earn a fixed fee and pass through to the owners of the Detroit Facility (or pay from the project revenues) all expenses associated with operations and maintenance of the facility. After paying all expenses, excess net revenues flow to the owners.
  •     The project company entered into a waste disposal agreement with GDRRA pursuant to which we will dispose of the waste of the City of Detroit for a term of at least one year. The term of the waste disposal agreement will automatically renew for successive one year terms unless either party provides advance written notice of termination in accordance with the provisions thereof. In addition, as an owner-participant we have the right, on one or more occasions, to call upon GDRRA to deliver the waste of the City of Detroit to the Detroit Facility at market-based rates. The call right continues for the duration of the participation agreements which expire in 2035, and the City of Detroit stands behind GDRRA’s waste delivery obligation following exercise of the call until 2021.
 
In December 2009, we entered into a short-term steam agreement for the Detroit Facility which remains in effect until June 2010. Negotiations with all stakeholders are in progress for arrangements to continue operating the Detroit Facility beyond June 30, 2010. Securing a long-term steam agreement with appropriate pricing remains an important factor to the overall Detroit Facility long-term economic viability.


9


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
Philadelphia Transfer Stations
 
On May 1, 2009, we acquired two waste transfer stations with combined capacity of 4,500 tpd in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania for cash consideration of $17.5 million, inclusive of final working capital adjustments. The final purchase price allocation included $5.9 million of identifiable intangible assets related primarily to customer relationships and goodwill of $1.3 million.
 
Alternative Energy Technology Development
 
We have entered into various agreements with multiple partners to invest in the development, testing or licensing of new technologies related to the transformation of waste materials into renewable fuels or the generation of energy. Licensing fees and demonstration unit purchases aggregated $1.6 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and, $4.7 million and $6.5 million during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
Harrisburg Energy-from-Waste Facility
 
In February 2008, we entered into a ten year agreement to maintain and operate an 800 tpd energy-from-waste facility located in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. Under the agreement, we have a right of first refusal to purchase the facility. We also have agreed to provide construction management services and to advance up to $25.5 million in funding for certain facility improvements required to enhance facility performance, which are expected to be completed during 2010. The repayment of this funding is guaranteed by the City of Harrisburg, but is otherwise unsecured, and is junior to project bondholders’ rights. We have advanced $21.7 million, of which $19.8 million is outstanding as of March 31, 2010 under this funding arrangement. The first three repayment installments under this funding arrangement have been paid, but the repayment installment of $0.6 million which was due to us on April 1, 2010 has not been paid, and the City of Harrisburg has requested a forbearance period. We are discussing the proposed terms of the forbearance period with representatives of the City and certain other stakeholders. The City of Harrisburg is in a precarious financial condition with substantial obligations, and it has reported consideration of various future options (including seeking bankruptcy protection). We intend to work with the City of Harrisburg and other stakeholders to maintain our position in the project and to protect the recovery of our advance.
 
Hillsborough County Energy-from-Waste Facility
 
In 2005, we entered into agreements with Hillsborough County to implement a 600 tpd expansion of this energy-from-waste facility, and to extend the agreement under which we operate the facility through 2027. During the third quarter of 2009, construction of the expansion was successfully completed and commercial operation commenced.
 
International
 
China Joint Ventures and Energy-from-Waste Facilities
 
On March 24, 2009, Taixing Covanta Yanjiang Cogeneration Co., Ltd. of which we own 85%, entered into a 25 year concession agreement and waste supply agreements to build, own and operate a 350 metric tpd energy-from-waste facility for Taixing Municipality, in Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China. The project, which will be built on the site of our existing coal-fired facility in Taixing, will supply steam to an adjacent industrial park under short-term arrangements. We will continue to operate our existing coal-fired facility. The project company has obtained Rmb 165 million in project financing which, together with available cash from existing operations, will fund construction costs. The Taixing project commenced construction in late 2009.
 
On April 2, 2008, our project joint venture with Chongqing Iron & Steel Company (Group) Limited received an award to build, own, and operate an 1,800 metric tpd energy-from-waste facility for Chengdu Municipality, in Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China. On June 25, 2008, the project’s 25 year waste concession agreement was executed. In connection with this project, we invested $17.1 million for a 49% equity interest in the project company. Construction of the facility has commenced and operation is expected to begin in 2011. The project company has obtained financing for Rmb 480 million for the project, of which 49% is guaranteed by us and 51% is guaranteed by Chongqing Iron & Steel Company (Group) Limited until the project has been constructed and for one year after operations commence.
 
Dublin Joint Venture
 
On September 6, 2007, we entered into agreements to build, own, and operate a 1,700 metric tpd energy-from-waste project serving the City of Dublin, Ireland and surrounding communities at an estimated cost of €350 million. The Dublin project is being developed and will be owned by Dublin Waste to Energy Limited, which we control and co-own with DONG Energy Generation A/S. Dublin Waste to Energy Limited has a 25 year tip fee type contract to provide disposal service for 320,000 metric tons of waste annually, representing approximately 50% of the facility’s processing capacity. The project is expected to sell electricity into the local electricity grid. A portion of the electricity is expected to be eligible for a preferential renewable tariff. We and DONG Energy Generation A/S have committed to provide financing for all phases of the project.


10


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
We expect to fund construction through existing sources of liquidity, and effect project financing as the project progresses. The primary approvals and licenses for the project have been obtained and construction commenced in December 2009. The parties are working to satisfy remaining conditions and obtain remaining approvals for the balance of construction activity, pending receipt of which we expect to curtail project spending.
 
NOTE 4. LOSS PER SHARE
 
Per share data is based on the weighted average number of outstanding shares of our common stock, par value $0.10 per share, during the relevant period. Basic earnings per share are calculated using only the weighted average number of outstanding shares of common stock. Diluted earnings per share computations, as calculated under the treasury stock method, include the weighted average number of shares of additional outstanding common stock issuable for stock options, restricted stock, rights and warrants whether or not currently exercisable. Diluted earnings per share for all the periods presented does not include securities if their effect was anti-dilutive (in thousands, except per share amounts).
 
                 
    For the Three Months
 
    Ended March 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
Net loss attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation
  $ (7,233 )   $ (651 )
                 
Basic earnings per share:
               
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding
    153,894       153,467  
                 
Basic loss per share
  $ (0.05 )   $  
                 
Diluted earnings per share:
               
Weighted average basic common shares outstanding
    153,894       153,467  
Dilutive effect of stock options
           
Dilutive effect of restricted stock
           
Dilutive effect of convertible debentures
           
Dilutive effect of warrants
           
                 
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding
    153,894       153,467  
                 
Diluted loss per share
  $ (0.05 )   $  
                 
Stock options excluded from the weighted average dilutive common shares outstanding because their inclusion would have been antidilutive
    1,915       2,026  
                 
Restricted stock awards excluded from the weighted average dilutive common shares outstanding because their inclusion would have been antidilutive
    1,327       1,128  
                 
Restricted stock units excluded from the weighted average dilutive common shares outstanding because their inclusion would have been antidilutive
    986        
                 
Warrants excluded from the weighted average dilutive common shares outstanding because their inclusion would have been antidilutive
    24,803        
                 
 
On May 22, 2009, we entered into privately negotiated warrant transactions in connection with the issuance of 3.25% Cash Convertible Senior Notes due 2014. These warrants could have a dilutive effect to the extent that the price of our common stock exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrants. As of March 31, 2010, the warrants did not have a dilutive effect on earnings per share.
 
On January 31, 2007, we issued 1.00% Senior Convertible Debentures due 2027 (“Debentures”). The Debentures are convertible under certain circumstances if the closing sale price of our common stock exceeds a specified conversion price before February 1, 2025. As of March 31, 2010, the Debentures did not have a dilutive effect on earnings per share.
 
NOTE 5. FINANCIAL INFORMATION BY BUSINESS SEGMENTS
 
Our reportable segments are Americas and International. The Americas segment is comprised of waste and energy services operations primarily in the United States and Canada. The International segment is comprised of waste and energy


11


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
services operations in other markets, currently the United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy, China, The Philippines, India, and Bangladesh. The results of our reportable segments are as follows (in thousands):
 
                                 
    Reportable Segments              
    Americas     International     All Other(1)     Total  
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010:
                               
Operating revenues
  $ 357,287     $ 54,774     $ 4,734     $ 416,795  
Operating income (loss)
    1,727       (247 )     491       1,971  
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009:
                               
Operating revenues
  $ 313,173     $ 41,537     $ 4,050     $ 358,760  
Operating income (loss)
    4,435       (859 )     (384 )     3,192  
 
(1) All other is comprised of our insurance subsidiaries’ operations.
 
NOTE 6. CHANGES IN CAPITALIZATION
 
Short-Term Liquidity
 
The credit facilities are comprised of a $300 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Loan Facility”), a $320 million funded letter of credit facility (the “Funded L/C Facility”), and a $650 million term loan (the “Term Loan Facility”) (collectively referred to as the “Credit Facilities”). As of March 31, 2010, we were in compliance with all required covenants and had available credit for liquidity as follows (in thousands):
 
                                 
    Total
          Outstanding Letters
       
    Available
          of Credit as of
    Available as of
 
    Under Facility     Maturing     March 31, 2010     March 31, 2010  
 
Revolving Loan Facility(1)
  $  300,000       2013     $  —     $  300,000  
Funded L/C Facility
  $  320,000       2014     $  295,339     $  24,661  
 
(1) Up to $200 million of which may be utilized for letters of credit.
 
Long-Term Debt
 
Long-term debt is as follows (in thousands):
 
                 
    As of  
    March 31,
    December 31,
 
    2010     2009  
 
3.25% Cash Convertible Senior Notes due 2014
  $ 460,000     $ 460,000  
Debt discount related to Cash Convertible Senior Notes
    (107,359 )     (112,475 )
Cash conversion option derivative at fair value
    89,785       128,603  
                 
3.25% Cash Convertible Senior Notes, net
    442,426       476,128  
                 
                 
1.00% Senior Convertible Debentures due 2027
    373,750       373,750  
Debt discount related to Convertible Debentures
    (39,988 )     (45,042 )
                 
1.00% Senior Convertible Debentures, net
    333,762       328,708  
                 
                 
Term Loan Facility due 2014
    630,500       632,125  
Other long-term debt
    512       745  
                 
Total
    1,407,200       1,437,706  
Less: current portion
    (6,801 )     (7,027 )
                 
Total long-term debt
  $ 1,400,399     $ 1,430,679  
                 
 
3.25% Cash Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 (“Notes”)
 
Under limited circumstances, the Notes are convertible by the holders thereof into cash only, based on an initial conversion rate of 53.9185 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes (which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $18.55 per share) subject to certain customary adjustments as provided in the indenture for the Notes. We will not deliver common stock (or any other securities) upon conversion under any circumstances.
 
For specific criteria related to contingent interest, conversion or redemption features of the Notes and details related to the cash conversion option, cash convertible note hedge and warrants related to the Notes, refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K.


12


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
For details related to the fair value for the contingent interest feature, cash conversion option, and cash convertible note hedge related to the Notes, see Note 12. Derivative Instruments.
 
1.00% Senior Convertible Debentures due 2027
 
Under limited circumstances, prior to February 1, 2025, the Debentures are convertible by the holders into cash and shares of our common stock, if any, initially based on a conversion rate of 35.4610 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Debentures, (which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $28.20 per share) or 13,253,867 issuable shares. As of March 31, 2010, if the Debentures were converted, no shares would have been issued since the trading price of our common stock was below the conversion price of the Debentures.
 
For specific criteria related to contingent interest, conversion or redemption features of the Debentures, refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K.
 
For details related to the fair value for the contingent interest feature related to the Debentures, see Note 12. Derivative Instruments.
 
Debt discount for the Debentures and the Notes
 
The debt discount related to the Debentures and the debt discount related to the Notes is accreted over their respective terms and recognized as non-cash convertible debt related expense.
 
The following table details the amount of the accretion of debt discount as of March 31, 2010 included or expected to be included in our condensed consolidated financial statements for each of the periods indicated (in millions):
 
                                                 
    Three Months ended
  Remainder of
  For the Years Ended
    March 31, 2010   2010   2011   2012   2013   2014
 
Non-cash convertible debt discount expense for the Notes
  $ 5.1     $ 16.2     $ 23.5     $ 26.0     $ 28.8     $ 12.9  
Non-cash convertible debt discount expense for the Debentures (1)
  $ 5.1     $ 15.7     $ 22.3     $ 1.9     $     $  
 
(1) The Debentures mature on February 1, 2027. At our option, the Debentures are subject to redemption at any time on or after February 1, 2012, in whole or in part. In addition, holders may require us to repurchase their Debentures on February 1, 2012, February 1, 2017, and February 1, 2022, in whole or in part. For purposes of the accretion of the debt discount related to the Debentures, we have assumed that the Debentures will be repurchased pursuant to the holders’ option on February 1, 2012. For information detailing the redemption features of the Debentures, see Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K.
 
Equity
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we granted 725,693 restricted stock awards. For information related to stock-based award plans, see Note 10. Stock-Based Compensation. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we did not repurchase shares of our common stock.
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, we repurchased 139,762 shares of our common stock in connection with tax withholdings for vested stock awards.
 
NOTE 7. INCOME TAXES
 
We record our interim tax provision based upon our estimated annual effective tax rate and account for the tax effects of discrete events in the period in which they occur. We file a federal consolidated income tax return with our eligible subsidiaries. Our federal consolidated income tax return also includes the taxable results of certain grantor trusts described below.
 
We currently estimate our annual effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 to be approximately 42.4%. The increase in the estimated annual effective tax rate for 2010 was primarily a result of the sunset of eligibility for production tax credits at some of our biomass facilities. We review the annual effective tax rate on a quarterly basis as projections are revised and laws are enacted. The effective income tax rate was 48.4% and 39.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The liability for uncertain tax positions, exclusive of interest and penalties, was $131.6 million and $131.2 million as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Liabilities for uncertain tax positions increased by approximately $0.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010. Included in the balance of unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2010 are potential benefits of $115.1 million that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate.
 
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we recognized a benefit of $1.7 million and an expense of $0.03 million, respectively, of interest and penalties on uncertain tax positions. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,


13


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
we had accrued interest and penalties associated with liabilities for unrecognized tax positions of $6.8 million and $8.4 million, respectively. We continue to reflect interest accrued on uncertain tax positions and penalties as part of the tax provision.
 
As issues are examined by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and state auditors, we may decide to adjust the existing liability for uncertain tax positions for issues that were not deemed an exposure at the time we adopted accounting standards related to the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. Accordingly, we will continue to monitor the results of audits and adjust the liability as needed. Federal income tax returns for Covanta Energy are closed for the years through 2003. However, to the extent NOLs are utilized from earlier years, federal income tax returns for Covanta Holding Corporation, formerly known as Danielson Holding Corporation, are still open. State income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of three to five years after the filing of the respective return. The state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states. We have various state income tax returns in the process of examination, administrative appeals or litigation.
 
Our NOLs predominantly arose from our predecessor insurance entities (which were subsidiaries of our predecessor, which was formerly named Mission Insurance Group, Inc., “Mission”). These Mission insurance entities have been in state insolvency proceedings in California and Missouri since the late 1980’s. The amount of NOLs available to us will be reduced by any taxable income or increased by any taxable losses generated by current members of our consolidated tax group, which include grantor trusts associated with the Mission insurance entities.
 
While we cannot predict with certainty what amounts, if any, may be includable in taxable income as a result of the final administration of these grantor trusts, substantial actions toward such final administration have been taken and we believe that neither arrangements with the California Commissioner nor the final administration by the Missouri Director will result in a material reduction in available NOLs.
 
We had consolidated federal NOLs estimated to be approximately $545 million for federal income tax purposes as of December 31, 2009, based on the tax returns as filed. The federal NOLs will expire in various amounts from December 31, 2011 through December 31, 2028, if not used. Current forecasts indicate we will utilize consolidated federal NOLs in 2010 which will otherwise expire in 2011. In addition to the consolidated federal NOLs, as of December 31, 2009, we had state NOL carryforwards of approximately $264.7 million, which expire between 2011 and 2027, capital loss carryforwards of $0.2 million expiring in 2013, and additional federal credit carryforwards of $47.5 million. These deferred tax assets are offset by a valuation allowance of $20.5 million.
 
In March, 2010, U.S. Federal legislation enacted the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) as well as a companion bill, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (“the Reconciliation Act”). As a result of enactment of the PPACA and the Reconciliation Act (collectively, the “Acts”), employers receiving the Medicare Part D subsidy will recognize a deferred tax charge for the reduction in deductibility of postretirement prescription drug coverage for eligible retirees. The resulting deferred tax charge from enactment of the Acts was recognized in the results for March 31, 2010. This charge was not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
For further information, refer to Note 16. Income Taxes of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K.
 
NOTE 8. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
 
Operating Revenues
 
The components of waste and service revenues are as follows (in thousands):
 
                 
    For the Three Months
 
    Ended March 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
Waste and service revenues unrelated to project debt
  $ 220,757     $ 186,680  
Revenue earned explicitly to service project debt-principal
    16,392       13,719  
Revenue earned explicitly to service project debt-interest
    4,851       5,870  
                 
Total waste and service revenues
  $ 242,000     $ 206,269  
                 
 
Under some of our service agreements, we bill municipalities fees to service project debt (principal and interest). The amounts billed are based on the actual principal amortization schedule for the project bonds. Regardless of the amounts billed to client communities relating to project debt principal, we recognize revenue earned explicitly to service project debt principal on a levelized basis over the term of the applicable agreement. In the beginning of the agreement, principal billed is less than the amount of levelized revenue recognized related to principal and we record an unbilled service receivable asset. At some point during the agreement, the amount we bill will exceed the levelized revenue and the unbilled service receivable begins to reduce, and ultimately becomes nil at the end of the contract.


14


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
In the final year(s) of a contract, cash may be utilized from available debt service reserve accounts to pay remaining principal amounts due to project bondholders and such amounts are no longer billed to or paid by municipalities. Generally, therefore, in the last year of the applicable agreement, little or no cash is received from municipalities relating to project debt, while our levelized service revenue continues to be recognized until the expiration date of the term of the agreement.
 
Our independent power production facilities in India generate electricity and steam explicitly for specific purchasers and as such, these agreements are considered lease arrangements. Electricity and steam sales included lease income from our international business of $43.5 million and $32.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
Operating Costs
 
Pass through costs
 
Pass through costs are costs for which we receive a direct contractually committed reimbursement from the municipal client which sponsors an energy-from-waste project. These costs generally include utility charges, insurance premiums, ash residue transportation and disposal and certain chemical costs. These costs are recorded net of municipal client reimbursements in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Total pass through costs were $20.5 million and $14.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
Other operating expenses
 
The components of other operating expenses are as follows (in thousands):
 
                 
    For the Three Months
 
    Ended March 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
Construction costs
  $ 20,485     $ 5,346  
Insurance subsidiary operating expenses (1)
    4,070       3,813  
Foreign exchange (gain) loss
    (1,008 )     505  
Other
    (37 )     80  
                 
Total other operating expenses
  $ 23,510     $ 9,744  
                 
 
(1) Insurance subsidiary operating expenses are primarily comprised of increased incurred but not reported loss reserves, loss adjustment expenses and policy acquisition costs.
 
Amortization of waste, service and energy contracts
 
Our waste, service and energy contracts are intangible assets and liabilities relating to long-term operating contracts at acquired facilities and are recorded upon acquisition at their estimated fair market values based upon discounted cash flows. Intangible assets and liabilities are amortized using the straight line method over their remaining useful lives. The following table details the amount of the actual/estimated amortization expense and contra-expense associated with these intangible assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2010 included or expected to be included in our condensed consolidated statement of income for each of the years indicated (in thousands):
 
                 
    Waste, Service and
    Waste and Service
 
    Energy Contracts
    Contracts
 
    (Amortization Expense)     (Contra-Expense)  
 
Three Months ended March 31, 2010
  $ 10,278     $ (3,166 )
                 
Remainder of 2010
  $ 30,258     $ (9,555 )
2011
    37,730       (12,408 )
2012
    35,636       (12,412 )
2013
    32,026       (12,390 )
2014
    29,135       (12,500 )
2015
    25,800       (8,188 )
Thereafter
    310,886       (30,734 )
                 
Total
  $ 501,471     $ (98,187 )
                 


15


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
Non-Cash Convertible Debt Related Expense
 
The components of non-cash convertible debt related expense are as follows (in thousands):
 
                 
    For the Three Months
 
    Ended March 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
Debt discount accretion related to the Debentures
  $ 5,054     $ 4,702  
Debt discount accretion related to the Notes
    5,116        
Fair value changes related to the Note Hedge
    36,896        
Fair value changes related to the Cash Conversion Option
    (38,819 )      
                 
Total non-cash convertible debt related expense
  $ 8,247     $ 4,702  
                 
 
Comprehensive (Loss) Income
 
The components of comprehensive (loss) income are as follows (in thousands):
 
                 
    Three Months Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
Comprehensive (loss) income, net of income taxes:
               
Net loss attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation
  $ (7,233 )   $ (651 )
                 
Foreign currency translation
    (1,391 )     (1,801 )
Pension and other postretirement plan unrecognized net loss
    (74 )     (42 )
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities
    176       (284 )
                 
Other comprehensive loss attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation
    (1,289 )     (2,127 )
                 
Comprehensive loss attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation
  $ (8,522 )   $ (2,778 )
                 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
  $ 2,500     $ 1,380  
Other comprehensive gain (loss) — Foreign currency translation
    965       (530 )
                 
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
  $ 3,465     $ 850  
                 
 
Goodwill
 
The following table details the changes in the carrying value of goodwill (in thousands):
 
         
    Total  
 
Balance as of December 31, 2009
  $ 202,996  
Veolia EfW Acquisition (See Note 3)
    24,738  
         
Balance as of March 31, 2010
  $ 227,734  
         
 
NOTE 9. BENEFIT OBLIGATIONS
 
Pension and Other Benefit Obligations
 
The components of net periodic benefit costs are as follows (in thousands):
 
                                 
          Other Post-
 
          Retirement
 
    Pension Benefits     Benefits  
    For the Three Months Ended March 31,  
    2010     2009     2010     2009  
 
Service cost
  $     $     $     $  
Interest cost
    1,056       1,197       119       122  
Expected return on plan assets
    (1,237 )     (975 )            
Amortization of net prior service cost
    (82 )     19              
Amortization of actuarial gain
    (15 )     (46 )     (25 )     (37 )
                                 
Net periodic benefit cost
  $ (278 )   $ 195     $ 94     $ 85  
                                 


16


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
Defined Contribution Plans
 
Substantially all of our employees in the United States are eligible to participate in defined contribution plans we sponsor. Our costs related to all defined contribution plans were $4.9 million and $4.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
NOTE 10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
 
Compensation expense related to our stock-based awards totaled $3.5 million and $3.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we awarded certain employees 725,693 shares of restricted stock awards. The restricted stock awards will be expensed over the requisite service period, subject to an assumed ten percent forfeiture rate. The terms of the restricted stock awards include vesting provisions based solely on continued service. If the service criteria are satisfied, the awards vest during March of 2011, 2012 and 2013.
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we adopted a Growth Equity Plan, which is to be used for awards pursuant to our Equity Award Plan for Employees and Officers. The Growth Equity Plan provides for the award of restricted stock units (“RSU”) to certain employees in connection with specified growth-based acquisitions that have been completed or development projects that have commenced. We awarded certain employees 1,085,040 shares of restricted stock units under the Growth Equity Plan.
 
The Growth Equity Plan provides that as of the award date of the restricted stock units, the Compensation Committee shall determine the net present value of cash flows for the applicable acquisitions or development projects (“Projected NPV”). Vesting of such awards will not occur until at least three years have passed following an acquisition and upon the later of three years from the grant date or one year following the commencement of commercial operations for development projects. Upon the vesting date, the Compensation Committee will re-calculate the net present values from cash flows (“Bring Down NPV”). If the ratio of the Bring Down NPV to the Projected NPV is greater than 95% all of the RSUs related to the particular project will vest. If the ratio is less than 95%, the number of RSUs originally issued will be proportionately reduced.
 
As of March 31, 2010, we had approximately $18.6 million, $12.0 million and $2.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to our unvested restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, and unvested stock options, respectively. We expect this compensation expense to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2 years for our unvested restricted stock awards, approximately 4 years for our unvested restricted stock units and approximately 2 years for our unvested stock options.
 
NOTE 11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments:
 
  •     For cash and cash equivalents, restricted funds, and marketable securities, the carrying value of these amounts is a reasonable estimate of their fair value. The fair value of restricted funds held in trust is based on quoted market prices of the investments held by the trustee.
  •     Fair values for long-term debt and project debt are determined using quoted market prices.
  •     The fair value of the Note Hedge and the Cash Conversion Option are determined using an option pricing model based on observable inputs such as implied volatility, risk free rate, and other factors. The fair value of the Note Hedge is adjusted to reflect counterparty risk of non-performance, and is based on the counterparty’s credit spread in the credit derivatives market. The contingent interest features related to the Debentures and the Notes are valued quarterly using the present value of expected cash flow models incorporating the probabilities of the contingent events occurring.
 
The estimated fair value amounts have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is necessarily required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that we would realize in a current market exchange. The fair-value estimates presented herein are based on pertinent information available to us as of March 31, 2010. However, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since March 31, 2010, and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.


17


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
The following table presents information about the fair value measurement of our assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2010:
 
                                         
                Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using  
                Quoted Prices in
          Significant
 
    As of March 31, 2010     Active Markets for
    Significant Other
    Unobservable
 
Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
  Carrying
    Estimated
    Identical Assets
    Observable Inputs
    Inputs
 
on a Recurring Basis:   Amount     Fair Value     (Level 1)     (Level 2)     (Level 3)  
    (In thousands)  
Assets:
                                       
Cash and cash equivalents:
                                       
Bank deposits and certificates of deposit
  $ 77,615     $ 77,615     $ 77,615     $     $  
Money market funds
    251,748       251,748       251,748              
                                         
Total cash and cash equivalents:
    329,363       329,363       329,363              
Restricted funds held in trust:
                                       
Bank deposits and certificates of deposit
    23,805       23,791       23,791              
Money market funds
    147,809       147,842       147,842              
U.S. Treasury/Agency obligations (a)
    41,552       41,552       41,552              
State and municipal obligations
    10,253       10,253       10,253              
Commercial paper/Guaranteed investment contracts/ Repurchase agreements
    52,660       52,660       52,660              
                                         
Total restricted funds held in trust:
    276,079       276,098       276,098              
Restricted funds — other:
                                       
Bank deposits and certificates of deposit (b)
    20,253       20,244       20,244              
Money market funds (c)
    7,557       7,557       7,557              
U.S. Agency obligations (c)
    1,629       1,629       1,629              
                                         
Total restricted funds other:
    29,439       29,430       29,430              
Investments:
                                       
Marketable securities available for sale (c)
    300       300       300              
Mutual and bond funds (b)
    2,214       2,343       2,343              
Investments available for sale:
                                       
U.S. Treasury/Agency obligations (d)
    14,810       14,810       14,810              
Residential mortgage-backed securities (d)
    3,197       3,197       3,197              
Corporate investments (d)
    12,302       12,302       12,302              
Other government obligations (d)
    1,326       1,326       1,326              
Equity securities (c)
    897       897       897              
                                         
Total investments:
    35,046       35,175       35,175              
Derivative Asset — Note Hedge
    86,647       86,647             86,647        
                                         
Total assets:
  $ 756,574     $ 756,713     $ 670,066     $ 86,647     $  
                                         
Liabilities:
                                       
Derivative Liability — Cash Conversion Option
  $ 89,785     $ 89,785     $     $ 89,785     $  
Derivative Liabilities — Contingent interest features of the Debentures and Notes
    0       0             0        
                                         
Total liabilities:
  $ 89,785     $ 89,785     $     $ 89,785     $  
                                         
Financial Instruments Recorded at Carrying
Amount:
                                       
                                         
Assets:
                                       
Accounts receivables (e)
  $ 288,984     $ 288,984                          
Liabilities:
                                       
Long-term debt (excluding Cash Conversion Option)
  $ 1,317,415     $ 1,301,036                          
Project debt
  $ 955,908     $ 972,324                          
 
(a) The U.S. Treasury/Agency obligations in restricted funds held in trust are primarily comprised of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation securities at fair value.
(b) Included in other noncurrent assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
(c) Included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
(d) Included in investments in fixed maturities at market in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
(e) Includes $30.6 million of noncurrent receivables in other noncurrent assets.
 
Investments
 
Our insurance subsidiaries’ fixed maturity debt and equity securities portfolio are classified as “available-for-sale” and are carried at fair value. Equity securities that are traded on a national securities exchange are stated at the last reported sales price on the day of valuation. Debt securities values are determined by third party matrix pricing based on the last days trading activity. Changes in fair values are credited or charged directly to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (“AOCI”) in the condensed consolidated statements of equity as unrealized gains or losses, respectively. Investment gains or losses realized on the sale of securities are determined using the specific identification method. Realized gains and losses are recognized in the condensed consolidated statements of income based on the amortized cost of fixed maturities and the cost basis for equity securities on the date of trade, subject to any previous adjustments for other-than-temporary declines.


18


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
Other-than-temporary declines in fair value are recorded as realized losses in the condensed consolidated statements of income to the extent they relate to credit losses, and to AOCI to the extent they are related to other factors. The cost basis of the security is also reduced. We consider the following factors in determining whether declines in the fair value of securities are other-than-temporary:
 
  •     the significance of the decline in fair value compared to the cost basis;
  •     the time period during which there has been a significant decline in fair value;
  •     whether the unrealized loss is credit-driven or a result of changes in market interest rates;
  •     a fundamental analysis of the business prospects and financial condition of the issuer; and
  •     our ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.
 
Other investments, such as investments in companies in which we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence, are carried at the lower of cost or estimated realizable value.
 
The cost or amortized cost, unrealized gains, unrealized losses and the fair value of our investments categorized by type of security, were as follows (in thousands):
 
                                 
    As of March 31, 2010  
    Cost or
    Unrealized
    Unrealized
    Fair
 
    Amortized Cost     Gain     Loss     Value  
 
Current investments:
                               
Fixed maturities
  $ 300     $     $     $ 300  
Equity securities — insurance business
    732       168       3       897  
                                 
Total current investments
  $ 1,032     $ 168     $ 3     $ 1,197  
                                 
Noncurrent investments:
                               
Fixed maturities — insurance business:
                               
U.S. government obligations
  $ 315     $ 2     $     $ 317  
U.S. government agencies
    14,274       245       26       14,493  
Residential mortgage-backed
    3,109       88             3,197  
Corporate
    11,932       410       40       12,302  
Other government obligations
    1,342             16       1,326  
                                 
Total fixed maturities — insurance business
    30,972       745       82       31,635  
Mutual and bond funds
    2,214       129             2,343  
                                 
Total noncurrent investments
  $ 33,186     $ 874     $ 82     $ 33,978  
                                 
 
                                 
    As of December 31, 2009  
    Cost or
    Unrealized
    Unrealized
    Fair
 
    Amortized Cost     Gain     Loss     Value  
 
Current investments:
                               
Fixed maturities
  $ 300     $     $     $ 300  
Equity securities — insurance business
    732       150       11       871  
                                 
Total current investments
  $ 1,032     $ 150     $ 11     $ 1,171  
                                 
Noncurrent investments:
                               
Fixed maturities — insurance business:
                               
U.S. government obligations
  $ 315     $ 6     $     $ 321  
U.S. government agencies
    13,157       257       9       13,405  
Residential mortgage-backed
    5,150       74       21       5,203  
Corporate
    8,878       337       2       9,213  
                                 
Total fixed maturities — insurance business
    27,500       674       32       28,142  
Mutual and bond funds
    1,802       303             2,105  
                                 
Total noncurrent investments
  $ 29,302     $ 977     $ 32     $ 30,247  
                                 


19


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
The following table sets forth a summary of temporarily impaired investments held by our insurance subsidiary (in thousands):
 
                                 
    As of March 31, 2010     As of December 31, 2009  
    Fair
    Unrealized
    Fair
    Unrealized
 
Description of Investments
  Value     Losses     Value     Losses  
 
U.S. Treasury and other direct U.S. Government obligations
  $ 1,974     $ 26     $ 341     $ 9  
Federal agency mortgage-backed securities
                1,503       21  
Other government obligations
    1,326       16              
Corporate bonds
    3,029       40       100       2  
                                 
Total fixed maturities
    6,329       82       1,944       32  
Equity securities
    121       3       94       11  
                                 
Total temporarily impaired investments
  $ 6,450     $ 85     $ 2,038     $ 43  
                                 
 
The number of U.S. Treasury and federal agency obligations, mortgage-backed securities, other government obligations, and corporate bonds temporarily impaired are 2, 0, 2, and 6, respectively. As of March 31, 2010, all of the temporarily impaired fixed maturity investments had maturities greater than 12 months.
 
Our fixed maturities held by our insurance subsidiary include mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, collectively (“MBS”) representing 10.1%, and 18.5% of the total fixed maturities as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Our MBS holdings are issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), or the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) all of which are rated “AAA” by Moody’s Investors Services. MBS and callable bonds, in contrast to other bonds, are more sensitive to market value declines in a rising interest rate environment than to market value increases in a declining interest rate environment.
 
The expected maturities of fixed maturity securities, by amortized cost and fair value are shown below (in thousands):
 
                 
    As of March 31, 2010  
    Amortized Cost     Fair Value  
 
Available-for-sale:
               
One year or less
  $ 11,331     $ 11,535  
Over one year to five years
    15,900       16,398  
Over five years to ten years
    2,391       2,373  
More than ten years
    1,350       1,329  
                 
Total fixed maturities
  $ 30,972     $ 31,635  
                 
 
The following reflects the change in net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities included as a separate component of accumulated AOCI in the condensed consolidated statements of equity (in thousands):
 
                 
    For the Three Months
 
    Ended March 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
Fixed maturities, net
  $ 21     $ (97 )
Equity securities, net
    26       (145 )
Mutual and bond funds
    129       (42 )
                 
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on investments
  $ 176     $ (284 )
                 
 
The components of net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities consist of the following (in thousands):
 
                 
    For the Three Months
 
    Ended March 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
Net unrealized holding gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities arising during the period
  $ 176     $ (290 )
Reclassification adjustment for net realized losses on available-for-sale securities included in net income
          6  
                 
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities
  $ 176     $ (284 )
                 


20


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
NOTE 12. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
 
The following disclosures summarize the fair value of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments in the condensed consolidated balance sheets and the effect of changes in fair value related to those derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the condensed consolidated statements of income.
 
                     
Derivative Instruments Not Designated
      Fair Value as of  
As Hedging Instruments   Balance Sheet Location   March 31, 2010     December 31, 2009  
        (In thousands)  
 
Asset Derivatives:
                   
Note Hedge
  Other noncurrent assets   $ 86,647     $ 123,543  
Liability Derivatives:
                   
Cash Conversion Option
  Long-term debt   $ 89,785     $ 128,603  
Contingent interest features of the Debentures and Notes
  Other noncurrent liabilities   $ 0     $ 0  
 
                     
Effect on Income of
      Amount of Gain or (Loss)
 
Derivative Instruments
  Location of Gain or (Loss)
  Recognized in Income on Derivative
 
Not Designated
  Recognized in Income on
  For the Three Months Ended March 31,  
As Hedging Instruments   Derivatives   2010     2009  
        (In thousands)  
 
Note Hedge
  Non-cash convertible debt related expense   $ (36,896 )   $  
Cash Conversion Option
  Non-cash convertible debt related expense     38,818        
Contingent interest features of the Debentures and Notes
  Non-cash convertible debt related expense            
                     
Effect on income of derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments
      $ 1,922     $  
                     
 
Cash Conversion Option, Note Hedge and Contingent Interest features related to the 3.25% Cash Convertible Senior Notes
 
The Cash Conversion Option is a derivative instrument which is recorded at fair value quarterly with any change in fair value being recognized in our condensed consolidated income statement as non-cash convertible debt related expense. The Note Hedge is accounted for as a derivative instrument and as such, is recorded at fair value quarterly with any change in fair value being recognized in our condensed consolidated income statement as non-cash convertible debt related expense.
 
We expect the gain or loss associated with changes to the valuation of the Note Hedge to substantially offset the gain or loss associated with changes to the valuation of the Cash Conversion Option. However, they will not be completely offsetting as a result of changes in the credit valuation adjustment related to the Note Hedge. Our most significant credit exposure arises from the Note Hedge. The fair value of the Note Hedge reflects the maximum loss that would be incurred should the Option Counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the Note Hedge agreement. For specific details related to the Cash Conversion Option, Note Hedge and contingent interest features of the Notes, refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K.
 
Contingent Interest feature of the 1.00% Senior Convertible Debentures
 
The contingent interest feature in the Debentures is an embedded derivative instrument. The first contingent cash interest payment period would not commence until February 1, 2012. For specific criteria related to the contingent interest features of the Debentures, refer to Note 11 and Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K.
 
NOTE 13. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
 
We hold a 26% investment in Quezon Power, Inc. (“Quezon”). We are party to an agreement with Quezon in which we assumed responsibility for the operation and maintenance of Quezon’s coal-fired electricity generation facility. Accordingly, 26% of the net income of Quezon is reflected in our statements of income and as such, 26% of the revenue earned under the terms of the operation and maintenance agreement is eliminated against Equity in Net Income from Unconsolidated Investments. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, we collected $7.6 million and $5.2 million, respectively, for the operation and maintenance of the facility. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the net amount due to Quezon was $4.3 million and $5.0 million, respectively, which represents advance payments received from Quezon for operation and maintenance costs.


21


Table of Contents

COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Continued)
 
NOTE 14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
We and/or our subsidiaries are party to a number of claims, lawsuits and pending actions, most of which are routine and all of which are incidental to our business. We assess the likelihood of potential losses on an ongoing basis and when losses are considered probable and reasonably estimable, record as a loss an estimate of the ultimate outcome. If we can only estimate the range of a possible loss, an amount representing the low end of the range of possible outcomes is recorded. The final consequences of these proceedings are not presently determinable with certainty.
 
Environmental Matters
 
Our operations are subject to environmental regulatory laws and environmental remediation laws. Although our operations are occasionally subject to proceedings and orders pertaining to emissions into the environment and other environmental violations, which may result in fines, penalties, damages or other sanctions, we believe that we are in substantial compliance with existing environmental laws and regulations.
 
We may be identified, along with other entities, as being among parties potentially responsible for contribution to costs associated with the correction and remediation of environmental conditions at disposal sites subject to federal and/or analogous state laws. In certain instances, we may be exposed to joint and several liabilities for remedial action or damages. Our ultimate liability in connection with such environmental claims will depend on many factors, including our volumetric share of waste, the total cost of remediation, and the financial viability of other companies that also sent waste to a given site and, in the case of divested operations, its contractual arrangement with the purchaser of such operations.
 
The potential costs related to the matters described below and the possible impact on future operations are uncertain due in part to the complexity of governmental laws and regulations and their interpretations, the varying costs and effectiveness of cleanup technologies, the uncertain level of insurance or other types of recovery and the questionable level of our responsibility. Although the ultimate outcome and expense of any litigation, including environmental remediation, is uncertain, we believe that the following proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
 
In August 2004, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) notified Covanta Essex Company (“Essex”) that it was a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) for Superfund response actions in the Lower Passaic River Study Area, referred to as “LPRSA,” a 17 mile stretch of river in northern New Jersey. Essex is one of at least 73 PRPs named thus far that have joined the LPRSA PRP group. On May 8, 2007, EPA and the PRP group entered into an Administrative Order on Consent by which the PRP group is undertaking a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (“Study”) of the LPRSA under EPA oversight. The cost to complete the Study is estimated at $52.5 million, in addition to EPA oversight costs. Essex’s share of the Study costs to date are not material to its financial position and results of operations; however, the Study costs are exclusive of any costs that may be required of PRPs to remediate the LPRSA or costs associated with natural resource damages to the LPRSA that may be assessed against PRPs. On February 4, 2009, Essex and over 300 other PRPs were named as third-party defendants in a suit brought by the State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (“NJDEP”) in Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County against Occidental Chemical Corporation and certain related entities (“Occidental”) with respect to alleged contamination of the LPRSA by Occidental. The Occidental third-party complaint seeks contribution from the third-party defendants with respect to any award to NJDEP of damages against Occidental in the matter. Considering the history of industrial and other discharges into the LPRSA from other sources, including named PRPs, Essex believes any releases to the LPRSA from its facility to be de minimis in comparison; however, it is not possible at this time to predict that outcome with certainty or to estimate Essex’s ultimate liability in the matter, including for LPRSA remedial costs and/or natural resource damages and/or contribution claims made by Occidental and/or other PRPs.
 
Other Matters
 
Other commitments as of March 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
 
                         
    Commitments Expiring by Period  
          Less Than
    More Than
 
    Total     One Year     One Year  
 
Letters of credit
  $ 302,227     $ 5,542     $ 296,685  
Surety bonds
    111,471             111,471  
                         
Total other commitments — net
  $ 413,698     $ 5,542     $ 408,156  
                         
 
The letters of credit were issued under various credit facilities (primarily the Funded L/C Facility) to secure our performance under various contractual undertakings related to our domestic and international projects or to secure obligations under our insurance program. Each letter of credit relating to a project is required to be maintained in effect for the period specified in related project contracts, and generally may be drawn if it is not renewed prior to expiration of that period.


22


Table of Contents

 
COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (Concluded)
 
We believe that we will be able to fully perform under our contracts to which these existing letters of credit relate, and that it is unlikely that letters of credit would be drawn because of a default of our performance obligations. If any of these letters of credit were to be drawn by the beneficiary, the amount drawn would be immediately repayable by us to the issuing bank. If we do not immediately repay such amounts drawn under these letters of credit, unreimbursed amounts would be treated under the Credit Facilities as additional term loans in the case of letters of credit issued under the Funded L/C Facility, or as revolving loans in the case of letters of credit issued under the Revolving Loan Facility.
 
The surety bonds listed on the table above relate primarily to performance obligations ($100.7 million) and support for closure obligations of various energy projects when such projects cease operating ($10.8 million). Were these bonds to be drawn upon, we would have a contractual obligation to indemnify the surety company.
 
We have certain contingent obligations related to the Notes. These are:
 
  •     holders may require us to repurchase their Notes, if a fundamental change occurs; and
  •     holders may exercise their conversion rights upon the occurrence of certain events, which would require us to pay the conversion settlement amount in cash.
 
For specific criteria related to contingent interest, conversion or redemption features of the Notes, see Note 6. Changes in Capitalization.
 
We have certain contingent obligations related to the Debentures. These are:
 
  •     holders may require us to repurchase their Debentures on February 1, 2012, February 1, 2017 and February 1, 2022;
  •     holders may require us to repurchase their Debentures, if a fundamental change occurs; and
  •     holders may exercise their conversion rights upon the occurrence of certain events, which would require us to pay the conversion settlement amount in cash and/or our common stock.
 
For specific criteria related to contingent interest, conversion or redemption features of the Debentures, refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K.
 
We have issued or are party to guarantees and related contractual support obligations undertaken pursuant to agreements to construct and operate waste and energy facilities. For some projects, such performance guarantees include obligations to repay certain financial obligations if the project revenues are insufficient to do so, or to obtain or guarantee financing for a project. With respect to our businesses, we have issued guarantees to municipal clients and other parties that our subsidiaries will perform in accordance with contractual terms, including, where required, the payment of damages or other obligations. Additionally, damages payable under such guarantees for our energy-from-waste facilities could expose us to recourse liability on project debt. If we must perform under one or more of such guarantees, our liability for damages upon contract termination would be reduced by funds held in trust and proceeds from sales of the facilities securing the project debt and is presently not estimable. Depending upon the circumstances giving rise to such damages, the contractual terms of the applicable contracts, and the contract counterparty’s choice of remedy at the time a claim against a guarantee is made, the amounts owed pursuant to one or more of such guarantees could be greater than our then-available sources of funds. To date, we have not incurred material liabilities under such guarantees.


23


Table of Contents

 
Item 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The terms “we,” “our,” “ours,” “us,” “Covanta” and “Company” refer to Covanta Holding Corporation and its subsidiaries. The following discussion addresses our financial condition as of March 31, 2010 and our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared with the same period last year. It should be read in conjunction with our Audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2009 and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 to which the reader is directed for additional information.
 
The preparation of interim financial statements necessarily relies heavily on estimates. Due to the use of estimates and certain other factors, such as the seasonal nature of our waste and energy services business, as well as competitive and other market conditions, we do not believe that interim results of operations are indicative of full year results of operations. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and classification of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
 
OVERVIEW
 
We are a leading developer, owner and operator of infrastructure for the conversion of waste to energy (known as “energy-from-waste” or “EfW”), as well as other waste disposal and renewable energy production businesses in the Americas, Europe and Asia. Our reportable segments are Americas and International. We are organized as a holding company and conduct all of our operations through subsidiaries which are engaged predominantly in the businesses of waste and energy services. We also engage in the independent power production business outside the Americas.
 
As of March 31, 2010, we owned, had equity investments in, and/or operate 65 energy generation facilities, 57 of which were in the Americas and eight of which were located outside the Americas. Our energy generation facilities use a variety of fuels, including municipal solid waste, wood waste (biomass), landfill gas, water (hydroelectric), natural gas, coal, and heavy fuel-oil. We also own or operate several businesses that are associated with our energy-from-waste business, including a waste procurement business, two ash fills and two landfills, which we use primarily for ash disposal, and 13 waste transfer stations.
 
We have extensive experience in developing, constructing, operating, acquiring and integrating waste and energy services businesses. We intend to continue to focus our efforts on pursuing development and acquisition-based growth. We anticipate that a part of our future growth will come from acquiring or investing in additional energy-from-waste, waste disposal and renewable energy production businesses in the Americas, Europe and Asia. Our business is capital intensive because it is based upon building and operating municipal solid waste processing and energy generating projects. In order to provide meaningful growth through development, we must be able to invest our funds, obtain equity and/or debt financing, and provide support to our operating subsidiaries.
 
The Energy-From-Waste Solution
 
We believe that our business offers solutions to public sector leaders around the world in two related elements of critical infrastructure: waste disposal and renewable energy generation. We believe that the environmental benefits of energy-from-waste, as an alternative to landfilling, are clear and compelling: by processing municipal solid waste in energy-from-waste facilities we reduce greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions, lower the risk of groundwater contamination, and conserve land. At the same time, energy-from-waste generates clean, reliable energy from a renewable fuel source, thus reducing dependence on fossil fuels, the combustion of which is itself a major contributor to GHG emissions. As public planners in the Americas, Europe and Asia address their needs for more environmentally sustainable waste disposal and energy generation in the years ahead, we believe that energy-from-waste will be an increasingly attractive alternative. We will also consider, for application in the Americas and International segments, acquiring or developing new technologies that complement our existing renewable energy and waste services businesses.
 
Our business offers sustainable solutions to energy and environmental problems, and our corporate culture is increasingly focused on themes of sustainability in all of its forms. We aspire to continuous improvement in environmental performance, beyond mere compliance with legally required standards. This ethos is embodied in our “Clean World Initiative,” an umbrella program under which we are:
 
  •     investing in research and development of new technologies to enhance existing operations and create new business opportunities in renewable energy and waste management;
  •     exploring and implementing processes and technologies at our facilities to improve energy efficiency and lessen environmental impacts; and
  •     partnering with governments and non-governmental organizations to pursue sustainable programs, reduce the use of environmentally harmful materials in commerce and communicate the benefits of energy-from-waste.


24


Table of Contents

Our Clean World Initiative is designed to be consistent with our mission to be the world’s leading energy-from-waste company by providing environmentally superior solutions, advancing our technical expertise and creating new business opportunities. It represents an investment in our future that we believe will enhance stockholder value.
 
In order to create new business opportunities and benefits and enhance stockholder value, we are actively engaged in the current discussion among policy makers in the United States regarding the benefits of energy-from-waste and the reduction of our dependence on landfilling for waste disposal and fossil fuels for energy. Given the ongoing global economic slowdown and related unemployment, policy makers are also expected to focus on economic stimulus, job creation, and energy security. We believe that the construction and permanent jobs created by additional energy-from-waste development represent the type of “green jobs” that are consistent with this focus. The extent to which we are successful in growing our business will depend in part on our ability to effectively communicate the benefits of energy-from-waste to public planners seeking waste disposal solutions and to policy makers seeking to encourage renewable energy technologies (and the associated jobs) as viable alternatives to reliance on fossil fuels as a source of energy.
 
The United States Congress is currently debating proposals designed to encourage two broad policy objectives: increased renewable energy generation, and reduction of fossil fuel usage and related GHG emissions. The United States House of Representatives passed a bill known as the America Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (“ACES”) which addresses both policy objectives, by means of a phased-in national renewable energy standard and a “cap-and-trade” system to reduce GHG emissions. Energy-from-waste and biomass have generally been included in the ACES bill to be among the technologies that help to achieve both policy objectives. Similar legislation has been introduced in the United States Senate. While legislation is far from final and a vigorous debate is expected when the House of Representatives and Senate bills are reconciled, the direction of Congressional efforts to date lead us to believe legislation might be passed that could create additional growth opportunities for our business and increase energy revenue from existing facilities.
 
Factors Affecting Business Conditions and Financial Results
 
Market Pricing for Waste, Energy and Metal — Global and regional economy activity, as well as technological advances, regulations and a variety of other factors, will affect market supply and demand and therefore prices for waste disposal services, energy (including electricity and steam) and other commodities such as scrap metal. As market prices for waste disposal, electricity, steam and recycled metal rise it benefits our existing business as well as our prospects for growth through expansions or new development. Conversely, market price declines for these services and commodities will adversely affect both our existing business and growth prospects.
 
Seasonal — Our quarterly operating income for the Americas and International segments, within the same fiscal year, typically differ substantially due to seasonal factors, primarily as a result of the timing of scheduled plant maintenance. We typically conduct scheduled maintenance periodically each year, which requires that individual boiler units temporarily cease operations. During these scheduled maintenance periods, we incur material repair and maintenance expenses and receive less revenue until the boiler units resume operations. This scheduled maintenance typically occurs during periods of off-peak electric demand in the spring and fall. The spring scheduled maintenance period is typically more extensive than scheduled maintenance conducted during the fall. As a result, we typically incur the highest maintenance expense in the first half of the year. Given these factors, we typically experience lower operating income from our projects during the first six months of each year and higher operating income during the second six months of each year.
 
In addition, at certain of our project subsidiaries, distributions of excess earnings (above and beyond monthly operation and maintenance service payments) are subject to periodic tests of project debt service coverage or requirements to maintain minimum working capital balances. While these distributions occur throughout the year based upon the specific terms of the relevant project debt arrangements, they are typically highest in the fourth quarter. Our net cash provided by operating activities exhibits seasonal fluctuations as a result of the timing of these distributions, including a benefit in the fourth quarter compared to the first nine months of the year.
 
Other Factors Affecting Performance — We have historically performed our operating obligations without experiencing material unexpected service interruptions or incurring material increases in costs. In addition, with respect to many of our contracts, we generally have limited our exposure for risks not within our control. For additional information about such risks and damages that we may owe for unexcused operating performance failures, see Item 1A. Risk Factors. In monitoring and assessing the ongoing operating and financial performance of our businesses, we focus on certain key factors: tons of waste processed, electricity and steam sold, and boiler availability.
 
Business Segments
 
Our reportable segments are Americas and International. The Americas segment is comprised of waste and energy services operations primarily in the United States and Canada. The International segment is comprised of waste and energy services operations in other countries, currently those of the United Kingdom, Ireland, Italy, China, The Philippines, India and Bangladesh.
 


25


Table of Contents

     
 
Segment   Business Description
 
 
Americas
  Our business in the Americas is comprised primarily of energy-from-waste projects. For all of these projects, we earn revenue from two primary sources: fees charged for operating projects or processing waste received and payments for electricity and steam sales. We also operate, and in some cases have ownership interests in, transfer stations and landfills which generate revenue from waste and ash disposal fees or operating fees. In addition, we own and in some cases operate, other renewable energy projects primarily in the United States which generate electricity from wood waste (biomass), landfill gas, and hydroelectric resources. The electricity from these other renewable energy projects is sold to utilities. We may receive additional revenue from construction activity during periods when we are constructing new facilities or expanding existing facilities.
 
 
International
  We have ownership interests in and/or operate facilities internationally, including independent power production facilities in the Philippines, Bangladesh, China and India where we generate electricity by combusting coal, natural gas and heavy fuel-oil, and energy-from-waste facilities in China and Italy. We are constructing energy-from-waste facilities in Ireland and China. We earn revenue from operating fees, waste processing fees, electricity and steam sales, construction activities, and in some cases, we receive cash from equity distributions.
 
 
 
Contract Structures
 
Most of our energy-from-waste projects were developed and structured contractually as part of competitive procurement processes conducted by municipal entities. As a result, many of these projects have common features. However, each service agreement is different reflecting the specific needs and concerns of a client community, applicable regulatory requirements and other factors. Often, we design the facility, help to arrange for financing and then we either construct and equip the facility on a fixed price and schedule basis, or we undertake an alternative role, such as construction management, if that better meets the goals of our municipal client. Following construction and during operations, we earn revenue from two primary sources: fees we receive for operating projects or for processing waste received, and payments we earn for electricity and/or steam we sell. Typical features of these agreements are as follows:
 
             
 
    Current
       
    number of
  Fees for operating projects or for
  Payments for electricity
Contract types   projects   processing waste received   and/or steam we sell
 
Service Fee
  29   We charge a fixed fee (which adjusts over time pursuant to contractual indices that we believe are appropriate to reflect price inflation) for operation and maintenance services provided to these energy-from-waste projects. At projects that we own and where project debt is in place, a portion of our fee is dedicated to project debt service. Our contracts at Service Fee projects provide revenue that does not materially vary based on the amount of waste processed or energy generated and as such is relatively stable for the contract term. (29 Americas segment Service Fee projects).   At most of our Service Fee projects, the operating subsidiary retains only a fraction of the energy revenues generated, with the balance (generally 90%) used to provide a credit to the municipal client against its disposal costs. Therefore, in these projects, the municipal client derives most of the benefit and risk of energy production and changing energy prices.
 
 
Tip Fee
  16   We receive a per-ton fee under contracts for processing waste at Tip Fee projects. We generally enter into long-term waste disposal contracts for a substantial portion of the project’s disposal capacity. The waste disposal and energy revenue from these projects is more dependent upon operating performance and, as such, is subject to greater revenue fluctuation to the extent performance levels fluctuate. (13 Americas segment Tip Fee projects and 3 International segment Tip Fee projects).   Where Tip Fee structures exist, we generally retain 100% of the energy revenues as well as risk associated with energy production and changing energy pricing. The majority of Tip Fee structures are under long-term fixed-price energy contracts.
 
 

26


Table of Contents

Under both structures, our returns are expected to be stable if we do not incur material unexpected operation and maintenance costs or other expenses. In addition, most of our energy-from-waste project contracts are structured so that contract counterparties generally bear, or share in, the costs associated with events or circumstances not within our control, such as uninsured force majeure events and changes in legal requirements. The stability of our revenues and returns could be affected by our ability to continue to enforce these obligations. Also, at some of our energy-from-waste facilities, commodity price risk is mitigated by passing through commodity costs to contract counterparties. With respect to our other renewable energy projects and international independent power projects, such structural features generally do not exist because either we operate and maintain such facilities for our own account or we do so on a cost-plus basis rather than a fixed-fee basis.
 
We receive the majority of our revenue under short- and long-term contracts with little or no exposure to price volatility but with adjustments intended to reflect changes in our costs. Where our revenue is received under other arrangements and depending upon the revenue source, we have varying amounts of exposure to price volatility. The largest component of our revenue is waste revenue, which has generally been subject to less price volatility than our revenue derived from sales of energy and metals. During the second and third quarters of 2008, pricing for energy reached historically high levels and has subsequently declined materially.
 
At some of our renewable energy and international independent power projects, our operating subsidiaries purchase fuel in the open markets which exposes us to fuel price risk. At other projects, fuel costs are contractually included in our electricity revenues, or fuel is provided by our customers. In some of our international projects, the project entity (which in some cases is not our subsidiary) has entered into long-term fuel purchase contracts that protect the project from fuel shortages, provided counterparties to such contracts perform their commitments.
 
We generally sell the energy output from our projects to local utilities pursuant to long-term contracts. At several of our energy-from-waste projects, we sell energy output under short-term contracts or on a spot-basis to our customers.
 
Contracted and Merchant Capacity
 
We generally have long-term contracts to operate, or obtain waste supplies for, our energy-from-waste projects. For those projects we own, our contract to sell the project’s energy output (either electricity or steam) generally expires on or after the date when the initial term of our contract to operate or receive waste also expires. Expiration of both our operating agreements and our agreements to sell energy output will subject us to greater market risk in maintaining and enhancing revenues. As contracts expire at projects we own, we intend to enter into replacement or additional contracts for waste supplies and will sell our energy output either into the regional electricity grid or pursuant to new contracts. Because project debt on these facilities will be paid off at such time, we believe that we will be able to offer disposal services at rates that will attract sufficient quantities of waste and provide acceptable revenues. For those projects we operate but do not own, prior to the expiration of the initial term of our operating contract, we will seek to enter into renewal or replacement contracts to continue operating such projects.
 
Growth and Development
 
In our Americas segment, we are pursuing additional growth opportunities through project expansions, new energy-from-waste and other renewable energy projects, contract extensions, acquisitions, and businesses ancillary to our existing business, such as additional waste transfer, transportation, processing and disposal businesses. We also intend to maintain a focus on research and development of technologies that we believe will enhance our competitive position, and offer new technical solutions to waste and energy problems that augment and complement our business.
 
We are also pursuing international waste and/or renewable energy business opportunities, particularly in locations where the market demand, regulatory environment or other factors encourage technologies such as energy-from-waste to reduce dependence on landfilling for waste disposal and fossil fuels for energy production in order to reduce GHG emissions. Outside of the Americas, we are focusing on the United Kingdom, Ireland, and China.
 
The following is a discussion of acquisitions and business development for 2010 and 2009. See Item 1. Financial Statements — Note 3. Acquisitions and Business Development for additional information.
 
ACQUISITIONS AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT
 
                     
 
Facility/Operating
                   
Contract   Location   Year   Transaction   Type   Summary
 
Huntington
  NY   2010   Acquisition   EfW   We acquired a nominal limited partnership interest held by a third party in Covanta Huntington Limited Partnership, our subsidiary which owns and operates an energy-from-waste facility in Huntington, New York.
 
 


27


Table of Contents

                     
 
Facility/Operating
                   
Contract   Location   Year   Transaction   Type   Summary
 
Dade
Long Beach
Hudson Valley
MacArthur
Plymouth
York
Burnaby
Abington
  FL
CA
NY
NY
PA
PA
Canada
PA
  2010
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
2009
  Acquisition   EfW
EfW
EfW
EfW
EfW
EfW
EfW
Trans.St.
  We acquired seven energy-from-waste businesses and one transfer station business from Veolia Environmental Services North America Corp. (the “Veolia EfW Acquisition”). The acquired businesses have a combined capacity of 9,600 tpd. Each of the operations acquired includes a long-term operating contract with the respective municipal client. Six of the energy-from-waste facilities and the transfer station are publicly-owned facilities. We acquired a majority ownership stake in one of the energy-from-waste facilities and subsequently purchased the remaining ownership stake in this facility.
 
 
Detroit
  MI   2009   Contract   EfW   We entered into an operating and maintenance agreement with owners of the Detroit energy-from-waste facility (2,832 tpd, 952 pounds of steam generated per day), pursuant to which we will operate, maintain and provide certain other services for a term of one year. Under this agreement, we will earn a fixed fee and pass through to the owners of the Detroit facility (or pay from the project revenues) all expenses associated with operations and maintenance of the facility. After paying all expenses, excess net revenues flow to the owners (see discussion below regarding our acquisition of an ownership interest in the facility). We entered into a waste disposal agreement with the Greater Detroit Resource Recovery Authority (“GDRRA”) pursuant to which we will dispose of the waste of the City of Detroit for a term of at least one year. The term of the waste disposal agreement will automatically renew for successive one year terms unless and until either party provides advance written notice of termination in accordance with the provisions of the agreement. In December 2009, we entered into a short-term steam agreement for the Detroit Facility which remains in effect through June 2010. Negotiations with all stakeholders are in progress for arrangements to continue operating the Detroit Facility beyond June 30, 2010. Securing a long-term steam agreement with appropriate pricing remains an important factor to the overall Detroit Facility long-term economic viability.
 
 
Detroit
  MI   2009   Acquisition   EfW   A newly-formed Covanta subsidiary purchased an undivided 30% owner-participant interest in the Detroit energy-from-waste facility. In addition, as an owner-participant, we have the right, on one or more occasions, to call upon GDRRA to deliver the waste of the City of Detroit to the Detroit energy-from-waste facility at market-based rates. The call right continues for the duration of the participation agreement agreements expiring in 2035, and the City of Detroit stands behind GDRRA’s waste delivery obligation following exercise of the call until 2021.
 
 
Stanislaus
County
  CA   2009   Contract   EfW   The service fee contract with Stanislaus County was extended from 2010 to 2016.
 
 
Philadelphia
Transfer
Stations
  PA   2009   Acquisition   Transfer
Stations
  We acquired two waste transfer stations with combined capacity of 4,500 tpd in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
 
 

28


Table of Contents

ENERGY-FROM-WASTE
PROJECTS UNDER ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT OR CONSTRUCTION
 
         
 
Project/Facility   Location   Summary
 
Technology
Development
      We entered into various agreements with multiple partners to invest in the development, testing or licensing of new technologies related to the transformation of waste materials into renewable fuels or the generation of energy. Licensing fees and demonstration unit cumulative purchases totaled approximately $11.2 million in 2008 and 2009. Licensing fees and demonstration unit purchases aggregated $1.6 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 and, $4.7 million and $6.5 million during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
 
 
AMERICAS
       
 
 
Honolulu
  HI   We operate and maintain the energy-from-waste facility located in and owned by the City and County of Honolulu, Hawaii. In December 2009, we entered into agreements with the City and County of Honolulu to expand the facility’s waste processing capacity from 2,160 tpd to 3,060 tpd and to increase the gross electricity capacity from 57 MW to 90 MW. The agreements also extend the service contract term by 20 years. The $302 million expansion project is a fixed-price construction project which will be funded and owned by the City and County of Honolulu. Environmental and other project related permits have been received and expansion construction has commenced.
 
 
Harrisburg
  PA   We have an agreement to provide construction management services and advance up to $25.5 million (of which $21.7 million has been advanced and $19.8 million is outstanding as of March 31, 2010) in funding for certain facility improvements required to enhance facility performance, which are expected to be completed during 2010. The repayment of this funding is guaranteed by the City of Harrisburg, but is otherwise unsecured, and is junior to project bondholders’ rights. The first three repayment installments under this funding arrangement have been paid, but the repayment installment of $0.6 million which was due to us on April 1, 2010 has not been paid, and the City of Harrisburg has requested a forbearance period. We are discussing the proposed terms of the forbearance period with representatives of the City and certain other stakeholders. The City of Harrisburg is in a precarious financial condition with substantial obligations, and it has reported consideration of various future options (including seeking bankruptcy protection). We intend to work with the City of Harrisburg and other stakeholders to maintain our position in the project and to protect the recovery of our advance.
 
 
Hillsborough
  FL   During the third quarter of 2009, we completed the expansion and commenced the operations of the expanded energy-from-waste facility located in Hillsborough County, Florida. We expanded waste processing capacity from 1,200 tpd to 1,800 tpd and increased gross electricity capacity from 29.0 MW to 46.5 MW. As part of the agreement to implement this expansion, we received a long-term operating contract extension to 2027.
 
 


29


Table of Contents

         
 
Project/Facility   Location   Summary
 
INTERNATIONAL
       
 
 
Dublin
  Ireland   We are developing a 1,700 metric tpd energy-from-waste project serving the City of Dublin, Ireland and surrounding communities at an estimated cost of approximately €350 million. The Dublin project is being developed and will be owned by Dublin Waste to Energy Limited, which we control and co-own with DONG Energy Generation A/S. We are responsible for the design and construction of the project. We will operate and maintain the project for Dublin Waste to Energy Limited, which has a 25 year tip fee type contract with Dublin to provide disposal service for approximately 320,000 metric tons of waste annually, representing approximately 50% of the facility’s processing capacity. The project is structured on a build-own-operate-transfer model, where ownership will transfer to Dublin after the 25 year term, unless extended. The project is expected to sell electricity into the local grid. A portion of the electricity is expected to be eligible for a preferential renewable tariff. We and DONG Energy Generation A/S have committed to provide financing for all phases of the project. We expect to fund construction through existing sources of liquidity and effect project financing as the project progresses. The primary approvals and licenses for the project have been obtained and construction commenced in December 2009. The parties are working to satisfy remaining conditions and obtain remaining approvals for the balance of construction activity, pending receipt of which we expect to curtail project spending.
 
 
Taixing
  China   Taixing Covanta Yanjiang Cogeneration Co., Ltd., of which we own 85%, entered into a 25 year concession agreement and waste supply agreements to build, own and operate a 350 metric tpd energy-from-waste facility for Taixing Municipality, in Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China. The project, which will be built on the site of our existing coal-fired facility in Taixing, will supply steam to an adjacent industrial park under short-term arrangements. We will continue to operate our existing coal-fired facility. The project company has obtained Rmb 165 million in project financing which, together with available cash from existing operations will fund construction costs. The Taixing project commenced construction in late 2009.
 
 
Chengdu
  China   We and Chongqing Iron & Steel Company (Group) Limited have entered into an award to build, own, and operate an 1,800 metric tpd energy-from-waste facility for Chengdu Municipality in Sichuan Province, People’s Republic of China. We also executed a 25 year waste concession agreement for this project. In connection with this award, we acquired a 49% equity interest in the project company. Construction of the facility has commenced and operation is expected to begin in 2011. The project company has obtained Rmb 480 million in project financing, of which 49% is guaranteed by us and 51% is guaranteed by Chongqing Iron & Steel Company (Group) Limited until the project has been constructed and for one year after operations commence.
 
 

30


Table of Contents

 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The comparability of the information provided below with respect to our revenues, expenses and certain other items for periods during each of the quarters presented was affected by several factors. As outlined above under Overview — Growth and Development, our acquisition and business development initiatives resulted in various additional projects which increased comparative revenues and expenses. These factors must be taken into account in developing meaningful comparisons between the periods compared below.
 
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS — Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 vs. Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
 
                         
    For the Three Months Ended
    Increase
 
    March 31,     (Decrease)  
    2010     2009     2010 vs 2009  
    (Unaudited, in thousands)  
 
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS:
                       
Total operating revenues
  $ 416,795     $ 358,760     $ 58,035  
Total operating expenses
    414,824       355,568       59,256  
                         
Operating income
    1,971       3,192       (1,221 )
                         
Other income (expense):
                       
Investment income
    586       1,028       (442 )
Interest expense
    (10,588 )     (7,916 )     2,672  
Non-cash convertible debt related expense
    (8,247 )     (4,702 )     3,545  
                         
Total other expenses
    (18,249 )     (11,590 )     6,659  
                         
Loss before income tax benefit and equity in net income from unconsolidated investments
    (16,278 )     (8,398 )     7,880  
Income tax benefit
    7,875       3,318       4,557  
Equity in net income from unconsolidated investments
    3,670       5,809       (2,139 )
                         
NET (LOSS) INCOME
    (4,733 )     729       (5,462 )
                         
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
    (2,500 )     (1,380 )     1,120  
                         
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION
  $ (7,233 )   $ (651 )     (6,582 )
                         
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
                       
Basic
    153,894       153,467       427  
                         
Diluted
    153,894       153,467       427  
                         
Earnings Per Share:
                       
Basic
  $ (0.05 )   $     $ (0.05 )
                         
Diluted
  $ (0.05 )   $     $ (0.05 )
                         
 
The following general discussions should be read in conjunction with the above table, the condensed consolidated financial statements and the Notes thereto and other financial information appearing and referred to elsewhere in this report. Additional detail relating to changes in operating revenues and operating expenses, and the quantification of specific factors affecting or causing such changes, is provided in the Americas and International segment discussions below.
 
Consolidated Results of Operations — Comparison of Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 vs. Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
 
Operating revenues increased by $58.0 million primarily due to the following:
 
  •     increased waste and services revenues at our new businesses in our Americas segment, primarily due to the Veolia EfW Acquisition, and
  •     increased electricity and steam sales revenue due to higher fuel pass through costs at our Indian facilities, and
  •     increased recycled metal revenues at our existing energy-from-waste facilities in our Americas segment, and
  •     increased construction revenue for expansion projects, offset by
  •     decreased waste and service revenues due to the Detroit contract transition, and
  •     decreased electricity and steam pricing at our existing energy-from-waste facilities in our Americas segment, primarily due to the Hempstead and Union contract transitions.
 
Operating expenses increased by $59.3 million primarily due to the following:
 
  •     increased operating costs at our new businesses in our Americas segment, primarily due to the Veolia EfW Acquisition, and
  •     increased operating expenses at our Indian facilities resulting primarily from higher fuel costs, and
  •     increased construction expense for expansion projects, offset by
  •     decreased expenses due to contract transitions.


31


Table of Contents

Operating income was relatively flat with the prior year comparative period. Increased revenues were offset by increased operating expenses as described above.
 
Interest expense increased by $2.7 million primarily due to the issuance of the 3.25% Cash Convertible Senior Notes (“Notes”) which were issued in 2009, offset by lower floating interest rates on the Term Loan Facility (as defined in the Liquidity section below). Non-cash convertible debt related expense increased by $3.5 million primarily due to the amortization of the debt discount for the Notes which issued in 2009, offset by the net changes to the valuation of the derivatives associated with the Notes.
 
Income tax benefit increased by $4.6 million primarily due to higher pre-tax operating losses and lower production tax credits. See Item 1. Financial Statements — Note 7. Income Taxes for additional information.
 
Equity in net income from unconsolidated investments decreased by $2.1 million primarily due to decreased earnings resulting from timing differences in annual maintenance for Quezon Power, Inc., foreign exchange losses at our Chengdu joint venture and lower earnings at a biomass project in the Americas segment due to a turbine outage.
 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries increased by $1.1 million primarily due to increased earnings attributable to the minority partner for our Southeast Massachusetts energy-from-waste facility.
 
Americas Segment Results of Operations — Comparison of Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 vs. Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
 
                         
    For the Three Months Ended
    Increase
 
    March 31,     (Decrease)  
    2010     2009     2010 vs 2009  
    (Unaudited, in thousands)  
 
Waste and service revenues
  $ 241,063     $ 205,352     $ 35,711  
Electricity and steam sales
    95,409       101,249       (5,840 )
Other operating revenues
    20,815       6,572       14,243  
                         
Total operating revenues
    357,287       313,173       44,114  
                         
Plant operating expenses
    257,182       222,400       34,782  
Depreciation and amortization expense
    48,021       49,722       (1,701 )
Net interest expense on project debt
    10,282       11,670       (1,388 )
General and administrative expenses
    19,461       19,493       (32 )
Other operating expenses
    20,614       5,453       15,161  
                         
Total operating expenses
    355,560       308,738       46,822  
                         
Operating income
  $ 1,727     $ 4,435       (2,708 )
                         
 
Operating Revenues
 
Operating revenues for the Americas segment increased by $44.1 million as reflected in the comparison of existing business and new business in the table below (in millions) and the discussion of key variance drivers which follows:
 
                         
    Americas Segment
 
    Operating Revenue Variances  
    Existing
    New
       
    Business     Business(A)     Total  
 
Waste and service revenues
                       
Service fee
  $ (7.9 )   $ 33.9     $ 26.0  
Tip fee
    (1.1 )     3.4       2.3  
Recycled metal
    6.4       1.0       7.4  
                         
Total waste and service revenues
    (2.6 )     38.3       35.7  
Electricity and steam sales
    (9.2 )     3.4       (5.8 )
Other operating revenues
    14.1       0.1       14.2  
                         
Total operating revenues
  $ 2.3     $ 41.8     $ 44.1  
                         
 
(A) New business is defined as businesses acquired after March 31, 2009.
 
  •     Revenues from Service Fee arrangements for existing business decreased primarily due to the transition of the Detroit facility to accounting under the equity method and lower revenues earned explicitly to service project debt of $2.0 million, partially offset by the Hillsborough expansion.
  •     Revenues from Tip Fee arrangements for existing business decreased primarily due to increased levels of waste disposal internalization.


32


Table of Contents

  •     Recycled metal revenues for existing business increased $6.4 million compared to the same prior year period primarily due to higher pricing. Historically, we have experienced volatile prices for recycled metal which has affected our recycled metal revenue as reflected in the table below (in millions):
 
                         
    For the
 
    Quarters Ended  
Total Recycled Metal Revenues
  2010     2009     2008  
 
March 31,
  $ 12.6     $ 5.2     $ 11.4  
June 30,
          5.8       19.0  
September 30,
          9.1       17.3  
December 31,
          9.1       5.9  
                         
Total for the Year Ended December 31,
  $ N/A     $ 29.2     $ 53.6  
                         
  •     Electricity and steam sales for existing business decreased by $9.2 million due to lower energy pricing, lower production primarily due to economically dispatching one of our biomass facilities and the transition of the Detroit facility to accounting under the equity method.
  •     Other operating revenues for existing business increased primarily due to increased construction revenue for expansion projects.
 
Operating Expenses
 
Variances in plant operating expenses for the Americas segment are as follows (in millions):
 
                         
    Americas Segment
 
    Plant Operating Expense Variances  
    Existing
    New
       
    Business     Business(A)     Total  
 
Total plant operating expenses
  $ (0.9 )   $ 35.7     $ 34.8  
                         
 
(A) New business is defined as businesses acquired after March 31, 2009.
 
Existing business plant operating expenses decreased by $0.9 million primarily due to the Detroit contract transition, and the benefit of lower fuel costs related to economically dispatching one of our biomass facilities, partially offset by cost escalations, and higher costs relating to the Hempstead contract transition.
 
Other operating expenses increased by $15.2 million primarily due to increased construction expense for expansion projects.
 
Operating Income
 
Operating income declined $2.7 million from the prior year comparative period. New business was break-even due to seasonal expense related to scheduled maintenance activity. Operating income attributable to the existing business declined primarily due to contract transitions at our Hempstead, Union and Detroit facilities, as well as lower energy prices, partially offset by higher recycled metal revenues and improved performance at recently acquired facilities following the completion of work carried out last year.
 
International Business Results of Operations — Comparison of Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 vs. Results for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
 
                         
    For the Three Months Ended
    Increase
 
    March 31,     (Decrease)  
    2010     2009     2010 vs 2009  
    (Unaudited, in thousands)  
 
Waste and service revenues
  $ 937     $ 917     $ 20  
Electricity and steam sales
    53,837       40,620       13,217  
                         
Total operating revenues
    54,774       41,537       13,237  
                         
Plant operating expenses
    47,044       33,642       13,402  
Depreciation and amortization expense
    1,875       1,749       126  
Net interest expense on project debt
    695       1,099       (404 )
General and administrative expenses
    6,582       5,428       1,154  
Other operating (income) expense
    (1,175 )     478       (1,653 )
                         
Total operating expenses
    55,021       42,396       12,625  
                         
Operating loss
  $ (247 )   $ (859 )     (612 )
                         
 
The increases in revenues and plant operating expenses resulted primarily from higher fuel costs at our Indian facilities, which are a pass through at both facilities, partially offset by lower demand from the electricity offtaker and resulting lower electricity generation.


33


Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses increased by $1.2 million primarily due to additional business development spending, and normal wage and benefit escalations.
 
Other operating expense decreased by $1.7 million primarily due to higher foreign currency exchange gains.
 
Quarterly Supplementary Financial Information — Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP Discussion)
 
To supplement our results prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we use the measure of Adjusted EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP measure as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. This non-GAAP financial measure is described below, and used in the tables below, is not intended as a substitute and should not be considered in isolation from measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, our use of non-GAAP financial measures may be different from non-GAAP measures used by other companies, limiting their usefulness for comparison purposes. The presentation of Adjusted EBITDA is intended to enhance the usefulness of our financial information by providing a measure which management internally uses to assess and evaluate the overall performance of its business and those of possible acquisition candidates, and highlight trends in the overall business.
 
We use Adjusted EBITDA to provide further information that is useful to an understanding of the financial covenants contained in the credit facilities of our most significant subsidiary, Covanta Energy, and as an additional way of viewing aspects of its operations that, when viewed with the GAAP results and the accompanying reconciliations to corresponding GAAP financial measures, provide a more complete understanding of our business. The calculation of Adjusted EBITDA is based on the definition in Covanta Energy’s credit facilities as described below under Liquidity and Capital Resources, which we have guaranteed. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, as adjusted for additional items subtracted from or added to net income. Because our business is substantially comprised of that of Covanta Energy, our financial performance is substantially similar to that of Covanta Energy. For this reason, and in order to avoid use of multiple financial measures which are not all from the same entity, the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and other financial measures presented herein are measured on a consolidated basis. Under these credit facilities, Covanta Energy is required to satisfy certain financial covenants, including certain ratios of which Adjusted EBITDA is an important component. Compliance with such financial covenants is expected to be the principal limiting factor which will affect our ability to engage in a broad range of activities in furtherance of our business, including making certain investments, acquiring businesses and incurring additional debt. Covanta Energy was in compliance with these covenants as of March 31, 2010. Failure to comply with such financial covenants could result in a default under these credit facilities, which default would have a material adverse affect on our financial condition and liquidity.
 
Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow provided by operating activities as indicators of our performance or liquidity or any other measures of performance or liquidity derived in accordance with GAAP.
 
In order to provide a meaningful basis for comparison, we are providing information with respect to our Adjusted EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, reconciled for each such period to net income and cash flow provided by operating activities, which are believed to be the most directly comparable measures under GAAP.
 
The following is a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
 
                 
    For the
 
    Three Months Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
Net Loss Attributable to Covanta Holding Corporation
  $ (7,233 )   $ (651 )
Depreciation and amortization expense
    49,922       51,498  
Debt service:
               
Net interest expense on project debt
    10,977       12,769  
Interest expense
    10,588       7,916  
Non-cash convertible debt related expense
    8,247       4,702  
Investment income
    (586 )     (1,028 )
                 
Subtotal debt service
    29,226       24,359  
Income tax benefit
    (7,875 )     (3,318 )
Acquisition-related costs(A)
    235        
Other adjustments:
               
Change in unbilled service receivables
    10,803       4,700  
Non-cash compensation expense
    3,500       3,907  
Other non-cash items
    1,037       545  
                 
Subtotal other adjustments
    15,340       9,152  
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
    2,500       1,380  
                 
Total adjustments
    89,348       83,071  
                 
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 82,115     $ 82,420  
                 
 
(A) This amount relates to acquisition-related costs associated with the Veolia EfW Acquisition in 2009.


34


Table of Contents

 
The following is a reconciliation of cash flow provided by operating activities to Adjusted EBITDA (in thousands):
 
                 
    For the
 
    Three Months Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
Cash flow provided by operating activities
  $ 119,027     $ 51,395  
Acquisition-related costs
    1,623        
Debt service
    29,226       24,359  
Amortization of debt premium and deferred financing costs
    169       1,178  
Other(A)
    (67,930 )     5,488  
                 
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 82,115     $ 82,420  
                 
 
(A) This amount relates primarily to changes in working capital.
 
For additional discussion related to management’s use of non-GAAP measures, see Liquidity and Capital Resources — Quarterly Supplementary Financial Information — Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP Discussion) below.
 
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
 
We generate substantial cash flow from our ongoing business, which we believe will allow us to meet our liquidity needs, invest in our business, pay down debt, and pursue strategic growth opportunities. As of March 31, 2010, in addition to our ongoing cash flow, we had access to several sources of liquidity, as discussed in Available Sources of Liquidity below, including our existing cash on hand of $329 million and the undrawn and available capacity of $300 million of our revolving credit facility. In addition, we had restricted cash of $276 million, of which $154 million was designated for future payment of project debt principal.
 
We derive our cash flows principally from our operations from the projects in our Americas and International segments, which allow us to satisfy project debt covenants and payments and distribute cash. We typically receive cash distributions from our Americas segment projects on either a monthly or quarterly basis, whereas a material portion of cash from our international projects is received semi-annually, during the second and fourth quarters. The frequency and predictability of our receipt of cash from projects differs, depending upon various factors, including whether restrictions on distributions exist in applicable project debt arrangements, whether a project is domestic or international, and whether a project has been able to operate at historical levels of production.
 
Our primary future cash requirements will be to fund capital expenditures to maintain our existing businesses, make debt service payments and grow our business through acquisitions and business development. We will also seek to enhance our cash flow from renewals or replacement of existing contracts, from new contracts to expand existing facilities or operate additional facilities and by investing in new projects. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition — Overview — Growth and Development above.
 
Sources and Uses of Cash Flow for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
 
                         
    For the Three Months
    Increase
 
    Ended March 31,     (Decrease)  
    2010     2009     2010 vs 2009  
    (Unaudited, in thousands)  
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 119,027     $ 51,395     $ 67,632  
Net cash used in investing activities
    (184,259 )     (34,720 )       149,539  
Net cash used in financing activities
    (38,780 )     (49,303 )     (10,523 )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    (308 )     (293 )     15  
                         
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
  $   (104,320 )   $   (32,921 )     71,399  
                         
 
Net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $119.0 million, an increase of $67.6 million from the prior year period. The increase was primarily due to the timing of working capital and operations at our new businesses in our Americas segment.
 
Net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $184.3 million, an increase of $149.5 million from the prior year period. The increase was primarily comprised of higher cash outflows of $128.3 million related to the acquisition of the Dade, Florida energy-from-waste business in February 2010 and $11.1 million of higher cash outflows for increased capital expenditures.
 
Net cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $38.8 million, a decrease of $10.5 million from the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in restricted funds of $11.2 million for debt principal payments.


35


Table of Contents

Available Sources of Liquidity
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Cash and cash equivalents include all cash balances and highly liquid investments having maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase. These short-term investments are stated at cost, which approximates market value. As of March 31, 2010, we had unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $329 million.
 
Short-Term Liquidity
 
We have credit facilities which are comprised of a $300 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Loan Facility”), a $320 million funded letter of credit facility (the “Funded L/C Facility”), and a $650 million term loan (the “Term Loan Facility”) (collectively referred to as the “Credit Facilities”). As of March 31, 2010, we had available credit for liquidity as follows (in thousands):
 
                                 
    Total
      Outstanding Letters
   
    Available
      of Credit as of
  Available as of
    Under Facility   Maturing   March 31, 2010   March 31, 2010
 
Revolving Loan Facility(1)
  $   300,000       2013     $     $   300,000  
Funded L/C Facility
  $ 320,000       2014     $   295,339     $ 24,661  
 
(1)  Up to $200 million of which may be utilized for letters of credit.
 
Quarterly Supplementary Financial Information — Free Cash Flow (Non-GAAP Discussion)
 
To supplement our results prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we use the measure of Free Cash Flow, which is a non-GAAP measure as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission. This non-GAAP financial measure is not intended as a substitute and should not be considered in isolation from measures of liquidity prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, our use of Free Cash Flow may be different from similarly identified non-GAAP measures used by other companies, limiting their usefulness for comparison purposes. The presentation of Free Cash Flow is intended to enhance the usefulness of our financial information by providing measures which management internally uses to assess and evaluate the overall performance of its business and those of possible acquisition candidates, and highlight trends in the overall business.
 
We use the non-GAAP measure of Free Cash Flow as a criterion of liquidity and performance-based components of employee compensation. Free Cash Flow is defined as cash flow provided by operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures, which are capital expenditures primarily to maintain our existing facilities. We use Free Cash Flow as a measure of liquidity to determine amounts we can reinvest in our businesses, such as amounts available to make acquisitions, invest in construction of new projects or make principal payments on debt. For additional discussion related to management’s use of non-GAAP measures, see Results of Operations — Quarterly Supplementary Financial Information — Adjusted EBITDA (Non-GAAP Discussion) above.
 
In order to provide a meaningful basis for comparison, we are providing information with respect to our Free Cash Flow for the for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, reconciled for each such period to cash flow provided by operating activities.
 
The following is a summary of Free Cash Flow and its primary uses (in thousands):
 
                 
    For the Three Months Ended
 
    March 31,  
    2010     2009  
 
Cash flow provided by operating activities
  $   119,027     $ 51,395  
Less: Maintenance capital expenditures(A)
    (32,604 )     (23,664 )
                 
Free cash flow
  $ 86,423     $ 27,731  
                 
Selected Uses of Free Cash Flow:
               
Principal payments on long-term debt
  $ (1,857 )   $ (1,675 )
Principal payments on project debt, net of restricted funds used(B)
  $ (31,195 )   $   (38,493 )
Distributions to partners of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
  $ (3,054 )   $ (3,716 )
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
  $ (128,254 )   $  
Acquisition of noncontrolling interests in subsidiary
  $ (2,000 )   $  
Purchase of equity interests
  $     $ (1,083 )
Other investment activities, net
  $ (16,023 )   $ (6,804 )
Purchases of Property, Plant and Equipment:
               
Maintenance capital expenditures(A)
  $ (32,604 )   $ (23,664 )
Capital expenditures associated with development projects
    (2,862 )     (2,114 )
Capital expenditures associated with technology development
    (1,720 )     (446 )
Capital expenditures — other
    (796 )     (609 )
                 
Total purchases of property, plant and equipment
  $ (37,982 )   $ (26,833 )
                 


36


Table of Contents

(A)   Capital Expenditures primarily to maintain existing facilities. Purchase of property, plant and equipment is also referred to as Capital Expenditures.
 
(B)   Principal payments on project debt are net of restricted funds held in trust used to pay debt principal of $15.5 million and $4.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Principal payments on project debt excludes principal repayments on working capital borrowings relating to the operations of our Indian facilities of $0.7 million and $2.5 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
Credit Agreement Financial Covenants
 
The loan documentation under the Credit Facilities contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and financial covenants as discussed in Note 11. Long-Term Debt of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (“Form 10-K). As of March 31, 2010, we were in compliance with the covenants under the Credit Facilities. The maximum Covanta Energy capital expenditures that can be incurred to maintain existing operating businesses is approximately $220 million as of March 31, 2010.
 
Long-Term Debt
 
Long-term debt is as follows (in thousands):
 
                 
    As of  
    March 31,
    December 31,
 
    2010     2009  
 
3.25% Cash Convertible Senior Notes due 2014
  $ 460,000     $ 460,000  
Debt discount related to Cash Convertible Senior Notes
    (107,359 )     (112,475 )
Cash conversion option derivative at fair value
    89,785       128,603  
                 
3.25% Cash Convertible Senior Notes, net
    442,426       476,128  
                 
                 
1.00% Senior Convertible Debentures due 2027
    373,750       373,750  
Debt discount related to Convertible Debentures
    (39,988 )     (45,042 )
                 
1.00% Senior Convertible Debentures, net
    333,762       328,708  
                 
                 
Term Loan Facility due 2014
    630,500       632,125  
Other long-term debt
    512       745  
                 
Total
    1,407,200       1,437,706  
Less: current portion
    (6,801 )     (7,027 )
                 
Total long-term debt
  $   1,400,399     $   1,430,679  
                 
 
3.25% Cash Convertible Senior Notes due 2014 (“Notes”)
 
Under limited circumstances, the Notes are convertible by the holders thereof into cash only, based on an initial conversion rate of 53.9185 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes (which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $18.55 per share) subject to certain customary adjustments as provided in the indenture for the Notes. We will not deliver common stock (or any other securities) upon conversion under any circumstances.
 
For specific criteria related to contingent interest, conversion or redemption features of the Notes and details related to the cash conversion option, cash convertible note hedge and warrants related to the Notes, refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K.
 
For details related to the fair value for the contingent interest feature, cash conversion option, and cash convertible note hedge related to the Notes, see Note 12. Derivative Instruments.
 
1.00% Senior Convertible Debentures due 2027 (“Debentures”)
 
Under limited circumstances, prior to February 1, 2025, the Debentures are convertible by the holders into cash and shares of our common stock, if any, initially based on a conversion rate of 35.4610 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Debentures, (which represents an initial conversion price of approximately $28.20 per share) or 13,253,867 issuable shares. As of March 31, 2010, if the Debentures were converted, no shares would have been issued since the trading price of our common stock was below the conversion price of the Debentures.
 
For specific criteria related to contingent interest, conversion or redemption features of the Debentures, refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K.
 
For details related to the fair value for the contingent interest feature related to the Debentures, see Note 12. Derivative Instruments.


37


Table of Contents

Project Debt
 
Americas Project Debt
 
Financing for the energy-from-waste projects is generally accomplished through tax-exempt and taxable municipal revenue bonds issued by or on behalf of the municipal client. For such facilities that are owned by a subsidiary of ours, the municipal issuers of the bond loans the bond proceeds to our subsidiary to pay for facility construction. For such facilities, project-related debt is included as “Project debt” (short- and long-term) in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Generally, such project debt is secured by the revenues generated by the project and other project assets including the related facility. The only potential recourse to us with respect to project debt arises under the operating performance guarantees described below under Other Commitments. Certain subsidiaries had recourse liability for project debt which is recourse to our subsidiary Covanta ARC LLC, but is non-recourse to us, which as of March 31, 2010 aggregated to $251.2 million.
 
International Project Debt
 
Financing for projects in which we have an ownership or operating interest is generally accomplished through commercial loans from local lenders or financing arranged through international banks, bonds issued to institutional investors and from multilateral lending institutions based in the United States. Such debt is generally secured by the revenues generated by the project and other project assets and is without recourse to us. Project debt relating to two international projects in India is included as “Project debt (short- and long-term)” in our condensed consolidated financial statements. In most projects, the instruments defining the rights of debt holders generally provide that the project subsidiary may not make distributions to its parent until periodic debt service obligations are satisfied and other financial covenants are complied with.
 
Restricted Funds Held in Trust
 
Restricted funds held in trust are primarily amounts received by third-party trustees relating to certain projects we own which may be used only for specified purposes. We generally do not control these accounts. They primarily include debt service reserves for payment of principal and interest on project debt, and deposits of revenues received with respect to projects prior to their disbursement, as provided in the relevant indenture or other agreements. Such funds are invested principally in money market funds, bank deposits and certificates of deposit, United States treasury bills and notes, and United States government agency securities. Restricted fund balances are as follows (in thousands):
 
                                 
    As of March 31, 2010     As of December 31, 2009  
    Current     Noncurrent     Current     Noncurrent  
 
Debt service funds
  $ 90,990     $ 76,739     $ 73,406     $ 101,376  
Revenue funds
    18,682             13,061        
Other funds
    45,284       44,384       44,756       45,153  
                                 
Total
  $   154,956     $   121,123     $  131,223     $  146,529  
                                 
 
Of the $276.1 million in total restricted funds as of March 31, 2010, approximately $153.7 million was designated for future payment of project debt principal.
 
Capital Requirements
 
Our projected contractual obligations are consistent with amounts disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We believe that when combined with our other sources of liquidity, including our existing cash on hand and the Revolving Loan Facility, we will generate sufficient cash over at least the next twelve months to meet operational needs, make capital expenditures, invest in the business and service debt due.
 
Other Commitments
 
Other commitments as of March 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
 
                         
    Commitments Expiring by Period  
          Less Than
    More Than
 
    Total     One Year     One Year  
 
Letters of credit
  $ 302,227     $ 5,542     $ 296,685  
Surety bonds
    111,471             111,471  
                         
Total other commitments — net
  $   413,698     $   5,542     $   408,156  
                         
 
The letters of credit were issued under various credit facilities (primarily the Funded L/C Facility) to secure our performance under various contractual undertakings related to our domestic and international projects or to secure obligations under our insurance program. Each letter of credit relating to a project is required to be maintained in effect for the period specified in related project contracts, and generally may be drawn if it is not renewed prior to expiration of that period.


38


Table of Contents

We believe that we will be able to fully perform under our contracts to which these existing letters of credit relate, and that it is unlikely that letters of credit would be drawn because of a default of our performance obligations. If any of these letters of credit were to be drawn by the beneficiary, the amount drawn would be immediately repayable by us to the issuing bank. If we do not immediately repay such amounts drawn under these letters of credit, unreimbursed amounts would be treated under the Credit Facilities as additional term loans in the case of letters of credit issued under the Funded L/C Facility, or as revolving loans in the case of letters of credit issued under the Revolving Loan Facility.
 
The surety bonds listed on the table above relate primarily to performance obligations ($100.7 million) and support for closure obligations of various energy projects when such projects cease operating ($10.8 million). Were these bonds to be drawn upon, we would have a contractual obligation to indemnify the surety company.
 
We have certain contingent obligations related to the Notes. These are:
 
  •     holders may require us to repurchase their Notes, if a fundamental change occurs; and
  •     holders may exercise their conversion rights upon the occurrence of certain events, which would require us to pay the conversion settlement amount in cash.
 
For specific criteria related to contingent interest, conversion or redemption features of the Notes, see Note 6. Changes in Capitalization.
 
We have certain contingent obligations related to the Debentures. These are:
 
  •     holders may require us to repurchase their Debentures on February 1, 2012, February 1, 2017 and February 1, 2022;
  •     holders may require us to repurchase their Debentures, if a fundamental change occurs; and
  •     holders may exercise their conversion rights upon the occurrence of certain events, which would require us to pay the conversion settlement amount in cash and/or our common stock.
 
For specific criteria related to contingent interest, conversion or redemption features of the Debentures, refer to Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
We have issued or are party to guarantees and related contractual support obligations undertaken pursuant to agreements to construct and operate waste and energy facilities. For some projects, such performance guarantees include obligations to repay certain financial obligations if the project revenues are insufficient to do so, or to obtain or guarantee financing for a project. With respect to our businesses, we have issued guarantees to municipal clients and other parties that our subsidiaries will perform in accordance with contractual terms, including, where required, the payment of damages or other obligations. Additionally, damages payable under such guarantees for our energy-from-waste facilities could expose us to recourse liability on project debt. If we must perform under one or more of such guarantees, our liability for damages upon contract termination would be reduced by funds held in trust and proceeds from sales of the facilities securing the project debt and is presently not estimable. Depending upon the circumstances giving rise to such damages, the contractual terms of the applicable contracts, and the contract counterparty’s choice of remedy at the time a claim against a guarantee is made, the amounts owed pursuant to one or more of such guarantees could be greater than our then-available sources of funds. To date, we have not incurred material liabilities under such guarantees.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
See Note 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to new accounting pronouncements.
 
Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
In preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles, we are required to use judgment in making estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and related notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Many of our critical accounting policies are subject to significant judgments and uncertainties which could potentially result in materially different results under different conditions and assumptions. Future events rarely develop exactly as forecast, and the best estimates routinely require adjustment. Management believes there have been no material changes during the three months ended March 31, 2010 to the items discussed in Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
Item 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
In the normal course of business, our subsidiaries are party to financial instruments that are subject to market risks arising from changes in commodity prices, interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and derivative instruments. Our use of derivative instruments is very limited and we do not enter into derivative instruments for trading purposes. We use a sensitivity model to evaluate the fair value or cash flows of financial instruments with exposure to market risk that assumes instantaneous, parallel shifts in exchange rates and interest rate yield curves. There are certain limitations inherent in use of a


39


Table of Contents

sensitivity analysis, primarily due to the assumption that exchange rates change in a parallel manner and that interest rates change instantaneously.
 
There have been no material changes during the three months ended March 31, 2010 to the items discussed in Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. For details related to fair value estimates for the Cash Conversion Option, Note Hedge and contingent interest as of March 31, 2010, refer to Item 1. Financial Statements — Note 11. Financial Instruments and Note 12. Derivative Instruments.
 
Item 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of Covanta’s disclosure controls and procedures, as required by Rule 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) as of March 31, 2010. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.
 
Our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, based on their review, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide such reasonable assurance.
 
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, believes that any disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must consider the benefits of controls relative to their costs. Inherent limitations within a control system include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by unauthorized override of the control. While the design of any system of controls is to provide reasonable assurance of the effectiveness of disclosure controls, such design is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and such assumptions, while reasonable, may not take into account all potential future conditions. Accordingly, because of the inherent limitations in a cost effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be prevented or detected.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
 
In August 2009, we completed the acquisition of six energy-from-waste businesses and one transfer station business located in New York, Pennsylvania, California and Canada and in February 2010, we completed this acquisition transaction with the purchase of an energy-from-waste business in Florida. We have excluded these businesses from Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting as of December 31, 2009, and we will include these businesses in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting as of December 31, 2010.
 
There has not been any change in our system of internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.


40


Table of Contents

 
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
See Note 14. Commitments and Contingencies of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Item 1A.  RISK FACTORS
 
There have been no material changes during the three months ended March 31, 2010 to the risk factors discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
Item 2.  UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
 
None.
 
Item 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
 
None.
 
Item 4.  SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
 
None
 
Item 5.  OTHER INFORMATION
 
(a) None.
 
(b) Not applicable.
 
Item 6.  EXHIBITS
 
         
Exhibit
   
Number   Description
 
 
31.1
    Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Executive Officer.
 
31.2
    Certification pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Interim Chief Financial Officer.
 
32
    Certification of periodic financial report pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 by the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer.


41


Table of Contents

 
SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
COVANTA HOLDING CORPORATION
(Registrant)
 
  By: 
/s/  Thomas E. Bucks
Thomas E. Bucks
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer
and Interim Chief Financial Officer
 
Date: April 21, 2010


42