form10q2qtr06302012.htm
======================================================================================================================================================
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
[x] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
OR
|
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 0-20260
IntegraMed America, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
06-1150326
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(IRS employer identification no.)
|
|
|
Two Manhattanville Road
|
|
|
|
Purchase, NY
|
10577
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip code)
|
(914) 253-8000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated Filer x
|
|
|
Non-Accelerated filer ¨
|
Smaller Reporting Company ¨
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate number of shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding on July 25, 2012 was approximately 11.986,713.
====================================================================================================================================================================
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
Page
|
PART I.
|
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Other Comprehensive Income for the three and six-month periods ending June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 (unaudited)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (unaudited)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
8-16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
17-25
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
PART II.
|
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
Risk Factors
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
Other Information
|
26
|
Item 6.
|
|
Exhibits
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|
EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|
EXHIBITS
|
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(All amounts in thousands, except per share and share amounts)
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
56,669 |
|
|
$ |
57,909 |
|
Patient and other receivables, net
|
|
|
7,233 |
|
|
|
6,372 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
10,277 |
|
|
|
8,602 |
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
2,222 |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
76,702 |
|
|
|
75,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets, net
|
|
|
24,482 |
|
|
|
21,288 |
|
Business service rights, net
|
|
|
24,845 |
|
|
|
24,114 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
30,334 |
|
|
|
30,334 |
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
4,442 |
|
|
|
4,442 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
|
2,221 |
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
163,180 |
|
|
$ |
157,504 |
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
2,573 |
|
|
$ |
4,037 |
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
18,530 |
|
|
|
17,074 |
|
Current portion of long-term notes payable and other obligations
|
|
|
9,070 |
|
|
|
3,816 |
|
Due to fertility medical practices
|
|
|
19,483 |
|
|
|
14,229 |
|
Attain IVF deferred revenue and other patient deposits
|
|
|
16,960 |
|
|
|
16,342 |
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
66,616 |
|
|
|
55,498 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes payable and other obligations
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
7,187 |
|
Deferred and other tax liabilities
|
|
|
4,587 |
|
|
|
5,277 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
71,203 |
|
|
|
67,962 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value – 20,000,000 shares authorized at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, 12,023,921 and 11,894,302 issued at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, and 11,986,713 and 11,857,094 shares outstanding at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
Capital in excess of par
|
|
|
78,794 |
|
|
|
78,156 |
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost – 37,208 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 respectively
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(330 |
) |
Retained earnings
|
|
|
13,423 |
|
|
|
11,639 |
|
Total shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
91,977 |
|
|
|
89,542 |
|
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
163,180 |
|
|
$ |
157,504 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(all amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
|
|
For the
Three-month period
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
For the
Six-month period
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Revenues, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attain Fertility Centers
|
|
$ |
53,131 |
|
|
$ |
49,653 |
|
|
$ |
104,388 |
|
|
$ |
98,251 |
|
Vein Clinics
|
|
|
23,060 |
|
|
|
19,398 |
|
|
|
42,629 |
|
|
|
35,059 |
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
76,191 |
|
|
|
69,051 |
|
|
|
147,017 |
|
|
|
133,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs of services and sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attain Fertility Centers
|
|
|
48,537 |
|
|
|
45,481 |
|
|
|
95,525 |
|
|
|
89,645 |
|
Vein Clinics
|
|
|
21,992 |
|
|
|
18,206 |
|
|
|
40,710 |
|
|
|
33,618 |
|
Total costs of services and sales
|
|
|
70,529 |
|
|
|
63,687 |
|
|
|
136,235 |
|
|
|
123,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attain Fertility Centers
|
|
|
4,594 |
|
|
|
4,172 |
|
|
|
8,863 |
|
|
|
8,606 |
|
Vein Clinics
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
Total contribution
|
|
|
5,662 |
|
|
|
5,364 |
|
|
|
10,782 |
|
|
|
10,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
4,537 |
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
|
|
7,421 |
|
|
|
6,042 |
|
Legal settlement
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
Total other expenses, net
|
|
|
4,597 |
|
|
|
4,734 |
|
|
|
7,544 |
|
|
|
7,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,065 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
3,238 |
|
|
|
2,178 |
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
|
$ |
1,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net earnings per share of Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares – basic
|
|
|
11,987 |
|
|
|
11,836 |
|
|
|
11,981 |
|
|
|
11,825 |
|
Weighted average shares - diluted
|
|
|
12,053 |
|
|
|
11,878 |
|
|
|
12,037 |
|
|
|
11,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(all amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
For the three-month period
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
For the six-month period
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income as reported
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
|
$ |
1,306 |
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on hedging transaction
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Related tax (provision) / benefit
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
$ |
332 |
|
|
$ |
1,796 |
|
|
$ |
1,303 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(all amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital in
Excess of Par
|
|
|
Accumulated Comprehensive Income (loss)
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Retained Earnings
|
|
|
Total Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2011
|
|
|
11,894 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
78,156 |
|
|
$ |
(42 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
$ |
(330 |
) |
|
$ |
11,639 |
|
|
$ |
89,542 |
|
Stock awards granted, net
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Restricted stock award and stock option expense amortization
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
587 |
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Unrealized gain on hedging transaction
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Tax effect of equity transactions
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Net income for the six months ended
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
|
|
1,784 |
|
Balance at June 30, 2012
|
|
|
12,024 |
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
78,794 |
|
|
$ |
(30 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
$ |
(330 |
) |
|
$ |
13,423 |
|
|
$ |
91,977 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(all amounts in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
For the
Six-month period
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
|
$ |
1,306 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,313 |
|
|
|
3,935 |
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
(998 |
) |
|
|
223 |
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
780 |
|
Changes in assets and liabilities —
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patient and other accounts receivable
|
|
|
(861 |
) |
|
|
(927 |
) |
Other current assets
|
|
|
(1,675 |
) |
|
|
(763 |
) |
Other assets
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(174 |
) |
(Decrease) increase in liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,464 |
) |
|
|
(1,327 |
) |
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,456 |
|
|
|
5,752 |
|
Due to fertility medical practices
|
|
|
5,254 |
|
|
|
2,911 |
|
Attain IVF Deferred revenue and other patient deposits
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
8,860 |
|
|
|
14,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of business service rights
|
|
|
(1,380 |
) |
|
|
(2,395 |
) |
Purchase of fixed assets, net
|
|
|
(6,858 |
) |
|
|
(6,212 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(8,238 |
) |
|
|
(8,607 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt repayments
|
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
|
(1,834 |
) |
Proceeds from stock option exercises
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,862 |
) |
|
|
(1,742 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(1,240 |
) |
|
|
3,692 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
57,909 |
|
|
|
50,183 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
56,669 |
|
|
$ |
53,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
NOTE 1 — GENERAL:
Acquisition by Sagard Capital
On June 10, 2012, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by affiliates formed by Sagard Capital Partners, L.P. (“Sagard Capital”), an investment fund and IntegraMed shareholder. The acquisition consideration is $14.05 per share, net to the the Company’s shareholders in cash, without interest thereon and subject to applicable withholding taxes or a total equity purchase price of approximately $169.5 million. The agreement is subject to shareholder approval as well as other regulatory and customary closing conditions. If approved by the Company’s shareholders and if the other conditions to closing are satisfied, the transaction is expected to be completed as promptly as practicable, but no later than mid-November 2012. The merger is subject to certain closing conditions and there can be no assurance that the merger will be consummated.
The accompanying unaudited financial statements do not include the effects of the merger, nor do they include any adjustments associated with the purchase price allocation of the merger.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules related to Form 10-Q and, accordingly, do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position at June 30, 2012, and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Operating results for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012 or any other period. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in IntegraMed America, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC for the year ended December 31, 2011.
NOTE 2 — EARNINGS PER SHARE:
The reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows (000's omitted, except for per share amounts):
|
|
For the three-month period
ended June 30,
|
|
|
For the six-month period
ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
Numerator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
476 |
|
|
$ |
348 |
|
|
$ |
1,784 |
|
|
$ |
1,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic)
|
|
|
11,987 |
|
|
|
11,836 |
|
|
|
11,981 |
|
|
|
11,825 |
|
Effect of dilutive options and warrants
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Weighted average shares and dilutive potential Common shares (diluted)
|
|
|
12,053 |
|
|
|
11,878 |
|
|
|
12,037 |
|
|
|
11,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, there were no options to purchase shares of common stock which were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise price of all options was at or below the average market price of the shares of common stock.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, options to purchase approximately 12,000 and 18,000 shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as the exercise price of the options was above the average market price of the shares of common stock.
As of June 30, 2012, there were 12,023,921 shares of common stock issued of which 11,986,713 were outstanding and 37,208 held as treasury shares. As of December 31, 2011, there were 11,894,302 shares of common stock issued of which 11,857,094 were outstanding and 37,208 held as treasury shares.
NOTE 3 ¾ SEGMENT INFORMATION:
We currently report two major operating segments and a corporate office that provides shared services. These operating segments reflect our organizational structure, lines of responsibility and management’s perspective of the organization. Each segment includes an element of overhead costs specifically associated with its operations with the corporate shared services group responsible for support functions generic to both segments.
Performance by segment, for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are presented below (000’s omitted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues, net
|
|
$ |
53,131 |
|
|
$ |
23,060 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
$ |
76,191 |
|
Cost of Services and Sales
|
|
|
48,537 |
|
|
|
21,992 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
70,529 |
|
Contribution
|
|
|
4,594 |
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
5,662 |
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
8.61 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and Administrative
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4,537 |
|
|
|
4,537 |
|
Interest, net
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$ |
4,594 |
|
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
$ |
(4,597 |
) |
|
$ |
1,065 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense included above
|
|
$ |
1,060 |
|
|
$ |
658 |
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
1,902 |
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$ |
1,247 |
|
|
$ |
2,640 |
|
|
$ |
181 |
|
|
$ |
4,068 |
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
40,247 |
|
|
$ |
59,761 |
|
|
$ |
63,172 |
|
|
$ |
163,180 |
|
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues, net
|
|
$ |
104,388 |
|
|
$ |
42,629 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
$ |
147,017 |
|
Cost of Services and Sales
|
|
|
95,525 |
|
|
|
40,710 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
136,235 |
|
Contribution
|
|
|
8,863 |
|
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
10,782 |
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and Administrative
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
7,421 |
|
|
|
7,421 |
|
Interest, net
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$ |
8,863 |
|
|
$ |
1,919 |
|
|
$ |
(7,544 |
) |
|
$ |
3,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense included above
|
|
$ |
2,058 |
|
|
$ |
1,267 |
|
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
$ |
3,664 |
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$ |
2,673 |
|
|
$ |
3,564 |
|
|
$ |
621 |
|
|
$ |
6,858 |
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
40,247 |
|
|
$ |
59,761 |
|
|
$ |
63,172 |
|
|
$ |
163,180 |
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues, net |
|
$ |
49,653 |
|
|
$ |
19,398 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
$ |
69,051 |
|
Cost of Services and Sales
|
|
|
45,481 |
|
|
|
18,206 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
63,687 |
|
Contribution
|
|
|
4,172 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
5,364 |
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and Administrative
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
Legal settlement
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
Interest, net
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
─
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$ |
4,209 |
|
|
$ |
1,192 |
|
|
$ |
(4,771 |
) |
|
$ |
630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense included above
|
|
$ |
1,008 |
|
|
$ |
526 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
|
$ |
1,699 |
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$ |
1,104 |
|
|
$ |
849 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
|
$ |
2,062 |
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
44,060 |
|
|
$ |
57,199 |
|
|
$ |
57,624 |
|
|
$ |
158,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues, net
|
|
$ |
98,251 |
|
|
$ |
35,059 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
$ |
133,310 |
|
Cost of Services and Sales
|
|
|
89,645 |
|
|
|
33,618 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
123,263 |
|
Contribution
|
|
|
8,606 |
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
10,047 |
|
Operating margin
|
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and Administrative
|
|
|
- |
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
6,042 |
|
|
|
6,042 |
|
Legal settlement
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
1,650 |
|
Interest, net
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
─
|
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$ |
8,676 |
|
|
$ |
1,441 |
|
|
$ |
(7,939 |
) |
|
$ |
2,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense included above
|
|
$ |
1,983 |
|
|
$ |
970 |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
3,287 |
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
$ |
2,534 |
|
|
$ |
3,384 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
6,212 |
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
44,060 |
|
|
$ |
57,199 |
|
|
$ |
57,624 |
|
|
$ |
158,883 |
|
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
NOTE 4 – CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
To the extent that cash balances exceed short term operating needs, excess cash is invested in short term interest bearing instruments. It is our policy to restrict our investments to high-quality securities with fixed principal amounts and maturity dates of one year or less. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, our entire cash balances were held in accounts with depository institutions or were invested in certificate of deposits and are considered cash or cash equivalents.
NOTE 5 – PATIENT AND OTHER RECEIVABLES, NET:
Patient and other receivables are principally comprised of patient and insurance receivables from our Vein Clinics division which represent outstanding balances due for patient treatments less estimated allowances for uncollectible balances. Reserves for uncollectable accounts are based on both historical trends and specific identification of specific accounts. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, we believe that our receivable reserves were adequate to provide for any collection issues.
The composition of our patient and other receivables is as follows (000’s omitted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vein Clinic patient and insurance receivables
|
|
$ |
7,503 |
|
|
$ |
7,045 |
|
Reserve for uncollectible accounts
|
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
(769 |
) |
Subtotal Vein Clinic receivables, net
|
|
$ |
7,016 |
|
|
$ |
6,276 |
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Total Patient and other receivables, net
|
|
$ |
7,233 |
|
|
$ |
6,372 |
|
NOTE 6 – DIRECT RESPONSE ADVERTISING:
Direct Response Advertising Costs are included in other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and were $3.8 million and $1.3 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. These costs consist of capitalized advertising costs which have met the criteria outlined in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 340, including; probable future benefit, the ability to uniquely track individual responses to specific advertisements, and the absence of material selling or marketing expenses expected to occur after the advertisement. These capitalized direct response advertising costs are amortized and recognized as an expense over a seven or six month useful life (depending on the segment that the advertising relates to). These amounts (which relate primarily to specific broadcast and internet based advertisements) are capitalized and begin to amortize at the time of use, based on the broadcast date or month of usage and are amortized over the expected period that revenue will be generated as a result of these costs.
NOTE 7 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS:
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, our financial statements contained intangible assets totaling approximately $60 million and $59 million, respectively, as per the table below (000’s):
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
30,334 |
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,442 |
|
Business Service Rights - Refundable
|
|
|
13,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
Business Service Rights - Non-Refundable, net
|
|
|
11,408 |
|
|
|
24,845 |
|
|
|
11,947 |
|
|
|
24,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
59,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
58,890 |
|
In evaluating the recoverability of our intangible assets, we follow the guidance contained in FASB ASU 2011-08 Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), which provides for a qualitative assessment of intangible asset valuation, followed by a quantitative two-step process to determine impairment if necessary.
Based on a review of relevant events, circumstances and expected trends as contained in FASB ASU 2011-08 section 350-20-35-3C, as well as other qualifiers, we concluded that as of June 30, 2012, it is more likely than not that the carrying value of our goodwill and intangible assets, in whole and individually, is less than their fair value, and no impairment has occurred.
If the fair value is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss would be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the carrying amount of the intangible assets over their fair values. To date we have not recorded any impairment losses.
NOTE 8 – DUE TO FERTILITY MEDICAL PRACTICES:
Due to Fertility Medical Practices is comprised of the net amounts owed by us to fertility practices contracted for full service practice management services. We do not consolidate the results of the Fertility Medical Practices into our accounts (as discussed in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011). This balance is comprised of amounts due to us by the medical practices for funds which we advance for use in financing their accounts receivable and selected other transactions, less balances owed to the fertility practices by us for undistributed physician earnings and patient deposits which we hold on behalf of the fertility practices.
While we are responsible for the management and collection of the fertility practices’ accounts receivable, as part of the business services we provide, the credit and collection risk for these receivables remains with the fertility practice. We generally finance the receivables with full recourse. Amounts financed relating to uncollectible accounts are recovered from the fertility practice in the month uncollectible reserves are established or accounts are written-off.
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, Due to Fertility Medical Practices was comprised of the following balances (000’s omitted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances to Partner fertility practices
|
|
$ |
(18,363 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,552 |
) |
Undistributed Physician Earnings
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
5,508 |
|
Physician Practice Patient Deposits
|
|
|
30,252 |
|
|
|
26,273 |
|
Due to Fertility Medical Practices, net
|
|
$ |
19,483 |
|
|
$ |
14,229 |
|
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
NOTE 9 – NOTES PAYABLE AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS:
Notes payable and other obligations as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 consisted of the following (000’s omitted):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note payable to bank
|
|
$ |
9,024 |
|
|
$ |
10,904 |
|
Derivative fair valuation adjustment
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes payable and other obligations
|
|
$ |
9,070 |
|
|
$ |
11,003 |
|
Less — current portion
|
|
|
(9,070 |
) |
|
|
(3,816 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes payable and other obligations
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
7,187 |
|
Note payable to Bank ¾
In May, 2010, we entered into a syndicated amended and restated financing arrangement with Bank of America, N.A., TD Bank, N.A., and Webster Bank, N.A. and secured a $35 million three-year revolving credit facility (amounts available to be borrowed are based on eligible patient receivables and as of June 30, 2012, approximately $14.5 million of the $35 million line of credit was available) and a $25 million three-year term loan. Both the term loan and the revolving credit facility mature in May 2013. Interest on the term loan and revolving loans are payable based on a tiered pricing structure related to a defined leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2012 interest on the term loan was payable at a rate of approximately 3.5%. As of June 30, 2012, the company had a $90 thousand letter of credit against the revolving credit facility and the unused balance bore a commitment fee of 0.25%.
Our credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of our assets. As of June 30, 2012, we were in full compliance with all of our applicable debt covenants.
NOTE 10 – STOCK-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION:
We currently have stock option plans which have been previously approved by the stockholders, the details of which are described more fully in Note 19 of the consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Under these plans, stock options and stock grants may be granted to employees, directors and such other persons as the Board of Directors determines will contribute to our success. Vesting periods are set by the Board of Directors and stock options are generally exercisable during a five or ten-year period following the date of grant. The Board of Directors has the authority to accelerate the maturity of any stock option or grant at its discretion, and all stock options and grants have anti-dilution provisions. Under all of our plans, options expire three months from the date of the holder’s termination of employment or twelve months in the event of disability or death. As of June 30, 2012, there were 690,064 shares available for granting under these Plans.
The following table sets forth information about the weighted-average fair value of options granted in periods below. No options were granted in the three months ended June 30, 2012.
|
|
For the three-month period
Ended June 30,
|
|
For the six-month period
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of options granted
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
$
|
6.06
|
|
|
─
|
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
─
|
%
|
|
─
|
%
|
|
─
|
%
|
|
─
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
─
|
%
|
|
─
|
%
|
|
47
|
%
|
|
─
|
%
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
─
|
%
|
|
─
|
%
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
─
|
%
|
Expected term in years
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
─
|
|
We recognize compensation cost for stock option plans over the vesting period which approximates the service period, based on the fair value of the option as of the date of the grant.
Stock award activity for the first six months of 2012 under these plans is summarized below:
|
Number of shares of Common Stock underlying options
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2011
|
|
164,543
|
|
$
|
7.55
|
Granted – stock options
|
|
51,569
|
|
$
|
8.10
|
Granted – stock awards
|
|
112,034
|
|
$
|
8.10
|
Exercised – stock options
|
|
(17,585
|
) |
$
|
2.94
|
Exercised – stock awards
|
|
(112,034
|
) |
$
|
8.10
|
Canceled
|
|
(6,287
|
) |
$
|
4.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at June 30, 2012
|
|
192,240
|
|
$
|
8.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at:
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
119,948
|
|
$
|
7.37
|
June 30, 2012
|
|
113,020
|
|
$
|
8.32
|
The aggregate intrinsic value (difference between exercise price and current value of our common stock) of options outstanding and exercisable as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was approximately $348,454 and $205,000, respectively.
We recorded a charge to earnings to recognize compensation expense related to outstanding stock options of $59,000 and $71,000 for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively and $132,000 and $122,000 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. As of June 30, 2012, we had approximately $398,000 of unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options which will be recognized over their remaining vesting period, which approximates the service period of 4 years.
We also issue stock grants to officers and members of the Board of Directors. Stock granted to Board members vests immediately and stock granted to officers is restricted and generally vests over a period of three to five years. We recorded a charge to earnings to recognize compensation expense related to stock grants of $236,000 and $356,000 for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. For six-month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, we recorded $455,000 and $658,000, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, we had approximately $1,425,000 of unrecognized compensation costs related to stock grants which will be recognized over their remaining vesting period, which approximates the service period.
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
NOTE 11 – OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS:
IntegraMed is exposed to the risk that its earnings and cash flows could be adversely impacted by market driven fluctuations in the level of interest rates. It is our policy to manage these risks by using a mix of fixed and floating rate debt and derivative instruments. After the expiration of an existing interest rate swap agreement in the third quarter of 2010, we entered into another interest rate swap agreement, with a nominal value of $10 million and maturity of May 2013, which is designed to help manage the interest rate risk associated with our long term debt. As a result of the swap agreement entered into during the third quarter of 2010, our net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 includes additional financing costs of approximately $16,000 and $32,000, respectively. In addition to the costs included in our reported net income, the interest rate swap is accounted for as a cash flow hedge and has also generated a non-recognized after-tax loss of approximately $30,000 as of June 30, 2012 which is reported as part of our comprehensive income.
This fair value of this hedge was calculated in accordance with ASC 820, utilizing Level 2 inputs of quoted prices for similar liabilities in active markets.
We deem this hedge to be highly effective as it shares the same amortization schedule as the underlying debt subject to the hedge and any change in fair value inversely mimics the appropriate portion of the hedged item. As of June 30, 2012, we had no other hedge or derivative transactions.
NOTE 12 – LITIGATION AND COMPLIANCE WITH HEALTHCARE REGULATIONS:
From time to time, we and our Partner fertility centers and vein clinics and their physicians are parties to legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. We are exposed to claims of professional negligence based on services performed by our employees, including physician assistants and nurse practitioners, as well as based on our relationships with physicians providing treatments at our Partner fertility centers and vein clinics. We maintain, for our medical practices and certain of our employees, medical malpractice insurance with limits of $3 million per claim, regardless of the number of the covered defendants, and $10 million per year in the aggregate, with respect to our Partner fertility centers, and with limits generally equal to $1 million per physician and $10 million per year in the aggregate, with respect to our vein clinics. Our Partner fertility centers, vein clinics and their physicians are additional named insured under our policies. All of our insurance policies are subject to deductibles or a self-insured retention. A portion of the insurance for certain of our fertility centers is provided by ARTIC (a captive insurance company, which provides coverage for a number of our partner centers).
On April 13, 2012, we gave notice to Southeastern Fertility Centers, PA., our fertility partner practice located outside of Charleston, South Carolina ("SEFC"), that SEFC was in default of our joint Business Service agreement (BSA). A recent binding order of arbitration mandates dissolution of SEFC, which automatically constitutes a default under the BSA. Pursuant to the terms of the BSA, SEFC is obligated to pay us (i) the right to manage fee originally paid by us to SEFC, which was $950,000, (ii) the net book value of all our fixed assets at SEFC's facility, which net book value at March 31, 2012 was $230,680 and (iii) other obligations owed to the Company, which amount at March 31, 2012 was $110,739. Additionally, SEFC is obligated to re-purchase all uncollected accounts receivable which amount at March 31, 2012 was $402,772.
On April 18, 2012, we entered into a non-binding letter of intent ("LOI") with one of the disputing shareholders of SEFC pursuant to which we will, among other things, enter into a new Business Services Agreement with such shareholder and a non-shareholder SEFC physician, who are forming a new professional association to practice medicine in the Charleston area. If we are successful in entering into this new arrangement, we do not expect the termination of the Agreement to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, but we have no assurances that negotiating a definitive agreement will be successful.
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Subsequent to the conclusion of the arbitration between our Attain Fertility Centers Division practice in Charlotte, North Carolina, Reproductive Endocrine Associates of Charlotte, P.C. (“REACH”) and their patients , Sally and Christopher Ware, in which $2,026,381 was awarded to Plaintiffs for wrongful conception and emotional distress because their daughter was born with cystic fibrosis, we received a letter dated April 19, 2011 from Medical Mutual Insurance Company of North Carolina (“MMIC”) demanding, as Subrogee of REACH, indemnification from IntegraMed based on the indemnification provision in the management agreement between REACH and IntegraMed dated September 1, 2003 (the “MSA”). IntegraMed rejected the demand. On September 30, 2011, we were served with a complaint filed in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, Guildford County, South Carolina in which MMIC is claiming, among other things, a willful refusal of IntegraMed to indemnify MMIC under the MSA as a result of payments made by MMIC to Sally and Christopher Ware as a result of the arbitral award. We have retained North Carolina counsel and are vigorously defending the claims based on meritorious defenses. The parties have agreed to the arbitrators who will arbitrate the matter in Q4. Although we will vigorously defend the allegations, we cannot assure you that we will ultimately prevail.
In June 2012, subsequent to the Company’s June 11, 2012 announcement of an Agreement and Plan of Merger with SCP-325 Holding Corp and SCP-325 Merger Sub, Inc., affiliates of Sagard Capital Partners, LP, two lawsuits (Shane Ruth Vs. IntegraMed, et. al. , New York Supreme Court, Westchester County and Charles Francis vs. IntegraMed et. al., Chancery Court, State of Delaware) were filed against the Company, its Board of Directors and Sagard. The plaintiff in the New York action seeks injunctive and other equitable relief, including enjoining the merger, and damages, as well as recovery of costs, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. In July 2012, the plantiffs in both lawsuits began coordinating their claims and the plaintiff in the Delaware case requested that the action in Delaware be stayed pending resolution of the New York case, which the Delaware Chancery Court granted. Although the Company believes that the claims in these lawsuits are without merit, the Company can offer no assurances that it will be successful in defending the claims.
NOTE 13 – RECENT ISSUED ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE:
Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU No. 2011-05)
In June 2011, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on presenting comprehensive income with the intention of increasing its prominence in financial statements by eliminating the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in stockholder’s equity. The standard requires comprehensive income to be reported in either a single statement that presents the components of net income, the components of other comprehensive income, and total comprehensive income, or in two consecutive statements. The standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011 for public companies. We have adopted the relevant provisions of ASU 2011-05 in the first quarter of 2012. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Health Care Entities (Topic 954): Presentation and Disclosure of Patient Service Revenue (ASU No. 2011-07)
In July 2011, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on the presentation of patient service revenue and related provisions for doubtful accounts. Under the term of this pronouncement certain health care entities are required to change the presentation of their statement of operations by reclassifying the provision for bad debts associated with patient service revenue from an operating expense to a deduction from patient service revenue (net of contractual allowances and discounts). This pronouncement is applicable to only those entities that recognize significant amounts of patient service revenue at the time services are rendered even though the entities do not assess a patient’s ability to pay. All other entities would continue to present the provision for bad debts (including bad debts associated with patient service revenue) as an operating expense. The new standard is effective for public companies effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2011. As the patient service revenue included in our financials includes an assessment of a patient’s ability to pay, and is presented net of related contractual allowances, it is our opinion that this standard is not applicable to our statement of operations, and therefore we will continue to present the provision for bad debts as an operating expense.
|
ITEM 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this report and with IntegraMed America, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results and timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those discussed under the caption “Risk Factors” appearing under Item 1-A included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
On June 11, 2012, we entered into a merger agreement, as further described in Note 1 above to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, we paid advisory fees of $1.0 million and legal and other professional fees totaling approximately $471,000 during the second quarter 2012. In addition, approximately $1.0 million in additional advisory fees will be payable upon the consummation of the merger.
Overview
We manage highly specialized outpatient centers in emerging, technology-based, niche medical markets. We currently operate in two healthcare sectors, fertility care and vein treatment. We support our operations with an established and extensive infrastructure of clinical and business resources. Each of our operating divisions is presented as a separate segment for financial reporting purposes.
The Attain Fertility Centers Division is comprised of 35 contracted fertility centers, located in major markets across the United States. Each contracted center is composed of a multi-physician practice with most offering multiple clinical locations in their service area. This Division provides an array of services to contracted fertility centers ranging from consumer marketing services to complete practice management services. The strategy of the Attain Fertility Centers Division is to support the long term growth of contracted centers by attracting and retaining new patients, expanding market share, and for our partner practices (those that we provide the full range of management service), we enable superior clinical and patient care, and increase the operational efficiency of the fertility center. The Attain Fertility Centers Division drives growth at our contracted fertility centers through a number of business development and marketing initiatives, these include our suite of Attain™ IVF programs. The Attain™ IVF programs consist of product offerings which allow a patient to pay one fee for multiple treatment cycles and under certain programs, patients are eligible for a refund if they do not take home a baby.
Our Vein Clinics Division began operations on August 8, 2007, with the purchase of Vein Clinics of America, Inc. (“VCA”), a company that had been in business since 1981. The Vein Clinics Division currently manages a network of 50 clinics located in 15 states, which specialize in the treatment of vein disease and other vein disorders.
The primary elements of our overall business strategy include:
|
|
•
|
Drive growth at our contracted fertility centers by providing additional management; services.
|
|
|
•
|
Expand the relationships to additional fertility centers through the sale of consumer product offerings;
|
|
|
•
|
Develop de novo vein clinics;
|
|
|
•
|
Increase the total number of patients treated;
|
|
|
•
|
Increase the penetration of our Attain IVF programs; and
|
|
|
•
|
Continue to improve operating efficiencies.
|
Major Events Impacting Financial Condition and Results of Operations
2012
On June 11, 2012, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by affiliates formed by Sagard Capital Partners, L.P. (“Sagard Capital”), an investment fund and IntegraMed shareholder. The Merger Agreement was filed as an exhibit to a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 11, 2012.
On April 13, 2012, we gave notice to Southeastern Fertility Centers, PA., our fertility partner practice located outside of Charleston, South Carolina ("SEFC"), that SEFC was in default of our joint Business Service agreement (BSA). A recent binding order of arbitration mandates dissolution of SEFC, which automatically constitutes a default under the BSA. Pursuant to the terms of the BSA, SEFC is obligated to pay us (i) the right to manage fee originally paid by us to SEFC, which was $950,000, (ii) the net book value of all our fixed assets at SEFC's facility, which net book value at March 31, 2012 was $230,680 and (iii) other obligations owed to the Company, which amount at March 31, 2012 was $110,739. Additionally, SEFC is obligated to re-purchase all uncollected accounts receivable which amount at March 31, 2012 was $402,772.
On April 18, 2012, we entered into a non-binding letter of intent ("LOI") with one of the disputing shareholders of SEFC pursuant to which we will, among other things, enter into a new Business Services Agreement with such shareholder and a non-shareholder SEFC physician, who are forming a new professional association to practice medicine in the Charleston area. If we are successful in entering into this new arrangement, we do not expect the termination of the Agreement to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, but we have no assurances that negotiating a definitive agreement will be successful.
On March 5, 2012, we announced that our Attain Fertility Centers Division had acquired Palmetto Fertility Center in Miami Lakes, Florida, for a purchase price of approximately $0.5 million. Palmetto Fertility Center was an established fertility practice serving the greater Miami area and was integrated into our existing South Florida based Partner fertility center.
On February 10, 2012, we announced that our Attain Fertility Centers Division had entered into an agreement with UNC Health Care System’s to provide full complement of support services, including operational and financial management, revenue cycle management, patient marketing and sales, information systems support to their fertility practice. Under the terms of this 20-year agreement, our service fees are comprised of a fixed percentage of revenues, reimbursed costs of services, and an additional fixed percentage of the center’s earnings. We also committed up to $0.5 million to fund any necessary capital needs of the practice
2011
On August 2, 2011, we amended our credit facility with Bank of America, N.A., TD Bank, N.A., and Webster Bank, N. A.. This amendment revised our consolidated EBITDA covenant.
On June 30, 2011, we announced the appointment of Mr. Michael C. Howe to our Board of Directors.
On March 2, 2011, we amended our credit facility with Bank of America, N.A, TD Bank, N.A., and Webster Bank, N.A. This amendment revised two financial covenants (Consolidated EBITDA and in the method of calculating the fixed charge covenant) to better align our credit facility with our business strategy.
On January 14, 2011 we announced the acquisition of Northwest Center for Reproductive Science (NCRS) for a purchase price of approximately $2.4 million. NCRS was an established fertility practice based in the Pacific Northwest and was integrated into Seattle Reproductive Medicine, our Seattle based Partner fertility center.
Results of Operations
The following table shows the percentage of net revenues represented by various expenses and other income items reflected in our consolidated statements of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
|
For the three-month period
Ended June 30,
(unaudited)
|
|
For the six-month period
Ended June 30,
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
Revenues, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attain Fertility Centers
|
|
|
69.7
|
% |
71.9
|
% |
71.0
|
% |
|
73.7
|
% |
Vein Clinics
|
|
|
30.3
|
% |
28.1
|
% |
29.0
|
% |
|
26.3
|
% |
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
% |
100.0
|
% |
100.0
|
% |
|
100.0
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attain Fertility Centers
|
|
|
63.7
|
% |
65.9
|
% |
65.0
|
% |
|
67.2
|
% |
Vein Clinics
|
|
|
28.9
|
% |
26.4
|
% |
27.7
|
% |
|
25.2
|
% |
Total cost of services and sales
|
|
|
92.6
|
% |
92.3
|
% |
92.7
|
% |
|
92.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attain Fertility Centers
|
|
|
6.0
|
% |
6.0
|
% |
6.0
|
% |
|
6.5
|
% |
Vein Clinics
|
|
|
1.4
|
% |
1.7
|
% |
1.3
|
% |
|
1.1
|
% |
Total contributions
|
|
|
7.4
|
% |
7.7
|
% |
7.3
|
% |
|
7.6
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
6.0
|
% |
4.3
|
% |
5.0
|
% |
|
4.5
|
% |
Legal settlement
|
|
|
0.0
|
% |
2.4
|
% |
0.0
|
% |
|
1.2
|
% |
Interest income
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)% |
(0.1
|
)%
|
(0.1
|
)% |
|
(0.1
|
)% |
Interest expense
|
|
|
0.1
|
% |
0.2
|
% |
0.1
|
% |
|
0.2
|
% |
Total other expenses, net
|
|
|
6.0
|
% |
6.8
|
% |
5.1%
|
% |
|
5.8
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1.4
|
% |
0.9
|
% |
2.2
|
% |
|
1.8
|
% |
Income tax provision
|
|
|
0.8
|
% |
0.4
|
% |
1.0
|
% |
|
0.7
|
% |
Net income
|
|
|
0.6
|
% |
0.5
|
% |
1.2
|
% |
|
1.1
|
% |
For the three months ended June 30, 2012, total revenues were $76.2 million, an increase of approximately $7.1 million, or 10.3%, from the same period in 2011. Revenue at our Attain Fertility Centers Division grew $3.5 million, or 7.0%, above the same period in 2011, based on growth in both our Partner fertility centers and Attain IVF programs. Revenue at our Vein Clinics Division was up approximately $3.7 million, or 18.9%.
For the six months ended June 30, 2012, total revenues were $147.0 million, an increase of approximately $13.7 million, or 10.3%, from the same period in 2011. Revenue growth at our Attain Fertility Centers Division of $6.1 million was 6.2% above the same period in 2011 based on growth in both our Partner fertility centers and Attain IVF programs. Revenue at our Vein Clinics Division was up approximately $7.6 million, or 21.6%.
A segment-by-segment discussion is presented below.
Attain Fertility Centers:
Our Attain Fertility Centers segment is comprised primarily of our Partner fertility centers, which represent the provider aspect of the fertility market, and our Attain IVF Programs, which are directed at the consumer portion of the market.
Partner fertility centers
In providing clinical care to patients, each of our Partner fertility centers generates patient revenues which we do not report in our consolidated financial statements. Although we do not consolidate the Partner fertility center practice financials with our own, these financials do directly affect our revenues.
The components of our revenues from most of the Partner fertility centers are:
|
|
|
|
•
|
A base service fee calculated as a percentage of patient revenues as reported by the Partner fertility center (this percentage generally varies depending on the agreement and the level of patient revenues);
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Cost of services equal to reimbursement for the expenses which we advanced to the Partner fertility center during the month (representing substantially all of the expenses incurred by the center, except physician compensation); and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
Our additional fees which represent our share of the net income of the Partner fertility center (which also varies depending on the underlying center, subject to limits in some circumstances).
|
Our revenues from one Partner clinic are not based on this three-part structure. Rather, our revenues for this clinic are based on a cost-plus formula and are generally equal to the operating expenses associated with managing the medical practice plus 9.5% of such expenses.
In addition to these revenues generated from our fertility centers, we often receive miscellaneous other revenues related to providing non-medical services to medical practices. From the total of our revenues, we subtract the amortization of our business service rights under several agreements, which are the rights to provide business services to each of the centers.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, revenue from our partner practices in our Attain Fertility Centers Division, increased by $2.7 million, or 6.4%, and $5.4 million, or 6.5%, respectively, relative to the same period in the prior year. This increase was the result of a rise in same-center revenues and profitability compared to the same period in 2011. The increased revenue from same-centers was due in part to the increased number of physicians practicing at these locations as well as facility fees earned from affiliated physicians who utilized our clinical facilities.
The table below illustrates the components of the Attain Fertility Centers revenues in relation to the Partner fertility center practice financials for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (000’s omitted):
|
|
For the three-month period
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
For the six-month period
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Physician Financials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Patient revenue
|
|
$ |
62,807 |
|
|
$ |
60,714 |
|
|
$ |
125,216 |
|
|
$ |
118,441 |
|
(b) Cost of services
|
|
|
40,606 |
|
|
|
37,739 |
|
|
|
80,241 |
|
|
|
74,960 |
|
(c) Base service fee
|
|
|
3,095 |
|
|
|
2,974 |
|
|
|
6,196 |
|
|
|
5,872 |
|
(d) Practice contribution (a-b-c)
|
|
|
19,106 |
|
|
|
20,001 |
|
|
|
38,779 |
|
|
|
37,609 |
|
(e) Physician compensation
|
|
|
17,715 |
|
|
|
18,335 |
|
|
|
35,725 |
|
|
|
34,377 |
|
(f) IntegraMed additional fee
|
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IntegraMed Financials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(g) IntegraMed gross revenue (b+c+f)
|
|
|
45,092 |
|
|
|
42,379 |
|
|
|
89,491 |
|
|
|
84,064 |
|
(h) Amortization of business service rights
|
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
(649 |
) |
|
|
(648 |
) |
(i) Other revenue
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
(j) IntegraMed fertility services revenue (g+h+i)
|
|
|
44,798 |
|
|
|
42,086 |
|
|
|
88,904 |
|
|
|
83,478 |
|
(k) Costs of services
|
|
|
40,606 |
|
|
|
37,771 |
|
|
|
80,241 |
|
|
|
75,021 |
|
(l) Division overhead
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
4,239 |
|
(m) Contribution of Integramed Centers (j-k-l)
|
|
$ |
1,916 |
|
|
$ |
2,305 |
|
|
$ |
4,284 |
|
|
$ |
4,218 |
|
(i) Other revenue includes administrative fees we receive from ARTIC, the captive insurance company as well as other miscellaneous fees.
The Company’s revenue generated from the business services provided to the physician Partner clinics (line g) is comprised of the three fee components, the cost of service fee (line b), the base service fee (line c) and the additional service fee (line f).
The revenue recorded by our physician Partner clinics (line “a”) is derived from providing medical services to patients. As the exclusive service provider to these clinics, we supply the clinics with all resources necessary for the physicians to provide these medical services. In return, we receive reimbursement for the cost of these resources (line “b”) plus two additional fees (lines “c” and “f”) which are based on the performance of specific operations under the service agreement. The residual financial results of the partner physician’s business (patient revenue, line “a”, less costs and fees of the business) (line “e”), are a right of the partner physicians (the business owners), and as such are not consolidated in the financial results of IntegraMed.
The following summarized quarterly data for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is presented for additional analysis and demonstration of the slight seasonality of our Attain Fertility Centers Division. New patients visits are an indicator of initial patient interest in fertility treatment and IVF cases completed are an indicator of billable charges (000’s omitted, except IVF statistics).
|
|
|
Q2 2012 |
|
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
YTD 2012
|
|
|
YTD 2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue, Net
|
|
$ |
53,131 |
|
|
$ |
49,653 |
|
|
$ |
3,478 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
$ |
104,388 |
|
|
$ |
98,251 |
|
|
$ |
6,137 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
Contribution
|
|
$ |
4,594 |
|
|
$ |
4,172 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
$ |
8,863 |
|
|
$ |
8,606 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner Centers Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Patient Visits
|
|
|
7,340 |
|
|
|
7,458 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
|
|
15,943 |
|
|
|
15,101 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
% |
IVF Cycles
|
|
|
4,013 |
|
|
|
3,886 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
8,398 |
|
|
|
7,695 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
% |
IUI Cycles
|
|
|
6,445 |
|
|
|
6,410 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
13,461 |
|
|
|
12,427 |
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attain Statistics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(16.1 |
)% |
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
(12.2 |
)% |
Enrollments
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(11.6 |
)% |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
)% |
Pregnancies
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
% |
Patients enrolled in our Attain IVF Refund Program pay us an up-front fee (deposit) in return for up to six treatment cycles (consisting of three fresh IVF cycles and three frozen embryo transfers). Any non-refundable portion of these fees is recognized as revenue, based on the relative fair value of each treatment cycle completed relative to the total fair value of the contracted treatment package available to the patient. The refundable portion of the program contract amount is recognized as revenue when the patient becomes pregnant. At the time of pregnancy, we establish a reserve for future medical costs should the patient miscarry and require additional contracted treatment cycles. The two main factors that impact Attain IVF Refund Program financial performance are:
|
|
|
|
•
|
the number of patients enrolled and receiving treatment, and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
clinical pregnancy rates.
|
Patients enrolled in our Attain IVF Multi-Cycle Program pay us a single fee, which is slightly less than the average cost of two fresh IVF cycles, in return for up to four treatment cycles (consisting of two fresh IVF cycles and two frozen embryo transfers). With respect to our Attain IVF Multi-Cycle Program, we recognize a pro rata share of the contract amount as revenue as each treatment cycle is completed. The refundable portion of the program contract amount is recognized as revenue when the patient becomes pregnant. Under such revenue recognition methodology, we never recognize more revenue than the potential refundable amount under the program. At the time of pregnancy, we establish a reserve for future medical costs should the patient miscarry and require additional contracted treatment cycles. The main factors that impacts Attain IVF Multi-Cycle Program financial performance is the number of patients enrolled and receiving treatment as well as clinical outcomes.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, revenues from our Attain IVF programs increased by $0.8 million, or 11.2%, and $0.8 million, or 5.6%, respectively, versus the same periods in the prior year. This growth was fueled primarily by the expansion of our Multi-Cycle product offering launched during fiscal 2011 which helped drive enrollments and pregnancies in our Attain IVF programs.
Contribution from our Attain Fertility Centers Division for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 increased by $422 thousand or 10.1%, and $257 thousand or 3.0%, respectively, versus the same periods in the prior year. This increase is primarily the result of increased patient revenues at the clinic level coupled with increased favorable outcomes within our Attain IVF product offerings.
Vein Clinics Segment:
Revenues within our Vein Clinics segment are generated from direct billings to patients or their insurer for vein disease treatment services and these revenues are consolidated directly into our financials.
Revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 increased by $3.7 million or 18.9%, and $7.6 million or 21.6%, respectively, from the comparable periods in 2011. During the first six months of 2012, we opened 6 new vein clinic locations in Wayne, PA, Geneva IL, Annapolis, MD, Plano and Allen, TX, and Mid-Town (Atlanta) , GA, These additional clinics brought our total number of vein clinics to 50 as of June 30, 2012.
Contribution for the three and six months ending June 30, 2012 was $1.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively, versus $1.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively, for the same periods in the prior year. The reduction in contribution for the three month period ended June 30, 2012 is due to additional new clinic start-up losses incurred in the quarter versus the same period in the prior year.
Our strategy is to continue to expand our clinic footprint by opening additional new vein clinics in locations across the United States during 2012 and in future years. We plan to open three clinics through the remainder of 2012. As a result of this expansion program, we incurred new clinic start-up losses on clinics opened in 2012 totaling $1.1 million during the first two quarters of 2012, and we estimate incurring start-up losses of approximately $2.0 million for all of fiscal 2012. The pace of these openings is dependent upon our ability to identify and develop appropriate site locations for clinics which comprise both adequate reimbursement rates and patient demographics, and to recruit qualified physicians to staff those sites.
Vein Clinics Division data for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 appear below (in thousands, except first leg starts).
|
|
|
Q2 2012 |
|
|
|
Q2 2011 |
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
YTD 2012
|
|
|
YTD 2011
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues, Net
|
|
$ |
23,060 |
|
|
$ |
19,398 |
|
|
$ |
3,662 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
% |
|
$ |
42,629 |
|
|
$ |
35,059 |
|
|
$ |
7,570 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
% |
Contribution
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
)% |
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inquiries
|
|
|
9,667 |
|
|
|
8,912 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
16,256 |
|
|
|
14,353 |
|
|
|
1,903 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
New Consultations
|
|
|
6,382 |
|
|
|
5,604 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
|
|
10,650 |
|
|
|
9,156 |
|
|
|
1,494 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
First Leg Starts
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
|
2,759 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
4,787 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
% |
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses are comprised of salaries and benefits, administrative, regulatory compliance and operational support costs defined as our Shared Services group, which are not specifically related to individual center or clinic operations or other product offerings. These costs totaled $4.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012, versus $3.0 million recognized in the same period in the prior year, and $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, versus $6.0 million for the prior year period.
As previously noted, the three and six month periods in 2012 included approximately $1.5 million of costs related to our proposed merger with affiliates of Sagard Capital. Excluding these costs, General and Administrative expenses would have been approximately even with prior year levels for both the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2012.
We continue to actively manage general and administrative expenses in an effort to leverage our Shared Services group and extract economies of scale as those opportunities arise.
Interest
Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was $96 thousand and $201 thousand, respectively, down $36 thousand and $72 thousand from their respective prior year periods. These reductions are due primarily to lower interest costs resulting from scheduled debt payments on our outstanding term loan.
Income Tax Provision
Our provision for income tax was approximately $0.6 million and $1.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, or 55.3% and 44.9%, respectively, of pre-tax income. This is compared to approximately $0.3 million and $0.9 million, or 44.8% and 40.0%, respectively, of pre-tax income during the same period last year. Our effective tax rates for 2012 and 2011 reflect provisions for both current and deferred federal and state income taxes. Our effective income tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 includes additional interest for uncertain tax position items. Our effective income tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 also includes the tax effect of non-deductible merger costs that caused our effective income tax rate to increase.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Current accounting guidance addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") amended its guidance on accounting for variable interest entities ("VIE"). The new accounting guidance is effective for reporting periods after January 1, 2010 requires continuous assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. An enterprise is required to consolidate if it has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, and is the primary beneficiary or obligor of the VIE. As of June 30, 2012, through our ownership of Vein Clinics of America, Inc, we have interests in the individual vein clinics, where we are the primary beneficiary and obligor of their financial results (our contract provides for us to receive any excess or deficit profits from the vein clinics). As such we have consolidated these vein clinic operations in our consolidated financial statements. Since we do not have any financial interest in the individual fertility centers and we are not the primary beneficiary or obligor of their financial results (our contracts provide for the physician owners of the clinics to receive any excess or deficit profits), we do not consolidate the results of the fertility centers in our accounts. Also, since we do not have a controlling interest in the captive insurance provider and we are not the primary beneficiary, we do not consolidate the results of the captive insurance company in our accounts.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2012, we had approximately $56.7 million in cash and cash equivalents on hand as compared to $57.9 million at December 31, 2011. We had a working capital of approximately $10.1 million and $19.6 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
Deferred revenue and other patient deposits from our Attain IVF programs, which are reflected as a current liability, represent funds received from patients in advance of treatment cycles and are an indication of future revenues. These deposits totaled approximately $14.4 million and $13.9 million as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The change in deposit balances are a direct result of patient enrollment, and through-put, in our treatment programs. These deposits are a significant source of cash flow and represent interest-free financing for us. These funds are not restricted and the cash balances are included in our cash and cash equivalents.
In May, 2010, we entered into a syndicated amended and restated financing arrangement with Bank of America, TD Bank and Webster Bank and secured a $35 million three-year revolving credit facility (amounts available to be borrowed are based on eligible patient receivables and as of June 30, 2012, approximately all of the $35 million line of credit was available) and a $25 million three-year term loan. Both the term loan and the revolving credit facility mature in May 2013. Interest on the term loan and revolving loans are payable based on a tiered pricing structure related to a defined leverage ratio. Commitment fees on unused portions of the revolving credit facility are also payable based on a tiered pricing structure tied to the same defined leverage ratio. At June 30, 2012, there were no outstanding balances on the revolving credit facility.
As of June 30, 2012, we were in full compliance with all of our applicable debt covenants. We continuously review our credit agreements and may renew, revise or enter into new agreements from time to time as deemed necessary.
During the third quarter of 2010 we also entered into an interest rate swap agreement to help manage interest rate risk. This swap agreement will mature in the third quarter of 2013, at which time we will re-evaluate our options for managing interest rate risk.
As of June 30, 2012, we did not have any significant contractual commitments for the acquisition of fixed assets or construction of leasehold improvements. However, we do anticipate upcoming capital expenditures during the normal course of business which we will be able to finance from our operating cash flows. These expenditures are primarily related to medical equipment, information system infrastructure and leasehold improvements.
We believe that working capital, specifically cash, remains at adequate levels to fund our operations and our commitments for fixed asset acquisitions. We also believe that the cash flows from our operations plus our available credit facility will be sufficient to provide for our future liquidity needs over the next twelve months.
Significant Contractual Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments
The following summarizes our contractual obligations and other commercial commitments at June 30, 2012, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods.
|
|
Payments due by period (000’s omitted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable
|
|
$
|
9,070
|
|
$
|
9,070
|
|
$
|
─
|
|
$
|
─
|
|
$
|
─
|
Interest on debt
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
|
|
─
|
Operating leases (rents)
|
|
|
76,933
|
|
|
5,720
|
|
|
25,206
|
|
|
19,529
|
|
|
26,478
|
Total contractual cash
obligations
|
|
$
|
86,217
|
|
$
|
15,004
|
|
$
|
25,206
|
|
$
|
19,529
|
|
$
|
26,478
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration per Period
(000’s omitted)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unused lines of credit
|
|
$
|
35,000
|
|
$
|
35,000
|
|
$
|
─
|
|
$
|
─
|
|
$
|
─
|
We also have commitments to provide working capital financing to Partner centers in our Attain Fertility Centers division that are not included in the above table. A significant portion of these commitments relate to our transactions with the medical practices themselves. Our responsibilities to these medical practices are to provide financing for their accounts receivable and to hold patient deposits on their behalf, as well as undistributed physician earnings. Disbursements to the medical practices generally occur monthly. The medical practice’s repayment hierarchy consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
•
|
We provide a cash credit to the practice for billings to patients and insurance companies;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
We reduce the cash credit for center expenses that we have incurred on behalf of the practice;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
We reduce the cash credit for the base portion of our service fee which relates to the Partner revenues;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
We reduce the cash credit for the variable portion of our service fee which relates to the Partner earnings; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
We disburse to the medical practice the remaining cash amount which represents the physician’s undistributed earnings.
|
We are also responsible for the collection of the Partner accounts receivables. We continuously fund these needs from our cash flows from operations, the collection of prior months’ receivables and deposits from patients in advance of treatment. If delays in repayment are incurred, which have not as yet been encountered, we could draw on our existing revolving line of credit. We also make payments on behalf of the Partner for which we are reimbursed in the short-term. Other than these payments, as a general course, we do not make other advances to the medical practices. We have no other funding commitments to the Partner centers.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
In the normal course of business, our interest income and expense items are sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates. We are currently subject to interest rate risk associated with our credit facilities as well as our short term investments and certain advances to our Partner Fertility Centers, some of which are tied to either short term interest rates, LIBOR or the prime rate. As of June 30, 2012, we do not believe that a one percent change in market level interest rates would have a material impact our pre-tax income.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a)
|
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
|
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2012 (the "Evaluation Date"). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
(b) Changes in internal controls
There were no changes made in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Part II OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
Item 1
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
|
|
|
From time to time, we are party to legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Please refer to Note 12 of these financial statements for additional disclosures.
|
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
|
|
|
There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
|
|
None.
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
Defaults upon Senior Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
None.
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Index to Exhibits on Page 28
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
August 7, 2012
|
|
By:
|
INTEGRAMED AMERICA, INC.
(Registrant)
/s/Timothy P. Sheehan
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy P. Sheehan
Senior Vice President Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
|
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 dated August 7, 2012
|
|
|
31.2
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 dated August 7, 2012
|
|
|
32.1
|
CEO Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 dated August 7, 2012
|
|
|
32.2
|
CFO Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 dated August 7, 2012
|
101.INS
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
101.SCH
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
|
101.CAL
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document
|
101.DEF
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document
|
101. LAB
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Document
|
101.PRE
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Document
|
|
|
|
|