Quarterly Report Ended December 31, 2005

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 


 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2005

 

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from              to             .

 

Commission file number: 1-6311

 


 

Tidewater Inc

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


 

Delaware   72-0487776

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. employer

identification no.)

 

601 Poydras St., Suite 1900

New Orleans, Louisiana 70130

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

 

(504) 568-1010

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

N/A

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or of such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  x    No  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

 

57,576,115 shares of Tidewater Inc. common stock $.10 par value per share were outstanding on January 6, 2006. Excluded from the calculation of shares outstanding at January 6, 2006 are 2,912,692 shares held by the Registrant’s Grantor Stock Ownership Trust. Registrant has no other class of common stock outstanding.

 



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

TIDEWATER INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and par value data)

 

     December 31,
2005


   March 31,
2005


ASSETS

           

Current assets:

           

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 167,064    15,376

Trade and other receivables, net

     232,148    169,784

Marine operating supplies

     40,351    38,959

Other current assets

     4,437    3,837
    

  

Total current assets

     444,000    227,956
    

  

Investments in, at equity, and advances to unconsolidated companies

     35,240    32,074

Properties and equipment:

           

Vessels and related equipment

     2,442,080    2,483,970

Other properties and equipment

     50,047    48,512
    

  
       2,492,127    2,532,482

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

     1,121,782    1,080,296
    

  

Net properties and equipment

     1,370,345    1,452,186
    

  

Goodwill

     328,754    328,754

Other assets

     116,971    172,203
    

  

Total assets

   $ 2,295,310    2,213,173
    

  

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

           

Current liabilities:

           

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

     81,129    82,261

Accrued property and liability losses

     8,368    9,286

Income taxes

     10,024    695
    

  

Total current liabilities

     99,521    92,242
    

  

Long-term debt

     300,000    380,000

Deferred income taxes

     179,903    184,410

Accrued property and liability losses

     28,144    34,778

Other liabilities and deferred credits

     95,695    79,041

Stockholders’ equity:

           

Common stock of $.10 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized, issued 60,488,807 shares at December and 60,718,231 shares at March

     6,049    6,072

Other stockholders’ equity

     1,585,998    1,436,630
    

  

Total stockholders’ equity

     1,592,047    1,442,702
    

  

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 2,295,310    2,213,173
    

  

 

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

2


TIDEWATER INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

    

Quarter Ended

December 31,


    Nine Months Ended
December 31,


 
     2005

    2004

    2005

    2004

 

Revenues:

                          

Vessel revenues

   $ 228,086     170,076     611,708     481,076  

Other marine revenues

     6,473     17,517     19,369     31,461  
    


 

 

 

       234,559     187,593     631,077     512,537  
    


 

 

 

Costs and expenses:

                          

Vessel operating costs

     103,414     101,825     315,629     298,650  

Costs of other marine revenues

     5,226     15,007     14,750     25,914  

Depreciation and amortization

     26,892     25,298     79,843     73,936  

General and administrative

     22,855     18,741     61,547     54,045  

Impairment on long-lived assets

     3,050     —       3,050     —    

Gain on sales of assets

     (5,275 )   (2,837 )   (75,462 )   (10,517 )
    


 

 

 

       156,162     158,034     399,357     442,028  
    


 

 

 

       78,397     29,559     231,720     70,509  

Other income (expenses):

                          

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

     136     (645 )   1,155     (195 )

Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated companies

     2,228     1,169     7,110     4,501  

Minority interests

     22     (36 )   27     (23 )

Interest and miscellaneous income

     2,429     695     5,246     1,887  

Interest and other debt costs

     (2,357 )   (1,694 )   (6,630 )   (4,704 )
    


 

 

 

       2,458     (511 )   6,908     1,466  
    


 

 

 

Earnings before income taxes

     80,855     29,048     238,628     71,975  

Income taxes

     20,833     9,295     67,554     23,032  
    


 

 

 

Net earnings

   $ 60,022     19,753     171,074     48,943  
    


 

 

 

Earnings per common share

   $ 1.05     .35     2.99     .86  
    


 

 

 

Diluted earnings per common share

   $ 1.04     .34     2.96     .86  
    


 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding

     57,231,972     57,035,705     57,217,573     56,919,397  

Incremental common shares from stock options

     696,163     233,024     530,842     137,005  
    


 

 

 

Adjusted weighted average common shares

     57,928,135     57,268,729     57,748,415     57,056,402  
    


 

 

 

Cash dividends declared per common share

   $ .15     .15     .45     .45  
    


 

 

 

 

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

3


TIDEWATER INC.

UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

 

     Nine Months Ended
December 31,


 
     2005

    2004

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

   $ 183,644     110,595  
    


 

Cash flows from investing activities:

              

Proceeds from sales of assets

     199,625     14,362  

Additions to properties and equipment

     (125,609 )   (153,983 )
    


 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

     74,016     (139,621 )
    


 

Cash flows from financing activities:

              

Borrowings

     30,000     90,000  

Principal payments on debt

     (110,000 )   (40,000 )

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

     8,984     4,162  

Common stock repurchases

     (8,691 )   —    

Cash dividends

     (25,907 )   (25,691 )

Other

     (358 )   (1,039 )
    


 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

     (105,972 )   27,432  
    


 

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

     151,688     (1,594 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     15,376     17,636  
    


 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

   $ 167,064     16,042  
    


 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

              

Cash paid during the period for:

              

Interest

   $ 8,188     8,853  

Income taxes

   $ 19,394     24,542  
    


 

 

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

4


TIDEWATER INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

(1) Interim Financial Statements

 

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the interim periods presented herein have been prepared in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting principles and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated balance sheets and the condensed consolidated statements of earnings and cash flows at the dates and for the periods indicated. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for the respective full years. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in the company’s 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005 financial statement presentation.

 

(2) Stockholders’ Equity

 

At December 31, 2005 and March 31, 2005, 2,913,205 and 3,201,352 shares, respectively, of common stock were held in a grantor stock ownership plan trust for the benefit of stock-based employee benefits programs. These shares are not included in common shares outstanding for earnings per share calculations and transactions between the company and the trust, including dividends paid on the company’s common stock, are eliminated in consolidating the accounts of the trust and the company.

 

(3) Common Stock Repurchase Program

 

In July 2005, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the company to spend up to $120.0 million to repurchase shares of its common stock. Repurchases will be made through open market or privately-negotiated transactions. The company intends to use its available cash and, when considered advantageous, borrowings under its revolving credit facility to fund the share repurchases. The Board of Directors’ authorization for this repurchase program will expire when all authorized funds have been expended or on June 30, 2006, unless extended by the Board of Directors. The company did not repurchase any stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2005. For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, the company spent $8.7 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 220,000 common shares. At December 31, 2005, approximately $111.3 million was available to repurchase shares of the company’s common stock pursuant to the stock repurchase program.

 

(4) Stock-Based Compensation

 

The company measures compensation expense for its stock-based compensation plan using the intrinsic value recognition and measurement principles prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and related interpretations. The company uses the disclosure provision of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure,” which amended the disclosure provision of SFAS No. 123. The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per share for the quarters and nine-month periods ended December 31 had the company

 

5


determined compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant date for its stock options under SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.”

 

     Quarter Ended
December 31,


   

Nine Months Ended
December 31,


 

(In thousands, except share data)


   2005

    2004

    2005

    2004

 

Net earnings as reported

   $ 60,022     19,753     171,074     48,943  

Add stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net earnings, net of related tax effect

     586     301     1,710     902  

Less total stock-based employee compensation expense, under fair value method for all awards, net of tax

     (1,001 )   (1,454 )   (3,358 )   (4,561 )
    


 

 

 

Pro forma net earnings

   $ 59,607     18,600     169,426     45,284  
    


 

 

 

Earnings per common share:

                          

As reported

   $ 1.05     .35     2.99     .86  

Pro forma

   $ 1.04     .33     2.96     .80  

Diluted earnings per common share:

                          

As reported

   $ 1.04     .34     2.96     .86  

Pro forma

   $ 1.03     .32     2.93     .79  

 

(5) Income Taxes

 

The effective tax rate applicable to pre-tax earnings for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005 was 25.8% and 28.3%, respectively. The effective tax rate applicable to pre-tax earnings for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2004 was 32.0%. The effective tax rate in the current quarter and nine-month period is lower than during the same periods in fiscal 2005 as a result of the provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 which reduced taxes on earnings of most non-U.S. subsidiaries considered indefinitely reinvested abroad.

 

(6) Employee Benefit Plans

 

A defined benefit pension plan covers certain U.S. citizen employees and employees who are permanent residents of the United States. Benefits are based on years of service and employee compensation. In addition, the company also offers a supplemental retirement plan (supplemental plan) that provides pension benefits to certain employees in excess of those allowed under the company’s tax-qualified pension plan. The company contributed $0.8 million to the defined benefit pension plan during the quarter ended June 30, 2005, which satisfied its fiscal 2006 annual funding requirement. The company did not make a contribution to the defined benefit pension plan during the quarters ended December 31, 2005 and September 30, 2005 and does not expect to make a contribution during the remainder of the current fiscal year. The company was not required to and did not make a contribution to the defined benefit pension plan during the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2004.

 

Qualified retired employees currently are covered by a program that provides limited health care and life insurance benefits. Costs of the program are based on actuarially determined amounts and are accrued over the period from the date of hire to the full eligibility date of employees who are expected to qualify for these benefits.

 

The net periodic benefit cost for the company’s U.S. defined benefit pension plan and the supplemental plan (referred to collectively as “Pension Benefits”) and the postretirement health care

 

6


and life insurance plan (referred to collectively as “Other Benefits”) is comprised of the following components:

 

     Quarter Ended
December 31,


    Nine Months Ended
December 31,


 

(In thousands)


   2005

    2004

    2005

    2004

 

Pension Benefits:

                          

Service cost

   $ 190     174     570     522  

Interest cost

     883     839     2,648     2,517  

Expected return on plan assets

     (614 )   (640 )   (1,840 )   (1,920 )

Amortization of prior service cost

     22     24     66     72  

Recognized actuarial loss

     237     211     711     633  
    


 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

   $ 718     608     2,155     1,824  
    


 

 

 

Other Benefits:

                          

Service cost

   $ 503     439     1,509     1,317  

Interest cost

     591     587     1,773     1,761  

Amortization of prior service cost

     (4 )   (6 )   (12 )   (18 )

Recognized actuarial loss

     127     140     381     420  
    


 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

   $ 1,217     1,160     3,651     3,480  
    


 

 

 

 

(7) Sale of KMAR 404 Class of Vessels

 

On July 26, 2005, the company completed the sale of six of its KMAR 404 class of Anchor Handling Towing Supply vessels to Deep Sea Supply ASA for a total cash price of $188.0 million. This transaction resulted in a $65.9 million pre-tax financial gain, or approximately $42.8 million after tax, or $0.74 per diluted common share during the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The transaction resulted in an approximate $112.0 million taxable gain, but no cash taxes are due because of the availability of net operating loss carryforwards. The company used a portion of the proceeds of the sale to repay $95.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the company’s revolving credit agreement.

 

(8) Contingencies

 

At the conclusion of its examination of the company’s income tax returns covering fiscal years 2001 and 2002, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) proposed changes to taxable income which, if sustained, would result in additional income tax of $12.8 million. The proposed increase in taxable income results primarily from the IRS disallowance of all claimed deductions from taxable income related to the company’s foreign sales corporation (FSC) as well as all deductions claimed under the Extraterritorial Income Exclusion (ETI). The company has filed a formal protest with the IRS seeking a reconsideration of their position taken. The company has also received a final assessment of additional income tax of $1.75 million resulting from the IRS’s earlier examination of the company’s income tax returns for fiscal years 1999 and 2000. Such assessment is due to the IRS disallowance of essentially all deductions related to FSC activity during this period. The company has paid the 1999 and 2000 assessment and has begun the process of seeking a refund of the taxes paid through the initiation of legal proceedings. The IRS has begun an examination of the company’s 2003 and 2004 federal income tax returns. The company also has additional ongoing examinations by various state and foreign tax authorities. The company does not believe that the results of these examinations will have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

Certain current and former subsidiaries of the company are, or have been, participating employers in an industry-wide multi-employer retirement fund in the United Kingdom, the Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund (MNOPF.) The company has been informed of an estimated 234 million sterling, or

 

7


approximately $433 million, total fund deficit as estimated by the MNOPF actuary, that will require contributions from the participating employers. Substantially all of the fund’s deficit allocable to the company relates to current operating subsidiaries as the company does not believe, on the advice of counsel, that it is liable for any additional portion of the fund’s deficit that relates to subsidiaries that have either been sold or dissolved in prior years. The amount of the company’s share of the fund’s deficit will depend ultimately on a number of factors including an updated calculation of the total fund deficit, the number of participating employers, and the final method used in allocating the required contribution among participating employers.

 

In August 2005, the company received an invoice from the fund in the amount of $3.8 million for what the trustees calculated to be the company’s current share of the fund deficit. Accordingly, the company recorded this amount in full as crew cost expense in the September 2005 quarter. As allowed by the terms of the assessment, approximately $0.7 million of the invoiced amount was paid during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, respectively, with the remainder, including interest charges, to be paid in annual installments over nine years.

 

It is possible that the fund’s trustee may issue additional invoices to the company for additional amounts in the future for various reasons, including the results of future fund valuation reports and whether other assessed parties have the financial capability to contribute their respective allocations.

 

The company has previously disclosed that it is the subject of an informal inquiry by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) related to the $26.5 million impairment charge that it recorded in its fiscal year ended March 31, 2004 that was related to 83 “cold stacked” vessels that had been used in the Gulf of Mexico. The company is in discussions with the SEC in an effort to resolve the matters raised by the inquiry. At this time, the company is unable to predict the timing or ultimate outcome of these discussions.

 

Various legal proceedings and claims are outstanding which arose in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these actions will not have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

 

(9) New Accounting Pronouncements

 

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (SFAS 123R). This standard requires expensing of stock options and other share-based payments and supersedes SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and its related implementation guidance that had allowed companies to choose between expensing stock options or showing proforma disclosure only. This standard, together with a new rule adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission in April 2005, is effective for the company as of April 1, 2006 and will apply to all awards granted, modified, cancelled or repurchased after that date. The ultimate amount of increased compensation expense will be dependent on the number of option shares granted, their timing and vesting period and the method used to calculate the fair value of the awards, among other factors. The company is currently evaluating the expected impact that the adoption of SFAS 123R will have on its results of operations and cash flows in the future.

 

8


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Tidewater Inc.:

 

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Tidewater Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2005, and the related condensed consolidated statements of earnings for the three-month and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

 

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

 

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

We have previously audited, in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and other comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated June 14, 2005, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2005 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

New Orleans, Louisiana

 

January 23, 2006

 

9


Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Forward Looking Information and Cautionary Statement

 

In accordance with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the company notes that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the information incorporated herein by reference contain certain forward-looking statements which reflect the company’s current view with respect to future events and financial performance. Any such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and the company’s future results of operations could differ materially from historical results or current expectations. Some of these risks are discussed in this report, and include, without limitation, fluctuations in oil and gas prices; level of fleet additions by competitors and industry overcapacity; changes in capital spending by customers in the energy industry for exploration, development and production; changing customer demands for different vessel specifications; acts of terrorism; significant weather conditions; unsettled political conditions, war, civil unrest and governmental actions, especially in higher risk countries of operations; foreign currency fluctuations; and environmental and labor laws.

 

Forward-looking statements, which can generally be identified by the use of such terminology as “may,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “believe,” “think,” “could,” “will,” “continue,” “intend,” “seek,” “plan,” “should,” “would” and similar expressions contained in this report, are predictions and not guarantees of future performance or events. Any forward-looking statements are based on current industry, financial and economic information, which the company has assessed but which by its nature is dynamic and subject to rapid and possibly abrupt changes. The company’s actual results could differ materially from those stated or implied by such forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties associated with our business. The forward-looking statements should be considered in the context of the risk factors listed above and discussed in Items 1, 2 and 7 included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 14, 2005 and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Investors and prospective investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Management disclaims any obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect new information, future events or developments.

 

Overview

 

The company provides services to the global offshore energy industry through the operation of a diversified fleet of marine service vessels. Revenues, net earnings and cash flows from operations are dependent upon the activity level of the vessel fleet, which is ultimately dependent upon oil and natural gas prices, which, in turn, are determined by the supply/demand relationship for crude oil and natural gas. The following information contained in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report and related disclosures.

 

General Market Conditions and Results of Operations

 

The company’s vessels provide a diverse range of services and equipment to the offshore energy industry. Fleet size, utilization and vessel day rates primarily determine the amount of revenues and operating profit because operating costs and depreciation do not change proportionally with changes in revenues. Operating costs consist primarily of crew costs, repair and maintenance, insurance, fuel, lube oil and supplies. Fleet size and utilization are the major factors that affect crew costs. The timing and amount of repair and maintenance costs are influenced by customer demands, vessel age and scheduled drydockings to satisfy safety and inspection requirements mandated by regulatory agencies. Whenever possible, vessel drydockings are scheduled in order to minimize any impact on vessel operations and are only done if economically justified, given the vessel’s age and physical condition.

 

10


The following table compares revenues and operating expenses (excluding general and administrative expense, depreciation expense and gain on sales of assets) for the company’s vessel fleet for the quarters and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the quarter ended September 30, 2005. Vessel revenues and operating costs relate to vessels owned and operated by the company while other marine services relate to third-party activities of the company’s shipyards, brokered vessels and other miscellaneous marine-related activities.

 

     Quarter Ended
December 31,


   Nine Months Ended
December 31,


  

Quarter Ended
Sept 30,

2005


(In thousands)


   2005

   2004

   2005

   2004

  

Revenues:

                          

Vessel revenues:

                          

United States

   $ 50,710    29,306    126,710    87,341    40,718

International

     177,376    140,770    484,998    393,735    157,512
    

  
  
  
  
       228,086    170,076    611,708    481,076    198,230

Other marine revenues

     6,473    17,517    19,369    31,461    6,121
    

  
  
  
  
     $ 234,559    187,593    631,077    512,537    204,351
    

  
  
  
  

Operating costs:

                          

Vessel operating costs:

                          

Crew costs

   $ 60,449    58,662    181,332    168,549    61,926

Repair and maintenance

     16,810    17,419    53,399    54,966    16,793

Insurance and loss reserves

     3,044    4,922    11,196    13,266    2,628

Fuel, lube and supplies

     8,482    9,682    28,847    29,253    10,932

Other

     14,629    11,140    40,855    32,616    13,726
    

  
  
  
  
       103,414    101,825    315,629    298,650    106,005

Costs of other marine revenues

     5,226    15,007    14,750    25,914    4,934
    

  
  
  
  
     $ 108,640    116,832    330,379    324,564    110,939
    

  
  
  
  

 

Marine support services are conducted worldwide with assets that are highly mobile. Revenues are principally derived from offshore service vessels, which regularly and routinely move from one operating area to another, often to and from offshore operating areas in different continents. Because of this asset mobility, revenues and long-lived assets attributable to the company’s international marine operations in any one country are not “material” as that term is defined by SFAS No. 131.

 

As a result of the uncertainty of a certain customer to make payment of vessel charter hire, the company has deferred the recognition of approximately $6.4 million of billings as of December 31, 2005 ($1.6 million of billings as of March 31, 2005), which would otherwise have been recognized as revenue. The company will recognize the amounts as revenue as cash is collected or at such time as the uncertainty has been significantly reduced.

 

The company’s domestic results of operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 benefited from strong industry fundamentals which translated into higher utilization and average day rates for the company’s domestic-based vessel fleet. Prospects for growth in the offshore market in the Gulf of Mexico have shown significant improvement during the past year. However, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita have caused extensive damage to the energy industry infrastructure in the Gulf of Mexico and along the U.S. Gulf Coast resulting in an interruption in oil and gas production in the Gulf of Mexico. It is forecast that oil and natural gas production will not likely return to pre-storm levels before the second quarter of calendar 2006. Pre-storm offshore rig demand improved greatly and drilling activity was forecast to remain at improved levels well into 2006. The exploration and production (E&P) companies have contracted offshore drilling rigs for longer durations than in past periods due to concerns over rig availability in the domestic market. The market for offshore support vessels tightened as drilling operators discovered that offshore vessels currently in service are in short supply. The Gulf of Mexico supply boat market still has a significant number of vessels stacked that

 

11


could resume active status, but only after expenditures to drydock and re-certify the vessels. The company did not experience any injuries to its personnel or damage or interruption of service to its fleet of vessels serving the offshore oil and gas industry in the Gulf of Mexico due to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. The aftermath of the storms did not have any material impact on the company’s ability to respond to customer needs or to its ability to fulfill contract commitments. Demand for the company’s available domestic-based vessels prior to the two storms was strong and business has been brisk since the storms, with charter rates exceeding levels that were achieved in prior upturns in 1997 and 2001.

 

Commodity prices for crude oil and natural gas spiked on the news that the two storms devastated the Gulf Coast and caused damage to the oil and gas infrastructure. At the present time, commodity prices for natural gas are at high levels and inventories for the resource have tightened primarily due to production shut-ins. Domestic results of operations are primarily driven by natural gas exploration and production and, given the present supply/demand fundamentals and damage sustained to the offshore oil and gas infrastructure, management anticipates its vessels to be in high demand in the Gulf of Mexico for the near term while repairs are made to offshore pipelines and platforms. While the repair work in the Gulf of Mexico is expected to keep domestic-based vessel demand high for the near term, the offshore rig count in the Gulf of Mexico remains relatively depressed as compared to past up cycles. The uptick in domestic-based business during the quarter ended December 31, 2005 is related to the repair work resulting from damage caused by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Upon completion of the needed repair work in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, the number of available drilling rigs in the U.S. market will be the primary driver of the company’s future profitability in the domestic market. The strength of the international drilling market has attracted offshore rigs from the U.S. market over the past few years and the company does not anticipate that the number of rigs drilling in the Gulf of Mexico will change dramatically in the foreseeable future. This capacity constraint is forcing some E&P companies to delay drilling programs. Over the longer term, the company’s domestic-based fleet will be influenced more by the active offshore rig count than by any other single outside influence.

 

Historically, the company’s international results of operations have been primarily dependent on the supply and demand relationship for crude oil and crude oil prices are at historically high levels. The company’s international results of operations for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 benefited from higher average day rates, utilization and an increase in the number of vessels operating internationally. Improvements in the company’s average day rates and utilization are due to increases in international E&P spending and an increase in rig utilization in the international arena. Industry analysts are forecasting that demand for crude oil will likely remain strong throughout calendar year 2006 and expect future crude oil prices to remain at high levels due to strong consumer demand, tight crude oil inventory supplies and continued concerns over possible supply interruptions caused by geopolitical risk in certain countries that are members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Analysts also forecast that calendar year 2006 E&P spending in the international markets will increase approximately 15% from amounts spent in calendar 2005. Management anticipates international vessel demand will continue to improve along with these market conditions, although the demand will be limited by the availability of drilling and production units to serve the industry. There are also a number of vessels under construction that will enter into service in the coming year that will increase the available supply of vessels to satisfy customer demands.

 

Marine operating profit/(loss) and other components of earnings before income taxes for the quarters and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 consist of the following:

 

12


     Quarter Ended
December 31,


    Nine Months Ended
December 31,


   

Quarter Ended
Sept 30,

2005


 

(In thousands)


   2005

    2004

    2005

    2004

   

Vessel activity:

                                

United States

   $ 20,125     623     39,974     (572 )   12,996  

International

     61,699     27,356     132,835     67,101     38,357  
    


 

 

 

 

       81,824     27,979     172,809     66,529     51,353  

Gain on sales of assets

     5,275     2,837     75,462     10,515     68,553  

Impairment of long-lived assets

     (3,050 )   —       (3,050 )   —       —    

Other marine services

     1,330     2,350     4,451     5,131     1,057  
    


 

 

 

 

Operating profit

     85,379     33,166     249,672     82,175     120,963  
    


 

 

 

 

Equity in net earnings of unconsolidated companies

     2,228     1,169     7,110     4,501     2,715  

Interest and other debt costs

     (2,357 )   (1,694 )   (6,630 )   (4,704 )   (1,911 )

Corporate general and administrative

     (5,995 )   (3,934 )   (14,558 )   (10,855 )   (4,029 )

Other income

     1,600     341     3,034     858     1,035  
    


 

 

 

 

Earnings before income taxes

   $ 80,855     29,048     238,628     71,975     118,773  
    


 

 

 

 

 

U.S.-based vessel revenues for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005 increased 73% and 45%, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2005, due to an increase in utilization rates and average day rates on all classes of vessels operating in the domestic market. The company’s deepwater class of vessels contributed approximately 26% and 23% of revenue growth for the quarter and nine-months ended December 31, 2005, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2005. Active towing supply/supply vessels, the company’s most significant income producing vessel class in the domestic market, generated approximately 49% and 56% of the revenue growth during the same comparative periods, respectively, while the crew/utility class contributed 16% and 16% of the revenue growth during the same comparative periods, respectively. The company’s offshore tugs also made a positive contribution to the revenue increase generating 10% and 5% of the revenue growth during the same comparative periods, respectively.

 

Utilization rates on the company’s domestic-based deepwater class of vessels increased approximately 8% and 15% (almost reaching full capacity) for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2005. Average day rates for the deepwater class of vessels increased approximately 53% and 39% from the same comparative periods, respectively. Utilization rates on the domestic-based towing supply/supply vessels increased approximately 8% and 14% for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2005, while average day rates on this same class of vessel increased approximately 53% and 38% during the same comparative periods, respectively. Utilization rates on the company’s domestic-based crew/utility class of vessels increased approximately 14% and 14% for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2005. Average day rates for the crew/utility class of vessels increased approximately 46% and 34% from the same comparative periods, respectively. Lastly, utilization rates on the domestic-based offshore tugs increased approximately 33% and 3% for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2005, while average day rates on this same class of vessel increased approximately 37% and 37% during the same comparative periods, respectively.

 

U.S.-based operating profit for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 increased approximately $19.5 million as compared to the same period in fiscal year 2005 due to higher revenues. Revenues were slightly offset by higher crew costs which increased due to general inflationary wage increases.

 

13


U.S.-based operating profit for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2005 increased approximately $40.5 million as compared to the same period in fiscal year 2005 primarily due to higher revenues and slightly lower depreciation expense resulting from fewer vessels operating in the domestic market due to vessel sales and the redeployment of vessels to opportunities in international areas.

 

Current quarter U.S.-based vessel revenues increased approximately 25% as compared to the previous quarter due to higher utilization on all vessel classes operating in the domestic market and higher average day rates on the company’s deepwater, towing-supply/supply and crewboat class of vessels. U.S.-based operating profit increased approximately 55% for the current quarter as compared to the previous quarter due to higher revenues which were partially offset by higher crew costs.

 

The company’s main operational base in Amelia, Louisiana was unaffected by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita except for power and telephone outages. The company’s corporate headquarters located in New Orleans, Louisiana did not sustain any damage and is accessible for business. The company’s New Orleans based staff personnel have resumed operations in New Orleans while the company’s senior management group continues to operate from temporary offices in Houston, Texas. The company maintains insurance against property damage, including extra-expense coverage which covers costs incurred to continue as nearly as practicable the normal operations of the business. The company’s shipyard, Quality Shipyards, LLC located in Houma, Louisiana also did not sustain any damage. All international operations of the company were unaffected by the two storms.

 

International-based vessel revenues increased approximately 26% and 23% for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2005 due to an increase in average day rates on all vessel classes. The company’s international deepwater class, towing supply/supply class and crew/utility class of vessels generated approximately 16%, 61% and 11%, respectively, of the revenue growth during the quarter ended December 31, 2005 and generated approximately 23%, 62% and 11%, respectively, of the revenue growth for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2005 as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2005. Revenues also improved due to an increase in total utilization on the international-based fleet which increased 3.8% and 1.6% for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, respectively as compared to the same periods in the fiscal year 2005.

 

International-based vessel operating profit increased 126% and 98%, for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2005 primarily due to higher revenues. For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, higher revenues were partially offset by increases in crew costs (resulting from an increase of vessels operating in the international market and due to the additional United Kingdom multi-employer retirement fund expense) and depreciation expense resulting from an increase in the number of vessels operating in the international market.

 

Current quarter international-based vessel revenues increased approximately 13% as compared to the previous quarter due to an increase in utilization rates on all classes of vessels operating in the international market and higher average day rates on the company’s international deepwater class, towing supply/supply class, crew/utility class and offshore tug class of vessels. International-based vessel operating profit for the current quarter increased 61% as compared to the previous quarter due to higher revenues.

 

During the quarter ended December 31, 2005, the company performed a thorough review of all vessels in its fleet for asset impairment. The review resulted in an impairment charge of $3.1 million on eight vessels in the company’s fleet. The eight vessels were written down to each vessel’s respective estimated fair value.

 

14


Due to an improved safety record and lower claim costs and loss reserves, the company’s insurance and loss reserve costs decreased approximately 38% and 16% for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005 as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2005.

 

Other marine services revenues and costs of other marine services decreased approximately 63% and 38% and 65% and 43%, respectively, for the quarter and nine-months ended December 31, 2005, respectively, as compared to the same periods in fiscal year 2005, primarily because the company’s shipyard, Quality Shipyards, LLC, performed more third party vessel construction, repair and refurbishments in the prior fiscal year.

 

Gain on sales of assets for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 increased significantly as compared to the same period in fiscal 2005 due to the July 26, 2005 sale of six KMAR 404 class of Anchor Handling Towing Supply vessels to Deep Sea Supply ASA for a total cash price of $188.0 million. The transaction resulted in a $65.9 million pre-tax financial gain, or approximately $42.8 million after tax, or $0.74 per diluted common share during the quarter ended September 30, 2005. The transaction resulted in an approximate $112.0 million taxable gain, but no cash taxes are due because of the availability of net operating loss carryforwards. The company used a portion of the proceeds of the sale to repay $95.0 million of outstanding borrowings under the company’s revolving credit agreement.

 

Vessel Class Statistics

 

Vessel utilization is determined primarily by market conditions and to a lesser extent by drydocking requirements. Vessel day rates are determined by the demand created through the level of offshore exploration, development and production spending by energy companies relative to the supply of offshore service vessels. Suitability of equipment and the degree of service provided also influence vessel day rates. Vessel utilization rates are calculated by dividing the number of days a vessel works during a reporting period by the number of days the vessel is available to work in the reporting period. Average day rates are calculated by dividing the revenue a vessel earns during a reporting period by the number of days the vessel worked in the reporting period. Vessel utilization and average day rates are calculated on active vessels only and, as such, do not include vessels withdrawn from active service or joint venture vessels. The following tables compare day-based utilization percentages and average day rates by vessel class and in total for the quarter and nine months ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the quarter ended September 30, 2005:

 

15


     Quarter Ended
December 31,


   Nine Months Ended
December 31,


  

Quarter Ended
Sept 30,

2005


     2005

    2004

   2005

   2004

  

UTILIZATION:

                           

Domestic-based fleet:

                           

Deepwater vessels

     99.3 %   91.7    99.0    85.9    97.9

Towing-supply/supply

     62.2     57.6    61.7    54.3    60.6

Crew/utility

     88.0     77.1    85.2    74.8    86.6

Offshore tugs

     32.7     24.6    28.4    27.7    26.4

Total

     65.0 %   57.2    62.8    55.1    61.9

International-based fleet:

                           

Deepwater vessels

     89.4 %   91.8    85.8    84.4    82.7

Towing-supply/supply

     75.8     72.2    73.1    69.8    72.1

Crew/utility

     79.9     77.0    76.4    75.4    74.1

Offshore tugs

     63.0     62.2    55.7    64.9    46.4

Other

     44.3     45.4    38.1    50.1    35.7

Total

     75.5 %   72.8    72.0    70.9    69.6

Worldwide fleet:

                           

Deepwater vessels

     91.1 %   91.8    87.9    84.6    85.2

Towing-supply/supply

     73.2     69.3    71.0    66.7    69.9

Crew/utility

     81.7     77.0    78.4    75.2    76.9

Offshore tugs

     54.2     50.8    47.5    52.2    40.3

Other

     44.3     45.4    38.1    50.1    35.7

Total

     73.3 %   69.5    70.1    67.4    68.0

AVERAGE VESSEL DAY RATES:

                           

Domestic-based fleet:

                           

Deepwater vessels

   $ 20,306     13,289    17,766    12,823    17,456

Towing-supply/supply

     9,474     6,194    8,088    5,860    7,569

Crew/utility

     5,080     3,477    4,411    3,287    4,238

Offshore tugs

     10,146     7,388    10,177    7,444    11,110

Total

   $ 9,318     6,136    8,113    5,924    7,814

International-based fleet:

                           

Deepwater vessels

   $ 17,014     12,553    15,428    12,338    15,592

Towing-supply/supply

     7,318     6,288    7,064    6,183    7,121

Crew/utility

     3,444     2,950    3,351    2,845    3,306

Offshore tugs

     6,129     4,347    5,644    4,430    5,847

Other

     3,064     1,201    3,167    1,361    3,536

Total

   $ 7,284     6,064    7,000    5,892    7,046

Worldwide fleet:

                           

Deepwater vessels

   $ 17,640     12,648    15,837    12,417    15,933

Towing-supply/supply

     7,667     6,273    7,233    6,130    7,194

Crew/utility

     3,845     3,073    3,615    2,956    3,547

Offshore tugs

     6,841     4,793    6,452    4,974    6,914

Other

     3,064     1,201    3,167    1,361    3,536

Total

   $ 7,655     6,076    7,204    5,898    7,191

 

16


The following table compares the average number of vessels by class and geographic distribution for the quarters and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the quarter ended September 30, 2005:

 

     Quarter Ended
December 31,


   Nine Months Ended
December 31,


  

Quarter Ended
Sept 30,

2005


     2005

   2004

   2005

   2004

  

Domestic-based fleet:

                        

Deepwater vessels

   6    5    6    6    6

Towing-supply/supply

   49    48    48    50    48

Crew/utility

   20    19    20    21    20

Offshore tugs

   17    18    17    20    18
    
  
  
  
  

Total

   92    90    91    97    92
    
  
  
  
  

International-based fleet:

                        

Deepwater vessels

   28    32    30    31    29

Towing-supply/supply

   206    198    204    197    205

Crew/utility

   68    64    67    63    67

Offshore tugs

   40    41    40    40    40

Other

   8    12    8    12    8
    
  
  
  
  

Total

   350    347    349    343    349
    
  
  
  
  

Owned or chartered vessels included in marine revenues

   442    437    440    440    441

Vessels withdrawn from active service

   81    99    86    97    85

Joint-venture and other

   22    31    28    31    31
    
  
  
  
  

Total

   545    567    554    568    557
    
  
  
  
  

 

Included in total owned or chartered vessels for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005 are approximately 80 vessels that are “cold stacked” by the company. Each of the vessels require a certain level of repairs to return to service and market conditions will dictate the economic viability of returning these vessels to active service. The company continually assesses the market environment and moves vessels into and out of cold stack.

 

During the nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, the company took delivery of 10 anchor handling towing supply vessels and six crewboats and sold seven anchor handling towing supply vessels, 11 platform supply vessels, one utility vessel, one crewboat, two offshore tugs and four other type vessels. During the third quarter of fiscal 2006, the company disposed its interest in a Nigerian joint venture which resulted in the disposition of nine crewboats from the joint venture and other vessel count.

 

During fiscal 2005, the company purchased three anchor handling towing supply vessels and one platform supply vessel. The company also took delivery of 11 newly-constructed vessels which included six anchor handling towing supply vessels, one platform supply vessel and four crewboats. Also during fiscal 2005, the company sold seven anchor handling towing supply vessels, one platform supply vessel, three offshore tugs, 10 crewboats and two other type vessels.

 

17


General and Administrative Expenses

 

Consolidated general and administrative expenses for the quarters and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 were as follows:

 

     Quarter Ended
December 31,


   Nine Months Ended
December 31,


  

Quarter Ended
Sept 30,

2005


(In thousands)


   2005

   2004

   2005

   2004

  

Personnel

   $ 13,670    10,674    36,973    31,630    12,008

Office and property

     3,018    3,252    9,050    9,437    2,974

Sales and marketing

     1,778    1,334    4,099    3,611    1,240

Professional services

     2,066    1,902    6,548    5,072    2,117

Other

     2,323    1,579    4,877    4,295    1,094
    

  
  
  
  
     $ 22,855    18,741    61,547    54,045    19,433
    

  
  
  
  

 

General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 as compared to the same period in fiscal 2005 were higher due primarily to the amortization of restricted stock granted in March 2005, costs associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and an improved business environment. Current quarter general and administrative expenses were higher as compared to the costs incurred in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 due to costs associated with Hurricanes Katrina and Rita (approximately $1.8 million through December 31, 2005) including a recently adopted Board of Director-approved employee assistance program for personal uninsured losses related to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and increased employee bonus plan accrual resulting from increased earnings of the company.

 

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Other Matters

 

Cash from operations, in combination with the company’s senior unsecured debt and available line of credit, provide the company, in management’s opinion, with adequate resources to satisfy its current financing requirements. At December 31, 2005, all of the company’s $300 million revolving line of credit was available for future financing needs. Continued payment of dividends, currently $0.15 per quarter per common share, is subject to declaration by the Board of Directors.

 

During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the company amended its $295 million revolving line of credit agreement. The amended agreement, which expires on May 18, 2010, increased the face amount of the facility from $295 million to $300 million and includes a mechanism for increasing the amount of the facility up to $400 million. Borrowings bear interest at the company’s option, at the greater of prime or Federal Funds rates plus .5% or LIBOR rates plus margins from .50 to 1.125% based on the company’s funded debt to total capitalization ratio. The amended agreement reduced the annual fee on the unused portion of the facility to a range between .10 to .25% and modified certain financial covenants, which allow for more flexibility in utilizing the facility.

 

In July 2005, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the company to spend up to $120.0 million to repurchase shares of its common stock. Repurchases will be made through open market or privately-negotiated transactions. The company intends to use its available cash and, when considered advantageous, borrowings under its revolving credit facility to fund the share repurchases. The Board of Directors’ authorization for this repurchase program will expire when all authorized funds have been expended or on June 30, 2006, unless extended by the Board of Directors. The company did not repurchase any stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2005. For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, the company spent $8.7 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 220,000 common shares. At December 31, 2005, approximately

 

18


$111.3 million was available to repurchase shares of the company’s common stock pursuant to the stock repurchase program.

 

Operating Activities

 

Net cash provided by operating activities for any quarter will fluctuate according to the level of business activity for the applicable quarter. For the nine months ended December 31, 2005, net cash from operating activities was considerably higher than the same period in fiscal 2005 due to higher net earnings partially offset by increases in accounts receivables.

 

Investing Activities

 

Investing activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 provided $74.0 million of cash, which is primarily attributed to the $199.6 million of proceeds from the sale of assets, and approximately $125.6 million of additions to properties and equipment. Additions to properties and equipment were comprised of approximately $18.3 million in capitalized major repair costs, $0.7 million for vessel enhancements, $100.9 million for the construction of offshore marine vessels, $3.7 million for the construction of an aircraft and $2.0 million of other properties and equipment purchases.

 

Investing activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2004 used $139.6 million of cash, which is primarily attributed to the $154.0 million of additions to properties and equipment net of $14.4 million of proceeds from the sale of assets. Additions to properties and equipment was comprised of approximately $21.3 million in capitalized major repair costs, $0.5 million for vessel enhancements, $93.7 million for the construction of offshore marine vessels and $38.4 million for the acquisition of three vessels.

 

Financing Activities

 

Financing activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2005 used $106.0 million of cash, which included $30.0 million of credit facility borrowings. Borrowings were offset primarily by repayments of debt of $110.0 million, repurchase of common stock of $8.7 million and $25.9 million of cash used for quarterly payment of common stock dividends of $0.15 per share.

 

Financing activities for the nine months ended December 31, 2004 provided $27.4 million of cash, which included $90 million of credit facility borrowings and $4.1 million from the issuance of common stock. This was offset primarily by repayments of debt of $40.0 million and $25.7 million of cash used for quarterly cash dividends of $.15 per share.

 

Vessel Construction and Acquisition Expenditures

 

The company is constructing five anchor handling towing supply vessels varying in size from 5,000 brake horsepower (BHP) to 10,000 BHP. Two international shipyards are each constructing two vessels while a different international shipyard is constructing one vessel. Scheduled delivery for the five vessels will begin in January 2006, with the last vessel scheduled for delivery in December 2007. As of December 31, 2005, $22.0 million has been expended on the vessels of the total $71.7 million commitment cost.

 

The company is also committed to the construction of two 220-foot and three 250-foot supply vessels for approximately $75.2 million. The company’s shipyard, Quality Shipyard, LLC, is constructing the two 220-foot vessels while a different U.S. shipyard is constructing the 250-foot vessels. Scheduled delivery of the two 220-foot vessels is expected in February 2006 and August of 2006 while the three 250-foot vessels are expected to be delivered in March 2007, June 2007 and September 2007. As of December 31, 2005, $23.9 million has been expended on these five vessels.

 

19


The company is also committed to the construction of one 175-foot, state-of-the-art, fast, crew/supply boat, two water jet crewboats and one tugboat for an approximate total cost of $16.8 million. A U.S. shipyard is constructing the 175-foot crewboat, while one international shipyard is constructing the two water jet crewboats and a different international shipyard is constructing the tugboat. Scheduled delivery of the 175-foot crewboat is expected in July 2006. The expected delivery date for the two water jet crewboats is March 2006 and May 2006 while the tugboat is expected to be delivered in February of 2007. As of December 31, 2005, $3.0 million has been expended on these three vessels.

 

The table below summarizes the various vessel commitments as discussed above by vessel class and type as of December 31, 2005:

 

     U. S. Built

   International Built

Vessel class and type


   Number
of
Vessels


  

Total

Cost
Commitment


   Expended
Through
12/31/05


   Number
of
Vessels


  

Total

Cost
Commitment


   Expended
Through
12/31/05


          (In thousands)         (In thousands)

Deepwater vessels:

                                     

Platform supply vessels

   3    $ 51,914    $ 10,073    —        —        —  

Replacement Fleet:

                                     

Anchor handling towing supply

   —        —        —      5    $ 71,675    $ 22,045

Platform supply vessels

   2    $ 23,335    $ 13,815    —        —        —  

Crewboats:

                                     

Crewboats – 175-foot

   1    $ 7,259    $ 361    —        —        —  

Crewboats – Water Jet

   —        —        —      2    $ 2,180    $ 855

Offshore Tugs:

                                     

Tugboat

   —        —        —      1    $ 7,390    $ 1,749
    
  

  

  
  

  

Totals

   6    $ 82,508    $ 24,249    8    $ 81,245    $ 24,649
    
  

  

  
  

  

 

The last of the large anchor handling towing supply vessels constructed by a Chinese shipyard was delivered in December 2005. The total estimated cost for the vessel is approximately $37.3 million, which includes shipyard commitments and other incidental costs such as spare parts, management and supervision, and outfitting costs. The vessel is currently undergoing sea trials and will be modified and outfitted by a second shipyard. The vessel will be delivered in March 2006 from the second shipyard.

 

The company has also contracted for the construction of a new corporate aircraft for a total approximate cost of $27.0 million. As of December 31, 2005, $3.7 million has been spent. The airplane is expected to be available for use in May of 2007.

 

To date, the company has financed its vessel commitment programs from its current cash balances, its operating cash flow and its $300 million senior unsecured notes and its revolving credit facility. Of the total $163.8 million of capital commitments for vessels currently under construction the company has expended $48.9 million as of December 31, 2005.

 

Interest and Debt Costs

 

The company is capitalizing a portion of its interest costs incurred on borrowed funds used to construct vessels. Interest and debt costs incurred, net of interest capitalized for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, was approximately $2.4 million and $6.6 million, respectively. Interest costs capitalized for the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005 was approximately $1.2 million and $5.2 million, respectively. Total interest and debt costs incurred during the quarter and nine-month period ended December 31, 2005 were higher than the same periods in fiscal year 2005 because the relative-portion of interest cost capitalized during the quarter and nine month period ended December 31, 2005 was less than the same periods in fiscal year 2005 due to the reduction in the level of investments in the company’s new construction program during the comparative periods.

 

20


Other Liquidity Matters

 

While the company does not have any other commitments for new-build vessel contracts other than what is discussed in the “Vessel Construction and Acquisitions Expenditures” section above, the company anticipates that over the next several years, it will continue to build, acquire or lease newer vessels in order to replace its aging vessels. The majority of the company’s supply and towing supply vessels were constructed between 1976 and 1983. As such, most of this vessel class exceeds 20 years of age and will need to be replaced within the next several years. In addition to age, market conditions will also help determine when a vessel is no longer economically viable. The company anticipates using future operating cash flows, existing borrowing capacities or new borrowings or lease arrangements to fund over the next few years the continuing replacement of the company’s mature fleet of vessels, with emphasis on the international anchor handling towing supply vessels. These vessels would replace the company’s core international fleet with fewer, larger and more efficient vessels. The company believes that adequate capital resources will be available to continue its fleet replacement.

 

At the conclusion of its examination of the company’s income tax returns covering fiscal years 2001 and 2002, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) proposed changes to taxable income which, if sustained, would result in additional income tax of $12.8 million. The proposed increase in taxable income results primarily from the IRS disallowance of all claimed deductions from taxable income related to the company’s foreign sales corporation (FSC) as well as all deductions claimed under the Extraterritorial Income Exclusion (ETI). The company has filed a formal protest with the IRS seeking a reconsideration of their position taken. The company has received a final assessment of additional income tax of $1.75 million resulting from the IRS’s earlier examination of the company’s income tax returns for fiscal years 1999 and 2000. Such assessment is due to the IRS disallowance of essentially all deductions related to FSC activity during this period. The company has paid the 1999 and 2000 assessment and has begun the process of seeking a refund of the taxes paid through the initiation of legal proceedings. The IRS has begun an examination of the company’s 2003 and 2004 federal income tax returns. The company also has additional ongoing examinations by various state and foreign tax authorities. The company does not believe that the results of these examinations will have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial position or results of operations.

 

Certain current and former subsidiaries of the company are, or have been, participating employers in an industry-wide multi-employer retirement fund in the United Kingdom, the Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund (MNOPF.) The company has been informed of an estimated 234 million sterling, or approximately $433 million, total fund deficit as estimated by the MNOPF actuary, that will require contributions from the participating employers. Substantially all of the fund’s deficit allocable to the company relates to current operating subsidiaries as the company does not believe, on the advice of counsel, that it is liable for any additional portion of the fund’s deficit that relates to subsidiaries that have either been sold or dissolved in prior years. The amount of the company’s share of the fund’s deficit will depend ultimately on a number of factors including an updated calculation of the total fund deficit, the number of participating employers, and the final method used in allocating the required contribution among participating employers.

 

In August 2005, the company received an invoice from the fund in the amount of $3.8 million for what the trustees calculated to be the company’s current share of the fund deficit. Accordingly, the company recorded this amount in full as crew cost expense in the September 2005 quarter. As allowed by the terms of the assessment, approximately $0.7 million of the invoiced amount was paid during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, respectively, with the remainder, including interest charges, to be paid in annual installments over nine years.

 

It is possible that the fund’s trustee may issue additional invoices to the company for additional amounts in the future for various reasons, including the results of future fund valuation reports and whether other assessed parties have the financial capability to contribute their respective allocations.

 

21


Goodwill

 

The company tests goodwill impairment annually at the reporting unit level using carrying amounts as of December 31. The company considers its reporting units to be its domestic and international operations.

 

The company performed its annual impairment test as of December 31, 2005, and the test determined there was no goodwill impairment. Interim testing will be performed when events occur or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may be impaired. A full discussion on the methodology the company uses to test goodwill impairment and examples of the types of events that may occur which would require interim testing is included in Item 7 and in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 14, 2005. Goodwill as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 is $328.8 million.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

The company currently does not utilize any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities to enhance its liquidity and capital resource positions, or for any other purpose. Any future transactions involving off-balance sheet arrangements would be analyzed and disclosed by the company’s management.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 14, 2005, describes the accounting policies that are critical to reporting the company’s financial position and operating results and that require management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the discussion contained in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005, regarding these critical accounting policies.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

The company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events occur or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. In such evaluation, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by an asset group are compared with the carrying amount of the asset group to determine if a write-down may be required. The company estimates cash flows based upon historical data adjusted for the company’s best estimate of future market performance that is based on industry trends. If impairment exists, the carrying value of the asset group is reduced to its estimated fair value. Vessels with similar operating and marketing characteristics are grouped for asset impairment testing.

 

Although the company believes its assumptions and estimates are reasonable, deviations from the assumptions and estimates could produce a materially different result. Management estimates may vary considerably from actual outcomes due to future adverse market conditions or poor operating results that could result in the inability to recover the current carrying value of an asset group, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future. As the company’s fleet continues to age, management closely monitors the estimates and assumptions used in the impairment analysis to properly identify evolving trends and changes in market conditions that could impact the results of the impairment evaluation.

 

In addition to the periodic review of long-lived assets for impairment when circumstances warrant, the company also performs a review of its stacked vessels every six months. This review considers items such as the vessel’s age, length of time stacked and likelihood of a return to active service, among

 

22


others. The company records an impairment charge when the carrying value of a stacked vessel that is unlikely to return to active service exceeds its estimated fair value.

 

During the quarter ended December 31, 2005, the company performed a thorough review of all vessels in its fleet for asset impairment. The review resulted in an impairment charge of $3.1 million on eight vessels in the company’s fleet. The eight vessels were written down to each vessel’s respective estimated fair value.

 

Effects of Inflation

 

Day-to-day operating costs are generally affected by inflation. However, because the energy services industry requires specialized goods and services, general economic inflationary trends may not affect the company’s operating costs. The major impact on operating costs is the level of offshore exploration, development and production spending by energy exploration and production companies. As this spending increases, prices of goods and services used by the energy industry and the energy services industry will increase. Future increases in vessel day rates may shield the company from the inflationary effects on operating costs.

 

Environmental Matters

 

During the ordinary course of business the company’s operations are subject to a wide variety of environmental laws and regulations. The company attempts to comply with these laws and regulations in order to avoid costly accidents and related environmental damage. Compliance with existing governmental regulations that have been enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, has not had, nor is expected to have, a material effect on the company. The company is proactive in establishing policies and operating procedures for safeguarding the environment against any environmentally hazardous material aboard its vessels and at shore base locations. Whenever possible, hazardous materials are maintained or transferred in confined areas to ensure containment if accidents occur. In addition the company has established operating policies that are intended to increase awareness of actions that may harm the environment.

 

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Market risk refers to the potential losses arising from changes in interest rates, foreign currency fluctuations and exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices including the correlation among these factors and their volatility. The company is primarily exposed to interest rate risk and foreign currency fluctuations and exchange risk.

 

Interest Rate Risk. Changes in interest rates may result in changes in the fair market value of the company’s financial instruments, interest income and interest expense. The company’s financial instruments that are exposed to interest rate risk are its cash equivalents and long-term borrowings. Due to the short duration and conservative nature of the cash equivalent investment portfolio, the company does not expect any material loss with respect to its investments. The book value for cash equivalents is considered to be representative of its fair value.

 

On May 18, 2005, the company amended its $295 million revolving line of credit agreement. The amended agreement, which expires on May 18, 2010, increased the face amount of the facility from $295 million to $300 million and includes a mechanism for increasing the amount of the facility up to $400 million. Borrowings bear interest at the company’s option, at the greater of prime or Federal Funds rates plus .5% or LIBOR rates plus margins from .50 to 1.125% based on the company’s funded debt to total capitalization ratio. The amended agreement reduced the annual fee on the unused portion of the facility to a range between .10 to .25% and modified certain financial covenants, which allow for more flexibility in utilizing the facility.

 

23


At December 31, 2005, the company had $300 million of debt outstanding which represents senior unsecured notes that were issued on July 8, 2003. The multiple series of notes with maturities ranging from 7 years to 12 years have an average outstanding life to maturity of 9.5 years and can be retired prior to maturity without penalty. The average interest rate on the notes is 4.35%. The fair value of this debt at December 31, 2005 is estimated to be approximately $284.8 million.

 

Foreign Exchange Risk. The company’s financial instruments that can be affected by foreign currency fluctuations and exchange risks consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and trade payables denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The company periodically enters into spot and forward derivative financial instruments as a hedge against foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities and currency commitments.

 

Spot derivative financial instruments are short-term in nature and settle within two business days. The fair value approximates the carrying value due to the short-term nature of this instrument, and as a result, no gains or losses are recognized. Forward derivative financial instruments are generally longer-term in nature. The accounting for gains or losses on forward contracts is dependent on the nature of the risk being hedged and the effectiveness of the hedge. The company enters into derivative instruments only to the extent considered necessary to meet its risk management objectives and does not use derivative contracts for speculative purposes.

 

The company had no currency spot contracts outstanding as of December 31, 2005. The company is exposed to possible currency fluctuations related to its commitment to construct two of its new-build anchor handling towing supply vessels at an Indonesian shipyard. The company is required, per the construction agreements, to make all payments in Singapore dollars and is currently exposed to possible currency fluctuations on the remaining commitment which totals a current U.S. dollar equivalent of approximately $22.8 million. At December 31, 2005 the company had eight forward currency derivative contracts outstanding totaling $15.9 million that hedged the company’s foreign exchange exposure relating to the Indonesian shipyard commitments, which qualified as a fair value foreign currency hedge instrument. The fair value of the eight forward contracts at December 31, 2005 is $16.1 million.

 

Because of its significant international operations, the company is exposed to currency fluctuations and exchange risk on all charter hire contracts denominated in foreign currencies. The company does not hedge against any foreign currency rate fluctuations associated with foreign currency contracts that arise in the normal course of business. To minimize the financial impact of these items the company attempts to contract a majority of its services in United States dollars. The company continually monitors the currency exchange risks associated with all contracts not denominated in U.S. dollars.

 

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

CEO and CFO Certificates

 

Included as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are “Certifications” of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. The first form of certification is required in accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This section of the Quarterly Report contains the information concerning the controls evaluation referred to in the Section 302 Certifications and this information should be read in conjunction with the Section 302 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

 

24


Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), such as this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules. However, any control system, no matter how well conceived and followed, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

 

The company evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of the company’s management, including the company’s Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘Exchange Act’)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the company’s Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer along with the company’s Chief Financial Officer concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed in the reports the company files and submits under the Exchange Act.

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

There have been no changes in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

25


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

 

Common Stock Repurchase Program

 

In July 2005, the company’s Board of Directors authorized the company to spend up to $120.0 million to repurchase shares of its common stock. Repurchases will be made through open market or privately-negotiated transactions. The company intends to use its available cash and, when considered advantageous, borrowings under its revolving credit facility to fund the share repurchases. The Board of Directors’ authorization for this repurchase program will expire when all authorized funds have been expended or on June 30, 2006, unless extended by the Board of Directors.

 

The company did not repurchase any stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2005. For the nine-month period ended December 31, 2005, the company spent $8.7 million for the repurchase and cancellation of 220,000 common shares. At December 31, 2005, approximately $111.3 million was available to repurchase shares of the company’s common stock pursuant to the stock repurchase program.

 

26


ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

 

A. At page 29 of this report is the index for those exhibits required to be filed as a part of this report.

 

B. The company’s report on Form 8-K dated October 27, 2005 reported that the company issued a press release announcing the company’s fiscal 2006 second quarter net earnings and the time and date of the analyst conference call.

 

C. The company’s report on Form 8-K dated October 27, 2005 reported that the company provided a transcript from the company’s October 27, 2005 analyst conference call discussing its financial results for the quarter and six-month period ended September 30, 2005.

 

D. The company’s report on Form 8-K dated November 14, 2005 reported that the company filed a slide presentation which was provided to investors at the Bank of America Energy Conference in Boca Raton, Florida. The Form 8-K also includes a transcript to the presentation at the Bank of America Energy Conference in Boca Raton, Florida.

 

27


SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

    

TIDEWATER INC.

(Registrant)

Date: January 24, 2006   

/s/ Dean E. Taylor


     Dean E. Taylor
    

Chairman of the Board, President and

Chief Executive Officer

Date: January 24, 2006   

/s/ J. Keith Lousteau


     J. Keith Lousteau
     Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: January 24, 2006   

/s/ Joseph M. Bennett


     Joseph M. Bennett
    

Senior Vice President, Principal Accounting Officer

and Chief Investor Relations Officer

 

 

28


EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit

Number


   
15   Letter re Unaudited Interim Financial Information
31.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2   Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2   Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

29