10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
_________________________________________________________
FORM 10-Q
_________________________________________________________
(Mark One)
|
| |
ý | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016
- OR - |
| |
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-31553
CME GROUP INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | |
Delaware | | 36-4459170 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| |
20 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois | | 60606 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(312) 930-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | |
Large accelerated filer x | | | Accelerated filer o |
| | | |
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | | | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes ¨ No ý
The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of April 13, 2016 was as follows: 338,639,819 shares of Class A common stock, $0.01 par value; 625 shares of Class B-1 common stock, $0.01 par value; 813 shares of Class B-2 common stock, $0.01 par value; 1,287 shares of Class B-3 common stock, $0.01 par value; and 413 shares of Class B-4 common stock, $0.01 par value.
CME GROUP INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
|
| | |
| | |
| | Page |
| |
| |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
| | |
Item 3. | | |
| | |
Item 4. | | |
| |
| |
| | |
Item 1. | | |
| | |
Item 1A. | | |
| | |
Item 2. | | |
| | |
Item 4. | | |
| | |
Item 6. | | |
| |
| |
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Certain Terms
Unless otherwise indicated, references to CME Group Inc. (CME Group or the company) products include references to products listed on one of its regulated exchanges: Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (CME), Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. (CBOT), New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (NYMEX) and Commodity Exchange, Inc. (COMEX). Products listed on these exchanges are subject to the rules and regulations of the particular exchange and the applicable rulebook should be consulted. Unless otherwise indicated, references to NYMEX include its subsidiary, COMEX.
All references to “options” or “options contracts” in the text of this document refer to options on futures contracts.
Further information about CME Group and its products can be found at http://www.cmegroup.com. Information made available on our website does not constitute a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Information about Contract Volume and Average Rate per Contract
All amounts regarding contract volume and average rate per contract exclude our interest rate swaps and credit default swaps contracts.
Trademark Information
CME Group is a trademark of CME Group Inc. The Globe logo, CME, Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Globex and E-mini are trademarks of Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. CBOT, Chicago Board of Trade, KCBT and Kansas City Board of Trade are trademarks of Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. NYMEX, New York Mercantile Exchange and ClearPort are trademarks of New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. COMEX is a trademark of Commodity Exchange, Inc. Dow Jones, Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500 and S&P are service and/or trademarks of Dow Jones Trademark Holdings LLC, Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC and S&P/Dow Jones Indices LLC, as the case may be, and have been licensed for use by Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
Forward-Looking Statements
From time to time, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as well as in other written reports and verbal statements, we discuss our expectations regarding future performance. These forward-looking statements are identified by their use of terms and phrases such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “could,” “estimate,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “expect” and similar expressions, including references to assumptions. These forward-looking statements are based on currently available competitive, financial and economic data, current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industries in which we operate and management's beliefs and assumptions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. We want to caution you not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Among the factors that might affect our performance are:
| |
• | increasing competition by foreign and domestic entities, including increased competition from new entrants into our markets and consolidation of existing entities; |
| |
• | our ability to keep pace with rapid technological developments, including our ability to complete the development, implementation and maintenance of the enhanced functionality required by our customers while maintaining reliability and ensuring that such technology is not vulnerable to security risks; |
| |
• | our ability to continue introducing competitive new products and services on a timely, cost-effective basis, including through our electronic trading capabilities, and our ability to maintain the competitiveness of our existing products and services, including our ability to provide effective services to the swaps market; |
| |
• | our ability to adjust our fixed costs and expenses if our revenues decline; |
| |
• | our ability to maintain existing customers, develop strategic relationships and attract new customers; |
| |
• | our ability to expand and offer our products outside the United States; |
| |
• | changes in domestic and non-U.S. regulations, including the impact of any changes in domestic and foreign laws or government policy with respect to our industry, such as any changes to regulations and policies that require increased financial and operational resources from us or our customers; |
| |
• | the costs associated with protecting our intellectual property rights and our ability to operate our business without violating the intellectual property rights of others; |
| |
• | decreases in revenue from our market data as a result of decreased demand; |
| |
• | changes in our rate per contract due to shifts in the mix of the products traded, the trading venue and the mix of customers (whether the customer receives member or non-member fees or participates in one of our various incentive programs) and the impact of our tiered pricing structure; |
| |
• | the ability of our financial safeguards package to adequately protect us from the credit risks of clearing members; |
| |
• | the ability of our compliance and risk management methods to effectively monitor and manage our risks, including our ability to prevent errors and misconduct and protect our infrastructure against security breaches and misappropriation of our intellectual property assets; |
| |
• | changes in price levels and volatility in the derivatives markets and in underlying equity, foreign exchange, interest rate and commodities markets; |
| |
• | economic, political and market conditions, including the volatility of the capital and credit markets and the impact of economic conditions on the trading activity of our current and potential customers; |
| |
• | our ability to accommodate increases in contract volume and order transaction traffic and to implement enhancements without failure or degradation of the performance of our trading and clearing systems; |
| |
• | our ability to execute our growth strategy and maintain our growth effectively; |
| |
• | our ability to manage the risks and control the costs associated with our strategy for acquisitions, investments and alliances; |
| |
• | our ability to continue to generate funds and/or manage our indebtedness to allow us to continue to invest in our business; |
| |
• | industry and customer consolidation; |
| |
• | decreases in trading and clearing activity; |
| |
• | the imposition of a transaction tax or user fee on futures and options on futures transactions and/or repeal of the 60/40 tax treatment of such transactions; and |
| |
• | the unfavorable resolution of material legal proceedings. |
For a detailed discussion of these and other factors that might affect our performance, see Item 1A. of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 26, 2016 and Item 1A. of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
|
| |
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
CME GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in millions, except par value data; shares in thousands)
(unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
Assets | | | | |
Current Assets: | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 1,146.0 |
| | $ | 1,692.6 |
|
Marketable securities | | 79.2 |
| | 72.5 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $3.7 and $1.9 | | 389.3 |
| | 357.8 |
|
Other current assets (includes $32.0 in restricted cash in both periods) | | 141.5 |
| | 228.6 |
|
Performance bonds and guaranty fund contributions | | 37,497.3 |
| | 35,553.0 |
|
Total current assets | | 39,253.3 |
| | 37,904.5 |
|
Property, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $680.6 and $788.6 | | 449.8 |
| | 491.7 |
|
Intangible assets—trading products | | 17,175.3 |
| | 17,175.3 |
|
Intangible assets—other, net | | 2,513.9 |
| | 2,537.9 |
|
Goodwill | | 7,569.0 |
| | 7,569.0 |
|
Other assets (includes $69.1 and $70.5 in restricted cash) | | 1,806.9 |
| | 1,681.0 |
|
Total Assets | | $ | 68,768.2 |
| | $ | 67,359.4 |
|
| | | | |
Liabilities and Equity | | | | |
Current Liabilities: | | | | |
Accounts payable | | $ | 32.2 |
| | $ | 28.7 |
|
Other current liabilities | | 321.6 |
| | 1,242.8 |
|
Performance bonds and guaranty fund contributions | | 37,494.3 |
| | 35,553.0 |
|
Total current liabilities | | 37,848.1 |
| | 36,824.5 |
|
Long-term debt | | 2,229.8 |
| | 2,229.3 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities, net | | 7,330.8 |
| | 7,358.3 |
|
Other liabilities | | 518.1 |
| | 395.5 |
|
Total Liabilities | | 47,926.8 |
| | 46,807.6 |
|
| | | | |
Shareholders’ Equity: | | | | |
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015; none issued | | — |
| | — |
|
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015; 337,216 and 336,938 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively | | 3.4 |
| | 3.4 |
|
Class B common stock, $0.01 par value, 3 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 | | — |
| | — |
|
Additional paid-in capital | | 17,737.6 |
| | 17,721.6 |
|
Retained earnings | | 3,072.3 |
| | 2,907.6 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | | 28.1 |
| | (80.8 | ) |
Total shareholders’ equity | | 20,841.4 |
| | 20,551.8 |
|
Total Liabilities and Equity | | $ | 68,768.2 |
| | $ | 67,359.4 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
CME GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(dollars in millions, except per share data; shares in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 |
Revenues | | | |
Clearing and transaction fees | $ | 796.1 |
| | $ | 708.2 |
|
Market data and information services | 102.4 |
| | 98.0 |
|
Access and communication fees | 21.6 |
| | 21.3 |
|
Other | 14.1 |
| | 15.2 |
|
Total Revenues | 934.2 |
| | 842.7 |
|
Expenses | | | |
Compensation and benefits | 131.9 |
| | 141.3 |
|
Communications | 6.7 |
| | 7.6 |
|
Technology support services | 17.4 |
| | 15.6 |
|
Professional fees and outside services | 31.7 |
| | 29.1 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangibles | 24.0 |
| | 24.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | 33.9 |
| | 31.8 |
|
Occupancy and building operations | 21.3 |
| | 22.8 |
|
Licensing and other fee agreements | 39.0 |
| | 30.6 |
|
Other | 54.4 |
| | 31.7 |
|
Total Expenses | 360.3 |
| | 335.4 |
|
Operating Income | 573.9 |
| | 507.3 |
|
| | | |
Non-Operating Income (Expense) | | | |
Investment income | 17.6 |
| | 5.7 |
|
Gains (losses) on derivative investments | — |
| | (1.8 | ) |
Interest and other borrowing costs | (29.8 | ) | | (31.6 | ) |
Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated subsidiaries | 26.8 |
| | 22.5 |
|
Other non-operating income (expense) | (10.0 | ) | | 21.7 |
|
Total Non-Operating | 4.6 |
| | 16.5 |
|
Income before Income Taxes | 578.5 |
| | 523.8 |
|
Income tax provision | 210.7 |
| | 193.4 |
|
Net Income | $ | 367.8 |
| | $ | 330.4 |
|
| | | |
Earnings per Common Share: | | | |
Basic | $ | 1.09 |
| | $ | 0.98 |
|
Diluted | 1.09 |
| | 0.98 |
|
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares: | | | |
Basic | 337,014 |
| | 335,680 |
|
Diluted | 338,549 |
| | 337,416 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
CME GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in millions)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | |
| Quarter Ended |
| March 31, |
| 2016 | | 2015 |
Net income | $ | 367.8 |
| | $ | 330.4 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | | | |
Investment securities: | | | |
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period | 109.6 |
| | (27.7 | ) |
Income tax benefit (expense) | (0.8 | ) | | — |
|
Investment securities, net | 108.8 |
| | (27.7 | ) |
Defined benefit plans: | | | |
Net change in defined benefit plans arising during the period | 3.1 |
| | (0.3 | ) |
Amortization of net actuarial (gains) losses included in compensation and benefits expense | 0.8 |
| | 0.7 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) | (1.5 | ) | | (0.2 | ) |
Defined benefit plans, net | 2.4 |
| | 0.2 |
|
Derivative investments: | | | |
Net unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period | — |
| | (4.7 | ) |
Ineffectiveness on cash flow hedges included in (gains) losses on derivative investments | — |
| | 1.8 |
|
Amortization of effective portion of net (gains) losses on cash flow hedges included in interest expense | (0.3 | ) | | (0.3 | ) |
Income tax benefit (expense) | 0.1 |
| | 1.2 |
|
Derivative investments, net | (0.2 | ) | | (2.0 | ) |
Foreign currency translation: | | | |
Foreign currency translation adjustments | (3.3 | ) | | (4.0 | ) |
Income tax benefit (expense) | 1.2 |
| | 1.5 |
|
Foreign currency translation, net | (2.1 | ) | | (2.5 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 108.9 |
| | (32.0 | ) |
Comprehensive Income | $ | 476.7 |
| | $ | 298.4 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
CME GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(dollars in millions, except per share data; shares in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Class A Common Stock (Shares) | | Class B Common Stock (Shares) | | Common Stock and Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Total Shareholders’ Equity |
Balance at December 31, 2015 | | 336,938 |
| | 3 |
| | $ | 17,725.0 |
| | $ | 2,907.6 |
| | $ | (80.8 | ) | | $ | 20,551.8 |
|
Net income | | | | | | | | 367.8 |
| | | | 367.8 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to CME Group | | | | | | | | | | 108.9 |
| | 108.9 |
|
Dividends on common stock of $0.60 per share | | | | | | | | (203.1 | ) | | | | (203.1 | ) |
Exercise of stock options | | 102 |
| | | | 6.4 |
| | | | | | 6.4 |
|
Excess tax benefits from option exercises and restricted stock vesting | | | | | | 3.9 |
| | | | | | 3.9 |
|
Vesting of issued restricted Class A common stock | | 176 |
| | | | (10.3 | ) | | | | | | (10.3 | ) |
Stock-based compensation | | | | | | 16.0 |
| | | | | | 16.0 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2016 | | 337,216 |
| | 3 |
| | $ | 17,741.0 |
| | $ | 3,072.3 |
| | $ | 28.1 |
| | $ | 20,841.4 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
CME GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (continued)
(dollars in millions, except per share data; shares in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Class A Common Stock (Shares) | | Class B Common Stock (Shares) | | Common Stock and Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | Total Shareholders’ Equity |
Balance at December 31, 2014 | 335,452 |
| | 3 |
| | $ | 17,600.0 |
| | $ | 3,317.3 |
| | $ | 6.2 |
| | $ | 20,923.5 |
|
Net income | | | | | | | 330.4 |
| | | | 330.4 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) attributable to CME Group | | | | | | | | | (32.0 | ) | | (32.0 | ) |
Dividends on common stock of $0.50 per share | | | | | | | (168.4 | ) | | | | (168.4 | ) |
Exercise of stock options | 436 |
| | | | 28.6 |
| | | | | | 28.6 |
|
Excess tax benefits from option exercises and restricted stock vesting | | | | | 0.7 |
| | | | | | 0.7 |
|
Vesting of issued restricted Class A common stock | 40 |
| | | | (2.0 | ) | | | | | | (2.0 | ) |
Stock-based compensation | | | | | 14.7 |
| | | | | | 14.7 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2015 | 335,928 |
| | 3 |
| | $ | 17,642.0 |
| | $ | 3,479.3 |
| | $ | (25.8 | ) | | $ | 21,095.5 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
CME GROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in millions)
(unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
Cash Flows from Operating Activities | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 367.8 |
| | $ | 330.4 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Stock-based compensation | | 16.0 |
| | 14.7 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangibles | | 24.0 |
| | 24.9 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | | 33.9 |
| | 31.8 |
|
Loss on datacenter | | 27.1 |
| | — |
|
Undistributed earnings, net of losses, of unconsolidated subsidiaries | | 4.2 |
| | 3.3 |
|
Deferred income taxes | | (0.4 | ) | | 0.5 |
|
Change in: | | | | |
Accounts receivable | | (33.3 | ) | | (41.8 | ) |
Other current assets | | (0.1 | ) | | 4.9 |
|
Other assets | | (5.9 | ) | | (11.2 | ) |
Accounts payable | | 3.5 |
| | (3.0 | ) |
Income taxes payable | | 178.5 |
| | 149.1 |
|
Other current liabilities | | (88.1 | ) | | (85.4 | ) |
Other liabilities | | (7.5 | ) | | (1.9 | ) |
Other | | — |
| | 2.6 |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities | | 519.7 |
| | 418.9 |
|
| | | | |
Cash Flows from Investing Activities | | | | |
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale marketable securities | | 31.8 |
| | 10.2 |
|
Purchases of available-for-sale marketable securities | | (35.9 | ) | | (10.2 | ) |
Purchases of property, net
| | (20.2 | ) | | (31.4 | ) |
Investments in business ventures | | (3.0 | ) | | — |
|
Settlement of derivative related to debt issuance | | — |
| | 7.0 |
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities | | (27.3 | ) | | (24.4 | ) |
| | | | |
Cash Flows from Financing Activities | | | | |
Proceeds from debt, net of issuance costs | | — |
| | 743.7 |
|
Cash dividends | | (1,179.3 | ) | | (838.8 | ) |
Proceeds from finance lease obligation | | 130.0 |
| | — |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | | 6.4 |
| | 28.6 |
|
Excess tax benefits related to employee option exercises and restricted stock vesting | | 3.9 |
| | 0.7 |
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities | | (1,039.0 | ) | | (65.8 | ) |
| | | | |
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | (546.6 | ) | | 328.7 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | 1,692.6 |
| | 1,366.1 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period | | $ | 1,146.0 |
| | $ | 1,694.8 |
|
| | | | |
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information | | | | |
Income taxes paid | | $ | 28.1 |
| | $ | 43.9 |
|
Interest paid | | 42.4 |
| | 44.6 |
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements consist of CME Group Inc. (CME Group) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the company), including Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (CME), Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. (CBOT), New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (NYMEX), Commodity Exchange, Inc. (COMEX), CME Clearing Europe Limited (CMECE) and CME Europe Limited (CME Europe). CME, CBOT, NYMEX, COMEX, CMECE and CME Europe and their subsidiaries are referred to collectively as “the exchange” in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The clearing houses include CME Clearing, which is the U.S. clearing house and a division of CME, and CMECE.
The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by CME Group without audit. Certain notes and other information normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments considered necessary to present fairly the financial position of the company at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods indicated. Quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent period.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto in CME Group’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 26, 2016.
2. Performance Bonds and Guaranty Fund Contributions
Performance Bonds and Guaranty Fund Contributions. At March 31, 2016, performance bonds and guaranty fund contribution assets on the consolidated balance sheets include cash and U.S. Treasury securities with maturity dates of 90 days or less. U.S. Treasury securities are purchased by CME, at its discretion, using cash collateral. The benefits, including interest earned, and risks of ownership accrue to CME. Interest earned is included in investment income on the consolidated statements of income. These securities are classified as available-for-sale. At March 31, 2016, the amortized cost and fair value of the U.S. Treasury securities was $10,247.6 million and $10,248.7 million, respectively. The original cost of these U.S. Treasury securities was $10,245.7 million. The U.S. Treasury securities will mature in the second quarter of 2016. Performance bonds and guaranty fund contribution assets also include overnight reverse repurchase agreements that were purchased by CME, at its discretion, using cash collateral. The fair value of the overnight securities under the reverse repurchase agreements was $3.0 billion at March 31, 2016.
CME has been designated as a systemically important financial market utility by the Financial Stability Oversight Council and is authorized to establish and maintain a cash account at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. This account is expected to be opened in the second quarter of 2016 and CME will be able to begin holding cash collateral at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
Clearing House Contract Settlement. CME Clearing and CMECE mark-to-market open positions for all futures and options contracts twice a day (once a day for CME's cleared-only credit default swap and interest rate swap contracts). Based on values derived from the mark-to-market process, CME Clearing and CMECE require payments from clearing firms whose positions have lost value and make payments to clearing firms whose positions have gained value. Under the extremely unlikely scenario of simultaneous default by every clearing firm who has open positions with unrealized losses, the maximum exposure related to positions other than cleared-only credit default and interest rate swap contracts would be one half day of changes in fair value of all open positions, before considering the clearing houses' ability to access defaulting clearing firms' collateral deposits. For CME's cleared-only credit default swap and interest rate swap contracts, the maximum exposure related to CME Clearing's guarantee would be one full day of changes in fair value of all open positions, before considering CME Clearing's ability to access defaulting clearing firms' collateral. During the first quarter of 2016, CME Clearing and CMECE transferred an average of approximately $3.8 billion a day through their clearing systems for settlement from clearing firms whose positions had lost value to clearing firms whose positions had gained value. CME Clearing and CMECE reduce their guarantee exposure through initial and maintenance performance bond requirements and mandatory guaranty fund contributions. The company believes that its guarantee liability is immaterial and therefore has not recorded any liability at March 31, 2016.
3. Property
In March 2016, the company sold its datacenter in the Chicago area for $130.0 million. At the time of the sale, the company leased back a portion of the property. The sale leaseback transaction was recognized under the financing method and not as a sale leaseback arrangement under generally accepted accounting principles due to the company's participation in future revenues and development work, which constitutes continuing involvement in the datacenter. Under the financing method, the assets remain on the consolidated balance sheet throughout the term of the lease and the proceeds of $130.0 million from the transaction are recognized as a finance lease obligation within other liabilities and other current liabilities in the consolidated
balance sheet. A portion of the lease payments will be recognized as a reduction of the finance lease obligation and a portion will be recognized as interest expense based on an imputed interest rate.
The net cost basis of the property and equipment legally sold was $153.1 million at the date of the sale. At March 31, 2016, the company wrote down the property and equipment to a fair value of $130.0 million based on qualitative indications of impairment and a quantitative analysis based on undiscounted cash flows. The company recognized a net loss on the transaction of $27.1 million through other expenses, which includes the write down to fair value and certain other transaction-related costs. The company recognized a total net loss and expenses of $28.6 million, which also includes $1.5 million of legal and other fees incurred. The property and equipment legally sold will continue to be recognized on the consolidated balance sheets and will continue to be depreciated on the consolidated statements of income over the term of the lease.
The lease has an initial lease term ending in March 2031 and contains two consecutive renewal options for five years. Future minimum lease payments under this non-cancellable lease will be payable as follows as of March 31, 2016 (in millions):
|
| | | |
Year | |
Remainder of 2016 | $ | 12.5 |
|
2017 | 16.7 |
|
2018 | 16.8 |
|
2019 | 16.8 |
|
2020 | 16.9 |
|
Thereafter | 181.6 |
|
Total | $ | 261.3 |
|
4. Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consisted of the following at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
(in millions) | | Assigned Value | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Book Value | | Assigned Value | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Book Value |
Amortizable Intangible Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Clearing firm, market data and other customer relationships | | $ | 2,838.8 |
| | $ | (778.2 | ) | | $ | 2,060.6 |
| | $ | 2,838.8 |
| | $ | (754.5 | ) | | $ | 2,084.3 |
|
Technology-related intellectual property | | 29.4 |
| | (27.5 | ) | | 1.9 |
| | 29.4 |
| | (27.2 | ) | | 2.2 |
|
Other | | 2.4 |
| | (1.0 | ) | | 1.4 |
| | 2.4 |
| | (1.0 | ) | | 1.4 |
|
Total amortizable intangible assets | | $ | 2,870.6 |
| | $ | (806.7 | ) | | 2,063.9 |
| | $ | 2,870.6 |
| | $ | (782.7 | ) | | 2,087.9 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Trade names | | | | | | 450.0 |
| | | | | | 450.0 |
|
Total intangible assets – other, net | | | | | | $ | 2,513.9 |
| | | | | | $ | 2,537.9 |
|
Trading products(1) | | | | | | $ | 17,175.3 |
| | | | | | $ | 17,175.3 |
|
| |
(1) | Trading products represent futures and options products acquired in our business combinations with CBOT Holdings, Inc., NYMEX Holdings, Inc. and The Board of Trade of Kansas City, Missouri, Inc. Clearing and transaction fees are generated through the trading of these products. These trading products, most of which have traded for decades, require authorization from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Product authorizations from the CFTC have no term limits. |
Total amortization expense for intangible assets was $24.0 million and $24.9 million for the quarters ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of March 31, 2016, the future estimated amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets is expected to be as follows: |
| | | |
(in millions) | Amortization Expense |
Remainder of 2016 | $ | 72.1 |
|
2017 | 95.5 |
|
2018 | 94.7 |
|
2019 | 94.7 |
|
2020 | 94.7 |
|
2021 | 94.7 |
|
Thereafter | 1,517.5 |
|
5. Debt
In the first quarter of 2016, the company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board's (FASB) standards update on changes to the presentation of debt issue costs. The update requires debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented as a deduction of the carrying value of the debt liability. Previously debt issuance costs were recognized as deferred charges within other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. The standards update was applied on a retrospective basis, adjusting all prior periods presented, as if the new accounting methodology was in effect during those periods. As of December 31, 2015, $12.1 million of debt issuance costs were reclassified in the consolidated balance sheet from other assets to long-term debt compared with what was previously reported. At March 31, 2016, $11.9 million of debt issuance costs were deducted from long-term debt. The change in accounting policy has been reflected in the table below.
Long-term debt consisted of the following at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
|
| | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | | March 31, 2016 | | December 31, 2015 |
$750.0 million fixed rate notes due September 2022, stated rate of 3.00% (1) | | $ | 744.6 |
| | $ | 744.4 |
|
$750.0 million fixed rate notes due March 2025, stated rate of 3.00% (2) | | 743.6 |
| | 743.4 |
|
$750.0 million fixed rate notes due September 2043, stated rate of 5.30% (3) | | 741.6 |
| | 741.5 |
|
Total long-term debt | | $ | 2,229.8 |
| | $ | 2,229.3 |
|
| |
(1) | In August 2012, the company entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap agreement that modified the interest obligation associated with these notes so that the interest payable on the notes effectively became fixed at a rate of 3.32%. |
| |
(2) | In December 2014, the company entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap agreement that modified the interest obligation associated with these notes so that the interest payable on the notes effectively became fixed at a rate of 3.11%. |
| |
(3) | In August 2012, the company entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap agreement that modified the interest obligation associated with these notes so that the interest payable on the notes effectively became fixed at a rate of 4.73%. |
Long-term debt maturities, at par value, were as follows at March 31, 2016: |
| | | |
(in millions) | Par Value |
2017 | $ | — |
|
2018 | — |
|
2019 | — |
|
2020 | — |
|
2021 | — |
|
Thereafter | 2,250.0 |
|
6. Income Taxes
In the first quarter of 2016, the company adopted the FASB's standards update that simplifies the classification of deferred tax assets and liabilities. The update eliminates the current requirement to present deferred tax assets and liabilities as current and non-current in a classified balance sheet. Instead, all deferred tax assets, along with valuation allowances, and deferred tax
liabilities will be required to be classified as non-current. Companies are still required to offset deferred tax assets and liabilities for each taxpaying component within a tax jurisdiction. Beginning in the first quarter of 2016, the company adopted this standards update on a prospective basis and classified all deferred tax assets and liabilities as non-current. Prior period deferred tax assets and liabilities were not retrospectively adjusted.
A net current deferred tax asset of $27.9 million was included in other current assets at December 31, 2015. As of March 31, 2016, net current deferred tax assets of $27.9 million were reclassified to net long-term liabilities. Total net current deferred tax assets are primarily attributable to stock-based compensation and accrued expenses.
Net long-term deferred tax liabilities were $7.3 billion and $7.4 billion at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Net deferred tax liabilities are principally the result of purchase accounting for intangible assets in our various mergers, including CBOT Holdings, Inc. and NYMEX Holdings, Inc.
Valuation allowances of $85.3 million and $122.3 million have been provided on deferred tax assets at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, valuation allowances were related to certain domestic net operating losses, foreign net operating losses as well as built in capital losses for which we do not believe that we currently meet the more-likely-than-not-threshold for recognition.
7. Contingencies
Legal and Regulatory Matters. In 2008, Fifth Market, Inc. (Fifth Market) filed a complaint against CME Group and CME in the Delaware District Court seeking a permanent injunction against CME's Globex system and unquantified enhanced damages for what the plaintiff alleges is willful infringement of two patents, in addition to costs, expenses and attorneys' fees. CME and Fifth Market reached a settlement agreement resolving all pending matters including the federal litigation in the District of Delaware, the two appeals pending at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit from the first two covered business method review and the third covered business method review pending at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. As part of the settlement, Fifth Market agreed to a consent judgment against each of its patents holding the patents to be invalid and not infringed by CME. The parties agreed to waive any claim for attorney fees or cost recovery. The judge ordered the dismissal of the case in Delaware with prejudice on March 9, 2016. In a separate agreement, CME acquired Fifth Market’s last patent that was not part of any of the disputes.
In 2013, the CFTC filed suit against NYMEX and two former employees alleging disclosure of confidential customer information in violation of the Commodity Exchange Act. NYMEX’s motion to dismiss was denied in 2014. Based on its investigation to date and advice from legal counsel, the company believes that it has strong factual and legal defenses to the claim.
In the normal course of business, the company discusses matters with its regulators raised during regulatory examinations or otherwise subject to their inquiry and oversight. These matters could result in censures, fines, penalties or other sanctions. Management believes the outcome of any resulting actions will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations. However, the company is unable to predict the outcome or the timing of the ultimate resolution of these matters, or the potential fines, penalties or injunctive or other equitable relief, if any, that may result from these matters.
In addition, the company is a defendant in, and has potential for, various other legal proceedings arising from its regular business activities. While the ultimate results of such proceedings against the company cannot be predicted with certainty, the company believes that the resolution of any of these matters on an individual basis will not have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.
At December 31, 2015, the company had accrued $3.5 million for legal and regulatory matters that were probable and estimable. No accrual was required for legal and regulatory matters that were probable and estimable as of March 31, 2016.
Intellectual Property Indemnifications. Certain agreements with customers and other third parties related to accessing the CME platforms, utilizing market data services and licensing CME SPAN software may contain indemnifications from intellectual property claims that may be made against them as a result of their use of the applicable products and/or services. The potential future claims relating to these indemnifications cannot be estimated and therefore no liability has been recorded.
8. Guarantees
Mutual Offset Agreement. CME and Singapore Exchange Limited (SGX) have a mutual offset agreement with a current term through October 2016. This agreement enables market participants to open a futures position on one exchange and liquidate it on the other. The term of the agreement will automatically renew for a one-year period unless either party provides advance notice of their intent to terminate. CME must maintain U.S. Treasury securities or irrevocable, standby letters of credit as collateral for this agreement. At March 31, 2016, CME was contingently liable to SGX on letters of credit totaling $610.0 million. Regardless of the collateral, CME guarantees all cleared transactions submitted through SGX and would initiate procedures designed to satisfy these financial obligations in the event of a default, such as the use of performance bonds and
guaranty fund contributions of the defaulting clearing firm. The company believes that its guarantee liability is immaterial and therefore has not recorded any liability at March 31, 2016.
Family Farmer and Rancher Protection Fund. In 2012, the company established the Family Farmer and Rancher Protection Fund (the Fund). The Fund is designed to provide payments, up to certain maximum levels, to family farmers, ranchers and other agricultural industry participants who use the company's agricultural commodity products and who suffer losses to their segregated account balances due to their CME clearing member becoming insolvent. Under the terms of the Fund, farmers and ranchers are eligible for up to $25,000 per participant. Farming and ranching cooperatives are eligible for up to $100,000 per cooperative. The Fund was established with a maximum of $100.0 million available for distribution to participants. Since its establishment, the Fund has made payments of approximately $2.0 million, which leaves $98.0 million available for future claims. If, at any time, payments due to participants were to exceed the amount remaining in the fund, payments would be pro-rated. Clearing members and customers must register with the company in advance and provide certain documentation in order to substantiate their eligibility. The company believes that its guarantee liability is immaterial and therefore has not recorded any liability at March 31, 2016.
9. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The following tables present changes in the accumulated balances for each component of other comprehensive income (loss), including current period other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | Investment Securities | | Defined Benefit Plans | | Derivative Investments | | Foreign Currency Translation | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2015 | $ | (95.0 | ) | | $ | (36.6 | ) | | $ | 59.6 |
| | $ | (8.8 | ) | | $ | (80.8 | ) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications and income tax benefit (expense) | 109.6 |
| | 3.1 |
| | — |
| | (3.3 | ) | | 109.4 |
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | — |
| | 0.8 |
| | (0.3 | ) | | — |
| | 0.5 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) | (0.8 | ) | | (1.5 | ) | | 0.1 |
| | 1.2 |
| | (1.0 | ) |
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) | 108.8 |
| | 2.4 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | (2.1 | ) | | 108.9 |
|
Balance at March 31, 2016 | $ | 13.8 |
| | $ | (34.2 | ) | | $ | 59.4 |
| | $ | (10.9 | ) | | $ | 28.1 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | Investment Securities | | Defined Benefit Plans | | Derivative Investments | | Foreign Currency Translation | | Total |
Balance at December 31, 2014 | $ | (22.9 | ) | | $ | (31.3 | ) | | $ | 62.6 |
| | $ | (2.2 | ) | | $ | 6.2 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications and income tax benefit (expense) | (27.7 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | | (4.7 | ) | | (4.0 | ) | | (36.7 | ) |
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | — |
| | 0.7 |
| | 1.5 |
| | — |
| | 2.2 |
|
Income tax benefit (expense) | — |
| | (0.2 | ) | | 1.2 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 2.5 |
|
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) | (27.7 | ) | | 0.2 |
| | (2.0 | ) | | (2.5 | ) | | (32.0 | ) |
Balance at March 31, 2015 | $ | (50.6 | ) | | $ | (31.1 | ) | | $ | 60.6 |
| | $ | (4.7 | ) | | $ | (25.8 | ) |
10. Fair Value Measurements
The company uses a three-level classification hierarchy of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes.
| |
• | Level 1 inputs, which are considered the most reliable evidence of fair value, consist of quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
| |
• | Level 2 inputs consist of observable market data, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or inputs other than quoted prices that are directly observable. |
| |
• | Level 3 inputs consist of unobservable inputs which are derived and cannot be corroborated by market data or other entity-specific inputs. |
Level 1 assets generally include U.S. Treasury securities, investments in publicly traded mutual funds, equity securities and corporate debt securities with quoted market prices. In general, the company uses quoted prices in active markets for identical assets to determine the fair value of marketable securities and equity investments. If quoted prices are not available to determine fair value, the company uses other inputs that are directly observable.
Assets included in level 2 generally consist of asset-backed securities. Asset-backed securities were measured at fair value based on matrix pricing using prices of similar securities with similar inputs such as maturity dates, interest rates and credit ratings.
Financial assets recorded in the consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2016 were classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that was significant to each asset's fair value measurement. There were no liabilities that were measured at fair value as of March 31, 2016. The following tables present financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2016 |
(in millions) | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
Assets at Fair Value: | | | | | | | | |
Marketable securities: | | | | | | | | |
Corporate debt securities | | $ | 21.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 21.0 |
|
Mutual funds | | 57.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 57.8 |
|
Equity securities | | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.1 |
|
Asset-backed securities | | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
|
Total Marketable Securities | | 78.9 |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | 79.2 |
|
Performance bonds and guaranty fund contributions: | | | | | | | | |
U.S. Treasury securities (1) | | 10,248.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10,248.7 |
|
Equity investments | | 322.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 322.2 |
|
Total Assets at Fair Value | | $ | 10,649.8 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 10,650.1 |
|
(1) Performance bonds and guaranty fund contributions on the consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2016 include U.S. Treasury securities purchased with cash collateral.
There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between level 1, level 2 and level 3 during the first quarter of 2016. There were no level 3 assets valued at fair value on a recurring basis during the first quarter of 2016. The following is a reconciliation of level 3 liabilities valued at fair value on a recurring basis during the first quarter of 2016.
|
| | | |
(in millions) | Contingent Consideration |
Fair value of liability at December 31, 2015 | $ | 0.3 |
|
Realized and unrealized (gains) losses: | |
Included in other expenses | (0.3 | ) |
Fair value of liability at March 31, 2016 | $ | — |
|
In the first quarter of 2016, we sold a datacenter and leased back a portion of the property. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the transaction has been recognized under the financing method instead of recognized as a sale-leaseback arrangement. As a result, the property and equipment legally sold will continue to be recognized on the consolidated balance sheets and was written down to fair value of $130.0 million at March 31, 2016, based on qualitative indications of impairment and a quantitative analysis of undiscounted cash flows. The fair value of the datacenter is considered a level 3 and nonrecurring. There were no other level 3 assets or liabilities valued at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the first quarter of 2016.
The following presents the estimated fair values of long-term debt notes, which are carried at amortized cost on the consolidated balance sheets. The fair values, which are classified as level 2 under the fair value hierarchy, were estimated using quoted market prices. At March 31, 2016, the fair values were as follows:
|
| | | |
(in millions) | Fair Value |
$750.0 million fixed rate notes due September 2022, stated rate of 3.00% | $ | 776.5 |
|
$750.0 million fixed rate notes due March 2025, stated rate of 3.00% | 759.9 |
|
$750.0 million fixed rates notes due September 2043, stated rate of 5.30% | 901.6 |
|
11. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to the company by the weighted average number of shares of all classes of CME Group common stock outstanding for each reporting period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the increase in shares using the treasury stock method to reflect the impact of an equivalent number of shares of common stock if stock options were exercised and restricted stock awards were converted into common stock. Anti-dilutive stock options, restricted stock and performance share awards were as follows for the periods presented:
|
| | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, |
(in thousands) | | 2016 | | 2015 |
Stock options | | 329 |
| | 514 |
|
Restricted stock and performance shares | | 14 |
| | 24 |
|
Total | | 343 |
| | 538 |
|
The following table presents the earnings per share calculation for the periods presented:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
Net Income (in millions) | | $ | 367.8 |
| | $ | 330.4 |
|
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares (in thousands): | | | | |
Basic | | 337,014 |
| | 335,680 |
|
Effect of stock options, restricted stock and performance shares | | 1,535 |
| | 1,736 |
|
Diluted | | 338,549 |
| | 337,416 |
|
Earnings per Common Share: | | | | |
Basic | | $ | 1.09 |
| | $ | 0.98 |
|
Diluted | | 1.09 |
| | 0.98 |
|
12. Subsequent Events
The company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined that there are no subsequent events that require disclosure.
|
| |
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
The following discussion is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
References in this discussion and analysis to “we,” “us” and “our” are to CME Group Inc. (CME Group) and its consolidated subsidiaries, collectively. References to “exchange” are to Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (CME), Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc. (CBOT), New York Mercantile Exchange, Inc. (NYMEX), Commodity Exchange, Inc. (COMEX), CME Clearing Europe Limited (CMECE) and CME Europe Limited (CME Europe), collectively, unless otherwise noted. The clearing houses include CME Clearing, which is the U.S. clearing house and a division of CME, and CMECE.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Financial Highlights
The following summarizes significant changes in our financial performance for the periods presented.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | | |
(dollars in millions, except per share data) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
Total revenues | | $ | 934.2 |
| | $ | 842.7 |
| | 11 | % |
Total expenses | | 360.3 |
| | 335.4 |
| | 7 |
|
Operating margin | | 61.4 | % | | 60.2 | % | | |
Non-operating income (expense) | | $ | 4.6 |
| | $ | 16.5 |
| | (72 | ) |
Effective tax rate | | 36.4 | % | | 36.9 | % | | |
Net income | | $ | 367.8 |
| | $ | 330.4 |
| | 11 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share attributable to CME Group | | 1.09 |
| | 0.98 |
| | 11 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities | | 519.7 |
| | 418.9 |
| | 24 |
|
Revenues |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | | |
(dollars in millions) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
Clearing and transaction fees | | $ | 796.1 |
| | $ | 708.2 |
| | 12 | % |
Market data and information services | | 102.4 |
| | 98.0 |
| | 5 |
|
Access and communication fees | | 21.6 |
| | 21.3 |
| | 1 |
|
Other | | 14.1 |
| | 15.2 |
| | (8 | ) |
Total Revenues | | $ | 934.2 |
| | $ | 842.7 |
| | 11 |
|
Clearing and Transaction Fees
Futures and Options Contracts
The following table summarizes our total contract volume, revenue and average rate per contract for futures and options. Total contract volume includes contracts that are traded on our exchange and cleared through our clearing houses and certain cleared-only contracts. Volume is measured in round turns, which is considered a completed transaction that involves a purchase and an offsetting sale of a contract. Average rate per contract is determined by dividing total clearing and transaction fees by total contract volume. Contract volume and average rate per contract disclosures exclude interest rate swaps and credit default swaps. The interest rate swaps and credit default swaps are discussed in a later section.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
Total contract volume (in millions) | | 1,033.6 |
| | 914.4 |
| | 13 | % |
Clearing and transaction fees (in millions) | | $ | 781.1 |
| | $ | 688.6 |
| | 13 |
|
Average rate per contract | | $ | 0.756 |
| | $ | 0.753 |
| | — |
|
We estimate the following increases in clearing and transaction fees based on a change in total contract volume and a change in average rate per contract for futures and options during the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015.
|
| | | | |
(in millions) | | Quarter Ended |
Increase due to change in total contract volume | | $ | 90.1 |
|
Increase due to change in average rate per contract | | 2.4 |
|
Increase in clearing and transaction fees | | $ | 92.5 |
|
Average rate per contract is impacted by our rate structure, including volume-based incentives; product mix; trading venue, and the percentage of volume executed by customers who are members compared with non-member customers. Due to the relationship between average rate per contract and contract volume, the change in clearing and transaction fees attributable to changes in each is only an approximation.
Contract Volume
The following table summarizes average daily contract volume. Contract volume can be influenced by many factors, including political and economic conditions, the regulatory environment and market competition.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | | |
(amounts in thousands) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
Average Daily Volume by Product Line: | | | | | | |
Interest rate | | 8,246 |
| | 7,564 |
| | 9 | % |
Equity | | 3,557 |
| | 2,772 |
| | 28 |
|
Foreign exchange | | 944 |
| | 954 |
| | (1 | ) |
Agricultural commodity | | 1,206 |
| | 1,189 |
| | 1 |
|
Energy | | 2,536 |
| | 2,142 |
| | 18 |
|
Metal | | 455 |
| | 369 |
| | 23 |
|
Aggregate average daily volume | | 16,944 |
| | 14,990 |
| | 13 |
|
Average Daily Volume by Venue: | | | | | | |
Electronic | | 14,713 |
| | 13,034 |
| | 13 |
|
Open outcry | | 1,424 |
| | 1,291 |
| | 10 |
|
Privately negotiated | | 807 |
| | 665 |
| | 21 |
|
Aggregate average daily volume | | 16,944 |
| | 14,990 |
| | 13 |
|
Electronic Volume as a Percentage of Total Volume | | 87 | % | | 87 | % | | |
Overall futures and options contract volume increased in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015, largely due to an increase in equity and interest rate contract volume. We believe global market concerns and considerable uncertainty regarding the Federal Reserve's interest rate policy have resulted in increased volatility in the equity and interest rate markets, leading to an increase in volume. Additionally, the deceleration of the Chinese economy beginning in the second half of 2015 resulted in higher volatility within equity markets.
Crude oil markets continue to show considerable uncertainty regarding the direction of future oil prices. The oversupply of crude oil that began in 2014 continues to weigh on oil prices, resulting in additional volatility and an increase in overall energy contract volume.
Interest Rate Products
The following table summarizes average daily contract volume for our key interest rate products. Eurodollar Front 8 futures include contracts expiring in two years or less. Eurodollar Back 32 futures include contracts with expirations after two years through ten years. |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | | |
(amounts in thousands) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
Eurodollar futures and options: | | | | | | |
Front 8 futures | | 2,037 |
| | 1,917 |
| | 6 | % |
Back 32 futures | | 729 |
| | 875 |
| | (17 | ) |
Options | | 1,520 |
| | 1,007 |
| | 51 |
|
U.S. Treasury futures and options: | | | | | | |
10-Year | | 1,845 |
| | 1,778 |
| | 4 |
|
5-Year | | 939 |
| | 898 |
| | 5 |
|
Treasury bond | | 385 |
| | 422 |
| | (9 | ) |
2-Year | | 344 |
| | 381 |
| | (10 | ) |
Overall interest rate contract volume increased in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015 largely due to the uncertainty around the Federal Reserve's interest rate policy. As a result, contract volume increased for short-term interest rate contracts, including the Eurodollar Front 8 futures and Eurodollar options. Back 32 Eurodollar futures volume declined as participants became more focused on short-term interest rate uncertainty. In addition, electronic Eurodollar options volume increased in the first quarter of 2016 due to our continued investment in system enhancements, new products and client education.
Equity Products
The following table summarizes average daily contract volume for our key equity products. |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | | |
(amounts in thousands) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
E-mini S&P 500 futures and options | | 2,781 |
| | 2,172 |
| | 28 | % |
E-mini NASDAQ 100 futures and options | | 353 |
| | 283 |
| | 25 |
|
Overall equity contract volume increased in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015 due to overall higher market volatility, as measured by the CBOE Volatility Index and CBOE Nasdaq-100 Volatility Index. We believe overall volatility resulted from continued uncertainty surrounding the Federal Reserve's interest rate policy, the deceleration of the Chinese economy and declining global crude oil prices.
Foreign Exchange Products
The following table summarizes average daily contract volume for our key foreign exchange products.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | | |
(amounts in thousands) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
Euro | | 275 |
| | 335 |
| | (18 | )% |
Japanese yen | | 191 |
| | 171 |
| | 12 |
|
British pound | | 118 |
| | 121 |
| | (2 | ) |
Australian dollar | | 113 |
| | 108 |
| | 4 |
|
Canadian dollar | | 92 |
| | 80 |
| | 14 |
|
Foreign exchange contract volume remained relatively flat in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015. Euro contract volume decreased in the first quarter of 2016 due to strong volume in the first quarter of 2015 resulting from volatility caused by quantitative easing programs initiated by central banks throughout Europe in early 2015. The decrease in overall foreign exchange contract volume was offset by an increase in Japanese yen contract volume, which we believe was caused by volatility resulting from the strengthening of the Japanese yen against other major currencies.
Agricultural Commodity Products
The following table summarizes average daily contract volume for our key agricultural commodity products.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | | |
(amounts in thousands) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
Corn | | 391 |
| | 386 |
| | 2 | % |
Soybean | | 290 |
| | 277 |
| | 5 |
|
Wheat | | 182 |
| | 170 |
| | 7 |
|
Soybean oil | | 106 |
| | 106 |
| | — |
|
Agricultural commodity contract volume remained relatively flat in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015 due to overall low price volatility.
Energy Products
The following table summarizes average daily contract volume for our key energy products.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | | |
(amounts in thousands) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
WTI crude oil | | 1,397 |
| | 1,133 |
| | 23 | % |
Natural gas | | 522 |
| | 484 |
| | 8 |
|
Refined products | | 373 |
| | 346 |
| | 8 |
|
Brent crude oil | | 116 |
| | 139 |
| | (17 | ) |
Overall energy contract volume increased in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015 largely due to an increase in crude oil trading, which we believe resulted from a continuing shift in supply that began in the fourth quarter of 2014. In the first quarter of 2016, the overall market shifted more focus on WTI crude oil instead of Brent crude oil because of the marketplaces' increased weighting of WTI pricing as a global benchmark price for crude oil. Additionally, refined products and natural gas contract volume increased largely due to higher price volatility in the underlying markets.
Metal Products
The following table summarizes average daily volume for our key metal products.
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | | |
(amounts in thousands) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
Gold | | 284 |
| | 222 |
| | 28 | % |
Copper | | 77 |
| | 69 |
| | 11 |
|
Silver | | 69 |
| | 56 |
| | 22 |
|
We believe the increase in metals contract volume in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015 was due to investors turning to gold and other precious metals as a safe haven investment alternative to the volatile equity markets.
Average Rate per Contract
The average rate per contract remained relatively flat in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015. The impact from a rate increase in the first quarter of 2016 was offset by higher volume-based incentives and discounts on our energy contracts.
Cleared-only Swap Contracts
Clearing and transaction fees as presented on the consolidated statements of income include revenues for our cleared-only interest rate swap and credit default swap contracts. In the first quarter of 2016 and 2015, clearing and transaction fees generated from these contracts were $15.1 million and $19.6 million, respectively. The decrease in revenue was largely attributable to a reduction in client activity after the first quarter of 2015, as we believe some customers chose alternative products and venues to manage risk.
Concentration of Revenue
We bill a substantial portion of our clearing and transaction fees directly to our clearing firms. The majority of clearing and transaction fees received from clearing firms represent charges for trades executed and cleared on behalf of their customers. One firm represented 13% of our clearing and transaction fees in the first quarter of 2016. Should a clearing firm withdraw, we believe that the customer portion of the firm’s trading activity would likely transfer to another clearing firm of the exchange. Therefore, we do not believe we are exposed to significant risk from the ongoing loss of revenue received from or through a particular clearing firm.
Other Sources of Revenue
Beginning in 2016, the partial fee waivers that existed in 2015 ended, which contributed to an increase in market data and information services revenue in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015.
The two largest resellers of our market data represented approximately 40% of our market data and information services revenue in the first quarter of 2016. Despite this concentration, we consider exposure to significant risk of revenue loss to be minimal. In the event that one of these vendors no longer subscribes to our market data, we believe the majority of that vendor’s customers would likely subscribe to our market data through another reseller. Additionally, several of our largest institutional customers that utilize services from our two largest resellers report usage and remit payment of their fees directly to us.
Expenses |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | | |
(dollars in millions) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
Compensation and benefits | | $ | 131.9 |
| | $ | 141.3 |
| | (7 | )% |
Communications | | 6.7 |
| | 7.6 |
| | (13 | ) |
Technology support services | | 17.4 |
| | 15.6 |
| | 12 |
|
Professional fees and outside services | | 31.7 |
| | 29.1 |
| | 9 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangibles | | 24.0 |
| | 24.9 |
| | (4 | ) |
Depreciation and amortization | | 33.9 |
| | 31.8 |
| | 7 |
|
Occupancy and building operations | | 21.3 |
| | 22.8 |
| | (6 | ) |
Licensing and other fee agreements | | 39.0 |
| | 30.6 |
| | 27 |
|
Other | | 54.4 |
| | 31.7 |
| | 72 |
|
Total Expenses | | $ | 360.3 |
| | $ | 335.4 |
| | 7 |
|
Operating expenses increased by $24.9 million in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015. The following table shows the estimated impacts of key factors resulting in the change in operating expenses:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended, March 31, 2016 |
| | Amount of Change | | Change as a Percentage of Total Expenses |
(dollars in millions) | |
Loss on datacenter and related legal fees | | $ | 28.6 |
| | 9 | % |
Licensing and other fee agreements | | 8.4 |
| | 2 |
|
Losses on disposal of fixed assets | | 3.2 |
| | 1 |
|
Salaries, benefits and employer taxes | | (3.5 | ) | | (1 | ) |
Reorganization costs | | (5.5 | ) | | (2 | ) |
Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuation | | (6.1 | ) | | (2 | ) |
Other expenses, net | | (0.2 | ) | | — |
|
Total increase | | $ | 24.9 |
| | 7 | % |
Increases in overall operating expenses in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015 were as follows:
| |
• | In the first quarter of 2016, we sold and leased back our datacenter in the Chicago area. The transaction was recognized under the financing method under generally accepted accounting principles. We recognized total losses and expenses of $28.6 million, including a net loss on write-down to fair value of the assets and certain other transaction fees of $27.1 million within other expenses and $1.5 million of legal and other fees. |
| |
• | An increase in licensing and other fee sharing agreements expense resulted from higher expense related to revenue sharing agreements for certain equity and energy contracts due to both an increase in volume and an increase in the license rates for certain equity products. |
| |
• | In the first quarter of 2016, we recognized additional losses on disposals of certain fixed assets. |
The overall increase in operating expenses in the first quarter of 2016 was partially offset by the following decreases:
| |
• | Compensation and benefits expense decreased as a result of a decline in average headcount related to our reorganization announced in the third quarter of 2015 as well as the partial closing of the trading floor in the second quarter of 2015. |
| |
• | Severance and other costs related to the reorganization announced in October 2014 and the reduction of our trading floors in mid-2015 were recognized in the first quarter of 2015, resulting in an decrease in compensation and benefits expenses in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015. |
| |
• | In the first quarter of 2016, we recognized a net loss within other expenses of $3.9 million due to an unfavorable change in exchange rates on foreign cash balances, compared with a net loss of $10.0 million in the first quarter of 2015. Gains and losses from exchange rate fluctuations primarily result when subsidiaries with a U.S. dollar functional currency hold cash as well as certain other monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. We expect to continue to incur gains and losses from exchange rate fluctuations. |
Non-Operating Income (Expense)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | | |
(dollars in millions) | | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
Investment income | | $ | 17.6 |
| | $ | 5.7 |
| | n.m. |
|
Gains (losses) on derivative investments | | — |
| | (1.8 | ) | | n.m. |
|
Interest and other borrowing costs | | (29.8 | ) | | (31.6 | ) | | (6 | ) |
Equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated subsidiaries | | 26.8 |
| | 22.5 |
| | 19 |
|
Other non-operating income (expense) | | (10.0 | ) | | 21.7 |
| | n.m. |
|
Total Non-Operating | | $ | 4.6 |
| | $ | 16.5 |
| | (72 | ) |
n.m. not meaningful
The overall increase in investment income in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015 was largely due to an increase in the rate of interest earned from cash performance bond and guaranty fund contributions that are reinvested.
The following table shows the key impacts in the overall decrease in interest expense and other borrowing costs in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Quarter Ended March 31, | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | Change |
Weighted average borrowings outstanding (in millions) | | $ | 2,250.0 |
| | $ | 2,295.8 |
| | $ | (45.8 | ) |
Weighted average effective yield | | 3.71 | % | | 4.02 | % | | (0.31 | )% |
Average cost of borrowings (1) | | 3.90 |
| | 4.27 |
| | (0.37 | ) |
| |
(1) | Average cost of borrowings includes interest, the effective portion of interest rate hedges, discount accretion and debt issuance costs. Commitment fees on line of credit agreements are not included in the average cost of borrowings. |
In March 2015, we issued $750.0 million 3.0% notes due March 2025. In April 2015, we repurchased the $612.5 million 4.40% notes due March 2018. These transactions decreased weighted average borrowings outstanding, weighted average effective yield and average cost of borrowings for the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015.
Higher income generated from our S&P/Dow Jones Indices LLC business venture contributed to an increase in equity in net earnings (losses) of unconsolidated subsidiaries in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015.
In the first quarter of 2015, we received a termination fee of $22.5 million, net of the portion paid to outside advisers, related to our proposed acquisition of GFI Group Inc. (GFI Group), which was classified as income within other non-operating income (expense). In the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015, we recognized higher expense related to
the distribution of interest earned on performance bond collateral reinvestment to the clearing firms. This expense is included in other non-operating income (expense).
Income Tax Provision
The following table summarizes the effective tax rates for the periods presented:
|
| | | | | | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 |
Quarter ended March 31 | | 36.4 | % | | 36.9 | % |
The decrease in effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015 is attributable to our continued expansion of our international operations and legislative extension of the research and development tax credit.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources and Uses of Cash. Net cash provided by operating activities increased in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period of 2015. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was largely attributable to higher clearing and transaction fees resulting from an increase in volume. Net cash used in investing activities remained relatively flat in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period of 2015. Cash used in financing activities was higher in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015. The increase was attributable to the issuance of $750.0 million fixed rate notes due March 2025 in the first quarter of 2015 as well as higher cash dividends paid in the first quarter of 2016 when compared with the same period in 2015. We also recognized proceeds from a finance lease obligation related to the sale-leaseback of the datacenter in the first quarter of 2016.
Debt Instruments. The following table summarizes our debt outstanding at March 31, 2016: |
| | | |
(in millions) | Par Value |
Fixed rate notes due September 2022, stated rate of 3.00% (1) | $ | 750.0 |
|
Fixed rate notes due March 2025, stated rate of 3.00% (2) | 750.0 |
|
Fixed rate notes due September 2043, stated rate of 5.30% (3) | 750.0 |
|
| |
(1) | In August 2012, we entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap agreement that modified the interest obligation associated with these notes so that the interest payable effectively became fixed at a rate of 3.32%. |
| |
(2) | In December 2014, we entered into a forward-starting interest rate swap agreement that modified the interest obligation associated with these notes so that the interest payable effectively became fixed at a rate of 3.11% |
| |
(3) | In August 2012, we entered into a forward starting interest rate swap agreement that modified the interest obligation associated with these notes so that the interest payable effectively became fixed at a rate of 4.73%. |
We maintain a $2.3 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility with various financial institutions, which matures in March 2020. The proceeds from this facility can be used for general corporate purposes, which includes providing liquidity for our clearing houses in certain circumstances at CME Group's discretion and, if necessary, for maturities of commercial paper. As long as we are not in default under this facility, we have the option to increase it up to $3.0 billion with the consent of the agent and lenders providing the additional funds. This facility is voluntarily pre-payable from time to time without premium or penalty. Under this facility, we are required to remain in compliance with a consolidated net worth test, which is defined as our consolidated shareholders' equity at December 31, 2014, giving effect to share repurchases made and special dividends paid during the term of the agreements (and in no event greater than $2.0 billion in aggregate), multiplied by 0.65. We currently do not have any borrowings outstanding under this facility.
In March 2016, we sold our datacenter in the Chicago area for $130.0 million. At the time of the sale, we leased back a portion of the property. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the transaction has been accounted for under the financing method instead of a sale-leaseback arrangement because our participation in future revenues and development work constitute continuing involvement in the datacenter. Under the financing method, the assets remain on the consolidated balance sheet throughout the term of the lease and the proceeds of $130.0 million from the transaction are recognized as a finance lease obligation within other liabilities and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. A portion of the lease payments will be recognized as a reduction of the finance lease obligation and a portion will be recognized as interest expense based on an imputed interest rate.
We maintain a 364-day multi-currency revolving secured credit facility with a consortium of domestic and international banks to be used in certain situations by CME Clearing. The facility provides for borrowings of up to $7.0 billion. We may use the proceeds to provide temporary liquidity in the unlikely event of a clearing firm default, in the event of a liquidity constraint or default by a depositary (custodian for our collateral), or in the event of a temporary disruption with the domestic payments
system that would delay payment of settlement variation between us and our clearing firms. CME clearing firm guaranty fund contributions received in the form of cash or U.S. Treasury securities as well as the performance bond assets of a defaulting firm can be used to collateralize the facility. At March 31, 2016, guaranty funds available to collateralize the facility totaled $6.7 billion. We have the option to request an increase in the line from $7.0 billion to $10.0 billion. Our 364-day facility contains a requirement that CME remain in compliance with a consolidated tangible net worth test, defined as CME consolidated shareholder's equity less intangible assets (as defined in the agreement), of not less than $800.0 million. We currently do not have any borrowings outstanding under this facility.
The indentures governing our fixed rate notes, our $2.3 billion multi-currency revolving senior credit facility and our 364-day multi-currency revolving secured credit facility for $7.0 billion do not contain specific covenants that restrict the ability to pay dividends. These documents, however, do contain other customary financial and operating covenants that place restrictions on the operations of the company that could indirectly affect the ability to pay dividends.
At March 31, 2016, we have excess borrowing capacity for general corporate purposes of approximately $2.3 billion under our multi-currency revolving senior credit facility.
At March 31, 2016, we were in compliance with the various covenant requirements of all our debt facilities.
CME Group, as a holding company, has no operations of its own. Instead, it relies on dividends declared and paid to it by its subsidiaries in order to provide the funds which it uses to pay dividends to its shareholders.
To satisfy our performance bond obligation with Singapore Exchange Limited, we may pledge CME-owned U.S. Treasury securities in lieu of, or in combination with, irrevocable standby letters of credit. At March 31, 2016, the letters of credit totaled $610.0 million.
The following table summarizes our credit ratings at March 31, 2016:
|
| | | | | | |
| | Short-Term | | Long-Term | | |
Rating Agency | | Debt Rating | | Debt Rating | | Outlook |
Standard & Poor’s | | A1+ | | AA- | | Stable |
Moody’s Investors Service | | P1 | | Aa3 | | Stable |
Given our cash flow generation, our ability to pay down debt levels and our ability to refinance existing debt facilities if necessary, we expect to maintain an investment grade rating. If our ratings are downgraded below investment grade due to a change of control, we are required to make an offer to repurchase our fixed rate notes at a price equal to 101% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Liquidity and Cash Management. Cash and cash equivalents totaled $1.1 billion and $1.7 billion at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The balance retained in cash and cash equivalents is a function of anticipated or possible short-term cash needs, prevailing interest rates, our investment policy and alternative investment choices. A majority of our cash and cash equivalents balance is invested in money market mutual funds that invest only in U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government agency securities and U.S. Treasury security reverse repurchase agreements. Our exposure to credit and liquidity risk is minimal given the nature of the investments. Cash that is not available for general corporate purposes because of regulatory requirements or other restrictions is classified as restricted cash and is included in other current assets or other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
Regulatory Requirements. CME is regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a U.S. Derivatives Clearing Organization (DCO). DCOs are required to maintain capital, as defined by the CFTC, in an amount at least equal to one year of projected operating expenses as well as cash, liquid securities, or a line of credit at least equal to six months of projected operating expenses. CME was designated by the Financial Stability Oversight Council as a systemically important DCO under Title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. As a result, CME must comply with the requirements for financial resources and liquidity resources. CME is in compliance with all DCO financial requirements.
CME, CBOT, NYMEX and COMEX are regulated by the CFTC as Designated Contract Markets (DCM). DCMs are required to maintain capital, as defined by the CFTC, in an amount at least equal to one year of projected operating expenses as well as cash, liquid securities or a line of credit at least equal to six months of projected operating expenses. Our DCMs are in compliance with all DCM financial requirements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a new standard on revenue recognition that replaces numerous, industry-specific requirements and converges U.S. accounting with International Financial Reporting Standards. The new standard introduces a framework for recognizing revenue that focuses on the transfer of control rather than risks and
rewards. The new standard also requires significant additional disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments, changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The new standard was intended to become effective in the first annual period beginning after December 15, 2016, but in August 2015, FASB extended the deadline by one year. This guidance may be adopted using one of two transition methods, which we are still evaluating along with the impact of the new standard on our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2016, the FASB issued a standards update that will change how entities measure certain equity investments. It does not change the guidance for classifying and measuring investments in debt securities and loans. Under the new guidance, entities will have to measure many equity investments at fair value and recognize any changes in fair value in net income, unless the investments qualify for a practicability exception. Entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on equity securities classified today as available for sale in other comprehensive income. The update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of this update on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued a standards update that requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities associated with the rights and obligations created by those leases. The guidance for lessors is largely unchanged from current U.S. GAAP. Under the new guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. Consistent with current U.S. GAAP, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. The update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of this update on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued a standards update that will change certain aspects of accounting for share-based payments to employees. The guidance will require that all income tax effects of awards to be recognized in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. It will also allow an employer to repurchase more of an employee’s shares for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting and to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur. The update is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. If this guidance is early adopted during an interim period, any adjustments must be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of this update on our consolidated financial statements.
|
| |
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
We are subject to various market risks, including those caused by changes in interest rates, credit, foreign currency exchange rates and equity prices. There have not been material changes in our exposure to market risk since December 31, 2015. Refer to Item 7A. of CME Group’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for additional information.
|
| |
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. As required by Rule 13a-15(d) under the Exchange Act, the company’s management, including the company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated the company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in the company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this quarterly report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
See “Legal and Regulatory Matters” in Note 7. Contingencies to the Consolidated Financial Statements for updates to CME Group’s existing legal proceedings disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference. Note 7. Contingencies includes updates to the legal proceedings disclosed in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 26, 2016.
There have been no material updates to the Risk Factors disclosure included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 26, 2016. In addition to the other information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, which are the risks that we believe are material at this time. These risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business in the future.
|
| |
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
(c) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | | (a) Total Number of Class A Shares Purchased (1) | | (b) Average Price Paid Per Share | | (c) Total Number of Class A Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs | | (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Value) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (in millions) |
January 1 to January 31 | | 58 |
| | $ | 88.67 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
|
February 1 to February 29 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
March 1 to March 31 | | 108,020 |
| | 96.69 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Total | | 108,078 |
| | $ | 96.69 |
| | — |
| | |
| |
(1) | Shares purchased consist of an aggregate of 108,078 shares of Class A common stock surrendered in the first quarter of 2016 to satisfy employees’ tax obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock. |
|
| |
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Not applicable.
|
| | |
| | |
31.1 | | Section 302 Certification—Phupinder S. Gill |
| |
31.2 | | Section 302 Certification—John W. Pietrowicz |
| |
32.1 | | Section 906 Certification |
| |
101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document |
| |
101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| |
101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| |
101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase |
| |
101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
| |
101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
| | |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | CME Group Inc. (Registrant) |
| | | |
Dated: May 4, 2016 | | | | By: | | /s/ John W. Pietrowicz |
| | | | | | Chief Financial Officer & Senior Managing Director Finance |