UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
£
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from ___________ to ______________.
Commission
File Number 1-32955
HOUSTON
AMERICAN ENERGY CORP.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
|
76-0675953
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation
or organization)
|
|
(IRS
Employer Identification
No.)
|
801
Travis Street, Suite 1425, Houston, Texas 77002
(Address
of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
(713)
222-6966
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.Yes x No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
|
Accelerated
filer x
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
|
Smaller
reporting company ¨
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes
¨ No x
As of May
8, 2009, we had 28,000,772 shares of $0.0001 par value Common Stock
outstanding.
HOUSTON AMERICAN ENERGY
CORP.
FORM
10-Q
|
|
|
|
Page No.
|
PART
I.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4. |
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
6.
|
|
|
|
17
|
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
6,455,815 |
|
|
$ |
9,910,694 |
|
Accounts
receivable – oil and gas sales
|
|
|
7,285 |
|
|
|
315,631 |
|
Notes
receivable
|
|
|
115,724 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Escrow
receivable
|
|
|
1,673,551 |
|
|
|
1,673,551 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
120,847 |
|
|
|
20,240 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
8,373,222 |
|
|
|
11,920,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
and gas properties – full cost method
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
subject to amortization
|
|
|
18,900,127 |
|
|
|
17,550,268 |
|
Costs
not being amortized
|
|
|
1,951,966 |
|
|
|
2,064,566 |
|
Office
equipment
|
|
|
11,878 |
|
|
|
11,878 |
|
Total
property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
20,863,971 |
|
|
|
19,626,712 |
|
Accumulated
depreciation, depletion, and impairment
|
|
|
(14,617,996
|
) |
|
|
(14,363,581
|
) |
Total
property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
6,245,975 |
|
|
|
5,263,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
|
|
5,277,354 |
|
|
|
5,277,354 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
176,452 |
|
|
|
176,453 |
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
20,073,003 |
|
|
$ |
22,637,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
592,751 |
|
|
$ |
1,363,827 |
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
14,189 |
|
|
|
9,264 |
|
Foreign
income taxes payable
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,191 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
606,940 |
|
|
|
1,383,282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
rent obligation
|
|
|
19,219 |
|
|
|
19,614 |
|
Reserve
for plugging and abandonment costs
|
|
|
189,171 |
|
|
|
185,910 |
|
Total
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
208,390 |
|
|
|
205,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.001 par value: 10,000,000 shares authorized; 0 shares
outstanding
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 28,000,772 shares
outstanding
|
|
|
28,001 |
|
|
|
28,001 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
22,319,518 |
|
|
|
22,631,773 |
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(3,089,846
|
) |
|
|
(1,611,526
|
) |
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
19,257,673 |
|
|
|
21,048,248 |
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
20,073,003 |
|
|
$ |
22,637,054 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
|
|
For
the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
and gas
|
|
$ |
445,142 |
|
|
$ |
2,937,134 |
|
Total
revenue
|
|
|
445,142 |
|
|
|
2,937,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
operating expense and severance taxes
|
|
|
910,488 |
|
|
|
876,842 |
|
Joint
venture expenses
|
|
|
40,723 |
|
|
|
47,354 |
|
General
and administrative expense
|
|
|
720,867 |
|
|
|
320,926 |
|
Depreciation
and depletion
|
|
|
254,415 |
|
|
|
341,801 |
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
1,926,493 |
|
|
|
1,586,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) from operations
|
|
|
(1,481,351 |
) |
|
|
1,350,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
(income) expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
(17,848 |
) |
|
|
(94,041 |
) |
Total
other income
|
|
|
(17,848 |
) |
|
|
(94,041 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) before taxes
|
|
|
(1,463,503 |
) |
|
|
1,444,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax expense
|
|
|
14,817 |
|
|
|
572,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(1,478,320 |
) |
|
$ |
871,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
income (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
Diluted
income (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
(0.05 |
) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
weighted average shares
|
|
|
28,000,772 |
|
|
|
27,920,172 |
|
Diluted
weighted average shares
|
|
|
28,000,772 |
|
|
|
28,061,583 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
For
the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(1,478,320 |
) |
|
$ |
871,721 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash from operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and depletion
|
|
|
254,415 |
|
|
|
341,801 |
|
Stock
based compensation
|
|
|
247,760 |
|
|
|
41,166 |
|
Accretion
expense – asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
3,261 |
|
|
|
1,931 |
|
Amortization
of deferred rent
|
|
|
(395 |
) |
|
|
197 |
|
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease
(increase) in accounts receivable
|
|
|
308,346 |
|
|
|
(660,398 |
) |
Increase
in prepaid expense
|
|
|
(100,606 |
) |
|
|
(98,832 |
) |
Increase
(decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(776,342 |
) |
|
|
491,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(1,541,881 |
) |
|
|
989,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
for issuance of notes receivable
|
|
|
(115,724 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Sale
of marketable securities
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,650,000 |
|
Acquisition
of oil and gas properties
|
|
|
(1,237,259 |
) |
|
|
(639,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(1,352,983 |
) |
|
|
8,010,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
paid
|
|
|
(560,015 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(560,015 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
(decrease) in cash and equivalents
|
|
|
(3,454,879 |
) |
|
|
8,999,388 |
|
Cash,
beginning of period
|
|
|
9,910,694 |
|
|
|
417,818 |
|
Cash,
end of period
|
|
$ |
6,455,815 |
|
|
$ |
9,417,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENT
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Colombian
taxes paid
|
|
$ |
25,008 |
|
|
$ |
297,425 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
NOTE
1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The
accompanying unaudited financial statements of Houston American Energy Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for
interim financial information and with the instructions to Form
10-Q. They do not include all of the information and footnotes
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America for a complete financial presentation. In the opinion of management, all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, considered
necessary for a fair presentation, have been included in the accompanying
unaudited financial statements. Operating results for the periods
presented are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for
the full year.
These
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements
and footnotes, which are included as part of the Company’s Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008.
Notes
Receivables
Notes
receivable are carried at the expected net realizable value. Impairment of notes
receivable is based on management's continued assessment of the collectability
of debtors.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit
risk include cash, cash equivalents and any marketable securities. The Company
had cash deposits of approximately $6,041,102 in excess of FDIC insured limits
at the period end. The Company has not experienced any losses on its deposits of
cash and cash equivalents.
NOTE
2 – CHANGES IN PRESENTATION
Certain
financial presentations for the periods presented for 2008 have been
reclassified to conform to the 2009 presentation.
NOTE
3 – RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 161”), an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133,
“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”).
SFAS 161 is effective beginning January 1, 2009 and required entities to provide
expanded disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities
including (1) the ways in which an entity uses derivatives, (2) the accounting
for derivatives and hedging activities, and (3) the impact that derivatives have
(or could have) on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and
cash flows. SFAS 161 requires expanded disclosures and does not change the
accounting for derivatives. The adoption of SFAS 161 did not have a material
impact on the disclosures already provided.
In May
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles”, (SFAS 162), which identifies a consistent framework for
selecting accounting principles to be used in preparing financial statements for
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with United States
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The current GAAP hierarchy was
criticized due to its complexity, ranking position of FASB Statements of
Financial Accounting Concepts and the fact that it is directed at auditors
rather than entities. SFAS 162 will be effective 60 days following the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) approval of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, The Meaning of
Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The
FASB does not expect that SFAS 162 will have a change in current practice, and
the Company does not believe that SFAS 162 will have an impact on operating
results, financial position or cash flows.
In June
2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted
in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (“FSP EITF
03-6-1”). FSP EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in share-based
payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and,
therefore, need to be included in computing earnings per share under the
two-class method described in SFAS No. 128, “Earnings Per Share.” FSP EITF
03-6-1 is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2009 and in accordance with
its requirements it will be applied retrospectively. The adoption of FSP EITF
03-6-1 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
statements.
On
December 31, 2008, the SEC published the final rules and interpretations
updating its oil and gas reporting requirements. Many of the revisions are
updates to definitions in the existing oil and gas rules to make them consistent
with the petroleum resource management system, which is a widely accepted
standard for the management of petroleum resources that was developed by several
industry organizations. Key revisions include changes to the pricing used to
estimate reserves utilizing a 12-month average price rather than a single day
spot price which eliminates the ability to utilize subsequent prices to the end
of a reporting period when the full cost ceiling was exceeded and subsequent
pricing exceeds pricing at the end of a reporting period, the ability to include
nontraditional resources in reserves, the use of new technology for determining
reserves, and permitting disclosure of probable and possible reserves. The SEC
will require companies to comply with the amended disclosure requirements for
registration statements filed after January 1, 2010, and for annual reports on
Form 10-K for fiscal years ending on or after December 15, 2009. Early adoption
is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact that the
adoption will have on the Company’s disclosures, operating results, financial
position and cash flows.
No other
accounting standards or interpretations issued recently are expected to a have a
material impact on our consolidated financial position, operations or cash
flows.
NOTE
4 – SALE OF CARACARA OIL AND GAS PROPERTIES
Gain
on Sale of Oil and Gas Properties
In June
2008, the Company, through Hupecol Caracara LLC as owner/operator under the
Caracara Association Contract, sold all of its interest in the Caracara
Association Contract and related assets for a total cash consideration of
$11,917,418.
The
following table presents pro forma data that reflects revenue, income from
continuing operations, net income and income per share for the three ended March
31, 2008 as if the Caracara transaction had occurred at the beginning of that
period.
Pro-Forma
Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
and gas revenue
|
|
$ |
807,956 |
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(344,500 |
) |
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(369,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
loss per share
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Diluted
loss per share
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
Other
Current Assets
Pursuant
to the terms of the sale of the Caracara assets, on the closing date of the
sale, a portion of the purchase price was deposited in escrow to settle
post-closing adjustments under the purchase and sale agreement. The
funds deposited in escrow will be released to the Company, or to the purchaser,
based on post-closing adjustments 12 months following closing. The
Company’s proportionate interest in the escrow deposit, totaling $1,673,551, has
been recorded as other current assets.
The net
proceeds and the gain realized from the sale of the Caracara assets may be
adjusted based on post-closing adjustments.
NOTE
5 – NOTES RECEIVABLE
On
February 4, 2009, the Company entered into a letter agreement (the “Letter
Agreement”) with Yazoo Pipeline Co., L.P. (“Yazoo”), Sterling Exploration &
Production Co., L.L.C. (“Sterling”), and Matagorda Operating Company (together
with Yazoo and Sterling, the “Debtors”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to
provide debtor-in-possession financing (“DIP Financing”) to the Debtors subject
to approval of the Letter Agreement by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas (the “Bankruptcy Court”). On February 4, 2009, the
Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the DIP Financing on the terms set
out in the Letter Agreement.
Under the
terms of the Letter Agreement, the Company agreed to advance to the Debtors up
to $300,000 (the “Maximum Borrowing Amount”), with all advances bearing interest
at 10% per annum and being repayable in full ninety (90) days from approval of
the DIP Financing by the Bankruptcy Court, or the earlier consummation of a sale
of the principal assets of the Debtors to the Company. Under the Letter
Agreement, the Company and the Debtors agreed to commence negotiations and due
diligence with respect to the potential acquisition by the Company of the
principal assets of the Debtors based on certain financial terms described in
the Letter Agreement. On February 4 and February 20th, advances under
the Letter Agreement were made in the total amount of $115,724. As of
March 31, 2009, advances pursuant to the DIP Financing totaled
$115,724.
Pursuant
to its rights under the Letter Agreement, after conducting due diligence with
respect to the Debtors, the Company determined to terminate negotiations with
the Debtors with respect to the potential acquisition of the assets of the
Debtors. On April 10, 2009, the Debtors repaid the DIP Financing in
full in the amount of $117,897, including principal and
interest.
NOTE
6 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE AND WARRANTS
On
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
123R, “Share-Based
Payments”, or SFAS 123R. The Company periodically grants options to
employees, directors and consultants under the Company’s 2005 Stock Option Plan
and the Company’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan. These are accounted for in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123R and Emerging Issues Task Force
Abstract No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments
That are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring or in Conjunction with
Selling, Goods or Services” as well as other authoritative accounting
pronouncements. The Company is required to make estimates of the fair value of
the related instruments and recognize expense over the period benefited, usually
the vesting period.
In 2008,
the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the Houston American Energy Corp. 2008
Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan” and, together with the 2005 Plan, the
“Plans”). The terms of the 2008 Plan allow for the issuance of up to 2,200,000
shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to the grant of stock options and
restricted stock. Persons eligible to participate in the Plans are key
employees, consultants and directors of the Company.
During
2008 the Company granted 3,333 options to the members of the Board of Directors,
1,050,000 options to employees and 55,600 shares of restricted
stock. Shares available for issuance under the Plans as of March 31,
2009 totaled 1,091,067.
A summary
of stock option activity and related information for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 is presented below:
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at January 1, 2009
|
|
|
1,392,333 |
|
|
$ |
6.21 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Outstanding
at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,392,333 |
|
|
$ |
6.21 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Exercisable
at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
342,333 |
|
|
$ |
3.16 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
No
options were granted or exercised during the three months ended March 31,
2009. As of March 31, 2009, total unrecognized stock-based
compensation expense related to non-vested stock options was $4,465,094. The
unrecognized expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period
of 4.8 years and the weighted average remaining contractual term of the
outstanding and exercisable options at March 31, 2009 is
8.67 years.
The
following table reflects share-based compensation recorded by the Company for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based
compensation expense included in reported net income
|
|
$ |
247,760 |
|
|
$ |
41,166 |
|
Earnings
per share effect of share-based compensation expense
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
At March
31, 2009 the Company had remaining 190,000 warrants outstanding with a remaining
contractual life of 2.08 years. The weighted average exercise price
for all remaining outstanding warrants was $3.00. The warrants had an
intrinsic value of $0 at March 31, 2009.
NOTE
7 – DIVIDEND
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we declared and paid cash dividends to our
shareholders of $0.02 per share, or an aggregate of $560,015.
NOTE
8 - GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION
The
Company currently has operations in two geographical areas, the United States
and Colombia. Revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and Long Lived
Assets as of March 31, 2009 attributable to each geographical area are presented
below:
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Long
Lived Assets, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
21,696 |
|
|
$ |
1,973,689 |
|
Colombia
|
|
|
423,446 |
|
|
|
4,272,286 |
|
NOTE
9 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Lease
Commitment
The
Company leases office facilities under an operating lease agreement that expires
May 31, 2012. The lease agreement requires future payments as
follows:
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
2009
|
|
$ |
61,459 |
|
2010
|
|
|
84,315 |
|
2011
|
|
|
86,684 |
|
2012
|
|
|
36,530 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
268,988 |
|
For the
three months ended March 31, the total base rental expense was $20,140 in 2009
and $19,548 in 2008. The Company does not have any capital leases or
other operating lease commitments.
NOTE
10 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On May 7,
2009 the Board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.005 per share to
shareholders of record as of May 27, 2009. The payment date was set
for June 11, 2009.
|
MANAGEMENT'S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
Forward-Looking
Information
This Form
10-Q quarterly report of Houston American Energy Corp. (the “Company”) for the
three months ended March 31, 2009, contains certain forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are
intended to be covered by the safe harbors created thereby. To the
extent that there are statements that are not recitations of historical fact,
such statements constitute forward-looking statements that, by definition,
involve risks and uncertainties. In any forward-looking statement,
where we express an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such
expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a
reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the statement of
expectation or belief will be achieved or accomplished.
The
actual results or events may differ materially from those anticipated and as
reflected in forward-looking statements included herein. Factors that
may cause actual results or events to differ from those anticipated in the
forward-looking statements included herein include the Risk Factors described in
Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements
contained herein, which speak only as of the date hereof. We believe
the information contained in this Form 10-Q to be accurate as of the date
hereof. Changes may occur after that date, and we will not update
that information except as required by law in the normal course of our public
disclosure practices.
Additionally,
the following discussion regarding our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and
related notes contained in Item 1 of Part 1 of this Form 10-Q, as well as the
Risk Factors in Item 1A and the financial statements in Item 7 of Part II of our
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is
based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. We believe certain critical accounting policies affect the
more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our
financial statements. A description of our critical accounting
policies is set forth in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2008. As of, and for the quarter ended, March 31, 2009, there have
been no material changes or updates to our critical accounting policies other
than the following updated information relating to Unevaluated Oil and Gas
Properties:
Unevaluated Oil and Gas
Properties. Unevaluated oil and gas properties not subject to
amortization include the following at March 31, 2009:
|
|
March
31, 2009
|
|
Acquisition
costs
|
|
$ |
309,912 |
|
Evaluation
costs
|
|
|
1,591,631 |
|
Retention
costs
|
|
|
50,423 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,951,966 |
|
Included
in the carrying value of unevaluated oil and gas prospects above, was $49,511
for properties in the South American country of Colombia. We are
maintaining our interest in these properties and development has or is
anticipated to commence within the next twelve months.
Current
Year Developments
Production
Levels, Commodity Prices and Revenues
Our
production levels and revenues during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as
compared to the same period in 2008, were affected by the sale of our Caracara
prospect in 2008 and the sharp decline in oil and natural gas prices that began
during the second half of 2008 and continued through the first quarter of
2009. As a result of depressed commodity prices, our operator in
Colombia temporarily shut-in production from a majority of our Colombian
properties and we had no sales in Colombia from February 13, 2009 through the
end of the quarter. Sales from our Colombian properties resumed on
April 5, 2009.
The
Caracara prospect accounted for approximately 22,262 barrels of oil (net to the
Company), or 75% of the Company’s oil production, during the quarter ended March
31, 2008 and $2,129,178 of revenues.
Drilling
Activity
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we drilled 5 international wells in Colombia,
as follows:
▪
|
3
wells were drilled on concessions in which we hold a 12.5% working
interest, of which one was shut in at March 31, 2009, one was a dry hole,
and one was awaiting completion at March 31,
2009.
|
▪
|
1
well was drilled on a concession in which we hold a 6.25% working interest
and was a dry hole.
|
▪
|
1
well was drilled on a concession in which we hold a 1.6% working interest
and was in production at March 31,
2009.
|
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we drilled 1 domestic well, the Wilberts &
Sons #1 (Home Run Prospect) and it was a dry hole.
At March
31, 2009, drilling operations were ongoing in Colombia on one well.
Leasehold
Activity
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2009, we acquired interests in 2 additional
prospects in Louisiana, the N. Jade and W. Jade, for $22,232.
Seismic
Activity
During
the quarter ended March 31, 2009, our operator in Colombia acquired
approximately 40 square miles of additional seismic and geological data. The
additional data relates primarily to prospects in which we hold a 1.594674%
working interest. Our share of the costs of such data acquisition was
$93,103.
Acquisition
Activity
In light
of our debt-free capital structure, solid cash position and low overhead and in
response to conditions in the oil and gas market, in particular the
non-economical cost and capital structures of many operators and financiers
following the sharp decline in commodity prices during the second half of 2008
continuing into early 2009, during the first quarter of 2009, we began actively
seeking opportunistic oil and gas acquisitions.
Pursuant
to those efforts, on February 4, 2009, we entered into a letter agreement (the
“Letter Agreement”) with Yazoo Pipeline Co., L.P. (“Yazoo”), Sterling
Exploration & Production Co., L.L.C. (“Sterling”), and Matagorda Operating
Company (together with Yazoo and Sterling, the “Debtors”), pursuant to which we
agreed to provide debtor-in-possession financing (“DIP Financing”) to the
Debtors subject to approval of the Letter Agreement by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Texas (the “Bankruptcy Court”). On February 4,
2009, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving the DIP Financing on the
terms set out in the Letter Agreement.
Under the
terms of the Letter Agreement, we agreed to advance to the Debtors up to
$300,000 (the “Maximum Borrowing Amount”), with all advances bearing interest at
10% per annum and being repayable in full ninety (90) days from approval of the
DIP Financing by the Bankruptcy Court, or the earlier consummation of a sale of
the principal assets of the Debtors to our company. Under the Letter Agreement,
we and the Debtors agreed to commence negotiations and due diligence with
respect to the potential acquisition by our company of the principal assets of
the Debtors based on certain financial terms described in the Letter
Agreement. On February 4 and February 20th, advances under the Letter
Agreement were made in the total amount of $115,724. As of March 31,
2009, advances pursuant to the DIP Financing totaled $115,724.
Pursuant
to our rights under the Letter Agreement, after conducting due diligence with
respect to the Debtors, we determined to terminate negotiations with the Debtors
with respect to the potential acquisition of the assets of the
Debtors. On April 10, 2009, the Debtors repaid the DIP Financing in
full in the amount of $117,897, including principal and interest.
We intend
to continue to seek out and evaluate opportunities to acquire existing oil and
gas assets and operations where we determine attractive returns on invested
capital can be realized in current market conditions and superior returns can be
derived from a recovery in primary prices. There is no assurance,
however, that we will be successful in our efforts to identify and acquire oil
and gas assets or operations or that any acquisitions that may be consummated
will provide the returns expected by management.
Results
of Operations
Oil and Gas
Revenues. Total oil and gas revenues decreased 84.8% to
$445,142 in the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $2,937,134 in the
three months ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in revenue is
principally due to (1) the sale of our Caracara interest during 2008, which
accounted for $2,129,178 of our revenues in the 2008 period, (2) lower oil and
gas prices during the 2009 period and (3) the cessation of production and sales
from the majority of our Colombian properties during the final 46 days of the
2009 period.
The
following table sets forth the gross and net producing wells, net oil and gas
production volumes and average hydrocarbon sales prices for the quarters ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Gross
producing wells
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Net
producing wells
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Net
oil and gas production (BOE)
|
|
|
13,401 |
|
|
|
31,775 |
|
Average
sales price – oil (per barrel)
|
|
$ |
33.32 |
|
|
$ |
95.10 |
|
Average
sales price – natural gas (per Mcf)
|
|
$ |
4.70 |
|
|
$ |
8.50 |
|
The
change in gross and net producing wells reflects the 2008 sale of our Caracara
interest offset by the increase in average working interest during 2009, while
the change in net oil and gas production reflects the same factors plus the
effects of the temporary cessation of production of a majority of our Colombian
properties during the 2009 period. Giving pro forma effect to exclude
sales revenues from the Caracara interest, oil and gas revenues for the first
quarter of 2008 would have been $807,956.
Oil and
gas sales revenues by region were as follows:
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2009
First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
sales
|
|
$ |
423,446 |
|
|
$ |
14,350 |
|
|
$ |
437,796 |
|
Gas
sales
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
7,346 |
|
|
$ |
7,346 |
|
2008
First Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
sales
|
|
$ |
2,817,978 |
|
|
$ |
46,266 |
|
|
$ |
2,864,244 |
|
Gas
sales
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
72,890 |
|
|
|
72,890 |
|
Lease Operating
Expenses. Lease operating
expenses, excluding joint venture expenses relating to our Columbian operations
discussed below, increased 3.8% to $910,488 in the 2009 quarter from $876,842 in
the 2008 quarter. The increase in lease operating expenses, from 30%
of revenues for 2008 to 205% of revenues for 2009, was primarily attributable to
an increase in the number of wells in which we own a 12.5% working interest in,
as well as increased cost in Colombia relating to personnel expenses, facilities
and equipment expenses, catering expenses, road maintenance, as well
environmental services expenses. Following is a summary comparison of
lease operating expenses for the periods.
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2009
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
898,234 |
|
|
$ |
12,254 |
|
|
$ |
910,488 |
|
2008
First Quarter
|
|
|
837,983 |
|
|
|
38,859 |
|
|
|
876,842 |
|
Hupecol,
our operator in Colombia, has implemented cost cutting measures in order to
improve field economics from our Colombian operations. We have also
seen declines in drilling and operating costs in the Llanos Basin which,
together, are expected to result in improved margins during the balance of
2009.
Joint Venture
Expenses. Our allocable share of joint venture expenses
attributable to the Colombian Joint Venture totaled $40,723 during the 2009
quarter and $47,354 during the 2008 quarter. The decrease in joint
venture expenses was attributable to a decrease in drilling
activity.
Depreciation and Depletion
Expense. Depreciation and depletion expense was $254,415 and
$341,801 for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The 25.6% decrease is due to a reduction in production
as a result of the shut in Colombian wells for most of the 2009
quarter.
General and Administrative
Expenses. General and administrative expense increased by
124.6% to $720,867 during the 2009 quarter from $320,926 during the 2008
quarter. The increase in general and administrative expense was
primarily attributable to increases in employee compensation and professional
fees, including an increase of $206,584 in share-based compensation charges
attributable to stock option grants during 2008.
Other
Income. Other income consists of interest earned on cash
balances and marketable securities. Other income totaled $17,848
during the 2009 quarter as compared to $94,041 during the 2008
quarter. The decrease in other income resulted from the sale of the
balance of our marketable securities held during 2008 and a reduction in
interest rates on short term cash investments, partially offset by interest
earned on DIP Financing provided to the Creditors under the Letter
Agreement.
Income Tax
Expense. Income tax expense decreased by 97.4% to $14,817
during the 2009 quarter from $572,531 during the 2008 quarter. Income
tax expense during the 2009 quarter and the 2008 quarter was entirely
attributable to operations in Colombia. The decrease in income tax expense
during the 2009 quarter was attributable to the reduction of sales in Colombia
during the same period. Management believes it is more likely than
not that it will realize the benefit of its net deferred tax assets except for
the foreign tax credit carry forward. No valuation allowance is placed on the
portion of the foreign tax credit that the tax payer can elect to take as a
deduction on future tax returns. A valuation allowance has been established on
the remaining foreign tax credit carryover. The Company recorded no
U.S. income tax liability in the 2009 or 2008 quarters.
Financial
Condition
Liquidity and Capital
Resources. At March 31, 2009, we had a cash balance of
$6,455,814 and working capital of $7,766,282 compared to a cash balance of
$9,910,694 and working capital of $10,536,834 at December 31, 2008. The change
in working capital during the period was primarily attributable to the
acquisition of oil and gas properties, payment of dividends and the payment of
operating cost in Colombia.
Operating
activities used $1,541,881 of cash during the 2009 quarter as compared to
$989,303 provided during the 2008 quarter. The adverse change in
operating cash flow was primarily attributable to (1) a $2,350,041 adverse swing
from profitability during the 2008 quarter to a loss during the 2009 quarter and
(2) a reduction in payables and accrued expenses during the 2009 quarter of
$776,342 as compared to an increase in payables and accrued expenses during the
2008 quarter of $491,717.
Investing
activities used $1,352,983 during the 2009 quarter compared to $8,010,085
provided during the 2008 quarter. The funds used in investing
activities principally reflect investments in oil and gas properties and assets
of $1,237,259 during the 2009 quarter and $639,915 during the 2008 quarter and
also reflect advances of funds comprising the DIP Financing totaling $115,724
during the 2009 quarter. For the 2008 quarter, funds used in
investing activities were more than offset by funds provided by the sale of
marketable securities of $8,650,000
Financing
activities used $560,015 during the 2009 quarter, consisting of cash dividends
paid. We had no financing activities during the 2008
quarter.
Long-Term
Liabilities. At March 31, 2009, we had long-term liabilities
of $208,390 as compared to $205,524 at December 31, 2008. Long-term
liabilities at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of a reserve for
plugging costs and a deferred rent obligation.
Capital and Exploration Expenditures
and Commitments. Our principal capital and exploration
expenditures relate to ongoing efforts to acquire, drill and complete
prospects. We expect that future capital and exploration expenditures
will be funded principally through funds on hand and funds generated from
operations.
During
the first quarter of 2009, we invested approximately $1,237,259 for the
acquisition and development of oil and gas properties, consisting of (1)
drilling of 5 wells in Colombia ($886,677), (2) seismic cost in Colombia
($77,362), (3) delay rentals on U.S. properties ($22,232), (4) leasehold costs
on U.S. properties ($20,218), (5) drilling of 1 U.S. well ($162,690), and (6)
completion cost of one U.S well ($68,080).
At March
31, 2009, our only material contractual obligation requiring determinable future
payments was a lease relating to the Company’s executive offices which was
unchanged when compared to the 2008 Form 10-K.
At March
31, 2009, our acquisition and drilling budget for the balance of 2009 totaled
approximately $2,507,000, which consisted of the drilling of 4 wells in
Colombia, 2 wells in the United States, and seismic and infrastructure
cost. Our acquisition and drilling budget has historically been
subject to substantial fluctuation over the course of a year based upon
successes and failures in drilling and completion of prospects and the
identification of additional prospects during the course of a
year. In particular, we note that, in light of the sharp decline in
commodity prices during the second half of 2008 and early 2009, we expect to see
an increase in asset acquisition opportunities as operators and financiers are
faced with uneconomical cost and capital structures resulting in forced
liquidations of holdings. We intend to evaluate, and as appropriate
pursue, asset acquisition opportunities. Should we pursue any such
opportunities, our acquisition and drilling budget could be materially
altered.
Management
anticipates that our current financial resources combined with expected
operating cash flows will meet our anticipated objectives and business
operations, including planned property acquisitions and drilling activities, for
at least the next 12 months without the need for additional
capital. Management continues to evaluate producing property
acquisitions as well as a number of drilling prospects. It is
possible, although not anticipated, that we may require and seek additional
financing if additional drilling prospects are pursued beyond those presently
under consideration.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We had no
off-balance sheet arrangements or guarantees of third party obligations at March
31, 2009.
Inflation
We
believe that inflation has not had a significant impact on operations since
inception.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
Commodity Price
Risk
The price
we receive for our oil and gas production heavily influences our revenue,
profitability, access to capital and future rate of growth. Crude oil and
natural gas are commodities and, therefore, their prices are subject to wide
fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in supply and demand.
Historically, the markets for oil and gas have been volatile, and these markets
will likely continue to be volatile in the future. The prices we receive for
production depends on numerous factors beyond our control.
We have
not historically entered into any hedges or other transactions designed to
manage, or limit, exposure to oil and gas price volatility.
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the
supervision and the participation of our management, including our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation as
of March 31, 2009 of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on this
evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March
31, 2009.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
No change
in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Certification
of CEO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
Certification
of CFO pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
Certification
of CEO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
|
|
Certification
of CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
HOUSTON
AMERICAN ENERGY CORP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
John F. Terwilliger
|
|
|
John
Terwilliger
|
|
|
CEO
and President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
James J. Jacobs
|
|
|
James
J. Jacobs
|
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
Date: May
8, 2009