Document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant x
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨
| |
¨ | Check the appropriate box: |
| |
¨ | Preliminary Proxy Statement |
| |
¨ | Confidential, for use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
| |
x | Definitive Proxy Statement |
| |
¨ | Definitive Additional Materials |
| |
¨ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to (S) 240.14a-11(c) or (S) 240.14a-12 |
WEC Energy Group, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
| |
¨ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
| |
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
| |
| |
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
| |
| |
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
| |
| |
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
| |
| |
(5) | Total fee paid: |
| |
| |
¨ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
| |
¨ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
| |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
(3) | Filing Party: |
(4) | Date Filed: |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-2 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
March 23, 2017
To the Stockholders of WEC Energy Group, Inc.:
On behalf of the Board of Directors, you are cordially invited to attend WEC Energy Group’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at Concordia University Wisconsin in Mequon, just north of Milwaukee. To attend, you must pre-register and present photo identification at the door. Instructions on how to pre-register are provided on page P-83. If you are not able to attend, you may listen to a live webcast available on our Website at: www.wecenergygroup.com/invest/annualmtg.htm. An archive of the webcast will be available on our Website for approximately 12 months following the meeting. Regardless of whether you plan to attend, please take a moment to vote your proxy.
WEC Energy Group’s Annual Meeting will be held as follows:
|
| | | |
WHEN: | | Thursday, May 4, 2017 10:00 a.m., Central time |
| | | |
WHERE: | | Concordia University Wisconsin R. John Buuck Field House 12800 North Lake Shore Drive Mequon, Wisconsin 53097 |
| | | |
ITEMS OF BUSINESS: | | • | Elect thirteen directors for terms expiring in 2018. |
| | • | Ratify Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for 2017. |
| | • | Advisory vote on compensation of the named executive officers. |
| | • | Advisory vote to establish the frequency of "say-on-pay" advisory votes. |
| | • | Consider any other matters that may properly come before the meeting. |
| | | |
RECORD DATE: | | February 23, 2017 |
| | | |
VOTING BY PROXY: | | Your vote is important. You may vote by: |
| | • | using the Internet; |
| | • | telephone; or |
| | • | returning the proxy card in the envelope provided. |
This year we will again follow the Securities and Exchange Commission rule that allows companies to deliver proxy materials to their stockholders online. On or about March 23, 2017, we began mailing stockholders a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a paper copy of the proxy statement and 2016 Annual Report. This Notice contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials and vote online. If you receive paper copies of the materials, consider signing up to receive them electronically in the future by following the instructions contained on page P-80. By delivering our proxy materials electronically, we can provide our stockholders with the information they need in a more cost-effective manner.
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 4, 2017 – The Proxy Statement and 2016 Annual Report are available at: www.envisionreports.com/wec.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Susan H. Martin
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-3 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-4 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
PROXY SUMMARY
This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.
BUSINESS OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
WEC Energy Group, Inc.’s (“WEC Energy Group" or the “Company”) upcoming Annual Meeting will be held at Concordia University Wisconsin on Thursday, May 4, 2017. Certain details regarding the business of the meeting follow. For additional information about the Annual Meeting, including the vote required for each proposal, see the preceding "Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders" on page P-3, as well as "Information About the Annual Meeting" in this proxy statement beginning on page P-81.
Matters Requiring A Vote Of Stockholders
There are four items of business for which the Company is soliciting a stockholder vote in conjunction with the Annual Meeting:
|
| | | |
Proposal Item | Board Vote Recommendation | Page |
1. | Election of Directors – Terms Expiring in 2018 | FOR each nominee | |
2. | Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as Independent Auditors for 2017 | FOR | |
3. | Advisory Vote on Compensation of the Named Executive Officers | FOR | |
4. | Advisory Vote to Establish the Frequency of Say-On-Pay Advisory Votes | FOR every year | |
Voting
Registered stockholders of record as of the February 23, 2017 record date are encouraged to vote using one of the following options. Stockholders who hold shares in street name through an intermediary on this date must obtain a legal proxy from their broker, bank or other nominee granting the right to vote.
|
| | | |
| | | |
Internet at | Call toll-free | Mail | In person at |
www.investorvote.com/wec | at 800-652-8683 | signed proxy card | the Annual Meeting |
Annual Meeting Attendance
Pre-registration is required. In addition, for entry into the meeting each stockholder will be required to present a government-issued photo identification, such as a driver’s license, state identification card, or passport. Information on how to pre-register can be found on page P-83.
Electronic Access to Annual Meeting Information
For information regarding how you can receive future proxy materials and annual reports electronically, please see "Electronic Access to Annual Meeting Information" beginning on page P-79 of this proxy statement.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-5 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2016 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS
We completed our first full year of combined utility operations as WEC Energy Group in 2016 following Wisconsin Energy Corporation's acquisition of Integrys Energy Group in June 2015. Following the acquisition, we deliver electricity and natural gas to approximately 4.4 million customers in four states – Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, and Minnesota.
During 2016, we made excellent progress in our efforts to integrate our employees, merge and improve business processes, and consolidate our IT infrastructure. At the same time, the Company achieved solid results and continued to create long-term value for our stockholders and customers by focusing on the following:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| • | World-class reliability | | • | Operating efficiency | | • | Employee safety |
| • | Financial discipline | | • | Exceptional customer care | | | |
2016 Financial Performance |
| | | |
| • | WEC Energy Group delivered solid earnings growth again, generated strong cash flow, and increased the dividend for the 13th consecutive year.
| |
| • | Achieved fully diluted earnings and adjusted earnings per share of $2.96 and $2.97, respectively. (2) |
| • | Each of our regulated utility subsidiaries earned its allowed rate of return. |
| • | Returned approximately $625 million to WEC Energy Group stockholders through dividends. |
| • | In January 2017, the Board raised the quarterly dividend to $0.52 per share, which is equivalent to an annual dividend rate of $2.08 per share. |
| | |
| |
(1) | Excludes costs of $0.01, $0.30, and $0.06 per share for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively, related to our acquisition of Integrys. See Appendix A on P-85 for a full GAAP reconciliation and an explanation of why we believe the presentation of adjusted earnings per share is relevant and useful to investors. |
| |
(2) | This measure is a component of our short-term incentive compensation program. |
2016 Operational Performance
| |
• | WEC Energy Group was recognized in 2016 by Corporate Responsibility Magazine in its annual “Most Responsible Companies Ranked by Industry Sector” in the Utility category. |
| |
• | Our utilities continued to balance the delivery of safe, reliable, and affordable energy with a commitment to protecting the environment. |
| |
• | We Energies was named the most reliable utility in the Midwest for the sixth year by PA Consulting Group and received the first-ever Outstanding Customer Reliability Experience Award for effective customer service and communications. |
| |
• | We received the best results in our history for large customer satisfaction as surveyed by TQS Research and achieved a third place national ranking. (2) |
| |
• | All major utility subsidiaries either met or exceeded our overall customer satisfaction targets. (2) |
| |
• | WEC Energy Group's utility companies experienced growing employee participation in health and wellness programs, as well as increased proactive safety reporting, helping to reduce the number of OSHA-reportable incidents and lost-time incidents by almost 17% on a year over year basis. (2) |
| |
• | We Energies Supplier Diversity Initiative was recognized by the National Association of Minority Contractors-Wisconsin Chapter for outreach, support, commitment, and leadership in minority business development in the Wisconsin construction industry. (2) |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-6 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2016 Strategic Performance
| |
• | Continued the successful integration of Integrys Energy Group into WEC Energy Group. |
| |
• | Transitioned leadership of the Company, from Gale E. Klappa to Allen L. Leverett as CEO, effective May 1, 2016. |
| |
• | Formed a stand-alone utility (Upper Michigan Energy Resources Corporation) to serve customers in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula and to facilitate a long-term generation solution for the region. |
| |
• | Sold Wisconsin Electric Power Company's ("WE") Milwaukee County Power Plant, a coal-fired power plant, in 2016 as part of our long-term strategy to restructure the Company's generation portfolio to meet changing demands and regulations. |
| |
• | Sold the compressed natural gas business, Trillium CNG, thereby exiting a significant non-regulated business. |
| |
• | Announced a plan to work with industry partners, environmental groups, and the state of Wisconsin with a goal of reducing CO2 emissions from our electric generating fleet by approximately 40% below 2005 levels by 2030. |
| |
• | Deployed capital during 2016 to focus on strengthening and modernizing the reliability of the Company's generation and distribution networks. Highlights include: |
At year-end 2016, implementation of the Improved Customer Experience project was 80% complete; when fully implemented, this $100-plus million customer care software project will provide all of the Company’s customers, located across four states, with a common experience, while also improving business capability and service delivery across all of our utility subsidiaries.
Illinois. The Peoples Gas Light & Coke Company (“PGL”), one of the Company’s Illinois utility subsidiaries, completed a top to bottom review of the capital construction project underway in the City of Chicago to modernize the natural gas infrastructure; management successfully worked with regulators to identify and prioritize 2016 capital expenditures, while also implementing enhanced project controls and significantly reducing class 2 methane leaks.
PGL also broke ground on a $20 million, 100,000-plus square foot state-of-the art training facility in Chicago, which will provide training for current and future utility employees, as well as prepare high school students for careers as utility workers.
Wisconsin. In November 2016, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation’s ("WPS") ReACTTM system went into commercial operation at Weston Unit 3, one of our coal-fired facilities; this $345 million capital project installed an air quality control system that is the first of its kind in the United States. The ReACTTM system is currently meeting or exceeding all environmental performance expectations, including reducing sulfur dioxide and mercury emissions from Weston Unit 3 to near zero.
WPS met the scheduling, safety, and reliability improvement targets set for 2016 on a five-year, $220 million system modernization and reliability project; upon completion in 2018, the company will have converted more than 1,100 miles of overhead lines to underground and added distribution automation equipment on 400 miles of lines.
The new powerhouse at WE's Twin Falls hydroelectric plant went into commercial operation in July 2016; forecasted at $64 million, this capital project was completed on schedule and under budget, and has increased plant capacity by 50%.
We completed the expansion of the coal storage facilities at WE’s Oak Creek Power Plant site; this $62 million project, finished under budget, was placed into service ahead of schedule in December 2016 and is already providing fueling flexibility benefits that lower costs for customers.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-7 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
LONG-TERM STOCKHOLDER RETURNS
Over the past decade, WEC Energy Group has consistently delivered among the best total returns in the industry and did so again in 2016.
|
| |
| |
(3) The Five-Year Cumulative Return Chart shows a comparison of the cumulative total return, assuming reinvestment of dividends, over the last five years had $100 been invested at the close of business on December 31, 2011. For information about the Custom Peer Index Group and the Recomprised Custom Peer Index Group, see page F-93 in the Company's 2016 Annual Report. | Source: Bloomberg; assumes all dividends are reinvested and returns are compounded daily. |
2016 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS (Page P-39)
Key Compensation Program Changes
In 2016, we made some changes to our compensation program that followed from our stockholder engagement efforts and our focus on continually refining our executive compensation program to more effectively align executive pay with performance and reflect best compensation practices.
Competitive Benchmarking - Recomprised Market Data Sources. Based upon a recommendation from our independent compensation consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co. (“Frederic Cook”), the Compensation Committee revised the data sources used to benchmark executive compensation. Instead of considering just market data obtained from Willis Towers Watson’s Executive Compensation Data Bank, Frederic Cook also considered survey data from Aon Hewitt and a comparison group of 19 companies comparable in size to WEC Energy Group that share similar traits with the Company. For additional information on our benchmarking methodology, see “Competitive Benchmarking” on page P-44 of this proxy statement.
Long-Term Incentive Awards - Performance Unit Plan - Short-Term Dividend Equivalents. The Compensation Committee amended and restated the Company’s Performance Unit Plan effective January 1, 2016, to provide that short-term dividend equivalents are paid out at the end of a three-year performance period based on WEC Energy Group’s total stockholder return over the three-year performance period as compared to the stockholder return of a peer group of companies. Short-term dividend equivalents granted prior to January 1, 2016 were paid out annually on unearned performance units if the Company met applicable earnings per share targets. For additional information on the short-term dividend equivalents, see “Short-Term Dividend Equivalents” on page P-50 of this proxy statement.
Long-Term Incentive Awards - Performance Unit Plan - Additional Performance Measure. On December 1, 2016, based upon feedback we received from stockholders during our investor outreach efforts, the Compensation Committee amended and restated the Company’s Performance Unit Plan effective January 1, 2017, to provide for an Additional Performance Measure (in addition to total stockholder return), which is defined as the performance criterion or criteria (if any) that the Compensation Committee selects at the time of the award, in its
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-8 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
sole discretion, against which WEC Energy Group's performance will be measured. For additional information regarding the change, see “Long-Term Incentive Compensation - Performance Units” on page P-49 of this proxy statement.
Executive Compensation Overview
Compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to the Company’s Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) during 2016 is set forth in the "Summary Compensation Table" on page P-57 and described in "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" beginning on page P-39 in this proxy statement.
Performance-Based Executive Compensation Program (Page P-39)
The primary objective of the executive compensation program is to provide a competitive, performance-based plan that enables the Company to attract and retain key individuals. The program has been designed to provide a level of compensation that is strongly dependent upon the achievement of our short-term and long-term goals. To that end, a substantial portion of pay is at risk and, generally, the value will only be realized upon strong corporate performance.
Short-term performance targets are based upon the achievement of pre-established stockholder, customer, and employee-focused objectives, which include:
| |
• | Financial performance, measured by earnings per share and cash flow, as well as utility net income for utility officers; and |
| |
• | Operational performance, measured in the areas of customer satisfaction, safety, and supplier and workforce diversity. |
Long-term incentives are designed to link the interests of our executives and other key employees to creating long-term stockholder value. Long-term equity incentive awards are comprised of performance units, stock options, and restricted stock.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-9 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Total Direct Compensation Components
|
| | |
Component | Terms/Conditions |
Annual Base Salary | | Annual evaluation takes into consideration level of experience, performance, responsibility, contribution to the results of the Company’s operations, and peer data. |
Annual Cash Incentive Awards |
Short-Term Performance Plan | | Award is based upon level of achievement of pre-established financial and operational targets aligned with stockholder, customer, and employee-focused objectives; all payments are variable and at risk.
Financial targets: Earnings per share, cash flow, utility net income *
Operational targets: Customer satisfaction, employee safety, and workforce and supplier diversity
*Utility net income is a performance metric for those officers whose positions primarily relate to utility operations. |
Long-Term Equity Incentive Awards |
Performance Units | | Award is contingent on Company’s “total stockholder return” in comparison to a peer group of companies over a three-year period; exceptional performance versus peers results in higher payouts; substantially lower performance than peers results in no payout.
For 2017, an additional performance measure will be based on the weighted average actual return on equity for the Company's primary utilities compared to the weighted average authorized return on equity for the same utilities.
Short-term dividend equivalents are credited and accumulated as reinvested dividends on each performance unit such that the performance units and accumulated dividends will be paid out at the end of the three-year performance period, contingent upon performance.
|
Stock Options | | Long-term value is tied to Company performance and stock price appreciation following the grant date. |
Restricted Stock | | Long-term value is tied to stock price appreciation and dividends. |
With respect to these components of total direct compensation, 86% of Mr. Leverett’s compensation as CEO and an average of 74% of the other NEOs’ compensation, excluding Mr. Klappa, is tied to Company performance and is not guaranteed, demonstrating the significance of variable incentive compensation in the total direct compensation mix.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-10 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2016 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS (Page P-13)
A comprehensive discussion of the Company’s Corporate Governance practices starts on page P-13.
WEC Energy Group was one of the earliest adopters of a formal set of Corporate Governance Guidelines, which have been modified over time as governance practices and stockholder expectations have evolved. Our Guidelines closely align with the Commonsense Principles of Corporate Governance, a well-publicized best practice framework recommended by a coalition of companies and investors in July 2016. See page P-14 for more detail.
Highlights of our 2016 corporate governance performance include:
Investor Outreach. Direct engagement by senior management and the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board with nearly 30 of the Company’s top institutional investors, representing nearly 35% of outstanding shares, took place throughout the year:
| |
▪ | Provided investors with an opportunity to discuss with us our governance and compensation practices, as well as environmental and social performance matters. |
| |
▪ | Requested feedback from stockholders as the Board developed and adopted a proxy access bylaw in 2016 (page P-21). |
| |
▪ | Discussed enhancements to our executive compensation program, including the changes described on pages P-8 to P-9. |
Strategic Planning Process. In keeping with its standard practices, the Board was regularly engaged in discussions with management on strategic initiatives throughout the year, utilizing several mechanisms:
| |
▪ | At every board meeting, the CEO held substantive discussions with the Board on strategic matters. |
| |
▪ | External subject matter experts as appropriate, in addition to senior level and executive management employees, regularly attended board and committee meetings throughout the year to conduct detailed informational sessions. |
| |
▪ | The CEO and other members of senior management communicated with the directors as needed between meetings to follow-up on matters discussed at the meetings. |
Governance and Risk Management. Applying their diversity of experiences and core competencies (page P-23), the Board provided critical input in several key areas in 2016, which was particularly valuable during this first full year operating as a bigger company with both a larger utility business portfolio and geographical footprint:
| |
▪ | Provided guidance to ensure a smooth transition for the new CEO and other new key executive management appointed in 2016. |
| |
▪ | Shared insights on successful engagement with investors, utilizing experience gained from serving on other boards. |
| |
▪ | Leveraged relationships with key local stakeholders, especially in the newly-acquired Illinois service territory, to help strengthen relationships for the new management team. |
| |
▪ | Worked closely with the independent compensation consultant to align our compensation practices with stockholder interests. |
| |
▪ | Advised management on significant financing and investment decisions on major capital projects and investments. |
| |
▪ | Recommended enhancements to the parent and subsidiary companies’ governance processes to allow for appropriate risk oversight over a larger organization. |
| |
▪ | Strengthened the board succession planning process through focused committee and board discussions on core competencies needed given the Company’s industry, risks, and strategic direction (page P-23). |
| |
▪ | Engaged in thoughtful discussions with management on the Company’s strategy for setting and achieving short- and long-term environmental and social performance goals and objectives. |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-11 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2017 DIRECTOR NOMINEES (Page P-23)
Board Composition. The Corporate Governance Committee has evaluated each individual director nominee listed under Proposal 1 and confirmed that he or she has the right competencies, qualifications, and experiences required to further the success of the Company’s business. In addition, the Committee believes the collective diversity of these nominees, along with a balanced tenure that indicates a mix of both deep historical knowledge and new perspectives, enables the Board to appropriately represent stockholder interests and effectively carry out its oversight function.
The collective diversity of the nominees is summarized as follows. Individual core competencies, qualifications, and experiences are included in the director biographies, beginning on page P-25.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-12 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
PROXY STATEMENT
This proxy statement is being furnished to stockholders beginning on or about March 23, 2017, in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the WEC Energy Group, Inc. (“WEC Energy Group” or the “Company”) Board of Directors (the “Board”) to be used at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders on Thursday, May 4, 2017 (the “Meeting”) at 10:00 a.m., Central time, at Concordia University Wisconsin in the R. John Buuck Field House located at 12800 North Lake Shore Drive, Mequon, Wisconsin 53097, and at all adjournments or postponements of the Meeting, for the purposes listed in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
What is the Company's corporate governance framework?
Since 1996, the Board has maintained Corporate Governance Guidelines that provide a framework under which it conducts business. WEC Energy Group was one of the earliest adopters of a formal set of Corporate Governance Guidelines. The guidelines address governance matters including director selection and election, determination of independence, board leadership, board committee structure and evaluation, chief executive officer performance evaluation, and management succession.
To maintain effective guidelines, the Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews the Company’s governance practices, taking into consideration discussions with stockholders as part of our investor outreach program, industry surveys, and benchmarking studies, as well as governance guidelines published by proxy advisors. Our guidelines align with the Commonsense Principles of Corporate Governance, a recommended governance framework, published by a coalition of companies and investors in July 2016 and summarized as follows:
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-13 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
|
| | |
Commonsense Principles | WEC Energy Group Practices |
Board composition/internal governance | ü | • 11 of 13 independent directors • Annual election of directors since 2005 • Board committee structure/service evaluated annually • Stockholders can nominate directors • Stock ownership requirements • Balanced director tenure/retirement age at 72 • Diverse representation of skills and competencies • Annual board performance evaluation |
Board responsibilities | ü | • Chairman active in stakeholder communications • Board participation in critical activities, including setting agenda |
Stockholder rights | ü | • Proxy access bylaw • Dual class voting is not practiced • Written consent/special meeting provisions |
Public reporting | ü | • Transparent quarterly financial results; reported using GAAP • Quarterly reporting framed in broader context of strategy • Disclosure of long-term goals is specific and measurable • Take long-term strategic view and explain how material decisions are consistent with that view |
Board leadership | ü | • Separate CEO/chair roles • Presiding independent director • Independent Audit and Oversight, Compensation, Finance, and Corporate Governance Committees |
Management succession planning | ü | • Board interaction with and evaluation of senior management • Public disclosure of succession planning |
Management compensation | ü | • Competitively tailored to business and industry, aligned with long-term performance and business strategy • Includes short- and long-term metrics, cash, and equity components; a substantial portion of compensation is at risk • Public disclosure of benchmarks and performance measurements • Clawback policies for cash and equity |
The Company’s Website, wecenergygroup.com, contains information on the Company’s governance activities. The Website, under the “Governance” section, includes the Code of Business Conduct, Corporate Governance Guidelines, charters for the Board's Audit and Oversight, Compensation, Corporate Governance, and Finance Committees, and other useful information.
As policies are continually evolving, the Company encourages you to periodically visit the Website. Copies of these documents may also be requested in writing from the Corporate Secretary.
Does the Company have a written code of ethics?
Yes. All WEC Energy Group directors, executive officers, and employees, including the principal executive, financial, and accounting officers, have a responsibility to comply with WEC Energy Group’s Code of Business Conduct, to seek advice in doubtful situations, and to report suspected violations.
WEC Energy Group’s Code of Business Conduct addresses, among other things: conflicts of interest; confidentiality; fair dealing; protection and proper use of Company assets; and compliance with laws, rules, and regulations (including insider trading laws). The Company has not provided any waiver to the Code for any director, executive officer, or other employee.
The Code of Business Conduct is posted in the “Governance” section of the Company’s Website at wecenergygroup.com. It is also available in print to any stockholder upon request in writing to the Corporate Secretary.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-14 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
The Company has several ways employees can raise questions concerning WEC Energy Group’s Code of Business Conduct and other Company policies. As one reporting mechanism, the Company has contracted with an independent service for employees to confidentially and anonymously report suspected violations of the Code of Business Conduct or other concerns, including those regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters.
Does the Company have policies and procedures in place to review and approve related party transactions?
Yes. All employees of WEC Energy Group, including executive officers and members of the Board, are required to comply with the Company’s Code of Business Conduct. The Code of Business Conduct addresses, among other things, what actions are required when potential conflicts of interest may arise, including those from related party transactions. Specifically, executive officers and members of the Board are required to obtain approval of the Audit and Oversight Committee Chair before: (1) obtaining any financial interest in or participating in any business relationship with any company, individual, or concern doing business with WEC Energy Group or any of its subsidiaries; (2) participating in any joint venture, partnership, or other business relationship with WEC Energy Group or any of its subsidiaries; and (3) serving as an officer or member of the board of any substantial outside for-profit organization. Furthermore, before serving as an officer or member of the board of any substantial outside for-profit organization, the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") must obtain the approval of the full Board; members of the WEC Energy Group Board must obtain the prior approval of the Corporate Governance Committee. In addition, executive officers must obtain the prior approval of the CEO before accepting a position with a substantial non-profit organization; members of the Board must notify the Compliance Officer when joining the board of a substantial non-profit organization, but do not need to obtain prior approval.
WEC Energy Group’s Code of Business Conduct also requires employees and directors to notify the Compliance Officer of situations where family members are a supplier or significant customer of WEC Energy Group or employed by one. To the extent the Compliance Officer deems it appropriate, she will consult with the Audit and Oversight Committee Chair in situations involving executive officers and members of the Board.
STOCKHOLDER OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT
What is the Company’s philosophy on stockholder engagement?
Accountability to stockholders is critical to the Company’s long-term success. We have mechanisms in place to ensure that management and the Board hear, understand, and consider the issues that matter most to our stockholders. This ongoing engagement helps provide valuable insight as to how our stockholders view the Company’s practices and policies, helps us set goals and expectations, and helps identify emerging issues that may affect our strategy and/or corporate governance and compensation practices.
What steps does the Company take to engage with investors?
The Company’s outreach and engagement program took many forms during 2016:
| |
• | Direct engagement by senior management and the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors with the Company’s largest stockholders to discuss issues of interest, including corporate governance, executive compensation, and corporate responsibility practices. These conversations are reported to the Board and are taken into consideration when reviewing and modifying governance and compensation practices and policies. |
| |
• | Investor presentations conducted at analyst meetings and investor conferences across the U.S., Canada, and Europe. |
| |
• | CEO, Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), and other senior management meetings and conference calls with stockholders to discuss corporate strategy, financial and business performance, and to update stockholders on key developments. |
| |
• | Investors are invited to listen to Webcasts of the Annual Meeting and quarterly earnings conference calls, and to view the annual report, news releases, Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") filings, and other significant corporate publications on our Website. |
| |
• | The opportunity to attend and voice opinions at our Annual Meeting. |
| |
• | The ability for stockholders to submit stockholder proposals and director nominees, and to formally nominate director candidates using proxy access under our bylaws. |
| |
• | Annual election of directors, who are elected by majority vote in uncontested elections. |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-15 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
| |
• | Annual advisory vote on our executive compensation program (“say-on-pay”). |
| |
• | Strong Board committee structure which allows the Board to focus on issues that matter most to our stockholders, including consideration of previous stockholder votes on say-on-pay, director elections, and other matters when developing policies and practices. |
| |
• | Process for stockholders to directly correspond with individual directors via the Corporate Secretary (page P-21). |
ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL PERFORMANCE
BALANCING RELIABILITY AND CUSTOMER COSTS WITH ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP
While providing safe, reliable, and affordable energy to customers is a responsibility WEC Energy Group takes seriously, we also are focused on our responsibility and commitment to protecting the environment.
|
| | |
SUPPORTING A CLEAN ENERGY FUTURE For more than a decade, WEC Energy Group has implemented a multi-emission strategy to achieve greater environmental benefit for lower cost. The diagram to the right illustrates that, since 2000, nitrogen oxide emissions are down more than 80%, while mercury and sulfur dioxide emissions are down more than 90%.
| | |
|
| | |
REDUCING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Addressing climate change is an integral component of our strategic planning process. We will continue to reshape our portfolio of electric generation facilities with investments that are cost effective for our customers, preserve fuel diversity, and will improve our environmental performance, including reduced greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of our operating fleet. Our plan is to work with industry partners, environmental groups, and the state of Wisconsin with a goal of reducing CO2 emissions from the Company-owned fossil-fueled electric generating fleet by approximately 40% below 2005 levels by 2030.
The diagram to the right illustrates the progress we have made in reducing our carbon intensity since 2000. | | |
LONG-STANDING ATTENTION TO SOCIAL PERFORMANCE
Social performance is a way to measure how a company manages relationships with its employees, suppliers, customers, and the communities where it operates. Since 2004, WEC Energy Group has strategically linked management annual incentive compensation to operational goals that include the following social performance measures: employee safety, customer satisfaction, and supplier and workforce diversity.
To learn more about the Company’s corporate responsibility efforts, please view our Corporate Responsibility Report which is posted to the Company's Website at www.wecenergygroup.com/csr.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-16 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
BOARD LEADERSHIP
Is the office of CEO combined with the office of Chairman of the Board?
Effective May 1, 2016, the office of CEO was separated from the office of Chairman of the Board. Gale Klappa serves as Non-Executive Chairman, and Allen Leverett serves as CEO. Consistent with WEC Energy Group’s bylaws and our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board retains the right to exercise its discretion in combining or separating the offices of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board.
Does the Board have an independent lead or presiding director?
Yes. Director Bowles, an independent director and Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee, currently serves as presiding director. In that role, Director Bowles:
| |
• | Presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including executive sessions of the independent directors; |
| |
• | Serves as liaison between the CEO and the independent directors under most circumstances, although each individual director has full access to the CEO; |
| |
• | Has authority to call meetings of the independent directors; |
| |
• | Reviews and provides input to meeting agendas for the Board and its Committees; |
| |
• | Reviews meeting schedules to assure there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items; |
| |
• | Reviews all proposed changes to committee charters; and |
| |
• | Leads the annual Board evaluation. |
Do the non-management directors meet separately from management?
Yes. At every regularly scheduled Board meeting, executive sessions are scheduled for the non-management directors only and for the independent directors only. With the exception of Gale Klappa, all non-management directors are independent.
Are directors subject to term limits?
The Board does not believe it is appropriate or necessary to limit the number of terms a director may serve. The Board values the participation and insight of directors who have developed an increased understanding of the governance of the Company and the specific issues it faces doing business in a complex industry, as well as those directors who bring fresh and varied perspectives. Therefore, the Board is comprised of members with diverse backgrounds and tenure.
The Corporate Governance Committee annually evaluates each director nominee to confirm that he or she has the skills, education, experience, and qualifications required to help further the success of the Company’s business and represent stockholder interests.
How can interested parties contact the members of the Board?
Correspondence may be sent to the directors, including the non-management directors, in care of the Corporate Secretary, Susan H. Martin, at the Company’s principal business office, 231 West Michigan Street, PO Box 1331, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201.
All communications received as set forth above will be opened by the Corporate Secretary for the sole purpose of confirming the contents represent a message to the Company’s directors. Pursuant to instructions from the Board of Directors, all communication, other than advertising, promotion of a product or service, or patently offensive material, will be forwarded promptly to the addressee.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-17 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
BOARD INDEPENDENCE
How are directors determined to be independent?
No director qualifies as independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the Company. The Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the Board should consist of at least a two-thirds majority of independent directors.
What are the Board’s standards of independence?
The guidelines the Board uses in determining director independence are located in Appendix A of the Corporate Governance Guidelines. These standards of independence, which are summarized below, include those established by the New York Stock Exchange as well as a series of standards that are more comprehensive than New York Stock Exchange requirements. A director will be considered independent by the Board if the director:
| |
• | has not been an employee of the Company for the last five years; |
| |
• | has not received, in the past three years, more than $120,000 per year in direct compensation from the Company, other than director fees or deferred compensation for prior service; |
| |
• | is not a current partner or employee of a firm that is the Company’s internal or external auditor, was not within the last three years a partner or employee of such a firm and personally worked on the Company’s audit within that time, has no immediate family member who is a current partner of such a firm, or has no immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and personally works on the Company’s audit; |
| |
• | has not been an executive officer, in the past three years, of another company where any of the Company’s present executives at the same time serves or served on that other company’s compensation committee; |
| |
• | in the past three years, has not been an employee of a company that makes payments to, or receives payments from, the Company for property or services in an amount which in any single fiscal year is the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues; |
| |
• | has not received, during the current calendar year or the immediately preceding calendar year, remuneration, other than de minimus remuneration, as a result of services as, or being affiliated with an entity that serves as, an advisor, consultant, or legal counsel to the Company or to a member of the Company’s senior management, or a significant supplier of the Company; |
| |
• | has no personal service contract(s) with the Company or any member of the Company’s senior management; |
| |
• | is not an employee or officer with a not-for-profit entity that receives 5% or more of its total annual charitable awards from the Company; |
| |
• | is not employed by a public company at which an executive officer of the Company serves as a director; and |
| |
• | does not have any beneficial ownership interest of 5% or more in an entity that has received remuneration, other than de minimus remuneration, from the Company, our subsidiaries or affiliates. |
The Board also considers whether a director’s immediate family members meet the above criteria, as well as whether a director has any relationships with WEC Energy Group’s affiliates for certain of the above criteria, when determining the director’s independence.
Who are the independent directors?
The Board has affirmatively determined that Directors Bergstrom, Bowles, Brodsky, Budney, Chadwick, Culver, Fischer, Jones, Knueppel, Payne, and Stanek have no relationships described in the Board’s standards of independence noted above and otherwise have no material relationships with WEC Energy Group and are independent. Director Leverett is not independent due to his employment with WEC Energy Group. Director Klappa is not independent due to his prior employment with WEC Energy Group.
Since 2005, WEC Energy Group has engaged Baird Financial Group primarily to provide consulting services for investments held in the Company’s various benefit plan trusts. The Board reviewed the terms of this engagement, including the approximately $588,000 in fees paid to Baird in 2016 (which are less than one-tenth of 1% of Baird’s total revenue), and Ms. Stanek’s position at Baird, and concluded that such engagement is not material and did not impact Ms. Stanek’s independence.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-18 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
BOARD COMMITTEES
What are the committees of the Board?
The Board of Directors has the following committees: Audit and Oversight, Compensation, Corporate Governance, Finance, and Executive. All committees, except the Executive Committee, operate under a charter approved by the Board. The members and the responsibilities of each committee are listed on page P-32 of this proxy statement under the heading “Committees of the Board of Directors.”
Does the Board have a nominating committee?
Yes. The Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, identifying and evaluating director nominees. The chair of the Corporate Governance Committee coordinates this effort.
Are the Audit and Oversight, Corporate Governance, and Compensation Committees comprised solely of independent directors?
Yes. These committees are comprised solely of independent directors, as determined under New York Stock Exchange rules and the Board’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.
In addition, the Board has determined that each member of the Audit and Oversight Committee and of the Compensation Committee is independent under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange applicable to audit committee and compensation committee members, respectively. The Audit and Oversight Committee is a separately designated committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Are all the members of the Audit Committee financially literate and does the committee have an “audit committee financial expert?”
Yes. The Board has determined that all of the members of the Audit and Oversight Committee are financially literate as required by New York Stock Exchange rules and qualify as audit committee financial experts within the meaning of SEC rules.
How does the Compensation Committee administer the executive and director compensation programs?
One of the principal responsibilities of the Compensation Committee is to provide competitive, performance-based executive and director compensation programs.
With respect to the executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include:
| |
• | determining and annually reviewing the Compensation Committee’s compensation philosophy; |
| |
• | reviewing and determining the compensation paid to executive officers (including base salaries, incentive compensation, and benefits); |
| |
• | overseeing the compensation and benefits to be paid to other officers and key employees; |
| |
• | establishing and administering the CEO compensation package; and |
| |
• | reviewing the results of the most recent stockholder advisory vote on compensation of the NEOs. |
The Compensation Committee is also charged with administering the compensation package of WEC Energy Group’s non-management directors. The Compensation Committee meets with the Corporate Governance Committee annually to review the compensation package of WEC Energy Group’s non-management directors and to determine the appropriate amount of such compensation.
The Compensation Committee, which has authority to retain advisers, including compensation consultants, at WEC Energy Group’s expense, retained Frederic Cook to analyze and help develop the Company’s executive compensation program, and to assess whether the compensation program is competitive and supports the Committee’s objectives. Frederick Cook also assesses and provides recommendations on non-management director compensation, as discussed in more detail on page P-33.
Frederic Cook is engaged solely by the Compensation Committee to provide executive compensation consulting services, and does not provide any additional services to the Company. In connection with its retention of Frederic Cook, the Compensation Committee reviewed Frederic Cook’s independence including: (1) the amount of fees received by Frederic
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-19 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Cook from WEC Energy Group as a percentage of Frederic Cook’s total revenue; (2) Frederic Cook’s policies and procedures designed to prevent conflicts of interest; and (3) the existence of any business or personal relationships that could impact independence. After reviewing these and other factors, the Compensation Committee determined that Frederic Cook is independent and the engagement did not present any conflicts of interest. Frederic Cook also determined that it was independent from the Company’s management, which was confirmed in a written statement delivered to the Compensation Committee.
For more information regarding our executive and director compensation processes and procedures, please refer to “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page P-39 and to "Director Compensation" beginning on
page P-33, respectively.
PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS
Does the Board evaluate CEO performance?
Yes. The Compensation Committee, on behalf of the Board, annually evaluates the performance of the CEO and reports the results to the Board. As part of this practice, the Compensation Committee obtains from each non-management director his or her input on the CEO’s performance, which input is then discussed in executive session with all non-management directors.
The CEO is evaluated in a number of areas including leadership, vision, financial stewardship, strategy development, management development, effective communication with constituencies, demonstrated integrity, and effective representation of the Company in community and industry affairs. The Chair of the Compensation Committee shares the evaluation results with the CEO. The process is also used by the Compensation Committee to determine appropriate compensation for the CEO. This procedure allows the Board to evaluate the CEO and to communicate the Board’s expectations.
Does the Board evaluate its own performance?
Yes. The Board annually evaluates its own performance. Each director is asked to consider the performance of the Board on such things as: (1) establishing appropriate corporate governance practices; (2) providing appropriate oversight for key affairs of the Company (including its strategic plans, long-range goals, financial and operating performance, risks to the enterprise, and customer satisfaction initiatives); (3) communicating the Board’s expectations and concerns to the CEO; (4) overseeing opportunities critical to the Company; and (5) operating in a manner that ensures open communication, candid and constructive dialogue, as well as critical questioning. The Corporate Governance Committee uses the results of this process as part of its annual review of the Corporate Governance Guidelines and to foster continuous improvement of the Board’s activities.
Is Board committee performance evaluated?
Yes. Each committee, except the Executive Committee, conducts an annual performance evaluation of its own activities and reports the results to the Board. The evaluation compares the performance of each committee with the requirements of its charter. The results of the annual evaluations are used by each committee to identify both its strengths and areas where its governance practices can be improved. Each committee may adjust its charter, with Board approval, based on the evaluation results.
RISK OVERSIGHT
What is the Board’s role in risk oversight?
The Board oversees the Company’s risk environment and has delegated specific risk monitoring responsibilities to the Audit and Oversight Committee and the Finance Committee as described in each committee’s charter. Both of these committees routinely report back to the Board. The Board and its committees also receive regular briefings from management on specific areas of risk as well as emerging risks to the enterprise.
Over the course of the year, the Audit and Oversight Committee hears reports from management on the Company’s major risk exposures in such areas as compliance, environmental, legal/litigation, technology security (cybersecurity), and ethical conduct, as well as steps taken to monitor and control such exposures. The Finance Committee discusses the Company’s risk assessment and risk management policies; it also provides oversight of insurance matters to ensure that
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-20 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
its risk management program is functioning properly. Both committees have direct access to, and meet as needed with, Company representatives without other management present to discuss matters related to risk management.
The CEO, who is ultimately responsible for managing risk, routinely reports to the Board on risk-related matters. As part of this process, the business unit leaders identify existing, new, or emerging issues or changes within their business areas that could have enterprise implications and report them to senior management. Management is tasked with ensuring that these risks and opportunities are appropriately addressed. The Company has established an Enterprise Risk Steering Committee, comprised of senior level management employees, whose purpose is to foster an enterprise-wide approach to managing risk and compliance. The results of each of these risk-management efforts are reported to the CEO and to the Board or its appropriate committee.
The Board believes that its leadership structure and enterprise risk management program support the risk oversight function of the Board.
STOCKHOLDER NOMINEES AND PROPOSALS
What is the process used to identify director nominees and how do I recommend a nominee to the Corporate Governance Committee?
Candidates for director nomination may be proposed by stockholders, the Corporate Governance Committee, and other members of the Board. The Corporate Governance Committee may pay a third party to identify qualified candidates; however, no such firm was engaged with respect to the nominees listed in this proxy statement. No formal stockholder nominations or recommendations for director candidates were received.
Stockholders wishing to propose director candidates for consideration and recommendation by the Corporate Governance Committee for election at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must submit the candidates’ names and qualifications to the Corporate Governance Committee no later than November 1, 2017, via the Corporate Secretary, Susan H. Martin, at the Company’s principal business office, 231 West Michigan Street, PO Box 1331, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201. Stockholders may also propose director candidates for consideration and recommendation by the Board by following the guidelines outlined in the Company's bylaws and summarized on page P-23 of this proxy statement.
Does the Company have a proxy access bylaw?
Yes. Stockholders voted in favor of a non-binding proxy access bylaw proposal that was considered at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. After this vote, the Company conducted an extensive evaluation that included feedback from (1) our top institutional investors, (2) proxy advisors, and (3) the proponent of the stockholder proposal. Based upon its evaluation and stockholder feedback, the Board adopted a proxy access bylaw in October 2016. The bylaw allows a stockholder (or a group of up to 20 stockholders) who own at least 3% of our stock for a period of three years the right to nominate candidates for up to the greater of 2 nominees or 20% of the Board.
What is the deadline for stockholders to submit proposals for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders?
Stockholders who intend to have a proposal considered for inclusion in the Company’s proxy materials for presentation at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must submit the proposal to the Company no later than November 23, 2017.
Stockholders who intend to present a proposal at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders without inclusion of such proposal in the Company’s proxy materials, or who propose to nominate a person for election as a director at the 2018 Annual Meeting, are required to provide notice of such proposal or nomination, containing the information required by the Company’s bylaws, to the Company at least 70 days and not more than 100 days prior to the scheduled date of the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is tentatively scheduled for May 3, 2018.
Under our new proxy access bylaw, if a stockholder (or a group of up to 20 stockholders) who has owned at least 3% of our shares of common stock for at least three years and has complied with the other requirements set forth in the Company’s bylaws wants us to include director nominees (up to the greater of two nominees or 20% of the Board) in our proxy statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the nominations must be received by our Corporate Secretary and must arrive at the Company in a timely manner, between 120 and 150 days prior to the anniversary of the date our proxy statement was first sent to stockholders in connection with our last annual meeting, which would be no earlier than October 24, 2017 and no later than November 23, 2017.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-21 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Correspondence in this regard should be directed to the Corporate Secretary, Susan H. Martin, at the Company’s principal business office, 231 West Michigan Street, PO Box 1331, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201.
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS – TERMS EXPIRING IN 2018
WEC Energy Group’s bylaws require each director to be elected annually to hold office for a one-year term. Because this is an uncontested election, our majority vote standard for election of directors will apply. Under this standard, the director nominees will be elected only if the number of votes cast favoring such nominee’s election exceeds the number of votes cast opposing that nominee’s election, as long as a quorum is present. Therefore, presuming a quorum is present, shares not voted, whether by broker non-vote, abstention, or otherwise, have no effect in the election of directors.
Proxies may not be voted for more than 13 persons in the election of directors.
The Board requires its current and potential directors to have a broad range of skills, education, experience, and qualifications that will benefit WEC Energy Group and our stockholders. Information regarding the specific criteria and processes used to evaluate director nominees can be found on page P-23.
The Board’s nominees for election are:
|
| | | |
• John F. Bergstrom | • Patricia W. Chadwick | • Paul W. Jones | • Allen L. Leverett |
• Barbara L. Bowles | • Curt S. Culver | • Gale E. Klappa | • Ulice Payne, Jr. |
• William J. Brodsky | • Thomas J. Fischer | • Henry W. Knueppel | • Mary Ellen Stanek |
• Albert J. Budney, Jr. | | | |
Each nominee has consented to being nominated and to serve if elected. In the unlikely event that any nominee becomes unable to serve for any reason, the proxies will be voted for a substitute nominee selected by the Board upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee of the Board. Information regarding each nominee is included on the following pages.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” all of the director nominees.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-22 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
DIRECTOR NOMINEES
Criteria and Processes Used to Evaluate Nominees
The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates director nominees in the context of the Board as a whole with the goal of recommending nominees with diverse backgrounds and experience that, together, can best perpetuate the success of WEC Energy Group’s business and represent stockholder interests. In addition to evaluating director nominees on the basis of the director candidate criteria, board diversity, and independence as described below, the Corporate Governance Committee has determined, through the Board succession planning process, that the Board should consist of candidates that collectively possess the following core competencies in order to effectively carry out its oversight function. Key core competencies, qualifications, and experience for each director are listed in their respective biographies under the heading "Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors."
|
| | |
Director Candidate Criteria. The Corporate Governance Committee has established criteria for evaluating director candidates, as set forth in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which include: proven integrity; mature and independent judgment; vision and imagination; ability to objectively appraise problems; ability to evaluate strategic options and risks; sound business experience and acumen; relevant technological, political, economic, or social/cultural expertise; social consciousness; achievement of prominence in career; familiarity with national and international issues affecting the Company’s businesses; contribution to the Board’s desired diversity and balance; and, in the case of new directors, availability to serve for five years before reaching the directors’ retirement age of 72. | | |
As stated in its charter, the Corporate Governance Committee reviews these criteria annually; in mid-2016, the Committee completed its review and had no recommended changes. In selecting the 2017 nominees for director, the Corporate Governance Committee determined that the candidates fulfill these criteria.
During 2016, Director Brodsky reached retirement age. The Corporate Governance Committee discussed this matter in January 2017 and agreed that Director Brodsky's long history living and working in, and deep knowledge of, the metro-Chicago area, as well as his strong strategic relationships, continue to provide special expertise to the Board that is critical to the successful operations of the Company's Illinois utilities. As a result, upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee, the Board of Directors approved Director Brodsky's continued service beyond age 72 and nominated him to continue serving as a director for a term expiring in 2018.
Board Diversity. The Corporate Governance Committee does not have a specific policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying director nominees. However, the Corporate Governance Committee strives to recommend candidates who each bring a unique perspective to the Board in order to contribute to the collective diversity of the Board. As part of its process in connection with the nomination of directors to the Board, the Corporate Governance Committee considers several factors to ensure the entire Board collectively embraces a wide variety of characteristics, including professional background, experience, skills, and knowledge, as well as the criteria listed above. Each candidate will generally exhibit different and varying degrees of these characteristics. With respect to the Company’s current slate of director nominees, the Company also benefits from the diversity inherent from differences in board member gender, ethnicity, tenure, and maturity as depicted on the infographic on page P-12.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-23 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Director Independence. Prior to nomination, both new and returning directors are evaluated to ensure compliance with the Board’s standards of independence, as described in detail on page P-18. Additionally, the Corporate Governance Committee reviews potential conflicts of interest, including interlocking directorships and substantial business, civic, and/or social relationships with other members of the Board that could impair the prospective Board member’s ability to act independently from the other Board members and management.
Director Nominee Evaluation Process. Once a person has been identified by the Corporate Governance Committee as a potential candidate, the Corporate Governance Committee may collect and review publicly available information regarding the person to assess whether that person should be considered further. If the Corporate Governance Committee determines that the candidate warrants further consideration, the chair or another member of the Board of Directors contacts the person. Generally, if the person expresses a willingness to be considered and to serve on the Board, the Corporate Governance Committee requests additional information from the candidate, reviews the person’s accomplishments and qualifications, and conducts one or more interviews with the candidate. In certain instances, Corporate Governance Committee members may contact one or more references provided by the candidate or may contact other members of the business community or other persons who may have greater firsthand knowledge of the candidate’s accomplishments.
The Corporate Governance Committee evaluates director candidates, including those proposed by stockholders, using this criteria and process. The process is designed to provide the Board with a diversity of experience and stability to allow it to effectively meet the many challenges WEC Energy Group faces in today’s challenging economic environment.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-24 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Nominees for Election to the Board of Directors
The following 13 individuals have been nominated for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. Biographical information for each director nominee is set forth below. Ages are as of January 19, 2017, the date each person was designated as a nominee of the Board for election at the Meeting.
|
| | | | |
| John F. Bergstrom Age: 70 Director Since: 1987 Board Committees: Audit and Oversight; Compensation (Chair); Executive Core Competencies: CEO experience; Talent management and executive compensation; Business operations and customer service | | | Barbara L. Bowles Age: 69 Director Since: 1998 Board Committees: Audit and Oversight; Corporate Governance (Chair); Executive WEC Board: Presiding Director Core Competencies: Corporate governance; Financial strategy and investment management; Risk assessment |
• Bergstrom Corporation – Chairman and CEO since 1982. Bergstrom Corporation owns and operates numerous automobile sales and leasing companies.• Director of Advance Auto Parts Inc. since 2008; Director of Associated Banc-Corp since 2010; Director of Kimberly-Clark Corporation since 1987.• Director of WEC Energy Group since 1987; Director of Wisconsin Electric Power Company from 1985 to June 2015. | | | |
| • Profit Investment Management – Retired Vice Chair. Served as Vice Chair from January 2006 until retirement in December 2007. Profit Investment Management is an investment advisory firm.• The Kenwood Group, Inc. – Retired Chairman. Served as Chairman from 2000 until 2006 when The Kenwood Group, Inc. merged into Profit Investment Management. CEO from 1989 to 2005.• Director of Hospira, Inc. from 2008 to 2015.• Director of WEC Energy Group since 1998; Director of Wisconsin Electric Power Company from 1998 to June 2015. |
Specific qualifications and experience Mr. Bergstrom brings to our Board of Directors 35 years of leadership experience as CEO of Bergstrom Corporation, one of the top 50 automotive dealership groups in America. With significant business operations in WEC Energy Group utilities' service territories and customer service perspective, Mr. Bergstrom brings strong insight with respect to the needs and concerns of WEC Energy Group's large retail customers, as well as perspective on the business environment in the State of Wisconsin, home to WEC Energy Group's corporate headquarters and our largest utility subsidiaries. His deep governance knowledge, which includes over 50 years of combined experience as a director on the boards of other publicly traded U.S. corporations and regional non-profit entities, including the Green Bay Packers, Inc., is particularly valuable to board and committee discussions focused on executive compensation and succession planning matters, as well as strategic planning initiatives. With a focus on excellence, Mr. Bergstrom has attained the National Association of Corporate Directors ("NACD") top designation of Board Leadership Fellow.
| |
| Specific qualifications and experience As founder, CEO, and retired Chairman of The Kenwood Group, Inc., a Chicago-based investment advisory firm that managed pension funds for corporations, public institutions, and endowments, Ms. Bowles, who is a Chartered Financial Analyst, brings over 20 years of investment advisory experience to our Board of Directors. Having also served as a portfolio manager and utility analyst for more than 10 years, and as a chief investor relations officer for two Fortune 50 companies, she contributes valuable perspective as to what issues are important to large investors. In the role of Chief Compliance Officer of Profit Investment Management, Ms. Bowles gained a deep understanding of corporate governance issues and concerns, experience she applies to her positions as Chair of WEC Energy Group's Corporate Governance Committee and independent presiding director. She also contributes valuable risk management and financial reporting insights as a member of the Audit and Oversight Committee, expertise she developed from current and past service as a director on the boards of several other public companies where she has served on the audit and finance committees. With utility subsidiaries located in Chicago, the Board of Directors also benefits from the economic and political perspectives Ms. Bowles provides as a result of her involvement in several important non-profit organizations in Chicago.
|
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-25 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
|
| | | | |
| William J. Brodsky Age: 72 Director Since: 2015 Board Committee: Finance Core Competencies: CEO experience; Financial strategy and investment management; Regulated industry | | | Albert J. Budney, Jr. Age: 69 Director Since: 2015 Board Committee: Corporate Governance Core Competencies: Regulated industry; Business operations and customer service; Corporate governance |
| | | | |
• CBOE Holdings, Inc. – Chairman of the Board from May 2014 to February 28, 2017. Served as Executive Chairman from 2013 to May 2014 and Chairman and CEO from 2010 to 2013. CBOE Holdings, Inc. is the holding company for the Chicago Board Options Exchange, an exchange that focuses on options contracts for individual equities, indexes, and volatility (VIX), and CBOE Futures Exchange which offers volatility futures.• The Chicago Board Options Exchange – Chairman of the Board from May 2014 to February 28, 2017. Served as Executive Chairman from 2013 to May 2014 and Chairman and CEO from 1997 to 2013.• Chairman of Cedar Street Asset Management LLC since 2016. Cedar Street Asset Management LLC is a Chicago-based portfolio management firm that specializes in investments in international equities.• Director of WEC Energy Group since June 2015; Director of Integrys Energy Group from February 2007 to June 2015. | | • Niagara Mohawk Holdings, Inc. – Retired President and Director. Niagara Mohawk Holdings, Inc. a holding company that distributes electricity in areas of New York through its utility subsidiaries.• Director of WEC Energy Group since June 2015; Director of Integrys Energy Group from February 2007 to June 2015. |
| Specific qualifications and experience With over 40 years of utility experience in senior leadership positions, Mr. Budney brings to our Board of Directors extensive knowledge in managing the operations of a utility company and the complexities that arise from operating in a highly-regulated industry. He has acquired considerable board experience in utility industry mergers and acquisitions having served as a director of Niagara Mohawk Holdings when it was acquired by National Grid, as well as serving as a director of WPS Resources Corporation when it purchased Peoples Energy Corporation and changed its name to Integrys Energy Group, and has since been acquired by WEC Energy Group. He also brings to the Board a broad knowledge in governance, customer service, and corporate management matters, most recently having served as both the Chair of the Corporate Governance Committee and lead director of Integrys Energy. |
Specific qualifications and experience Mr. Brodsky brings to our Board of Directors extensive finance, regulatory, and business management experience gained from nearly 35 years of combined service as CEO of The Chicago Board Options Exchange, CBOE Holdings, Inc., and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. His over 40 years of experience in the financial markets industry, and recognition as a leading industry advocate in options market policy and regulation, is particularly valuable in his service on the WEC Energy Group Finance Committee where he can apply his keen insights to the Company's financial strategy and investment management matters. Mr. Brodsky's extensive knowledge of the economic and governmental challenges as well as policy issues facing a public company doing business in Illinois is of great value to the Board, as is his extensive past and present experience serving on the boards of numerous highly-visible not-for-profit organizations in the metro Chicago area. | |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-26 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
|
| | | | |
| Patricia W. Chadwick Age: 68 Director Since: 2006 Board Committees: Audit and Oversight; Finance Core Competencies: Financial strategy and investment management; Accounting/auditing oversight and financial reporting; Strategic planning | | | Curt S. Culver Age: 64 Director Since: 2004 Board Committees: Corporate Governance; Finance (Chair) Core Competencies: CEO experience; Corporate governance; Talent management and executive compensation |
| | | | |
• Ravengate Partners, LLC – President since 1999. Ravengate Partners, LLC provides businesses and not-for-profit institutions with advice about the financial markets, business management, and global economics.• Director of AMICA Mutual Insurance Company since 1992; Director of VOYA Mutual Funds (previously ING Mutual Funds) since 2006; Director of The Royce Funds since 2009.• Director of WEC Energy Group since 2006; Director of Wisconsin Electric Power Company from 2006 to June 2015. | | • MGIC Investment Corporation – Non-executive Chairman of the Board since March 2015. Served as Chairman from 2005 to February 2015, CEO from 2000 to February 2015, and President from 1999 to 2006. MGIC Investment Corporation is the parent of Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation.• Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation – Non-executive Chairman of the Board since March 2015. Served as Chairman from 2005 to February 2015, CEO from 1999 to February 2015, and President from 1996 to 2006. Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation is a private mortgage insurance company.• Director of MGIC Investment Corporation since 1999.• Director of WEC Energy Group since 2004; Director of Wisconsin Electric Power Company from 2004 to June 2015. |
Specific qualifications and experience Ms. Chadwick, who is a Chartered Financial Analyst, brings to our Board of Directors extensive investment management expertise gained from 30 years of experience as an investment professional/portfolio manager or principal. As founder and President of Ravengate Partners, a firm that has been educating and advising businesses and not-for-profit institutions about the financial markets, independent research, and global economic activity since 1999, Ms. Chadwick's insights into what the investment industry is thinking and discussing is of great value to the Board as it contemplates its financial plan and strategy. Her knowledge on capital markets is particularly helpful to WEC Energy Group and its subsidiaries which operate in a capital-intensive industry and must consistently access the capital markets. Ms. Chadwick serves as a director on the boards of two registered investment companies, VOYA Mutual Funds and The Royce Funds, which afford her a perspective on current issues and concerns of today's investors, and she is a board director and Finance Committee member of AMICA Mutual Insurance Company, where she has gained a deep understanding of insurance risk management matters; she applies these to her role on the WEC Energy Group Finance Committee.
| |
| Specific qualifications and experience Having served for 15 years as the CEO of Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation and its parent company, MGIC Investment Corporation, Mr. Culver brings to our board of directors a strong working knowledge of the strategic, economic, and compliance issues facing a large publicly-traded company headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. As chair of the Finance Committee, he provides expertise in the financial markets and risk assessment and management; his experience in the insurance industry also puts him in a position to advise on the Company's insurance program and its effect on overall risk management. Mr. Culver's broad corporate governance experience from his extensive past and present service on the boards of several highly-visible Milwaukee-area non-profit entities and two private for-profit organizations is of great value to the Board. |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-27 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
|
| | | | |
| Thomas J. Fischer Age: 69 Director Since: 2005 Board Committees: Audit and Oversight (Chair); Compensation; Executive Core Competencies: Accounting/auditing oversight and financial reporting; Regulated industry; Strategic planning | | | Paul W. Jones Age: 68 Director Since: 2015 Board Committee: Audit and Oversight Core Competencies: Strategic planning; Business operations and customer service; Corporate governance |
| | | | |
• Fischer Financial Consulting LLC – Principal since 2002. Fischer Financial Consulting LLC provides consulting on corporate financial, accounting, and governance matters.• Director of Badger Meter, Inc. since 2003; Director of Regal Beloit Corporation since 2004.• Director of Actuant Corporation from 2003 to January 2017.• Director of WEC Energy Group since 2005; Director of Wisconsin Electric Power Company from 2005 to June 2015. | | • A.O. Smith Corporation – Retired Executive Chairman and CEO. A.O. Smith Corporation is a leading manufacturer of residential and commercial water heaters and boilers.• Rexnord Corporation – Non-executive Chairman since 2015. Director since 2014.• Director of Federal Signal Corporation since 1998; Director of A.O. Smith Corporation since 2004.• Director of WEC Energy Group since June 2015; Director of Integrys Energy Group from 2011 to June 2015. |
Specific qualifications and experience Mr. Fischer provides our Board of Directors with significant expertise in accounting and auditing matters, including financial reporting and regulatory compliance, risk assessment and management, and corporate governance issues. His experience in these areas comes from 33 years of work at Arthur Andersen, a large, international independent accounting firm, where for 22 years, he served as a partner responsible for services provided to large, complex public and private companies and several public utility audits. Since 2002, Mr. Fischer has provided consulting services to companies in the areas of corporate financial, accounting, and governance matters. Mr. Fischer, who is a Certified Public Accountant, brings extensive knowledge and experience to his responsibilities as WEC Energy Group's Audit and Oversight Committee Chair as a result of his past and present service on several other audit committees at public companies based in Wisconsin. His significant expertise is invaluable to WEC Energy Group's Board as it navigates a complex and evolving regulatory compliance landscape.
| | Specific qualifications and experience Having held leadership positions at A.O. Smith Corporation, U.S. Can Company, Inc., and Greenfield Industries, Mr. Jones brings to our Board of Directors over 25 years of senior and executive management experience in managing business operations for large retail and industrial entities. As the retired executive Chairman and CEO of A.O. Smith Corporation, a large, publicly traded company that is also headquartered in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, he has an understanding of the customer base and an appreciation for the economic issues facing the Company with our headquarters in Milwaukee. Mr. Jones previously served on the board of directors of the Milwaukee-based Bucyrus International, Inc., prior to its acquisition by Caterpillar, Inc., where he gained perspective on the concerns of an energy-intensive utility customer located in one of the Company's largest service territories. Mr. Jones is also one of three former Integrys Energy Group board members elected to the WEC Energy Group Board following its acquisition of Integrys, and therefore, provides helpful perspective on the utility subsidiaries that were acquired. With close to 20 years of service as a public company board director, including rotations as committee chair of the governance and nominating, finance, and compensation committees, as well as his current role as non-executive chairman of Rexnord Corporation, Mr. Jones contributes a deep understanding of corporate governance practices. |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-28 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
|
| | | | |
| Gale E. Klappa Age: 66 Director Since: 2003 Board Committee: Executive (Chair) Core Competencies: CEO experience; Regulated industry; Financial strategy and investment management | | | Henry W. Knueppel Age: 68 Director Since: 2013 Board Committees: Audit and Oversight; Corporate Governance Core Competencies: CEO experience; Business operations and customer service; Corporate governance |
| | | | |
• WEC Energy Group, Inc. – Non-Executive Chairman of the Board since May 2016; Chairman of the Board and CEO from 2004 to May 2016; President from 2003 to August 2013.• Wisconsin Electric Power Company – Chairman of the Board from 2004 to May 2016; CEO from 2003 to May 2016; President from 2003 to June 2015.• Director of Associated Banc-Corp since 2016; Director of Badger Meter, Inc. since 2010; Director of Joy Global Inc. since 2006.• Director of WEC Energy Group since 2003; Director of Wisconsin Electric Power Company from 2003 to May 2016.• Director of The Peoples Gas Light and Coke Company, a public utility subsidiary of WEC Energy Group located in Chicago, Illinois, since June 2015. | | • Regal Beloit Corporation – Retired Chairman of the Board and CEO. Served as CEO from 2005 to 2011 and as Chairman from 2006 to 2011. Regal Beloit Corporation is a leading manufacturer of electric motors, mechanical and electrical motion controls, and power generation products.• Harsco Corporation – Independent, Non-Executive Chairman of the Board from September 2012 until September 2014. Served as Interim Chairman and CEO from February 2012 to September 2012. Director from 2008 to April 2016. Harsco Corporation is a diversified, worldwide industrial services company.• Director of Regal Beloit Corporation since 1987; Director of Snap-on Incorporated since 2011.• Director of WEC Energy Group since 2013; Director of Wisconsin Electric Power Company from 2013 to June 2015. |
Specific qualifications and experience Mr. Klappa has more than 40 years of experience working in the public utility industry, the last 24 at a senior executive level. He retired as the Company's CEO in May 2016, at which time he transitioned to his current role as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board. Under his leadership, the Company successfully completed its 2015 acquisition of Integrys Energy Group. Prior to joining the Company in 2003, Mr. Klappa served in various executive leadership roles at The Southern Company, a public utility holding company serving the southeastern United States. With his extensive experience in the business operations and C-suite leadership of publicly regulated utilities, his service as a board member for three other public companies, and his contributions to significant economic development initiatives in southeastern Wisconsin, Mr. Klappa leads the Board with a deep understanding of the financial investment decisions and public policy issues facing large public companies in the utility sector.
| |
| Specific qualifications and experience With more than 30 years of senior management experience at Regal Beloit Corporation, including five years as the combined Chairman of the Board and CEO, Mr. Knueppel brings extensive executive management experience to our Board of Directors. Regal Beloit Corporation is a Wisconsin-based manufacturer of electrical motors, mechanical and electrical motion controls, and power generation products, which gives Mr. Knueppel knowledge of equipment used in the Company's operations. He currently serves on the boards of several large, publicly-traded industrial companies and provides the Board with perspective on operational and customer service matters the Company faces with our large commercial and industrial customers. Mr. Knueppel also brings to the Board a wide range of knowledge and experience in board governance, having served for more than 30 years as a director for several publicly-traded companies, including his role as the independent, non-executive chairman of the board of Harsco Corporation. |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-29 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
|
| | | | |
| Allen L. Leverett Age: 50 Director Since: 2016 Board Committee: Executive Core Competencies: Regulated industry; Risk assessment; CEO experience | | | Ulice Payne, Jr. Age: 61 Director Since: 2003 Board Committees: Compensation; Executive; Finance Core Competencies: Risk assessment; Business operations and customer service; Governmental, legal, public policy, and community relations |
| | | | |
• WEC Energy Group, Inc. – CEO since May 2016; President since August 2013; Executive Vice President from 2004 to July 2013; Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") from 2003 until 2011. Mr. Leverett also served as the principal executive officer of WEC Energy Group’s generation operations from 2011 to May 2016.• Wisconsin Electric Power Company – Chairman of the Board and CEO since May 2016; President from June 2015 to May 2016; Executive Vice President from 2004 until June 2015; CFO from 2003 until 2011.• Director of WEC Energy Group since January 2016; Director of Wisconsin Electric Power Company since June 2015.• Mr. Leverett also serves as an executive officer and/or director of several other major subsidiaries of WEC Energy Group. | | • Addison-Clifton, LLC – Managing Member since 2004. Addison-Clifton, LLC provides global trade compliance advisory services.• Director of Foot Locker, Inc. since December 2016; Director of Manpower Group since 2007; Trustee of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company since 2005.• Director of WEC Energy Group since 2003; Director of Wisconsin Electric Power Company from 2003 to June 2015. |
| Specific qualifications and experience Mr. Payne brings to our Board of Directors strong business leadership experience within the local Milwaukee community and state of Wisconsin, previously serving in roles that included the Securities Commissioner for the state of Wisconsin, managing partner of the Milwaukee law office of Foley & Lardner, and president and CEO of the Milwaukee Brewers Baseball Club, Inc. In addition, Mr. Payne is and has been involved in numerous Milwaukee-area non-profit entities, making him well-positioned to provide the Board with perspective on the economic and social issues affecting the greater Milwaukee area as well as a broad spectrum of the Company's customers. As founder and President of Addison-Clifton, LLC, which provides global trade compliance consulting, Mr. Payne understands the importance of providing clients with exceptional customer service, a focus that is critical to execution of WEC Energy Group's strategic initiatives. Mr. Payne also contributes valuable financial and risk assessment insights gained throughout his career, including from his past and present service on the boards of several public companies.
|
Specific qualifications and experience Having worked in the public utility industry for nearly 25 years, Mr. Leverett has developed a deep understanding of the complexities of the Company's industry, operations, and regulatory environment, while having built extensive leadership experience. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Leverett served in executive positions at Georgia Power and Southern Company Services, where he held overall responsibility for financial planning and analysis, capital markets and leasing, treasury, and investor relations. He joined the Company in 2003 as CFO and has proceeded to hold numerous executive positions, including CEO of the Company's power generation group, with overall responsibility for electric generation fleet operations and planning, fuel procurement, environmental compliance, and renewable energy development strategy. Since May 1, 2016, Mr. Leverett has served as CEO of WEC Energy Group, adding to his roles as President and Director. Mr. Leverett's experience and insights in running a regulated public company are critical to the Board as it carries out its oversight of the Company's risk environment.
| |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-30 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
|
| | | | |
| Mary Ellen Stanek Age: 60 Director Since: 2012 Board Committee: Finance Core Competencies: Financial strategy and investment management; Risk assessment; Governmental, legal, public policy, and community relations | | |
| | |
• Baird Financial Group – Managing Director and Director of Asset Management since 2000. Baird Financial Group provides wealth management, capital markets, private equity, and asset management services to clients worldwide.• Baird Advisors – Chief Investment Officer since 2000. Baird Advisors is an institutional fixed income investment advisor.• Baird Funds, Inc. – President since 2000. Baird Funds is a publicly registered investment company.• Trustee of The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company since 2009.• Director of Journal Media Group, Inc. and its predecessor companies from 2002 to April 2016.• Director of WEC Energy Group since 2012; Director of Wisconsin Electric Power Company from 2012 to June 2015. | |
Specific qualifications and experience Ms. Stanek, who is a Chartered Financial Analyst, brings to our Board of Directors her extensive financial and investment strategy expertise, resulting from over 35 years of investment management experience. As Managing Director and Director of Asset Management of Baird Financial Group, a position she has held since 2000, Ms. Stanek's expertise in fixed income investments provides the Board and management with invaluable financial strategy insight relative to WEC Energy Group and its subsidiaries, which customarily issue debt securities as a means of raising capital. As a member of the WEC Energy Group Finance Committee, she also offers valuable perspective on insurance risk matters, having served for 15 years as a director of West Bend Mutual Insurance Company. In addition to her recognition as a leader in Milwaukee's financial community, Ms. Stanek has dedicated significant time to serving on the boards of a large number of Milwaukee-area non-profit organizations, through which she has developed strong relationships with key community leaders and stakeholders. From these experiences, she brings the Board insightful perspectives on issues impacting the culture and viability of the workforce, as well as customer concerns.
| |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-31 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
|
| |
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
Members | Principal Responsibilities; Meetings |
| |
Audit and Oversight | • Oversee the integrity of the financial statements. • Oversee management compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. • Review, approve, and evaluate the independent auditors’ services. • Oversee the performance of the internal audit function and independent auditors. • Discuss risk management and major risk exposures and steps taken to monitor and control such exposures. • Prepare the report required by the SEC for inclusion in the proxy statement. • Establish procedures for the submission of complaints and concerns regarding WEC Energy Group’s accounting or auditing matters. • The Audit and Oversight Committee conducted six meetings in 2016. |
Thomas J. Fischer, Chair John F. Bergstrom Barbara L. Bowles Patricia W. Chadwick Paul W. Jones Henry W. Knueppel |
Compensation | • Identify through succession planning potential executive officers. • Provide competitive, performance-based executive and director compensation programs. • Set performance goals for the CEO, annually evaluate the CEO’s performance against such goals, and determine compensation adjustments based on whether these goals have been achieved. • Prepare the report required by the SEC for inclusion in the proxy statement. • The Compensation Committee conducted seven meetings in 2016 and executed two written unanimous consents. |
John F. Bergstrom, Chair Thomas J. Fischer Ulice Payne, Jr. |
Corporate Governance | • Establish and annually review the Corporate Governance Guidelines to verify that the Board is effectively performing its fiduciary responsibilities to stockholders. • Establish and annually review director candidate selection criteria. • Identify and recommend candidates to be named as nominees of the Board for election as directors. • Lead the Board in its annual review of the Board’s performance. • The Corporate Governance Committee conducted three meetings in 2016 and executed one written unanimous consent. |
Barbara L. Bowles, Chair Albert J. Budney, Jr. Curt S. Culver Henry W. Knueppel |
Finance | • Review and monitor the Company’s current and long-range financial policies and strategies, including our capital structure and dividend policy. • Authorize the issuance of corporate debt within limits set by the Board. • Discuss policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. • Approve the Company’s financial plan, including the capital budget. • The Finance Committee conducted four meetings in 2016 and executed one written unanimous consent. |
Curt S. Culver, Chair William J. Brodsky Patricia W. Chadwick Ulice Payne, Jr. Mary Ellen Stanek |
Executive Committee. The Board also has an Executive Committee which may exercise all powers vested in the Board except action regarding dividends or other distributions to stockholders, filling Board vacancies, and other powers which by law may not be delegated to a committee or actions reserved for a committee comprised of independent directors. The members of the Executive Committee are Gale E. Klappa (Chair), John F. Bergstrom, Barbara L. Bowles, Thomas J. Fischer, Allen L. Leverett, and Ulice Payne, Jr. The Executive Committee did not meet in 2016.
In addition to the number of committee meetings listed in the preceding table, the Board met eight times in 2016 and executed six signed, written unanimous consents. The average meeting attendance during the year was over 95%. All directors attended more than 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and Board committees on which he or she served.
Generally, all directors are expected to attend the Company’s annual meetings of stockholders. All directors attended the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 5, 2016.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-32 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes total compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each of WEC Energy Group’s non-management directors during 2016.
|
| | | | | | | |
Name | Fees Earned or Paid In Cash | (1)(2) Stock Awards | Option Awards | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | (3) All Other Compensation | Total |
($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) |
John F. Bergstrom | 90,000 | 125,000 | — | — | — | 27,571 | 242,571 |
Barbara L. Bowles | 85,000 | 125,000 | — | — | — | 25,463 | 235,463 |
William J. Brodsky | 75,000 | 125,000 | — | — | — | — | 200,000 |
Albert J. Budney, Jr. | 75,000 | 125,000 | — | — | — | — | 200,000 |
Patricia W. Chadwick | 75,000 | 125,000 | — | — | — | 27,815 | 227,815 |
Curt S. Culver | 85,000 | 125,000 | — | — | — | 19,793 | 229,793 |
Thomas J. Fischer | 95,000 | 125,000 | — | — | — | 31,759 | 251,759 |
Paul W. Jones | 75,000 | 125,000 | — | — | — | — | 200,000 |
Gale E. Klappa (4) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Henry W. Knueppel | 75,000 | 125,000 | — | — | — | — | 200,000 |
Ulice Payne, Jr. | 75,000 | 125,000 | — | — | — | 14,427 | 214,427 |
Mary Ellen Stanek | 75,000 | 125,000 | — | — | — | — | 200,000 |
| |
(1) | The amounts reported reflect the aggregate grant date fair value, as computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) Topic 718, of restricted stock awards made to the directors in 2016. Each restricted stock award vests in full on the third anniversary of the grant date. |
| |
(2) | Other than Mr. Brodsky (2,540 shares), Mr. Budney (2,540 shares), Mr. Jones (2,540 shares), and Mr. Klappa (2,931 shares), each current director held 7,001 shares of restricted stock as of December 31, 2016. |
| |
(3) | All amounts represent costs for the Directors’ Charitable Awards Program. See “Compensation of the Board of Directors” below for additional information regarding this program. |
| |
(4) | Mr. Klappa was executive Chairman and CEO of WEC Energy Group until May 1, 2016, and therefore, is considered a Named Executive Officer. All of Mr. Klappa's compensation he received as a director is reported in the "Summary Compensation Table" on page P-57. |
Compensation of the Board of Directors
2016 Compensation. During 2016, each non-management director (other than Mr. Klappa) received an annual retainer fee of $75,000. In addition, during 2016, non-management chairs of the Finance Committee and the Corporate Governance Committee each received an annual retainer of $10,000, the chair of the Compensation Committee received an annual retainer of $15,000, and the chair of the Audit and Oversight Committee received an annual retainer of $20,000. The Company reimbursed non-management directors for all out-of-pocket travel expenses (which reimbursed amounts are not reflected in the table above).
On January 4, 2016, each non-management director (other than Mr. Klappa) also received the 2016 annual stock compensation award in the form of restricted stock equal to a value of $125,000, with all shares vesting three years from the grant date. Employee directors do not receive these fees.
Insurance is also provided by the Company for director liability coverage, fiduciary and employee benefit liability coverage, and travel accident coverage for director travel on Company business. The premiums paid for this insurance are not included in the amounts reported in the table above.
Effective May 1, 2016, Mr. Klappa retired as executive Chairman of the Board and CEO of WEC Energy Group. Mr. Klappa continued as a director and became Non-Executive Chairman of the Board. Consistent with the Company's compensation policy for non-management directors, Mr. Klappa received an annual retainer fee of $75,000 and an annual restricted stock award equal to a value of $125,000, both of which were prorated for the number of months to be served during 2016 as a non-management director. In connection with his service as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, Mr. Klappa received an additional annual retainer fee of $125,000 and an additional annual restricted stock award equal to a value of $125,000, both of which were prorated for the number of months to be served during 2016 as Non-Executive Chairman. The restricted stock awarded to Mr. Klappa vests three years from the date of grant.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-33 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Deferred Compensation Plan. Non-management directors may defer all or a portion of director fees pursuant to the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. Prior to January 1, 2017, deferred amounts could be credited to any of ten measurement funds, including a WEC Energy Group phantom stock account. Effective January 1, 2017, directors have two investment options in the plan - the Company's stock measurement fund and the Prime Rate Fund. The value of these accounts will appreciate or depreciate based on market performance, as well as through the accumulation of reinvested dividends. Deferral amounts are credited to accounts in the name of each participating director on the books of WEC Energy Group, are unsecured, and are payable only in cash following termination of the director’s service to WEC Energy Group. The deferred amounts will be paid out of general corporate assets or the assets of the Wisconsin Energy Corporation 2014 Rabbi Trust discussed later in this proxy statement.
Legacy Charitable Awards Program. Directors elected prior to January 1, 2007 participate in a Directors’ Charitable Awards Program under which the Company intends to contribute up to $100,000 per year for 10 years to one or more charitable organizations chosen by each director, including employee directors, following the director’s death. Charitable donations under the program will be paid out of general corporate assets. Directors derive no financial benefit from the program, and all income tax deductions accrue solely to the Company. The tax deductibility of these charitable donations mitigates the net cost to the Company. The Directors’ Charitable Awards Program has been eliminated for any new directors elected after January 1, 2007. Directors already participating as of that date are Messrs. Bergstrom, Culver, Fischer, Klappa, and Payne, and Ms. Bowles and Chadwick.
2017 Compensation. In December 2016, the Compensation Committee conducted its annual review of non-management director compensation and determined that, based upon research provided by Frederic Cook, the total director compensation package remained slightly below the market median in light of the increased size and complexity of the Company following the Integrys acquisition. The Compensation Committee determined that it was appropriate to increase the annual cash retainer award by $25,000. As a result, effective January 1, 2017, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors increased the annual cash retainer award from $75,000 to $100,000. The Compensation Committee concluded that the chair fee retainers, including the annual cash retainer for the Non-Executive Chairman, and the amount of the annual restricted stock award, would remain at the levels approved for the 2016 calendar year.
In December 2016, also based upon market research provided by Frederic Cook, the Compensation Committee concluded that it would be appropriate to reduce the vesting schedule for restricted stock awarded to directors. As a result, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors shortened the vesting period for future restricted awards to directors from three years to one year effective for awards granted after January 1, 2017.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-34 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR 2017
The Audit and Oversight Committee of the Board of Directors has sole authority to select, evaluate, and, where appropriate, terminate and replace the independent auditors. The Audit and Oversight Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. The Audit and Oversight Committee believes that stockholder ratification of this matter is important considering the critical role the independent auditors play in maintaining the integrity of the Company’s financial statements. If stockholders do not ratify the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Audit and Oversight Committee will reconsider the selection.
Deloitte & Touche LLP has served as the independent auditors for the Company for the last 15 fiscal years beginning with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. The members of the Audit and Oversight Committee and the other members of the Board believe that the continued retention of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as the Company’s independent external auditor is in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.
Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company's independent auditors requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast in person or by proxy at the Meeting. Presuming a quorum is present, shares not voted, whether by broker non-vote, abstention, or otherwise, have no effect on the outcome of this matter.
Representatives of Deloitte & Touche LLP are expected to be present at the Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and are expected to respond to appropriate questions that may be directed to them. Information concerning Deloitte & Touche LLP can be found in the following pages.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR”
the ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for 2017.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ FEES AND SERVICES
Pre-Approval Policy. The Audit and Oversight Committee has a formal policy delineating its responsibilities for reviewing and approving, in advance, all audit, audit-related, tax, and other services of the independent auditors. As such, the Audit and Oversight Committee is responsible for the audit fee negotiations associated with the Company’s retention of independent auditors.
The Audit and Oversight Committee is committed to ensuring the independence of the auditors, both in appearance as well as in fact. In order to assure continuing auditor independence, the Audit and Oversight Committee periodically considers whether there should be a regular rotation of the independent external audit firm. In addition, the Audit and Oversight Committee is directly involved in the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP’s lead engagement partner.
Under the pre-approval policy, before engagement of the independent auditors for the next year’s audit, the independent auditors will submit (1) a description of all services anticipated to be rendered, as well as an estimate of the fees for each of the services, for the Audit and Oversight Committee to approve, and (2) written confirmation that the performance of any non-audit services is permissible and will not impact the firm’s independence. Annual pre-approval will be deemed effective for a period of twelve months from the date of pre-approval, unless the Audit and Oversight Committee specifically provides for a different period. A fee level will be established for all permissible, pre-approved non-audit services. Any additional audit service, audit-related service, tax service, and other service must also be pre-approved.
The Audit and Oversight Committee delegated pre-approval authority to the Committee’s Chair. The Audit and Oversight Committee Chair is required to report any pre-approval decisions at the next scheduled Audit and Oversight Committee meeting. Under the pre-approval policy, the Audit and Oversight Committee may not delegate to management its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by the independent auditors.
Under the pre-approval policy, prohibited non-audit services are services prohibited by the Securities and Exchange Commission or by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) to be performed by the Company’s independent auditors. These services include: bookkeeping or other services related to the accounting records or financial statements of the Company; financial information systems design and implementation; appraisal or valuation services;
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-35 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports; actuarial services; internal audit outsourcing services; management functions, or human resources, broker-dealer, investment advisor or investment banking services; legal services and expert services unrelated to the audit; services provided for a contingent fee or commission; and services related to planning, marketing or opining in favor of the tax treatment of a confidential transaction or an aggressive tax position transaction that was initially recommended, directly or indirectly, by the independent auditors. In addition, the Audit and Oversight Committee has determined that the independent auditors may not provide any services, including personal financial counseling and tax services, to any officer or other employee of the Company who serves in a financial reporting oversight role or to the chair of the Audit and Oversight Committee or to an immediate family member of these individuals, including spouses, spousal equivalents, and dependents.
Fee Table. The following table shows the fees, all of which were pre-approved by the Audit and Oversight Committee, for professional audit services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP for the audit of the annual financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries for fiscal years 2016 and 2015, and fees for other services rendered during those periods. No fees were paid to Deloitte & Touche LLP pursuant to the “de minimus” exception to the pre-approval policy permitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
|
| | | | | | |
| 2016 | 2015 (1) |
Audit Fees (2) | $ | 4,886,950 |
| $ | 4,988,090 |
|
Audit-Related Fees (3) | — | 32,940 |
|
Tax Fees | — | — |
All Other Fees (4) | 7,946 |
| 4,950 |
|
Total | $ | 4,894,896 |
| $ | 5,025,980 |
|
| |
(1) | Includes fees incurred by the legacy Integrys Energy Group family of companies following the acquisition of Integrys on June 29, 2015. |
| |
(2) | Audit Fees consist of fees for professional services rendered in connection with the audits of: (1) the annual financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries, (2) the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and (3) other non-recurring audit work. This category also includes reviews of financial statements included in Form 10-Q filings of the Company and its subsidiaries and services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. |
| |
(3) | Audit-Related Fees consist of fees for professional services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” |
| |
(4) | All Other Fees consist of costs for certain employees to attend accounting/tax seminars hosted by Deloitte & Touche LLP plus the subscription cost for the use of a Deloitte & Touche LLP accounting research tool. |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-36 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
AUDIT AND OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit and Oversight Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, oversees the integrity of the financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of WEC Energy Group, Inc. In addition, the Audit and Oversight Committee oversees compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. The Audit and Oversight Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board, which can be found in the “Governance” section of the Company’s Website at wecenergygroup.com.
The Audit and Oversight Committee is also directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the Company’s independent auditors, as well as the oversight of the Company’s internal audit function.
In order to assure continuing auditor independence, the Audit and Oversight Committee periodically considers whether there should be a regular rotation of the independent external audit firm. For 2017, the Audit and Oversight Committee has appointed Deloitte & Touche LLP to remain as the Company’s independent auditors, subject to stockholder ratification. The members of the Audit and Oversight Committee and other members of the Board believe that the continued retention of Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve as the Company’s independent external auditor is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
The Audit and Oversight Committee is directly involved in the selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP’s lead engagement partner in conjunction with a mandated rotation policy and are also responsible for audit fee negotiations with Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Management is responsible for the Company’s financial reporting process, the preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the system of internal controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. The Company’s independent auditors are responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (the “PCAOB”) and issuing a report thereon.
The Audit and Oversight Committee held six meetings during 2016. Meetings are designed to facilitate and encourage open communication among the members of the Audit and Oversight Committee, management, the internal auditors, and the Company’s independent auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP. During these meetings, we reviewed and discussed with management, among other items, the Company’s unaudited quarterly and audited annual financial statements and the system of internal controls designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws.
We have reviewed and discussed with management and the Company’s independent auditors the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related footnotes for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, and the independent auditor’s report on those financial statements. Management represented to us that the Company’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Deloitte & Touche LLP presented the matters required to be discussed with the Audit and Oversight Committee by PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees. This review included a discussion with management and the independent auditors about the quality of the Company’s accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant estimates and judgments, and the disclosures in the Company’s financial statements, as well as the disclosures relating to critical accounting policies.
In addition, we received the written disclosures and the letter relative to the auditors’ independence from Deloitte & Touche LLP, as required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding Deloitte & Touche LLP’s communications with the Audit and Oversight Committee concerning independence. The Audit and Oversight Committee discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP its independence and also considered the compatibility of non-audit services provided by Deloitte & Touche LLP with maintaining its independence.
Based on these reviews and discussions, the Audit and Oversight Committee recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in WEC Energy Group’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Respectfully submitted to WEC Energy Group stockholders by the Audit and Oversight Committee of the Board. |
| |
| The Audit and Oversight Committee |
| |
| Thomas J. Fischer, Committee Chair |
| John F. Bergstrom |
| Barbara L. Bowles |
| Patricia W. Chadwick |
| Paul W. Jones |
| Henry W. Knueppel |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-37 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
COMPENSATION OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-38 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The following discussion provides an overview and analysis of our executive compensation program, including the role of the Compensation Committee of our Board, the elements of our executive compensation program, the purposes and objectives of these elements, and the manner in which we established the compensation of our NEOs for fiscal year 2016.
References to “we,” “us,” “our,” "Company," and “WEC Energy Group” in this discussion and analysis mean WEC Energy Group, Inc. and its management, as applicable.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Overview
The primary objective of our executive compensation program is to provide a competitive, performance-based plan that enables the Company to attract and retain key individuals and to reward them for achieving both the Company’s short-term and long-term goals without creating an incentive for our NEOs to take excessive risks. Our program has been designed to provide a level of compensation that is strongly dependent upon the achievement of short-term and long-term goals that are aligned with the interests of our stockholders and customers. To that end, a substantial portion of pay is at risk, and generally, the value will only be realized upon strong corporate performance.
2016 Business Highlights
We completed our first full year of combined utility operations as WEC Energy Group in 2016 following Wisconsin Energy Corporation's acquisition of Integrys Energy Group in June 2015. Following the acquisition, we deliver electricity and natural gas to approximately 4.4 million customers in four states - Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, and Minnesota.
During 2016, we made excellent progress in our efforts to integrate our employees, merge and improve business processes, and consolidate our IT infrastructure. At the same time, the Company achieved solid results and continued to create long-term value for our stockholders and customers by focusing on the following:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| • | World-class reliability | | • | Operating efficiency | | • | Employee safety |
| • | Financial discipline | | • | Exceptional customer care | | | |
Commitment to Stockholder Value Creation. Financially, WEC Energy Group again delivered solid earnings growth, generated strong cash flow, and increased the dividend for the 13th consecutive year. In January 2016, the Board raised the quarterly dividend 8.2% to $0.4950 per share, equivalent to an annual rate of $1.98 per share. In January 2017, the Board increased the quarterly dividend to $0.5200 per share, which is equivalent to an annual rate of $2.08 per share, in line with our plan to maintain a dividend payout ratio of 65% to 70% of earnings. The Company also turned in strong performances in employee safety, customer satisfaction, and network reliability during 2016. Specific Company achievements during 2016 include:
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-39 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2016 Financial Highlights
|
| | |
• | WEC Energy Group delivered solid earnings growth again, generated strong cash flow, and increased the dividend for the 13th consecutive year. | |
• | Achieved fully diluted earnings and adjusted earnings per share of $2.96 and $2.97, respectively. (2) |
• | Each of our regulated utility subsidiaries earned its allowed rate of return. |
• | Returned approximately $625 million to WEC Energy Group stockholders through dividends. |
• | In January 2017, the Board raised the quarterly dividend to $0.52 per share, which is equivalent to an annual dividend rate of $2.08 per share. |
| |
(1) | Excludes costs of $0.01, $0.30, and $0.06 per share for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively, related to our acquisition of Integrys. See Appendix A on P-85 for a full GAAP reconciliation and an explanation of why we believe the presentation of adjusted earnings per share is relevant and useful to investors. |
| |
(2) | This measure is a component of our short-term incentive compensation program. |
2016 Operational Performance
| |
• | WEC Energy Group was recognized in 2016 by Corporate Responsibility Magazine in its annual “Most Responsible Companies Ranked by Industry Sector” in the Utility category. |
| |
• | Our utilities continued to balance the delivery of safe, reliable, and affordable energy with a commitment to protecting the environment. |
| |
• | We Energies was named the most reliable utility in the Midwest for the sixth year by PA Consulting Group and also received the first-ever Outstanding Customer Reliability Experience Award for effective customer service and communications. |
| |
• | We received the best results in our history for large customer satisfaction as surveyed by TQS Research and achieved a third place national ranking. (2) |
| |
• | All major utility subsidiaries either met or exceeded our overall customer satisfaction targets. (2) |
| |
• | WEC Energy Group's utility companies experienced growing employee participation in health and wellness programs, as well as increased proactive safety reporting, helping to reduce the number of OSHA-reportable incidents and lost-time incidents by almost 17% on a year-over-year basis. (2) |
| |
• | We Energies Supplier Diversity Initiative was recognized by the National Association of Minority Contractors-Wisconsin Chapter for outreach, support, commitment, and leadership in minority business development in the Wisconsin construction industry. (2) |
2016 Strategic Performance
| |
• | Continued the successful integration of Integrys Energy Group into WEC Energy Group. |
| |
• | Transitioned leadership of the Company, from Gale E. Klappa to Allen L. Leverett as CEO, effective May 1, 2016. |
| |
• | Formed a stand-alone utility (Upper Michigan Energy Resources Corporation) to serve customers in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula and to facilitate a long-term generation solution for the region. |
| |
• | Sold Wisconsin Electric Power Company's ("WE's") Milwaukee County Power Plant, a coal-fired power plant, in 2016 as part of our long-term strategy to restructure the Company's generation portfolio to meet changing demands and regulations. |
| |
• | Sold the compressed natural gas business, Trillium CNG, thereby exiting a significant non-regulated business. |
| |
• | Announced a plan to work with industry partners, environmental groups, and the state of Wisconsin with a goal of reducing CO2 emissions from our electric generating fleet by approximately 40% below 2005 levels by 2030. |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-40 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
| |
• | Deployed capital during 2016 to focus on strengthening and modernizing the reliability of our generation and distribution networks. Highlights include: |
At year-end 2016, implementation of the Improved Customer Experience project was 80% complete; when fully implemented, this $100-plus million customer care software project will provide all of the Company’s customers, located across four states, with a common experience, while also improving business capability and service delivery across all of our utility subsidiaries.
Illinois. The Peoples Gas Light & Coke Company (“PGL”), one of the Company’s Illinois utility subsidiaries, completed a top to bottom review of the capital construction project underway in the City of Chicago to modernize the natural gas infrastructure; management successfully worked with regulators to identify and prioritize 2016 capital expenditures, while also implementing enhanced project controls and significantly reducing class 2 methane leaks.
PGL also broke ground on a $20 million, 100,000-plus square foot state-of-the art training facility in Chicago, which will provide training for current and future utility employees, as well as prepare high school students for careers as utility workers.
Wisconsin. In November 2016, Wisconsin Public Service Corporation’s ("WPS") ReACTTM system went into commercial operation at Weston Unit 3, one of our coal-fired facilities; this $345 million capital project installed an air quality control system that is the first of its kind in the United States. The ReACTTM system is currently meeting or exceeding all environmental performance expectations, including reducing sulfur dioxide and mercury emissions from Weston Unit 3 to near zero.
WPS met the scheduling, safety, and reliability improvement targets set for 2016 on a five-year, $220 million system modernization and reliability project; upon completion in 2018, the company will have converted more than 1,100 miles of overhead lines to underground and added distribution automation equipment on 400 miles of lines.
The new powerhouse at WE's Twin Falls hydroelectric plant went into commercial operation in July 2016; forecasted at $64 million, this capital project was completed on schedule and under budget, and has increased plant capacity by 50%.
We completed the expansion of the coal storage facilities at WE's Oak Creek Power Plant site; this $62 million project, finished under budget, was placed into service ahead of schedule in December 2016 and is already providing fueling flexibility benefits that lower costs for customers.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-41 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Long-Term Stockholder Returns
Over the past decade, WEC Energy Group has consistently delivered among the best total returns in the industry and did so again in 2016.
|
| |
| |
(3) The Five-Year Cumulative Return Chart shows a comparison of the cumulative total return, assuming reinvestment of dividends, over the last five years had $100 been invested at the close of business on December 31, 2011. For information about the Custom Peer Index Group and the Recomprised Custom Peer Index Group, see page F-93 in the Company's 2016 Annual Report. | Source: Bloomberg; assumes all dividends are reinvested and returns are compounded daily. |
Key Compensation Program Changes
In 2016, we made some changes to our compensation program that followed from stockholder engagement efforts and our focus on continually refining our executive compensation program to more effectively align executive pay with performance and reflect best compensation practices.
Competitive Benchmarking - Recomprised Market Data Sources. Based upon a recommendation from our independent compensation consultant, Frederic Cook, the Compensation Committee revised the data sources used to benchmark executive compensation. Instead of considering just market data obtained from Willis Towers Watson’s Executive Compensation Data Bank, Frederic Cook also considered survey data from Aon Hewitt and a comparison group of 19 companies comparable in size to WEC Energy Group that share similar traits with the Company. For additional information on our benchmarking methodology, see “Competitive Benchmarking” on page P-44 of this proxy statement.
Long-Term Incentive Awards - Performance Unit Plan - Short-Term Dividend Equivalents. The Compensation Committee amended and restated the Company’s Performance Unit Plan effective January 1, 2016, to provide that short-term dividend equivalents are paid out at the end of a three-year performance period based on WEC Energy Group’s total stockholder return over the three-year performance period as compared to the stockholder return of a peer group of companies. Short-term dividend equivalents granted prior to January 1, 2016 were paid out annually on unearned performance units if the Company met applicable earnings per share targets. For additional information on the short-term dividend equivalents, see “Short-Term Dividend Equivalents” on page P-50 of this proxy statement.
Long-Term Incentive Awards - Performance Unit Plan - Additional Performance Measure. On December 1, 2016, based upon feedback we received from stockholders during our investor outreach efforts, the Compensation Committee amended and restated the Company’s Performance Unit Plan effective January 1, 2017, to provide for an “Additional Performance Measure” (in addition to total stockholder return), which is defined as the performance criterion or criteria (if any) that the Compensation Committee selects at the time of the award, in its sole discretion, against which WEC Energy Group's performance will be measured. For additional information regarding the change, see “Long-Term Incentive Compensation - Performance Units” on page P-49 of this proxy statement.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-42 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Consideration of 2016 Stockholder Advisory Vote and Stockholder Outreach
At the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the Company’s stockholders approved the compensation of our named executive officers with 85.8% of the votes cast. The Compensation Committee considered this outcome as well as the feedback received during meetings we held with a number of our institutional stockholders and determined that additional changes should be made to the executive compensation program. As indicated above, the Compensation Committee amended WEC Energy Group’s Performance Unit Plan to provide for an Additional Performance Measure. In light of the significant stockholder support our executive compensation program received in 2015, the payout levels under our performance-based program for 2016, and the additional changes made to the program, the Compensation Committee continues to believe that the compensation program is competitive, aligned with our financial and operational performance, and in the best interests of the Company, stockholders, and customers.
COMPONENTS OF OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM
We have three primary elements of total direct compensation: (1) base salary; (2) annual incentive awards; and (3) long-term incentive awards consisting of a mix of performance units, stock options, and restricted stock. The Compensation Committee retained Frederic Cook as its independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee with respect to our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee generally relied on the recommendations of Frederic Cook as it developed the 2016 program.
On January 27, 2016, the Board appointed Mr. Leverett to serve as our CEO effective upon Mr. Klappa’s retirement on May 1, 2016. Mr. Klappa continues to serve as the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board. As shown in the charts below, 86% of Mr. Leverett’s 2016 total direct compensation as CEO and an average of 74% of the other NEO’s (other than Mr. Klappa) 2016 total direct compensation is tied to Company performance and is not guaranteed.
The other NEOs total direct compensation mix does not include Mr. Klappa’s compensation as his compensation mix was based upon his position as CEO and significantly changes the reported NEO mix. If Mr. Klappa is included in the calculation of the other NEOs total compensation mix, the amounts reported in the chart above change as follows: Annual Base Salary (15%); Annual Cash Incentive (24%); and Long-Term Equity Incentive (61%).
To the extent feasible, we believe it is important that the Company’s compensation program not dilute the interests of current stockholders. Therefore, we currently use open market purchases to satisfy our benefit plan obligations, including the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock.
In addition to the components of total direct compensation identified above, our retirement programs are another important component of our compensation program.
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis contains a more detailed discussion of each of the above components for 2016, including Frederic Cook's recommendations with respect to each component.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-43 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Compensation Governance and Practices
The Compensation Committee annually reviews and considers the Company’s compensation policies and practices to ensure our executive compensation program aligns with our compensation philosophy. Highlighted below is an overview of our current compensation practices.
|
| | | |
What We Do |
| | | |
| • Our compensation program focuses on key Company results (financial, safety, customer satisfaction, diversity) that are aligned with our strategic goals.
• A substantial portion of compensation is at risk and tied to Company performance.
• The compensation program has a long-term orientation aligned with stockholder interests.
• The Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant reviews competitive employment market data from two general industry surveys and a comparison group of companies similar to WEC Energy Group.
• We have implemented a clawback policy that provides for the recoupment of incentive-based compensation. (page P-54)
• Annual incentive-based compensation contains multiple, pre-established performance metrics aligned with stockholder and customer interests. (page P-46)
• The Performance Unit Plan award payouts (including dividend equivalents) are based on stockholder return as compared to an appropriate peer group and, beginning with the 2017 award, Additional Performance Measure(s), if any, selected by the Compensation Committee. | | • The Performance Unit Plan requires a separation from service following a change in control for award vesting to occur. (page P-53)
• Equity award and other benefit plan obligations are satisfied through open market purchases of WEC Energy Group common stock.
• Meaningful stock ownership levels are required for senior executives. (page P-54)
• Ongoing engagement with investors takes place to ensure that compensation practices are responsive to stockholder interests.
• We prohibit hedging and pledging of WEC Energy Group common stock. (page P-54)
• We have a policy that prohibits entry into any new arrangements that obligate the Company to pay directly or reimburse individual tax liability for benefits provided by the Company. (page P-56)
• We prohibit repricing of stock options without stockholder approval.
• The Compensation Committee retains an independent compensation consultant to help design the Company’s compensation program and determine competitive levels of pay. |
Competitive Benchmarking
As a general matter, we believe the labor market for WEC Energy Group executive officers is consistent with that of general industry. Although we recognize our business is focused on the energy services industry, our goal is to have an executive compensation program that will allow us to be competitive in recruiting the most qualified candidates to serve as executive officers of the Company, including individuals who may be employed outside of the energy services industry. Further, in order to retain top performing executive officers, we believe our compensation practices must be competitive with those of general industry.
To confirm that our annual executive compensation is competitive with the market, Frederic Cook reviewed the compensation data obtained from Willis Towers Watson's 2016 Executive Compensation Data Bank as well as similar data from Aon Hewitt. Frederic Cook also analyzed the compensation data from a peer group of 19 companies similar to WEC Energy Group in size and business model. The methodology used by Frederic Cook to determine the peer group of companies is described below.
Frederic Cook started with U.S. companies in the Standard & Poor’s database, and then limited those companies to the same line of business as WEC Energy Group as indicated by the Global Industry Classification Standards. This list of companies was then further limited to companies with revenues between $3 billion and $30 billion (approximately one-third to three times the size of WEC Energy Group’s revenues), and that were within a reasonable size range in various other measures such as operating income, total assets, total employees, and market capitalization. From this list, Frederic Cook selected companies similar in overall size to WEC Energy Group with consideration given to companies that met one or more of the following criteria:
| |
• | Diversified, technically sophisticated utility operations (e.g., multiple utilities, electric utilities); |
| |
• | Minimal non-regulated business; and/or |
| |
• | Operates in the Midwest. |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-44 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
These criteria resulted in a comparison group of 20 companies with median revenues and market capitalization of approximately $12 billion and $17 billion, respectively.
After reviewing the proposed comparison group, the Compensation Committee requested Frederic Cook to conduct additional analysis of the group because the Compensation Committee wanted WEC Energy Group to be positioned closer to the median of the group in various measures of company size besides market capitalization. Based upon this feedback, Frederic Cook removed the two largest companies and added NiSource resulting in a revised comparison group consisting of the 19 companies listed below.
|
| | | |
• Alliant Energy Corporation | • Consolidated Edison, Inc. | • Eversource Energy | • Pinnacle West Capital Corp. |
• Ameren Corporation | • DTE Energy Co. | • FirstEnergy Corp. | • SCANA Corporation |
• American Electric Power Company | • Dominion Resources | • NiSource Inc. | • The Southern Company |
• CMS Energy Corporation | • Edison International | • PG&E Corporation | • Xcel Energy Inc. |
• CenterPoint Energy | • Entergy Inc. | • PPL Corp. | |
The Compensation Committee approved this revised comparison group.
DETERMINATION OF MARKET MEDIAN
In order to determine the “market median” for our NEOs, Frederic Cook recommended that the survey data from Willis Towers Watson and Aon Hewitt receive a 75% weighting and the comparison group of 19 companies receive a 25% weighting. The Compensation Committee agreed with this recommendation. The survey data received a higher weighting because we consider the labor market for our executives to be consistent with that of general industry. Using this methodology, Frederic Cook recommended, and the Compensation Committee approved, the appropriate market median for each of our NEOs.
The comparison of each component of compensation with the appropriate market median when setting the compensation levels of our NEOs drives the allocation of cash versus non-cash compensation and short-term versus long-term incentive compensation.
ANNUAL BASE SALARY
The annual base salary component of our executive compensation program provides each executive officer with a fixed level of annual cash compensation. We believe that providing annual cash compensation through a base salary is an established market practice and is a necessary component of a competitive compensation program.
Based upon the market data analyzed by Frederic Cook, we generally target base salaries to be within (plus or minus) 15% of the market median for each NEO. However, the Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, adjust base salaries outside of this 15% band when the Compensation Committee deems it appropriate.
Actual salary determinations are made taking into consideration factors such as the relative levels of individual experience, performance, responsibility, and contribution to the results of the Company’s operations. At the beginning of each year, our CEO develops a list of goals for WEC Energy Group and our employees to achieve during the upcoming year. At the end of the year, our CEO measures the performance of the Company against each stated goal and reports the results to the Board. The Compensation Committee then takes the Company’s performance into consideration when establishing our CEO’s compensation for the upcoming year. Our CEO undertakes a similar process with the NEOs, who develop individual goals related to the achievement of the Company’s goals developed by our CEO. At the end of the year, each officer’s performance is measured against these goals. Compensation recommendations and determinations for the upcoming year for each executive officer also take into consideration the level of such performance.
Mr. Klappa served as executive Chairman and CEO until his retirement on May 1, 2016. As a result, he received $455,710, which represents a pro-rata portion of his annual base salary that had been established by the Compensation Committee in December 2015. Mr. Klappa’s annual base salary reflected the fact that his tenure of 13 years was longer than many of those in the traditional market median. Following his retirement, Mr. Klappa no longer received base salary and instead received compensation for his service as a director, including service as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board. See "Director Compensation" on page P-33 of this proxy statement.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-45 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Mr. Leverett's base salary was initially set at $825,000. However, in April 2016, in recognition of Mr. Leverett’s new position as WEC Energy Group's CEO, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Leverett’s annual base salary by 21.2% to $1,000,000 effective May 1, 2016.
With respect to each other NEO, in December 2015, Mr. Klappa, then CEO, recommended an annual base salary to the Compensation Committee based upon a review of the market compensation data provided by Frederic Cook and the factors described above. The Compensation Committee approved the recommendations, which represented an average increase in annual base salary of approximately 3% for Messrs. Keyes and Garvin, and Ms. Martin.
In recognition of his appointment as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Lauber’s annual base salary by 35% to $376,165, effective April 1, 2016. In addition, in recognition of his appointment as President of our Wisconsin utilities, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Fletcher’s annual base salary by 6.6% to $420,000, effective May 1, 2016.
Other than with respect to Mr. Lauber, the annual base salary of each NEO was within our targeted range of the market median as discussed above. Mr. Lauber’s base salary was set below the target range because of how significant the one-time increase would have been in order to bring his salary within the range. Therefore, the Compensation Committee intends to increase Mr. Lauber’s salary in multiple steps to move it within the target range.
ANNUAL CASH INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
We provide annual cash incentive compensation through our Short-Term Performance Plan (“STPP”). The STPP provides for annual cash awards to NEOs based upon the achievement of pre-established stockholder, customer, and employee focused objectives. All payments under the STPP are at risk. Payments are made only if performance goals are achieved, and awards may be less or greater than targeted amounts based on actual performance. Payments under the STPP are intended to reward achievement of short-term goals that contribute to stockholder and customer value, as well as individual contributions to successful operations.
2016 Target Awards. Each year, the Compensation Committee approves a target level of compensation under the STPP for each of our NEOs. This target level of compensation is expressed as a percentage of base salary.
In the first quarter of 2016, the target award levels for Messrs. Leverett and Lauber were increased to 110% and 75% of base salary, respectively, in each case in recognition of appointment to their new positions. Therefore, Mr. Leverett's STPP payout level reflects a 90% target level for four months and a 110% target level for eight months; Mr. Lauber's STPP payout level reflects a 45% target level for three months and a 75% target level for nine months.
The year-end 2016 target awards for each NEO (other than Mr. Klappa) were as follows:
|
| |
Executive Officer | Target STPP Award as a Percentage of Base Salary |
Mr. Leverett | 110% |
Mr. Lauber | 75% |
Mr. Keyes | 75% |
Ms. Martin | 70% |
Mr. Garvin | 60% |
Mr. Fletcher | 70% |
The target award levels of each officer named in the table above reflect median incentive compensation practices as indicated by the market data.
Based upon the market data provided by Frederic Cook, Mr. Klappa’s annual incentive target was set at 120% of his base salary. As a result of his retirement as executive Chairman and CEO effective May 1, 2016, Mr. Klappa was entitled to a pro rata amount of his annual incentive, or $1,134,718.
For 2016, the possible payout for any NEO ranged from 0% of the target award to 210% of the target award, based on performance.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-46 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2016 Financial Goals under the STPP. The Compensation Committee adopted the 2016 STPP with a continued principal focus on financial results. In December 2015, the Compensation Committee approved WEC Energy Group’s earnings per share (75% weight) and cash flow (25% weight) as the primary performance measures to be used in 2016. For those officers whose positions primarily relate to utility operations in Wisconsin, the Compensation Committee approved WEC Energy Group’s earnings per share (25% weight) and cash flow (25% weight), as well as aggregate net income of WEC Energy Group’s Wisconsin utility operations (50% weight), as the primary performance measures to be used in 2016. We believe earnings per share and cash flow are key indicators of financial strength and performance and are recognized as such by the investment community. Utility net income is an important financial measure as it is an indicator of the return on equity earned by our utilities, and in order to meet our earnings per share targets it is important that our utilities earn at or close to their authorized rate of return.
In January 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the performance goals under the STPP for WEC Energy Group’s earnings per share as follows:
|
| | |
Earnings Per Share Performance Goal | Earnings Per Share CAGR | Payout Level |
$2.81 | 3.4% | 25% |
$2.83 | 4.2% | 50% |
$2.86 | 5.1% | 100% |
$2.88 | 5.9% | 135% |
$2.94 | 8.0% | 200% |
If the Company’s performance falls between these levels, the payout level with respect to earnings per share is determined by interpolating on a straight line basis the appropriate payout level.
The Company’s growth plan, which has been communicated to the public, calls for a long-term compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) in earnings per share of 5.0% to 7.0% off of a 2015 base of $2.72 per share, with 6.0% to 8.0% growth in 2016. At the time the Compensation Committee was establishing targets for 2016, we believed that this CAGR plus our continued growth in dividends would support a premium valuation as compared to the Company’s peers. Therefore, the above target (135%) and maximum payout levels (200%) were tied to achievement of the 6.0% to 8.0% growth in 2016. The target (100%) payout level was tied to a 5.1% CAGR as the Compensation Committee thought it appropriate that the NEOs and other Company employees be awarded for achieving a CAGR within the Company’s long-term CAGR range in 2016. The CAGR at each of the threshold (25%) and below target (50%) payout levels recognizes that the acquisition of Integrys would still have achieved one of our criteria for entering into the transaction - that it be accretive to earnings in the first full year after the acquisition.
In January 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the performance goals under the STPP for WEC Energy Group’s cash flow as follows ($ in millions):
|
| |
Cash Flow | Payout Level |
$(300) | 25% |
$(275) | 50% |
$(250) | 100% |
$(220) | 135% |
$(200) | 200% |
If the Company's performance falls between these levels, the payout level with respect to cash flow is determined by interpolating on a straight line basis the appropriate payout level.
Once the Compensation Committee established the earnings per share performance level goals, it set the cash flow performance levels at the amount of cash flow estimated to be necessary to achieve the corresponding earnings per share performance level. In the judgment of the Compensation Committee, these cash flow targets reasonably represented the amount of cash flow necessary to achieve a combination of earnings per share performance and appropriate capital spending levels given the scope of WEC Energy Group's construction program.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-47 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
In January 2016, the Compensation Committee approved the performance goals under the STPP for the Wisconsin utilities’ net income (based on the earnings per share performance goals) as follows ($ in millions):
|
| | |
Net Income | Weighted Return on Equity | Payout Level |
$540 | 9.88% | 25% |
$545 | 9.97% | 50% |
$550 | 10.05% | 100% |
$555 | 10.14% | 135% |
$564 | 10.30% | 200% |
2016 Financial Performance under the STPP. In January 2017, the Compensation Committee reviewed our actual performance for 2016 against the financial and operational performance goals established under the STPP, subject to final audit.
WEC Energy Group’s 2016 financial performance satisfied the maximum payout level established for earnings per share, cash flow, and net income for the Wisconsin utilities. WEC Energy Group’s GAAP earnings per share and adjusted earnings per share were $2.96 and $2.97, respectively, for 2016. WEC Energy Group’s cash flow was $153.3 million, and the Wisconsin utilities’ net income was $567.5 million for 2016. Cash flow is measured by subtracting WEC Energy Group’s cash used in capital expenditures and for the payment of dividends from WEC Energy Group’s cash provided by operations. Net income is measured against the net income from WEC Energy Group’s Wisconsin segment excluding contributions to the Wisconsin utilities’ charitable foundations. Our adjusted earnings per share, cash flow, and net income are not measures of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles.
By satisfying the maximum payout level with respect to these financial measures, the NEOs earned 200% of the target award from the financial goal component of the STPP.
2016 WEC Energy Group Operational Goals and Performance under the STPP. Similar to prior years, in December 2015 and January 2016, the Compensation Committee also approved operational performance measures and targets under the STPP. Annual incentive awards could be increased or decreased by up to 10% of the target award based upon WEC Energy Group’s performance in the operational areas of customer satisfaction (5% weight), safety (2.5% weight), and supplier and workforce diversity (2.5% weight). The Compensation Committee recognizes the importance of strong operational results to the success of the Company and has identified these three operational areas in particular as being critical to that success.
The following table provides the operational goals approved by the Compensation Committee for 2016, as well as WEC Energy Group’s performance against these goals:
|
| | | | |
Operational Measure | Below Goal | Goal | Above Goal | Final Result |
Customer Satisfaction: | -5.00% | 0.00% | +5.00% | |
Percentage of “Highly Satisfied” - Company | <72.3% | 72.3% - 78.4% | >78.4% | 80.2% |
Transaction | <80.2% | 80.2% - 85.6% | >85.6% | 86.7% |
Safety: | -2.50% | 0.00% | +2.50% | |
Lost Time Injury - Incidents | >75 | 54 - 75 | <54 | 49 |
OSHA Recordable Incidents | >225 | 184 - 225 | <184 | 163 |
Diversity: | -2.50% | 0.00% | +2.50% | |
Supplier ($ in Millions) | <133.5 | 133.5 - 177.4 | >177.4 | 171.0 |
Workforce - Assessment | Not Met | Met | Exceeded | Met |
WEC Energy Group’s performance with respect to operational goals generated a 7.5% increase to the compensation awarded under the STPP for 2016 as WEC Energy Group exceeded the customer satisfaction and safety target performance measures. The Compensation Committee measured customer satisfaction levels based on the results of surveys that an independent third party conducted of customers who had direct contact with our utilities during the year, which measured (1) customers’ satisfaction with the respective utility overall, and (2) customers’ satisfaction with respect to the particular transactions with the applicable utility.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-48 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
2016 Wisconsin Utilities Operational Goals and Performance under the STPP. For those officers whose positions primarily relate to utility operations in Wisconsin, STPP awards could be increased or decreased by up to 10% based upon performance in the operational areas of customer satisfaction (5% weight), safety (2.5% weight), and supplier diversity (1.25% weight) for WEC Energy Group’s Wisconsin utility operations, as well as WEC Energy Group’s performance in the operational area of workforce diversity (1.25% weight). The following table provides the operational goals approved by the Compensation Committee for 2016 for WEC Energy Group’s Wisconsin utility operations, as well as the Company’s performance against these goals:
|
| | | | |
Operational Measure | Below Goal | Goal | Above Goal | Final Result |
Customer Satisfaction: | -5.00% | 0.00% | +5.00% | |
Percentage of “Highly Satisfied” - Company | <75.0% | 75.0% - 81.0% | >81.0% | 82.2% |
Transaction | <83.0% | 83.0% - 89.0% | >89.0% | 88.8% |
Safety: | -2.50% | 0.00% | +2.50% | |
Lost Time Injury - Incidents | >26 | 16 - 26 | <16 | 26 |
OSHA Recordable Incidents | >112 | 88 - 112 | <88 | 88 |
Diversity: | -2.50% | 0.00% | +2.50% | |
Supplier ($ in Millions) | <73.5 | 73.5 - 102.4 | >102.4 | 105.8 |
Workforce - Assessment | Not Met | Met | Exceeded | Met |
The Wisconsin utilities' performance with respect to operational goals generated a 3.75% increase to the compensation awarded under the STPP for 2016. The Compensation Committee measured customer satisfaction levels based on the results of surveys that an independent third party conducted of customers who had direct contact with our Wisconsin utilities during the year, which measured (1) customers’ satisfaction with the specific Wisconsin utility overall, and (2) customers’ satisfaction with respect to their particular transactions with their specific utility. Our Wisconsin utilities exceeded target level performance with respect to the first customer satisfaction measure; those utilities also exceeded target level performance with respect to supplier diversity.
The Compensation Committee retains the right to exercise discretion in adjusting awards under the STPP when it deems appropriate, but did not factor individual contributions into determining the amount of the awards for the NEOs for 2016. Because the Company’s performance against the financial and operational goals resulted in significant STPP awards in 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that no further adjustments based upon individual contributions or otherwise were appropriate.
Based on the Company’s performance against the financial and operational goals established by the Compensation Committee, Mr. Leverett received annual incentive cash compensation under the STPP of $2,035,229 for 2016. This represented 216% of his annual base salary. Messrs. Lauber, Keyes, Garvin, and Fletcher, and Ms. Martin, received annual cash incentive compensation for 2016 under the STPP equal to 143%, 156%, 124%, 143%, and 145% of their respective annual base salaries, representing a range of 203.75% to 207.5% of the target award for each officer.
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee administers our 1993 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, amended and restated effective January 1, 2016, which is a stockholder-approved, long-term incentive plan designed to link the interests of our executives and other key employees to creating long-term stockholder value. It allows for various types of awards tied to the performance of our common stock, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, and restricted stock. The Compensation Committee also administers the WEC Energy Group Performance Unit Plan, under which the Compensation Committee may award performance units. The Compensation Committee primarily uses (1) performance units, including dividend-equivalents, (2) stock options, and (3) restricted stock to deliver long-term incentive opportunities.
Performance Units. Each year, the Compensation Committee makes annual grants of performance units under the Performance Unit Plan. The performance units are designed to provide a form of long-term incentive compensation that aligns the interests of management with those of a typical utility stockholder who is focused not only on stock price appreciation but also on dividends. In 2016, under the terms of the performance units, payouts were based on the Company’s level of “total stockholder return” (stock price appreciation plus reinvested dividends) in comparison to a peer group of companies over a three-year performance period. The performance units are settled in cash.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-49 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Changes to Performance Unit Plan. On December 1, 2016, based upon feedback we received from stockholders during our investor outreach efforts, the Compensation Committee amended and restated the Performance Unit Plan, effective January 1, 2017, to provide for an Additional Performance Measure in addition to the performance measure of total stockholder return. “Additional Performance Measure” is defined as the performance criterion or criteria (if any) that the Compensation Committee selects, in its sole discretion, based on the attainment of specific levels of performance by WEC Energy Group. Performance units will continue to vest in an amount between 0% and 175% of the target award based upon WEC Energy Group’s comparative total stockholder return over a three-year performance period. However, the vesting percentage may be adjusted based upon WEC Energy’s performance against the Additional Performance Measure(s).
The Additional Performance Measure(s), if any, must be selected by the Compensation Committee at the beginning of the three-year performance period. For each year during the performance period, the Compensation Committee will select the target(s) for the Additional Performance Measure(s) and the potential adjustment to the vesting percentage for that year based on achievement of the Additional Performance Measure(s) relative to the selected target(s). The actual adjustment, if any, to the vesting percentage based upon the Additional Performance Measure(s) will be determined annually. In no event will any adjustment cause the vesting percentage over the three-year performance period to be less than zero. For the 2017 performance unit awards, the Compensation Committee selected performance against the weighted average authorized return on equity of all WEC Energy Group’s utility subsidiaries as the Additional Performance Measure. In order to achieve our financial goals, it is important that the Company’s utilities earn at or close to their authorized return on equity.
Short-Term Dividend Equivalents. Prior to January 1, 2016, certain officers, including the NEOs, and employees were eligible to receive dividend equivalents under the STPP in an amount equal to the number of performance units at the target 100% rate held by each such officer or employee on the dividend declaration date multiplied by the amount of cash dividends paid by the Company on a share of our common stock on such date. The short-term dividend equivalents vested at the end of each year only if the Company achieved the performance target or targets for that year established by the Compensation Committee in the same manner as the performance targets are established under the STPP for the annual incentive awards.
In 2015, the Compensation Committee determined that short-term dividend equivalents should no longer vest annually on unearned performance units and, therefore, would no longer be issued under the STPP. Therefore, in December 2015, the Compensation Committee amended and restated the Company’s Performance Unit Plan effective January 1, 2016, to provide for short-term dividend equivalents. Pursuant to the amendments to the Performance Unit Plan, beginning with the 2016 awards of performance units, we increase the number of unvested performance units as of any date that we declare a cash dividend on our common stock by the amount of the short-term dividend equivalents. Short-term dividend equivalents are calculated by multiplying (a) the number of unvested performance units held by a plan participant as of the related dividend record date by (b) the amount of cash dividend payable by the Company on a share of common stock; and (c) dividing the result by the closing price for a share of the Company's common stock on the dividend payment date. In effect, short-term dividend equivalents will be credited and accumulated as reinvested dividends on each performance unit so that the performance units and accumulated dividends will be paid out at the end of the three-year performance period, rather than paying out the dividend equivalents annually on unearned performance units.
Short-term dividend equivalents will be treated as additional unvested performance units and will be subject to the same vesting, forfeiture, payment, termination, and other terms and conditions as the original performance units to which they relate. In addition, outstanding short-term dividend equivalents will be treated as unvested performance units for purposes of calculating future short-term dividend equivalents.
Stock Options. Each year, the Compensation Committee also makes annual stock option grants as part of our long-term incentive program. These stock options have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant and expire on the 10th anniversary of the grant date. Since management benefits from a stock option award only to the extent our stock price appreciates above the exercise price of the stock option, stock options align the interests of management with those of our stockholders in attaining long-term stock price appreciation.
Restricted Stock. The Compensation Committee also awards restricted stock as part of the long-term incentive plan, consistent with market practice. Similar to performance units, restricted stock aligns the interests of management with a typical utility stockholder who is focused on stock price appreciation and dividends.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-50 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
Aggregate 2016 Long-Term Incentive Awards. In establishing the target value of long-term incentive awards and the appropriate mix of performance units, stock options, and restricted stock for each NEO in 2016, the Compensation Committee reviewed the market compensation data and analysis provided by Frederic Cook. Based on Frederic Cook’s analysis, the Compensation Committee determined that the long-term incentive awards would be weighted 65% performance units, 20% stock options, and 15% restricted stock. These target values were presented to and approved by the Compensation Committee in December 2015. In addition, based upon the recommendation by Frederic Cook, effective May 2, 2016, the Compensation Committee awarded Mr. Leverett additional long-term incentive awards consisting of performance units, stock options, and restricted stock equal to a value of $1,238,333 in order to better align his total 2016 long-term incentive award with that of a CEO at a company similar in size to WEC Energy Group. Mr. Leverett’s appointment was effective on Sunday, May 1, 2016, a non-trading day.
Based upon the market data provided by Frederic Cook, we target the long-term incentive award to be within (plus or minus) 20% of the market median value of long-term incentive compensation. All of the NEO’s long-term incentive awards were within this target range for 2016.
2016 Stock Option Grants. In December 2015, the Compensation Committee approved the grant of stock options to each of our NEOs and established an overall pool of options that were granted to approximately 200 other employees. The option grants to the NEOs were made effective January 4, 2016, the first trading day of 2016. The options were granted with an exercise price equal to the average of the high and low prices reported on the NYSE for shares of WEC Energy Group common stock on the grant date. The options were granted in accordance with our standard practice of making annual stock option grants effective on the first trading day of each year, and the timing of the grants was not tied to the timing of any release of material information. In addition, as discussed above, in April 2016, the Compensation Committee approved a grant of additional stock options to Mr. Leverett effective as of May 2, 2016.
These stock options have a term of 10 years and vest 100% on the third anniversary of the date of grant. The vesting of the stock options may be accelerated in connection with a change in control or an executive officer’s termination of employment. Subject to the limitations of the 1993 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, the Compensation Committee has the power to amend the terms of any option (with the participant’s consent). See “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” beginning on page P-70 for additional information.
For purposes of determining the appropriate number of options to grant to a particular NEO, the value of an option was determined based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model for purposes of the compensation valuation. The following table provides the number of options granted to each NEO in 2016.
|
| | |
Executive Officer | Options Granted |
Mr. Leverett | 125,134 |
|
Mr. Lauber | 6,720 |
|
Mr. Klappa | 190,830 |
|
Mr. Keyes | 37,665 |
|
Ms. Martin | 24,850 |
|
Mr. Garvin | 17,210 |
|
Mr. Fletcher | 14,260 |
|
For financial reporting purposes, the stock options granted on January 4, 2016 had a grant date fair value of $5.71 per option for Messrs. Leverett, Lauber, Keyes, Garvin, and Fletcher, and a grant date fair value of $4.28 for Mr. Klappa and Ms. Martin. Mr. Klappa and Ms. Martin are considered to be “retirement eligible.” Therefore, their options are presumed to have a shorter expected life, which results in a lower option value. For financial reporting purposes, the stock options granted on May 2, 2016 to Mr. Leverett had a grant date fair value of $6.99 per option.
2016 Restricted Stock Awards. In December 2015, the Compensation Committee also approved the grant of restricted stock to each of our NEOs and established an overall pool of restricted stock that was granted to approximately 200 other employees. The grants to the NEOs were also made effective January 4, 2016. The restricted stock vests in three equal annual installments beginning on January 4, 2017.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-51 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
The vesting of the restricted stock may be accelerated in connection with a termination of employment due to a change in control, death or disability, or by action of the Compensation Committee. See “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” beginning on page P-70 for additional information. Tax withholding obligations related to vesting may be satisfied, at the option of the executive officer, by withholding shares otherwise deliverable upon vesting or by cash. The NEOs have the right to vote the restricted stock and to receive cash dividends when the Company pays a dividend to our stockholders.
For purposes of determining the appropriate number of shares of restricted stock to grant to a particular NEO, the Compensation Committee used a value of $50.024 per share. This value was based on the volume weighted price of WEC Energy Group’s common stock for the ten trading days beginning on December 7, 2015 and ending on December 18, 2015. The Compensation Committee uses the volume weighted price in order to minimize the impact of day to day volatility in the stock market. The measurement period is customarily early to mid-December for annual awards to shorten the timeframe between the calculation of the awards and the actual grant date. The following table provides the number of shares of restricted stock granted to each NEO in January 2016.
|
| | |
Executive Officer | Restricted Stock Granted |
Mr. Leverett | 7,173 |
|
Mr. Lauber | 585 |
|
Mr. Klappa | 16,602 |
|
Mr. Keyes | 3,276 |
|
Ms. Martin | 2,160 |
|
Mr. Garvin | 1,497 |
|
Mr. Fletcher | 1,239 |
|
As discussed above, in April 2016, the Compensation Committee approved a grant of 3,186 shares of restricted stock to Mr. Leverett, effective as of May 2, 2016, in connection with his appointment as CEO, that vests in three equal annual installments beginning May 2, 2017. The Compensation Committee also granted 2,858 shares of restricted stock to Mr. Klappa, effective as of May 2, 2016, in connection with his appointment as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board, that vests three years following the grant date on May 2, 2019.
In addition, in connection with Mr. Klappa’s retirement as CEO, and in light of WEC Energy Group’s industry-leading performance during his tenure and his significant contributions to the development and execution of the Company's strategic plan, the Compensation Committee vested the remaining balance of several awards of restricted stock to Mr. Klappa, consisting of 47,181 shares.
2016 Performance Units. In 2016, the Compensation Committee granted performance units to each of our NEOs and approved a pool of performance units that were granted to approximately 200 other employees. With respect to the 2016 performance units, the amount of the benefit that ultimately vests will be dependent upon the Company’s total stockholder return over a three-year period ending December 31, 2018, as compared to the total stockholder return of the custom peer group described below. Total stockholder return is the calculation of total return (stock price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends) based upon an initial investment of $100 and subsequent $100 investments at the end of each quarter during the three-year performance period.
Upon vesting, the performance units will be settled in cash in an amount determined by multiplying the number of performance units that have vested by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the last trading day of the performance period.
In addition to WEC Energy Group, the 2016 performance unit peer group originally included:
|
| | | |
• Alliant Energy Corporation | • DTE Energy Co. | • Great Plains Energy, Inc. | • SCANA Corporation |
• Ameren Corporation | • Duke Energy Corp. | • NiSource Inc. | • The Southern Company |
• American Electric Power Company | • Edison International | • OGE Energy Corp. | • Westar Energy, Inc. |
• CMS Energy Corporation | • Eversource Energy | • PG&E Corporation | • Xcel Energy Inc. |
• Consolidated Edison, Inc. | • FirstEnergy Corp. | • Pinnacle West Capital Corp. | |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-52 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
The peer group is chosen by the Compensation Committee, based upon management’s recommendation and with the concurrence of Frederic Cook. This peer group was chosen because we believe these companies are similar to WEC Energy Group in terms of business model and long-term strategies, with a focus on regulated utility operations rather than a non-regulated business model. There is significant overlap between the performance unit peer group and the comparison group developed by Frederic Cook for purposes of benchmarking compensation levels. However, there are several companies that are different among the two groups because Frederic Cook places significant weight on the financial metrics of the companies included in its comparison group, whereas we focus more on operational measures for the performance unit peer group.
In December 2016, the Compensation Committee determined that Westar Energy, Inc. should be removed from the custom peer group for the outstanding 2014 - 2016 performance unit awards, and should not be included in any future peer groups. On May 31, 2016, Great Plains Energy announced that it had entered into an agreement to purchase Westar Energy. Upon this announcement, there was a significant increase in Westar Energy’s stock price which we believe was not the result of ongoing operating performance. This action is consistent with the Compensation Committee’s past decisions to adjust the peer group to account for the impact of mergers and acquisitions.
The required percentile ranking for total stockholder return and the applicable vesting percentage are set forth in the chart below.
|
| |
Performance Percentile Rank | Vesting Percent |
< 25th Percentile | 0% |
25th Percentile | 25% |
Target (50th Percentile) | 100% |
75th Percentile | 125% |
90th Percentile | 175% |
If the Company’s rank is between the benchmarks identified above, the vesting percentage will be determined by interpolating on a straight line basis the appropriate vesting percentage. Unvested performance units generally are immediately forfeited upon a NEO’s cessation of employment with WEC Energy Group prior to completion of the three-year performance period. However, the performance units will vest immediately at the target 100% rate upon the termination of the NEO’s employment (1) by reason of disability or death or (2) after a change in control of WEC Energy Group. In addition, a prorated number of performance units (based upon the target 100% rate) will vest upon the termination of employment of the NEO by reason of retirement prior to the end of the three-year performance period.
For purposes of determining the appropriate number of performance units to grant to a particular NEO, the Compensation Committee used a value of $50.024 per unit, the same value used for the restricted stock granted in January 2016. The following table provides the number of units granted to each NEO effective January 4, 2016, at the 100% target level.
|
| | |
Executive Officer | Performance Units Granted |
Mr. Leverett | 31,090 |
|
Mr. Lauber | 2,535 |
|
Mr. Klappa | 71,945 |
|
Mr. Keyes | 14,200 |
|
Ms. Martin | 9,370 |
|
Mr. Garvin | 6,490 |
|
Mr. Fletcher | 5,375 |
|
With respect to the additional 13,800 performance units granted to Mr. Leverett effective May 2, 2016 in connection with his appointment as CEO, the Compensation Committee used a value of $58.325 per unit, the same value used for the additional restricted stock granted to Mr. Leverett in May 2016.
2016 Payouts under Previously Granted Long-Term Incentive Awards. In 2014, the Compensation Committee granted performance unit awards to participants in the Performance Unit Plan, including the NEOs. The terms of the performance units granted in 2014 were substantially similar to those of the performance units granted in 2016
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-53 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
described above, and the required performance percentile ranks and related vesting schedule were identical to that of the 2016 units.
Payouts under the 2014 performance units were based on our total stockholder return for the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2016 against the same group of peer companies used for the 2016 performance unit awards, except that the 2014 peer group included Avista Corporation and Portland General Electric, but did not include Edison International.
Accounting for these changes, our total stockholder return was at the 42nd percentile of the peer group for the three-year performance period ended December 31, 2016, resulting in the performance units vesting at a level of 76.3%. The actual payouts were determined by multiplying the number of vested performance units by the closing price of our common stock ($58.65) on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of the performance period. The actual payout to each NEO is reflected in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 2016” table.
COMPENSATION RECOUPMENT POLICY
Accountability is a fundamental value of WEC Energy Group. To reinforce this value through the Company’s executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee has adopted a clawback policy that provides for the recoupment of incentive-based compensation in the event WEC Energy Group is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws (other than restatements permitted as a result of changes in accounting principles or interpretation). Pursuant to the policy, the Compensation Committee will recover from any current or former executive officer who has received incentive-based compensation during the three-year period preceding the date on which WEC Energy Group is required to prepare the accounting restatement, any portion of the incentive-based compensation paid in excess of what would have been paid to the executive officer under the restated financial results. The Company may also recover incentive-based compensation if an executive officer’s employment is terminated for cause, or the executive officer violates a noncompetition or other restrictive covenant.
STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
The Compensation Committee believes that an important adjunct to the long-term incentive program is significant stock ownership by officers who participate in the program, including the NEOs. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee has implemented stock ownership guidelines requiring officers who participate in the long-term incentive program to hold an amount of Company common stock and other equity-related Company securities that varies depending upon such officer's level.
In addition to shares owned outright, holdings of each of the following are included in determining compliance with our stock ownership guidelines: restricted stock; WEC Energy Group phantom stock units held in the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan; WEC Energy Group stock held in the WEC Energy Group 401(k) plan and the WEC Energy Group Retirement Savings Plan; performance units at target; and shares held by a brokerage account, jointly with an immediate family member or in a trust.
Until December 31, 2016, the guidelines required each executive officer, including the NEOs, to acquire (generally within five years of appointment as an executive officer) and hold common stock and other equity-related securities of the Company having a minimum fair market value ranging from 250% to 500% of base salary. Effective January 1, 2017, the Compensation Committee changed the range to 250% to 600% of base salary. The Compensation Committee believes these stock ownership guidelines discourage unreasonable risk taking by Company officers.
The Compensation Committee annually reviews whether executive officers are in compliance with these guidelines. The last review was completed in July 2016. The Compensation Committee determined that the CEO is in compliance with the new ownership guidelines, and all of the other NEOs are in compliance or making appropriate progress to comply with these guidelines.
PROHIBITION ON HEDGING AND PLEDGING
WEC Energy Group's Corporate Securities Trading Policy prohibits the use of any strategies or products, including derivatives and short-selling techniques, to hedge against potential changes in the value of WEC Energy Group’s
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-54 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
common stock. The policy also prohibits the holding of WEC Energy Group securities in a margin account, as well as the pledging of WEC Energy Group securities as collateral for a loan.
LIMITED TRADING WINDOWS
Officers, including the NEOs, other key employees, and the Company’s directors may only transact in WEC Energy Group securities during approved trading windows after satisfying mandatory pre-clearance requirements.
RETIREMENT PROGRAMS
We also maintain retirement plans in which our NEOs participate: a defined benefit pension plan of the cash balance type, a supplemental executive retirement plan, and individual letter agreements with some of the NEOs. We believe our retirement plans are a valuable benefit in the attraction and retention of our employees, including the NEOs. We believe that providing a foundation for long-term financial security for our employees, beyond their employment with the Company, is a valuable component of our overall compensation program which will inspire increased loyalty and improved performance. For more information about our retirement plans, see "Pension Benefits at Fiscal Year-End 2016" and "Retirement Plans."
The Compensation Committee did not amend or otherwise modify Mr. Leverett's employment agreement, dated as of December 28, 2008, in any way in connection with his service as CEO.
OTHER BENEFITS, INCLUDING PERQUISITES
We provide our executive officers, including the NEOs, with employee benefits and a limited number of perquisites. Except as specifically noted elsewhere in this proxy statement, the employee benefits programs in which executive officers participate (which provide benefits such as medical coverage, retirement benefits, and annual contributions to a qualified savings plan) are generally the same programs offered to substantially all of the Company’s salaried employees.
The perquisites made available to executive officers include financial planning, membership in a service that provides health care and safety management when traveling outside the United States, payment of the cost of a mandatory physical exam that the Board requires annually, limited spousal travel for business purposes, and monitoring costs related to a residential security system. The Company also pays periodic dues and fees for club memberships for certain of the NEOs and other designated officers.
We customarily review market data regarding executive perquisite practices on an annual basis. Following our acquisition of Integrys, the Compensation Committee undertook a thorough review of WEC Energy Group’s perquisite practices with Frederic Cook. For 2016, Frederic Cook recommended to the Compensation Committee that the Company retain our current package of perquisites. WEC Energy Group has a legacy group of executives who are still eligible for gross-ups. We reimburse those executives for taxes paid on income attributable to the financial planning benefits provided to the executives only if the executive uses the Company’s identified preferred provider, AYCO. We believe the use of the preferred financial adviser provides administrative benefits and eases communication between Company personnel and the financial adviser.
We pay periodic dues and fees for certain club memberships as we have found that the use of these facilities helps foster better customer and community relationships. Officers, including the NEOs, are expected to use clubs for which the Company pays dues primarily for business purposes. We do not pay any additional expenses incurred for personal use of these facilities, and officers are required to reimburse the Company to the extent that it pays for any such personal use. The total annual club dues are included in the "Summary Compensation Table." We do not permit personal use of the airplane utilized by the Company. We do allow spousal travel if an executive’s spouse is accompanying the executive on business travel and the airplane is not fully utilized by Company personnel. There is no incremental cost to the Company for this travel, other than the reimbursement for taxes paid on imputed income attributable to the executives for this perquisite, as the airplane cost is the same regardless of whether an executive’s spouse travels.
In addition, each of our executive officers is eligible to participate in an officer life insurance benefit. If an executive officer chooses to participate, upon such officer’s death while employed by the Company, a benefit is paid to his or her designated beneficiary in an amount equal to the value of three times the officer’s base salary at the time of death.
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-55 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
TAX GROSS-UP POLICY
The Compensation Committee adopted a formal policy that prohibits entry into any contract, agreement, or arrangement with any officer of the Company that obligates the Company to pay directly or reimburse the officer for any portion of the officer’s individual tax liability for benefits provided by the Company. Excluded from this policy are (1) agreements or arrangements entered into prior to December 2014 when the policy was adopted, (2) agreements or arrangements entered into prior to, and assumed by the Company in connection with, any merger or acquisition, or (3) plans or policies applicable to Company employees generally.
This policy formalizes WEC Energy Group’s practice since the beginning of 2006 to not include any provisions requiring a gross-up for excise tax in any new executive employment agreement, as well as the Compensation Committee’s policy since July 2011 to eliminate tax gross-ups on perquisites provided by the Company to its officers (except to officers who were already receiving gross-ups as of July 2011). Of the NEOs, Messrs. Leverett, Lauber, Klappa, and Garvin, and Ms. Martin, were receiving gross-ups from the Company prior to July 2011.
SEVERANCE BENEFITS AND CHANGE IN CONTROL
Several years ago, the Compensation Committee determined that it would no longer offer severance and change in control benefits in employment agreements. Therefore, Messrs. Lauber, Keyes, and Garvin, and Ms. Martin, have not entered into an employment agreement that provides for these benefits. However, they are eligible to participate in the Company’s Severance Pay Plan. Prior to that time, each of Messrs. Leverett, Klappa, and Fletcher entered into an employment agreement with the Company which includes severance and change in control provisions. For a discussion of the severance and change in control benefits available under these agreements, and to our executive officers generally, see “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control.”
In addition, our supplemental pension plan provides that in the event of a change in control, each NEO will be entitled to a lump sum payment of amounts due under the plan if employment is terminated within 18 months of the change in control.
IMPACT OF PRIOR COMPENSATION
The Compensation Committee does not believe it is appropriate to consider the amounts realized or realizable from prior incentive compensation awards when establishing future levels of short-term and long-term incentive compensation.
SECTION 162(m) OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code limits the deductibility of certain executives’ compensation that exceeds $1 million per year, unless the compensation is performance-based under Section 162(m) and is issued through a plan that has been approved by stockholders. Although the Compensation Committee takes into consideration the provisions of Section 162(m), it believes that maintaining tax deductibility is only one consideration among many in the design of an effective executive compensation program.
With respect to 2016 compensation for the NEOs, the stock option grants under the 1993 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan have been structured to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). The remaining components of the 2016 compensation program do not qualify for tax deductibility under Section 162(m).
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
|
| |
| The Compensation Committee |
| |
| John F. Bergstrom, Committee Chair Thomas J. Fischer Ulice Payne, Jr. |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-56 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES
The following table summarizes total compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to WEC Energy Group’s Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), and each of the other individuals identified in the table below (the “NEOs”).
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus | (5) Stock Awards | (7) Option Awards | (8) Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | (10) Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings | (11) (12) All Other Compensation | Total | Total Without Change in Pension Value |
| | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) |
Allen L. Leverett President and Chief Executive Officer
| 2016 | 941,667 |
| — | 2,939,251 |
| 769,144 |
| 2,162,593 |
| 4,549,812 |
| 140,512 |
| 11,502,979 |
| 6,963,294 |
|
2015 | 799,155 |
| — | 2,762,955 |
| 481,762 |
| 1,680,500 |
| 925,639 |
| 132,014 |
| 6,782,025 |
| 5,858,590 |
|
2014 | 774,000 |
| — | 1,759,152 |
| 671,616 |
| 1,598,927 |
| 1,578,300 |
| 125,250 |
| 6,507,245 |
| 4,928,945 |
|
Scott J. Lauber(1) Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | 2016 | 351,784 |
| — | 158,886 |
| 38,371 |
| 513,010 |
| 65,818 |
| 38,116 |
| 1,165,985 |
| 1,103,685 |
|
Gale E. Klappa(2) Non-Executive Chairman of the Board | 2016 | 589,043(3) |
| — | 7,427,755(6) |
| 816,752 |
| 1,179,632(9) |
| 925,719 |
| 210,435 |
| 11,149,336 |
| 10,250,269 |
|
2015 | 1,324,739 |
| — | 5,388,193 |
| 809,646 |
| 3,454,116 |
| 2,573,492 |
| 276,582 |
| 13,826,768 |
| 11,260,113 |
|
2014 | 1,283,040 |
| — | 3,969,744 |
| 1,061,898 |
| 3,289,058 |
| 2,647,425 |
| 246,641 |
| 12,497,806 |
| 9,850,381 |
|
J. Patrick Keyes(2) Executive Vice President-Strategy | 2016 | 546,400 |
| — | 889,965 |
| 215,067 |
| 904,320 |
| 111,973 |
| 73,034 |
| 2,740,759 |
| 2,630,909 |
|
2015 | 531,002 |
| — | 1,121,231 |
| 201,993 |
| 911,839 |
| 90,080 |
| 71,410 |
| 2,927,555 |
| 2,837,539 |
|
2014 | 515,536 |
| — | 752,317 |
| 287,248 |
| 846,957 |
| 105,365 |
| 70,153 |
| 2,577,576 |
| 2,472,211 |
|
Susan H. Martin Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary | 2016 | 515,000 |
| — | 587,165 |
| 106,358 |
| 779,035 |
| 102,117 |
| 113,108 |
| 2,202,783 |
| 2,103,032 |
|
2015 | 475,000 |
| — | 824,278 |
| 87,032 |
| 741,831 |
| 86,748 |
| 58,343 |
| 2,273,232 |
| 2,186,678 |
|
2014 | 430,499 |
| — | 429,204 |
| 114,795 |
| 649,371 |
| 79,808 |
| 110,671 |
| 1,814,348 |
| 1,734,540 |
|
Robert M. Garvin Executive Vice President - External Affairs | 2016 | 416,120 |
| — | 406,738 |
| 98,269 |
| 541,443 |
| 75,596 |
| 65,541 |
| 1,603,707 |
| 1,528,639 |
|
2015 | 404,000 |
| — | 709,707 |
| 88,189 |
| 539,575 |
| 60,584 |
| 62,499 |
| 1,864,554 |
| 1,804,019 |
|
2014 | 386,548 |
| 30,000(4) | 323,646 |
| 123,572 |
| 505,437 |
| 72,709 |
| 61,126 |
| 1,503,038 |
| 1,430,329 |
|
J. Kevin Fletcher(1) President - WE, WG and WPS | 2016 | 411,345 |
| — | 336,818 |
| 81,425 |
| 606,866 |
| 671,274 |
| 39,869 |
| 2,147,597 |
| 1,482,133 |
|
Note: In order to show the effect that the year-over-year change in pension value had on total compensation, as determined under applicable SEC rules, we have included an additional column to show total compensation minus the change in pension value. The amounts reported in the Total Without Change in Pension Value column may differ substantially from the amounts reported in the Total column required under SEC rules and are not a substitute for total compensation. Total Without Change in Pension Value represents total compensation, as determined under applicable SEC rules, minus the change in pension value reported in the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column. The change in pension value is subject to many external variables, such as interest rates, that are not related to Company performance. Therefore, we do not believe a year-over-year change in pension value is helpful in evaluating compensation for comparative purposes.
| |
(1) | Mr. Lauber, who was named Executive Vice President and CFO effective April 1, 2016, and Mr. Fletcher, who was named President of the Wisconsin utilities effective May 1, 2016, became named executive officers in 2016. Therefore, no information has been provided for 2014 and 2015 for either officer. |
| |
(2) | Mr. Klappa was the executive Chairman of the Board and CEO of WEC Energy Group until May 1, 2016, at which time he retired and became Non-Executive Chairman of the Board. Mr. Keyes was Executive Vice President and CFO until April 1, 2016, at which time he became Executive Vice President-Strategy of WEC Energy Group and President of our Minnesota and Michigan utilities. |
| |
(3) | Includes pro rata Board of Director fees earned by Mr. Klappa in the amount of $133,333. |
| |
(4) | Constitutes discretionary bonus paid to Mr. Garvin for exceptional work on legislative and regulatory matters during 2014. |
| |
(5) | The amounts reported reflect the aggregate grant date fair value, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 excluding estimated forfeitures, of performance units and restricted stock awarded to each NEO in the respective year for which such amounts are |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-57 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
reported. The amounts reported for the performance units are based upon the probable outcome as of the grant date of associated performance and market conditions, and are consistent with our estimate, as of the grant date, of aggregate compensation cost to be recognized over the three-year performance period. The actual value received by the executives from these awards may range from $0 to greater than the reported amounts, depending upon the Company’s performance and the executive’s number of additional years of service with the Company.
The value of the performance unit awards as of the grant date, assuming achievement of the highest level of performance and excluding any performance units resulting from short-term dividend equivalents, for each of Messrs. Leverett, Lauber, Klappa, Keyes, Garvin, and Fletcher, and Ms. Martin, is $4,179,276, $225,903, $6,411,661, $1,265,486, $578,406, $479,001, and $835,068, respectively, for the 2016 awards. The value of the performance unit awards as of the grant date, assuming achievement of the highest level of performance, for each of Messrs. Leverett, Lauber, Klappa, Keyes, Garvin, and Fletcher, and Ms. Martin, is $2,729,329, $186,508, $6,162,162, $1,144,595, $499,382, $449,872 and $662,298, respectively, for the 2015 awards. See “Option Exercises and Stock Vested For Fiscal Year 2016” for the amount of the actual payout with respect to the 2014 award of performance units. Not included are the performance unit awards resulting from short-term dividend equivalents that may increase this amount depending upon WEC Energy Group's total stockholder return over a three-year performance period.
| |
(6) | In connection with Mr. Klappa's retirement, and in light of his many contributions to the success of the Company, the Compensation Committee accelerated the vesting of 47,181 shares of restricted stock previously awarded to him. The fair value associated with this acceleration was $2,751,832, which is included in the reported amount. The prorated payout to Mr. Klappa for the performance units that were granted in 2016 is reflected in the "Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 2016" table. The amount also includes $166,667 related to the restricted stock award granted on becoming the Non-Executive Chairman of the Board. |
| |
(7) | The amounts reported reflect the aggregate grant date fair value, as computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 excluding estimated forfeitures, of options awarded to each NEO in the respective year for which such amounts are reported. The actual value received by the executives from these awards may range from $0 to greater than the reported amounts, depending upon Company performance. In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, we made certain assumptions in our calculation of the grant date fair value of the stock options. See “Stock Options” in Note 1(q) -- Stock-Based Compensation, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of these assumptions. For 2016, the assumptions made in connection with the valuation of the stock options are the same as described in Note 1(q), except that the expected life of the options is 4.1 years for Mr. Klappa and Ms. Martin, and 7.8 years for Messrs. Leverett, Lauber, Keyes, Garvin, and Fletcher. The change in the expected life of the options as set forth in Note 1(q) resulted from the fact that Mr. Klappa and Ms. Martin were “retirement eligible” as of the grant date, and Messrs. Leverett, Lauber, Keyes, Garvin, and Fletcher were not, whereas the assumption described in Note 1(q) is a weighted average of all option holders. |
| |
(8) | Consists of the annual incentive compensation and short-term dividend equivalents earned under WEC Energy Group’s STPP. The amounts earned for each award for 2016 are shown below. |
|
| | | | | | |
Name | Annual Incentive Award ($) | Short-Term Dividend Equivalents ($) | Total ($) |
Allen L. Leverett | 2,035,229 |
| 127,364 |
| 2,162,593 |
|
Scott J. Lauber | 504,100 |
| 8,910 |
| 513,010 |
|
Gale E. Klappa | 1,134,718 |
| 44,914 |
| 1,179,632 |
|
J. Patrick Keyes | 850,335 |
| 53,985 |
| 904,320 |
|
Susan H. Martin | 748,038 |
| 30,997 |
| 779,035 |
|
Robert M. Garvin | 518,069 |
| 23,374 |
| 541,443 |
|
J. Kevin Fletcher | 586,680 |
| 20,186 |
| 606,866 |
|
| |
(9) | Represents prorated amounts earned by Mr. Klappa prior to his retirement. |
| |
(10) | The amounts reported for 2016, 2015, and 2014 reflect the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of each applicable NEO’s accumulated benefit under all defined benefit plans from December 31, 2015 to December 31, 2016, December 31, 2014 to December 31, 2015, and December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2014, respectively. For 2016 and 2015, the amounts reported also include above-market earnings on compensation that is deferred by the NEOs into the Prime Rate Fund under WEC Energy Group’s Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Above-market earnings represent the difference between the interest rate used to calculate earnings under the Plan and 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code. The amounts earned for 2016 are shown below. |
|
| | | | | | |
Name | Change in Pension Value ($) | Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) | Total ($) |
Allen L. Leverett | 4,539,685 |
| 10,127 |
| 4,549,812 |
|
Scott J. Lauber | 62,300 |
| 3,518 |
| 65,818 |
|
Gale E. Klappa | 899,067 |
| 26,652 |
| 925,719 |
|
J. Patrick Keyes | 109,850 |
| 2,123 |
| 111,973 |
|
Susan H. Martin | 99,751 |
| 2,366 |
| 102,117 |
|
Robert M. Garvin | 75,068 |
| 528 |
| 75,596 |
|
J. Kevin Fletcher | 665,464 |
| 5,810 |
| 671,274 |
|
In 2016, for purposes of calculating the actuarial present value of Mr. Leverett's defined benefit pension plan, we assumed that Mr. Leverett would stay with the Company until age 60 at which time he would be entitled to an unreduced pension benefit. $2.9 million of the amount
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-58 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
reported for Mr. Leverett's aggregate change in actuarial present value relates to this change in assumption. For 2016, 2015, and 2014, the applicable discount rate used to value pension plan liabilities moved from 4.45% to 4.15%, 4.15% to 4.45%, and 5.00% to 4.15%, respectively. As the discount rate decreases, the Company’s pension funding obligation increases, and vice versa. The changes in the actuarial present values of the NEOs’ pension benefits do not constitute cash payments to the NEOs.
The pension values reported represent only WEC Energy Group’s obligation of the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of each NEO’s accumulated benefit under all defined benefit plans. Messrs. Leverett, Klappa, and Fletcher are entitled to receive pension benefits from prior employers. To the extent such prior employers are unable to pay their pension obligations, WEC Energy Group may be obligated to pay the total amount.
| |
(11) | During 2016, each NEO received financial planning services and, other than Mr. Klappa, the cost of an annual physical exam; Messrs. Leverett, Klappa, and Ms. Martin received reimbursement for club dues; Messrs. Leverett, Lauber, and Klappa were provided with membership in a service that provides healthcare and safety management when traveling outside the United States; and Mr. Klappa received reimbursement for monitoring costs related to a home security system. In addition, the NEOs were eligible to receive reimbursement for taxes paid on imputed income attributable to certain perquisites including spousal travel and related costs for industry events where it is customary and expected that officers attend with their spouses. During 2016, Mr. Klappa utilized the benefit of spousal travel for business purposes with the associated tax reimbursement. These tax reimbursements are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table (see the third bullet point in Note 12 below). Other than the tax reimbursement, there is no incremental cost to the Company related to this spousal travel. |
| |
(12) | For Mr. Klappa, the amount reported in All Other Compensation for 2016 includes $21,434 attributable to WEC Energy Group’s Directors’ Charitable Awards Program in connection with Mr. Klappa’s service on the Company’s Board. See “Director Compensation” for a description of the Directors’ Charitable Awards Program. |
All Other Compensation for Messrs. Leverett, Lauber, Klappa, Keyes, Garvin, and Fletcher, and Ms. Martin, for 2016 also consists of:
| |
• | Employer matching of contributions into the WEC Energy Group 401(k) plan in the amount of $10,325 for Messrs. Leverett, Lauber, Keyes, and Garvin; $10,600 for Mr. Klappa; $7,768 for Mr. Fletcher; and $5,973 for Ms. Martin; |
| |
• | “Make-whole” payments under the Executive Deferred Compensation Plan that provides a match at the same level as the WEC Energy Group 401(k) plan (4% for up to 7% of wages) for all deferred salary and bonus not otherwise eligible for a match in the amounts of $87,483, $12,938, $44,709, $26,406, $130,034, $26,701, and $37,930, respectively; and |
| |
• | Tax reimbursements or “gross-ups” for all applicable perquisites in the amounts of $20,968, $5,048, $25,002, and $14,290 for Messrs. Leverett, Lauber, Klappa, and Garvin, respectively, and $25,229 for Ms. Martin. |
|
| | |
WEC Energy Group | P-59 | 2017 Proxy Statement |
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2016
The following table shows additional data regarding incentive plan awards to the NEOs in 2016.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name | Grant Date | Action Date (1) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (3) | All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (4) | All Other Option Awards (5) | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards |
Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum | Number of Securities Underlying Options | Exercise or Base Price (6) | Closing Market Price |
| | | ($) | ($) | ($) | (#) | (#) | (#) | (#) | (#) | ($/Sh) | ($/Sh) | ($) |
Allen L. Leverett | 1/21/16 | — | 245,208 |
| 980,833 |
| 2,059,749 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
1/21/16 | — | — | 127,364 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | 7,773 | 31,090 | 54,408 | — | — | — | — | 1,583,258 |
|
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7,173 | — | — | — | 365,285 |
|
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 82,455 | 50.925 | 51.32 | 470,818 |
|
5/2/16 | 4/21/16 | — | — | — | 3,450 | 13,800 | 24,150 | — | — | — | — | 804,885 |
|
5/2/16 | 4/21/16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,186 | — | — | — | 185,823 |
|
5/2/16 | 4/21/16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 42,679 | 58.325 | 58.42 | 298,326 |
|
Scott J. Lauber | 1/21/16 | — | 60,735 |
| 242,940 |
| 510,174 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
1/21/16 | — | — | 8,910 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | 634 |
| 2,535 |
| 4,436 | — | — | — | — | 129,095 |
|
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 585 |
| — | — | — | 29,791 |
|
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6,720 | 50.925 | 51.32 | 38,371 |
|
Gale E. Klappa | 1/21/16 | — | 136,713 |
| 546,852 |
| 1,148,389 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
1/21/16 | — | — | 44,914 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | 17,986 |
| 71,945 |
| 125,904 | — | — | — | — | 3,663,799 |
|
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16,602 |
| — | — | — | 845,457 |
|
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 190,830 | 50.925 | 51.32 | 816,752 |
|
5/2/16 | 4/21/16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,858 |
| — | — | — | 166,693 |
|
5/2/16 | 4/21/16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 47,181 |
| — | — | — | 2,751,832 |
|
J. Patrick Keyes | 1/21/16 | — | 102,450 |
| 409,800 |
| 860,580 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
1/21/16 | — | — | 53,985 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | 3,550 |
| 14,200 |
| 24,850 | — | — | — | — | 723,135 |
|
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3,276 |
| — | — | — | 166,830 |
|
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 37,665 | 50.925 | 51.32 | 215,067 |
|
Susan H. Martin | 1/21/16 | — | 90,125 |
| 360,500 |
| 757,050 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
1/21/16 | — | — | 30,997 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | 2,343 |
| 9,370 |
| 16,398 | — | — | — | — | 477,167 |
|
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,160 |
| — | — | — | 109,998 |
|
1/4/16 | 12/3/15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24,850 | 50.925 | 51.32 | 106,358 |
|
Robert M. Garvin | 1/21/16 | — | 62,418 |
| 249,672 |
| 524,311 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
1/21/16 | — | — | 23,374 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|