FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-13215
GARDNER DENVER, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
76-0419383 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
1800 Gardner Expressway
Quincy, Illinois 62305
(Address of principal executive offices and Zip Code)
(217) 222-5400
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See the definitions of
large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ |
|
Accelerated filer
o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date: 51,921,903 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, as of
April 26, 2009.
GARDNER DENVER, INC.
Table of Contents
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
GARDNER DENVER, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
462,480 |
|
|
$ |
495,670 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
321,869 |
|
|
|
334,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
140,611 |
|
|
|
161,326 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
94,583 |
|
|
|
86,619 |
|
Other operating expense (income), net |
|
|
8,873 |
|
|
|
(1,241 |
) |
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
265,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(227,845 |
) |
|
|
75,948 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
7,657 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(235,314 |
) |
|
|
70,589 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
13,855 |
|
|
|
19,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(249,169 |
) |
|
$ |
50,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(4.81 |
) |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(4.81 |
) |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
GARDNER DENVER, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
132,741 |
|
|
$ |
120,735 |
|
Accounts receivable (net of allowance of $11,434 at March 31, 2009
and $10,642 at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
356,711 |
|
|
|
388,098 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
270,499 |
|
|
|
284,825 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
31,049 |
|
|
|
33,014 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
20,474 |
|
|
|
30,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
811,474 |
|
|
|
857,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation of
$289,226 at March 31, 2009 and $283,676 at December 31, 2008) |
|
|
291,497 |
|
|
|
305,012 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
535,695 |
|
|
|
804,648 |
|
Other intangibles, net |
|
|
311,178 |
|
|
|
346,263 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
22,072 |
|
|
|
26,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,971,916 |
|
|
$ |
2,340,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
37,143 |
|
|
$ |
36,968 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
119,239 |
|
|
|
135,864 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
215,357 |
|
|
|
224,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
371,739 |
|
|
|
397,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
|
464,020 |
|
|
|
506,700 |
|
Postretirement benefits other than pensions |
|
|
15,651 |
|
|
|
17,481 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
84,094 |
|
|
|
91,218 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
115,229 |
|
|
|
128,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,050,733 |
|
|
|
1,141,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares
authorized; 51,905,388 and 51,785,125 shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
583 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
549,417 |
|
|
|
545,671 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
461,896 |
|
|
|
711,065 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
41,390 |
|
|
|
72,268 |
|
Treasury stock at cost; 6,424,820 and 6,469,971 shares at March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008, respectively |
|
|
(132,103 |
) |
|
|
(130,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
921,183 |
|
|
|
1,198,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,971,916 |
|
|
$ |
2,340,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
GARDNER DENVER, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Cash Flows From Operating Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(249,169 |
) |
|
$ |
50,859 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
16,668 |
|
|
|
14,920 |
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
265,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized foreign currency transaction gain, net |
|
|
(211 |
) |
|
|
(1,063 |
) |
Net loss (gain) on asset dispositions |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
Stock issued for employee benefit plans |
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
|
1,402 |
|
Stock-based compensation expense |
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(428 |
) |
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
(2,521 |
) |
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
22,088 |
|
|
|
(6,174 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
7,007 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(18,053 |
) |
|
|
10,904 |
|
Other assets and liabilities, net |
|
|
8,982 |
|
|
|
(4,851 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
55,701 |
|
|
|
65,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(8,954 |
) |
|
|
(9,553 |
) |
Disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
979 |
|
Other, net |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(8,843 |
) |
|
|
(8,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on short-term borrowings |
|
|
(18,397 |
) |
|
|
(7,128 |
) |
Proceeds from short-term borrowings |
|
|
15,695 |
|
|
|
7,705 |
|
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(61,520 |
) |
|
|
(50,582 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
31,318 |
|
|
|
49,783 |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
(44,511 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(759 |
) |
|
|
(1,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(33,635 |
) |
|
|
(44,448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
|
|
(1,217 |
) |
|
|
5,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and equivalents |
|
|
12,006 |
|
|
|
18,183 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
120,735 |
|
|
|
92,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
132,741 |
|
|
$ |
111,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
GARDNER DENVER, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts and amounts described in millions)
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Gardner
Denver, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiaries (referred to herein as Gardner Denver or the
Company). In consolidation, all significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been
eliminated.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation
(see below).
The financial information presented as of any date other than December 31, 2008 has been
prepared from the books and records of the Company without audit. The accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary
for a fair presentation of such financial statements, have been included.
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the complete consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in
Gardner Denvers Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 are not necessarily
indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The balance sheet at December 31, 2008
has been derived from the audited financial statements as of that date but does not include all of
the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
Other than as specifically indicated in these Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company has not materially changed
its significant accounting policies from those disclosed in its Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company reorganized its five former operating divisions into
two major product groups: the Industrial Products Group and the Engineered Products Group. The
Industrial Products Group includes the former Compressor and Blower Divisions, plus the multistage
centrifugal blower operations formerly managed in the Engineered Products Division. The Engineered
Products Group is comprised of the former Engineered Products (excluding the multistage centrifugal
blower operations), Thomas Products and Fluid Transfer Divisions. These changes were designed to
streamline operations, improve organizational efficiencies and create greater focus on customer
needs. As a result of these organizational changes, the Company realigned its segment reporting
structure with the newly formed product groups effective with the reporting period ended March 31,
2009. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information (SFAS No. 131), segment
financial information presented for prior years in these Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements and under Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations, has been recast to reflect this realignment. See Note 17 Segment
Information.
New Accounting Standards
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for
using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, and expands
6
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other statements
require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. This statement was effective
for the Company on January 1, 2008. In February 2008, the FASB released FASB Staff Position No. FAS
157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delayed for one year the effective date of
SFAS No. 157 for all non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are
recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value at least annually. Items in this
classification include goodwill, asset retirement obligations, rationalization accruals, intangible
assets with indefinite lives and certain other items. The adoption of the provisions of SFAS No.
157 with respect to the Companys financial assets and liabilities and non-financial assets and
liabilities did not have a significant effect on the Companys consolidated statements of
operations, balance sheets and statements of cash flows. See Note 12 Hedging Activities and Fair
Value Measurements for the disclosures required by SFAS No. 157.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
No. 141(R)), which establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business is
to (i) recognize and measure in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (ii) recognize and measure
the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and (iii)
determine what information to disclose to enable users of its financial statements to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination. This statement requires an acquirer to
recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date. This replaces the
guidance of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, which requires the cost of an acquisition to be
allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
values. In addition, costs incurred by the acquirer to effect the acquisition and restructuring
costs that the acquirer expects to incur, but is not obligated to incur, are to be recognized
separately from the acquisition. SFAS No. 141(R) applies to all transactions or other events in
which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses. This statement requires an acquirer to
recognize assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contractual contingencies as of the
acquisition date, measured at their acquisition-date fair values. An acquirer is required to
recognize assets or liabilities arising from all other contingencies as of the acquisition date,
measured at their acquisition-date fair values, only if it is more likely than not that they meet
the definition of an asset or a liability in FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, Elements of Financial
Statements. This Statement requires the acquirer to recognize goodwill as of the acquisition date,
measured as a residual, which generally will be the excess of the consideration transferred plus
the fair value of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date over the fair
values of the identifiable net assets acquired. Contingent consideration should be recognized at
the acquisition date, measured at its fair value at that date. SFAS No. 141(R) defines a bargain
purchase as a business combination in which the total acquisition-date fair value of the
identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred plus any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and requires the acquirer to recognize that excess in
earnings as attributable to the acquirer. This statement is effective for business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company will apply the provisions of this statement
prospectively to business combinations from January 1, 2009. The impact of SFAS No. 141(R) on the
Companys consolidated financial statements will depend on the nature, terms and size of
acquisitions it consummates in the future.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). This statement establishes
accounting and reporting standards that require (i) ownership interest in subsidiaries held by
parties other than the parent be presented and identified in the equity section of the consolidated
balance sheet, separate from the parents equity; (ii) the amount of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be identified and presented on the
face of the consolidated statement of operations; (iii) changes in a parents ownership interest
while the parent retains its controlling interest be accounted for consistently; (iv) when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former
subsidiary be initially measured at fair value, and the resulting gain or loss be measured using
the fair value of any noncontrolling equity investment rather than the carrying amount of that
retained investment; and (v) disclosures be provided that clearly identify and distinguish between
the interests of the parent and interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15,
2008. The Company adopted the standard on January 1, 2009. The adoption had no significant effect
on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 requires
enhanced disclosures for derivative instruments and hedging activities, including (i) how and why
an entity uses derivative instruments; (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations; and (iii) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance,
and cash flows. Under SFAS No. 161, entities must disclose the fair value of
7
derivative instruments, their gains or losses and their location in the balance sheet in
tabular format, and information about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative
agreements, counterparty credit risk, and strategies and objectives for using derivative
instruments. The fair value amounts must be disaggregated by asset and liability values, by
derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments and those that are
not, and by each major type of derivative contract. The Company adopted SFAS No. 161 effective
January 1, 2009. See Note 12 for the Companys disclosures about its derivative instruments and
hedging activities.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS No. 142-3, Determination of
the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP FAS No. 142-3) to improve the consistency between the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS No. 142) and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the
asset under SFAS No. 141(R). FSP FAS No. 142-3 amends the factors to be considered when developing
renewal or extension assumptions that are used to estimate an intangible assets useful life under
SFAS No. 142. The guidance in FSP FAS No. 142-3 is to be applied prospectively to intangible
assets acquired after December 31, 2008. In addition, FSP FAS No. 142-3 increases the disclosure
requirements related to renewal or extension assumptions. The adoption of FSP FAS No. 142-3 had no
effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial
Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active (FSP FAS No. 157-3). FSP FAS No. 157-3
clarifies how SFAS No. 157 should be applied when valuing securities in markets that are not active
by illustrating key considerations in determining fair value. It also reaffirms the notion of fair
value as the exit price as of the measurement date. FSP FAS No. 157-3 was effective upon issuance,
which included periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The adoption of
FSP FAS No. 157-3 had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and
Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies (FSP FAS No.
141(R)-1). FSP FAS No. 141(R)-1 amends the provisions in Statement 141(R) for the initial
recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosures for assets and
liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. This FSP also amends the
subsequent measurement and accounting guidance, and disclosure requirements in Statement 141(R).
FSP FAS No. 141(R)-1 is effective for contingent assets or contingent liabilities acquired in
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company will apply the
provisions of this statement prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date
is on or after January 1, 2009 and can only assess the impact of the standard once an acquisition
is consummated.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 132R-1, Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP FAS No. 132R-1). FSP FAS No. 132R-1 provides additional
guidance regarding disclosures about plan assets of defined benefit pension or other postretirement
plans and is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2009. The Company is currently evaluating the disclosure impact of adopting this new guidance on
its consolidated financial statements; however, its adoption will not have an impact on the
determination of the Companys financial results.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS No. 115-2). FSP FAS No. 115-2
provides guidance in determining whether impairments in debt securities are other than temporary,
and modifies the presentation and disclosures surrounding such instruments. This FSP is effective
for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, but early adoption is permitted for interim periods
ending after March 15, 2009. The Company plans to adopt the provisions of this Staff Position
during the second quarter of 2009, but does not believe this guidance will have a significant
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS No. 157-4). FSP FAS No. 157-4 provides additional
guidance in determining whether the market for a financial asset is not active and a transaction is
not distressed for fair value measurement purposes as defined in SFAS
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. FSP FAS No. 157-4 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, but
early adoption is permitted for interim periods ending after March 15, 2009. The
8
Company will apply the provisions of this statement prospectively beginning with the second
quarter 2009, and does not expect its adoption to have a material effect on its consolidated
financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1). This FSP amends FASB Statement
No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Values of Financial Instruments, to require disclosures about
fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial
statements. APB 28-1 also amends APB Opinion No. 28,
Interim Financial Reporting, to require
those disclosures in all interim financial statements. This standard is effective for interim
periods ending after June 15, 2009, but early adoption is permitted for interim periods ending
after March 15, 2009. The Company plans to adopt FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1 and provide the
additional disclosure requirements beginning in second quarter 2009.
Note 2. Business Combinations
On October 20, 2008, the Company acquired CompAir Holdings Ltd. (CompAir), a leading global
manufacturer of compressed air and gas solutions. The acquisition of CompAir allows the Company to
further broaden its geographic presence, diversify its end market segments served, and provides
opportunities to reduce operating costs and achieve sales and marketing efficiencies. CompAirs
products are complementary to the Industrial Products Groups product portfolio. The Company
acquired all outstanding shares and share equivalents of CompAir for a total purchase price of
$378.5 million, which consisted of $329.9 million in shareholder consideration, $39.8 million of
CompAir external debt retired at closing and $8.8 million of transaction costs and other
liabilities settled at closing. As part of the transaction the Company also assumed approximately
$5.9 million in long-term debt. As of October 20, 2008, CompAir had $24.1 million in cash and
equivalents. The net transaction value, including assumed debt (net of cash acquired) and direct
acquisition costs, was approximately $360.3 million. There are no remaining material contingent
payments or commitments related to this acquisition.
The CompAir acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method and, accordingly, its
results are included in the Companys consolidated financial statements from the date of
acquisition. Under the purchase method, the purchase price is allocated based on the fair value of
assets received and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date.
Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of CompAir were recorded
at their estimated respective fair values as of October 20, 2008. The initial allocation of the
purchase price was subsequently adjusted when certain preliminary valuation estimates were
finalized. The following table summarizes the nature and amount of such adjustments recorded in
2009. The amounts presented in this table do not reflect the portion of the goodwill impairment
charge recorded in the first quarter of 2009 that may be directly attributable to the CompAir
acquisition. For purposes of the impairment testing performed during the first quarter of 2009 in
accordance with SFAS 142, the net assets from the CompAir acquisition were included as a component
of the reporting unit within the Industrial Products Group in which the impairment charge was
recorded. Since goodwill impairment testing is performed at the reporting unit level, the amount
directly attributable to the CompAir acquisition cannot be specifically identified. See also Note
5 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets for a description of the impairment charge.
9
CompAir Holdings Limited
Purchase Price Allocation and Adjustments
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocated to amortizable intangible assets as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
166,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments recorded in 2009: |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of trademarks |
|
|
(3,243 |
) |
Fair value of customer relationships |
|
|
(13,231 |
) |
Fair value of other amortizable intangible assets |
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocated to amortizable intangible assets as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
148,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocated to goodwill as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
155,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments recorded in 2009: |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of amortizable intangible assets |
|
|
17,671 |
|
Termination benefits and other related liabilities |
|
|
1,495 |
|
Income taxes, net |
|
|
(4,793 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price allocated to goodwill as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
169,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note 3. Restructuring
In 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, the Company finalized and announced certain
restructuring plans designed to address (i) rationalization of the Companys manufacturing
footprint, (ii) the slowing global economy and the resulting deterioration in the Companys end
markets and (iii) the integration of CompAir into its existing operations. These plans included the
closure and consolidation of manufacturing facilities in Europe and the U.S., and various voluntary
and involuntary employee termination and relocation programs. In accordance with SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities and SFAS No. 112, Employers
Accounting for Postemployment Benefits an amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 43, a charge
totaling $11.1 million (included in Other operating expense, net) was recorded in 2008, of which
$8.5 million was associated with the Industrial Products Group and $2.6 million was associated with
the Engineered Products Group. An additional charge totaling $7.9 million was recorded in the
first quarter of 2009, of which $1.5 million was associated with the Industrial Products Group and
$6.4 million was associated with the Engineered Products Group. Execution of these plans,
including payment of employee severance benefits, is expected to be substantively completed during
2009.
In connection with the acquisition of CompAir, the Company has been implementing plans
identified at or prior to the acquisition date to close and consolidate certain former CompAir
functions and facilities, primarily in North America and Europe. These plans included various
voluntary and involuntary employee termination and relocation programs affecting both salaried and
hourly employees and exit costs associated with the sale, lease termination or sublease of certain
manufacturing and administrative facilities. The terminations, relocations and facility exits are
expected to be substantively completed during 2009. A liability of $8.9 million was included in the
allocation of the CompAir purchase price for the estimated cost of these actions at October 20,
2008 in accordance with EITF No. 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase
Business Combination. This liability was increased by $1.5 million in the first quarter of 2009
to reflect the finalization of certain of these plans. Any further adjustments, if required, will
be recorded as adjustments to the allocation of the purchase price of CompAir.
10
The following table summarizes the activity in the restructuring accrual accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
13,634 |
|
|
$ |
2,365 |
|
|
$ |
15,999 |
|
Charged to expense |
|
|
7,270 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
7,864 |
|
Acquisition purchase price allocation |
|
|
1,481 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
Paid |
|
|
(7,384 |
) |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
(7,778 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
14,603 |
|
|
$ |
2,858 |
|
|
$ |
17,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4. Inventories
Inventories as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Raw materials, including parts and subassemblies |
|
$ |
154,345 |
|
|
$ |
159,425 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
41,532 |
|
|
|
47,060 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
89,910 |
|
|
|
90,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,787 |
|
|
|
297,436 |
|
Excess of FIFO costs over LIFO costs |
|
|
(15,288 |
) |
|
|
(12,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
270,499 |
|
|
$ |
284,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 5. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
In accordance with SFAS 142, the Company performs an impairment test of the carrying values of
its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles assets on an annual basis and whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable. The Company
performed its annual impairment test during the third quarter of 2008 using balances as of June 30,
2008. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company experienced a significant slowdown in orders
and lower projected near-term earnings levels compared to managements expectations as of June 30,
2008 coupled with a considerable decline in the price of the Companys common stock. As a result,
the Company performed an interim impairment analysis as of December 31, 2008. Based on the results
of these impairment tests, the Company concluded that no impairment of goodwill and
indefinite-lived intangibles assets had occurred.
During the first quarter of 2009, the Company concluded that sufficient indicators existed to
require it to perform another interim impairment test as of March 31, 2009. The Companys
conclusion was based upon a combination of factors, including the continued significant decline in
order rates for certain products, the uncertain outlook regarding when such order rates might
return to levels and growth rates experienced in recent years, and the sustained decline in the
price of the Companys common stock and in the Companys market capitalization below the Companys
carrying value at March 31, 2009. Accordingly, the Company performed the first step of its interim
goodwill impairment test for each of its reporting units and determined that the carrying value of
one of its reporting units within the Industrial Products Group exceeded its fair value, indicating
that potential goodwill impairment existed. Having determined that the goodwill of this reporting
unit was potentially impaired, the Company began performing the second step of the goodwill
impairment analysis with the assistance of a third-party valuation firm. This analysis involves
calculating the implied fair value of its goodwill by allocating the fair value of the reporting
unit to all of its assets and liabilities other than goodwill (including both recognized and
unrecognized intangible assets) and comparing the residual amount to the carrying value of
goodwill. As of the date of the filing of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company determined that goodwill related to one of its reporting
units within the Industrial Products Group was impaired. In accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, the Company recorded a preliminary non-cash goodwill impairment
charge of $265.0 million which represents the Companys best estimate of the loss. After
recognition of the charge, $228.3 million of goodwill remained with the Industrial Products Group.
The Company recorded this charge based on a preliminary assessment and will continue to evaluate
the valuations of tangible and intangible assets and the allocation of fair value to all of the
particular reporting units assets and liabilities other than goodwill. The
11
Company currently expects to finalize its goodwill impairment analysis during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009. There could be a material adjustment to the estimated charge recorded in the
first quarter of 2009 upon completion of the goodwill impairment
analysis, or if the Company
experiences further deterioration in the price of its common stock and orders or experiences other
indicators of further impairment.
In performing the annual and interim impairment tests, the Company determined the estimated
fair value of each reporting unit utilizing an income approach model based on the present value of
the estimated future cash flows of the reporting unit assuming a discount rate. This approach
makes use of unobservable factors such as projected revenues and a discount rate applied to the
estimated cash flows. The determination of the discount rate was based on a cost of equity model,
which uses a risk-free rate, a stock-beta adjusted risk premium and a size premium, and aims to be
reflective of the assumptions made by market participants. Additionally, the aggregate estimated
fair value of the reporting units was compared to the Companys market capitalization. In
considering the Companys market capitalization, an estimated premium to reflect the fair value on
a control basis was applied.
An impairment evaluation for indefinite-lived intangible assets, which consist of certain
trademarks, was also conducted as part of the interim impairment test performed during the first
quarter of 2009. The Company evaluated its indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment by
comparing the discounted estimates of future revenue projections to the carrying values and
determined that there was no impairment. Significant judgments inherent in this analysis included
assumptions regarding appropriate revenue growth rates, discount rates and royalty rates.
The Company reviews long-lived assets, including its intangible assets subject to
amortization, which consist primarily of customer relationships and intellectual property for the
Company, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of long-lived assets is measured by a
comparison of the carrying amount of the asset group to the future undiscounted net cash flows
expected to be generated by those assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the
impairment charge recognized is the amount by which the carrying amounts of the assets exceeds the
fair value of the assets. As a result of the impairment indicators described above, during the
first quarter of 2009, the Company tested its long-lived assets for impairment and determined that
there was no impairment.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill attributable to each business segment for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2009, and the year ended December 31, 2008, are presented in the
table below. The adjustments to goodwill in 2009 are primarily related to the finalization of the
valuation of certain CompAir intangible assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial |
|
|
Engineered |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products |
|
|
Products |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
363,011 |
|
|
$ |
322,485 |
|
|
$ |
685,496 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
157,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,533 |
|
Adjustments to goodwill |
|
|
(3,851 |
) |
|
|
3,559 |
|
|
|
(292 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(25,641 |
) |
|
|
(12,448 |
) |
|
|
(38,089 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2008 |
|
|
491,052 |
|
|
|
313,596 |
|
|
|
804,648 |
|
Adjustments to goodwill |
|
|
14,492 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
14,491 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
(265,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(265,000 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
(12,261 |
) |
|
|
(6,183 |
) |
|
|
(18,444 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
228,283 |
|
|
$ |
307,412 |
|
|
$ |
535,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
The following table presents the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of
identifiable intangible assets, other than goodwill, at the dates presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
Amortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer lists and relationships |
|
$ |
113,105 |
|
|
$ |
(16,644 |
) |
|
$ |
133,596 |
|
|
$ |
(17,654 |
) |
Acquired technology |
|
|
91,291 |
|
|
|
(38,527 |
) |
|
|
91,713 |
|
|
|
(36,464 |
) |
Trademarks |
|
|
50,224 |
|
|
|
(4,011 |
) |
|
|
57,332 |
|
|
|
(3,450 |
) |
Other |
|
|
4,497 |
|
|
|
(4,740 |
) |
|
|
4,728 |
|
|
|
(2,883 |
) |
Unamortized intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks |
|
|
115,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangible assets |
|
$ |
375,100 |
|
|
$ |
(63,922 |
) |
|
$ |
406,714 |
|
|
$ |
(60,451 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
was $5.1 million and $3.0 million, respectively. Amortization of intangible assets is anticipated
to be approximately $21.9 million in 2009 and $19.8 million in 2010 through 2013 based upon
exchange rates as of March 31, 2009 and intangible assets with finite useful lives included in the
balance sheet as of March 31, 2009.
Note 6. Accrued Product Warranty
A reconciliation of the changes in the accrued product warranty liability for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
19,141 |
|
|
$ |
15,087 |
|
Product warranty accruals |
|
|
4,774 |
|
|
|
4,301 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
(4,887 |
) |
|
|
(3,553 |
) |
Effect of foreign currency translation |
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
18,634 |
|
|
$ |
16,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7. Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit cost for the Companys
defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans recognized for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
U.S. Plans |
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
2,549 |
|
|
|
3,120 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(913 |
) |
|
|
(1,175 |
) |
|
|
(2,078 |
) |
|
|
(3,364 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior-service cost |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
Unrecognized net actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit (income) cost |
|
$ |
638 |
|
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
$ |
721 |
|
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
|
$ |
(106 |
) |
|
$ |
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
The Company previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2008, that it expected to contribute approximately $8.6 million to its U.S. pension plans in fiscal
2009. As a result of recent changes to pension plan funding guidelines in the U.S. released by the
Internal Revenue Service, the Company currently expects to contribute $1.7 million to its U.S.
pension plans in fiscal 2009.
Note 8. Debt
The Companys debt at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
$ |
8,633 |
|
|
$ |
11,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Line, due 2013 (1) |
|
$ |
11,463 |
|
|
$ |
37,000 |
|
Term Loan, denominated in U.S. dollars, due 2013 (2) |
|
|
175,500 |
|
|
|
177,750 |
|
Term Loan, denominated in euro (EUR), due 2013 (3) |
|
|
154,990 |
|
|
|
165,284 |
|
Senior Subordinated Notes at 8%, due 2013 |
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
Secured Mortgages (4) |
|
|
8,464 |
|
|
|
8,911 |
|
Variable Rate Industrial Revenue Bonds, due 2018 (5) |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
Capitalized leases and other long-term debt |
|
|
9,113 |
|
|
|
9,937 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, including current maturities |
|
|
492,530 |
|
|
|
531,882 |
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
|
28,510 |
|
|
|
25,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
$ |
464,020 |
|
|
$ |
506,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The loans under this facility may be denominated in U.S. Dollars (USD) or several foreign
currencies. At March 31, 2009, the outstanding balance consisted only of British pound
borrowings. The interest rates under the facility are based on prime, federal funds and/or
LIBOR for the applicable currency. The weighted-average interest rate was 3.1% as of March 31,
2009. The interest rate averaged 3.6% for the first three months of 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
The interest rate for this loan varies with prime, federal funds and/or LIBOR. At March 31,
2009, this rate was 3.1% and averaged 3.0% for the first three months of 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
The interest rate for this loan varies with LIBOR. At March 31, 2009, this rate was 3.6% and
averaged 4.5% for the first three months of 2009. |
|
(4) |
|
This amount consists of two fixed-rate commercial loans with an outstanding balance of 6,389
at March 31, 2009. The loans are secured by the Companys facility in Bad Neustadt, Germany. |
|
(5) |
|
The interest rate varies with market rates for tax-exempt industrial revenue bonds. At March
31, 2009, this rate was 0.8% and averaged 0.9% during the first three months of 2009. These
industrial revenue bonds are secured by an $8,100 standby letter of credit. |
Note 9. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised
2004), Share-based Payment, (SFAS No. 123(R)), which requires the measurement and recognition
of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and non-employee
directors based on their estimated fair values. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation
expense for share-based payment awards over the requisite service period for vesting of the award
or to an employees eligible retirement date, if earlier. The following table summarizes the total
stock-based compensation expense included in the consolidated statements of operations and the
realized excess tax benefits included in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
|
$ |
2,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense included in operating expenses |
|
$ |
1,120 |
|
|
$ |
2,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
(2,259 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(774 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
(428 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
428 |
|
Plan Descriptions
Under the Companys Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Incentive Plan),
designated employees and non-employee directors are eligible to receive awards in the form of
restricted stock and restricted stock units (restricted shares), stock options, stock
appreciation rights or performance shares, as determined by the Management Development and
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the Compensation Committee). Under the
Incentive Plan, the grant price of a stock option is determined by the Compensation Committee, but
must not be less than the market close price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant.
The Incentive Plan provides that the term of any stock option granted may not exceed ten years.
There are no vesting provisions tied to performance conditions for any of the outstanding stock
options and restricted shares. Vesting for all outstanding stock options and restricted shares is
based solely on continued service as an employee or director of the Company and generally occurs
upon retirement, death or cessation of service due to disability, if earlier.
Stock Option Awards
Under the terms of existing awards, employee stock options become vested and exercisable
ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. The options granted to
employees in 2009 and 2008 expire seven years after the date of grant. The options granted to
non-employee directors become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant and expire
five years after the date of grant.
A summary of the Companys stock option activity for the three-month period ended March 31,
2009 is presented in the following table (underlying shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Aggregate |
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Intrinsic |
|
Contractual |
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Value |
|
Life |
Outstanding at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
$ |
27.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
377 |
|
|
$ |
18.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
10.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited or canceled |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
$ |
31.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,631 |
|
|
$ |
25.85 |
|
|
$ |
3,587 |
|
|
4.4 years |
Exercisable at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
$ |
26.10 |
|
|
$ |
2,377 |
|
|
3.3 years |
The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated as the difference between the exercise price of
the underlying stock options and the quoted closing price of the Companys common stock at March
31, 2009 multiplied by the number of in-the-money stock options. The
15
weighted-average estimated grant-date fair value of employee stock options granted during the
three-month period ended March 31, 2009 was $6.89.
The total pre-tax intrinsic values of stock options exercised during the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were $0.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively. Pre-tax
unrecognized compensation expense for stock options, net of estimated forfeitures, was $3.5 million
as of March 31, 2009 and will be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of 2.4 years.
Valuation Assumptions and Expense under SFAS No. 123(R)
The fair value of each stock option grant under the Incentive Plan was estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted-average assumptions used for
the periods indicated are noted in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
2009 |
|
2008 |
Assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility factor |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Expected life (in years) |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Restricted Share Awards
In 2008, the Company began granting restricted stock units in lieu of restricted stock. Upon
vesting, restricted stock units result in the issuance of the equivalent number of shares of the
Companys common stock. All restricted share awards cliff vest three years after the date of grant.
A summary of the Companys restricted share award `activity for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2009 is presented in the following table (underlying shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Grant- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
(per share) |
Nonvested at December 31, 2008 |
|
|
159 |
|
|
$ |
35.25 |
|
Granted |
|
|
56 |
|
|
$ |
18.53 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
$ |
32.33 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at March 31, 2009 |
|
|
146 |
|
|
$ |
30.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The restricted stock units granted in the first three months of 2009 were valued at the market
close price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. Pre-tax unrecognized compensation
expense for nonvested restricted share awards, net of estimated forfeitures, was $2.2 million as of
March 31, 2009, which will be recognized as expense over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.
The total fair value of restricted share awards that vested during the three-month periods ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008 was $1.6 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
Note 10. Stockholders Equity and (Loss) Earnings Per Share
In November 2008, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program
to acquire up to 3.0 million shares of the Companys outstanding common stock. During the
three-month period ended March 31, 2009, no shares were repurchased under this program. All common
stock acquired is held as treasury stock and available for general corporate purposes.
The following table details the calculation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common
share for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 (shares in thousands):
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Basic (Loss) Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(249,169 |
) |
|
$ |
50,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
51,765 |
|
|
|
53,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per common share |
|
$ |
(4.81 |
) |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(249,169 |
) |
|
$ |
50,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
51,765 |
|
|
|
53,030 |
|
Effect of dilutive outstanding equity-based awards (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of diluted common shares |
|
|
51,765 |
|
|
|
53,749 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share |
|
$ |
(4.81 |
) |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Share equivalents totaling 170, consisting of outstanding stock options and nonvested
restricted stock, were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share in the
three-months ended March 31, 2009 because the net loss for the period caused all potentially
dilutive shares to be anti-dilutive. |
For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, antidilutive
equity-based awards to purchase 939 and 473 weighted-average shares of common stock were
outstanding. Antidilutive equity-based awards outstanding were not included in the computation of
diluted (loss) earnings per common share.
Note 11. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The Companys accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists of (i) unrealized net gains and losses on the translation of the assets and liabilities of its foreign operations; (ii) foreign currency gains and losses associated with the Companys net investments in foreign operations and translation of intercompany transactions of a long-term investment nature; (iii) unrecognized gains
and losses on cash flow hedges (consisting of interest rate swaps), net of income taxes; and (iv) unamortized pension and other postretirement benefit prior service cost and actuarial gains or losses, net of income taxes.
The following table sets forth the changes in each component of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Cumulative |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
Losses on |
|
|
Pension and |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Gains and |
|
|
Cash Flow |
|
|
Postretirement |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Adjustment (1) |
|
|
(Losses) |
|
|
Hedges |
|
|
Benefit Plans |
|
|
Income |
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
133,467 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(110 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,347 |
) |
|
$ |
128,010 |
|
Before tax income (loss) |
|
|
50,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,110 |
) |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
48,654 |
|
Income tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
50,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
49,223 |
|
Currency translation (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
183,624 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(798 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,592 |
) |
|
$ |
177,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
99,633 |
|
|
$ |
(9,410 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(17,955 |
) |
|
$ |
72,268 |
|
Before tax (loss) income |
|
|
(35,671 |
) |
|
|
7,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(27,964 |
) |
Income tax effect |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,886 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(2,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(35,671 |
) |
|
|
4,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(30,878 |
) |
Currency translation (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
63,962 |
|
|
$ |
(4,662 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(17,910 |
) |
|
$ |
41,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Income taxes are generally not provided for foreign currency translation adjustments, as such
adjustments relate to permanent investments in international subsidiaries. |
17
|
|
|
(2) |
|
The Company uses the historical rate approach in determining the USD amounts of changes to
accumulated other comprehensive income associated with non-U.S. pension benefit plans. |
The Companys comprehensive (loss) income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and
2008 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(249,169 |
) |
|
$ |
50,859 |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(30,878 |
) |
|
|
49,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income |
|
$ |
(280,047 |
) |
|
$ |
100,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 12. Hedging Activities and Fair Value Measurements
Hedging Activities
The Company is exposed to certain market risks during the normal course of business arising
from adverse changes in commodity prices, interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates. The
Companys exposure to these risks is managed through a combination of operating and financing
activities. The Company selectively uses derivative financial instruments (derivatives),
including foreign currency forward contracts and interest rate swaps, to manage the risks from
fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company does not purchase
or hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Fluctuations in commodity prices,
interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates can be volatile, and the Companys risk
management activities do not totally eliminate these risks. Consequently, these fluctuations could
have a significant effect on the Companys financial results.
Credit risk related to derivatives arises when amounts receivable from a counterparty exceed
those payable. Because the notional amount of the derivative instruments only serves as a basis
for calculating amounts receivable or payable, the risk of loss with any counterparty is limited to
a fraction of the notional amount. The Company minimizes the credit risk related to derivatives by
transacting only with multiple, high-quality counterparties that are major financial institutions
with investment-grade credit ratings. The Company has not experienced any credit loss as a result
of counterparty nonperformance in the past. The majority of the derivative contracts to which the
Company is a party settle monthly or quarterly, or mature within one year. Because of these
factors, the Company has minimal credit risk related to derivative contracts at March 31, 2009.
The Companys exposure to interest rate risk results primarily from its borrowings of $501.2
million at March 31, 2009. The Company manages its debt centrally considering tax consequences and
its overall financing strategies. The Company manages its exposure to interest rate risk by
maintaining a mixture of fixed and variable rate debt and, from time to time, uses pay-fixed
interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of variable rate debt in order to adjust the relative
proportions. There were no outstanding interest rate swaps as of March 31, 2009.
A substantial portion of the Companys operations is conducted by its subsidiaries outside of
the U.S. in currencies other than the USD. Almost all of the Companys non-U.S. subsidiaries
conduct their business primarily in their local currencies, which are also their functional
currencies. Other than the USD, the EUR, British pound sterling (GBP), and Chinese yuan (CNY)
are the principal currencies in which the Company and its subsidiaries enter into transactions.
The Company is exposed to the impacts of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on the
translation of its non-U.S. subsidiaries assets, liabilities, and earnings into USD. The Company
partially offsets these exposures by having certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries act as the obligor
on a portion of its borrowings and by denominating such borrowings, as well as a portion of the
borrowings for which the Company is the obligor, in currencies other than the USD.
The Company and its subsidiaries are also subject to the risk that arises when they, from time
to time, enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency. To mitigate
this risk, the Company and its subsidiaries typically settle intercompany trading balances monthly.
The Company also selectively uses forward currency contracts to manage this risk. These contracts
for the sale or purchase of European and other currencies generally mature within one year.
18
In accordance with SFAS No. 133, the Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or
liabilities on the balance sheet and measures those instruments at fair value. If a derivative is
designated as a fair value hedge and is effective, the changes in the fair value of the derivative
and of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings in the same
period. If a derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portions of changes in
the fair value of the derivative are recorded in other comprehensive earnings and are recognized in
the statement of operations when the hedged item affects income. Ineffective portions of changes in
the fair value of cash flow hedges are recognized in earnings. Derivatives that are not designated
as hedges or do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment are marked to market through earnings.
All cash flows associated with derivatives are classified as operating cash flows in the Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
Fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates in the value of non-USD
borrowings that have been designated as hedges of the Companys net investment in foreign
operations are included in other comprehensive income.
The following table summarizes the notional amounts, fair values and classification of the
Companys outstanding derivatives by risk category and instrument type within the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
Liability |
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
Derivatives |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Amount (1) |
|
Fair Value (1) |
|
Fair Value (1) |
Derivatives designated
as hedging instruments
under SFAS No. 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None |
|
N/A |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not
designated as hedging
instruments under SFAS
No. 133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forwards |
|
Other Current Assets |
|
$ |
205,253 |
|
|
$ |
9,114 |
|
|
$ |
8,545 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Notional amounts represent the gross contract amounts of the outstanding derivatives
excluding the total notional amount of positions that have been effectively net settled
through offsetting positions. The net gains and net losses associated with positions that
have been effectively net settled are included in the asset and liability derivatives fair
value columns, respectively. |
There were 45 foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of March 31, 2009 with
notional amounts ranging from $0.1 million to $7.7 million. During the three-month period ended
March 31, 2009, the Company recorded net gains of $6.2 million relating to foreign currency forward
contracts outstanding during all or part of the first quarter of 2009. This amount is included in
the other operating expense (income), net line on the face of the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Operations.
As of March 31, 2009, the Company has designated its term loan denominated in EUR of
approximately 117.0 million as a hedge of the Companys net investment in European subsidiaries
with EUR functional currencies. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of this debt due to changes
in the USD to EUR exchange rate are recorded through other comprehensive income. During the
three-month period ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded gains of $5.1 million, net of tax,
through other comprehensive income. As of March 31, 2009, the net balance of such gains included
in accumulated other comprehensive income was $1.8 million, net of tax.
Fair Value Measurements
A financial instrument is defined as a cash equivalent, evidence of an ownership interest in
an entity, or a contract that creates a contractual obligation or right to deliver or receive cash
or another financial instrument from another party. The Companys financial instruments consist
primarily of cash and equivalents, trade receivables, trade payables, deferred compensation
obligations and debt instruments. The book values of these instruments are a reasonable estimate of
their respective fair values.
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157 with respect to its financial
assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value under GAAP and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined
under SFAS No. 157 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a
liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability
in an orderly transaction between market
19
participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under
SFAS No. 157 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the
first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair
value as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. |
|
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. |
|
|
|
Level 3 |
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
The following table summarizes the Companys fair value hierarchy for its financial assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Financial Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forwards (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
569 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
569 |
|
Trading securities held in deferred compensation plan (2) |
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,860 |
|
|
$ |
569 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Phantom stock plan (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
Deferred compensation plan (4) |
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,860 |
|
|
$ |
1,274 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Based on internally-developed models that use as their basis readily observable market
parameters such as current spot and forward rates, and the LIBOR index. |
|
(2) |
|
Based on the observable price of publicly traded mutual funds which, in accordance with EITF
No. 97-14, Accounting for Deferred Compensation Arrangements where Amounts Earned are Held in
a Rabbi Trust and Invested, are classified as Trading securities and accounted for using
the mark-to-market method. |
|
(3) |
|
Based on the price of the Companys common stock. |
|
(4) |
|
Based on the fair value of the investments in the deferred compensation plan. |
As discussed in Note 5 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 142, the Company recorded a preliminary goodwill impairment charge of $265.0
million in the quarter ended March 31, 2009. This preliminary charge was calculated as the amount
by which the carrying value of goodwill exceeded its implied fair value. The implied fair value of
the goodwill was determined using Level 3 inputs of the fair value hierarchy.
Note 13. Income Taxes
As of March 31, 2009, the total balance of unrecognized tax benefits was $5.1 million compared
with $7.8 million at December 31, 2008. The decrease in the balance primarily related to the
favorable settlement of tax audits in various foreign jurisdictions and changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. Included in the unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2009 is $5.1 million of
uncertain tax positions that would affect the Companys effective tax rate if recognized, of which
$1.0 million would be offset by a reduction of a corresponding deferred tax asset. The Company
does not expect any significant changes to its unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve
months.
The Companys accounting policy with respect to interest expense on underpayments of income
tax and related penalties is to recognize such interest expense and penalties as part of the
provision for income taxes. The Companys income tax liabilities at March 31, 2009 include
approximately $1.0 million of accrued interest and no penalties.
20
The Companys U.S. federal income tax returns for the tax years 2005 to 2007 are under
examination by the Internal Revenue Service. As of the date of this report, the examination is in
its initial stages. The statutes of limitations for the U.S. state tax returns are open beginning
with the 2005 tax year, except for three states for which the statute has been extended beginning
with the 2003 tax year for one state and the 2004 tax year for two states.
The Company is subject to income tax in approximately 30 jurisdictions outside the U.S. The
statute of limitations varies by jurisdiction with 2001 being the oldest tax year still open,
except as noted below. The Companys significant operations outside the U.S. are located in China,
the United Kingdom and Germany. In China and the United Kingdom, tax years prior to 2005 are
closed. In Germany, generally, the tax years 2003 and beyond remain subject to examination with
the statute of limitations for the 2003 tax year expiring during 2009. In addition, audits are
being conducted in various countries for years ranging from 2003 through 2005. To date, no
material adjustments have been proposed as a result of these audits.
The provision for income taxes was $13.9 million for the three-month period ended March 31,
2009. The provision in the first quarter of 2009 includes $8.6 million associated with the
write-off of deferred tax assets related to net operating losses recorded in connection with the
acquisition of CompAir. This write-off was based on revisions to projections associated with the
goodwill impairment charge. The goodwill for which the impairment charge was taken was not
amortizable for tax purposes and, accordingly, deferred tax liabilities were not recorded when the
goodwill was established and a corresponding tax benefit did not arise upon impairment of the
goodwill. The provision in the first quarter of 2009 also includes the reversal of an income tax
reserve related to a prior acquisition and related interest totaling $3.6 million associated with
the completion of a foreign tax examination.
Note 14. Supplemental Information
The components of other operating expense, net, and supplemental cash flow information are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Other Operating Expense (Income), Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency gains, net |
|
$ |
(211 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,823 |
) |
Restructuring charges (1) |
|
|
7,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other operating expense (income), net |
|
$ |
8,873 |
|
|
$ |
(1,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash taxes paid |
|
$ |
8,852 |
|
|
$ |
7,113 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
4,721 |
|
|
|
2,761 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
See Note 3 Restructuring. |
Note 15. Contingencies
The Company is a party to various legal proceedings, lawsuits and administrative actions,
which are of an ordinary or routine nature. In addition, due to the bankruptcies of several
asbestos manufacturers and other primary defendants, among other things, the Company has been named
as a defendant in a number of asbestos personal injury lawsuits. The Company has also been named as
a defendant in a number of silica personal injury lawsuits. The plaintiffs in these suits allege
exposure to asbestos or silica from multiple sources and typically the Company is one of
approximately 25 or more named defendants. In the Companys experience to date, the substantial
majority of the plaintiffs have not suffered an injury for which the Company bears responsibility.
Predecessors to the Company sometimes manufactured, distributed and/or sold products allegedly
at issue in the pending asbestos and silica litigation lawsuits (the Products). However, neither
the Company nor its predecessors ever mined, manufactured, mixed, produced or distributed asbestos
fiber or silica sand, the materials that allegedly caused the injury underlying the lawsuits.
Moreover, the asbestos-containing components of the Products were enclosed within the subject
Products.
21
The Company has entered into a series of cost-sharing agreements with multiple insurance
companies to secure coverage for asbestos and silica lawsuits. The Company also believes some of
the potential liabilities regarding these lawsuits are covered by indemnity agreements with other
parties. The Companys uninsured settlement payments for past asbestos and silica lawsuits have not
been material.
The Company believes that the pending and future asbestos and silica lawsuits are not likely
to, in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position,
results of operations or liquidity, based on: the Companys anticipated insurance and
indemnification rights to address the risks of such matters; the limited potential asbestos
exposure from the components described above; the Companys experience that the vast majority of
plaintiffs are not impaired with a disease attributable to alleged exposure to asbestos or silica
from or relating to the Products or for which the Company otherwise bears responsibility; various
potential defenses available to the Company with respect to such matters; and the Companys prior
disposition of comparable matters. However, due to inherent uncertainties of litigation and because
future developments, including, without limitation, potential insolvencies of insurance companies
or other defendants, could cause a different outcome, there can be no assurance that the resolution
of pending or future lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated
financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
The Company has been identified as a potentially responsible party (PRP) with respect to
several sites designated for cleanup under federal Superfund or similar state laws that impose
liability for cleanup of certain waste sites and for related natural resource damages. Persons
potentially liable for such costs and damages generally include the site owner or operator and
persons that disposed or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances found at those sites.
Although these laws impose joint and several liability, in application, the PRPs typically allocate
the investigation and cleanup costs based upon the volume of waste contributed by each PRP. Based
on currently available information, the Company was only a small contributor to these waste sites,
and the Company has, or is attempting to negotiate, de minimis settlements for their cleanup. The
cleanup of the remaining sites is substantially complete and the Companys future obligations
entail a share of the sites ongoing operating and maintenance expense.
The Company is also addressing three on-site cleanups for which it is the primary responsible
party. Two of these cleanup sites are in the operation and maintenance stage and the third is in
the implementation stage. The Company is also negotiating a settlement through a voluntary clean up
program with other potentially responsible parties and the relevant governmental agencies on a
fourth site. Based on currently available information, the Company does not anticipate that any of
these sites will result in material additional costs beyond those already accrued on its balance
sheet.
The Company has an accrued liability on its balance sheet to the extent costs are known or can
be reasonably estimated for its remaining financial obligations for these matters. Based upon
consideration of currently available information, the Company does not anticipate any material
adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition, liquidity or competitive position
as a result of compliance with federal, state, local or foreign environmental laws or regulations,
or cleanup costs relating to the sites discussed above.
Note 16. Guarantor Subsidiaries
The Companys obligations under its 8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 are jointly and
severally, fully and unconditionally guaranteed by certain wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries of
the Company (the Guarantor Subsidiaries). The Companys subsidiaries that do not guarantee the
Senior Subordinated Notes are referred to as the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries. The guarantor
condensed consolidating financial data below presents the statements of operations, balance sheets
and statements of cash flows data (i) for Gardner Denver, Inc. (the Parent Company), the
Guarantor Subsidiaries and the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis (which is derived
from Gardner Denvers historical reported financial information); (ii) for the Parent Company alone
(accounting for its Guarantor Subsidiaries and Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries on a cost basis under
which the investments are recorded by each entity owning a portion of another entity at historical
cost); (iii) for the Guarantor Subsidiaries alone; and (iv) for the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries
alone.
22
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
93,234 |
|
|
$ |
110,291 |
|
|
$ |
332,983 |
|
|
$ |
(74,028 |
) |
|
$ |
462,480 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
67,142 |
|
|
|
80,287 |
|
|
|
248,954 |
|
|
|
(74,514 |
) |
|
|
321,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
26,092 |
|
|
|
30,004 |
|
|
|
84,029 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
140,611 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
21,464 |
|
|
|
12,768 |
|
|
|
60,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,583 |
|
Other operating (income) expense, net |
|
|
(6,297 |
) |
|
|
5,070 |
|
|
|
10,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,873 |
|
Impairment of intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
10,925 |
|
|
|
12,166 |
|
|
|
(251,422 |
) |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
(227,845 |
) |
Interest expense (income) |
|
|
3,677 |
|
|
|
(4,215 |
) |
|
|
8,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,657 |
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
7,184 |
|
|
|
16,386 |
|
|
|
(259,370 |
) |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
(235,314 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
6,281 |
|
|
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
13,855 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
4,991 |
|
|
$ |
10,105 |
|
|
$ |
(264,433 |
) |
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
(249,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
95,899 |
|
|
$ |
134,222 |
|
|
$ |
338,254 |
|
|
$ |
(72,705 |
) |
|
$ |
495,670 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
65,722 |
|
|
|
93,217 |
|
|
|
244,715 |
|
|
|
(69,310 |
) |
|
|
334,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
30,177 |
|
|
|
41,005 |
|
|
|
93,539 |
|
|
|
(3,395 |
) |
|
|
161,326 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
23,572 |
|
|
|
13,596 |
|
|
|
49,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,619 |
|
Other operating (income) expense, net |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(4,327 |
) |
|
|
3,119 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1,241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
6,642 |
|
|
|
31,736 |
|
|
|
40,969 |
|
|
|
(3,399 |
) |
|
|
75,948 |
|
Interest expense (income) |
|
|
5,979 |
|
|
|
(2,943 |
) |
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
Other expense (income), net |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
34,680 |
|
|
|
38,692 |
|
|
|
(3,399 |
) |
|
|
70,589 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
13,006 |
|
|
|
7,221 |
|
|
|
(665 |
) |
|
|
19,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
448 |
|
|
$ |
21,674 |
|
|
$ |
31,471 |
|
|
$ |
(2,734 |
) |
|
$ |
50,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
20,597 |
|
|
$ |
1,223 |
|
|
$ |
110,921 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
132,741 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
53,587 |
|
|
|
58,275 |
|
|
|
244,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
356,711 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
38,173 |
|
|
|
58,498 |
|
|
|
194,313 |
|
|
|
(20,485 |
) |
|
|
270,499 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
19,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,440 |
|
|
|
4,535 |
|
|
|
31,049 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
3,593 |
|
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
12,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
135,024 |
|
|
|
122,161 |
|
|
|
570,239 |
|
|
|
(15,950 |
) |
|
|
811,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany (payable) receivable |
|
|
(384,574 |
) |
|
|
385,285 |
|
|
|
(711 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
893,423 |
|
|
|
198,653 |
|
|
|
87,347 |
|
|
|
(1,179,394 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
55,660 |
|
|
|
48,876 |
|
|
|
186,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291,497 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
124,045 |
|
|
|
200,824 |
|
|
|
210,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
535,695 |
|
Other intangibles, net |
|
|
9,569 |
|
|
|
45,692 |
|
|
|
255,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311,178 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
28,187 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
(11,533 |
) |
|
|
22,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
861,334 |
|
|
$ |
1,001,865 |
|
|
$ |
1,315,594 |
|
|
$ |
(1,206,877 |
) |
|
$ |
1,971,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
$ |
26,638 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
10,462 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
37,143 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
52,731 |
|
|
|
51,661 |
|
|
|
231,607 |
|
|
|
(1,403 |
) |
|
|
334,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
79,369 |
|
|
|
51,704 |
|
|
|
242,069 |
|
|
|
(1,403 |
) |
|
|
371,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term intercompany (receivable) payable |
|
|
(303,737 |
) |
|
|
(85,829 |
) |
|
|
389,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
|
438,068 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
25,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464,020 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,737 |
|
|
|
68,890 |
|
|
|
(11,533 |
) |
|
|
84,094 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
56,639 |
|
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
73,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
270,339 |
|
|
|
(6,193 |
) |
|
|
799,523 |
|
|
|
(12,936 |
) |
|
|
1,050,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
548,320 |
|
|
|
769,120 |
|
|
|
411,371 |
|
|
|
(1,179,394 |
) |
|
|
549,417 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
185,128 |
|
|
|
223,344 |
|
|
|
68,339 |
|
|
|
(14,915 |
) |
|
|
461,896 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(10,933 |
) |
|
|
15,594 |
|
|
|
36,361 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
41,390 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(132,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(132,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
590,995 |
|
|
|
1,008,058 |
|
|
|
516,071 |
|
|
|
(1,193,941 |
) |
|
|
921,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
861,334 |
|
|
$ |
1,001,865 |
|
|
$ |
1,315,594 |
|
|
$ |
(1,206,877 |
) |
|
$ |
1,971,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents |
|
$ |
2,126 |
|
|
$ |
807 |
|
|
$ |
117,802 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
120,735 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
67,813 |
|
|
|
57,247 |
|
|
|
263,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388,098 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
37,641 |
|
|
|
58,493 |
|
|
|
210,203 |
|
|
|
(21,512 |
) |
|
|
284,825 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
25,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,168 |
|
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
33,014 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
12,032 |
|
|
|
4,604 |
|
|
|
14,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
145,476 |
|
|
|
121,151 |
|
|
|
610,467 |
|
|
|
(19,530 |
) |
|
|
857,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany (payable) receivable |
|
|
(369,870 |
) |
|
|
368,024 |
|
|
|
1,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in affiliates |
|
|
886,150 |
|
|
|
198,653 |
|
|
|
104,024 |
|
|
|
(1,188,798 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
57,286 |
|
|
|
48,787 |
|
|
|
198,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,012 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
124,045 |
|
|
|
200,490 |
|
|
|
480,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
804,648 |
|
Other intangibles, net |
|
|
6,911 |
|
|
|
45,959 |
|
|
|
293,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,263 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
30,718 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
5,325 |
|
|
|
(9,793 |
) |
|
|
26,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
880,716 |
|
|
$ |
983,423 |
|
|
$ |
1,694,107 |
|
|
$ |
(1,218,121 |
) |
|
$ |
2,340,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current maturities of
long-term debt |
|
$ |
23,659 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
13,267 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,968 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
64,147 |
|
|
|
46,296 |
|
|
|
254,401 |
|
|
|
(4,430 |
) |
|
|
360,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
87,806 |
|
|
|
46,338 |
|
|
|
267,668 |
|
|
|
(4,430 |
) |
|
|
397,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term intercompany (receivable) payable |
|
|
(338,041 |
) |
|
|
(107,540 |
) |
|
|
445,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
|
491,323 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
15,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
506,700 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,639 |
|
|
|
72,372 |
|
|
|
(9,793 |
) |
|
|
91,218 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
68,302 |
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
76,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
309,390 |
|
|
|
(31,351 |
) |
|
|
877,561 |
|
|
|
(14,223 |
) |
|
|
1,141,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583 |
|
Capital in excess of par value |
|
|
544,575 |
|
|
|
778,472 |
|
|
|
411,422 |
|
|
|
(1,188,798 |
) |
|
|
545,671 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
180,137 |
|
|
|
213,239 |
|
|
|
332,772 |
|
|
|
(15,083 |
) |
|
|
711,065 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(23,130 |
) |
|
|
23,063 |
|
|
|
72,352 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
72,268 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(130,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(130,839 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
571,326 |
|
|
|
1,014,774 |
|
|
|
816,546 |
|
|
|
(1,203,898 |
) |
|
|
1,198,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
880,716 |
|
|
$ |
983,423 |
|
|
$ |
1,694,107 |
|
|
$ |
(1,218,121 |
) |
|
$ |
2,340,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities |
|
$ |
29,898 |
|
|
$ |
4,523 |
|
|
$ |
21,280 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
55,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(3,723 |
) |
|
|
(2,188 |
) |
|
|
(3,043 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,954 |
) |
Disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
Other |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(3,664 |
) |
|
|
(2,181 |
) |
|
|
(2,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in long-term intercompany receivables/payables |
|
|
31,705 |
|
|
|
(1,796 |
) |
|
|
(29,909 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on short-term borrowings |
|
|
(732 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,665 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,397 |
) |
Proceeds from short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,695 |
|
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(61,237 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,520 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,318 |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(759 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(10,236 |
) |
|
|
(1,806 |
) |
|
|
(21,593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,635 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(3,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,217 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents |
|
|
18,471 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
(6,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,006 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
2,126 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
117,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
20,597 |
|
|
$ |
1,223 |
|
|
$ |
110,921 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
132,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Three Months Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities |
|
$ |
31,735 |
|
|
$ |
929 |
|
|
$ |
32,777 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
65,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(2,168 |
) |
|
|
(1,420 |
) |
|
|
(5,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,553 |
) |
Disposals of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(2,160 |
) |
|
|
(1,357 |
) |
|
|
(5,057 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows From Financing Activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in long-term intercompany receivables/payables |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,128 |
) |
Proceeds from short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,705 |
|
Principal payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(20,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,582 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,783 |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
1,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,115 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
428 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(44,511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,511 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(33,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,448 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and equivalents |
|
|
(4,159 |
) |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
22,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,183 |
|
Cash and equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
10,409 |
|
|
|
(2,261 |
) |
|
|
84,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
6,250 |
|
|
$ |
(2,689 |
) |
|
$ |
107,544 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
111,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Note 17. Segment Results
Through December 31, 2008, the Companys organizational structure consisted of five operating
divisions: Compressor, Blower, Engineered Products, Thomas Products and Fluid Transfer. These
divisions comprised two reportable segments: Compressor and Vacuum Products and Fluid Transfer
Products. The Compressor, Blower, Engineered Products and Thomas Products divisions were
aggregated into the Compressor and Vacuum Products segment.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company reorganized its five former operating divisions into
two major product groups based primarily on the products and services offered to its customers: the
Industrial Products Group and the Engineered Products Group. The Industrial Products Group
includes the former Compressor and Blower Divisions, plus the multistage centrifugal blower
operations formerly managed in the Engineered Products Division. The Engineered Products Group is
comprised of the former Engineered Products (excluding the multistage centrifugal blower
operations), Thomas Products and Fluid Transfer Divisions. These changes were designed to
streamline operations, improve organizational efficiencies and create greater focus on customer
needs. As a result of these organizational changes, the Company realigned its segment reporting
structure with the newly formed product groups effective with the reporting period ended March 31,
2009. The Industrial Products Group and Engineered Products Group have each been determined to be
operating segments and reportable segments in accordance with SFAS No. 131.
In the Industrial Products Group, the Company designs, manufactures, markets and services the
following products and related aftermarket parts for industrial and commercial applications: rotary
screw, reciprocating, and sliding vane air compressors; and positive displacement, centrifugal and
side channel blowers; primarily serving general industrial and original equipment manufacturer
(OEM) applications. This segment also designs, manufactures, markets and services complementary
ancillary products. Stationary air compressors are used in manufacturing, process applications and
materials handling, and to power air tools and equipment. Blowers are used primarily in pneumatic
conveying, wastewater aeration, numerous applications in industrial manufacturing and engineered
vacuum systems. The markets served are primarily in Europe, the U.S. and Asia.
In the Engineered Products Group, the Company designs, manufactures, markets and services a
diverse group of products for industrial and commercial applications, OEM applications, engineered
systems and general industry. Products include pumps, liquid ring pumps, single-piece piston
reciprocating, diaphragm vacuum pumps, water jetting systems and related aftermarket parts used in
oil and natural gas well drilling, servicing and production and in industrial cleaning and
maintenance. Liquid ring pumps are used in many different applications such as water removal,
distilling, reacting, flare gas recovery, efficiency improvement, lifting and handling, and
filtering, principally in the pulp and paper, industrial manufacturing, petrochemical and power
industries. This segment also designs, manufactures, markets and services other fluid transfer
components and equipment for the chemical, petroleum and food industries. The markets served are
primarily in the U.S., Europe, Canada and Asia.
The following table provides financial information by business segment for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The information for the three-month period ended March 31,
2008 has been recast to reflect the realignment discussed above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Industrial Products Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
253,873 |
|
|
$ |
246,111 |
|
Operating (loss) income |
|
|
(262,087 |
) |
|
|
24,851 |
|
Operating (loss) income as a percentage of revenues |
|
NM |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered Products Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
208,607 |
|
|
$ |
249,559 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
34,242 |
|
|
|
51,097 |
|
Operating income as a percentage of revenues |
|
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Segment Results to Consolidated Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating (loss) income |
|
$ |
(227,845 |
) |
|
$ |
75,948 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
7,657 |
|
|
|
5,600 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated (loss) income before income taxes |
|
$ |
(235,314 |
) |
|
$ |
70,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a preliminary $265.0 million impairment
charge to reduce the carrying amount of goodwill in the Industrial Products Group based on the
results of an interim assessment of such goodwill. See Note 5 Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. Primarily as a result of this charge, the identifiable assets of the Industrial Products
Group were reduced to approximately $1,075.5 million at March 31, 2009 compared to approximately
$1,428.1 million at December 31, 2008. The Company currently expects to finalize its impairment
analysis during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and, upon its completion, there could be a material
adjustment to the preliminary charge recorded in the first quarter of 2009.
The following tables provide selected segment financial information recast to reflect the
realignment of the Companys segment reporting structure for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
First |
|
|
Second |
|
|
Third |
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Year |
|
Industrial Products Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
246,111 |
|
|
$ |
269,270 |
|
|
$ |
247,827 |
|
|
$ |
294,893 |
|
|
$ |
1,058,101 |
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
24,851 |
|
|
|
29,509 |
|
|
|
18,164 |
|
|
|
(1,201 |
) |
|
|
71,323 |
|
Operating income (loss) as a percentage
of segment revenues |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
(0.4 |
)% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered Products Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
249,559 |
|
|
$ |
248,842 |
|
|
$ |
232,483 |
|
|
$ |
229,347 |
|
|
$ |
960,231 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
51,097 |
|
|
|
44,086 |
|
|
|
37,292 |
|
|
|
54,401 |
|
|
|
186,876 |
|
Operating income as a percentage of
segment revenues |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
23.7 |
% |
|
|
19.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Segment Operating Income
to Consolidated Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
$ |
75,948 |
|
|
$ |
73,595 |
|
|
$ |
55,456 |
|
|
$ |
53,200 |
|
|
$ |
258,199 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
5,600 |
|
|
|
5,041 |
|
|
|
3,829 |
|
|
|
11,013 |
|
|
|
25,483 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
(237 |
) |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income before income taxes |
|
$ |
70,589 |
|
|
$ |
68,890 |
|
|
$ |
51,864 |
|
|
$ |
42,123 |
|
|
$ |
233,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Industrial Products Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
943,992 |
|
|
$ |
874,927 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
97,702 |
|
|
|
89,586 |
|
Operating income as a percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
|
|
10.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Engineered Products Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
924,852 |
|
|
$ |
794,249 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
193,817 |
|
|
|
144,763 |
|
Operating income as a percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of Segment Operating Income to
Consolidated Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
$ |
291,519 |
|
|
$ |
234,349 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
26,211 |
|
|
|
37,379 |
|
Other income, net |
|
|
(3,052 |
) |
|
|
(3,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income before income taxes |
|
$ |
268,360 |
|
|
$ |
200,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
Note 18. Subsequent Events
In April 2009, the Company finalized and announced additional restructuring plans, including
the closure and consolidation of facilities, primarily in Europe and North America, and various
employee termination programs. The Company currently expects to record charges totaling
approximately $9.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2009 in connection with these actions,
excluding the effect of the potential receipt of certain government-funded incentives.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008, including the financial statements, accompanying notes and managements
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, and the interim condensed
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q.
Operating Segments
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company reorganized its five former operating divisions into
two major product groups: the Industrial Products Group and the Engineered Products Group. The
Industrial Products Group includes the former Compressor and Blower Divisions, plus the multistage
centrifugal blower operations formerly managed in the Engineered Products Division. The Engineered
Products Group is comprised of the former Engineered Products (excluding the multistage centrifugal
blower operations), Thomas Products and Fluid Transfer Divisions. These changes were designed to
streamline operations, improve organizational efficiencies and create greater focus on customer
needs. As a result of these organizational changes, the Company realigned its segment reporting
structure with the newly formed product groups effective with the reporting period ended March 31,
2009. The Industrial Products Group and Engineered Products Group constitute the Companys two
reportable segments.
In the Industrial Products Group, the Company designs, manufactures, markets and services the
following products and related aftermarket parts for industrial and commercial applications: rotary
screw, reciprocating, and sliding vane air compressors; and positive displacement, centrifugal and
side channel blowers; primarily serving general industrial and original equipment manufacturer
(OEM) applications. This segment also designs, manufactures, markets and services complementary
ancillary products. Stationary air compressors are used in manufacturing, process applications and
materials handling, and to power air tools and equipment. Blowers are used primarily in pneumatic
conveying, wastewater aeration, numerous applications in industrial manufacturing and engineered
vacuum systems. The markets served are primarily in Europe, the U.S. and Asia.
In the Engineered Products Group, the Company designs, manufactures, markets and services a
diverse group of products for industrial and commercial applications, OEM applications, engineered
systems and general industry. Products include pumps, liquid ring pumps, single-piece piston
reciprocating, diaphragm vacuum pumps, water jetting systems and related aftermarket parts used in
oil and natural gas well drilling, servicing and production and in industrial cleaning and
maintenance. Liquid ring pumps are used in many different applications such as water removal,
distilling, reacting, flare gas recovery, efficiency improvement, lifting and handling, and
filtering, principally in the pulp and paper, industrial manufacturing, petrochemical and power
industries. This segment also designs, manufactures, markets and services other fluid transfer
components and equipment for the chemical, petroleum and food industries. The markets served are
primarily in the U.S., Europe, Canada and Asia.
The Company has determined its reportable segments in accordance with SFAS No. 131 and
evaluates the performance of its reportable segments based on, among other measures, operating
income, which is defined as income before interest expense, other income, net, and income taxes.
Reportable segment operating income and segment operating margin (defined as segment operating
income divided by segment revenues) are indicative of short-term operating performance and ongoing
profitability. Management closely monitors the operating income and operating margin of each
reportable segment to evaluate past performance and actions required to improve profitability. See
Note 17 Segment Results in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
To supplement the Companys financial information presented in accordance with GAAP,
management, from time to time, uses additional measures to clarify and enhance understanding of
past performance and prospects for the future. These measures may exclude,
30
for example, the impact of unique and infrequent items or items outside of managements
control (e.g. foreign currency exchange rates). Such measures are provided in addition to and
should not be considered to be a substitute for, or superior to, the comparable measure under GAAP.
Results of Operations
Performance during the Quarter Ended March 31, 2009 Compared
with the Quarter Ended March 31, 2008
Revenues
Revenues decreased $33.2 million, or 6.7%, to $462.5 million in the three months ended March
31, 2009, compared to $495.7 million in the first quarter of 2008. This decrease was attributable
to lower volume in both segments and unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates ($31.9
million, or 7%), partially offset by the acquisitions of CompAir and Best Aire, Inc. ($94.3
million, or 19%) and price increases ($14.4 million, or 3%). The net combined volume decline
between the two segments was $110.0 million, or 22%.
Revenues in the Industrial Products Group increased $7.8 million, or 3%, to $253.9 million in
the first quarter of 2009, compared to $246.1 million in the first quarter of 2008. This increase
reflects the effect of acquisitions ($94.3 million, or 38%) and price increases (2%), largely
offset by lower volume (30%) and unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates (7%). The
volume decline was attributable to the global economic slowdown and was realized across most
product lines and geographic regions.
Revenues in the Engineered Products Group decreased $41.0 million, or 16%, to $208.6 million
in the first quarter of 2009, compared to $249.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. This
decrease reflects lower volume (13%) and unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates
(6%), partially offset by price increases (3%). The decline in volume was realized across most
product lines and geographic regions.
Gross Profit
Gross profit decreased $20.7 million, or 13%, to $140.6 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2009, compared to $161.3 million in the first quarter of 2008, and as a percentage of
revenues was 30.4% in 2009, compared to 32.5% in 2008. Acquisitions provided incremental gross
profit of approximately $23.0 million in the first quarter of 2009. The decrease in gross profit
primarily reflects the volume reductions discussed above and unfavorable changes in foreign
currency exchange rates, partly offset by price increases. The decline in gross profit as a
percentage of revenues was due primarily to unfavorable product mix, primarily related to the
CompAir product lines which have a lower gross margin percentage than the Company average, and the
loss of volume leverage on fixed and semi-fixed costs as production levels declined, partially
offset by the benefits of operational improvements and cost reductions.
Selling and Administrative Expenses
Selling and administrative expenses increased $8.0 million to $94.6 million in the first
quarter of 2009, compared to $86.6 million in the first quarter of 2008. This increase primarily
reflects the incremental effect of acquisitions of approximately $22.6 million, partially offset by
cost reductions of approximately $7.4 million realized through the implementation of integration
and other restructuring initiatives, and the favorable effect of changes in foreign currency
exchange rates of approximately $7.2 million. As a percentage of revenues, selling and
administrative expenses increased to 20.5% in 2009 compared to 17.5% in 2008 as a result of the
acquisition of CompAir, which currently has higher selling and administrative expenses as a
percentage of sales than the rest of the Company, and the reduced leverage resulting from lower
revenues.
Other Operating Expense (Income), Net
Other operating expense (income), net, consisting primarily of restructuring charges and
realized and unrealized foreign currency gains and losses, was $8.9 million in the first quarter of
2009 compared to ($1.2) million in the first quarter of 2008. This change reflects restructuring
charges of $7.9 million recorded in the first quarter of 2009 and a $1.6 million reduction in
foreign currency transaction gains.
31
Impairment of Intangible Assets
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a preliminary $265.0 million impairment
charge to reduce the carrying amount of goodwill in its Industrial Products Group based on the
results of an interim assessment of such goodwill. This assessment was conducted as a result of
the continuing significant decline in order rates for certain products in the Industrial Products
Group during the first quarter of 2009, the uncertain outlook regarding when such order rates might
return to levels and growth rates experienced in recent years and the sustained decline in the
price of the Companys common stock through March 31, 2009. The impairment charge recorded in the
first quarter of 2009 was based on the Companys estimate, determined with the assistance of a
third-party valuation firm, of the amount by which the implied fair value of the goodwill of one
reporting unit within the Industrial Products Group was less than its carrying value. The Company
currently expects to finalize its impairment analysis during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and,
upon its completion, there could be a material adjustment to the preliminary charge recorded in the
first quarter of 2009. See Note 5 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets for further discussion of
this preliminary impairment charge.
Operating (Loss) Income
An operating loss of $227.8 million in the first quarter of 2009 compares to operating income
of $75.9 million in the first quarter of 2008. These results reflect the revenue, gross profit,
selling and administrative expense, other operating expense (income), net, and impairment charge
factors discussed above. The operating loss in the first quarter of 2009 reflects the intangible
impairment charge of $265.0 million and charges totaling $8.1 million associated with profit
improvement initiatives (consisting primarily of employee termination costs).
The Industrial Products Group generated an operating loss of $262.1 million in the first
quarter of 2009 compared to operating income of $24.9 million in the first quarter of 2008 (see
Note 17 Segment Results in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a
reconciliation of segment operating (loss) income to consolidated (loss) income before income
taxes). This decline in year over year performance was due primarily to the intangible impairment
charge of $265.0 million, lower revenue and the resulting loss of volume leverage on fixed and
semi-fixed costs as production levels declined, partially offset by the benefits of operational
improvements and cost reductions. In addition, first quarter 2009 results were negatively impacted
by charges recorded in connection with the profit improvement initiatives totaling $1.6 million.
The Engineered Products Group generated operating income of $34.2 million and operating margin
of 16.4% in the first quarter of 2009, compared to $51.1 million and 20.5%, respectively, in the
same period of 2008 (see Note 17 Segment Results in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements for a reconciliation of segment operating (loss) income to consolidated
(loss) income before income taxes). The decline in segment operating income and segment operating
margin was due primarily to the lower revenue discussed above and the resulting loss of volume
leverage on fixed and semi-fixed costs as production levels declined, partially offset by the
benefits of operational improvements and cost reductions. In addition, first quarter 2009 results
were negatively impacted by charges recorded in connection with the profit improvement initiatives
totaling $6.5 million.
Interest Expense
Interest expense of $7.7 million in the first quarter of 2009 increased $2.1 million from $5.6
million in the first quarter of 2008, due to higher average borrowings in 2009 compared with the
first quarter of 2008, partially offset by a lower weighted average interest rate reflecting
declines in the floating-rate indices of the Companys borrowings. The weighted average interest
rate, including the amortization of debt issuance costs, declined to 5.9% in the first quarter of
2009 compared to 7.7% in the first quarter of 2008, due primarily to a decline in the USD LIBOR (on
which, in part, the interest rate on borrowings under the Companys 2008 Credit Agreement are
based).
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was $13.9 million for the three-month period ended March 31,
2009 compared to $19.7 million and an effective income tax rate of 28.0%, respectively, for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2008. The provision in the first quarter of 2009 includes $8.6
million associated with the write-off of
deferred tax assets related to net operating losses recorded in connection with the acquisition of
CompAir. This write-off was based on revisions to
32
projections associated with the goodwill impairment charge. The goodwill for which the
impairment charge was taken was not amortizable for tax purposes and, accordingly, deferred tax
liabilities were not recorded when the goodwill was established and a corresponding tax benefit did
not arise upon impairment of the goodwill. The provision in the first quarter of 2009 also
includes the reversal of an income tax reserve related to a prior acquisition and related interest
totaling $3.6 million associated with the completion of a foreign tax examination. Excluding the
pre-tax goodwill impairment charge of $265.0 million, the
write-off of deferred tax assets of $8.6 million and
the $3.6 million tax reserve reversal, the effective income tax rate was 29.6%.
Net (Loss) Income
The consolidated net loss of $249.2 million and diluted loss per share of $4.81 in the first
quarter of 2009 compares with net income and diluted earnings per share of $50.9 million and $0.95,
respectively, recorded in the first quarter of 2008. This decline was the net result of the
factors affecting operating (loss) income, interest expense and the provision for income taxes
discussed above. The net effect of the impairment charge of $265.0 million, write-off of deferred tax assets of $8.6 million and charges totaling $8.1 million associated with profit improvement
initiatives was a net reduction of first quarter 2009 diluted earnings per share of approximately
$5.39. The reversal of the income tax reserve and related interest increased first quarter 2009
diluted earnings per share by approximately $0.07.
Outlook
In general, the Company believes that demand for products in its Industrial Products Group
tends to correlate with the rate of total industrial capacity utilization and the rate of change of
industrial production because air is often used as a fourth utility in the manufacturing process.
Rates above 80% have historically indicated a good demand environment for industrial equipment such
as compressor and vacuum products. Over longer time periods, the Company believes that demand also
tends to follow economic growth patterns indicated by the rates of change in the gross domestic
product (GDP) around the world. During 2008, total industrial capacity utilization rates in the
U.S., as published by the Federal Reserve Board, declined below 80% and continued to decline
throughout the year to 2003 levels. This trend continued through the first quarter of 2009. The
rapid decline in industrial production in the U.S. and Europe has resulted in reduced levels of
capacity utilization and reduced demand for capital equipment such as compressor packages. Orders
for products serving industrial end market segments remained weak in the first quarter of 2009,
especially in the U.S. and Europe. In the first quarter of 2009, orders in the Industrial Products
Group decreased $28.6 million, or 10%, to $244.7 million, compared to $273.3 million in the first
quarter of 2008. This decrease reflected lower demand across most product lines and geographic
regions as a result of the global economic downturn ($105.7 million) and the unfavorable effect of
changes in foreign currency exchange rates ($15.5 million), partially offset by the effect of
acquisitions ($92.6 million). Order backlog for the Industrial Products Group decreased 3% to
$245.3 million as of March 31, 2009, compared to $252.0 million as of March 31, 2008 due to reduced
demand in most product lines and geographic regions ($83.8 million) and unfavorable changes in
foreign currency exchange rates ($20.7 million), partially offset by the effect of acquisitions
($97.8 million). As a result of the Companys expectation for on-going weak economic conditions,
it anticipates demand for industrial products to remain relatively low for the remainder of 2009.
When demand begins to recover, the Company expects to initially see increased orders for
aftermarket parts and shorter lead-time products that are more susceptible to swings in the
economy, such as those that serve light industry and Class 8 trucks. At this point, the Company
has not yet seen signs of that demand improving.
Orders in the Engineered Products Group decreased 41% to $148.4 million in the first quarter
of 2009, compared to $251.7 million in the first quarter of 2008, due to lower demand ($92.4
million) and the unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates ($10.9 million).
Order backlog for the Engineered Products Group declined 28% to $259.6 million at March 31, 2009,
compared to $359.2 million at March 31, 2008, as a result of lower demand ($76.8 million) and the
unfavorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates ($22.8 million). Orders for
products in the Companys Engineered Products Group have historically corresponded to demand for
petrochemical products and been influenced by prices for oil and natural gas and rig count, among
other factors, which the Company cannot predict. Although the Company expects orders for
Engineered Products to decline through the balance of 2009, shipments from current backlog provide
slightly better visibility than exists for the Industrial Products Group. The Company currently
expects revenues in the Engineered Products Group to decline through the balance of 2009 and is
uncertain how long orders will remain at lower levels. However, the Company has identified
opportunities to increase aftermarket sales, which could help mitigate the lower demand for new
units.
Order backlog consists of orders believed to be firm for which a customer purchase order has
been received or communicated. However, since orders may be rescheduled or canceled, backlog does
not necessarily reflect future sales levels.
33
The deteriorating worldwide economic conditions and financial crisis have clouded the
Companys visibility into many of its key end market segments and it remains cautious in its
outlook for the balance of 2009 and beyond. The Company estimates that it may incur additional
restructuring costs of approximately $26.0 million (consisting primarily of employee termination
benefits) for further consolidation of manufacturing capacity in the last three quarters of 2009.
Actual restructuring costs incurred in 2009 will be dependent on, among other things, the length
and severity of the current economic downturn.
The Company currently expects to finalize its goodwill impairment analysis during the quarter
ended June 30, 2009. Upon its completion, or if the Company
experiences further deterioration in the price of its common stock and orders or experiences other indicators of further impairment, there could be a material adjustment to the estimated
charge recorded in the first quarter of 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating Working Capital
During the three months ended March 31, 2009, operating working capital (defined as accounts
receivable plus inventories, less accounts payable and accrued liabilities) declined $19.9 million
to $292.6 million from $312.5 million at December 31, 2008 due to reduced accounts receivable and
inventory levels and the favorable effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, partially
offset by lower accrued liabilities. Inventory reductions generated $7.0 million in cash flows in
the first three months of 2009. Inventory turns declined slightly to 4.8 times in the first quarter
of 2009 compared to 5.0 times in the first quarter of 2008, due primarily to the significant
decline in cost of goods sold as a result of the reduced volume leverage, mitigated by the
inventory reduction achieved through manufacturing velocity improvements realized from the
completion of certain lean manufacturing initiatives. Excluding the effect of changes in foreign
currency exchange rates, accounts receivable declined $22.1 million during the first quarter of
2009 due primarily to lower revenue. Days sales in receivables increased to 70 at March 31, 2009
from 68 at December 31, 2008, due largely to the continued increase in revenues outside the U.S.,
which typically carry longer payment terms. The decrease in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities reflected reduced production levels, severance and other payments under previously
accrued restructuring initiatives, a reduction in customer advance payments and cash payments under
the Companys incentive compensation plans.
Cash Flows
Cash provided by operating activities of $55.7 million in the first three months of 2009
decreased $9.7 million from $65.4 million in the same period of 2008. This decline was primarily
due to lower earnings (excluding non-cash charges for the impairment of intangible assets,
depreciation and amortization and unrealized foreign currency transaction gains), partially offset
by cash generated from operating working capital. Operating working capital generated cash of $11.0
million in the first three months of 2009 compared to $5.1 million in the first three months of
2008. Cash provided by accounts receivable of $22.1 million in the first quarter of 2009 compares
with cash used of $6.2 million in the first quarter of 2008. In the first quarter of 2009,
collections of accounts receivable exceeded additions due the lower sales levels. The increase in
2008 primarily reflected increased sales outside of the U.S. Cash provided by inventories of $7.0
million in the first three months of 2009 represents a $6.7 million improvement over cash provided
by inventories of $0.3 million in the first three months of 2008. This improvement reflects
increased manufacturing velocity realized from the completion of certain lean manufacturing
initiatives and inventory reductions attributable to volume declines. Cash outflows from accounts
payable and accrued liabilities were $18.1 million in the first three months of 2009 compared to
$10.9 million provided in the first three months of 2008. The year over year change reflected
reduced production levels, severance and other payments under previously accrued restructuring
initiatives and a greater reduction in customer advance payments in 2009 compared to 2008. Cash
flow from other assets and liabilities in the first quarter of 2009 consisted primarily of receipts
on the settlement of foreign currency (primarily GBP) forward contracts associated with the funding
of the acquisition of CompAir in 2008.
Net cash used in investing activities of $8.8 million and $8.6 million in the first three
months of 2009 and 2008, respectively, consisted primarily of capital expenditures on assets
intended to increase operating efficiency and flexibility, support acquisition projects and bring
new products to market. The Company currently expects capital expenditures to total approximately
$60.0 to $70.0 million for the full year 2009, including the purchase of certain facilities leased
by subsidiaries acquired in the CompAir acquisition. Capital expenditures related to environmental
projects have not been significant in the past and are not expected to be significant in the
foreseeable future.
34
Net cash used in financing activities of $33.6 million in the first three months of 2009
compares with $44.4 million used in the same period of 2008. Cash provided by operating activities
was used for net repayments of short-term and long-term borrowings of $32.9 million in the
three-month period of 2009 and $0.2 million in the three-month period of 2008. Lower debt
repayments in the first quarter of 2008 were primarily attributable to the Companys repurchase of
shares of its common stock totaling $44.5 million, including shares exchanged or surrendered in
connection with its stock option plans of $0.5 million.
Share Repurchase Program
In November 2008, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program
to acquire up to 3.0 million shares of the Companys outstanding common stock. As of March 31,
2009, no shares under this program have been repurchased.
Liquidity
The Companys debt to total capital (defined as total debt divided by the sum of total debt
plus total stockholders equity) was 35.2% as of March 31, 2009, compared to 31.2% at December 31,
2008 and 19.4% at March 31, 2008.
The Companys primary cash requirements include working capital, capital expenditures, stock
repurchases, funding of employee termination and other restructuring costs, and principal and
interest payments on indebtedness. The Companys primary sources of funds are its ongoing net cash
flows from operating activities and availability under its Revolving Line of Credit (as defined
below). At March 31, 2009, the Company had cash and equivalents of $132.7 million, of which $3.7
million was pledged to financial institutions as collateral to support the issuance of standby
letters of credit and similar instruments. The Company also had $283.0 million of unused
availability under its Revolving Line of Credit at March 31, 2009.
On September 19, 2008, the Company entered into the 2008 Credit Agreement consisting of (i) a
$310.0 million Revolving Line of Credit (the Revolving Line of Credit), (ii) a $180.0 million
term loan (U.S. Dollar Term Loan) and (iii) a 120.0 million term loan (Euro Term Loan). In
addition, the 2008 Credit Agreement provides for a possible increase in the revolving credit
facility of up to $200.0 million.
The interest rates per annum applicable to loans under the 2008 Credit Agreement are, at the
Companys option, either a base rate plus an applicable margin percentage or a Eurocurrency rate
plus an applicable margin. The base rate is the greater of (i) the prime rate or (ii) one-half of
1% over the weighted average of rates on overnight federal funds as published by the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York. The Eurocurrency rate is the London interbank offer rate (LIBOR).
The initial applicable margin percentage over LIBOR under the 2008 Credit Agreement was 2.5%
with respect to the term loans and 2.1% with respect to loans under the Revolving Line of Credit,
and the initial applicable margin percentage over the base rate was 1.25%. After the Companys
delivery of its financial statements and compliance certificate for each fiscal quarter, the
applicable margin percentages will be subject to adjustments based upon the ratio of the Companys
Consolidated Total Debt to Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization) (each as defined in the 2008 Credit Agreement) being within certain
defined ranges.
The obligations under the 2008 Credit Agreement are guaranteed by the Companys existing and
future domestic subsidiaries. The obligations under the 2008 Credit Agreement are also secured by a
pledge of the capital stock of each of the Companys existing and future material domestic
subsidiaries, as well as 65% of the capital stock of each of the Companys existing and future
first-tier material foreign subsidiaries.
The 2008 Credit Agreement includes customary covenants. Subject to certain exceptions, these
covenants restrict or limit the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to, among other things:
incur liens; engage in mergers, consolidations and sales of assets; incur additional indebtedness;
pay dividends and redeem stock; make investments (including loans and advances); enter into
transactions with affiliates, make capital expenditures and incur rental obligations. In addition,
the 2008 Credit Agreement requires the Company to maintain compliance with certain financial ratios
on a quarterly basis, including a maximum total leverage ratio test and a minimum interest coverage
ratio test. The maximum total leverage ratio test will become more restrictive over time.
35
The 2008 Credit Agreement contains customary events of default, including upon a change of
control. If an event of default occurs, the lenders under the 2008 Credit Agreement will be
entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of amounts due under the 2008 Credit
Agreement.
The U.S. Dollar and Euro Term Loans have a final maturity of October 15, 2013. The U.S.
Dollar Term Loan requires quarterly principal payments aggregating approximately $11.3 million,
$20.3 million, $29.2 million, $49.5 million and $67.5 million in fiscal years 2009 through 2013,
respectively. The Euro Term Loan requires quarterly principal payments aggregating approximately
7.5 million, 13.5 million, 19.5 million, 33.0 million and 45.0 million in fiscal years 2009
through 2013, respectively.
The Revolving Line of Credit also matures on October 15, 2013. Loans under this facility may
be denominated in USD or several foreign currencies and may be borrowed by the Company or two of
its foreign subsidiaries as outlined in the 2008 Credit Agreement.
The Company issued $125.0 million of 8% Senior Subordinated Notes (the Notes) in 2005. The
Notes have a fixed annual interest rate of 8% and are guaranteed by certain of the Companys
domestic subsidiaries (the Guarantors). At any time prior to May 1, 2009, the Company may redeem
all or part of the Notes issued under the Indenture among the Company, the Guarantors and The Bank
of New York Trust Company, N.A. (the Indenture) at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
principal amount of the Notes redeemed plus a premium as determined under the Indenture, accrued
and unpaid interest through May 1, 2009 and liquidated damages, if any. On or after May 1, 2009,
the Company may redeem all or a part of the Notes at varying redemption prices, plus accrued and
unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any. The Company may also repurchase Notes from time to
time in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. Upon a change of control, as
defined in the Indenture, the Company is required to offer to purchase all of the Notes then
outstanding at 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated
damages, if any. The Indenture contains events of default and affirmative, negative and financial
covenants customary for such financings, including, among other things, limits on incurring
additional debt and restricted payments.
Management currently expects the Companys future cash flows from operating activities will be
sufficient to fund its scheduled debt service, stock repurchase program and capital expenditures
for at least the next twelve months. The Company continues to consider acquisition opportunities,
but the size and timing of any future acquisitions and the related potential capital requirements
cannot be predicted. In the event that suitable businesses are available for acquisition upon
acceptable terms, the Company may obtain all or a portion of the necessary financing through the
incurrence of additional long-term borrowings.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table and accompanying disclosures summarize the Companys significant
contractual obligations at March 31, 2009 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on
its liquidity and cash flow in future periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After |
Contractual Cash Obligations |
|
Total |
|
of 2009 |
|
2010-2011 |
|
2012 2013 |
|
2013 |
|
Debt |
|
$ |
492.3 |
|
|
$ |
26.2 |
|
|
$ |
94.6 |
|
|
$ |
360.0 |
|
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
Estimated interest payments (1) |
|
|
84.6 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
Capital leases |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
109.3 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
Purchase obligations (2) |
|
|
174.9 |
|
|
|
170.1 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
870.0 |
|
|
$ |
238.1 |
|
|
$ |
176.3 |
|
|
$ |
403.7 |
|
|
$ |
51.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Estimated interest payments for long-term debt were calculated as follows: for fixed-rate
debt and term debt, interest was calculated based on applicable rates and payment dates; for
variable-rate debt and/or non-term debt, interest rates and payment dates were estimated based
on managements determination of the most likely scenarios for each relevant debt instrument.
Management expects to settle such interest payments with cash flows from operating activities
and/or short-term borrowings. |
|
(2) |
|
Purchase obligations consist primarily of agreements to purchase inventory or services made
in the normal course of business to meet operational requirements. The purchase obligation
amounts do not represent the entire anticipated purchases in the future, but |
36
|
|
|
|
|
represent only those items for which the Company is contractually obligated as of March 31, 2009.
For this reason, these amounts will not provide a complete and reliable indicator of the
Companys expected future cash outflows. |
In accordance with SFAS No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 123(R) (SFAS No.
158), the total pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities recognized on the
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008 were $92.5 million and represented the funded
status of the Companys defined benefit plans at the end of 2008. The total pension and other
postretirement benefit liability is included in the consolidated balance sheet line items accrued
liabilities, postretirement benefits other than pensions and other liabilities. Because this
liability is impacted by, among other items, plan funding levels, changes in plan demographics and
assumptions, and investment return on plan assets, it does not represent expected liquidity needs.
Accordingly, the Company did not include this liability in the Contractual Cash Obligations
table.
The Company funds its U.S. qualified pension plans in accordance with the Employee Retirement
Income Security Act of 1974 regulations for the minimum annual required contribution and Internal
Revenue Service regulations for the maximum annual allowable tax deduction. The Company is
committed to making the required minimum contributions and expects to contribute a total of
approximately $1.7 million to its U.S. qualified pension plans during 2009. Furthermore, the
Company expects to contribute a total of approximately $2.1 million to its U.S. postretirement
health care benefit plans during 2009. Future contributions are dependent upon various factors
including the performance of the plan assets, benefit payment experience and changes, if any, to
current funding requirements. Therefore, no amounts were included in the Contractual Cash
Obligations table. The Company generally expects to fund all future contributions with cash flows
from operating activities.
The Companys non-U.S. pension plans are funded in accordance with local laws and income tax
regulations. The Company expects to contribute a total of approximately $4.0 million to its
non-U.S. qualified pension plans during 2009, based on foreign currency exchange rates at December
31, 2008. No amounts have been included in the Contractual Cash Obligations table due to the same
reasons noted above. The Company generally expects to fund all future contributions with cash
flows from operating activities.
Disclosure of amounts in the Contractual Cash Obligations table regarding expected benefit
payments in future years for the Companys pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans
cannot be properly reflected due to the ongoing nature of the obligations of these plans. In order
to inform the reader about expected benefit payments for these plans over the next several years,
the Company anticipates the annual benefit payments for the U.S. plans to be in the range of
approximately $8.0 million to $9.0 million in 2009 and to remain at or near these annual levels for
the next several years, and the annual benefit payments for the non-U.S. plans to be in the range
of approximately $5.5 million to $6.5 million in 2009 and to increase by approximately $0.5 million
each year over the next several years, based on foreign currency exchange rates at December 31,
2008. The majority of estimated future benefit payments are expected to be paid from plan assets.
Net deferred income tax liabilities were $53.0 million as of March 31, 2009. This amount is
not included in the Contractual Cash Obligations table because the Company believes this
presentation would not be meaningful. Net deferred income tax liabilities are calculated based on
temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their book basis, which
will result in taxable amounts in future years when the book basis is settled. The results of these
calculations do not have a direct connection with the amount of cash taxes to be paid in any future
periods. As a result, scheduling net deferred income tax liabilities as payments due by period
could be misleading, because this scheduling would not relate to liquidity needs.
In the normal course of business, the Company or its subsidiaries may sometimes be required to
provide surety bonds, standby letters of credit or similar instruments to guarantee its performance
of contractual or legal obligations. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had $75.8 million in such
instruments outstanding and had pledged $3.7 million of cash to the issuing financial institutions
as collateral for such instruments.
Contingencies
The Company is a party to various legal proceedings, lawsuits and administrative actions,
which are of an ordinary or routine nature. In addition, due to the bankruptcies of several
asbestos manufacturers and other primary defendants, among other things, the Company has been named
as a defendant in a number of asbestos personal injury lawsuits. The Company has also been named as
a defendant in a number of silica personal injury lawsuits. The plaintiffs in these suits allege
exposure to asbestos or silica from multiple sources and
37
typically the Company is one of approximately 25 or more named defendants. In the Companys
experience to date, the substantial majority of the plaintiffs have not suffered an injury for
which the Company bears responsibility.
Predecessors to the Company sometimes manufactured, distributed and/or sold products allegedly
at issue in the pending asbestos and silica litigation lawsuits (the Products). However, neither
the Company nor its predecessors ever mined, manufactured, mixed, produced or distributed asbestos
fiber or silica sand, the materials that allegedly caused the injury underlying the lawsuits.
Moreover, the asbestos-containing components of the Products were enclosed within the subject
Products.
The Company has entered into a series of cost-sharing agreements with multiple insurance
companies to secure coverage for asbestos and silica lawsuits. The Company also believes some of
the potential liabilities regarding these lawsuits are covered by indemnity agreements with other
parties. The Companys uninsured settlement payments for past asbestos and silica lawsuits have not
been material.
The Company believes that the pending and future asbestos and silica lawsuits are not likely
to, in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position,
results of operations or liquidity, based on: the Companys anticipated insurance and
indemnification rights to address the risks of such matters; the limited potential asbestos
exposure from the components described above; the Companys experience that the vast majority of
plaintiffs are not impaired with a disease attributable to alleged exposure to asbestos or silica
from or relating to the Products or for which the Company otherwise bears responsibility; various
potential defenses available to the Company with respect to such matters; and the Companys prior
disposition of comparable matters. However, due to inherent uncertainties of litigation and because
future developments, including, without limitation, potential insolvencies of insurance companies
or other defendants, could cause a different outcome, there can be no assurance that the resolution
of pending or future lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated
financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
The Company has been identified as a potentially responsible party (PRP) with respect to
several sites designated for cleanup under federal Superfund or similar state laws that impose
liability for cleanup of certain waste sites and for related natural resource damages. Persons
potentially liable for such costs and damages generally include the site owner or operator and
persons that disposed or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances found at those sites.
Although these laws impose joint and several liability, in application, the PRPs typically allocate
the investigation and cleanup costs based upon the volume of waste contributed by each PRP. Based
on currently available information, the Company was only a small contributor to these waste sites,
and the Company has, or is attempting to negotiate, de minimis settlements for their cleanup. The
cleanup of the remaining sites is substantially complete and the Companys future obligations
entail a share of the sites ongoing operating and maintenance expense.
The Company is also addressing three on-site cleanups for which it is the primary responsible
party. Two of these cleanup sites are in the operation and maintenance stage and the third is in
the implementation stage. The Company is also negotiating a settlement through a voluntary cleanup
program with other potentially responsible parties and the relevant governmental agencies on a
fourth site. Based on currently available information, the Company does not anticipate that any of
these sites will result in material additional costs beyond those already accrued on its balance
sheet.
The Company has an accrued liability on its balance sheet to the extent costs are known or can
be reasonably estimated for its remaining financial obligations for these matters. Based upon
consideration of currently available information, the Company does not anticipate any material
adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition, liquidity or competitive position
as a result of compliance with federal, state, local or foreign environmental laws or regulations,
or cleanup costs relating to the sites discussed above.
New Accounting Standards
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS No. 157), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for
using fair value to measure assets and liabilities, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies whenever other statements require or permit assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value. This statement was effective for the Company on January
1, 2008. In February 2008, the FASB released FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of
FASB Statement No. 157, which delayed for one year the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for all
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed
in the financial statements at
38
fair value at least annually. Items in this classification include goodwill, asset retirement
obligations, rationalization accruals, intangible assets with indefinite lives and certain other
items. The adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 157 with respect to the Companys financial
assets and liabilities and non-financial assets and liabilities did not have a significant effect
on the Companys consolidated statements of operations, balance sheets and statements of cash
flows. See Note 12 Hedging Activities and Fair Value Measurements for the disclosures required by
SFAS No. 157.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (SFAS
No. 141(R)), which establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer of a business is
to (i) recognize and measure in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the
liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (ii) recognize and measure
the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and (iii)
determine what information to disclose to enable users of its financial statements to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination. This statement requires an acquirer to
recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the
acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date. This replaces the
guidance of SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, which requires the cost of an acquisition to be
allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
values. In addition, costs incurred by the acquirer to effect the acquisition and restructuring
costs that the acquirer expects to incur, but is not obligated to incur, are to be recognized
separately from the acquisition. SFAS No. 141(R) applies to all transactions or other events in
which an entity obtains control of one or more businesses. This statement requires an acquirer to
recognize assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contractual contingencies as of the
acquisition date, measured at their acquisition-date fair values. An acquirer is required to
recognize assets or liabilities arising from all other contingencies as of the acquisition date,
measured at their acquisition-date fair values, only if it is more likely than not that they meet
the definition of an asset or a liability in FASB Concepts Statement No. 6, Elements of Financial
Statements. This Statement requires the acquirer to recognize goodwill as of the acquisition date,
measured as a residual, which generally will be the excess of the consideration transferred plus
the fair value of any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date over the fair
values of the identifiable net assets acquired. Contingent consideration should be recognized at
the acquisition date, measured at its fair value at that date. SFAS No. 141(R) defines a bargain
purchase as a business combination in which the total acquisition-date fair value of the
identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred plus any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree, and requires the acquirer to recognize that excess in
earnings as attributable to the acquirer. This statement is effective for business combinations for
which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company will apply the provisions of this statement
prospectively to business combinations from January 1, 2009. The impact of SFAS No. 141(R) on the
Companys consolidated financial statements will depend on the nature, terms and size of
acquisitions it consummates in the future.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (SFAS No. 160). This statement establishes
accounting and reporting standards that require (i) ownership interest in subsidiaries held by
parties other than the parent be presented and identified in the equity section of the consolidated
balance sheet, separate from the parents equity; (ii) the amount of consolidated net income
attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest be identified and presented on the
face of the consolidated statement of operations; (iii) changes in a parents ownership interest
while the parent retains its controlling interest be accounted for consistently; (iv) when a
subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former
subsidiary be initially measured at fair value, and the resulting gain or loss be measured using
the fair value of any noncontrolling equity investment rather than the carrying amount of that
retained investment; and (v) disclosures be provided that clearly identify and distinguish between
the interests of the parent and interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective
for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15,
2008. The Company adopted the standard on January 1, 2009. The adoption had no significant effect
on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 requires
enhanced disclosures for derivative instruments and hedging activities, including (i) how and why
an entity uses derivative instruments; (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are
accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations; and (iii) how derivative
instruments and related hedged items affect an entitys financial position, financial performance,
and cash flows. Under SFAS No. 161, entities must disclose the fair value of derivative
instruments, their gains or losses and their location in the balance sheet in tabular format, and
information about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements, counterparty
credit risk, and strategies and objectives for using derivative instruments. The fair value amounts
must be disaggregated by asset and liability values, by derivative instruments that are designated
and qualify as hedging instruments and those that are not, and by each major type of derivative
contract. The Company
39
adopted SFAS No. 161 effective January 1, 2009. See Note 12 for the Companys disclosures
about its derivative instruments and hedging activities.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS No. 142-3, Determination of
the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (FSP FAS No. 142-3) to improve the consistency between the
useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS No. 142) and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the
asset under SFAS No. 141(R). FSP FAS No. 142-3 amends the factors to be considered when developing
renewal or extension assumptions that are used to estimate an intangible assets useful life under
SFAS No. 142. The guidance in FSP FAS No. 142-3 is to be applied prospectively to intangible
assets acquired after December 31, 2008. In addition, FSP FAS No. 142-3 increases the disclosure
requirements related to renewal or extension assumptions. The adoption of FSP FAS No. 142-3 had no
effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-3, Determining the Fair Value of a Financial
Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Active (FSP FAS No. 157-3). FSP FAS No. 157-3
clarifies how SFAS No. 157 should be applied when valuing securities in markets that are not active
by illustrating key considerations in determining fair value. It also reaffirms the notion of fair
value as the exit price as of the measurement date. FSP FAS No. 157-3 was effective upon issuance,
which included periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The adoption of
FSP FAS No. 157-3 had no impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and
Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies (FSP FAS No.
141(R)-1). FSP FAS No. 141(R)-1 amends the provisions in Statement 141(R) for the initial
recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosures for assets and
liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. This FSP also amends the
subsequent measurement and accounting guidance, and disclosure requirements in Statement 141(R).
FSP FAS No. 141(R)-1 is effective for contingent assets or contingent liabilities acquired in
business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first
annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company will apply the
provisions of this statement prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date
is on or after January 1, 2009 and can only assess the impact of the standard once an acquisition
is consummated.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 132R-1, Employers Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (FSP FAS No. 132R-1). FSP FAS No. 132R-1 provides additional
guidance regarding disclosures about plan assets of defined benefit pension or other postretirement
plans and is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2009. The Company is currently evaluating the disclosure impact of adopting this new guidance on
its consolidated financial statements; however, its adoption will not have an impact on the
determination of the Companys financial results.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 115-2 and FAS No. 124-2, Recognition and
Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS No. 115-2). FSP FAS No. 115-2
provides guidance in determining whether impairments in debt securities are other than temporary,
and modifies the presentation and disclosures surrounding such instruments. This FSP is effective
for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, but early adoption is permitted for interim periods
ending after March 15, 2009. The Company plans to adopt the provisions of this Staff Position
during the second quarter of 2009, but does not believe this guidance will have a significant
impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS No. 157-4). FSP FAS No. 157-4 provides additional
guidance in determining whether the market for a financial asset is not active and a transaction is
not distressed for fair value measurement purposes as defined in SFAS
No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. FSP FAS No. 157-4 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, but
early adoption is permitted for interim periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company will
apply the provisions of this statement prospectively beginning with the second quarter 2009, and
does not expect its adoption to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments (FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1). This FSP amends FASB Statement
No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Values of Financial
40
Instruments, to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim
financial statements as well as in annual financial statements. APB 28-1 also amends APB Opinion
No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require those disclosures in all interim financial
statements. This standard is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009, but early
adoption is permitted for interim periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company plans to adopt
FSP FAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1 and provide the additional disclosure requirements beginning in
second quarter 2009.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management has evaluated the accounting policies used in the preparation of the Companys
condensed financial statements and related notes and believes those policies to be reasonable and
appropriate. Certain of these accounting policies require the application of significant judgment
by management in selecting appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their
nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. These judgments are based
on historical experience, trends in the industry, information provided by customers and information
available from other outside sources, as appropriate. The most significant areas involving
management judgments and estimates may be found in the Companys 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K,
filed on March 2, 2009, in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section of Managements
Discussion and Analysis and in Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. See also the additional Critical Accounting Policy described
below. There were no significant changes to the Companys critical accounting polices during the
quarter ended March 31, 2009.
Restructuring Charges
The Company accounts for costs incurred in connection with the closure and consolidation of
facilities and functions in accordance with SFAS No. 146, SFAS No. 112, SFAS No. 144, Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, EITF No. 95-3 (superseded by SFAS 141(R)) and
SFAS No. 88, Employers Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Pension Plans and
for Termination Benefits. Such costs include employee termination benefits (one-time arrangements
and benefits attributable to prior service); termination of contractual obligations; the write-down
of current and long-term assets to the lower of cost or fair value; and other direct incremental
costs including relocation of employees, inventory and equipment.
A liability is established through a charge to operations for one-time employee termination
benefits when management commits to a plan of termination and communicates such plan to the
affected group of employees. A liability is established for employee termination benefits that
accumulate or vest based on prior service when it becomes probable that such termination benefits
will be paid and the amount of the payment can be reasonably estimated. A liability for contract
termination costs is established at fair value when the contract is terminated or the Company
becomes contractually obligated to make such payment. If an operating lease is not terminated, a
liability is established when the Company ceases use of the leased property. Other direct
incremental costs are charged to operations as incurred.
With respect to business combinations consummated prior to January 1, 2009, liabilities for
employee termination and relocation benefits and contractual obligations of the acquired company,
contemplated at the acquisition date and finalized within one year of the acquisition date, and
subsequent adjustments, if any, are included in, and recorded as adjustments to, goodwill.
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
All of the statements in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations, other than historical facts, are forward-looking statements, including,
without limitation, the statements made under the caption Outlook. As a general matter,
forward-looking statements are those focused upon anticipated events or trends, expectations, and
beliefs relating to matters that are not historical in nature. The words could, anticipate,
preliminary, expect, believe, estimate, intend, plan, will, foresee, project,
forecast, or the negative thereof or variations thereon, and similar expressions identify
forward-looking statements.
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for these
forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company notes
that forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors relating to the Companys operations and business environment, all of which are difficult
to predict and
41
many of which are beyond the control of the Company. These known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those matters
expressed in, anticipated by or implied by such forward-looking statements.
These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to: (1) the
Companys exposure to the risks associated with the current global economic crisis, which may
negatively impact our revenues, liquidity, suppliers and customers; (2) the risks that the Company
will not realize the expected financial and other benefits from the acquisition of CompAir and from
recently announced restructuring actions; (3) exposure to economic downturns and market cycles,
particularly the level of oil and natural gas prices and oil and natural gas drilling production,
which affect demand for the Companys petroleum products, and industrial production and
manufacturing capacity utilization rates, which affect demand for the Companys compressor and
vacuum products; (4) the risks associated with intense competition in the Companys market
segments, particularly the pricing of the Companys products; (5) the risks of large or rapid
increases in raw material costs or substantial decreases in their availability, and the Companys
dependence on particular suppliers, particularly iron casting and other metal suppliers; (6)
economic, political and other risks associated with the Companys international sales and
operations, including changes in currency exchange rates (primarily between the USD, the EUR, the
GBP and the CNY); (7) the risk of additional future charges if the Company determines that the
value of goodwill and other intangible assets, representing a significant portion of the Companys
total assets, are further impaired; (8) risks associated with the Companys indebtedness and
changes in the availability or costs of new financing to support the Companys operations and
future investments; (9) the risks associated with potential product liability and warranty claims
due to the nature of the Companys products; (10) the ability to attract and retain quality
executive management and other key personnel; (11) the ability to avoid employee work stoppages and
other labor difficulties; (12) the ability to continue to identify and complete strategic
acquisitions and effectively integrate such acquired companies to achieve desired financial
benefits; (13) changes in discount rates used for actuarial assumptions in pension and other
postretirement obligation and expense calculations and market performance of pension plan assets;
(14) the risk of regulatory noncompliance; (15) the risks associated with environmental compliance
costs and liabilities; (16) the risk that communication or information systems failure may disrupt
our business and result in financial loss and liability to our customers; (17) the risks associated
with pending asbestos and silica personal injury lawsuits; and (18) the risks associated with
enforcing the Companys intellectual property rights and defending against potential intellectual
property claims. The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read
together with important information regarding risks and factors that may affect the Companys
future performance set forth under Item 1A Risk Factors in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
These statements reflect the current views and assumptions of management with respect to
future events. The Company does not undertake, and hereby disclaims, any duty to update these
forward-looking statements, even though its situation and circumstances may change in the future.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only
as of the date of this report. The inclusion of any statement in this report does not constitute
an admission by the Company or any other person that the events or circumstances described in such
statement are material.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The Company is exposed to market risks during the normal course of business, including those
presented by changes in commodity prices, interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates. The
Companys exposure to these risks is managed through a combination of operating and financing
activities. The Company selectively uses derivative financial instruments, including forwards and
swaps, to manage the risks from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The
Company does not hold derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. Fluctuations in commodity
prices, interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates can be volatile, and the Companys risk
management activities do not totally eliminate these risks. Consequently, these fluctuations could
have a significant effect on the Companys financial results.
Notional transaction amounts and fair values for the Companys outstanding derivatives, by
risk category and instrument type, as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, are summarized in
Note 12 Hedging Activities and Fair Value Measurements in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Commodity Price Risk
The Company is a purchaser of certain commodities, principally aluminum. In addition, the
Company is a purchaser of components and parts containing various commodities, including cast iron,
aluminum, copper, and steel. The Company generally buys these commodities and components based upon
market prices that are established with the vendor as part of the purchase process. The Company
does not use commodity financial instruments to hedge commodity prices.
42
The Company has long-term contracts with some of its suppliers of key components. However, to
the extent that commodity prices increase and the Company does not have firm pricing from its
suppliers, or its suppliers are not able to honor such prices, then the Company may experience
margin declines to the extent it is not able to increase selling prices of its products.
Interest Rate Risk
The Companys exposure to interest rate risk results primarily from its borrowings of $501.2
million at March 31, 2009. The Company manages its exposure to interest rate risk by maintaining a
mixture of fixed and variable rate debt and, from time to time, uses pay-fixed interest rate swaps
as cash flow hedges of variable rate debt in order to adjust the relative proportions. The interest
rates on approximately 27% of the Companys borrowings were effectively fixed as of March 31, 2009.
If the relevant LIBOR amounts for all of the Companys borrowings had been 100 basis points higher
than actual in the first three months of 2009, the Companys interest expense would have increased
by $1.0 million.
Exchange Rate Risk
A substantial portion of the Companys operations is conducted by its subsidiaries outside of
the U.S. in currencies other than the USD. Almost all of the Companys non-U.S. subsidiaries
conduct their business primarily in their local currencies, which are also their functional
currencies. Other than the USD, the EUR, GBP, and CNY are the principal currencies in which the
Company and its subsidiaries enter into transactions.
The Company is exposed to the impacts of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on the
translation of its non-U.S. subsidiaries assets, liabilities, and earnings into USD. The Company
partially offsets these exposures by having certain of its non-U.S. subsidiaries act as the obligor
on a portion of its borrowings and by denominating such borrowings, as well as a portion of the
borrowings for which the Company is the obligor, in currencies other than the USD. Of the Companys
total net assets of $921.2 million at March 31, 2009, approximately $516.1 million was denominated
in currencies other than the USD. Borrowings by the Companys non-U.S. subsidiaries at March 31,
2009 totaled $36.3 million, and the Companys consolidated borrowings denominated in currencies
other than the USD totaled $191.3 million. Fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange
rates in the value of non-USD borrowings that have been designated as hedges of the Companys net
investment in foreign operations are included in other comprehensive income.
The Company and its subsidiaries are also subject to the risk that arises when they, from time
to time, enter into transactions in currencies other than their functional currency. To mitigate
this risk, the Company and its subsidiaries typically settle intercompany trading balances monthly.
The Company also selectively uses forward currency contracts to manage this risk. At March 31,
2009, the notional amount of open forward currency contracts was $205.3 million and their aggregate
fair value was $0.6 million.
To illustrate the impact of foreign currency exchange rates on the Companys financial
results, the Companys operating income (excluding the effect of the goodwill impairment charge)
for the first three months of 2009 would have decreased by approximately $1.4 million if the USD
had been 10 percent more valuable than actual relative to other currencies. This calculation
assumes that all currencies change in the same direction and proportion to the USD and that there
are no indirect effects of the change in the value of the USD such as changes in non-USD sales
volumes or prices.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Companys management carried out an evaluation (as required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)), with the participation of the President and
Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon this evaluation, the President and Chief Executive
Officer and Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of
the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, such that the information
relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries required to be disclosed by the Company
in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed,
summarized, and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management,
including its principal executive and financial officers, or persons performing similar functions,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
43
In addition, the Companys management carried out an evaluation, as required by Rule 13a-15(d)
of the Exchange Act, with the participation of the President and Chief Executive Officer and the
Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, of changes in the Companys internal
control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, the President and Chief Executive
Officer and the Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer concluded that there
were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
quarter ended March 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Company is a party to various legal proceedings and administrative actions. The
information regarding these proceedings and actions is included under Note 15 Contingencies to
the Companys Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q and under Contingencies in Part I, Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
For information regarding factors that could affect the Companys results of operations,
financial condition and liquidity, see (i) the risk factors discussion provided under Part I, Item
1A of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, (ii)
the Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements included in Part I, Item 2 of this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and (iii) the additional risk factor set forth below in this Part II,
Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
A significant portion of the Companys assets consist of goodwill and other intangible assets,
the value of which may be reduced if the Company determines that those assets are further impaired.
Goodwill is recorded as the difference, if any, between the aggregate consideration paid for
an acquisition and the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired.
In accordance with GAAP, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are evaluated for
impairment annually, or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred.
Impairment assessment under GAAP requires that the Company consider, among other factors,
differences between the current book value and estimated fair value of its net assets, and
comparison of the estimated fair value of its net assets to its current market capitalization.
In the first quarter of 2009, the Company determined that the fair value of one of its
reporting units was impaired and recorded a preliminary impairment charge of $265.0 million to
reduce the carrying amount of goodwill in its Industrial Products Group. After this charge, the
net carrying value of goodwill and other intangible assets represented approximately $846.9
million, or 42.9% of the Companys total assets.
An additional impairment charge may be recorded in the second quarter of 2009 upon the
finalization of the extensive financial analysis necessary to complete the measurement of the
impairment identified in the first quarter of 2009. Furthermore, if goodwill or other assets are
further impaired based on a future impairment test, the Company could be required to record
additional non-cash impairment charges to its operating income. Such non-cash impairment charges,
if significant, could materially and adversely affect the Companys results of operations and
reduce its consolidated stockholders equity in the period recognized.
44
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Repurchases of equity securities during the three months ended March 31, 2009 are listed in
the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Maximum Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased |
|
of Shares that May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly |
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Average Price |
|
Announced Plans |
|
Under the Plans or |
Period |
|
Shares Purchased (1) |
|
Paid per Share (2) |
|
or Programs (3) |
|
Programs |
January 1, 2009 January 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
February 1, 2009 February 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
March 1, 2009 March 31, 2009 |
|
|
8,782 |
|
|
|
18.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
8,782 |
|
|
|
18.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All of these shares were exchanged or surrendered in connection with the exercise of options
under Gardner Denvers stock option plans. |
|
(2) |
|
Excludes commissions. |
|
(3) |
|
In November 2008, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to acquire up to 3.0 million
shares of its common stock. As of March 31, 2009, no shares under this repurchase program
have been repurchased. |
Item 6. Exhibits
See the list of exhibits in the Index to Exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which
is incorporated herein by reference.
45
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GARDNER DENVER, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 7, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Barry L. Pennypacker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barry L. Pennypacker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 7, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Helen W. Cornell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Helen W. Cornell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: May 7, 2009
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ David J. Antoniuk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David J. Antoniuk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
46
GARDNER DENVER, INC.
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Gardner Denver, Inc., as amended on May 3,
2006, filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Gardner Denver, Inc.s Current Report on Form
8-K, filed May 3, 2006, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Gardner Denver, Inc., filed as Exhibit 3.2 to
Gardner Denver, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 4, 2008, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of January 17, 2005, between
Gardner Denver, Inc. and National City Bank as Rights Agent, filed as Exhibit
4.1 to Gardner Denver, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 21,
2005, and incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
Form of Indenture by and among Gardner Denver, Inc., the Guarantors and The
Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
Gardner Denver, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 4, 2005, and
incorporated herein by reference. |
|
|
|
10* |
|
Retirement Agreement dated January 6, 2009 between Gardner Denver, Inc. and
Richard C. Steber, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Gardner Denver, Inc.s Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed January 8, 2009, and incorporated herein by
reference. |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Statement re: Computation of Earnings Per Share, incorporated herein by
reference to Note 10 Stockholders Equity and (Loss) Earnings per Share to
the Companys Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
|
|
|
31.1** |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or
15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2** |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) or
15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*** |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2*** |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan. |
|
** |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
*** |
|
This exhibit is furnished herewith and shall not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
47