BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Activities, with the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative recorded in other comprehensive income and the ineffective portion included in the change in fair value of derivatives and amortization in the statement of operations.

On October 1, 2006, the Company elected to discontinue hedge accounting prospectively for the previously designated swap instruments. Consequently, the net gains and losses accumulated in other comprehensive income at that date of $1.3 million related to the previously designated swap instruments are being amortized to interest expense over the life of the underlying hedged debt payments. In the future, if the underlying hedged debt is extinguished or refinanced, the remaining unamortized gain or loss in accumulated other comprehensive income will be recognized in net income. Although hedge accounting was discontinued on October 1, 2006, the swap instruments remain outstanding and are carried at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet and the change in fair value beginning October 1, 2006 has been included in the statements of operations.

In April 2007, the Company entered into two separate treasury rate locks for notional amounts of $70 million and $50 million in anticipation of the Company’s planned future issuance of $120 million of fixed-rate debt. Both rate locks expired in May 2007 and resulted in a cash receipt to the Company of approximately $0.4 million which has been included in the results from operations.

8.	Legal Proceedings

In connection with the sale of certain facilities to Ventas Realty Limited Partnership (‘‘Ventas’’) in 2004, two legal actions have been filed. The first action was filed on September 15, 2005, by current and former limited partners in 36 investing partnerships in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York captioned David T. Atkins et al. v. Apollo Real Estate Advisors, L.P., et al. (the ‘‘Action’’). On March 17, 2006, a third amended complaint was filed in the Action. The third amended complaint is brought on behalf of current and former limited partners in 14 investing partnerships. It names as defendants, among others, the Company, Brookdale Living Communities, Inc. (‘‘BLC’’), a subsidiary of the Company, GFB-AS Investors, LLC (‘‘GFB-AS’’), a subsidiary of BLC, the general partners of the 14 investing partnerships, which are alleged to be subsidiaries of GFB-AS, Fortress Investment Group (‘‘Fortress’’), an affiliate of our largest stockholder, and R. Stanley Young, our former Chief Financial Officer. The nine count third amended complaint alleges, among other things, (i) that the defendants converted for their own use the property of the limited partners of 11 partnerships, including through the failure to obtain consents the plaintiffs contend were required for the sale of facilities indirectly owned by those partnerships to Ventas; (ii) that the defendants fraudulently persuaded the limited partners of three partnerships to give up a valuable property right based upon incomplete, false and misleading statements in connection with certain consent solicitations; (iii) that certain defendants, including GFB-AS, the general partners, and our former Chief Financial Officer, but not including the Company, BLC, or Fortress, committed mail fraud in connection with the sale of facilities indirectly owned by the 14 partnerships at issue in the Action to Ventas; (iv) that certain defendants, including GFB-AS and our former Chief Financial Officer, but not including the Company, BLC, the general partners, or Fortress, committed wire fraud in connection with certain communications with plaintiffs in the Action and another investor in a limited partnership; (v) that the defendants, with the exception of the Company, committed substantive violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (‘‘RICO’’); (vi) that the defendants conspired to violate RICO; (vii) that GFB-AS and the general partners violated the partnership agreements of the 14 investing partnerships; (viii) that GFB-AS, the general partners, and our former Chief Financial Officer breached fiduciary duties to the plaintiffs; and (ix) that the defendants were unjustly enriched. The plaintiffs have asked for damages in excess of $100.0 million on each of the counts described above, including treble damages for the RICO claims. On April 18, 2006, we filed a motion to dismiss the claims with prejudice, which remains pending before the court, and plan to continue to vigorously defend this Action. A putative class action lawsuit was

14

Table of Contents

BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

also filed on March 22, 2006, by certain limited partners in four of the same partnerships involved in the Action in the Court of Chancery for the State of Delaware captioned Edith Zimmerman et al. v. GFB-AS Investors, LLC and Brookdale Living Communities, Inc. (the ‘‘Second Action’’). On November 21, 2006, an amended complaint was filed in the Second Action. The putative class in the Second Action consists only of those limited partners in the four investing partnerships who are not plaintiffs in the Action. The Second Action names as defendants BLC and GFB-AS. The complaint alleges a claim for breach of fiduciary duty arising out of the sale of facilities indirectly owned by the investing partnerships to Ventas and the subsequent lease of those facilities by Ventas to subsidiaries of BLC. The plaintiffs seek, among other relief, an accounting, damages in an unspecified amount, and disgorgement of unspecified amounts by which the defendants were allegedly unjustly enriched. On December 12, 2006, we filed an answer denying the claim asserted in the amended complaint and providing affirmative defenses. On December 27, 2006, the plaintiffs moved to certify the Action as a class action. Both the plaintiffs and defendants have served document production requests and the Action is currently in the beginning stages of document discovery. We also intend to vigorously defend this Second Action. Because these actions are in an early stage we cannot estimate the possible range of loss, if any.

In addition, we have been and are currently involved in other litigation and claims incidental to the conduct of our business which are comparable to other companies in the senior living industry. Certain claims and lawsuits allege large damage amounts and may require significant legal costs to defend and resolve. Similarly, our industry is continuously subject to scrutiny by governmental regulators, which could result in litigation related to regulatory compliance matters. As a result, we maintain insurance policies in amounts and with coverage and deductibles we believe are adequate, based on the nature and risks of our business, historical experience and industry standards. Because our current policies provide for deductibles of $3.0 million for each claim, we are, in effect, self insured for most claims.

9.	Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information ($ in 000’s)

			Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid				$	67,564					$	35,362
Income taxes paid				$	501					$	335
Supplemental Schedule of Non-cash Operating, Investing and Financing Activities:
Consolidation of limited partnerships pursuant to EITF 04-5 on January 1, 2006:
Property, plant, equipment and leasehold intangibles, net				$	—					$	31,645
Accounts receivable and other					—						1,410
Cash and investments-restricted					—						1,204
Accrued expenses and other					—						(2,245	)
Tenant refundable fees and security deposits					—						(177	)
Debt					—						(19,723	)
Minority interest					—						(12,114	)
Net				$	—					$	—
De-consolidation of leased development property:
Property, plant, equipment and leasehold intangibles, net				$	(2,978	)				$	—

15

---

Table of Contents

BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

			Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006
Debt					2,978						—
Net				$	—					$	—
Acquisition of assets, net of related payables and cash received, net:
Cash and investments-restricted				$	387					$	1,719
Accounts receivable					64						—
Property, plant, equipment and leasehold intangibles, net					155,957						706,647
Investment in unconsolidated ventures					(1,342	)					—
Goodwill					3,101						—
Other intangible assets, net					(668	)					—
Trade accounts payable, accrued expenses and other					(1,336	)					—
Debt obligations					(5,273	)					—
Capital lease obligations assumed					—						(163,245	)
Deferred tax liability					—						(9,812	)
Minority interest					650						—
Other, net					(1,752	)					(3,414	)
Acquisition of assets, net of related payables and cash received				$	149,788					$	531,895

10.	Facility Leases

A summary of facility lease expense and the impact of straight-line adjustment and amortization of deferred gains are as follows ($ in 000’s):

			Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006						2007						2006
Cash basis payment				$	62,233					$	42,470					$	125,463					$	84,032
Straight-line expense					6,028						5,239						12,364						10,498
Amortization of deferred gain					(1,085	)					(1,086	)					(2,170	)					(2,173	)
Facility lease expense				$	67,176					$	46,623					$	135,657					$	92,357

16

---

Table of Contents

BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

11.	Other Comprehensive Loss, Net

The following table presents the after-tax components of the Company’s other comprehensive loss for the periods presented ($ in 000’s):

			Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006						2007						2006
Net loss				$	(18,675	)				$	(20,259	)				$	(53,815	)				$	(39,585	)
Unrealized gain on derivatives					—						1,279						—						9,191
Reclassification of net gains on derivatives into earnings					(393	)					—						(786	)					—
Amortization of payments from settlement of forward interest swaps					94						94						188						188
Other					116						—						232						—
Total comprehensive loss				$	(18,858	)				$	(18,886	)				$	(54,181	)				$	(30,206	)

12.	Income Taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ending June 30, 2007 and 2006 are 39.7% and 1.4%, respectively, and for the six months ending June 30, 2007 and 2006 are 38.0% and 1.7%, respectively. The difference between the periods is primarily due to the ability to benefit book losses in the first two quarters of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 as a result of the deferred tax liabilities generated in connection with the acquisitions of American Retirement Corporation (‘‘ARC’’) and Southern Assisted Living, Inc. (‘‘SALI’’).

The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 resulted in a transition adjustment to goodwill of $1.6 million, comprised of $1.4 million in taxes and $0.2 million in interest and penalties. The adoption impacted goodwill versus retained earnings as the original benefit recorded on these positions was not recorded through earnings as the Company previously reserved for all deferred tax assets. Due to the recognition of deferred tax liabilities in connection with the ARC and SALI acquisitions, the previously recorded valuation allowance was reversed through purchase accounting and thus the benefit was reflected as a component of goodwill. Interest and penalties related to these tax positions are classified as tax expense in the Company’s financial statements. Tax returns for all wholly owned subsidiaries for the years 2002 through 2006 are subject to future examination by tax authorities. In addition, for one wholly owned subsidiary, Alterra Healthcare Corporation, tax returns are open from 1999 through 2001 to the extent of the net operating losses generated during those periods. The Company has reviewed its FIN 48 position as of June 30, 2007, and has determined that, with the exception of updating the interest computation for the period, no additional reserve is required.

13.	Segment Results

Under SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, the Company determined that it has four reportable segments based on the way that our chief operating decision makers organize the Company’s business activities for making operating decisions and assessing performance. The four segments are independent living; assisted living; retirement centers/CCRCs; and management services.

	•	Independent Living.    Our independent living facilities are primarily designed for middle to upper income senior citizens age 70 and older who desire an upscale residential environment providing the highest quality of service. The majority of our independent living facilities consist of both independent living and assisted living units in a single facility, which allows residents to ‘‘age-in-place’’ by providing them with a continuum of senior independent and assisted living services.

17

---

Table of Contents

BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

	•	Assisted Living.    Our assisted living facilities offer housing and 24-hour assistance with activities of daily life to mid-acuity frail and elderly residents. Our assisted living facilities include both freestanding, multi-story facilities and freestanding, single-story facilities. We also operate memory care facilities, which are freestanding assisted living facilities specially designed for residents with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias.

	•	Retirement Centers/CCRCs.    Our retirement centers/CCRCs are large communities that offer a variety of living arrangements and services to accommodate all levels of physical ability and health. Most of our retirement centers/CCRCs have independent living, assisted living and skilled nursing available on one campus, and some also include memory care and Alzheimer’s units.

	•	Management Services.    Our management services segment includes facilities owned by others and operated by us pursuant to management agreements. Under our management agreements for these facilities, we receive management fees as well as reimbursed expenses, which represent the reimbursement of certain expenses we incur on behalf of the owners.

The following table sets forth certain segment financial and operating data ($ in 000’s)

			Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006						2007						2006
Revenue(1)
Independent Living				$	112,197					$	95,697					$	219,307					$	186,404
Assisted Living					196,847						146,234						390,314						258,097
Retirement Centers/CCRCs					147,578						25,911						292,339						44,377
Management Services					1,788						585						3,284						1,732
				$	458,410					$	268,427					$	905,244					$	490,610
Segment operating income(2)
Independent Living				$	50,217						43,048					$	96,999						82,829
Assisted Living					72,006						58,997						143,860						99,263
Retirement Centers/CCRCs					48,533						4,516						94,426						8,560
Management Services					1,252						410						2,299						1,212
				$	172,008					$	106,971					$	337,584					$	191,864
General and administrative (including non-cash stock-based compensation expense)(3)				$	35,222					$	22,950					$	75,426					$	43,690
Facility lease expense					67,176						46,623						135,657						92,357
Deprecation and amortization					82,471						30,947						155,455						53,246
(Loss) income from operations				$	(12,861	)				$	6,451					$	(28,954	)				$	2,571
Total Assets
Independent living																$	1,156,772					$	1,080,744
Assisted living																	1,296,941						852,156
Retirement Centers/CCRCs																	2,069,645						334,494
Corporate and Management Services																	331,126						113,792
																$	4,854,484					$	2,381,186

18

---

Table of Contents

BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

(1)	All revenue is earned from external third parties in the United States.

(2)	Segment operating income is defined as segment revenues less segment operating expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization).

(3)	Net of general and administrative costs allocated to management services reporting segment.

14.	Subsequent Events

In July 2007, the Company entered into a series of forward starting interest rate swaps in the aggregate notional amount of $553.1 million in anticipation of planned future financing transactions as well as the replacement of certain existing hedges that will be expiring.

19

---

Table of Contents

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and other information we provide from time to time may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Those forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical statements of fact and those regarding our intent, belief or expectations, including, but not limited to, statements relating to our ability to deploy capital, close accretive transactions, anticipate, manage and address industry trends and their effect on our business, grow dividends, generate growth organically or through acquisitions, achieve operating efficiencies and cost savings, expand our offering of ancillary services (therapy and home health) to additional facilities, expand existing facilities, develop new facilities, secure financing and increase revenues, earnings, Adjusted EBITDA, Cash From Facility Operations, and/or Facility Operating Income (as such terms are defined herein) and add residents and statements relating to our expectations for the performance of our entrance fee communities and our expected levels of expenditures. Words such as ‘‘anticipate(s)’’, ‘‘expect(s)’’, ‘‘intend(s)’’, ‘‘plan(s)’’, ‘‘target(s)’’, ‘‘project(s)’’, ‘‘believe(s)’’, ‘‘will’’, ‘‘would’’, ‘‘seek(s)’’, ‘‘estimate(s)’’ and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could lead to actual results differing materially from those projected, forecasted or expected. Although we believe that the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to, our ability to integrate the facilities of American Retirement Corporation (‘‘ARC’’) or other acquisitions into our operations; our continued ability to acquire facilities at attractive prices which will generate returns consistent with expectations; the possibility that the facilities that we have recently acquired and will acquire may not generate sufficient additional income to justify their acquisition; possibilities that conditions to closing of certain transactions will not be satisfied; the possibilities that changes in the capital markets, including changes in interest rates and/or credit spreads, or other factors could make financing more expensive or unavailable to us; a decrease in the overall demand for senior housing; general economic conditions and economic conditions in the markets in which we operate; downturns in the real estate markets in the regions where our facilities are located; competitive pressures within the industry and/or markets in which we operate; the creditworthiness of our residents; interest rate fluctuations; licensing risks; our failure to comply with federal, state and local laws and regulations; our failure to comply with environmental laws; the effect of future legislation or regulatory changes on our operations; and other risks detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases and other communications, including those set forth under ‘‘Risk Factors’’ included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report. We expressly disclaim any obligation to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based.

Executive Overview

During the second quarter of 2007, we continued to make significant progress in implementing the growth strategy outlined in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. We are focusing on increasing our revenues, cash flows and dividends per share through a combination of: (i) organic growth in our existing operations; (ii) expansion of our ancillary service programs (including therapy and home health services); (iii) selected acquisitions of additional operating companies and facilities; and (iv) expansion of our existing facilities.

20

---

Table of Contents

As a result of these efforts, and as more fully described below, our revenues for the second quarter of 2007 increased to $458.4 million, an increase of $190.0 million, or 70.8%, over the second quarter of 2006. Including the effect of the historical results of the ARC facilities not included in our results of operations in the second quarter of 2006, same store revenues grew 7.8% over the second quarter of 2006.

In addition, we declared a dividend of $0.50 per share for the second quarter, an increase of 11.1% over the $0.45 per share dividend declared for the first quarter of 2007 and an increase of 42.9% over the $0.35 per share dividend declared for the second quarter of 2006.

We continued to make progress in expanding our ancillary services programs to additional facilities during the second quarter. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we have completed the roll-out of our ancillary services program to over 10,000 units.

Our focus on growth through selective acquisition of new properties, as well as previously leased or managed properties, also continued during the second quarter. During the quarter, we closed four acquisitions, with an aggregate purchase price of $179.2 million. As a result of these acquisitions, we acquired ownership of three facilities that were previously leased or managed by us, and acquired leasehold interests in three other facilities. We also acquired ownership of a facility in which we held partnership interests.

In addition, we continued to invest in our facility expansion program during the quarter. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we have completed expansions at five facilities. As of the end of the quarter, we had another four expansion projects under construction.

As a result of our acquisition and expansion activity, the number of units we operated as of the end of the second quarter increased to 51,616, an increase of 17,270, or 50.3%, over the same prior year quarter.

Although we continued to experience volatility in the entrance fee portion of our business during the second quarter, our net entrance fee sales increased from the previous quarter. The timing of entrance fee sales is subject to a number of different factors and is also inherently subject to variability (positively or negatively) when measured over the short-term. We believe that our entrance fee sales during the quarter continued to be negatively impacted by softness in the housing markets in certain of the markets in which we operate (primarily certain areas of Florida and Arizona). In response, we have increased our sales and marketing efforts in those markets and expect entrance fee sales to normalize over the longer term.

Consolidated Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, statement of operations items and the amount and percentage of increase or decrease of these items. The results of operations for any particular period are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period. The following data should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, which are included herein. Our results reflect the inclusion of acquisitions that occurred during the respective reporting periods. Refer to our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed March 16, 2007, and Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed May 8, 2007, and the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information regarding these acquisitions ($ in 000’s):

21

---

Table of Contents

			Three Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006						Increase (Decrease)						% Increase (Decrease)
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenue
Resident fees
Independent Living				$	112,197					$	95,697					$	16,500						17.2	%
Assisted Living					196,847						146,234						50,613						34.6	%
Retirement Centers/CCRCs					147,578						25,911						121,667						469.6	%
Total resident fees					456,622						267,842						188,780						70.5	%
Management fees					1,788						585						1,203						205.6	%
Total revenue					458,410						268,427						189,983						70.8	%
Expense
Facility operating expense
Independent Living					61,980						52,649						9,331						17.7	%
Assisted Living					124,841						87,237						37,604						43.1	%
Retirement Centers/CCRCs					99,045						21,395						77,650						362.9	%
Total facility operating expense					285,866						161,281						124,585						77.2	%
General and administrative expense					35,758						23,125						12,633						54.6	%
Facility lease expense					67,176						46,623						20,553						44.1	%
Depreciation and amortization					82,471						30,947						51,524						166.5	%
Total operating expense					471,271						261,976						209,295						79.9	%
(Loss) income from operations					(12,861	)					6,451						(19,312	)					(299.4	%)
Interest income					1,563						625						938						150.1	%
Interest expense
Debt					(35,078	)					(25,544	)					(9,534	)					(37.3	%)
Amortization of deferred financing costs					(2,109	)					(1,335	)					(774	)					(58.0	%)
Change in fair value of derivatives and Amortization					17,619						519						17,100						3,294.8	%
Loss on extinguishment of debt					(803	)					—						(803	)					(100.0	%)
Equity in loss of unconsolidated ventures					(601	)					(469	)					(132	)					(28.1	%)
Other non-operating income					238						—						238						100.0	%
Loss before income taxes					(32,032	)					(19,753	)					(12,279	)					(62.2	%)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes					12,715						(273	)					12,988						4,757.5	%
Loss before minority interest					(19,317	)					(20,026	)					709						3.5	%
Minority interest					642						(233	)					875						375.5	%
Net loss				$	(18,675	)				$	(20,259	)				$	1,584						7.8	%
Selected Operating and Other Data:
Total number of facilities (at end of period)					548						453						95						21.0	%
Total units/beds operated(1)					51,616						34,346						17,270						50.3	%
Owned/leased facilities units/beds					47,421						33,045						14,376						43.5	%
Owned/leased facilities occupancy rate:
Period end					90.8	%					89.9	%					0.9	%					1.0	%
Weighted average					90.7	%					90.0	%					0.7	%					0.8	%
Average monthly revenue per unit/bed(2)				$	3,562					$	3,098					$	464						15.0	%

22

---

Table of Contents

			Three Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006						Increase (Decrease)						% Increase (Decrease)
Selected Segment Operating and Other Data
Independent Living
Number of facilities (period end)					70						61						9						14.8	%
Total units/beds(1)					12,331						11,191						1,140						10.2	%
Occupancy rate:
Period end					92.9	%					92.4	%					0.5	%					0.5	%
Weighted average					92.7	%					92.5	%					0.2	%					0.2	%
Average monthly revenue per unit/bed(2)				$	3,256					$	3,021					$	235						7.8	%
Assisted Living
Number of facilities (period end)					409						373						36						9.7	%
Total units/beds(1)					21,083						17,687						3,396						19.2	%
Occupancy rate:
Period end					89.3	%					89.7	%					(0.4	%)					(0.4	%)
Weighted average					89.5	%					89.9	%					(0.4	%)					(0.4	%)
Average monthly revenue per unit/bed(2)				$	3,481					$	3,100					$	381						12.3	%
Retirement Centers/CCRCs
Number of facilities (period end)					48						12						36						300.0	%
Total units/beds(1)					14,007						4,167						9,840						236.1	%
Occupancy rate:
Period end					91.2	%					82.4	%					8.8	%					10.7	%
Weighted average					90.7	%					81.3	%					9.4	%					11.6	%
Average monthly revenue per unit/bed(2)				$	3,981					$	3,392					$	589						17.4	%
Management Services
Number of facilities (period end)					21						7						14						200.0	%
Total units/beds(1)					4,195						1,301						2,894						222.4	%
Occupancy rate:
Period end					90.6	%			93.4%								(2.8	%)					(3.0	%)
Weighted average					90.5	%			94.1%								(3.6	%)					(3.8	%)

(1)	Total units/beds operated represent the total units/beds operated as of the end of the period. Occupancy rate is calculated by dividing total occupied units/beds by total units/beds operated as of the end of the period.

(2)	Average monthly revenue per unit/bed represents the average of the total monthly revenues, excluding amortization of entrance fees, divided by occupied units/beds at the end of the period averaged over the respective period presented.

Resident Fees

The increase in resident fees was driven by revenue growth across all business segments. Resident fees increased over the prior-year second quarter mainly due to the number of acquisitions that the Company completed during the latter part of 2006 and the first half of 2007 whereby resident fees from these acquisitions are partially or entirely excluded from the prior period results. Including the effect of the historical results of the ARC facilities not included in our results of operations in the second quarter of 2006, same store revenues grew 7.8% over the second quarter of 2006.

Independent living revenue increased $16.5 million, or 17.2%, primarily due to an increase in the average monthly revenue per unit/bed on facilities we operated during both periods. Occupancy on these facilities remained fairly constant period over period. Revenue growth was also impacted by the inclusion of facilities acquired during 2006 and 2007 whereby resident fees from these acquisitions are partially or entirely excluded from the prior period results.

23

---

Table of Contents

Assisted living revenue increased $50.6 million, or 34.6%, primarily due to the 2006 and 2007 acquisitions. Additionally, resident fees increased as a result of an average monthly revenue per unit/bed increase on facilities we operated during both periods coupled with relatively constant occupancy as compared to the same period in the prior-year.

Retirement Centers/CCRCs revenue increased $121.7 million, or 469.6%, primarily due to the acquisition of ARC in the third quarter of 2006.

Management Fees

The increase in current quarter management fees over same period prior-year is mainly due to the acquisition of management contracts in conjunction with the ARC acquisition in the third quarter of 2006. The increase is partially offset by the termination of four management agreements during 2006.

Facility Operating Expense

Facility operating expense increased over the prior-year same period mainly due to the ARC acquisition as well as other 2006 and 2007 acquisitions. Additionally, there was an approximate $13.1 million increase – primarily due to salaries, wages and benefits – attributable to the 393 facilities we operated during both periods. The increase in expense was partially offset by cost savings from new and renegotiated vendor supply contracts.

Independent living operating expenses increased $9.3 million, or 17.7%, primarily due to the 2006 and 2007 acquisitions. The remaining increase is primarily due to an increase in operating expenses for facilities we operated during both periods, mainly for salaries, wages and benefits.

Assisted living operating expenses increased $37.6 million, or 43.1%, primarily due to increased salaries, wages and benefits resulting from the 2006 acquisitions and additional 2007 acquisitions.

Retirement Centers/CCRC operating expenses increased $77.7 million, or 362.9% primarily due to the 2006 acquisition of ARC.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expenses increased $12.6 million, or 54.6%, primarily as a result of a $4.4 million increase of non-cash compensation expense in connection with restricted stock grants, an increase in salaries, wages and benefits, and an increase in the number of employees in connection with the 2006 acquisition of ARC. Additionally, general and administrative expense was positively impacted during the year by a receivable related to a collateral recovery from an insurance carrier recorded in the second quarter which was largely offset by other quarterly insurance activity. General and administrative expense as a percentage of total revenue, including revenue generated by the facilities we manage, was 4.8% and 5.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, calculated as follows ($ in 000’s):

			Three Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006
Resident fee revenues				$	456,622					$	267,842
Resident fee revenues under management					38,600						11,439
Total				$	495,222					$	279,281
General and administrative expenses (excluding merger and integration expenses and non-cash stock compensation expense totaling $11.8 and $7.4 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively)				$	23,934					$	15,681
General and administrative expenses as a percent of total revenues					4.8	%					5.6	%

Facility Lease Expense

Lease expense increased by $20.6 million, or 44.1%, primarily due to the 2007 and 2006 acquisitions slightly offset for the acquisition of certain facilities which were previously leased. Lease

24

---

Table of Contents

expense includes straight-line rent expense of $6.0 million and $5.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and is partially offset by $1.1 million of additional deferred gain amortization for both respective time periods.

Depreciation and Amortization

Total depreciation and amortization expense increased by $51.5 million, or 166.5%, primarily due to the acquisition of ARC as well as other 2006 and 2007 acquisitions. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in expense for resident in-place lease intangibles which were fully depreciated at the end of 2006.

Interest Income

Interest income increased $0.9 million, or 150.1%, primarily due to our acquisition of ARC in July 2006.

Interest Expense

Interest expense decreased $6.8 million, or 25.8%, primarily due to the change in fair value of our interest rate swaps which was offset by interest expense on additional debt incurred in connection with our acquisitions. The effective portion of the change in fair value of derivatives was excluded from interest expense and was included in other comprehensive loss for the three months ended June 30, 2006. On October 1, 2006, we discontinued hedge accounting prospectively. Changes in fair value of derivatives are now included in interest expense.

Income Taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are 39.7% and 1.4%, respectively. The difference between the periods is primarily due to the ability to benefit book losses in the first two quarters of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 as a result of the deferred tax liabilities generated in connection with the acquisitions of ARC and SALI.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, statement of operations items and the amount and percentage of increase or decrease of these items. The results of operations for any particular period are not necessarily indicative of results for any future period. The following data should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, which are included herein. Our results reflect the inclusion of acquisitions that occurred during the respective reporting periods. Refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, filed March 16, 2007, our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, filed May 8, 2007 and the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements included herein for additional information regarding these acquisitions ($ in 000’s):

			For the Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006						Increase (Decrease)						% Increase (Decrease)
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenue
Resident fees
Independent Living				$	219,307					$	186,404					$	32,903						17.7	%
Assisted Living					390,314						258,097						132,217						51.2	%
Retirement Centers/CCRCs					292,339						44,377						247,962						558.8	%
Total resident fees					901,960						488,878						413,082						84.5	%
Management fees					3,284						1,732						1,552						89.6	%

25

---

Table of Contents

			For the Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006						Increase (Decrease)						% Increase (Decrease)
Total revenue					905,244						490,610						414,634						84.5	%
Expense
Facility operating expense
Independent Living					122,308						103,575						18,733						18.1	%
Assisted Living					246,454						158,834						87,620						55.2	%
Retirement Centers/CCRCs					197,913						35,817						162,096						452.6	%
Total facility operating expense					566,675						298,226						268,449						90.0	%
General and administrative expense					76,411						44,210						32,201						72.8	%
Facility lease expense					135,657						92,357						43,300						46.9	%
Depreciation and amortization					155,455						53,246						102,209						192.0	%
Total operating expense					934,198						488,039						446,159						91.4	%
(Loss) income from operations					(28,954	)					2,571						(31,525	)					(1,226.2	%)
Interest income					3,383						1,677						1,706						101.7	%
Interest expense
Debt					(68,530	)					(39,234	)					(29,296	)					(74.7	%)
Amortization of deferred financing costs					(3,727	)					(2,038	)					(1,689	)					(82.9	%)
Change in fair value of derivatives and amortization					12,838						418						12,420						2,971.3	%
Loss on extinguishment of debt					(803	)					(1,334	)					531						39.8	%
Equity in loss of unconsolidated ventures					(2,054	)					(637	)					(1,417	)					(222.4	%)
Other non-operating income					238						—						238						100.0	%
Loss before income taxes					(87,609	)					(38,577	)					(49,032	)					(127.1	%)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes					33,283						(659	)					33,942						5,150.5	%
Loss before minority interest					(54,326	)					(39,236	)					(15,090	)					(38.5	%)
Minority interest					511						(349	)					860						246.4	%
Net loss				$	(53,815	)				$	(39,585	)				$	(14,230	)					(35.9	%)
Selected Operating and Other Data:
Total number of facilities (at end of period)					548						453						95						21.0	%
Total units/beds operated(1)					51,616						34,346						17,270						50.3	%
Owned/leased facilities units/beds					47,421						33,045						14,376						43.5	%
Owned/leased facilities occupancy rate:
Period end					90.8	%					89.9	%					0.9	%					1.0	%
Weighted average					90.8	%					89.8	%					1.0	%					1.1	%
Average monthly revenue per unit/bed(2)				$	3,530					$	3,107					$	423						13.6	%
Selected Segment Operating and Other Data
Independent Living
Number of facilities (period end)					70						61						9						14.8	%
Total units/beds(1)					12,331						11,191						1,140						10.2	%
Occupancy rate:
Period end					92.9	%					92.4	%					0.5	%					0.5	%
Weighted average					92.6	%					92.7	%					(0.1	%)					(0.1	%)
Average monthly revenue per unit/bed(2)				$	3,215					$	2,976					$	239						8.0	%
Assisted Living
Number of facilities (period end)					409						373						36						9.7	%
Total units/beds(1)					21,083						17,687						3,396						19.2	%
Occupancy rate:

26

---

Table of Contents

			For the Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006						Increase (Decrease)						% Increase (Decrease)
Period end					89.3	%					89.7	%					(0.4	%)					(0.4	%)
Weighted average					89.5	%					89.3	%					0.2	%					0.2	%
Average monthly revenue per unit/bed(2)				$	3,446					$	3,144					$	302						9.6	%
Retirement Centers/CCRCs
Number of facilities (period end)					48						12						36						300.0	%
Total units/beds(1)					14,007						4,167						9,840						236.1	%
Occupancy rate:
Period end					91.2	%					82.4	%					8.8	%					10.7	%
Weighted average					91.2	%					80.5	%					10.7	%					13.3	%
Average monthly revenue per unit/bed(2)				$	3,958					$	3,512					$	446						12.7	%
Management Services
Number of facilities (period end)					21						7						14						200.0	%
Total units/beds(1)					4,195						1,301						2,894						222.4	%
Occupancy rate:
Period end					90.6	%					93.4	%					(2.8	%)					(3.0	%)
Weighted average					90.6	%					92.8	%					(2.2	%)					(2.4	%)

(1)	Total units/beds operated represent the total units/beds operated as of the end of the period. Occupancy rate is calculated by dividing total occupied units/beds by total units/beds operated as of the end of the period.

(2)	Average monthly revenue per unit/bed represents the average of the total monthly revenues, excluding amortization of entrance fees, divided by occupied units/beds at the end of the period averaged over the respective period presented.

Resident Fees

The increase in resident fees was driven by revenue growth across all business segments. Resident fees increased over the prior-year same period mainly due to the number of acquisitions that the Company completed during the latter part of 2006 and the first half of 2007 whereby resident fees from these acquisitions are partially or entirely excluded from the prior period results. Additionally, resident fees increased approximately $39.2 million at the 367 facilities we operated during both periods, representing a 8.9% increase driven primarily by an increase of 8.2% in the average monthly revenue per unit/bed.

Independent living revenue increased $32.9 million, or 17.7%, primarily due to an increase in the average monthly revenue per unit/bed on facilities we operated during both periods. Occupancy on these facilities remained fairly constant period over period. Revenue growth was also impacted by the inclusion of facilities acquired during 2006 and 2007 whereby resident fees from these acquisitions are partially or entirely excluded from the prior period results.

Assisted living revenue increased $132.2 million, or 51.2%, primarily due to the 2006 and 2007 acquisitions. Additionally, resident fees increased as a result of an average monthly revenue per unit/bed increase coupled with relatively constant occupancy as compared to the same period in the prior-year.

Retirement Centers/CCRCs revenue increased $248.0 million, or 558.8%, primarily due to the acquisition of ARC in the third quarter of 2006.

27

---

Table of Contents

Management Fees

The increase in current quarter management fees over prior-year same period is mainly due to the acquisition of management contracts in conjunction with the ARC acquisition in the third quarter of 2006. The increase is partially offset by the termination of nine management agreements during 2006.

Facility Operating Expense

Approximately $19.1 million of our increased facility operating expense – primarily due to salaries, wages and benefits – was attributable to the 367 facilities we operated during both periods, partially offset by cost savings from new and renegotiated vendor supply contracts. The remaining increase was primarily due to the inclusion of the operations of 2006 acquisitions and additional 2007 acquisitions.

Independent living operating expenses increased $18.7 million, or 18.1%, primarily due to the 2006 acquisitions and additional 2007 acquisitions. The balance was primarily due to increases in salaries, wages and benefits.

Assisted living operating expenses increased $87.6 million, or 55.2%, primarily due to increased salaries, wages and benefits primarily as a result of the 2006 acquisitions and additional 2007 acquisitions.

Retirement Centers/CCRC operating expenses increased $162.1 million, or 452.6%, primarily due to the 2006 acquisition of ARC.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expenses increased $32.2 million, or 72.8%, primarily as a result of a $12.2 million increase of non-cash compensation expense in connection with restricted stock grants (including $4.1 million of expense related to the accelerated vesting of restricted stock grants in conjunction with modifications of certain awards), an increase in salaries, wages and benefits, and an increase in the number of employees in connection with the 2006 acquisition of ARC. Additionally, general and administrative expense was positively impacted during the year by a receivable related to a collateral recovery from an insurance carrier recorded in the second quarter which was largely offset by other insurance activity. General and administrative expense as a percentage of total revenue, including revenue generated by the facilities we manage, was 5.2% and 6.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, calculated as follows ($ in 000’s):

			Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006
Resident fee revenues				$	901,960					$	488,878
Resident fee revenues under management					76,201						21,297
Total				$	978,161					$	510,175
General and administrative expenses (excluding merger and integration expenses and non-cash stock compensation expense totaling $25.8 and $13.5 million in 2007 and 2006, respectively)				$	50,642					$	30,742
General and administrative expenses as a percent of total revenues					5.2	%					6.0	%

Facility Lease Expense

Lease expense increased by $43.3 million, or 46.9%, primarily due to the ARC acquisition in July 2006 as well as other 2006 and 2007 acquisitions. The increase in expense is partially offset by the purchase of previously leased assets in the fourth quarter of 2006. Lease expense includes straight-line rent expense of $12.4 million and $10.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and is partially offset by $2.2 million of additional deferred gain amortization for the same respective time periods.

28

---

Table of Contents

Depreciation and Amortization

Total depreciation and amortization expense increased by $102.2 million, or 192.0%, primarily due to the acquisition of ARC as well as other 2006 and 2007 acquisitions. The increase was partially offset by a decrease in expense for resident in-place lease intangibles which were fully depreciated at the end of 2006.

Interest Income

Interest income increased $1.7 million, or 101.7%, primarily due to the acquisition of ARC in July 2006.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased $18.6 million, or 45.4%, primarily due to additional debt incurred in connection with our acquisitions which was partially offset by the change in fair value of our interest rate swaps for the six months ended June 30, 2007. The effective portion of the change in fair value of derivatives was excluded from interest expense and was included in other comprehensive loss for the six months ended June 30, 2006. On October 1, 2006, we discontinued hedge accounting prospectively. Changes in fair value of derivatives are now included in interest expense.

Income Taxes

The Company’s effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 are 38.0% and 1.7%, respectively. The difference between the periods is primarily due to the ability to benefit book losses in the first two quarters of 2007 compared to the same period in 2006 as a result of the deferred tax liabilities generated in connection with the acquisitions of ARC and SALI.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

For a description of our critical accounting policies and estimates, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

To date, we have financed our operations primarily with cash generated from operations and both short- and long-term borrowings. We financed our acquisitions with long-term borrowings, draws on our credit facility and proceeds from our equity offerings. The following is a summary of cash flow information for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 ($ in 000’s):

			Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006
Cash provided by operating activities				$	84,910					$	23,239
Cash used in investing activities					(239,062	)					(526,732	)
Cash provided by financing activities					167,347						456,209
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents					13,195						(47,284	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period					68,034						77,682
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period				$	81,229					$	30,398

We had $81.2 million of cash and cash equivalents at June 30, 2007, excluding cash and investments-restricted and lease security deposits of $116.6 million. Additionally, we had $32.7 million available under our credit facility and $9.3 million of unused capacity under our letter of credit facility.

The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to the acquisition of ARC in July 2006 and other 2006 and 2007 acquisitions as well as strength of the performance of the facilities we operated during both six month periods.

29

---

Table of Contents

The decrease in cash used in investing activities was primarily due to the size of prior year acquisitions funded as compared to the current year. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in additions to property, plant, equipment and leasehold intangibles at our existing facilities and those under development in conjunction with the Company’s current year focus on its expansion of its existing facilities as well as an increase in restricted cash in the current year based on timing of escrow deposits and the substitution of letters of credit for cash previously securing our obligations in the prior year.

The decrease in cash provided by financing activities was primarily due to an increase in repayments under the Company’s line of credit and borrowings, an increase in the payment of dividends and a decrease in debt proceeds during the year. Additionally, during the current quarter, the Company bought out a capital lease obligation in conjunction with the acquisition of the Freedom Square Portfolio real property.

We believe that cash on hand, together with funds from operations, other current assets, and existing credit facilities will satisfy our expected working capital, contractual obligations, capital expenditures, and investment requirements for at least the next 12 months and the foreseeable future.

At June 30, 2007, we had $1,886.4 million of debt outstanding, including capital lease obligations, excluding our line of credit, at a weighted-average interest rate of 6.94%, of which $17.3 million was due in the next 12 months.

At June 30, 2007, we had $208.9 million of negative working capital, which includes the classification of $194.7 million of refundable entrance fees and $29.5 million in tenant deposits as current liabilities as required by applicable accounting pronouncements. Based upon our historical operating experience, we anticipate that only approximately 9% to 12% of those entrance fee liabilities will actually come due, and be required to be settled in cash, during the next 12 months. We expect that any entrance fee liabilities due within the next 12 months will be fully offset by the proceeds generated by subsequent entrance fee sales. Entrance fee sales, net of refunds paid, provided $6.6 million of cash for the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Our liquidity requirements have historically arisen from, and we expect they will continue to arise from, working capital, general and administrative costs, debt service and lease payments, acquisition costs, employee compensation and related benefits, capital improvements and dividend payments. In the past, we have met our cash requirements for operations using cash flows from operating revenues, the receipt of resident fees and the receipt of management fees from third-party managed facilities. In addition to using cash flows from operating revenues, we use available funds from our indebtedness and long-term leasing of our facilities to meet our cash obligations. The primary use of our cash is for operating costs, which includes debt service and lease payments and capital expenditures. We currently estimate that our existing cash flows from operations, together with existing working capital and the proceeds of our credit facility will be sufficient to fund our short-term liquidity needs. For the year ending December 31, 2007, in addition to normal recurring capital expenditures and expenditures in connection with our expansion and development program, we expect to spend approximately $75.0 million for major capital projects and renovations at our existing and recently acquired facilities (including projects related to the implementation of our ancillary services program). We presently estimate that we will also spend approximately $25.0 million during the year ending December 31, 2007 for corporate branding, integration of corporate functions and enhancement of our infrastructure operations. The source of these funds is expected to be cash on hand and cash generated from operations and financings. We anticipate funding our expansion and development program through debt and lease financing. There can be no assurance that financing or refinancing will be available to us or available on acceptable terms.

We expect to continue to fund the growth of our business through cash flows from operations and cash flows from financing activities, such as equity offerings, and through the incurrence of additional indebtedness or leasing arrangements. We expect to continue to assess our financing alternatives periodically and access the capital markets opportunistically. If our existing resources are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, or if we enter into an acquisition or strategic arrangement with another company, we may need to sell additional equity or debt securities. Any such sale of additional

30

---

Table of Contents

equity securities will dilute the interests of our existing stockholders, and we cannot be certain that additional public or private financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain this additional financing, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more aspects of our business development activities, which could harm the growth of our business. We may incur additional indebtedness or lease financing to fund such acquisitions. In addition, we may incur additional indebtedness or lease financing to fund future dividends.

In July 2007, the Company entered into a series of forward starting interest rate swaps in the aggregate notional amount of $553.1 million in anticipation of planned future financing transactions as well as the replacement of certain existing hedges that will be expiring.

Our actual liquidity and capital funding requirements depend on numerous factors, including our operating results, our ability to acquire new facilities, general economic conditions and the cost of capital.

Contractual Commitments

Significant ongoing commitments consist primarily of leases, debt, purchase commitments and certain other long-term liabilities. For a summary and complete presentation and description of our ongoing commitments and contractual obligations, see the ‘‘Contractual Commitments’’ section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006. Material changes in these commitments resulting from debt incurred during the six months ended June 30, 2007 are as follows ($ in 000’s):

			Total						2007						2008						2009						2010						2011						Thereafter
Long-term debt obligations				$	311,875					$	12,103					$	14,280					$	14,257					$	14,257					$	14,257					$	242,721

There have been no other material changes in our contractual commitments during the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The equity method of accounting has been applied in the accompanying financial statements with respect to our investment in unconsolidated ventures that are not considered variable interest entities we do not possess a controlling financial interest. We do not believe these off-balance sheet arrangements have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

A non-GAAP financial measure is generally defined as one that purports to measure historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows, but excludes or includes amounts that would not be so adjusted in the most comparable GAAP measure. In this report, we define and use the non-GAAP financial measures Adjusted EBITDA, Cash From Facility Operations and Facility Operating Income, as set forth below.

Adjusted EBITDA

Definition of Adjusted EBITDA

We define Adjusted EBITDA as follows:

Net income before:

	•	provision (benefit) for income taxes;

31

---

Table of Contents

	•	non-operating (income) loss items;

	•	depreciation and amortization;

	•	straight-line rent expense (income);

	•	amortization of deferred gain;

	•	amortization of deferred entrance fees; and

	•	non-cash compensation expense;

and including:

	•	entrance fee receipts and refunds.

Management’s Use of Adjusted EBITDA

We use Adjusted EBITDA to assess our overall financial and operating performance. We believe this non-GAAP measure, as we have defined it, is helpful in identifying trends in our day-to-day performance because the items excluded have little or no significance on our day-to-day operations. This measure provides an assessment of controllable expenses and affords management the ability to make decisions which are expected to facilitate meeting current financial goals as well as achieve optimal financial performance. It provides an indicator for management to determine if adjustments to current spending decisions are needed.

Adjusted EBITDA provides us with a measure of financial performance, independent of items that are beyond the control of management in the short-term, such as depreciation and amortization, straight-line rent expense (income), taxation and interest expense associated with our capital structure. This metric measures our financial performance based on operational factors that management can impact in the short-term, namely the cost structure or expenses of the organization. Adjusted EBITDA is one of the metrics used by senior management and the board of directors to review the financial performance of the business on a monthly basis. Adjusted EBITDA is also used by research analysts and investors to evaluate the performance of and value companies in our industry.

Limitations of Adjusted EBITDA

Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool. It should not be viewed in isolation or as a substitute for GAAP measures of earnings. Material limitations in making the adjustments to our earnings to calculate Adjusted EBITDA, and using this non-GAAP financial measure as compared to GAAP net income (loss), include:

	•	the cash portion of interest expense, income tax (benefit) provision and non-recurring charges related to gain (loss) on sale of facilities and extinguishment of debt activities generally represent charges (gains), which may significantly affect our financial results; and

	•	depreciation and amortization, though not directly affecting our current cash position, represent the wear and tear and/or reduction in value of our facilities, which affects the services we provide to our residents and may be indicative of future needs for capital expenditures.

An investor or potential investor may find this item important in evaluating our performance, results of operations and financial position. We use non-GAAP financial measures to supplement our GAAP results in order to provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting our business.

Adjusted EBITDA is not an alternative to net income, income from operations or cash flows provided by or used in operations as calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. You should not rely on Adjusted EBITDA as a substitute for any such GAAP financial measure. We strongly urge you to review the reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to GAAP net income (loss), along with our consolidated financial statements included herein. We also strongly urge you to not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business. In addition, because Adjusted EBITDA is not a

32

---

Table of Contents

measure of financial performance under GAAP and is susceptible to varying calculations, the Adjusted EBITDA measure, as presented in this report, may differ from and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

The table below shows the reconciliation of net loss to Adjusted EBITDA for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 ($ in 000’s):

			Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007 (1)						2006(1)						2007(1)						2006(1)
Net loss				$	(18,675	)				$	(20,259	)				$	(53,815	)				$	(39,585	)
Minority interest					(642	)					233						(511	)					349
(Benefit) provision for income taxes					(12,715	)					273						(33,283	)					659
Equity in loss of unconsolidated ventures					601						469						2,054						637
Loss on extinguishment of debt					803						—						803						1,334
Other non-operating income					(238	)					—						(238	)					—
Interest expense:
Debt					27,953						18,963						53,192						30,493
Capitalized lease obligation					7,125						6,581						15,338						8,741
Amortization of deferred financing costs					2,109						1,335						3,727						2,038
Change in fair value of derivatives and amortization					(17,619	)					(519	)					(12,838	)					(418	)
Interest income					(1,563	)					(625	)					(3,383	)					(1,677	)
(Loss) income from operations					(12,861	)					6,451						(28,954	)					2,571
Depreciation and amortization					82,471						30,947						155,455						53,246
Straight-line lease expense					6,028						5,239						12,364						10,498
Amortization of deferred gain					(1,085	)					(1,086	)					(2,170	)					(2,173	)
Amortization of entrance fees					(4,641	)					(62	)					(8,900	)					(145	)
Non-cash compensation expense					8,192						3,755						19,012						6,773
Entrance fee receipts(2)					8,790						1,300						16,964						3,369
Entrance fee disbursements					(4,089	)					(308	)					(10,404	)					(1,011	)
Adjusted EBITDA				$	82,805					$	46,236					$	153,367					$	73,128

(1)

The calculation of Adjusted EBITDA includes merger, integration, and certain other non-recurring expenses, as well as acquisition transition costs, totaling $3.9 million and $3.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively and $7.0 million and $6.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.

(2)	Includes the receipt of refundable and nonrefundable entrance fees.

Cash From Facility Operations

Definition of Cash From Facility Operations

We define Cash From Facility Operations as follows:

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities adjusted for:

	•	changes in operating assets and liabilities;

	•	deferred interest and fees added to principal;

	•	refundable entrance fees received;

	•	entrance fee refunds disbursed;

	•	other; and

	•	recurring capital expenditures.

Recurring capital expenditures include expenditures capitalized in accordance with GAAP that are funded from Cash From Facility Operations. Amounts excluded from recurring capital

33

---

Table of Contents

expenditures consist primarily of unusual or non-recurring capital items and facility purchases and/or major renovations that are funded using financing proceeds and/or proceeds from the sale of facilities that are held for sale.

Management’s Use of Cash From Facility Operations

We use Cash From Facility Operations to assess our overall liquidity. This measure provides an assessment of controllable expenses and affords management the ability to make decisions which are expected to facilitate meeting current financial and liquidity goals as well as to achieve optimal financial performance. It provides an indicator for management to determine if adjustments to current spending decisions are needed.

This metric measures our liquidity based on operational factors that management can impact in the short-term, namely the cost structure or expenses of the organization. Cash From Facility Operations is one of the metrics used by our senior management and board of directors (i) to review our ability to service our outstanding indebtedness (including our credit facilities and long-term leases), (ii) our ability to pay dividends to stockholders, (iii) our ability to make regular recurring capital expenditures to maintain and improve our facilities on a period-to-period basis, (iv) for planning purposes, including preparation of our annual budget and (v) in setting various covenants in our credit agreements. These agreements generally require us to escrow or spend a minimum of between $250 and $450 per unit/bed per year. Historically, we have spent in excess of these per unit/bed amounts; however, there is no assurance that we will have funds available to escrow or spend these per unit/bed amounts in the future. If we do not escrow or spend the required minimum annual amounts, we would be in default of the applicable debt or lease agreement which could trigger cross default provisions in our outstanding indebtedness and lease arrangements.

Limitations of Cash From Facility Operations

Cash From Facility Operations has limitations as an analytical tool. It should not be viewed in isolation or as a substitute for GAAP measures of cash flow from operations. Cash From Facility Operations does not represent cash available for dividends or discretionary expenditures, since we may have mandatory debt service requirements or other non-discretionary expenditures not reflected in the measure. Material limitations in making the adjustment to our cash flow from operations to calculate Cash From Facility Operations, and using this non-GAAP financial measure as compared to GAAP operating cash flows, include:

	•	the cash portion of interest expense, income tax (benefit) provision and non-recurring charges related to gain (loss) on sale of facilities and extinguishment of debt activities generally represent charges (gains), which may significantly affect our financial results; and

	•	depreciation and amortization, though not directly affecting our current cash position, represent the wear and tear and/or reduction in value of our facilities, which affects the services we provide to our residents and may be indicative of future needs for capital expenditures.

We believe Cash From Facility Operations is useful to investors because it assists their ability to meaningfully evaluate (1) our ability to service our outstanding indebtedness, including our credit facilities and capital and financing leases, (2) our ability to pay dividends to stockholders and (3) our ability to make regular recurring capital expenditures to maintain and improve our facilities.

Cash From Facility Operations is not an alternative to cash flows provided by or used in operations as calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. You should not rely on Cash From Facility Operations as a substitute for any such GAAP financial measure. We strongly urge you to review the reconciliation of Cash From Facility Operations to GAAP net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, along with our consolidated financial statements included herein. We also strongly urge you to not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business. In addition, because Cash From Facility Operations is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and is susceptible to varying calculations, the Cash From Facility Operations measure, as presented in this report, may differ from and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

34

---

Table of Contents

The table below shows the reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to Cash From Facility Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 ($ in 000’s)

			Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007(1)						2006(1)						2007(1)						2006(1)
Net cash provided by operating activities				$	56,082					$	11,120					$	84,910					$	23,239
Changes in operating assets and liabilities					(6,797	)					9,097						5,342						9,928
Refundable entrance fees received(2)					4,064						1,135						8,322						2,756
Entrance fee refunds disbursed					(4,089	)					(308	)					(10,404	)					(1,011	)
Recurring capital expenditures, net					(7,049	)					(5,299	)					(13,274	)					(7,360	)
Reimbursement of operating expenses and other					812						1,350						1,942						2,850
Cash From Facility Operations				$	43,023					$	17,095					$	76,838					$	30,402

(1)

The calculation of Cash From Facility Operations includes merger, integration and certain other non-recurring expenses, as well as acquisition transition costs, totaling $3.9 million and $3.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively and $7.0 million and $6.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

(2)

Total entrance fee receipts for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were $8.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively, including $4.7 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of nonrefundable entrance fee receipts included in net cash provided by operating activities. Total entrance fee receipts for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were $17.0 million and $3.4 million, respectively, including $8.6 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of nonrefundable entrance fee receipts included in net cash provided by operating activities.

Facility Operating Income

Definition of Facility Operating Income

We define Facility Operating Income as follows:

Net income before:

	•	provision (benefit) for income taxes;

	•	non-operating (income) loss items;

	•	depreciation and amortization;

	•	facility lease expense;

	•	general and administrative expense, including non-cash stock compensation expense;

	•	amortization of deferred entrance fee revenue; and

	•	management fees.

Management’s Use of Facility Operating Income

We use Facility Operating Income to assess our facility operating performance. We believe this non-GAAP measure, as we have defined it, is helpful in identifying trends in our day-to-day facility performance because the items excluded have little or no significance on our day-to-day facility operations. This measure provides an assessment of revenue generation and expense management and affords management the ability to make decisions which are expected to facilitate meeting current financial goals as well as to achieve optimal facility financial performance. It provides an indicator for management to determine if adjustments to current spending decisions are needed.

Facility Operating Income provides us with a measure of facility financial performance, independent of items that are beyond the control of management in the short-term, such as

35

---

Table of Contents

depreciation and amortization, lease expense, taxation and interest expense associated with our capital structure. This metric measures our facility financial performance based on operational factors that management can impact in the short-term, namely the cost structure or expenses of the organization. Facility Operating Income is one of the metrics used by our senior management and board of directors to review the financial performance of the business on a monthly basis. Facility Operating Income is also used by research analysts and investors to evaluate the performance of and value companies in our industry by investors, lenders and lessors. In addition, Facility Operating Income is a common measure used in the industry to value the acquisition or sales price of facilities and is used as a measure of the returns expected to be generated by a facility.

A number of our debt and lease agreements contain covenants measuring Facility Operating Income to gauge debt or lease coverages. The debt or lease coverage covenants are generally calculated as facility net operating income (defined as total operating revenue less operating expenses, all as determined on an accrual basis in accordance with GAAP). For purposes of the coverage calculation, the lender or lessor will further require a pro forma adjustment to facility operating income to include a management fee (generally 4% to 5% of operating revenue) and an annual capital reserve (generally $250 to $450 per unit/bed). An investor or potential investor may find this item important in evaluating our performance, results of operations and financial position, particularly on a facility-by-facility basis.

Limitations of Facility Operating Income

Facility Operating Income has limitations as an analytical tool. It should not be viewed in isolation or as a substitute for GAAP measures of earnings. Material limitations in making the adjustments to our earnings to calculate Facility Operating Income, and using this non-GAAP financial measure as compared to GAAP net income (loss), include:

	•	interest expense, income tax (benefit) provision and non-recurring charges related to gain (loss) on sale of facilities and extinguishment of debt activities generally represent charges (gains), which may significantly affect our financial results; and

	•	depreciation and amortization, though not directly affecting our current cash position, represent the wear and tear and/or reduction in value of our facilities, which affects the services we provide to our residents and may be indicative of future needs for capital expenditures.

An investor or potential investor may find this item important in evaluating our performance, results of operations and financial position on a facility-by-facility basis. We use non-GAAP financial measures to supplement our GAAP results in order to provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting our business. Facility Operating Income is not an alternative to net income, income from operations or cash flows provided by or used in operations as calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. You should not rely on Facility Operating Income as a substitute for any such GAAP financial measure. We strongly urge you to review the reconciliation of Facility Operating Income to GAAP net income (loss), along with our consolidated financial statements included herein. We also strongly urge you to not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business. In addition, because Facility Operating Income is not a measure of financial performance under GAAP and is susceptible to varying calculations, the Facility Operating Income measure, as presented in this report, may differ from and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

The table below shows the reconciliation of net loss to Facility Operating Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 ($ in 000’s):

36

---

Table of Contents

			Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
			2007						2006						2007						2006
Net loss				$	(18,675	)				$	(20,259	)				$	(53,815	)				$	(39,585	)
(Benefit) provision for income taxes					(12,715	)					273						(33,283	)					659
Minority interest					(642	)					233						(511	)					349
Equity in loss of unconsolidated ventures					601						469						2,054						637
Loss on extinguishment of debt					803						—						803						1,334
Other non-operating income					(238	)					—						(238	)					—
Interest expense:
Debt					27,953						18,963						53,192						30,493
Capitalized lease obligation					7,125						6,581						15,338						8,741
Amortization of deferred financing costs					2,109						1,335						3,727						2,038
Change in fair value of derivatives and amortization					(17,619	)					(519	)					(12,838	)					(418	)
Interest income					(1,563	)					(625	)					(3,383	)					(1,677	)
(Loss) income from operations					(12,861	)					6,451						(28,954	)					2,571
Depreciation and amortization					82,471						30,947						155,455						53,246
Facility lease expense					67,176						46,623						135,657						92,357
General and administrative (including non-cash stock compensation expense)					35,758						23,125						76,411						44,210
Amortization of entrance fees					(4,641	)					(62	)					(8,900	)					(145	)
Management fees					(1,788	)					(585	)					(3,284	)					(1,732	)
Facility Operating Income				$	166,115					$	106,499					$	326,385					$	190,507

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are subject to market risks from changes in interest rates charged on our credit facilities used to finance acquisitions on an interim basis, floating-rate indebtedness and lease payments subject to floating rates. The impact on earnings and the value of our long-term debt and lease payments are subject to change as a result of movements in market rates and prices. As of June 30, 2007, we had approximately $293.4 million of long-term fixed rate debt, $1,279.0 million of long-term variable-rate debt, and $314.1 million of capital lease obligations. As of June 30, 2007, our total fixed-rate debt and variable-rate debt outstanding had weighted-average interest rates of 6.94%.

We do not expect changes in interest rates to have a material effect on earnings or cash flows since approximately 96% of our debt, excluding credit facilities, and lease payments either have fixed rates or variable rates that are subject to swap or interest rate cap agreements with major financial institutions to manage our risk. As of June 30, 2007, a 100 basis point change in short-term interest rates would affect our operating cash flow no more than $1.8 million per annum.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Co-Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer each concluded that, as of June 30, 2007, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

37

---

Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has not been any change in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.    OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

The information contained in Note 8 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by this reference.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds    

The following table contains information regarding purchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended June 30, 2007 by or on behalf of the Company or any ‘‘affiliated purchaser,’’ as defined by Rule 10b-18(a)(3) of the Exchange Act:

Period			Total Number of Shares Purchased(1)						Average Price Paid per Share						Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs						Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
04/01/07 – 04/30/07					—					$	—						—						—
05/01/07 – 05/31/07					—						—						—						—
06/01/07 – 06/30/07					997						46.69						—						—
Total					997						46.69						—						—

(1)	Consists entirely of shares withheld to satisfy tax liabilities due upon the vesting of restricted stock.

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

(a)    We held our annual meeting of stockholders on June 5, 2007.

(b)    William B. Doniger, Jackie M. Clegg and Jeffrey G. Edwards were reelected as Class II directors at the annual meeting, to hold office for a term of three years and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified. The terms of office of the following directors continued after the annual meeting: Wesley R. Edens, Frank M. Bumstead, Jeffrey R. Leeds, and Dr. Samuel Waxman.

(c)    The following votes were taken in connection with the election of directors at the annual meeting:

Director Nominees			Votes For						Withhold Authority
William B. Doniger					98,773,515						8,418
Jackie M. Clegg					98,320,345						461,588
Jeffrey G. Edwards					98,773,358						8,575

The proposal to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the 2007 fiscal year was approved. The following

38

---

Table of Contents

votes were taken in connection with the proposal:

Proposal			Votes For						Votes Against						Abstentions						Broker Non-Votes
Ratification of the Audit Committee’s appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2007					98,104,125						503,823						173,985						—

39

---

Table of Contents

Item 6.    Exhibits

Exhibit No.						Description
	3	.1				Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2006).
	3	.2				Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Amendment No. 2) (No. 333-127372) filed on October 11, 2005).
	4	.1				Form of Certificate for common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Amendment No. 3) (No. 333-127372) filed on November 7, 2005).
	4	.2				Stockholders Agreement, dated as of November 28, 2005, by and among Brookdale Senior Living Inc., FIT-ALT Investor LLC, Fortress Brookdale Acquisition LLC, Fortress Investment Trust II and Health Partners (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 31, 2006).
	4	.3				Amendment No. 1 to Stockholders Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2006, by and among Brookdale Senior Living Inc., FIT-ALT Investor LLC, Fortress Registered Investment Trust, Fortress Brookdale Investment Fund LLC, FRIT Holdings LLC, and FIT Holdings LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on August 14, 2006).
	10	.1				Brookdale Senior Living Inc. Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective June 12, 2007.
	10	.2				Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the Brookdale Senior Living Inc. Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (Three Year Time-Vesting; No Dividends).
	10	.3				Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the Brookdale Senior Living Inc. Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (Five Year Time-Vesting; With Dividends).
	10	.4				Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the Brookdale Senior Living Inc. Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (Four Year Performance/Time-Vesting; With Dividends).
	10	.5				Form of Restricted Share Agreement under the Brookdale Senior Living Inc. Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (Four Year Performance/Time-Vesting; No Dividends).
	31	.1				Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31	.2				Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31	.3				Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32					Certification of Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

40

---

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING INC.

(Registrant)

By:    /s/ Mark W. Ohlendorf

Name:    Mark W. Ohlendorf Title:       Duly authorized officer and                 Chief Financial Officer

Date:       August 8, 2007

By:    /s/ Bryan D. Richardson

Name:     Bryan D. Richardson Title:       Duly authorized officer and                 Chief Accounting Officer

Date:       August 8, 2007

41

---