e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
x
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
or |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the transition period
from to |
Commission file number 1-7534
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
84-0593263 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) |
|
One StorageTek Drive, Louisville, Colorado
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
80028-4309
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code
303-673-5151
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.10 par value per share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x Yes
o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
x Yes
o No
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by
non-affiliates of the registrant was $2,729,968,651 based on the
last reported sale price of the common stock of the registrant
on the New York Stock Exchanges consolidated transactions
reporting system on June 25, 2004, the last business day of
the registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter. For purposes of this disclosure, shares of common stock
held by persons who hold more than 10% of the outstanding common
stock of the registrant and common stock held by Section 16
officers and directors of the registrant have been excluded in
that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates as
that term is defined under the rules and regulations promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933. This determination is not
necessarily conclusive for other purposes.
As of March 4, 2005, there were 108,978,831 shares of
common stock of the registrant outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The Registrant intends to file a definitive proxy statement
pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 within 120 days of its fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004. Portions of the registrants
definitive proxy statement for its annual meeting of
stockholders to be held April 27, 2005, are incorporated by
reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
PART I
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
All assumptions, anticipations, expectations, and forecasts
contained in the following discussion regarding our business,
future products, business plans, financial results, performance,
and future events are forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Our actual results may differ materially because of a number of
risks and uncertainties. Some of these risks are detailed in
Item 7, MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FACTORS THAT
MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS, and elsewhere in this
Form 10-K. Forward-looking statements can typically be
identified by the use of words such as may,
will, should, expects,
plans, anticipates,
believes, estimates,
predicts, intends,
potential, continue, or the negative of
such terms, or other comparable words. Forward-looking
statements also include the assumptions underlying or relating
to any such statements. The forward-looking statements contained
in this Form 10-K represent a good-faith assessment of our
future performance for which management believes there is a
reasonable basis. We disclaim any obligation to update the
forward-looking statements contained herein, whether as a result
of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as may
be otherwise required by law.
GENERAL
Storage Technology Corporation (StorageTek, we, our, or us) was
incorporated in Delaware in 1969. Our principal executive
offices are located at One StorageTek Drive, Louisville,
Colorado 80028, telephone 303-673-5151.
Data storage has been our principal business for 35 years.
Through our Information Lifecycle Management (ILM) strategy, we
enable businesses to align the cost of storage with the value of
information. Our innovative storage solutions manage the
complexity and growth of information, lower costs, improve
efficiency, and protect investments.
We provide products and services to a broad range of customers,
including large multinational companies, midsize and small
businesses, universities, medical institutions, and governmental
agencies. Our customers encompass a broad range of industry
sectors around the world, including financial services, retail
sales, healthcare, broadcasting, telecommunications,
transportation, and a variety of manufacturing industries.
We market our products and services to end-user customers
through our direct sales organization and through our indirect
channel partners, including original equipment manufacturers
(OEMs), value-added distributors (VADs), value-added resellers
(VARs), and other distributors.
We maintain a presence in many major cities of the world. We
operate sales and service offices throughout the United States
and Canada, as well as throughout various international regions,
including Europe, Asia-Pacific, and Latin America.
U.S. operations accounted for approximately 45% of our
total revenue in 2004, and international operations accounted
for approximately 55%.
OUR STRATEGY
Our strategy is to design, develop, and deliver easy-to-use,
industry-leading, innovative storage solutions that help
customers manage and protect business critical information
throughout its lifecycle, from creation to archival and
deletion. We call this approach ILM. Our unique offerings help
customers implement a cost-efficient platform for scalable data
archive, reliable data protection, and simplified storage
management.
Our storage solutions include a combination of software,
services, and a variety of storage formats: primary disk, ATA
disk, access tape, and capacity tape. Each storage format offers
a different price/performance point, and our solutions optimize
these formats to help customers align the value of their
information with the cost of storing it.
1
Today, the vast majority of the worlds information ends up
residing permanently on tape. As the leader in tape automation
storage, we intend to leverage our leadership position by
focusing on three strategic opportunities in the broader storage
marketplace:
|
|
|
|
|
Data Archive. Enable a flexible archival architecture by
offering long-term storage, search, and retrieval capabilities
for large amounts of information across the appropriate
combination of disk and tape storage. |
|
|
|
Data Protection. Make backup and recovery simple,
predictable, and reliable by offering advanced data protection
solutions such as virtual tape and continuous data protection to
meet the most stringent backup windows and recovery requirements. |
|
|
|
Storage Management. Drive primary storage productivity by
helping customers relocate infrequently used copies of data from
expensive storage formats to lower cost disk and tape, and by
making these copies transparently available to their business
applications. |
BUSINESS SEGMENTS
We are organized into two reportable business segments: storage
products and storage services. Information concerning revenue
and gross profit for each of our business segments is found in
Item 7, MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, and in
Item 8, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY
DATA, of this Form 10-K, which information is
incorporated by reference into this Item 1. All of our
assets are retained and analyzed at the corporate level and are
not allocated to the individual segments.
STORAGE PRODUCTS
Within storage products, we offer tape, disk, and network
products. These product offerings include software designed to
maximize storage management capabilities.
Tape Products
Our tape products historically have generated a significant
portion of our product revenue. During 2004, tape products
represented approximately 77% of our product revenue. These
products are engineered to provide a reliable, affordable means
to store large volumes of data and consist principally of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Automated tape libraries. The
StreamLinetm
modular library systems provide the ability to consolidate data
storage from supercomputers, mainframes, UNIX, Linux, and NT
servers into one easy-to-manage library. The SL8500 modular
library system meets enterprise requirements for backup and
archiving in open-systems and mainframe environments. Its fast
robotics can handle unpredictable peak workloads, and it
provides the ability to add slots and drives to increase
capacity and throughput without interrupting operations. The
library is also very efficient in its use of floor space. The
modular, flexible SL500 library scales from 30 Linear Tape Open
(LTO) cartridge slots up to 577 LTO slots. The expandable
drive capacity and use of LTO and SDLT technology are also ideal
for critical server applications with fast data growth rates
such as e-mail servers, database applications, and enterprise
file servers. |
Our L-Series automated tape libraries range from the L20, with
up to 2 tape drives and 20 tape cartridge slots, to the L5500,
with up to 80 tape drives and more than 120,000 tape cartridge
slots. L-Series libraries are used in open-systems environments
and support a wide variety of tape drives. These libraries
provide significant flexibility to the customer because they can
be easily installed, scaled, and upgraded.
|
|
|
|
|
Tape drives. The T9840 series tape drives are designed to
optimize access speed and are ideal for transaction-intensive
applications. The T9940 series tape drives are designed to
optimize capacity and are ideal for archiving, record retention,
and disaster recovery applications. The T9840 series and T9940
series tape drives are used in both the mainframe and
open-systems environments and can be attached by a variety of
communication protocols, including SCSI, ESCON, FICON, and
native Fibre Channel. We also sell mainframe and open-systems
tape media as well as third-party tape drives. |
2
|
|
|
|
|
Virtual tape solutions. The Virtual Storage
Managertm
(VSM) system is a virtual tape product that provides customers
with an intelligent software-driven data storage management
solution. It is designed to maximize tape utilization, free up
floor space, and optimize batch processing. VSM uses a disk
buffer and virtual tape technology to optimize access time,
throughput, and physical media and transport use, which results
in significant time, money, and resource savings for the
customer. It is currently available for the mainframe
environment. |
Disk Products
Our disk products are designed to maximize disk capacity
utilization, provide fast access to business critical
information, scale to customer storage requirements, and support
storage area network (SAN) implementations. Our principal disk
products include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
FlexLine 200 and 300 Series. The
FlexLinetm
200 and 300 Series storage systems deliver reliable performance
for mission-critical applications, including large SANs,
cluster, and storage consolidation initiatives as well as direct
attach environments. These storage systems include robust
features that combine scalability and solid performance to meet
the requirements of online applications in a cost-efficient
manner. Customers can therefore mix different drive types in the
same system while increasing their disaster recovery/ business
continuity capabilities through asynchronous, remote
disk-to-disk mirroring. |
|
|
|
FlexLine V-Series. The V2X Shared Virtual
Arraytm
(SVAtm)
subsystem is a virtual disk storage subsystem designed for both
the mainframe and open-systems environments. The V2X utilizes a
virtual architecture that permits customers to use 100% of their
disk storage capacity, saving both time and money. The V2X
facilitates rapid data restoration and maximizes application and
system availability. Our Virtual Power
Suitetm
software, which is offered in conjunction with our SVA products,
is designed to provide virtual duplication and significantly
reduce central processing unit and channel utilization costs
associated with data movement. |
Network Products
Our storage network products provide a total integrated SAN
solution to our customers by enabling cross-media,
cross-platform, and cross-vendor accessibility. We resell
leading world-class products, including Fibre Channel switches,
directors, and multi-protocol storage routers for SAN solutions.
We integrate these products for our customers to allow them to
leverage all of their digital assets.
STORAGE SERVICES
We provide a broad portfolio of storage services to help our
customers maintain, support, and manage their storage
infrastructures while reducing their total cost of ownership.
Our storage services offerings include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise maintenance and support services. We provide
global maintenance and support services for storage products and
integrated-system solutions through a combination of service
engineers, remote diagnostic tools, online and telephone
assistance, and local third-party service providers. We have
strategically located our distribution centers throughout our
markets to provide spare parts on an expedited basis. We offer
different levels of service to meet customer requirements,
including on-site service, same-day or next-day service, and
parts exchange. |
|
|
|
Professional services. We provide global professional
services that are designed to help customers solve their storage
management and integration issues in a cost-effective manner.
Our principal professional services offerings include the
following: |
|
|
|
|
|
Data center operations |
|
|
Storage utility |
|
|
Business assessments |
|
|
Storage optimization |
|
|
Data migration |
|
|
Continuity and recovery |
|
|
Product implementation |
|
|
Product testing and packaging |
3
BACKLOG
We generally manufacture our products based on our forecasts of
near-term demand. We typically receive a significant volume of
our orders late in each quarter, and customers may reschedule or
cancel unfilled orders. For these reasons, we believe that
backlog levels are not a meaningful indicator of future sales.
MARKETING AND DISTRIBUTION
We market our products and services on a global basis to
end-user customers through our direct sales organization and
through indirect channel partners. Our worldwide direct sales
organization includes sales representatives, service engineers,
system engineers, system integrators, and administrative support
staff. Sales made by our direct sales force accounted for
approximately 54% of our product revenue in 2004, 53% in 2003,
and 55% in 2002.
Our indirect channel partners, including OEMs, VADs, and VARs,
expand our reach into new markets and provide access to new
customers. We generally receive lower gross profit margins on
indirect channel sales, as compared to sales generated by our
direct sales organization. Indirect channel sales accounted for
approximately 46% of our product revenue in 2004, 47% in 2003,
and 45% in 2002.
Our revenue recognition accounting policies for indirect channel
sales differ from those used for direct sales. See Note 1
of NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS in
Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of our
revenue recognition policies. We are subject to various risks
associated with our indirect channel partners, as detailed in
Item 7, MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FACTORS THAT
MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS We may be materially affected by
our ability to grow our indirect channels successfully,
which information is incorporated by reference into this
Item 1.
International revenue accounted for approximately 55% of total
revenue in 2004, 53% in 2003, and 49% in 2002. In each of these
three fiscal years, over two-thirds of our international revenue
was derived from Europe. We are subject to various risks
associated with conducting business outside the U.S. See
Item 7, MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FACTORS THAT
MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS We may be materially affected by
the risks of conducting business outside the United
States, which information is incorporated by reference
into this Item 1, for a discussion of risks associated with
international operations.
MANUFACTURING AND MATERIALS
Our primary manufacturing and assembly facilities are located in
Puerto Rico. We also perform limited manufacturing and assembly
in Colorado and France. All of our manufacturing and assembly
facilities are currently in compliance with ISO 9001:2000.
We purchase subassemblies, parts, and components for our
products from both U.S. and international vendors. These
purchases make up a substantial portion of our production costs.
In-house manufacturing, assembly, and testing make up the
remaining balance of our production costs.
Certain parts and components included in our products are
obtained from a sole source supplier or a limited group of
suppliers. For a discussion of risks associated with sole source
suppliers, see Item 7, MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS We
may be materially affected by the risks associated with sole
source suppliers, which information is incorporated by
reference into this Item 1.
We have long-term supply contracts with certain suppliers, and
we obtain other parts and components through purchase orders.
Our suppliers are generally not obligated to supply products for
an extended period or at specific quantities or prices. Our
dependence on suppliers involves a number of risks, including
the possibility of a shortage of key parts or components, longer
lead times, and reduced control over production and delivery
schedules. See Item 7, MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION
AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS We
may be materially affected by a failure to
4
obtain quality parts and components in a timely manner or by a
failure to effectively manage inventory levels, which
information is incorporated by reference into this Item 1.
We use proprietary design and manufacturing technologies to
perform certain critical manufacturing steps for the read/write
heads used in our T9840 and T9940 series tape drives. The
sophisticated nature of the exacting manufacturing process
requires a clean room environment. Even within a clean room
environment, problems such as chemical contamination, power
surges, optical misalignments, and temperature variations
in any one of the many processes used in manufacturing
could halt production for an indeterminate period of time.
COMPETITION
The data storage industry is intensely competitive and is
characterized by rapid and continuous technological change,
short product life cycles, changing customer requirements, and
aggressive pricing. Our competitors vary in size and offer a
broad range of products and services. We compete primarily on
the basis of technology, product availability, performance,
quality, reliability, price, and customer service. Aggressive
competition has resulted in price erosion in the past, and we
expect this trend to continue.
Competition for data storage products and services is
characterized based on the class of products or services, as
described below:
|
|
|
|
|
Tape products. We are a leading provider of automated
tape libraries, tape drives, and virtual tape solutions. Our
main competitors in these markets include Advanced Digital
Information Corporation, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, and Quantum. |
|
|
|
Disk products. Our disk product offerings compete in the
mainframe and open-systems disk markets. EMC, Hitachi, and IBM
hold dominant positions in the mainframe disk market. These
competitors also have much larger research and development
programs, as well as substantially greater financial, technical,
and marketing resources, than we do. Competition is much more
diverse in the open-systems disk market, which is characterized
by low barriers to entry. |
|
|
|
Network products. We offer third-party network products
in conjunction with storage integration offerings for our
customers. The market for network products is highly competitive
and characterized by low barriers to entry and rapidly changing
standards for protocols and interconnects. |
|
|
|
Storage services. We compete with a wide range of service
providers who vary in terms of size and service offerings, no
one of which is dominant in the storage services industry. |
See Item 7, MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FACTORS
THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS We may be materially
affected by competition and by our ability to execute our ILM
strategy, which information is incorporated by reference
into this Item 1, for a discussion of risk factors related
to competition and ILM.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
We incurred research and development costs of approximately
$197 million in 2004, $204 million in 2003, and
$215 million in 2002. Our research and development
activities focus primarily on tape products, disk products, and
virtual storage. We conduct research and development activities
primarily internally, but we also enter into strategic
partnerships and outsourcing arrangements for certain research
and development activities.
We anticipate that we will continue to incur significant
research and development costs in order to maintain and improve
our competitive position. We cannot provide any assurance that
we will successfully develop future products in a timely or
cost-efficient manner. For further discussion of risk factors
concerning research and development, see Item 7,
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FACTORS THAT MAY
AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS We may be materially affected by
risks associated with new product development, which
information is incorporated by reference into this Item 1.
5
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND LICENSES
We protect our proprietary rights through a combination of
patents, copyrights, trademarks, and enforcement of trade secret
laws. We enter into confidentiality agreements relating to our
intellectual property with our employees and consultants, and we
include confidentiality provisions in license and non-exclusive
sales agreements with our customers. Our policy is to apply for
patents or other appropriate proprietary or statutory protection
in both the United States and selected foreign countries.
We presently hold approximately 615 U.S. patents, 73 of
which were issued in 2004. We have numerous patent applications
pending in the United States, including several that have been
allowed and that we expect to be formally issued. Each patent
generally has a 20-year term from the first effective filing
date. We believe that the duration and effect of our patents is
adequate relative to the expected lives of our products. We hold
foreign counterparts to certain of our U.S. patents, and we
have applications pending in foreign countries. In addition, we
have licenses to use patents held by others. No individual
patent, license, or other item of proprietary information is
material to our business.
For discussion of risk factors concerning intellectual property,
see Item 7, MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FACTORS
THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS We may be materially
affected by the risks associated with developing and protecting
intellectual property, which information is incorporated
by reference into this Item 1.
ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
We are subject to federal, state, local, and international
environmental laws and regulations. Compliance with these laws
and regulations has not had a material effect on our capital
expenditures, earnings, or competitive position.
The European Union has finalized the Waste Electrical and
Electronic Equipment (WEEE) directive, which regulates the
collection, recovery, and recycling of waste from electrical and
electronic products, and the Restrictions on the Use of Certain
Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment
(RoHS) directive, which bans the use of certain hazardous
materials including lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium,
and two brominated flame-retardants (PBB and PBDE). Under WEEE,
we will be responsible for financing operations for the
collection, treatment, disposal, and recycling of past and
future covered products. Since the Member States of the EU have
not finalized the specific legal requirements relating to these
directives, we are presently unable to reasonably estimate the
amount of any costs that may be necessary in order to comply
with WEEE. We cannot provide any assurance that compliance with
WEEE and RoHS will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or results of operations.
EMPLOYEES
As of December 31, 2004, we had approximately
7,100 full-time employees.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments
to reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are
available free of charge on our website at www.storagetek.com as
soon as reasonably practicable after electronic filing of such
material with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In addition, our website includes items related to corporate
governance matters such as our Corporate Governance Guidelines,
charters of various committees of the Board of Directors, our
Code of Business Ethics and Conduct applicable to all directors
and employees, as well as our Finance Code of Ethics which is
applicable to our CEO, CFO, Corporate Controller, and all of our
worldwide finance employees. Copies of these documents are
available free of charge on our website. Any stockholder may
also obtain copies of these documents, free of charge, by
sending a written request to the following address:
|
|
|
Corporate Secretary |
|
StorageTek |
|
One StorageTek Drive |
|
Louisville, CO 80028-4309 |
6
OTHER MATTERS
Our business, particularly the storage products segment, has
experienced seasonality in the past. The fourth quarter has
historically generated the most revenue, while the first quarter
has generated the least revenue. See Item 7,
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FACTORS THAT MAY
AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS We may be materially affected by
uneven sales patterns and by our ability to forecast customer
demand accurately, which information is incorporated by
reference into this Item 1, for a discussion of risk
factors related to seasonality.
No single customer accounted for 10% or more of our total
revenue in 2004. No material portion of our business is subject
to contract termination at the election of the
U.S. government.
Reference is made to the following NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS set forth in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K for certain additional information, which
information is incorporated by reference into this Item 1:
Note 4 Description
of our derivative instruments.
Note 7 Description
of our credit facilities, debt, and lease obligations.
Note 11 Information
on the operations of business segments and geographic areas.
Reference is also made to Item 7, MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS, of this Form 10-K for information
regarding liquidity, capital resources, and factors that may
affect future results, which information is incorporated by
reference into this Item 1.
Our headquarters are located in Louisville, Colorado. As of
December 31, 2004, we owned or leased a total of
approximately 3,276,700 square feet of space worldwide. At
the present time, we believe that our existing properties are
suitable and adequate to meet our business needs.
The following is a summary of the locations, functions,
approximate square footage, and estimated utilization of those
properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square Footage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Location |
|
Function |
|
Owned |
|
Leased |
|
Utilization | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boulder County, CO
|
|
Executive and administrative offices, as well as manufacturing,
research and development, spare parts, and finished goods
facilities |
|
1,652,800 |
|
87,800 |
|
|
81% |
|
Minneapolis, MN
|
|
Research and product development facilities and administrative
offices |
|
|
|
46,500 |
|
|
100% |
|
Norcross, GA
|
|
Shared service center |
|
|
|
35,600 |
|
|
100% |
|
Other U.S. locations
|
|
Sales, customer service, and logistics facilities |
|
|
|
472,000 |
|
|
86% |
|
Puerto Rico
|
|
Manufacturing and assembly facilities |
|
83,100 |
|
91,200 |
|
|
97% |
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toulouse, France
|
|
Engineering, consulting integration, and marketing facilities |
|
|
|
173,000 |
|
|
74% |
|
Europe
|
|
Sales and customer service facilities |
|
|
|
392,500 |
|
|
94% |
|
Canada
|
|
Sales and customer service facilities |
|
|
|
88,800 |
|
|
100% |
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
Sales and customer service facilities |
|
|
|
134,600 |
|
|
100% |
|
Latin America
|
|
Sales and customer service facilities |
|
|
|
18,800 |
|
|
100% |
|
7
|
|
ITEM 3. |
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
For information regarding legal proceedings, see Note 6 of
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, included
in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, which information is
incorporated by reference into this Item 3.
|
|
ITEM 4. |
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS |
No matter was submitted to a vote of our security holders during
the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004.
8
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR
REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol STK. The table below reflects the high and low
closing sales prices of our common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange composite tape as reported by The Wall Street
Journal during each fiscal quarter of 2004 and 2003. On
March 4, 2005, there were 9,374 record holders of our
common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
2004 |
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
30.41 |
|
|
$ |
25.40 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
28.62 |
|
|
|
25.79 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
29.00 |
|
|
|
23.14 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
31.62 |
|
|
|
23.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
2003 |
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
25.43 |
|
|
$ |
20.00 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
27.00 |
|
|
|
20.22 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
27.90 |
|
|
|
24.30 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
26.71 |
|
|
|
22.35 |
|
We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. We
currently plan to continue to retain future earnings for use in
our business. Our revolving credit facility agreement limits the
payment of cash dividends.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table and footnotes provide information as of
December 31, 2004, for shares of our common stock that may
be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Available | |
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
for Future Issuance | |
|
|
to Be Issued | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
Under Equity | |
|
|
upon Exercise | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Compensation Plans | |
|
|
of Outstanding | |
|
Options, | |
|
(Excluding Securities | |
|
|
Options, Warrants, | |
|
Warrants, and | |
|
Reflected in | |
Plan Category |
|
and Rights | |
|
Rights | |
|
Column (a)) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
10,143,534 |
(1) |
|
|
22.98 |
(2) |
|
|
12,463,766 |
(3) |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
|
87,311 |
|
|
|
(1) |
There were no outstanding purchase rights under the Storage
Technology Corporation 1987 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP).
Excludes purchase rights accruing under the ESPP. Includes
17,313 common stock equivalents payable in common stock over the
next four years that were issued to employees with no exercise
price or other consideration, and 32,994 common stock
equivalents issued to non-employee directors in lieu of cash
compensation. |
(2) |
Calculation of the weighted-average exercise price does not
include the 50,307 common stock equivalents described in
footnote 1 above. |
(3) |
Includes 3,525,317 shares of common stock available for
future issuance under the ESPP. |
(4) |
Consists solely of shares available for future issuance under
the Storage Technology Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan. |
(5) |
There were no outstanding rights under this plan at fiscal
year-end. |
9
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Storage Technology Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan
(Deferred Plan) allows certain outside directors and
highly compensated employees to defer receipt of a portion of
their cash compensation. In 2001, the Compensation Committee
allowed a select group of participants a one-time irrevocable
election to have all or a portion of their Deferred Plan
accounts treated as if they were invested in our common stock,
and set aside a maximum of 100,000 shares for this purpose.
Only 12,689 shares of common stock have been issued under
the Deferred Plan, and all of these shares were paid out to
participants by the end of 2004. Currently participants are not
allowed to elect to receive common stock in the Deferred Plan.
REPURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The following table summarizes our purchases of our equity
securities during the fourth quarter of 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares | |
|
Approximate Dollar Value | |
|
|
Total Number | |
|
Average | |
|
Purchased as Part of | |
|
of Shares that May yet Be | |
|
|
of Shares | |
|
Price Paid | |
|
Publicly Announced | |
|
Purchased Under the | |
Period |
|
Purchased(1) | |
|
per Share | |
|
Plans or Programs | |
|
Plans or Programs(2) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
09/25/04 - 10/29/04
|
|
|
1,248,800 |
|
|
$ |
25.23 |
|
|
|
1,248,800 |
|
|
$ |
373,340,599 |
|
10/30/04 - 11/26/04
|
|
|
276,150 |
|
|
|
27.12 |
|
|
|
276,150 |
|
|
|
365,851,970 |
|
11/27/04 - 12/31/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
365,851,970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,524,950 |
|
|
$ |
25.57 |
|
|
|
1,524,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes shares withheld to satisfy minimum tax withholding
requirements associated with restricted stock lapses. |
(2) |
On July 8, 2004, our Board of Directors authorized a stock
repurchase program to acquire up to $500 million of common
stock. Purchases under this repurchase program may be made from
time-to-time, in the open market, through block trades or
otherwise, and in privately negotiated transactions. There is no
fixed termination date for this repurchase program. |
|
|
ITEM 6. |
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
FIVE-YEAR COMPARISON OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The fiscal year 2004, 2003, and 2002 statements of
operations data has been derived from the consolidated financial
statements and notes appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
The fiscal year 2001 and 2000 statements of operations data have
been derived from our historical financial statements for such
periods. The fiscal year 2004 and 2003 balance sheet data has
been derived from the consolidated financial statements and
notes appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The fiscal
year 2002, 2001, and 2000 balance sheet data has been derived
from our historical financial statements for such periods. The
following table (in thousands, except per share amounts) should
be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and associated notes found in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
2,224,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,182,560 |
|
|
$ |
2,039,615 |
|
|
$ |
2,045,322 |
|
|
$ |
2,060,204 |
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
221,927 |
|
|
|
193,112 |
|
|
|
138,156 |
|
|
|
98,452 |
|
|
|
4,017 |
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
191,023 |
|
|
|
148,912 |
|
|
|
110,031 |
|
|
|
67,207 |
|
|
|
(1,782 |
) |
Earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.72 |
|
|
|
1.35 |
|
|
|
1.02 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
BALANCE SHEET DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$ |
997,458 |
|
|
$ |
872,512 |
|
|
$ |
656,223 |
|
|
$ |
539,986 |
|
|
$ |
470,602 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
2,407,841 |
|
|
|
2,305,246 |
|
|
|
1,976,140 |
|
|
|
1,758,883 |
|
|
|
1,653,558 |
|
Total debt
|
|
|
12,557 |
|
|
|
12,240 |
|
|
|
11,134 |
|
|
|
83,736 |
|
|
|
96,574 |
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,441,808 |
|
|
|
1,361,438 |
|
|
|
1,157,763 |
|
|
|
1,034,820 |
|
|
|
938,635 |
|
In 2000, we had restructuring and other related charges of
approximately $27.3 million, net of tax.
10
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and associated notes found in
Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
2004 FINANCIAL OVERVIEW
Total revenue of $2.2 billion was up 2% compared to 2003.
Revenue decreased 3% as adjusted to reflect constant foreign
currencies. We had an 8% increase in storage services revenue in
2004 due to a 7% increase in maintenance and support services
revenue and the continued increases in revenue contribution from
our professional service offerings. This increase was offset by
a 2% decrease in storage products revenue. Our EAME (Europe,
Africa, Middle East) and Latin America geographies drove our
revenue growth in 2004, while North America and Asia-Pacific had
slight decreases in revenue compared to 2003. We had a solid
improvement in storage products gross profit margin due
primarily to favorable product and channel mix.
The fourth quarter of 2004 represented the eighteenth straight
quarter we have increased our earnings on a year-over-year
basis. In 2004, we increased earnings by 28% compared to 2003
due primarily to:
|
|
|
|
|
Improved gross profits |
|
|
Our focus on productivity improvements |
|
|
Strong cost controls |
|
|
Favorable currency impacts |
|
|
Favorable impacts to our effective tax rate |
Financial Position and Liquidity
We continued to strengthen our balance sheet and cash flows
during 2004. Total cash and investments increased
$123.1 million to $1.2 billion as of December 31,
2004, a 12% increase from December 26, 2003. Our cash flow
from operations was $384.5 million, which funded
$195.4 million of share repurchases during 2004. Days sales
outstanding for the full year 2004 was 85 days, which is a
5-day improvement compared to 2003. Our year-end accounts
receivable balance decreased 4% in 2004, compared to 2003, due
primarily to a 22% reduction in our past due receivable balances
and improvements in our cash conversion cycle. Our year-end
inventory levels were $123.5 million as of
December 31, 2004, a 12% increase from December 26,
2003. This increase is due primarily to manufacturing ramps
during the fourth quarter of 2004 for several new product
launches. Our operations continue to be self-funded and our
debt-to-capitalization ratio remains constant at 1%.
FINANCIAL OUTLOOK
As we head into 2005, our primary challenge is to grow revenue.
We believe that we can achieve profitable revenue growth through
the successful execution of our Information Lifecycle Management
(ILM) strategy.
In 2004, we enhanced our product and solution portfolio, direct
channels, sales coverage, and productivity. We believe that our
strong balance sheet and cash flows will continue to be a
competitive advantage for us in 2005. Based on these strengths,
as well as the key product launches we have planned for 2005, we
believe that we are firmly positioned to take advantage of the
opportunities created by the ever increasing storage demands
placed on our customers.
We believe the following industry and economic factors will
impact our business in 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the levels of IT spending, and in particular, storage
spending |
|
|
Shifts in customer demand to a storage solutions and services
environment, with less emphasis on storage products |
|
|
Global economic conditions |
We believe that success with our new product offerings will help
drive revenue growth during 2005. However, we expect revenue
growth to be offset by a decrease in favorable currency impacts
to revenue as compared to 2004. With many of
11
our new product offerings aimed at the small and medium library
markets, the success of these products will be largely dependent
on our indirect channel sales. We expect that a higher indirect
channel sales mix will result in a decrease in our product gross
profit margin. We expect professional services to become a
larger percentage of total service revenues in 2005, and these
services typically do not carry the same level of gross profit
margin as product support services. Accordingly, our total
storage services gross profit margin may be negatively impacted
by further success in growing our professional services revenue.
In 2005, we plan to keep research and development expenditures
in the low $50.0 million range on a quarterly basis. To the
extent that we are successful in effectively increasing our
sales coverage models, we plan on making additional investments
in our sales and marketing efforts. Overall, we expect that
selling, general, and administrative expense (SG&A) as a
percentage of total revenue will be slightly below the 2004
ratio of 29%. Additionally, we expect an increase in our
effective tax rate in 2005 as we do not believe that favorable
impacts to our 2004 effective tax rate will be sustainable. We
expect the seasonality of our business to be consistent with
prior years, with the lowest amount of revenue and earnings in
the first quarter and the highest amount in the fourth quarter.
For a discussion of some of the risks and uncertainties that
impact our business, see Item 7, MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS.
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS DATA
The following table presents Consolidated Statements of
Operations data stated as a percentage of total revenue, except
for segment gross profit, which is stated as a percentage of the
applicable segment revenue. The table also presents the
percentage change based on the dollar amounts of each of the
items.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
Increase (Decrease) | |
|
|
December | |
|
Based on Dollar Amounts | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
2003 vs. 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage products
|
|
|
58.8 |
% |
|
|
61.2 |
% |
|
|
62.6 |
% |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
Storage services
|
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage products
|
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
|
47.6 |
% |
|
|
45.1 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
|
Storage services
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
45.6 |
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development costs
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expenses
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
39.8 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
54.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
(15.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
46.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
28.3 |
% |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
The following table presents supplemental data for storage
products revenue stated as a percentage of total storage
products revenue, and the percentage change based on the dollar
amounts of each of the items.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended | |
|
Increase (Decrease) | |
|
|
December | |
|
Based on Dollar Amounts | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
2003 vs. 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Supplemental data storage products revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tape products
|
|
|
77.5 |
% |
|
|
77.2 |
% |
|
|
77.6 |
% |
|
|
(1.8 |
)% |
|
|
4.2 |
% |
Disk products
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
Network products
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
(15.6 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
(14.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total storage products revenue
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
(2.2 |
)% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
Storage Products Revenue and Gross Profit Margin |
Our storage products revenue consists of sales of tape products,
disk products, and network products, including related software,
for the mainframe and open-systems markets. The open-systems
market consists of products designed to operate in the UNIX, NT,
and other non-MVS operating environments.
Storage products revenue decreased 2% in 2004, compared to 2003,
primarily due to a decrease in tape and network product sales.
We had a 2% decrease in tape product sales due to a decrease in
our L-Series automated tape library revenue. We believe that our
customers delayed their purchases in anticipation of the release
of our SL500 library in the fourth quarter of 2004. This
decrease was offset by growth in both our T9840 and T9940 series
tape drive and third-party tape drive revenue, sales of our new
SL8500 library, and continued strength in our Virtual Storage
Manager (VSM) system revenue. Our total disk revenue
increased primarily due to significant growth in our FlexLine
Series storage solutions revenue. We had a decrease in network
product sales due primarily to the competitive environment. We
had a solid improvement in storage products gross profit margin
due primarily to favorable product and channel mix. Product mix,
channel mix, and operational efficiencies are the key factors
that affect our storage products gross profit margin.
Storage products revenue increased 5% in 2003, compared to 2002,
primarily due to increases in tape and disk product sales. We
had a 4% increase in tape product sales that was driven by
strength in our VSM system revenue, which increased 20% from
2002. We also had a 10% increase in both our high-end and
mid-range tape drive revenue. Disk product revenue increased 17%
in 2003, propelled by a 37% increase in open-systems disk
product revenue. We expanded our open-systems disk product
portfolio in 2003, including our FlexLine Series offerings. The
increase in open-systems disk revenue was partially offset by an
8% decrease in enterprise disk products. Storage products gross
profit margin increased primarily due to a shift in product mix
toward our higher margin products, led by the strength of our
VSM sales. Revenue growth and margin increases benefited in 2003
from a particularly strong fourth quarter for VSM.
|
|
|
Storage Services Revenue and Gross Profit Margin |
Our storage services revenue consists primarily of revenue
associated with the maintenance and support of our storage
products and third-party storage products, as well as
professional services revenue associated with diverse storage
consulting activities.
Storage services revenue increased 8% in 2004 and 11% in 2003,
primarily due to increases in maintenance and support services
revenue. We also had strong revenue growth from professional
service offerings in both 2004 and 2003. Professional services
revenue accounted for 13% of total storage services revenue in
2004, compared to 11% in 2003 and 9% for 2002. The increase in
professional services revenue in 2004 was primarily due to our
focus on delivering total ILM solutions, as well as success in
expanding our reach into new markets. In 2003, new professional
service offerings contributed to the majority of the growth.
13
Storage services gross profit margin increased slightly in 2004,
compared to 2003, with improvements in both our maintenance and
professional services gross profit margin. Storage services
gross profit margin decreased in 2003, compared to 2002,
primarily due to additional investments in resources within the
services arena that we made in 2003 in order to expand our reach
into new markets. The decrease in service margin was also due to
increased revenue contributions from professional services,
which typically carry lower margins than our traditional
maintenance offerings. If professional services continue to
become a greater portion of our service revenue, we expect that
the resulting change in our services mix would adversely impact
our storage services gross profit margin.
Research and development expenses decreased 4% in 2004, compared
to 2003, consistent with the trend we have experienced since
2001. These decreases have been achieved primarily through the
implementation of engineering initiatives designed to improve
research and development productivity, increase strategic
alignment, and reduce non-essential spending. We do not expect
this trend to continue in 2005 based on our plans to keep
research and development expenditures in the low
$50.0 million range each quarter. We currently have several
research and development projects in progress that are
associated with planned product launches. We expect that these
projects will have a material impact on future revenue and cash
flows. However, no single research or development project is
expected to be individually material to our financial condition
or results of operations in terms of the estimated future cost
to complete the project.
|
|
|
Selling, General, and Administrative Expense |
SG&A increased 6% in 2004, compared to 2003, primarily due
to increased selling expenses associated with the launch of
several key products, unfavorable impacts of foreign currency
movements on the operating expenses of our international
operations, and an increase in compliance costs attributed to
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. SG&A as a percentage of total
revenue increased slightly in 2004 compared to 2003 and 2002.
SG&A increased 7% in 2003, compared to 2002, primarily due
to increased commission and bonus expenses as a result of our
improved financial performance. SG&A also increased in 2003
as a result of investments in sales coverage and marketing
initiatives designed to promote our ILM strategy.
|
|
|
Interest Income and Expense |
Net interest income increased by over 50% in 2004 compared to
2003 and 2002, primarily due to our growing cash and investments
balance and an increase in interest rates during 2004. Net
interest income was largely unchanged in 2003 compared to 2002,
primarily due to decreasing interest rates which resulted in
lower returns on our increasing cash and investment balance. See
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES for further
discussion of our debt and financing arrangements.
Our effective tax rate was 19.4% in 2004 compared to 29.0% in
2003 and 32.0% in 2002. Our effective tax rate for these years
varied from the United States federal statutory tax rate of 35%
primarily due to benefits relating to our manufacturing strategy
in Puerto Rico. The income tax rates for 2004 and 2003 were
favorably impacted by the expiration of the statutes of
limitations for assessing additional taxes pertaining to the
United States and Puerto Rico. As a result of these statutes
expiring during each respective year, tax expense was reduced by
$32.0 million during 2004 and $18.2 million during
2003. The benefit relating to 2003 was partially offset by
changes in our estimates of tax contingencies that occurred
during the year as a result of tax rulings, settlements, and
other factors which increased tax expense by $12.7 million.
The income tax expense for 2002 was reduced by
$10.5 million as a result of a favorable resolution of
prior years tax audits.
We have approximately $220.8 million of deferred tax assets
as of December 31, 2004, which are recorded in accordance
with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 109, Accounting for Income
Taxes. Our valuation allowance of approximately
$23.2 million relates principally to foreign net operating
loss carryforwards.
The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the AJCA) enacted on
October 22, 2004, provides for a temporary 85% dividends
received deduction on certain foreign earnings repatriated
during a one-year period. The deduction would result in an
approximate 5.25% federal tax rate on the repatriated earnings.
To qualify for the deduction, the repatriated foreign earnings
must be reinvested in the United States pursuant to a domestic
reinvestment plan established by a companys
14
chief executive officer and approved by the companys board
of directors. Certain other criteria in the AJCA must be
satisfied as well. For us, the one-year period during which the
qualifying distributions can be made is fiscal 2005.
We are in the process of evaluating whether or not to repatriate
foreign earnings pursuant to the repatriation provision of the
AJCA. As of today, uncertainty remains as to how to interpret
many of those provisions. As such, we do not expect to be able
to complete our evaluation until after Congress or the Treasury
Department has provided additional clarifying language on key
elements of those provisions. We expect to complete the
evaluation of the effects of the repatriation provision within a
reasonable period of time following the publication of the
additional clarifying language. The range of reasonably possible
amounts of unremitted earnings that we are currently considering
for repatriation pursuant to the AJCA is from $0 to
$500 million. The related potential range of income tax
expense which would result from repatriation is currently
estimated to be between $0 and $2.6 million. These amounts
exclude amounts that have been previously recognized in the
financial statements.
See CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS
Accounting for Income Taxes for further description of our
critical accounting estimates and assumptions for income taxes.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The following table summarizes our cash flows from operations
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended December | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
384,515 |
|
|
$ |
364,577 |
|
|
$ |
360,289 |
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(83,049 |
) |
|
|
(179,830 |
) |
|
|
(276,981 |
) |
Financing activities
|
|
|
(124,197 |
) |
|
|
57,674 |
|
|
|
(50,374 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(51,213 |
) |
|
|
6,484 |
|
|
|
(7,702 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
126,056 |
|
|
$ |
248,905 |
|
|
$ |
25,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our cash and cash equivalents balance increased
$126.1 million in 2004 and $248.9 million in 2003. We
continue to generate solid cash flows from operating activities,
which has provided a consistent source of funds each year over
the past three years. In 2004, cash used in financing activities
included $195.4 million of share repurchases made under our
common stock share repurchase programs, which are intended to
reduce dilution and return value to shareholders. These share
repurchases were offset by $72.1 million of proceeds from
employee stock plans in 2004, which represents a 23% increase
over 2003 and a 200% increase over 2002. We did not have any
share repurchase programs in place during 2003 or 2002. In 2002,
cash used in financing activities included $73.4 million of
repayments of borrowings under our credit facilities. In 2003
and 2002, cash used in investing activities included net
purchases of short-and long-term investments of
$144.3 million and $177.1 million, respectively.
|
|
|
Future Sources and Uses of Cash |
We expect that cash flows from operations will continue to serve
as our principal source of liquidity, and we believe that we
have adequate working capital and financing capabilities to meet
our anticipated operating and capital requirements for the next
12 months. However, cash flows from operations could be
negatively impacted by a decrease in demand for our products and
services as a result of rapid technological changes and other
risks described under FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE
RESULTS. Cash flows from operations can be supplemented by
our unsecured $75.0 million revolving credit facility (the
Revolver) that expires in October 2008. For information
regarding the Revolver, see Note 7 of NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, included in Item 8
of this Form 10-K. Over the longer term, we may choose to
fund our operations through the issuance of additional equity or
debt financing. The issuance of equity or convertible debt
securities could result in dilution to our stockholders, and we
cannot provide any assurance that such additional long-term
financing, if required, could be completed on favorable terms.
The AJCA enacted on October 22, 2004, provides for a
temporary 85% dividends received deduction on certain foreign
earnings repatriated during a one-year period. The deduction
would result in an approximate 5.25% federal tax rate on the
15
repatriated earnings. To qualify for the deduction, the
repatriated foreign earnings must be reinvested in the United
States pursuant to a domestic reinvestment plan established by a
companys chief executive officer and approved by the
companys board of directors. Certain other criteria in the
AJCA must be satisfied as well. Repatriation also would
substantially increase liquidity in the United States, although
use of the additional liquidity would be restricted by the
domestic reinvestment plan. There would be a corresponding
reduction in liquidity in our foreign subsidiaries.
Our stock repurchase program allows us to acquire up to
$500.0 million of our common stock. As of December 31,
2004, we had $365.9 million available to repurchase shares
under the program. We intend to fund future purchases of our
common stock under our share repurchase program through cash on
hand and cash flows from operations. We continue to review and
evaluate alternative uses for our cash, including additional
stock repurchases, potential acquisitions, and investments in
our business.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less Than | |
|
|
|
More Than | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
13 Years | |
|
45 Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Capital leases
|
|
$ |
15,360 |
|
|
$ |
2,170 |
|
|
$ |
3,783 |
|
|
$ |
3,762 |
|
|
$ |
5,645 |
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
93,208 |
|
|
|
32,767 |
|
|
|
38,292 |
|
|
|
15,601 |
|
|
|
6,548 |
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
409,859 |
|
|
|
79,412 |
|
|
|
157,883 |
|
|
|
103,618 |
|
|
|
68,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
518,427 |
|
|
$ |
114,349 |
|
|
$ |
199,958 |
|
|
$ |
122,981 |
|
|
$ |
81,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The majority of our purchase obligations relate to a ten-year
agreement with EDS, under which we outsourced certain internal
information technology and customer call center operations to
EDS. This agreement has seven years remaining.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations is based on our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP). The preparation of our financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires us to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, related revenue and expenses, and disclosure of
gain or loss contingencies. We base our estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are
reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ
materially from these estimates and assumptions.
Management has discussed the development, selection, and
disclosure of our critical accounting estimates and assumptions
with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. We believe
that the application of the following critical accounting
estimates and assumptions represent our more significant
judgments used in the preparation of our consolidated financial
statements.
Revenue Recognition
The majority of our products and services are delivered subject
to agreements with standard terms and conditions. In certain
situations, however, our agreements may include non-standard
terms and conditions. In these situations, we must make
judgments to determine the appropriate accounting treatment.
These judgments generally involve assessments such as:
|
|
|
|
|
whether there are sufficient legally binding terms and conditions |
|
|
whether customer acceptance has been received |
|
|
whether the price to the customer is fixed or determinable |
|
|
whether collection is reasonably assured |
|
|
the allocation of revenue associated with multiple-element
arrangements |
|
|
the determination as to whether software is essential to the
functionality of hardware |
16
Sales to indirect channel customers are generally subject to
agreements that provide limited rights of return with respect to
unsold products, subsequent sales price adjustments, and return
rights under the product warranties. We apply judgment in
determining whether to use the sell-in or sell-through method of
accounting for these indirect channel customers. Our judgment is
based principally upon our historical experience with returns
and adjustments. We use the sell-in method unless we conclude
that we cannot reliably estimate future returns, in which case
we utilize the sell-through method. Under both methods, all
sales reserves are recorded as reductions of revenue. The
reserves for anticipated future returns and sales price
adjustments are determined based on our historical claims and
returns experience. Our actual experience in future periods with
respect to returns and sales price adjustments may differ from
our historical experience.
We perform a quarterly analysis of our historical bad debt
write-off experience to assess the reserve requirements for our
aged receivables. We evaluate the collectibility of our accounts
receivable through a specific analysis of known situations where
we anticipate that customers will be unable to meet their
financial obligations and a general analysis of past due
receivables based on our historical collection experience with
similar accounts. If circumstances related to a specific
customer change, or if our historical bad debt write-off
experience changes as a result of changes in global economic
conditions or other changes in our business, we may need to
subsequently adjust our allowance for doubtful accounts. For
additional information related to our allowance for doubtful
accounts, see Note 1 of NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, included in Item 8 of this
Form 10-K.
|
|
|
Warranty Costs and Liability |
Our standard product warranties provide for the repair or
replacement of products that fail to meet their published
specifications. In situations where a product fails its
essential purpose to the customer, we may also be responsible
for refunding the purchase price of the product to the customer
if we cannot remedy the product failure. We establish a warranty
liability for the estimated cost of warranty-related claims at
the time revenue is recognized. The amount of the warranty
liability reflects our estimate of the expected future costs of
fulfilling our obligations under the warranties. In developing
our estimate, we consider the length of the warranty period, our
historical warranty claim experience for existing products or
like products, and our expectations for new products. The
warranty liability is reviewed quarterly based on actual
warranty claim experience to verify that it properly reflects
managements best estimate of the remaining warranty
obligations. If we discover a product design flaw or other
unanticipated problem, our actual warranty costs may differ
significantly from our original estimates. If we determine that
an increased warranty reserve is necessary, we would increase
the warranty liability and cost of revenue in the period the
determination was made.
Inventory Valuation
We establish and evaluate our inventory reserve estimates for
obsolete, slow-moving, and non-saleable inventory based on a
quarterly review of inventory cost versus estimated market
value. Market value estimates involve significant judgments
about a number of factors, including the impacts of future
product or technology introductions by us or by our competitors,
delays in the availability of new products, changes in the
purchasing patterns of our customers, and changes in global
economic conditions. To the extent that inventory cost exceeds
estimated market value, we would increase our inventory reserve,
which would result in a corresponding charge to cost of revenue.
For additional information related to our inventory reserves,
see Note 1 of NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS, included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Accounting for Income Taxes
We are subject to regular audits by federal, state, and foreign
tax authorities. These audits may result in proposed assessments
that may result in additional tax liabilities. We recognize
liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on our
estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes
will be due. Our income taxes payable balances as reported on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets are comprised primarily of tax
contingencies that we believe are both probable and reasonably
estimable.
17
Future benefits or charges to our reported income tax provision
can result from the resolution of open tax matters. Some factors
that may result in a change in our estimates for contingent tax
matters include:
|
|
|
|
|
The expiration of statutes of limitations |
|
|
Changes in tax regulations |
|
|
Tax rulings, settlements, and other factors affecting estimates
of tax contingencies |
The interaction of all these factors, together with any
opportunities for us to minimize the impact of these factors
through the carryback or carryforward of any associated tax
liabilities or benefits in the multiple tax jurisdictions where
we do business, is very complex and requires considerable
judgment. Furthermore, these uncertainties may require an
extended period of time to resolve and may not be determinable
prior to the time the statutes of limitations expire in the
respective tax jurisdictions. While we believe that we have
appropriately provided for income taxes for all years, any of
these factors may result in significant adjustments to our tax
provision. Any adjustments to our reserves for tax contingencies
may result in benefits or charges that would impact our reported
financial results in future periods.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the expected tax
consequences of transactions that are recognized in different
time periods for book and tax purposes. We record a valuation
allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount of the
tax benefit that we believe will be realized in the future. We
assess the need for a valuation allowance by reviewing our
earnings history, the number of years that our operating losses
and tax credits can be carried forward, and future taxable
income expectations by tax jurisdiction. We perform an ongoing
assessment to determine whether there is a need to increase or
decrease the valuation allowance based on our expected
realization of the deferred tax assets. Any adjustment to the
valuation allowance would impact our tax provision.
Our effective tax rate does not include U.S. tax on
undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries because such
earnings are intended to be reinvested indefinitely outside of
the U.S. The determination of amounts to be reinvested is
based on the projected cash flow needs and the working capital
and long-term investment requirements of our foreign
subsidiaries and domestic operations. If excess cash has
accumulated in the foreign subsidiaries and it is advantageous
for business operations, tax, or foreign exchange reasons, a
portion of the subsidiary earnings may be remitted. If such a
determination is made, we would provide for the U.S. taxes
due on those amounts at the time the determination is made.
Material changes in our estimates of cash, working capital, and
long-term investment requirements could impact our effective tax
rate. For additional information related to our taxes, see
Note 3 of NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS, included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
For information regarding recent accounting pronouncements, see
Note 1 of NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS, included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS
We may be materially affected by global economic and
political conditions
Our ability to generate revenue growth during the last several
years was adversely affected by a difficult global economy as
customers delayed their purchase decisions, reduced their
information technology spending budgets, increased their
purchase authorization approval requirements, and reduced their
capital expenditures by maximizing the current capacities of
their data storage equipment. This trend has continued in 2004,
although we are beginning to see some improvement. We have
implemented various cost-saving measures to help mitigate the
adverse effects of the difficult global environment. We cannot
provide any assurance that a prolonged weakness in information
technology spending will not have additional adverse effects on
our financial condition, results of operations, or our ability
to generate revenue growth. Furthermore, we cannot provide any
assurance that our cost-saving measures will be successful or
sufficient to allow us to continue to generate improved
operating results in future periods.
Our financial condition and results of operations could also be
materially affected by unstable global political conditions.
Terrorist attacks or acts of war could significantly disrupt our
operations and the operations of our customers, suppliers,
distributors, or resellers. We cannot predict the potential
impact on our financial condition or results of operations
should such events occur.
18
We may be materially affected by a decrease in demand for our
tape products or by an inability to maintain key competitive
advantages in tape
In 2004, approximately 77% of our storage products revenue was
generated by sales of our tape products. Services associated
with our tape products also represent a significant portion of
our storage services revenue. For a discussion of risk
associated with new products, see We may be materially
affected by risks associated with new product development,
below. If overall demand for tape storage products declines, or
if we lose significant market share in tape, our financial
condition and results of operations could be materially affected.
One of the key competitive advantages that our tape products
have over competing disk products is that tape products store
data at a fraction of the price of disk storage. The price of
disk storage continues to decrease rapidly due to competition
and decreasing manufacturing costs associated with new disk
drive technologies such as ATA disk. We must continue to
develop and introduce new tape products that reduce the cost of
tape storage at a rate that is similar to or greater than the
decline in disk storage costs in order to maintain this
competitive advantage. We cannot provide any assurance that we
will be able to reduce the cost of our tape products at a rate
similar to the decline in disk storage costs.
We may be materially affected by competition and by our
ability to execute our ILM strategy
The data storage industry is highly competitive, and customers
make their decisions based on a number of competitive factors.
We must address each of these factors effectively in order to
successfully compete. If we are unable to adapt our products and
services to changes in these competitive factors, we may lose
market share to our competitors.
Our principal strategy for growing revenue and addressing the
competition is our ILM strategy. Our ILM strategy is
intended to capitalize on our ability to deliver complete
storage solutions that satisfy customer storage requirements
around data archive, data protection, and primary storage. These
solutions comprise tape, disk, networking, software, and
services. We have achieved some initial success in our
ILM strategy; however, we must continue to develop and
deliver on this strategy in the future in order to grow revenue.
We have also seen the adoption of strategies similar to our
ILM strategy by our competitors. We cannot provide any
assurance that we will successfully execute our
ILM strategy or that this strategy will provide us with a
competitive advantage in the data storage industry.
We may be materially affected by risks associated with new
product development
New product research and development is complex and requires the
investigation and evaluation of multiple alternatives, as well
as planning the design and manufacture of those alternatives
selected for further development. Research and development
efforts could be adversely affected by any of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Hardware and software design flaws |
|
|
Product development delays |
|
|
Changes in data storage technologies |
|
|
Changes in operating systems |
|
|
Changes in industry standards |
In addition, we have outsourced software development for certain
tape and network products. We cannot provide any assurance that
our research and development activities will be successful in
bringing new products to market.
Manufacturing new products involves integrating complex designs
and processes, coordinating with suppliers for parts and
components, and managing manufacturing capacities to accommodate
forecasted demand. Failure to obtain sufficient quantities of
parts and components, as well as other manufacturing delays or
constraints, could adversely affect the timing of new product
introductions. We have experienced product development and
manufacturing delays in the past that adversely affected our
results of operations and competitive position.
We have introduced significant new products in 2004 and we plan
to introduce a number of other significant new products during
2005, including virtual tape products targeted for both the
enterprise and open-systems markets. When we introduce new
products, we must effectively manage the transition from our
existing products to the new products.
If we do not manage the transition effectively, we may be
subject to the following adverse effects:
|
|
|
|
|
Excess or obsolete inventory |
|
|
Insufficient inventory or manufacturing capacity to meet
customer demand |
19
|
|
|
|
|
Delayed customer purchases |
|
|
Lost sales if customers purchase from our competitors |
Sales of our new products may replace some of the sales of our
existing products, and there may be a decline in sales of
existing products in the periods leading up to new product
introductions. In addition, sales of new products may result in
lower service revenues if new products under warranty replace
older products being serviced under maintenance agreements. We
cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to
successfully manage the development, introduction, or transition
of new products in the future.
We may be materially affected by the risks associated with
expanding our service offerings
Services continue to contribute an increasing amount of our
total revenue. Growth in services has partially been driven by
service offerings such as storage consulting services,
implementation services, and storage management services. The
development and delivery of these services are critical to the
success of our plan to deliver complete storage solutions to our
customers. We must ensure that storage service professionals
have the necessary skill sets, experience, tools, and training
to support these service offerings. Revenue growth from these
service offerings is needed to offset possible future declines
in maintenance revenue from our installed service base of
products under maintenance contracts as these products are
displaced by sales of new StorageTek products under warranty.
Any failure to properly develop or deliver our service offerings
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and results of operations.
We may be materially affected by uneven sales patterns and by
our ability to forecast customer demand accurately
In the past, our results have followed a seasonal pattern, which
reflects the tendency of customers to make their purchase
decisions at the end of a calendar year. During any fiscal
quarter, a disproportionately large percentage of total product
sales are earned in the last weeks or days of the quarter. We
continued to experience these trends in 2004. It is difficult to
predict the extent to which these historical trends will
continue in the future. We cannot provide any assurance that we
will be able to manage our uneven sales patterns.
We prepare and update our forecasts on a regular basis to
predict customer demand for our products and services. If actual
demand exceeds predicted demand, we may not be able to meet
customer requirements in a timely manner due to sourcing,
manufacturing, or service constraints. If actual demand is less
than predicted demand, we may have excess inventory or an
underutilized employee base. We cannot provide any assurance
that we will be able to forecast customer demand accurately or
respond quickly to changes in customer demand.
Our gross profit margin may be materially affected by product
mix, channel mix, and resale of third-party products
We provide a variety of solutions to meet customer needs,
including tape, disk, and network products, along with
associated software and services. Our products and services
contribute varying gross profit margins, and the gross margin on
a customers total solution is dependent on the amounts and
types of products or services involved. Gross profit margins may
also be impacted by early start-up manufacturing costs
associated with new products. We cannot provide any assurance
that our future gross profit margin will be similar to our
historical gross profit margin.
We market our solutions through a combination of a direct sales
organization and indirect channel partners. Direct sales to the
end-user customer usually result in higher gross profit margins
than indirect channel sales. We cannot provide any assurance
that changes in our channel mix will not have a material impact
on gross profit margin in the future.
We sell a number of third-party products, and our gross profit
margin may be adversely affected if those products become a
larger portion of our total storage solutions. We may also be at
a cost disadvantage in acquiring third-party products that are
manufactured by competitors.
We may be materially affected by our ability to grow our
indirect channels successfully
We are continually developing our indirect distribution
channels, including original equipment
manufacturers (OEMs), value-added distributors (VADs),
value-added resellers (VARs), and other distributors.
Indirect channel sales contributed approximately 46% of our
total product revenue in 2004, compared to 47% in 2003 and 45%
in 2002. Increasing our sales through these indirect channels is
critical to expanding our reach into new accounts and the
growing open-systems market. Successfully managing the
interaction of our direct and indirect channel efforts to
effectively reach all of the potential customer segments for our
products and services is a complex process. We cannot provide
any assurance that we will be successful in expanding our
indirect channel sales. Our ability to forecast future demand
for our products may be
20
adversely affected by unforeseen changes in demand from our
indirect channel partners. Storage products gross profit margins
may be adversely impacted to the extent we continue to receive a
larger portion of our sales through our indirect channels in the
future. Maintenance revenue may also be adversely affected in
future periods to the extent that customers of our indirect
channel partners elect to purchase maintenance services from our
competitors. Our financial results may also be negatively
affected if the financial condition of one or more of our
channel partners weakens.
We may be materially affected by the risks associated with
sole source suppliers
We purchase certain key parts, components, and services from
sole source suppliers who we believe are currently the only
providers that meet our specifications or for which alternative
sources of supply are not readily available.
The following table shows our significant sole source suppliers
and the products or services they provide:
|
|
|
Name of supplier |
|
Product or service provided |
|
|
|
Imation Corporation
|
|
T9840 and T9940 series tape media
|
Sanmina-SCI Corporation
|
|
Printed circuit boards and certain other manufacturing and
repair services
|
Engenio Information Technologies, Inc.
|
|
Certain FlexLine disk products
|
Fujitsu Electronics America
|
|
Application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) for various
tape and disk products
|
Austria Microsystems
|
|
ASICs for various tape products
|
Herald Datanetics Ltd. (HDL)
|
|
Key component used in certain tape products
|
We also obtain certain key parts and components from less
significant sole source suppliers. If a sole source supplier did
not continue to provide its products or services, we would need
to identify and qualify other acceptable suppliers. This process
could take an extended period, and we cannot provide any
assurance that we could identify and qualify an alternative
source on a timely basis or at an acceptable quality or price.
We cannot provide any assurance that significant sole source
suppliers will be able to meet our ongoing quality or delivery
requirements. Failure to meet these requirements may have a
material adverse impact on our financial condition and results
of operations.
HDL is located in the Peoples Republic of
China (PRC). Our dependence on HDL is subject to additional
risks beyond those associated with other sole source suppliers,
including the lack of a well-established court system or
acceptance of the rule of law in the PRC, the degree to which
the PRC permits economic reform policies to continue, the
political relationship between the PRC and the United States,
and broader political and economic factors. To date, we have not
experienced any material problems securing key components from
HDL; however, we cannot provide any assurance that we will not
experience material problems in the future.
We may be materially affected by a failure to obtain quality
parts and components in a timely manner or by a failure to
effectively manage inventory levels
We generally use standard parts and components for our products
and believe that there are a number of alternative, competent
vendors for most of those parts and components. Certain
suppliers have experienced occasional technical, financial, or
other problems that have delayed deliveries in the past. An
unanticipated failure of one of our suppliers to meet
requirements for an extended period, or the inability to secure
comparable components in a timely manner, could result in a
shortage of key components or products, longer lead times,
reduced control over production and delivery schedules, and an
inability to fulfill customer orders in a timely manner.
Since we operate in a lean manufacturing environment, we are
dependent on a limited supplier base to deliver quality parts
and components in a timely manner. A suppliers inability
to deliver parts and components on a timely basis, or our
failure to effectively manage inventory levels, could have a
material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations.
We may be materially affected by rapid technological change
and evolving industry standards
Short product life cycles are inherent in high-technology
industries due to rapid technological change and evolving
industry standards. Our financial condition and results of
operations depend on our ability to respond effectively to these
changes. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to
successfully develop, manufacture, and market
21
innovative new products or adapt our current products to new
technologies or new industry standards. In addition, customers
may be reluctant to adopt new technologies and standards, or
they may prefer competing technologies and standards.
We may be materially affected by the risks associated with
developing and protecting intellectual property
We depend on our ability to develop new intellectual property
that does not infringe on the rights of others. We cannot
provide any assurance that we will be able to continue to
develop such new intellectual property.
We rely on a combination of U.S. patent, copyright,
trademark, and trade secret laws to protect our intellectual
property rights. We enter into confidentiality agreements
relating to our intellectual property with our employees and
consultants, and we include confidentiality provisions in
license and non-exclusive sales agreements with our customers.
We also file patent and trademark registration applications with
foreign governments; however, many foreign countries do not have
intellectual property laws that are as well developed as those
of the United States.
Despite all of our efforts to protect our intellectual property
rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise
obtain or use our intellectual property. Monitoring the
unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult,
particularly in foreign countries. We cannot provide any
assurance that we will be able to adequately protect our
intellectual property.
We may be materially affected by the risks associated with
litigation
We are involved in a number of pending legal proceedings that
arise from time-to-time in the ordinary course of business. We
believe that any liability as a result of adverse outcomes in
such proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition. However, the outcome of these actions is
inherently difficult to predict. In the event of an adverse
outcome, the ultimate potential loss could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operations in a particular quarter. An unfavorable decision,
particularly in patent litigation, could require material
changes in production processes and products or result in an
inability to ship products or components found to have violated
third-party patent rights.
We may be materially affected if we are unable to attract and
retain our key employees
Our future success depends in large part on our ability to
attract and retain our key employees. During the past year,
several changes were made with respect to the executive
management team and their organizational responsibilities. We
face significant competition for individuals who possess the
skills required to sell our products and services, as well as
design, develop, manufacture, service, and market those products
and services. An inability to successfully attract and retain
these employees could have an adverse effect on our future
financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore,
there may be a delay between when organizational announcements
are made and when the organizations are fully effective.
We may be materially affected by the risks of conducting
business outside the United States
International operations accounted for approximately 55% of our
revenue in 2004, compared to 53% in 2003 and 49% in 2002. We
also sell products through U.S. indirect channel partners
that have some of their end-user customers located outside the
United States. We expect that we will continue to generate a
significant portion of our revenue from international operations.
Our international business may be affected by changes in demand
resulting from global and localized economic, business, and
political conditions. We are subject to the risks of conducting
business outside the United States, including the following
risks:
|
|
|
|
|
Adverse political and economic conditions |
|
|
Impositions of tariffs or quotas |
|
|
Changes in laws or regulations |
|
|
Difficulty in obtaining export licenses |
|
|
Potentially adverse tax or labor laws |
|
|
The burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws |
|
|
Longer payment cycles typically associated with international
sales |
22
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency fluctuations |
|
|
Other factors outside our control |
We expect these risks to increase in the future as we expand our
operations in foreign countries. We cannot provide any assurance
that these factors will not have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition or results of operations in the future.
We may be materially affected by regulatory requirements
The European Union (EU) has finalized the Waste Electrical
and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) directive, which regulates
the collection, recovery, and recycling of waste from electrical
and electronic products, and the Restrictions on the Use of
Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic
Equipment (RoHS) directive, which bans the use of certain
hazardous materials including lead, mercury, cadmium, chromium,
and two brominated flame-retardants (PBB and PBDE). Under
WEEE, we will be responsible for financing operations for the
collection, treatment, disposal, and recycling of past and
future covered products. Since the Member States of the EU have
not finalized the specific legal requirements relating to these
directives, we are presently unable to reasonably estimate the
amount of any costs that may be necessary in order to comply
with WEEE. We cannot provide any assurance that compliance with
WEEE and RoHS will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or results of operations.
We are subject to various other regulatory requirements,
including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we evaluate and determine
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting. Because of inherent limitations, internal control
over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions,
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may deteriorate.
Our manufacturing operations may be materially affected by
weather-related risks
We manufacture and assemble a significant portion of our
products in Puerto Rico. Our ability to perform these activities
may be significantly affected by weather-related risks beyond
our control. We believe that if the Puerto Rico facilities were
significantly affected by adverse weather, we could relocate to
an alternative facility within a reasonable period of time;
however, we cannot provide any assurance that we would be able
to relocate to that facility without a material adverse impact
on our financial condition or results of operations.
We may be materially affected by restructuring activities
We have recognized significant restructuring charges in the past
and it is possible that changes in our business, industry, or in
the global economy may necessitate restructuring activities in
the future. The necessity for restructuring activities may
result in expenses that adversely affect our financial condition
and results of operations and may require incremental cash
payments.
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
Our primary market risk relates to changes in foreign currency
exchange rates. The functional currency for our foreign
subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. A significant portion of
our revenue is generated by our international operations. The
majority of our international operations involve transactions
denominated in the euro, United Kingdom pound sterling, and
Japanese yen. An increase in the exchange value of the
U.S. dollar reduces the value of revenue and profits
generated by our international operations. As a result, our
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows can
be materially affected by changes in foreign currency exchange
rates. We attempt to mitigate this exposure as part of our
foreign currency hedging program. The primary goal of our
foreign currency hedging program is to reduce the risk of
adverse foreign currency movements on the reported financial
results of our non-U.S. dollar transactions. Factors that
could have an impact on the effectiveness of our hedging program
include the accuracy of forecasts, the geographies where we do
business, and the volatility of foreign currency markets. All
foreign currency derivatives are authorized and executed
pursuant to our policies. We do not hold or issue derivatives or
any other financial instruments for trading or speculative
purposes.
23
To implement our foreign currency hedging program, we use
foreign currency options and forwards. These derivatives are
used to hedge the risk that forecasted revenue denominated in
foreign currencies might be adversely affected by changes in
foreign currency exchange rates. Foreign currency forwards are
also used to reduce our exposure to foreign currency exchange
rate fluctuations in connection with monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies.
A hypothetical 10% adverse movement in foreign exchange
rates applied to our foreign currency exchange rate sensitive
instruments held as of December 31, 2004, and as of
December 26, 2003, would result in a hypothetical loss in
fair value of approximately $55.4 million and
$59.2 million, respectively. The determination of the fair
value of these instruments is described in Note 4 of
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, included
in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The decrease in the
hypothetical loss for 2004 is primarily due to a decrease in net
outstanding derivatives. These hypothetical losses do not take
our underlying international operations into consideration. We
anticipate that any hypothetical loss associated with our
foreign currency exchange rate sensitive instruments would be
substantially offset by gains associated with our underlying
international operations.
Interest Rate Risk
Changes in interest rates primarily affect interest income
earned on our cash and short-term investments. A hypothetical
10% adverse movement in interest rates applied to cash
investments would not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Credit Risk
We are exposed to credit risk associated with cash equivalents,
investments, foreign currency options and forwards, and trade
receivables. We do not believe that our cash equivalents,
investments, or foreign currency derivatives present significant
credit risks, because the counterparties to the instruments
consist of major financial institutions, and we manage the
notional amount of contracts entered into with any one
counterparty. Substantially all trade receivable balances are
unsecured. The concentration of credit risk with respect to
trade receivables is limited by the large number of customers in
our customer base and their dispersion across various industries
and geographic areas. Although we have a large number of
customers who are dispersed across different industries and
geographic areas, a prolonged economic downturn could increase
our exposure to credit risk on our trade receivables. We perform
ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and maintain an
allowance for potential credit losses.
24
|
|
ITEM 8. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
25
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A companys internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
|
|
|
(i) |
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company; |
|
|
(ii) |
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and |
|
|
(iii) |
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of
the companys assets that could have a material effect on
the financial statements. |
Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We conducted our evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting based on the framework in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Our evaluation included evaluating, documenting, and
testing the design and operating effectiveness of our internal
controls over financial reporting. Based on our evaluation, our
management concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of December 31, 2004.
Our managements assessment of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.
26
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Storage Technology
Corporation:
We have completed an integrated audit of Storage Technology
Corporations 2004 consolidated financial statements and of
its internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004 and audits of its 2003 and 2002
consolidated financial statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Our opinions, based on our audits, are
presented below.
Consolidated financial statements
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of operations, of cash
flows, of changes in shareholders equity, and of
comprehensive income present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of Storage Technology Corporation and its
subsidiaries at December 31, 2004 and December 26,
2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We
conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit of financial statements includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Internal control over financial reporting
Also, in our opinion, managements assessment, included in
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting appearing in Item 8, that the company maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO), is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on
those criteria. Furthermore, in our opinion, the company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework issued by the COSO. The companys management
is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility
is to express opinions on managements assessment and on
the effectiveness of the companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit
of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with
the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. An audit of internal
control over financial reporting includes obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating
the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and
performing such other procedures as we consider necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 16, 2005
27
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 26, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
853,410 |
|
|
$ |
727,354 |
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
281,028 |
|
|
|
288,925 |
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
519,273 |
|
|
|
539,334 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
123,459 |
|
|
|
109,988 |
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
174,253 |
|
|
|
139,446 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,062 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,952,485 |
|
|
|
1,805,170 |
|
Long-term investments
|
|
|
48,408 |
|
|
|
43,501 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
177,371 |
|
|
|
201,647 |
|
Spare parts for maintenance
|
|
|
49,048 |
|
|
|
44,695 |
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
46,569 |
|
|
|
93,521 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
133,960 |
|
|
|
116,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
2,407,841 |
|
|
$ |
2,305,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
1,551 |
|
|
$ |
1,090 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
121,019 |
|
|
|
132,404 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
533,839 |
|
|
|
483,672 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
239,253 |
|
|
|
250,818 |
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
59,365 |
|
|
|
64,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
955,027 |
|
|
|
932,658 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
11,006 |
|
|
|
11,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
966,033 |
|
|
|
943,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 6, 7, and 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Common stock, $0.10 par value, 300,000,000 shares
authorized; 112,875,937 shares issued at 2004 and
111,135,483 shares issued at 2003
|
|
|
11,288 |
|
|
|
11,114 |
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
1,019,101 |
|
|
|
991,273 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
600,095 |
|
|
|
409,072 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(38,772 |
) |
|
|
(30,436 |
) |
Treasury stock of 5,448,350 shares at 2004 and
299,677 shares at 2003, at cost
|
|
|
(134,148 |
) |
|
|
(5,919 |
) |
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
(15,756 |
) |
|
|
(13,666 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
1,441,808 |
|
|
|
1,361,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
2,407,841 |
|
|
$ |
2,305,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
28
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 26, | |
|
December 27, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage products
|
|
$ |
1,307,091 |
|
|
$ |
1,336,072 |
|
|
$ |
1,275,941 |
|
|
Storage services
|
|
|
916,909 |
|
|
|
846,488 |
|
|
|
763,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
2,224,000 |
|
|
|
2,182,560 |
|
|
|
2,039,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage products
|
|
|
653,660 |
|
|
|
700,727 |
|
|
|
700,806 |
|
|
Storage services
|
|
|
516,759 |
|
|
|
485,824 |
|
|
|
424,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue
|
|
|
1,170,419 |
|
|
|
1,186,551 |
|
|
|
1,125,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,053,581 |
|
|
|
996,009 |
|
|
|
914,495 |
|
Research and development costs
|
|
|
196,709 |
|
|
|
204,362 |
|
|
|
215,007 |
|
Selling, general, and administrative expense
|
|
|
634,945 |
|
|
|
598,535 |
|
|
|
561,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit
|
|
|
221,927 |
|
|
|
193,112 |
|
|
|
138,156 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
16,264 |
|
|
|
10,548 |
|
|
|
10,250 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,270 |
) |
|
|
(1,748 |
) |
|
|
(2,075 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
236,921 |
|
|
|
201,912 |
|
|
|
146,331 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(45,898 |
) |
|
|
(53,000 |
) |
|
|
(36,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
191,023 |
|
|
$ |
148,912 |
|
|
$ |
110,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
109,074 |
|
|
|
108,135 |
|
|
|
105,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
111,243 |
|
|
|
110,648 |
|
|
|
107,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
29
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 26, | |
|
December 27, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from customers
|
|
$ |
2,270,300 |
|
|
$ |
2,258,219 |
|
|
$ |
2,003,517 |
|
Cash paid to suppliers and employees
|
|
|
(1,874,807 |
) |
|
|
(1,889,154 |
) |
|
|
(1,636,056 |
) |
Interest received
|
|
|
15,231 |
|
|
|
9,912 |
|
|
|
9,956 |
|
Interest paid
|
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
|
|
(1,285 |
) |
|
|
(1,698 |
) |
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
(25,177 |
) |
|
|
(13,115 |
) |
|
|
(15,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
384,515 |
|
|
|
364,577 |
|
|
|
360,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(337,283 |
) |
|
|
(1,102,244 |
) |
|
|
(761,305 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments
|
|
|
339,968 |
|
|
|
957,973 |
|
|
|
584,159 |
|
Purchase of property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
(55,010 |
) |
|
|
(43,555 |
) |
|
|
(88,459 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
1,661 |
|
|
|
3,752 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(32,385 |
) |
|
|
4,244 |
|
|
|
(12,650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(83,049 |
) |
|
|
(179,830 |
) |
|
|
(276,981 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(195,353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from employee stock plans
|
|
|
72,092 |
|
|
|
58,721 |
|
|
|
23,979 |
|
Proceeds from other debt
|
|
|
1,258 |
|
|
|
1,325 |
|
|
|
1,625 |
|
Repayments of other debt
|
|
|
(2,194 |
) |
|
|
(2,372 |
) |
|
|
(2,577 |
) |
Repayments of credit facilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73,401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(124,197 |
) |
|
|
57,674 |
|
|
|
(50,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
(51,213 |
) |
|
|
6,484 |
|
|
|
(7,702 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
126,056 |
|
|
|
248,905 |
|
|
|
25,232 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
727,354 |
|
|
|
478,449 |
|
|
|
453,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$ |
853,410 |
|
|
$ |
727,354 |
|
|
$ |
478,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RECONCILIATION OF NET INCOME TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
191,023 |
|
|
$ |
148,912 |
|
|
$ |
110,031 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
78,485 |
|
|
|
87,890 |
|
|
|
90,533 |
|
Inventory writedowns
|
|
|
19,716 |
|
|
|
24,064 |
|
|
|
32,571 |
|
Translation loss
|
|
|
53,175 |
|
|
|
21,053 |
|
|
|
8,990 |
|
Other non-cash adjustments to income
|
|
|
27,344 |
|
|
|
(22,470 |
) |
|
|
17,694 |
|
(Increase) decrease in assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
46,300 |
|
|
|
75,659 |
|
|
|
(36,098 |
) |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(16,460 |
) |
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
21,403 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
945 |
|
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
(3,550 |
) |
|
Spare parts
|
|
|
(22,117 |
) |
|
|
(16,344 |
) |
|
|
(22,998 |
) |
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
15,603 |
|
|
|
(13,715 |
) |
|
|
4,622 |
|
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(14,650 |
) |
|
|
(7,191 |
) |
|
|
67,337 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
19,469 |
|
|
|
17,111 |
|
|
|
39,865 |
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(4,850 |
) |
|
|
5,020 |
|
|
|
16,869 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(9,468 |
) |
|
|
41,332 |
|
|
|
13,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
384,515 |
|
|
$ |
364,577 |
|
|
$ |
360,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
30
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common | |
|
|
|
Capital in | |
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Common | |
|
Excess of | |
|
Retained | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Treasury | |
|
Unearned | |
|
|
|
|
Issued | |
|
Stock | |
|
Par Value | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
Stock | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balances, December 28, 2001
|
|
|
105,033 |
|
|
$ |
10,503 |
|
|
$ |
875,379 |
|
|
$ |
150,129 |
|
|
$ |
7,642 |
|
|
$ |
(3,777 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,056 |
) |
|
$ |
1,034,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,031 |
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,031 |
|
|
|
(17,226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
9,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,146 |
|
|
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,807 |
|
|
Restricted stock activity
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,098 |
) |
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 27, 2002
|
|
|
106,849 |
|
|
|
10,685 |
|
|
|
908,100 |
|
|
|
260,160 |
|
|
|
(9,584 |
) |
|
|
(4,444 |
) |
|
|
(7,154 |
) |
|
|
1,157,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,912 |
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,852 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,852 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,912 |
|
|
|
(20,852 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
2,843 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
43,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,697 |
|
|
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
856 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
14,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,966 |
|
|
Restricted stock activity
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
12,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,512 |
) |
|
|
5,961 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
12,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,991 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 26, 2003
|
|
|
111,135 |
|
|
|
11,114 |
|
|
|
991,273 |
|
|
|
409,072 |
|
|
|
(30,436 |
) |
|
|
(5,919 |
) |
|
|
(13,666 |
) |
|
|
1,361,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,023 |
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191,023 |
|
|
|
(8,336 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options
|
|
|
3,266 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
56,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,207 |
|
|
Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
14,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,838 |
|
|
|
Shares repurchased under stock repurchase program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195,353 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195,353 |
) |
|
Restricted stock activity
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
9,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,090 |
) |
|
|
7,228 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,519 |
) |
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
(53,109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
112,876 |
|
|
$ |
11,288 |
|
|
$ |
1,019,101 |
|
|
$ |
600,095 |
|
|
$ |
(38,772 |
) |
|
$ |
(134,148 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,756 |
) |
|
$ |
1,441,808 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
31
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
| |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 26, | |
|
December 27, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income
|
|
$ |
191,023 |
|
|
$ |
148,912 |
|
|
$ |
110,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedging contracts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on foreign currency cash flow hedges, net of tax benefit of
$14,764, $25,310, and $18,106
|
|
|
(23,485 |
) |
|
|
(40,377 |
) |
|
|
(29,045 |
) |
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net
income, net of tax benefit of $14,086, $18,689, and $5,947
|
|
|
22,406 |
|
|
|
29,788 |
|
|
|
9,539 |
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of tax benefit of
$1,934, $4,380, and $0
|
|
|
(4,514 |
) |
|
|
(10,219 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement medical benefit adjustment, net of tax benefit of
$272, $0, and $0
|
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding gain (loss), net of tax expense (benefit) of $(153),
$695, and $977
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
1,587 |
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net
income, net of tax expense of $905, $699, and $0
|
|
|
(2,111 |
) |
|
|
(1,631 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(8,336 |
) |
|
|
(20,852 |
) |
|
|
(17,226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
182,687 |
|
|
$ |
128,060 |
|
|
$ |
92,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
32
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
NOTE 1 |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Principles of
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP). These financial statements
include the accounts of Storage Technology Corporation and our
wholly owned subsidiaries (collectively referred to as
StorageTek, we, our, and us). All intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated.
Fiscal Year
Our fiscal year is a 52- or 53-week period ending on the last
Friday in December. Fiscal year 2004 was a 53-week fiscal year,
while 2003 and 2002 were 52-week fiscal years. All references to
years in these notes to consolidated financial statements
represent fiscal years unless otherwise noted.
Significant
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, related
revenue and expenses, and disclosure of gain or loss
contingencies. Examples include estimates of revenue reserves,
warranty liabilities, the valuation of inventory, and income
taxes. Actual results could differ materially from these
estimates and assumptions.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue for sales and services is recognized when all of the
following criteria have been met: (a) persuasive evidence
of an arrangement exists, (b) delivery has occurred or
services have been rendered, (c) the price to the customer
is fixed or determinable, and (d) collectibility is
reasonably assured. The application of these criteria varies
based on the nature of the products or services, the terms and
conditions under which the products or services are sold, and
our historical experience with returns and adjustments. The
majority of our software is designed to be installed and operate
with our storage products, and does not require significant
modification or customization. The following table summarizes
total revenue contribution by policy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
End-user products
|
|
|
32% |
|
|
|
32% |
|
|
|
34% |
|
Indirect channel products sell-in method
|
|
|
13% |
|
|
|
14% |
|
|
|
15% |
|
Indirect channel products sell-through method
|
|
|
14% |
|
|
|
15% |
|
|
|
14% |
|
Storage services
|
|
|
41% |
|
|
|
39% |
|
|
|
37% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End-user products. Product is deemed delivered to the
customer either at the time of installation at the
customer-designated site, or on delivery and receipt of written
customer acceptance, depending on the terms of the contract and
applicable commercial law.
Indirect channel products sell-in method. Revenue
from sales to indirect channel customers under the sell-in
method is recognized at the time of delivery based on our
assessment that the amount of future returns and price
adjustments can be reasonably estimated from historical
experience. Reserves for estimated returns and price adjustments
are recorded as revenue reductions based on historical claims
experience.
Indirect channel products sell-through method.
Revenue from sales to indirect channel customers under the
sell-through method is recognized after the product has shipped
and all rights of return for unsold products have expired.
Reserves for estimated price adjustments and product warranty
returns are recorded as revenue reductions based on historical
claims experience.
33
Storage services. Revenue for maintenance service
contracts and storage services arrangements is recognized
ratably as earned over the contractual period. Revenue for time
and material service contracts is recognized as the services are
rendered. Service costs and expenses are recognized as incurred.
Prepaid services are recognized on a straight-line basis over
the contractual service period.
Multiple-element arrangements. We enter into transactions
that include multiple-element arrangements, which may include
any combination of products and services. When some elements are
delivered prior to others in an arrangement, revenue for the
delivered elements is separately recognized provided the
following requirements are met; otherwise, revenue is deferred
until all elements of the arrangement are delivered.
|
|
|
|
|
The delivered elements have a value to the customer on a
standalone basis |
|
|
There is vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE) of the
fair value of the undelivered element |
|
|
Delivery or performance of the undelivered element is considered
probable and substantially under our control |
The amount allocable to delivered items is limited to the amount
that is not contingent upon the delivery of additional items or
meeting other specified performance conditions. If the
undelivered element represents services, a residual method of
allocating revenue is used. Under the residual method, revenue
is deferred for the estimated fair value of the undelivered
services. We estimate the fair value of the undelivered services
based on separate service offerings with customers. For
undelivered elements other than services, a relative fair value
method of revenue allocation is used, under which revenue is
allocated to the separate elements based on their relative fair
values. Deferred revenue associated with undelivered elements is
included within accrued liabilities.
Software. Revenue from one-time license agreements is
recognized at the inception of the license term. Revenue from
technical support agreements, including unspecified upgrades, is
recognized ratably over the term of the support agreement. For
multiple-element arrangements involving software where the
software is essential to the functionality of non-software
products, revenue recognition for the non-software products is
deferred from recognition until the software is delivered and
all other requirements for separate recognition of
multiple-element arrangements are met.
Warranties. We provide warranties associated with the
sale of our products. Our standard product warranties provide
for the repair or replacement of products that fail to meet
their published specifications. In situations where a product
fails its essential purpose to the customer, we may also be
responsible for refunding the purchase price of the product if
we cannot remedy the product failure. We establish a warranty
liability for the estimated cost of warranty-related claims at
the time revenue is recognized. The following table summarizes
information related to our warranty reserves (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
43,676 |
|
|
$ |
37,088 |
|
|
$ |
31,941 |
|
|
Accruals for warranties
|
|
|
47,238 |
|
|
|
51,676 |
|
|
|
44,423 |
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(48,503 |
) |
|
|
(45,146 |
) |
|
|
(39,310 |
) |
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
2,125 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$ |
44,536 |
|
|
$ |
43,676 |
|
|
$ |
37,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-Based
Compensation Plans
Our stock-based compensation plans are described in
Note 10. We account for those plans under the recognition
and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and the related interpretations. Stock-based
compensation cost reflected in net income is related to
restricted stock and common stock equivalents.
34
The following table illustrates the pro forma effect on net
income and earnings per share if we had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, to stock-based compensation (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income, as reported
|
|
$ |
191,023 |
|
|
$ |
148,912 |
|
|
$ |
110,031 |
|
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net
income, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
5,235 |
|
|
|
4,105 |
|
|
|
2,279 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under
fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax
effects
|
|
|
(26,599 |
) |
|
|
(21,482 |
) |
|
|
(22,199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
169,659 |
|
|
$ |
131,535 |
|
|
$ |
90,111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic, as reported
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
Basic, pro forma
|
|
$ |
1.56 |
|
|
$ |
1.22 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
Diluted, as reported
|
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
|
Diluted, pro forma
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
The fair value of options granted under the stock-based
compensation plans is estimated on the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions and results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options | |
|
ESPP | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Expected life (in years)
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Volatility
|
|
|
57.2 |
% |
|
|
64.5 |
% |
|
|
64.0 |
% |
|
|
31.7 |
% |
|
|
61.2 |
% |
|
|
50.3 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Weighted average fair value
|
|
$ |
13.44 |
|
|
$ |
11.28 |
|
|
$ |
11.77 |
|
|
$ |
5.94 |
|
|
$ |
6.65 |
|
|
$ |
5.94 |
|
Research and
Development Costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs are charged to expense as incurred.
Advertising costs were approximately $10.1 million in 2004,
$12.0 million in 2003, and $12.0 million 2002.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense is based on reported income before income
taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the
expected tax consequences of transactions that are recognized in
different time periods for book and tax purposes. We record a
valuation allowance to reduce the deferred tax assets to the
amount that we believe will be realized. We account for income
tax contingencies included within income taxes payable when tax
contingencies are both probable and reasonably estimable.
35
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Loss
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of
taxes, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Unrealized losses on foreign currency hedging contracts
|
|
$ |
(23,530 |
) |
|
$ |
(22,452 |
) |
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
(14,733 |
) |
|
|
(10,219 |
) |
Postretirement medical benefit adjustment
|
|
|
(432 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
2,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(38,772 |
) |
|
$ |
(30,436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency hedging contracts and marketable securities are
more fully described in Note 4. The minimum pension
liability relates primarily to a pension plan in our United
Kingdom operations, and is accounted for in accordance with
SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for
Pensions. The total net pension accrued liability
associated with this pension plan is approximately
$28.2 million as of December 31, 2004.
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments
Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents,
short- and long-term investments, foreign currency options and
forwards, and long-term debt. The carrying amount for cash and
cash equivalents approximates fair value due to the short
maturities and variable rates of interest associated with those
instruments. The short- and long-term investments, as well as
the foreign currency options and forwards, are recorded at fair
value on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. For a further
description of the methods we use to determine the fair value of
our financial instruments, see Investments below,
Note 2, and Note 4. The carrying amount of long-term
debt approximates fair value based on current rates available
for similar types of instruments.
Cash
Equivalents
Short-term, highly liquid investments that are both readily
convertible to cash and have original maturities of three months
or less at the time of acquisition are considered cash
equivalents. The Company had $681.1 million of cash
equivalents as of December 31, 2004, and
$489.6 million as of December 26, 2003.
Investments
All of our marketable debt and equity securities are accounted
for as available-for-sale securities and recorded at their
estimated fair value based on quoted market prices. Unrealized
gains and losses on these investments are reported, net of tax,
as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Interest earned on investments is included in interest income
and realized gains and losses on sales of securities are
recognized within selling, general, and administrative expense
(SG&A). Securities are classified as short-or long-term
investments based upon contractual maturity date.
An evaluation of our investments is performed periodically to
determine whether any decline in fair value below cost basis is
other-than-temporary. Impairment charges are recognized within
SG&A to the extent that a decline in the value of an
investment is determined to be other-than-temporary in nature.
We have made minority equity investments in privately-held
companies from time to time. These investments are accounted for
as cost-method investments based on our ownership and control of
the investees. Losses included within SG&A associated with
cost-method equity investments were $0 in 2004, $0 in 2003, and
$4.5 million in 2002.
See Note 2 for additional information regarding our
investments.
36
Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts
The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects our best estimate
of probable future losses on our accounts receivable. We
determine the allowance based on known troubled accounts,
historical experience, and other available evidence. The
following table summarizes information related to our allowance
for doubtful accounts (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
13,585 |
|
|
$ |
15,713 |
|
|
$ |
17,414 |
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
1,991 |
|
|
|
4,898 |
|
|
|
7,641 |
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(7,502 |
) |
|
|
(7,026 |
) |
|
|
(9,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$ |
8,074 |
|
|
$ |
13,585 |
|
|
$ |
15,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
Inventories include material, labor, and factory overhead and
are accounted for at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out
method) or market value. The components of inventories, net of
the associated reserves, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Raw materials
|
|
$ |
26,567 |
|
|
$ |
14,951 |
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
21,341 |
|
|
|
29,740 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
75,551 |
|
|
|
65,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
123,459 |
|
|
$ |
109,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We evaluate the need for obsolete, slow-moving, and non-saleable
inventory reserves based on a review of forecasted product
demand and market values on a quarterly basis. When the cost of
inventory exceeds its market value, we recognize inventory
writedowns in cost of revenue. The following table summarizes
information related to our inventory reserves (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
54,302 |
|
|
$ |
80,976 |
|
|
$ |
85,193 |
|
|
Inventory writedowns
|
|
|
19,716 |
|
|
|
24,064 |
|
|
|
32,571 |
|
|
Inventory write-offs
|
|
|
(27,780 |
) |
|
|
(50,738 |
) |
|
|
(36,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$ |
46,238 |
|
|
$ |
54,302 |
|
|
$ |
80,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spare Parts for
Maintenance
Spare parts for maintenance services are valued at cost, and
consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Spare parts for maintenance
|
|
$ |
105,024 |
|
|
$ |
97,831 |
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(55,976 |
) |
|
|
(53,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49,048 |
|
|
$ |
44,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of spare parts is computed using the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the associated
products, which are generally five to ten years. Spare parts
amortization expense was $17.8 million in 2004,
$11.0 million in 2003, and $19.3 million in 2002.
37
Property, Plant, and
Equipment
Property, plant, and equipment are carried at depreciated cost
and consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Useful Life |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
$ |
588,177 |
|
|
$ |
595,924 |
|
|
1-7 years |
Buildings and building improvements
|
|
|
145,286 |
|
|
|
149,956 |
|
|
7-35 years |
Land and land improvements
|
|
|
18,205 |
|
|
|
18,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
751,668 |
|
|
|
764,244 |
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(574,297 |
) |
|
|
(562,597 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
177,371 |
|
|
$ |
201,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and building improvements include capitalized leases
of $13.9 million as of December 31, 2004, and
$14.5 million as of December 26, 2003. Accumulated
depreciation includes accumulated amortization on capitalized
leases of $7.3 million as of December 31, 2004, and
$4.6 million as of December 26, 2003.
Depreciation of property, plant, and equipment is computed using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the
related assets. Depreciation expense was $59.5 million in
2004, $75.5 million in 2003, and $69.1 million in 2002.
We perform an impairment analysis of our property, plant, and
equipment whenever significant events or changes in
circumstances occur that indicate the carrying amounts may not
be recoverable. Impairment is evaluated based on a comparison of
the carrying value of the asset to the undiscounted future cash
flows associated with the asset. If an impairment is identified,
the asset is written down to its estimated fair value based on a
discounted cash flow model.
Goodwill
Goodwill is included within other assets and is tested for
impairment on an annual basis or as circumstances change. The
annual impairment test is performed in the second quarter. No
impairment charges were recorded during 2004, 2003, or 2002. We
had approximately $16.1 million of goodwill as of
December 31, 2004, and $7.9 million as of
December 26, 2003.
Translation of Foreign
Currencies
The functional currency for our foreign subsidiaries is the
U.S. dollar, reflecting the significant volume of
intercompany transactions and associated cash flows that result
from the fact that the majority of our storage products sold
worldwide are manufactured in Puerto Rico, a territory of the
United States. Accordingly, monetary assets and liabilities are
translated at year-end exchange rates, while non-monetary items
are translated at historical exchange rates. Revenue and
expenses are translated at the average exchange rates in effect
during the year, except for cost of revenue, depreciation, and
amortization, which are translated at historical exchange rates
during the year. The impact of such translations is reported in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations when incurred. See
Note 4 for additional information with respect to our
accounting policies for financial instruments utilized in our
foreign currency hedging program.
Concentrations of
Credit Risk
We are exposed to credit risk associated with cash equivalents,
investments, foreign currency derivatives, and trade
receivables. We dont believe that our cash equivalents,
investments, or foreign currency derivatives present significant
credit risks, because the counterparties to the instruments
consist of major financial institutions, and we manage the
notional amount of contracts entered into with any counterparty.
Substantially all trade receivable balances are unsecured. The
concentration of credit risk with respect to trade receivables
is limited by the large number of customers in our customer base
and their dispersion across various industries and geographic
areas. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers
and maintain an allowance for potential credit losses.
38
Reclassifications
Certain prior year information has been reclassified to conform
to the current year presentation. These reclassifications
include our presentation and disclosure of auction rate
securities. In prior periods, we included auction rate
securities in cash and cash equivalents. The current year
presentation classifies auction rate securities in short-term
investments. The following table summarizes the changes to our
2003 Consolidated Balance Sheet due to the reclassification of
auction rate securities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported | |
|
As Reclassified | |
|
Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,001,629 |
|
|
$ |
727,354 |
|
|
$ |
(274,275 |
) |
Short-term investments
|
|
|
14,650 |
|
|
|
288,925 |
|
|
|
274,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,016,279 |
|
|
$ |
1,016,279 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have also made corresponding reclassifications to our
consolidated statements of cash flows to reflect the gross
purchases and sales of these securities as investing activities
rather than as a component of cash and cash equivalents. As a
result of these reclassifications, net cash used in investing
activities increased $95.1 million and $179.2 million
in 2003 and 2002, respectively. This change in classification
does not affect previously reported cash flows from operations,
cash flows from financing activities, or consolidated statements
of operations for any period.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory
Costsan amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4. This statement amends the guidance in ARB
No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to
clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility
expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material
(spoilage). This statement requires that the above items be
recognized as current-period charges, regardless of whether they
meet the criterion of abnormal. Additionally,
SFAS No. 151 requires that the allocation of fixed
production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the
normal capacity of the production facilities.
SFAS No. 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after June 15, 2005, and is required to be adopted by us in
the third quarter of fiscal 2005. We do not expect
SFAS No. 151 to have a material impact on our
financial condition or results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment, which requires companies to
measure and recognize compensation expense for all stock-based
payments at fair value. SFAS No. 123R is effective for
all interim periods beginning after June 15, 2005;
therefore, it will be effective for us beginning with the third
quarter of fiscal 2005. We are currently evaluating the impact
of SFAS No. 123R on our financial position and results
of operations as well as alternative transition methods under
SFAS No. 123R. In addition, we have not determined
whether the adoption of SFAS No. 123R will result in
amounts that are similar to the current pro forma disclosures
under SFAS 123. See Stock-Based Compensation
Plans above for information related to the pro forma
effects on our net income and earnings per share if we had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation.
In December 2004, the FASB issued two Staff Positions (FSPs)
that provide accounting guidance on how companies should account
for the effects of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the
Act) that was signed into law on October 22, 2004. The Act
could affect how companies report their deferred income tax
balances. The first FSP is FSP FAS 109-1 (FSP 109-1); the
second is FSP FAS 109-2 (FSP 109-2). In FSP 109-1, the FASB
concludes that the tax relief (special tax deduction for
domestic manufacturing) from the Act should be accounted for as
a special deduction instead of a tax rate reduction.
FSP 109-2 gives a company additional time to evaluate the
effects of the Act on any plan for reinvestment of repatriation
of foreign earnings for purposes of applying
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
However, a company must provide certain disclosures if it
chooses to utilize the additional time granted by the FASB. We
are evaluating the impact, if any, these FSPs may have on our
consolidated financial statements.
39
Short- and long-term investments consist of the following
marketable debt and equity securities (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
|
Holding | |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Gain (Loss) | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Short-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
260 |
|
|
$ |
1,586 |
|
|
$ |
3,086 |
|
|
$ |
4,672 |
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
269,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269,000 |
|
|
|
274,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274,275 |
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agency securities
|
|
|
6,497 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
6,468 |
|
|
|
9,977 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
9,978 |
|
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term investments
|
|
|
280,797 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
281,028 |
|
|
|
285,838 |
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
288,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agency securities
|
|
|
44,857 |
|
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
44,551 |
|
|
|
39,366 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
39,443 |
|
|
|
Corporate securities
|
|
|
3,893 |
|
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
3,857 |
|
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
4,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term investments
|
|
|
48,750 |
|
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
48,408 |
|
|
|
43,409 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
43,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
$ |
329,547 |
|
|
$ |
(111 |
) |
|
$ |
329,436 |
|
|
$ |
329,247 |
|
|
$ |
3,179 |
|
|
$ |
332,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual maturities of debt securities as of
December 31, 2004, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Due within one year
|
|
$ |
280,797 |
|
|
$ |
280,768 |
|
Due after one year through three years
|
|
|
48,750 |
|
|
|
48,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
329,547 |
|
|
$ |
329,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We use the specific identification method to account for gains
and losses on securities. Realized gains on sales of marketable
debt and equity securities included within SG&A were
$3.3 million in 2004, $2.4 million in 2003, and $0 in
2002.
We review all marketable securities to determine if any decline
in value is other than temporary. We have concluded that the
decline in value as of December 31, 2004 is not other than
temporary.
Income before income taxes consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
U.S.
|
|
$ |
190,627 |
|
|
$ |
161,572 |
|
|
$ |
124,338 |
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
46,294 |
|
|
|
40,340 |
|
|
|
21,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
236,921 |
|
|
$ |
201,912 |
|
|
$ |
146,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
The provision for income taxes attributable to the amounts shown
above consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
$ |
12,745 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
24,600 |
|
|
U.S. state
|
|
|
4,470 |
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
11,421 |
|
|
|
15,600 |
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,636 |
|
|
|
48,300 |
|
|
|
32,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
|
17,586 |
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
3,100 |
|
|
U.S. state
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(1,100 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
(402 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,262 |
|
|
|
4,700 |
|
|
|
3,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
45,898 |
|
|
$ |
53,000 |
|
|
$ |
36,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The deferred income tax balances consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred income tax assets, net of valuation allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$ |
174,253 |
|
|
$ |
139,446 |
|
|
Noncurrent
|
|
|
46,569 |
|
|
|
93,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset
|
|
$ |
220,822 |
|
|
$ |
232,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our net deferred income tax assets consist of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Gross deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
$ |
43,089 |
|
|
$ |
71,003 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities and reserves
|
|
|
66,931 |
|
|
|
65,246 |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
31,533 |
|
|
|
32,106 |
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
17,983 |
|
|
|
24,105 |
|
|
Deferred income
|
|
|
23,676 |
|
|
|
16,488 |
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
21,804 |
|
|
|
17,541 |
|
|
Depreciation/amortization
|
|
|
15,502 |
|
|
|
10,828 |
|
|
Investment basis difference
|
|
|
9,555 |
|
|
|
10,510 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13,974 |
|
|
|
8,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244,047 |
|
|
|
256,178 |
|
Less: Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(23,225 |
) |
|
|
(23,211 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax asset
|
|
$ |
220,822 |
|
|
$ |
232,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The valuation allowance relates primarily to foreign net
operating loss carryforwards. We evaluate a variety of factors
in determining the amount of deferred income tax assets to be
recognized pursuant to SFAS No. 109 including our
earnings history, the number of years our operating loss and tax
credits can be carried forward, and future taxable income
expectations by tax jurisdiction.
Tax benefits resulting from the exercise of employee stock
options and other stock programs were credited directly to
stockholders equity in the amount of $14.6 million in
2004, $12.3 million in 2003, and $3.2 million in 2002.
41
We have foreign net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $34.5 million as of December 31, 2004,
which have an indefinite carryforward period. We also have
general business credit carryforwards of approximately
$22.2 million, which begin to expire in 2019, and
alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards of approximately
$20.9 million, which have an indefinite carryforward
period. We also have a tax incentive grant, which expires in
2018, that reduces the tax rate on our operations in Puerto Rico.
We are subject to regular audits by federal, state, and foreign
tax authorities. These audits may result in proposed assessments
that may result in additional tax liabilities. We believe that
we have provided adequate reserves relating to these potential
adjustments. Our income taxes payable balances as reported on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets are comprised primarily of tax
contingencies we believe are both probable and reasonably
estimable.
We have not provided taxes on cumulative undistributed earnings
of our foreign subsidiaries because such earnings are intended
to be indefinitely reinvested outside the United States. At
December 31, 2004, we had approximately $471.7 million
of earnings indefinitely reinvested in subsidiaries outside the
U.S.
The provision for income taxes reconciles to the amount computed
by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to
income before income taxes in the following manner (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
U.S. federal income tax provision at statutory rate
|
|
$ |
82,922 |
|
|
$ |
70,669 |
|
|
$ |
51,215 |
|
Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of Puerto Rico operations
|
|
|
(22,982 |
) |
|
|
(17,632 |
) |
|
|
(12,654 |
) |
|
Tax rulings, settlements, and other factors affecting estimates
of tax contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,500 |
) |
|
|
(10,500 |
) |
|
Nondeductible and other items
|
|
|
(6,413 |
) |
|
|
4,898 |
|
|
|
5,207 |
|
|
Foreign tax rate differentials
|
|
|
(1,929 |
) |
|
|
4,054 |
|
|
|
3,914 |
|
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
(6,460 |
) |
|
|
(2,735 |
) |
|
|
(3,963 |
) |
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(2,924 |
) |
|
|
(1,972 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefits
|
|
|
3,684 |
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
3,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$ |
45,898 |
|
|
$ |
53,000 |
|
|
$ |
36,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The income tax rates for 2004 and 2003 were favorably impacted
by the expiration of the statutes of limitations for assessing
additional taxes pertaining to the United States and Puerto
Rico. As a result of these statutes expiring during each
respective year, tax expense was reduced by $32.0 million
during 2004 and $18.2 million during 2003. The benefit
relating to 2003 was partially offset by changes in our
estimates of tax contingencies that occurred during the year as
a result of tax rulings, settlements, and other factors, which
increased tax expense by $12.7 million. We have included
these items within their respective captions on the tax rate
reconciliation.
|
|
NOTE 4 |
DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS |
A significant portion of our revenue is generated by our
international operations. As a result, our financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flows can be materially affected
by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. We attempt to
mitigate this exposure as part of our foreign currency hedging
program. The primary goal of our foreign currency hedging
program is to reduce the risk of adverse foreign currency
movements on the reported financial results of our
non-U.S. dollar transactions. To operate this hedging
program, we use a combination of foreign currency forwards and
foreign currency options. We do not enter into derivative
transactions for trading or speculative purposes.
Cash Flow
Hedges
We attempt to mitigate the risk that forecasted cash flows
associated with revenue denominated in foreign currencies may be
adversely affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates
through a combination of foreign currency options and foreign
currency forwards. Typically, the maximum length of time over
which we hedge our exposure to the variability of forecasted
cash flows is 18 months.
42
We record derivatives designated as cash flow hedges at their
estimated fair value within other current assets or other
current liabilities. The gains and losses associated with
changes in the fair value of the derivatives are included within
other comprehensive income (OCI) to the extent that the
derivatives are effective in offsetting changes in the value of
the forecasted cash flows being hedged. The gains and losses are
then reclassified as an adjustment to revenue in the same period
that the related forecasted revenue is recognized in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations. If a derivative is
terminated or discontinued as a hedge, the effective portion of
gains and losses to that date is deferred in OCI and
subsequently recognized in the Consolidated Statement of
Operations in the same period that the related forecasted
revenue is recognized. The ineffective portion of the
derivatives is immediately recognized as a component of
SG&A. As of December 31, 2004, all $23.5 million
of the net estimated losses associated with cash flow hedges
included within OCI is expected to be reclassified into revenue
during the next 12 months.
The fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts used as
cash flow hedges is determined utilizing forward rates. The
forward rates are defined as the sum of the forward points as
quoted by independent pricing services and the spot rates as of
the end of the fiscal period. This same methodology is used to
assess hedge effectiveness for these forward contracts. There
was no material hedge ineffectiveness associated with forward
contracts during 2004, 2003, or 2002.
The fair value of our foreign currency options used as cash flow
hedges is determined based on a Black-Scholes option pricing
model. These options are considered perfectly effective hedges
based on the currencies, notional amounts, pricing, and maturity
of the options that we utilize. Accordingly, we record all of
the changes in the options fair value, including changes
in the time value of the options, in OCI.
Other Hedges
We also utilize foreign currency forwards, generally with
durations of less than two months, to reduce our exposure to
foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations in connection with
monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies. We account for these derivatives in accordance with
SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation.
We record these forwards at their estimated fair value within
other current assets or other current liabilities. Changes in
the fair value of these derivatives are immediately recognized
as a component of SG&A. We use the same methodology for
determining the fair value of these foreign currency forwards as
we use for valuing our forward contracts utilized as cash flow
hedges.
|
|
NOTE 5 |
ACCRUED LIABILITIES |
Accrued liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred revenue
|
|
$ |
152,754 |
|
|
$ |
125,350 |
|
Accrued payroll, bonus, and commissions
|
|
|
77,006 |
|
|
|
86,254 |
|
Accrued warranty reserve
|
|
|
44,536 |
|
|
|
43,676 |
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
34,456 |
|
|
|
40,530 |
|
Other
|
|
|
225,087 |
|
|
|
187,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
533,839 |
|
|
$ |
483,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities consist of items that are individually
less than 5% of total accrued liabilities.
In August 2002, Ted Marx, a former StorageTek employee who was
terminated in 2001, filed suit in California State Superior
Court (Los Angeles) against us. The complaint contained claims
for wrongful termination, wrongful termination in violation of
the California Labor Code, breach of the covenant not to
terminate without good reason, breach of contract, breach of the
covenant of good faith and fair dealing, failure to pay wages
under the California Labor Code, and intentional infliction of
emotional distress. In September 2003, we filed a motion for
summary judgment. In December 2003, the court ruled in our favor
on the claim of breach of the covenant not to terminate without
good reason. The trial commenced in May 2004. In June 2004, the
jury awarded approximately $2.9 million in compensatory
damages and
43
$9.0 million in punitive damages to the plaintiff. In
addition, in the first quarter of 2005, the trial court awarded
approximately $1.0 million in attorney fees and costs to
the plaintiff. We are vigorously seeking to overturn and/or
reduce these awards. We have not accrued the damages or the
attorney fees for this case, as we do not believe that these
amounts represent a loss contingency that meets the definition
of probable under SFAS No. 5, Accounting for
Contingencies.
We are also involved in a number of other pending legal
proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course
of business. We believe that any liability as a result of
adverse outcomes in such proceedings would not have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition taken as a whole.
However, the outcome of these actions is inherently difficult to
predict. In the event of an adverse outcome, the ultimate
potential loss could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or results of operations in a particular
quarter. An unfavorable decision, particularly in patent
litigation, could require material changes in production
processes and products or result in the inability to ship
products or components found to have violated third-party patent
rights.
|
|
NOTE 7 |
CREDIT FACILITIES, DEBT, AND LEASE OBLIGATIONS |
Credit
Facilities
We have a $75.0 million revolving credit facility (the
Revolver) that expires in October 2008. The interest rates for
borrowing under the Revolver are based upon our Consolidated
Leverage Ratio, which is the ratio of Consolidated Funded
Indebtedness to rolling four quarter Consolidated Earnings
Before Interest Expense, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization
(EBITDA). The rate ranges from the applicable LIBOR plus 1.00%
to 2.00% or the agent banks base rate plus 0.00% to 1.00%.
We pay an annual commitment fee of 0.175% or 0.200% on any
unused borrowings based upon the Consolidated Leverage Ratio.
The Revolver contains certain financial and other covenants,
including limitations on the payment of cash dividends. We had
no outstanding borrowings under the Revolver as of
December 31, 2004. However, we had letters of credit
totaling approximately $850,200 under the Revolver as of
December 31, 2004. The Revolver replaces a previous
revolving credit facility that expired in October 2004.
Debt
The following table summarizes information related to our debt,
which consists of capitalized lease obligations (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Capitalized lease obligations
|
|
$ |
12,557 |
|
|
$ |
12,240 |
|
Less: Current portion
|
|
|
(1,551 |
) |
|
|
(1,090 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,006 |
|
|
$ |
11,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
Lease
Obligations
Scheduled maturities of capital lease obligations and future
minimum rental payments under noncancellable operating leases as
of December 31, 2004, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized | |
|
Noncancellable | |
|
|
Lease | |
|
Operating Lease | |
|
|
Obligations | |
|
Obligations | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
2,170 |
|
|
$ |
32,767 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
23,323 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
14,969 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,881 |
|
|
|
5,601 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
5,645 |
|
|
|
6,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,360 |
|
|
$ |
93,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Amount representing interest
|
|
|
(2,803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of capitalized lease obligations (including $1,551
classified as current)
|
|
$ |
12,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our operating leases are primarily related to sales and
administrative offices, customer service and logistics
facilities, and equipment leases. Rent expense associated with
operating leases was $39.6 million in 2004,
$38.6 million in 2003, and $40.1 million in 2002.
|
|
NOTE 8 |
GUARANTEES AND INDEMNIFICATIONS |
In the normal course of business, we are party to a variety of
agreements under which we may be obligated to indemnify the
other party for certain matters. These obligations typically
arise in contracts where we customarily agree to hold the other
party harmless against losses arising from a breach of
representations or covenants for certain matters such as title
to assets and intellectual property rights associated with the
sale of products. We also have indemnification obligations to
our officers and directors. The duration of these
indemnifications varies, and in certain cases, is indefinite. In
each of these circumstances, payment by us depends upon the
other party making an adverse claim according to the procedures
outlined in the particular agreement, which procedures generally
allow us to challenge the other partys claims. In certain
instances, we may have recourse against third parties for
payments that we make.
We are unable to reasonably estimate the maximum potential
amount of future payments under these or similar agreements due
to the unique facts and circumstances of each agreement and the
fact that certain indemnifications provide for no limitation to
the maximum potential future payments under the indemnification.
We have not recorded any liability for these indemnifications in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets; however, we accrue
losses for any known contingent liability, including those that
may arise from indemnification provisions, when the obligation
is both probable and reasonably estimable.
|
|
NOTE 9 |
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE |
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities or other contracts to issue common stock were
exercised or converted into common shares.
45
The computations of the basic and diluted EPS amounts are as
follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income
|
|
$ |
191,023 |
|
|
$ |
148,912 |
|
|
$ |
110,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
109,074 |
|
|
|
108,135 |
|
|
|
105,108 |
|
|
Effect of dilutive common stock equivalents
|
|
|
2,169 |
|
|
|
2,513 |
|
|
|
2,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
111,243 |
|
|
|
110,648 |
|
|
|
107,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.05 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
$ |
1.02 |
|
Options to purchase 3,583,823 shares of common stock
in 2004, 1,042,901 shares of common stock in 2003, and
5,256,268 shares of common stock in 2002 were excluded from
the computation of diluted earnings per share because the
exercise price of the options was greater than the average
market price of our common stock and, therefore, the effect
would have been antidilutive.
|
|
NOTE 10 |
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS |
401(k)
Plan
We have a defined contribution retirement plan that complies
with Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Participating U.S. employees may contribute up to 50% of
their compensation, subject to certain statutory limitations. We
provide a matching contribution equal to 100% of the first 3% of
compensation contributed by the participant, and 50% of the next
4% of compensation contributed by the participant, up to a
maximum match of 5% of the participants compensation each
pay period. We made contributions to the 401(k) of
$13.9 million in 2004, $13.4 million in 2003, and
$13.7 million in 2002.
Stock Option
Plans
Under the 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan (2004 Plan) and the 1995
Equity Participation Plan (1995 Plan), we are authorized to
issue up to 7,500,000 (2004 Plan) and up to 21,050,000 (1995
Plan) shares of common stock to eligible employees and
directors. The plans provide for the issuance of common shares
pursuant to stock option exercises, restricted stock grants,
other share-based awards, and for the grant of cash awards. As
of December 31, 2004, we had 7,500,000 shares
available for grant under the 2004 Plan and
1,062,113 shares available for grant under the 95 Plan.
Under the Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (Director
Plan), we are authorized to issue up to 1,560,000 shares of
common stock to non-employee directors. The Director Plan
provides for the issuance of common shares pursuant to stock
option exercises. As of December 31, 2004, we had
376,336 shares available for grant under the Director Plan.
Stock options are granted under the plans with an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date
of grant and generally vest over a four-year period. Options may
not be exercised prior to vesting. Options granted under the
plans generally have a maximum contractual term of ten years
from the date of grant, and may be accelerated upon certain
events, including death, disability, the attainment of certain
performance criteria, or change of control. Stockholders have
approved all of our stock option plans.
46
The following table summarizes stock option activity under our
plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Average | |
|
Number of | |
|
Average | |
|
Number of | |
|
Average | |
|
|
Shares Under | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Shares Under | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Shares Under | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Option | |
|
Price | |
|
Option | |
|
Price | |
|
Option | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
10,900,651 |
|
|
$ |
19.40 |
|
|
|
11,159,906 |
|
|
$ |
17.61 |
|
|
|
10,393,763 |
|
|
$ |
16.40 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
3,699,889 |
|
|
|
28.84 |
|
|
|
3,500,645 |
|
|
|
22.14 |
|
|
|
2,266,893 |
|
|
|
22.64 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3,265,926 |
) |
|
|
17.52 |
|
|
|
(2,842,919 |
) |
|
|
15.37 |
|
|
|
(683,499 |
) |
|
|
13.38 |
|
Forfeited/ Expired
|
|
|
(1,191,080 |
) |
|
|
23.36 |
|
|
|
(916,981 |
) |
|
|
20.48 |
|
|
|
(817,251 |
) |
|
|
19.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
10,143,534 |
|
|
|
22.98 |
|
|
|
10,900,651 |
|
|
|
19.40 |
|
|
|
11,159,906 |
|
|
|
17.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
3,154,182 |
|
|
$ |
19.82 |
|
|
|
4,431,190 |
|
|
$ |
18.84 |
|
|
|
5,475,189 |
|
|
$ |
18.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information concerning
outstanding and exercisable stock options as of
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
|
|
|
Range of |
|
Number of | |
|
Contractual | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
Number of | |
|
Weighted Average | |
Exercise Prices |
|
Options | |
|
Life in Years | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Options | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$0 - $10
|
|
|
17,663 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
9.44 |
|
|
|
17,663 |
|
|
$ |
9.44 |
|
10 - 20
|
|
|
2,193,237 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
13.20 |
|
|
|
1,359,927 |
|
|
|
13.25 |
|
20 - 30
|
|
|
7,630,228 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
25.28 |
|
|
|
1,500,383 |
|
|
|
22.78 |
|
30 - 40
|
|
|
216,626 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
34.18 |
|
|
|
190,429 |
|
|
|
33.78 |
|
40 - 50
|
|
|
85,780 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
43.30 |
|
|
|
85,780 |
|
|
|
43.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,143,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22.98 |
|
|
|
3,154,182 |
|
|
$ |
19.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase
Plan
We have an employee stock purchase plan (Purchase Plan) that is
qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.
As of December 31, 2004, we had an aggregate of 3,525,317
common shares reserved for issuance under the Purchase Plan. We
are authorized to issue up to 18.2 million shares of common
stock to eligible employees. Under the terms of the Purchase
Plan, employees may contribute up to 10% of their pay toward the
purchase of stock, subject to certain statutory limitations. The
purchase price of the stock is equal to 85% of the lower of the
stocks closing price on the first or last day of the
six-month offering period. The following table shows the number
of shares issued under the Purchase Plan in each of the last
three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Shares issued under the Purchase Plan
|
|
|
707,619 |
|
|
|
855,473 |
|
|
|
923,632 |
|
Restricted
Stock
Grants of restricted stock, restricted stock units, and common
stock equivalents (collectively, Restricted Stock) are made
pursuant to the 1995 and 2004 Plans. These grants are generally
issued to employees for no purchase price or for a purchase
price equal to the par value of our common stock. Restricted
stock typically vests over a four-year period. Vesting may be
accelerated upon certain events, including death, disability,
the attainment of certain performance criteria, or change of
control. Restricted Stock is subject to forfeiture if employment
terminates prior to vesting. The fair value of a share of
Restricted Stock is calculated based on the market value of our
common stock on the grant date, and is recorded as unearned
compensation in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Unearned
compensation is recognized ratably over the vesting period, net
of forfeitures.
47
The following table provides information about Restricted Stock
under both the 1995 and 2004 Plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
905,394 |
|
|
|
576,308 |
|
|
|
571,520 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
401,004 |
|
|
|
653,635 |
|
|
|
277,503 |
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(160,577 |
) |
|
|
(244,126 |
) |
|
|
(198,041 |
) |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(100,613 |
) |
|
|
(80,423 |
) |
|
|
(74,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
1,045,208 |
|
|
|
905,394 |
|
|
|
576,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of Restricted Stock granted during
the year
|
|
$ |
28.90 |
|
|
$ |
21.28 |
|
|
$ |
23.04 |
|
NOTE 11BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS
Business
Segments
We are organized into two business segments: storage products
and storage services. The storage products segment includes
sales of tape, disk, network, and other miscellaneous products.
The storage services segment includes maintenance and support
services, as well as professional services.
The accounting policies for the business segments are the same
as those described in the summary of significant accounting
polices. We do not have any intersegment revenue, and segment
operating performance is evaluated based on gross profit. The
aggregate gross profit by segment equals the consolidated gross
profit, and we do not allocate research and development costs;
SG&A expense; interest income; interest expense; or
provision for income taxes to the segments. All of our assets
are retained and analyzed at the corporate level and are not
allocated to the individual segments. Depreciation and
amortization expense is associated with corporate assets and is
not separately identifiable within the segments.
The following table shows revenue and gross profit by segment
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage products
|
|
$ |
1,307,091 |
|
|
$ |
1,336,072 |
|
|
$ |
1,275,941 |
|
|
Storage services
|
|
|
916,909 |
|
|
|
846,488 |
|
|
|
763,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$ |
2,224,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,182,560 |
|
|
$ |
2,039,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage products
|
|
$ |
653,431 |
|
|
$ |
635,345 |
|
|
$ |
575,135 |
|
|
Storage services
|
|
|
400,150 |
|
|
|
360,664 |
|
|
|
339,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross profit
|
|
$ |
1,053,581 |
|
|
$ |
996,009 |
|
|
$ |
914,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides supplemental financial data
regarding revenue from our storage products segment (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Tape products
|
|
$ |
1,012,944 |
|
|
$ |
1,031,827 |
|
|
$ |
989,819 |
|
Disk products
|
|
|
182,277 |
|
|
|
170,586 |
|
|
|
145,792 |
|
Network products
|
|
|
75,608 |
|
|
|
89,579 |
|
|
|
88,533 |
|
Other
|
|
|
36,262 |
|
|
|
44,080 |
|
|
|
51,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total storage products revenue
|
|
$ |
1,307,091 |
|
|
$ |
1,336,072 |
|
|
$ |
1,275,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
Geographic
Areas
Revenue and long-lived assets by geographic area are based on
the country in which we are legally transacting business.
Long-lived assets consist primarily of property, plant, and
equipment. Revenue and long-lived assets for Europe and
Asia-Pacific are reported in aggregate, as there are no
individual countries with revenue or long-lived assets that
exceed 10% of the consolidated amounts. Other individual
geographic areas account for less than 10% of the consolidated
revenue and long-lived assets, and are combined and shown in the
table below as Other. Revenue and long-lived assets
for each geographic area are shown below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States(1)
|
|
$ |
1,125,244 |
|
|
$ |
1,137,797 |
|
|
$ |
1,143,110 |
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
785,063 |
|
|
|
722,642 |
|
|
|
654,035 |
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
198,737 |
|
|
|
209,056 |
|
|
|
175,414 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
114,956 |
|
|
|
113,065 |
|
|
|
67,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$ |
2,224,000 |
|
|
$ |
2,182,560 |
|
|
$ |
2,039,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$ |
152,042 |
|
|
$ |
170,359 |
|
|
$ |
210,451 |
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
26,701 |
|
|
|
26,086 |
|
|
|
28,957 |
|
|
Asia-Pacific
|
|
|
9,316 |
|
|
|
8,462 |
|
|
|
6,064 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,429 |
|
|
|
5,692 |
|
|
|
4,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-lived assets
|
|
$ |
193,488 |
|
|
$ |
210,599 |
|
|
$ |
250,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
U.S. revenue from unaffiliated customers includes
international export sales to customers of $114,105 in 2004,
$118,586 in 2003, and $110,395 in 2002, as well as the impacts
of foreign currency exchange rate hedging activities. |
NOTE 12QUARTERLY INFORMATION (UNAUDITED)
The consolidated results of operations on a quarterly basis were
as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Share | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Revenue | |
|
Gross Profit | |
|
Net Income | |
|
Basic | |
|
Diluted | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$ |
515,072 |
|
|
$ |
238,203 |
|
|
$ |
23,349 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
516,615 |
|
|
|
237,832 |
|
|
|
35,627 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
526,486 |
|
|
|
248,242 |
|
|
|
42,755 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
665,827 |
|
|
|
329,304 |
|
|
|
89,292 |
|
|
|
0.84 |
|
|
|
0.83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,224,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,053,581 |
|
|
$ |
191,023 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$ |
479,955 |
|
|
$ |
212,759 |
|
|
$ |
16,454 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
527,263 |
|
|
|
237,666 |
|
|
|
30,106 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
|
|
0.27 |
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
520,260 |
|
|
|
237,068 |
|
|
|
31,007 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
0.28 |
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
655,082 |
|
|
|
308,516 |
|
|
|
71,345 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,182,560 |
|
|
$ |
996,009 |
|
|
$ |
148,912 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share (EPS) in each quarter is computed
using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during
that quarter while EPS for the full year is computed using the
weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year.
Therefore, the sum of the four quarters EPS may not equal
the full year EPS.
49
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND
DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
Evaluation of
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to StorageTek, including our
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the officers who
certify our financial reports and to other members of senior
management and the Board of Directors.
Based on their evaluation as of December 31, 2004, the
chief executive officer and chief financial officer have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that
the information required to be disclosed in the reports that we
file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time
periods specified in SEC rules and forms.
Additional information required to be furnished pursuant to this
item is set forth under the captions Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm, which are filed as part of this report under
Item 8 on page 26 and 27, respectively.
Changes in Internal
Control
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial
reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2004, that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
50
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10. |
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT |
The following persons were serving as our directors as of
March 4, 2005.
|
|
|
Name |
|
Position |
|
|
|
James R. Adams
|
|
Director, Texas Instruments, a semiconductor, tools, and
software company |
Charles E. Foster
|
|
Director of Amdocs Limited, a provider of software products and
services to the communications industry, and an advisory
director to the San Antonio office of JPMorgan
Chase & Co., a global financial services firm |
Mercedes Johnson
|
|
Former Senior Vice President, Finance, & Chief
Financial Officer, Lam Research Corporation, a semiconductor
processing equipment company |
William T. Kerr
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Meredith Corporation, a
media and marketing company |
Robert E. Lee
|
|
President, Glacier Properties, Inc., a private investment firm |
Patrick J. Martin
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer of
StorageTek |
Judy C. Odom
|
|
Director, Leggett & Platt, Inc., a diversified
manufacturer for products used in homes, offices, retail stores,
and automobiles, and Harte-Hanks, Inc, a worldwide direct and
targeted marketing company |
The following persons were serving as our executive officers as
of March 4, 2005.
|
|
|
Name |
|
Position |
|
|
|
Eula L. Adams
|
|
Vice President, Global Services |
Jon H. Benson
|
|
Vice President and General Manager, Automated Tape Solutions |
Pierre J. Cousin
|
|
Corporate Vice President, Research, Development, and Engineering |
Angel P. Garcia
|
|
Corporate Vice President, International Operations |
Roger C. Gaston
|
|
Corporate Vice President, Human Resources |
Robert S. Kocol
|
|
Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
Patrick J. Martin
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer |
Michael R. McLay
|
|
Vice President, Global Accounts |
Roy G. Perry
|
|
Corporate Vice President, Global Supply Chain, Manufacturing,
Logistics, and Quality Processes |
Mark Roellig
|
|
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary |
Brenda J. Zawatski
|
|
Vice President, General Manager, Information Lifecycle
Management Solutions |
The information concerning our directors required by this
Item 10, including the Audit Committee Financial Expert, is
incorporated by reference to the information set forth under the
captions Board of Directors and Committees and
Proposal 1. To Elect Seven Directors in our
definitive proxy statement relating to the annual meeting of
stockholders to be held on April 27, 2005 (the 2005
Proxy Statement). The information concerning our executive
officers required by this Item is incorporated by reference to
the information set forth under the caption Executive
Officers in the 2005 Proxy Statement.
The information concerning compliance with Section 16(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, required by
this Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the
information set forth under the caption Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the 2005
Proxy Statement.
The information concerning our code of ethics is incorporated by
reference to the information set forth under the caption
Corporate Governance in the 2005 Proxy Statement.
51
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated by
reference to the information under the captions
Compensation of Executive Officers and Board
of Directors and Committees in the 2005 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP
OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated by
reference to the information under the caption Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in
the 2005 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated by
reference to the information under the caption Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions in the 2005 Proxy
Statement.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated by
reference to the information under the caption
Proposal 2. To Ratify the Selection of the
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in the 2005
Proxy Statement.
52
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this
report:
1. Financial Statements:
2. Financial Statement Schedules:
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is included in the consolidated financial
statements or notes thereto.
3. Exhibits:
The exhibits listed below are filed as part of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K or are incorporated by reference into
this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Storage Technology
Corporation dated July 28, 1987 (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 29, 2000, filed on
February 21, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Certificate of Amendment dated May 22, 1989, to the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated July 28, 1987
(previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2000,
filed on February 21, 2001, and incorporated herein by
reference) |
|
|
3 |
.3 |
|
Certificate of Second Amendment dated May 28, 1992, to the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated July 28, 1987
(previously filed as Exhibit 3.3 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2000,
filed on February 21, 2001, and incorporated herein by
reference) |
|
|
3 |
.4 |
|
Certificate of Third Amendment dated May 21, 1999, to the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated July 28, 1987
(previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 25, 1999,
filed on August 9, 1999, and incorporated herein by
reference) |
|
|
3 |
.5 |
|
Restated Bylaws of Storage Technology Corporation, as amended
through November 16, 2002 (previously filed as
Exhibit 3.5 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 27, 2002, filed on March 7,
2003, and incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Specimen Certificate of Common Stock, $0.10 par value of
Registrant (previously filed as Exhibit(c)(2) to our Current
Report on Form 8-K dated June 2, 1989, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.1(1) |
|
Storage Technology Corporation Amended and Restated 1987
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended through May 21,
2003 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.6 to our Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-106930)
filed on July 10, 2003, and incorporated herein by
reference) |
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.2(1) |
|
Storage Technology Corporation Amended and Restated 1995 Equity
Participation Plan, as amended through May 20, 2004
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 25,
2004, filed on August 3, 2004, and incorporated herein by
reference) |
|
|
10 |
.3(1) |
|
Storage Technology Corporation 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 25,
2004, filed on August 3, 2004, and incorporated herein by
reference) |
|
|
10 |
.4(1) |
|
Storage Technology Corporation Management by Objective Bonus
Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 30, 2001, filed on May 14, 2001, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.5(1) |
|
Storage Technology Corporation 2004 Performance-Based Incentive
Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 25, 2004, filed on August 3, 2004, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.6(1) |
|
Storage Technology Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Option
Plan for Non-Employee Directors (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended June 28, 1996, filed on
August 12, 1996, and incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.7(1) |
|
Storage Technology Corporation Flexible Option Plan, dated
December 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 28, 2001, filed on March 4, 2002, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.8(1) |
|
Severance Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2001, between
StorageTek and Robert S. Kocol (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.9 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended September 28, 2001, filed on
November 8, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.9(1) |
|
Offer Letter, dated May 10, 2001, from StorageTek to
Michael McLay (previously filed as Exhibit 10.17 to our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 29, 2001, filed on August 9, 2001, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.10(1) |
|
Offer Letter, dated February 9, 2001, from StorageTek to
Roger Gaston (previously filed as Exhibit 10.20 to our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 30, 2001, filed on May 14, 2001, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.11(1) |
|
Offer Letter, dated July 16, 2001, from StorageTek to Roy
Perry (previously filed as Exhibit 10.28 to our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 28, 2001, filed on November 8, 2001, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.12(1) |
|
Offer Letter, dated June 27, 2001, from StorageTek to Angel
Garcia (previously filed as Exhibit 10.29 to our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 28, 2001, filed on November 8, 2001, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.13(1) |
|
Form of Executive Severance Agreement (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.32 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2002, filed on
May 13, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.14 |
|
Master Services Agreement (MSA), between each of StorageTek,
Electronic Data Systems Corporation, and EDS Information
Services L.L.C., dated as of April 1, 2002 (previously
filed as Exhibit 10.33 to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 29, 2002,
filed on May 13, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Authorization Letter #1 pursuant to the MSA, dated
April 1, 2002 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.34 to
our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended March 29, 2002, filed on May 13, 2002, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.16 |
|
Authorization Letter #2 pursuant to the MSA, dated
April 1, 2002 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.35 to
our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended March 29, 2002, filed on May 13, 2002, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Master Secondary Storage Services Agreement, between StorageTek
and Electronic Data Systems Corporation, dated March 29,
2002 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.36 to our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 29, 2002, filed on May 13, 2002, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.18(1) |
|
Offer Letter, dated June 25, 2002, between StorageTek and
Mark Roellig (previously filed as Exhibit 10.28 to our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 28, 2002, filed on August 12, 2002, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.19(1) |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement, dated as of November 22,
2002, between StorageTek and each director (previously filed as
Exhibit 10.31 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 27, 2002, filed on
March 7, 2003, and incorporated herein |
|
|
10 |
.20(1) |
|
Offer Letter, dated November 12, 2002, between StorageTek
and Pierre Cousin (previously filed as Exhibit 10.33 to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 27, 2002, filed on March 7, 2003, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.21(1) |
|
Agreement, dated December 1, 2002, between StorageTek and
Pierre Cousin (previously filed as Exhibit 10.34 to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 27, 2002, filed on March 7, 2003, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.22(1) |
|
Amended and Restated CEO Employment Agreement, dated
March 27, 2003, between StorageTek and Patrick J. Martin
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.36 to our Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 28,
2003, filed on May 9, 2003, and incorporated herein by
reference) |
|
|
10 |
.23(1) |
|
Form of Executive Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2003,
between StorageTek and each executive officer (previously filed
as Exhibit 10.37 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended March 28, 2003, filed on
May 9, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.24 |
|
Letter, dated July 24, 2003, from StorageTek to Bank of
America, N.A. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.32 to our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
June 27, 2003, filed on August 8, 2003, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.25(1) |
|
Offer Letter, dated December 12, 2003, between StorageTek
and Mark Ward (previously filed as Exhibit 10.30 to our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 26, 2004, filed on May 5, 2004, and incorporated
herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.26(1) |
|
Offer Letter, dated March 1, 2004, between StorageTek and
Eula Adams (previously filed as Exhibit 10.31 to our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 26, 2004, filed on May 5, 2004, and incorporated
herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.27(1) |
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of October 15, 2004, among
StorageTek, the several financial institutions thereto, Bank of
America, N.A., as L/ C Issuer and Administrative Agent for the
Banks, and Banc of America Securities LLC as Sole Lead Arranger
and Sole Book Manager (previously filed in our Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 24, 2004, filed on November 1, 2004 and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.28(1) |
|
Amended and Restated form of Stock Option Agreement for use in
connection with the Amended and Restated 1995 Equity
Participation Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 21,
2004, and incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.29(1) |
|
Amended and Restated form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use
in connection with the Amended and Restated 1995 Equity
Participation Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 21,
2004, and incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.30(1) |
|
Amended and Restated form of Stock Option Agreement for use in
connection with StorageTeks 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan
(previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on
Form 8-K, filed on December 21, 2004, and incorporated
herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.31(1) |
|
Amended and Restated form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use
in connection with StorageTeks 2004 Long Term Incentive
Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to our Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 21, 2004, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.32(1) |
|
Amended and Restated form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for
use in connection with StorageTeks 2004 Long Term
Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5 to our
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on December 21,
2004, and incorporated herein by reference) |
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.33(1) |
|
Offer Letter, dated January 27, 2005, between StorageTek
and Brenda Zawatski (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to
our Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on
February 2, 2005, and incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.34(1) |
|
Amended and Restated form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use
in connection with the Amended and Restated 1995 Equity
Participation Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 14,
2005, and incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
10 |
.35(1) |
|
Amended and Restated form of Restricted Stock Agreement for use
in connection with StorageTeks 2004 Long Term Incentive
Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed on February 14, 2005, and
incorporated herein by reference) |
|
|
21 |
.1(2) |
|
Subsidiaries of registrant |
|
|
23 |
.1(2) |
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|
|
31 |
.1(2) |
|
Certification Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
31 |
.2(2) |
|
Certification Pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
32 |
.1(2) |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
32 |
.2(2) |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
(1) |
Contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which directors
and/or officers participate |
|
(2) |
Indicates exhibit filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K |
56
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
STORAGE TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION
|
Dated: March 16, 2005
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Patrick J. Martin
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick J. Martin |
|
Chairman of the Board, |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, |
|
and Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURE |
|
TITLE |
|
DATE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick J. Martin
Patrick
J. Martin |
|
Chairman of the Board, President, Chief Executive Officer, and
Director (Principal Executive Officer) |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Robert S. Kocol
Robert
S. Kocol |
|
Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer) |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Thomas G. Arnold
Thomas
G. Arnold |
|
Vice President and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting
Officer) |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ James R. Adams
James
R. Adams |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Charles E. Foster
Charles
E. Foster |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Mercedes Johnson
Mercedes
Johnson |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ William T. Kerr
William
T. Kerr |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Robert E. Lee
Robert
E. Lee |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Judy C. Odom
Judy
C. Odom |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
57