def14a
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
|
|
|
Filed by the Registrant
þ |
|
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant
o |
|
|
Check the appropriate box: |
|
|
|
o Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
þ Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION
(Name
of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name
of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
|
þ No fee required. |
|
o
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and
0-11. |
|
|
|
1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the
filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|
|
|
4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
|
|
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|
|
|
1) Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
SEC 1913 (02-02) |
Persons who are to respond to the collection of information
contained in this form are not required to respond unless the form displays a currently valid
OMB control number. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ISABELLA
BANK CORPORATION
401 N. Main St.
Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48858
NOTICE OF
THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held May 4, 2010
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
of Isabella Bank Corporation will be held on Tuesday,
May 4, 2010 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, at the
Comfort Inn, 2424 S. Mission Street, Mount Pleasant,
Michigan. The meeting is for the purpose of considering and
acting upon the following:
1. The election of five directors.
2. Such other business as may properly come before the
meeting, or any adjournment or adjournments thereof.
The Board of Directors has fixed March 31, 2010 as the
record date for determination of shareholders entitled to notice
of, and to vote at, the meeting or any adjournments thereof.
Your vote is important. Even if you plan to attend the meeting,
please date and sign the enclosed proxy form, indicate your
choice with respect to the matters to be voted upon, and return
it promptly in the enclosed envelope. Note that if stock is held
in more than one name, all parties should sign the proxy form.
By order of the Board of Directors
Debra Campbell, Secretary
Dated: April 9, 2010
ISABELLA
BANK CORPORATION
401 N. Main St
Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48858
PROXY
STATEMENT
General
Information
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the
solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Isabella
Bank Corporation (the Corporation) a Michigan financial holding
company, to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of
the Corporation to be held on Tuesday, May 4, 2010 at
5:00 p.m. at the Comfort Inn, 2424 S. Mission
Street, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, or at any adjournment or
adjournments thereof, for the purposes set forth in the
accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and in
this Proxy Statement.
This Proxy Statement has been mailed on April 9, 2010 to
all holders of record of common stock as of the record date. If
a shareholders shares are held in the name of a broker,
bank or other nominee, then that party should give the
shareholder instructions for voting the shareholders
shares.
Voting at
the Meeting
The Board of Directors of the Corporation has fixed the close of
business on March 31, 2010 as the record date for the
determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote
at, the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and any adjournment
thereof. The Corporation has only one class of common stock and
no preferred stock. As of March 31, 2010, there were
7,543,506 shares of common stock of the Corporation
outstanding. Each outstanding share entitles the holder thereof
to one vote on each separate matter presented for vote at the
meeting. Shareholders may vote on matters that are properly
presented at the meeting by either attending the meeting and
casting a vote or by signing and returning the enclosed proxy.
If the enclosed proxy is executed and returned, it may be
revoked at any time before it is exercised at the meeting. All
shareholders are encouraged to date and sign the enclosed proxy,
indicate their choice with respect to the matters to be voted
upon, and return it to the Corporation.
The Corporation will hold the Annual Meeting of Shareholders if
holders of a majority of the Corporations shares of common
stock entitled to vote are represented in person or by proxy at
the meeting. If a shareholder signs and returns the proxy, those
shares will be counted to determine whether the Corporation has
a quorum, even if the shareholder abstains or fails to vote on
any of the proposals listed on the proxy.
If a shareholders shares are held in the name of a
nominee, and the shareholder does not tell the nominee how to
vote the shares (referred to as broker non-votes), then the
nominee can vote them as they see fit only on matters that are
determined to be routine and not on any other proposal. Broker
non-votes will be counted as present to determine if a quorum
exists but will not be counted as present and entitled to vote
on any non-routine proposals.
In the election of directors, director nominees receiving a
plurality of votes cast at the meeting will be elected directors
of the Corporation. Shares not voted, including broker
non-votes, have no effect on the election of directors.
Election
of Directors
The Board of Directors is divided into three classes, with the
directors in each class being elected for a term of three years.
At the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders five directors, James
C. Fabiano, Dale D. Weburg, Theodore W. Kortes, Thomas L.
Kleinhardt and Joseph LaFramboise, whose terms expire at the
annual meeting, have been nominated for election through 2013
for the reasons described below.
Except as otherwise specified in the proxy, proxies will be
voted for election of the five nominees. If a nominee becomes
unable or unwilling to serve, proxies will be voted for such
other person, if any, as shall be designated by the Board of
Directors. However, the Corporations management now knows
of no reason to anticipate that this will occur. The five
nominees for election as directors who receive the greatest
number of votes cast will be elected directors. Each of the
nominees has agreed to serve as a director if elected.
Nominees for election and current directors are listed below.
Also shown for each nominee and each current director is his or
her principal occupation for the last five or more years, age
and length of service as a director of the Corporation.
The Board of Directors recommends that shareholders vote FOR
the election of each of the five director nominees nominated by
the Board of Directors.
Directors
Qualifications
The Corporations Board of Directors (the Board) consists
of 15 members who are all well qualified to serve on the Board
and represent our shareholders best interest. As described
below, under the caption Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee the Board and Nominating and
Corporate Governance Committee (the Nominating
Committee) select nominees to the Board to establish a
Board that is comprised of members who:
|
|
|
|
|
Have extensive business leadership
|
|
|
|
Bring a diverse perspective and experience
|
|
|
|
Are independent and collegial
|
|
|
|
Have high ethical standards and have demonstrated sound business
judgment
|
|
|
|
Are willing and able to commit the significant time and effort
to effectively fulfill their responsibilities
|
|
|
|
Are active in and knowledgeable of their respective communities
|
Each director nominee along with the other directors bring these
qualifications to the Board. They provide a diverse complement
of specific business skills, experience, and knowledge including
extensive financial and accounting experience, knowledge of
banking, small business operating experience, and specific
knowledge of customer market segments, including agriculture,
oil and gas, health care, food and beverage, manufacturing, and
retail.
The following describes the key qualifications each director
brings to the Board, in addition to the general qualifications
described above and the information included in the biographical
summaries provided below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
Professionals
|
|
Expertise
|
|
Audit
|
|
|
|
Leadership
|
|
Diversity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
Standing
|
|
in Financial
|
|
Committee
|
|
Civic and
|
|
and Team
|
|
by Race,
|
|
Geo-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entre-
|
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
in Chosen
|
|
or Related
|
|
Financial
|
|
Community
|
|
Building
|
|
Gender, or
|
|
graphical
|
|
|
|
Tech-
|
|
Market-
|
|
Govern-
|
|
preneurial
|
|
Human
|
|
Represent-
|
Director
|
|
Field
|
|
Field
|
|
Expert
|
|
Involvement
|
|
Skills
|
|
Cultural
|
|
Diversity
|
|
Finance
|
|
nology
|
|
ing
|
|
ance
|
|
Skills
|
|
Resources
|
|
ation
|
|
James C. Fabiano
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Theodore W. Kortes
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas L. Kleinhardt
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Joseph Laframboise
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dale D. Weburg
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Dennis P. Angner
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey J. Barnes
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
G. Charles Hubscher
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
David J. Maness
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
W. Joseph Manifold
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William J. Strickler
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Richard J. Barz
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra L. Caul
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
W. Michael McGuire
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dianne C. Morey
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
2
The following table identifies the individual members of our
Board currently serving on each of these standing committees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Corporate
|
|
|
and Human
|
|
Director
|
|
Audit
|
|
|
Governance
|
|
|
Resource
|
|
|
James C. Fabiano
|
|
|
X
|
o
|
|
|
X
|
o
|
|
|
X
|
c,o
|
Theodore W. Kortes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Thomas L. Kleinhardt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Joseph LaFramboise
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Dale D. Weburg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
c
|
|
|
X
|
|
Dennis P. Angner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey J. Barnes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
G. Charles Hubscher
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
David J. Maness
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
W. Joseph Manifold
|
|
|
X
|
c
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
William J. Strickler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Richard J. Barz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sandra L. Caul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
W. Michael McGuire
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
Dianne C. Morey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
C Chairperson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O Ex-Officio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Nominees for Terms Ending in 2013
James C. Fabiano (age 66) has been a director
of Isabella Bank (the Bank) since 1979 and of the Corporation
since 1988. Mr. Fabiano is Chairman and CEO of Fabiano
Brothers, Inc., a wholesale beverage distributor operating in
several counties throughout Michigan. Mr. Fabiano is a past
recipient of the Mount Pleasant Area Chamber of Commerce Citizen
of the Year award. He is also a past Chairman of Central
Michigan University Board of Trustees.
Theodore W. Kortes (age 69) was appointed
director of the Corporation on January 1, 2008, and of the
Bank on January 1, 2010. Mr. Kortes was President and
CEO of Greenville Community Bank and Greenville Community
Financial Corporation since its founding in 1998, until his
retirement in 2006.
Thomas L. Kleinhardt (55) has been a director of
Isabella Bank since October 1998 and was appointed to the
Corporations Board of Directors effective January 1,
2010. Mr. Kleinhardt is President of McGuire Chevrolet, is
active in the Clare Kiwanis Club, and coaches girls Junior
Varsity Basketball team at Clare High School.
Joseph LaFramboise (60) has been a director of
Isabella Bank since September 2007, and was appointed to the
Corporations Board of Directors effective January 1,
2010. He is a retired Sales and Marketing Executive of Ford
Motor Company. Mr. LaFramboise is Ambassador of Eagle
Village in Evart, Michigan.
Dale D. Weburg (age 66) has served as a
director of the Breckenridge Division of Isabella Bank since
1987 and of the Bank and Corporation since 2000. Mr. Weburg
is President of Weburg Farms, a cash crop farm operation.
Mr. Weburg also serves as a trustee of the Board of
Directors of Gratiot Health System.
Current
Directors with Terms Ending in 2011
Dennis P. Angner (age 54) has been a director
of the Corporation and Isabella Bank since 2000. Mr. Angner
has been principally employed by the Corporation since 1984 and
has served as President of the Corporation since
December 30, 2001 and CFO since January 1, 2010.
Mr. Angner served as Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation from December 30, 2001 through
December 31, 2009. He is the past Chair of the Michigan
Bankers Association, is a member of the American Bankers
Association Government Relations Council, and has served on the
Central Michigan American Red Cross board for over 20 years.
3
Jeffrey J. Barnes (47) has been a director of
Isabella Bank since September 2007 and was appointed to the
Corporations Board of Directors effective January 1,
2010. Dr. Barnes is a physician and owner of Central Eye
Consultants. He is a former member of the Central Michigan
Community Hospital Board of Directors.
G. Charles Hubscher (56) has been a director of
Isabella Bank since May 2004 and was appointed to the
Corporations Board of Directors effective January 1,
2010. Mr. Hubscher is the President of Hubscher and Son,
Inc., a sand and gravel producer. He is a director of the
National Stone and Gravel Association, the Michigan Aggregates
Association, serves on the Board of Trustees for the Mt.
Pleasant Area Community Foundation, and is a member of Zoning
Board of Appeals for Deerfield Township.
David J. Maness (age 56) has been a director of
Isabella Bank since 2003 and of the Corporation since 2004. He
is President of Maness Petroleum, a geological and geophysical
consulting services company. Mr. Maness previously served
on the Mount Pleasant Public Schools Board of Education.
W. Joseph Manifold (age 58) has been a
director of the Corporation since 2003 and of the Bank since
January 1, 2010. Mr. Manifold is a Certified Public
Accountant and CFO of Federal Broach Holdings LLC, a holding
company which operates several manufacturing companies.
Previously, he was a senior auditor with Ernst & Young
Certified Public Accounting firm working principally on external
bank audits and was CFO of the Delfield Company. Prior to
joining the Board, Mr. Manifold also served on the Isabella
Community Credit Union Board and was Chairman of the Mount
Pleasant Public Schools Board of Education.
William J. Strickler (age 69) has been a
director of Isabella Bank since 1995 and of the Corporation
since 2002. Mr. Strickler is President of Michiwest Energy,
an oil and gas producer. Prior to joining the Corporation and
the Bank Board he served as a director of the National City
Community Bank Board.
Current
Directors with Terms Ending in 2012
Richard J. Barz (age 61) has been a director of
Isabella Bank since 2000 and of the Corporation since 2002.
Mr. Barz has been employed by the Corporation since 1972
and has been Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation since
January 1, 2010 and President and CEO of Isabella Bank
since December 2001. Prior to his appointment as President and
CEO, he served as Executive Vice President of Isabella Bank.
Mr. Barz has been very active in community organizations
and events. He is the past chairman of the Central Michigan
Community Hospital Board of Directors, is the current chairman
of the Middle Michigan Development Corporation Board of
Directors, and serves on several boards and committees for
Central Michigan University and various volunteer organizations
throughout mid-Michigan.
Sandra L. Caul (age 66) has been a director of
Isabella Bank since 1994 and of the Corporation since 2005.
Ms. Caul is Vice Chairperson of the Central Michigan
Community Hospital Board of Directors, Chairperson of the Mid
Michigan Community College Advisory Board and board member for
Central Michigan Community Mental Health Facilities. She also
sits on the board of the Central Michigan American Red Cross.
Ms. Caul retired in January 2005 as a state representative
of the Michigan State House of Representatives. Ms. Caul is
a registered nurse.
W. Michael McGuire (age 60) has been a
director of the Corporation since 2007 and of the Bank since
January 1, 2010. He is a director of the Farwell Division
of Isabella Bank. Mr. McGuire is currently an attorney and
the Director of the Office of the Corporate Secretary and
Assistant Secretary of The Dow Chemical Company, a manufacturer
of chemicals, plastics and agricultural products, headquartered
in Midland, Michigan.
Dianne C. Morey (63) has been a director of Isabella
Bank since December 2000 and was appointed to the
Corporations Board of Directors effective January 1,
2010. Mrs. Morey is an owner of Bandit Industries, Inc., a
forestry equipment manufacturer. She serves as a Trustee for the
Mt Pleasant Area Community Foundation.
Each of the directors has been engaged in their stated
professions for more than five years.
Other
Named Executive Officers
Timothy M. Miller (age 59), President of the
Breckenridge Division of Isabella Bank and a member of its Board
of Directors, has been an employee of the Corporation since
1985. Peggy L. Wheeler (age 50), Senior Vice
4
President and Controller of the Corporation, has been employed
by the Corporation since 1977. Steven D. Pung (age 60),
Chief Operations Officer of Isabella Bank and a member of the
Board of Directors of Financial Group Information Services (a
wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation) has been employed by
the Corporation since 1978.
All officers of the Corporation serve at the pleasure of the
Corporations Board of Directors.
Corporate
Governance
Director
Independence
The Corporation has adopted the director independence standards
as defined under Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Marketplace
Rules. The Board has determined that James C. Fabiano, Dale D.
Weburg, David J. Maness, W. Joseph Manifold, William J.
Strickler, Sandra L. Caul, W. Michael McGuire, Ted W. Kortes,
Thomas L. Kleinhardt, Joseph LaFramboise, Jeffrey J. Barnes,
Dianne C. Morey, G. Charles Hubscher are independent directors.
Dennis P. Angner is not independent as he is employed as
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation.
Richard J. Barz is not independent as he is employed as Chief
Executive Officer of the Corporation.
Board
Leadership Structure and Risk Oversight
The Corporations Governance policy provides that only
directors who are deemed to be independent as set forth by
NASDAQ and SEC rules are eligible to hold the office of Chairman
of the Board. Additionally, the chairpersons of Board
established committees must also be independent directors. It is
the Boards belief that the having a separate Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer best serves the interest of the
shareholders. The Board of Directors elects its chairperson at
the first Board meeting following the annual meeting.
Independent members of the Board of Directors meet without
insider directors at least twice per year.
Management is responsible for the Corporations day to day
risk management and the Boards role is to engage in
informed oversight. The Board utilizes committees to oversee
risks associated with compensation, financial, and governance.
Financial Group Information Services, the Corporations
information processing subsidiary is responsible for overseeing
risks associated with information technology. The Isabella Bank
Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing credit,
investment, interest rate, and trust risks. The chairpersons of
the respective boards or committees report on their activities
on a regular basis.
The Audit Committee is responsible for the integrity of the
consolidated financial statements of the Corporation; the
independent auditors qualifications and independence; the
performance of the Corporations, and its
subsidiaries internal audit function and independent
auditors; the Corporations system of internal controls;
the Corporations financial reporting and system of
disclosure controls; and the compliance by the Corporation with
legal and regulatory requirements and with the
Corporations Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.
Committees
of the Board of Directors and Meeting Attendance
The Board met 13 times during 2009. All incumbent directors
attended 75% or more of the meetings held in 2009. The Board has
an Audit Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee, and a Compensation and Human Resource Committee.
Audit
Committee
The Audit Committee is composed of independent directors who
meet the requirements for independence as defined in
Rule 5605(a)(2)of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. Information
regarding the functions performed by the Committee, its
membership, and the number of meetings held during the year, is
set forth in the Report of the Audit Committee
included elsewhere in this annual proxy statement. The Audit
Committee is governed by a written charter approved by the
Board. The Audit Committee Charter is available on the
Banks website, www.isabellabank.com, under the Investor
Relations tab.
5
In accordance with the provisions of the Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002, directors Manifold and McGuire meet the
requirements of Audit Committee Financial Expert and have been
so designated by the Board. The current Committee also consists
of directors Fabiano, Hubscher, LaFramboise, and Maness.
Nominating
and Corporate Governance Committee
The Corporation has a standing Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee consisting of independent directors who
meet the requirements for independence as defined in
Rule 5605(a)(2) of NASDAQ Marketplace Rules. The Committee
consists of directors Caul, Fabiano, Manifold, Strickler and
Weburg. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held
two meetings in 2009, and all directors attended 75% or more of
the meetings. The Board has approved a Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee Charter which is available on the
Banks website www.isabellabank.com under the Investor
Relations tab.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible
for evaluating and recommending individuals for nomination to
the Board for approval. The Committee in evaluating nominees,
including incumbent directors and any nominees put forth by
shareholders, considers business experience, skills, character,
judgment, leadership experience, and their knowledge of the
geographical markets, business segments or other criteria the
Committee deems relevant and appropriate based on the current
composition of the Board. The Committee considers diversity in
identifying members with respect to geographical markets served
by the Corporation and the business experience of the nominee.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider
as potential nominees, persons recommended by shareholders.
Recommendations should be submitted in writing to the Secretary
of the Corporation, 401 N. Main St., Mount Pleasant,
Michigan 48858 and include the shareholders name, address
and number of shares of the Corporation owned by the
shareholder. The recommendation should also include the name,
age, address and qualifications of the recommended candidate for
nomination. Recommendations for the 2010 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders should be delivered no later than December 10,
2010. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not
evaluate potential nominees for director differently based on
whether they are recommended to the Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee by a shareholder or otherwise.
Compensation
and Human Resource Committee
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee of the Corporation
is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the
Corporations Board the compensation of the President and
executive officers of the Corporation, benefit plans and the
overall percentage increase in salaries. The committee consists
of independent directors, who meet the requirements for
independence as defined in Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ
Marketplace Rules. The current Committee consists of directors
Fabiano, Barnes, Caul, Hubscher, Kleinhardt, Kortes,
LaFramboise, McGuire, Maness, Manifold, Morey, Strickler, and
Weburg. The Committee held two meetings during 2009 with all
directors attending the meetings. This Committee is governed by
a written charter approved by the Board that is available on the
Banks website www.isabellabank.com under the Investor
Relations tab.
Communications
with the Board
Shareholders may communicate with the Corporations Board
of Directors by sending written communications to the
Corporations Secretary, Isabella Bank Corporation,
401 N. Main St., Mount Pleasant, Michigan 48858.
Communications will be forwarded to the Board of Directors or
the appropriate committee, as soon as practicable.
Code
of Ethics
The Corporation has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics that is applicable to the Corporations Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. The
Corporations Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is
available on the Banks website www.isabellabank.com under
the Investor Relations tab.
6
Report of
the Audit Committee
The Audit Committee oversees the Corporations financial
reporting process on behalf of the Board. The 2009 Committee
consisted of directors Fabiano, Caul, Maness, Manifold, McGuire,
and Weburg.
The Audit Committee is responsible for pre-approving all
auditing services and permitted non-audit services over $5,000
for the Corporation by its independent auditors or any other
auditing or accounting firm, except as noted below. The Audit
Committee has established general guidelines for the permissible
scope and nature of any permitted non-audit services in
connection with its annual review of the audit plan and reviews
the guidelines with the Board of Directors.
Management has the primary responsibility for the consolidated
financial statements and the reporting process including the
systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight
responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed the audited
consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report with
management including a discussion of the quality, not just the
acceptability, of the accounting principles, the reasonableness
of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee also
reviewed with management and the independent auditors,
managements assertion on the design and effectiveness of
the Corporations internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2009.
The Audit Committee reviewed with the Corporations
independent auditors, who are responsible for expressing an
opinion on the conformity of those audited consolidated
financial statements with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America, their judgments as to
the quality, not just the acceptability, of the
Corporations accounting principles and such other matters
as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee by the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), including those described in AU
Section 380 Communication with Audit
Committees, as may be modified or supplemented. In
addition, the Audit Committee has received the written
disclosures and the letter from the independent accountants
required by PCAOB Rule 3526, Communication with Audit
Committees Concerning Independence, as may be modified or
supplemented, and has discussed with the independent accountant
the independent accountants independence.
The Audit Committee discussed with the Corporations
internal and independent auditors the overall scope and plans
for their respective audits. The Audit Committee meets with the
internal and external independent auditors, with and without
management present, to discuss the results of their
examinations, their evaluations of the Corporations
internal controls and the overall quality of the
Corporations financial reporting process. The Audit
Committee held seven meetings during 2009, and all committee
members attended 75% or more of the meetings.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above,
the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and
the Board has approved) that the audited consolidated financial
statements be included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009 for filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. The Audit Committee has
appointed Rehmann Robson as the independent auditors for the
2010 audit.
G. Charles Hubscher and Joseph LaFramboise became members
of the Board and the Audit Committee as of January 1, 2010
and therefore did not participate in any of the reviews or other
procedures set forth above with respect to the year ended
December 31, 2009.
Respectfully submitted,
W. Joseph Manifold, Audit Committee Chairperson
James C. Fabiano
Sandra L. Caul
David J. Maness
W. Michael McGuire
Dale D. Weburg
7
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee (the
Committee) is responsible for the compensation and
benefits for the President and executive officers of the
Corporation. The Committee evaluates and approves the executive
officer and senior management compensation plans, policies and
programs of the Corporation and its affiliates. The Committee
also evaluates and establishes the compensation of the Chief
Executive Officer and President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Corporation. The Chief Executive Officer, Richard J. Barz,
conducts annual performance reviews for other Named Executive
Officers, excluding himself. Mr. Barz recommends an
appropriate salary increase to the Committee based on the
performance review and the officers years of service along
with competitive market data.
Compensation
Objectives
The Committee considers asset growth and earnings per share to
be the primary ratios in measuring financial performance. The
Corporations philosophy is to maximize long-term return to
shareholders consistent with safe and sound banking practices,
while maintaining the commitment to superior customer and
community service. The Corporation believes that the performance
of executive officers in managing the business should be the
basis for determining overall compensation. Consideration is
also given to overall economic conditions and current
competitive forces in the market place. The objectives of the
Committee are to effectively balance salaries and potential
compensation to an officers individual management
responsibilities and encourage them to realize their potential
for future contributions to the Corporation. The objectives are
designed to attract and retain high performing executive
officers who will lead the Corporation while attaining the
Corporations earnings and performance goals.
What the
Compensation Programs are Designed to Reward
The Corporations compensation programs are designed to
reward dedicated and conscientious employment with the
Corporation, loyalty in terms of continued employment,
attainment of job related goals and overall profitability of the
Corporation. In measuring an executive officers
contributions to the Corporation, the Committee considers
numerous factors including, among other things, the
Corporations growth in terms of asset size and increase in
earnings per share. In rewarding loyalty and long-term service,
the Corporation provides attractive retirement benefits.
Review of
Risks Associated with Compensation Plans
Based on an analysis conducted by management and reviewed by the
Committee, management does not believe that the
Corporations compensation programs for employees are
reasonably likely to have a material short or long term adverse
effect on the Corporations Results of Operation.
Elements
of Compensation
The Corporations executive compensation program has
consisted primarily of base salary and benefits, annual cash
bonus incentives, stock awards for insider directors, and
participation in the Corporations retirement plans.
Why Each
of the Elements of Compensation is Chosen
Base Salary and Benefits are set to provide competitive
levels of compensation to attract and retain officers with
strong motivated leadership. Each officers performance,
current compensation, and responsibilities within the
Corporation are considered by the Committee when establishing
base salaries. The Corporation also believes it is best to pay
sufficient base salary because it believes an over-reliance on
equity incentive compensation could potentially skew incentives
toward short-term maximization of shareholder value as opposed
to building long-term shareholder value. Base salary encourages
management to operate the Corporation in a safe and sound manner
even when incentive goals may prove unattainable.
Annual Performance Incentives are used to reward
executive officers for the Corporations overall financial
performance. This element of the Corporations compensation
programs is included in the overall compensation in
8
order to reward employees above and beyond their base salaries
when the Corporations performance and profitability exceed
established annual targets. The inclusion of incentive
compensation encourages management to be more creative, diligent
and exhaustive in managing the Corporation to achieve specific
financial goals.
Stock Awards are also provided as they are the element of
compensation that is most effective in aligning the financial
interests of management with those of shareholders and because
stock awards are a traditional and well-proven element of
compensation among community banks and bank holding companies.
These stock awards are granted pursuant to the Isabella Bank
Corporation and Related Companies Deferred Compensation Plan for
Directors (Directors Plan), under which
eligible executive officers elect to defer their director fees,
which deferred fees are then converted, on a quarterly basis,
into shares of the Corporations common stock. The
Corporation has established a Trust to fund the Directors
Plan. The directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are
required to defer at least 25% of their earned board fees into
the Directors Plan.
Retirement Plans. The Corporations
retirement plans are designed to assist executives in providing
themselves with a financially secure retirement. The retirement
plans include: a frozen defined benefit pension plan, a 401(k)
plan, and a non-leveraged employee stock ownership plan (ESOP),
which is frozen to new participants, and a retirement bonus plan.
How the
Corporation Chose Amounts for Each Element
The Committees approach to determining the annual base
salary of executive officers is to offer competitive salaries in
comparison with other comparable financial institutions. The
Committee utilizes both an independent compensation survey
prepared by SNL Financial and a survey prepared by the Michigan
Bankers Association of similar sized Michigan based
institutions. Compensation for 2009 was based on the
compensation information provided by these organizations for
2008. Specific factors used to decide where an executive
officers salary should be within the established range
include the historical financial performance, financial
performance outlook, years of service, and job performance.
The annual performance incentive is based on goals set on
individual performance and recognition of individual
performance. A subjective analysis is conducted by the Chief
Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer makes a
recommendation to the Committee for the appropriate amount for
each individual executive officer. The Committee reviews,
modifies, if necessary, and approves the recommendations of the
Chief Executive Officer. The Committee reviews the performance
of the Chief Executive Officer. The Committee uses the following
factors as quantitative measures of corporate performance in
determining annual cash bonus amounts to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
Peer group financial performance compensation
|
|
|
|
1 and 5 year shareholder returns
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share and earnings per share growth
|
|
|
|
Budgeted as compared to actual annual operating performance
|
|
|
|
Community and industry involvement
|
|
|
|
Results of audit and regulatory exams
|
|
|
|
Other strategic goals as established by the board of directors
|
While no particular weight is given to any specific factor, the
Committee gives at least equal weight to the subjective analyses
as described above.
Stock awards are granted pursuant to the Directors Plan,
under which participants elect to defer their director fees,
which director fees are then converted, on a quarterly basis,
into shares of the Corporations common stock based on the
fair market value of a share of the Corporations common
stock at that time. Shares of stock credited to a
participants account under the Directors Plan are
eligible for stock and cash dividends as payable.
Total compensation in 2009 was based on the Committee targeting
its executive officers compensation to approximate the
median of the ranges provided by an independent consultant and
Michigan Bankers Association surveys.
9
Retirement plans. The Corporation has a 401(k)
plan in which substantially all employees are eligible to
participate. Employees may contribute up to 50% of their
compensation subject to certain limits based on federal tax
laws. As a result of the curtailment of the defined benefit plan
noted below, the Corporation increased the contributions to the
401(k) plan effective January 1, 2007. The Corporation
makes a 3.0% safe harbor contribution for all eligible employees
and matching contributions equal to 50% of the first 4.0% of an
employees compensation contributed to the Plan during the
year. Employees are 100% vested in the safe harbor contributions
and are 0% vested through their first two years of employment
and are 100% vested after 6 years of service for matching
contributions.
The Corporation maintains a non-leveraged employee stock
ownership plan (ESOP) which covers substantially all of its
employees. The plan was frozen effective December 31, 2006
to new participants. Contributions to the plan are discretionary
and approved by the Board of Directors.
The Corporation maintains a plan for officers to provide death
benefits to each participant. Insurance policies, designed
primarily to fund death benefits, have been purchased on the
life of each participant with the Corporation as the sole owner
and beneficiary of the policies.
The retirement bonus plan is a nonqualified plan of deferred
compensation benefits for eligible employees effective
January 1, 2007. An initial amount has been credited for
each eligible employee as of January 1, 2007. Subsequent
amounts will be credited on each allocation date thereafter as
defined in the plan. The amount of the initial allocation and
the annual allocation are determined pursuant to the payment
schedule adopted at the sole and exclusive discretion of the
Board of Directors, as set forth in the plan.
In December 2006, the Board of Directors voted to curtail the
defined benefit plan effective March 1, 2007. The effect of
the curtailment was recognized in the first quarter of 2007 and
the current participants accrued benefits were frozen as
of March 1, 2007. Participation in the plan was limited to
eligible employees as of December 31, 2006.
How
Elements Fit into Overall Compensation Objectives
The elements of the Corporations compensation are
structured to reward past and current performance, continued
service and motivate its leaders to excel in the future. The
Corporations salary compensation has generally been used
to retain and attract motivated leadership. The Corporation
intends to continually ensure salaries are sufficient to attract
and retain exceptional officers. The Corporations cash
bonus incentive rewards current performance based upon personal
and corporate goals and targets. The Corporation makes stock
awards to motivate its eligible officers to enhance value for
shareholders by aligning the interests of management with those
of its shareholders.
As part of its goal of attracting and retaining quality team
members, the Corporation has developed employee benefit plans
that make it stand out from the rest of the competition.
Management feels that the combination of all of the plans listed
above makes the Corporations total compensation packages
attractive.
Compensation
and Human Resources Committee Report
The following Report of the Compensation and Human Resource
Committee does not constitute soliciting material and should not
be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other
Corporation filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the
Corporation specifically incorporates this Report by reference
therein.
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee, which includes
the independent directors of the Board, has reviewed and
discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by
Item 402(b) of SEC
Regulation S-K
with management, and based on such review and discussion, the
Compensation and Human Resource Committee recommended to the
Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis
be included in this Proxy Statement and Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
10
G. Charles Hubscher, Thomas L. Kleinhardt, Joseph
LaFramboise and Dianne C. Morey became members of the Board and
the Compensation and Human Resources Committee as of
January 1, 2010 and therefore did not participate in any of
the reviews or other procedures set forth above with respect to
the year ended December 31, 2009.
Submitted by the Compensation and Human Resource Committee of
Isabella Bank Corporations Board of Directors:
James C. Fabiano, Chairperson
Sandra L. Caul
Ted W. Kortes
David J. Maness
W. Joseph Manifold
W. Michael McGuire
William J. Strickler
Dale D. Weburg
11
Executive
Officers
Executive Officers of the Corporation are compensated in
accordance with their employment with the applicable entity. The
following table shows information on compensation earned from
the Corporation or its subsidiaries for each of the last three
fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, for the Chief
Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the
Corporations three most highly compensated executive
officers.
Summary
Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in pension
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
($)(1)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)(2)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Richard J. Barz
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
$
|
320,600
|
|
|
$
|
9,625
|
|
|
$
|
33,650
|
|
|
$
|
46,219
|
|
|
$
|
30,568
|
|
|
$
|
440,662
|
|
CEO Isabella Bank Corporation
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
300,785
|
|
|
|
9,100
|
|
|
|
32,490
|
|
|
|
72,622
|
|
|
|
22,697
|
|
|
|
437,694
|
|
President and CEO Isabella Bank
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
274,706
|
|
|
|
7,875
|
|
|
|
18,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,226
|
|
|
|
323,932
|
|
Dennis P. Angner
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
311,375
|
|
|
|
9,800
|
|
|
|
48,050
|
|
|
|
19,450
|
|
|
|
25,252
|
|
|
|
413,927
|
|
President and CFO
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
294,670
|
|
|
|
9,450
|
|
|
|
41,425
|
|
|
|
28,089
|
|
|
|
18,453
|
|
|
|
392,087
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
288,101
|
|
|
|
8,225
|
|
|
|
26,280
|
|
|
|
(7,000
|
)
|
|
|
18,715
|
|
|
|
334,321
|
|
Timothy M. Miller
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
167,200
|
|
|
|
7,319
|
|
|
|
7,400
|
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
17,323
|
|
|
|
202,007
|
|
President of the Breckenridge
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
160,145
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
6,715
|
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
|
|
14,127
|
|
|
|
187,598
|
|
Division of Isabella Bank
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
155,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,880
|
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
14,167
|
|
|
|
176,218
|
|
Steven D. Pung
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
126,200
|
|
|
|
6,003
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
28,140
|
|
|
|
18,468
|
|
|
|
179,711
|
|
Sr. Vice President and COO
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
117,100
|
|
|
|
3,785
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
45,884
|
|
|
|
13,169
|
|
|
|
181,063
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
108,100
|
|
|
|
3,625
|
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,194
|
|
|
|
127,719
|
|
Peggy L. Wheeler
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
5,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
5,649
|
|
|
|
129,997
|
|
Sr. Vice President and Controller
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
123,716
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)
|
|
|
2,023
|
|
|
|
105,023
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes compensation voluntarily deferred under the
Corporations 401(k) plan. Directors fees paid in cash are
also included, for calendar years 2009, 2008 and 2007
respectively as follows: Dennis P. Angner $11,375, $14,670, and
$23,870; Richard J. Barz $25,600, $25,785, and $20,475; and
Timothy M. Miller $19,500, $17,445, and $20,940. |
|
(2) |
|
For all noted executives all other compensation includes 401(k)
matching contributions. For Richard J. Barz, and Steven D. Pung,
this also includes club dues and auto allowance. For Dennis P.
Angner and Timothy M. Miller, this also includes auto allowance. |
12
2009
Pension Benefits
The following table indicates the present value of accumulated
benefits as of December 31, 2009 for each named executive
in the summary compensation table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years of
|
|
Present
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credited
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service as
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
|
|
of 01/01/09
|
|
Benefit
|
|
During Last
|
Name
|
|
Plan name
|
|
(#)
|
|
($)
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
Richard J. Barz
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
681,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
235,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dennis P. Angner
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
329,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
225,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
Timothy M. Miller
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven D. Pung
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
342,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
125,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peggy L. Wheeler
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
88,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
56,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit pension plan. The Corporation
sponsors the Isabella Bank Corporation Pension Plan, a frozen
defined benefit pension plan. In December 2006, the Board of
Directors voted to curtail the defined benefit plan effective
March 1, 2007. The effect of the curtailment, which was
recognized in the first quarter of 2007, froze the current
participants accrued benefits as of March 1, 2007 and
limited participation in the plan to eligible employees as of
December 31, 2006. Due to the curtailment of the plan, the
number of years of credited service was frozen. As such, the
years of credited service for the plan may differ from the
participants actual years of service with the Corporation.
Annual contributions are made to the plan as required by
accepted actuarial principles, applicable federal tax laws, and
expenses of operating and maintaining the plan. The amount of
contributions on behalf of any one participant cannot be
separately or individually computed.
Pension plan benefits are based on years of service and the
employees five highest consecutive years of compensation
out of the last ten years of service, effective through
December 31, 2006.
A participant may earn a benefit for up to 35 years of
accredited service. Earned benefits are 100 percent vested
after five years of service. Benefit payments normally start
when a participant reaches age 65. A participant with more
than five years of service may elect to take early retirement
benefits anytime after reaching age 55. Benefits payable
under early retirement are reduced actuarially for each month
prior to age 65 in which benefits begin.
Richard J. Barz, Timothy M. Miller, and Steven D. Pung are
eligible for early retirement under the Isabella Bank
Corporation Pension Plan. Under the provisions of the Plan,
participants are eligible for early retirement after reaching
the age of 55 with at least 5 years of service. The early
retirement benefit amount is the accrued benefit payable at
normal retirement date reduced by
5/9%
for each of the first 60 months and
5/18%
for each of the next 60 months that the benefit
commencement date precedes the normal retirement date.
Retirement bonus plan. The Corporation
sponsors the Isabella Bank Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan.
The Retirement Bonus Plan is a nonqualified plan of deferred
compensation benefits for eligible employees effective
January 1, 2007. This plan is intended to provide eligible
employees with additional retirement benefits. To be eligible,
the employee needed to be employed by the Corporation on
January 1, 2007, and be a participant in the
Corporations frozen Executive Supplemental Income
Agreement. Participants must also be an officer of the
Corporation with at least 10 years of service as of
December 31, 2006. The Corporation has sole and exclusive
discretion to add new participants to the plan by authorizing
such participation pursuant to action of the Corporations
Board of Directors.
An initial amount has been credited for each eligible employee
as of January 1, 2007. Subsequent amounts shall be credited
on each allocation date thereafter as defined in the plan. The
amount of the initial allocation and the
13
annual allocation shall be determined pursuant to the payment
schedule adopted by the sole and exclusive discretion of the
Board, as set forth in the Plan.
Richard J. Barz, Timothy M. Miller, and Steven D. Pung are
eligible for early retirement under the Isabella Bank
Corporation Retirement Bonus Plan. Under the provisions of the
plan, participants are eligible for early retirement upon
attaining 55 years of age. There is no difference between
the calculation of benefits payable upon early retirement and
normal retirement.
2009
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
Contributions in
|
|
|
Earnings in
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
Last FY
|
|
|
Last FY
|
|
|
Last FYE
|
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Richard J. Barz
|
|
$
|
33,650
|
|
|
$
|
2,217
|
|
|
$
|
70,120
|
|
Dennis P. Angner
|
|
|
48,050
|
|
|
|
2,971
|
|
|
|
94,933
|
|
Timothy M. Miller
|
|
|
6,715
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
19,440
|
|
Steven D. Pung
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
4,098
|
|
Peggy L. Wheeler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are
required to defer at least 25% of their earned board fees into
the Directors Plan and may defer up to 100% of their
earned fees based on their annual election. These amounts are
reflected in the 2009 nonqualified deferred compensation table
above. Under the Directors Plan, these deferred fees are
converted on a quarterly basis into shares of the
Corporations common stock based on the fair market value
of shares of the Corporations common stock at that time.
Shares credited to a participants account are eligible for
stock and cash dividends as payable.
Distribution from the Directors Plan occurs when the
participant retires from the Board, attains age 70 or upon
the occurrence of certain other events. Distributions must take
the form of shares of the Corporations common stock. Any
Corporation common stock issued under the Directors Plan
will be considered restricted stock under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended.
Potential
Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The estimated payments payable to each named executive officer
upon severance from employment, retirement, termination upon
death or disability or termination following a change in control
of the Corporation are described below. For all termination
scenarios, the amounts assume such termination took place as of
December 31, 2009.
Any
Severance of Employment
Regardless of the manner in which a named executive
officers employment terminates, he or she is entitled to
receive amounts earned during his or her term of employment.
Such amounts include:
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts accrued and vested through the Defined Benefit Pension
Plan.
|
|
|
|
Amounts accrued and vested through the Retirement Bonus Plan.
|
|
|
|
Amounts deferred in the Directors Plan.
|
|
|
|
Unused vacation pay.
|
Retirement
In the event of the retirement of an executive officer, the
officer would receive the benefits identified above. As of
December 31, 2009, the named executive officers listed had
no unused vacation days.
14
Death or
Disability
In the event of death or disability of an executive officer, in
addition to the benefits listed above, the executive officer
will also receive payments under the Corporations life
insurance plan or benefits under the Corporations
disability plan as appropriate.
In addition to potential payments upon termination available to
all employees, the estates for the executive officers listed
below would receive the following payments upon death:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While an
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
Subsequent to
|
|
Name
|
|
Employee
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Richard J. Barz
|
|
$
|
590,000
|
|
|
$
|
295,000
|
|
Dennis P. Angner
|
|
|
600,000
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
Timothy M. Miller
|
|
|
295,400
|
|
|
|
147,700
|
|
Steven D. Pung
|
|
|
252,400
|
|
|
|
126,200
|
|
Peggy L. Wheeler
|
|
|
220,000
|
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
Change in
Control
The Corporation currently does not have a change in control
agreement with any of the executive officers; provided, however,
pursuant to the Retirement Bonus Plan each participant would
become 100% vested in their benefit under the plan if, following
a change in control, they voluntarily terminate employment or
are terminated without just cause.
Director
Compensation
The following table summarizes the Compensation of each
non-employee director who served on the Board of Directors
during 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Non-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earned or
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Awards
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Name
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
Jeffrey J. Barnes
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,900
|
|
|
$
|
(3,564
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,336
|
|
Sandra L. Caul
|
|
|
10,762
|
|
|
|
30,063
|
|
|
|
(69,293
|
)
|
|
|
(28,468
|
)
|
James Fabiano
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,100
|
|
|
|
(188,982
|
)
|
|
|
(133,882
|
)
|
G. Charles Hubscher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,200
|
|
|
|
(12,609
|
)
|
|
|
11,591
|
|
Thomas L. Kleinhardt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,500
|
|
|
|
(37,979
|
)
|
|
|
(13,479
|
)
|
Ted W. Kortes
|
|
|
20,467
|
|
|
|
8,933
|
|
|
|
(1,789
|
)
|
|
|
27,611
|
|
Joseph LaFramboise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,350
|
|
|
|
(3,684
|
)
|
|
|
18,666
|
|
David J. Maness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,375
|
|
|
|
(32,785
|
)
|
|
|
11,590
|
|
W. Joseph Manifold
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,375
|
|
|
|
(21,952
|
)
|
|
|
5,423
|
|
W. Michael McGuire
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,200
|
|
|
|
(14,910
|
)
|
|
|
14,290
|
|
Dianne C. Morey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,050
|
|
|
|
(22,802
|
)
|
|
|
(3,752
|
)
|
William J. Strickler
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,767
|
|
|
|
(85,814
|
)
|
|
|
(36,047
|
)
|
Dale D. Weburg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,775
|
|
|
|
(44,427
|
)
|
|
|
(8,652
|
)
|
The Corporation paid a $6,000 retainer plus $1,000 per board
meeting to its directors during 2009 and $225 per committee
meeting attended.
Pursuant to the Directors Plan the directors of the
Corporation and its subsidiaries are required to defer at least
25% of their earned board fees. Under the Directors Plan,
deferred directors fees are converted on a quarterly basis
into shares of the Corporations common stock, based on the
fair market value of a share of the Corporations
15
common stock at that time. Shares of stock credited to a
participants account are eligible for cash and stock
dividends as payable. Participants deferred $529,740 under the
Directors Plan in 2009.
Upon a participants attainment of age 70, retirement
from the Board, or the occurrence of certain other events, the
participant is eligible to receive a lump-sum, in-kind
distribution of all of the stock that is then credited to his or
her account. The plan does not allow for cash settlement. Stock
issued under the Directors Plan is restricted stock under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The Corporation established a Trust effective as of
January 1, 2008 to fund the Directors Plan. The Trust
is an irrevocable grantor trust to which the Corporation may
contribute assets for the limited purpose of funding a
nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Although the
Corporation may not reach the assets of the Trust for any
purpose other than meeting its obligations under the
Directors Plan, the assets of the Trust remain subject to
the claims of the Corporations creditors. The Corporation
may contribute cash or common stock to the Trust from time to
time for the sole purpose of funding the Directors Plan.
The Trust will use any cash that the Corporation may contribute
to purchase shares of the Corporations common stock.
The Corporation transferred $557,798 to the Trust in 2009, which
held 30,626 shares of the Corporations common stock
for settlement as of December 31, 2009. As of
December 31, 2009, there were 186,279 shares of stock
credited to participants accounts as adjusted for the 10%
stock dividend paid on February 29, 2008, which credits are
unfunded as of such date to the extent that they are in excess
of the stock and cash that has been credited to the Trust. All
amounts are unsecured claims against the Corporations
general assets. The net cost of this benefit to the Corporation
was $139,109 in 2009.
The following table displays the number of equity shares granted
pursuant to the terms of the Directors Plan as of
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of Shares of
|
|
Name
|
|
Stock Granted
|
|
|
Dennis P Angner
|
|
|
5,009
|
|
Jeffrey J. Barnes
|
|
|
1,651
|
|
Richard J. Barz
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
Sandra L. Caul
|
|
|
15,167
|
|
James Fabiano
|
|
|
39,924
|
|
G. Charles Hubscher
|
|
|
3,766
|
|
Thomas L. Kleinhardt
|
|
|
8,746
|
|
Ted W. Kortes
|
|
|
825
|
|
Joseph LaFramboise
|
|
|
1,918
|
|
David J. Maness
|
|
|
8,767
|
|
W. Joseph Manifold
|
|
|
5,750
|
|
W. Michael McGuire
|
|
|
4,468
|
|
Dianne C. Morey
|
|
|
5,480
|
|
William J. Strickler
|
|
|
19,443
|
|
Dale D. Weburg
|
|
|
10,580
|
|
Compensation
and Human Resource Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
The Compensation and Human Resource Committee of the Corporation
is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the
Corporations Board the compensation of the President and
executive officers of the Corporation, benefit plans and the
overall percentage increase in salaries. The committee consists
of directors Fabiano, Barnes, Caul, Hubscher, Kleinhardt,
Kortes, LaFramboise, Maness, Manifold, McGuire, Morey,
Strickler, and Weburg.
16
Indebtedness
of and Transactions with Management
Certain directors and officers of the Corporation and members of
their families were loan customers of Isabella Bank, or have
been directors or officers of corporations, or partners of
partnerships which have had transactions with the Bank. In
managements opinion, all such transactions were made in
the ordinary course of business and were substantially on the
same terms, including collateral and interest rates, as those
prevailing at the same time for comparable transactions with
customers not related to the Bank. These transactions do not
involve more than normal risk of collectability or present other
unfavorable features. Total loans to these customers were
approximately $4,142,000 as of December 31, 2009. The
Corporation addresses transactions with related parties in its
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics policy.
Conflicts of interest are prohibited as a matter of Corporation
policy, except under guidelines approved by the Board of
Directors or committees of the Board.
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
As of March 31, 2010 the Corporation does not have any
person who is known to the Corporation to be the beneficial
owner of more than 5% of the common stock of the Corporation.
The following table sets forth certain information as of
March 31, 2010 as to the common stock of the Corporation
owned beneficially by each director and director nominee, by
each named executive officer, and by all directors, director
nominees and executive officers of the Corporation as a group.
The shares to be granted from stock awards are not included in
the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership
|
|
|
|
Sole Voting
|
|
|
Shared Voting
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
and Investment
|
|
|
and Investment
|
|
|
Beneficial
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
Name of Owner
|
|
Powers
|
|
|
Powers
|
|
|
Ownership
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Dennis P. Angner*
|
|
|
17,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,782
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
%
|
Jeffrey J. Barnes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,439
|
|
|
|
5,439
|
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
Richard J. Barz*
|
|
|
19,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,997
|
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
Sandra L. Caul
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,390
|
|
|
|
10,390
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
James C. Fabiano
|
|
|
261,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261,387
|
|
|
|
3.47
|
%
|
G. Charles Hubscher
|
|
|
26,892
|
|
|
|
3,283
|
|
|
|
30,175
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
Thomas L. Kleinhardt
|
|
|
10,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,065
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
Theodore W. Kortes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
Joseph LaFramboise
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
728
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
David J. Maness
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
W. Joseph Manifold
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
W. Michael McGuire
|
|
|
231,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,983
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
%
|
Dianne C. Morey
|
|
|
38,647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,647
|
|
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
William J. Strickler
|
|
|
76,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,902
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
%
|
Dale D. Weburg
|
|
|
26,711
|
|
|
|
30,396
|
|
|
|
57,107
|
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
Timothy M. Miller
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
Steven D. Pung
|
|
|
17,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,102
|
|
|
|
0.23
|
%
|
Peggy L. Wheeler
|
|
|
4,270
|
|
|
|
2,498
|
|
|
|
6,768
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Directors, nominees and Executive Officers as a Group
(18 persons)
|
|
|
736,779
|
|
|
|
64,006
|
|
|
|
800,785
|
|
|
|
10.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Trustees of the ESOP who vote ESOP stock. |
17
Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee has appointed Rehmann Robson as the
independent auditors of the Corporation for the year ending
December 31, 2010.
A representative of Rehmann Robson is expected to be present at
the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to respond to appropriate
questions from shareholders and to make any comments they
believe appropriate.
Fees for
Professional Services Provided by Rehmann Robson P.C.
The following table shows the aggregate fees billed by Rehmann
Robson for the audit and other services provided to the
Corporation for 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Audit fees
|
|
$
|
288,810
|
|
|
$
|
238,275
|
|
Audit related fees
|
|
|
22,860
|
|
|
|
52,415
|
|
Tax fees
|
|
|
39,784
|
|
|
|
65,257
|
|
Other professional services fees
|
|
|
10,675
|
|
|
|
15,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
362,129
|
|
|
$
|
371,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The audit fees were for performing the integrated audit of the
Corporations consolidated annual financial statements, and
the audit of internal control over financial reporting related
to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act
(2009 only), review of interim quarterly financial statements
included in the Corporations
Forms 10-Q,
auditing of the Corporations employee benefit plans and
services that are normally provided by Rehmann Robson in
connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
The audit related fees are typically for various discussions
related to the adoption and interpretation of new accounting
pronouncements. During 2008, there were also fees for regulatory
filings and procedures related to the acquisition of Greenville
Community Financial Corporation.
The tax fees were for the preparation of the Corporation and its
subsidiaries state and federal tax returns and for
consultation with the Corporation on various tax matters. The
tax fees for 2008 include fees related to tax consulting for an
audit conducted by the State of Michigan for Single Business Tax
(SBT), the 2007 Greenville Community Financial Corporation final
tax return preparation, and tax consulting related to the joint
venture with CT/IBT Title (refer to Note 2 of the
Corporations consolidated financial statements). During
2009 tax fees also included consulting related to the new State
of Michigan Business Tax (MBT).
The Audit Committee has considered whether the services provided
by Rehmann Robson, other than the audit fees, are compatible
with maintaining Rehmann Robsons independence and believes
that the other services provided are compatible.
Pre-Approval
Policies and Procedures
All audit and non-audit services over $5,000 to be performed by
Rehmann Robson must be approved in advance by the Audit
Committee. As permitted by the SECs rules, the Audit
Committee has authorized its Chairperson to pre-approve audit,
audit-related, tax and non-audit services, provided that such
approved service is reported to the full Audit Committee at its
next meeting.
As early as practicable in each calendar year, the independent
auditor provides to the Audit Committee a schedule of the audit
and other services that the independent auditor expects to
provide or may provide during the next twelve months. The
schedule will be specific as to the nature of the proposed
services, the proposed fees, timing, and other details that the
Audit Committee may request. The Audit Committee will by
resolution authorize or decline the proposed services. Upon
approval, this schedule will serve as the budget for fees by
specific activity or service for the next twelve months.
A schedule of additional services proposed to be provided by the
independent auditor, or proposed revisions to services already
approved, along with associated proposed fees, may be presented
to the Audit Committee for their
18
consideration and approval at any time. The schedule will be
specific as to the nature of the proposed service, the proposed
fee, and other details that the Audit Committee may request. The
Audit Committee will by resolution authorize or decline
authorization for each proposed new service.
Applicable SEC rules and regulations permit waiver of the
pre-approval requirements for services other than audit, review
or attest services if certain conditions are met. Out of the
services characterized above as audit-related, tax and
professional services, none were billed pursuant to these
provisions in 2009 and 2008 without pre-approval as required
under the Corporations policies.
Shareholder
Proposals
Any proposals which shareholders of the Corporation intend to
present at the next annual meeting of the Corporation must be
received before December 10, 2010 to be considered for
inclusion in the Corporations proxy statement and proxy
for that meeting. Proposals should be made in accordance with
Securities and Exchange Commission
Rule 14a-8.
Directors
Attendance at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders
The Corporations directors are encouraged to attend the
annual meeting of shareholders. At the 2009 annual meeting, all
directors were in attendance.
Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires the Corporations directors and certain officers
and persons who own more than ten percent of the
Corporations common stock, to file with the SEC initial
reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the
Corporations common stock. These officers, directors, and
greater than ten percent shareholders are required by SEC
regulation to furnish the Corporation with copies of these
reports.
To the Corporations knowledge, based solely on review of
the copies of such reports furnished to the Corporation, during
the year ended December 31, 2009 all Section 16(a)
filing requirements were satisfied, with respect to the
applicable officers, directors, and greater than 10 percent
beneficial owners.
Other
Matters
The cost of soliciting proxies will be borne by the Corporation.
In addition to solicitation by mail, officers and other
employees of the Corporation may solicit proxies by telephone or
in person, without compensation other than their regular
compensation.
As to
Other Business Which May Come Before the Meeting
Management of the Corporation does not intend to bring any other
business before the meeting for action. However, if any other
business should be presented for action, it is the intention of
the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy to vote in
accordance with their judgment on such business.
By order of the Board of Directors
Debra Campbell, Secretary
19
Isabella
Bank Corporation
Financial
Information Index
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Description
|
|
21
|
|
Summary of Selected Financial Data
|
22
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
24
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
29
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
68
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
|
89
|
|
Common Stock and Dividend Information
|
92
|
|
Shareholders Information
|
20
SUMMARY
OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
INCOME STATEMENT DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
58,105
|
|
|
$
|
61,385
|
|
|
$
|
53,972
|
|
|
$
|
44,709
|
|
|
$
|
36,882
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
38,266
|
|
|
|
35,779
|
|
|
|
28,013
|
|
|
|
24,977
|
|
|
|
23,909
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
6,093
|
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
7,800
|
|
|
|
4,101
|
|
|
|
7,930
|
|
|
|
7,001
|
|
|
|
6,776
|
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year assets
|
|
$
|
1,143,944
|
|
|
$
|
1,139,263
|
|
|
$
|
957,282
|
|
|
$
|
910,127
|
|
|
$
|
741,654
|
|
Daily average assets
|
|
|
1,127,634
|
|
|
|
1,113,102
|
|
|
|
925,631
|
|
|
|
800,174
|
|
|
|
700,624
|
|
Daily average deposits
|
|
|
786,714
|
|
|
|
817,041
|
|
|
|
727,762
|
|
|
|
639,046
|
|
|
|
576,091
|
|
Daily average loans/net
|
|
|
712,965
|
|
|
|
708,434
|
|
|
|
596,739
|
|
|
|
515,539
|
|
|
|
459,310
|
|
Daily average equity
|
|
|
139,810
|
|
|
|
143,626
|
|
|
|
119,246
|
|
|
|
91,964
|
|
|
|
74,682
|
|
PER SHARE DATA(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
$
|
1.12
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.01
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
1.09
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.62
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
0.55
|
|
Book value (at year end)
|
|
|
18.69
|
|
|
|
17.89
|
|
|
|
17.58
|
|
|
|
16.61
|
|
|
|
13.44
|
|
FINANCIAL RATIOS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity to assets (at year end)
|
|
|
12.31
|
%
|
|
|
11.80
|
%
|
|
|
12.86
|
%
|
|
|
12.72
|
%
|
|
|
10.91
|
%
|
Return on average equity
|
|
|
5.58
|
|
|
|
2.86
|
|
|
|
6.65
|
|
|
|
7.61
|
|
|
|
9.07
|
|
Return on average tangible equity
|
|
|
8.54
|
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
|
|
8.54
|
|
|
|
8.31
|
|
|
|
9.12
|
|
Cash dividend payout to net income
|
|
|
67.40
|
|
|
|
118.82
|
|
|
|
54.27
|
|
|
|
53.92
|
|
|
|
48.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
|
0.69
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
4th
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
4th
|
|
|
3rd
|
|
|
2nd
|
|
|
1st
|
|
|
Quarterly Operating Results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
14,411
|
|
|
$
|
14,516
|
|
|
$
|
14,505
|
|
|
$
|
14,673
|
|
|
$
|
15,099
|
|
|
$
|
15,401
|
|
|
$
|
15,359
|
|
|
$
|
15,526
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,657
|
|
|
|
4,928
|
|
|
|
5,026
|
|
|
|
5,228
|
|
|
|
5,836
|
|
|
|
6,309
|
|
|
|
6,379
|
|
|
|
7,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
9,754
|
|
|
|
9,588
|
|
|
|
9,479
|
|
|
|
9,445
|
|
|
|
9,263
|
|
|
|
9,092
|
|
|
|
8,980
|
|
|
|
8,444
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
1,542
|
|
|
|
1,535
|
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
|
5,725
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
1,593
|
|
|
|
1,207
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
2,102
|
|
|
|
2,566
|
|
|
|
3,131
|
|
|
|
2,357
|
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
2,377
|
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
2,517
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
8,176
|
|
|
|
7,995
|
|
|
|
8,468
|
|
|
|
9,044
|
|
|
|
8,377
|
|
|
|
7,430
|
|
|
|
7,341
|
|
|
|
7,556
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
2,197
|
|
|
|
2,201
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
|
|
(2,041
|
)
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
1,927
|
|
Per Share of Common Stock:(1)
|
Earnings (loss) per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.29
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.23
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.17
|
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
Cash dividends
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
Book value (at quarter end)
|
|
|
18.69
|
|
|
|
18.97
|
|
|
|
18.06
|
|
|
|
18.01
|
|
|
|
17.89
|
|
|
|
18.78
|
|
|
|
18.75
|
|
|
|
19.07
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Retroactively restated for the 10% stock dividend, paid on
February 29, 2008. |
21
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Shareholders and Board of Directors
Isabella Bank Corporation
Mt. Pleasant, Michigan
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Isabella Bank Corporation as of December 31,
2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of
changes in shareholders equity, income, comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2009. We also have audited
Isabella Bank Corporations internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on
criteria established in the Internal Control-Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Isabella
Bank Corporations management is responsible for
these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these consolidated financial statements and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Isabella Bank Corporations
internal control over financial reporting, based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement and whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the
consolidated financial statements included examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management,
and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our
audit of internal control over financial reporting included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material misstatement
exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
A corporations internal control over financial reporting
is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
consolidated financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
corporations internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the corporation; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts
and expenditures of the corporation are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the corporation; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the corporations
assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2008 the Corporation
adopted ASC Topic 715, Compensation Retirement
Benefits. Also, as described in Notes 17 and 20 to the
consolidated financial statements, effective January 1,
2007 the Corporation elected the early adoption of ASC Topic
825, Financial Instruments and ASC Topic 820, Fair
Value Measurements and Disclosures, and effective
December 31, 2006 changed its method of accounting for
defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans in
accordance with ASC Topic 715, Compensation
Retirement Benefits.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of Isabella Bank
Corporation as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and
the consolidated results of their operations and their cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
22
Also, in our opinion Isabella Bank Corporation
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009,
based on the criteria established in the Internal
Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) of the Treadway Commission.
Rehmann Robson, P.C.
Saginaw, Michigan
March 11, 2010
23
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
22,706
|
|
|
$
|
22,979
|
|
Interest bearing balances held in other financial institutions
|
|
|
7,156
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
13,563
|
|
|
|
21,775
|
|
Investment securities available for sale (amortized cost of
$258,585 in 2009 and $248,741 in 2008)
|
|
|
259,066
|
|
|
|
246,455
|
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
723,316
|
|
|
|
735,385
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
12,979
|
|
|
|
11,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loans
|
|
|
710,337
|
|
|
|
723,403
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
23,917
|
|
|
|
23,231
|
|
Corporate-owned life insurance policies
|
|
|
16,782
|
|
|
|
16,152
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
6,322
|
|
Acquisition intangibles and goodwill, net
|
|
|
47,429
|
|
|
|
47,804
|
|
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
|
|
|
17,921
|
|
|
|
17,345
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
16,954
|
|
|
|
12,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,143,944
|
|
|
$
|
1,139,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing
|
|
$
|
96,875
|
|
|
$
|
97,546
|
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
128,111
|
|
|
|
113,973
|
|
Certificates of deposit and other savings
|
|
|
389,644
|
|
|
|
422,689
|
|
Certificates of deposit over $100,000
|
|
|
188,022
|
|
|
|
141,422
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
802,652
|
|
|
|
775,630
|
|
Borrowed funds ($17,804 in 2009 and $23,130 in 2008 at fair
value)
|
|
|
193,101
|
|
|
|
222,350
|
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities
|
|
|
7,388
|
|
|
|
6,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,003,141
|
|
|
|
1,004,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock no par value 15,000,000 shares
authorized; outstanding 7,535,193 (including
30,626 shares to be issued) in 2009 and 7,518,856
(including 5,248 shares to be issued) in 2008
|
|
|
133,443
|
|
|
|
133,602
|
|
Shares to be issued for deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
4,507
|
|
|
|
4,015
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
4,972
|
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,119
|
)
|
|
|
(5,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
140,803
|
|
|
|
134,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,143,944
|
|
|
$
|
1,139,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
24
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares to be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Obligations
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except per share data)
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2007
|
|
|
6,335,861
|
|
|
$
|
111,648
|
|
|
$
|
3,137
|
|
|
$
|
4,451
|
|
|
$
|
(3,487
|
)
|
|
$
|
115,749
|
|
Cumulative effect to apply ASC Topic 825, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,930
|
|
|
|
2,324
|
|
|
|
10,254
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
63,233
|
|
|
|
2,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,657
|
|
Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
8,246
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
(123
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced
repurchase plan
|
|
|
(43,220
|
)
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
Cash dividends ($0.62 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,304
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
6,364,120
|
|
|
|
112,547
|
|
|
|
3,772
|
|
|
|
7,027
|
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
123,080
|
|
Cumulative effect to apply ASC Topic 715, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,571
|
)
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,101
|
|
|
|
(5,303
|
)
|
|
|
(1,202
|
)
|
Common stock dividends (10)%
|
|
|
687,599
|
|
|
|
30,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory capital transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank acquisition
|
|
|
514,809
|
|
|
|
22,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,652
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
73,660
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
27,004
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced
repurchase plan
|
|
|
(148,336
|
)
|
|
|
(6,440
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,440
|
)
|
Cash dividends ($0.65 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,873
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,873
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
7,518,856
|
|
|
|
133,602
|
|
|
|
4,015
|
|
|
|
2,428
|
|
|
|
(5,569
|
)
|
|
|
134,476
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,800
|
|
|
|
3,450
|
|
|
|
11,250
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
126,059
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
Common stock issued for deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
12,890
|
|
|
|
331
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
677
|
|
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
Common stock repurchased pursuant to publicly announced
repurchase plan
|
|
|
(122,612
|
)
|
|
|
(2,387
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,387
|
)
|
Cash dividends ($0.70 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,256
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
7,535,193
|
|
|
|
133,443
|
|
|
|
4,507
|
|
|
|
4,972
|
|
|
|
(2,119
|
)
|
|
|
140,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
25
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands
|
|
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees
|
|
$
|
47,706
|
|
|
$
|
49,674
|
|
|
$
|
43,808
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
4,712
|
|
|
|
5,433
|
|
|
|
3,751
|
|
Nontaxable
|
|
|
4,623
|
|
|
|
4,642
|
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
Trading account securities
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
Federal funds sold and other
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
58,105
|
|
|
|
61,385
|
|
|
|
53,972
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
13,588
|
|
|
|
19,873
|
|
|
|
22,605
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
6,251
|
|
|
|
5,733
|
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
19,839
|
|
|
|
25,606
|
|
|
|
25,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
38,266
|
|
|
|
35,779
|
|
|
|
28,013
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
6,093
|
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
32,173
|
|
|
|
26,279
|
|
|
|
26,802
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges and fees
|
|
|
6,913
|
|
|
|
6,370
|
|
|
|
5,894
|
|
Gain on sale of mortgage loans
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
Net gain on trading securities
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
460
|
|
Net gain (loss) on borrowings measured at fair value
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
Gain (loss) on sale of investment securities
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Title insurance revenue (Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
10,156
|
|
|
|
7,802
|
|
|
|
9,962
|
|
Noninterest expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits
|
|
|
18,258
|
|
|
|
16,992
|
|
|
|
15,618
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
2,170
|
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
4,146
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
FDIC insurance premiums
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,379
|
|
|
|
7,515
|
|
|
|
6,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses
|
|
|
33,683
|
|
|
|
30,704
|
|
|
|
27,229
|
|
Income before federal income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
8,646
|
|
|
|
3,377
|
|
|
|
9,535
|
|
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,800
|
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
26
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,800
|
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the year
|
|
|
3,415
|
|
|
|
(3,104
|
)
|
|
|
614
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for net realized (gains) losses
included in net income
|
|
|
(648
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
2,767
|
|
|
|
(3,128
|
)
|
|
|
633
|
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses), net of tax
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
|
|
(3,771
|
)
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction (increase) of unrecognized pension cost
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
(2,320
|
)
|
|
|
2,890
|
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on defined benefit pension plan
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
(1,532
|
)
|
|
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
3,450
|
|
|
|
(5,303
|
)
|
|
|
2,324
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
11,250
|
|
|
$
|
(1,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,800
|
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
6,093
|
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
Provision for foreclosed asset losses
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
2,349
|
|
|
|
2,171
|
|
|
|
1,960
|
|
Amortization and impairment of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
683
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
Amortization of acquisition intangibles
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
Net amortization of
available-for-sale
investment securities
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Realized (gain) loss on sale of
available-for-sale
investment securities
|
|
|
(648
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
19
|
|
Unrealized gains on trading securities
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(245
|
)
|
|
|
(460
|
)
|
Unrealized (gains) losses on borrowings measured at fair value
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Increase in cash value of corporate owned life insurance policies
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
(616
|
)
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
Share-based payment awards under equity compensation plan
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
(1,812
|
)
|
|
|
301
|
|
Net changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided
(used) cash, net in 2008 of bank acquisition and joint venture
formation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
8,292
|
|
|
|
8,513
|
|
|
|
53,235
|
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
|
(1,383
|
)
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(6,331
|
)
|
|
|
(3,565
|
)
|
|
|
(4,667
|
)
|
Escrow funds payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
(504
|
)
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
(1,450
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
18,225
|
|
|
|
20,661
|
|
|
|
60,387
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in interest-bearing balances held in other financial
institutions
|
|
|
(6,581
|
)
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
1,535
|
|
Activity in
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, calls, and sales
|
|
|
130,580
|
|
|
|
66,387
|
|
|
|
54,997
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(140,517
|
)
|
|
|
(96,168
|
)
|
|
|
(132,115
|
)
|
Loan principal collections (originations), net
|
|
|
4,437
|
|
|
|
(42,700
|
)
|
|
|
(24,455
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets
|
|
|
4,145
|
|
|
|
2,310
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
Purchases of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(3,035
|
)
|
|
|
(2,990
|
)
|
|
|
(3,722
|
)
|
Bank acquisition, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,465
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash contributed to title company joint venture formation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,542
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption (purchase) of corporate owned life insurance policies
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(1,560
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(10,960
|
)
|
|
|
(87,846
|
)
|
|
|
(103,098
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in deposits
|
|
|
27,022
|
|
|
|
(47,892
|
)
|
|
|
7,633
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in other borrowed funds
|
|
|
(28,960
|
)
|
|
|
123,016
|
|
|
|
34,365
|
|
Cash dividends paid on common stock
|
|
|
(5,256
|
)
|
|
|
(4,873
|
)
|
|
|
(4,304
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2,479
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
2,657
|
|
Common stock repurchased
|
|
|
(2,056
|
)
|
|
|
(6,440
|
)
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(7,538
|
)
|
|
|
66,038
|
|
|
|
38,470
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
(1,147
|
)
|
|
|
(4,241
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
22,979
|
|
|
|
24,126
|
|
|
|
28,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
22,706
|
|
|
$
|
22,979
|
|
|
$
|
24,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flows information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
20,030
|
|
|
$
|
25,556
|
|
|
$
|
25,872
|
|
Federal income taxes paid
|
|
|
2,237
|
|
|
|
1,155
|
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
Transfer of loans to foreclosed assets
|
|
|
2,536
|
|
|
|
3,398
|
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
28
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)
|
|
Note 1
|
Nature of
Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Basis
of Presentation and Consolidation:
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Isabella Bank Corporation (the Corporation), a
financial services holding company, and its wholly owned
subsidiaries, Isabella Bank (the Bank), Financial
Group Information Services, and IB&T Employee Leasing, LLC.
All intercompany balances and accounts have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Nature
of Operations:
Isabella Bank Corporation is a financial services holding
company offering a wide array of financial products and services
in mid-Michigan. Its banking subsidiary, Isabella Bank, offers
banking services through 24 locations,
24-hour
banking services locally and nationally through shared automatic
teller machines, 24 hour online banking, and direct
deposits to businesses, institutions, and individuals. Lending
services offered include commercial loans, agricultural loans,
residential real estate loans, consumer loans, student loans,
and credit cards. Deposit services include interest and
noninterest bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, money
market accounts, and certificates of deposit. Other related
financial products include trust and investment services, safe
deposit box rentals, and credit life insurance. Active
competition, principally from other commercial banks, savings
banks and credit unions, exists in all of the Banks
principal markets. The Corporations results of operations
can be significantly affected by changes in interest rates or
changes in the local economic environment.
On January 1, 2008, the Corporation acquired
100 percent of Greenville Community Financial Corporation
(GCFC). As a result of this acquisition, Greenville Community
Bank, a wholly-owned subsidiary of GCFC, merged with and into
the Bank (see Note 2 Business
Combinations and Joint Venture Formation).
On March 1, 2008, IBT Title and Insurance Agency, Inc. (IBT
Title), a wholly owned subsidiary of Isabella Bank Corporation,
merged its assets and liabilities with Corporate
Title Agency, LLC (Corporate Title), a
third-party title business based in Traverse City, Michigan, to
form CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC. As a result of this
transaction, the Corporation became a 50 percent joint
venture owner in CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC. The joint
venture is accounted for as an equity investment. The purpose of
this joint venture was to help IBT Title and Insurance Agency,
Inc. expand its service area and to take advantage of economies
of scale (see Note 2 Business
Combinations and Joint Venture Formation).
Financial Group Information Services provides information
technology services to Isabella Bank Corporation and its
subsidiaries.
IB&T Employee Leasing provides payroll services, benefit
administration, and other human resource services to Isabella
Bank Corporation and its subsidiaries.
Use of
Estimates:
In preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
year. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to
significant change in the near term relate to the determination
of the allowance for loan losses, the fair value of investment
securities, the valuation of real estate acquired in connection
with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans, valuation of
goodwill and intangible assets, determinations of assumptions in
accounting for the defined benefit pension plan, and other
post-retirement liabilities. In connection with the
determination of the allowance for loan losses and the carrying
value of foreclosed real estate, management obtains independent
appraisals for significant properties.
29
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value Measurements:
Fair value refers to the price that would be received to sell an
asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in an
orderly transaction between market participants in the market in
which the reporting entity transacts such sales or transfers
based on the assumptions market participants would use when
pricing an asset or liability. Assumptions are developed based
on prioritizing information within a fair value hierarchy that
gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets
and the lowest priority to unobservable data, such as the
reporting entitys own data. The Corporation may choose to
measure eligible items at fair value at specified election
dates. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair
value measurement option has been elected are reported in
earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The fair value
option (i) may be applied instrument by instrument, with
certain exceptions, allowing the Corporation to record identical
financial assets and liabilities at fair value or by another
measurement basis permitted under generally accepted accounting
principles, (ii) is irrevocable (unless a new election date
occurs) and (iii) is applied only to entire instruments and
not to portions of instruments.
For assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, it is the
Corporations policy to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when
developing fair value measurements for those financial
instruments for which there is an active market. In cases where
the market for a financial asset or liability is not active, the
Corporation includes appropriate risk adjustments that market
participants would make for nonperformance and liquidity risks
when developing fair value measurements. Fair value measurements
for assets and liabilities for which limited or no observable
market data exists are accordingly based primarily upon
estimates, are often calculated based on the economic and
competitive environment, the characteristics of the asset or
liability and other factors. Therefore, the results cannot be
determined with precision and may not be realized in an actual
sale or immediate settlement of the asset or liability.
Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any
calculation technique, and changes in the underlying assumptions
used, including discount rates and estimates of future cash
flows, could significantly affect the results of current or
future values. For a further discussion of Fair Value
Measurement, refer to Notes 20 and 21 to the consolidated
financial statements.
Significant
Group Concentrations of Credit Risk:
Most of the Corporations activities conducted are with
customers located within the central Michigan area. A
significant amount of its outstanding loans are secured by
commercial and residential real estate. Other than these types
of loans, there is no significant concentration to any other
industry or customer.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents:
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash
and cash equivalents include cash and balances due from banks,
federal funds sold, and other deposit accounts, all of which
have original maturity dates within ninety days. Generally,
federal funds sold are for a one day period. The Corporation
maintains deposit accounts in various financial institutions
which generally exceed federally insured limits or are not
insured.
Interest
Bearing Balances Held in Other Financial
Institutions:
Interest bearing balances held in other financial institutions
consist primarily of certificates of deposit that mature within
3 years and are carried at cost.
Trading
Securities:
Securities that are held principally for resale in the near term
are recorded in the trading assets account at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded in noninterest income. Interest
and dividends are included in net interest income.
30
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Available-For-Sale
Investment Securities:
Securities classified as
available-for-sale,
other than auction rate money market preferred securities and
preferred stock, are recorded at fair value, with unrealized
gains and losses, net of the effect of deferred income taxes,
excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive
income. Auction rate money market preferred securities and
preferred stock are recorded at fair value, with unrealized
gains and losses, considered not
other-than-temporary,
excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive
income. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in
interest income using the interest method over the terms of the
securities.
Investment securities are reviewed quarterly for possible
other-than-temporary
impairment (OTTI). In determining whether an other than
temporary impairment exists for debt securities, management must
assert that: (a) it does not have the intent to sell the
security; and (b) it is more likely than not it will not
have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis.
Declines in the fair value of
held-to-maturity
and
available-for-sale
debt securities below their cost that are deemed to be other
than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to
the extent the impairment is related to credit losses. The
amount of the impairment related to other factors is recognized
in other comprehensive income.
Loans:
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the
foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are reported at
their outstanding principal balance adjusted for any charge
offs, the allowance for loans losses, and any deferred fees or
costs on originated loans. Interest income on loans is accrued
over the term of the loan based on the principal amount
outstanding. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan
origination costs are capitalized and recognized as a component
of interest income over the term of the loan using the constant
yield method.
The accrual of interest on mortgage and commercial loans is
discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days or more past
due unless the credit is well-secured and in the process of
collection. Credit card loans and other personal loans are
typically charged off no later than 180 days past due. Past
due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In all
cases, loans are placed on nonaccrual or charged off at an
earlier date if collection of principal or interest is
considered doubtful.
For loans that are placed on non-accrual status or charged-off,
all interest accrued in the current calendar year, but not
collected, is reversed against interest income while interest
accrued in prior calendar years, but not collected is charged
against the allowance for loan losses. The interest on these
loans is accounted for on the cash-basis or cost-recovery
method, until qualifying for return to accrual status. Loans are
returned to accrual status when all principal and interest
amounts contractually due are brought current and future
payments are reasonably assured. For impaired loans not
classified as nonaccrual, interest income continues to be
accrued over the term of the loan based on the principal amount
outstanding.
Allowance
for Loan Losses:
The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are
estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses
charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the
allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of the
loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are
credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by
management and is based upon managements periodic review
of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical
experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse
situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay,
estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing
economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as
it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant
revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated
components. The specific component relates to loans that are
classified as either doubtful, substandard or special mention.
For such loans that are also analyzed for specific allowance
allocations, an allowance is established when the discounted
cash flows or collateral value or observable market price of the
impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The
general component
31
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
covers
non-classified
loans and is based on historical loss experience. An unallocated
component is maintained to cover uncertainties that management
believes affect its estimate of probable losses based on
qualitative factors. The unallocated component of the allowance
reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying
assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific
and general losses in the portfolio.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information
and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to
collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
Factors considered by management in determining impairment
include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of
collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.
Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment
shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management
determines the significance of payment delays and payment
shortfalls on a
case-by-case
basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstance
surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of
the delay, the reason for the delay, the borrowers prior
payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to
the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a
loan by loan basis for commercial and commercial real estate
loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows
discounted at the loans effective interest rate, the
loans obtainable market price, or the fair value of the
collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are
collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the
Corporation does not separately identify individual consumer and
residential loans for impairment disclosures.
Loans
Held for Sale:
Mortgage loans originated and intended for sale in the secondary
market are carried at the lower of cost or fair value as
determined by aggregating outstanding commitments from investors
or current investor yield requirements. Net unrealized losses,
if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges
to income.
Mortgage loans held for sale are sold with the mortgage
servicing rights retained by the Bank. The carrying value of
mortgage loans sold is reduced by the cost allocated to the
associated mortgage servicing rights. Gains or losses on sales
of mortgage loans are recognized based on the difference between
the selling price and the carrying value of the related mortgage
loans sold.
Transfers
of Financial Assets:
Transfers of financial assets, including sold mortgage loans and
mortgage loans held for sale, as described above, and
participation loans are accounted for as sales when control over
the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets
is determined to be surrendered when 1) the assets have
been legally isolated from the Bank, 2) the transferee
obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from
taking advantage of the right) to pledge or exchange the
transferred assets and 3) the Bank does not maintain
effective control over the transferred assets through an
agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.
Servicing:
Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights
are acquired through purchase or through sale of financial
assets. The Corporation has no purchased servicing rights. For
sales of mortgage loans, a portion of the cost of originating
the loan is allocated to the servicing right based on relative
fair value. Fair value is based on market prices for comparable
mortgage servicing contracts, when available, or alternatively,
is based on a valuation model that calculates the present value
of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model
incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in
estimating future net servicing income, such as the cost to
service, the discount rate, the custodial earnings rate, an
inflation rate, ancillary income, prepayment speeds and default
rates and losses.
Servicing assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the
fair value of the rights as compared to amortized cost.
Impairment is determined by stratifying rights into tranches
based on predominant risk characteristics, such as interest
rate, loan type, and investor type. Impairment is recognized
through a valuation allowance for an individual
32
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
tranche, to the extent that fair value is less than the
capitalized amount for the tranche. If the Corporation later
determines that all or a portion of the impairment no longer
exists for a particular tranche, a reduction of the allowance
may be recorded as an increase to income. Capitalized servicing
rights are reported in other assets and are amortized into
non-interest income in proportion to, and over the period of,
the estimated future net servicing income of the underlying
financial assets.
Servicing fee income is recorded for fees earned for servicing
loans for others. The fees are based on a contractual percentage
of the outstanding principal; or a fixed amount per loan and are
recorded as income when earned. The amortization of mortgage
servicing rights is netted against loan servicing fee income, a
component of noninterest income.
Loans
Acquired Through Transfer:
Authoritative accounting guidance related to acquired loans
requires that a valuation allowance for loans acquired in a
transfer, including in a business combination, reflect only
losses incurred after acquisition, and should not be recorded at
acquisition. This standard applies to any loan acquired in a
transfer that shows evidence of credit quality deterioration
since it was originated. Included in the fair value adjustments
of nonintangible net assets acquired from Greenville Community
Financial Corporation (GCFC), was a reduction in the allowance
for loan losses of $437. The $437 represented the identified
impairments in GCFCs loan portfolio as of
December 31, 2007 (see Note 2).
Foreclosed
Assets:
Assets acquired through, or in lieu, of loan foreclosure are
initially recorded at the lower of the Banks carrying
amount or fair value less estimated selling costs at the date of
transfer, establishing a new cost basis. Any write-downs based
on the assets fair value at the date of acquisition are
charged to the allowance for loan losses. After foreclosure,
property held for sale is carried at the lower of the new cost
basis or fair value less costs to sell. Impairment losses on
property to be held and used are measured at the amount by which
the carrying amount of property exceeds its fair value. Costs
relating to holding these assets are expensed as incurred.
Valuations are periodically performed by management, and any
subsequent write-downs are recorded as a charge to operations,
if necessary, to reduce the carrying value of a property to the
lower of the Banks carrying amount or fair value less
costs to sell. Foreclosed assets of $1,157 and $2,923 are
included in Other Assets on the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Off-Balance-Sheet
Credit Related Financial Instruments:
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation has entered
into commitments to extend credit, including commitments under
credit card arrangements, home equity lines of credit,
commercial letters of credit, and standby letters of credit.
Such financial instruments are recorded only when funded.
Premises
and Equipment:
Land is carried at cost. Buildings and equipment are carried at
cost, less accumulated depreciation which is computed
principally by the straight-line method based upon the estimated
useful lives of the related assets, which range from 5 to
30 years. Major improvements are capitalized and
appropriately amortized based upon the useful lives of the
related assets or the expected terms of the leases, if shorter,
using the straight-line method. Maintenance, repairs and minor
alterations are charged to current operations as expenditures
occur. Management annually reviews these assets to determine
whether carrying values have been impaired.
Fdic
Insurance Premium:
In 2009, the Bank was required to prepay quarterly FDIC
risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and each
of the quarters in the years ending December 31, 2010, 2011
and 2012. The assessments for 2010 through 2012, which had a
carrying balance of $4,737 as of December 31, 2009, have
been recorded as a prepaid asset in the
33
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
accompanying consolidated balance sheet in Other Assets, and
will be expensed on a ratable basis quarterly through
December 31, 2012.
Equity
Securities Without Readily Determinable Fair
Values:
Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair
values are restricted securities, which are carried at cost, and
investments in nonconsolidated entities accounted for under the
equity method of accounting.
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
consist of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
|
$
|
7,960
|
|
|
$
|
7,460
|
|
Investment in CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC
|
|
|
6,782
|
|
|
|
6,905
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank Stock
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
Investment in Valley Financial Corporation
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17,921
|
|
|
$
|
17,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
Compensation Plans:
The Corporations Deferred Compensation Plan has
216,905 shares to be issued to participants, for which an
associated grantor trust (Rabbi Trust) held 30,626 shares.
Compensation costs relating to share-based payment transactions
are recognized in the consolidated financial statements and the
cost is measured based on the fair value of the equity or
liability instruments issued. The Corporation has no other share
based compensation plans.
Corporate
Owned Life Insurance:
The Corporation has purchased life insurance policies on key
members of management. In the event of death of one of these
individuals, the Corporation would receive a specified cash
payment equal to the face value of the policy. Such policies are
recorded at their cash surrender value, or the amount that can
be realized on the balance sheet dates. Increases in cash
surrender value in excess of single premiums paid are reported
as Other Noninterest Income.
As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the present value of the
post retirement benefits promised by the Corporation to the
covered employees was estimated to be $2,505 and $2,460,
respectively. The periodic policy maintenance costs were $45 and
$85 for 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Acquisition
Intangibles and Goodwill:
Isabella Bank previously acquired branch facilities and related
deposits in business combinations accounted for as a purchase.
On January 1, 2008, the Corporation acquired Greenville
Community Financial Corporation (GCFC) resulting in
identified core deposit intangibles and goodwill (see
Note 2). The acquisition of the branches included amounts
related to the valuation of customer deposit relationships (core
deposit intangibles). Such core deposit intangibles are included
in Other Assets and are being amortized on the straight line
basis over nine years. Core deposit intangibles arising from the
acquisition of GCFC are being amortized on a 15 year
sum-of-years
digits amortization schedule. Goodwill, which represents the
excess of purchase price over identifiable assets, is included
in Other Assets and is not amortized but is evaluated for
impairment at least annually, or on an interim basis if an event
occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not
reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below the carrying
value.
Federal
Income Taxes:
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using
the liability (or balance sheet) method. Under this method, the
net deferred tax assets or liability is determined based on the
tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and
tax bases on the various balance sheet assets and liabilities
and gives current
34
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recognition to changes in tax rates and laws. Valuations
allowances are established, where necessary, to reduce deferred
tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
Advertising
Costs:
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred (see Note 11).
Computation
of Earnings Per Share:
Basic earnings per share represents income available to common
stockholders divided by the weighted average number
of common shares issued during the period, which includes shares
held in the Rabbi Trust controlled by the Corporation (see
Note 17). Diluted earnings per share reflects additional
common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive
potential common shares had been issued, as well as any
adjustments to income that would result from the assumed
issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the
Corporation relate solely to outstanding shares in the
Corporations Deferred Director fee plan (see Note 17).
Earnings per common share have been computed based on the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Average number of common shares outstanding for basic
calculation(1)
|
|
|
7,517,276
|
|
|
|
7,492,677
|
|
|
|
6,973,508
|
|
Average potential effect of shares in the Deferred Director fee
plan(1)(2)
|
|
|
181,319
|
|
|
|
184,473
|
|
|
|
197,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate
diluted earnings per common share
|
|
|
7,698,595
|
|
|
|
7,677,150
|
|
|
|
7,170,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,800
|
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.04
|
|
|
$
|
0.55
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
1.01
|
|
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
|
$
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid February 29,
2008 |
|
(2) |
|
Exclusive of shares held in the Rabbi Trust |
Reclassifications:
Certain amounts reported in the 2008 and 2007 consolidated
financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the
2009 presentation.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements:
On July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) completed the FASB Accounting Standards Codification,
The FASB Codification(ASC), as the single source of
authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP), superseding all then existing authoritative accounting
and reporting standards, except for rules and interpretive
releases for the SEC under authority of federal securities laws,
which are sources of authoritative GAAP for Securities and
Exchange Commission registrants. ASC Topic 105 reorganized the
authoritative literature comprising GAAP into a topical format.
ASC is now the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the
FASB to be applied by all nongovernmental entities. ASC was
effective for the Corporations interim period ending
September 30, 2009. The Codification did not change GAAP
and, therefore, did not impact the Corporations financial
statements. However, since it completely supersedes existing
standards, it affected the way authoritative accounting
pronouncements are referenced in the financial statements and
other disclosure documents. Specifically, all references in this
report to new or pending financial reporting standards, where
deemed necessary, use the ASC Topic number.
35
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
FASB ASC Topic 320, Investments Debt and
Equity Securities. New authoritative accounting
guidance under ASC Topic 320, Investments Debt
and Equity Securities, (i) changes existing guidance
for determining whether an impairment is other than temporary to
debt securities and (ii) replaces the existing requirement
that the entitys management assert it has both the intent
and ability to hold an impaired security until recovery with a
requirement that management assert: (a) it does not have
the intent to sell the security; and (b) it is more likely
than not it will not have to sell the security before recovery
of its cost basis. Under ASC Topic 320, declines in the fair
value of
held-to-maturity
and
available-for-sale
securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than
temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the
extent the impairment is related to credit risk. The amount of
the impairment related to other risk factors (interest rate and
market) is recognized as a component of other comprehensive
income. The Corporation adopted the provisions of the new
authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 320 during the
first quarter of 2009. Adoption of the new guidance did not
significantly impact the Corporations consolidated
financial statements.
FASB ASC Topic 715, Compensation Retirement
Benefits. In December 2008, new authoritative guidance
under ASC Topic 715, Compensation Retirement
Benefits was issued. ASC Topic 715 provides guidance
related to an employers disclosures about plan assets of
defined benefit pension or other post retirement benefit plans.
Under ASC Topic 715, disclosures should provide users of
financial statements with an understanding of how investment
allocation decisions are made, the factors that are pertinent to
an understanding of investment policies and strategies, the
major categories of plan assets, the inputs and valuation
techniques used to measure the fair value of plan assets, the
effect of fair value measurements using significant unobservable
inputs on changes in plan assets for the period and significant
concentrations of risk within plan assets. The disclosures
required by ASC Topic 715 are included in the Corporations
consolidated 2009 financial statements (see Note 17).
FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. On
January 1, 2009, new authoritative accounting guidance
under ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, became
applicable to the Corporations accounting for business
combinations closing on or after January 1, 2009. ASC Topic
805 applies to all transactions and other events in which one
entity obtains control over one or more other businesses. ASC
Topic 805 requires an acquirer, upon initially obtaining control
of another entity, to recognize the assets, liabilities and any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair value as of the
acquisition date. Contingent consideration is required to be
recognized and measured at fair value on the date of acquisition
rather than at a later date when the amount of that
consideration may be determinable beyond a reasonable doubt.
This fair value approach replaces the cost-allocation process
required under previous accounting guidance whereby the cost of
an acquisition was allocated to the individual assets acquired
and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value. ASC
Topic 805 requires acquirers to expense acquisition-related
costs as incurred rather than allocating such costs to the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as was the case under
prior accounting guidance. Assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in a business combination that arise from contingencies
are to be recognized at fair value if fair value can be
reasonably estimated. If fair value of such an asset or
liability cannot be reasonably estimated, the asset or liability
would generally be recognized in accordance with ASC Topic 450,
Contingencies. Under ASC Topic 805, the requirements
of ASC Topic 420, Exit or Disposal Cost Obligations,
would have to be met in order to accrue for a restructuring plan
in purchase accounting. Pre-acquisition contingencies are to be
recognized at fair value, unless it is a non-contractual
contingency that is not likely to materialize, in which case,
nothing should be recognized in purchase accounting and,
instead, that contingency would be subject to the probable and
estimable recognition criteria of ASC Topic 450,
Contingencies. Such guidance could have a material
effect on the Corporations accounting for any future
business combination.
FASB ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. New
authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 810,
Consolidation, amended prior guidance to establish
accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling
interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. Under ASC Topic 810, a non controlling interest in a
subsidiary, which is sometimes referred to as minority interest,
is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should
be reported as a component of equity in the consolidated
financial statements. Among other requirements, ASC Topic 810
requires consolidated net income to be reported at amounts that
include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the
non-controlling interest. It also requires disclosure, on the
face of the
36
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
consolidated income statement, of the amounts of consolidated
net income attributable to the parent and to the non controlling
interest. The new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC
Topic 810 became effective for the Corporation on
January 1, 2009 and did not impact the Corporations
consolidated financial statements.
Further new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic
810 amends prior guidance to change how a company determines
when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not
controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be
consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required
to consolidate an entity is based on, among other factors, an
entitys purpose and design and a companys ability to
direct the activities of the entity that most significantly
impact the entitys economic performance. The new
authoritative accounting guidance requires additional
disclosures about the reporting entitys involvement with
variable-interest entities and any significant changes in risk
exposure due to that involvement as well as its affect on the
entitys financial statements. The new authoritative
accounting guidance under ASC Topic 810 will be effective
January 1, 2010 and is not expected to have a significant
impact on the Corporations financial statements.
FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. New authoritative accounting guidance
under ASC Topic 820,Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures, affirms that the objective of fair value when
the market for an asset is not active is the price that would be
received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction, and
clarifies and includes additional factors for determining
whether there has been a significant decrease in market activity
for an asset when the market for that asset is not active. ASC
Topic 820 requires an entity to base its conclusion about
whether a transaction was not orderly on the weight of the
evidence. The new accounting guidance amended prior guidance to
expand certain disclosure requirements. The Corporation adopted
the new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 820
during the first quarter of 2009. Adoption of the new guidance
did not significantly impact the Corporations financial
statements.
Further new authoritative accounting guidance (Accounting
Standards Update
No. 2009-5)
under ASC Topic 820 provides guidance for measuring the fair
value of a liability in circumstances in which a quoted price in
an active market for the identical liability is not available.
In such instances, a reporting entity is required to measure
fair value utilizing a valuation technique that uses
(i) the quoted price of the identical liability when traded
as an asset, (ii) quoted prices for similar liabilities or
similar liabilities when traded as assets, or (iii) another
valuation technique that is consistent with the existing
principles of ASC Topic 820, such as an income approach or
market approach. The new authoritative accounting guidance also
clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a
reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or
adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a
restriction that prevents the transfer of the liability. The
forgoing new authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic
820 was effective for the Corporations financial
statements beginning October 1, 2009 and did not have a
significant impact on the Corporations consolidated
financial statements (see
Note 20-
Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value).
FASB ASC Topic 825 Financial Instruments. New
authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic
825,Financial Instruments, requires an entity to
provide disclosures about the fair value of financial
instruments in interim financial information and amends prior
guidance to require those disclosures in summarized financial
information at interim reporting periods. The Corporation
implemented the required disclosures in its 2009 quarterly
filings.
FASB ASC Topic 855, Subsequent Events. In
March 2010, ASC Topic 855, Subsequent Events was
amended by Accounting Standards Update (ASU)
No. 2010-09
, Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure
Requirements, to exclude entities that file or furnishes
financial statements with the SEC from disclosing the date
through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The new
authoritative guidance is effective immediately. Although the
Corporation must continue to evaluate subsequent events through
the date on which the consolidated financial statements are
issued the Corporation is no longer required to disclose the
date on which subsequent events have been evaluated.
FASB ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing.
New authoritative accounting guidance under ASC Topic 860,
Transfers and Servicing, amends prior accounting
guidance to enhance reporting about transfers of financial
assets, including securitizations, and where companies have
continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred
37
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
financial assets. The new authoritative accounting guidance
eliminates the concept of a qualifying special-purpose
entity and changes the requirements for derecognizing
financial assets. The new authoritative accounting guidance also
requires additional disclosures about all continuing
involvements with transferred financial assets including
information about gains and losses resulting from transfers
during the period. The new authoritative accounting guidance
under ASC Topic 860 will be effective January 1, 2010 and
management is currently evaluating the effects of the
implementation of this standard.
|
|
Note 2
|
Business
Combinations and Joint Venture Formation
|
Greenville
Community Financial Corporation
Effective on the opening of business on January 1, 2008,
Isabella Bank Corporation acquired 100 percent of
Greenville Community Financial Corporation (GCFC). As a result
of this acquisition, Greenville Community Bank, a wholly owned
subsidiary of GCFC, merged with and into the Bank. Under the
terms of the merger agreement, each share of GCFC common stock
was automatically converted into the right to receive
0.6659 shares of Isabella Bank Corporation common stock and
$14.70 per share in cash. Exclusive of the effects of the 10%
stock dividend paid February 29, 2008, the Corporation
issued 514,809 shares of Isabella Bank Corporation common
stock valued at $22,652 and paid a total of $11,365 in cash to
GCFC shareholders. The total consideration exchanged including
the value of the common stock issued, cash paid to shareholders,
plus $564 of cash paid for transaction costs resulted in a total
purchase price of $34,581. The purchase price was determined
using the latest Isabella Bank Corporation stock transaction
price known to management as of November 27, 2007, the date
of the merger agreement. The acquisition of Greenville has
increased the overall market share for Isabella Bank Corporation
in furtherance of the Banks strategic plan.
The following table summarizes the total purchase price of the
transaction as well as adjustments to allocate the purchase
price based on the preliminary estimates of fair values of the
assets and liabilities of GCFC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenville
|
|
|
Nonintangible
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
|
of Net Assets
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
Acquired
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,339
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,339
|
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
4,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,979
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
7,007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,007
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
88,613
|
|
|
|
(398
|
)
|
|
|
88,215
|
|
Bank premises and equipment
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
2,248
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
107,987
|
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
107,783
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
90,151
|
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
90,049
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
5,625
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
5,806
|
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
95,922
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
96,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
12,065
|
|
|
$
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
11,782
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposit intangible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value adjustments of tangible net assets acquired are
being amortized over two years using the straight line
amortization method. The core deposit intangible is being
amortized using a 15 year
sum-of-the-years
digits amortization schedule. Goodwill, which is not amortized,
is tested for impairment at least annually. As the acquisition
was considered a stock transaction, goodwill is not deductible
for federal income tax purposes.
The 2009 and 2008 consolidated statements of income include the
operating results of GCFC for the entire year.
The unaudited pro forma information presented in the following
table has been prepared based on Isabella Bank
Corporations historical results combined with GCFC. The
information has been combined to present the results of
operations as if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning
of the earliest period presented. The pro forma results are not
necessarily indicative of the results which would have actually
been attained if the acquisition had been consummated in the
past or what may be attained in the future:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31 2007
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
31,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
8,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share*
|
|
$
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
As adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid February 29,
2008. |
Title Company
Joint Venture Formation
On March 1, 2008, IBT Title and Insurance Agency, Inc. (IBT
Title), a wholly owned subsidiary of Isabella Bank Corporation,
merged its assets and liabilities with Corporate
Title Agency, LLC (Corporate Title), a
third-party title business based in Traverse City, Michigan, to
form CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC. As a result of this
transaction, the Corporation became a 50 percent joint
venture owner in CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC. The purpose of
this joint venture is to help IBT Title and Insurance Agency,
Inc. expand its service area and to take advantage of economies
of scale. As the Corporation is a 50 percent owner of this
new entity, revenues and expenses will now be recorded under the
equity method and, as such, the Corporations share of the
net income or loss from the joint venture included in other
noninterest income. As of December 31, 2008, the
Corporation had a recorded investment of $6,905 in the new
entity. The following table summarizes the condensed balance
sheet of IBT Title as of March 1,
39
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2008. These amounts were excluded from the balance sheet detail
of the Corporation and are now included in investment in equity
securities without readily determinable fair values.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IBT Title
|
|
|
|
March 1,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
4,542
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
2,352
|
|
Other assets, including intangibles of $1,590
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
9,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Escrow funds
|
|
$
|
1,866
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
2,060
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
7,173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities & equity
|
|
$
|
9,233
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations share of the joint ventures
operating results for the year ended December 31, 2009 and
the ten-months ended December 31, 2008 was not significant.
|
|
Note 3
|
Trading
Securities
|
Trading securities, at fair value, consist of the following
investments at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,014
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
9,962
|
|
|
|
11,556
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
6,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13,563
|
|
|
$
|
21,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4
|
Investment
Securities
|
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities
available for sale, with gross unrealized gains and losses, are
as follows as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
$
|
19,386
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
19,471
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
150,688
|
|
|
|
3,632
|
|
|
|
2,590
|
|
|
|
151,730
|
|
Auction rate money market preferred
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
Preferred stocks
|
|
|
7,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
7,054
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
67,215
|
|
|
|
638
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
67,734
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
10,296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
10,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
258,585
|
|
|
$
|
4,397
|
|
|
$
|
3,916
|
|
|
$
|
259,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agencies
|
|
$
|
3,999
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,083
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
61,919
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
62,988
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
148,186
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
149,323
|
|
Corporate market preferred
|
|
|
7,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,145
|
|
Auction rate money
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,021
|
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
16,492
|
|
|
|
445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
248,741
|
|
|
$
|
3,407
|
|
|
$
|
5,693
|
|
|
$
|
246,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation had pledged investments in the following amounts
as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Pledged for public deposits and for other purposes necessary or
required by law
|
|
$
|
61,666
|
|
|
$
|
18,000
|
|
Pledged to secure repurchase agreements
|
|
|
74,605
|
|
|
|
64,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
136,271
|
|
|
$
|
82,876
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and fair value of
available-for-sale
securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2009 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
$
|
7,852
|
|
|
$
|
7,922
|
|
Over 1 year through 5 years
|
|
|
61,992
|
|
|
|
63,414
|
|
After 5 years through 10 years
|
|
|
65,292
|
|
|
|
66,783
|
|
Over 10 years
|
|
|
45,938
|
|
|
|
43,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181,074
|
|
|
|
181,228
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
67,215
|
|
|
|
67,734
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
10,296
|
|
|
|
10,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
258,585
|
|
|
$
|
259,066
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities
because issuers have the right to call or prepay obligations.
Because of their variable payments, mortgage-backed securities
and collateralized mortgage obligations are not reported by a
specific maturity group.
41
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the activity related to the sale of
available-for-sale
debt securities is as follows during the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales of securities
|
|
$
|
32,204
|
|
|
$
|
6,096
|
|
|
$
|
5,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
$
|
648
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gains (losses)
|
|
$
|
648
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicable income tax (expense) benefit
|
|
$
|
(220
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information pertaining to
available-for-sale
securities with gross unrealized losses at December 31
aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in continuous loss position,
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Less Than Twelve Months
|
|
|
Over Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
7,960
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
2,536
|
|
|
|
11,459
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
2,267
|
|
|
|
2,590
|
|
Auction rate money market preferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
Preferred stocks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
746
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
25,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
10,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,889
|
|
|
$
|
54,918
|
|
|
$
|
1,027
|
|
|
$
|
8,294
|
|
|
$
|
3,916
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less Than Twelve Months
|
|
|
Over Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
999
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
620
|
|
|
|
27,015
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
2,705
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
Auction rate money market preferred
|
|
|
5,021
|
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,642
|
|
|
$
|
33,993
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
2,705
|
|
|
$
|
5,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation has invested $11,000 in auction rate money
market preferred investment security instruments, which are
classified as
available-for-sale
securities and reflected at estimated fair value. Due to market
concentrations and general uncertainty in credit markets, these
investments have become illiquid. As a result of the illiquidity
of the markets for these securities, $7,800 converted to
preferred stock with debt like characteristics in 2009.
Due to the illiquidity of these securities, the fair values were
estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis or other
type of valuation adjustment methodology as of December 31,
2009 and 2008. These analyses consider, among other factors, the
collateral underlying the security investments, the
creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected
future cash flows, estimates of the next time the security is
expected to have a successful auction, and the fact that the
management asserts that it does not intend to sell the security
in an unrealized loss position and it is more likely than not it
will not have to sell the securities before recovery of its cost
basis. These securities were also compared, when possible, to
other securities with similar characteristics.
42
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Due to the lack of marketability of certain investments,
management conducted an analysis to determine whether all
securities currently in an unrealized loss position, including
auction rate money market preferred securities and preferred
stocks, should be considered
other-than-temporarily-impaired
(OTTI). Such analyses included, among other factors, the
following criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
Has the value of the investment declined more than 20% based on
a risk and maturity adjusted discount rate?
|
|
|
|
Is the investment credit rating below investment grade?
|
|
|
|
Is it probable that the issuer will be unable to pay the amount
when due?
|
|
|
|
Does management assert its ability and intent to hold the
security until maturity?
|
|
|
|
Has the duration of the investment been extended by more than
7 years?
|
Based on the Corporations analysis using the above
criteria, and the fact that management has asserted that it does
not have the intent to sell these securities in an unrealized
loss position and that it is more likely than not the
Corporation will not have sell the securities before recovery of
its loss basis, management does not believe that the values of
these or any other securities are
other-than-temporarily
impaired as of December 31, 2009 or 2008.
The Bank grants commercial, agricultural, consumer and
residential loans to customers situated primarily in Isabella,
Gratiot, Mecosta, Southwestern Midland, Western Saginaw,
Montcalm and Southern Clare counties in Michigan. The ability of
the borrowers to honor their repayment obligations is often
dependent upon the real estate, agricultural, and general
economic conditions of this region. Substantially all of the
consumer and residential mortgage loans are secured by various
items of property, while commercial loans are secured primarily
by real estate, business assets and personal guarantees; a
portion of loans are unsecured.
A summary of the major classifications of loans is as follows as
of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
|
$
|
207,560
|
|
|
$
|
231,705
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
224,176
|
|
|
|
200,398
|
|
Agricultural
|
|
|
38,236
|
|
|
|
31,656
|
|
Construction and land development
|
|
|
13,268
|
|
|
|
16,571
|
|
Second mortgages
|
|
|
34,255
|
|
|
|
46,103
|
|
Equity lines of credit
|
|
|
30,755
|
|
|
|
25,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage loans
|
|
|
548,250
|
|
|
|
551,451
|
|
Commercial and agricultural loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
116,098
|
|
|
|
124,408
|
|
Agricultural production
|
|
|
26,609
|
|
|
|
26,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and agricultural loans
|
|
|
142,707
|
|
|
|
150,755
|
|
Consumer installment loans
|
|
|
32,359
|
|
|
|
33,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
723,316
|
|
|
|
735,385
|
|
Less: allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
12,979
|
|
|
|
11,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
710,337
|
|
|
$
|
723,403
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
11,982
|
|
|
$
|
7,301
|
|
|
$
|
7,605
|
|
Allowance of acquired bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(6,642
|
)
|
|
|
(6,325
|
)
|
|
|
(2,146
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
Provision charged to income
|
|
|
6,093
|
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
12,979
|
|
|
$
|
11,982
|
|
|
$
|
7,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of information pertaining to impaired
loans at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Impaired loans with a valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
3,757
|
|
|
$
|
7,378
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Impaired loans without a valuation allowance
|
|
|
8,897
|
|
|
|
6,465
|
|
|
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
12,654
|
|
|
$
|
13,843
|
|
|
$
|
4,841
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance related to impaired loans
|
|
$
|
612
|
|
|
$
|
1,413
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Total restructured loans
|
|
$
|
4,977
|
|
|
$
|
4,550
|
|
|
$
|
685
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
$
|
8,522
|
|
|
$
|
11,175
|
|
|
$
|
4,156
|
|
Average investment in impaired loans
|
|
$
|
13,249
|
|
|
$
|
9,342
|
|
|
$
|
4,491
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection
with impaired loans.
The following is a summary of loans accruing interest past due
90 days or more at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
|
|
$
|
768
|
|
|
$
|
1,251
|
|
|
$
|
1,185
|
|
Residential mortgage loans serviced for others are not included
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid
principal balance of mortgages serviced for others was $307,656,
$254,495, and $255,839 at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
respectively. The fair value of servicing rights was determined
using discount rates ranging from 7.50% to 9.00%, prepayment
speeds ranging from 6.00% to 45.72%, depending upon the
stratification of the specific right and weighted average
default rates ranging from 0.0% to 25.7%. Servicing loans for
others generally consists of collecting mortgage payments,
maintaining escrow accounts, disbursing payments to investors
and taxing authorities, and foreclosure processing.
The following table summarizes the carrying value and changes
therein of mortgage servicing rights included in Other Assets as
of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
2,105
|
|
|
$
|
2,198
|
|
|
$
|
2,155
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights capitalized
|
|
|
4,370
|
|
|
|
3,079
|
|
|
|
2,869
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(3,706
|
)
|
|
|
(3,016
|
)
|
|
|
(2,785
|
)
|
Impairment valuation allowance
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
2,620
|
|
|
$
|
2,105
|
|
|
$
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment losses (reversed) recognized
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 7
|
Premises
and Equipment
|
A summary of premises and equipment at December 31 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
4,614
|
|
|
$
|
4,665
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
20,478
|
|
|
|
18,653
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
24,284
|
|
|
|
23,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
49,376
|
|
|
|
46,361
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
25,459
|
|
|
|
23,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
23,917
|
|
|
$
|
23,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense amounted to $2,349, $2,171 and $1,960 in
2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.
|
|
Note 8
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
|
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance at January 1
|
|
$
|
45,618
|
|
|
$
|
25,889
|
|
Goodwill identified in GCFC acquisition (See Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,319
|
|
Reclassification for goodwill contributed to CT/IBT Title
Agency, LLC joint venture (See Note 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,590
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31
|
|
$
|
45,618
|
|
|
$
|
45,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable intangible assets at year end were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Core deposit premium resulting from the Greenville acquisition
in 2008
|
|
$
|
1,480
|
|
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
1,122
|
|
Core deposit premium resulting from previous acquisitions
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
3,204
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,373
|
|
|
$
|
3,562
|
|
|
$
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Core deposit premium resulting from the Greenville acquisition
in 2008
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
1,295
|
|
Core deposit premium resulting from previous acquisitions
|
|
|
3,893
|
|
|
|
3,002
|
|
|
|
891
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,373
|
|
|
$
|
3,187
|
|
|
$
|
2,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense associated with identifiable intangible
assets was $375, $415, and $278 in 2009, 2008, and 2007,
respectively.
45
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Estimated amortization expense associated with identifiable
intangibles for each of the next five years and thereafter is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
338
|
|
2011
|
|
|
299
|
|
2012
|
|
|
261
|
|
2013
|
|
|
221
|
|
2014
|
|
|
183
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled maturities of time deposits for the next five years,
and thereafter, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
269,257
|
|
2011
|
|
|
47,053
|
|
2012
|
|
|
53,054
|
|
2013
|
|
|
32,959
|
|
2014
|
|
|
16,273
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
420,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense on time deposits greater than $100 was $5,246
in 2009, $6,525 in 2008, and $6,649 in 2007.
Borrowed funds consist of the following obligations at December
31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank advances
|
|
$
|
127,804
|
|
|
$
|
150,220
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase without stated
maturity dates
|
|
|
37,797
|
|
|
|
42,430
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with stated
maturity dates
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank discount window advance
|
|
|
7,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
193,101
|
|
|
$
|
222,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings are collateralized by a
blanket lien on all qualified 1-to-4 family whole mortgage loans
and U.S. government and federal agency securities. Advances
are also secured by FHLB stock owned by the Bank.
46
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The maturity and weighted average interest rates of FHLB
advances are as follows as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Fixed rate advances due 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,215
|
|
|
|
1.89
|
%
|
Fixed rate advances due 2010
|
|
|
28,320
|
|
|
|
4.52
|
%
|
|
|
29,516
|
|
|
|
4.58
|
%
|
One year putable advances due 2010
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
%
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
%
|
Fixed rate advances due 2011
|
|
|
10,206
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
%
|
|
|
10,225
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
%
|
One year putable advances due 2011
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
Fixed rate advances due 2012
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
%
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
4.19
|
%
|
One year putable advances due 2012
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
4.10
|
%
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
Fixed rate advances due 2013
|
|
|
5,278
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year putable advances due 2013
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
3.15
|
%
|
|
|
10,264
|
|
|
|
3.66
|
%
|
Fixed rate advances due 2014
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
%
|
Fixed rate advances due 2015
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
127,804
|
|
|
|
4.11
|
%
|
|
$
|
150,220
|
|
|
|
3.68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are classified as
secured borrowings. Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase without stated maturity dates generally mature within
one to four days from the transaction date. Securities sold
under agreements to repurchase are reflected at the amount of
cash received in connection with the transaction. The
U.S. government agency securities underlying the agreements
have a carrying value and a fair value of $74,605 and $64,876 at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Such securities
remain under the control of the Corporation. The Corporation may
be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair
value of underlying securities.
The maturity and weighted average interest rates of securities
sold under agreements to repurchase with stated maturity dates
are as follows at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Repurchase agreements due 2010
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
Repurchase agreements due 2013
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
Repurchase agreements due 2014
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
3.72
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
3.72
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 11
|
Other
Noninterest Expenses
|
A summary of expenses included in Other Noninterest Expenses are
as follows for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Director fees
|
|
$
|
923
|
|
|
$
|
867
|
|
|
$
|
796
|
|
Marketing and advertising
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
Foreclosed asset and collection
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
Other, not individually significant
|
|
|
4,792
|
|
|
|
5,106
|
|
|
|
4,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,379
|
|
|
$
|
7,515
|
|
|
$
|
6,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual items disclosed represent at least 1% of gross income
in any one of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and
2007.
47
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
Note 12
|
Federal
Income Taxes
|
Components of the consolidated provision (benefit) for income
taxes are as follows for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Currently payable
|
|
$
|
1,487
|
|
|
$
|
1,088
|
|
|
$
|
1,304
|
|
Deferred (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
(1,812
|
)
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
846
|
|
|
$
|
(724
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation of the provision (benefit) for federal income
taxes and the amount computed at the federal statutory tax rate
of 34% of income before federal income tax (benefit) expense is
as follows for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Income taxes at 34% statutory rate
|
|
$
|
2,940
|
|
|
$
|
1,148
|
|
|
$
|
3,242
|
|
Effect of nontaxable income
|
|
|
(2,265
|
)
|
|
|
(2,088
|
)
|
|
|
(1,782
|
)
|
Effect of nondeductible expenses
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
846
|
|
|
$
|
(724
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,605
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for federal income tax purposes. Significant components of
the Corporations deferred tax assets and liabilities,
included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets, are as follows as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
3,482
|
|
|
$
|
3,145
|
|
Deferred directors fees
|
|
|
2,251
|
|
|
|
1,930
|
|
Employee benefit plans
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
Net unrealized losses on trading securities
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Net unrecognized actuarial loss on pension plan
|
|
|
1,084
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
Life insurance death benefit payable
|
|
|
804
|
|
|
|
804
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
9,209
|
|
|
|
8,314
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid pension cost
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
951
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
620
|
|
Accretion on securities
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Core deposit premium and acquisition expenses
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
506
|
|
Net unrealized gains on
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
930
|
|
Other
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
3,190
|
|
|
|
3,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
6,019
|
|
|
$
|
5,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation and its subsidiaries are subject to
U.S. federal income tax. The Corporation is no longer
subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before
2006. There are no material uncertain tax positions
48
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
requiring recognition in the Companys consolidated
financial statements. The Corporation does not expect the total
amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase in
the next twelve months.
The Corporation recognizes interest
and/or
penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense.
The Corporation does not have any amounts accrued for interest
and penalties at December 31, 2009 and is not aware of any
claims for such amounts by federal income tax authorities.
Included in other comprehensive income for the year ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 are unrealized gains of $4,048
and unrealized losses of $5,021, respectively, related to
auction rate money market securities and preferred stock. For
federal income tax purposes, these securities are considered
equity investments for which no federal deferred income taxes
are expected or recorded.
|
|
Note 13
|
Off-Balance-Sheet
Activities
|
Credit-Related
Financial Instruments
The Corporation is party to credit related financial instruments
with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments are
entered into in the normal course of business to meet the
financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments,
which include commitments to extend credit and standby letters
of credit, involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and
interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the
consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of
these instruments reflect the extent of involvement the
Corporation has in a particular class of financial instrument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract Amount
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Unfunded commitments under lines of credit
|
|
$
|
111,711
|
|
|
$
|
106,861
|
|
Commercial and standby letters of credit
|
|
|
6,509
|
|
|
|
6,429
|
|
Commitments to grant loans
|
|
|
9,645
|
|
|
|
10,228
|
|
Unfunded commitments under commercial lines of credit, revolving
credit home equity lines of credit and overdraft protection
agreements are commitments for possible future extensions of
credit to existing customers. The commitments for equity lines
of credit may expire without being drawn upon. These lines of
credit are uncollateralized and usually do not contain a
specified maturity date and may not be drawn upon to the total
extent to which the Bank is committed. A majority of such
commitments are at fixed rates of interest; a portion is
unsecured.
Commercial and standby letters of credit are conditional
commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee the
performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are
primarily issued to support private borrowing arrangements,
including commercial paper, bond financing, and similar
transactions.
These commitments to extend credit and letters of credit mature
within one year. The credit risk involved in these transactions
is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to
customers. The Corporation evaluates each customers credit
worthiness on a
case-by-case
basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by
the Corporation upon the extension of credit, is based on
managements credit evaluation of the borrower. While the
Corporation considers standby letters of credit to be
guarantees, the amount of the liability related to such
guarantees on the commitment date is not significant and a
liability related to such guarantees is not recorded on the
consolidated balance sheets.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a
customer as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
payment of a fee. The commitments may expire without being drawn
upon. Therefore, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral
obtained, if it is deemed necessary by the Bank, is based on
managements credit evaluation of the customer.
The Corporations exposure to credit-related loss in the
event of nonperformance by the counter parties to the financial
instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters
of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of
those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies
in deciding to make these
49
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
commitments as it does for extending loans to customers. No
significant losses are anticipated as a result of these
commitments.
|
|
Note 14
|
On-Balance
Sheet Activities
|
Derivative
Loan Commitments
Mortgage loan commitments are referred to as derivative loan
commitments if the loan that will result from exercise of the
commitment will be held for sale upon funding. The Corporation
enters into commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at
specific times in the future, with the intention that these
loans will subsequently be sold in the secondary market. A
mortgage loan commitment binds the Corporation to lend funds to
a potential borrower at a specified interest rate within a
specified period of time, generally up to 60 days after
inception of the rate lock.
Outstanding derivative loan commitments expose the Corporation
to the risk that the price of the loans arising from the
exercise of the loan commitment might decline from the inception
of the rate lock to funding of the loan due to increases in
mortgage interest rates. If interest rates increase, the value
of these loan commitments decreases. Conversely, if interest
rates decrease, the value of these loan commitments increases.
The notional amount of undesignated interest rate lock
commitments was $760 and $334 at December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Forward
Loan Sale Commitments
To protect against the price risk inherent in derivative loan
commitments, the Corporation utilizes both mandatory
delivery and best efforts forward loan sale
commitments to mitigate the risk of potential decreases in the
values of loan that would result from the exercise of the
derivative loan commitments.
With a mandatory delivery contract, the Corporation
commits to deliver a certain principal amount of mortgage loans
to an investor at a specified price on or before a specified
date. If the Corporation fails to deliver the amount of
mortgages necessary to fulfill the commitment by the specified
date, it is obligated to pay a pair-off fee, based
on then current market prices, to the investor to compensate the
investor for the shortfall.
With a best efforts contract, the Corporation
commits to deliver an individual mortgage loan of a specified
principal amount and quality to an investor if the loan to the
underlying borrower closes. Generally, the price the investor
will pay the seller for an individual loan is specified prior to
the loan being funded (e.g. on the same day the lender commits
to lend funds to a potential borrower).
The Corporation expects that these forward loan sale commitments
will experience changes in fair value opposite to the change in
fair value of derivate loan commitments. The notional amount of
undesignated forward loan sale commitments was $3,041 and $1,232
at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The fair values of the rate lock loan commitments related to the
origination of mortgage loans that will be held for sale and the
forward loan sale commitments are deemed insignificant by
management and, accordingly, are not recorded in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
|
|
Note 15
|
Commitments
and Other Matters
|
Banking regulations require banks to maintain cash reserve
balances in currency or as deposits with the Federal Reserve
Bank. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, the reserve balances
amounted to $687 and $700, respectively.
Isabella Bank sponsors the IBT Foundation (the
Foundation), which is a nonprofit entity formed for
the purpose of distributing charitable donations to recipient
organizations generally located in the communities serviced by
Isabella Bank. The Bank periodically makes charitable
contributions in the form of cash transfers to the Foundation.
The Foundation is administered by members of the Isabella Bank
Board of Directors. The assets and transactions of the
Foundation are not included in the consolidated financial
statements of Isabella Bank Corporation. During 2009, 2008, and
2007, the Corporation contributed $140, $78, and $0 respectively
to the Foundation. The assets of the Foundation as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008 were $985 and $953, respectively.
50
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Banking regulations limit the transfer of assets in the form of
dividends, loans, or advances from the Bank to the Corporation.
At December 31, 2009, substantially all of the Banks
assets were restricted from transfer to the Corporation in the
form of loans or advances. Consequently, bank dividends are the
principal source of funds for the Corporation. Payment of
dividends without regulatory approval is limited to the current
years retained net income plus retained net income for the
preceding two years, less any required transfers to common
stock. At January 1, 2010, the amount available for
dividends without regulatory approval was approximately $10,591.
The Bank has obtained approval to borrow up to an additional
$13,849 from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Indianapolis,
based on the assets currently pledged as collateral. Under the
terms of the agreement, the Bank may obtain advances at the
stated rate at the time of the borrowings. The Bank has pledged
eligible mortgage loans and U.S. Treasury and governmental
agencies as collateral for any such borrowings.
|
|
Note 16
|
Minimum
Regulatory Capital Requirements
|
The Corporation (on a consolidated basis) and the Bank are
subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered
by the Federal Reserve Bank and the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (The Regulators). Failure to meet minimum capital
requirements can initiate mandatory and possibly additional
discretionary actions by The Regulators that if undertaken,
could have a material effect on the Corporations and
Banks financial statements. Under regulatory capital
adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, the Corporation and the Bank must meet
specific capital guidelines that include quantitative measures
of their assets, liabilities, capital, and certain
off-balance-sheet items, as calculated under regulatory
accounting standards. The Banks capital amounts and
classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by The
Regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank
holding companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure
capital adequacy require the Corporation and the Bank to
maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following
table) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the
regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and
Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined). Management
believes, as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, that the
Corporation and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements
to which they are subject.
As of December 31, 2009, the most recent notifications from
The Regulators categorized the Bank as well capitalized under
the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be
categorized as well capitalized, an institution must maintain
total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1
leverage ratios as set forth in the following tables. There are
no conditions or events since the notifications that management
believes has changed the Banks categories. The
Corporations and the Banks actual capital amounts
(in thousands) and ratios are also presented in the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum to be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Well Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Under Prompt Corrective Action
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Requirement
|
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
$
|
93,079
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
|
$
|
57,713
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
72,141
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
102,285
|
|
|
|
14.1
|
|
|
|
58,213
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
|
84,012
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
28,856
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
43,285
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
93,141
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
29,106
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
|
84,012
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
42,813
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
53,516
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
93,141
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
43,326
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
51
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum to be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum
|
|
|
Well Capitalized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Under Prompt Corrective Action
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Requirement
|
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
$
|
89,192
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
57,666
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
72,082
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
98,867
|
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
58,484
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
|
80,145
|
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
|
|
28,833
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
43,249
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
89,694
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
29,242
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
|
80,145
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
|
|
43,069
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
53,836
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
89,694
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
42,603
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
Note 17
|
Employee
Benefit Plans
|
Defined
Benefit Pension Plan
The Corporation has a non-contributory defined benefit pension
plan covering substantially all of its employees. In December
2006, the Board of Directors voted to curtail the defined
benefit plan effective March 1, 2007. The effect of the
curtailment, which was recognized in the first quarter of 2007,
suspended the current participants accrued benefits as of
March 1, 2007 and limited participation in the plan to
eligible employees as of December 31, 2006. Due to the
curtailment, future salary increases will not be considered and
the benefits are based on years of service and the
employees five highest consecutive years of compensation
out of the last ten years of service through March 1, 2007.
The curtailment resulted in a reduction in 2007 of $2,939 in the
projected benefit obligation, which served to reduce
unrecognized net actuarial loss of $2,939, a component of
accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Subsequent to the decision to curtail the defined benefit plan,
the Corporation decided to increase the contributions to the
Corporations 401(k) plan effective January 1, 2007
(see Other Employee Benefit Plans on page 69).
52
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Changes in the projected benefit obligation and plan assets
during each year, the funded status of the plan, and the net
amount recognized on the Corporations consolidated balance
sheets using an actuarial measurement date of December 31,
are summarized as follows during the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, January 1
|
|
$
|
8,436
|
|
|
$
|
8,206
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
504
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
Benefits paid, including plan expenses
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, December 31
|
|
|
8,897
|
|
|
|
8,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, January 1
|
|
|
7,669
|
|
|
|
9,607
|
|
Investment return (loss)
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
|
|
(1,309
|
)
|
Benefits paid, including plan expenses
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
Fair value of plan assets, December 31
|
|
|
8,355
|
|
|
|
7,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficiency in funded status at December 31, included in
other liabilities on the balance sheets
|
|
$
|
(542
|
)
|
|
$
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in accrued pension benefit costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Accrued) prepaid benefit cost at January 1
|
|
$
|
(767
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,401
|
|
Net periodic benefit (cost) income for the year
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
152
|
|
Net change in unrecognized actuarial loss and prior service cost
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
(2,320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued pension benefit cost at December 31
|
|
$
|
(542
|
)
|
|
$
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive loss consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Unrecognized pension cost
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
$
|
(2,320
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,890
|
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
(1,532
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,907
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation was $8,897 and $8,436 at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The components of net periodic benefit cost and other pension
related amounts recognized in other comprehensive income (loss)
are as follows for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost (income)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost on benefits earned for services rendered during the
year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
503
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
|
|
(659
|
)
|
|
|
(628
|
)
|
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost (income)
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
(152
|
)
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at December 31, 2009
includes net unrecognized actuarial losses of $3,190, of which
$153 is expected to be amortized into benefit cost during 2010.
53
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Actuarial assumptions used in determining the projected benefit
obligation are as follows for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Weighted average discount rate
|
|
|
5.87
|
%
|
|
|
6.10
|
%
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
Expected long-term rate of return
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
The actual weighted average assumptions used in determining the
net periodic pension costs are as follows for the year ended
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.87
|
%
|
|
|
6.10
|
%
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
Expected long-term return on plan assets
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
As a result of the curtailment of the Plan, there is no rate of
compensation increase considered in the above assumptions.
The expected long term rate of return is an estimate of
anticipated future long term rates of return on plan assets as
measured on a market value basis. Factors considered in arriving
at this assumption include:
|
|
|
|
|
Historical longer term rates of return for broad asset classes.
|
|
|
|
Actual past rates of return achieved by the plan.
|
|
|
|
The general mix of assets held by the plan.
|
|
|
|
The stated investment policy for the plan.
|
The selected rate of return is net of anticipated investment
related expenses.
Plan
Assets
The Corporations overall investment strategy is to
conservatively grow the portfolio by investing 40% of the
portfolio in equity securities and 60% in fixed income
securities. This strategy is designed to generate a long term
rate of return of 6.0%. Equity securities primarily consist of
the S&P 500 Index with a smaller allocation to the Small
Cap and International Index. Fixed income securities are
invested in the Bond Market Index. The Plan has appropriate
assets invested in short term investments to meet near-term
benefit payments.
The asset mix and the sector weighting of the investments are
determined by the pension committee, which is comprised of
members of management of the Corporation. Consultations are held
with a third party investment advisor retained by the
Corporation to manage the Plan. The Corporation reviews the
performance of the advisor no less than annually.
The fair values of the Corporations pension plan assets as
of December 31, 2009 by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Description
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Asset Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
Common collective trusts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income
|
|
|
4,826
|
|
|
|
4,826
|
|
Equity investments
|
|
|
3,459
|
|
|
|
3,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,355
|
|
|
$
|
8,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies
used for assets measured at fair value. There have been no
changes in the methodologies used at December 31, 2009 and
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments: Shares of a money
market portfolio, which is valued using amortized cost, which
approximates fair value.
|
|
|
|
Common collective trusts: These investments
are public investment securities valued using the net asset
value (NAV) provided by a third party investment
advisor. The NAV is quoted on a private market that is not
active; however, the unit price is based on underlying
investments which are traded on an active market.
|
The Corporation expects to contribute $47 to the pension plan in
2010.
Estimated future benefit payments are as follows for the next
ten years:
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
Amount
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
2011
|
|
|
386
|
|
2012
|
|
|
405
|
|
2013
|
|
|
404
|
|
2014
|
|
|
495
|
|
Years 2015 - 2019
|
|
|
2,908
|
|
The components of projected net periodic benefit cost are as
follows for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
531
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(491
|
)
|
Amortization of unrecognized actuarial net loss
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Employee Benefit Plans
The Corporation maintains a nonqualified supplementary employee
retirement plan (SERP) for qualified officers to provide
supplemental retirement benefits to each participant. Expenses
related to this program for 2009, 2008, and 2007 were $219,
$206, and $202, respectively, and are being recognized over the
participants expected years of service. As a result of
curtailing Isabella Bank Corporations defined benefit plan
in March 2007, the Corporation established an additional SERP to
maintain the benefit levels for all employees that were at least
forty years old and had at least 15 years of service. The
cost to provide this benefit was $124, $128 and $120 for 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
The Corporation maintains a non-leveraged employee stock
ownership plan (ESOP) and a profit sharing plan which cover
substantially all of its employees. Effective December 31,
2006, the ESOP was frozen to new participants. Contributions to
the plans are discretionary and are approved by the Board of
Directors and recorded as compensation expense. In 2009 the
Board approved a contribution to the ESOP of $50. Expenses
related to the plans for 2009, 2008, and 2007 were $50, $0, and
$115, respectively. Total allocated shares outstanding related
to the ESOP at December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 were
271,421, 271,520, and 149,154, respectively, were included in
the computation of dividends and earnings per share in each of
the respective years and have not been adjusted for the 10%
stock dividend paid February 29, 2008.
The Corporation maintains a self-funded medical plan under which
the Corporation is responsible for the first $50 per year of
claims made by a covered family. Medical claims are subject to a
lifetime maximum of $5,000 per covered individual. Expenses are
accrued based on estimates of the aggregate liability for claims
incurred and the Corporations experience. Expenses were
$2,155 in 2009, $2,110 in 2008 and $1,804 in 2007.
55
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Corporation offers dividend reinvestment, and employee and
director stock purchase plans. The dividend reinvestment plan
allows shareholders to purchase previously unissued Isabella
Bank Corporation common shares. The stock purchase plan allows
employees and directors to purchase Isabella Bank Corporation
common stock through payroll deduction. The number of shares
reserved for issuance under these plans are 635,000, with
187,982 shares unissued at December 31, 2009, as
adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid February 29, 2008.
During 2009, 2008 and 2007, 126,874 shares were issued for
$2,396, 78,994 shares were issued for $2,879 and
63,233 shares were issued for $2,657, respectively, in cash
pursuant to these plans, exclusive of the effects of the 10%
stock dividend paid February 29, 2008.
401(k)
Plan
The Corporation has a 401(k) plan in which substantially all
employees are eligible to participate. Employees may contribute
up to 50% of their compensation subject to certain limits based
on federal tax laws. The Corporation makes a 3.0% safe harbor
contribution for all eligible employees and matching
contributions equal to 50% of the first 4.0% of an
employees compensation contributed to the Plan during the
year. Employees are 100% vested in the safe harbor contributions
and are 0% vested through their first two years of employment
and are 100% vested after 6 years of service for matching
contributions.
As a result of the curtailment of the defined benefit plan noted
above, the Corporation decided to increase the contributions to
the Corporations 401(k) plan effective January 1,
2007. For the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
expenses attributable to the Plan were $617, $543 and $439
respectively.
Equity
Compensation Plan
Pursuant to the terms of the Deferred Compensation Plan for
Directors (the Plan), directors of the Corporation
and its subsidiaries are required to defer at least 25% of their
earned board fees to the Plan. The fees are converted to stock
units based on the fair market value of a share of common stock
as of the relevant valuation date. Stock credited to a
participants account is eligible for stock and cash
dividends as declared. Upon retirement from the board or the
occurrence of certain other events, the participant is eligible
to receive a lump-sum, in-kind, distribution of all of the stock
that is then in his or her account, and any unconverted cash
will be converted to and rounded up to whole shares of stock and
distributed, as well. The Plan as modified does not allow for
cash settlement, and therefore, such share-based payment awards
qualify for classification as equity. All authorized but
unissued shares of common stock are eligible for issuance under
this Plan. The Corporation may also purchase shares of common
stock from the open market to meet its obligations under the
Plan. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Plan had
186,279 unissued shares valued at $3,530 and 186,766 unissued
shares valued at $3,766, respectively, as adjusted for the 10%
stock dividend paid on February 29, 2008, pursuant to the
antidilution provisions required by the Plan.
On December 17, 2008, the Corporation established a Rabbi
Trust effective as of July 1, 2008, to fund the Plan. A
Rabbi Trust is an irrevocable grantor trust to which the
Corporation may contribute assets for the limited purpose of
funding a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Although the
Corporation may not reach the assets of the Rabbi Trust for any
purpose other than meeting its obligations under the Plan, the
assets of the trust remain subject to the claims of the
Corporations creditors and are included in the
consolidated financial statements. The Corporation may
contribute cash or common stock to the trust from time to time
for the sole purpose of funding the Plan. The trust will use any
cash that the Corporation contributed to purchase shares of the
Corporations common stock on the open market through the
Corporations brokerage services department.
As of December 31, 2009, the Trust held 30,626 shares
of the Corporations common stock for settlement.
|
|
Note 18
|
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income as well as
unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on
available-for-sale
investment securities owned and changes in the funded status of
the Corporations defined benefit pension plan, which are
excluded from net income. Unrealized investment securities gains
and losses and changes
56
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
in the funded status of the pension plan, net of tax, are
excluded from net income, and are reflected as a direct charge
or credit to shareholders equity. Comprehensive income
(loss) and the related components are disclosed in the
accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income for
each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007.
The following is a summary of the components comprising the
balance of accumulated other comprehensive loss reported on the
consolidated balance sheets as of December 31 (presented net of
tax):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Unrealized losses on
available-for-sale
investment securities
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,216
|
)
|
Unrecognized pension costs
|
|
|
(2,106
|
)
|
|
|
(2,353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(2,119
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 19
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
In the ordinary course of business, the Bank grants loans to
principal officers and directors and their affiliates (including
their families and companies in which they have 10% or more
ownership). Annual activity consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
4,011
|
|
|
$
|
10,461
|
|
New loans
|
|
|
5,033
|
|
|
|
3,488
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(4,902
|
)
|
|
|
(9,938
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
4,142
|
|
|
$
|
4,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits of these principal officers and directors and
their affiliates amounted to $7,090 and $8,317 at
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition,
Isabella Bank Corporations Employee Stock Ownership Plan
(Note 17) held deposits with the Bank aggregating $219
and $370, respectively, at December 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
Note 20
|
Financial
Instruments Recorded at Fair Value
|
In February 2007, the FASB issued ASC Topic 825,
Financial Instruments. ASC Topic 825 expands
the use of fair value accounting but does not affect existing
standards which require assets or liabilities to be carried at
fair value. Under ASC Topic 825, the Corporation may elect to
measure many financial instruments and certain other assets and
liabilities at fair value (fair value
option FVO). The fair value measurement option
is not allowed for deposit or withdrawable on demand
liabilities. If the use of fair value is elected, any upfront
costs and fees related to the instrument must be recognized in
earnings and cannot be deferred, e.g., debt issue costs. The
fair value election is irrevocable and is generally made on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis, even if the Corporation has similar instruments that it
elects not to measure based on fair value. At the adoption date,
unrealized gains and losses on existing items for which fair
value has been elected are reported as a cumulative adjustment
to beginning retained earnings as of January 1, 2007.
Subsequent to the adoption of ASC Topic 825, changes in fair
value are recognized in earnings. Although ASC Topic 825 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007 and would have been required to be adopted by the
Corporation in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, the Corporation
elected to early adopt ASC Topic 825 effective January 1,
2007, the impact of which is detailed in the table below.
As shown in the following table, the Corporation elected to
transfer $77,839 of its $213,450
available-for-sale
securities investment portfolio to trading status to facilitate
more active trading of these securities. In determining which
available-for-sale
securities to transfer, the Corporation considered interest
rates, duration, marketability, and balance sheet management
strategies. The securities transferred included obligations of
US Government Agencies, variable rate Federal National Mortgage
Association and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation mortgage
backed securities, taxable municipal bonds, and a limited number
of tax exempt bonds.
57
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Corporation also elected to report $7,256 of long-term,
relatively high interest rate, Federal Home Loan Bank advances
at their fair value upon the early adoption of ASC Topic 825 to
provide a hedge against significant movement in interest rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Net Gain / (Loss)
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
1/1/2007 Prior to
|
|
|
Upon Adoption of
|
|
|
1/1/2007 After
|
|
|
|
Adoption of FVO
|
|
|
FVO
|
|
|
Adoption of FVO
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
$
|
79,198
|
|
|
$
|
(1,359
|
)
|
|
$
|
77,839
|
|
FHLB borrowings included in other borrowed funds
|
|
|
(7,256
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
(7,488
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax cumulative loss effect of adoption of the fair value
option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,591
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deferred tax asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative loss effect of adoption of the fair value option
(charged as a reduction to retained earnings as of
January 1, 2007)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,050
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation utilizes fair value measurements to record fair
value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to
determine fair value disclosures. Securities
available-for-sale,
trading securities and certain liabilities are recorded at fair
value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the
Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets
on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans
held-for-sale,
impaired loans, foreclosed assets, mortgage servicing rights and
certain other assets and liabilities. These nonrecurring fair
value adjustments typically involve the application of lower of
cost or market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.
Fair
Value Hierarchy
Under fair value measurement and disclosure authoritative
guidance, the Corporation groups assets and liabilities at fair
value into three levels, based on the markets in which the
assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability of the
assumptions used to determine fair value, based on the
prioritization of inputs in the valuation techniques. These
levels are:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1: Valuation is based upon quoted prices
for identical instruments traded in active markets.
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Valuation is based upon quoted prices
for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active,
and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant
assumptions are observable in the market.
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Valuation is generated from model-based
techniques that use at least one significant assumption not
observable in the market. These unobservable assumptions reflect
estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability.
|
The assets or liabilitys fair value measurement level
within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of
any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Valuation techniques used need to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and
key inputs used to measure financial assets and liabilities
recorded at fair value, as well as a description of the methods
and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value
disclosures for financial instruments not recorded at fair value
in their entirety on a recurring basis. For financial assets and
liabilities recorded at fair value, the description includes an
indication of the level of the fair value hierarchy in which the
assets or liabilities are classified
58
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Investment
Securities:
Investment securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring
basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if
available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are
measured using independent pricing models or other model-based
valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash
flows, adjusted for the securitys credit rating,
prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss and
liquidity assumptions. Level 2 securities include
U.S. Treasury securities, mortgage-backed securities issued
by government-sponsored entities, municipal bonds and corporate
debt securities in active markets. Securities classified as
Level 3 include securities in less liquid markets,
including illiquid markets in some instances, and include
auction rate money market preferred securities and preferred
stocks.
The Corporation invested $11,000 in auction rate money market
preferred investment security instruments, which are classified
as
available-for-sale
securities and reflected at fair value. Due to continuing
uncertainty in credit markets, these investments are illiquid.
As a result of the illiquidity of the markets for these
securities, $7,800 converted to preferred stock with debt like
characteristics in 2009.
Due to the illiquidity of these securities, these assets were
classified as Level 3 during 2008. The fair values of these
securities are estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow
analysis or other type of valuation adjustment methodology as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008. These analyses consider, among
other factors, the collateral underlying the security
investments, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the
timing of expected future cash flows, estimates of the next time
the security is expected to have a successful auction, and the
fact that the management asserts that it does not intend to sell
the security in an unrealized loss position and it is more
likely than not it will not have to sell the securities before
recovery of its cost basis, as further described in Note 4
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Mortgage
Loans
Available-for-Sale:
Loans available for sale are carried at the lower of cost or
market value. The fair value of loans
held-for-sale
is based on what price secondary markets are currently offering
for portfolios with similar characteristics. As such, the
Corporation classifies loans subjected to nonrecurring fair
value adjustments as Level 2 valuation.
Loans:
The Corporation does not record loans at fair value on a
recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is
considered impaired and a specific allowance for loan losses is
established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of
interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the
contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired.
Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management
measures the estimated impairment. The fair value of impaired
loans is estimated using one of several methods, including
collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise
value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those
impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for
which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral
exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At
December 31, 2009, impaired loans were evaluated based on
the fair value of the collateral or based on the net present
value of their expected cash flows. Impaired loans where an
allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral
require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When a
current appraised value is not available or management
determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired
below the appraised value and there is no observable market
price, or the impairment is determined using the net present
value of the expected cash flows, the Corporation classifies the
impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3 valuation.
Foreclosed
Assets:
Upon transfer from the loan portfolio, foreclosed assets are
adjusted to and subsequently carried at the lower of carrying
value or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair value is
based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the
collateral or managements estimation of the value of the
collateral and as such, the Corporation classifies foreclosed
assets as nonrecurring level 2 valuation. When a current
appraisal is not available
59
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
or management determines the fair value of the collateral is
further impaired below the appraised value and there is no
observable market price, the Corporation records the foreclosed
asset as nonrecurring level 3 valuation.
Equity
Securities Without Readily Determinable Fair
Values:
The Corporation has investments in equity securities without
readily determinable fair values as well as an investment in a
joint venture. The assets are individually reviewed for
impairment on an annual basis by comparing the carrying value to
the estimated fair value. The lack of an independent source to
validate fair value estimates, including the impact of future
capital calls and transfer restrictions, is an inherent
limitation in the valuation process. The Corporation classifies
nonmarketable equity securities and its investment in a joint
venture subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as
Level 3 valuation. During 2009 and 2008, there were no
impairments recorded on equity securities without readily
determinable fair values.
Mortgage
Servicing Rights:
Loan servicing rights are subject to impairment testing. A
valuation model, which utilizes a discounted cash flow analysis
using interest rates and prepayment speed assumptions currently
quoted for comparable instruments and a discount rate determined
by management, is used for impairment testing. If the valuation
model reflects a value less than the carrying value, mortgage
servicing rights are adjusted to fair value through a valuation
allowance as determined by the model. As such, the Corporation
classifies loan servicing rights subjected to nonrecurring fair
value adjustments as Level 2 valuation.
Acquisition
Intangibles and Goodwill:
Intangible assets are subject to impairment testing. A projected
cash flow valuation method is used in the completion of
impairment testing. This valuation method requires a significant
degree of management judgment. In the event the projected
undiscounted net operating cash flows are less than the carrying
value, the asset is recorded at fair value as determined by the
valuation model. If the testing resulted in impairment, the
Corporation would classify goodwill and other intangible assets
subjected to nonrecurring fair value adjustments as Level 3
valuation. During 2009 and 2008, there were no impairments
recorded on goodwill and other acquisition intangible assets.
Other
Borrowed Funds:
The Corporation has elected to measure a portion of other
borrowed funds at their fair value. These borrowings are
recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, with the fair value
measurement estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based
on the Corporations current incremental borrowings rates
for similar types of borrowing arrangements. Changes in the fair
value of these borrowings are included in noninterest income. As
such, the Corporation classifies other borrowed funds as
Level 2 valuation.
The preceding methods described may produce a fair value
calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value
or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, although the
Company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and
consistent with other market participants, the use of different
methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of
certain financial instruments could result in a different fair
value measurement at the reporting date.
60
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The table below represents the activity in Level 3 inputs
measured on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs January 1
|
|
$
|
5,021
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Transfers of securities into level 3 due to changes in the
observability of significant inputs (illiquid markets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on
available-for-sale
investment securities
|
|
|
5,006
|
|
|
|
(5,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs December 31
|
|
$
|
10,027
|
|
|
$
|
5,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tables below present the recorded amount of assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Description
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Recurring Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,014
|
|
|
$
|
4,014
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
9,962
|
|
|
|
9,962
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,556
|
|
|
|
11,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,045
|
|
|
|
6,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading securities
|
|
|
13,563
|
|
|
|
13,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,775
|
|
|
|
21,775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale
investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
|
4,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
19,471
|
|
|
|
19,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,988
|
|
|
|
62,988
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and political sub divisions
|
|
|
151,730
|
|
|
|
151,730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149,323
|
|
|
|
149,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,145
|
|
|
|
7,145
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate money market preferred
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
7,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
67,734
|
|
|
|
67,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
10,104
|
|
|
|
10,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
available-for-sale
investment securities
|
|
|
259,066
|
|
|
|
249,039
|
|
|
|
10,027
|
|
|
|
246,455
|
|
|
|
240,476
|
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
17,804
|
|
|
|
17,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,130
|
|
|
|
23,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonrecurring Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
13,843
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,843
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,105
|
|
|
|
2,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
1,157
|
|
|
|
1,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
309,145
|
|
|
$
|
286,464
|
|
|
$
|
22,681
|
|
|
$
|
311,129
|
|
|
$
|
291,307
|
|
|
$
|
19,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of assets and liabilities measured at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92.66
|
%
|
|
|
7.34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93.63
|
%
|
|
|
6.37
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In certain previous
Form 10-Q
and
Form 10-K
filings the Corporation disclosed that a portion of trading
securities,
available-for-sale
investment securities and other borrowed funds were measured at
Level 1 and at Level 3. The Corporation recently
determined that documentation provided to the Corporation by its
third party securities pricing vendor more closely reflects a
Level 2 categorization than Level 1 and Level 3
as previously reported. No significant measurement methodology
changes have been made by the Corporations securities
pricing vendor. As a result, $10,175 of trading securities,
$89,507 of
available-for-sale
investment securities and $23,130 of other borrowed funds were
reclassified from Level 1 to Level 2 classification as
of December 31, 2008.
61
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Furthermore, $14,370 of
available-for-sale
investment securities were reclassified from Level 3 to
Level 2 classification as of December 31, 2008
The changes in fair value of assets and liabilities recorded at
fair value through earnings on a recurring basis and changes in
assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis, for which impairment was recognized in the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains and
|
|
|
Other Gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains and
|
|
|
Other Gains
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
and (Losses)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
and (Losses)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Recurring Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
Nonrecurring Items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(813
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2008, primarily as a result of declines in the rates
offered on new residential mortgage loans, the Corporation
recorded impairment charges of $115 related to the carrying
value of its mortgage servicing rights, in accordance with
authoritative guidance related to mortgage servicing assets.
This decline in offering rates decreased the expected lives of
the loans serviced and in turn decreased the value of the
serving rights.
The impairment charges to foreclosed assets were the result of
the real estate held declining in value subsequent to the
properties being transferred to other real estate.
The activity in the trading portfolio of investment securities
was as follows for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,010
|
|
Sales, calls, and maturities
|
|
|
(8,292
|
)
|
|
|
(14,544
|
)
|
Net change in fair market value
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(8,212
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net gain on trading securities represents
mark-to-market
adjustments. Included in the net trading gains of $80 during
2009, was $38 of net trading gains on securities that were held
in the Corporations trading portfolio as of
December 31, 2009.
The activity in borrowings carried at fair value was as follows
for years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Issuances
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
Sales, calls, and maturities
|
|
|
(5,037
|
)
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Net change in fair value
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(5,326
|
)
|
|
$
|
15,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 21
|
Fair
Values of Financial Instruments
|
The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount
that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a
forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon
quoted market prices. However, in many
62
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
instances, there are no quoted market prices for the
Corporations various financial instruments. In cases where
quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on
estimates using present value or other valuation techniques.
Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions
used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash
flows. Accordingly, the estimated amounts provided herein do not
necessarily indicate amounts which could be realized in a
current exchange. Furthermore, as the Corporation typically
holds the majority of its financial instruments until maturity,
it does not expect to realize all of the estimated amounts
disclosed. The disclosures also do not include estimated fair
value amounts for items which are not defined as financial
instruments, but which have significant value. These include
such items as core deposit intangibles, the future earnings of
significant customer relationships and the value of other fee
generating businesses. The Corporation believes the imprecision
of an estimate could be significant.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the
Corporation in estimating fair value disclosures for financial
instruments.
Cash
and cash equivalents:
The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instrument,
including Federal funds sold, approximate fair values.
Interest
bearing balances held in other financial
institutions:
Interest bearing balances held in other financial institutions
include certificates of deposit and other short term interest
bearing balances that mature within 3 years. The fair
values of these instruments approximate the carrying amounts.
Investment
securities:
Investment securities are recorded at fair value on a recurring
basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if
available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are
measured using independent pricing models or other model-based
valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash
flows, adjusted for the securitys credit rating,
prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss and
liquidity assumptions.
Mortgage
loans available for sale:
Fair values of mortgage loans available for sale are based on
commitments on hand from investors or prevailing market prices.
Loans:
For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no
significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on
carrying values. Fair values for other loans (e.g. , real estate
mortgage, agricultural, commercial, and installment) are
estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest
rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to
borrowers of similar credit quality. The resulting amounts are
adjusted to estimate the effect of declines, if any, in the
credit quality of borrowers since the loans were originated.
Fair values for non-performing loans are estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values,
where applicable.
Mortgage
servicing rights:
The carrying amounts for mortgage servicing rights are reported
in the consolidated balance sheets under Other
Assets. Fair value is determined using prices for similar
assets with similar characteristics when applicable, or based
upon discounted cash flow analyses.
63
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deposits:
Demand, savings, and money market deposits are, by definition,
equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date
(i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for variable rate
certificates of deposit approximate their recorded carrying
value. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are
estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies
interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a
schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time
deposits.
Short-term
borrowings:
The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings
under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings
maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values. Fair
values of other short-term borrowings are estimated using
discounted cash flow analyses based on the Corporations
current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of
borrowings arrangements.
Borrowings:
The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings
under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings
maturing within ninety days approximate their fair values. The
fair values of the Corporations other borrowings are
estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the
Corporations current incremental borrowing arrangements.
Accrued
interest:
The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.
Derivative
financial instruments:
Fair values for derivative loan commitments and forward loan
sale commitments are based on fair values of the underlying
mortgage loans and the probability of such commitments being
exercised.
Commitments
to extend credit, standby letters of credit and undisbursed
loans:
Fair values for off-balance-sheet lending commitments are based
on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements,
taking into consideration the remaining terms of the agreements
and the counterparties credit standings. The Corporation
does not charge fees for lending commitments; thus it is not
practicable to estimate the fair value of these instruments.
64
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following sets forth the estimated fair value and recorded
carrying values of the Corporations financial instruments
as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and demand deposits due from banks
|
|
$
|
22,706
|
|
|
$
|
22,706
|
|
|
$
|
22,979
|
|
|
$
|
22,979
|
|
Interest bearing balances held in other financial institutions
|
|
|
7,156
|
|
|
|
7,156
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
13,563
|
|
|
|
13,563
|
|
|
|
21,775
|
|
|
|
21,775
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
259,066
|
|
|
|
259,066
|
|
|
|
246,455
|
|
|
|
246,455
|
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
|
2,294
|
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
719,604
|
|
|
|
710,337
|
|
|
|
743,110
|
|
|
|
723,403
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
6,322
|
|
|
|
6,322
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
2,620
|
|
|
|
2,105
|
|
|
|
2,105
|
|
Foreclosed assets
|
|
|
1,157
|
|
|
|
1,157
|
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
|
2,923
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
Deposits with no stated maturities
|
|
|
382,006
|
|
|
|
382,006
|
|
|
|
394,042
|
|
|
|
394,042
|
|
Deposits with stated maturities
|
|
|
424,048
|
|
|
|
420,646
|
|
|
|
387,291
|
|
|
|
381,588
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
195,179
|
|
|
|
193,101
|
|
|
|
230,130
|
|
|
|
222,350
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
1,334
|
|
|
|
Note 22
|
Parent
Company Only Financial Information
|
Condensed
Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash on deposit at subsidiary Bank
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
1,144
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
2,073
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
89,405
|
|
|
|
82,673
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
2,346
|
|
|
|
2,043
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
53,644
|
|
|
|
52,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
147,640
|
|
|
$
|
140,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Other liabilities
|
|
$
|
6,837
|
|
|
$
|
5,620
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
140,803
|
|
|
|
134,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
$
|
147,640
|
|
|
$
|
140,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed
Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends from subsidiaries
|
|
$
|
6,100
|
|
|
$
|
5,800
|
|
|
$
|
15,975
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Management fee and other
|
|
|
993
|
|
|
|
1,011
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income
|
|
|
7,170
|
|
|
|
6,899
|
|
|
|
17,669
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
3,907
|
|
|
|
3,989
|
|
|
|
3,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax benefit and equity in undistributed
earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
3,263
|
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
13,779
|
|
Federal income tax benefit
|
|
|
976
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,239
|
|
|
|
3,815
|
|
|
|
14,552
|
|
Undistributed earnings (distributions in excess of earnings) of
subsidiaries
|
|
|
3,561
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
(6,622
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,800
|
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Condensed
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7,800
|
|
|
$
|
4,101
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries
|
|
|
(3,561
|
)
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
6,622
|
|
Share based payment awards
|
|
|
677
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
592
|
|
Net amortization of investment securities
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Deferred income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(570
|
)
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities which provided
(used) cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
|
(817
|
)
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
Accrued interest and other expenses
|
|
|
517
|
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
4,284
|
|
|
|
4,646
|
|
|
|
14,574
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, calls, and sales
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
(Purchases) sales of equipment and premises
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
(1,135
|
)
|
Advances to subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,927
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
(10,517
|
)
|
|
|
(856
|
)
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in other borrowed funds
|
|
|
700
|
|
|
|
1,836
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid on common stock
|
|
|
(5,256
|
)
|
|
|
(4,873
|
)
|
|
|
(4,304
|
)
|
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock
|
|
|
2,479
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
|
|
2,657
|
|
Common stock repurchased
|
|
|
(2,056
|
)
|
|
|
(6,440
|
)
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
Common stock purchased for deferred compensation obligations
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities
|
|
|
(4,900
|
)
|
|
|
(7,250
|
)
|
|
|
(3,528
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
(972
|
)
|
|
|
(13,121
|
)
|
|
|
10,190
|
|
Cash and cash equivelants at beginning of year
|
|
|
1,144
|
|
|
|
14,265
|
|
|
|
4,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
1,144
|
|
|
$
|
14,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 23
|
Operating
Segments
|
The Corporations reportable segments are based on legal
entities that account for at least 10 percent of net
operating results. Retail banking operations for 2009, 2008, and
2007 represent approximately 90% or greater of the
Corporations total assets and operating results. As such,
no additional segment information is presented.
67
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Opearations
ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION FINANCIAL REVIEW
(All dollars in thousands)
The following is managements discussion and analysis of
the financial condition and results of operations for Isabella
Bank Corporation (the Corporation). This discussion
and analysis is intended to provide a better understanding of
the consolidated financial statements and statistical data
included elsewhere in the Annual Report. The Corporations
acquisition of Greenville Community Financial Corporation in
January 2008 was accounted for as a purchase transaction, and as
such, the related results of operations are included from the
date of acquisition. See Note 2 Business
Combinations and Joint Venture Formation in the
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included
elsewhere in the report.
The current recession, which began in 2008, continued to
negatively impact the Corporations overall profitability
throughout 2009 as historically high delinquencies and
nonaccrual loans have translated into high levels of net loans
charged off and foreclosed asset and collection related
expenses. Although nonperforming loans remain at historically
high levels, they have declined $3,136 from last year. This
improvement, coupled with a decline in net loans charged off,
enabled the Corporation to reduce its provision for loan losses
in 2009. The reduction in the provision for loan losses along
with an increased net yield on interest earning assets (on a
fully tax equivalent basis) resulted in net income of $7,800 for
2009, as compared to $4,101 for 2008. For further detailed
discussion and analysis, see below.
The Corporation has not received any notices of regulatory
actions as of December 31, 2009.
Critical
Accounting Policies:
The Corporations significant accounting policies are set
forth in Note 1 of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Of these significant accounting policies, the Corporation
considers its policies regarding the allowance for loan losses,
acquisition intangibles, and the determination of the fair value
of investment securities to be its most critical accounting
policies.
The allowance for loan losses requires managements most
subjective and complex judgment. Changes in economic conditions
can have a significant impact on the allowance for loan losses
and, therefore, the provision for loan losses and results of
operations. The Corporation has developed appropriate policies
and procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for
loan losses, recognizing that this process requires a number of
assumptions and estimates with respect to its loan portfolio.
The Corporations assessments may be impacted in future
periods by changes in economic conditions, and the discovery of
information with respect to borrowers which is not known to
management at the time of the issuance of the consolidated
financial statements. For additional discussion concerning the
Corporations allowance for loan losses and related
matters, see the Provision for Loan Losses discussion below.
United States generally accepted accounting principles require
that the Corporation determine the fair value of the assets and
liabilities of an acquired entity, and record their fair value
on the date of acquisition. The Corporation employs a variety of
measures in the determination of the fair value, including the
use of discounted cash flow analysis, market appraisals, and
projected future revenue streams. For certain items that
management believes it has the appropriate expertise to
determine the fair value, management may choose to use its own
calculations of the value. In other cases, where the value is
not easily determined, the Corporation consults with outside
parties to determine the fair value of the identified asset or
liability. Once valuations have been adjusted, the net
difference between the price paid for the acquired entity and
the value of its balance sheet, including identifiable
intangibles, is recorded as goodwill. This goodwill is not
amortized, but is tested for impairment on at least an annual
basis.
The Corporation currently has both
available-for-sale
and trading investment securities that are carried at fair
value. Changes in the fair value of
available-for-sale
investment securities are included as a component of other
comprehensive income, while declines in the fair value of these
securities below their cost that are other than temporary are
reflected as realized losses. The change in value of trading
investment securities is included in current earnings.
Management evaluates securities for indications of losses that
are considered
other-than-temporary,
if any, on a regular basis.
68
The market values for
available-for-sale
and trading investment securities are typically obtained from
outside sources and applied to individual securities within the
portfolio. The fair values of investment securities with
illiquid markets are estimated by management utilizing a
discounted cash flow analysis or other type of valuation
adjustment methodology. These securities are also compared, when
possible, to other securities with similar characteristics.
DISTRIBUTION
OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES, AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
INTEREST RATE AND INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL
The following schedules present the daily average amount
outstanding for each major category of interest earning assets,
nonearning assets, interest bearing liabilities, and noninterest
bearing liabilities for the last three years. This schedule also
presents an analysis of interest income and interest expense for
the periods indicated. All interest income is reported on a
fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis using a 34% federal income
tax rate. Nonaccruing loans, for the purpose of the following
computations, are included in the average loan amounts
outstanding. Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank Equity
holdings which are restricted are included in Other Assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Equivalent
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
INTEREST EARNING ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
725,299
|
|
|
$
|
47,706
|
|
|
|
6.58
|
%
|
|
$
|
717,040
|
|
|
$
|
49,674
|
|
|
|
6.93
|
%
|
|
$
|
604,342
|
|
|
$
|
43,808
|
|
|
|
7.25
|
%
|
Taxable investment securities
|
|
|
119,063
|
|
|
|
4,712
|
|
|
|
3.96
|
%
|
|
|
108,919
|
|
|
|
5,433
|
|
|
|
4.99
|
%
|
|
|
68,398
|
|
|
|
3,751
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
%
|
Nontaxable investment securities
|
|
|
121,676
|
|
|
|
7,217
|
|
|
|
5.93
|
%
|
|
|
121,220
|
|
|
|
7,218
|
|
|
|
5.95
|
%
|
|
|
96,789
|
|
|
|
5,726
|
|
|
|
5.92
|
%
|
Trading account securities
|
|
|
17,279
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
4.95
|
%
|
|
|
26,618
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
|
|
50,904
|
|
|
|
2,298
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
%
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
5,198
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
2.12
|
%
|
|
|
6,758
|
|
|
|
342
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
27,433
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
1.37
|
%
|
|
|
17,600
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
2.46
|
%
|
|
|
7,143
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total earning assets
|
|
|
1,011,592
|
|
|
|
60,868
|
|
|
|
6.02
|
%
|
|
|
996,595
|
|
|
|
64,173
|
|
|
|
6.44
|
%
|
|
|
834,334
|
|
|
|
56,242
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
%
|
NON EARNING ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(12,334
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,603
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
|
18,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
23,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,905
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,507
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued income and other assets
|
|
|
86,376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,127,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,113,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
925,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
116,412
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
$
|
114,889
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
$
|
109,370
|
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
177,538
|
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
%
|
|
|
213,410
|
|
|
|
2,439
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
%
|
|
|
188,323
|
|
|
|
4,232
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
398,356
|
|
|
|
13,043
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
%
|
|
|
393,190
|
|
|
|
16,621
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
|
|
349,941
|
|
|
|
16,493
|
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
193,922
|
|
|
|
6,251
|
|
|
|
3.22
|
%
|
|
|
145,802
|
|
|
|
5,733
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
|
|
68,586
|
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities
|
|
|
886,228
|
|
|
|
19,839
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
867,291
|
|
|
|
25,606
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
|
|
716,220
|
|
|
|
25,959
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
NONINTEREST BEARING LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
|
94,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
139,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
1,127,634
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,113,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
925,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (FTE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net yield on interest earning assets (FTE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.06
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
Net
Interest Income
The Corporation derives the majority of its gross income from
interest earned on loans and investments, while its most
significant expense is the interest cost incurred for funds
used. Net interest income is the amount by which interest income
on earning assets exceeds the interest cost of deposits and
borrowings. Net interest income is influenced by changes in the
balance and mix of assets and liabilities and market interest
rates. Management exerts some control over these factors;
however, Federal Reserve monetary policy and competition have a
significant impact. Interest income includes loan fees of
$1,963, in 2009, $1,808 in 2008, and $1,330 in 2007. For
analytical purposes, net interest income is adjusted to a
taxable equivalent basis by adding the income tax
savings from interest on tax-exempt loans and securities, thus
making
year-to-year
comparisons more meaningful.
VOLUME
AND RATE VARIANCE ANALYSIS
The following table details the dollar amount of changes in FTE
net interest income for each major category of interest earning
assets and interest bearing liabilities and the amount of change
attributable to changes in average balances (volume) or average
rates. The change in interest due to both volume and rate has
been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the
relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the change in
each.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 Compared to 2008
|
|
|
2008 Compared to 2007
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due to
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due to
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
CHANGES IN INTEREST INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
567
|
|
|
$
|
(2,535
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,968
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,877
|
|
|
$
|
(2,011
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,866
|
|
Taxable investment securities
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
(1,195
|
)
|
|
|
(721
|
)
|
|
|
2,048
|
|
|
|
(366
|
)
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
Nontaxable investment securities
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
Trading account securities
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
(1,176
|
)
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
(993
|
)
|
Federal funds sold
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(58
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
(239
|
)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
(190
|
)
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes in interest income
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
(4,041
|
)
|
|
|
(3,305
|
)
|
|
|
10,443
|
|
|
|
(2,512
|
)
|
|
|
7,931
|
|
CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(678
|
)
|
|
|
(667
|
)
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
(1,157
|
)
|
|
|
(1,067
|
)
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
(1,687
|
)
|
|
|
(2,040
|
)
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
(2,298
|
)
|
|
|
(1,793
|
)
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
(3,794
|
)
|
|
|
(3,578
|
)
|
|
|
1,924
|
|
|
|
(1,796
|
)
|
|
|
128
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
(1,154
|
)
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
|
|
(767
|
)
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes in interest expense
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
(7,313
|
)
|
|
|
(5,767
|
)
|
|
|
5,665
|
|
|
|
(6,018
|
)
|
|
|
(353
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in interest margin (FTE)
|
|
$
|
(810
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,272
|
|
|
$
|
2,462
|
|
|
$
|
4,778
|
|
|
$
|
3,506
|
|
|
$
|
8,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation, as well as all other financial institutions,
has experienced dramatic changes in interest rates in the last
three years. The Federal Reserve Bank (The Fed)
lowered its target Fed Funds rate to 0.00% 0.25% in
December 2008. The Feds actions were the result of a
significant weakening of the Nations economy to an extent
not seen since the Great Depression. As the Corporations
balance sheet is liability sensitive, net interest margins
increased as the interest rates paid on interest bearing
liabilities decreased faster than those earned on interest
earning assets.
Management does anticipate, however, that net interest margins
will decline throughout 2010 due to the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Based on the current economic conditions, management does not
anticipate any changes in the target Fed funds rate during much
of 2010. As such, the Corporation does not anticipate
significant, if any, changes in market rates. However, there is
the potential for declines in rates earned on interest earning
assets. Most of the potential declines would arise out of the
Corporations investment portfolio, as securities with call
dates will most likely be called and the Corporation will be
reinvesting those proceeds at significantly lower rates.
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
Long term residential mortgage rates continue to be at
historically low levels. This rate environment has led to strong
consumer demand for fixed rate mortgage products which are sold
to the secondary market. As a result of the majority of loans
being sold to the secondary market, there has been a significant
decline in balloon mortgages, which are held on the
Corporations balance sheet. As these balloon mortgages
have been paid off, the proceeds from these loans have been
reinvested at lower interest rates, which has, and will continue
to, adversely impact interest income.
|
|
|
|
While the Corporations liability sensitive balance sheet
has allowed it to benefit from decreases in interest rates, it
also makes the Corporation extremely sensitive to increases in
deposit and borrowing rates. As part of the Corporations
goal to minimize the potential negative impacts of possible
increases in future interest rates, management will actively
work to lengthen its interest bearing liabilities. This
lengthening will increase the Corporations cost of
funding, potentially reducing net interest income in the short
term.
|
|
|
|
In an effort to reduce the potential long term negative impact
of increases in rates paid on interest bearing liabilities, the
Corporation anticipates growing the balance sheet through the
acquisition of investment securities in 2010. These investments
will be funded through deposit growth and wholesale borrowings.
The net interest margin generated by the purchase of these
investments is anticipated to be less than 2.0%, but will
provide additional net interest income.
|
LOAN
QUALITY
Provision
for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses represents the current period loan
cost associated with maintaining an appropriate allowance for
loan losses as determined by management. Periodic fluctuations
in the provision for loan losses result from managements
best estimates as to the adequacy of the allowance for loan
losses to absorb probable losses within the existing loan
portfolio. The provision for loan losses for each period is
further dependent upon many factors, including loan growth, net
charge-offs, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio,
delinquencies, assessment by management, third parties and
banking regulators of the quality of the loan portfolio, the
value of the underlying collateral on problem loans and the
general economic conditions in the market areas.
In the past two years, residential real estate values in the
Banks market areas have declined 20% to 40%. These
declines are the result of increases in the inventory of unsold
homes. This increased inventory is partially the result of the
inability of potential home buyers to obtain financing due to
the tightening of loan underwriting criteria by many of the
financial institutions, brokers and government sponsored
agencies. While Isabella Bank has maintained traditional lending
standards, the decline in real estate values has had an adverse
impact on customers who are experiencing financial difficulties.
Historically, customers who experienced difficulties were able
to sell their properties for more than the loan balance owed.
The steep decline in real estate values has diminished homeowner
equity and led borrowers who are experiencing financial
difficulties to default on their mortgage loans.
While the Bank has elected not to participate in the
U.S. Treasurys Making Home Affordable
Program, it has taken aggressive actions to avoid
foreclosures on borrowers who are willing to work with the Bank
in modifying their loans, thus making them more affordable.
Actions taken include extensions of amortizations, temporary
reductions in interest rates and, when necessary, a reduction in
the principal balance owed. To date, the Bank has modified 94
loans with outstanding balances totaling $7,562.
71
The following schedule shows the composition of the provision
for loan losses and the allowance for loan losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses January 1
|
|
$
|
11,982
|
|
|
$
|
7,301
|
|
|
$
|
7,605
|
|
|
$
|
6,899
|
|
|
$
|
6,444
|
|
Allowance of acquired bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
726
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
|
3,081
|
|
|
|
2,137
|
|
|
|
905
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
|
2,627
|
|
|
|
3,334
|
|
|
|
659
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans charged off
|
|
|
6,642
|
|
|
|
6,325
|
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
1,546
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off
|
|
|
5,096
|
|
|
|
5,641
|
|
|
|
1,515
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
Provision charged to income
|
|
|
6,093
|
|
|
|
9,500
|
|
|
|
1,211
|
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses December 31
|
|
$
|
12,979
|
|
|
$
|
11,982
|
|
|
$
|
7,301
|
|
|
$
|
7,605
|
|
|
$
|
6,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year to date average loans
|
|
$
|
725,299
|
|
|
$
|
717,040
|
|
|
$
|
604,342
|
|
|
$
|
522,726
|
|
|
$
|
466,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off to average loans outstanding
|
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
|
|
0.79
|
%
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount of loans outstanding
|
|
$
|
723,316
|
|
|
$
|
735,385
|
|
|
$
|
612,687
|
|
|
$
|
591,042
|
|
|
$
|
483,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses as a % of loans
|
|
|
1.79
|
%
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
|
|
1.19
|
%
|
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
|
|
1.43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As shown in the preceding table, the Corporations gross
chargeoffs increased $317 to $6,642 in 2009, while recoveries
increased by $862 resulting in a $545 reduction in net
chargeoffs compared with 2008. Management believes the increase
in recoveries, in both dollars and as a percentage of
chargeoffs, is a direct result of management conservatively
valuing collateral that it has repossessed from defaulted
credits.
As discussed above, the Corporation experienced a decline in
credit quality in 2008 resulting in a dramatic increase in total
loans charged off. These chargeoffs were a direct result of the
significant downturn in the national and local economy which has
led to increases in unemployment coupled with significant
property devaluation. As a result of the significant increases
in loans charged off, local and regional economic uncertainties
of the Corporations loan portfolio and increases in
foreclosed loans during 2008 and 2009, the Corporation
significantly increased its provision for loan losses in these
years. This increased provision has resulted in an allowance for
loan losses as a percentage of gross loans of 1.79% as of
December 31, 2009.
The Corporation has also experienced an increase in foreclosed
loans and an increase in loans charged off due mainly to the
downturn in the commercial real estate mortgage market. Of the
$3,081 commercial and agricultural loans charged off in 2009,
$1,325 was related to one loan, for which a $1,000 specific
allocation was recorded as of December 31, 2008.
The nationwide increase in residential mortgage loans past due
and in foreclosures has received considerable attention by the
Federal Government, the media, banking regulators, and industry
trade groups. Based on information provided by The Mortgage
Bankers Association, a substantial portion of the nationwide
increase in both past dues and foreclosures are related to
option adjustable rate mortgages and Alternative-A
sub-prime
mortgage products. While the Corporation has not originated or
held alternative mortgage loan products, the
72
difficulties experienced in these markets have adversely
impacted the entire market, and thus the overall credit quality
of the Corporations residential mortgage portfolio. The
increase in troubled residential mortgage loans and a tightening
of underwriting standards will most likely result in an increase
in residential mortgage loans in foreclosure and possibly the
inventory of unsold homes. The combination of all of these
factors is expected to further reduce average home values and
thus homeowners equity on a national level.
The Corporation originates and sells fixed rate residential real
estate mortgages to the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
The Corporation has not originated loans for either trading or
its own portfolio that would be classified as sub prime, nor has
it originated adjustable rate mortgages or financed loans for
more than 80% of market value unless insured by private third
party insurance.
Based on managements analysis, the allowance for loan
losses of $12,979 is considered adequate as of December 31,
2009.
Allocation
of the Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses has been allocated according to
the amount deemed to be reasonably necessary to reflect for the
probability of losses being incurred within the following
categories as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Each
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
Category
|
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
to Total
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
to Total
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
to Total
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
to Total
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
to Total
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
$
|
3,565
|
|
|
|
53.1
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,632
|
|
|
|
50.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
46.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,687
|
|
|
|
43.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,771
|
|
|
|
46.9
|
%
|
Real estate mortgage
|
|
|
3,809
|
|
|
|
39.5
|
%
|
|
|
3,832
|
|
|
|
43.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
48.6
|
%
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
50.9
|
%
|
|
|
1,192
|
|
|
|
46.8
|
%
|
Consumer installment
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
1,736
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
|
2,195
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
|
2,434
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
2,286
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
Specific allocations
|
|
|
3,572
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
2,065
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
594
|
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,979
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,982
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,301
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,605
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,899
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management has evaluated all specific allocations and believes
the valuation allowance related to these loans to be adequate.
Nonperforming
Assets
Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when they become
90 days past due, unless they are well secured and in the
process of collection. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual
status, any interest previously accrued and not collected is
reversed from income or charged off against the allowance for
loan losses. Loans are charged off when management determines
that collection has become unlikely. Restructured loans are
those where a concession has been granted on either principal or
interest paid due to financial difficulties of the borrower.
Other real estate owned consists of real property acquired
through foreclosure on the related collateral underlying
defaulted loans.
73
The following table presents nonperforming assets for the past
five years:
Nonperforming
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans
|
|
$
|
8,522
|
|
|
$
|
11,175
|
|
|
$
|
4,156
|
|
|
$
|
3,444
|
|
|
$
|
1,375
|
|
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
1,727
|
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
|
9,290
|
|
|
|
12,426
|
|
|
|
5,883
|
|
|
|
4,629
|
|
|
|
2,433
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
|
1,141
|
|
|
|
2,770
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
Repossessed assets
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
10,447
|
|
|
$
|
15,349
|
|
|
$
|
7,259
|
|
|
$
|
5,191
|
|
|
$
|
2,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans as a % of total loans
|
|
|
1.28
|
%
|
|
|
1.69
|
%
|
|
|
0.96
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
0.50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets as a % of total assets
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
|
1.35
|
%
|
|
|
0.76
|
%
|
|
|
0.57
|
%
|
|
|
0.34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructured
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Complying with modified terms
|
|
$
|
2,754
|
|
|
$
|
2,565
|
|
|
$
|
517
|
|
|
$
|
640
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
Past due
30-89 days
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
663
|
|
Past due 90 days or more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual
|
|
|
2,116
|
|
|
|
1,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restructured loans
|
|
$
|
4,977
|
|
|
$
|
4,550
|
|
|
$
|
685
|
|
|
$
|
697
|
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since December 31, 2008, the Corporations
nonperforming loans have declined $3,136. Of this decline,
$1,325 is related to the charge off of one specific loan as
noted previously. The remainder of the decline is related to
loans being removed from nonaccrual status as a result of
improvements in creditworthiness, loans being paid off, loans
being charged off, or transfers to other real estate owned. The
majority of the restructured loans are the result of the
Corporation working with borrowers to develop a payment
structure that will allow them to continue making payments in
lieu of foreclosure or repossession of collateral.
Of the $1,629 decline in other real estate owned, $670 related
to the sale of one property. Management has evaluated the
properties held as other real estate owned and has adjusted the
carrying value of each property to the lower of the carrying
amount or fair value less costs to sell, as necessary.
Management anticipates the balance of other real estate owned to
remain at historically high levels throughout 2010.
Management established a credit risk management committee in
2008. This committee consists of management from lending,
accounting, collection and auditing. This committee reviews
various reports covering credit quality to help identify
potential problem credits and their potential impact on the
Corporations consolidated financial statements. Management
believes that as of December 31, 2009 all significant loans
for which inherent losses are probable have been identified and
that the carrying amounts of the loans have been adjusted to
reflect the collaterals net realizable values. To
managements knowledge, there are no other loans which
cause management to have serious doubts as to the ability of a
borrower to comply with their loan repayment terms. A continued
decline in real estate values may require further write downs of
loans in foreclosure and other real estate owned and could
potentially have an adverse impact on the Corporations
financial performance.
As of December 31, 2009, there were no other interest
bearing assets which required classification. Management is not
aware of any recommendations by regulatory agencies that, if
implemented, would have a material impact on the
Corporations liquidity, capital, or operations.
74
As a result of the new State of Michigan foreclosure laws, which
went into effect on July 5, 2009, the time required to
complete a residential mortgage foreclosure has increased.
Despite the increased timeline to complete the foreclosure
process, the new law did not have a significant impact on the
Corporations ability to initiate and complete foreclosure
proceedings.
Noninterest
Income
The following table shows the changes in noninterest income
between the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Service charges and fee income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NSF and overdraft fees
|
|
$
|
3,187
|
|
|
$
|
3,413
|
|
|
$
|
(226
|
)
|
|
|
−6.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,961
|
|
|
$
|
452
|
|
|
|
15.3
|
%
|
Trust fees
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
−8.1
|
%
|
|
|
1,035
|
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
−14.4
|
%
|
Freddie Mac servicing fee
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
%
|
|
|
635
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
−1.3
|
%
|
ATM and debit card fees
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
%
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
39.6
|
%
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
−7.5
|
%
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
Net originated mortgage servicing rights income (loss)
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
606
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
(135
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
All other
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
−17.0
|
%
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
−12.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total service charges and fees
|
|
|
6,913
|
|
|
|
6,370
|
|
|
|
543
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
5,894
|
|
|
|
476
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
Gain on sale of mortgage loans
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
Net gain (loss) on trading securities
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
−67.3
|
%
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
−46.7
|
%
|
Net gain (loss) on borrowings measured at fair value
|
|
|
289
|
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(575
|
)
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Gain (loss) on sale of investment securities
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
624
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Title insurance revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
|
|
−100.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
(1,958
|
)
|
|
|
−89.3
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash value of corporate owned life insurance policies
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
Brokerage and advisory fees
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
480
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
73.9
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
−20.9
|
%
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
(359
|
)
|
|
|
−61.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,292
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
$
|
10,156
|
|
|
$
|
7,802
|
|
|
$
|
2,354
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,962
|
|
|
$
|
(2,160
|
)
|
|
|
−21.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant changes in noninterest income are detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Management continuously analyzes various fees related to deposit
accounts, including service charges, NSF and overdraft fees, and
ATM and debit card fees. Based on these analyses, the
Corporation makes any necessary adjustments to ensure that its
fee structure is within the range of its competitors, while at
the same time making sure that the fees remain fair to deposit
customers. NSF and overdraft fees have been declining over the
past two years. This decline is a result of customers more
closely managing their deposit accounts to avoid paying
overdraft fees. Management does not expect significant changes
to its deposit fee structure throughout 2010.
|
|
|
|
Trust fees fluctuate from period to period based on various
factors including changes in the market value of assets held,
the mix of their customers portfolios and the closing of
client estates (as much of their estate fees are non-recurring
in nature and are based on the assets of the estate).
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
The increases in ATM and debit card fees during 2009 and 2008
are primarily the result of the increased usage of debit cards
by the Banks customers. As management does not anticipate
any significant changes to the ATM and debit card fee
structures, these fees are expected to continue to increase as
the usage of debit cards increases.
|
|
|
|
As a result of lower than normal residential mortgage rates, the
Corporation has experienced increases in Federal Home Loan
Corporation (Freddie Mac) servicing fees, net
originated mortgage servicing rights (OMSR), and gains from the
sale of mortgage loans to the secondary market in 2009. The
Corporations servicing portfolio has increased $53,161
since December 31, 2008. The increase in Freddie Mac
servicing fees is a direct result of the increase in the volume
of loans the Corporation services as the Corporation is paid
0.25% per year for each dollar of loans serviced. The increase
in loans serviced, as well as recent increases in residential
mortgage rates, has led to the increase in net OMSR income. As
refinancing activity is expected to decline, the Corporation
anticipates net OMSR income and the gains from the sale of
mortgage loans to decline in 2010.
|
|
|
|
Title insurance revenue decreased as a result of a joint venture
between IBT Title and Insurance Agency and Corporate Title on
March 1, 2008 (see Note 2 Business
Combinations and Joint Venture Formation of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements). The Corporations
portion of income or loss from the joint venture is now included
in all other income. This new venture was the primary reason for
the decline in all other income when the year ended
December 31, 2008 is compared to the same period in 2007 as
the Corporations share of the entitys losses were
$268.
|
|
|
|
Net gains and losses related to trading securities and
borrowings carried at fair market value fluctuate based on
interest rate variances. During 2008, the Corporation recorded
$641 in net losses related to borrowings carried at fair market
value. These losses were the result of a dramatic decline in
offering rates on borrowed funds. Management does not anticipate
any significant fluctuations in net trading activities for 2010
as significant interest rate changes are not expected.
|
|
|
|
Income related to the value of Corporate owned life insurance
increased in 2008 when compared to 2007 as a result of the
purchase of additional policies as well as transferring the
management of the policies to a new investment advisor.
|
|
|
|
The years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009 were excellent
years for brokerage and advisory services income. These results
are due to an increase in customer base, a conscious effort by
management to expand the Banks presence in the local
market, and a result of the addition of another broker in the
fourth quarter of 2008. The Corporation anticipates this trend
to continue in 2010.
|
76
Noninterest
Expenses
The following table shows the changes in noninterest expenses
between the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007
respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leased employee salaries
|
|
$
|
13,494
|
|
|
$
|
12,465
|
|
|
$
|
1,029
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,507
|
|
|
$
|
958
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
Leased employee benefits
|
|
|
4,745
|
|
|
|
4,502
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
4,096
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
|
|
9.9
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
−24.0
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
66.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total compensation
|
|
|
18,258
|
|
|
|
16,992
|
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
15,618
|
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
Outside services
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
−12.0
|
%
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
48.2
|
%
|
Property taxes
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
Utilities
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
366
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
7.4
|
%
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
Building rent
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
−33.3
|
%
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
−95.8
|
%
|
Building repairs
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
42.6
|
%
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
37.4
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
30.2
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total occupancy
|
|
|
2,170
|
|
|
|
2,035
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
%
|
|
|
1,766
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
15.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
|
1,663
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Computer/service contracts
|
|
|
1,676
|
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
%
|
|
|
1,289
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
21.4
|
%
|
ATM and debit card fees
|
|
|
621
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
31.6
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
−9.8
|
%
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
−19.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total furniture and equipment
|
|
|
4,146
|
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
|
3,297
|
|
|
|
552
|
|
|
|
16.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FDIC insurance premiums
|
|
|
1,730
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit and SOX compliance fees
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
−3.4
|
%
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
−3.1
|
%
|
Marketing and community relations
|
|
|
833
|
|
|
|
844
|
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
−1.3
|
%
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
Directors fees
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
Printing and supplies
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
Education and travel
|
|
|
395
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
−19.6
|
%
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
−2.8
|
%
|
Postage and freight
|
|
|
472
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
−9.8
|
%
|
|
|
459
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
13.9
|
%
|
Legal
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
−1.0
|
%
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
41.6
|
%
|
Amortization of deposit premium
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
−9.6
|
%
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
49.3
|
%
|
Foreclosed asset and collection
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
19.1
|
%
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
159.5
|
%
|
Brokerage and advisory
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
−6.8
|
%
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
122.8
|
%
|
Consulting
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
−32.6
|
%
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
69.3
|
%
|
All other
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
−0.8
|
%
|
|
|
1,867
|
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
−9.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other
|
|
|
7,379
|
|
|
|
7,515
|
|
|
|
(136
|
)
|
|
|
−1.8
|
%
|
|
|
6,453
|
|
|
|
1,062
|
|
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expenses
|
|
$
|
33,683
|
|
|
$
|
30,704
|
|
|
$
|
2,979
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
27,229
|
|
|
$
|
3,475
|
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
Significant changes in noninterest expenses are detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Leased employee salaries expenses have increased due to annual
merit increases and the continued growth of the Corporation as
well as overtime due to the increased volume of mortgage
refinancing noted earlier. The increases in leased employee
benefits expenses are principally the result of continued
increases in health care costs.
|
|
|
|
The increase in building repairs for 2009 can be attributed to
standard upkeep done to various branches throughout the year,
while the decline in building rent in 2008 was a result of the
new joint venture (see Note 2 Business
Combinations and Joint Venture Formation of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements).
|
|
|
|
FDIC insurance premium expense has increased primarily as a
result of significant increases in the premium rates charged by
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. This expense also
includes a one time assessment of $479, which was paid in
September 2009.
|
|
|
|
In April 2008, the Corporation unveiled a new brand for both
Isabella Bank (the Bank) and Isabella Bank
Corporation. As a result of the development of this brand and
the corresponding marketing campaign, the Corporation incurred
significant nonrecurring marketing expenses during 2008. During
2009, the Corporation contributed $140 to the IBT Foundation as
compared to $0 in 2008.
|
|
|
|
The increase in the amortization of deposit premium in 2008 was
related to the January 2008 acquisition of Greenville Community
Financial Corporation (GCFC). This expense declined in 2009, and
is expected to decline again in 2010, as the deposit premium is
being amortized using an accelerated amortization method.
|
|
|
|
As a result of the recent increases in delinquencies and
foreclosures, the Corporation has incurred historically high
legal, foreclosed asset, and collection expenses since 2007.
These expenses are expected to remain above historical levels in
2010 as management anticipates that delinquency rates and
foreclosures will remain high.
|
|
|
|
Consulting fees were elevated in 2008 primarily as a result of a
potential new branch location study that was performed.
|
|
|
|
All other expenses include title insurance expenses as well as
other miscellaneous expenses. All other expenses decreased by
$222 in 2008 as a result of the new joint venture (see
Note 2 Business Combinations and Joint
Venture Formation of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements). The remaining changes in other expenses are
individually not significant.
|
|
|
|
The increase in total noninterest expenses from 2007 to 2008 was
partially the result of the acquisition of GCFC in January 2008.
Exclusive of the effects of the acquisition, total noninterest
expenses increased 2.3%, with no individually significant
changes other than those noted above.
|
Federal
Income Taxes
Federal income tax (benefit) expense for 2009 was $846 or 9.8%
of pre-tax income compared to ($724) or (21.4%) of pre-tax
income in 2008 and $1,605 or 16.8% in 2007. The primary factor
behind the reduction in the effective rate in 2008 is related to
the increase in tax exempt income as a percentage of net income.
A reconcilement of actual federal income tax expense reported
and the amount computed at the federal statutory rate of 34% is
found in Note 12, Federal Income Taxes of Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements.
78
ANALYSIS
OF CHANGES IN FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
22,706
|
|
|
$
|
22,979
|
|
|
$
|
(273
|
)
|
|
|
−1.19
|
%
|
Interest bearing balances in other financial institutions
|
|
|
7,156
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
6,581
|
|
|
|
N/M
|
|
Trading account securities
|
|
|
13,563
|
|
|
|
21,775
|
|
|
|
(8,212
|
)
|
|
|
−37.71
|
%
|
Available-for-sale
investment securities
|
|
|
259,066
|
|
|
|
246,455
|
|
|
|
12,611
|
|
|
|
5.12
|
%
|
Mortgage loans available for sale
|
|
|
2,281
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
1,383
|
|
|
|
154.01
|
%
|
Loans
|
|
|
723,316
|
|
|
|
735,385
|
|
|
|
(12,069
|
)
|
|
|
−1.64
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(12,979
|
)
|
|
|
(11,982
|
)
|
|
|
(997
|
)
|
|
|
8.32
|
%
|
Premises and equipment
|
|
|
23,917
|
|
|
|
23,231
|
|
|
|
686
|
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
Acquisition intangibles and goodwill, net
|
|
|
47,429
|
|
|
|
47,804
|
|
|
|
(375
|
)
|
|
|
−0.78
|
%
|
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
|
|
|
17,921
|
|
|
|
17,345
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
3.32
|
%
|
Other assets
|
|
|
39,568
|
|
|
|
34,798
|
|
|
|
4,770
|
|
|
|
13.71
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,143,944
|
|
|
$
|
1,139,263
|
|
|
$
|
4,681
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
802,652
|
|
|
$
|
775,630
|
|
|
$
|
27,022
|
|
|
|
3.48
|
%
|
Other borrowed funds
|
|
|
193,101
|
|
|
|
222,350
|
|
|
|
(29,249
|
)
|
|
|
−13.15
|
%
|
Accrued interest and other liabilities
|
|
|
7,388
|
|
|
|
6,807
|
|
|
|
581
|
|
|
|
8.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
1,003,141
|
|
|
|
1,004,787
|
|
|
|
(1,646
|
)
|
|
|
−0.16
|
%
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
140,803
|
|
|
|
134,476
|
|
|
|
6,327
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,143,944
|
|
|
$
|
1,139,263
|
|
|
$
|
4,681
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A discussion of changes in balance sheet amounts by major
categories follows:
Interest
bearing balances in other financial institutions
The increase in interest bearing balances in other financial
institutions is primarily the result of the Corporation
increasing its holdings in certificates of deposits due to the
relative competitiveness of the interest rates as well as the
temporary increase in FDIC insurance limits.
Trading
account securities
Trading securities are carried at fair value. The
Corporations overall intent is to maintain a trading
portfolio to enhance the ongoing restructuring of assets and
liabilities as part of our interest rate risk management
objectives (See Note 3 of the Consolidated Financial
Statements). Due to the current interest rate environment, the
Corporation has allowed this balance to decline.
Available-for-sale
Investment Securities
The primary objective of the Corporations investing
activities is to provide for safety of the principal invested.
Secondary considerations include the need for earnings,
liquidity, and the Corporations overall exposure to
changes in interest rates. Securities currently classified as
available-for-sale
are stated at fair value.
79
The following is a schedule of the carrying value of investment
securities
available-for-sale
as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agencies
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,083
|
|
|
$
|
4,058
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
19,471
|
|
|
|
62,988
|
|
|
|
50,181
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
151,730
|
|
|
|
149,323
|
|
|
|
130,956
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,145
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
Auction rate money market preferred
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
|
|
5,979
|
|
|
|
12,300
|
|
Preferred stocks
|
|
|
7,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
67,734
|
|
|
|
16,937
|
|
|
|
3,632
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
10,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
259,066
|
|
|
$
|
246,455
|
|
|
$
|
213,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a schedule of the carrying value of trading
securities as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,014
|
|
|
$
|
4,024
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
9,962
|
|
|
|
11,556
|
|
|
|
10,324
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
3,601
|
|
|
|
6,045
|
|
|
|
9,712
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13,563
|
|
|
$
|
21,775
|
|
|
$
|
25,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding those holdings of the investment portfolio in
government-sponsored enterprises and municipalities within the
states of Michigan and Pennsylvania, there were no investments
in securities of any one issuer that exceeded 10% of
shareholders equity. The Corporation has a policy
prohibiting investments in securities that it deems are
unsuitable due to their inherent credit or market risks.
Prohibited investments include stripped mortgage backed
securities, zero coupon bonds, nongovernment agency asset backed
securities, and structured notes. The Corporations
holdings in mortgage-backed securities include only government
agencies and government sponsored agencies as the Corporation
holds no investments in private label mortgage-backed securities.
The Corporation invested $11,000 in auction rate money market
preferred security instruments, which are classified as
available-for-sale
securities and reflected at fair value. As a result of the
illiquidity of the markets for these securities, $7,800
converted during 2009 to preferred stock with debt like
characteristics. Due to the continuing uncertainty in credit
markets, these investments are considered illiquid. Due to their
illiquidity, the fair values of these securities were estimated
utilizing a discounted cash flow analysis or other type of
valuation adjustment methodology as of December 31, 2009
and 2008. This analysis considers, among other factors, the
collateral underlying the security investments, the
creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected
future cash flows, estimates of the next time the security is
expected to have a successful auction, and the
Corporations ability to hold such securities until credit
markets improve.
The following is a schedule of maturities of available for sale
investment securities (at carrying value) and their weighted
average yield as of December 31, 2009. Weighted average
yields have been computed on a fully taxable-equivalent basis
using a tax rate of 34%. Mortgage-backed securities and
collateralized mortgage obligations are included in maturity
categories based on their stated maturity date. Expected
maturities may differ from contractual maturities because
issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations.
Trading securities have been excluded as they are not expected
to be held to maturity. Included in the contractual maturity
distribution in the following table are auction rate money
market preferred securities and preferred stock. Auction rate
debt and auction rate preferred securities are long-term
floating rate instruments for which interest rates are set at
periodic auctions. At each successful auction, the Corporation
has the option to sell the security at par value. Additionally,
the issuers of
80
auction rate securities generally have the right to redeem or
refinance the debt. As a result, the expected life of auction
rate securities may differ significantly from the contractual
term.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After One Year But
|
|
|
After Five Years But
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within One Year
|
|
|
Within Five Years
|
|
|
Within Ten Years
|
|
|
After Ten Years
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield (%)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield (%)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield (%)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield (%)
|
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,570
|
|
|
|
2.32
|
|
|
$
|
901
|
|
|
|
7.91
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States and political subdivisions
|
|
|
7,922
|
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
|
|
44,844
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
|
|
|
65,882
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
33,082
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
|
Mortgage-backed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
38,790
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
28,495
|
|
|
|
3.74
|
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,104
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
Auction rate money market preferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
|
Preferred stocks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,054
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,922
|
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
|
$
|
63,863
|
|
|
|
3.68
|
|
|
$
|
105,573
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
|
$
|
81,708
|
|
|
|
3.58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
The largest component of earning assets is loans. The proper
management of credit and market risk inherent in the loan
portfolio is critical to the financial well-being of the
Corporation. To control these risks, the Corporation has adopted
strict underwriting standards. The standards include specific
criteria against lending outside the Corporations defined
market areas, lending limits to a single borrower, and strict
loan to collateral value limits. The Corporation also monitors
and limits loan concentrations extended to volatile industries.
The Corporation has no foreign loans and there were no
concentrations greater than 10% of total loans that are not
disclosed as a separate category in the following table.
The following table presents the composition of the loan
portfolio for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
340,274
|
|
|
$
|
324,806
|
|
|
$
|
238,306
|
|
|
$
|
212,701
|
|
|
$
|
179,541
|
|
Agricultural
|
|
|
64,845
|
|
|
|
58,003
|
|
|
|
47,407
|
|
|
|
47,302
|
|
|
|
49,424
|
|
Residential real estate mortgage
|
|
|
285,838
|
|
|
|
319,397
|
|
|
|
297,937
|
|
|
|
300,650
|
|
|
|
226,251
|
|
Installment
|
|
|
32,359
|
|
|
|
33,179
|
|
|
|
29,037
|
|
|
|
30,389
|
|
|
|
28,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
723,316
|
|
|
$
|
735,385
|
|
|
$
|
612,687
|
|
|
$
|
591,042
|
|
|
$
|
483,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the change in the loan categories
for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
15,468
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
86,500
|
|
|
|
36.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
25,605
|
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
Agricultural
|
|
|
6,842
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
|
|
10,596
|
|
|
|
22.4
|
%
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Residential real estate mortgage
|
|
|
(33,559
|
)
|
|
|
−10.5
|
%
|
|
|
21,460
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
|
(2,713
|
)
|
|
|
−0.9
|
%
|
Installment
|
|
|
(820
|
)
|
|
|
−2.5
|
%
|
|
|
4,142
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
|
|
(1,352
|
)
|
|
|
−4.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(12,069
|
)
|
|
|
−1.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
122,698
|
|
|
|
20.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
21,645
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The growth in commercial and agricultural loans is a result of
the Corporations efforts to increase the commercial loan
portfolio as a percentage of total loans. A significant portion
of this growth has been driven by the Corporations new
business development team.
The current rate environment has increased residential mortgage
refinancing activity, which has led to increases in loans sold
to the secondary market. This refinancing activity has, however,
led to a decline in the residential real estate portfolio as
customers who have traditionally utilized 3 and 5 year
balloon products are refinancing into 15 and 30 year fixed
rate loans, which the Corporation typically sells on the
secondary market. This
81
activity resulted in a net increase of $53,161 in the balance of
residential mortgage loans sold to the secondary market since
December 31, 2008.
A substantial portion of the increase in total loans as of
December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007 was a
result of the acquisition of Greenville Financial Corporation in
January 2008. Pursuant to the acquisition, the Corporation
purchased gross loans totaling $88,613.
Equity
securities without readily determinable fair values
Included in equity securities without readily determinable fair
values are restricted securities, which are carried at cost, and
investments in nonconsolidated entities accounted for under the
equity method of accounting.
Equity securities without readily determinable fair values
consist of the following as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
|
|
$
|
7,960
|
|
|
$
|
7,460
|
|
Investment in CT/IBT Title Agency, LLC
|
|
|
6,782
|
|
|
|
6,905
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank Stock
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
Investment in Valley Financial Corporation
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Other
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17,921
|
|
|
$
|
17,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Assets
Other assets increased in 2009 primarily due to the required
prepayment of $4,737 in estimated FDIC insurance premiums for
2010, 2011 and 2012.
Deposits
The main source of funds for the Corporation is deposits. The
deposit portfolio represents various types of non transaction
accounts as well as savings accounts and time deposits.
The following table presents the composition of the deposit
portfolio as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
96,875
|
|
|
$
|
97,546
|
|
|
$
|
84,846
|
|
|
$
|
83,902
|
|
|
$
|
73,839
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
128,111
|
|
|
|
113,973
|
|
|
|
105,526
|
|
|
|
111,406
|
|
|
|
104,251
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
157,020
|
|
|
|
182,523
|
|
|
|
196,682
|
|
|
|
178,001
|
|
|
|
153,397
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
356,594
|
|
|
|
340,976
|
|
|
|
311,976
|
|
|
|
320,226
|
|
|
|
250,246
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit
|
|
|
50,933
|
|
|
|
28,185
|
|
|
|
28,197
|
|
|
|
27,446
|
|
|
|
7,076
|
|
Internet certificates of deposit
|
|
|
13,119
|
|
|
|
12,427
|
|
|
|
6,246
|
|
|
|
4,859
|
|
|
|
3,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
802,652
|
|
|
$
|
775,630
|
|
|
$
|
733,473
|
|
|
$
|
725,840
|
|
|
$
|
592,478
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
The following table presents the change in the deposit
categories for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
$ Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
(671
|
)
|
|
|
−0.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
12,700
|
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
944
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
14,138
|
|
|
|
12.4
|
%
|
|
|
8,447
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
(5,880
|
)
|
|
|
−5.3
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
(25,503
|
)
|
|
|
−14.0
|
%
|
|
|
(14,159
|
)
|
|
|
−7.2
|
%
|
|
|
18,681
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
15,618
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
29,000
|
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
|
(8,250
|
)
|
|
|
−2.6
|
%
|
Brokered certificates of deposit
|
|
|
22,748
|
|
|
|
80.7
|
%
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
751
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
Internet certificates of deposit
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
6,181
|
|
|
|
99.0
|
%
|
|
|
1,387
|
|
|
|
28.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
27,022
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
42,157
|
|
|
|
5.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,633
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As shown in the preceding table, total deposits have grown
conservatively since December 31, 2008. This growth has
primarily come in the form of interest bearing demand deposits,
certificates of deposits, and brokered certificates of deposits.
The growth in interest bearing demand deposits and certificates
of deposits, as well as the declines in savings deposits is the
results of a change in customers preferences as much of
the variances represent transfers between different types of
accounts and the current economics within the market. The
increase in brokered certificates of deposit is the result of
the Corporation purchasing CDs through the Certificate of
Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS).
A substantial portion of the increase in total deposits as of
December 31, 2008 compared to December 31, 2007 was a
result of the acquisition of Greenville Community Financial
Corporation (GCFC) in January 2008. Pursuant to the acquisition,
the Corporation purchased deposits totaling $90,151. Exclusive
of the GCFC acquisition, deposits decreased $47,994 when
December 31, 2008 is compared to December 31, 2007.
This decline was the result of increased competition with other
depository institutions as well as declines in brokered
certificates of deposit and internet certificates of deposit.
The following table shows the average balances and corresponding
interest rates paid on deposit accounts as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Noninterest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
94,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
95,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
80,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
116,412
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
114,889
|
|
|
|
0.71
|
%
|
|
|
109,370
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
%
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
177,538
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
%
|
|
|
213,410
|
|
|
|
1.14
|
%
|
|
|
188,323
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
%
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
398,356
|
|
|
|
3.27
|
%
|
|
|
393,190
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
|
|
349,941
|
|
|
|
4.71
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
786,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
817,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
727,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The remaining maturity of time certificates and other time
deposits of $100 or more at December 31, 2009 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
|
Within 3 months
|
|
$
|
45,849
|
|
Within 3 to 6 months
|
|
|
23,223
|
|
Within 6 to 12 months
|
|
|
56,669
|
|
Over 12 months
|
|
|
62,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
188,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowed
Funds
As a result of the decrease in loans, coupled with the increase
in deposits, the Corporation was able to reduce other borrowed
funds.
83
Capital
The capital of the Corporation consists solely of common stock,
retained earnings, and accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss). The Corporation offers dividend reinvestment and
employee and director stock purchase plans. Under the provisions
of these Plans, the Corporation issued 126,874 shares of
common stock generating $2,396 of capital during 2009, and
78,994 shares of common stock generating $2,879 of capital
in 2008. The Corporation also offers share-based payment awards
through its equity compensation plan (See Note 17 of Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements). Pursuant to this plan,
the Corporation generated $677 and $603 of capital in 2009 and
2008, respectively.
The Board of Directors has adopted a common stock repurchase
plan. This plan was approved to enable the Corporation to
repurchase the Corporations common stock for reissuance to
the dividend reinvestment plan, the employee stock purchase plan
and for distributions of share-based payment awards. During 2009
and 2008 the Corporation repurchased 122,612 shares of
common stock at an average price of $19.47 and
148,336 shares of common stock at an average price of
$43.41, respectively.
Accumulated other comprehensive loss decreased $3,450 in 2009
and consists of $3,203 of unrealized gains on available-for-sale
investment securities and a $247 reduction of unrecognized
pension cost. These amounts are net of tax.
The Federal Reserve Boards current recommended minimum
primary capital to assets requirement is 6.0%. The
Corporations primary capital to average assets ratio,
which consists of shareholders equity plus the allowance
for loan losses less acquisition intangibles, was 8.60% at year
end 2009. There are no commitments for significant capital
expenditures.
The Federal Reserve Board has established a minimum risk based
capital standard. Under this standard, a framework has been
established that assigns risk weights to each category of on and
off-balance-sheet items to arrive at risk adjusted total assets.
Regulatory capital is divided by the risk adjusted assets with
the resulting ratio compared to the minimum standard to
determine whether a corporation has adequate capital. The
minimum standard is 8%, of which at least 4% must consist of
equity capital net of goodwill. The following table sets forth
the percentages required under the Risk Based Capital guidelines
and the Corporations values at December 31, 2009:
Percentage of Capital to Risk Adjusted Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporation
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Required
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Equity Capital
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
12.80
|
%
|
Secondary Capital
|
|
|
4.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
14.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporations secondary capital includes only
the allowance for loan losses. The percentage for the secondary
capital under the required column is the maximum amount allowed
from all sources.
The Federal Reserve also prescribes minimum capital requirements
for the Corporations subsidiary Bank. At December 31,
2009, the Bank exceeded these minimums. For further information
regarding the Banks capital requirements, refer to
Note 16 of the Consolidated Financial Statements,
Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements.
Fair
Value
The Corporation utilizes fair value measurements to record fair
value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to
determine fair value disclosures. Securities available-for-sale,
trading securities and certain liabilities are recorded at fair
value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the
Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets
on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held-for-sale, loans held
for investment in foreclosed assets, mortgage servicing rights
and certain other assets and liabilities. These
84
nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve the
application of lower of cost or market accounting or write-downs
of individual assets.
Due to the illiquidity of certain investment securities, these
assets were classified as having significant non observable
inputs (Level 3) during 2008. The fair values of these
securities are estimated utilizing a discounted cash flow
analysis or other type of valuation adjustment methodology as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008. These analyses consider, among
other factors, the collateral underlying the security
investments, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the
timing of expected future cash flows, estimates of the next time
the security is expected to have a successful auction, and the
fact that the management asserts that it does not intend to sell
the security in an unrealized loss position and it is more
likely than not it will not have to sell the securities before
recovery of its cost basis, as further described in Note 4
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The table below represents the activity in Level 3 inputs
measured on a recurring basis for the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs January 1
|
|
$
|
5,021
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Transfers of securities into level 3 due to changes in the
observability of significant inputs (illiquid markets)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investment
securities
|
|
|
5,006
|
|
|
|
(5,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs December 31
|
|
$
|
10,027
|
|
|
$
|
5,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For further information regarding fair value measurements see
Note 20 of the Consolidated Financial Statements,
Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value and
Note 21of the Consolidated Financial Statements, Fair
Values of Financial Instruments.
Interest
Rate Sensitivity
Interest rate sensitivity is determined by the amount of earning
assets and interest bearing liabilities repricing within a
specific time period, and their relative sensitivity to a change
in interest rates. Management also strives to achieve reasonable
stability in the net interest margin through periods of changing
interest rates. One tool used by management to measure interest
rate sensitivity is gap analysis. As shown in the following
table, the gap analysis depicts the Corporations position
for specific time periods and the cumulative gap as a percentage
of total assets.
Trading securities are included in the 0 to 3 month time
frame due to their repricing characteristics. Fixed interest
rate investment securities are scheduled according to their
contractual maturity. Fixed rate loans are included in the
appropriate time frame based on their scheduled amortization.
Variable rate loans are included in the time frame of their
earliest repricing. Of the $723,316 in total loans, $138,085 are
variable rate loans. Time deposit liabilities are scheduled
based on their contractual maturity except for variable rate
time deposits in the amount of $1,821 that are included in the 0
to 3 month time frame.
Savings, NOW accounts, and money market accounts have no
contractual maturity date and are believed to be predominantly
noninterest rate sensitive by management. These accounts have
been classified in the gap table according to their estimated
withdrawal rates based upon managements analysis of
deposit runoff over the past five years. Management believes
this runoff experience is consistent with its expectation for
the future. As of December 31, 2009, the Corporation had
$88,403 more liabilities than assets maturing within one year. A
negative gap position results when more liabilities, within a
specified time frame, mature or reprice than assets.
The following table shows the time periods and the amount of
assets and liabilities available for interest rate repricing as
of December 31, 2009. The interest rate sensitivity
information for investment securities is based on the
85
expected prepayments and call dates versus stated maturities.
For purposes of this analysis, nonaccrual loans and the
allowance for loan losses are excluded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 to 3
|
|
|
4 to 12
|
|
|
1 to 5
|
|
|
Over 5
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Interest Sensitive Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
$
|
13,563
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
23,430
|
|
|
|
44,648
|
|
|
|
97,741
|
|
|
|
93,247
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
173,302
|
|
|
|
89,964
|
|
|
|
402,764
|
|
|
|
48,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
210,295
|
|
|
$
|
134,612
|
|
|
$
|
500,505
|
|
|
$
|
142,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Sensitive Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
$
|
56,947
|
|
|
$
|
28,154
|
|
|
$
|
63,000
|
|
|
$
|
45,000
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
91,078
|
|
|
|
178,748
|
|
|
|
148,770
|
|
|
|
2,050
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
9,622
|
|
|
|
35,247
|
|
|
|
88,645
|
|
|
|
23,506
|
|
Interest bearing demand
|
|
|
8,070
|
|
|
|
25,444
|
|
|
|
71,605
|
|
|
|
22,992
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
165,717
|
|
|
$
|
267,593
|
|
|
$
|
372,020
|
|
|
$
|
93,548
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative gap (deficiency)
|
|
$
|
44,578
|
|
|
$
|
(88,403
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,082
|
|
|
$
|
88,545
|
|
Cumulative gap (deficiency) as a % of assets
|
|
|
3.90
|
%
|
|
|
(7.73
|
)%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
7.74
|
%
|
The following table shows the maturity of commercial and
agricultural loans outstanding at December 31, 2009. Also
provided are the amounts due after one year, classified
according to the sensitivity to changes in interest rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1 to 5
|
|
|
Over 5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Less
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Commercial and agricultural
|
|
$
|
96,488
|
|
|
$
|
291,650
|
|
|
$
|
16,981
|
|
|
$
|
405,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Sensitivity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans maturing after one year that have:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
246,145
|
|
|
$
|
15,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,505
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
291,650
|
|
|
$
|
16,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity
Liquidity is monitored regularly by the Corporations
Market Risk Committee, which consists of members of senior
management. The committee reviews projected cash flows, key
ratios and liquidity available from both primary and secondary
sources.
The primary sources of the Corporations liquidity are cash
and cash equivalents, trading securities, and
available-for-sale
investment securities, excluding auction rate money market
preferred securities and preferred stock due to their
illiquidity. These categories totaled $292,464 or 25.6% of
assets as of December 31, 2009 as compared to $285,805 or
25.0% in 2008. Liquidity is important for financial institutions
because of their need to meet loan funding commitments,
depositor withdrawal requests and various other commitments
discussed in the accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements. Liquidity varies significantly daily, based on
customer activity.
Operating activities provided $18,225 of cash in 2009 as
compared to $20,661 in 2008. Net financing activities used
$7,538 of cash in 2009 as compared to providing $66,038 in 2008,
with the fluctuation being primarily the result of increases in
other borrowed funds during 2008. The Corporations
investing activities used cash amounting to $10,960 in 2009 and
$87,846 in 2008. The accumulated effect of the
Corporations operating, investing, and financing
activities used $273 of cash in 2009 and $1,147 in 2008.
86
The primary source of funds for the Bank is deposits. The Bank
emphasizes interest-bearing time deposits as part of its funding
strategy. The Bank also seeks noninterest bearing deposits, or
checking accounts, to expand its customer base, while reducing
cost of funds.
In recent periods, the Corporation has experienced some
competitive challenges in obtaining additional deposits to fuel
growth. As depositors continue to have wider access to the
Internet and other real-time interest rate monitoring resources,
deposit sourcing and pricing has become more competitive.
Deposit growth is achievable, but generally at a higher cost. As
a result of this increased competition, the Corporation (as
discussed above) has begun to rely more and more on brokered,
internet deposits, and other borrowed funds as a key funding
source.
In addition to these primary sources of liquidity, the
Corporation has the ability to borrow from the Federal Home Loan
Bank, the Federal Reserve Bank, and through various
correspondent banks as federal funds. As of December 31,
2009, the Corporation had the capacity to borrow up to an
additional $13,849 from the Federal Home Loan Bank based upon
the assets currently pledged as collateral. The
Corporations liquidity is considered adequate by the
management of the Corporation.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Corporations primary market risks are interest rate
risk and liquidity risk. The Corporation has no significant
foreign exchange risk, holds limited loans outstanding to oil
and gas concerns, and does not utilize interest rate swaps or
derivatives, except for interest rate locks, in the management
of its interest rate risk. Any changes in foreign exchange rates
or commodity prices would have an insignificant impact, if any,
on the Corporations interest income and cash flows. The
Corporation does have a significant amount of loans extended to
borrowers in agricultural production. The cash flow of such
borrowers and ability to service debt is largely dependent on
the commodity prices for corn, soybeans, sugar beets, milk,
beef, and a variety of dry beans. The Corporation mitigates
these risks by using conservative price and production yields
when calculating a borrowers available cash flow to
service their debt.
Interest rate risk (IRR) is the exposure of the
Corporations net interest income, its primary source of
income, to changes in interest rates. IRR results from the
difference in the maturity or repricing frequency of a financial
institutions interest earning assets and its interest
bearing liabilities. IRR is the fundamental method in which
financial institutions earn income and create shareholder value.
Excessive exposure to IRR could pose a significant risk to the
Corporations earnings and capital.
The Federal Reserve Board, the Corporations primary
Federal regulator, has adopted a policy requiring the Board of
Directors and senior management to effectively manage the
various risks that can have a material impact on the safety and
soundness of the Corporation. The risks include credit, interest
rate, liquidity, operational, and reputational. The Corporation
has policies, procedures and internal controls for measuring and
managing these risks. Specifically, the IRR policy and
procedures include defining acceptable types and terms of
investments and funding sources, liquidity requirements, limits
on investments in long term assets, limiting the mismatch in
repricing opportunity of assets and liabilities, and the
frequency of measuring and reporting to the Board of Directors.
The Corporation uses several techniques to manage IRR. The first
method is gap analysis. Gap analysis measures the cash flows
and/or the
earliest repricing of the Corporations interest bearing
assets and liabilities. This analysis is useful for measuring
trends in the repricing characteristics of the balance sheet.
Significant assumptions are required in this process because of
the imbedded repricing options contained in assets and
liabilities. A substantial portion of the Corporations
assets are invested in loans and investment securities with
issuer call options. Loans have imbedded options that allow the
borrower to repay the balance prior to maturity without penalty.
The amount of prepayments is dependent upon many factors,
including the interest rate of a given loan in comparison to the
current interest rate for residential mortgages, the level of
sales of used homes, and the overall availability of credit in
the market place. Generally, a decrease in interest rates will
result in an increase in the Corporations cash flows from
these assets. A significant portion of the Corporations
securities are callable. The call option is more likely to be
exercised in a period of decreasing interest rates. Investment
securities, other than those that are callable, do not have any
significant imbedded options. Savings and checking deposits may
generally
87
be withdrawn on request without prior notice. The timing of cash
flows from these deposits is estimated based on historical
experience. Time deposits have penalties that discourage early
withdrawals.
The second technique used in the management of IRR is to combine
the projected cash flows and repricing characteristics generated
by the gap analysis and the interest rates associated with those
cash flows to project future interest income. By changing the
amount and timing of the cash flows and the repricing interest
rates of those cash flows, the Corporation can project the
effect of changing interest rates on its interest income. Based
on the projections prepared for the year ended December 31,
2009, the Corporations net interest income would increase
during a period of decreasing interest rates.
The following tables provide information about the
Corporations assets and liabilities that are sensitive to
changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2009 and 2008.
The Corporation has no interest rate swaps, futures contracts,
or other derivative financial options. The principal amounts of
assets and time deposits maturing were calculated based on the
contractual maturity dates. Savings and NOW accounts are based
on managements estimate of their future cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
2014
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
12/31/09
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Rate sensitive assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interest bearing assets
|
|
$
|
4,996
|
|
|
$
|
960
|
|
|
$
|
1,200
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,156
|
|
|
$
|
7,156
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
1.13
|
%
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
|
|
|
2.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
$
|
7,139
|
|
|
$
|
2,043
|
|
|
$
|
2,546
|
|
|
$
|
1,094
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
13,563
|
|
|
$
|
13,563
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
|
|
2.42
|
%
|
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
|
|
2.53
|
%
|
|
|
2.66
|
%
|
|
|
4.86
|
%
|
|
|
2.66
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate securities
|
|
$
|
68,078
|
|
|
$
|
35,401
|
|
|
$
|
21,540
|
|
|
$
|
20,369
|
|
|
$
|
20,431
|
|
|
$
|
93,247
|
|
|
$
|
259,066
|
|
|
$
|
259,066
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
3.53
|
%
|
|
|
3.51
|
%
|
|
|
3.59
|
%
|
|
|
3.65
|
%
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
|
|
3.58
|
%
|
|
|
3.57
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate loans
|
|
$
|
133,703
|
|
|
$
|
111,981
|
|
|
$
|
118,749
|
|
|
$
|
109,754
|
|
|
$
|
62,280
|
|
|
$
|
48,764
|
|
|
$
|
585,231
|
|
|
$
|
594,498
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
6.64
|
%
|
|
|
6.85
|
%
|
|
|
6.72
|
%
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.61
|
%
|
|
|
6.01
|
%
|
|
|
6.61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest rate loans
|
|
$
|
60,727
|
|
|
$
|
17,695
|
|
|
$
|
13,799
|
|
|
$
|
16,357
|
|
|
$
|
16,940
|
|
|
$
|
12,567
|
|
|
$
|
138,085
|
|
|
$
|
138,085
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.69
|
%
|
|
|
4.79
|
%
|
|
|
3.83
|
%
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
|
|
5.35
|
%
|
|
|
4.68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Rate sensitive liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
$
|
85,101
|
|
|
$
|
11,000
|
|
|
$
|
32,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,000
|
|
|
$
|
45,000
|
|
|
$
|
193,101
|
|
|
$
|
195,179
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
2.28
|
%
|
|
|
4.04
|
%
|
|
|
3.50
|
%
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
|
|
4.38
|
%
|
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
|
|
3.17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and NOW accounts
|
|
$
|
78,383
|
|
|
$
|
65,107
|
|
|
$
|
44,439
|
|
|
$
|
30,095
|
|
|
$
|
20,609
|
|
|
$
|
46,498
|
|
|
$
|
285,131
|
|
|
$
|
285,131
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate time deposits
|
|
$
|
268,005
|
|
|
$
|
46,484
|
|
|
$
|
53,054
|
|
|
$
|
32,959
|
|
|
$
|
16,273
|
|
|
$
|
2,050
|
|
|
$
|
418,825
|
|
|
$
|
422,227
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
2.26
|
%
|
|
|
3.59
|
%
|
|
|
3.47
|
%
|
|
|
3.83
|
%
|
|
|
3.09
|
%
|
|
|
3.35
|
%
|
|
|
2.72
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest rate time deposits
|
|
$
|
1,252
|
|
|
$
|
569
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,821
|
|
|
$
|
1,821
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
1.56
|
%
|
|
|
1.40
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2013
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
Total
|
|
12/31/08
|
|
Rate sensitive assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interest bearing assets
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
|
$
|
575
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
$
|
7,867
|
|
|
$
|
4,902
|
|
|
$
|
3,181
|
|
|
$
|
2,937
|
|
|
$
|
1,089
|
|
|
$
|
1,799
|
|
|
$
|
21,775
|
|
|
$
|
21,775
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
3.89
|
%
|
|
|
3.57
|
%
|
|
|
3.47
|
%
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
|
2.90
|
%
|
|
|
3.11
|
%
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate securities
|
|
$
|
82,852
|
|
|
$
|
13,043
|
|
|
$
|
12,494
|
|
|
$
|
11,247
|
|
|
$
|
20,291
|
|
|
$
|
106,528
|
|
|
$
|
246,455
|
|
|
$
|
246,455
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
4.68
|
%
|
|
|
4.78
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
4.20
|
%
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
|
|
3.69
|
%
|
|
|
4.15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate loans
|
|
$
|
136,854
|
|
|
$
|
105,529
|
|
|
$
|
110,218
|
|
|
$
|
80,163
|
|
|
$
|
88,540
|
|
|
$
|
57,692
|
|
|
$
|
578,996
|
|
|
$
|
598,703
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
6.73
|
%
|
|
|
6.78
|
%
|
|
|
6.90
|
%
|
|
|
7.20
|
%
|
|
|
6.86
|
%
|
|
|
6.34
|
%
|
|
|
6.82
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest rate loans
|
|
$
|
61,795
|
|
|
$
|
25,166
|
|
|
$
|
16,524
|
|
|
$
|
8,049
|
|
|
$
|
27,505
|
|
|
$
|
17,350
|
|
|
$
|
156,389
|
|
|
$
|
156,389
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
5.32
|
%
|
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
|
|
5.27
|
%
|
|
|
5.34
|
%
|
|
|
4.45
|
%
|
|
|
5.90
|
%
|
|
|
5.14
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Rate sensitive liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowed funds
|
|
$
|
95,159
|
|
|
$
|
39,191
|
|
|
$
|
21,000
|
|
|
$
|
22,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
222,350
|
|
|
$
|
230,130
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
1.11
|
%
|
|
|
4.57
|
%
|
|
|
3.63
|
%
|
|
|
4.17
|
%
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
|
|
4.59
|
%
|
|
|
2.95
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and NOW accounts
|
|
$
|
119,801
|
|
|
$
|
79,465
|
|
|
$
|
63,274
|
|
|
$
|
25,140
|
|
|
$
|
8,816
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
296,496
|
|
|
$
|
296,496
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
0.12
|
%
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
|
|
0.34
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rate time deposits
|
|
$
|
239,152
|
|
|
$
|
62,838
|
|
|
$
|
29,771
|
|
|
$
|
21,565
|
|
|
$
|
24,860
|
|
|
$
|
1,589
|
|
|
$
|
379,775
|
|
|
$
|
385,478
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
3.47
|
%
|
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
|
|
4.55
|
%
|
|
|
4.61
|
%
|
|
|
4.18
|
%
|
|
|
4.57
|
%
|
|
|
3.81
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Variable interest rate time deposits
|
|
$
|
1,187
|
|
|
$
|
626
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,813
|
|
|
$
|
1,813
|
|
Average interest rates
|
|
|
1.90
|
%
|
|
|
1.67
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.82
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
88
Forward
Looking Statements
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended. The Corporation intends such
forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor
provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the
Private Securities Reform Act of 1995, and is including this
statement for purposes of these safe harbor provisions.
Forward-looking statements, which are based on certain
assumptions and describe future plans, strategies and
expectations of the Corporation, are generally identifiable by
use of the words believe, expect,
intend, anticipate,
estimate, project, or similar
expressions. The Corporations ability to predict results
or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently
uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on
the operations and future prospects of the Corporation and the
subsidiaries include, but are not limited to, changes in
interest rates, general economic conditions,
legislative/regulatory changes, monetary and fiscal policies of
the U.S. Government including policies of the
U.S. Treasury, the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal
Deposit Insurance Corporation, the quality or composition of the
loan or investment portfolios, demand for loan products, deposit
flows, competition, demand for financial services in the
Corporations market area, and accounting principles,
policies and guidelines. These risks and uncertainties should be
considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue
reliance should not be placed on such statements. Further
information concerning the Corporation and its business,
including additional factors that could materially affect the
Corporations financial results, is included in the
Corporations filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
COMMON
STOCK AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION
The Corporations common stock is traded in the
over-the-counter
market. The common stock has been quoted on the Pink Sheets
Electronic Quotation Service (Pink Sheets) under the
symbol ISBA since August of 2008 and under the
symbol IBTM prior to August of 2008. Other trades in
the common stock occur in privately negotiated transactions from
time to time of which the Corporation may have little or no
information.
Management has reviewed the information available as to the
range of reported high and low bid quotations, including high
and low bid information as reported by Pink Sheets and closing
price information as reported by the parties to privately
negotiated transactions. The following table sets forth
managements compilation of that information for the
periods indicated. Price information obtained from Pink Sheets
reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail
mark-up,
mark-down or commissions and may not necessarily represent
actual transactions. Price information obtained from parties to
privately negotiated transactions reflects actual closing prices
that were disclosed to the Corporation, which management has not
independently verified. The following compiled data is provided
for information purposes only and should not be viewed as
indicative of the actual or market value of the
Corporations common stock. All of the information has been
adjusted to reflect the 10% stock dividend, paid
February 29, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Sale Price
|
|
Period
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
61,987
|
|
|
$
|
14.99
|
|
|
$
|
25.51
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
91,184
|
|
|
|
15.85
|
|
|
|
20.75
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
66,399
|
|
|
|
17.50
|
|
|
|
19.50
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
76,985
|
|
|
|
14.00
|
|
|
|
19.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296,555
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
107,920
|
|
|
|
32.73
|
|
|
|
44.00
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
50,600
|
|
|
|
39.00
|
|
|
|
44.00
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
29,303
|
|
|
|
33.00
|
|
|
|
40.00
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
71,855
|
|
|
|
22.50
|
|
|
|
36.50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
The following table sets forth the cash dividends paid for the
following quarters, adjusted for the 10% stock dividend paid on
February 29, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank Corporations authorized common stock
consists of 15,000,000 shares, of which
7,535,193 shares are issued and outstanding as of
December 31, 2009. As of that date, there were
3,004 shareholders of record.
The Board of Directors has adopted a common stock repurchase
plan. On October 29, 2009, the Board of Directors amended
the plan to allow for the repurchase of an additional
100,000 shares of the Corporations common stock. The
maximum number of shares which may be repurchased pursuant to
this plan was 78,432 shares as of December 31, 2009.
These authorizations do not have expiration dates. As shares are
repurchased under this plan, they are retired and revert back to
the status of authorized, but unissued shares. The following
table provides information for the three month period ended
December 31, 2009, with respect to this plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Maximum Number of
|
|
|
|
Shares Repurchased
|
|
|
as Part of Publicly
|
|
|
Shares That May Yet Be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Price
|
|
|
Announced Plan
|
|
|
Purchased Under the
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
or Program
|
|
|
Plans or Programs
|
|
|
Balance, September 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,636
|
|
October 1 - 28, 2009
|
|
|
3,689
|
|
|
$
|
17.45
|
|
|
|
3,689
|
|
|
|
2,947
|
|
Additional authorization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,947
|
|
October 29 - 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,947
|
|
November 1 - 30, 2009
|
|
|
11,152
|
|
|
|
17.06
|
|
|
|
11,152
|
|
|
|
91,795
|
|
December 1 - 31, 2009
|
|
|
13,363
|
|
|
|
18.12
|
|
|
|
13,363
|
|
|
|
78,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
28,204
|
|
|
$
|
17.61
|
|
|
|
28,204
|
|
|
|
78,432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information concerning Securities Authorized for Issuance Under
Equity Compensation Plans appears under Item 11.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Shareholder Matters included in the
Corporations 2009 annual report on
Form 10-K.
90
Stock
Performance
The following graph compares the cumulative total shareholder
return on Corporation common stock for the last five years with
the cumulative total return on (1) the NASDAQ Stock Market
Index, which is comprised of all United States common shares
traded on the NASDAQ and (2) the NASDAQ Bank Stock Index,
which is comprised of bank and bank holding company common
shares traded on the NASDAQ over the same period. The graph
assumes the value of an investment in the Corporation and each
index was $100 at December 31, 2004 and all dividends are
reinvested.
Stock
Performance
Five-Year Total Return
The dollar values for total shareholder return plotted in the
graph above are shown in the table below:
Comparison
of Five Year Cumulative
Among Isabella Bank Corporation, NASDAQ Stock Market,
and NASDAQ Bank Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isabella Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
NASDAQ
|
|
Year
|
|
Corporation
|
|
|
NASDAQ
|
|
|
Banks
|
|
|
12/31/2004
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
|
12/31/2005
|
|
|
106.4
|
|
|
|
102.1
|
|
|
|
98.0
|
|
12/31/2006
|
|
|
118.7
|
|
|
|
112.6
|
|
|
|
111.4
|
|
12/31/2007
|
|
|
120.6
|
|
|
|
124.6
|
|
|
|
89.5
|
|
12/31/2008
|
|
|
78.5
|
|
|
|
75.0
|
|
|
|
70.5
|
|
12/31/2009
|
|
|
60.5
|
|
|
|
108.8
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
|
91
SHAREHOLDERS
INFORMATION
Annual
Meeting
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held at
5:00 p.m., Tuesday, May 4, 2010, Comfort Inn,
2424 S. Mission Street, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan.
Financial
Information and
Form 10-K
Copies of the 2009 Annual Report, Isabella Bank Corporation
Form 10-K,
and other financial information not contained herein are
available on the Banks website (www.isabellabank.com)
under the Investor Relations tab, or may be obtained, without
charge, by writing to:
Secretary
Isabella Bank Corporation
401 N. Main St.
Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858
Mission
Statement
To create an operating environment that will provide
shareholders with sustained growth in their investment while
maintaining our independence and subsidiaries autonomy.
Equal
Employment Opportunity
The equal employment opportunity clauses in Section 202 of
the Executive Order 11246, as amended; 38 USC 2012, Vietnam
Era Veterans Readjustment Act of 1974; Section 503 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; relative to equal
employment opportunity and implementing rules and regulations of
the Secretary of Labor are adhered to and supported by Isabella
Bank Corporation, and its subsidiaries.
92
ISABELLA BANK CORPORATION PROXY
401 North Main Street
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The undersigned hereby appoints Sandra L. Caul, David J. Maness, and W. Joseph Manifold as
proxies, each with the power to appoint his/her substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent
and to vote as designated below, all the shares of Common Stock of Isabella Bank Corporation held
of record by the undersigned on March 31, 2010 at the annual meeting of shareholders to be held on
May 4, 2010 or any adjournments thereof.
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS: The Election of the following five (5) persons as directors. Please
mark the appropriate box for each director-nominee.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOR
|
|
AGAINST
|
|
WITHHOLD AUTHORITY |
|
|
James C. Fabiano
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
Ted Kortes
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
Thomas L. Kleinhardt
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
Joseph LaFramboise
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o |
|
|
Dale D. Weburg
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
|
o
|
(continued and signed on other side) |
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein by the undersigned
shareholder. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED TO ELECT ALL NOMINEES. The shares
represented by this proxy will be voted in the discretion of the proxies on any other matters which
may come before the meeting.
Please sign below as your name appears on the label. When shares are held by joint tenants,
both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please
give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign full corporate name by the President or
other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: , 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Please mark, sign, date and return
|
|
Signature |
|
|
Proxy card promptly using the enclosed |
|
|
|
|
Envelope.
|
|
Signature (if held jointly)
|
|
|