424B4
Filed pursuant to Rule 424(b)(4)
Registration No. 333-121086
15,666,666 Shares
Common Stock
This is an initial public offering of shares of common stock of
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. Of the
15,666,666 shares of common stock to be sold in the
offering, 6,000,000 shares are being sold by us and
9,666,666 shares are being sold by the selling stockholders
identified in this prospectus. We will not receive any of the
proceeds from the shares of common stock sold by the selling
stockholders.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. Our common stock has been approved for quotation
on The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc.s National Market under
the symbol CNSL, subject to official notice of
issuance.
The underwriters have an option to purchase a maximum
2,350,000 additional shares from the selling stockholders
to cover over-allotments of shares, if any.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
Factors beginning on page 13.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting | |
|
|
|
Proceeds to | |
|
|
Price to | |
|
Discounts and | |
|
Proceeds to | |
|
Selling | |
|
|
Public | |
|
Commissions | |
|
Us | |
|
Stockholders | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Per share
|
|
|
$13.00 |
|
|
|
$0.8125 |
|
|
|
$12.1875 |
|
|
|
$12.1875 |
|
Total
|
|
|
$203,666,658 |
|
|
|
$12,729,166.13 |
|
|
|
$73,125,000 |
|
|
|
$117,812,491.87 |
|
Delivery of the shares of common stock will be made on or about
July 27, 2005.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
Credit Suisse First Boston
Citigroup
Banc of America Securities
LLC
The date of this prospectus is July 21, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
|
P-1 |
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
You should rely only on the information contained in this
document or to which we have referred you. We have not
authorized anyone to provide you with information that is
different. This document may only be used where it is legal to
sell these securities. The information in this document may only
be accurate on the date of this document.
Dealer Prospectus Delivery Obligation
Until August 15, 2005 (25 days after the date of
this prospectus), all dealers selling shares of our common
stock, whether or not participating in this offering, may be
required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the
dealers obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as
underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or
subscriptions.
i
SUMMARY
|
|
The following is a summary of the principal features of this
offering of common stock and should be read together with the
more detailed information and financial data contained elsewhere
in this prospectus. Throughout this prospectus, unless the
context otherwise requires or we specifically state otherwise,
we are presenting all financial and other information on a pro
forma basis for the acquisition of TXU Communications
Ventures Company, which we refer to as TXUCV, this offering and
the related transactions described elsewhere in this
prospectus. |
|
The Company
|
|
We are an established rural local exchange company that provides
communications services to residential and business customers in
Illinois and in Texas. As of March 31, 2005, we estimate
that we were the 15th largest local telephone company in the
United States, based on industry sources, with approximately
253,071 local access lines and approximately 30,804 digital
subscriber lines, or DSL lines, in service. Our main sources of
revenues are our local telephone businesses in Illinois and
Texas, which offer an array of services, including local dial
tone, custom calling features, private line services, long
distance, dial-up and high-speed Internet access, carrier access
and billing and collection services. Each of the subsidiaries
through which we operate our local telephone businesses is
classified as a rural telephone company under the
Telecommunications Act of 1996, or the Telecommunications Act.
Our rural telephone companies in general benefit from stable
customer demand and a favorable regulatory environment. In
addition, because we primarily provide service in rural areas,
competition for local telephone service has been limited due to
the generally unfavorable economics of constructing and
operating competitive systems in these areas. |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the three months
ended March 31, 2005, we had $323.5 million and
$79.8 million of revenues, respectively, of which
approximately 15.9% and 17.2%, respectively, came from state and
federal subsidies. For the year ended December 31, 2004 and
the three months ended March 31, 2005, we had
$1.7 million and $1.9 million of net income,
respectively. As of March 31, 2005, we had
$561.1 million of total long-term debt (including current
portion), an accumulated deficit of $34.5 million and
$215.0 million of shareholders equity.
Our Strengths
We believe our strengths include:
|
|
|
|
|
stable local telephone businesses; |
|
|
|
favorable regulatory environment; |
|
|
|
attractive markets and limited competition; |
|
|
|
technologically advanced network; |
|
|
|
broad service offerings and bundling of services; and |
|
|
|
experienced management team with proven track record. |
Business Strategy
Our current business strategy includes:
|
|
|
|
|
improving operating efficiency and maintaining capital
expenditure discipline; |
|
|
|
increasing revenues per customer; |
|
|
|
continuing to build on our reputation for high quality service;
and |
|
|
|
pursuing selective acquisitions. |
1
TXUCV Acquisition and Integration
On April 14, 2004, we acquired TXUCV for
$524.1 million in cash, net of cash acquired and including
transaction costs. Promptly following the TXUCV acquisition, we
began integrating the operations of Consolidated Communications,
Inc. and its subsidiaries, which we refer to collectively as CCI
Illinois, with the operations of Consolidated Communications
Acquisition Texas, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which we refer to
collectively as CCI Texas. We currently expect to incur
approximately $14.5 million in operating expenses
associated with the integration and restructuring process in
2004 and 2005, $9.2 million of which had been incurred as
of March 31, 2005. These one-time integration and
restructuring costs will be in addition to certain ongoing
expenses we expect to incur to expand certain administrative
functions, such as those relating to SEC reporting and
compliance, and do not take into account other potential cost
savings and expenses of the TXUCV acquisition.
Related Transactions
In connection with this offering we intend, among other things,
to enter into the following related transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
effect a reorganization pursuant to which first our sister
subsidiary Consolidated Communications Texas Holdings, Inc. and
then Homebase Acquisition, LLC, our parent company, will merge
with and into us, and we will change our name to Consolidated
Communications Holdings, Inc.; |
|
|
|
amend and restate our existing credit agreement to enable us to
pay dividends on our common stock and to provide aggregate
financing of up to $455.0 million, consisting of a new term
loan D facility of up to $425.0 million and a
$30.0 million revolving credit facility; |
|
|
|
repay in full amounts outstanding under our existing term
loan A and term loan C facilities; and |
|
|
|
redeem 32.5%, or $65.0 million, of the aggregate principal
amount of our
93/4%
senior notes due 2012. |
Recent Developments
On June 7, 2005, we made a $37.5 million cash
distribution to our existing equity investors (as defined under
Our Current Organizational Structure)
from cash on our balance sheet. Unless the context otherwise
requires or we specifically state otherwise, we are presenting
all financial information in this prospectus on a pro forma
basis for this distribution.
2
Our Current Organizational Structure
The following chart illustrates our current organizational
structure and the percentage ownership of our outstanding common
shares by Central Illinois Telephone LLC, an entity associated
with our chairman, Richard A. Lumpkin, or Central Illinois
Telephone, Providence Equity Partners IV L.P. and its
affiliates, or Providence Equity, and Spectrum Equity
Investors IV, L.P. and its affiliates, or Spectrum Equity,
which we refer to collectively as our existing equity investors,
and management prior to this offering:
3
Post-Offering Organizational Structure
The following chart illustrates our organizational structure
upon completion of this offering and the related transactions
and the percentage of our outstanding common stock held by each
of our existing equity investors, our management and investors
purchasing in this offering:
4
The Offering
|
|
|
Shares of common stock offered by us |
|
6,000,000 shares. |
|
Shares of common stock offered by the selling stockholders |
|
9,666,666 shares (or 12,016,666 shares if the
underwriters over-allotment option is exercised). We will
not receive any of the proceeds from the selling
stockholders sale of shares of common stock in the
offering. |
|
Total shares of common stock to be outstanding following the
offering |
|
29,687,510 shares. |
|
Percentage of outstanding common stock being sold in the offering |
|
52.8% |
|
Dividends |
|
Effective upon the closing of this offering, our board of
directors will adopt a dividend policy that reflects its
judgment that our stockholders would be better served if we
distributed to them a substantial portion of the cash generated
by our business in excess of our expected cash needs rather than
retaining it or using the cash for other purposes, such as to
make investments in our business or to make acquisitions. In
accordance with our dividend policy, we currently intend to pay
an initial dividend of $0.4089 per share (representing a
pro rata portion of the expected dividend for the first year
following the closing of this offering) on or about
November 1, 2005 to stockholders of record as of
October 15, 2005, and to continue to pay quarterly
dividends at an annual rate of $1.5495 per share for the
first year following the closing of this offering, subject to
the limitations described in the next paragraph. The expected
cash needs referred to above include interest payments on our
indebtedness, capital expenditures, integration, restructuring
and related costs of the TXUCV acquisition in 2005, taxes,
incremental costs associated with being a public company and
certain other costs. |
|
|
|
We are not required to pay dividends, and our stockholders will
not be guaranteed, or have contractual or other rights, to
receive dividends. Our board of directors may decide at any
time, in its discretion, to decrease the amount of dividends,
otherwise change or revoke the dividend policy or discontinue
entirely the payment of dividends. In addition, our ability to
pay dividends in full will depend upon our ability to generate
cash in excess of our cash needs. For the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the twelve months ended
March 31, 2005, had our dividend policy been in effect, our
estimated cash available to pay dividends would not have been
sufficient to pay dividends in accordance with our dividend
policy due to (a) approximately $15.2 million and
$16.4 million, respectively, in non-recurring cash costs
incurred in connection with the TXUCV acquisition and
(b) $5.0 million of professional service fees paid to
Mr. Lumpkin, Providence Equity and Spectrum Equity pursuant to
two professional service agreements that were incurred in each
period and that will terminate upon consummation of this
offering. Finally, our ability to pay dividends will be
restricted by current and future agreements governing our debt,
including our amended and |
5
|
|
|
|
|
restated credit agreement and the indenture governing our senior
notes, Delaware and Illinois law and state regulatory
requirements. |
|
|
|
For more information regarding our dividend policy and
restrictions on our ability to pay dividends, see Dividend
Policy and Restrictions. |
|
Nasdaq National Market Symbol |
|
CNSL |
|
Conditions |
|
The closing of this offering is conditioned on the closing of
the reorganization and the entering into, and borrowing under,
the amended and restated credit facilities. |
General Information About This Prospectus
Throughout this prospectus, unless the context otherwise
requires or we specifically state otherwise, all information in
this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
assumes no exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment
option described on the cover of this prospectus and the
Underwriting section; |
|
|
|
excludes 750,000 shares available for issuance under our
2005 long term incentive plan; and |
|
|
|
that refers to the offering and the related transactions shall
collectively refer to this offering, the reorganization, the
refinancing of our existing credit facilities, the redemption of
a portion of our senior notes and the payment of related
expenses. |
Information About Us
Our principal executive office is located at 121 South 17th
Street, Mattoon, Illinois 61938-3987. Our telephone number at
that address is (217) 235-3311, and our website address is
www.consolidated.com. Information on our website is not deemed
to be a part of this prospectus.
6
Summary Consolidated Pro Forma Financial and Other Data
The consolidated pro forma statement of operations data and the
consolidated pro forma data summarized below have been derived
from the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements of CCI Holdings and have been prepared to give
pro forma effect to the TXUCV acquisition and this offering and
the related transactions as if they had occurred on the first
day of the periods presented. The other consolidated pro forma
financial data and the other consolidated data summarized below
have been derived from the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial statements of CCI Holdings and have been
prepared to give pro forma effect to the TXUCV acquisition as if
it had occurred on the first day of the periods presented. The
actual consolidated balance sheet data as of March 31, 2005
summarized below have been derived from the unaudited condensed
consolidated balance sheet of CCI Holdings. You should read
the information summarized below in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
CCI Holdings and CCI Texas,
the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements of CCI Holdings and the related notes and the
financial statements of each of CCI Holdings and TXUCV and
the related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Consolidated Pro Forma Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$ |
323,463 |
|
|
$ |
79,433 |
|
|
$ |
79,772 |
|
|
Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization
shown separately below)
|
|
|
95,868 |
|
|
|
25,508 |
|
|
|
24,417 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
108,117 |
|
|
|
23,984 |
|
|
|
25,482 |
|
|
Restructuring, asset impairment and other charges
|
|
|
11,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
67,521 |
|
|
|
17,776 |
|
|
|
16,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
40,391 |
|
|
|
12,165 |
|
|
|
13,055 |
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(38,486 |
) |
|
|
(8,978 |
) |
|
|
(9,669 |
) |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
4,764 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
6,669 |
|
|
|
3,963 |
|
|
|
3,773 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
4,979 |
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,690 |
|
|
$ |
2,448 |
|
|
$ |
1,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Consolidated Pro Forma Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone operations revenues
|
|
$ |
284,256 |
|
|
$ |
68,249 |
|
|
$ |
71,019 |
|
|
Other operations revenues
|
|
|
39,207 |
|
|
|
11,184 |
|
|
|
8,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$ |
323,463 |
|
|
$ |
79,433 |
|
|
$ |
79,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma EBITDA(1)
|
|
$ |
109,818 |
|
|
$ |
30,003 |
|
|
$ |
29,546 |
|
|
Non-cash charges (credits) included in pro forma EBITDA(2)
|
|
|
6,802 |
|
|
|
(776 |
) |
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
Unusual or non-recurring items included in pro forma EBITDA(3)
|
|
|
20,214 |
|
|
|
2,309 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
Partnership distributions not included in pro forma EBITDA(4)
|
|
|
4,135 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Other Consolidated Data (as of end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local access lines in service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
168,778 |
|
|
|
174,830 |
|
|
|
168,017 |
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
86,430 |
|
|
|
87,331 |
|
|
|
85,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total local access lines
|
|
|
255,208 |
|
|
|
262,161 |
|
|
|
253,071 |
|
|
DSL subscribers
|
|
|
27,445 |
|
|
|
19,048 |
|
|
|
30,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total connections
|
|
|
282,653 |
|
|
|
281,209 |
|
|
|
283,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Pro Forma Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash interest expense
|
|
$ |
34,158 |
|
|
$ |
8,376 |
|
|
$ |
9,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual | |
|
As Adjusted(5) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents(6)
|
|
$ |
56,538 |
|
|
$ |
13,594 |
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
103,916 |
|
|
|
60,972 |
|
Net plant, property & equipment
|
|
|
353,060 |
|
|
|
353,060 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,002,243 |
|
|
|
964,380 |
|
Total long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
|
624,909 |
|
|
|
561,059 |
|
Redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
210,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(21,031 |
) |
|
|
215,048 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Pro forma EBITDA represents our historical EBITDA as adjusted
for the TXUCV acquisition and has been prepared on a basis
consistent with the comparable data in the unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in this prospectus. Pro forma EBITDA does not give effect to our
estimate of incremental, ongoing expenses of approximately
$1.0 million associated with being a public company with
equity securities quoted on the Nasdaq National Market. These
expenses include estimated compliance (SEC and Nasdaq) and
related administrative expenses, accounting and legal fees,
investor relations expenses, directors fees and director
and officer liability insurance premiums, registrar and transfer
agent fees, listing fees and other, miscellaneous expenses. |
|
|
Our historical EBITDA is defined as net earnings (loss) before
interest expenses, income taxes, depreciation and amortization.
We believe that net cash provided by operating activities is the
most directly comparable financial measure to EBITDA under
generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. We present
EBITDA for several reasons. Management believes that EBITDA is
useful as a means to evaluate our ability to pay our estimated
cash needs and pay dividends. In addition, we have presented
EBITDA to investors in the past because it is frequently used by
investors, securities analysts and other interested parties in
the evaluation of companies in our industry, and we believe that
presenting it here provides a measure of consistency in our
financial reporting. EBITDA is also a component of the
restrictive covenants and financial ratios contained in the
agreements governing our debt and will be contained in our
amended and restated credit agreement, which will require us to
maintain compliance with these covenants and limit certain
activities, such as our ability to incur debt and to pay
dividends. The definitions in these covenants and ratios are
based on EBITDA after giving effect to specified charges. As a
result, we believe that the presentation of EBITDA as
supplemented by these other items provides important additional
information to investors. See Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations CCI Holdings Liquidity and
Capital Resources Debt and Capital
Leases Covenant Compliance. In addition, |
8
|
|
|
EBITDA provides our board of directors meaningful information to
determine, with other data, assumptions and considerations, our
dividend policy and our ability to pay dividends under the
restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our debt. For
a more complete description of our dividend policy and the
factors, assumptions and considerations relating to it, see
Dividend Policy and Restrictions. |
|
|
|
EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. Accordingly, it should
not be construed as an alternative to net cash from operating or
investing activities, cash flows from operations or net income
(loss) as defined by GAAP and is not on its own necessarily
indicative of cash available to fund our cash needs as
determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, not all
companies use identical calculations, and this presentation of
EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures
of other companies. |
|
|
The following table provides a reconciliation of pro forma
EBITDA to net cash provided by operating activities on the bases
described above, which management believes is the most nearly
equivalent GAAP measure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
79,766 |
|
|
$ |
5,870 |
|
|
$ |
14,612 |
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,551 |
) |
|
Partnership income and minority interest
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
Provision for bad debt losses
|
|
|
(4,666 |
) |
|
|
(1,067 |
) |
|
|
(1,579 |
) |
|
Asset impairment
|
|
|
(11,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(6,476 |
) |
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(732 |
) |
Change in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(4,427 |
) |
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
6,605 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
39,551 |
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
11,441 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical EBITDA
|
|
|
93,162 |
|
|
|
11,104 |
|
|
|
29,546 |
|
Pro forma adjustments(a)
|
|
|
16,656 |
|
|
|
18,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma EBITDA
|
|
$ |
109,818 |
|
|
$ |
30,003 |
|
|
$ |
29,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Pro forma adjustments consist of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Three Months |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
CCI Texas EBITDA(i)
|
|
$ |
15,538 |
|
|
$ |
17,922 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense adjustments for
TXUCV acquisition(ii)
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,656 |
|
|
$ |
18,899 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(i) |
CCI Texas EBITDA represents the EBITDA of CCI Texas for the
periods presented. The operating results of CCI Texas are not
reflected in our historical EBITDA and financial results for the
period from January 1, 2004 through April 13, 2004.
The following table illustrates our calculation of CCI Texas
EBITDA for the following periods: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 1, | |
|
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
|
April 13, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
5,319 |
|
|
$ |
6,138 |
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment penalty on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
(950 |
) |
|
|
(2,777 |
) |
|
Provision for postretirement benefits
|
|
|
(3,007 |
) |
|
|
(1,621 |
) |
|
Loss/(gain) or disposition of property and investments
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
Restructuring, asset impairment and other charges
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership income and minority interest
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
Provision for bad debt losses
|
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
(442 |
) |
|
Other charges
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
9,909 |
|
|
|
11,548 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCI Texas EBITDA
|
|
$ |
15,538 |
|
|
$ |
17,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) |
The pro forma adjustments to selling, general, and
administrative expense for the TXUCV acquisition reflect
(A) a reduction in costs of approximately $2.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2004 and approximately
$1.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004
resulting from the termination of TXUCV employees upon the
closing of the TXUCV acquisition and (B) incremental
professional service fees of $0.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and $0.8 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2004 to be paid to Mr. Lumpkin,
Providence Equity and Spectrum Equity pursuant to the second
professional services agreement entered into in connection with
the TXUCV acquisition. See Note 2 to the unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
(2) |
Non-cash charges (credits) included in pro forma EBITDA are
detailed in the following table: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Restructuring, asset impairment and other charges
|
|
$ |
11,566 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other, net(a)
|
|
|
(4,764 |
) |
|
|
(776 |
) |
|
|
(387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,802 |
|
|
$ |
(776 |
) |
|
$ |
(387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Other, net includes equity earnings from our investments in
cellular partnerships, dividend income, recognizing the minority
interests of investors in East Texas Fiber Line Incorporated as
well as certain other miscellaneous non-operating items. |
10
See Note 6 to our audited consolidated financial statements
for a description of our investments. The table below sets out
the components of Other, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Partnership income
|
|
$ |
2,462 |
|
|
$ |
857 |
|
|
$ |
330 |
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
$ |
4,764 |
|
|
$ |
776 |
|
|
$ |
387 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Unusual or non-recurring items included in pro forma EBITDA are
detailed in the following table: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Retention bonuses(a)
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
21 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Severance costs(b)
|
|
|
5,707 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
TXUCV sales due diligence and transaction costs(c)
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
|
|
Integration costs(d)
|
|
|
7,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,250 |
|
Professional service fees(e)
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,214 |
|
|
$ |
2,309 |
|
|
$ |
3,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
During 2004, TXUCV paid retention bonuses to keep key employees
to run its day-to-day business operations while it was being
prepared for sale. Other than retention costs payable in
connection with the TXUCV acquisition, we do not expect to incur
such charges in the future. |
|
|
(b) |
During 2004, we incurred severance costs primarily due to
employee terminations associated with the TXUCV acquisition. See
note (d) below for a summary of 2005 integration and
restructuring costs. |
|
|
(c) |
During 2004, TXUCV incurred certain costs associated with the
sale of the company. We do not expect to incur such charges in
the future. |
|
|
(d) |
We currently expect to incur approximately $14.5 million in
operating expenses associated with the TXUCV integration and
restructuring process in 2004 and 2005. Of the
$14.5 million, approximately $11.5 million relates to
integration and approximately $3.0 million relates to
restructuring. As of March 31, 2005, we had spent
$9.2 million on integration and restructuring. In
connection with this offering and the related transactions, we
will pre-fund the remaining $5.3 million of expected
integration and restructuring expenses for 2005 with cash from
our balance sheet. We do not expect that the pre-funding of
these estimated expenses will change any of our expected cash
plans or otherwise effect our expected working capital
requirements. These one-time integration and restructuring costs
will be in addition to certain ongoing costs we expect to incur
to expand certain administrative functions, such as those
relating to SEC reporting and compliance, and do not take into
account other potential cost savings and expenses of the TXUCV
integration. We do not expect to incur any significant costs
relating to the TXUCV acquisition after 2005. |
|
|
(e) |
Represents the aggregate professional service fees we paid to
Mr. Lumpkin, Providence Equity and Spectrum Equity pursuant
to two professional services agreements. Upon closing of the
offering, these professional service agreements will
automatically terminate. See Note 7 to the unaudited pro
forma condensed consolidated financial statements. |
11
|
|
(4) |
Represents cash distributions from our investments in three
cellular partnerships. See Note 6 to our audited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. |
|
(5) |
As adjusted to give effect to this offering and the related
transactions as if they occurred on March 31, 2005 and
includes $5.3 million of cash that will be used to pre-fund
expected integration and restructuring costs for 2005 relating
to the TXUCV acquisition. |
|
(6) |
Our actual cash and cash equivalents as of March 31, 2005
includes $37.5 million of cash that was used to fund the
distribution to our existing equity investors on June 7,
2005, as well as approximately $0.4 million in expenses
incurred to amend our existing credit facilities to permit this
distribution. |
12
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following factors in
addition to the other information contained in this prospectus
before investing in our common stock.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
|
|
|
You may not receive dividends because our board of
directors could, in its discretion, depart from or change our
dividend policy at any time. |
We are not required to pay dividends, and our stockholders will
not be guaranteed, or have contractual or other rights, to
receive dividends. Our board of directors may decide at any
time, in its discretion, to decrease the amount of dividends,
otherwise change or revoke the dividend policy or discontinue
entirely the payment of dividends. Our board could depart from
or change our dividend policy, for example, if it were to
determine that we had insufficient cash to take advantage of
other opportunities with attractive rates of return. In
addition, if we do not pay dividends, for whatever reason, your
shares of our common stock could become less liquid and the
market price of our common stock could decline.
|
|
|
We might not have cash in the future to pay dividends in
the intended amounts or at all. |
Our ability to pay dividends, and our board of directors
determination to maintain our dividend policy, will depend on
numerous factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the state of our business, the environment in which we operate
and the various risks we face, including, but not limited to,
competition, technological change, changes in our industry,
regulatory and other risks summarized in this prospectus; |
|
|
|
changes in the factors, assumptions and other considerations
made by our board of directors in reviewing and adopting the
dividend policy, as described under Dividend Policy and
Restrictions; |
|
|
|
our future results of operations, financial condition, liquidity
needs and capital resources; |
|
|
|
our various expected cash needs, including interest and
principal payments on our indebtedness, capital expenditures,
integration and restructuring costs associated with TXUCV
acquisition, incremental costs associated with being a public
company, taxes and certain other costs; and |
|
|
|
potential sources of liquidity, including borrowing under our
revolving credit facility or possible asset sales. |
For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the twelve months
ended March 31, 2005, had our dividend policy been in
effect, our estimated cash available to pay dividends would not
have been sufficient to pay dividends in accordance with our
dividend policy due to (a) approximately $15.2 million and
$16.4 million, respectively, in non-recurring cash costs
incurred in connection with the TXUCV acquisition and (b)
$5.0 million of professional service fees paid to Mr.
Lumpkin, Providence Equity and Spectrum Equity pursuant to two
professional service agreements that were incurred in each
period and that will terminate upon consummation of this
offering.
If our estimated cash available to pay dividends for the first
year following the closing of the offering were to fall below
our expectations, our assumptions as to estimated cash needs are
too low or if other applicable assumptions were to prove
incorrect, we may need to:
|
|
|
|
|
either reduce or eliminate dividends; |
|
|
|
fund dividends by incurring additional debt (to the extent we
were permitted to do so under the agreements governing our then
existing debt), which would increase our leverage, debt
repayment obligations and interest expense and decrease our
interest coverage, resulting in, among other things, reduced
capacity to incur debt for other purposes, including to fund
future dividend payments; |
|
|
|
amend the terms of our amended and restated credit agreement or
indenture to permit us to pay dividends or make other payments
if we are otherwise not permitted to do so; |
13
|
|
|
|
|
fund dividends from future issuances of equity securities, which
could be dilutive to our stockholders and negatively effect the
price of our common stock; |
|
|
|
fund dividends from other sources, such as such as by asset
sales or by working capital, which would leave us with less cash
available for other purposes; and |
|
|
|
reduce other expected uses of cash, such as capital expenditures
or TXUCV integration and restructuring costs, which could limit
our ability to grow or delay our integration of the TXUCV
acquisition. |
|
|
|
Over time, our capital and other cash needs will invariably be
subject to uncertainties, which could affect whether we pay
dividends and the level of any dividends we may pay in the
future. In addition, to the extent that we would seek to raise
additional cash from additional debt incurrence or equity
security issuances, we cannot assure you that such financing
will be available on reasonable terms or at all. Each of the
results listed above could negatively affect our results of
operations, financial condition, liquidity and ability to
maintain and expand our business. |
|
|
|
You may not receive dividends because of restrictions in
our debt agreements, Delaware and Illinois law and state
regulatory requirements. |
Our ability to pay dividends will be restricted by current and
future agreements governing our debt, including the amended and
restated credit agreement and our indenture, Delaware law and
state regulatory requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
Our amended and restated credit agreement will restrict, and our
indenture restricts, our ability to pay dividends. For the
twelve months ended March 31, 2005, on a pro forma
basis and after giving effect to this offering and the related
transactions, CCI Holdings would have been able to pay
dividends of $69.2 million based on the restricted payment
covenant of the amended and restated credit agreement and the
indenture. This is based on the ability of the borrowers under
the amended and restated credit facility (CCI and Texas
Holdings) to pay to CCI Holdings $69.2 million in
dividends and the ability of CCI Holdings to pay to its
stockholders $116.5 million in dividends under the general
formula under the restricted payments covenants of the
indenture, commonly referred to as the build-up amount. The
amount of dividends we will be able to make under the build-up
amount will be based, in part, on the amount of cash that may be
distributed by the borrowers under the amended and restated
credit agreement to us. In addition, based on the indenture
provision relating to public equity offerings, which includes
this offering, we expect that we will be able to pay
approximately $4.1 million annually in dividends, subject
to specified conditions. This means that we could pay
$4.1 million in dividends under this provision in addition
to whatever we may be able to pay under the build-up amount,
although a dividend payment under this provision will reduce the
amount we otherwise would have available to us under the
build-up amount for restricted payments, including dividends.
See Description of Indebtedness Amended and
Restated Credit Facilities and Senior
Notes. |
|
|
|
Under Delaware law, our board of directors may not authorize
payment of a dividend unless it is either paid out of our
surplus, as calculated in accordance with the Delaware General
Corporation law, or the DGCL, or if we do not have a surplus, it
is paid out of our net profits for the fiscal year in which the
dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. The
Illinois Business Corporation Act also imposes limitations on
the ability of our subsidiaries that are Illinois corporations,
including Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company, which we
refer to as ICTC, to declare and pay dividends. |
|
|
|
The Illinois Commerce Commission, or the ICC, and the Public
Utility Commission of Texas, or the PUCT, could require our
Illinois and Texas rural telephone companies to make minimum
amounts of capital expenditures and could limit the amount of
cash available to transfer from our rural telephone companies to
us. Our rural telephone companies are ICTC, Consolidated
Communications of Fort Bend Company and Consolidated
Communications of Texas Company. As |
14
|
|
|
|
|
part of the ICCs review of the reorganization, the ICC
imposed various conditions as part of its approval of the
reorganization, including (1) prohibitions on the payment
of dividends or other cash transfers from ICTC, our Illinois
rural telephone company, to us if it fails to meet or exceed
agreed benchmarks for a majority of seven service quality
metrics for the prior reporting year and (2) the
requirement that our Illinois rural telephone company have
access to the higher of $5.0 million or its currently
approved capital expenditure budget for each calendar year
through a combination of available cash and amounts available
under credit facilities. In addition, the Illinois Public
Utilities Act prohibits the payment of dividends by ICTC, except
out of earnings and earned surplus, if ICTCs capital is or
would become impaired by payment of the dividend, or if payment
of the dividend would impair ICTCs ability to render
reasonable and adequate service at reasonable rates, unless the
ICC otherwise finds that the public interest requires payment of
the dividend, subject to any conditions imposed by the ICC. For
the first year following the offering, we expect to satisfy each
of the applicable Illinois regulatory requirements necessary to
permit ICTC to pay dividends to us. See Dividend Policy
and Restrictions Restrictions on Payment of
Dividends State Regulatory Requirements. |
|
|
|
Because we are a holding company with no operations, we
will not be able to pay dividends unless our subsidiaries
transfer funds to us. |
As a holding company we have no direct operations and our
principal assets are the equity interests we hold in our
respective subsidiaries. In addition, our subsidiaries are
legally distinct from us and have no obligation to transfer
funds to us. As a result, we are dependent on the results of
operations of our subsidiaries and, based on their existing and
future debt agreements (such as the amended and restated credit
agreement), state corporation law of the subsidiaries and state
regulatory requirements, their ability to transfer funds to us
to meet our obligations and to pay dividends.
We expect that our cash income tax liability will increase
in the future as a result of the use of, and limitations on, our
net operating loss carryforwards, which may reduce our after-tax
cash available to pay dividends and may require us to reduce
dividend payments in future periods.
In the future, we expect that our cash income tax liability will
increase, which may limit the amount of cash we have available
to pay dividends. Under the Internal Revenue Code, in general,
to the extent a corporation has losses in excess of taxable
income in a taxable period, it will generate a net operating
loss or NOL that may be carried back or carried forward and used
to offset taxable income in prior or future periods. The amount
of an NOL that may be used in a taxable year to offset taxable
income may be limited, such as when a corporation undergoes an
ownership change under Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code. We expect to generate taxable income in
the future, which will be offset by our NOLs, subject to
limitations, such as under Section 382 of the Internal
Revenue Code as a result of this offering and prior ownership
changes. Once our NOLs have been used or have expired, we will
be required to pay additional cash income taxes. The increase in
our cash income tax liability will have the effect of reducing
our after-tax cash available to pay dividends in future periods
and may require us to reduce dividend payments on our common
stock in such future periods.
If we continue to pay dividends at the level currently
anticipated under our dividend policy, our ability to pursue
growth opportunities may be limited.
We believe that our dividend policy will limit, but not
preclude, our ability to grow. If we continue paying dividends
at the level currently anticipated under our dividend policy, we
may not retain a sufficient amount of cash, and may need to seek
financing, to fund a material expansion of our business,
including any significant acquisitions or to pursue growth
opportunities requiring capital expenditures significantly
beyond our current expectations. The risks relating to funding
any dividends, or other cash needs as a result of paying
dividends, are summarized above. In addition, because we expect
a significant portion of cash available will be distributed to
the holders of our common stock under our dividend policy, our
ability to pursue any material expansion of our business will
depend more than it otherwise would on our ability
15
to obtain third party financing. We cannot assure you that such
financing will be available to us on reasonable terms or at all.
Because there has been no public market for our common
stock prior to this offering, there may be volatility in the
trading price of our common stock, which could negatively affect
the value of your investment.
Before this offering, there has been no public market for our
common stock. The initial public offering price of our common
stock has been determined by negotiations between us and the
underwriters and may not be indicative of the market price for
our common stock after this offering. It is possible that an
active trading market for our common stock will not develop or
be sustained after the offering. Even if a trading market
develops, the market price of our common stock may fluctuate
widely as a result of various factors, such as period-to-period
fluctuations in our operating results, sales of our common stock
by principal stockholders, developments in the
telecommunications industry, the failure of securities analysts
to cover our common stock after this offering or changes in
financial estimates by analysts, competitive factors, regulatory
developments, economic and other external factors. You may be
unable to resell your shares of our common stock at or above the
initial public offering price.
Future sales, or the perception of future sales, of a
substantial amount of our common stock may depress the price of
the shares of our common stock.
Future sales, or the perception or the availability for sale in
the public market, of substantial amounts of our common stock
could adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common
stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through
future sales of equity securities.
Upon consummation of this offering, there will be
29,687,510 shares of common stock outstanding, an increase
of approximately 25.3% from the number of shares of common stock
outstanding immediately prior to this offering. The shares of
common stock sold by us and our existing stockholders in this
offering will be freely transferable without restriction or
further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Act. The remaining
14,020,844 shares of common stock owned by our existing
stockholders will be restricted securities within the meaning of
Rule 144 under the Securities Act but will be eligible for
resale subject to applicable volume, manner of sale, holding
period and other limitations of Rule 144. We, our officers,
directors and the selling stockholders have agreed to a
lock-up, meaning that, subject to specified
exceptions, neither we nor they will sell any shares or engage
in any hedging transactions without the prior consent of Credit
Suisse First Boston LLC for 180 days after the date of
this prospectus, subject to extension under certain
circumstances. Following the expiration of the lock-up period,
all of these shares of our common stock will be eligible for
future sale, subject to the applicable volume, manner of sale,
holding period and other limitations of Rule 144. Finally,
our existing equity investors have certain registration rights
with respect to the common stock that they will retain following
this offering. See Shares Eligible for Future Sale
for a discussion of the shares of common stock that may be sold
into the public market in the future.
We may issue shares of our common stock, or other securities,
from time to time as consideration for future acquisitions and
investments. In the event any such acquisition or investment is
significant, the number of shares of our common stock, or the
number or aggregate principal amount, as the case may be, of
other securities that we may issue may in turn be significant.
We may also grant registration rights covering those shares or
other securities in connection with any such acquisitions and
investments.
Our organizational documents could limit or delay another
partys ability to acquire us and, therefore, could deprive
our investors of the opportunity to obtain a takeover premium
for their shares.
A number of provisions in our amended and restated certificate
of incorporation and bylaws will make it difficult for another
company to acquire us. These provisions include, among others,
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
dividing our board of directors into three classes, which
results in only approximately one-third of our board of
directors being elected each year; |
16
|
|
|
|
|
requiring the affirmative vote of holders of not less than 75%
of the voting power of our outstanding common stock to approve
any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of
our assets; |
|
|
|
providing that directors may only be removed for cause and then
only upon the affirmative vote of holders of not less than
two-thirds of the voting power of our outstanding common stock; |
|
|
|
requiring the affirmative vote of holders of not less than
two-thirds of the voting power of our outstanding common stock
to amend, alter, change or repeal specified provisions of our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws
(other than provisions regarding stockholder approval of any
merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our
assets, which shall require the affirmative vote of 75% of the
voting power of our outstanding common stock); |
|
|
|
requiring stockholders to provide us with advance notice if they
wish to nominate any persons for election to our board of
directors or if they intend to propose any matters for
consideration at an annual stockholders meeting; and |
|
|
|
authorizing the issuance of so-called blank check
preferred stock without stockholder approval upon such terms as
the board of directors may determine. |
We are also subject to laws that may have a similar effect. For
example, federal and Illinois telecommunications laws and
regulations generally prohibit a direct or indirect transfer of
control over our business without prior regulatory approval.
Similarly, section 203 of the DGCL prohibits us from engaging in
a business combination with an interested stockholder for a
period of three years from the date the person became an
interested stockholder unless certain conditions are met.
As a result of the foregoing, it will be difficult for another
company to acquire us and, therefore, could limit the price that
possible investors might be willing to pay in the future for
shares of our common stock. In addition, the rights of our
common stockholders will be subject to, and may be adversely
affected by, the rights of holders of any class or series of
preferred stock that may be issued in the future.
The concentration of the voting power of our common stock
ownership among our existing equity investors will limit your
ability to influence corporate matters.
Upon consummation of this offering, our existing equity
investors, Central Illinois Telephone, Providence Equity and
Spectrum Equity, will own approximately 25.5%, 14.6% and 3.8% of
our common stock, respectively. As a result, they will be able
to significantly influence all matters requiring stockholder
approval, including the ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
elect a majority of the members of our board of directors; |
|
|
|
enter into significant corporate transactions, such as a merger
or other sale of our company or its assets, or to prevent any
such transaction; |
|
|
|
enter into acquisitions that increase our amount of indebtedness
or sell revenue-generating assets; |
|
|
|
determine our corporate and management policies; |
|
|
|
amend our organizational documents; and |
|
|
|
other matters submitted to our stockholders for approval. |
In addition, because any merger, consolidation or sale of all or
substantially all of our assets must be approved by not less
than 75% of our then outstanding common stock, our existing
equity investors together or Central Illinois Telephone by
itself, will be able to prevent any such transaction should they
or it choose to do so. This concentrated control will limit your
ability to influence corporate matters and, as a result, we may
take actions that other stockholders do not view as beneficial,
which may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
17
Our existing equity investors may have conflicts of
interests with you or us in the future, including by making
investments in companies that compete with us, competing with us
for acquisition opportunities or otherwise taking actions that
further their interests but which might involve risks to, or
otherwise adversely affect, us or you.
While our existing equity investors do not currently hold
interests in companies that compete with us, they may make
investments in companies in the future and may from time to time
acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly
or indirectly with us. These other investments may:
|
|
|
|
|
create competing financial demands on our equity investors; |
|
|
|
create potential conflicts of interest; |
|
|
|
require efforts consistent with applicable law to keep the other
businesses separate from our operations; and |
|
|
|
require efforts consistent with applicable law to keep the other
businesses separate from our operations. |
Our existing equity investors may also pursue acquisition
opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and as
a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available
to us. Furthermore, our existing equity investors also may have
an interest in pursuing acquisitions, divestitures, financings
or other transactions that, in their judgment, could enhance
their equity investment, even though such transactions might
involve risks to our common stockholders. In addition, our
existing equity investors rights to vote or dispose of
equity interests in our company are not subject to restrictions
in favor of our company other than as may be required by
applicable law.
If you purchase shares of our common stock, you will
experience immediate and substantial dilution.
Investors purchasing common stock in the offering will
experience immediate and substantial dilution in the net
tangible book value of their shares. At the initial public
offering price of $13.00 per share, dilution to new
investors will be $21.90 per share. Investors purchasing
common stock in this offering will contribute 66.1% of the total
consideration we received for our common stock, but will only
own 52.8% of our outstanding common stock. If we sell additional
shares of common stock or securities convertible into shares of
common stock in the future, you may suffer further dilution of
your equity investment. See Dilution.
Following this offering, we will need to comply with new
laws, regulations and requirements as a result of becoming a
public company, which will increase our expenses and
administrative workload. This will likely occupy a significant
amount of the time of our board of directors, management and our
officers and will increase our costs and expenses.
As a public company with listed equity securities, we will need
to comply with new laws, regulations and requirements, such as
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, related SEC regulations and
requirements of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc., or Nasdaq, that
we did not need to comply with as a private company. Preparing
to comply and complying with new statutes, regulations and
requirements will occupy a significant amount of the time of our
board of directors, management and our officers and will
increase our costs and expenses. We will need to:
|
|
|
|
|
create or expand the roles and duties of our board of directors,
our board committees and management; |
|
|
|
institute a more comprehensive compliance function; |
|
|
|
prepare and distribute periodic public reports in compliance
with our obligations under the federal securities laws; |
|
|
|
involve and retain to a greater degree outside counsel and
accountants in the above activities; |
18
|
|
|
|
|
enhance our investor relations function; and |
|
|
|
establish new internal policies, such as those relating to
disclosure controls and procedures and insider trading. |
In addition, we also expect that being a public company and
these new rules and regulations will make it more expensive for
us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we
may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur
substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These factors
could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain
qualified members of our board of directors, particularly to
serve on our audit committee, and qualified executive officers.
If we are not able to implement the requirements of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 in a timely manner
or with adequate compliance, we may be unable to provide the
required financial information in a timely and reliable manner
and may be subject to sanctions by regulatory authorities. The
perception of these matters could cause our share price to
fall.
Changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate
governance and public disclosure, including the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and related regulations implemented by the SEC and
Nasdaq are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing
legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities
more time consuming. We will be evaluating our internal controls
systems to allow management to report on, and our independent
auditors to attest to, our internal controls. We will be
performing the system and process evaluation and testing (and
any necessary remediation) required to comply with the
management certification and auditor attestation requirements of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. While we anticipate
being able to fully implement the requirements relating to
internal controls and all other aspects of Section 404 by
the December 31, 2006 deadline, we cannot be certain as to
the timing of completion of our evaluation, testing and
remediation actions or the impact of the same on our operations
since there is presently no precedent available by which to
measure compliance adequacy. If we are not able to implement the
requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with
adequate compliance, we might be subject to sanctions or
investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the SEC or
Nasdaq. Any such action could adversely affect our financial
results or investors confidence in our company, and could
cause our stock price to fall. In addition, the controls and
procedures that we will implement may not comply with all of the
relevant rules and regulations of the SEC and Nasdaq. If we fail
to develop and maintain effective controls and procedures, we
may be unable to provide financial information in a timely and
reliable manner. The perception of these matters could cause our
share price to fall.
Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness and Our Capital
Structure
|
|
|
We have a substantial amount of debt outstanding and may
incur additional indebtedness in the future, which could
restrict our ability to pay dividends. |
We have a significant amount of debt outstanding. As of
March 31, 2005, we would have had $561.1 million of
total long-term debt (including current portion) outstanding and
$215.0 million of stockholders equity. The degree to which
we are leveraged could have important consequences for you,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to make payments on our debt, which payments we
currently expect to be approximately $37.9 million in the
first year following the offering, thereby reducing funds
available for operations, future business opportunities and
other purposes and/or dividends on our common stock; |
|
|
|
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to,
changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; |
|
|
|
making it more difficult for us to satisfy our debt and other
obligations; |
|
|
|
limiting our ability to borrow additional funds, or to sell
assets to raise funds, if needed, for working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes; |
19
|
|
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and
industry conditions, including changes in interest
rates; and |
|
|
|
placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt. |
We cannot assure you that we will generate sufficient revenues
to service and repay our debt and have sufficient funds left
over to achieve or sustain profitability in our operations, meet
our working capital and capital expenditure needs, compete
successfully in our markets or pay dividends to our stockholders.
Subject to the restrictions in the indenture or to be contained
in the amended and restated credit agreement, we may be able to
incur additional debt. As of March 31, 2005, and after
giving effect to this offering and the related transactions, we
would have been able to incur approximately $116.1 million
additional debt. Although the indenture contains and the amended
and restated credit agreement will contain restrictions on our
ability to incur additional debt, these restrictions are subject
to a number of important exceptions. If we incur additional
debt, the risks associated with our substantial leverage,
including our ability to service our debt, would likely increase.
|
|
|
We will require a significant amount of cash to service
and repay our debt and to pay dividends on our common stock, and
our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our
control. |
We currently expect our cash interest expense to be
approximately $37.9 million in the first year following the
offering. Our ability to make payments on our debt and to pay
dividends on our common stock will depend on our ability to
generate cash in the future, which will depend on many factors
beyond our control. We cannot assure you that:
|
|
|
|
|
our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations
to service and repay our debt, pay dividends on our common stock
and to fund working capital and planned capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
future borrowings will be available under the amended and
restated credit facilities or any future credit facilities in an
amount sufficient to enable us to repay our debt and pay
dividends on our common stock; or |
|
|
|
we will be able to refinance any of our debt on commercially
reasonable terms or at all. |
If we cannot generate sufficient cash from our operations to
meet our debt service and repayment obligations, we may need to
reduce or delay capital expenditures, the development of our
business generally and any acquisitions. If for any reason we
are unable to meet our debt service and repayment obligations,
we would be in default under the terms of the agreements
governing our debt, which would allow the lenders under the
amended and restated credit facilities to declare all borrowings
outstanding to be due and payable, which would in turn trigger
an event of default under the indenture. If the amounts
outstanding under the amended and restated credit facilities or
our senior notes were to be accelerated, we cannot assure you
that our assets would be sufficient to repay in full the money
owed to the lenders or to our other debt holders.
|
|
|
The indenture contains, and the amended and restated
credit agreement will contain, covenants that limit the
discretion of our management in operating our business and could
prevent us from capitalizing on business opportunities and
taking other corporate actions. |
The indenture imposes and the amended and restated credit
agreement will impose significant operating and financial
restrictions on us. These restrictions limit or restrict, among
other things, our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries
that are restricted by these agreements to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional debt and issue preferred stock; |
|
|
|
make restricted payments, including paying dividends on,
redeeming, repurchasing or retiring our capital stock; |
|
|
|
make investments and prepay or redeem debt; |
|
|
|
enter into agreements restricting our subsidiaries ability
to pay dividends, make loans or transfer assets to us; |
20
|
|
|
|
|
create liens; |
|
|
|
sell or otherwise dispose of assets, including capital stock of
subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
engage in sale and leaseback transactions; |
|
|
|
make capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
engage in business other than telecommunications
businesses; and |
|
|
|
consolidate or merge. |
In addition, the amended and restated credit agreement will
require, and any future credit agreements may require, us to
comply with specified financial ratios, including ratios
regarding interest coverage, total leverage, senior secured
leverage and fixed charge coverage. Our ability to comply with
these ratios may be affected by events beyond our control. The
restrictions contained in the indenture and to be contained in
the amended and restated credit agreement will:
|
|
|
|
|
limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions,
meet capital needs or otherwise restrict our activities or
business plans; and |
|
|
|
adversely affect our ability to finance our operations, enter
into acquisitions or to engage in other business activities that
would be in our interest. |
In the event of a default under the amended and restated credit
agreement, the lenders could foreclose on the assets and capital
stock pledged to them.
A breach of any of the covenants contained in the amended and
restated credit agreement, or in any future credit agreements,
or our inability to comply with the financial ratios could
result in an event of default, which would allow the lenders to
declare all borrowings outstanding to be due and payable, which
would in turn trigger an event of default under the indenture
governing our senior notes. If the amounts outstanding under the
amended and restated credit facilities or our senior notes were
to be accelerated, we cannot assure you that our assets would be
sufficient to repay in full the money owed to the lenders or to
our other debt holders.
Because we expect to need to refinance our existing debt,
we face the risks of either not being able to do so or doing so
at a higher interest expense.
Our senior notes mature in 2012 and our amended and restated
credit facilities will mature in full in 2011. We may not be
able to refinance our senior notes or renew or refinance the
amended and restated credit facilities, or any renewal or
refinancing may occur on less favorable terms. If we are unable
to refinance or renew our senior notes or our amended and
restated credit facilities, our failure to repay all amounts due
on the maturity date would cause a default under the indenture
or the amended and restated credit agreement. In addition, our
interest expense may increase significantly if we refinance our
senior notes, which bear interest at
93/4%
per year, or our amended and restated credit facilities on terms
that are less favorable to us than the terms of our senior notes
or the expected terms of our amended and restated credit
facilities, which could impair our ability to pay dividends.
21
Risk Factors Relating to Our Business
The telecommunications industry is generally subject to
substantial regulatory changes, rapid development and
introduction of new technologies and intense competition that
could cause us to suffer price reductions, customer losses,
reduced operating margins or loss of market share.
The telecommunications industry has been, and we believe will
continue to be, characterized by several trends, including the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
substantial regulatory change due to the passage and
implementation of the Telecommunications Act, which included
changes designed to stimulate competition for both local and
long distance telecommunications services; |
|
|
|
rapid development and introduction of new technologies and
services; |
|
|
|
increased competition within established markets from current
and new market entrants that may provide competing or
alternative services; |
|
|
|
the blurring of traditional dividing lines between, and the
bundling of, different services, such as local dial tone, long
distance, wireless, cable, data and Internet services; and |
|
|
|
an increase in mergers and strategic alliances that allow one
telecommunications provider to offer increased services or
access to wider geographic markets. |
We expect competition to intensify as a result of new
competitors and the development of new technologies, products
and services. Some or all of these risks may cause us to have to
spend significantly more in capital expenditures than we
currently anticipate to keep existing, and attract new,
customers.
Many of our voice and data competitors, such as cable providers,
Internet access providers, wireless service providers and long
distance carriers have brand recognition and financial,
personnel, marketing and other resources that are significantly
greater than ours. In addition, due to consolidation and
strategic alliances within the telecommunications industry, we
cannot predict the number of competitors that will emerge,
especially as a result of existing or new federal and state
regulatory or legislative actions. For example, the pending
acquisition of AT&T, one of our largest customers, by SBC,
the dominant local exchange company in the areas in which our
Texas rural telephone companies operate, could increase
competitive pressures for our services and impact our long
distance and access revenues. Such increased competition from
existing and new entities could lead to price reductions, loss
of customers, reduced operating margins or loss of market share.
The use of new technologies by other, existing companies
may increase our costs and cause us to lose customers and
revenues.
The telecommunications industry is subject to rapid and
significant changes in technology, frequent new service
introductions and evolving industry standards. Technological
developments may reduce the competitiveness of our services and
require unbudgeted upgrades, significant capital expenditures
and the procurement of additional services that could be
expensive and time consuming. New services arising out of
technological developments may reduce the competitiveness of our
services. If we fail to respond successfully to technological
changes or obsolescence or fail to obtain access to important
new technologies, we could lose customers and revenues and be
limited in our ability to attract new customers or sell new
services to our existing customers. The successful development
of new services, which is an element of our business strategy,
is uncertain and dependent on many factors, and we may not
generate anticipated revenues from such services, which would
reduce our profitability. We cannot predict the effect of these
changes on our competitive position, costs or our profitability.
In addition, part of our marketing strategy is based on market
acceptance of DSL. We expect that an increasing amount of our
revenues will come from providing DSL service. The market for
high-speed Internet access is still developing, and we expect
current competitors and new market entrants to introduce
competing services and to develop new technologies. The markets
for our DSL services could fail to
22
develop, grow more slowly than anticipated or become saturated
with competitors with superior pricing or services. In addition,
our DSL offerings may become subject to newly adopted laws and
regulations. We cannot predict the outcome of these regulatory
developments or how they may affect our regulatory obligations
or the form of competition for these services. As a result, we
could have higher costs and capital expenditures, lower revenues
and greater competition than expected for DSL services.
If we are not successful in integrating TXUCV, we may have
higher costs and fail to achieve expected cost savings, among
other things.
Our future success, and thus our ability to pay interest and
principal on our indebtedness and dividends on our common stock
will depend in part on our ability to integrate TXUCV into our
business. We currently expect to incur approximately
$14.5 million in operating expenses associated with the
integration and restructuring of TXUCV in 2004 and 2005. Of the
$14.5 million, approximately $11.5 million relates to
integration and approximately $3.0 million relates to
restructuring. These one-time integration and restructuring
costs will be in addition to certain ongoing costs we expect to
incur to expand certain administrative functions, such as those
relating to SEC reporting and compliance and do not take into
account other potential cost savings and expenses of the TXUCV
acquisition. The integration of TXUCV involves numerous risks,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
greater demands on our management and administrative resources; |
|
|
|
difficulties and unexpected costs in integrating the operations,
personnel, services, technologies and other systems of CCI
Illinois and CCI Texas; |
|
|
|
possible unexpected loss of key employees, customers and
suppliers; |
|
|
|
unanticipated liabilities and contingencies of TXUCV and its
business; |
|
|
|
unexpected costs of integrating the management and operation of
the two businesses; and |
|
|
|
failure to achieve expected cost savings. |
These challenges and uncertainties could increase our costs and
cause our management to spend less time than expected executing
our business strategy. We may not be able to manage the combined
operations and assets effectively or realize all or any of the
anticipated benefits of the acquisition. To the extent that we
make any additional acquisitions in the future, these risks
would likely be exacerbated.
We may become responsible for unexpected liabilities or other
contingencies that we did not discover in the course of
performing due diligence in connection with the acquisition.
Under the stock purchase agreement, the parent company of TXUCV
agreed to indemnify us against certain undisclosed liabilities.
We cannot assure you, however, that any indemnification will be
enforceable, collectible or sufficient in amount, scope or
duration to fully offset any possible liabilities associated
with the acquisition. Any of these contingencies, individually
or in the aggregate, could increase our costs.
Our possible pursuit of acquisitions is expensive, may not
be successful and, even if it is successful, may be more costly
than anticipated.
Our acquisition strategy entails numerous risks. The pursuit of
acquisition candidates is expensive and may not be successful.
Our ability to complete future acquisitions will depend on our
ability to identify suitable acquisition candidates, negotiate
acceptable terms for their acquisition and, if necessary,
finance those acquisitions, in each case, before any attractive
candidates are purchased by other parties, some of whom may have
greater financial and other resources than us. Whether or not
any particular acquisition is closed successfully, each of these
activities is expensive and time consuming and would likely
require our management to spend considerable time and effort to
accomplish them, which would detract from their ability to run
our current business. We may face unexpected challenges in
receiving any required approvals from the FCC, the ICC, or other
applicable state regulatory commissions, which could result in
delay or our not being able to consummate the acquisition.
Although we may spend considerable expense and effort to pursue
acquisitions, we may not be successful in closing them.
23
If we are successful in closing any acquisitions, we would face
several risks in integrating them, including those listed above
regarding the risks of integrating TXUCV. In addition, any due
diligence we perform may not prove to have been accurate. For
example, we may face unexpected difficulties in entering markets
in which we have little or no direct prior experience or in
generating expected revenue and cash flow from the acquired
companies or assets. The risks identified above may make it more
challenging and costly to integrate TXUCV if we have not done so
fully by the time of any new acquisition.
Currently, we are not pursuing any acquisitions or other
strategic transactions. But, if any of these risks materialize,
they could have a material adverse effect on our business and
our ability to achieve sufficient cash flow, provide adequate
working capital, service and repay our indebtedness and leave
sufficient funds to pay dividends.
Poor economic conditions in our service areas in Illinois
and Texas could cause us to lose local access lines and
revenues.
Substantially all of our customers and operations are located in
Illinois and Texas. The customer base for telecommunications
services in each of our rural telephone companies service
areas in Illinois and Texas is small and geographically
concentrated, particularly for residential customers. Due to our
geographical concentration, the successful operation and growth
of our business is primarily dependent on economic conditions in
our rural telephone companies service areas. The economies
of these areas, in turn, are dependent upon many factors,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
demographic trends; |
|
|
|
in Illinois, the strength of the agricultural markets and the
light manufacturing and services industries, continued demand
from universities and hospitals and the level of government
spending; and |
|
|
|
in Texas, the strength of the manufacturing and retail
industries and continued demand from schools and hospitals. |
Poor economic conditions and other factors beyond our control in
our rural telephone companies service areas could cause a
decline in our local access lines and revenues.
|
|
|
A system failure could cause delays or interruptions of
service, which could cause us to lose customers. |
In the past, we have experienced short, localized disruptions in
our service due to factors such as cable damage, inclement
weather and service failures of our third party service
providers. To be successful, we will need to continue to provide
our customers reliable service over our network. The principal
risks to our network and infrastructure include:
|
|
|
|
|
physical damage to our central offices or local access lines; |
|
|
|
disruptions beyond our control; |
|
|
|
power surges or outages; and |
|
|
|
software defects. |
Disruptions may cause interruptions in service or reduced
capacity for customers, either of which could cause us to lose
customers and incur unexpected expenses, and thereby adversely
affect our business, revenue and cash flow.
Loss of a large customer could reduce our revenues. In
addition, a significant portion of our revenues from the State
of Illinois is based on contracts that are favorable to the
government.
Our success depends in part upon the retention of our large
customers such as AT&T and the State of Illinois. After
giving effect to the TXUCV acquisition, AT&T accounted for
4.1% and the State of
24
Illinois accounted for 6.1% of our revenues during 2004, and
4.0% and 5.7% of our revenues for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, respectively. In general,
telecommunications companies such as ours face the risk of
losing customers as a result of a contract expiration, merger or
acquisition, business failure or the selection of another
provider of voice or data services. In addition, we generate a
significant portion of our operating revenues from originating
and terminating long distance and international telephone calls
for carriers such as AT&T and MCI, which are in the process
of being acquired or are experiencing substantial financial
difficulties. We cannot assure you that we will be able to
retain long-term relationships or secure renewals of short-term
relationships with our customers in the future.
In 2004, virtually all of the revenues of the Public Services
business and 40.8% of the revenues of the Market Response
business of our Other Operations were derived from our
relationships with various agencies of the State of Illinois,
principally the Department of Corrections and the Toll Highway
Authority and various county governments in Illinois. Obtaining
contracts from government agencies is challenging, and
government contracts, like our contracts with the State of
Illinois, often include provisions that are favorable to the
government in ways that are not standard in private commercial
transactions. Specifically, each of our contracts with the State
of Illinois:
|
|
|
|
|
includes provisions that allow the respective state agency to
terminate the contract without cause and without penalty under
some circumstances; |
|
|
|
is subject to decisions of state agencies that are subject to
political influence on renewal; |
|
|
|
gives the State of Illinois the right to renew the contract at
its option but does not give us the same right; and |
|
|
|
could be cancelled if state funding becomes unavailable. |
The failure of the State of Illinois to perform under the
existing agreements for any reason, or to renew the agreements
when they expire, could have a material adverse effect on the
revenues of CCI Illinois. For example, the State of Illinois,
which represented 40.8% of Market Responses revenues for
2004, recently awarded the renewal of the Illinois State Toll
Highway Authority contract, the sole source of those revenues,
to another provider.
If we are unsuccessful in obtaining and maintaining
necessary rights-of-way for our network, our operations may be
interrupted and we would likely face increased costs.
We need to obtain and maintain the necessary rights-of-way for
our network from governmental and quasi-governmental entities
and third parties, such as railroads, utilities, state highway
authorities, local governments and transit authorities. We may
not be successful in obtaining and maintaining these
rights-of-way or obtaining them on acceptable terms whether in
existing or new service areas. Some of the agreements relating
to these rights-of-way may be short-term or revocable at will,
and we cannot be certain that we will continue to have access to
existing rights-of-way after they have expired or terminated. If
any of our rights-of-way agreements were terminated or could not
be renewed, we may be forced to remove our network facilities
from under the affected rights-of-way or relocate or abandon our
networks. We may not be able to maintain all of our existing
rights-of-way and permits or obtain and maintain the additional
rights-of-way and permits needed to implement our business plan.
In addition, our failure to maintain the necessary
rights-of-way, franchises, easements, licenses and permits may
result in an event of default under the amended and restated
credit agreement and other credit agreements we may enter into
in the future and, as a result, other agreements governing our
debt. As a result of the above, our operations may be
interrupted and we may need to find alternative rights-of-way
and make unexpected capital expenditures.
25
We are dependent on third party vendors for our
information and billing systems. Any significant disruption in
our relationship with these vendors could increase our costs and
affect our operating efficiencies.
Sophisticated information and billing systems are vital to our
ability to monitor and control costs, bill customers, process
customer orders, provide customer service and achieve operating
efficiencies. We currently rely on internal systems and third
party vendors to provide all of our information and processing
systems. Some of our billing, customer service and management
information systems have been developed by third parties for us
and may not perform as anticipated. In addition, our plans for
developing and implementing our information and billing systems
rely primarily on the delivery of products and services by third
party vendors. Our right to use these systems is dependent upon
license agreements with third party vendors. Some of these
agreements are cancelable by the vendor, and the cancellation or
nonrenewable nature of these agreements could impair our ability
to process orders or bill our customers. Since we rely on third
party vendors to provide some of these services, any switch in
vendors could be costly and affect operating efficiencies.
The loss of key management personnel, or the inability to
attract and retain highly qualified management and other
personnel in the future, could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our success depends upon the talents and efforts of key
management personnel, many of whom have been with our company
and our industry for decades, including Mr. Lumpkin, Robert
J. Currey, Steven L. Childers, Joseph R. Dively,
Steven J. Shirar, C. Robert Udell, Jr. and
Christopher A. Young. There are no employment agreements
with any of these senior managers. The loss of any such
management personnel, due to retirement or otherwise, and the
inability to attract and retain highly qualified technical and
management personnel in the future, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Regulatory Risks
The telecommunications industry in which we operate is
subject to extensive federal, state and local regulation that
could change in a manner adverse to us.
Our main sources of revenues are our local telephone businesses
in Illinois and Texas. The laws and regulations governing these
businesses may be, and in some cases have been, challenged in
the courts, and could be changed by Congress, state legislatures
or regulators at any time. In addition, new regulations could be
imposed by federal or state authorities increasing our operating
costs or capital requirements or that are otherwise adverse to
us. We cannot predict the impact of future developments or
changes to the regulatory environment or the impact such
developments or changes may have on us. Adverse rulings,
legislation or changes in governmental policy on issues material
to us could increase our competition, cause us to lose customers
to competitors and decrease our revenues, increase our costs and
decrease profitability.
Our rural telephone companies could lose their rural
status under interconnection rules, which would increase our
costs and could cause us to lose customers and the associated
revenues to competitors.
The Telecommunications Act imposes a number of interconnection
and other requirements on local communications providers,
including incumbent telephone companies. Each of the
subsidiaries through which we operate our local telephone
businesses is an incumbent telephone company and is also
classified as a rural telephone company under the
Telecommunications Act. The Telecommunications Act exempts rural
telephone companies from some of the more burdensome
interconnection requirements such as unbundling of network
elements and sharing information and facilities with other
communications providers. These unbundling requirements and the
obligation to offer unbundled network elements, or UNEs, to
competitors, impose substantial costs on, and result in customer
attrition for, the incumbent telephone companies that must
comply with these requirements. The ICC or the PUCT can
terminate the applicable rural exemption for each of our rural
telephone companies if it receives a bona fide request for
26
full interconnection from another telecommunications carrier and
the state commission determines that the request is technically
feasible, not unduly economically burdensome and consistent with
universal service requirements. Neither the ICC nor the PUCT has
yet terminated, or proposed to terminate, the rural exemption
for any of our rural telephone companies. However, our Illinois
rural telephone company has received a request that we provide
interconnection services that are not required of an incumbent
telephone company holding a rural exemption, which could result
in a request to the ICC to terminate our Illinois rural
telephone companys exemption. If the ICC or PUCT
terminates the applicable rural exemption in whole or in part
for any of our rural telephone companies, or if the applicable
state commission does not allow us adequate compensation for the
costs of providing the interconnection or UNEs, our
administrative and regulatory costs could increase significantly
and we could suffer a significant loss of customers and revenues
to existing or new competitors.
Legislative or regulatory changes could reduce or
eliminate the revenues our rural telephone companies receive
from network access charges.
A significant portion of our rural telephone companies
revenues come from network access charges paid by long distance
and other carriers for originating or terminating calls in our
rural telephone companies service areas. The amount of
network access charge revenues that our rural telephone
companies receive is based on interstate rates set by the FCC
and intrastate rates set by the ICC and PUCT. The FCC has
reformed, and continues to reform, the federal network access
charge system, and the states, including Illinois and Texas,
often establish intrastate network access charges that mirror or
otherwise interrelate with the federal rules.
Traditionally, regulators have allowed network access rates to
be set higher in rural areas than the actual cost of originating
or terminating calls as an implicit means of subsidizing the
high cost of providing local service in rural areas. In 2001,
the FCC adopted rules reforming the network access charge system
for rural carriers, including reductions in per-minute access
charges and increases in both universal service fund subsidies
and flat-rate, monthly per line charges on end-user customers.
Our Illinois rural telephone companys intrastate network
access rates mirror interstate network access rates. Illinois
does not provide, however, an explicit subsidy in the form of a
universal service fund applicable to our Illinois rural
telephone company. As a result, while subsidies from the federal
universal service fund have offset Illinois Telephone
Operations decrease in revenues resulting from the
reduction in interstate network access rates, there was not a
corresponding offset for the decrease in revenues from the
reduction in intrastate network access rates.
The FCC is currently considering even more sweeping potential
changes in network access charges. Depending on the FCCs
decisions, our current network access charge revenues could be
reduced materially, and we do not know whether increases in
other revenues, such as federal or Texas subsidies and monthly
line charges, will be sufficient to offset any such reductions.
The ICC and the PUCT also may make changes in our intrastate
network access charges, which may also cause reductions in our
revenues. To the extent any of our rural telephone companies
become subject to competition and competitive telephone
companies increase their operations in the areas served by our
rural telephone companies, a portion of long distance and other
carriers network access charges will be paid to our
competitors rather than to our companies. In addition, the
compensation our companies receive from network access charges
could be reduced due to competition from wireless carriers.
In addition, VOIP services are increasingly being embraced by
cable companies, incumbent telephone companies, competitive
telephone companies and long distance carriers. The FCC is
considering whether VOIP services are regulated
telecommunications services or unregulated information services
and is considering whether providers of VOIP services are
obligated to pay access charges for calls originating or
terminating on incumbent telephone company facilities. We cannot
predict the outcome of the FCCs rulemaking or the impact
on the revenues of our rural telephone companies. The
proliferation of VOIP, particularly to the extent such
communications do not utilize our rural telephone
companies networks, may cause significant reductions to
our rural telephone companies network access charge
revenues.
27
We believe telecommunications carriers, such as long
distance carriers or VOIP providers, are disputing and/or
avoiding their obligation to pay network access charges to rural
telephone companies for use of their networks. If carriers
successfully dispute or avoid the applicability of network
access charges, our revenues could decrease.
In recent years, telecommunications carriers, such as long
distance carriers or VOIP providers, have become more aggressive
in disputing interstate access charge rates set by the FCC and
the applicability of network access charges to their
telecommunications traffic. We believe that these disputes have
increased in part due to advances in technology that have
rendered the identity and jurisdiction of traffic more difficult
to ascertain and that have afforded carriers an increased
opportunity to assert regulatory distinctions and claims to
lower access costs for their traffic. As a result of the
increasing deployment of VOIP services and other technological
changes, we believe that these types of disputes and claims will
likely increase. In addition, we believe that there has been a
general increase in the unauthorized use of telecommunications
providers networks without payment of appropriate access
charges, or so-called phantom traffic, due in part
to advances in technology that have made it easier to use
networks without having to pay for the traffic. As a general
matter, we believe that this phantom traffic is due to
unintended usage and, in some cases, fraud. We cannot assure you
that there will not be material claims made against us
contesting the applicability of network access charges billed by
our rural telephone companies or continued or increased phantom
traffic that uses our network without paying us for it. If there
is a successful dispute or avoidance of the applicability of
network access charges, our revenues could decrease.
Legislative or regulatory changes could reduce or
eliminate the government subsidies we receive.
The federal and Texas state system of subsidies, from which we
derive a significant portion of our revenues, are subject to
modification. Our rural telephone companies receive significant
federal and state subsidy payments.
|
|
|
|
|
In 2004, CCI Illinois received $10.6 million from the
federal universal service fund and CCI Texas received an
aggregate of $40.9 million from the federal universal
service fund and the Texas universal service fund, which in the
aggregate comprised 15.9% of our revenues in 2004, after giving
effect to the TXUCV acquisition. |
|
|
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, CCI Illinois received
$4.2 million from the federal universal service fund and CCI
Texas received an aggregate of $9.5 million from the
federal universal service fund and the Texas universal service
fund, which in the aggregate comprised 17.2% of our revenues for
the three months ended March 31, 2005. |
During the last two years, the FCC has made modifications to the
federal universal service fund system that changed the sources
of support and the method for determining the level of support
recipients of federal universal service fund subsidies receive.
It is unclear whether the changes in methodology will continue
to accurately reflect the costs incurred by our rural telephone
companies and whether we will continue to receive the same
amount of federal universal service fund support that our rural
telephone companies have received in the past. The FCC is also
currently considering a number of issues regarding the source
and amount of contributions to, and eligibility for payments
from, the federal universal service fund, and these issues may
also be the subject of legislative amendments to the
Telecommunications Act.
In December 2004, Congress suspended the application of a law
called the Urgent Deficiency Act to the FCCs universal
service fund until December 31, 2005. The Urgent Deficiency
Act prohibits government agencies from making financial
commitments in excess of their funds on hand. Currently, the
universal service fund administrator makes commitments to fund
recipients in advance of collecting the contributions from
carriers that will pay for these commitments. The FCC has not
determined whether the Urgent Deficiency Act would apply to
payments to our rural telephone companies. Congress is now
considering whether to extend the current temporary legislation
that exempts the universal service fund from the Urgent
Deficiency Act. If it does not grant this extension, however,
the universal service subsidy payments to our rural telephone
companies may be delayed or reduced in the future.
28
We cannot predict the outcome of any federal or state
legislative action or any FCC, PUCT or ICC rulemaking or similar
proceedings. If our rural telephone companies do not continue to
receive federal and state subsidies, or if these subsidies are
reduced, our rural telephone companies will likely have lower
revenues and may not be able to operate as profitably as they
have historically. In addition, if the number of local access
lines that our rural telephone companies serve increases, under
the rules governing the federal universal service fund, the rate
at which we can recover certain federal universal service fund
payments may decrease. This may have an adverse effect on our
revenues and profitability.
In addition, under the Telecommunications Act, our competitors
can obtain the same level of federal universal service fund
subsidies as we do if the ICC or PUCT, as applicable, determines
that granting these subsidies to competitors would be in the
public interest and the competitors offer and advertise certain
telephone services as required by the Telecommunications Act and
the FCC. Under current rules, any such payments to our
competitors would not affect the level of subsidies received by
our rural telephone companies, but they would facilitate
competitive entry into our rural telephone companies
service areas and our rural telephone companies may not be able
to compete as effectively or otherwise continue to operate as
profitability.
The high costs of regulatory compliance could make it more
difficult for us to enter new markets, make acquisitions or
change our prices.
Regulatory compliance results in significant costs for us and
diverts the time and effort of management and our officers away
from running our business. In addition, because regulations
differ from state to state, we could face significant costs in
obtaining information necessary to compete effectively if we try
to provide services, such as long distance services, in markets
in different states. These information barriers could cause us
to incur substantial costs and to encounter significant
obstacles and delays in entering these markets. Compliance costs
and information barriers could also affect our ability to
evaluate and compete for new opportunities to acquire local
access lines or businesses as they arise.
Our intrastate services are also generally subject to
certification, tariff filing and other ongoing state regulatory
requirements. Challenges to our tariffs by regulators or third
parties or delays in obtaining certifications and regulatory
approvals could cause us to incur substantial legal and
administrative expenses. If successful, these challenges could
adversely affect the rates that we are able to charge to
customers, which would negatively affect our revenues.
Legislative and regulatory changes in the
telecommunications industry could raise our costs by
facilitating greater competition against us and reduce potential
revenues.
Legislative and regulatory changes in the telecommunications
industry could adversely affect our business by facilitating
greater competition against us, reducing our revenues or raising
our costs. For example, federal or state legislatures or
regulatory commissions could impose new requirements relating to
standards or quality of service, credit and collection policies,
or obligations to provide new or enhanced services such as
high-speed access to the Internet or number portability, whereby
consumers can keep their telephone number when changing
carriers. Any such requirements could increase operating costs
or capital requirements.
The Telecommunications Act provides for significant changes and
increased competition in the telecommunications industry. This
federal statute and the related regulations remain subject to
judicial review and additional rulemakings of the FCC, as well
as to implementing actions by state commissions.
Currently, there exists only a small body of law and regulation
applicable to access to, or commerce on, the Internet. As the
significance of the Internet expands, federal, state and local
governments may adopt new rules and regulations or apply
existing laws and regulations to the Internet. The FCC is
currently reviewing the appropriate regulatory framework
governing high speed access to the Internet through telephone
and cable providers communications networks. The outcome
of these proceedings may affect our regulatory obligations and
costs and competition for our services which could have a
material adverse effect on our revenues.
29
Do not call registries may increase our costs
and limit our ability to market our services.
Our Market Response business is subject to various federal and
state do not call list requirements. Recently, the
FCC and the Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, amended their
rules to provide for a national do not call
registry. Under these new federal regulations, consumers may
have their phone numbers added to the national registry and
telemarketing companies, such as our Market Response business,
are prohibited from calling anyone on that registry other than
for limited exceptions. In September 2003, telemarketers were
given access to the registry and are now required to compare
their call lists against the national do not call
registry at least once every 31 days. We are required to
pay a fee to access the registry on a quarterly basis. This rule
may restrict our ability to market our services effectively to
new customers. Furthermore, compliance with this new rule may
prove difficult, and we may incur penalties for improperly
conducting our marketing activities.
Because we are subject to extensive laws and regulations
relating to the protection of the environment, natural resources
and worker health and safety, we may face significant
liabilities or compliance costs in the future.
Our operations and properties are subject to federal, state and
local laws and regulations relating to protection of the
environment, natural resources and worker health and safety,
including laws and regulations governing and creating liability
relating to, the management, storage and disposal of hazardous
materials, asbestos, petroleum products and other regulated
materials. We also are subject to environmental laws and
regulations governing air emissions from our fleets of vehicles.
As a result, we face several risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Under certain environmental laws, we could be held liable,
jointly and severally and without regard to fault, for the costs
of investigating and remediating any actual or threatened
environmental contamination at currently and formerly owned or
operated properties, and those of our predecessors, and for
contamination associated with disposal by us or our predecessors
of hazardous materials at third party disposal sites. Hazardous
materials may have been released at certain current or formerly
owned properties as a result of historic operations. |
|
|
|
The presence of contamination can adversely affect the value of
our properties and our ability to sell any such affected
property or to use it as collateral. |
|
|
|
We could be held responsible for third party property damage
claims, personal injury claims or natural resource damage claims
relating to any such contamination. |
|
|
|
The cost of complying with existing environmental requirements
could be significant. |
|
|
|
Adoption of new environmental laws or regulations or changes in
existing laws or regulations or their interpretations could
result in significant compliance costs or as yet identified
environmental liabilities. |
|
|
|
Future acquisitions of businesses or properties subject to
environmental requirements or affected by environmental
contamination could require us to incur substantial costs
relating to such matters. |
|
|
|
In addition, environmental laws regulating wetlands, endangered
species and other land use and natural resource issues may
increase costs associated with future business or expansion
opportunities, delay, alter or interfere with such plans, or
otherwise adversely affect such plans. |
As a result of the above, we may face significant liabilities
and compliance costs in the future.
30
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Any statements contained in this prospectus that are not
statements of historical fact, including statements about our
beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements and
should be evaluated as such. The words anticipates,
believes, expects, intends,
plans, estimates, targets,
projects, should, may,
will and similar words and expressions are intended
to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking
statements are contained throughout this prospectus, for example
in Summary, Risk Factors, Dividend
Policy and Restrictions, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations CCI Holdings and
CCI Texas, Business,
Regulation and the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial statements and the related notes. Such
forward-looking statements reflect, among other things, our
current expectations, plans and strategies, and anticipated
financial results, all of which are subject to known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and factors that may cause our actual
results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
these forward-looking statements. Many of these risks are beyond
our ability to control or predict. All forward-looking
statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf
are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary
statements contained throughout this prospectus. Because of
these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should not place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Furthermore,
forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are
made. We do not undertake any obligation to update or review any
forward-looking information, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
31
USE OF PROCEEDS
We estimate that we will receive net proceeds from this offering
of approximately $68.5 million, after deducting
underwriting discounts and commissions and other
offering-related expenses. We will use the net proceeds from
this offering, together with additional borrowings under the
amended and restated credit facilities and approximately
$10.3 million of cash on hand, to:
|
|
|
|
|
repay in full outstanding borrowings under our term loan A
and C facilities, together with accrued but unpaid interest
through the closing date of this offering; |
|
|
|
redeem 32.5% of the aggregate principal amount of our
senior notes and to pay the associated redemption premium of
9.75% of the principal amount to be redeemed, together with
accrued but unpaid interest through the date of redemption; |
|
|
|
pre-fund expected integration and restructuring costs for 2005
relating to the TXUCV acquisition; and |
|
|
|
pay fees and expenses associated with the repayment of the term
loan A and C facilities and entering into the amended and
restated credit facilities. |
At March 31, 2005, the term loan A and term loan C
facilities bore interest at rates of 5.10% and 5.35%,
respectively, and had outstanding balances of
$112.0 million and $311.9 million, respectively. The
term loan A facility is scheduled to mature on
April 14, 2010, and the term loan C facility is scheduled
to mature on October 14, 2011. Our senior notes bear
interest at a rate of
93/4%
annually and are scheduled to mature on April 1, 2012. The
proceeds from our borrowings under the term loan A
facility, the term loan B facility and our issuance of the
senior notes were used, together with other sources of funds, to
pay a portion of the purchase price of the TXUCV acquisition and
to repay existing debt of Consolidated Communications, Inc.,
which we refer to as CCI, among other uses of funds. On
October 22, 2004, we converted all borrowings then
outstanding under the term loan B facility into
approximately $314.0 million of aggregate borrowings under
a term loan C facility.
We will not receive any of the proceeds from the selling
stockholders sale of shares of common stock in the
offering.
The following table lists the estimated sources and uses of
funds from this offering and the related transactions. The
actual amounts on the date that this offering and the related
transactions close may vary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources |
|
|
|
Uses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Cash
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
Repayment of term loan A facility(1)(2)
|
|
$ |
112.0 |
|
Offering proceeds
|
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
Repayment of term loan C facility(1)(2)
|
|
|
311.9 |
|
New term loan D facility(1)
|
|
|
425.0 |
|
|
Senior notes redemption(2)
|
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees and expenses(3)
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption premium
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-funding integration and
restructuring costs
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sources
|
|
$ |
513.3 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
513.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In connection with this offering, our existing credit facilities
will be amended and restated to, among other things, provide for
the repayment in full of our term loan A and C facilities and to
borrow $425.0 million under a new term loan D facility,
which is expected to mature on October 14, 2011. See
Description of Indebtedness Amended and
Restated Credit Facilities. |
32
|
|
(2) |
Excludes accrued but unpaid interest on the term loan A and
C facilities and the senior notes to be redeemed, respectively,
through the closing date of this offering. |
|
(3) |
Transaction fees and expenses include estimated underwriting
discounts and commissions, commitment and financing fees payable
in connection with the amended and restated credit facilities,
and legal, accounting, advisory and other costs payable in
connection with this offering and the related transactions. We
will pay approximately $9.5 million of fees and expenses in
connection with this offering and approximately
$3.4 million in connection with the amendment and
restatement of the existing credit facilities. |
33
DIVIDEND POLICY AND RESTRICTIONS
General
Effective upon the closing of this offering, our board of
directors will adopt a dividend policy that reflects its
judgment that our stockholders would be better served if we
distributed to them a substantial portion of the cash generated
by our business in excess of our expected cash needs rather than
retaining it or using the cash for other purposes, such as to
make investments in our business or to make acquisitions. In
accordance with our dividend policy, we currently intend to pay
an initial dividend of $0.4089 per share (representing a
pro rata portion of the expected dividend for the first year
following the closing of this offering) on or about
November 1, 2005 to stockholders of record as of
October 15, 2005, and to continue to pay quarterly
dividends at an annual rate of $1.5495 per share for the
first year following the closing of this offering, but only if
and to the extent declared by our board of directors and subject
to various restrictions on our ability to do so. The expected
cash needs referred to above include interest payments on our
indebtedness, capital expenditures, taxes, incremental costs
associated with being a public company and certain other costs.
Although it is our current intention to pay quarterly dividends
at an annual rate of $1.5495 per share for the first year
following the closing of this offering, you may not receive any
dividends as a result of any of the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Nothing requires us to pay dividends. |
|
|
|
While our current dividend policy contemplates the distribution
of a substantial portion of the cash generated by our business
in excess of our expected cash needs, this policy could be
changed or revoked by our board of directors at any time, for
example, if it were to determine that we had insufficient cash
to take advantage of other opportunities with attractive rates
of return. |
|
|
|
Even if our dividend policy is not changed or revoked, the
actual amount of dividends distributed under this policy, and
the decision to make any distributions, is entirely at the
discretion of our board of directors. |
|
|
|
The amount of dividends distributed will be subject to covenant
restrictions in the agreements governing our debt, including our
indenture and our amended and restated credit agreement, and in
agreements governing our future debt. |
|
|
|
The amount of dividends distributed may be limited by state
regulatory requirements. |
|
|
|
The amount of dividends distributed is subject to restrictions
under Delaware and Illinois law. |
|
|
|
Our stockholders have no contractual or other legal right to
receive dividends. |
|
|
|
We might not have sufficient cash in the future to pay dividends
in the intended amounts or at all. Our ability to generate this
cash will depend on numerous factors, including the state of our
business, the environment in which we operate and the various
risks we face, changes in the factors, assumptions and other
considerations made by our board of directors in reviewing and
adopting the dividend policy, as described below, our future
results of operations, financial condition, liquidity needs and
capital resources and our various expected cash needs. |
We have no history of paying dividends out of our cash flow.
Dividends on our common stock will not be cumulative.
In reviewing and adopting the dividend policy, our board of
directors reviewed estimates of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our EBITDA; |
|
|
|
our Bank EBITDA, which under the terms of our amended and
restated credit agreement excludes certain items (such as
expenses associated with TXUCV acquisition and professional
service fees) |
34
|
|
|
|
|
that do not affect our ongoing ability to pay interest on our
debt or pay dividends on our common stock; and |
|
|
|
our cash available to pay dividends determined under our amended
and restated credit agreement. |
We believe that our amended and restated credit agreement
represents the most significant legal restraint on our ability
to pay dividends. That is because its restricted payments
covenant allows a lower amount of dividends to be paid from the
borrowers (CCI and Texas Holdings) to CCI Holdings than the
comparable covenant in the indenture (referred to earlier as the
build-up amount) permits CCI Holdings to pay to its
stockholders. The amount of dividends CCI Holdings will be able
to make under the indenture in the future will be based, in
part, on the amount of cash that may be distributed by the
borrowers under the amended and restated credit agreement to CCI
Holdings.
With respect to these estimates and the dividend policy as a
whole, our board of directors evaluated numerous factors, made
several assumptions and took other considerations into account,
which are summarized below under Assumptions
and Considerations. We expect that our board of directors
will regularly review the dividend policy and these factors,
assumptions and considerations.
Estimated Minimum Bank EBITDA and Cash Available to Pay
Dividends
In the first year following the closing of this offering, the
principal, but not exclusive, limitation on our ability to pay
dividends according to our dividend policy will be that
contained in our amended and restated credit agreement. Under
our amended and restated credit agreement, the borrowers
ability to pay dividends to CCI Holdings will primarily depend
on their ability to generate Bank EBITDA. We believe that in
order to pay dividends on our common stock in the year following
this offering according to our dividend policy, collectively the
borrowers would need to have at least $118.6 million of
Bank EBITDA. We refer to this minimum amount of Bank EBITDA as
our estimated minimum Bank EBITDA. Bank EBITDA for any period
will be defined as Bank Consolidated Net Income, as defined in
our amended and restated credit agreement:
|
|
|
plus all amounts deducted in arriving at Bank
Consolidated Net Income in respect of (without duplication),
interest expense, amortization or write-off of debt discount and
non-cash expense incurred in connection with our equity
compensation plans, income taxes, charges for depreciation of
fixed assets and amortization of intangible assets, non-cash
charges for the impairment of long lived assets, fees accrued
prior to this offering payable to certain of our existing equity
investors not exceeding $5.0 million in any twelve-month
period and fees, expenses and charges incurred in connection
with this offering and the related transactions as disclosed in
this prospectus under the heading Use of Proceeds; |
|
|
minus (in the case of gains) or plus
(in the case of losses) (a) gain or loss on any sale of
assets and (b) non-cash charges relating to foreign
currency gains or losses; |
|
|
plus (in the case of losses) and minus
(in the case of income) non-cash minority interest income or
loss; |
|
|
plus (in the case of items deducted in
arriving at Bank Consolidated Net Income) or minus (in
the case of items added in arriving at Bank Consolidated Net
Income) non-cash charges resulting from changes in accounting
principles; |
|
|
plus (a) extraordinary losses and
(b) the first $15.0 million of TXUCV integration
expenses incurred after April 14, 2004 and prior to
December 31, 2005; |
|
|
minus the sum of interest income and
extraordinary income or gains; and |
|
|
plus unusual or nonrecurring charges, fees or
expenses (excluding integration expenses) relating to the
acquisition of TXUCV (including severance payments and retention
bonuses) that were incurred during the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2004 (net of any offsetting items that increased
Bank EBITDA in such quarter as a result thereof) and to give pro
forma effect to the |
35
|
|
|
TXUCV acquisition and the related transactions as if they had
occurred on the first day of such fiscal quarter and in an
aggregate amount not to exceed $12.0 million. |
The amount of dividends we are able to pay in the future under
the amended and restated credit agreement will increase or
decrease based upon, among other things, cumulative Bank EBITDA
and our needs for Available Cash. For a more complete
description of Bank EBITDA and the related definitions and
exceptions, see Description of Indebtedness
Amended and Restated Credit Facilities Restricted
Payments.
Calculation of Estimated Minimum Bank EBITDA and Cash
Available to Pay Dividends
To provide context for our dividend policy and to illustrate our
calculation of our estimate of cash available to pay dividends
in the first year following the closing of the offering, we
present the following three tables below:
|
|
|
|
|
estimated cash available to pay dividends based upon our
estimated minimum Bank EBITDA; |
|
|
|
our calculation of EBITDA on an historical basis for the year
ended December 31, 2004 and the twelve months ended
March 31, 2005; and |
|
|
|
our calculation of (a) Bank EBITDA on a pro forma basis for
the TXUCV acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2004
and the twelve months ended March 31, 2005 and
(b) estimated cash available to pay dividends based upon
our calculation of pro forma Bank EBITDA for these periods. |
The first table sets forth our unaudited calculation
illustrating our belief that $118.6 million of Bank EBITDA
in the first year following the closing of this offering would
be sufficient to fund our expected cash needs, to comply with
the restrictive covenants in our amended and restated credit
agreement and indenture and to fund dividends according to our
dividend policy. We do not currently expect to have to use our
amended and restated revolving credit facility to pay dividends
on our common stock according to our dividend policy in the
first year following the offering.
The second table sets forth our calculation of EBITDA derived
from our net cash provided by operating activities on an
historical basis for the year ended December 31, 2004 and
for the twelve months ended March 31, 2005. This table
demonstrates that if our dividend policy had been in effect for
the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the twelve months
ended March 31, 2005, without making any pro forma
adjustments other than the proposed payment of dividends, we
would not have been able to fund dividends according to our
dividend policy from available cash without borrowing under our
revolving credit facility or otherwise incurring debt. This
inability to fund dividends is primarily due to the significant
cash expenditures associated with our acquisition of TXUCV as
well as our payment of professional services fees to our
existing equity investors.
The final table presents two unaudited calculations that,
together, show our calculation of our ability to pay dividends
based on pro forma Bank EBITDA. First, it presents our
calculation of Bank EBITDA on a pro forma basis for the TXUCV
acquisition in a manner consistent with the comparable data in
the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements presented elsewhere in this prospectus. We believe
that the presentation of pro forma Bank EBITDA provides
investors with meaningful information about our ability to pay
dividends following this offering because it excludes the effect
of certain cash charges that are not expected to impact our
ability to pay dividends in the future. When establishing our
dividend policy, our board of directors specifically considered,
among other things, our pro forma Bank EBITDA for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and for the twelve months ended
March 31, 2005, because of our belief that they more
closely reflect our ability to generate cash available to pay
dividends following the offering as opposed to historical EBITDA
for these periods. The second calculation in this table presents
our calculation of estimated cash available to pay dividends
based upon our pro forma Bank EBITDA. To derive estimated cash
available to pay dividends, we have deducted (1) certain cash
expenses paid by us that have been excluded from the calculation
of pro forma Bank EBITDA in accordance with the terms of our
amended and restated credit agreement and (2) our estimated cash
needs that are not already accounted for in our historical
EBITDA or our pro forma Bank EBITDA. The
36
second calculation demonstrates that if our dividend policy had
been in effect for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the
twelve months ended March 31, 2005, our estimated cash
available to pay dividends would have been approximately
$2.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively, less than
the cash amount required to pay dividends in accordance with our
dividend policy. As such, we would have had to either incur
additional borrowings (under our revolving credit facility or
otherwise) in order to pay the entire $46.0 million in
dividends, or reduce the contemplated dividend by approximately
$0.074 per share for the year ended December 31, 2004, and
$0.027 per share for the twelve months ended March 31,
2005. The shortfall in estimated cash available to pay dividends
for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the twelve months
ended March 31, 2005 is due to approximately
$15.2 million and $16.4 million, respectively, in cash
costs incurred in connection with the TXUCV acquisition and
$5.0 million of professional service fees incurred in each
period. The cash costs incurred in connection with the TXUCV
acquisition were costs that will not recur, except for a limited
amount of expected integration and restructuring costs that we
will pre-fund with cash on our balance sheet at the closing of
this offering. As a result, we do not expect these costs to
affect our ability to pay dividends in the future. Similarly,
our obligation to pay professional service fees will terminate
upon the consummation of this offering and, therefore, will not
affect our ability to pay dividends in the future.
We do not as a matter of course make public projections as to
future sales, earnings or other results of operations and do not
plan to do so in the future. However, our management has
prepared the estimated financial information set forth in the
tables below in order to provide our board of directors with an
estimate of the amount of cash that may be available to pay
dividends, subject to the limits on our ability to do so. The
estimated financial information was not prepared with a view
toward complying with any SEC or American Institute of Certified
Public Accountants guidelines with respect to prospective
financial information, but, in the view of our management, was
prepared on a reasonable basis, reflects the best currently
available estimates and judgments and presents, to the best of
managements current belief, our expected future financial
performance. Neither our independent registered public
accounting firm nor any other independent registered public
accounting firm has compiled, examined, or performed any
procedures with respect to the estimated financial information
contained herein, nor have they expressed any opinion or any
other form of assurance on such information or its
achievability, and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim
any association with, the estimated financial information.
The estimated financial information in the tables below are only
estimates, are not predictions of fact and should not be relied
upon as being necessarily indicative of future results. You are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on the estimated financial
information. The factors, assumptions and other considerations
relating to the estimated financial information are inherently
uncertain and, though considered reasonable by our management as
of the date of its preparation, are subject to a wide variety of
significant business, economic, competitive and other risks and
uncertainties, including those described under Risk
Factors. There will be differences between actual and
projected results. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that the
estimated financial information is indicative of our future
performance or that the actual results will not differ
materially from the estimated financial information presented in
the tables below.
In light of the foregoing and based on numerous factors,
assumptions and considerations described under
Assumptions and Considerations below, we
believe that our Bank EBITDA for the year following the closing
of this offering will be at least $118.6 million. Nothing
in this prospectus should be understood to be, directly or
indirectly, a prediction or estimate for any other period.
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Estimated Cash Available to Pay Dividends Based on Estimated
Minimum Bank EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Minimum Bank EBITDA(1)
|
|
$ |
118,568 |
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated cash interest expense(2)
|
|
|
(37,901 |
) |
|
Estimated capital expenditures(3)
|
|
|
(33,500 |
) |
|
Estimated principal payments associated with capital lease
obligations(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
TXUCV integration and restructuring costs(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated cash taxes(6)
|
|
|
(1,167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Estimated cash available to pay dividends on common stock(7)
|
|
$ |
46,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net leverage ratio derived from the above(8)
|
|
|
4.71:1.00 |
|
Senior secured leverage ratio derived from the above(9)
|
|
|
3.64:1.00 |
|
Fixed charge coverage ratio derived from the above(10)
|
|
|
3.11:1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Historical EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
79,766 |
|
|
$ |
88,508 |
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
(201 |
) |
|
|
(1,752 |
) |
|
Partnership income and minority interest
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
Provision for bad debt losses
|
|
|
(4,666 |
) |
|
|
(5,178 |
) |
|
Asset impairment
|
|
|
(11,578 |
) |
|
|
(11,578 |
) |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(6,476 |
) |
|
|
(7,045 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(4,427 |
) |
|
|
(312 |
) |
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
39,551 |
|
|
|
48,195 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
(359 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical EBITDA(11)
|
|
$ |
93,162 |
|
|
$ |
111,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Pro Forma Bank EBITDA and Estimated Cash Available to Pay
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical EBITDA
|
|
$ |
93,162 |
|
|
$ |
111,604 |
|
Pro forma adjustments(12)
|
|
|
16,656 |
|
|
|
(2,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma EBITDA(13)
|
|
|
109,818 |
|
|
|
109,361 |
|
|
Retention bonuses(14)
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
Severance costs(15)
|
|
|
5,707 |
|
|
|
5,331 |
|
|
TXUCV sales due diligence and transaction costs(16)
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
TXUCV integration and restructuring costs(5)
|
|
|
7,009 |
|
|
|
9,259 |
|
|
Professional service fees(17)
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
Other, net(18)
|
|
|
(4,764 |
) |
|
|
(4,375 |
) |
|
Partnership distributions(19)
|
|
|
4,135 |
|
|
|
3,624 |
|
|
|
Non-cash losses (gains):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring, asset impairment and other charges
|
|
|
11,566 |
|
|
|
11,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma Bank EBITDA
|
|
|
140,969 |
|
|
|
141,581 |
|
|
Cash expenses excluded from pro forma Bank EBITDA(20)
|
|
|
(20,214 |
) |
|
|
(21,405 |
) |
|
Estimated cash interest expense(2)
|
|
|
(37,901 |
) |
|
|
(37,901 |
) |
|
Capital expenditures(3)
|
|
|
(36,745 |
) |
|
|
(34,744 |
) |
|
Estimated public company expenses(1)
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
Estimated principal payments associated with capital lease
obligation(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TXUCV integration and restructuring costs(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash income taxes(6)
|
|
|
(1,317 |
) |
|
|
(1,317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated cash available to pay dividends
|
|
$ |
43,792 |
|
|
$ |
45,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated cash required to pay dividends
|
|
$ |
46,000 |
|
|
$ |
46,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
In comparing our estimated minimum Bank EBITDA to our Bank
EBITDA calculated on an historical basis, the historical
calculation does not include approximately $1.0 million in
incremental, ongoing expenses associated with being a public
company with equity securities quoted on the Nasdaq National
Market. These expenses include estimated compliance (SEC and
Nasdaq) and related administrative expenses, accounting and
legal fees, investor relations expenses, directors fees
and director and officer liability insurance premiums, registrar
and transfer agent fees, listing fees and other, miscellaneous
expenses. |
|
|
(2) |
Assumes: (a) with respect to the amended and restated
credit facilities, interest at a weighted average rate of 5.79%
on an annual basis on $425.0 million outstanding borrowings
under the new term loan D facility, no borrowings under our new
$30.0 million revolving credit facility and a 0.5%
commitment fee on the unused balance under the new revolving
credit facility; (b) with respect to our senior notes, an
interest rate of
93/4%
on $135.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior
notes outstanding after giving effect to the redemption of
$65.0 million principal amount of senior notes in
connection with this offering and the related transactions; and
(c) excludes non-cash amortization of deferred financing costs.
For a discussion of deferred financing costs, see Note 14
to the unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements. At March 31, 2005, we had interest rate swap
agreements covering $213.7 million of aggregate principal
amount of our existing variable rate debt, which we expect to
cover our new variable rate debt under the new term loan
D facility, at fixed LIBOR rates ranging from 2.99% to
3.35%. If market interest rates were to average 1.0% higher than
the average rates that prevailed from January 1, 2005
through March 31, 2005, our interest payments would have
increased by approximately $0.5 million for the period. |
39
|
|
|
|
|
We note that the tables above do not reflect the payment of
principal on any debt because our amended and restated credit
agreement will not, and the indenture does not, require any
amortization prior to the applicable maturity dates. |
|
|
(3) |
We expect capital expenditures for the year following the
offering to be approximately $33.5 million. If our capital
expenditures in the year following the offering were to exceed
$33.5 million, which is less than actual amounts incurred
during the year ended December 31, 2004 and the twelve
months ended March 31, 2005, our Estimated Minimum Bank
EBITDA would have to be commensurately greater in order to pay
dividends at the expected level. For a more detailed discussion
of our capital expenditures, see Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations CCI Holdings Liquidity and
Capital Resources Capital Requirements. |
|
|
(4) |
Required principal payments under existing capital lease
obligation. On May 27, 2005, we elected to pay in full the
outstanding balance on this capital lease. As a result, no
scheduled principal payments will be incurred under this capital
lease obligation following the offering. See Description
of Indebtedness GECC Capital Leases. |
|
|
(5) |
We currently expect to incur approximately $14.5 million in
operating expenses associated with the TXUCV integration and
restructuring process in 2004 and 2005. Of the
$14.5 million, approximately $11.5 million relates to
integration and approximately $3.0 million relates to
restructuring. As of March 31, 2005, we had incurred
$9.2 million in integration and restructuring costs in
connection with the TXUCV acquisition. We expect to spend the
remaining $5.3 million during the remainder of 2005.
However, we have not listed any such expenses in the tables
because in connection with this offering and the related
transactions, we will pre-fund the remaining $5.3 million
of expected integration and restructuring expenses for 2005 with
cash from our balance sheet. We do not expect that the
pre-funding of these estimated expenses will change any of our
expected cash plans or otherwise affect our expected working
capital requirements. We do not expect to incur any significant
costs relating to the TXUCV acquisition after 2005. |
|
|
(6) |
We estimate that as of March 31, 2005, we had an estimated
$20.2 million of federal net operating losses, or NOLs, net
of valuation allowances, available to us to carry forward to
periods beginning after March 31, 2005. In estimating our
NOLs as of March 31, 2005, we forecasted information to
calculate our expected taxable income (loss) for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and then prorated the resulting amount to
arrive at estimated taxable income (loss) for the
three months ended March 31, 2005. In forecasting
information to calculate taxable income (loss) for the year
ended December 31, 2005, we assumed that there would be no
accounting entries or adjustments other than those known at the
time of the estimate. Prorating the forecasted year end taxable
income (loss) for the three months ended March 31,
2005 to arrive at an NOL estimate for March 31, 2005 also
necessarily involves the assumption that proration is a fair
basis to estimate taxable income (loss) at an interim period. In
addition, we believe that the possible limitations under
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code on our NOL as a
result of this offering should not have a significant impact on
our use of such NOL. |
|
|
|
In the table showing estimated cash available to pay dividends
based on estimated minimum Bank EBITDA, we have estimated 2005
federal cash taxes to be zero and state cash taxes to be
$1.1 million. This estimate is based on $118.6 million
of Bank EBITDA and estimated tax deductible items arising in
2005, including adjustments related to this offering and related
transactions and an estimate of our available NOL carryforward
in 2005, taking into account any limitation on the use of our
NOL resulting from an ownership change under
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Adjustments
related to this offering and related transactions include
deductions of the redemption premium and interest and
amortization of deferred financing costs based on our new
capital structure. Pursuant to these calculations, after taking
into account estimated 2005 taxable income (loss), we would have
estimated federal NOLs of $11.3 million, net of valuation
allowances, to be carried forward to taxable periods beginning
after December 31, 2005. In the future, we expect that we
will be required to pay cash income taxes because all of our NOL
will have been used or will have expired or because of
limitations on our NOL under Section 382 of |
40
|
|
|
|
|
the Internal Revenue Code. Any of the foregoing would have the
effect of reducing our after-tax cash available to pay dividends
in future periods. |
|
|
|
In the table showing estimated cash available to pay dividends
based on Pro Forma Bank EBITDA, we have estimated 2004 federal
cash taxes to be zero and state cash taxes to be
$1.3 million. We have estimated federal cash taxes to be
zero and state cash taxes to be $1.3 million for the twelve
months ended March 31, 2005. These estimates are based on
Pro Forma Bank EBITDA, taking into account an estimate of our
available NOL carryforward in the applicable period and any
limitation on the use of our NOL resulting from an
ownership change under Section 382 of the
Internal Revenue Code. See Risk Factors Risks
Relating to Our Common Stock We expect that our cash
income tax liability will increase in the future as a result of
the use of, and limitations on, our net operating loss
carryforwards, which may reduce our after-tax cash available to
pay dividends and may require us to reduce dividend payments in
future periods. |
|
|
(7) |
The table below sets forth the assumed number of outstanding
shares of common stock upon the closing of this offering and the
estimated per share and aggregate dividend amounts payable on
these shares during the year following the closing of this
offering. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Per | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Share | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Estimated dividends on our outstanding common stock
|
|
|
29,687,510 |
|
|
$ |
1.5495 |
|
|
$ |
46,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
(8) |
Under the restricted payments covenant in the amended and
restated credit agreement, if our total net leverage ratio (as
defined in the amended and restated credit agreement), as of the
end of any fiscal quarter, is greater than 4.75 to 1.00, we will
be required to suspend dividends on our common stock unless
otherwise permitted by an exception for dividends that may be
paid from the portion of the proceeds of any sale of our equity
not used to redeem or repurchase indebtedness and not used to
fund acquisitions, capital expenditures or make other
investments. It will be an event of default if our total net
leverage ratio, as of the end of any fiscal quarter, is greater
than 5.0 to 1.00. The calculation assumes no prepayment of the
amended and restated credit facilities during the period. |
|
|
(9) |
It will be an event of default under the amended and restated
credit agreement if our senior secured leverage ratio (as
defined under the amended and restated credit agreement), as of
the end of any fiscal quarter, is greater than 4.00 to 1.00. We
will not be permitted to pay dividends under the amended and
restated credit agreement if an event of default has occurred
and is continuing. |
|
|
(10) |
It will be an event default under the amended and restated
credit agreement if our fixed charge coverage ratio (as defined
in our amended and restated credit agreement), as of the end of
any fiscal quarter, is not (x) after the closing date and
on or prior to December 31, 2005, at least 2.50 to 1.00,
(y) after January 1, 2006 and on or prior to
December 31, 2006, at least 2.00 to 1.00 and (z) after
January 1, 2007, at least 1.75 to 1.00. We will not be
permitted to pay dividends under the amended and restated credit
agreement if an event of default has occurred and is continuing. |
|
(11) |
Historical EBITDA is defined as net earnings (loss) before
interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization on
an historical basis, without giving effect to the TXUCV
acquisition, this offering and the related transactions. We
believe that net cash provided by operating activities is the
most directly comparable financial measure to EBITDA under GAAP.
We present EBITDA for several reasons. Management believes that
EBITDA is useful as a means to evaluate our ability to pay our
estimated cash needs and pay dividends. In addition, we have
presented EBITDA to investors in the past because it is
frequently used by investors, securities analysts and other
interested parties in the evaluation of companies in our
industry, and we believe that presenting it here provides a
measure of consistency in our financial reporting. EBITDA is
also a component of the restrictive covenants and financial
ratios contained and will be contained in the agreements
governing our debt which will require us to maintain compliance
with these covenants and will limit certain activities, such as
our ability to incur debt and to pay dividends. The definitions
in these covenants and ratios are based on EBITDA after giving
effect to specified charges. As a result, we believe that the
presentation of EBITDA as supplemented by these other items
provides important additional |
41
|
|
|
information to investors. See Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations CCI Holdings Liquidity and
Capital Resources Debt and Capital
Leases Covenant Compliance. In addition,
EBITDA provides our board of directors meaningful information to
determine, with other data, assumptions and considerations, our
dividend policy and our ability to pay dividends under the
restrictive covenants in the agreements governing our debt. |
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure. Accordingly, it should
not be construed as an alternative to net cash from operating or
investing activities, cash flows from operations or net income
(loss) as defined by GAAP and is not on its own necessarily
indicative of cash available to fund our cash needs as
determined in accordance with GAAP. In addition, not all
companies use identical calculations, and this presentation of
EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures
of other companies. |
|
|
(12) |
Pro forma adjustments consist of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
CCI Texas EBITDA(a)
|
|
$ |
15,538 |
|
|
$ |
(2,384 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expense adjustments for
TXUCV acquisition(b)
|
|
|
1,118 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,656 |
|
|
$ |
(2,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
CCI Texas EBITDA represents the EBITDA of CCI Texas for the
periods presented. The operating results of CCI Texas are not
reflected in our historical EBITDA and financial results for the
period from January 1, 2004, through April 13, 2004.
The following table illustrates our calculation of CCI Texas
EBITDA for the following periods: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2004 | |
|
April 1, 2004 | |
|
|
through | |
|
through | |
|
|
April 13, 2004 | |
|
April 13, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
5,319 |
|
|
$ |
(819 |
) |
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment penalty on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
(950 |
) |
|
|
1,827 |
|
|
Provision for postretirement benefits
|
|
|
(3,007 |
) |
|
|
(1,386 |
) |
|
Loss/(gain) or disposition of property and investments
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
Restructuring, asset impairment and other charges
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
Partnership income and minority interest
|
|
|
1,068 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
Provision for bad debt losses
|
|
|
(542 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
Other charges
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
9,909 |
|
|
|
(1,639 |
) |
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
3,158 |
|
|
|
2,084 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
(750 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCI Texas EBITDA
|
|
$ |
15,538 |
|
|
$ |
(2,384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
The pro forma adjustments to selling, general, and
administrative expense for the TXUCV acquisition reflect
(1) a reduction in costs of approximately $2.0 million
for the year ended December 31, 2004 and $0.3 million
for the twelve months ended March 31, 2005 resulting from
the termination of TXUCV employees upon the closing of the TXUCV
acquisition and (2) incremental professional service fees
of $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
and $0.1 million for the twelve months ended March 31,
2005 to be paid to Mr. Lumpkin, Providence Equity and
Spectrum Equity pursuant to the second professional services
agreement entered into in connection with the TXUCV acquisition.
See Note 2 to the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial statements. |
42
|
|
(13) |
Pro forma EBITDA represents our historical EBITDA as adjusted
for the TXUCV acquisition and has been prepared on a basis
consistent with the comparable data in the unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in this prospectus. |
|
(14) |
During 2004, TXUCV paid retention bonuses to keep key employees
to run its day-to-day business operations while it was being
prepared for sale. Other than retention costs payable in
connection with the TXUCV acquisition, we do not expect to incur
such charges in the future. Given the unusual and non-recurring
nature of these expenses, they are excluded from the calculation
of Bank EBITDA under our amended and restated credit agreement
and do not affect our ongoing ability to pay dividends. |
|
(15) |
During 2004, we incurred severance costs primarily due to
employee terminations associated with the TXUCV acquisition.
While we expect to incur additional severance costs as part of
the integration and restructuring process in 2005, these costs
have already been accounted for within our $5.3 million
estimate of 2005 integration and restructuring costs described
in note 5 above. Given the unusual and non-recurring nature
of these expenses, they are excluded from the calculation of
Bank EBITDA under our amended and restated credit agreement and
do not affect our ongoing ability to pay dividends. |
|
(16) |
During 2004, TXUCV incurred certain costs associated with its
sale. Given the unusual and non-recurring nature of these
expenses, they are excluded from the calculation of Bank EBITDA
under our amended and restated credit agreement and do not
affect our ongoing ability to pay dividends. |
|
(17) |
Represents the aggregate professional service fees we paid to
Mr. Lumpkin, Providence Equity and Spectrum Equity pursuant
to two professional services agreements. After the closing of
the offering, we will no longer pay these fees because these
professional service agreements will automatically terminate on
the closing of the offering. See Note 7 to the unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements. |
|
(18) |
Other, net assumes the TXUCV acquisition occurred on the first
day of the period presented and includes the equity earnings
from our investments in cellular partnerships, dividend income,
recognizing the minority interests of investors in East Texas
Fiber Line Incorporated as well as certain other miscellaneous
non-operating items. |
|
|
|
See Note 6 to our audited consolidated financial statements
for a description of our investments. The table below sets out
the components of Other, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months | |
|
|
Year ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Partnership income
|
|
$ |
2,462 |
|
|
$ |
1,935 |
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
2,593 |
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
(473 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
$ |
4,764 |
|
|
$ |
4,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19) |
For purposes of calculating Bank EBITDA, our amended and
restated credit agreement provides that all dividends and other
distributions received from our cellular partnership investments
shall be included as part of our Bank Consolidated Net Income.
Partnership distributions included in the calculation of Pro
Forma Bank EBITDA assumes that the TXUCV acquisition occurred on
the first day of the periods presented. For a more detailed
description of how Bank EBITDA is calculated, including the
related definition of Bank Consolidated Net Income, please see
Description of Indebtedness Amended and
Restated Credit Facilities Restricted Payments. |
|
(20) |
Represents expenses that were excluded from the calculation of
pro forma Bank EBITDA as permitted by the terms of the amended
and restated credit agreement and as described in note (5)
and notes (14)-(17) above. These expenses were paid by us
in cash and would have impacted the amount of cash that would
have been available to pay dividends had our dividend policy
been in |
43
|
|
|
effect for the periods presented. However, we do not expect
these cash expenses to affect our ongoing ability to pay
dividends following this offering. See note (5) and
notes (14)-(17) above. |
Assumptions and Considerations
In reviewing and adopting the dividend policy, our board of
directors reviewed estimates of the cash available to pay
dividends and, with respect to these estimates and the dividend
policy as a whole, reviewed and analyzed several factors,
including, but not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
our results of operations and financial condition, including
that our Bank EBITDA was $141.0 million in 2004 and
$141.6 million for the twelve months ended March 31,
2005, on a pro forma basis to give effect to the TXUCV
acquisition; |
|
|
|
|
our estimated minimum Bank EBITDA of $118.6 million and our
belief that our actual Bank EBITDA for the first year following
the offering will be at least this amount; |
|
|
|
|
the matters discussed in the notes to the tables above; |
|
|
|
|
our expected cash needs will not include the repayment of any
principal on our debt since the agreements governing our debt do
not require any amortization prior to the applicable maturity
dates; |
|
|
|
our assumption that we will be able to refinance our debt prior
to the scheduled maturity dates; if we are unable to do so, or
are only able to do so on less favorable terms, our cash
available to pay dividends will be reduced; |
|
|
|
our various expected cash needs, including interest payments on
our debt, capital expenditures, integration and restructuring
costs of the TXUCV acquisition in 2005, taxes, incremental costs
associated with being a public company and certain other costs; |
|
|
|
the $37.5 million distribution to our existing equity
investors on June 7, 2005; |
|
|
|
our belief that the payment of dividends at the level described
above will not have a negative impact on our operations and
performance based on prior years results and, relatedly,
our belief that our amended and restated revolving credit
facility will have sufficient capacity to finance expected
fluctuations in working capital and other cash needs, including
the payment of dividends at the levels described above, although
we currently do not intend to borrow under our new revolving
credit facility to pay dividends; |
|
|
|
other possible uses of cash with attractive rates of return; |
|
|
|
potential sources of liquidity, including that we have at our
disposal the possibility of raising cash from asset sales, and
capital resources; |
|
|
|
the state of our business, the environment in which we operate
and the various risk we face, including competition,
technological change, changes in our industry, and regulatory
and other risks and that they will remain consistent with
previous periods; and |
|
|
|
our assumption regarding the absence of extraordinary business
events and risks, such as new industry-altering technological
developments or adverse regulatory developments, that may
adversely affect our business, results of operations or
anticipated cash needs. |
Our intended policy to distribute rather than retain a
significant portion of the cash generated by our business as
regular quarterly dividends is based upon the current assessment
by our board of directors of the factors and assumptions listed
above. If these factors and assumptions were to change, we would
need
44
to reassess that policy. Over time, our capital and other cash
needs will be subject to increasing uncertainties and are more
difficult to predict, which could affect whether we pay
dividends and the level of any dividends we may pay in the
future.
Our dividend policy may limit our ability to pursue growth
opportunities, such as to fund a material expansion of our
business, including any significant acquisitions or to pursue
growth opportunities requiring capital expenditures
significantly beyond our current expectations. In the recent
past, such growth opportunities have included investments in new
services such as DSL Internet access and the introduction of
digital video service in selected Illinois markets. Currently,
we have no specific plans to make a significant acquisition or
to increase capital spending to expand our business materially.
However, we will evaluate potential growth opportunities and
capital expenditures as they arise and, if our board of
directors determines that it is in our best interest to use cash
that would otherwise be available for dividends to pursue an
acquisition opportunity, to materially increase capital spending
or for some other purpose, the board would be free to depart
from or change our dividend policy at any time.
There are several risks relating to our dividend policy that are
summarized under Risk Factors Risks Relating
to Our Common Stock You may not receive dividends
because our board of directors could, in its discretion, depart
from or change our dividend policy at any time,
We might not have cash in the future to pay
dividends in the intended amounts or at all,
You may not receive dividends because of
restrictions in our debt agreements, Delaware and Illinois law
and state regulatory requirements, and
Because we are a holding company with no
operations, we will not be able to pay dividends unless our
subsidiaries transfer funds to us. We cannot assure you
that we will pay dividends during or following the year after
this offering or thereafter at the level estimated above or at
all. Dividend payments are within the absolute discretion of our
board of directors and will be dependent upon many factors and
future developments that could differ materially from our
current expectations.
Restrictions on Payment of Dividends
Our ability to pay dividends will be restricted by current and
future agreements governing our debt, including the amended and
restated credit agreement and the indenture and by Delaware and
Illinois law and may be restricted by state regulatory
requirements.
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement |
Our existing credit agreement currently does not permit us to
pay the dividends contemplated in this prospectus. As such,
concurrently with the closing of this offering, we intend to
amend and restate our existing credit agreement to enable the
borrowers (CCI and Texas Holdings) to pay dividends to CCI
Holdings to enable CCI Holdings to then pay its stockholders
dividends, subject to the satisfaction of certain financial
covenants, conditions and other restrictions. For the twelve
months ended March 31, 2005, on a pro forma basis after
giving effect to this offering and the related transactions, the
borrowers would have been permitted to pay dividends to CCI
Holdings of $69.2 million under the amended and restated
credit agreement. The amount of dividends the borrowers are able
to pay in the future under the amended and restated credit
agreement will increase or decrease based upon, among other
things, cumulative Bank EBITDA and our needs for Available Cash.
In addition, the borrowers will be required to comply with the
following financial ratio in order to pay dividends under the
amended and restated credit agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
If the total net leverage ratio (as defined under
Description of Indebtedness Amended and
Restated Credit Facilities), as of the end of any fiscal
quarter, is greater than 4.75 to 1.0, we will be required to
suspend dividends on our common stock unless otherwise permitted
by an exception for dividends that may be paid from the portion
of the proceeds of any sale of our equity not used to redeem or
repurchase indebtedness and not used to fund acquisitions,
capital expenditures or make other investments. During any
dividend suspension period, we will be required to repay debt |
45
|
|
|
|
|
in an amount equal to 50.0% of any increase in our Available
Cash during such dividend suspension period. |
|
|
|
In addition, we will not be permitted to pay dividends if an
event of default under the amended and restated credit agreement
has occurred and is continuing. In particular, it will be an
event of default if: |
|
|
|
|
|
our total net leverage, as of the end of any fiscal quarter, is
greater than 5.0 : 1.0; |
|
|
|
our senior secured leverage ratio, as of the end of any fiscal
quarter, is greater than 4.00 to 1.00; |
|
|
|
our fixed charge coverage ratio, as of the end of any fiscal
quarter, is not (x) after the closing date and on or prior
to December 31, 2005, at least 2.50 to 1.00, (y) after
January 1, 2006 and on or prior to December 31, 2006,
at least 2.00 to 1.00 and (z) after January 1, 2007,
at least 1.75 to 1.00; or |
|
|
|
we make or commit to make capital expenditures greater than the
base amount of $45.0 million in each fiscal year, provided
that the base amount may be increased by up to 100% of such base
amount by carrying over to any such period any portion of the
base amount (without giving effect to any increase) not spent in
the immediately preceding period, and that capital expenditures
in any period shall be deemed first made from the base amount
applicable to such period in any given period. |
For a more complete description of the expected terms of the
amended and restated credit agreement see Description of
Indebtedness Amended and Restated Credit
Facilities.
Our indenture also restricts the amount of dividends,
distributions and other restricted payments CCI Holdings may
pay. For the twelve months ended March 31, 2005, on a pro
forma basis and after giving effect to this offering and the
related transactions, CCI Holdings would have been permitted to
pay dividends of $116.5 million under the general formula
in the restricted payments covenant in the indenture, commonly
referred to as the build-up amount. The build-up amount is less
restrictive than the comparable provision in the amended and
restated credit agreement because it allows a greater amount of
dividends to be paid from CCI Holdings to its stockholders than
the restricted payments covenant in the amended and restated
credit agreement allows the borrowers (CCI and Texas Holdings)
to pay to CCI Holdings. However, the amount of dividends CCI
Holdings will be able to pay under the indenture in the future
will be based, in part, on the amount of cash that may be
distributed by the borrowers under the amended and restated
credit agreement to CCI Holdings. In addition, based on the
indenture provision relating to public equity offerings, which
includes this offering, we expect that we will be able to pay
approximately $4.1 million annually in dividends, subject
to specified conditions. This means that we could pay
$4.1 million in dividends under this provision in addition
to whatever we may be able to pay under the build-up amount,
although a dividend payment under this provision will reduce the
amount we otherwise would have available to us under the
build-up amount for restricted payments, including dividends.
Based upon our belief that Bank EBITDA for the year following
the closing of this offering will be at least
$118.6 million, we do not expect the restrictions in our
indenture to limit our ability to pay dividends in the first
year following the offering. For a description of the indenture,
see Description of Indebtedness Senior
Notes.
|
|
|
Delaware and Illinois Law |
Under Delaware law, our board of directors may not authorize
payment of a dividend unless it is either paid out of our
surplus, as calculated in accordance with the DGCL, or if we do
not have a surplus, it is paid out of our net profits for the
fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the
preceding fiscal year. Although we believe we will be permitted
to pay dividends at the anticipated levels during the first year
following this offering in compliance with Delaware law, our
board will periodically seek to assure itself that the statutory
requirements will be met before actually declaring dividends.
The Illinois
46
Business Corporation Act also imposes limitations on the ability
of our subsidiaries that are Illinois corporations, including
ICTC, to declare and pay dividends.
|
|
|
State Regulatory Requirements |
The ICC and the PUCT could require our Illinois and Texas rural
telephone companies to make minimum amounts of capital
expenditures and could limit the amount of cash available to
transfer from our rural telephone companies to us. In connection
with the reorganization, we were required to obtain the approval
of the ICC, but not the PUCT. As part of the ICCs review
of the reorganization, the ICC imposed various conditions as a
part of its approval of the reorganization, including
(1) prohibitions on payment of dividends or other cash
transfers from ICTC, our Illinois rural telephone company, to us
if it fails to meet or exceed agreed benchmarks for a majority
of seven service quality metrics for the prior reporting year
and (2) the requirement that ICTC have access to the higher
of $5.0 million or its currently approved capital
expenditure budget for each calendar year through a combination
of available cash and amounts available under credit facilities.
In the future, the ICC and the PUCT could impose additional or
other restrictions on us. In addition, the Illinois Public
Utilities Act prohibits the payment of dividends by ICTC, except
out of earnings and earned surplus, if ICTCs capital is or
would become impaired by payment of the dividend, or if payment
of the dividend would impair ICTCs ability to render
reasonable and adequate service at reasonable rates, unless the
ICC otherwise finds that the public interest requires payment of
the dividend, subject to any conditions imposed by the ICC. For
the first year following the offering, we expect to satisfy each
of the applicable Illinois regulatory requirements necessary to
permit ICTC to pay dividends to us.
47
CAPITALIZATION
The following table sets forth as of March 31, 2005, the
cash and cash equivalents and capitalization:
|
|
|
|
|
of Homebase on an actual basis without giving effect to the
reorganization; and |
|
|
|
of CCI Holdings, on an as adjusted basis to give effect to:
(a) the reorganization; (b) this offering;
(c) the amendment and restatement of our existing credit
facilities; and (d) our application of the estimated net
proceeds in the manner set forth in Use of Proceeds,
in each case, assuming these transactions occurred on
March 31, 2005. |
You should read this table in conjunction with Use of
Proceeds, Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations CCI
Holdings and CCI Texas, the
financial statements and the related notes of each of CCI
Holdings, TXUCV and its subsidiaries and the unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial statements of CCI Holdings
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Actual | |
|
As Adjusted | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash and cash equivalents(1)
|
|
$ |
56,538 |
|
|
$ |
13,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facility(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan facilities(3)
|
|
|
423,850 |
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit facilities
|
|
|
423,850 |
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
Capital lease obligation(4)
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
93/4
senior notes due 2012
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
|
624,909 |
|
|
|
561,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A preferred shares, $1,000 per value,
182,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
|
|
|
210,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
Members deficit/stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, no par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized,
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
100,000,000 shares authorized, and 29,687,510 shares
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share,
10,000,000 shares authorized, and no shares issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
247,325 |
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(23,033 |
) |
|
|
(34,518 |
) |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members (deficit)/stockholders equity
|
|
|
(21,031 |
) |
|
|
215,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$ |
813,970 |
|
|
$ |
776,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes $5.3 million of cash that will be used to pre-fund
expected integration and restructuring costs for 2005 relating
to the TXUCV acquisition. Our actual cash and cash equivalents
as of March 31, 2005 includes $37.5 million of cash
that was used to fund the distribution to our existing equity
investors on June 7, 2005, as well as approximately
$0.4 million in expenses incurred to amend our existing
credit facilities to permit this distribution. |
48
|
|
(2) |
The existing credit agreement contains, and the amended and
restated credit agreement will contain, a $30.0 million
revolving credit facility with a maturity of six years. |
|
(3) |
As of March 31, 2005, the existing credit facilities
included a $112.0 million term loan A facility and a
$311.9 million term loan C facility. In connection
with this offering, our existing credit facilities will be
amended and restated to, among other things, provide for the
repayment in full of our term loan A and C facilities and
to borrow $425.0 million under a new term loan D
facility, which is expected to mature on October 14, 2011.
See Description of Indebtedness Amended and
Restated Credit Facilities. |
|
(4) |
The capital lease obligation represents the outstanding balance
under the GECC capital lease. On May 27, 2005, we elected
to pay in full the outstanding balance on this capital lease.
See Description of Indebtedness GECC Capital
Leases. |
49
DILUTION
If you purchase common stock in this offering, your interest
will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the
price per share paid by you in this offering and the net
tangible book deficiency per share of our common stock after the
offering. Net tangible book deficiency per share of our common
stock may be determined at any date by subtracting our total
liabilities from our total assets less our intangible assets and
dividing the difference by the number of shares of common stock
outstanding at that date.
Our net tangible book deficiency as of March 31, 2005 was
approximately $327.7 million, or $13.83 per share of
common stock after giving effect to the reorganization. After
giving effect to this offering and the application of the net
proceeds in the manner described under Use of
Proceeds, our pro forma as adjusted net tangible book
deficiency as of March 31, 2005 would have been
approximately $264.2 million, or $8.90 per share of
common stock. This represents an immediate increase in net
tangible book value of $4.93 per share of our common stock
to our existing common stockholders and an immediate dilution of
$21.90 per share of our common stock to new investors
purchasing our common stock in this offering.
The following table illustrates the dilution to new investors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial public offering price per share of common stock
|
|
$ |
13.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net tangible book value (deficiency) per share as of
March 31, 2005
|
|
|
(13.83 |
) |
|
Increase per share attributable to new investors in this offering
|
|
|
4.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma as adjusted net tangible book value (deficiency) after
giving effect to this offering
|
|
$ |
(8.90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dilution in net tangible book value (deficiency) per share to
investors in this offering
|
|
$ |
21.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth on a pro forma basis:
|
|
|
|
|
the total number of shares of our common stock owned by our
existing common stockholders and to be owned by new investors
purchasing shares of common stock in this offering; |
|
|
|
the total consideration paid by our existing common stockholders
and to be paid by the new investors purchasing shares of common
stock in this offering; and |
|
|
|
the average price per share of common stock paid by our existing
common stockholders and to be paid by new investors purchasing
shares of common stock in this offering: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased | |
|
Total Consideration | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Average Price | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Per Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Existing common stockholders
|
|
|
14,020,844 |
|
|
|
47.2 |
% |
|
$ |
104,230,190 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
$ |
7.43 |
|
New investors
|
|
|
15,666,666 |
|
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
203,666,658 |
|
|
|
66.1 |
% |
|
|
13.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
29,687,510 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
307,896,848 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration and average price per share paid by the
existing common stockholders in the table above give effect to
the $37.5 million cash distribution paid to our existing
equity investors on June 7, 2005. The tables and
calculations above include all vested and unvested restricted
shares of common stock and assume no exercise of the option
granted to the underwriters to purchase additional shares of
common stock in this offering. The number of shares held by the
existing common stockholders will be reduced to the extent the
underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional
shares. To the extent that any options to purchase shares of our
common stock are granted in the future and these options are
exercised, there may be further dilution to new investors.
50
SELECTED HISTORICAL AND OTHER FINANCIAL DATA CCI
HOLDINGS
CCI Holdings is a holding company with no income from operations
or assets except for the capital stock of CCI and Consolidated
Communications Acquisition Texas, Inc., which we refer to as
Texas Holdings. CCI was formed for the sole purpose of acquiring
ICTC and the related businesses on December 31, 2002. We
believe the operations of ICTC and the related businesses prior
to December 31, 2002 represent the predecessor of CCI
Holdings. Texas Holdings is a holding company with no income
from operations or assets except for the capital stock of
Consolidated Communications Ventures Company (formerly TXUCV),
which we refer to as CCV. Texas Holdings was formed for the sole
purpose of acquiring TXUCV, which was acquired on April 14,
2004 and renamed CCV after the closing of the acquisition. Texas
Holdings operates its business through and receives all of its
income from, CCV and its subsidiaries. Results for the year
ended December 31, 2004 include the results of operations
of CCV since the date of the TXUCV acquisition.
The selected consolidated financial information set forth below
have been derived from the unaudited combined financial
statements of ICTC and related businesses as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2000, the audited combined financial
statements of ICTC and related businesses as of and for the
years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002, the audited
consolidated financial statements of CCI Holdings as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the
unaudited consolidated financial statements of CCI Holdings as
of and for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2005.
The unaudited combined financial statements of ICTC and
related businesses, the predecessor of CCI Holdings, as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2000 and the unaudited
consolidated financial statements of CCI Holdings as of and for
the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 reflect all
adjustments that management believes to be of a normal and
recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of the
results for the referenced unaudited periods. Operating results
for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 are not
necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.
The following selected historical consolidated financial
information should be read in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations CCI
Holdings, the audited and unaudited consolidated financial
statements of CCI Holdings and the audited combined financial
statements of ICTC and related businesses and the related notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
CCI Holdings | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$ |
117.1 |
|
|
$ |
115.6 |
|
|
$ |
109.9 |
|
|
|
$ |
132.3 |
|
|
$ |
269.6 |
|
|
$ |
34.1 |
|
|
$ |
79.8 |
|
|
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below)
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
38.9 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
80.6 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
|
|
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
|
87.9 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
Asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(1)
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
Interest expense, net(2)
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
|
(11.9 |
) |
|
|
(39.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
|
Other, net(3)
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(0.6 |
) |
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.5 |
) |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(16.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
CCI Holdings | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
|
Net loss per common share basic and diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.79 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone Operations revenues
|
|
$ |
82.0 |
|
|
$ |
79.8 |
|
|
$ |
76.7 |
|
|
|
$ |
90.3 |
|
|
$ |
230.4 |
|
|
$ |
22.9 |
|
|
$ |
71.0 |
|
Other Data (as of end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local access lines in service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
63,064 |
|
|
|
62,249 |
|
|
|
60,533 |
|
|
|
|
58,461 |
|
|
|
168,778 |
|
|
|
58,345 |
|
|
|
168,017 |
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
32,933 |
|
|
|
33,473 |
|
|
|
32,475 |
|
|
|
|
32,426 |
|
|
|
86,430 |
|
|
|
32,481 |
|
|
|
85,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total local access lines(3)
|
|
|
95,997 |
|
|
|
95,722 |
|
|
|
93,008 |
|
|
|
|
90,887 |
|
|
|
255,208 |
|
|
|
90,826 |
|
|
|
253,071 |
|
|
DSL subscribers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,501 |
|
|
|
5,761 |
|
|
|
|
7,951 |
|
|
|
27,445 |
|
|
|
8,456 |
|
|
|
30,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total connections
|
|
|
95,997 |
|
|
|
98,223 |
|
|
|
98,769 |
|
|
|
|
98,838 |
|
|
|
282,653 |
|
|
|
99,282 |
|
|
|
283,875 |
|
Consolidated Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
$ |
36.1 |
|
|
$ |
34.3 |
|
|
$ |
28.5 |
|
|
|
$ |
28.9 |
|
|
$ |
79.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
14.6 |
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities
|
|
|
(21.8 |
) |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
|
(296.1 |
) |
|
|
(554.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(21.5 |
) |
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
(16.6 |
) |
|
|
|
277.4 |
|
|
|
516.3 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
CCI Holdings | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
As of December 31 | |
|
As of March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
|
$ |
52.1 |
|
|
$ |
10.7 |
|
|
$ |
56.5 |
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
98.9 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
Net plant, property & equipment(4)
|
|
|
102.6 |
|
|
|
100.5 |
|
|
|
105.1 |
|
|
|
|
104.6 |
|
|
|
360.8 |
|
|
|
99.5 |
|
|
|
353.1 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
270.0 |
|
|
|
248.9 |
|
|
|
236.4 |
|
|
|
|
317.6 |
|
|
|
1,006.1 |
|
|
|
314.9 |
|
|
|
1,002.2 |
|
|
Total long-term debt (including current portion)(5)
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
|
180.4 |
|
|
|
629.4 |
|
|
|
177.8 |
|
|
|
624.9 |
|
|
Redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.5 |
|
|
|
205.5 |
|
|
|
95.1 |
|
|
|
210.1 |
|
|
Parent company investment/ Members deficit
|
|
|
191.3 |
|
|
|
178.1 |
|
|
|
174.5 |
|
|
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(21.0 |
) |
|
|
(1) |
On January 1, 2002, ICTC and related businesses adopted
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
Pursuant to SFAS No. 142, ICTC ceased amortizing
goodwill on January 1, 2002 and instead tested for goodwill
impairment annually. Amortization expense for goodwill and
intangible assets was $17.6 million for 2000 and 2001,
$10.1 million in 2002 and $7.0 million in 2003.
Depreciation and amortization excludes amortization of deferred
financing costs. |
|
(2) |
Interest expense includes amortization of deferred financing
costs totaling $0.5 million in 2003, $6.4 million in
2004, and $0.2 million and $0.7 million for the
periods ended March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005
respectively. |
|
(3) |
On September 30, 2001, ICTC sold two exchanges of
approximately 2,750 access lines, received proceeds from the
sale of $7.2 million and recorded a gain on the sale of
assets of approximately $5.2 million. |
|
(4) |
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. The cost of
additions, replacements and major improvements is capitalized,
while repairs and maintenance are charged to expenses. When
property, plant and equipment are retired from ICTC, the
original cost, net of salvage, is charged against accumulated
depreciation, with no gain or loss recognized in accordance with
composite group life remaining methodology used for regulated
telephone plant assets. |
|
(5) |
In connection with the TXUCV acquisition on April 14, 2004,
we issued $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
senior notes and entered into the existing credit facilities, of
which $423.9 million was outstanding as of March 31,
2005. |
52
SELECTED HISTORICAL AND OTHER FINANCIAL DATA
CCI TEXAS
Texas Holdings is a holding company with no income from
operations or assets except for the capital stock of CCV. Texas
Holdings was formed for the sole purpose of acquiring TXUCV,
which was acquired on April 14, 2004 and renamed CCV after
the closing of the acquisition. As a result, we have not
provided separate financial results for Texas Holdings and
present only the financial results of CCV. We believe that the
operations of TXUCV prior to April 14, 2004 represent the
predecessor of CCV. In addition, TXU Corp. contributed the
parent company of Fort Bend Telephone Company on
August 11, 2000 to TXUCV. We believe the operations of
Fort Bend Telephone Company prior to August 11, 2000
represent the predecessor of TXUCV.
The selected consolidated financial information set forth below
have been derived from the audited consolidated financial
statements of Fort Bend Telephone Company, the predecessor
of TXUCV, as of and for the year ended December 31, 1999
and as of and for the period ended August 10, 2000, the
audited consolidated financial statements of TXUCV, the
predecessor of CCV, as of and for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 2001, 2002 and 2003.
The following selected consolidated financial information should
be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations CCI Texas and the audited
consolidated financial statements of TXUCV and the related notes
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Predecessor to TXUCV | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/1/00 to | |
|
|
8/11/00 to | |
|
|
|
|
1999 | |
|
8/10/00 | |
|
|
12/31/00 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$ |
126.3 |
|
|
$ |
93.2 |
|
|
|
$ |
67.9 |
|
|
$ |
207.5 |
|
|
$ |
214.7 |
|
|
$ |
194.8 |
|
|
Network operating costs (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below)
|
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
|
|
|
76.9 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
|
88.7 |
|
|
|
109.4 |
|
|
|
75.4 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization(1)
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
Restructuring, asset impairment and other charges(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
Goodwill impairment charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
(11.2 |
) |
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
|
(132.0 |
) |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
Interest expense, net(3)
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(11.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
Other, net(4)
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(28.2 |
) |
|
|
(128.1 |
) |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Income taxes (expense) benefit
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
10.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
$ |
(5.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(21.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(89.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Predecessor to TXUCV | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/1/00 to | |
|
|
8/11/00 to | |
|
|
|
|
1999 | |
|
8/10/00 | |
|
|
12/31/00 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Other Data (as of end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local access lines in service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
80,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,130 |
|
|
|
119,488 |
|
|
|
119,060 |
|
|
|
116,862 |
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
36,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,292 |
|
|
|
50,406 |
|
|
|
53,023 |
|
|
|
54,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total local access lines
|
|
|
116,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,422 |
|
|
|
169,894 |
|
|
|
172,083 |
|
|
|
171,642 |
|
|
DSL subscribers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
4,069 |
|
|
|
5,423 |
|
|
|
8,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total connections
|
|
|
116,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,051 |
|
|
|
173,963 |
|
|
|
177,506 |
|
|
|
180,310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLEC access lines
|
|
|
3,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,541 |
|
|
|
58,591 |
|
|
|
26,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
56.8 |
|
|
$ |
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
$ |
37.4 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
34.7 |
|
|
$ |
75.1 |
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities
|
|
|
(53.0 |
) |
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
|
(48.3 |
) |
|
|
(59.9 |
) |
|
|
(21.3 |
) |
|
|
(14.3 |
) |
|
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
|
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
46.3 |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(61.8 |
) |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
67.0 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
|
|
|
to TXUCV | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
1999 | |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
|
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
12.4 |
|
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
69.7 |
|
|
|
|
63.8 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
|
|
86.4 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
Net plant, property & equipment(5)
|
|
|
198.8 |
|
|
|
|
332.4 |
|
|
|
363.4 |
|
|
|
240.8 |
|
|
|
231.4 |
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
555.5 |
|
|
|
|
787.0 |
|
|
|
800.4 |
|
|
|
700.1 |
|
|
|
647.9 |
|
|
Total long-term debt (including current portion)
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
|
157.5 |
|
|
|
172.8 |
|
|
|
166.2 |
|
|
|
100.4 |
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
354.3 |
|
|
|
|
490.5 |
|
|
|
496.6 |
|
|
|
407.6 |
|
|
|
410.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
On January 1, 2002, TXUCV adopted SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Pursuant to
SFAS No. 142, TXUCV ceased amortizing goodwill on
January 1, 2002, and instead tests for goodwill impairment
annually. Amortization expense for goodwill and intangible
assets was $5.3 million in 1999, $8.7 million in 2000,
and $13.7 million in 2001. In accordance with
SFAS No. 142, TXUCV recognized goodwill impairments of
$13.2 million and $18.0 million in 2003 and 2002,
respectively. |
|
|
(2) |
During 2002, TXUCV recognized restructurings, asset impairment
and other charges of $101.4 million due to write down of
assets relating to TXUCVs competitive telephone company
and transport businesses. |
|
|
(3) |
Interest expense prior to the TXUCV acquisition was from the TXU
revolving credit facility, GECC capital leases, mortgage notes
and is reduced by allowance for funds used during construction. |
|
|
(4) |
Other, net includes equity earnings from the cellular
partnerships, dividend income and recognizing the minority
interests of investors in East Texas Fiber Line Incorporated. |
|
|
(5) |
Property, plant and equipment items are recorded at cost. The
cost of additions, replacements and major improvements is
capitalized, while repairs and maintenance are charged to
expense. |
54
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS CCI HOLDINGS
We present below Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations of CCI Holdings.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
historical consolidated financial statements and related notes,
unaudited pro forma financial statements and other financial
information related to CCI Holdings appearing elsewhere in this
prospectus.
The following discussion gives retroactive effect to our
reorganization as if it had occurred on December 31, 2004.
As a result, the discussion below represents the financial
results of CCI and Texas Holdings on a consolidated basis. For
all periods prior to April 14, 2004, the date of the TXUCV
acquisition, our financial results only include CCI and its
consolidated subsidiaries. For all periods subsequent to
April 14, 2004, our financial results include CCI and Texas
Holdings on a consolidated basis.
Overview
We are an established rural local exchange company that provides
communications services to residential and business customers in
Illinois through CCI Illinois and in Texas through CCI Texas. As
of March 31, 2005, we estimate that we were the 15th
largest local telephone company in the United States, based on
industry sources, with approximately 253,071 local access lines
and 30,804 DSL lines in service. Our main sources of revenues
are our local telephone businesses in Illinois and Texas, which
offer an array of services, including local dial tone, custom
calling features, private line services, long distance, dial-up
and high-speed Internet access, carrier access and billing and
collection services. We also operate a number of complementary
businesses. In Illinois, we provide additional services such as
telephone service to county jails and state prisons, operator
and national directory assistance and telemarketing and order
fulfillment services and expect to begin publishing telephone
directories in the third quarter of 2005. In Texas, we publish
telephone directories and offer wholesale transport services on
a fiber optic network.
CCI Holdings began operations with the acquisition of ICTC and
several related businesses from McLeodUSA on December 31,
2002. CCI Texas began operations in its present form with our
acquisition of TXUCV on April 14, 2004 for
$524.1 million in cash, net of cash acquired and including
transaction costs. As a result of the foregoing,
period-to-period comparisons of our financial results to date
are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as
an indication of future performance due to the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues and expenses for the three months ended March 31,
2004 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2004 for certain long distance services and data and Internet
services include services that were not part of the financial
results of our Telephone Operations segment when it was owned by
McLeodUSA in 2002. These services were provided, and revenues
were recognized, by McLeodUSA as part of its competitive
telephone company operations. In order for McLeodUSA to provide
these services to customers in our Illinois rural telephone
companys service area, ICTC provided McLeodUSAs
competitive telephone company operations access to its network
and billing and collection services for which it received
network access charges and billing and collection fees.
Following our acquisition of ICTC and the related businesses,
Telephone Operations launched its own business providing similar
long distance and data and Internet services to customers
primarily located in our Illinois rural telephone companys
service area. As a result, the results of operations of
Telephone Operations for the three months ended March 31,
2004 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2004 include operations that were not included in 2002 when ICTC
and the related operations were owned by McLeodUSA. |
|
|
|
Revenues and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004
include the results of operations of CCI Texas from
April 14, 2004, the date of its acquisition. As a result,
our financial results as of and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and for the year ended for December 31,
2004 |
55
|
|
|
|
|
include operations that were not included for the three months
ended March 31, 2004 or for the year ended
December 31, 2003. |
|
|
|
Expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2005
and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 included
$0.5 million, $1.25 million, $2.0 million and
$4.1 million, respectively, in aggregate professional
services fees paid to our existing equity investors. The rights
of our existing equity investors to receive these professional
service fees will terminate upon the closing of this offering.
See Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Professional Services Fee
Agreements. |
|
|
|
In 2001 and 2002 McLeodUSA encountered financial difficulties
and, as a result, initiated cost-cutting initiatives and reduced
financial support for all operations other than ICTC. Although
certain expenses were reduced as a result of these initiatives,
revenues and income from operations also declined in these
periods. In connection with its bankruptcy proceeding in 2002,
McLeodUSA identified ICTC and the related businesses as assets
held for sale and as discontinued operations. |
|
|
|
In connection with the TXUCV acquisition, we currently expect to
incur approximately $14.5 million in operating expenses
associated with the integration and restructuring process in
2004 and 2005. As of March 31, 2005, $9.2 million had
been spent on integration and restructuring, including
$1.6 million and $0.6 million by CCI Texas and CCI
Illinois, respectively, in the first quarter of 2005. These
one-time integration and restructuring costs will be in addition
to certain ongoing expenses we expect to incur to expand certain
administrative functions, such as those relating to SEC
reporting and compliance, and do not take into account other
potential cost savings and expenses of the TXUCV acquisition. We
do not expect to incur costs relating to the TXUCV integration
after 2005. |
|
|
|
Reorganization and this Offering |
As a general matter, we expect that our becoming a public
company will enhance our stature and provide us new
opportunities, such as by being able to use our stock to make
selected investments and acquisitions. On a day-to-day basis, we
do not expect our operations will be affected, either positively
or negatively. Over the short-term, we will incur certain
additional expenses as well as eliminate certain costs as a
result of becoming a public company. Specifically, as a result
of becoming a public company, we expect our future results of
operations and liquidity will be affected in the following ways:
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with this offering, we will incur approximately
$10.2 million in one-time fees and expenses. These fees and
expenses, which will be recorded as a reduction to paid-in
capital, are in addition to certain other one-time fees and
expenses we will incur in connection with the related
transactions discussed under Liquidity and Capital
Resources. |
|
|
|
As a public company, we expect to incur approximately
$1.0 million in incremental, ongoing selling, general and
administrative expenses associated with being a public company
with equity securities quoted on the Nasdaq National Market.
These expenses include SEC reporting, compliance (SEC and
Nasdaq) and related administration expenses, accounting and
legal fees, investor relations expenses, directors fees
and director and officer liability insurance premiums, registrar
and transfer agent fees, listing fees and other, miscellaneous
expenses. |
|
|
|
Following this offering, we will have $5.0 million less annually
in selling, general and administrative expenses. We have been
obligated to pay these amounts as fees under two professional
service agreements with our existing equity investors. Upon the
closing of this offering, these professional service fee
agreements will automatically terminate. |
|
|
|
We expect to incur a non-cash compensation expense of
$6.4 million as a result of the amendment and restatement
of our restricted share plan in connection with this offering.
In the future, we expect to incur an additional
$6.4 million of non-cash compensation expense under the
restricted share plan that will be recognized ratably over the
remaining three year vesting period of the issued, but unvested
restricted shares outstanding at the offering date. We may also
incur additional non-cash compensation expenses in connection
with any new grants under our 2005 long term incentive plan,
consistent with other public companies. |
56
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the dividend policy that our board of directors
will adopt effective upon the closing of this offering, we
currently intend to pay an initial dividend of $0.4089 per share
(representing a pro rata portion of the expected dividend for
the first year following the closing of this offering) on or
about November 1, 2005 to stockholders of record as of
October 15, 2005 and to continue to pay quarterly dividends
at an annual rate of $1.5495 per share for the first year
following the closing of this offering, subject to various
restrictions on our ability to do so. We expect the aggregate
impact of this dividend policy in the year following the closing
of the offering to be $46.0 million. |
|
|
|
We do not expect any of our day-to-day operations to be affected
by this offering. |
|
|
|
Factors Affecting Future Results of Operations |
Telephone Operations and Other Operations. To date, our
revenues have been derived primarily from the sale of voice and
data communications services to residential and business
customers in our rural telephone companies service areas
as revealed in the following chart:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Percentage of total revenues) | |
Telephone Operations |
|
|
69.8 |
% |
|
|
68.2 |
% |
|
|
85.5 |
% |
|
|
67.2 |
% |
|
|
89.0 |
% |
Other Operations
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Telephone Operations added revenues in 2004 and in the three
months ended March 31, 2005 primarily due to the inclusion
of results from our Texas Telephone Operations. We do not
anticipate significant growth in revenues from our current
Telephone Operations due to its primarily rural service area,
but we do expect relatively consistent cash flow from year to
year due to stable customer demand, limited competition and a
generally supportive regulatory environment.
For the three months ended March 31, 2005, Other Operations
revenues were down from the same period in 2004, primarily due
to losing the telemarketing and fulfillment contract with the
Illinois Toll Highway Authority in mid-2004 and a decline in
telephone system sales. In 2004, Other Operations revenues were
down from 2003, reflecting the loss of the contract with the
Illinois Toll Highway Authority and the repricing of some large
Operator Services customer contracts at lower rates. We had
success in growing Other Operations revenues between 2002 and
2003 for several reasons. Due to its financial difficulties and
bankruptcy in 2002, McLeodUSA initiated cost-cutting initiatives
and reduced financial support for all operations other than ICTC
and, as a result, revenues for Other Operations suffered. In
2003, following the acquisition from McLeodUSA, management
renewed its focus on growing this segment. In addition, revenue
growth was driven by the award to Public Services by the State
of Illinois of an extension to the prison contract in December
2002 that nearly doubled the number of prison sites we served.
Illinois and Texas. We present in the following chart our
revenues for CCI Illinois and CCI Texas for each of the periods
presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCI Illinois | |
|
CCI Texas | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
April 14, 2004- | |
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Telephone Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local calling services
|
|
$ |
33.9 |
|
|
$ |
8.3 |
|
|
$ |
41.0 |
|
|
$ |
14.2 |
|
|
Network access services
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
Subsidies
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
Long distance services
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Data and Internet services
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
Other services
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
Total telephone operations
|
|
|
97.3 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
133.1 |
|
|
|
46.3 |
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
$ |
136.5 |
|
|
$ |
33.5 |
|
|
$ |
133.1 |
|
|
$ |
46.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
Local Access Lines and Bundled Services. Local access
lines are an important element of our business. An access
line is the telephone line connecting a persons home
or business to the public switched telephone network. The
monthly recurring revenue we generate from end users, the amount
of traffic on our network and related access charges generated
from other carriers, the amount of federal and state subsidies
we receive and most other revenue streams are directly related
to the number of local access lines in service. As of
March 31, 2005, we had 253,071 local access lines in
service, which is a decrease of 2,137 from the 255,208 local
access lines we had on December 31, 2004, which was an
increase of 164,321 from the local access lines we had on
December 31, 2003 (or a decrease of 4,005 local access
lines when CCI Texas 168,326 lines are excluded).
Historically, rural telephone companies have experienced
consistent growth in access lines because of positive
demographic trends, insulated rural local economies and limited
competition. Recently, many rural telephone companies have
experienced a loss of local access lines due to challenging
economic conditions, increased competition from wireless
providers, competitive local exchange carriers and, in some
cases, cable television operators. We have not been immune to
these conditions, particularly in Illinois. Excluding the effect
of the TXUCV acquisition, we have lost access lines in each of
the last two years in Illinois. Our Illinois telephone business
has experienced difficult economic and demographic conditions.
In addition, we believe we lost local access lines in Illinois
due to the disconnection of second telephone lines by our
residential customers in connection with their substituting DSL
or cable modem service for dial-up Internet access and wireless
services for wireline service.
A significant portion of our line loss in Texas in the first
quarter of 2005 is attributable to the migration of
MCIMetros Internet service provider, or ISP, traffic from
our primary rate interface, or PRI, facilities and local T-1
facilities to interconnection trunks. As a result of this
migration, we experienced a loss of approximately
1,534 access lines during the first quarter of 2005 and
expect to lose approximately 3,200 additional access lines
during the second quarter of 2005. Because these access lines do
not generate special feature, long distance, access or subsidy
revenue, the revenue loss associated with the migration is
approximately one fifth what it would have been if we had lost
an equivalent number of commercial access lines. In other words,
the loss of 1,534 ISP lines has a revenue impact comparable
to the loss of 279 commercial access lines. The expected
second quarter loss of 3,200 additional ISP lines will have
a revenue impact comparable to the loss of 582 commercial
lines. Once the migration of MCIMetros ISP traffic in
Texas is complete, we will have no remaining MCIMetro ISP lines
in Texas, approximately 644 MCIMetro ISP lines remaining in
Illinois and approximately 1,863 ISP lines remaining with
other customers.
Despite the slight loss of local access lines, we have been able
to mitigate the loss in each of our markets and have increased
average revenue per customer by focusing on the following:
|
|
|
|
|
aggressively promoting DSL service; |
|
|
|
bundling value-added services, such as DSL with a combination of
local service, custom calling features, voicemail and Internet
access; |
|
|
|
maintaining excellent customer service standards, particularly
as we introduce new services to existing and new customers and; |
|
|
|
keeping a strong local presence in the communities we serve. |
The number of DSL subscribers we serve grew substantially for
the year ended 2004 and during the three months ended
March 31, 2005. DSL lines in service increased 12.2% to
approximately 30,804 lines as of March 31, 2005 from
approximately 27,445 lines as of December 31, 2004, which
was a 245.2% increase from approximately 7,951 lines (or 35.8%
when CCI Texas 16,651 lines are excluded) as of
December 31, 2003. Our penetration rate for DSL lines in
service was approximately 12.2% of our rural telephone
companies local access lines at March 31, 2005.
We have also been successful in growing our revenues in
Telephone Operations by bundling combinations of local service,
custom calling features, voicemail and Internet access. The
number of these bundles, which we refer to as service bundles,
increased 6.3% to over 31,900 service bundles at
March 31, 2005 from approximately 30,000 service bundles at
December 31, 2004, which itself was a 343.6% increase
58
from approximately 6,700 service bundles (or 29.2% when CCI
Texas 21,300 bundles are excluded) as of
December 31, 2003.
We have implemented a number of initiatives to gain new access
lines and retain existing access lines by enhancing the
attractiveness of the bundle with new service offerings,
including unlimited long distance (introduced in Illinois in
July 2004), digital video service (introduced in Illinois in
January 2005) and promotional offers like discounted second
lines. In addition, we intend to continue to integrate best
practices across our Illinois and Texas regions. These efforts
may act to mitigate the financial impact of any access line loss
we may experience. However, if these actions fail to mitigate
access line loss, or we experience a higher degree of access
line loss than we currently expect, it could have an adverse
impact on our revenues and earnings.
Our strategy is to continue to execute the plan we have had for
the past two years and to continue to implement the plan in
Texas (where we acquired our rural telephone operations in April
2004).
Our primary operating expenses consist of cost of services,
selling, general and administrative expenses and depreciation
and amortization expenses.
|
|
|
Cost of Services and Products |
Our cost of services includes the following:
|
|
|
|
|
operating expenses relating to plant costs, including those
related to the network and general support costs, central office
switching and transmission costs and cable and wire facilities; |
|
|
|
general plant costs, such as testing, provisioning, network,
administration, power and engineering; |
|
|
|
the cost of transport and termination of long distance and
private lines outside our rural telephone companies
service area. |
Telephone Operations has agreements with McLeodUSA and other
carriers to provide long distance transport and termination
services. These agreements contain various commitments and
expire at various times. Telephone Operations believes it will
meet all commitments in the agreements and believes it will be
able to procure services for future periods. We are currently
procuring services for future periods, and at this time, the
costs and related terms under which we will purchase long
distance transport and termination services have not been
determined. We do not expect, however, any material adverse
changes from any changes in any new service contract.
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
In general, selling, general and administrative expenses include
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
selling and marketing expenses; |
|
|
|
expenses associated with customer care; |
|
|
|
billing and other operating support systems; and |
|
|
|
corporate expenses, including professional service fees. |
Telephone Operations incurs selling and marketing and customer
care expenses from its customer service centers and commissioned
sales people. Our customer service centers are the primary sales
channels for residential and business customers with one or two
phone lines, whereas commissioned sales representatives provide
customized proposals to larger business customers. In addition,
we use customer retail centers for various communications needs,
including new telephone, Internet and paging service purchases.
Each of our Other Operations businesses primarily use an
independent sales and marketing team comprised of dedicated
field sales account managers, management teams and service
representatives to execute our sales and marketing strategy.
59
We have operating support and other back office systems that are
used to enter, schedule, provision and track customer orders,
test services and interface with trouble management, inventory,
billing, collection and customer care service systems for the
local access lines in our operations. We are in the process of
migrating key business processes of CCI Illinois and CCI Texas
onto single, company-wide systems and platforms. Our objective
is to improve profitability by reducing individual company costs
through centralization, standardization and sharing of best
practices. We expect that our operating support systems and
customer care expenses will increase as we integrate CCI
Illinois and CCI Texas back office systems. During
2004, we spent $7.0 million on integration and
restructuring expenses and expect to spend approximately
$7.5 million in 2005 for these expenses.
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses |
We recognize depreciation expenses for our regulated telephone
plant using rates and lives approved by the ICC in Illinois and
the PUCT in Texas. The provision for depreciation on
nonregulated property and equipment is recorded using the
straight-line method based upon the following useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years | |
|
|
| |
Buildings
|
|
|
15-35 |
|
Network and outside plant facilities
|
|
|
5-30 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
3-17 |
|
Amortization expenses are recognized primarily for our
intangible assets considered to have finite useful lives on a
straight-line basis. In accordance to SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill and
intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are not
amortized but rather are tested annually for impairment. Because
trade names have been determined to have indefinite lives, they
are not amortized. Software and customer relationships are
amortized over their useful lives of five and ten years,
respectively.
The following summarizes the revenues and operating expenses
from continuing operations for ICTC and related business, the
predecessor of CCI, for the year ended December 31, 2002,
and for CCI Holdings on a consolidated basis for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2004, and for the three months ended
March 31, 2004 and 2005, from these sources:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
CCI Holdings | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
$ | |
|
Total | |
|
|
$ | |
|
Total | |
|
$ | |
|
Total | |
|
$ | |
|
Total | |
|
$ | |
|
Total | |
|
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local calling services
|
|
$ |
33.4 |
|
|
|
30.4 |
% |
|
|
$ |
34.4 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
% |
|
$ |
74.9 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
% |
|
$ |
8.5 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
$ |
22.5 |
|
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
Network access services
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
20.8 |
|
|
|
56.8 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
Subsidies
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
40.5 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
Long distance services
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
Data and Internet services
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
Other services
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Telephone Operations
|
|
|
76.7 |
|
|
|
69.8 |
|
|
|
|
90.3 |
|
|
|
68.3 |
|
|
|
230.4 |
|
|
|
85.5 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
|
67.2 |
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
|
89.0 |
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
39.2 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
109.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
132.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
269.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
79.8 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone Operations
|
|
|
46.9 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
41.3 |
|
|
|
133.5 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
53.2 |
|
|
Other Operations
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
54.5 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
96.0 |
|
|
|
87.4 |
|
|
|
|
111.3 |
|
|
|
84.1 |
|
|
|
234.6 |
|
|
|
87.0 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
|
67.4 |
|
|
|
84.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
|
CCI Holdings | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
|
% of | |
|
|
$ | |
|
Total | |
|
|
$ | |
|
Total | |
|
$ | |
|
Total | |
|
$ | |
|
Total | |
|
$ | |
|
Total | |
|
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income from operations
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
Income taxes expense
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
8.0 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
% |
|
$ |
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
%) |
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
This category reflects costs of services and products and
selling, general and administrative expenses line items set
forth in the consolidated financial statement of income of CCI
Holdings and the audited combined statements of income for ICTC
and related business. |
In accordance with the reporting requirement of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 131,
Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information, CCI Holdings has two reportable business
segments, Telephone Operations and Other Operations. The results
of operations discussed below reflect the consolidated results
of CCI Holdings.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005 Compared to
March 31, 2004 |
CCI Holdings revenues increased by 134.0%, or
$45.7 million, to $79.8 million in 2005 from
$34.1 million in 2004. The inclusion of the results of
operations of CCI Texas added $46.3 million of revenue in
2005. As explained below, an increase of $1.8 million in
our Illinois Telephone Operations revenue was offset by a
decrease of $2.4 million in our Other Operations revenue.
|
|
|
Telephone Operations Revenue |
Local calling services increased by 164.7%, or
$14.0 million, to $22.5 million in 2005 from
$8.5 million in 2004. The increase resulted entirely from
the inclusion of the operations for CCI Texas. Excluding the
impact of the TXUCV acquisition, local calling services revenues
declined by $0.2 million primarily due to the loss of local
access lines, which was partially offset by increased sales of
our service bundles, in each case, for the reasons described
above under Overview Factors
Affecting Future Results of Operations
Revenues Local Access Lines and Bundled
Services.
Network access services increased by 148.5%, or
$9.8 million, to $16.4 million in 2005 from
$6.6 million in 2004. Excluding the impact of the TXUCV
acquisition, network access revenues increased by 3.0%, or
$0.2 million. In 2005, we adopted new revenue sharing
arrangements that resulted in our recognizing $0.5 million
of revenue for services provided in prior periods. This revenue
increase was partially offset by a decrease in end user revenues
due to a decrease in lines in service and minutes used.
Subsidies revenues increased by $11.4 million to
$13.7 million in 2005 from $2.3 million in 2004.
Excluding the impact of the TXUCV acquisition, subsidies revenue
increased by $1.9 million. The subsidy settlement process
relates to the process of separately identifying regulated
assets that are used to provide interstate services, and
therefore fall under the regulatory regime of the FCC, from
regulated assets used to provide local and intrastate services,
which fall under the regulatory regime of the ICC. Since our
Illinois rural telephone company is regulated under a rate of
return system for interstate revenues, the value of all assets
in the interstate rate base is critical to calculating this rate
of return and, therefore, the subsidies our Illinois rural
telephone company will receive. In 2004, our Illinois rural
telephone company analyzed its regulated assets and associated
expenses and reclassified some of these for purposes of
61
regulatory filings. Due to this reclassification, our Illinois
rural telephone company received additional subsidy payments in
2005 in addition to $1.6 million of subsidy payments
recovered for prior years.
Long distance services revenues increased
$2.0 million, to $4.0 million in 2005 from
$2.0 million in 2004. Excluding the impact of the TXUCV
acquisition, long distance revenues declined by
$0.1 million due to a decline in billable minutes used due
to the substitution of competitive services and the introduction
of our unlimited long distance calling plans in Illinois. While
these plans are helpful in attracting new customers, they can
also lead to a reduction in long distance revenue as heavy users
of our long distance services take advantage of the fixed
pricing offered by these plans.
Data and Internet revenue increased by 160.0%, or
$4.0 million, to $6.5 million in 2005 from
$2.5 million in 2004. Excluding the impact of the TXUCV
acquisition, data and Internet revenue increased by
$0.1 million due to the addition of over 3,400 DSL
subscribers in Illinois, which was partially offset by a portion
of our residential customers substituting other DSL or cable
modem services for our dial-up Internet service.
Other Services revenues increased $6.9 million to
$7.9 million in 2005 from $1.0 million in 2004.
Excluding the impact of the TXUCV acquisition, Other Services
revenues decreased by $0.1 million.
Other Operations revenues decreased by 21.4%, or
$2.4 million, to $8.8 million in 2005 from
$11.2 million in 2004. The decrease was primarily due to a
$1.4 million decline in Market Response revenue that
resulted from the loss in 2004 of the Illinois State Toll
Highway Authority as a customer. In addition, a decrease in
equipment sales and installations resulted in a
$0.7 million decrease in Business System revenue while a
general decrease in demand for its services led to a revenue
decline of $0.3 million for Operator Services.
Public Services revenues remained constant at
$4.8 million from 2004 to 2005.
Operator Services revenues decreased by 15.0%, or
$0.3 million, to $1.7 million in 2005 from
$2.0 million in 2004. The decrease was primarily due to
competitive pricing pressure.
Market Response revenues declined by 60.9%, or
$1.4 million, to $0.9 million in 2005 from
$2.3 million in 2004. Much of the decrease is due to the
non-renewal of a service agreement with the Illinois State Toll
Highway Authority, which resulted in a revenue loss of
$1.1 million.
Business Systems revenues declined by 38.9%, or
$0.7 million, to $1.1 million in 2005 from
$1.8 million in 2004. Two large installations in 2004
resulted in revenue of $0.6 million, which did not recur in
2005.
Mobile Services revenue remained constant at
$0.3 million from 2004 to 2005.
|
|
|
CCI Holdings Operating Expenses |
CCI Holdings operating expenses increased by $39.0 million,
to $67.4 million in 2005 from $28.4 million in 2004.
Approximately $38.8 million of the increase resulted from
the inclusion of the results of operations for CCI Texas.
Increased depreciation and amortization expense, as well as
$0.6 million of CCI Illinois integration and restructuring
expenses caused the remainder of the increase, which was
partially offset by a reduction in Other Operations operating
expense.
|
|
|
Telephone Operations Operating Expenses |
Operating expenses for Telephone Operations increased by 214.1%,
or $28.9 million, to $42.4 million in 2005 from
$13.5 million in 2004. Excluding the impact of the TXUCV
acquisition, operating expenses for Telephone Operations
increased 8.1%, or $1.1 million. Expenses incurred in
connection with our integration and restructuring activities
accounted for $0.6 million of the increase in 2005. The
balance of the increase is primarily attributable to cost of
sales and acquisition expense associated with the
62
introduction of our digital video service in selected Illinois
markets and the start of our Illinois directory sales and
production operations.
|
|
|
Other Operations Operating Expenses |
Operating expenses for Other Operations decreased 13.7%, or
$1.3 million, to $8.2 million in 2005 from
$9.5 million in 2004. Operating expenses for Business
Systems and Market Response decreased by $0.6 million and
$0.5 million, respectively, due to lower sales volumes,
which resulted in a corresponding decrease in cost of sales.
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
Depreciation and amortization increased $11.4 million, to
$16.8 million in 2005 from $5.4 million in 2004.
Excluding the impact of the TXUCV acquisition, depreciation and
amortization increased by $0.4 million due to increased
amortization expense.
Income from operations increased $6.7 million, to
$12.4 million in 2005 from $5.7 million in 2004.
Excluding the impact of the TXUCV acquisition, income from
operations decreased by $0.8 million primarily due to a
revenue decrease of $0.6 million.
Interest expense, net increased by $8.6 million, to
$11.4 million in 2005 from $2.8 million in 2004. The
increase is primarily due to an increase in long-term debt
incurred in connection with the TXUCV acquisition. Interest
bearing debt increased by $447.1 million to
$624.9 million in 2005 from $177.8 million in 2004.
Other income was $0.3 million in 2005 primarily due to
income from a cellular partnership. Because this partnership
investment was acquired as part of the TXUCV acquisition on
April 14, 2004, no partnership income was received in 2004.
Provision for income taxes decreased $0.5 million, to
$0.6 million in 2005 from $1.1 million in 2004. The
effective income tax rate was 45.5% and 40.0% for 2005 and 2004,
respectively. A change in earnings mix as a result of the TXUCV
acquisition contributed to a higher overall effective rate.
Net income decreased by 61.1%, or $1.1 million, to
$0.7 million in 2005 from $1.8 million in 2004. The
decrease is due to integration and restructuring expenses,
increased interest expense and higher depreciation and
amortization expense.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to
December 31, 2003 |
CCI Holdings revenues increased by 103.8%, or
$137.3 million, to $269.6 million in 2004 from
$132.3 million in 2003. Approximately $133.1 million
of the increase resulted from the inclusion of the results of
operations for CCI Texas since the April 14, 2004
acquisition date. The balance of the increase is due to a
$7.0 million increase in our Illinois Telephone Operations
revenue, which was partially offset by a $2.8 million
decrease in our Other Operations revenue.
63
|
|
|
Telephone Operations Revenues |
Local calling services revenues increased
$40.5 million, to $74.9 million in 2004 from
$34.4 million in 2003. The increase resulted entirely from
the inclusion of the results of operations for CCI Texas since
the April 14, 2004 acquisition date. Excluding the impact
of the TXUCV acquisition, local calling services revenues
declined $0.5 million primarily due to the loss of local
access lines, which was partially offset by increased sales of
our service bundles.
Network access services revenues increased
$29.3 million, to $56.8 million in 2004 from
$27.5 million in 2003. Excluding the impact of the TXUCV
acquisition, network access services revenues increased 10.2%,
or $2.8 million, to $30.3 million in 2004 from
$27.5 million in 2003. The increase is primarily due to the
recognition of interstate access revenues previously reserved
during the FCCs prior two-year monitoring period. The
current regulatory rules allow recognition of revenues earned
when the FCC has deemed those rates to be lawful.
Subsidies revenues increased $35.8 million, to
$40.5 million in 2004 from $4.7 million in 2003.
Excluding the impact of the TXUCV acquisition, subsidies
revenues increased 125.5%, or $5.9 million, to
$10.6 million in 2004 from $4.7 million in 2003. The
increase was primarily a result of an increase in universal
service fund support due in part to normal subsidy settlement
processes and in part due to the FCC modifications to our
Illinois rural telephone companys cost recovery
mechanisms. The subsidy settlement process relates to the
process of separately identifying regulated assets that are used
to provide interstate services, and therefore fall under the
regulatory regime of the FCC, from regulated assets used to
provide local and intrastate services, which fall under the
regulatory regime of the ICC. Since our Illinois rural telephone
company is regulated under a rate of return system for
interstate revenues, the value of all assets in the interstate
rate base is critical to calculating this rate of return and,
therefore, the subsidies our Illinois rural telephone company
will receive. In 2004, our Illinois rural telephone company
analyzed its regulated assets and associated expenses and
reclassified some of these for purposes of regulatory filings.
The net effect of this reclassification was that our Illinois
rural telephone company was able to recover $2.4 million of
additional subsidy payments for prior years and for 2004.
Long distance services revenues increased
$5.9 million, to $14.7 million in 2004 from
$8.8 million in 2003. Excluding the impact of the TXUCV
acquisition, long distance services revenues decreased
$1.1 million due to competitive pricing pressure and a
decline in minutes used.
Data and Internet revenues increased $10.1 million,
to $20.9 million in 2004 from $10.8 million in 2003.
Excluding the impact of the TXUCV acquisition, services revenues
decreased 1.9%, or $0.2 million, to $10.6 million in
2004.
Other services revenues increased $18.5 million, to
$22.6 million in 2004 from $4.1 million in 2003.
Excluding the impact of the TXUCV acquisition, other services
revenues increased 2.4%, or $0.1 million, to
$4.2 million in 2004.
|
|
|
Other Operations Revenues |
Other Operations revenues decreased 6.7%, or $2.8 million,
to $39.2 million in 2004 from $42.0 million in 2003.
The decrease was due primarily to a $1.1 million decline in
operator services revenues resulting from a general decline in
the demand for these services and a $1.3 million decrease
in Market Response revenue due to the loss in 2004 of the
Illinois State Toll Highway Authority as a customer.
Public Services revenues increased 2.3%, or
$0.4 million, to $18.1 million in 2004 from
$17.7 million in 2003. The increase was primarily due to an
extension of the prison contract awarded by the State of
Illinois Department of Corrections in December 2002 pursuant to
which the number of prisons serviced by Public Services nearly
doubled. The new prison sites were implemented during the first
half of 2003. As a result, we did not receive the revenue from
these additional prison sites for the entire year ended
December 31, 2003.
64
Operator Services revenues decreased 12.2%, or
$1.1 million, to $7.9 million in 2004 from
$9.0 million in 2003. The decrease was due to a general
decline in demand for these services and competitive pricing
pressure.
Market Response revenues decreased by 17.8%, or
$1.3 million, to $6.0 million in 2004 from
$7.3 million in 2003. The decrease is due to the
non-renewal of a service agreement with the Illinois State Toll
Highway Authority, which resulted in a revenue loss of
$1.6 million. This decrease in revenue was partially offset
by additional revenues from new customers added during 2004.
Business Systems revenues decreased 9.0%, or
$0.6 million, to $6.1 million in 2004 from
$6.7 million in 2003. The decrease was primarily due to the
weakened economy and general indecision or delay in equipment
purchases.
Mobile Services revenues decreased 21.4%, or
$0.3 million, to $1.1 million in 2004 from
$1.4 million in 2003. This decrease was primarily due to a
continuing erosion of the customer base for one-way paging
products as competitive alternatives are increasing in
popularity.
|
|
|
CCI Holdings Operating Expenses |
CCI Holdings operating expenses increased $123.3 million to
$234.6 million in 2004 from $111.3 million in 2003.
Approximately $109.0 million of the increase resulted from
the inclusion of the results of operations for CCI Texas since
the April 14, 2004 acquisition date. An additional $11.6
million is the result of impairment of intangible assets in
Other Operations. The remainder of the increase was partially
due to expenses incurred in connection with our integration
activities and increased labor costs. During 2004, integration
and restructuring costs totaled $1.5 million for CCI
Illinois.
|
|
|
Telephone Operations Operating Expenses |
Operating expenses for Telephone Operations increased
$78.8 million, to $133.5 million in 2004 from
$54.7 million in 2003. Excluding the impact of the TXUCV
acquisition, operating expenses for Telephone Operations
increased 3.7%, or $2.0 million, to $56.7 million in
2004 from $54.7 million in 2003, which was primarily due to
expenses incurred in connection with our integration and
restructuring activities.
|
|
|
Other Operations Operating Expenses |
Operating expenses for Other Operations increased 36.7%, or
$12.5 million, to $46.6 million in 2004 from
$34.1 million in 2003. In 2004, the Operator Services and
Mobile Services units recognized $11.5 million and
$0.1 million of intangible asset impairment, respectively.
The remaining increase is due to increased costs incurred with
the growth of the prison system business and increased expense
in the telemarketing and fulfillment business unit.
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
Depreciation and amortization increased $32.0 million, to
$54.5 million in 2004 from $22.5 million in 2003.
Excluding the impact of the TXUCV acquisition, depreciation and
amortization decreased by $0.2 million to
$22.3 million in 2004.
Income from operations increased $14.0 million to
$35.0 million in 2004 compared to $21.0 million in
2003. Excluding the impact of the TXUCV acquisition, income from
operations decreased 48.1% or $10.1 million to
$10.9 million in 2004. The decrease is entirely due to the
intangible asset impairment charges in Other Operations, which
were partially offset by increased income from operations in our
Illinois Telephone Operations.
65
Interest expense increased $28.0 million, to
$39.9 million in 2004 from $11.9 million in 2003. In
connection with the TXUCV acquisition, CCI Holdings refinanced
its CoBank credit facility resulting in a charge of
$4.2 million to write-off unamortized deferred financing
costs. The remaining $23.8 million increase is primarily
due to an increase in long-term debt to help fund the TXUCV
acquisition. Interest bearing debt increased by
$449.0 million from $180.4 million in 2003 to
$629.4 million in 2004.
Other income increased $3.9 million, to $4.0 million
in 2004 from $0.1 million in 2003 due primarily to
$3.1 million of income received from investments in the
cellular partnerships acquired in the TXUCV acquisition.
Provision for income taxes decreased $3.5 million, to
$0.2 million in 2004 from $3.7 million in 2003. The
effective tax rate was a benefit of 25.6% and an expense of
40.3% for 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our effective tax rate is
lower primarily due to (1) the effect of the mix of
earnings, losses and nondeductible impairment charges on
permanent differences and derivative instruments and
(2) state income taxes owed in certain states where we are
required to file on a separate legal entity basis. A
reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the
effective income tax rate is included in Note 10 to our
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus. See Note 2, Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies and Note 10, Income
Taxes of our consolidated financial statements for an
expanded discussion of income taxes.
Net income decreased $6.6 million, to $(1.1) million
in 2004 from $5.5 million in 2003. The inclusion of
$4.0 million of net income from the results of operations
of CCI Texas since the April 14, 2004 acquisition date were
offset by a lower net income of CCI Illinois primarily due to
asset impairment charges of $11.6 million.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to
December 31, 2002 |
Our revenues increased by 20.4%, or $22.4 million, to
$132.3 million in 2003 from $109.9 million in 2002.
Telephone Operations revenues increased 17.7%, or
$13.6 million, to $90.3 million in 2003 from
$76.7 million in 2002. The increase was due primarily to
the inclusion of long distance and data and Internet revenues
previously recognized by McLeodUSA.
Other Operations revenues increased 26.5%, or
$8.8 million, to $42.0 million in 2003 from
$33.2 million in 2002. The increase was due primarily to a
significant growth in Public Services revenues as a result of
the inclusion of additional prisons when the applicable contract
to provide telecommunications services to the State of Illinois
Department of Corrections was renewed.
|
|
|
Telephone Operations Revenues |
Local calling services revenues increased 3.0%, or
$1.0 million, to $34.4 million in 2003 from
$33.4 million in 2002. The increase was due to an increase
in fees paid to our Illinois rural telephone company by wireless
carriers for local access. In addition, revenues from custom
calling features and voicemail increased $0.3 million due
primarily to the success of selling service bundles. These
increases were partially offset by the impact of a reduction in
local access lines of 2,121 lines.
66
Network access services revenues decreased 5.2%, or
$1.5 million, to $27.5 million in 2003 from
$29.0 million in 2002. During the last two years, the FCC
instituted modifications to our Illinois rural telephone
companys cost recovery mechanisms, decreasing implicit
support, which allowed rural carriers to set interstate network
access charges higher than the actual cost of originating and
terminating calls, and increasing explicit support through
subsidy payments from the federal universal service fund. The
ICC similarly decreased intrastate network access charges but
did not offset these reductions with state universal service
fund subsidies.
Subsidies revenues increased 14.6%, or $0.6 million,
to $4.7 million in 2003 from $4.1 million in 2002. The
increase was a result of an increase in federal universal
service fund support due in part to normal subsidy settlement
processes and in part due to the FCC modifications to our
Illinois rural telephone companys cost recovery mechanisms
described above in network access services revenues. The subsidy
settlement process relates to the process of separately
identifying regulated assets that are used to provide interstate
services, and therefore fall under the regulatory regime of the
FCC, from regulated assets used to provide local and intrastate
services, which fall under the ICC for regulatory purposes.
Since our Illinois rural telephone company is regulated under a
rate of return system for interstate revenues, the value of all
assets in the interstate rate base is critical to calculating
this rate of return, and thus the extent to which our Illinois
rural telephone company will receive subsidy payments. In 2003,
our Illinois rural telephone company analyzed its regulated
assets and reclassified some of these assets for purposes of
regulatory filings. The net effect of this reclassification was
that our Illinois rural telephone company was able to recover
additional subsidy payments for prior years and for 2003.
Long distance services revenues increased 528.6%, or
$7.4 million, to $8.8 million in 2003 from
$1.4 million in 2002. Telephone Operations did not provide
interLATA long distance service in 2002, and instead this
service was offered by other divisions of McLeodUSA. The only
long distance service revenues included in 2002 was for
intraLATA long distance services offered by our Illinois rural
telephone company. At December 31, 2003 Telephone
Operations long distance penetration was approximately
54.6%. LATAs are the 161 local access transport areas created to
define the service areas of the RBOCs by the judgment breaking
up AT&T. References to interLATA long distance service mean
long distance service provided between LATAs and intraLATA
refers to service within the applicable LATA.
Data and Internet services revenues increased 151.2%, or
$6.5 million, to $10.8 million in 2003 from
$4.3 million in 2002. As with long distance services, while
certain portions of revenues for DSL and non-local private lines
was attributed to our Telephone Operations, the remainder of
revenues from data and Internet services was included in other
McLeodUSA divisions for 2002. Revenues from DSL service
increased 70.0%, or $0.7 million, in 2003. Total DSL lines
in service increased 38.7% to approximately 7,951 lines as of
December 31, 2003 from approximately 5,761 lines as of
December 31, 2002.
Other services revenues decreased 8.9%, or
$0.4 million, to $4.1 million in 2003 from
$4.5 million in 2002. The decrease was due primarily to a
reduction in billing and collection revenues.
|
|
|
Other Operations Revenues |
Other Operations revenues increased 26.5%, or $8.8 million,
to $42.0 million in 2003 from $33.2 million in 2002.
The increase was primarily due to the extension of the prison
contract awarded by the State of Illinois Department of
Corrections in December 2002 pursuant to which the number of
prisons serviced by Public Services nearly doubled and,
secondarily, a more concerted commitment from management in 2003
to developing these services.
Public Services revenues increased 77.0%, or
$7.7 million, to $17.7 million in 2003 from
$10.0 million in 2002. The increase was due to the
extension of the prison contract awarded by the State of
Illinois Department of Corrections in December 2002 pursuant to
which the number of prisons serviced by Public Services nearly
doubled.
67
Operator Services revenues decreased 21.1%, or
$2.4 million to $9.0 million in 2003 from
$11.4 million in 2002. The decrease was due primarily to
decreases in revenues from general declines in demand.
Market Response revenues increased 62.2%, or
$2.8 million, to $7.3 million in 2003 from
$4.5 million in 2002. The increase was due to a renewed
commitment from management to serving third party customers and
a $500,000 investment in technology that allowed a larger sales
team to be more competitive in pursuing additional business
opportunities.
Business Systems revenues increased 15.5%, or
$0.9 million, to $6.7 million in 2003 from
$5.8 million in 2002. The increase was due in part to the
ability to secure performance bonds necessary to bid on certain
structured wiring business opportunities which we were
previously unable to secure due to McLeodUSAs financial
difficulties. The increase was also due to a general improvement
in the demand for telecom equipment spending in our markets.
Mobile Services revenues decreased 6.7%, or
$0.1 million, to $1.4 million in 2003 from
$1.5 million in 2002. This decrease was due to a continuing
shift in demand from residential customers for one-way paging
services to business customers who generate lower average
revenues per customer.
Our operating expenses increased 24.2%, or $17.3 million,
to $88.8 million in 2003 from $71.5 million in 2002.
The increase was due primarily to expenses incurred to generate
new services. In addition, expenses increased compared to 2002
due to the growth in its continuing operations, expenses related
to the acquisition of ICTC and the related businesses, including
the re-establishment of the CCI brand, systems and other related
separation expenses, the hiring and retention of the management
team and $2.0 million in professional services fees paid to
our existing equity investors.
|
|
|
Telephone Operations Operating Expenses |
Operating expenses for Telephone Operations for 2003 increased
16.6%, or $7.8 million, to $54.7 million in 2003 from
$46.9 million in 2002. Expenses associated with the
initiation of our Telephone Operations long distance
services accounted for the majority of the variance resulting in
$6.5 million of direct costs associated with long distance
services revenues and data and Internet services revenues that
were not included in 2002. Information technology and systems
expenses increased $1.3 million in 2003 from
$4.3 million in 2002, as ICTC and the related businesses
were separated from McLeodUSA and Telephone Operations invested
in new systems and software. Executive compensation increased
$0.9 million primarily due to the hiring and retention of
the management team. In addition, 2003 results include
professional services fees paid to our existing equity
investors. Other expenses, primarily equipment maintenance and
office equipment rents, decreased from prior year results
slightly offsetting the increases described above.
|
|
|
Other Operations Operating Expenses |
Operating expenses for Other Operations increased 38.6%, or
$9.5 million, to $34.1 million in 2003 from
$24.6 million in 2002. The increase was due principally to
increased direct cost of sales associated with a higher revenues
and an increase in expenses due to managements efforts to
grow these other operations. Total commissions paid to the State
of Illinois Department of Corrections in connection with the
renewed prison contract increased $4.7 million in 2003. In
addition, due to the credit characteristics of the prison
population served pursuant to the prison contracts, the increase
in the number of prisons served under the contract also had a
corresponding impact on bad debt expenses, which increased
proportionately, $1.3 million from 2002. In addition,
expenses relating to the telemarketing and order fulfillment
business increased by $2.3 million to $6.1 million in
2003 from $3.8 million in 2002 as a result of
managements effort to grow this business.
68
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
Depreciation and amortization decreased 8.2%, or
$2.0 million, to $22.5 million in 2003 from
$24.5 million in 2002. The majority of the decrease was due
to the sale and leaseback of five buildings on December 31,
2002, as further described in Certain Relationships and
Related Party Transactions LATEL Sale/
Leaseback. McLeodUSAs decision not to invest in the
Other Operations resulted in a reduction in capital expenditure
in 2001 and 2002 which decreased depreciation expenses
proportionately in 2003.
Income from operations increased 51.1%, or $7.1 million, to
$21.0 million in 2003 from $13.9 million in 2002. The
increase was due to the addition of long distance and data and
Internet services of the type which had previously been
attributable to other McLeodUSA divisions, resulting in
$8.5 million of incremental income from operations for
Telephone Operations in 2003. The increase was offset by the
expenses related to the acquisition of ICTC and the related
businesses, as well as the $2.0 million of professional
services fees paid to our existing equity investors, increased
costs associated with the hiring and retention of the management
team and additional information technology expenses of
$1.3 million relating to the investment in information
technology infrastructure necessary to transition from McLeodUSA
to CCI Holdings.
Interest expense increased 644.0%, or $10.3 million, to
$11.9 million in 2003 from $1.6 million in 2002. The
increase was due to the increased interest incurred from
borrowing under the CoBank credit facility to fund, in part, the
acquisition of ICTC and the related businesses from McLeodUSA on
December 31, 2002.
Other income decreased 75.0%, or $0.3 million, to
$0.1 million in 2003 from $0.4 million in 2002 due to
a general reduction in, and intercompany elimination of,
intrastate billing and collection fees revenues.
Provision for income taxes decreased $1.0 million, to
$3.7 million, in 2003 from $4.7 million in 2002. The
effective income tax rate for CCI increased to 40.3% in 2003
from 36.8% in 2002. The effective income tax rate for 2003
approximated the combined federal and state rate of
approximately 40%. In conjunction with the acquisition on
December 31, 2002, we made an election under the Internal
Revenue Code that resulted in approximately $172.5 million
of goodwill and other intangibles, which are deductible ratably
over a 15-year period.
Net income decreased 31.2%, or $2.5 million, to
$5.5 million in 2003 from $8.0 million in 2002. The
decrease is primarily attributable to increased interest expense
due to the borrowings incurred in connection with the
acquisition of the predecessor of CCI, offset by revenues growth
and additional income from operations.
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
The accounting estimates and assumptions discussed in this
section are those that we consider to be the most critical to an
understanding of our financial statements because they
inherently involve significant judgements and uncertainties. In
making these estimates, we considered various assumptions and
factors that will differ from the actual results achieved and
will need to be analyzed and adjusted in future periods. These
differences may have a material impact on our financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows. We believe that
of our significant accounting policies, the following involve a
higher degree of judgement and complexity.
69
Subsidies Revenues
We recognize revenues from universal service subsidies and
charges to interexchange carriers for switched and special
access services. In certain cases, our rural telephone
companies, ICTC, Consolidated Communications of Texas Company
and Consolidated Communications of Fort Bend Company,
participate in interstate revenue and cost sharing arrangements,
referred to as pools, with other telephone companies. Pools are
funded by charges made by participating companies to their
respective customers. The revenue we receive from our
participation in pools is based on our actual cost of providing
the interstate services. Such costs are not precisely known
until after the year-end and special jurisdictional cost studies
have been completed. These cost studies are generally completed
during the second quarter of the following year. Detailed rules
for cost studies and participation in the pools are established
by the FCC and codified in Title 47 of the Code of Federal
Regulations.
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
We evaluate the collectibility of our accounts receivable based
on a combination of estimates and assumptions. When we are aware
of a specific customers inability to meet its financial
obligations, such as a bankruptcy filing or substantial
down-grading of credit scores, we record a specific allowance
against amounts due to set the net receivable to an amount we
believe is reasonable to be collected. For all other customers,
we reserve a percentage of the remaining outstanding accounts
receivable balance as a general allowance based on a review of
specific customer balances, trends and our experience with prior
receivables, the current economic environment and the length of
time the receivables are past due. If circumstances change, we
review the adequacy of the allowance to determine if our
estimates of the recoverability of amounts due us could be
reduced by a material amount. At March 31, 2005, our total
allowance for uncollectable accounts for all business segments
was $2.8 million. If our estimate were understated by 10%,
the result would be a charge of approximately $0.3 million
to our results of operations.
Valuation of Goodwill and Tradenames
We review our goodwill and tradenames for impairment as part of
our annual business planning cycle in the fourth quarter and
whenever events or circumstances make it more likely than not
that an impairment may have occurred. Several factors could
trigger an impairment review such as:
|
|
|
|
|
a change in the use or perceived value of our tradenames; |
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to expected historical or
projected future operating results; |
|
|
|
significant regulatory changes that would impact future
operating revenues; |
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends; or |
|
|
|
significant changes in the overall strategy in which we operate
our overall business. |
We determine if an impairment exists based on a method of using
discounted cash flows. This requires management to make certain
assumptions regarding future income, royalty rates and discount
rates, all of which affect our impairment calculation. Upon
completion of our impairment review in December 2004 and as a
result of a decline in the future estimated cash flows in our
Mobile Services and Operator Services businesses, we recognized
impairment losses of $0.1 million and $11.5 million,
respectively. The carrying value of tradenames and goodwill
totaled $333.0 million at March 31, 2005.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
The amounts recognized in our financial statements for pension
and postretirement benefits are determined on an actuarial basis
utilizing several critical assumptions.
A significant assumption used in determining our pension and
postretirement benefit expense is the expected long-term rate of
return on plan assets. We used an expected long-term rate of
return of 8.5% in 2004 and 8.0% in the first three months of
2005 as we moved toward uniformity of assumptions and investment
strategies across all our plans and in response to the actual
returns on our portfolio in recent years being significantly
below our expectations.
70
Another significant estimate is the discount rate used in the
annual actuarial valuation of our pension and postretirement
benefit plan obligations. In determining the appropriate
discount rate, we consider the current yields on high quality
corporate fixed-income investments with maturities that
correspond to the expected duration of our pension and
postretirement benefit plan obligations. For 2004 and for the
first three months of 2005 we used a discount rate of 6.0%.
In connection with the sale of TXUCV, TXU Corp. contributed
$2.9 million to TXUCVs pension plan. In 2005, we
expect to contribute $2.2 million to the Texas pension plan
and $1.0 million to the other Texas postretirement benefits
plans. In 2004, we contributed $0.9 million to our Illinois
pension plan and another $0.8 million to our other Illinois
postretirement plan. We do not expect to contribute to the
Illinois pension plan in 2005 but do expect to contribute
$0.8 million to our other Illinois postretirement plan.
The effect of the change in selected assumptions on our estimate
of pension plan expense is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
|
|
Point | |
|
Obligation | |
|
2005 Expense | |
Assumption |
|
Change | |
|
Higher/(Lower) | |
|
Higher/(Lower) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Discount rate
|
|
±0.5 pts |
|
|
$(7,826)/$8,744 |
|
|
|
$(141)/$142 |
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
±1.0 pts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$(928)/$928 |
|
The effect of the change in selected assumptions on our estimate
of other postretirement benefit plan expense is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
|
|
Point | |
|
Obligation | |
|
2005 Expense | |
Assumption |
|
Change | |
|
Higher/(Lower) | |
|
Higher/(Lower) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Discount rate
|
|
±0.5 pts |
|
|
$(2,227)/$2,497 |
|
|
|
$(94)/$47 |
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, our operating requirements have been funded from
cash flow generated from our business and borrowings under
credit facilities. As of March 31, 2005, we had
$624.9 million of debt, exclusive of unused commitments.
Following the closing of this offering and the related
transactions, we expect that our operating requirements will
continue to be funded from cash flow generated from our business
and borrowings under our amended and restated revolving credit
facility.
|
|
|
Operating, Investing and Financing Activities |
Our borrowings for working capital have traditionally been
minimal because our operations have generated sufficient cash to
meet our operating and capital expenditure needs. Because we
have operated in markets with relatively little competition, our
operating cash flows have historically been stable and
predictable. Our borrowings have been primarily for acquisitions
and capital expenditures. As of March 31, 2005, we had a
cash balance of $56.5 million and no borrowings on our
revolving credit facilities.
The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for
the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 and for
the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor | |
|
CCI Holdings | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Net Cash Provided (Used):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
|
|
$ |
28.5 |
|
|
$ |
28.9 |
|
|
$ |
79.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.9 |
|
|
$ |
14.6 |
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
(296.1 |
) |
|
|
(554.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
Financing Activities
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
277.4 |
|
|
|
516.3 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
71
Cash provided by operating activities has historically been
generated primarily by net income adjusted for non-cash charges.
Cash provided by operating activities was $14.6 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2005. Net income adjusted
for non-cash charges generated $21.2 million of operating
cash. Partially offsetting the cash generated were cash payments
related to the certain working capital components, primarily
annual payments for prepaid insurance, taxes and other items.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, a net loss of
$1.1 million adjusted for $76.5 million of non-cash
charges accounted for the majority of our $79.8 million of
operating cash flows. The primary component of our non-cash
charges is depreciation and amortization, which was
$54.5 million in 2004. In addition, we recorded
$11.6 million of intangible asset impairment charges and
our provision for bad debt losses was $4.7 million. We also
recorded non-cash interest expense of $2.3 million for the
amortization of deferred financing costs and wrote off
$4.2 million of deferred financing costs upon entering into
our existing credit facilities in connection with the TXUCV
acquisition. The large change in operating cash flow from 2003
to 2004 was due to the acquisition of TXUCV in April 2004.
Excluding the impact of the TXUCV acquisition, CCI Holdings
generated cash from operating activities of $30.4 million
in 2004.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended
2003 of $28.9 million was primarily generated by net income
of $5.5 million and non-cash adjustments to net income of
$29.9 million. Changes in current assets and liabilities
required a usage of $6.5 million. In 2003 we made a
$2.0 million estimated tax payment for which no comparable
payment was made in 2002.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended
2002 was generated by net income of $8.0 million and
non-cash adjustments to net income of $21.5 million.
Working capital changes were generally minimal during 2002.
The major non-cash additions to net income for each of 2003 and
2002 were depreciation and amortization expenses of
$22.5 million and $24.5 million, respectively. In 2003
and 2002, we reported non-cash adjustments to net income of
$3.4 million and ($4.9) million, respectively, for the
expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the
tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts.
Cash used in investing activities has traditionally been for
capital expenditures or acquisitions. Cash used in investing
activities of $5.5 million and $2.7 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively,
was entirely for capital expenditures. Of the
$554.1 million used for investing activities during the
year ended December 31, 2004, $524.1 million (net of
cash acquired and including transaction costs) was for the
acquisition of TXUCV. Similarly, in 2003, $284.8 million
was used for the acquisition of ICTC from McLeod USA. The
company used $30.0 million for capital expenditures for the
year ended December 31, 2004.
During the year ended December 31, 2003 cash used in
investing totaled $296.1 million. In addition to the
acquisition of ICTC from McLeod we made capital expenditures of
$11.3 million. For the year ended 2002, capital
expenditures accounted for all of the investing activities. Over
the three years ended December 31, 2004, we used
$55.4 million in cash for capital investments. Of that
total, 82.3%, or $45.8 million, was for the expansion or
upgrade of outside plant facilities and switching assets.
We expect our remaining capital expenditures for 2005 will be
approximately $28.0 million, which will be used primarily
to maintain and upgrade our physical plant.
72
Payments of $4.5 million and $2.6 million made on
long-term obligations were the primary uses of cash for
financing activities during the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. No new financing was
obtained during these periods.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, net cash provided by
financing activities was $516.3 million compared to
$277.4 million of net cash provided by financing activities
for the year ended December 31, 2003. In connection with
the TXUCV acquisition in April 2004, we incurred
$637.0 million of new long-term debt, repaid
$178.2 million of debt and received $89.0 million in
net capital contributions from our existing equity investors. In
addition, we incurred $19.0 million of expenses to finance
the TXUCV acquisition. To fund the ICTC acquisition in 2003, we
received $283 million from equity and debt issuances and
approximately $9.2 million in proceeds from the sale of the
building subject to the LATEL sale/leaseback described under
Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions LATEL Sale/Leaseback. New
long-term debt of $8.8 million was also repaid after the
TXUCV acquisition in 2004.
For the year ended December 31, 2003, net cash provided by
financing activities was $277.4 million. The majority was
from financing obtained to fund the ICTC acquisition described
above. After settling the purchase consideration, funds from
financing activities were also used to repay $10.2 million
of outstanding borrowings under the CoBank credit facility in
2003. For the year ended December 31, 2002, net cash used
in financing activities was $16.6 million. 2002 financing
activities were primarily attributable to funds required to
settle intercompany net receivables with McLeodUSA.
Debt and Capital
Leases
On the closing of the TXUCV acquisition, CCI terminated its
CoBank credit facility, Texas Holdings and CCI severally entered
into, and borrowed under, the existing credit facilities, we
issued the senior notes and CCV assumed the former TXUCV capital
leases. In connection with this offering, we expect to amend and
restate the existing credit facilities and redeem 32.5% of
the outstanding principal amount of our senior notes pursuant to
an optional redemption provision in the indenture.
The following tables summarize our indebtedness and capital
leases as of March 31, 2005 on an historical basis and on a
pro forma basis to give effect to this offering and the related
transactions:
Historical Debt and Capital Leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Maturity Date | |
|
Rate(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Revolving credit facility
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
April 14, 2010 |
|
|
|
LIBOR + 2.25% |
|
Term loan A facility
|
|
|
112,000 |
|
|
|
April 14, 2010 |
|
|
|
LIBOR + 2.25% |
|
Term loan C facility
|
|
|
311,850 |
|
|
|
October 14, 2011 |
|
|
|
LIBOR + 2.50% |
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2012 |
|
|
|
9.75% |
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
March 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
6.50% |
|
Pro Forma Debt and Capital Leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Maturity Date | |
|
Rate(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Revolving credit facility
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
April 14, 2010 |
|
|
|
LIBOR + 2.00% |
|
Term loan D facility
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
October 14, 2011 |
|
|
|
LIBOR + 2.50% |
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
April 1, 2012 |
|
|
|
9.75% |
|
Capital lease
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
March 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
6.50% |
|
|
|
(1) |
As of March 31, 2005, the 90-day LIBOR rate was 3.12%. |
73
|
|
|
Existing Credit Facilities and Amended and Restated Credit
Facilities |
On April 14, 2004, CCI and Texas Holdings entered into the
existing credit facilities pursuant to which CCI borrowed an
aggregate of $170.0 million, $50.0 million under the
term loan A facility and $120.0 million under the term
loan B facility, and Texas Holdings borrowed an aggregate
of $267.0 million, $72.0 million under the term
loan A facility and $195.0 million under the term
loan B facility. In addition, the existing credit
facilities also provided for a $30.0 million revolving
credit facility, that was available to both CCI and Texas
Holdings in the same proportion as borrowings under the term
loan facilities, none of which had been drawn as of
March 31, 2005. Borrowings under the existing credit
facilities were secured by substantially all of the assets of
CCI (except ICTC, which is contingent upon obtaining the consent
of the ICC for ICTC to guarantee $195.0 million of the
borrowings) and Texas Holdings.
On October 22, 2004, we entered into an amended and
restated credit agreement that, among other things, converted
all borrowings then outstanding under the term loan B
facility into approximately $314.0 million of aggregate
borrowings under a new term loan C facility. The term
loan C facility is substantially identical to the term
loan B facility, except that the applicable margin for
borrowings through April 1, 2005 was 1.50% with respect to
base rate loans and 2.50% with respect to London Inter-Bank
Offer Rate, or LIBOR, loans. Thereafter, provided certain credit
ratings are maintained, the applicable margin is 1.25% for base
rate loans and 2.25% for LIBOR loans.
The borrowings under the existing credit facilities bore
interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at the
borrowers election, either a base rate or
LIBOR. The applicable margin was based upon the borrowers
total leverage ratio. As of March 31, 2005, the applicable
margin for interest rates on LIBOR based loans was 2.25% on the
term loan A facility and 2.50% on the term loan C
facility. The applicable margin for the alternative base rate
loans was 1.25% per year for the revolving loan facility
and term loan A facility and 1.75% for the term loan C
facility. At March 31, 2005, the weighted average interest
rate, including swaps, on our term debt was 5.4% per annum.
Concurrently with the closing of this offering, we will amend
and restate our existing credit facilities with a group of
lenders, including Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Credit
Suisse First Boston, acting through its Cayman Islands branch,
an affiliate of Credit Suisse First Boston LLC,
underwriters in this offering, providing for a total of up to
$455.0 million in new term and revolving credit facilities,
which we refer to as the amended and restated credit facilities.
The amended and restated credit facilities will provide
financing of up to $455.0 million, consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
a new term loan D facility of up to $425.0 million
maturing on October 14, 2011; and |
|
|
|
a $30.0 million new revolving credit facility maturing on
April 14, 2010. |
The amended and restated credit facilities will bear the same
rates of interest as before their amendment and restatement and
that they will require no amortization of principal before their
maturity. However, under certain circumstances, we may be
required to make annual mandatory prepayments with a portion of
our available cash, as described under Description of
Indebtedness Amended and Restated Credit
Facilities Restricted Payments. For a more
complete description of the expected terms of the amended and
restated credit facilities, see Description of
Indebtedness Amended and Restated Credit
Facilities.
Upon closing of the amended and restated credit facilities, we
intend to repay in full the $112.0 million of debt under
our term loan A facility and the $311.9 million of
debt under our term loan C facility (plus any revolving
debt, which we anticipate will be zero) and to borrow
$425.0 million under a new term loan D facility. See
Description of Indebtedness Amended and
Restated Credit Facilities.
In connection with the TXUCV acquisition, we and Consolidated
Communications Texas Holdings, Inc. issued $200.0 million
in aggregate principal amount of senior notes. The senior notes
are our senior unsecured obligations. Following the
reorganization, CCI Holdings will succeed to the obligations of
74
Consolidated Communications Texas Holdings, Inc. under the
indenture and Homebase under its non-recourse guarantee. In
addition, the lenders under the amended and restated credit
facilities will release us, as successor to Homebase, from that
guarantee.
The indenture contains customary covenants that restrict our,
and our restricted subsidiaries ability to, incur debt and
issue preferred stock, make restricted payments (including
paying dividends on, redeeming, repurchasing or retiring our
capital stock), enter into agreements restricting our
subsidiaries ability to pay dividends, make loans or
transfer assets to us, create liens, sell or otherwise dispose
of assets, including capital stock of subsidiaries, engage in
transactions with affiliates, engage in sale and leaseback
transactions, engage in business other than telecommunications
businesses and consolidate or merge. For a more complete
description of the indenture, see Description of
Indebtedness Senior Notes.
Following the closing, we plan on redeeming 32.5% of the
aggregate amount of the senior notes, or $65.0 million,
with a portion of the net proceeds we will receive from this
offering, pursuant to an optional redemption provision. The
total cost of the redemption, including the redemption premium,
will be $71.3 million.
We believe that our new amended and restated credit agreement
will be and the indenture governing our senior notes is a
material agreement, that the covenants contained in these
agreements are material terms of these agreements and that the
information presented below about these covenants is material to
investors understanding of our financial condition and
liquidity. In addition, the breach of covenants in our amended
and restated credit agreement, which will be based on ratios
that include EBITDA as a component, could result in a default
under this agreement, allowing the lenders to elect to declare
all amounts borrowed due and payable, and, as a result, and
possibly resulting in a default under our indenture.
Our amended and restated credit agreement will restrict our
ability to pay dividends directly in proportion to the amount of
Bank EBITDA that we generate and our compliance with a total net
leverage ratio, among other things. We are also restricted from
paying dividends under the indenture governing our senior notes.
However, the indenture restriction is less restrictive than the
restriction that will be contained in our amended and restated
credit agreement. That is because the restricted payments
covenant in our amended and restated credit agreement allows a
lower amount of dividends to be paid from the borrowers (CCI and
Texas Holdings) to CCI Holdings than the comparable
covenant in the indenture (referred to as the build-up amount)
permits CCI Holdings to pay to its stockholders. However,
the amount of dividends CCI Holdings will be able to make
under the indenture in the future will be based, in part, on the
amount of cash that may be distributed by the borrowers under
the amended and restated credit agreement to CCI Holdings.
Under the amended and restated credit agreement, if the total
net leverage ratio, as of the end of any fiscal quarter, is
greater than 4.75:1.00, we will be required to suspend dividends
on our common stock unless otherwise permitted by an exception
for dividends that may be paid from the portion of the proceeds
of any sale of our equity not used to make mandatory prepayments
of loans and not used to fund acquisitions, capital expenditures
or make other investments. During any dividend suspension
period, we will be required to repay debt in an amount equal to
50.0% of any increase in our Available Cash during such dividend
suspension period, among other things. In addition, we will not
be permitted to pay dividends if an event of default under the
amended and restated credit agreement has occurred and is
continuing. In particular, it will be an event of default if:
|
|
|
|
|
our senior secured leverage ratio, as of the end of any fiscal
quarter, is greater than 4.00 to 1.00; or |
|
|
|
our fixed charge coverage ratio, as of the end of any fiscal
quarter, is not (x) after the closing date and on or prior
to December 31, 2005, at least 2.50 to 1.00, (y) after
January 1, 2006 and on or prior to December 31, 2006,
at least 2.00 to 1.00 and (z) after January 1, 2007,
at least 1.75 to 1.00. |
75
As a result of the above, the presentation of Bank EBITDA on a
pro forma basis for the TXUCV acquisition and the ratios
referred to above is appropriate to provide additional
information to investors to demonstrate compliance with, and our
ability to pay dividends under, the applicable covenants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Year Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Pro forma Bank EBITDA
|
|
|
$124.0 |
|
|
|
$141.0 |
|
|
|
$141.6 |
|
Total net leverage ratio
|
|
|
4.49:1.00 |
|
|
|
3.95:1.00 |
|
|
|
3.93:1.00 |
|
Senior secured leverage ratio
|
|
|
3.47:1.00 |
|
|
|
3.05:1.00 |
|
|
|
3.04:1.00 |
|
Fixed charge coverage ratio
|
|
|
3.69:1.00 |
|
|
|
4.13:1.00 |
|
|
|
4.04:1.00 |
|
The calculation of the total net leverage ratio assumes no
prepayment of the amended and restated credit facilities during
the periods presented. For a more complete description of Bank
EBITDA, the total net leverage ratio and related provisions, see
Description of Indebtedness Amended and
Restated Credit Facilities.
Bank EBITDA is different than EBITDA that is derived solely from
GAAP components. Bank EBITDA should not be construed as
alternatives to net cash from operating or investing activities,
cash flows from operations or net income (loss) as defined by
GAAP, and it is not on its own necessarily indicative of cash
available to fund our cash needs as determined in accordance
with GAAP. In addition, not all companies use identical
calculations, and this presentation of Bank EBITDA may not be
comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.
CCI Texas was a party to a Master Lease Agreement with GECC, as
further described in Description of
Indebtedness GECC Capital Leases elsewhere in
this prospectus. On May 27, 2005, we elected to pay in full
the outstanding balance on this lease.
In 2004, our primary uses of cash and capital consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
scheduled principal and interest payments on our long-term debt; |
|
|
|
capital expenditures for CCI Holdings of approximately
$30.0 million for network, central offices and other
facilities and information technology for operating support and
other systems; and |
|
|
|
$7.0 million in aggregate to integrate and restructure the
operations of CCI Illinois and CCI Texas following the TXUCV
acquisition. |
In 2005, we expect that our primary uses of cash and capital
will consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
interest payments on our long-term debt; |
|
|
|
a $37.5 million cash distribution to our existing equity
investors; |
|
|
|
capital expenditures of approximately $33.5 million for
similar investments as we made in 2004; |
|
|
|
approximately $7.5 million in TXUCV integration and
restructuring costs; and |
|
|
|
incremental costs associated with being a public company. |
The expected one-time integration and restructuring costs of
approximately $14.5 million in aggregate for 2004 and 2005
will be in addition to certain additional ongoing costs we will
incur to expand certain administrative functions, such as those
relating to SEC reporting and compliance, and do not take into
account other potential cost savings of and expenses of the
TXUCV acquisition. We do not expect to incur costs relating to
the TXUCV integration after 2005.
76
Beyond 2005, we will require significant cash to service and
repay debt and make capital expenditures. In the future, we will
assess the need to expand our network and facilities based on
several criteria, including the expected demand for access lines
and communications services, the cost and expected return on
investing to develop new services and technologies and
competitive and regulatory factors. We believe that our current
network in Illinois is capable of supporting video with limited
additional capital investment.
In the future, we also expect to assess the cost and benefit of
selected acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances as
market conditions and other factors warrant. If we were to make
an acquisition, we could fund any such acquisition by using
available cash, incurring debt (whether borrowings under our
amended and restated revolving credit facility or publicly or
privately issuing debt securities), subject to the restrictions
in the agreements governing our debt, issuing equity securities
or raising proceeds from the sale of assets or a combination of
these funding sources. Currently, we are not pursuing any
acquisition or other strategic transaction.
Our amended and restated credit agreement will limit the amounts
we may spend on capital expenditures between 2004 and 2011. We
will be limited to aggregate capital expenditures of
$45.0 million each year. In the event the full amount
allotted to capital expenditures is not spent during a fiscal
year, the remaining balance may be carried forward to the
following year only. However, the carried forward balance may
not be utilized until such time as the amount originally
established as the capital expenditure limit for such year has
been fully utilized.
Effect of this Offering and the Related Transactions on
Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources
We expect that this offering and the related transactions will
have the following effects on our results of operations,
liquidity and capital resources in the future:
|
|
|
|
|
We will pay approximately $12.9 million in one-time fees
and expenses in connection with this offering and the related
transactions, $9.5 million of which are related to the
offering and will be recorded as a reduction to paid-in capital
and $3.4 million of which are related to the amendment and
restatement of the existing credit facilities and will be
recorded as deferred financing costs that will be amortized over
the life of the term loan D facility. |
|
|
|
We will pay a premium of $6.3 million in connection with
the redemption of senior notes. |
|
|
|
We will have a net decrease in interest expense of
$6.3 million per year due to the partial redemption of
senior notes and amendment and restatement of the credit
facilities. |
|
|
|
We will have a net increase in deferred financing costs, due to
the write-off of approximately $2.3 million of deferred
financing costs relating to the redemption of senior notes, and
the incurrence of approximately $3.4 million of deferred
financing costs to amend and restate the existing credit
facilities. |
|
|
|
As a result of the amendment and restatement of our credit
facilities, we will (a) have $18.1 million less in
scheduled amortization payments due to the elimination of the
requirement to amortize outstanding principal amounts and
(b) no longer be required to prepay our outstanding term
loans with 50% of our excess cash flow, as that term is used in
the amended and restated credit facilities. |
|
|
|
As a public company, we expect to incur approximately $1.0
million in incremental, ongoing selling, general and
administrative expenses associated with being a public company
with equity securities quoted on the Nasdaq National Market.
These expenses include SEC reporting, compliance (SEC and
Nasdaq) and related administration expenses, accounting and
legal fees, investor relations |
77
|
|
|
|
|
expenses, directors fees and director and officer
liability insurance premiums, registrar and transfer agent fees,
listing fees and other, miscellaneous expenses. |
|
|
|
Following this offering, we will have $5.0 million less
annually in selling, general and administrative expenses from
the termination of the two professional service agreements as
described above. |
|
|
|
We expect to incur a non-cash compensation expense of
$6.4 million as a result of the amendment and restatement
of our restricted share plan in connection with this offering.
In the future, we expect to incur an additional
$6.4 million of non-cash compensation expense under the
restricted share plan that will be recognized ratably over the
remaining three year vesting period of the issued, but unvested
restricted shares outstanding at the offering date. We may also
incur additional non-cash compensation expenses in connection
with any new grants under our 2005 long-term incentive plan,
consistent with other public companies. |
|
|
|
As a result of the dividend policy that our board of directors
will adopt effective upon the closing of this offering, we
currently intend to pay an initial dividend of $0.4089 per
share (representing a pro rata portion of the expected
dividend for the first year following the closing of this
offering) on or about November 1, 2005 to stockholders of
record as of October 15, 2005 and to continue to pay
quarterly dividends at an annual rate of $1.5495 per share for
the first year following the closing of this offering, subject
to various restrictions on our ability to do so. We expect the
aggregate impact of this dividend policy in the year following
the closing of the offering to be $46.0 million. The cash
requirements of the expected dividend policy are in addition to
our other expected cash needs, both of which we expect to be
funded with cash flow from operations. In addition, we expect we
will have sufficient availability under our amended and restated
revolving credit facility to fund dividend payments in addition
to any expected fluctuations in working capital and other cash
needs, although we do not intend to borrow under this facility
to pay dividends. |
We believe that our dividend policy will limit, but not
preclude, our ability to grow. If we continue paying dividends
at the level currently anticipated under our dividend policy, we
may not retain a sufficient amount of cash, and may need to seek
refinancing, to fund a material expansion of our business,
including any significant acquisitions or to pursue growth
opportunities requiring capital expenditures significantly
beyond our current expectations. In addition, because we expect
a significant portion of cash available will be distributed to
the holders of our common stock under our dividend policy, our
ability to pursue any material expansion of our business will
depend more than it otherwise would on our ability to obtain
third-party financing. Currently, we are not pursuing any
acquisitions or other strategic transactions.
Capital Resources. Our debt will decrease by
$63.8 million due to the redemption of $65.0 million
of our senior notes and incremental borrowing of
$1.2 million under our amended and restated credit
facility. Although we will have this net debt reduction, we will
still be able to incur additional debt under the amended and
restated credit agreement and the indenture governing our senior
notes. As of March 31, 2005, after giving effect to this
offering and the related transactions, we would have been able
to incur an additional $116.1 million of debt.
We believe that cash flow from operating activities, together
with our existing cash and borrowings available under the
amended and restated credit facilities, will be sufficient for
approximately the next twelve months to fund our currently
anticipated requirements for dividends, interest payments on our
indebtedness, capital expenditures, TXUCV integration and
restructuring costs, incremental costs associated with being a
public company, taxes and certain other costs. After 2005, our
ability to fund these requirements and to comply with the
financial covenants under our debt agreements will depend on the
results of future operations, performance and cash flow. Our
ability to do so will be subject to prevailing economic
conditions and to financial, business, regulatory, legislative
and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
We may be unable to access the cash flow of our subsidiaries
since certain of our subsidiaries are parties to credit or other
borrowing agreements that restrict the payment of dividends or
making intercompany loans and investments, and those
subsidiaries are likely to continue to be subject to such
78
restrictions and prohibitions for the foreseeable future. In
addition, future agreements that our subsidiaries may enter into
governing the terms of indebtedness may restrict our
subsidiaries ability to pay dividends or advance cash in
any other manner to us.
To the extent that our business plans or projections change or
prove to be inaccurate, we may require additional financing or
require financing sooner than we currently anticipate. Sources
of additional financing may include commercial bank borrowings,
other strategic debt financing, sales of nonstrategic assets,
vendor financing or the private or public sales of equity and
debt securities. We cannot assure you that we will generate
sufficient cash flow from operations in the future, that
anticipated revenue growth will be realized or that future
borrowings or equity contributions will be available in amounts
sufficient to provide adequate working capital, service our
indebtedness or make anticipated capital expenditures. Failure
to obtain adequate financing, if necessary, could require us to
significantly reduce our operations or level of capital
expenditures which could have a material adverse effect on our
projected financial condition and results of operations.
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into surety,
performance and similar bonds. As of March 31, 2005, we had
approximately $3.0 million of these types of bonds
outstanding.
|
|
|
Table of Contractual Obligations &
Commitments |
As of March 31, 2005, our material contractual cash
obligations and commitments on an historical basis were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Total | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Long-term debt(a)
|
|
$ |
623,850 |
|
|
$ |
36,169 |
|
|
$ |
21,900 |
|
|
$ |
23,150 |
|
|
$ |
26,900 |
|
|
$ |
33,400 |
|
|
$ |
482,331 |
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
24,276 |
|
|
|
3,644 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
2,601 |
|
|
|
2,571 |
|
|
|
8,395 |
|
Capital lease(b)
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum purchase contracts(c)
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other post-retirement obligations(d)
|
|
|
62,924 |
|
|
|
3,027 |
|
|
|
5,307 |
|
|
|
5,704 |
|
|
|
5,939 |
|
|
|
6,264 |
|
|
|
36,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations and commitments
|
|
$ |
713,165 |
|
|
$ |
43,535 |
|
|
$ |
32,062 |
|
|
$ |
32,484 |
|
|
$ |
35,440 |
|
|
$ |
42,235 |
|
|
$ |
527,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2005, our material contractual cash
obligations and commitments on a pro forma basis for this
offering and the related transactions would have been:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Total | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Long-term debt(e)
|
|
$ |
560,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
560,000 |
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
24,276 |
|
|
|
3,644 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
3,169 |
|
|
|
2,601 |
|
|
|
2,571 |
|
|
|
8,395 |
|
Capital lease(b)
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum purchase contracts(c)
|
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other post-retirement obligations(d)
|
|
|
62,924 |
|
|
|
3,027 |
|
|
|
5,307 |
|
|
|
5,704 |
|
|
|
5,939 |
|
|
|
6,264 |
|
|
|
36,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations and commitments
|
|
$ |
649,315 |
|
|
$ |
7,366 |
|
|
$ |
10,162 |
|
|
$ |
9,334 |
|
|
$ |
8,540 |
|
|
$ |
8,835 |
|
|
$ |
605,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
This item consists of loans outstanding under our existing
credit facilities and our senior notes. Our existing credit
facilities consist of a $112.0 million term loan A
facility with a maturity of six years, a $311.9 million
term loan C facility with a maturity of seven years and six
months, and a $30.0 million revolving credit facility with
a maturity of six years, which is fully available. |
79
|
|
|
(b) |
|
This item consists of a $1.1 million capital lease entered
into by CCI Texas with GECC. On May 27, 2005, we elected to
pay in full the outstanding balance on this lease. See
Description of Indebtedness GECC Capital
Leases. |
|
(c) |
|
As of March 31, 2005, the minimum purchase contract was a
60-month High-Capacity Term Payment Plan agreement with
Southwestern Bell, dated November 25, 2002. The agreement
requires CCI Texas to make monthly purchases of at least $33,000
from Southwestern Bell on a take-or-pay basis. The agreement
also provides for an early termination charge of 45.0% of the
monthly minimum commitment multiplied by the number of months
remaining through the expiration date of November 25, 2007.
As of March 31, 2005, the potential early termination
charge was approximately $0.5 million. |
|
(d) |
|
Pension funding is an estimate of our minimum funding
requirements to provide pension benefits for employees based on
service through 2004. Obligations relating to other post
retirement benefits are based on estimated future benefit
payments. Our estimates are based on forecasts of future benefit
payments which may change over time due to a number of factors,
including life expectancy, medical costs and trends and on the
actual rate of return on the plan assets, discount rates,
discretionary pension contributions and regulatory rules. See
Note E (Postretirement Benefit Plans) to the consolidated
financial statements of TXUCV and Note 12 (Pension Costs
and Other Postretirement Benefits) of CCI Holdings consolidated
financial statements. |
|
(e) |
|
This item consists of loans expected to be outstanding under the
amended and restated credit facilities and our senior notes. The
amended and restated credit facilities will consist of a
$425.0 million term loan D facility maturing on
October 14, 2011, which will be drawn on the closing of
this offering, and a $30.0 million revolving credit
facility maturing on April 14, 2010, which is expected to
be fully available but undrawn immediately following the closing
of this offering. See Description of
Indebtedness Amended and Restated Credit
Facilities. The table does not reflect any amortization of
long-term debt, that is because none requires any amortization
prior to its scheduled maturity. |
Impact of Inflation
The effect of inflation on our financial results has not been
significant in the periods presented.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2003, the U.S. Congress enacted the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003
that will provide a prescription drug subsidy beginning in 2006
to companies that sponsor post-retirement health care plans that
provide drug benefits. Additional legislation is anticipated
that will clarify whether a company is eligible for the subsidy,
the amount of the subsidy available and the procedures to be
followed in obtaining the subsidy. In May 2004, the FASB issued
Staff Position 106-2 Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, which
provides guidance on the accounting and disclosure for the
effects of this Act. We have determined that our post-retirement
prescription drug plan is actuarially equivalent and intend to
reflect the impact beginning on July 1, 2004 without a
material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of
operations.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R, which replaces
SFAS 123 and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25.
SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in
the financial statements based on their fair values beginning
with the first annual period after June 15, 2005, with
early adoption encouraged. The pro forma disclosures previously
permitted under SFAS 123 no longer will be an alternative
to financial statement recognition.
80
We are required to adopt SFAS 123R beginning
January 1, 2006. Under SFAS 123R, we must determine
the appropriate fair market value model to be used for valuing
share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation
cost and the transition method to be used at date of adoption.
As disclosed in the summary of significant accounting policies
in our consolidated financial statements, our restricted share
plan, prior to this offering, contained a call provision whereby
upon termination of employment, we could elect to repurchase the
shares held by the former employee. The purchase price is based
upon the lesser of fair value or a formula specified in the
plan. The existence of this call provision that allows for a
purchase price that is below fair value results in the plan
being accounted for as variable plan, with compensation expense,
if any, determined based upon the formula rather than fair
value. We are currently evaluating the effect SFAS 123R
will have on our financial condition or results of operations,
but we do not expect it to have a material impact.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets An
Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transaction. SFAS 153 eliminates the exception
from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar
productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion
No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions, and replaces it with an exception for
exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153
specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance
if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change
significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS 153 is
effective for fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005
and is required to be adopted by us in the three months ended
September 30, 2005. We are currently evaluating the effect
that the adoption of SFAS 153 will have on our financial
condition or results of operations, but do not expect it to have
a material impact.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on
our long-term debt obligations. We estimate our market risk
using sensitivity analysis. Market risk is defined as the
potential change in the fair value of a fixed-rate debt
obligation due to hypothetical adverse change in interest rates
and the potential change in interest expense on variable rate
long-term debt obligations due to a change in market interest
rates. The fair value on long-term debt obligations is
determined based on discounted cash flow analysis, using the
rates and the maturities of these obligations compared to terms
and rates currently available in long-term debt markets. The
potential change in interest expense is determined by
calculating the effect of the hypothetical rate increase on the
portion of variable rate debt that is not hedged through the
interest swap agreements described below and does not assume
changes in our capital structure. As of March 31, 2005,
62.3% of our long-term debt obligations would have been fixed
rate and approximately 37.7% would have been variable rate
obligations not subject to interest rate swap agreements.
As of March 31, 2005, after giving effect to this offering
and the related transactions, we would have had
$425.0 million of debt, including $211.3 million of
variable rate debt not covered by interest rate swap agreements,
outstanding under the amended and restated credit facilities.
Our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates would have been
limited by interest rate swap agreements that would effectively
convert a portion of the variable rate debt to a fixed-rate
basis, thus reducing the impact of interest rate changes on
future interest expenses. As of March 31, 2005, we would
have had interest rate swap agreements covering
$213.7 million of aggregate principal amount of our
variable rate debt at fixed LIBOR rates ranging from 2.99% to
3.35% and expiring on December 31, 2006, May 19, 2007
and December 31, 2007. As of March 31, 2005, the fair
value of the interest rate swaps would have amounted to an asset
of $2.2 million, net of taxes.
As of March 31, 2005, we would have had $135.0 million
in aggregate principal amount of fixed rate long-term debt
obligations with an estimated fair market value of
$142.4 million based on the overall weighted average
interest rate of our fixed rate long-term debt obligations of
9.75% and an overall weighted maturity of 7.0 years,
compared to rates and maturities currently available in
long-term debt
81
markets. Market risk is estimated as the potential loss in fair
value of our fixed rate long-term debt resulting from a
hypothetical increase of 10.0% in interest rates. Such an
increase in interest rates would have resulted in an
approximately $6.1 million decrease in the fair value of
our fixed rate long-term debt. As of March 31, 2005, we
would have had $211.3 million of variable rate debt not
covered by the interest rate swap agreements. If market interest
rates averaged 1.0% higher than the average rates that
prevailed from January 1, 2005 through March 31, 2005,
interest expense would have increased by approximately
$0.5 million for the period.
82
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS CCI TEXAS
We present below Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations of CCI Texas. The
following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
historical consolidated financial statements and notes and other
financial information related to CCV (formerly TXUCV) appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
CCI Texas is an established rural local exchange company that
provides communications services to residential and business
customers in Texas. As of March 31, 2005, we estimate that
CCI Texas would have been the 18th largest local telephone
company in the United States had it been a separate company,
based on industry sources, with approximately 166,447 local
access lines and approximately 18,889 DSL lines in service.
CCI Texas main source of revenues is its local telephone
businesses in Texas, which offers an array of services,
including local dial tone, custom calling features, private line
services, long distance, dial-up and high-speed Internet access,
carrier access and billing and collection services.
CCI Texas also operates complementary businesses, including
publishing telephone directories and offering wholesale
transport services on a fiber optic network.
Beginning in 1999, CCI Texas began operating a competitive
telephone company business in a number of local markets in
Texas. The competitive telephone company business grew to more
than 58,000 lines in service by the end of 2001, at which
time CCI Texas reevaluated its strategic direction and
decided to refocus on its rural telephone company business.
During the subsequent 18 months, CCI Texas
systematically exited certain of its less profitable competitive
telephone company markets, ceased service to residential
customers and concentrated on making the competitive telephone
company profitable by focusing solely on business customers
within a limited number of geographic markets. In late 2002,
CCI Texas decided to exit the competitive telephone company
business entirely, placed its competitive telephone company
assets and customer base for sale and classified all competitive
telephone company assets and liabilities as held for sale. In
2003, CCI Texas continued to rationalize its business plan
and, in March 2003, CCI Texas sold the majority of its
remaining competitive telephone company assets and customer base
to Grande Communications. By the end of March 2003, with the
exception of a small number of remaining competitive telephone
company customers who were in the process of transitioning to
other carriers, CCI Texas had effectively exited the
competitive telephone company business. As a result of the
foregoing, our financial results as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2003 are not directly comparable to prior
periods.
Competitive telephone company revenues, reflected in Exited
Operations, represent primarily local access revenues and
features attributable to competitive telephone company
customers. In addition, some competitive telephone company
customers also subscribed to other CCI Texas services including
long distance and dial-up Internet. For the relevant periods,
the revenues from competitive telephone company customers
associated with these products are included in the relevant
product categories listed above.
In 2002, as a part of CCI Texas refocus on its Texas
rural telephone companies, CCI Texas initiated a process to
sell its transport business. The transport assets were
consequently classified as held for sale at the end of 2002. In
early 2003, it became apparent that a sale of the entire company
was likely and the decision was made to cease efforts to sell
the transport network as a separate entity. Consequently, in
June 2003, the transport assets were reclassified as held and
used.
Prior to April 14, 2004, TXUCV had been a direct, wholly
owned subsidiary of Pinnacle One, which is owned by TXU Corp.
When the acquisition was consummated on April 14, 2004,
Homebase, through its indirect, wholly owned subsidiary Texas
Holdings, acquired all of the capital stock of TXUCV. Texas
Holdings was formed solely for the purpose of acquiring TXUCV.
TXUCV was subsequently renamed CCV.
83
For the year ended December 31, 2003, 85.1% of
CCI Texas $194.8 million of revenues were
derived from local and long distance voice and data services and
associated carrier access fees and subsidies associated with
customers within CCI Texas Texas rural telephone
companies service areas. Of the remaining 14.9% of
revenues, $10.4 million, or 5.3%, was derived from
directory advertising and publishing, $12.8 million, or
6.6%, was derived from transport services, primarily to other
carriers, and $5.9 million, or 3.0%, was associated with
products or services that CCI Texas no longer offers.
In 2003, CCI Texas experienced a slight decline in its
number of local access lines of 0.3%, or 441 from approximately
172,083 local access lines to approximately 171,642 local access
lines. This decline was comprised of a 1.8% decline in
residential access lines to approximately 116,862 access lines
partially offset by business line growth of 3.3% to
approximately 54,780 business access lines at the end of the
year. We believe that the principal reason our Texas rural
telephone company lost local access lines in this period was due
to the weak economy in Texas. In addition, we believe we lost
local access lines due to the disconnection of second telephone
lines by our residential customers in connection with their
substituting DSL or cable modem service for dial-up Internet
access and wireless service for wireline service. Furthermore,
CCI Texas implemented a more stringent disconnect policy for
non-paying customers in July 2003 following the consolidation of
CCI Texas two local billing systems. Partially offsetting
some of this residential decline was an increase in housing
starts in the suburban parts of our Texas rural telephone
companies service areas.
CCI Texas number of DSL subscribers grew substantially in
2003, compared to 2002. We believe this growth was due to
CCI Texas strong focus on selling DSL service,
including the deployment of a customer self-installation kit.
DSL lines in service increased 59.8% to approximately 8,668
lines as of December 31, 2003 from approximately 5,423
lines as of December 31, 2002. CCI Texas penetration
rate for DSL lines in service was 5.1% of our Texas rural
telephone companies local access lines December 31,
2003.
In October 2003, CCI Texas initiated a new campaign to market
service bundles. While CCI Texas offered limited service
bundles prior to 2003, this initiative was subsequently marketed
more aggressively and took advantage of increased pricing
flexibility associated with the change from a Chapter 59 to
Chapter 58 state regulatory election. See
Regulation State Regulation of CCI
Texas. Between the introduction of five service bundles in
October 2003 and December 31, 2003, CCI Texas sold over
7,500 service bundles.
In 2002, CCI Texas began to sell and publish its yellow and
white pages directories in-house. Until then, CCI Texas had
contracted with a third party provider to sell, publish and
distribute its directories. As compensation for selling and
publishing the directories, CCI Texas had previously paid
this contractor a portion of the directory revenues on a revenue
share basis of between 32.5% and 35.5%. The first directory that
CCI Texas produced in-house was the Lufkin directory published
in August 2002, which was followed by the Conroe directory in
February 2003 and the Katy directory in April 2003.
CCI Texas transport business has remained relatively
stable despite the general pricing pressure in the wholesale
transport business nationwide. This stability is partly due to
the relative lack of competition on some of CCI Texas
routes and CCI Texas having built fiber routes directly to some
significant carrier customers. In 2002, CCI Texas began to
investigate selling the transport network and, consequently did
not focus on aggressively growing this part of its business. In
light of TXU Corp.s decision to sell the entire company in
2003, CCI Texas continued to manage the transport network
in a maintenance mode and did not make any significant
investments in the network. We intend to continue to evaluate
the opportunities for growing the transport business going
forward.
We intend to focus on continuing to increase the revenues per
access line in our Texas rural telephone companies service
areas primarily generated from local dial tone, long distance,
custom calling features and data and Internet services. Our
primary focus will be to increase our DSL penetration and the
bundling of local access, custom calling features, long
distance, voicemail and DSL. We expect that the
84
sale of communications services to customers in our Texas rural
telephone companies service areas will continue to provide
the predominant share of CCI Texas revenues.
Operating expenses include network operating cost and selling,
general and administrative expenses. They have fluctuated over
the past three years because CCI Texas business
strategy has undergone several significant changes. The exit
from the competitive telephone company line of business
contributed to a significant reduction in the size of the
company and led to expense reductions primarily in employee
expenses and network circuit and operating costs. Several
significant systems projects contributed to higher costs
historically than we anticipate will be the case in the future.
These projects included a financial system restructuring and
conversion, the integration of the Consolidated Communications
of Fort Bend Company billing and operations systems and projects
designed to automate procedures and processes. The establishment
of a more significant headquarters presence in Irving, Texas and
the relocation of many functions from the field to Irving also
generated incremental cost.
CCI Texas cost of services includes:
|
|
|
|
|
expenses related to plant costs, including those related to
network and general support costs, central office switching and
transmission costs, and cable and wire facilities; |
|
|
|
general plant costs, such as testing, provisioning, network,
administration, power and engineering; and |
|
|
|
the cost of transport and termination of long distance and
private lines outside our Texas rural telephone companies
service areas. |
CCI Texas operates a dedicated long distance switch in Dallas
and transports the majority of its long distance traffic to this
switch over its transport network. Historically, CCI Texas was a
party to several long distance contracts for the purchase of
wholesale long distance minutes that involved minimum volume
commitments and that, at times, resulted in above market rate
average costs per minute for long distance services. CCI Texas
has since terminated all such contracts requiring minimum volume
commitments and now has considerably greater flexibility in its
ability to select long distance carriers for its traffic and to
manage a variety of carriers in order to minimize its cost of
long distance minutes. CCI Texas cost of providing long
distance service is currently significantly lower than the
average in 2003, and CCI Texas believes that it will be able to
continue providing long distance services to its subscribers
more profitably than it has been able to do historically.
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
Selling, general and administrative expenses include:
|
|
|
|
|
selling and marketing expenses; |
|
|
|
expenses associated with customer care; |
|
|
|
billing and other operating support systems; and |
|
|
|
corporate expenses. |
CCI Texas markets to residential customers and small business
customers primarily through its customer service centers and to
larger business customers through a dedicated, commissioned
sales force. The transport and directory divisions use dedicated
sales forces.
CCI Texas has operating support and other back office systems
that are used to enter, schedule, provision and track customer
orders, test services and interface with trouble management,
inventory, billing, collection and customer care service systems
for the local access lines in our Texas rural telephone
companies operations. We maintain an information
technology staff based in Irving, Conroe and Lufkin who maintain
and update our various systems.
85
We are in the process of migrating key business processes of CCI
Illinois and CCI Texas onto single, company-wide systems and
platforms. Our objective is to improve profitability by reducing
individual company costs through centralization, standardization
and sharing of best practices. We expect that our operating
support systems costs will increase temporarily as we integrate
CCI Illinois and CCI Texas back office systems. As
of December 31, 2004, $5.5 million and
$1.5 million has been spent on integration in Texas and
Illinois, respectively.
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses |
CCI Texas recognizes depreciation expenses for our regulated
telephone plant and equipment and nonregulated property and
equipment using the straight-line method. The depreciation rates
and depreciable lives for regulated telephone plant and
equipment are approved by the PUCT. CCI Texas depreciable
assets have the following useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years | |
|
|
| |
Buildings
|
|
|
15-35 |
|
Network and outside plant facilities
|
|
|
5-30 |
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
|
|
3-17 |
|
Amortization expenses were recognized on goodwill over its
useful life, normally 15 to 40 years prior to
January 1, 2002. Beginning January 1, 2002, CCI Texas
implemented SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets. SFAS No. 142 requires that
goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives
not be amortized, but rather be tested annually for impairment.
CCI Texas conducted impairment tests and recorded impairment
losses of $13.2 million and $18.0 million respectively
for 2003 and 2002.
The following summarizes revenues and operating expenses from
continuing operations for TXUCV, the predecessor of CCV, for the
years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003. The results
of operations presented herein for all periods prior to the
acquisition are sometimes referred to as the results of
operations of the predecessor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ | |
|
% of Total | |
|
$ | |
|
% of Total | |
|
$ | |
|
% of Total | |
|
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local calling services
|
|
$ |
52.5 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
$ |
54.3 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
$ |
56.2 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
% |
|
Network access services
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
Subsidies
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
Long distance services
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
Data and Internet services
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
Directory publishing
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
Transport services
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
Other services
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
Exited services
|
|
|
24.1 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues
|
|
|
207.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
214.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
194.8 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
$ | |
|
% of Total | |
|
$ | |
|
% of Total | |
|
$ | |
|
% of Total | |
|
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
(millions) | |
|
Revenues | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses(2)
|
|
|
184.3 |
|
|
|
88.8 |
|
|
|
186.3 |
|
|
|
86.8 |
|
|
|
133.8 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
Other charges(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119.4 |
|
|
|
55.6 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
234.5 |
|
|
|
113.0 |
|
|
|
346.7 |
|
|
|
161.5 |
|
|
|
180.1 |
|
|
|
92.5 |
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
(132.0 |
) |
|
|
(61.5 |
) |
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
Total other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
(Loss) income before income taxes
|
|
|
(28.2 |
) |
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
|
(128.1 |
) |
|
|
(59.7 |
) |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
(38.3 |
) |
|
|
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$ |
(21.9 |
) |
|
|
(10.6 |
)% |
|
$ |
(89.8 |
) |
|
|
(41.8 |
)% |
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
This category corresponds to the line items presented under
Business Telephone Operations
Texas and provides more detail than that presented in the
consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss of
TXUCV. See the audited consolidated financial statements of TXU
Communications Ventures Company and Subsidiaries. |
|
(2) |
This line item includes network operating costs and selling,
general and administrative expenses. |
|
(3) |
This line item includes restructuring, asset impairment and
other charges and goodwill impairment charges. |
Results of Operations
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003 compared to
December 31, 2002 |
CCI Texas total revenues decreased by 9.3%, or
$19.9 million, to $194.8 million in 2003 from
$214.7 million in 2002. The decrease was primarily due to
CCI Texas exit from the competitive telephone company
business.
Local services revenues increased 3.5%, or
$1.9 million, to $56.2 million in 2003 from
$54.3 million in 2002. The increase was primarily due to
the success of targeted promotions of custom calling features.
Network access revenues decreased 2.8%, or
$1.0 million, to $35.2 million in 2003 from
$36.2 million in 2002. During the last two years, the FCC
instituted certain modifications to our Texas rural telephone
companies cost recovery mechanisms, decreasing implicit
support, which allowed rural carriers to set interstate network
access charges higher than the actual cost of originating and
terminating calls, and increasing explicit support through
subsidy payments from the federal universal service fund.
Subsidies revenues increased 30.2%, or $9.6 million,
to $41.4 million in 2003 from $31.8 million in 2002.
The increase was due in part to the subsidy settlement processes
resulting in the recovery of additional subsidy payments
associated with prior years and 2003. Since our Texas rural
telephone companies are regulated under a rate of return
mechanism for interstate revenues, the value of assets in the
interstate rate base is critical to calculating this rate of
return and therefore, the subsidies our Texas rural telephone
companies will receive. During 2003, the Texas rural telephone
companies recognized revenues of $6.4 million of receipts
from the federal universal service fund that were attributable
to 2002 and 2001, which was a larger out-of-period adjustment
than in prior years. The receipts were the result of filings CCI
Texas made in 2003 that updated prior year cost studies and
reclassified certain asset and expense categories for regulatory
purposes. The increase was also due to the FCC modifications to
our Texas rural telephone companies cost recovery mechanisms
described above in network access service revenues.
87
Long distance services revenues decreased by 33.3%, or
$6.7 million, to $13.4 million in 2003 from
$20.1 million in 2002 due to decreased minutes of use and a
change in the average rate per minute due to customers selecting
lower rate plans.
Data and Internet services revenues increased by 4.3%, or
$0.6 million, to $14.7 million in 2003 from
$14.1 million in 2002. The increase was primarily due to
increased sales of DSL service. Growth in sales of DSL lines of
59.8% in 2003 contributed to a penetration of 5.1%, or
approximately 8,668 DSL lines in service, as of
December 31, 2003. The increase was offset by a decrease in
dial-up Internet service driven by the substitution by customers
of high speed Internet access and a decrease in dial-up and DSL
customers as a result of CCI Texas exiting the competitive
telephone company business.
Directory Publishing revenues increased by 8.3%, or
$0.8 million, to $10.4 million in 2003 from
$9.6 million in 2002. The increase was in part due to the
transition from a third party sales force to an internal sales
force for the sale of advertising for yellow and white pages
directories, beginning with the publication of the Lufkin
directory in August 2002 and followed by Conroe in February 2003
and Katy in April 2003. This transition resulted in increased
sales productivity and higher revenues due to the termination of
revenue sharing with the previous publisher of between 32.5% and
35.5%. Since CCI Texas recognizes the revenues from each
directory over the 12-month life of the directory, 2003 revenues
still reflect a combination of outsourced and in-house directory
operations.
Transport services revenues remained flat in 2003 with no
significant customer gains or losses.
Other services revenues decreased by 20.0%, or
$1.2 million, to $4.8 million in 2003 from
$6.0 million in 2002. The decrease was due to a reduction
in equipment sales to our competitive telephone company
customers and the termination of the pager product line.
Exited services revenues decreased 80.3%, or
$24.1 million, to $5.9 million in 2003 from
$30.0 million in 2002. The decrease was due to decreases in
revenues from the exit of the competitive telephone company
business and from lower revenues from wholesale long distance
service. Of this amount, $19.6 million was related to the
local service revenues from the competitive telephone company
business and $4.5 million was related to the wholesale long
distance service resulting from the exit from these businesses.
Operating expenses decreased by 28.2%, or $52.5 million, to
$133.8 million in 2003 from $186.3 million in 2002.
The decrease was due principally to the following factors.
|
|
|
|
|
Network costs decreased primarily as a result of CCI Texas
having substantially exited the competitive telephone company
business by the end of March 2003, which led to the removal of
leased circuit costs from SBC and other carriers. |
|
|
|
Related to the exit from the competitive telephone company
business, total headcount decreased by 161 to 644 as of
December 31, 2003. CCI Texas estimates that the actual
expense of salaries and benefits for these employees was
approximately $4.4 million in addition to the
$4.4 million in severance costs CCI Texas incurred in
connection with these terminations. |
|
|
|
Bad debt expense decreased by $11.0 million from
$10.2 million in 2002 to a $0.8 million benefit in
2003. This was primarily due to (1) a re-evaluation of the
bad debt reserve from $5.0 million at year-end 2002, which
included a $2.7 million reserve for MCI accounts receivable
due to the bankruptcy of MCIs parent, Worldcom, Inc., to
$1.5 million at year-end 2003 and (2) a decrease in
bad debt write-offs to $2.3 million in 2003, which decrease
primarily related to the exit from the competitive telephone
company business. |
|
|
|
Those network costs that were not associated with the
competitive telephone company decreased due to process
improvements and network optimization projects. Process
improvements were related to implementation of an automated
system for tracking circuit costs payable to other carriers,
including a monthly feed to the general ledger. Network
optimization projects included renegotiation of contracts with
long distance and other carriers, which eliminated monthly
minimum |
88
|
|
|
|
|
usage fees. In addition, network costs decreased due to the
removal of circuits in connection with the exit from the
wholesale long distance business. |
|
|
|
Operating expenses decreased due to one-time system
consolidation projects in 2002 that were not experienced in
2003. This decrease, however, was partially offset by expenses
associated with a one-time software development project to
enhance CCI Texas customer billing system in connection
with the sale process. |
|
|
|
The incurrence of $1.4 million of one-time transaction
costs, including financial and legal expenses associated with
preparing TXUCV for sale. |
|
|
|
In addition, $2.4 million in retention bonuses that were
paid to key employees to facilitate the sales transaction
process while running the day to day operations of the business. |
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased 19.8%, or
$8.1 million, to $32.9 million in 2003 from
$41.0 million in 2002 primarily due to the decrease in
depreciable asset base resulting from the impairment write-down
of the transport and competitive telephone company assets. In
connection with the impairment, TXUCV recorded a
$90.3 million write-down of the net book value of its
transport and competitive telephone company depreciable assets
from $98.3 million to $8.0 million.
Other charges decreased 88.8%, or $106.0 million, to
$13.4 million in 2003 from $119.4 million in 2002.
This decrease is primarily due to asset impairment and
restructuring charges for the competitive telephone company and
transport business of $0.2 million in 2003 compared to
$101.4 million in 2002. In accordance with
SFAS No. 142, CCI Texas conducted impairment tests on
October 1, 2003 and October 1, 2002 and, as a result
of TXUs decision in 2003 to sell TXUCV for a known price
and CCI Texas decision to exit the competitive telephone
company and transport businesses, recognized on its consolidated
financial statements, goodwill impairment losses of
$13.2 million and $18.0 million, respectively for the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.
Other income (expense) decreased 217.9%, or
$8.5 million, to $(4.6) million from
$3.9 million. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease
in interest expense of $2.1 million (net of allowance for
funds used during construction), a decrease in minority interest
of $8.9 million which resulted from the large transport
impairment charges recorded in 2002, which was offset by an
increase in partnership income of $0.4 million. Partnership
income is primarily derived from a minority interest in two
cellular partnerships as further described in
Business Telephone Operations
Texas Cellular Partnerships.
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) |
Income tax expense increased by 132.4%, or $50.7 million,
to $12.4 million in 2003 from $(38.3) million in 2002.
Of this increase, $48.3 million was due to the federal
income tax effect of the increase in income before income taxes
of $138.2 million primarily due to the significant one-time
charges in 2002 discussed above. Related to this increase was
the increase in state franchise tax of $4.8 million and the
tax effect on minority interest of $3.1 million. The
remaining $(5.5) million of the change was primarily due to
permanent differences and a change in the valuation reserve. See
Note D (Income Taxes) to the audited consolidated financial
statements of TXU Communications Ventures Company and
Subsidiaries.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to
December 31, 2001 |
CCI Texas total operating revenues increased by 3.5%, or
$7.2 million, to $214.7 million in 2002 from
$207.5 million in 2001. The increase was primarily due to
an increase in average competitive
89
telephone company access lines from 40,930 to 43,023. As
described above, all competitive telephone company operations
were substantially sold or exited by the end of March 2003.
Local calling services revenues increased 3.4%, or
$1.8 million, to $54.3 million in 2002, from
$52.5 million in 2001. The increase was due to an increase
in sales of custom calling features and a 1.3% increase in total
local access lines to 172,083 lines for the year ended
December 31, 2002 from 169,894 lines for the year ended
December 31, 2001.
Network access services revenues decreased by 2.2%, or
$0.8 million, to $36.2 million in 2002 from
$37.0 million in 2001. The decrease was the result of a
decrease in minutes of use, which was partially offset by an
increase in end user subscriber line charges. In addition,
during 2001 and 2002, the FCC instituted certain modifications
to our Texas rural telephone companies cost recovery
mechanisms, decreasing implicit support, which allowed rural
carriers to set interstate network access charges higher than
the actual cost of originating and terminating calls, and
providing explicit support through subsidy payments from the
federal universal service fund.
Subsidies increased by 11.2%, or $3.2 million, to
$31.8 million in 2002 from $28.6 million in 2001. The
increase was due in part to the FCC modifications to our Texas
rural telephone companies cost recovery mechanisms
described above in network access services revenues and due to
an increase in federal universal service fund payments due to
higher operating expenses and plant investment in 2002 compared
with the national average.
Long distance services revenues decreased by 14.1%, or
$3.3 million, to $20.1 million in 2002 from
$23.4 million in 2001. The decrease was due to a decrease
in minutes of use.
Data and Internet services revenues decreased by 5.4%, or
$0.8 million, to $14.1 million in 2002 from
$14.9 million in 2001 due to a change in sales focus to
higher margin products which was partially offset by an increase
in DSL sales and a modest increase in dial-up Internet service.
Directory Publishing revenues increased 15.7%, or
$1.3 million, to $9.6 million in 2002 from
$8.3 million in 2001. The increase was due to increased
advertising sales. The improvement was partially attributable to
bringing the sales and production functions in-house during 2002
as described above, resulting in a partial year recognition of
higher revenues on the Lufkin directory from its publication in
August 2002 through the end of the year.
Transport services revenues increased by 22.3%, or
$2.3 million, to $12.6 million in 2002 from
$10.3 million in 2001. The increase was primarily due to an
increase in one-time revenues associated with new service orders
by existing customers and some incremental recurring revenues
from existing and new customers.
Other services revenues decreased by 28.6%, or
$2.4 million, to $6.0 million in 2002 from
$8.4 million in 2001. The decrease was primarily due to
non-recurring equipment sales in 2001.
Exited services revenues increased by 24.5%, or
$5.9 million, to $30.0 million in 2002 from
$24.1 million in 2001. The increase was due to increased
competitive telephone company sales.
Total operating expenses increased by 1.1%, or
$2.0 million, to $186.3 million in 2002 from
$184.3 million in 2001. The increase was due to the
following factors: selling, general and administrative expenses
increased due to increased expenditures made in anticipation of
future rural telephone company acquisitions and expenses related
to the relocation of the TXUCV corporate headquarters, including
costs for employee severance and relocation expenses.
Informational technology costs increased due to systems
consolidation projects, including the consolidation of select
billing systems. Bad debt expense increased as the result of a
$2.7 million reserve for MCI receivables and a more
stringent policy for calculating reserves. Offsetting the above
were large cost reductions during 2002 related to competitive
telephone company activities due to exiting non-profitable
markets and holding the competitive telephone company operations
for sale. As a result of these activities, net headcount dropped
by 397, to 823 employees at December 31, 2002 from 1,220
employees at December 31, 2001.
90
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization |
Depreciation and amortization expense decreased by 18.3%, or
$9.2 million, to $41.0 million in 2002 from
$50.2 million in 2001. The decrease was primarily due to
the elimination of goodwill amortization of $13.7 million
recorded in 2001. SFAS No. 142 was adopted by CCI
Texas on January 1, 2002 requiring the discontinuation of
goodwill amortization.
Other income (expense) decreased 425.0%, or
$5.1 million, to $3.9 million of income in 2002 from
$(1.2) million of expense in 2001. The decrease was
primarily due to a decrease in interest expense of
$3.6 million (net of an allowance for funds used during
construction), an increase in minority interest of
$7.5 million which resulted from the transport impairment
charges recorded in 2002 and a decrease in partnership income of
$0.8 million. These were offset by a decrease in the gain
on sale of property and investments of $5.6 million
primarily related to the sale of an 18.0% interest in a cellular
partnership other than CCI Texas continuing investment in
GTE Mobilnet of South Texas, L.P. and GTE Mobilnet of Texas
RSA #17, L.P. in December 2001. See Note H
(Investments in Nonaffiliated Companies) to the audited
Consolidated Financial Statements of TXU Communications Ventures
Company and Subsidiaries. Partnership income is primarily
derived from a minority interest in the two continuing cellular
partnerships.
|
|
|
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) |
Income tax benefit increased 507.9%, or $32.0 million, to
$(38.3) million in 2002 from $(6.3) million in 2001.
Of this increase, $34.7 million was associated with the
federal income tax effect of the decrease in income before taxes
of $99.9 million. Related to this was the decrease in state
franchise tax of $3.5 million and the tax effect on
minority interest of $2.6 million. The remaining
$(8.8) million of the increase was primarily due to
permanent differences and a decrease in the valuation reserve.
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
The accounting estimates and assumptions discussed in this
section are those that we consider to be the most critical to an
understanding of CCI Texas financial statements because
they inherently involve significant judgements and
uncertainties. In making these estimates, we considered various
assumptions and factors that will differ from the actual results
achieved and will need to be analyzed and adjusted in future
periods. These differences may have a material impact on CCI
Texas financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows. We believe that of CCI Texas significant accounting
policies, the following involve a higher degree of judgement and
complexity.
Subsidies Revenues
CCI Texas recognizes revenues from universal service subsidies
and charges to interexchange carriers for switched and special
access services. In certain cases, its rural telephone
companies, Consolidated Communications of Texas Company and
Consolidated Communications of Fort Bend Company, participate in
interstate revenue and cost sharing arrangements, referred to as
pools, with other telephone companies. Pools are funded by
charges made by participating companies to their respective
customers. The revenue CCI Texas receives from its participation
in pools is based on its actual cost of providing the interstate
services. Such costs are not precisely known until after the
year-end and special jurisdictional cost studies have been
completed. These cost studies are generally completed during the
second quarter of the following year. Detailed rules for cost
studies and participation in the pools are established by the
FCC and codified in Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
We evaluate the collectibility of CCI Texas accounts
receivable based on a combination of estimates and assumptions.
When we are aware of a specific customers inability to
meet its financial obligations, such as a bankruptcy filing or
substantial down-grading of credit scores, CCI Texas records a
specific allowance against amounts due to set the net receivable
to an amount we believe is reasonable to be collected. For all
other customers, we reserve a percentage of the remaining CCI
Texas outstanding accounts receivable balance as a general
allowance based on a review of specific customer balances, trends
91
and our experience with CCI Texas prior receivables, the
current economic environment and the length of time the
receivables are past due. If circumstances change, we review the
adequacy of the CCI Texas allowance to determine if our
estimates of the recoverability of the amounts due CCI Texas
could be reduced by a material amount.
Valuation of Goodwill and Tradenames
We review CCI Texas goodwill and tradenames for impairment
as part of our annual business planning cycle in the fourth
quarter and whenever events or circumstances make it more likely
than not that an impairment may have occurred. Several factors
could trigger an impairment review such as:
|
|
|
|
|
a change in the use or perceived value of CCI Texas
tradenames; |
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to expected historical or
projected future operating results; |
|
|
|
significant regulatory changes that would impact future
operating revenues; |
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends; or |
|
|
|
significant changes in the overall strategy in which we operate
our overall business. |
We determine if an impairment exists based on a method of using
discounted cash flows. This requires management to make certain
assumptions regarding future income, royalty rates and discount
rates, all of which affect this calculation. Upon completion of
our impairment review in December 2004, it was determined that
an impairment did not exist for CCI Texas.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
The amounts recognized in our financial statements for pension
and postretirement benefits are determined on an actuarial basis
utilizing several critical assumptions.
A significant assumption used in determining CCI Texas
pension and postretirement benefit expense is the expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets. In 2004, we used an
expected long-term rate of return of 8.5% as we moved toward
uniformity of assumptions and investment strategies across all
our plans and in response to the actual returns on our portfolio
in recent years being significantly below our expectations.
Another significant estimate is the discount rate used in the
annual actuarial valuation of CCI Texas pension and
postretirement benefit plan obligations. In determining the
appropriate discount rate, we consider the current yields on
high quality corporate fixed-income investments with maturities
that correspond to the expected duration of CCI Texas
pension and postretirement benefit plan obligations. For 2004 we
used a discount rate of 6.0%.
In connection with the April 2004 sale of TXUCV, TXU Corp.
contributed $2.9 million to TXUCVs pension plan. In
2005, we expect to contribute $2.2 million to the Texas pension
plan and $1.0 million to the other Texas postretirement
benefits plans.
92
The effect of the change in selected assumptions on our estimate
of our Texas pension plan expense is shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
Point |
|
Obligation |
|
2005 Expense |
Assumption |
|
Change |
|
Higher/(Lower) |
|
Higher/(Lower) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Discount rate
|
|
+-0.5 pts |
|
$(4,545)/$5,110 |
|
$(114)/$116 |
Expected return on assets
|
|
+-1.0 pts |
|
|
|
$(413)/$413 |
The effect of the change in selected assumptions on our estimate
of our other Texas postretirement benefit plan expense is shown
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage |
|
December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
Point |
|
Obligation |
|
2005 Expense |
Assumption |
|
Change |
|
Higher/(Lower) |
|
Higher/(Lower) |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
Discount rate
|
|
+-0.5 pts |
|
$(1,881)/$2,125 |
|
$(80)/$33 |
93
BUSINESS
Overview
We are an established rural local exchange company that provides
communications services to residential and business customers in
Illinois and in Texas. As of March 31, 2005, we estimate
that we were the 15th largest local telephone company in the
United States, based on industry sources, with approximately
253,071 local access lines and approximately 30,804 DSL
lines in service. Our main sources of revenues are our local
telephone businesses in Illinois and Texas, which offer an array
of services, including local dial tone, custom calling features,
private line services, long distance, dial-up and high-speed
Internet access, carrier access and billing and collection
services. We also operate a number of complementary businesses.
In Illinois, we provide additional services such as telephone
services to county jails and state prisons, operator and
national directory assistance and telemarketing and order
fulfillment services and expect to begin publishing telephone
directories in the third quarter of 2005. In Texas, we publish
telephone directories and offer wholesale transport services on
a fiber optic network.
Each of the subsidiaries through which we operate our local
telephone businesses is classified as a rural telephone company
under the Telecommunications Act. Our rural telephone companies
are ICTC, Consolidated Communications of Fort Bend Company
and Consolidated Communications of Texas Company. Our rural
telephone companies in general benefit from stable customer
demand and a favorable regulatory environment. In addition,
because we primarily provide service in rural areas, competition
for local telephone service has been limited due to the
generally unfavorable economics of constructing and operating
competitive systems in these areas.
For the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the three
months ended March 31, 2005, we had $323.5 million and
$79.8 million of revenues, respectively, of which
approximately 15.9% and 17.2%, respectively, came from state and
federal subsidies. For the year ended December 31, 2004 and
the three months ended March 31, 2005, we had
$1.7 million and $1.9 million net income,
respectively. As of March 31, 2005, we had
$561.1 million of total long-term debt (including current
portion), an accumulated deficit of $34.5 million and
shareholders equity of $215.0 million.
Our Strengths
|
|
|
Stable Local Telephone Businesses |
We are the incumbent local telephone company in the rural
communities we serve, and demand for local telephone services
from our residential and business customers has been stable
despite changing economic conditions. We operate in a favorable
regulatory environment, and competition in our markets is
limited. As a result of these favorable characteristics, the
cash flow generated by our local telephone business is
relatively consistent from year to year, and our long-standing
relationship with our local telephone customers provides us with
an opportunity to pursue increased revenue per access line by
selling additional services to existing customers using
integrated packages, or bundles, of local, long distance and
internet service on a single monthly bill.
|
|
|
Favorable Regulatory Environment |
Each of the subsidiaries through which we operate our local
telephone businesses is classified as a rural telephone company
under the Telecommunications Act. As a result, we are exempt
from some of the more burdensome interconnection and unbundling
requirements that have affected larger incumbent telephone
companies. Also, we benefit from federal and Texas state
subsidies designed to promote widely available, quality
telephone service at affordable prices in rural areas, which are
also referred to as universal service. For the year ended
December 31, 2004, CCI Illinois received
$10.6 million from the federal universal service fund,
$2.4 million of which represented the recovery of
additional subsidy payments from the federal universal service
fund for prior periods. CCI Texas received an aggregate
$40.9 million from the federal universal service fund and
the Texas universal service fund, $2.0 million of which
represented the recovery of additional subsidy payments from the
federal universal service fund for prior periods. In the
aggregate, the $51.5 million comprised 15.9% of revenues
for the year ended
94
December 31, 2004, after giving effect to the TXUCV
acquisition. For the three months ended March 31, 2005,
CCI Illinois received $4.2 million from the federal
universal fund, $1.6 million of which represented the
recovery of additional subsidy payments from the federal
universal service fund for prior periods and CCI Texas
received an aggregate $9.5 million from the federal
universal service fund and the Texas universal service fund. In
the aggregate, the $13.7 million comprised 17.2% of our
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
|
|
|
Attractive Markets and Limited Competition |
The geographic areas in which our rural telephone companies
operate are characterized by a balanced mix of stable, insular
territories in which we have limited competition and growing
suburban areas where we expect our business to grow in tandem.
Currently, we have limited competition for basic voice services
from wireless carriers and cable providers.
Our Lufkin, Texas and central Illinois markets have experienced
nominal population growth over the past decade. As of
March 31, 2005, 134,142, or approximately 53%, of our
253,071 local telephone access lines were located in these
markets. We have experienced limited competition in these
markets because the low customer density and high residential
component have discouraged the significant capital investment
required to offer service over a competing network.
Our Conroe, Texas and Katy, Texas markets are suburban areas
located on the outskirts of the Houston metropolitan area that
have experienced above-average population and business
employment growth over the past decade as compared to Texas and
the United States as a whole. According to the most recent
census, the median household income in the primary county in our
Conroe market was over $50,000 per year and in our Katy
market was over $60,000 per year, both significantly higher
than the median household income in Texas of $39,927 per
year. As of March 31, 2005, 118,929, or approximately 47%,
of our 253,071 local access lines were located in these markets.
|
|
|
Technologically Advanced Network |
We have invested significantly in the last several years to
build a technologically advanced network capable of delivering a
broad array of reliable, high quality voice and data and
Internet services to our customers on a cost-effective basis.
For example, as of March 31, 2005, approximately 90% of our
total local access lines in both Illinois and Texas were
DSL-capable, excluding access lines already served by other high
speed connections. The service options we are able to provide
over our existing network allow us to generate additional
revenues per customer. We believe our current network in
Illinois is capable of supporting video with limited additional
capital investment.
|
|
|
Broad Service Offerings and Bundling of Services |
We offer our customers a single point of contact for access to a
broad array of voice and data and Internet services. For
example, we offer all of our customers custom calling features,
such as caller name and number identification, call forwarding
and call waiting. In addition, we offer value-added services
such as teleconferencing and voicemail. These service options
allow us to generate additional revenues per customer.
We also generate additional revenues per customer by bundling
services. Bundling enables us to provide a more complete package
of services to our customers at a relatively small incremental
cost to us. We believe the bundling of services results in
increased customer loyalty and higher customer retention. As of
March 31, 2005, our Illinois Telephone Operations had
approximately 7,300 customers who subscribed to service
bundles that included local service, custom calling features and
voicemail and approximately 2,000 additional customers who
subscribed to service bundles that included these services and
Internet access. This represents an increase of approximately
5.9% over the number of Illinois customers who subscribed to
service bundles as of December 31, 2004. As of
March 31, 2005, our Texas Telephone Operations had over
22,600 customers who subscribed to service bundles that
included local service, custom calling features and voicemail.
This represents an increase of approximate 6.2% over the number
of Texas customers who subscribed to service bundles as of
December 31, 2004.
95
|
|
|
Experienced Management Team with Proven Track
Record |
With an average of approximately 20 years of experience in
both regulated and non-regulated telecommunications businesses,
our management team has demonstrated the ability to deliver
profitable growth while providing high levels of customer
satisfaction. Specifically, our management team has:
|
|
|
|
|
particular expertise in providing superior quality services to
rural customers in a regulated environment; |
|
|
|
a proven track record of successful business integrations,
including the integration of ICTC and several related
businesses, including long distance and private line services,
into McLeodUSA in 1998; and |
|
|
|
a proven track record of launching and growing of new, regulated
services, such as long distance and DSL services, and
complementary services, such as operator and telemarketing and
order fulfillment services. |
Business Strategy
|
|
|
Improve Operating Efficiency and Maintain Capital
Expenditure Discipline |
Since acquiring ICTC and the related businesses in December
2002, we have made significant operating and management
improvements. We have centralized many of our business and back
office functions for our Illinois Telephone Operations. By
providing these centrally managed resources to our Illinois
operating companies, we have allowed our management and customer
service functions to focus on their business and to better serve
our customers in a cost-effective manner. We intend to continue
to seek and implement more cost efficient methods of managing
our business, including sharing best practices across our
operations.
We believe we have successfully managed the capital expenditures
for our Illinois Telephone Operations in order to optimize our
returns, while appropriately allocating resources to allow us to
maintain and upgrade our network. We intend to maintain our
capital expenditure discipline across our company.
|
|
|
Increase Revenues Per Customer |
We will continue to focus on increasing our revenues per
customer, primarily by seeking to increase our DSL
services market penetration, increasing the sale of other
value-added services and encouraging customers to subscribe for
service bundles. We believe that this strategy enables us to
provide a more complete package of services to our customers and
increase our revenues per customer at a relatively small
incremental cost to us.
We are expanding our service bundle in Illinois with the
introduction of an all-digital video service. Having made the
necessary upgrades to our network and purchased programming
content, we launched digital video service in the first quarter
of 2005 in our key Illinois exchanges: Mattoon; Charleston; and
Effingham. Initial customer feedback has been positive, and
management believes that video will enhance the competitive
appeal of our service bundle and increase revenue per customer.
We plan to use innovative marketing strategies for enhanced,
ancillary services and to continue to offer new applications and
technologies. By building on our long-standing relationships
with our customers while continuing to offer new services, we
believe we can continue to generate strong revenues and cash
flow.
Build on our Reputation for
High Quality Service
We will seek to continue to build on our strong reputation,
which dates to 1894 in Illinois and 1898 in Texas. We plan to do
this by continuing to offer a broad array of high quality
telecommunications services and consistent, high quality
customer service. We have consistently exceeded all ICC and PUCT
quality of service requirements, and we believe we can continue
this standard of excellence throughout the company. We will
continue to focus on building long-term relationships with our
customers by having an active local
96
presence. We believe these strategies will lead to high levels
of customer loyalty and increased demand for our services in
Illinois and Texas.
Selective
Acquisitions
We intend to pursue a disciplined process of selective
acquisitions of access lines from Regional Bell Operating
Companies and other rural local exchange carriers, as well as
acquiring providers of businesses complementary to ours, such as
dial-up and DSL Internet access services. Over the past five
years, Regional Bell Operating Companies have divested a
significant number of access lines nationwide and are expected
to continue these divestitures in order to focus on larger
markets. We also believe there may be attractive opportunities
to acquire rural local exchange carriers. For example, in
Illinois and Texas, there are approximately 90 rural local
exchange carriers serving a fragmented market representing
approximately 1.5 million total access lines. Our
acquisition criteria include:
|
|
|
|
|
attractiveness of the markets; |
|
|
|
quality of the network; |
|
|
|
our ability to integrate the acquired company efficiently; |
|
|
|
potential operating synergies; and |
|
|
|
the potential of any proposed transaction to permit increased
dividends on our common stock. |
Currently, we are not pursuing any acquisitions or other
strategic transactions.
History of the Company
Founded in 1894 as the Mattoon Telephone Company by the
great-grandfather of our Chairman, Mr. Lumpkin, CCI
Illinois began as one of the nations first independent
telephone companies. After several subsequent acquisitions, the
Mattoon Telephone Company was incorporated as the Illinois
Consolidated Telephone Company, or ICTC, on April 10, 1924.
On September 24, 1997, McLeodUSA acquired the predecessor
of CCI.
The Lumpkin family has been continuously involved in managing
CCI Illinois since inception, including the period during which
it was owned by McLeodUSA, when Mr. Lumpkin served as Vice
Chairman of McLeodUSA and Chairman of ICTC. In December 2002,
Mr. Lumpkin, through his affiliated entity Central Illinois
Telephone, together with Providence Equity and Spectrum Equity,
purchased the capital stock and assets of ICTC and several
related businesses from McLeodUSA for $284.8 million and
assumed specified liabilities. CCI Holdings was formed on
March 22, 2002 as an acquisition vehicle for the purpose of
acquiring ICTC and several related businesses from McLeodUSA.
TXUCV began operations in November 1997 with the acquisition by
TXU Corp. of Lufkin-Conroe Communications, a fourth-generation
family-owned business founded in 1898. The regional telephone
company subsidiary of Lufkin-Conroe Communications was renamed
TXU Communications Telephone Company. In August 2000, TXU Corp.
contributed the parent company of Fort Bend Telephone
Company, a family-owned business based in Katy, Texas which
began operations in 1914, to TXUCV. Beginning in 1999, TXUCV
began operating a competitive telephone company in a number of
local markets within Texas. In late 2001, TXUCV decided to
refocus its business strategy on its Texas rural telephone
companies. TXUCV systematically exited its competitive telephone
company markets, culminating in the sale of some of its
competitive telephone company operations to Texas-based Grande
Communications in March 2003 and the termination of the
remainder of its competitive telephone company operations by
June 2003.
On April 14, 2004, we acquired TXUCV, an indirect, wholly
owned subsidiary of TXU Corp., for a cash purchase price of
$524.1 million, net of cash acquired and including
transaction costs. Texas Holdings, a Delaware corporation, was
formed on October 8, 2003 for the sole purpose of acquiring
TXUCV from TXU Corp. TXUCV was subsequently renamed to CCV.
97
CCI Holdings is a holding company with no income from operations
or assets except for the capital stock of CCI and Texas
Holdings. Instead, all of our operations are conducted through
CCI Illinois and CCI Texas.
Telephone Operations
Illinois
Our Illinois Telephone Operations consist of local telephone,
long distance and data and Internet services and serves
residential and business customers in central Illinois. As of
March 31, 2005, our Illinois Telephone Operations had
approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
86,624 local access lines in service, of which approximately 64%
served residential customers and 36% served business customers; |
|
|
|
64% long distance penetration of its local access lines; |
|
|
|
7,611 dial-up Internet customers; and |
|
|
|
11,915 DSL lines, which represented an approximately 13.8%
penetration of total local access lines. Approximately 90% of
our total local access lines in Illinois, excluding local access
lines already served by other high speed connections, are
DSL-capable. |
In 2004, our Illinois Telephone Operations generated
$97.3 million of revenues and $27.6 million of cash
flows from operating activities. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005, our Illinois Telephone Operations generated
$24.7 million of revenues and $9.9 million of cash
flows from operating activities. As of March 31, 2005, our
Illinois Telephone Operations had total assets of
$264.7 million.
The following chart summarizes the primary sources of revenues
for Illinois Telephone Operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net | |
|
|
|
|
Revenue of Illinois | |
|
|
Revenue Source |
|
Telephone Operations | |
|
Description |
|
|
| |
|
|
Local Calling Services
|
|
|
33.6% |
|
|
Offers the local customer the ability to originate and receive
an unlimited number of calls within a defined local calling
area. The customer is charged a flat monthly fee for basic
service, including local calls, and service charges for custom
calling features, value added services and local private line
services. |
|
Network Access Services
|
|
|
27.5% |
|
|
Offers long distance and other carriers the opportunity to use
our Illinois network to originate or terminate long distance
calls in our Illinois service area. Network access charges are
paid by the long distance or other carriers to our Illinois
Telephone Operations and are regulated by the FCC and the ICC.
These revenues also include special access and certain
regulated, end-user charges. |
|
Subsidies
|
|
|
17.0% |
|
|
Our Illinois Telephone Operations receive federal subsidy
payments designed to promote widely available, quality telephone
service at affordable prices in rural areas. |
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net | |
|
|
|
|
Revenue of Illinois | |
|
|
Revenue Source |
|
Telephone Operations | |
|
Description |
|
|
| |
|
|
Long Distance Services
|
|
|
7.7% |
|
|
Offers intrastate and interstate long distance services provided
to local customers in Illinois who subscribe to our Telephone
Operations long distance services. |
|
Data and Internet Services
|
|
|
10.6% |
|
|
Offers DSL, non-local private line service, dial-up Internet
access and frame relay networks and related enhanced Internet
services. |
|
Other Services
|
|
|
3.6% |
|
|
Offers other services, including billing and collection services
and commissions from the sale of advertising for yellow and
white pages directories. |
The percentages of revenues listed above have been adjusted to
eliminate intra-company revenues and provide more detail than
that presented in the consolidated statement of income of CCI.
See consolidated financial statements of CCI and audited
combined financial statements of ICTC and the related businesses.
Local calling services include dial tone and local
calling services. Our Illinois Telephone Operations generally
charge residential and business customers a fixed monthly rate
for access to the network and for originating and receiving
telephone calls within their local calling area, which is the
geographic area established for administration and pricing of
telecommunications services. Custom calling features consist of
caller name and number identification, call forwarding and call
waiting. Value added services consist of teleconferencing and
voicemail. For custom calling features and value added services,
our Illinois Telephone Operations usually charge a flat monthly
fee, which varies depending on the type of service. In addition,
our Illinois Telephone Operations offer local private lines
providing direct connections between two or more local locations
primarily to business customers at flat monthly rates.
Network access services allow the origination or
termination of calls in our Illinois service area for which our
Telephone Operations charge long distance or other carriers
network access charges, which are regulated. Network access fees
also apply to private lines provisioned between a customer in
our Illinois service area and a location outside of our Illinois
service area. For long distance calls, our Illinois Telephone
Operations bill the long distance or other carrier on a per
minute or per minute, per mile usage basis. For private lines,
our Illinois Telephone Operations bill the long distance or
other carrier at a flat monthly rate. Included in this category
are subscriber line charges paid by the end user.
Our Illinois Telephone Operations record the details of the long
distance and private line calls through its carrier access
billing system and bills the applicable carrier on a monthly
basis. The network access charge rates for intrastate long
distance calls and private lines within Illinois are regulated
and approved by the ICC, whereas the access charge rates for
interstate long distance calls and private lines are regulated
and approved by the FCC.
Subsidies consist of federal subsidies designed to
promote widely available, quality telephone service at
affordable prices in rural areas. The subsidies are allocated
and distributed to our Illinois Telephone Operations from funds
to which telecommunications providers, including local, long
distance and wireless carriers, must contribute on a monthly
basis. Funds are distributed to our Illinois Telephone
Operations on a monthly basis based upon our costs for providing
local service in Illinois. Unlike our Texas Telephone
Operations, our Illinois Telephone Operations receive federal
but not state subsidies.
Long distance services in Illinois include services
provided to subscribers to long distance plans to originate
calls that terminate outside the callers local calling
area. For this service, our Illinois Telephone Operations
charges its subscribers a combination of subscription and usage
fees.
Data and Internet services include revenues from
non-local private lines and the provision of access to the
Internet by DSL, T-1 lines and dial-up access. Our Illinois
Telephone Operations also offer a variety
99
of data connectivity services, including frame relay networks.
Frame relay networks are public data networks commonly used for
local area network to local area network communications as an
alternative to private line data communications. In addition,
our Illinois Telephone Operations offer enhanced Internet
services, which include basic web site design and hosting,
content feeds, domain name services, e-mail services and
obtaining Internet protocol addresses.
Other services includes revenues from billing and
collection services. Our Illinois Telephone Operations also
receive what is referred to as revenue retention payments. These
payments are essentially a commission on advertising revenues
paid to ICTC by The Yell Group, which publishes yellow and white
pages directories for our Illinois service area.
In connection with the TXUCV acquisition, we acquired a
directory sales and publishing group, which currently publishes
the telephone directories for our Texas markets. We intend to
have this group publish directories for our Illinois markets as
well. As such, we notified Yellow Book on November 8, 2004
of our intention to terminate our directory publishing
agreement. We expect to begin publishing telephone directories
for our Illinois markets beginning in the third quarter of 2005.
Our Texas Telephone Operations serve residential and business
customers in east Texas and rural and suburban areas surrounding
Houston. As of March 31, 2005, our Texas Telephone
Operations had approximately:
|
|
|
|
|
166,447 local access lines in service, of which approximately
68% served residential customers and 32% served business
customers; |
|
|
|
40% long distance penetration of its local access lines in Texas; |
|
|
|
11,998 dial-up Internet customers; and |
|
|
|
18,889 DSL lines, which represented an approximately 11.3%
penetration of total local access lines. Approximately 90% of
our total local access lines in Texas, excluding local access
lines already served by other high speed connections, are
DSL-capable. |
Our Texas Telephone Operations also include the following
complementary businesses:
Directory Publishing sells directory advertising and
publishes yellow and white pages directories in and around our
Texas rural telephone companies service areas. The
directories are each published once per year and have a combined
circulation of approximately 400,000.
Transport Services provides connectivity to customers
within Texas over a fiber optic transport network consisting of
approximately 2,500 route-miles of fiber. This transport network
supports our long distance, Internet access and data services in
Texas and provides bandwidth on a wholesale basis to third party
customers, including national long distance and wireless
carriers. The transport network includes fiber owned by
Consolidated Communications Transport Company, a wholly owned
subsidiary of CCV and East Texas Fiber Line Incorporated, a
corporation in which our Texas Telephone Operations own a 63.0%
equity interest. In addition, Consolidated Communications
Transport Company owns a 39.1% equity interest in, and is the
managing partner of, Fort Bend Fibernet, a partnership.
Cellular Partnerships. Our Texas Telephone Operations
hold limited partnership interests in the following two cellular
partnerships:
|
|
|
|
|
GTE Mobilnet of South Texas, which serves the greater Houston
metropolitan area. Our Texas Telephone Operations own
approximately 2.3% of this partnership. In 2004, our Texas
Telephone Operations recognized income of $2.5 million and
received cash distributions totaling $3.2 million from this
partnership. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, our
Texas Telephone Operations did not recognize any income or
receive any cash distributions from this partnership. |
100
|
|
|
|
|
GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17, which serves rural areas in
and around Conroe, Texas. Our Texas Telephone Operations own
approximately 17.0% of the equity of this partnership. In 2004,
our Texas Telephone Operations recognized income of
$1.7 million and received cash distributions totaling
$0.8 million from this partnership. For the three months
ended March 31, 2005, our Texas Telephone Operations
recognized income of $0.3 million, but did not receive any
cash distributions from this partnership. |
San Antonio MTA, L.P., a wholly owned partnership of Cellco
Partnership (doing business as Verizon Wireless), is the general
partner for both partnerships.
In 2004, our Texas Telephone Operations generated
$186.9 million of revenues and $46.1 million of cash
flows from operating activities. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005, our Texas Telephone Operations generated
$46.3 million of revenues and $4.3 million of cash
flows from operating activities. As of March 31, 2005, our
Texas Telephone Operations had total assets of
$692.3 million.
The following chart summarizes the primary sources of revenues
for our Texas Telephone Operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net | |
|
|
|
|
Revenue of Our | |
|
|
Revenue Source |
|
Texas Telephone Operations | |
|
Description |
|
|
| |
|
|
Local Calling Services
|
|
|
30.7% |
|
|
Offers the local customer in Texas the ability to originate and
receive an unlimited number of calls within a defined local
calling area. The customer is charged a flat monthly fee for
basic service, including local calls, and service charges for
custom calling features, voicemail and local private line
services. |
|
Network Access Services
|
|
|
20.7% |
|
|
Offers long distance and other carriers the opportunity to use
our Texas network to originate or terminate long distance calls
in our Texas service areas. Network access charges are paid by
the long distance or other carriers to our Texas Telephone
Operations and are regulated by the FCC and PUCT. These revenues
also include special access and certain regulated, end user
charges. |
|
Subsidies
|
|
|
20.5% |
|
|
Our Telephone Operations in Texas receive federal and state
subsidy payments designed to promote widely available, quality
telephone service at affordable prices in rural areas. |
|
Long Distance Services
|
|
|
4.5% |
|
|
Offers intrastate and interstate long distance services provided
to local customers who subscribe to our long distance services
in Texas. |
|
Data and Internet Services
|
|
|
8.4% |
|
|
Offers DSL, non-local private line service, dial-up Internet
access, Asynchronous Transfer Mode, or ATM, based services and
frame relay networks and related enhanced Internet services. |
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Net | |
|
|
|
|
Revenue of Our | |
|
|
Revenue Source |
|
Texas Telephone Operations | |
|
Description |
|
|
| |
|
|
Directory Publishing
|
|
|
6.5% |
|
|
Offers the sale of directory advertising and publishes yellow
and white pages directories in and around our Texas service
areas. |
|
Transport Services
|
|
|
5.9% |
|
|
Offers connectivity to customers within Texas over a fiber-optic
transport network. |
|
Other Services
|
|
|
2.8% |
|
|
Offers other services, including equipment sales and billing and
collection services. |
The percentages of revenues listed above have been adjusted to
eliminate intra-company revenues and provides more detail than
that presented in the consolidated statement of operations and
comprehensive income of CCV. See the consolidated financial
statements of CCV and its predecessor, TXUCV.
Local call services include dial tone and local calling
services. Our Texas Telephone Operations generally charge
residential and business customers a fixed monthly rate for
access to the network and for originating and receiving
telephone calls within their local calling areas. Custom calling
and other features include caller name and number
identification, call forwarding, call waiting and voicemail. For
custom calling features, our Texas Telephone Operations usually
charge a flat monthly fee, which varies depending on the type of
service. In addition, our Texas Telephone Operations offer local
private lines providing direct connections between two or more
local locations primarily to business customers at flat monthly
rates.
Network access services allow the origination or
termination of calls in our Texas service areas for which our
Texas Telephone Operations charge long distance or other
carriers network access charges. The network access fees also
apply to private lines provisioned between a customer in one of
our Texas service areas and a location outside of such service
area. For long distance calls, our Texas Telephone Operations
bill the long distance or other carrier on a per minute or per
minute per mile usage basis. For private lines, our Texas
Telephone Operations bill the long distance or other carrier at
a flat monthly rate. Included in this category are subscriber
line charges paid by the end user.
Our Texas Telephone Operations record the details of the long
distance and private line calls through its carrier access
billing system and bills the applicable carrier on a monthly
basis. The network access charge rates for intrastate long
distance calls and private lines within Texas are regulated and
approved by the PUCT, whereas the access charge rates for
interstate long distance calls and private lines are regulated
and approved by the FCC.
Subsidies consist of federal and state subsidies designed
to promote widely available, quality telephone service at
affordable prices in rural areas. The federal and state
subsidies are allocated and distributed to our Texas Telephone
Operations from funds to which telecommunications providers,
including local, long distance and wireless carriers, must
contribute on a monthly basis. Funds are distributed to our
Texas Telephone Operations on a monthly basis based upon our
costs for providing local service.
Long distance services include services provided to Texas
subscribers to our long distance plans to originate calls that
terminate outside the callers local calling area. For this
service, our Texas Telephone Operations charge their subscribers
a combination of subscription and usage fees.
Data and Internet services includes revenues from
non-local private lines and the provision of access to the
Internet by DSL, T-1 lines and dial-up access. Our Texas
Telephone Operations also offer a variety of data connectivity
services, including ATM services and frame relay networks. ATM
is a high-speed switching technique used to transmit voice, data
and video. In addition, our Texas Telephone Operations
102
offer enhanced Internet services, which include domain name
services, obtaining Internet protocol addresses, e-mail services
and web site and hosting services.
Directory Publishing includes revenues from the sale of
directory advertising and the publication of yellow and white
pages directories in and around our Texas service areas.
Transport services includes revenues from the sale of
transmission services for high-capacity data circuits over a
fiber-optic transport network within Texas.
Other services includes revenues from equipment sales and
billing and collection services.
Other Operations
Our Other Operations consist of the following complementary
businesses:
|
|
|
|
|
Public Services provides local and long distance service
and automated collect calling from county jails and state
prisons in Illinois under multi-year contracts as described
under Customers and Markets. These
services include fraud control, customer service, call
management and technical field support. The range of customized
applications include institution-specific branding, call time
and dollar limits, 3-way call detection, Personal Identification
Number System, call blocking and screening, public defender
access, call restriction application, on-site training, fully
automated collect calls, touch tone and rotary dial acceptable,
inmate tested equipment and monitors and recorders. Public
Services also provides payphone services to approximately 356
payphones in our Illinois service area. |
|
|
|
Operator Services offers both live and automated local
and long distance operator assistance in Texas and national
directory assistance on a wholesale and retail basis to
incumbent telephone companies, competitive telephone companies,
long distance companies and payphone providers. Operator
Services also provides specialized message center services and
corporate and governmental attendant services and private
corporate directory assistance and messaging services to
corporations and government agencies. |
|
|
|
Market Response provides telemarketing and order
fulfillment services to customers nationwide. Our order
fulfillment services provide our clients with the ability to
quickly and cost-effectively meet their customers requests
for shipment of information and products. Typically, these
customers are responding to a direct-response advertising
campaign by the Internet, mail or telephone. |
|
|
|
Business Systems sells, installs and maintains
telecommunications equipment and wiring to residential and
business customers in our Illinois service area and in nearby,
larger markets including Champaign, Decatur and Springfield,
Illinois. This operation allows us to cross-sell our services to
many of our business customers in Illinois, such as colleges,
hospitals and secondary schools. |
|
|
|
Mobile Services provides one-way messaging service to
residential and business customers. The basic paging capability
has been supplemented with other complimentary mobile
information services, including Internet, 800 service, info-text
and voicemail. |
In 2004, our Other Operations generated $39.2 million of
revenues and $2.8 million of cash flows from operating
activities. For the three months ended March 31, 2005, our
Other Operations generated $8.8 million of revenues and
$0.4 million of cash flows from operating activities. As of
March 31, 2005, our Other Operations had total assets of
$45.2 million.
Customers and Markets
Our Illinois local telephone markets consist of
35 geographically contiguous exchanges serving
predominantly small towns and rural areas in an approximately
2,681 square mile area in central Illinois. An exchange is
a geographic area established for administration and pricing of
telecommunications
103
services. Our Illinois Telephone Operations is the incumbent
provider of basic telephone services within these exchanges,
with approximately 86,624 local access lines, or
approximately 32 lines per square mile, as of
March 31, 2005. Approximately 64% of our local access lines
serve residential customers and the remainder serve business
customers. Our business customers, 75% of which have one to
three lines, are predominantly in the light manufacturing and
services industries or are universities and hospitals. AT&T
and McLeodUSA accounted for approximately 12.1% and 10.2%, of
the revenues of our Illinois Telephone Operations in 2004 and
for the three months ended March 31, 2005, respectively.
The local telephone markets served by our Illinois Telephone
Operations include all or a substantial percentage of five
counties: Coles; Christian; Montgomery; Effingham; and Shelby.
According to the U.S. Census 2000, the population in these
counties has grown slightly in the last ten years, which is
consistent with our belief that these markets are mature and
stable.
We list below selected data from the U.S. Census 2000,
together with our number of local access lines in Illinois as of
March 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coles | |
|
Christian | |
|
Montgomery | |
|
Effingham | |
|
Shelby | |
|
Other | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2000 Census Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County Population (2000)
|
|
|
53,196 |
|
|
|
35,372 |
|
|
|
30,652 |
|
|
|
34,264 |
|
|
|
22,893 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
176,377 |
|
|
County Population CAGR 1990-2000
|
|
|
0.30 |
% |
|
|
0.27 |
% |
|
|
(0.03) |
% |
|
|
0.78 |
% |
|
|
0.28 |
% |
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
County Median Household Income
|
|
$ |
32,286 |
|
|
$ |
36,561 |
|
|
$ |
33,123 |
|
|
$ |
39,379 |
|
|
$ |
37,313 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Market Territory (sq. miles)
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
2,681 |
|
Local Access Lines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residence
|
|
|
19,095 |
|
|
|
12,276 |
|
|
|
9,564 |
|
|
|
4,369 |
|
|
|
6,002 |
|
|
|
4,101 |
|
|
|
55,407 |
|
|
Business
|
|
|
12,859 |
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
4,239 |
|
|
|
5,568 |
|
|
|
1,958 |
|
|
|
1,923 |
|
|
|
31,217 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
31,954 |
|
|
|
16,946 |
|
|
|
13,803 |
|
|
|
9,937 |
|
|
|
7,960 |
|
|
|
6,024 |
|
|
|
86,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Exchanges
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Each of the counties in which our Illinois Telephone Operations
operate consists of predominantly small towns and agricultural
areas with a mix of small businesses. Our two largest exchanges
in Illinois are Mattoon and Charleston, which are in Coles
County. Effingham Countys largest town is Effingham, which
is our Illinois Telephone Operations third largest
exchange, tied for seventh place in Site Selection
Magazines March 2003 ranking of the best U.S. small
town for corporate facilities.
Our Illinois Telephone Operations largest network access
customers include AT&T, McLeodUSA and MCI, collectively
representing 13.5% and 13.0% of our Illinois Telephone
Operations revenues for 2004 and the three months ended
March 31, 2005, respectively.
Our 21 exchanges in Texas serve three principal geographic
markets, Conroe, Lufkin and Katy, Texas in an approximately
2,054 square mile area. Lufkin is located in east Texas and
Katy and Conroe are located in the suburbs of Houston and
adjacent rural areas. Our Texas Telephone Operations is the
incumbent provider of basic telephone services within these
exchanges, with approximately 166,447 local access lines, or
approximately 81 lines per square mile, as of
March 31, 2005. As of March 31, 2005, approximately
68% of our Texas local access lines served residential customers
and the remainder served business customers. Our Texas business
customers, approximately 75% of which have one to three lines,
are predominately in the manufacturing and retail industries,
and our largest business customers are hospitals, local
governments and school districts.
104
The local telephone markets served by our Texas Telephone
Operations include all or parts of three counties: Angelina,
Fort Bend and Montgomery. The population growth within
Fort Bend and Montgomery has outpaced both the Texas and
U.S. national averages. According to data from the
U.S. Census 2000, the population of these counties grew by
3.6% annually between 1990 and 2000. This compares to a growth
rate of 1.9% for Texas and 1.2% for the United States during the
same period. In addition, according to the most recent census,
the weighted average median household income in our three Texas
markets was $55,298, which was higher than the average for
Texas, which was $39,927, and for the United States, which was
$42,148.
We list below selected data from the U.S. Census 2000,
together with our number of local access lines in Texas as of
March 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conroe Market | |
|
Lufkin Market | |
|
Katy Market | |
|
|
|
|
(Montgomery | |
|
(Angelina | |
|
(Fort Bend | |
|
|
|
|
County) | |
|
County) | |
|
County) | |
|
Totals | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2000 Census Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
County Population (2000)
|
|
|
293,768 |
|
|
|
80,130 |
|
|
|
354,452 |
|
|
|
728,350 |
|
|
County Population CAGR 1990-2000
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
County Median Household Income
|
|
$ |
50,864 |
|
|
$ |
33,806 |
|
|
$ |
63,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
Market Territory (sq. miles)
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
1,080 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
2,054 |
|
Local Access Lines
Residential
|
|
|
49,868 |
|
|
|
30,552 |
|
|
|
32,190 |
|
|
|
112,610 |
|
|
Business
|
|
|
23,400 |
|
|
|
16,966 |
|
|
|
13,471 |
|
|
|
53,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
73,268 |
|
|
|
47,518 |
|
|
|
45,661 |
|
|
|
166,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Exchanges
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
The Conroe market is located primarily in Montgomery County and
is centered approximately 40 miles north of Houston on
Interstate I-45. Parts of the Conroe operating territory
extend south to within 28 miles of downtown Houston,
including parts of the affluent suburb of The Woodlands. Major
industries in this market include education, health care,
manufacturing, retail and social services.
The Lufkin market is centered primarily in Angelina County in
east Texas approximately 120 miles northeast of Houston and
extends into three neighboring counties. Lufkin is the largest
town within this market, which also includes the towns of
Diboll, Hudson and Huntington. The area is a center for the
lumber industry. Other significant industries include education,
health care, manufacturing, retail and social services.
The Katy market is located in parts of Fort Bend, Harris,
Waller and Brazoria counties and is centered approximately
30 miles west of downtown Houston along the busy and
expanding I-10 corridor. The majority of the Katy market is
considered part of metropolitan Houston with major industries
including administrative, education, health care, management,
professional, retail, scientific and waste management services.
Some of our largest network access customers in Texas include
AT&T, MCI and Sprint.
Directory Publishing sells advertising and publishes
yellow and white pages directories in our Texas service areas
and neighboring communities, with approximately 75% of yellow
and white pages revenues as of March 31, 2005 derived from
customers within our Texas service areas. Directory Publishing
customers are primarily small- to medium-sized local businesses
and companies in surrounding service areas and large national
accounts that advertise nationally in local yellow and white
pages directories.
Transport Services provides connectivity in and between
major markets in Texas, including Austin, Corpus Christi,
Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio and many
second- and third-tier markets in-between these centers. Major
third party customers in Texas include some of the largest
national wireless and long distance carriers, such as Cingular
Wireless and AT&T.
105
Public Services has provided service to inmates in
Illinois state correctional facilities since 1990 and is
currently providing service to 56 state and county
correctional institutions. In 2004 and for the three months
ended March 31, 2005, approximately 92.8% and 92.7%,
respectively, of Public Services revenues, which was
approximately 42.8% and 50.4%, respectively, of our Other
Operations revenues over the same periods, was derived
from a contract with the Department of Corrections of the State
of Illinois. Under the contract, the State of Illinois does not
pay Public Services directly, but rather, Public Services bills
and collects revenue from the called parties and rebates
commissions to the State of Illinois based on this revenue. In
2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005, the
actual commissions recognized by Public Services to the State of
Illinois under this contract were approximately
$9.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively. The
initial term of the contract expires on June 2007, with five
additional one-year extensions available at the State of
Illinois option. Public Services currently serves all 46
Illinois state correctional facilities pursuant to this contract.
Operator Services offers service to callers nationwide.
McLeodUSA represented 48.1% and 43.1%, respectively, of Operator
Services revenues for 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, which was 9.7% and 8.5%, respectively, of
our Other Operations revenues over the same periods.
Market Response provides telemarketing and order
fulfillment services to customers nationwide. The State of
Illinois represented 40.8% of Market Responses revenues,
which was 6.2% of our Other Operations revenues during
2004, and 2.9% and 0.4% was derived from McLeodUSA during 2004
and for the three months ended March 31, 2005. Revenues
derived from the State of Illinois related to a contract with
the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority pursuant to which
Market Response distributed to customers and provided customer
service for transponders used for electronic toll collection on
Illinois toll-roads. In May 2004, the State of Illinois
informed us that it had awarded the renewal of this contract to
another provider. Market Response ended its provision of service
to the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority in September 2004.
While the recent non-renewal of the contract with the Illinois
State Toll Highway Authority will have a material impact on the
revenues generated by our Market Response business in the
near-term, we do not expect the loss of this contract to have a
material adverse impact on our results of operations as a whole.
Business Systems sells, installs and maintains
telecommunications equipment and wiring primarily in our
Illinois service area and nearby cities. Revenues are derived
from equipment sales and maintenance contracts. Most of Business
Systems equipment sales are telephone systems and
associated wiring to small business customers.
Mobile Services provides paging services as a convenience
to some of our Illinois Telephone Operations emergency
medical and government customers in and around our Illinois
service area.
In 2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2005,
49.6% and 51.1%, respectively, of the revenues of our Other
Operations were derived from our relationships with various
agencies of the State of Illinois, principally the Department of
Corrections. Overall, during 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005, 6.1% and 5.7%, respectively, of our
revenues were derived from our various relationships with the
State of Illinois. In addition, Public Services receives
revenues from various counties in Illinois. Our
predecessors relationship with the Department of
Corrections and the Toll Highway Authority have existed since
1990 and 1997, respectively, despite changes in government
administrations. Nevertheless, obtaining contracts from
government agencies is challenging, and government contracts,
like our contracts with the State of Illinois, often include
provisions that are favorable to the government in ways that are
not standard in private commercial transactions. Specifically,
each of our contracts with the State of Illinois:
|
|
|
|
|
includes provisions that allow the respective state agency and
county to terminate the contract without cause and without
penalty under some circumstances; |
|
|
|
is subject to decisions of state agencies and counties that are
subject to political influence on renewal; |
106
|
|
|
|
|
gives the State of Illinois the right to renew the contract at
its option but does not give us the same right; and |
|
|
|
could be cancelled if state funding becomes unavailable. |
Sales and Marketing
Key components of overall sales and marketing strategy in our
Telephone Operations have included the following:
|
|
|
|
|
positioning itself as a single point of contact for
customers telecommunications needs; |
|
|
|
providing its customers with a broad array of voice and data
services and bundling services where possible; |
|
|
|
providing excellent customer service, including providing
24-hour, 7-day a week centralized customer support to coordinate
installation of new services, repair and maintenance functions; |
|
|
|
developing and delivering new services; and |
|
|
|
with respect to our Illinois Telephone Operations, leveraging
the history of CCI Illinois and its involvement with its local
communities and expanding Consolidated
Communications and Consolidated brand
recognition, subject to regulatory and strategic business
considerations and, with respect to our Texas Telephone
Operations, leveraging the history of CCI Texas and its
involvement with its local communities. |
We have combined the management teams for sales and marketing
for our Illinois and Texas Telephone Operations into a single
centralized organization. Our combined strategy is focused on:
|
|
|
|
|
accelerating DSL service penetration in all of our service areas; |
|
|
|
cross-selling our services; |
|
|
|
developing additional services to maximize revenues and increase
revenues per customer; |
|
|
|
increasing customer loyalty through superior customer service,
local presence and motivated service employees; and |
|
|
|
leveraging the telemarketing, order fulfillment and
directory-assistance capabilities to provide functions that are
currently being outsourced by our Texas Telephone Operations, a
process that has already begun with the migration of Texas
directory assistance traffic to the system in Illinois in May
2004. |
Our Illinois Telephone Operations currently have two main sales
channels: customer service centers and commissioned sales
people. Our Illinois customer service centers are the primary
sales channels for residential and business customers with one
or two phone lines, whereas commissioned sales representatives
provide customized proposals to larger business customers. In
addition, our customers can also visit customer retail centers
for various communications needs, including new telephone,
Internet and paging service purchases. We believe that customer
service centers have helped decrease our customers late
payments and bad debt due to their ability to pay their bills
easily at these centers. Our Illinois Telephone Operations
sales efforts are supported by direct mail, bill inserts,
newspaper advertising, public relations activities, sponsorship
of community events and website promotions.
Our Texas Telephone Operations currently have two main sales
channels: customer service centers and commissioned sales
people. Our Texas customer service centers are the primary sales
channels for residential customers and business customers with
one or two phone lines, whereas commissioned sales people
provide customized proposals to larger businesses. In addition,
field service technicians in Texas are trained in customer
service and are provided with incentives to cross-sell
additional services to customers.
107
Our sales efforts in Texas are supported by local print and
electronic media advertising, and also by bill inserts, door
hangers, special promotional activities and sponsorship of
community events.
Directory Publishing in Texas is supported by a dedicated sales
force, which spends a certain number of months each year focused
on each of the directory markets in order to maximize the
advertising sales in each directory. We believe the directory
business has been an efficient tool for marketing our other
services in Texas and for promoting brand development and
awareness.
Transport Services has a sales force that consists of
commissioned sales people specializing in wholesale transport
products.
Each of our Other Operations businesses primarily use an
independent sales and marketing team comprised of dedicated
field sales account managers, management teams and service
representatives to execute our sales and marketing strategy.
These efforts are supported by attendance at industry trade
shows and leadership in industry groups including the United
States Telecom Association, the Associated Communications
Companies of America and the Independent Telephone and
Telecommunications Alliance.
Information Technology and Support Systems
Our information technology and support systems staff is a
seasoned organization that supports day-to-day operations and
develops system enhancements. The technology supporting our
Telephone Operations is centered on a core of commercially
available and internally maintained systems.
We have developed detailed plans to migrate key business
processes of our Illinois and Texas Telephone Operations onto
single, company-wide systems and platforms. Our objective is to
improve profitability by reducing individual company costs
through the sharing of best practices, centralization or
standardization of functions and processes and the use of
technologies and systems that provide for greater efficiencies.
A number of key billing, network provisioning, network
management and workforce management systems of our Illinois and
Texas Telephone Operations already use common software and
hardware platforms, and we have successfully completed
large-scale customer and billing migration projects in the last
five years in both Illinois and Texas. We believe our core
operating systems and hardware platform will have significant
scalability.
Network Architecture and Technology
Our local network in Illinois and Texas is based on a carrier
serving area architecture. Carrier serving area architecture is
a structure that allows access equipment to be placed closer to
customer premises enabling the customer to be connected to the
equipment over shorter copper loops than would be possible if
all customers were connected directly to the carriers main
switch. The access equipment is then connected back to that
switch on a high capacity fiber circuit, resulting in extensive
fiber deployment throughout the network. The access equipment is
sometimes referred to as a digital loop carrier and the
geographic area that it serves is the carrier serving area.
We have begun the integration of the our long distance networks
in Illinois and Texas and are leveraging the combined usage of
the two networks to obtain reduced costs of transport and
termination from wholesale vendors of those services. A single
engineering team is responsible for the overall architecture and
interoperability of the various elements in the combined network
of our Illinois and Texas Telephone Operations. Currently, our
Illinois Telephone Operations have a network operations center
in Mattoon, which monitors network performance 24 hours per
day, 365 days per year. We believe this network operations
center allows our Illinois and Texas Telephone Operations to
maintain high network performance standards. Our goal is to
interconnect the Illinois and Texas network operations centers,
using common network systems and platforms where possible. We
expect this will allow us to share weekend
108
and after-hours coverage between markets and more efficiently
allocate personnel to manage fluctuations in our workload
volumes.
Our network in Illinois is supported by three advanced 100%
digital switches, with a fiber network connecting 33 of our 35
exchanges and 69 of our 103 field-deployed carriers. These
switches provide all of our Illinois local telephone customers
with access to custom calling features, value-added services and
dial-up Internet access. In addition, approximately 90% of our
Telephone Operations total local access lines in Illinois,
excluding local access lines already served by other high speed
connections, are served by exchanges or carriers equipped with
digital subscriber line access multiplexers, or DSLAMs, and are
within distance limitations for providing DSL service. DSLAMs
are devices designed to separate voice-frequency signals from
DSL traffic. Our Illinois Telephone Operations have two
additional switches, one primarily dedicated to long distance
service and the other primarily dedicated to Public Services and
Operator Services.
In late 2003, we commenced the network improvements needed to
support the introduction of an all-digital video service that is
functionally similar to a digital cable television offering in
our Illinois markets of Mattoon, Charleston and Effingham. We
have since completed the initial capital investments necessary
to provide these services and introduced digital video services
in these markets in January, 2005. Other than the provision of
success-based set-top boxes to subscribers, we do not anticipate
having to make any material capital upgrades to our network
infrastructure in connection with our introduction of digital
video services in these markets. As of March 31, 2005,
these services are available to approximately 74% of our
residential customers in these markets, which represented
approximately 25% of all of our Illinois residential customers.
Our Texas network is supported by advanced 100% digital
switches, with fiber network connecting all of our 21 exchanges
and 68% of our wire centers. These switches provide all of our
Texas local telephone customers with access to custom calling
features. In addition, as of March 31, 2005, approximately
90% of our Texas total local access lines, excluding local
access lines already served by other high speed connections,
were served by exchanges or carriers are equipped with DSLAMs
and were within distance limitations for providing DSL service.
Our Texas Telephone Operations also dedicate a separate switch
for the provision of long distance service.
Our Texas transport network consists of approximately 2,500
route-miles of fiber optic cable. Approximately 54% of this
network consists of cable sheath owned by our Texas Telephone
Operations, either directly or through our majority-owned
subsidiary East Texas Fiber Line Incorporated and a partnership
partly owned by us, Fort Bend Fibernet. For most of the
remaining route-miles of the network, we purchased strands on
third-party fiber networks pursuant to contracts commonly known
as indefeasible rights of use. In limited cases, our Texas
Telephone Operations also leases capacity on third-party fiber
networks to complete routes, in addition to these fiber routes.
Employees
As of March 31, 2005, we had a total of
1,280 employees, of which 746 employees are from CCI
Illinois (634 of which were full-time and 112 of which were
part-time) and 534 employees are from CCI Texas (529 of
which were full-time and five of which were part-time).
Of the 746 employees of CCI Illinois, 304 employees
are attributable to our Illinois rural telephone company. In
addition, at March 31, 2005, Market Response had 165
temporary employees hired through a local temporary employment
agency. In Illinois, 340 of our full-time employees and
102 of our part-time employees are represented by the
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers. The current
collective bargaining agreement expires on November 15,
2005. We believe management currently has a good relationship
with our Illinois union and non-union employees.
Approximately 223 of the employees located in Lufkin or Conroe,
are represented by a collective bargaining agreement with the
Communications Workers of America, which expired on
October 16, 2004. On November 4, 2004, CCI Texas
signed a new three-year labor agreement with its unionized
employees, which included one-time signing bonuses of $225,000
and other ongoing benefits. In the winter of 2003, a union
expansion campaign was initiated in Katy but was unsuccessful.
We are not aware of any further
109
attempts to organize employees in Texas. We believe that
management currently has a good relationship with our Texas
union and non-union employees.
Properties
Our headquarters and most of the administrative offices for our
Illinois Telephone Operations are located in Mattoon, Illinois.
The properties that our Illinois Telephone Operations lease are
pursuant to leases that expire at various times between 2004 and
2007. The following chart summarizes the principal facilities
owned or leased in Illinois as of March 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned/ | |
|
Approx. | |
Location |
|
Primary Use |
|
Leased | |
|
Sq. Ft. | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Charleston
|
|
Illinois Telephone Operations Communications Center and Market
Response Offices(1) |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
33,987 |
|
Effingham
|
|
Office and Illinois Telephone Operations Communications Center |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
Mattoon
|
|
Sales and Administration Office(1) |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
30,687 |
|
Mattoon
|
|
Corporate Headquarters(1) |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
49,054 |
|
Mattoon
|
|
Operator Services and Operations |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
36,263 |
|
Mattoon
|
|
Archive |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
9,097 |
|
Mattoon
|
|
Operations and Distribution Center(1) |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
30,883 |
|
Mattoon
|
|
Communications Center |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
5,677 |
|
Mattoon
|
|
Market Response Order Fulfillment(2) |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
Mattoon
|
|
Office |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
10,086 |
|
Taylorville
|
|
Operations and Branch Distribution Center(1) |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
14,655 |
|
Taylorville
|
|
Office and Illinois Telephone Operations Communications Center |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
15,934 |
|
Taylorville
|
|
Operator Services Call Center(2) |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
(1) |
In 2002, our Illinois Telephone Operations sold these facilities
to, and leased them back from, LATEL, LLC, or LATEL, an entity
affiliated with Mr. Lumpkin. For more information about
these arrangements, see Certain Relationships and Related
Party Transactions LATEL Sale/ Leaseback. |
|
(2) |
All properties listed above other than these two properties are
used by both Illinois Telephone Operations and Other Operations.
These two properties are used by Other Operations only. |
In addition to the facilities listed above, our Illinois
Telephone Operations own or have the right to use 181 additional
properties consisting of central offices, remote switching sites
and buildings, tower sites, small offices, storage sites and
parking lots. Some of the facilities listed above also serve as
central office locations.
Our Texas Telephone Operations expect to continue to execute its
current strategy of moving all employees into owned space, with
the exception of the offices in Irving and the long distance
switch location in Dallas, and canceling or subletting leased
office space. The properties that our Texas Telephone Operations
leases are pursuant to leases that expire at various times
between 2004 and 2015. Our Texas Telephone Operations have
recently initiated legal proceedings to terminate our office
lease in Irving, Texas. We do not believe, however, that any
liability that may result from such lease termination would have
a material adverse effect on our results of operations or
financial conditions in Texas.
110
The following chart summarizes the principal facilities owned or
leased in Texas as of March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned/ | |
|
Approx. | |
Location |
|
Primary Use |
|
Leased | |
|
Sq. Ft. | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Brookshire
|
|
Office |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
Conroe
|
|
Regional Office |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
51,875 |
|
Conroe
|
|
Warehouse & Plant |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
28,500 |
|
Conroe
|
|
Office |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
10,650 |
|
Dallas
|
|
Current Texas Headquarters Administration |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
5,997 |
|
Irving
|
|
Office |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
44,060 |
|
Katy
|
|
Regional Office |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
Katy
|
|
Office (Electric Shop) |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
Katy
|
|
Warehouse |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
13,983 |
|
Katy
|
|
Office |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
5,733 |
|
Lufkin
|
|
Regional Office |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
30,145 |
|
Lufkin
|
|
Business Office |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
23,190 |
|
Lufkin
|
|
Warehouse |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
14,240 |
|
Lufkin
|
|
Office and Data Center |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
11,920 |
|
Lufkin
|
|
Office |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
Lufkin
|
|
Office and Parking Area |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
7,925 |
|
Needville
|
|
Office |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
|
6,649 |
|
Rosenberg
|
|
Storage |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
In addition to the facilities listed above, our Texas Telephone
Operations own or have the right to use 275 additional
properties consisting of cabinet/pop sites, central offices,
remote switching sites and buildings, small offices, tower
sites, storage sites and parking lots. Some of the facilities
listed above also serve as central office locations.
Legal Proceedings
We currently and from time to time, are subject to claims
arising in the ordinary course of business. Except as described
below, we are not currently subject to any such claims that we
believe could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse
effect on our results of operation or financial condition.
In addition, on March 1, 2005, Michael Hinds filed a claim
against us and certain of our existing equity investors in the
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Galveston division, asserting various contract and tort claims
relating to an alleged oral agreement to provide Mr. Hinds
with compensation and investment opportunities in connection
with the acquisition of TXUCV. Mr. Hinds is seeking
approximately $75.0 million in compensatory damages,
punitive damages and reimbursement of his attorneys fees
and expenses. Although we believe that this suit is without
merit and intend to vigorously defend our position, we cannot
predict at this time the outcome of this matter. If adversely
determined, this lawsuit could have a material adverse effect on
our financial condition and results of operations.
Industry Overview and Competition
Local Exchange Market
The telecommunications industry is comprised of companies
involved in the transmission of voice, data and video
communications over various media and through various
technologies. There are two predominant types of local telephone
service providers, or carriers, in the telecommunications
industry: incumbent telephone companies and competitive
telephone companies. An independent telephone company refers to
the regional bell operating companies, which were the local
telephone companies created from the break up of AT&T in
1984 and incumbent telephone companies, such as Cincinnati Bell
Inc. and Sprints
111
local telephone division, which sell local telephone service.
These incumbent telephone companies were the traditional
monopoly providers of local telephone service prior to the break
up of AT&T. Within the incumbent telephone company sector,
there are rural telephone companies, such as our local telephone
operations, that operate primarily in rural areas, and regional
bell operating companies, such as SBC and Verizon
Communications. Each of our subsidiaries that operates our local
telephone businesses is classified as an incumbent telephone
company and a rural telephone company under the
Telecommunications Act. A competitive telephone company is a
competitor to local telephone companies that has been granted
permission by a state regulatory commission to offer local
telephone service in an area already served by an incumbent
telephone company.
The most common measure of the relative size of a local
telephone company, including our rural telephone companies, is
the number of access lines it operates. An access
line is the telephone line connecting a persons home
or business to the public switched telephone network. An
incumbent telephone company can acquire access lines either
through normal growth or through a transaction with another
incumbent telephone company. We believe the net increase or
decrease in access lines incurred by an incumbent telephone
company on an annual basis is a relevant measure because the
access line is the foundation for a majority of incumbent
telephone company revenues and it is also an indicator of
customer growth or contraction. An incumbent telephone company
experiences normal growth when it activates additional access
lines in a particular market due to increased demand for
telephone service by current customers or from new customers,
such as a result of the construction of new residential or
commercial buildings. Growth in access lines through
transactions with other incumbent telephone companies occurs
less frequently. Typically, one incumbent telephone company
purchases access lines as well as the associated network
infrastructure from another incumbent telephone company. Such
purchases usually provide the acquiring incumbent telephone
company the opportunity to expand the geographic areas it
serves, rather than increasing its access lines totals in
markets that it already serves.
Rural Telephone Company Cost Structure and
Competition
In general, telecommunications service in rural areas is more
costly to provide than service in urban areas because the lower
customer density necessitates higher capital expenditures on a
per customer basis. In rural areas, local access line density is
relatively low, typically less than 100 local access lines per
square mile versus urban areas that can be in excess of 300
local access lines per square mile. This low customer density in
rural areas means that switching and other facilities serve few
customers. It also means that a given length of cable,
connecting the telephone company office to end users, serves
fewer customers than it would in a more densely populated area.
As a result, the average operating and capital cost per line is
higher for rural telephone companies than non-rural operators.
An industry source estimates that the total investment cost per
loop for rural operators is $5,000, compared to $3,000 for
non-rural carriers. The amount is estimated to be as high as
$10,000 for the smallest rural carriers. The rural telephone
companies higher cost structure has two important
consequences.
The first consequence is that it is generally not commercially
viable to overbuild in rural telephone company service
territories. In urban areas, where population density is higher,
some competitive telephone companies have built redundant
wireline telephone networks within the incumbent providers
service territory. These facilities-based competitive telephone
companies compete with the incumbent providers on their own
stand-alone networks. Because it is comparatively more expensive
to build a redundant network in rural areas, overbuilding is
less common in rural telephone company service territories.
The second consequence associated with the rural telephone
companies higher cost structure is the existence of
federal and state subsidies designed to promote widely
available, quality telephone service at affordable prices in
rural areas. This is accomplished through two principal
mechanisms. The first mechanism is through network access fees
that regulators historically have allowed to be set at higher
rates in rural areas than the actual cost of originating or
terminating interstate and intrastate calls. The second
mechanism is through explicit transfers to rural telephone
companies via the universal service fund and state funds such as
the Texas universal service fund.
112
Furthermore, rural telephone companies face less regulatory
oversight than the larger carriers and are exempt from the more
burdensome interconnection requirements of the
Telecommunications Act such as unbundling of network elements,
information sharing and co-location.
Despite the barriers to entry for voice services described
above, rural telephone companies face some competition for voice
services from new market entrants, such as cable providers,
competitive telephone companies and electric utility companies.
Cable providers are entering the telecommunications market by
upgrading their networks with fiber optics and installing
facilities to provide fully interactive transmission of
broadband voice, data and video communications. Electric utility
companies have existing assets and low cost access to capital
that may allow them to enter a market rapidly and accelerate
network development. Increased competition could lead to price
reductions, reduced operating margins and loss of market share.
While we currently have limited competition for basic voice
services from cable providers and electric utilities, we cannot
guarantee that we will not face increased competition from such
providers in the future.
Rural telephone companies are facing increasing competition for
voice services from wireless carriers. In particular, the
FCCs new number portability rules may result in increased
competition from wireless providers. As of May 2004, the FCC
required rural telephone companies to allow consumers to move a
phone number from a wireline phone to a wireless phone.
Generally, rural telephone companies face less wireless
competition than non-rural providers of voice services because
wireless networks in rural areas are generally less developed
than in urban areas. Our Texas rural telephone companies
service areas in Conroe and Katy, Texas are exceptions to this
general rule due to their proximity to Houston and, as a result,
are facing increased competition from wireless service
providers. Although we do not believe that wireless technology
represents a significant threat to our rural telephone companies
in the near term, we expect to face increased competition from
wireless carriers as technology, wireless network capacity and
economies of scale improve, wireless service prices continue to
decline and subscribers continue to increase.
VOIP service is increasingly being embraced by all industry
participants. VOIP service essentially involves the routing of
voice calls, at least in part, over the Internet through packets
of data instead of transmitting the calls over the existing
telephone system. While current VOIP applications typically
complete calls using incumbent telephone company infrastructure
and networks, as VOIP services obtain acceptance and market
penetration and technology advances further, a greater quantity
of communication may be placed without the use of the telephone
system. On March 10, 2004, the FCC issued a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking with respect to IP-enabled Services. Among
other things, the FCC is considering whether VOIP Services are
regulated telecommunications services or unregulated information
services. We cannot predict the outcome of the FCCs
rulemaking or the impact on the revenues of our rural telephone
companies. The proliferation of VOIP, particularly to the extent
such communications do not utilize our rural telephone
companies networks, may result in an erosion of our
customer base and loss of access fees and other funding.
The Internet services market in which our company operates is
highly competitive and there are few barriers to entry. Industry
sources expect competition to intensify. Internet services,
meaning both Internet access, wired and wireless, and on-line
content services, are provided by cable providers, Internet
service providers, long distance carriers and satellite-based
companies. Many of these companies provide direct access to the
Internet and a variety of supporting services to businesses and
individuals. In addition, many of these companies offer on-line
content services consisting of access to closed, proprietary
information networks. Cable providers and long distance
carriers, among others, are aggressively entering the Internet
113
access markets. Both have substantial transmission capabilities,
traditionally carry data to large numbers of customers and have
a billing system infrastructure that permits them to add new
services. Satellite companies are also offering broadband access
to the Internet. We expect that competition for Internet
services will increase.
|
|
|
Long Distance Competition |
The long distance telecommunications market is highly
competitive. Competition in the long distance business is based
primarily on price, although service bundling, branding,
customer service, billing service and quality play a role in
customers choices.
Our other lines of business are subject to substantial
competition from local, regional and national competitors. In
particular, our directory publishing and transport businesses
operate in competitive markets. We expect that competition as a
general matter in our businesses will continue to intensify as
new technologies and new services are offered. Our businesses
operate in a competitive environment where long-term contracts
are either not the norm or have cancellation clauses that allow
quick termination of the agreements. Where long-term contracts
are common, they are being renewed with shorter duration terms.
Customers in these businesses can and do change vendors
frequently. Customer business failures and consolidation of
customers through mergers and buyouts can cause loss of
customers.
Our ability to compete successfully in our markets will depend
on several factors, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
how well we market our existing services and develop new
technologies; |
|
|
|
the quality and reliability of our network and service; and |
|
|
|
our ability to anticipate and respond to various competitive
factors affecting the telecommunications industry, including a
changing regulatory environment that may affect us differently
from our competitors, pricing strategies by competitors, changes
in consumer preferences, demographic trends and economic
conditions. |
We expect competition to intensify as a result of new
competitors and the development of new technologies, products
and services. In addition, we believe that the traditional
dividing lines between different telecommunications services
will be blurred and that mergers and strategic alliances may
allow one telecommunications provider to offer increased
services or access to wider geographic markets. Some or all of
these risks may cause us to have to spend significantly more in
capital expenditures than we currently anticipate to keep
existing and attract new customers.
Some of our voice and data competitors, such as cable providers,
Internet access providers, wireless service providers and long
distance carriers have brand recognition and financial,
personnel, marketing and other resources that are significantly
greater than ours. In addition, due to consolidation and
strategic alliances within the telecommunications industry, we
cannot predict the number of competitors that will emerge,
especially as a result of existing or new federal and state
regulatory or legislative actions. For example, the pending
acquisition of AT&T, one of our largest customers, by SBC,
the dominant local exchange company in the areas in which our
Texas rural telephone companies operate, could increase
competitive pressures for our services and impact our long
distance and access revenues. Such increased competition from
existing and new entities could lead to price reductions, loss
of customers, reduced operating margins or loss of market share.
114
Market and Industry Data
Market and industry data and other information used throughout
this prospectus are based on independent industry publications,
government publications, publicly available information, reports
by market research firms or other published independent sources.
Some data is also based on estimates of our management, which
are derived from their review of internal surveys and industry
knowledge. Although we believe these sources are reliable, we
have not independently verified the information. In addition, we
note that our market share in each of our markets or for our
services is not known or reasonably obtainable given the nature
of our businesses and the telecommunications market in general
(for example, wireless providers both compete with and
complement local telephone services).
115
REGULATION
The following summary does not describe all present and
proposed federal, state and local legislation and regulations
affecting the telecommunications industry. Some legislation and
regulations are currently the subject of judicial proceedings,
legislative hearings and administrative proposals that could
change the manner in which this industry operates. Neither the
outcome of any of these developments, nor their potential impact
on us, can be predicted at this time. Regulation can change
rapidly in the telecommunications industry, and these changes
may have an adverse effect on us in the future. See Risk
Factors Regulatory Risks.
Overview
The telecommunications industry in which we operate is subject
to extensive federal, state and local regulation. Pursuant to
the Telecommunications Act, federal and state regulators share
responsibility for implementing and enforcing statutes and
regulations designed to encourage competition and the
preservation and advancement of widely available, quality
telephone service at affordable prices. At the federal level,
the FCC generally exercises jurisdiction over facilities and
services of local exchange carriers, such as our rural telephone
companies, to the extent they are used to provide, originate or
terminate interstate or international communications. State
regulatory commissions, such as the ICC in Illinois and the PUCT
in Texas, generally exercise jurisdiction over these facilities
and services to the extent they are used to provide, originate
or terminate intrastate communications. In particular, state
regulatory agencies have substantial oversight over
interconnection and network access by competitors of our rural
telephone companies. In addition, municipalities and other local
government agencies regulate the public rights-of-way necessary
to install and operate networks.
The FCC has the authority to condition, modify, cancel,
terminate or revoke our operating authority for failure to
comply with applicable federal laws or rules, regulations and
policies of the FCC. Fines or other penalties also may be
imposed for any of these violations. In addition, the states
have the authority to sanction our rural telephone companies or
to revoke our certifications if we violate relevant laws or
regulations.
Federal Regulation
Our rural telephone companies must comply with the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, or the Communications
Act, which requires, among other things, that telecommunications
carriers offer services at just and reasonable rates and on
non-discriminatory terms and conditions. The amendments to the
Communications Act enacted in 1996 and contained in the
Telecommunications Act dramatically changed, and are expected to
continue to change, the landscape of the telecommunications
industry.
|
|
|
Removal of Entry Barriers |
The central aim of the Telecommunications Act is to open local
telecommunications markets to competition while enhancing
universal service. Prior to the enactment of the
Telecommunications Act, many states limited the services that
could be offered by a company competing with an incumbent
telephone company. The Telecommunications Act preempts these
state and local laws.
The Telecommunications Act imposes a number of interconnection
and other requirements on all local communications providers.
All telecommunications carriers have a duty to interconnect
directly or indirectly with the facilities and equipment of
other telecommunications carriers. Local exchange carriers,
including our rural telephone companies, are required to:
|
|
|
|
|
allow others to resell their services; |
|
|
|
where feasible, provide number portability; |
|
|
|
ensure dialing parity, whereby consumers can choose their local
or long distance telephone company over which their calls will
automatically route without having to dial additional digits; |
116
|
|
|
|
|
ensure that competitors customers receive
nondiscriminatory access to telephone numbers, operator service,
directory assistance and directory listing; |
|
|
|
afford competitors access to telephone poles, ducts, conduits
and rights-of-way; and |
|
|
|
establish reciprocal compensation arrangements for the transport
and termination of telecommunications traffic. |
Furthermore, the Telecommunications Act imposes on incumbent
telephone companies, other than rural telephone companies that
maintain their so-called rural exemption, additional
obligations, by requiring them to:
|
|
|
|
|
negotiate any interconnection agreements in good faith; |
|
|
|
interconnect their facilities and equipment with any requesting
telecommunications carrier, at any technically feasible point,
at nondiscriminatory rates and on nondiscriminatory terms and
conditions; |
|
|
|
provide nondiscriminatory access to unbundled network elements,
commonly known as UNEs, such as local loops and transport
facilities, at any technically feasible point, at
nondiscriminatory rates and on nondiscriminatory terms and
conditions; |
|
|
|
offer their retail services for resale at discounted wholesale
rates; |
|
|
|
provide reasonable notice of changes in the information
necessary for transmission and routing of services over the
incumbent telephone companys facilities or in the
information necessary for interoperability; and |
|
|
|
provide, at rates, terms and conditions that are just,
reasonable and nondiscriminatory, for the physical co-location
of equipment necessary for interconnection or access to UNEs at
the premises of the incumbent telephone company. |
The unbundling requirements, while not applicable to our rural
telephone companies as long as they maintain their rural
exemption, have been some of the most controversial requirements
of the Telecommunications Act. The FCC has generally required
incumbent telephone companies to lease a wide range of unbundled
network elements to competitive telephone companies to enable
delivery of services to the competitors customers, either
in combination with the competitive telephone companys
network or as a recombined service offering on an UNEP. These
unbundling requirements, and the duty to offer UNEs to
competitors, imposed substantial costs on, and resulted in
customer attrition for, the incumbent telephone companies that
had to comply with these requirements. A decision by the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated several
components of the latest FCC ruling concerning incumbent
telephone companies obligations to offer UNEs and UNEPs to
competitors, effective June 30, 2004. In response to this
court ruling the FCC issued revised rules on February 4,
2005 that reinstated some unbundling requirements for incumbent
telephone companies that are not protected by the rural
exemption but eliminated certain other unbundling requirements.
Those new rules are subject to further court proceedings.
Each of the subsidiaries through which we operate our local
telephone businesses is an incumbent telephone company, but is
also classified as a rural telephone company under the
Telecommunications Act. The Telecommunications Act exempts rural
telephone companies from certain of the more burdensome
interconnection requirements such as unbundling of network
elements, information sharing and co-location.
As to each of our rural telephone companies, the ICC or PUCT can
remove the applicable rural exemption if the rural telephone
company receives a bona fide request for full interconnection
and the state commission determines that the request is
technically feasible, not unduly economically burdensome and
consistent with universal service requirements. Neither the ICC
nor the PUCT has yet terminated, or proposed to terminate, the
rural exemption for any of our rural telephone companies.
However, our Illinois rural telephone company has received a
request that we provide interconnection services that are not
117
required of an incumbent telephone company holding a rural
exemption, which could result in a request to the ICC to
terminate our Illinois rural telephone companies exemption. If
the ICC or PUCT rescinds the applicable rural exemption in
whole, or in part, for any of our rural telephone companies or
if the applicable state commission does not allow us adequate
compensation for the costs of providing the interconnection or
UNEs, our administrative and regulatory costs could
significantly increase and we could suffer a significant loss of
customers to existing or new competitors.
A significant portion of our rural telephone companies
revenues come from network access charges paid by long distance
and other carriers for originating or terminating calls within
our rural telephone companies service areas. The amount of
network access charge revenues our rural telephone companies
receive is based on rates set by federal and state regulatory
commissions, and these rates are subject to change at any time.
The FCC regulates the prices our rural telephone companies may
charge for the use of our local telephone facilities in
originating or terminating interstate and international
transmissions. The FCC has structured these prices as a
combination of flat monthly charges paid by the end-users and
usage sensitive charges or flat monthly rate charges paid by
long distance or other carriers. Intrastate network access
charges are regulated by state commissions, which in our case
are the ICC and the PUCT. Our Illinois rural telephone
companys intrastate network access charges currently
mirror interstate network access charges for all but one
element, local switching. In contrast, in accordance with the
regulatory regime in Texas, our Texas rural telephone companies
may charge significantly higher intrastate network access
charges than interstate network access charges.
The FCC regulates levels of interstate network access charges by
imposing either price caps or rate of return regulation. Price
caps are mandatory for the RBOCs and elective for all other
incumbent telephone companies. Price caps, introduced in 1992,
are adjusted based on various formulae, such as inflation and
productivity, and otherwise through regulatory proceedings. In
2000, the FCC approved the CALLS plan, which eliminated annual
rate reductions once an average rate was met. Small incumbent
telephone companies may elect to base network access charges on
price caps or CALLS, but are not required to do so. Our Illinois
rural telephone company and Texas rural telephone companies
elected not to apply federal price caps or CALLS. Instead, our
rural telephone companies employ rate-of-return regulation for
their network interstate access charges, whereby they earn a
fixed return on their investment over and above operating costs.
The FCC determines the profits our rural telephone companies can
earn by setting the rate-of-return on their allowable investment
base, which is currently 11.25%.
Traditionally, regulators have allowed network access rates to
be set higher in rural areas than the actual cost of terminating
or originating long distance calls as an implicit means of
subsidizing the high cost of providing local service in rural
areas. Following a series of federal circuit court decisions in
2001 ruling that subsidies must be explicit rather than
implicit, the FCC began to consider various reforms to the
existing rate structure for interstate network access rates as
proposed by the Multi Association Group, and the Rural Task
Force, each of which is a consortium of various
telecommunications industry groups. We believe that the states
will likely mirror any FCC reforms in establishing intrastate
network access charges.
In 2001, the FCC adopted an order implementing the beginning
phases of the plan of the Multi Association Group to reform the
network access charge system for rural carriers. The FCC reforms
reduced network access charges and shifted a portion of cost
recovery, which historically was based on minutes of use and was
imposed on long distance carriers, to flat-rate, monthly
subscriber line charges imposed on end-user customers. While the
FCC has simultaneously increased explicit subsidies through the
universal service fund to rural telephone companies, the
aggregate amount of interstate network access charges paid by
long distance carriers to access providers, such as our rural
telephone companies, has decreased and may continue to decrease.
In addition, the FCC initiated a rulemaking proceeding to
investigate the Multi Association Groups proposed
incentive regulation plan for small incumbent telephone
companies and other means of allowing rate-of-return carriers to
increase their efficiency and competitiveness.
118
The FCCs 2001 access reform order had a negative impact on
the intrastate network access revenues of our Illinois rural
telephone company. Our Illinois rural telephone companys
intrastate network access rates mirror interstate network access
rates. Illinois, however, unlike the federal system, does not
provide an explicit subsidy in the form of a universal service
fund. Therefore, while subsidies from the federal universal
service fund offset Illinois Telephone Operations decrease
in revenues resulting from the reduction in interstate network
access rates, there was not a corresponding offset for the
decrease in revenues from the reduction in intrastate network
access rates. In Texas, because the intrastate network access
rate regime applicable to our Texas rural telephone companies
does not mirror the FCC regime, the impact of the reforms was
revenue neutral. The ICC and the PUCT are continuing to
investigate possible changes to the structure for intrastate
access charges in their respective states.
VOIP service is increasingly being embraced by many industry
participants, including AT&T, SBC and Time Warner. On
March 10, 2004, the FCC issued a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking with respect to issues relating to services and
applications of IP-enabled services. Among other things, the FCC
is considering whether VOIP services are regulated
telecommunications services or unregulated information services.
We cannot predict the outcome of the FCCs rulemaking or
the impact on the revenues of our rural telephone companies. The
proliferation of VOIP, particularly to the extent such
communications do not utilize our rural telephone
companies networks, may result in an erosion of our
customer base and loss of access fees and other funding.
In recent years, long distance carriers, such as AT&T, MCI
and Sprint, have become more aggressive in disputing interstate
access charge rates set by the FCC and the applicability of
access charges to their telecommunications traffic. We believe
that these disputes have increased in part due to advances in
technology which have rendered the identity and jurisdiction of
traffic more difficult to ascertain and which have afforded
carriers an increased opportunity to assert regulatory
distinctions and claims to lower access costs for their traffic.
For example, in October 2002, AT&T filed a petition with the
FCC challenging its current and prospective obligation to pay
access charges to local exchange carriers for the use of their
networks. In September 2003, Vonage Holdings Corporation filed a
petition with the FCC to preempt an order of the Minnesota
Public Utilities Commission which had issued an order requiring
Vonage to comply with the Minnesota Commissions order. The
FCC determined that Vonages VOIP service was such that it
was impossible to divide it into interstate and intrastate
components without negating federal rules and policies.
Accordingly, the FCC found it was an interstate service not
subject to traditional state telephone regulation. While the FCC
Order did not specifically address the issue of the application
of intrastate access charges to Vonages VOIP service, the
fact that the service was found to be solely interstate raises
that concern. Although the FCC rejected AT&Ts
petition, we cannot predict what other actions that other long
distance carriers may take before the FCC or with their local
exchange carriers, including our rural telephone companies, to
challenge the applicability of access charges. To date, no long
distance or other carrier has made a claim to us contesting the
applicability of network access charges billed by our rural
telephone companies. We cannot assure you, however, that long
distance or other carriers will not make such claims to us in
the future nor, if such a claim is made, can we predict the
magnitude of the claim. As a result of the increasing deployment
of VOIP services and other technological changes, we believe
that these types of disputes and claims will likely increase.
|
|
|
Promotion of Universal Service |
In general, telecommunications service in rural areas is more
costly to provide than service in urban areas because there is a
lower customer density and higher capital requirements compared
to urban areas. The low customer density in rural areas means
that switching and other facilities serve fewer customers and
loops are typically longer requiring greater capital expenditure
per customer to build and maintain. By supporting the high cost
of operations in our rural markets, the federal universal
service fund subsidies our rural telephone companies receive are
intended to promote widely available, quality telephone service
at affordable prices in rural areas. In 2004 and for the three
months ended March 31, 2005, CCI Illinois received
$10.6 million and $4.2 million, respectively, from the
federal universal service fund and CCI
119
Texas received an aggregate of $40.9 million and
$9.5 million, respectively, from the federal universal
service fund and the Texas universal service fund.
The administration of collections and distributions of federal
universal service fund payments is performed by the National
Exchange Carrier Association, or NECA, which was formed by the
FCC in 1983 to perform telephone industry tariff filings and
revenue distributions following the breakup of AT&T. The
board of directors of NECA is comprised of representatives from
the RBOCs, large and small incumbent telephone companies and
other industry participants. NECA also performs various other
functions including filing access charge tariffs with the FCC,
collecting and validating cost and revenues data, assisting with
compliance with FCC rules and processing FCC regulatory fees.
NECA distributes federal universal service fund subsidies only
to carriers that are designated as eligible telecommunications
carriers, or ETCs, by a state commission. Each of our rural
telephone companies has been designated as an ETC by the
applicable state commission. Under the Telecommunications Act,
however, competitors can obtain the same level of federal
universal service fund subsidies as we do, per line served, if
the ICC or PUCT, as applicable, determines that granting such
federal universal service fund subsidies to competitors would be
in the public interest and the competitors offer and advertise
certain telephone services as required by the Telecommunications
Act and the FCC. One such application for ETC designation by a
potential competitor in Illinois was recently dismissed by the
ICC due to the applicants lack of appropriate ICC
certifications and at least two other such applications are
presently pending before the ICC. We are not aware of any having
been filed in our Texas service areas. Under current rules, the
subsidies received by our rural telephone companies are not
affected by any such payments to competitors.
With some limitations, incumbent telephone companies receive
federal universal service fund subsidies pursuant to existing
mechanisms for determining the amounts of such payments on a
cost per loop basis. The FCC has adopted, with modifications,
the proposed framework of the Rural Task Force for rural,
high-cost universal service fund subsidies. The FCC order
modifies the existing universal service fund mechanism for rural
telephone companies and adopts an interim embedded, or
historical, cost mechanism for a five-year period that provides
predictable levels of support to rural carriers. The FCC intends
to develop a long-term plan based on forward-looking costs when
the five-year period expires in 2006.
During the last two years, the FCC has made modifications to the
universal service support system that changed the sources of
support and the method for determining the level of support.
These changes, which, among other things, removed the implicit
support from network access charges and made it explicit
support, have been, generally, revenue neutral to our rural
telephone companies operations. It is unclear whether the
changes in methodology will continue to accurately reflect the
costs incurred by our rural telephone companies and whether it
will provide for the same amount of universal service support
that our rural telephone companies have received in the past. In
addition, several parties have raised objections to the size of
the federal universal service fund and the types of services
eligible for support. A number of issues regarding the source
and amount of contributions to, and eligibility for payments
from, the federal universal service fund need to be resolved in
the near future. The FCC recently has adopted new rules making
it more difficult for competitors to qualify for federal
universal service subsidies.
In December 2004, Congress suspended the application of a law
called the Urgent Deficiency Act to the FCCs universal
service fund until December 31, 2005. The Urgent Deficiency
Act prohibits government agencies from making financial
commitments in excess of their funds on hand. Currently, the
universal service fund administrator makes commitments to fund
recipients in advance of collecting the contributions from
carriers that will pay for these commitments. The FCC has not
determined whether the Urgent Deficiency Act would apply to
payments to our rural telephone companies. Congress is now
considering whether to extend the current temporary legislation
that exempts the universal service fund from the Urgent
Deficiency Act. If it does not grant this extension, however,
the universal service subsidy payments to our rural telephone
companies may be delayed or reduced in the future.
We cannot predict the outcome of any FCC rulemaking or similar
proceedings. The outcome of any of these proceedings or other
legislative or regulatory changes could affect the amount of
universal service support received by our rural telephone
companies.
120
|
|
|
Rural Telephone Company Services Regulation |
The FCC treats our rural telephone companies DSL services
as interstate network access services, and therefore regulates
the rates, terms and conditions for these services. This
regulation requires us to give advance notice of proposed rate
changes and new service offerings, and allows the FCC to suspend
and investigate proposed changes, thereby limiting our
flexibility to respond to offerings by providers of competing
services such as cable broadband. The FCC is currently
considering two proposals that may increase our competitive
flexibility. Under one proposal, DSL services would be
classified as information services, not telecommunications, and
thereby would become exempt from all FCC price regulation. Under
the second proposal, DSL would continue to be regulated as a
telecommunications service, but the FCC would forbear from
enforcing some or all of its regulatory requirements on this
service. We cannot predict when, or if, the FCC will act, or
whether it will eventually adopt either of these proposals.
The FCC requires incumbent telephone companies providing
interstate long distance services originating from their local
exchange service territories to operate in accordance with
separate affiliate rules. These rules require that
our subsidiaries providing long distance service do the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
maintain separate books of account; |
|
|
|
not own transmission or switching facilities jointly with our
rural telephone companies; and |
|
|
|
acquire any services from our rural telephone companies at
tariffed rates, term and conditions. |
The FCC has initiated a rulemaking proceeding to examine whether
there is a continuing need for these requirements. We cannot
predict, however, the outcome of that proceeding.
In addition, generally, the FCC must approve in advance most
transfers of control, and assignments of operating
authorizations by, FCC-regulated entities. Therefore, if, in the
future, we seek to acquire a company holding an FCC
authorization, in most instances we will be required to seek
approval from the FCC prior to completing the acquisition.
Similarly, we would need to obtain FCC approval to dispose of
our rural telephone company properties, or for our existing
equity investors to transfer control of our rural telephone
companies to third parties.
States may also require prior approvals or notifications for
certain acquisitions and transfers or dispositions of assets,
customers, or ownership of regulated entities, issuance of debt
and equity, and in certain instances, transactions between an
incumbent telephone company and its affiliates.
State Regulation of CCI Illinois
Illinois requires providers of telecommunications services to
obtain authority from the ICC prior to offering common carrier
services. Our Illinois rural telephone company is certified to
provide local telephone services. In addition, Illinois
Telephone Operations long distance, operator services and
payphone services subsidiaries hold the necessary certifications
in Illinois and the other states in which they operate. In
Illinois, our long distance, operator services and payphone
services subsidiaries are required to file tariffs with the ICC
but generally can change the prices, terms and conditions stated
in their tariffs on one days notice, with prior notice of
price increases to affected customers. Our Illinois Telephone
Operations other services are not subject to any significant
state regulations in Illinois. Our Other Operations are not
subject to any significant state regulation outside of any
specific contractually imposed obligations.
Our Illinois rural telephone company operates as a distinct
company from an Illinois regulatory standpoint and is regulated
under a rate of return system for intrastate revenues. Although
the FCC has preempted certain state regulations pursuant to the
Telecommunications Act, as explained above, the ICC retains the
authority to impose requirements on our Illinois rural telephone
company to preserve universal service, protect public safety and
welfare, ensure quality of service and protect consumers. Our
Illinois rural telephone company must file tariffs setting forth
the terms, conditions and prices for its intrastate services and
these tariffs may be challenged by third parties. Our Illinois
rural telephone company has not had a general rate proceeding
before the ICC since 1983, at which time the ICC set our
intrastate rates based on a rate of return on common equity of
15.0%. The ICC also reviewed our Illinois rural telephone
121
companys intrastate rates in a proceeding in 1989 at which
time the ICC Staff indicated that a reasonable rate of return on
common equity would be 13.3% and the ICC did not find a need to
revise the intrastate rates.
The ICC has broad authority to impose service quality and
service offering requirements on our Illinois rural telephone
company, including credit and collection policies and practices,
and to require our Illinois rural telephone company to take
other actions in order to insure that it meets its statutory
obligation to provide reliable local exchange service. In
particular, we were required to obtain the approval of the ICC
to effect the reorganization. As part of the ICCs review
of the reorganization, the ICC imposed various conditions as a
part of its approval of the reorganization, including
(1) prohibitions on payment of dividends or other cash
transfers from ICTC to us for a reporting year if the ICTC fails
to meet or exceed agreed benchmarks for a majority of seven
service quality metrics for the prior reporting year and
(2) the requirement that our Illinois rural telephone
company have access to the higher of $5.0 million or its
currently approved capital expenditure budget for each calendar
year through a combination of available cash and amounts
available under credit facilities. For the first year following
the offering, we expect to satisfy each of the applicable
Illinois regulatory requirements necessary to permit ICTC to pay
dividends to us.
Any requirements or restrictions of this type could limit the
amount of cash that is available to be transferred from our
Illinois rural telephone company to CCI Holdings and could
adversely impact our ability to meet our debt service
requirements and repayment obligations and to pay dividends on
our common stock.
The Illinois General Assembly has made major revisions and added
significant new provisions to the portions of the Illinois
Public Utilities Act governing the regulation and obligations of
telecommunications carriers on at least three occasions since
1985. However, the Illinois General Assembly concluded its
session in May 2005 and made no changes to the current state
telecommunications law except to extend the sunset date from
July 1, 2005 to July 1, 2007. The governor is expected
to sign this extension into law prior to July 1, 2005.
|
|
|
Local Government Authorizations |
In Illinois, we historically have been required to obtain
franchises from each incorporated municipality in which our
Illinois rural telephone company operates. Effective
January 1, 2003, an Illinois state statute prescribes the
fees that a municipality may impose on our Illinois rural
telephone company for the privilege of originating and
terminating messages and placing facilities within the
municipality. Illinois Telephone Operations may also be required
to obtain from municipal authorities permits for street opening
and construction, or operating franchises to install and expand
fiber optic facilities in specified rural areas and from county
authorities in unincorporated areas. These permits or other
licenses or agreements typically require the payment of fees.
State Regulation of CCI Texas
Texas requires providers of telecommunications services to
obtain authority from the PUCT prior to offering common carrier
services. Our Texas rural telephone companies are each certified
to provide local telephone services in their respective
territories. In addition, CCI Texas long distance and
transport subsidiaries are registered with the PUCT as
interexchange carriers. The transport subsidiary also has
obtained from the PUCT a service provider certificate of
operating authority to better assist the transport subsidiary
with its operations in municipal areas. While our Texas rural
telephone company services are extensively regulated by the
PUCT, CCI Texas other services, such as long distance and
transport services, are not subject to any significant state
regulation.
Our Texas rural telephone companies operate as distinct
companies from a Texas regulatory standpoint. Each Texas rural
telephone company is separately regulated by the PUCT in order
to preserve universal service, protect public safety and
welfare, ensure quality of service and protect consumers. Each
122
Texas rural telephone company also must file and maintain
tariffs setting forth the terms, conditions and prices for its
intrastate services.
Currently, both Texas rural telephone companies have immunity
from adjustments to their rates, including their intrastate
network access rates, due to their election of incentive
regulation under the Texas Public Utilities Regulatory Act, or
PURA. In order to qualify for this incentive regulation, our
rural telephone companies agreed to fulfill certain
infrastructure requirements and, in exchange, they are not
subject to challenge by the PUCT regarding their rates, overall
revenues, return on invested capital or net income.
There are two different forms of incentive regulation designated
by PURA: Chapter 58 and Chapter 59. Generally under
either election, the rates, including network access rates, an
incumbent telephone company may charge in connection with basic
local services cannot be increased from the amount(s) on the
date of election without PUCT approval. Even with PUCT approval,
increases can only occur in very specific situations. Pricing
flexibility under Chapter 59 is extremely limited. In
contrast, Chapter 58 allows greater pricing flexibility on
non-basic network services, customer specific contracts and new
services.
Initially, both Texas rural telephone companies elected
incentive regulation under Chapter 59 and fulfilled the
applicable infrastructure requirements to maintain their
election status. Consolidated Communications of Texas Company
made its election on August 17, 1997. Consolidated
Communications of Fort Bend Company made its election on
May 12, 2000. On March 25, 2003, both Texas rural
telephone companies changed their election status from
Chapter 59 to Chapter 58. The rate freezes for basic
services with respect to the current Chapter 58 elections
are due to expire on March 24, 2007.
In connection with the 2003 election by each of our Texas rural
telephone companies to be governed under an incentive regulation
regime, our Texas rural telephone companies were obligated to
fulfill certain infrastructure requirements. While our Texas
rural telephone companies have met the current infrastructure
requirements, the PUCT could impose additional or other
restrictions of this type in the future. Any requirements or
restrictions of this type could limit the amount of cash that is
available to be transferred from our rural telephone companies
to Texas Holdings and could adversely impact our ability to meet
our debt service requirements and repayment obligations.
Telecommunications regulation in Texas may undergo extensive
changes in the future. The Texas Legislature has made major
revisions to PURA on numerous occasions since its adoption in
1975. Various changes were proposed but not adopted in the most
recent legislative session and can be expected to be revisited
in future legislative sessions. We cannot predict the nature or
extent of the legislative changes that may result or the impact
these changes may have on CCI Texas, its incumbent telephone
companies or our other subsidiaries operating in Texas.
The Texas universal service fund was established within PURA and
is administered by NECA. The law directs the PUCT to adopt and
enforce rules requiring local exchange carriers to contribute to
a state universal service fund which assists telecommunications
providers in providing basic local telecommunications service at
reasonable rates in high cost rural areas. The Texas universal
service fund is also used to reimburse telecommunications
providers for revenues lost by providing Tel-Assistance and to
reimburse carriers for providing lifeline service. The Texas
universal service fund is funded by a statewide charge payable
by specified telecommunications providers at rates determined by
the PUCT. Our Texas rural telephone companies qualify for
disbursements from this fund pursuant to criteria established by
the PUCT. In 2003, CCI Texas received Texas universal service
fund subsidies of $20.0 million, or 10.3% of CCI
Texas revenues.
|
|
|
Local Government Authorizations |
In Texas, incumbent telephone companies have historically been
required to obtain franchises from each incorporated
municipality in which our Texas rural telephone companies
operate. In 1999, Texas
123
enacted legislation generally eliminating the need for incumbent
telephone companies to obtain franchises or other licenses to
use municipal rights-of-way for delivering services. Payments to
municipalities for rights-of-way are administered through the
PUCT and through a reporting process by each incumbent telephone
company and other similar telecommunications provider. Incumbent
telephone companies still need to obtain permits from municipal
authorities for street opening and construction, but most
burdens of obtaining municipal authorizations for access to
rights-of-way have been streamlined or removed.
Our Texas rural telephone companies still operate pursuant to
the terms of municipal franchise agreements in some territories
served by Consolidated Communications of Fort Bend Company.
As the franchises expire, they are not being renewed.
Potential Internet Regulatory Obligations
Our Internet access offerings may become subject to newly
adopted laws and regulations. Currently, there exists only a
small body of law and regulation applicable to access to, or
commerce on, the Internet. As the significance of the Internet
expands, federal, state and local governments may adopt new
rules and regulations or apply existing laws and regulations to
the Internet. The FCC is currently reviewing the appropriate
regulatory framework governing high speed access to the Internet
through telephone and cable providers communications
networks. We cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings,
and they may affect our regulatory obligations and the form of
competition for these services.
124
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the persons who will be the
directors and executive officers of CCI Holdings as of the date
of the completion of the offering and their ages as of
May 31, 2005. Executive officers are appointed by and serve
at the pleasure of our board of directors. A brief biography of
each person who is currently or will serve as a director or
executive officer upon consummation of this offering follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Richard A. Lumpkin
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Chairman of the board and director |
Robert J. Currey
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and director |
Steven L. Childers
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Joseph R. Dively
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Senior Vice President of CCI Holdings and President of Illinois
Telephone Operations |
Steven J. Shirar
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
Senior Vice President of CCI Holdings and President of
Enterprise Operations |
C. Robert Udell, Jr.
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Senior Vice President of CCI Holdings and President of Texas
Telephone Operations |
Christopher A. Young
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
Chief Information Officer |
Steven L. Grissom
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Treasurer and Secretary |
Kevin J. Maroni
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Director |
Mark A. Pelson
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
Director |
Jack W. Blumenstein
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
Director Nominee |
Roger H. Moore
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Director Nominee |
Maribeth S. Rahe
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Director Nominee |
Richard A. Lumpkin is the Chairman of the board and a
director of CCI Holdings. Mr. Lumpkin has served in these
positions with CCI Holdings and its predecessors since 2002.
From 1997 to 2002, Mr. Lumpkin served as Vice Chairman of
McLeodUSA, which acquired the predecessor of CCI in 1997. From
1963 to 1997, Mr. Lumpkin served in various positions at
the predecessor of CCI and ICTC, including Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer, President and Treasurer. Mr. Lumpkin is
currently a director of Ameren Corp., a public utility holding
company, First Mid-Illinois Bancshares, Inc., or First
Mid-Illinois, a financial services holding company, and Agracel,
Inc., a real estate investment company, and serves on the
advisory board of Eastern Illinois University and as a director
of The Lumpkin Family Foundation. Mr. Lumpkin is also a
former director, former President and former Treasurer of the
United States Telecom Association and a former president of the
Illinois Telecommunications Association. Mr. Lumpkin has
also served on the University Council Committee on Information
Technology for Yale University.
Robert J. Currey serves as the President, Chief Executive
Officer and a director of CCI Holdings. Mr. Currey has
served as a director of CCI Holdings and its predecessors since
2002 and as President and Chief Executive Officer of CCI since
2002. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Currey served as Vice Chairman
of RCN Corporation, a competitive telephone company providing
telephony, cable and Internet services in high-density markets
nationwide. From 1998 to 2000, Mr. Currey served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of 21st Century
Telecom Group. From 1997 to 1998, Mr. Currey served as
Director and Group President of Telecommunications Services of
McLeodUSA, which acquired the predecessor of CCI in 1997.
Mr. Currey joined the predecessor of CCI in 1990 and served
as President through its acquisition in 1997. Mr. Currey is
also a director of Management Network Group, Inc., Telution Inc,
the United States Telecom Association and the Illinois Business
RoundTable.
Steven L. Childers serves as Chief Financial Officer of
CCI Holdings. Mr. Childers has served in this position for
CCI since April 2004. From April 2003 to April 2004,
Mr. Childers served as Vice President of Finance of CCI.
From January 2003 to April 2003, Mr. Childers served as the
Director of Corporate Development of CCI. From 1997 to 2002,
Mr. Childers served in various capacities at McLeodUSA,
including as Vice President of Customer Service and, most
recently, as a member of its Business Process
125
Teams, leading an effort to implement new revenue assurance
processes and controls. Mr. Childers joined the predecessor
of CCI in 1986 and served in various capacities through its
acquisition in 1997, including as President of its then existing
Market Response division and in various finance and executive
roles. Mr. Childers is a member of the board of directors
and serves as Treasurer of the Eastern Illinois University
Foundation.
Joseph R. Dively serves as Senior Vice President of CCI
Holdings and President of Illinois Telephone Operations.
Mr. Dively has served in this position for CCI since 2002.
From 1999 to 2002, Mr. Dively served as Vice President and
General Manager of ICTC. In 2001, Mr. Dively also assumed
responsibility for the then existing non-regulated subsidiaries
of the predecessor of CCI, including Operator Services, Public
Services, and Market Response. From 1997 to 1999,
Mr. Dively served as Senior Vice President of Sales of
McLeodUSA. Mr. Dively joined the predecessor of CCI in 1991
and served in various capacities through its acquisition in
1997, including Vice President and General Manager of
Consolidated Market Response and Vice President of Sales and
Marketing of Consolidated Communications. Mr. Dively is
currently a director of First Mid-Illinois. Mr. Dively
currently serves on the boards of the Sarah Bush Lincoln Health
System, the Illinois State Chamber of Commerce and chairs the
EIU Business School Advisory Board. He is also past president of
the Charleston Area Chamber of Commerce.
Steven J. Shirar serves as Senior Vice President and
President of Enterprise Operations of CCI Holdings.
Mr. Shirar has served in this position for CCI since 2003.
From 1997 to 2002, Mr. Shirar served in various capacities
at McLeodUSA, progressing from Chief Marketing Officer to Chief
Sales and Marketing Officer. From 1996 to 1997, Mr. Shirar
served as President of the predecessor of CCIs then
existing software development subsidiary, Consolidated
Communications Systems and Services, Inc.
C. Robert Udell, Jr. serves as Senior Vice
President of CCI Holdings and President of Texas Telephone
Operations. From 1999 to 2004, Mr. Udell served in various
capacities at the predecessor of CCI Texas, including Executive
Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. He is also Chairman
of East Texas Fiber Line Incorporated. Prior to joining the
predecessor of CCI Texas in March 1999, Mr. Udell was
employed by the predecessor of CCI from 1993 to 1999 in a
variety of senior roles including Senior Vice President, Network
Operations, and Engineering.
Christopher A. Young serves as Chief Information Officer
of CCI Holdings. Mr. Young has served in this position for
CCI since 2003. From 2000 to 2003, Mr. Young served as
Chief Information Officer of NewSouth Communications, Inc., a
broadband communications provider. From 1998 to 2000,
Mr. Young served as Chief Information Officer for
21st Century Telecom Group.
Steven L. Grissom serves as Treasurer and Secretary of
CCI Holdings. Mr. Grissom has served in this position for
CCI since 2002. Since 1997, Mr. Grissom has also served as
the administrative officer of SKL Investment Group, LLC, or SKL
Investment Group, an investment holding company. Since 1989,
Mr. Grissom has served as Treasurer of ICTC.
Mr. Grissom is currently a director of First Mid-Illinois.
Mr. Grissom is also a director of Agracel, Coles Together,
Mattoon Area Industrial Development Corporation and The Lumpkin
Family Foundation.
Jack W. Blumenstein will be appointed a director of CCI
Holdings upon consummation of this offering.
Mr. Blumenstein is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
AirCell, Inc., a provider of airborne cellular and satellite
telecommunications systems and services. He has been the
co-President of Blumenstein/ Thorne Information Partners, LLC
since October 1996, and is a co-founder of that private equity
investment firm. Blumenstein/ Thorne focuses on capital
transactions in the telecommunications and information industry.
From October 1992 to September 1996, Mr. Blumenstein held
various positions with The Chicago Corporation (now ABN AMRO,
Inc.), serving most recently as Executive Vice President, Debt
Capital Markets Group and a member of the Board of Directors.
Mr. Blumenstein was President and Chief Executive Officer
of Ardis, a joint venture of Motorola and IBM, and has held
various senior management positions in product development and
sales and marketing for Rolm Corporation and IBM.
Mr. Blumenstein also presently serves on the boards of
eCollege, AirCell, Inc., and ShopperTrak, Inc.
126
Roger H. Moore will be appointed a director of CCI
Holdings upon consummation of this offering. Mr. Moore was
President and Chief Executive Officer of Illuminet Holdings,
Inc., a provider of network, database and billing services to
the communications industry, since October 1998, a member of its
board of directors since July 1998, and was its President and
Chief Executive Officer from January 1996 to August 1998. In
December of 2001, Illuminet was acquired by VeriSign, Inc. and
Mr. Moore retired at that time. From September 1998 to
October 1998, he served as President, Chief Executive Officer
and a member of the board of directors of VINA Technologies,
Inc., a telecommunications equipment company. Mr. Moore also
presently serves as a director of Tut Systems, Inc., VeriSign,
Inc., and Western Digital Corporation.
Maribeth S. Rahe will be appointed a director of CCI
Holdings upon consummation of this offering. Ms. Rahe has served
as President and Chief Executive Officer of Fort Washington
Investment Advisors, Inc., since November 2003. From January
2001 to October 2002, Ms. Rahe was President and a member of the
board of directors of U.S. Trust Company of New York, and from
June 1997 to January 2001, was its Vice Chairman and a member of
the board of directors.
Kevin J. Maroni has been a director of CCI Holdings since
2002. Mr. Maroni is a General Partner of Spectrum Equity.
Mr. Maroni has worked for Spectrum Equity since its
inception in 1994. Mr. Maroni will resign as a director
effective at the closing of this offering.
Mark A. Pelson has been a director of CCI Holdings since
2002. Mr Pelson is a Managing Director of Providence
Equity. Mr. Pelson has worked for Providence Equity since
1996. Mr. Pelson is also a director of Madison River
Telephone Company, LLC. Mr. Pelson will resign as director
effective on the closing of this offering.
Each of Messrs. Lumpkin, Shirar, Dively, Childers, and
Grissom were employed by McLeodUSA during 2002. In January 2002,
in order to complete a recapitalization, McLeodUSA filed a
prenegotiated plan of reorganization through a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware. In April 2002, McLeodUSAs plan
of reorganization became effective and McLeodUSA emerged from
Chapter 11 protection. Messrs Lumpkin and Shirar resigned
from McLeodUSA in April 2002 and June 2002, respectively. In
addition, Mr. Currey was employed by RCN Corporation from
2000 to 2002. In May 2004, RCN Corporation filed a plan of
reorganization through a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition on
a voluntary basis.
Composition of the Board After the Offering
Our board of directors currently consists of four members,
Messrs. Lumpkin, Currey, Maroni and Pelson. Upon closing of this
offering, it will consist of five members, taking into account
the resignation of Messrs. Maroni and Pelson and the election of
three new members, Messrs. Blumenstein and Moore and Ms. Rahe.
Each of the new directors will qualify as an
independent director under applicable SEC and Nasdaq
rules. These rules require that we have a majority of
independent directors on our board of directors and that our
compensation and corporate governance committees be comprised
solely of independent directors no later than the first
anniversary of our listing date.
Pursuant to our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, our board of directors will be divided into three
classes. The members of each class will serve for a staggered,
three-year term. Upon the expiration of the term of a class of
directors, directors in that class will be elected for a
three-year term at the annual meeting of stockholders in the
year in which their term expires. The classes will be comprised
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Class I Directors. Mr. Lumpkin will be the
Class I director, whose term will expire at the 2006 annual
meeting of stockholders; |
|
|
|
Class II Directors. Messrs. Moore and
Blumenstein will be the Class II directors, whose terms
will expire at the 2007 annual meeting of stockholders; and |
|
|
|
Class III Directors. Mr. Currey and
Ms. Rahe will be the Class III directors, whose terms
will expire at the 2008 annual meeting of stockholders. |
127
Any additional directorship resulting from an increase in the
number of directors will be distributed among the three classes
so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of
one-third of our directors.
Committees of the Board
The standing committees of our board of directors will consist
of an audit committee, a compensation committee and a corporate
governance committee.
Audit Committee. Upon completion of this offering, we
will have an audit committee that will be comprised of
Messrs. Blumenstein, Moore and Ms. Rahe, each of whom
will qualify as an independent director under applicable SEC and
Nasdaq rules.
The principal duties and responsibilities of our audit committee
will be to assist our board of directors in its oversight of:
|
|
|
|
|
the integrity of our financial statements and reporting process; |
|
|
|
our compliance with legal and regulatory matters; |
|
|
|
the independent registered public accounting firms
qualifications and independence; and |
|
|
|
the performance of our registered public accounting firm. |
Our audit committee will also be responsible for:
|
|
|
|
|
conducting an annual performance evaluation of the audit
committee; |
|
|
|
compensating, retaining and overseeing the work of our
registered public accounting firm; |
|
|
|
establishing procedures for (a) receipt and treatment of
complaints on accounting and other related matters and
(b) submission of confidential employee concerns regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters; and |
|
|
|
preparing reports to be included in our public filings with the
SEC. |
The audit committee will have the power to investigate any
matter brought to its attention within the scope of its duties.
It will also have the authority to retain counsel and advisors
to fulfill its responsibilities and duties. Our board of
directors will adopt a written charter for the audit committee,
which will be posted on our website.
Compensation Committee. Upon completion of this offering,
we will have a compensation committee that will be comprised of
Messrs. Lumpkin, Blumenstein and Moore. Our board of
directors has determined that each of Messrs. Blumenstein
and Moore qualify as an independent director under applicable
Nasdaq rules. The principal duties and responsibilities of the
compensation committee will be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
to review and approve goals and objectives relating to the
compensation of our chief executive officer and, based upon a
performance evaluation, to determine and approve the
compensation of the chief executive officer; |
|
|
|
to make recommendations to our board of directors on the
compensation of other executive officers and on incentive
compensation and equity-based plans; and |
|
|
|
to prepare reports on executive compensation to be included in
our public filings with the SEC. |
Corporate Governance Committee. Upon completion of this
offering, we will have a corporate governance committee that
will be comprised of Messrs. Lumpkin, Moore and
Ms. Rahe. Our board of directors has determined that each
of Mr. Moore and Ms. Rahe qualify as an independent
director under
128
applicable Nasdaq rules. The principal duties and
responsibilities of the corporate governance committee will be
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
to identify individuals qualified for membership on our board of
directors and to select, or recommend for selection, director
nominees; |
|
|
|
to develop and recommend to our board of directors a set of
corporate governance principles; and |
|
|
|
to oversee the evaluation of our board of directors and
management. |
Compensation of Executive Officers
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table |
The following table lists information regarding the compensation
of our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and the four next most
highly compensated executive officers, to whom we refer to,
collectively, as the named executive officers. The compensation
of each of these named executive officers exceeded $100,000 in
each of the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
2003 Restricted | |
|
|
|
|
Fiscal | |
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Share Plan | |
|
All Other | |
Name(1) |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Awards(8) | |
|
Compensation(9) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Richard A. Lumpkin
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
1,528,205 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
653,019 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,538 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Director |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
816,205 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,945 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,077 |
|
Robert J. Currey
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
301,923 |
|
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
8,931 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
263,846 |
|
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
13,847 |
(5) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
3,077 |
|
Steven J. Shirar
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
193,846 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
8,123 |
(5) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
5,873 |
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Enterprise Operations |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
178,615 |
|
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,138 |
(5) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,769 |
|
Joseph R. Dively
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
170,769 |
|
|
$ |
115,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,141 |
(5) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
6,828 |
|
|
Senior Vice President and President of Illinois Telephone
Operations |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
148,846 |
|
|
$ |
70,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,979 |
(5) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
2,423 |
|
Christopher A. Young
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
166,923 |
|
|
$ |
85,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,568 |
(5) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
6,791 |
|
|
Chief Information Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
144,615 |
|
|
$ |
74,000 |
|
|
$ |
58,724 |
(6) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,108 |
|
Steven L. Childers
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
157,692 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
834 |
(5) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
6,250 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
106,692 |
|
|
$ |
65,000 |
|
|
$ |
86,978 |
(7) |
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
1,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Each of the named executive officers served in their positions
throughout fiscal years 2003 and 2004, other than
Mr. Young, who was hired on February 3, 2003. |
|
|
(2) |
Includes professional services fees of $1,378,205 and $666,667
in 2004 and 2003, respectively, paid to Mr. Lumpkin as one of
our existing equity investors. See Certain Relationships
and Related Party Transactions Professional Services
Fee Agreements. Pursuant to a side letter agreement with
some of the other investors in Central Illinois Telephone,
including affiliates of Mr. Lumpkin and members of his
family, whereby Mr. Lumpkin shares a portion of this
professional services fee, Mr. Lumpkin retained only
$967,547 and $492,468 of the professional services fee in 2004
and 2003, respectively. In addition, the remaining $150,000 and
$149,538 in the table above represents amounts paid to
Mr. Lumpkin for his services to us in 2004 and 2003,
respectively. |
|
|
(3) |
Includes a lump sum payment of $649,617 by ICTC to
Mr. Lumpkin to terminate the Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan for Mr. Lumpkin. See
Employment and Other Arrangements |
129
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. The amount in the
table above also includes $3,402 for the reimbursement of taxes. |
|
|
(4) |
Includes $21,050 we paid to purchase Mr. Lumpkins
personal automobile, $542 attributable to
Mr. Lumpkins personal use of the automobile in 2003
and $353 for the reimbursement of taxes. |
|
|
(5) |
All amounts represent reimbursement of taxes. |
|
|
(6) |
Includes a relocation allowance of $58,724. Of the relocation
allowance, $24,315 represents reimbursement of taxes. |
|
|
(7) |
Includes a relocation allowance of $86,978. Of the relocation
allowance $25,781 represents reimbursement of taxes. |
|
|
(8) |
The board of managers of Homebase ascribed no value to the
restricted shares on the date awarded. The value of the
restricted shares of our common stock, after giving effect to
the reorganization, held by each of the named executive officers
as of December 31, 2004 would be as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted | |
|
Value as of | |
Named Officer |
|
Shares Held | |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Robert J. Currey
|
|
|
299,466 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Steven J. Shirar
|
|
|
99,822 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Joseph R. Dively
|
|
|
99,822 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Steven L. Childers
|
|
|
99,822 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
Christopher A. Young
|
|
|
62,389 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
|
|
25.0% of these shares vested on December 31, 2004 and 25%
will vest on the day prior to the completion of this offering.
The remaining 50% will vest in three equal installments on
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007. Holders of our restricted
common stock are entitled to receive dividends and other
distributions if and when declared by the board of directors. |
|
|
|
|
(9) |
Amounts listed consist of CCIs matching contributions to
its 401(k) plan. We also provide the named executive officers
with certain group life, health, medical and other non-cash
benefits generally available to all salaried employees and
excluded from this column pursuant to SEC rules. |
Director Compensation
Following this offering, directors who are not our employees or
who are not otherwise affiliated with us or our existing equity
investors will receive compensation that is commensurate with
arrangements offered to directors of companies that are similar
to us. Compensation arrangements for independent directors
established by our board may be in the form of cash payments
and/or option grants.
Long Term Incentive Plan
2005 Long Term Incentive Plan. We will adopt our 2005
long term incentive plan effective upon the completion of this
offering. The plan provides for grants of stock options, stock
grants and stock unit grants, stock appreciation rights and the
adoption of one or more cash incentive programs. Our outside
directors and certain employees will be eligible for grants
under the plan. The purpose of the plan is to provide these
individuals with incentives to maximize stockholder return,
otherwise contribute to our success and enable us to attract,
retain and reward the best available individuals for positions
of responsibility.
We expect that a total of 750,000 shares of our common
stock will be authorized for issuance under the plan, subject to
adjustment in the event of a reorganization, stock split, merger
or similar change in our corporate structure or the outstanding
shares of common stock. Our compensation committee will
administer the plan and determine if and when awards should be
granted. Our board also has the authority to administer the
plan. The terms and conditions of each award made under the
plan, including any vesting or forfeiture conditions, will be
set forth in the certificate evidencing the grant.
130
Stock Options. Under the plan, the compensation committee
may award grants of incentive stock options and other
non-qualified stock options. The compensation committee may not,
however, award to any one individual in any calendar year
options to purchase more than 300,000 shares of our common
stock. No more than 750,000 shares of our common stock may
be issued in connection with the exercise of incentive stock
options. The compensation committee will determine the exercise
price and term of any option in its discretion; however, the
exercise price may not be less than 100% of the fair market
value of a share of common stock on the date of grant.
Stock Grants and Stock Unit Grants. Under the plan, the
compensation committee may award stock grants and stock unit
grants subject to conditions and restrictions, if any, on the
issuance and forfeiture of such stock or units that the
compensation committee determines in its discretion. However, if
the only forfeiture condition is the continued employment or
service of the employee or outside director, the period of
service will be not less than three years from the date of
grant, unless the compensation committee determines that a
shorter period better serves our interests. No individual in any
calendar year may be granted stock or stock units where the
number of our shares of common stock subject to such grant
exceeds 300,000.
Stock Appreciation Rights. The compensation committee may
grant stock appreciation rights, or SARs, subject to the terms
and conditions contained in the plan. No individual in any
calendar year may be granted a stock appreciation right based on
the appreciation of more than 300,000 shares of our common
stock. Under the plan, the exercise price of an SAR must equal
the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date
the SAR was granted. Upon exercise of a SAR, the grantee will
receive an amount in cash, shares of common stock or a
combination of the two, as determined by the compensation
committee, equal to the difference between the fair market value
of a share of common stock on the date of exercise and the
exercise price of the SAR, multiplied by the number of shares as
to which the SAR is exercised.
Cash Incentive Programs. The compensation committee may
adopt one or more cash incentive programs providing for
performance-based cash bonuses contingent upon achievement by
the grantee or by us of certain performance goals over a period
of between one and five years. The performance goals detailed in
the plan include the following (or where appropriate, any growth
in the following over a specified time period): (1) our
free cash flow (which is defined as our cash flow from
operations after deducting capital expenditures and payment on
our debt), in the aggregate or on a per share basis;
(2) our EBITDA or our EBITDA margin, which is defined as
our EBITDA as a percentage of our revenue; (3) our
revenues; (4) our pre- or after-tax net income;
(5) our earnings per share; (6) our share price;
(7) total stockholder returns; (8) economic value
added or other similar metrics; and (9) such other criteria
as our compensation committee deems appropriate in its
discretion. The compensation committee shall determine terms and
conditions of each such program in its discretion. The maximum
amount that may be paid to any individual in any calendar year
under a cash incentive plan may not exceed $5,000,000.
Amendment and Termination of the Plan. The board may
amend or terminate the plan in its discretion, except:
(a) that no amendment will become effective without prior
approval of our stockholders to the extent such approval is
required under applicable law or the rules of the exchange on
which our common stock is listed; and (b) no amendment may
be made after the effective date of a change in control that
might adversely affect any rights that would otherwise vest on a
change in control. If not previously terminated by the board, no
awards may be made under the plan on or after the earlier of the
date on which all of the shares of common stock reserved for
issuance under the plan have been issued and are no longer
available for issuance or tenth anniversary of the plans
adoption.
Restricted Share Plan
In August 2003, Homebase adopted the 2003 Restricted Share Plan
to which we will succeed, or the restricted share plan. In
connection with the reorganization, all holders of Homebase
restricted common shares will receive similarly restricted
shares of our common stock. The restricted share plan authorized
131
our board of directors to grant to members of management, as
incentive compensation, awards of restricted shares of our
common stock or securities convertible into shares of our common
stock. Unless altered by the board, awards under the restricted
share plan cannot exceed an aggregate of 993,233 shares. As
of December 31, 2004, the entire 993,233 shares had been
awarded under the plan and were issued and outstanding. The
restricted share plan also provides for adjustment of the number
of shares of our common stock available for grant in the event
of an increase or reduction in the number of shares of common
stock, an exchange of our common stock for a different number or
type of security of ours or other specified changes in our
capitalization. All shares of common stock awarded under the
restricted share plan are and will be subject to restrictions on
transfer.
|
|
|
Administration and Terms of Awards |
The board of directors administers the restricted share plan and
designates the employees to receive awards. The board of
directors will determine the nature of the awards, the number of
shares of common stock subject to the awards and the terms and
conditions of each award. In connection with this offering, the
restricted share plan will be amended to eliminate the
boards ability to make any future awards of restricted
common stock.
Initially, 25.0% of the 973,268 shares granted in 2003 were
to vest every December 31st, beginning December 31,
2004 and ending December 31, 2007. In connection with this
offering, the restricted share plan will be amended to provide
that 25.0% of the Homebase shares granted in 2003 will vest on
the day prior to completion of the offering (which is in
addition to the 25% of such shares that vested on
December 31, 2004) and the remaining 50.0% of the CCI
Holdings shares received in exchange for unvested Homebase
shares granted in 2003 will vest in three equal installments on
December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007. Under the amended and
restated share plan, the remaining 19,965 shares granted in
2004 will vest 25.0% on the day prior to completion of the
offering and 25.0% on each of December 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007. All shares awarded under the restricted share plan will
automatically vest:
|
|
|
|
|
if the board of directors accelerates the vesting at any time
for any reason, which it is entitled to do; or |
|
|
|
upon a change of control (as defined in the restricted share
plan) of CCI Holdings, if the employee is terminated without
cause, the employees compensation is reduced below 90.0%
of the compensation prior to the change of control or the
employee is assigned duties and responsibilities materially
inconsistent with his or her previous level of responsibility. |
If the employee is terminated without cause or as a result of
death or disability, the employee will retain all vested shares
but will forfeit all of his or her rights to unvested shares.
All unvested shares of common stock awarded under the restricted
share plan are subject to forfeiture and employees are required
to sell to us, at the price the employee paid for the shares,
upon any of the following events: termination of employment for
cause or any attempt by the employee to transfer the unvested
shares without the prior written approval of the board of
directors.
Other than as described above, employees will have all of the
rights of a stockholder, including the right to vote the shares
and receive dividends and other distributions.
The restricted share plan will continue in effect until
August 28, 2013, unless terminated prior to that date by
the board of directors.
132
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
Following this offering, the compensation levels of our
executive officers will be determined by our board of directors
upon the recommendation of the compensation committee. In 2004,
Mr. Currey, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and
Mr. Lumpkin, our Chairman, both employees of ICTC,
participated in deliberations of the board of managers regarding
executive compensation.
Employment and Other Arrangements
We do not anticipate entering into any employment agreements
with our officers or employees.
On March 27, 2003, TXUCV entered into a retention and
change in control agreement with Mr. Udell. Pursuant to the
retention agreement, CCI Texas named Mr. Udell as Executive
Vice President through March 27, 2005. The retention
agreement provided that Mr. Udell would receive an annual
base salary of $243,775 with a bonus based on the greater of
45.0% of his base salary and $109,698 and Mr. Udell was
also entitled to participate in an annual incentive plan and all
benefit plans, programs and arrangements and fringe benefit
policies applicable generally to other employees. The retention
agreement also provided that Mr. Udell would receive a one
time payment upon a change of control, which included the
closing of the TXUCV acquisition. In addition,
Mr. Udells salary may not be decreased for a period
of two years following the closing of the TXUCV acquisition.
In connection with the TXUCV acquisition, we paid Mr. Udell
$706,948 to terminate the retention agreement without the other
benefits described in the preceding paragraph in exchange for
continuing to be employed in the position described above.
Mr. Udells annual base salary is now $200,000 with a
potential bonus of up to 50.0% of his annual salary based on the
achievement of various corporate objectives.
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan |
The Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Mr. Lumpkin
has been effective since 1986 and provided that Mr. Lumpkin
or his beneficiary would have been entitled to supplemental
benefits of $50,000 per year, payable monthly for a period
of twenty years, if Mr. Lumpkin retired after age 65
or if his employment was terminated prior to such time due to
his death. On July 29, 2004, the board of directors of ICTC
paid Mr. Lumpkin a lump sum of $649,617 to terminate the
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for Mr. Lumpkin.
|
|
|
Directors and Officers Indemnification and
Insurance |
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL and
except as otherwise provided in our bylaws, none of our
directors shall be personally liable to us or our stockholders
for monetary damages for a breach of fiduciary duty. In
addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
permits indemnification of, and the advancement of expenses to,
any person who was or is a party, or threatened to be made a
party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or
other proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the
registrant) by reason of the fact that he or she was director or
officer of CCI Holdings, or service as a director, officer,
employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint
venture, trust or other enterprise at our request to the fullest
extent authorized under the DGCL against all expenses (including
attorneys fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in
settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in
connection with such action, suit or proceeding. Further, our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation will provide
that we may purchase and maintain insurance on our own behalf
and on behalf of any other person who is or was a director,
officer or agent of CCI Holdings or was serving at our request
as a director, officer, employee or agent of another
corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other
enterprise.
133
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS
The following table presents information with respect to the
beneficial ownership of our common stock before and after giving
effect to this offering, held by:
|
|
|
|
|
certain of our employees participating as selling stockholders
in this offering; |
|
|
|
each person or entity who is known to us to beneficially own
more than 5.0% of our capital stock, including our existing
equity investors; |
|
|
|
our named executive officers, directors and director nominees;
and |
|
|
|
our directors and executive officers as a group. |
Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with the
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The following
table sets forth the percentage of beneficial ownership
(1) before the offering based upon 23,687,510 shares
of common stock outstanding after giving effect to the
reorganization and (2) after the offering based on
29,687,510 shares of common stock outstanding after
completion of this offering. If the underwriters fully exercise
their option to purchase 2,350,000 additional shares of common
stock to cover over-allotments, our existing equity investors
and certain of our management indicated in the table below will
sell shares of common stock to satisfy the underwriters
option exercise.
Unless otherwise indicated, each stockholder shown on the table
has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares
beneficially owned by him or it. Unless otherwise indicated, the
address of all individuals listed in the table is c/o
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.,
121 South 17th Street, Mattoon, Illinois 61938-3987.
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Offered Hereby | |
|
After Offering | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Assuming No | |
|
Assuming Full | |
|
Assuming No | |
|
Assuming Full | |
|
|
Shares Beneficially | |
|
Exercise of | |
|
Exercise of | |
|
Exercise of | |
|
Exercise of | |
|
|
Owned Prior | |
|
Over-Allotment | |
|
Over-Allotment | |
|
Over-Allotment | |
|
Over-Allotment | |
|
|
to Offering | |
|
Option | |
|
Option | |
|
Option | |
|
Option | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Name of Beneficial Owner |
|
Number | |
|
% | |
|
Number | |
|
Number | |
|
Number | |
|
% | |
|
Number | |
|
% | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Central Illinois Telephone(a)
|
|
|
7,564,758 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
585,548 |
|
|
|
7,564,758 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
6,979,210 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
% |
Providence Equity(b)
|
|
|
7,564,759 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
% |
|
|
3,222,222 |
|
|
|
3,782,380 |
|
|
|
4,342,537 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
3,782,379 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
Spectrum Equity(c)
|
|
|
7,564,760 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
% |
|
|
6,444,444 |
|
|
|
7,564,760 |
|
|
|
1,120,316 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Richard A. Lumpkin(d)
|
|
|
7,564,758 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
585,548 |
|
|
|
7,564,758 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
% |
|
|
6,979,210 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
% |
Robert J. Currey(e)
|
|
|
299,466 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
299,466 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
299,466 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
Kevin J. Maroni(f)
|
|
|
7,564,760 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
% |
|
|
6,444,444 |
|
|
|
7,564,760 |
|
|
|
1,120,316 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Mark A. Pelson(g)
|
|
|
7,564,759 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
% |
|
|
3,222,222 |
|
|
|
3,782,380 |
|
|
|
4,342,537 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
3,782,379 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
% |
Jack W. Blumenstein
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger H. Moore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maribeth S. Rahe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven J. Shirar(h)
|
|
|
99,822 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,822 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
99,822 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Joseph R. Dively(i)
|
|
|
99,822 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,822 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
99,822 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Steven L. Childers(j)
|
|
|
99,822 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99,822 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
99,822 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Christopher A. Young(k)
|
|
|
62,389 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,389 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
62,389 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Brian L. Carr(l)
|
|
|
49,911 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,500 |
|
|
|
49,911 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
37,411 |
|
|
|
* |
|
C. Robert Udell Jr.
|
|
|
19,965 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,965 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
19,965 |
|
|
|
* |
|
James A. Watkins(m)
|
|
|
49,911 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
49,911 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
29,911 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Michael W. Smith(n)
|
|
|
49,911 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
49,911 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
29,911 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Patricia A. Bacon(o)
|
|
|
24,956 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
24,956 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
19,956 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Rick H. Hall(p)
|
|
|
24,956 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
24,956 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
19,956 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Steven L. Grissom
|
|
|
24,956 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,956 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
24,956 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Barbara TenEyck(q)
|
|
|
12,478 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
12,478 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
7,478 |
|
|
|
* |
|
William T. White(r)
|
|
|
12,478 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,239 |
|
|
|
12,478 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
6,239 |
|
|
|
* |
|
Doug R. Abolt(s)
|
|
|
12,478 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
12,478 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
8,478 |
|
|
|
* |
|
David N. McDonald(t)
|
|
|
12,478 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,239 |
|
|
|
12,478 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
6,239 |
|
|
|
* |
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
(10 persons)
|
|
|
23,355,598 |
|
|
|
98.6 |
% |
|
|
9,666,666 |
|
|
|
11,932,688 |
|
|
|
13,688,932 |
|
|
|
46.1 |
% |
|
|
11,422,910 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
|
* |
|
Less than 1.0% ownership. |
|
(a) |
|
The equity interests in Central Illinois Telephone are
approximately 81.9% owned by SKL Investment Group, a Delaware
limited liability company, approximately 9.5% owned by LTIC,
LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, approximately 1.0%
owned by GRISS, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, and
approximately 7.6% owned collectively by Messrs. Currey,
Shirar, Dively, Udell and others, either directly or indirectly
through retirement accounts and various trusts. SKL Investment
Group is owned by Mr. Lumpkin and members of his family,
Mr. Lumpkin is the sole manager of an SKL Investment Group
investment fund and has the sole power to direct the voting and
disposition of its investments. LTIC, LLC is managed by Agracel,
an Illinois corporation, which has a four member board of
directors, two of whom are Messrs. Lumpkin and Grissom. In
addition, Mr. Lumpkin and members of his family own
approximately 50.0% of Agracel and Mr. Grissom owns
approximately 2.6% of Agracel. In addition, GRISS, LLC is
approximately 80.0% owned by Mr. Grissom and members of his
family, and Mr. Grissom is also a co-trustee of trusts that
own approximately 37.4% of the common shares of Central Illinois
Telephone through SKL Investment Group. As a result of the
above, Messrs. Lumpkin, Currey, Shirar, Dively, Udell and
Grissom may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the
shares owned by Central Illinois Telephone. Each of them
disclaims this beneficial ownership. Mr. Lumpkin is the sole
manager of Central Illinois Telephone has the sole investment
and voting power with respect to the shares of common stock held
by Central Illinois Telephone. The address of Central Illinois
Telephone and Mr. Lumpkin is c/o Homebase,
P.O. Box 1234, Mattoon, Illinois 61938. |
|
(b) |
|
Consists of 7,540,438 shares of common stock held by
Providence Equity Partners IV L.P. and 24,321 shares of
common stock held by Providence Equity Operating Partners IV
L.P. Providence Equity GP IV L.P. is the general partner of each
of these entities and Providence Equity Partners IV, LLC is the
general partner of Providence Equity GP IV L.P. Providence
Equity Partners IV, LLC has the sole power to direct the voting
and disposition of the shares. As a result, each of the entities
may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of the shares owned
by the others. Each of the entities disclaims this beneficial
ownership. Jonathan M. Nelson, Glenn M. Creamer and Paul J.
Salem are members and officers of Providence Equity Partners IV,
LLC, and thus may be deemed to possess indirect beneficial
ownership of the securities owned by these entities. Each of
Messrs. Nelson, Creamer and Salem disclaims such beneficial
ownership. The address of Providence Equity and
Messrs. Nelson, Creamer and Salem is c/o Providence Equity
Partners, Inc., 50 Kennedy Plaza, 18th Floor, Providence,
Rhode Island 02903. |
|
(c) |
|
Consists of 6,814,745 shares of common stock held by
Spectrum Equity Investors IV, L.P. (SEI4);
81,153 shares of common stock held by Spectrum IV
Investment Managers Fund, L.P. (SIM4);
40,230 shares of common stock held by |
135
|
|
|
|
|
Spectrum Equity Investors Parallel IV, L.P. (SEIP4);
603,487 shares of common stock held by Spectrum Equity
Investors III, L.P. (SEI3);
18,859 shares of common stock held by SEI III
Entrepreneurs Fund, L.P. (SEI3E); and
6,286 shares of common stock held by Spectrum III
Investment Managers Fund, L.P. (SIM3).
Spectrum Equity Associates IV, L.P. (SEA4) is
the sole general partner of SEI4 and SEIP4. Spectrum Equity
Associates III, L.P. (SEA3) is the sole general
partner of SEI3. SEI III Entrepreneurs LLC
(SEI3LLC) is the general partner of SEI3E. Because
these funds ultimately are under common management that shares
the power to direct the voting and disposition of the shares,
each of these entities may be deemed to share beneficial
ownership of the shares owned by the others. Each of these
entities disclaims this beneficial ownership except to the
extent of their pecuniary interest therein. Because decisions by
each of the entities serving as the ultimate general partners of
the individual funds in question are made by majority vote of
either four or seven partners or members, as the case may be, no
individual partner of SEA4, SIM4, SEA3 or SIM3, and no
individual member of SEI3LLC, has the power alone to direct the
voting or disposition of the shares, and no such individual has
the power to prevent the voting or disposition of such shares
over his objection. The address of Spectrum Equity is c/o
Spectrum Equity Investors, One International Place, 29th Floor,
Boston, Massachusetts 02110. |
|
(d) |
|
Mr. Lumpkin and his family own a majority of the shares of
Central Illinois Telephone, Mr. Lumpkin is its sole manager
and has the sole power to direct the voting and disposition of
its shares. As a result, Mr. Lumpkin may be deemed to share
beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Central Illinois
Telephone. Mr. Lumpkin disclaims this beneficial ownership
except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in those
securities. |
|
(e) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. In addition, Mr. Currey,
through an IRA trust, owns less than 1.0% of Central Illinois
Telephone. As a result, Mr. Currey may be deemed to share
beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Central Illinois
Telephone. Mr. Currey disclaims this beneficial ownership
except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in those
securities. |
|
(f) |
|
Mr. Maroni is a general partner or managing member of, and
holds a minority interest in, the Spectrum Equity funds that own
shares of common stock. As a result, Mr. Maroni may be
deemed to share beneficial ownership of the shares owned by
Spectrum Equity. Mr. Maroni disclaims this beneficial
ownership. Mr. Maroni will resign as director of CCI
Holdings effective on the closing of this offering. |
|
(g) |
|
Mr. Pelson is a Managing Director of Providence Equity and
holds a minority interest in the Providence Equity funds that
own shares of common stock. As result, Mr. Pelson may be
deemed to share beneficial ownership of the shares owned by
Providence Equity. Mr. Pelson disclaims this beneficial
ownership. Mr. Pelson will resign as director of CCI
Holdings effective on the closing of this offering. |
|
(h) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. In addition, Mr. Shirar,
through a trust, owns less than 1.0% of Central Illinois
Telephone. As a result, Mr. Shirar may be deemed to share
beneficial ownership of the shares owned by Central Illinois
Telephone. Mr. Shirar disclaims this beneficial ownership
except to the extent of his pecuniary interest in those
securities. |
|
(i) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. In addition, Mr. Dively owns
less than 1.0% of Central Illinois Telephone. As a result,
Mr. Dively may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of
the shares owned by Central Illinois Telephone. Mr. Dively
disclaims this beneficial ownership except to the extent of his
pecuniary interest in those securities. |
|
(j) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. |
|
(k) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. |
|
(l) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. |
|
(m) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. |
|
(n) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. |
|
(o) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. |
|
(p) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. |
|
(q) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. |
|
(r) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. |
|
(s) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. |
|
(t) |
|
Consists of shares of common stock initially awarded under the
restricted share plan. See Management
Restricted Share Plan. |
136
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Reorganization Agreement
Our existing equity investors and members of management who will
own shares of common stock will enter into a reorganization
agreement, effective immediately prior to the closing of this
offering, which sets forth the terms of the reorganization and
the certain other rights and obligations of our existing equity
investors in connection with this offering. The reorganization
agreement will provide first for the merger of Consolidated
Communications Texas Holdings, Inc. with and into CCI Holdings
and then for the merger of Homebase with and into CCI Holdings,
in each case, with CCI Holdings being the entity surviving
the merger. CCI Holdings, the issuer in this offering, is
presently a wholly owned subsidiary of Homebase Acquisition,
LLC. In connection with the reorganization, we will amend and
restate our certificate of incorporation to, among other things,
change our name from Consolidated Communications Illinois
Holdings, Inc. to Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.
Throughout this prospectus, unless the context otherwise
requires, we have assumed that the foregoing reorganization and
name change have been completed.
In connection with the merger of Homebase with and into CCI
Holdings:
|
|
|
|
|
Central Illinois Telephone will receive from Homebase an
aggregate of 7,564,758 shares of common stock; |
|
|
|
Spectrum Equity will receive from Homebase an aggregate of
7,564,760 shares of common stock; |
|
|
|
Providence Equity will receive from Homebase an aggregate of
7,564,759 shares of common stock; and |
|
|
|
our management stockholders will receive from Homebase an
aggregate of 993,233 shares of common stock. |
The number of shares of common stock received by each of Central
Illinois Telephone, Providence Equity, Spectrum Equity and our
management in the reorganization will be determined based on the
relative value of the Homebase preferred and common shares
assuming a liquidation of Homebase as part of the
reorganization. The aggregate equity value of Homebase will be
assumed to be equal to our aggregate equity value immediately
prior to the offering after giving effect to the reorganization
and was based upon an initial public offering price of
$13.00 per share. In the reorganization, each preferred
share in Homebase will be exchanged for a number of shares of
our common stock with a value at the initial public offering
price that equals the liquidation preference of such preferred
share at the closing of this offering. The holders of Homebase
common shares will receive shares of common stock representing
the remaining equity value of the company based upon their
respective number of Homebase common shares.
The reorganization agreement also provides for the following:
In connection with this offering and the related transactions,
we will grant registration rights to each of our existing equity
investors that provide each such investor with:
|
|
|
|
|
up to two demand registration rights; |
|
|
|
unlimited shelf registration rights; and |
|
|
|
unlimited piggyback registration rights. |
Limited Liability Company Agreement
CCI Holdings is presently a wholly owned subsidiary of Homebase,
a Delaware limited liability company organized on June 26,
2002. Currently, the operating agreement for Homebase, which we
refer to as the LLC agreement, provides for the management
and the conduct of our business prior to this offering.
137
Except for the indemnification provisions described below, the
provisions of the LLC agreement will terminate upon the
consummation of this offering.
Under the LLC agreement, Homebase agreed to indemnify, to the
fullest extent permitted by applicable law, its directors,
employees and agents and the existing equity investors and their
respective directors, stockholders, members, partners,
representatives or agents for losses that the indemnified person
may sustain, incur or assume as a result of, or relative to, any
act or omission performed by the indemnified person on behalf of
Homebase in a manner reasonably believed to be within the scope
of authority provided by the LLC agreement. The indemnification
does not apply to any loss incurred by the indemnified person as
a result of his or its gross negligence or willful misconduct.
Furthermore, this indemnity is limited to the value of the
assets of Homebase.
Under the LLC agreement, none of Homebases members,
directors, employees or agents will be liable to Homebase or
other members, directors, employees or agents of Homebase for
acts undertaken in good faith reliance on the provisions of the
LLC agreement.
|
|
|
Professional Services Fee Agreements |
Homebase and certain of its subsidiaries have entered into two
professional services fee agreements, each effective as of
April 14, 2004, with our existing equity investors. One
agreement requires CCI to pay to Mr. Lumpkin, Providence
Equity and Spectrum Equity an annual professional services fee
in the aggregate amount of $2.0 million for consulting,
advisory and other professional services provided to CCI and its
subsidiaries relating to the Illinois operations. The other
agreement requires Texas Holdings to pay to Mr. Lumpkin,
Providence Equity and Spectrum Equity an annual professional
services fee in the aggregate amount of $3.0 million for
consulting, advisory and other professional services provided to
Texas Holdings and its subsidiaries relating to the Texas
operations. The professional services fees are generally payable
in cash. The professional services fees, however, must be paid
in the form of class A preferred shares if payment in cash
is prohibited by the existing credit facilities or if
consolidated EBITDA (determined in accordance with the existing
credit facilities) is less than or equal to $106.0 million.
Payment of the professional services fees is subordinate to the
obligations under the existing credit facilities and our senior
notes. The rights of Mr. Lumpkin, Providence Equity and
Spectrum Equity to receive professional services fees described
above will terminate upon the closing of this offering.
Cash Distribution to the Existing Equity Investors
On June 7, 2005, we made a $37.5 million cash
distribution to our existing equity investors from cash on our
balance sheet.
LATEL Sale/ Leaseback
In 2002, in connection with CCI Holdings acquisition of
ICTC and several related businesses from McLeodUSA, each of ICTC
and Consolidated Communications Market Response, Inc., or
Consolidated Market Response, an indirect, wholly owned
subsidiary of CCI Holdings, entered into separate agreements
with LATEL, pursuant to which each of them sold to LATEL real
property for total consideration of approximately
$9.2 million and then leased the property back from LATEL.
LATEL is owned 50.0% by Mr. Lumpkin and 50.0% by Agracel.
Agracel is the sole managing member of LATEL. Mr. Lumpkin,
together with members of his family, beneficially owns 49.7% and
Mr. Grissom owns 2.6% of Agracel. In addition,
Messrs. Lumpkin and Grissom are directors of Agracel.
The initial term of both leases was one year beginning on
December 31, 2002. Each lease automatically renews for
successive one year terms through 2013, unless either ICTC or
Consolidated Market Response provides one year prior written
notice that it intends to terminate its respective lease.
Collectively, the lease expense for 2004 was approximately
$1.2 million, of which ICTC paid approximately
$1.0 million and Consolidated Market Response paid the
remainder. These lease payments represent 100.0% of the revenues
of LATEL. The annual rent for each lease will increase by 2.5%
upon
138
each renewal. Either subsidiary can terminate its lease
agreement with LATEL at any time by giving LATEL one year prior
written notice.
The sale prices for the properties sold to LATEL were determined
based upon an appraisal of each property. We believe the sale
prices were reasonable and comparable to those that could have
been obtained in an arms length transaction.
Upon the closing of this offering, we expect that LATEL will
exercise its option in the lease to convert the term of the
lease to a fixed term of six years commencing on the date the
option is exercised.
Currently, the leases are recorded as operating leases of ICTC
and Consolidated Market Response.
MACC, LLC
In 1997, prior to our acquisition of ICTC at the end of 2002,
Consolidated Market Response entered into a lease agreement with
MACC, LLC, or MACC, an Illinois limited liability company,
pursuant to which Consolidated Market Response agreed to lease
office space for a period of five years. Agracel is the sole
managing member and 66.7% owner of MACC. Mr. Lumpkin and
members of his family directly own the remainder of MACC. The
parties extended the lease for an additional five years
beginning October 14, 2002. Consolidated Market Response
paid MACC rent for 2004 in the amount of $123,278. These
payments represent approximately 58% of MACCs total
revenues for 2004. The lease provides for a cost of living
increase to the annual lease payments based on the Revised
Consumers Price Index, All Urban Consumers published by
the Bureau of Labor Statistics for the United States Department
of Labor. Neither party has the right to terminate this
agreement by the terms of the agreement. We believe the terms of
this lease are reasonable and comparable to those that could
have been obtained in an arms length transaction.
SKL Investment Group, LLC
Mr. Lumpkin, together with members of his family,
beneficially owns 100.0% of SKL Investment Group, a Delaware
limited liability company which is an investment company serving
the Lumpkin family. Mr. Lumpkin and members of his family
are the sole voting members of SKL Investment Group.
SKL Investment Group paid to CCI $76,800 in 2004 for the
use of office space, computers and telephones and for other
office related expenses. This amount also includes a
reimbursement of approximately $34,750 in 2004 for a pro rata
portion of Mr. Grissoms salary paid by CCI.
Mr. Grissom serves as Administrative Officer of SKL
Investment Group. The amount CCI charged SKL for the use of its
office space, equipment and other office related expenses is
based upon the amounts incurred by CCI. For example, in 2004 SKL
paid $28,100 to rent approximately 1,677 square feet of office
space, which is equivalent to CCIs base rent per square
foot plus SKLs pro rata share of real estate taxes,
utilities and maintenance. SKLs use of equipment and other
office related expenses was based on actual third-party charges
or SKLs estimated usage. We believe these terms are
reasonable and comparable to those that could have been obtained
in an arms length transaction.
First Mid-Illinois
Pursuant to various agreements with CCI, First Mid-Illinois
provides CCI Illinois with general banking services, including
depository, disbursement and payroll accounts, on terms
comparable to those available to other large unaffiliated
business accounts. Mr. Lumpkin and members of his family
own approximately 29.0% of the common stock of First
Mid-Illinois, Mr. Grissom owns less than 1.0%, and is the
co-trustee of trusts, with discretionary voting power, that hold
5.8% of the common stock of First Mid-Illinois and
Mr. Dively owns less than 1.0% of the common stock of
First Mid-Illinois. In addition, Messrs. Lumpkin, Grissom
and Dively are directors of First Mid-Illinois. The fees charged
and earnings received on deposits, through repurchase
agreements, are based on First Mid-Illinoiss standard
schedule for large customers. During 2004, CCI Illinois
paid maintenance and activity related charges of $5,465 to First
Mid-Illinois and earned $170,219 of interest on its deposits. In
addition, First Mid-Illinois administers CCI Illinois
hourly 401(k) plan. During 2004, CCI paid $77,222 to First
Mid-Illinois for this service,
139
which is a competitive market rate based on assets under
management that we believe is comparable to rates charged by
independent third parties.
In 2004, a wholly owned insurance brokerage subsidiary of First
Mid-Illinois received a commission relating to insurance and
risk management services provided to CCI in connection with a
cobrokerage arrangement with Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management
Services, Inc. CCI selected AJG Risk Management because it was
the lowest cost provider among the three companies that supplied
bids to us for insurance and risk management services. In 2004,
CCI paid approximately $2.0 million in insurance premiums
to the insurer providers.
Illinois Telephone Operations provides First Mid-Illinois with
local dial tone, custom calling features, long distance and
other related services. In 2004, First Mid-Illinois paid
Illinois Telephone Operations $462,498 for these services. These
services are regulated and, as a result, First Mid-Illinois paid
the same rate that is applicable to all customers.
Consolidated Communications Business Services, Inc., or
Consolidated Business Services, an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of CCI Holdings, provides repair services and,
if First Mid-Illinois elects, maintenance services for First
Mid-Illinoiss communications equipment, all of which are
pursuant to standard Centrex sales pricing formulas, which we
believe are comparable to those charged to independent third
parties. First Mid-Illinois paid $10,892 in 2004 to Consolidated
Business Services for these services. The contracts
automatically renew annually unless either party provides prior
written notice of termination.
Consolidated Communications Mobile Services, Inc., or
Consolidated Mobile Services, an indirect wholly owned
subsidiary of CCI Holdings, provides paging services to
First Mid-Illinois. During 2004, First Mid-Illinois paid $2,616
to Consolidated Mobile Services. The amounts received from First
Mid-Illinois were equal to or greater than the rate charged to
customers that are not affiliated with us.
140
DESCRIPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS
We summarize below certain material terms, provisions and
definitions contained in our amended and restated credit
agreement, the indenture governing our senior notes and the GECC
capital leases. This summary is not intended to be a complete
description of all of the terms, provisions and definitions
contained in these agreements and is qualified entirely by
reference to these agreements, which are exhibits to the
registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
Amended and Restated Credit Facilities
Concurrently with the closing of this offering, we will amend
and restate our existing credit agreement. The closing of this
offering is conditioned upon the closing of the amended and
restated credit facilities.
The amended and restated credit facilities will provide
financing of up to $455.0 million, consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
a new term loan D facility of up to $425.0 million
available at closing and maturing on October 14,
2011; and |
|
|
|
a $30.0 million revolving credit facility maturing on
April 14, 2010. |
Each of CCI and Texas Holdings will be a borrower under the
amended and restated credit facilities. The borrowers
obligations under the amended and restated credit facilities
will be joint and several. The revolving credit facility will
not change materially from our existing revolving credit
facility, and will continue to include a subfacility for letters
of credit as well as a swingline subfacility. We currently
expect that the revolving credit facility will be undrawn on the
closing of the offering and will remain available for general
corporate purposes.
Principal amounts outstanding under the term loan D
facility and the revolving credit facility will be due and
payable in full on their respective maturity dates.
The amended and restated credit agreement will require the
borrowers to prepay the term D loan facility, subject to
certain exceptions, with (i) 100% of Excess Subject Payment
Amounts (defined below under Restricted
Payments), subject to adjustment from time to time based
on our total net leverage ratio, (ii) 50% of any increase
of Available Cash (defined below under
Restricted Payments) during a dividend
suspension period, (iii) 100% of the net proceeds of all
non-ordinary course assets sales and any insurance or
condemnation proceeds not reinvested within required time
periods, and (iv) 100% of the net proceeds of certain
incurrences of indebtedness.
The borrowers will also be able to voluntarily repay outstanding
loans under the amended and restated credit facilities at any
time without any premium or penalty, other than customary
breakage costs with respect to LIBOR loans and
subject to payment of a 1.0% premium for certain prepayments of
the term loan D facility made prior to October 22,
2005 with proceeds from a new tranche of term loans under any
amendment to the amended and restated credit facilities, which
new tranche bears interest at a rate less than that applicable
to the term D loans.
Interest Rates and
Fees
The borrowings under the amended and restated credit facilities
will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to an applicable
margin plus, at the borrowers option, either a base rate
or a LIBOR rate. The initial applicable margin for borrowings
under the amended and restated credit facilities will be 1.5%
with respect to base rate loans and 2.5% with respect to LIBOR
loans. After April 1, 2005, if and for so long as the loans
are rated at least B1 (stable) by Moodys Investors
Service, Inc. and B+ (stable) by Standard &
Poors Rating Services, a division of the McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc., the amended and restated credit
141
facilities will provide that the applicable margin under the
term loan D facility will decrease by 0.25% (and any rating
with a negative outlook will be treated as one notch below that
rating). The applicable margin under the revolving credit
facility will also be adjusted from time to time in the future
based on our total net leverage ratio (defined below under
Restricted Payments), but will not
exceed 1.5% with respect to base rate loans and 2.5% with
respect to LIBOR loans.
In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal amounts
under the amended and restated credit facilities, the borrowers
will be required to pay a commitment fee of 0.5% per annum
to the lenders under the revolving credit facility for
unutilized commitments thereunder subject to adjustment from
time to time in the future based on our total net leverage
ratio, but not exceeding 0.5%. The borrowers will also be
required to pay customary letter of credit fees and fees of the
administrative agent.
Collateral and
Guarantees
CCI Holdings and each of the existing subsidiaries of CCI and
CCV (other than ICTC) and certain future direct and indirect
domestic subsidiaries, or the subsidiary guarantors, will, on a
joint and several basis, fully and unconditionally guarantee the
obligations of the borrowers under the amended and restated
credit facilities.
The obligations under the amended and restated credit facilities
and all the guarantees will be secured by substantially all of
the assets of each borrower and each guarantor, including, but
not limited to, the following, and subject to certain exceptions:
|
|
|
|
|
a pledge of the capital stock of the borrowers and each of the
subsidiary guarantors and ICTC (the enforcement of the pledges
of capital stock being subject to regulatory
restriction); and |
|
|
|
a security interest in substantially all tangible and intangible
assets of CCI Holdings, the borrowers and the subsidiary
guarantors. |
Certain Covenants and Events
of Default
The amended and restated credit agreement will contain a number
of covenants, that, among other things, restrict, subject to
certain exceptions, the borrowers ability and the ability
of CCI Holdings and CCI Holdings subsidiaries, to:
|
|
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness or issue capital stock; |
|
|
|
create liens on assets; |
|
|
|
repay other indebtedness (including our senior notes other than
as described under Use of Proceeds); |
|
|
|
sell assets; |
|
|
|
make investments, loans, guarantees or advances; |
|
|
|
pay dividends, repurchase equity interests or make other
restricted payments (other than Subject Payments as described
below) from the borrowers to CCI Holdings; |
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
|
make capital expenditures; |
|
|
|
engage in mergers, acquisitions or consolidations; |
|
|
|
enter into sale-leaseback transactions; |
|
|
|
amend or otherwise modify agreements governing indebtedness,
formation documents and certain material agreements; |
142
|
|
|
|
|
enter into agreements that restrict dividends from
subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
change the business conducted by us and our subsidiaries. |
In addition, the amended and restated credit agreement will
contain customary affirmative covenants, including but not
limited to, the requirement that the borrowers and the
guarantors pledge after-acquired property as collateral and
hedge a portion of the term loans.
Our amended and restated credit agreement will also require the
borrowers to comply with certain financial covenants, including
a maximum total net leverage ratio, a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio, maximum capital expenditures amount and a
maximum senior secured leverage ratio. The amended and restated
credit agreement will also contain customary representations and
warranties and events of default, including but not limited to
payment defaults, covenant defaults, cross-defaults to certain
indebtedness and other material agreements, and defaults
relating to the incorrectness in any material respect of
representations and warranties, certain events of bankruptcy,
material judgments, certain ERISA events and a change of
control. If such an event of default occurs, the lenders under
the amended and restated credit facilities will be entitled to
take various actions, including accelerating the amounts due
thereunder and enforcing the rights of a secured creditor.
Restricted Payments
The restricted payments covenant in the amended and restated
credit agreement will permit the borrowers among other things,
during any fiscal quarter and so long as no event of default
under the amended and restated credit agreement is continuing,
subject to specified conditions and restrictions, to pay
dividends and distributions on their equity to CCI Holdings and
to redeem or repurchase their or CCI Holdings debt or
equity (Subject Payments) under two bases as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
First, the borrowers may make Subject Payments in an aggregate
amount not to exceed Cumulative Available Cash which will be
equal to the sum of: |
|
|
|
(1) for the period from the closing date of this offering
until December 31, 2005, an amount available to pay
dividends on our outstanding common stock in accordance with our
dividend policy; |
|
|
(2) plus the excess, if any, of: |
|
|
|
(a) Available Cash, as defined below, for a period
commencing on the first day of the first full fiscal quarter
commencing after the closing and ending on the last day of the
fiscal quarter then most recently reported; and |
|
|
(b) the aggregate amount of Subject Payments paid after the
closing out of Available Cash. |
|
|
|
|
|
Second, the borrowers may make Subject Payments from the portion
of the proceeds of any equity sale not used to redeem or
repurchase their indebtedness and not used to fund acquisitions,
capital expenditures or make other investments. |
For the twelve months ended March 31, 2005, on a pro forma
basis and after giving affect to this offering and related
transactions, the borrowers would have been permitted to pay
dividends to CCI Holdings of $69.2 million under the
amended and restated credit agreement.
Available Cash means an amount equal to the sum of the following
for the applicable period:
(1) Bank EBITDA;
(2) minus (to the extent not deducted in the
determination of Bank EBITDA) the sum of the following: non-cash
dividend income; interest expense net of amortization of debt
issuance costs incurred in connection with or prior to the
consummation of this offering; capital expenditures from
internally generated funds; cash income taxes; any scheduled
principal payments of indebtedness; voluntary prepayments of
debt (other than in connection with this offering and the
related transactions); mandatory prepayments of Term D
loans on account of Excess Subject Payment Amounts (defined
below) or during
143
a dividend suspension period, and net increases in revolving
loans; the cash cost of any extraordinary or unusual losses or
charges; and all cash payments made on account of losses or
charges expensed during or prior to the period (to the extent
not deducted in the determination of Bank EBITDA for such prior
period);
|
|
|
(3) plus (to the extent not included in the
determination of Bank EBITDA), cash interest income for the
period, the cash amount realized in respect of extraordinary or
unusual gains during the period and net decreases in revolving
loans during the period. |
Bank EBITDA means our Bank Consolidated Net Income (defined
below) for the period
|
|
|
(a) plus all amounts deducted in arriving at Bank
Consolidated Net Income amount in respect of (without
duplication) interest expense, amortization or write-off of debt
discount and non-cash expense incurred in connection with equity
compensation plans, foreign, federal, state and local income
taxes for the period, charges for depreciation of fixed assets
and amortization of intangible assets during the period,
non-cash charges for the impairment of long-lived assets during
the period, fees accrued during periods prior to this offering
payable to certain of our existing equity investors not
exceeding $5.0 million in any twelve-month period, and
fees, expenses and charges incurred in connection with this
offering and the related transactions as specified in reasonable
detail in an amount not to exceed the amount of fees and
expenses disclosed under the heading Use of Proceeds
in this prospectus; |
|
|
(b) minus (in the case of gains) or plus (in
the case of losses) gain or loss on any sale of assets; |
|
|
(c) minus (in the case of gains) or plus (in
the case of losses) non-cash charges relating to foreign
currency gains or losses; |
|
|
(d) plus (in the case losses) and minus (in
the case of income) non-cash minority interest income or loss; |
|
|
(e) plus (in the case of items deducted in arriving
at Bank Consolidated Net Income) and minus (in the case
of items added in arriving at Bank Consolidated Net Income)
non-cash charges resulting from changes in accounting principles; |
|
|
(f) plus extraordinary loss as defined by GAAP; |
|
|
(g) plus the first $15.0 million of other
expenses relating to the integration of CCV incurred after
April 14, 2004 and prior to December 31, 2005; |
|
|
(h) minus the sum of interest income and
extraordinary income or gains as defined by GAAP; and |
|
|
(i) plus unusual or nonrecurring charges, fees or
expenses (excluding integration expenses) relating to the
acquisition of TXUCV (including severance payments and retention
bonuses) that were incurred during the fiscal quarter ended
June 30, 2004 (net of any offsetting items that increased
Bank EBITDA in such quarter as a result thereof) and to give pro
forma effect to the TXUCV acquisition and the related
transactions as if they had occurred on the first day of such
fiscal quarter and in an aggregate amount not to exceed
$12.0 million. |
Bank Consolidated Net Income means our net income or loss for
the period determined on a consolidated basis in accordance with
GAAP excluding, the income or loss of any person (other than any
of our consolidated subsidiaries) in which any other person
(other than the borrowers or any of their consolidated
subsidiaries) has a joint interest, except to the extent of the
amount of dividends or other distributions actually paid to
either borrower or any of their consolidated subsidiaries by
that person during the period, the cumulative effect of a change
in accounting principles during such period, any net after-tax
income (loss) from discontinued operations and any net after-tax
gains or losses on disposal of discontinued operations, the
income or loss of any person accrued prior to the date it
becomes a subsidiary of a borrower or is merged into or
consolidated with either borrower or any of their subsidiaries
or that persons assets are acquired by either borrower or
any of their subsidiaries, and the income of any consolidated
subsidiary of a borrower to the extent that declaration of
payment of dividends or similar distributions by that subsidiary
of that income is not at the time permitted by operation of the
terms of its
144
charter or any agreement, instrument, judgment, decree, order,
statute, rule or governmental regulation applicable to that
subsidiary.
Excess Subject Payment Amount means for any fiscal quarter, the
amount by which restricted payments, investments out of
Available Cumulative Cash, or redemptions or repurchases of
indebtedness during such fiscal quarter exceed the sum of
$11.875 million plus the amount of proportionate dividends
paid on common stock issued under our restricted share plan to
the extent reserved for future issuance at the time of
consummation of this offering.
The borrowers ability to make restricted payments will
depend on our compliance with, among other things, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
If the total net leverage ratio, as of any fiscal quarter, is
greater than 4.75:1.0, we will not be allowed to pay our Subject
Payments from Available Cash. The total net leverage ratio will
be defined as the ratio of total net debt (defined as total debt
minus the lesser of (x) the consolidated cash and cash
equivalents in excess of $5,000,000 reflected on our balance
sheets, other than amount that could be classified as
restricted cash in accordance with GAAP (and
excluding consolidated cash of any subsidiary that is not a loan
party to the extent the subsidiary would be prohibited from
distributing cash to a loan party), and (y) $25.0 million)
to Bank EBITDA. |
|
|
|
In addition, the borrowers will not be permitted to pay Subject
Payments if an event of default exists under the amended and
restated credit agreement. In particular, it will be an event of
default if: |
|
|
|
|
|
our total net leverage ratio, as of the end of any fiscal
quarter, is greater than 5.00:1.00; |
|
|
|
our senior secured leverage ratio (as defined in the amended and
restated credit agreement), as of the end of any fiscal quarter,
is greater than 4.00:1.00; |
|
|
|
our fixed charge coverage ratio, as of the end of any fiscal
quarter, is not (x) after the closing date and on or prior
to December 31, 2005, at least 2.50 to 1.00, (y) after
January 1, 2006 and on or prior to December 31, 2006,
at least 2.00 to 1.00 and (z) after January 1, 2007,
at least 1.75 to 1.00; or |
|
|
|
we make or commit to make capital expenditures greater than
$45,000,000 in any fiscal year, provided that the base amount
may be increased by up to 100% of such base amount by carrying
over to any such period any portion of the base amount (without
giving effect to any increase) not spent in the immediately
preceding period, and that capital expenditures in any period
shall be deemed first made from the base amount applicable to
such period in any given period. |
Senior Notes
On April 14, 2004, CCI Holdings and Consolidated
Communications Texas Holdings, Inc., as co-issuers, issued
$200,000,000 aggregate principal amount of senior notes in a
private placement exempt from the registration requirements of
the Securities Act. Our senior notes were issued under an
indenture, dated as of April 14, 2004, among CCI Holdings,
Consolidated Communications Texas Holdings, Inc., Homebase and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee. Following
the reorganization, CCI Holdings will succeed to the obligations
of Consolidated Communications Texas Holdings, Inc. under the
indenture, as the sole issuer of the senior notes.
Our senior notes:
|
|
|
|
|
mature on April 1, 2012; |
|
|
|
are our unsecured obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
equal in right of payment to any of our existing and future
senior unsecured indebtedness, |
|
|
|
senior in right of payment to any of our existing and future
subordinated indebtedness, |
145
|
|
|
|
|
effectively junior in right of payment to all of our existing
and future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of
the assets securing such indebtedness, and |
|
|
|
effectively subordinated to the existing and future liabilities
of our subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
|
|
accrue interest at a rate of
93/4% per
annum, payable on a semi-annual basis, on April 1 and
October 1 of each year. |
We may elect to redeem our senior notes on or after
April 1, 2008, in whole or in part, in cash, at the
following redemption prices, plus accrued and unpaid interest
to, and including, the date of redemption:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption | |
Period |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
2008
|
|
|
104.875 |
% |
2009
|
|
|
102.438 |
% |
2010 and thereafter
|
|
|
100.000 |
% |
In addition, at any time prior to April 1, 2007, we may, at
our option and subject to certain requirements, redeem up to
35.0% of the aggregate principal amount of our senior notes with
the net proceeds of certain equity offerings (including with
this offering) at a redemption price equal to 109.750% of the
principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if
any, to the date of redemption. Upon the closing of this
offering, we intend to exercise this right and redeem 32.5% of
our outstanding senior notes. See Use of Proceeds.
Further, at any time prior to October 6, 2005, we may
redeem our senior notes in whole but not in part with all or a
portion of the net proceeds of an offering of a qualified income
depository security at the following redemption prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption | |
Period |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
Day 1 through Day 360
|
|
|
104.875 |
% |
Day 361 through Day 540
|
|
|
102.438 |
% |
If a change of control (as defined in the indenture) occurs, we
will be required to make an offer to repurchase our senior
notes. The repurchase price will be 101.0% of the principal
amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to,
but excluding, the date of repurchase.
The indenture contains restrictive covenants which restricts our
ability, and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries, to,
among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
to incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock; |
|
|
|
pay dividends or make other distributions to its stockholders |
|
|
|
purchase or redeem capital stock or subordinated indebtedness; |
|
|
|
make investments; |
|
|
|
create liens; |
|
|
|
incur restrictions on the ability of our restricted subsidiaries
to pay dividends or make other payments to us; |
|
|
|
sell assets; |
146
|
|
|
|
|
consolidate or merge with or into other companies or transfer
all of substantially all of our assets; and |
|
|
|
engage in transactions with affiliates. |
|
|
|
Limitation on Restricted Payments |
We summarize below the material provisions of the restricted
payments covenant in the indenture. This summary is qualified in
its entirety by reference to the actual restricted payments
covenant, which has been filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part.
We shall not make, and shall not permit any of our restricted
subsidiaries to make, directly or indirectly, any restricted
payment if at the time of, and after giving effect to, such
proposed restricted payment:
|
|
|
|
|
a default or event of default shall have occurred and be
continuing (or would result from such payment); |
|
|
|
we could not incur at least $1.00 of additional indebtedness
pursuant a 6.0 to 1.0 leverage ratio (defined as the
ratio of outstanding indebtedness of CCI Holdings and its
restricted subsidiaries on a consolidated basis to the Pro Forma
EBITDA (as defined in the indenture) for the last four fiscal
quarters preceding the date on which the calculation is made); |
|
|
|
the aggregate amount of such restricted payment and all other
restricted payments declared or made subsequent to the issue
date and then outstanding would exceed, at the date of
determination, without duplication, the sum of: |
|
|
|
|
|
an amount (whether positive or negative) equal to consolidated
EBITDA (as defined in the indenture) from the beginning of the
first fiscal quarter in which our senior notes were originally
issued to the end of our most recent fiscal quarter for which
internal financial statements are available at the date of such
restricted payment, taken as a single accounting period, less
the product of 1.5 times our consolidated interest expense
(as defined in the indenture) from the first date of the fiscal
quarter in which the issue date occurs to the end of our most
recent fiscal quarter ending at least 45 days prior to the
date of such restricted payment, taken as a single accounting
period, |
|
|
|
proceeds of capital stock sales, |
|
|
|
the sum of (A) the aggregate net cash proceeds received by
us or any of our restricted subsidiaries from the issuance or
sale after the issue date of convertible or exchangeable
indebtedness that has been converted into or exchanged for our
capital stock (other than disqualified stock) and (B) the
aggregate amount by which our indebtedness or any of our
restricted subsidiaries is reduced on our consolidated balance
sheet on or after the issue date upon the conversion or exchange
of any indebtedness issued or sold on or prior to the issue date
that is convertible or exchangeable for our capital stock (other
than disqualified stock) (excluding, in the case of
clause (A) or (B), (x) any such indebtedness
issued or sold to us or a subsidiary of ours or an employee
stock ownership plan or trust established by us or any such
subsidiary of ours for the benefit of their employees and
(y) the aggregate amount of any cash or other property
distributed by us or any of our restricted subsidiaries upon any
such conversion or exchange), and |
|
|
|
an amount equal to the sum of (A) the net reduction in, or
any return on, investments (other than permitted investments)
resulting from dividends, repayments of loans or advances or
other transfers of property, in each case to us or any
restricted subsidiary in respect of such investment, or from the
reclassification of any unrestricted subsidiary as a restricted
subsidiary, or from the disposition of capital stock of an
unrestricted subsidiary for cash or property received by us or
any restricted subsidiary, and (B) the portion
(proportionate to our equity interest in an unrestricted
subsidiary) of the fair market value of the net assets of an |
147
|
|
|
|
|
unrestricted subsidiary at the time such unrestricted subsidiary
is designated a restricted subsidiary; provided, however, that
the foregoing sum shall not exceed, in the case of any person,
the amount of investments previously made (and treated as a
restricted payment) by any Issuer or any restricted subsidiary
in such person. |
The definitions of Pro Forma EBITDA and EBITDA in the indenture
provide, in summary, that the calculation of EBITDA is to be
based on the sum of Consolidated Net Income (as defined in the
indenture) of CCI Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis plus specified cash and non-cash charges
(so-called add backs) for the applicable period. The
definition of Consolidated Net Income means the net income (or
loss) of CCI Holdings and its restricted subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis, with certain exceptions including any net
income (but not loss) of any restricted subsidiary (including
the borrowers under the amended and restated credit agreement as
the first tier restricted subsidiaries of CCI Holdings) if such
restricted subsidiary is subject to restrictions, directly or
indirectly, on the payment of dividends or the making of
distributions, directly or indirectly, to CCI Holdings, except
that CCI Holdings equity in the net income of such
restricted subsidiary for such period will be included in
Consolidated Net Income up to the aggregate amount of cash
distributed by such restricted subsidiary to CCI Holdings plus
the amount of income accrued during such period in excess of
such distributed cash to the extent such excess income could be
distributed on the date of determination, subject to specified
limitations. In turn, the definition of EBITDA excludes
specified add-backs to Consolidated Net Income to the extent
(and in the same proportion) that the net income of a restricted
subsidiary was included in calculating Consolidated Net Income
and only if a corresponding amount would be permitted at the
date of determination to be dividend to CCI Holdings by such
restricted subsidiary. As a result, the amount of EBITDA, as
defined in the indenture, available under the build-up amount to
make restricted payments, including dividends, may be limited by
the amount of dividends or distributions the borrowers under the
amended and restated credit agreement will be able to make to
CCI Holdings.
For the twelve months ended March 31, 2005, on a pro forma
basis and after giving effect to this offering and related
transactions, CCI Holdings would have been permitted to pay
dividends to its stockholders of $116.5 million under the
general formula in the restricted payments covenant in the
indenture.
Regardless of whether we could make any restricted payment under
the build-up amount referred to above, we may, following the
first public equity offering that results in a public market,
pay dividends on our capital stock of up to 6.0% per year
of the cash proceeds (net of underwriters fees, discounts
or commissions paid by us) of such first public equity offering;
provided, however, that (1) such dividends shall be
(x) paid pro rata to the holders of all classes of the
applicable class of capital stock and (y) included in the
calculation of the amount of restricted payments and (2) at
the time of payment of any such dividend, no default or event of
default shall have occurred and be continuing or would result
therefrom. Based on this provision and after giving effect to
this offering and the related transactions, we would be able to
pay approximately $4.1 million annually in dividends. This
means that we could pay $4.1 million in dividends under
this provision in addition to whatever we may be able to pay
under the build-up amount, although a dividend payment under
this provision will reduce the amount we otherwise would have
available to us under the build-up amount for restricted
payments, including dividends.
Events of Default
The indenture also provides for events of default which, if any
of them occurs, would permit or require the principal of and
accrued interest on such senior notes to become or be declared
due and payable.
Registration Rights
Pursuant to a registration rights agreement entered into as part
of our senior notes issuance, we will:
|
|
|
|
|
use our reasonable best efforts to cause the registration of our
senior notes within 195 days after the issuance date of our
senior notes; |
148
|
|
|
|
|
use our reasonable best efforts to cause the registration
statement to become effective within 270 days of the issue
date of the notes; |
|
|
|
consummate the exchange offer within 300 days after the
issuance date of our senior notes; and |
|
|
|
use our reasonable best efforts to file a shelf registration
statement for the resale of our senior notes if we do not
consummate an exchange offer within the time period listed above
and in certain other circumstances. |
We will pay additional interest on our senior notes if we do not
meet these timing requirements for the filing the registration
statement or consummating the exchange offer. Because we have
not yet effected the exchange offer, additional interest started
accruing on our senior notes on February 9, 2005, and will
continue to accrue until such time as the exchange offer has
been consummated. We are required to pay interest on our senior
notes at a rate of 10.0% per annum for the first 90 days
following a registration default and, thereafter, the interest
rate will increase by 0.25% per annum for each successive 90 day
period, up to a maximum of 1.0% per annum above the stated
coupon.
GECC Capital Leases
CCI Texas leases certain furniture, fixtures, equipment and
leasehold improvements at CCI Texas current corporate
headquarters in Irving pursuant to two Master Lease Agreements
between CCI Texas and GECC. During 2004, CCI Texas
paid a total of $1.2 million to GECC pursuant to these
capital leases. The leases had an initial term of 30 months
and each ended on October 1, 2004. At the termination of
the initial term of the first lease for leasehold improvements,
CCI Texas elected to purchase the scheduled leasehold
improvements for $1.1 million. At the termination of the
initial term of the second lease for furniture, fixtures and
equipment, CCI Texas elected to extend the term of the agreement
until April 1, 2007, at which time CCI Texas will have an
option to purchase the equipment for its then fair market value.
As of March 31, 2005, the outstanding principal amount of
this capital lease was $1.1 million. On May 27, 2005,
we elected to pay in full the outstanding balance on this lease.
149
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK
We summarize below the material terms and provisions of our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended
and restated bylaws. The following summary of our capital stock
is intended as a summary only and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws, the forms of
which are filed as exhibits to the registration statement of
which this prospectus forms a part and by reference to the
DGCL.
General Matters
CCI Holdings, the issuer in this offering, is presently a wholly
owned subsidiary of Homebase. Prior to the consummation of this
offering, we plan to effect a reorganization pursuant to which
first our sister subsidiary Consolidated Communications Texas
Holdings, Inc. and then Homebase will merge with and into CCI
Holdings. See Summary Our Current
Organizational Structure and
Post-Offering Organizational Structure.
In connection with the reorganization, this offering and the
related transactions, we will amend and restate our certificate
of incorporation to, among other things, increase our authorized
number of shares of common stock and change our name to
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. Throughout this
prospectus, unless the context otherwise requires, we have
assumed that the foregoing reorganization has been consummated.
Authorized Capitalization
Upon the closing of this offering, our authorized common stock
and preferred stock will consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
100 million shares of common stock, par value
$0.01 per share; and |
|
|
|
10 million shares of preferred stock, par value
$0.01 per share. |
Immediately following the closing of this offering, we will have
29,687,510 shares of common stock issued and outstanding
and no shares of preferred stock issued or outstanding.
Common Stock
The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per
share with respect to each matter on which the holders of our
common stock are entitled to vote. Unless the DGCL, our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and
restated bylaws provide otherwise, stockholders action
requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares voting.
See Anti-Takeover Effects of our Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, Amended and Restated
Bylaws and Applicable Laws.
The holders of our common stock are entitled to receive
dividends ratably, if, as and when they may be lawfully declared
from time to time by our board of directors out of funds legally
available for that purpose, subject to any preferential rights
of holders of any outstanding shares of preferred stock.
Dividends on the common stock will not be cumulative.
Effective upon the closing of this offering, our board of
directors will adopt a dividend policy that reflects its
judgment that our stockholders would be better served if we
distributed to them a substantial portion of the cash generated
by our business in excess of our expected cash needs rather than
using the cash for other purposes. In accordance with our
dividend policy, we currently intend to pay an initial dividend
of $0.4089 per share (representing a pro rata portion of
the expected dividend for the first year following the closing
of this offering) on or about November 1, 2005 to
stockholders of record as of October 15, 2005 and to
continue to pay quarterly dividends at an annual rate of
$1.5495 per share for the first year following the closing
of this offering, but only if and to the extent declared by our
board of directors and subject to various restrictions on our
ability to do so. These expected cash needs referred to
150
above include interest payments on our indebtedness, capital
expenditures, integration, restructuring and related costs of
the TXUCV acquisition in 2005, taxes, incremental costs
associated with being a public company and certain other costs.
We are not required to pay dividends, and our stockholders will
not be guaranteed, or have contractual or other rights, to
receive dividends. Our board of directors may decide at any
time, in its discretion, to decrease the amount of dividends,
otherwise change or revoke the dividend policy or discontinue
entirely the payment of dividends. In addition, our ability to
pay dividends will be restricted by current and future
agreements governing our debt, including the amended and
restated credit agreement and the indenture governing our senior
notes, Delaware law and state regulatory authorities. See
Risk Factors Risks Relating to Our Common
Stock You may not receive dividends because our
board of directors could, in its discretion, depart from or
change our dividend policy at any time,
We might not have cash in the future to pay
dividends in the intended amounts or at all,
You may not receive dividends because of
restrictions in our debt agreements, Delaware and Illinois law
and state regulatory requirements,
Because we are a holding company with no
operations, we will not be able to pay dividends unless our
subsidiaries transfer funds to us and Dividend
Policy and Restrictions.
Rights Upon
Liquidation
In the event of our voluntary or involuntary liquidation,
dissolution or winding up, holders of shares of our common stock
will be entitled to share equally in our assets available for
distribution to holders of shares of our common stock on an
equal, pro rata basis, subject to the prior rights of our
creditors and holders of any outstanding preferred stock and
subject to limited exceptions for distributions of capital stock
or convertible securities with differential voting rights.
|
|
|
Preemptive and Other Subscription Rights |
The holders of our common stock do not have preemptive,
subscription or redemption rights and are not subject to further
calls or assessments. All outstanding shares of our common
stock, including the common stock offered in this offering, will
be fully paid and non-assessable.
Preferred Stock
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
provide that we may issue up to 10 million shares of
preferred stock in one or more classes or series as may be
determined by our board of directors.
Our board of directors has broad discretionary authority with
respect to the rights of issued classes or series of our
preferred stock and may take several actions without any vote or
action of the holders of our common stock, including:
|
|
|
|
|
determining the number of shares to be included in each class or
series; and |
|
|
|
fixing the designation, preferences, limitations and relative
rights of the shares of each class or series, including
provisions related to dividends, conversion, voting, redemption
and liquidation, which may be superior to those of our common
stock. |
The board of directors may authorize, without approval of
holders of our common stock, the issuance of preferred stock
with voting and conversion rights that could adversely affect
the voting power and other rights of holders of our common
stock. For example, our preferred stock may rank prior to our
common stock as to dividend rights, liquidation preferences or
both, may have full or limited voting rights and may be
convertible into shares of our common stock. The number of
authorized shares of our preferred stock may be increased or
decreased (but not below the number of shares then outstanding)
by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of
our common stock, without a vote of the holders of any other
class or series of our preferred stock unless required by the
terms of such class or series of preferred stock or by the DGCL.
We believe that the ability of our board of directors to issue
one or more series of our preferred stock will provide us with
flexibility in structuring possible future financings and
acquisitions and in meeting
151
other corporate needs that might arise. The authorized shares of
our preferred stock and common stock will be available for
issuance without action by holders of our common stock, unless
such action is required by applicable law or the rules of any
stock exchange or automated quotation system on which our
securities may be listed or traded.
Although our board of directors has no intention at the present
time of doing so, it could issue a series of our preferred stock
that could, depending on the terms of such series, be used to
implement a stockholder rights plan or otherwise impede the
completion of a merger, tender offer or other takeover attempts
of our company. Our board of directors could issue preferred
stock having terms that could discourage an acquisition attempt
through which an acquirer may be able to change the composition
of the board of directors, including by a tender offer or other
transaction that some, or a majority, of our stockholders might
believe to be in their best interests or in which stockholders
might receive a premium for their stock over the then current
market price.
Registration Rights
In connection with this offering and the related transactions,
we will grant registration rights to each of our existing equity
investors that provide each such investor with:
|
|
|
|
|
up to two demand registration rights; |
|
|
|
unlimited shelf registration rights; and |
|
|
|
unlimited piggyback registration rights. |
See Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Reorganization Agreement
Registration Rights.
Anti-takeover Effects of our Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation, Amended and Restated Bylaws and Applicable
Laws
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws will contain certain provisions that
are intended to enhance the likelihood of continuity and
stability in the composition of the board of directors and which
may have the effect of delaying, deferring, preventing or making
more costly a future takeover or change in control of the
company unless such takeover or change in control is approved by
the board of directors. A stockholder might consider an attempt
to takeover or effect a change in control to be in its best
interest, including those attempts that might result in it
receiving a premium over the prevailing market price for our
shares.
These provisions include:
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
provide that our board of directors will be divided into three
classes of directors, with the classes as nearly equal in number
as possible. As a result, approximately one-third of our board
of directors will be elected each year. The classification of
directors will have the effect of making it more difficult for
stockholders to change the composition of our board. Our amended
and restated certificate of incorporation will provide that,
subject to any rights of holders of preferred stock to elect
additional directors under specified circumstances, the number
of directors will be fixed by a resolution adopted by not less
than two-thirds of the directors then in office. Our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated
bylaws will provide that the number of directors will be fixed
from time to time solely pursuant to a resolution adopted by
two-thirds of our directors then in office. Upon completion of
the offering our board of directors will have five members.
|
|
|
Removal of Directors; Vacancies |
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws will provide that directors may be
removed only for cause and then only upon the affirmative vote
of holders of at least
152
two-thirds of the voting power of all the then outstanding
shares of common stock entitled to vote generally in the
election of directors. In addition, our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
will also provide that any vacancies on our board of directors
will be filled only by the affirmative vote of a majority of the
remaining directors (and not the stockholders).
|
|
|
Action by Written Consent; Special Meetings of
Stockholders |
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and
amended and restated bylaws will provide that stockholder action
can be taken by written consent in lieu of a meeting if signed
by stockholders holding not less than a majority of the voting
power of our then outstanding common stock. Our amended and
restated bylaws will provide that, except as otherwise required
by law, special meetings of the stockholders can only be called
by the chairman of the board or our president, or pursuant to a
resolution adopted by a majority of the board of directors or by
our board of directors upon a request of one or more
stockholders holding shares of common stock representing not
less than 50% of the voting power of our then outstanding common
stock. Except as provided above, stockholders will not be
permitted to call a special meeting or to require the board of
directors to call a special meeting.
|
|
|
Advance Notice Procedure for Director Nominations and
Stockholder Proposals |
Our amended and restated bylaws provide that, subject to the
rights of holders of any outstanding shares of our preferred
stock, a stockholder may nominate one or more persons for
election as directors at a meeting only if written notice of the
stockholders nomination has been given, either by personal
delivery or certified mail, to our corporate secretary not less
than 90 days nor more than 120 days before the first
anniversary of the date of our proxy statement in connection
with our last annual meeting of stockholders subject to
specified changes.
Each notice must contain:
|
|
|
|
|
the name, age, business address and, if known, residential
address of each nominee; |
|
|
|
the principal occupation or employment of each nominee; |
|
|
|
the class, series and number of our shares beneficially owned by
each nominee; |
|
|
|
any other information relating to each nominee required by the
SECs proxy rules; and |
|
|
|
the written consent of each nominee to be named in our proxy
statement and to serve as director if elected. |
Our corporate secretary will deliver all notices to the
nominating and corporate governance committee of our board of
directors for review. After review, the nominating and corporate
governance committee will make its recommendation regarding
nominees to our board of directors. Defective nominations will
be disregarded.
For business to be properly brought before an annual meeting by
a stockholder, the stockholder must have given timely notice of
the proposed business in writing to our corporate secretary. To
be timely, a stockholders notice must be given, either by
personal delivery or by certified mail, to our corporate
secretary not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days
before the first anniversary of the date of our proxy statement
in connection with our last annual meeting of stockholders
subject to specified changes. Each notice must contain, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
a brief description of the business desired to be brought before
the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting the business
at the annual meeting; |
|
|
|
the name and address of the stockholder proposing the business
as they appear on our stock transfer books; |
|
|
|
a representation that the stockholder is a stockholder of record
and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the annual
meeting to bring the business proposed in the notice before the
meeting; |
153
|
|
|
|
|
a representation whether the stockholder intends to deliver a
proxy statement to the holders of at least the percentage of our
outstanding common stock required to approve the business; |
|
|
|
the class, series and number of our shares beneficially owned by
the stockholder; and |
|
|
|
any material interest of the stockholder in the business. |
Attempts to bring business before an annual meeting without
complying with these provisions will not be permitted.
Although our amended and restated bylaws do not give the board
the power to approve or disapprove stockholder nominations of
candidates or proposals regarding other business to be conducted
at a special or annual meeting, our amended and restated bylaws
may have the effect of precluding the consideration of some
business at a meeting if the proper procedures are not followed
or may discourage or defer a potential acquiror from conducting
a solicitation of proxies to elect its own slate of directors or
otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.
Super-Majority Approval
Requirements
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
require the affirmative vote of holders of not less than 75% of
the voting power of our then outstanding common stock to approve
any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of
our assets. In addition, our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, as applicable,
will also require the affirmative vote of holders of not less
than two-thirds of the voting power of our then outstanding
common stock to amend, alter, change or repeal specified
provisions (other than those regarding stockholder approval of
any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of
our assets, which shall require the affirmative vote of 75% of
the voting power of our then outstanding common stock),
including those that address:
|
|
|
|
|
the classified board, removal of directors and filling of
director vacancies; |
|
|
|
the notice requirements for director nominations and stockholder
proposals; |
|
|
|
the ability to call a special meeting of stockholders; |
|
|
|
the limitation on the liability of our directors to us and our
stockholders and the obligation to indemnify and advance
reasonable expenses to the directors and officers to the fullest
extent authorized by the DGCL; |
|
|
|
the authority of our board of directors to amend or repeal our
bylaws without a stockholder vote, as described in more detail
in the next paragraph; and |
|
|
|
the amendment of any of the foregoing. |
The requirement of a super-majority vote to approve any merger,
consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets
and to approve specified amendments to our amended and restated
certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws
could enable a minority of our stockholders to exercise veto
power over any such transactions or amendments. In addition, our
amended and restated certificate of incorporation will grant our
board of directors the authority to amend and repeal our bylaws
without a stockholder vote in any manner not inconsistent with
the DGCL or our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation.
|
|
|
Authorized but Unissued Shares |
Under the DGCL, our authorized but unissued shares of common
stock and preferred stock will be available for future issuance
without stockholder approval. However, the listing requirements
of The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc., require stockholder approval
of certain issuances equal to or exceeding 20% of the then
outstanding voting power or then outstanding number of shares of
common stock. One of the effects of the existence of unissued
and unreserved common stock may be to enable our board of
directors to issue shares
154
to persons friendly to current management, which issuance could
render more difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control
of our company by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest
or otherwise, and thereby protect the continuity of our
management and possibly deprive the stockholders of
opportunities to sell their shares of common stock at prices
higher than prevailing market prices. These additional shares
may be utilized for a variety of corporate purposes, including
future public offerings to raise additional capital, corporate
acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of
authorized but unissued shares of common stock and preferred
stock could render more difficult or discourage an attempt to
obtain control of a majority of our common stock by means of a
proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.
|
|
|
Undesignated Preferred Stock |
Our board has the ability to issue 10 million shares of
preferred stock with such voting and other rights and
preferences it chooses in its sole discretion without prior
stockholder approval. As a result, the ability to authorize
undesignated or blank check preferred stock makes it
possible for our board of directors to issue preferred stock
that could impede the success of any attempt to acquire us.
These and other provisions may have the effect of delaying,
deferring, preventing or making more costly a future takeover or
change in control unless such takeover is approved by our board
of directors.
The DGCL provides that stockholders are not entitled to the
right to cumulate votes in the election of directors unless our
certificate of incorporation provides otherwise. Our amended and
restated certificate of incorporation will not expressly provide
for cumulative voting.
|
|
|
Anti-takeover Effects of Delaware Law |
Section 203 of the DGCL provides that, subject to
exceptions specified therein, an interested
stockholder of a Delaware corporation shall not engage in
any business combination, including general mergers
or consolidations or acquisitions of additional shares of the
corporation, with the corporation for a three-year period
following the time that such stockholder becomes an interested
stockholder unless:
|
|
|
|
|
prior to such time, the board of directors of the corporation
approved either the business combination or the transaction
which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested
stockholder; |
|
|
|
upon consummation of the transaction which resulted in the
stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the
interested stockholder owned at least 85% of the voting stock of
the corporation outstanding at the time the transaction
commenced (excluding specified shares); or |
|
|
|
on or subsequent to such time, the business combination is
approved by the board of directors of the corporation and
authorized at an annual or special meeting of stockholders, and
not by written consent, by the affirmative vote of at least
two-thirds percent of the outstanding voting stock not owned by
the interested stockholder. |
Under Section 203, the restrictions described above also do
not apply to specified business combinations proposed by an
interested stockholder following the announcement or
notification of one of specified transactions involving the
corporation and a person who had not been an interested
stockholder during the previous three years or who became an
interested stockholder with the approval of a majority of the
corporations directors, if such transaction is approved or
not opposed by a majority of the directors who were directors
prior to any person becoming an interested stockholder during
the previous three years or were recommended for election or
elected to succeed such directors by a majority of such
directors.
Except as otherwise specified in Section 203, an
interested stockholder is defined to include:
|
|
|
|
|
any person that is the owner of 15% or more of the outstanding
voting stock of the corporation, or is an affiliate or associate
of the corporation and was the owner of 15% or more of the
outstanding |
155
|
|
|
|
|
voting stock of the corporation at any time within three years
immediately prior to the date of determination; and |
|
|
|
the affiliates and associates of any such person. |
Under some circumstances, Section 203 makes it more
difficult for a person who would be an interested stockholder to
effect various business combinations with a Delaware corporation
for a three-year period. We have not elected to be exempt from
the restrictions imposed under Section 203.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will
provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL and
except as otherwise provided in our amended and restated bylaws,
none of our directors shall be liable to us or our stockholders
for monetary damages for a breach of fiduciary duty. In
addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
and amended and restated bylaws permit indemnification of any
person who was or is made, or threatened to be made, a party to
any action, suit or other proceeding, whether criminal, civil,
administrative or investigative, because of his or her status as
a director or officer of CCI Holdings, or service as a director,
officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust or other enterprise at our request to the
fullest extent authorized under the DGCL against all expenses,
liabilities and losses reasonably incurred by such person.
Further, our amended and restated bylaws will provide that we
may purchase and maintain insurance on our own behalf and on
behalf of any other person who is or was a director, officer or
agent of CCI Holdings or was serving at our request as a
director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation,
partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Equiserve Trust Company, N.A. will be appointed as the transfer
agent and registrar for our common stock upon completion of this
offering.
Nasdaq National Market
Our common stock has been approved for quotation on the Nasdaq
National Market under the symbol CNSL, subject
to official notice of issuance.
156
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
Prior to this offering, there has not been any public market for
our common stock, and we cannot predict what effect, if any,
market sales of shares or the availability of shares for sale
will have on the market price of our common stock. Nevertheless,
sales of substantial amounts of common stock in the public
market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could
materially and adversely affect the market price of our common
stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the
sale of our equity or equity-related securities at a time and
price that we deem appropriate.
Upon completion of this offering, 29,687,510 shares of our
common stock will be outstanding. Of these shares, the
15,666,666 shares of common stock sold in this offering
will be freely tradable without restriction or further
registration under the Securities Act, unless held by our
affiliates, as that term is defined in Rule 144
under the Securities Act. The remaining outstanding shares of
common stock will be deemed restricted securities as
that term is defined under Rule 144. Restricted securities
may be sold in the public market only if registered or if they
qualify for an exemption from registration under Rule 144
or 144(k) under the Securities Act, which are summarized below.
If permitted under our current and future agreements governing
our debt, such as the amended and restated credit agreement and
our indenture, we may issue shares of common stock from time to
time as consideration for future acquisitions, investments or
other purposes. In the event any such acquisition, investment or
other transaction is significant, the number of shares of common
stock that we may issue may in turn be significant. In addition,
we may also grant registration rights covering those shares of
common stock issued in connection with any such acquisitions,
investments or other transactions.
Lock-up Arrangements
In connection with this offering and the related transactions,
we, our officers, directors and the selling stockholders have,
subject to certain exceptions, agreed with the underwriters not
to dispose of or hedge any of our shares of common stock during
the 180-day period following the date of this prospectus, and
such 180-day period is subject to extension under certain
circumstances. See Underwriting for a further
discussion of the lock-up agreements.
Stockholders and Registration Rights
Our existing equity investors will have registration rights for
their shares of common stock for resale in some circumstances.
See Certain Relationships and Related Party
Transactions Reorganization Agreement
Registration Rights.
Rule 144
In general, under Rule 144, as currently in effect,
beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, any
person, including an affiliate, who has beneficially owned
shares of our common stock for a period of at least one year is
entitled to sell, within any three-month period, a number of
shares that does not exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
1.0% of the then-outstanding shares of common stock; and |
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume in the common stock on the
Nasdaq National Market during the four calendar weeks preceding
the date on which the notice of the sale is filed with the SEC. |
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to provisions
relating to notice, manner of sale, volume limitations and the
availability of current public information about us.
157
Following the lock-up period, we estimate that approximately
14,020,844 shares of our common stock (which includes
vested and unvested restricted shares) that are restricted
securities or are held by our affiliates as of the date of this
prospectus will be eligible for sale in the public market in
compliance with Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
Rule 144(k)
Under Rule 144(k), a person who is not deemed to have been
one of our affiliates at any time during the 90 days
preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned the shares for
at least two years, including the holding period of any prior
owner other than an affiliate, is entitled to sell
the shares without complying with the manner of sale, public
information, volume limitation or notice provisions of
Rule 144.
158
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal
income tax considerations with respect to the ownership and
disposition of our common stock by U.S. holders (as defined
below) and non-U.S. holders (as defined below) as of the
date hereof. This summary deals only with holders that hold our
common stock as a capital asset.
For purposes of this summary, a U.S. holder
means a beneficial owner of our common stock that is any of the
following for U.S. federal income tax purposes: (i) a
citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a
corporation created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States, any state thereof, or the District of Columbia,
(iii) an estate the income of which is subject to
U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source, or
(iv) a trust if (1) its administration is subject to
the primary supervision of a court within the United States and
one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all
of its substantial decisions, or (2) it has a valid
election in effect under applicable U.S. Treasury
regulations to be treated as a U.S. person. A
non-U.S. holder is a beneficial owner, other
than an entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal
income tax purposes, that is not a U.S. holder.
This summary is based upon provisions of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, and regulations, rulings and judicial
decisions as of the date hereof. Those authorities may be
changed, perhaps retroactively, or be subject to differing
interpretations, so as to result in U.S. federal tax
considerations different from those summarized below. This
summary does not represent a detailed description of the
U.S. federal tax considerations to you in light of your
particular circumstances. In addition, it does not represent a
description of the U.S. federal tax considerations to you
if you are subject to special treatment under U.S. federal
tax laws (including if you are a dealer in securities, trader in
securities that uses a mark-to-market method of accounting for
securities holdings, financial institution, tax-exempt entity,
insurance company, person holding common stock as part of a
hedging, integrated, conversion or constructive sale transaction
or a straddle, person owning 10 percent or more of our
voting stock, person subject to alternative minimum tax,
U.S. holder whose functional currency is not the
U.S. dollar, U.S. expatriate, controlled foreign
corporation or passive foreign investment
company), and it generally does not address any
U.S. taxes other than the federal income tax. We cannot
assure you that a change in law will not alter significantly the
tax considerations that we describe in this summary.
If an entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal
income tax purposes holds our common stock, the tax treatment of
a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and
the activities of the partnership. If you are a partnership
holding our common stock, or a partner in such a partnership,
you should consult your tax advisors.
If you are considering the purchase of our common stock, you
should consult your own tax advisors concerning the particular
U.S. federal tax consequences to you of the ownership and
disposition of the common stock, as well as the consequences to
you arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction,
including any state, local or foreign tax consequences.
U.S. Holders
The gross amount of dividends paid to U.S. holders of
common stock will be treated as dividend income to such holders,
to the extent paid out of current or accumulated earnings and
profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax
principles. Such income will be includable in the gross income
of a U.S. holder on the day received by the
U.S. holder. Under current legislation, which is scheduled
to sunset at the end of 2008, dividend income will
generally be taxed to individual U.S. holders at rates
applicable to long-term capital gains, provided that a minimum
holding period and other limitations and requirements are
satisfied. Dividends received after 2008 will be taxable at
ordinary rates. Corporate U.S. holders may be entitled to a
dividends received deduction with respect to distributions
treated as dividend income for U.S. federal income tax
purposes, subject to numerous limitations and requirements.
159
To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our
current and accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution
will first be treated as a tax-free return of capital, causing a
reduction in the adjusted basis of the shares of common stock
(thereby increasing the amount of gain, or decreasing the amount
of loss, to be recognized by the holder on a subsequent
disposition of our common stock), and the balance in excess of
adjusted basis will be taxed as capital gain (short-term or
long-term, as applicable) recognized on a sale or exchange.
|
|
|
Gain on Disposition of Common Stock |
A U.S. holder will recognize taxable gain or loss on any
sale or exchange of shares of our common stock in an amount
equal to the difference between the amount realized and the
U.S. holders basis in such shares of common stock.
Such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss. Capital gains of
individuals derived with respect to capital assets held for more
than one year are eligible for reduced rates of taxation. The
deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitation.
|
|
|
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding |
In general, information reporting requirements will apply to
dividends paid on our common stock and to the proceeds received
on the sale, exchange or other disposition of common stock by a
U.S. holder other than certain exempt recipients (such as
corporations). A backup withholding tax will apply to such
payments if the U.S. holder fails to provide an accurate
taxpayer identification number and to comply with certain
certification procedures or otherwise establish an exemption
from backup withholding. The amount of any backup withholding
from a payment to a U.S. holder will be allowed as a refund
or credit against the U.S. holders U.S. federal
income tax liability provided that the required information is
furnished to the Internal Revenue Service, or IRS.
Non-U.S. Holders
Dividends paid to a non-U.S. holder of our common stock, to
the extent paid out of current or accumulated earnings and
profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax
principles, generally will be subject to withholding of
U.S. federal income tax at a 30.0% rate or such lower rate
as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. However,
dividends that are effectively connected with the conduct of a
trade or business by a non-U.S. holder within the United
States and, where an income tax treaty applies, are attributable
to a U.S. permanent establishment of the
non-U.S. holder, are not subject to this withholding tax,
but instead are subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net
income basis at applicable individual or corporate rates.
Certain certification and disclosure requirements must be
complied with in order for effectively connected dividends to be
exempt from this withholding tax. Any such effectively connected
dividends received by a foreign corporation may be subject to an
additional branch profits tax at a 30.0% rate or
such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax
treaty.
A non-U.S. holder of our common stock who is entitled to
and wishes to claim the benefits of an applicable treaty rate
(and avoid backup withholding as discussed below) for dividends,
will be required to (i) complete IRS Form W-8BEN (or
successor form) and make certain certifications, under penalty
of perjury, to establish its status as a non-U.S. person
and its entitlement to treaty benefits or (ii) if the
common stock is held through certain foreign intermediaries,
satisfy the relevant certification requirements of applicable
U.S. Treasury regulations. Special certification and other
requirements apply to certain non-U.S. holders that are
entities rather than individuals.
A non-U.S. holder of our common stock eligible for a
reduced rate of U.S. federal withholding tax pursuant to an
income tax treaty may obtain a refund of any excess amounts
withheld by timely filing an appropriate claim for refund with
the IRS.
160
|
|
|
Gain on Disposition of Common Stock |
A non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to
U.S. federal income tax with respect to gain recognized on
a sale or other disposition of our common stock unless:
(i) the gain is effectively connected with a trade or
business of the non-U.S. holder in the U.S. and, where a
tax treaty applies, is attributable to a U.S. permanent
establishment of the non-U.S. holder (in which case, for a
non-U.S. holder that is a foreign corporation, the branch
profits tax described above may also apply); (ii) in the
case of a non-U.S. holder who is an individual, such holder
is present in the U.S. for 183 or more days in the taxable
year of the sale or other disposition and certain other
conditions are met; or (iii) we are or have been a
U.S. real property holding corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes.
We believe we currently are not, and do not anticipate becoming,
a U.S. real property holding corporation for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. If we are or if we become
a U.S. real property holding corporation, if the common
stock is regularly traded on an established securities market, a
non-U.S. holder who holds or held (at any time during the
shorter of the five year period preceding the date of
disposition or the holders holding period) more than five
percent of the common stock will be subject to U.S. federal
income tax on a disposition of the common stock but other
non-U.S. holders will not. If the common stock is not so
traded, all non-U.S. holders will be subject to
U.S. federal income tax on disposition of the common stock.
Common stock held by an individual non-U.S. holder at the
time of death will be included in such holders gross
estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes, unless an
applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise.
|
|
|
Information Reporting and Backup Withholding |
We must report annually to the IRS and to each
non-U.S. holder the amount of dividends paid to such holder
and the tax withheld (if any) with respect to such dividends,
regardless of whether withholding was required. Copies of the
information returns reporting such dividends and any withholding
may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country
in which the non-U.S. holder resides under the provisions
of an applicable income tax treaty. In addition, dividends paid
to a non-U.S. holder generally will be subject to backup
withholding unless applicable certification requirements are met.
Payment of the proceeds of a sale of our common stock within the
United States or conducted through certain U.S. related
financial intermediaries is subject to information reporting
and, depending upon the circumstances, backup withholding unless
the beneficial owner certifies under penalties of perjury that
it is not a United States person (and the payor does not have
actual knowledge or reason to know that the beneficial owner is
a United States person) or the holder otherwise establishes an
exemption.
Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be
allowed as a refund or a credit against such holders
U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required
information is timely furnished to the IRS.
161
UNDERWRITING
Under the terms and subject to the conditions contained in an
underwriting agreement dated July 21, 2005, we and the
selling stockholders have agreed to sell to the underwriters
named below, for whom Credit Suisse First Boston LLC and
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. are acting as representatives, the
following respective numbers of shares of common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
Underwriter |
|
Shares | |
|
|
| |
Credit Suisse First Boston LLC
|
|
|
5,308,335 |
|
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
|
|
|
3,791,667 |
|
Banc of America Securities LLC
|
|
|
1,516,666 |
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
|
|
|
1,516,666 |
|
Lehman Brothers Inc.
|
|
|
1,516,666 |
|
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
|
|
|
1,516,666 |
|
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
Robert W. Baird & Co. Incorporated
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
William Blair & Company, L.L.C.
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
CMG Institutional Trading LLC
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
15,666,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters are
obligated to purchase all the shares of common stock in this
offering if any are purchased, other than those shares covered
by the over-allotment option described below. The underwriting
agreement also provides that if an underwriter defaults, the
purchase commitments of non-defaulting underwriters may be
increased or the offering may be terminated.
Certain selling stockholders have granted to the underwriters a
30-day option to purchase on a pro rata basis up to
2,350,000 additional shares at the initial public offering
price less the underwriting discounts and commissions. The
option may be exercised only to cover any over-allotments of
common stock.
The underwriters propose to offer the shares of common stock
initially at the public offering price on the cover page of this
prospectus and to selling group members at that price less a
selling concession of $0.4875 per share. The underwriters
and selling group members may allow a discount of $0.10 per
share on sales to other brokers or dealers. After the initial
public offering, the underwriters may change the public offering
price and concession and discount to brokers and dealers.
The following table summarizes the compensation and estimated
expenses we and the selling stockholders will pay:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Without Over- | |
|
With Over- | |
|
Without Over- | |
|
With Over- | |
|
|
allotment | |
|
allotment | |
|
allotment | |
|
allotment | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by us
|
|
$ |
0.8125 |
|
|
$ |
0.8125 |
|
|
$ |
4,875,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,875,000 |
|
Expenses payable by us
|
|
$ |
1.5758 |
|
|
$ |
1.5758 |
|
|
$ |
9,455,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,455,000 |
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions paid by the selling
stockholders
|
|
$ |
0.8125 |
|
|
$ |
0.8125 |
|
|
$ |
7,854,166 |
|
|
$ |
9,763,541 |
|
Expenses payable by the selling stockholders
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
In addition, Credit Suisse First Boston LLC will receive a
financial advisory fee relating to the structuring of the
offering in the amount of $500,000.
162
The underwriters have informed us that they do not expect sales
to accounts over which the underwriters have discretionary
authority to exceed 5.0% of the shares of common stock being
offered.
We have agreed that we will not offer, sell, contract to sell,
pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly or indirectly, or file
with the Securities and Exchange Commission a registration
statement under the Securities Act relating to, any additional
shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or
exchangeable or exercisable for any shares of our common stock,
or publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, sale,
pledge, disposition or filing, without the prior written consent
of Credit Suisse First Boston LLC for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus except
(a) the issuance of the common stock in the reorganization,
(b) the issuance of the common stock to the underwriters,
(c) issuances of additional common stock or grants of
employee or director stock options or other equity awards
pursuant to the terms of a plan in effect on the date of this
prospectus or contemplated by this prospectus,
(d) issuances of common stock pursuant to the exercise of
such options or the exercise of any other employee or director
stock options outstanding on the date of this prospectus,
(e) the filing of registration statements on Form S-8
under the Securities Act registering common stock issuable
pursuant to clauses (c) and (d) above, or
(f) issuances of common stock by us in connection with one
or more mergers or acquisition transactions (assets or stock),
joint ventures or other strategic corporate transactions with
unaffiliated entities; provided, however, that, in the
case of this clause (f), each recipient of such common
stock shall have, prior to any such issuance, entered into a
written lock-up agreement that is identical in all material
respects to our lock up agreement with respect to the
then-remaining portion of the lock-up period. The initial
lock-up period will commence on the date of this prospectus and
will continue and include the date 180 days after the date
hereof or such earlier date that Credit Suisse First
Boston LLC consents to in writing; provided,
however, that if (1) during the last 17 days of the
initial 180-day lock-up period, we release earnings results or
material news or a material event relating to us occurs or
(2) prior to the expiration of the initial 180-day lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the initial
180-day lock-up period, then in each case the lock-up period
will be extended until the expiration of the 18-day period
beginning on the date of release of the earnings results or the
occurrence of the material news or material event, as
applicable, unless Credit Suisse First Boston LLC waives,
in writing, such extension.
Our officers and directors and existing stockholders, including
the selling stockholders, have agreed that they will not offer,
sell, contract to sell, pledge or otherwise dispose of, directly
or indirectly, any shares of our common stock or securities
convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for any shares
of our common stock, enter into a transaction that would have
the same effect, or enter into any swap, hedge or other
arrangement that transfers, in whole or in part, any of the
economic consequences of ownership of our common stock, whether
any of these transactions are to be settled by delivery of our
common stock or other securities, in cash or otherwise, or
publicly disclose the intention to make any offer, sale, pledge
or disposition, or to enter into any transaction, swap, hedge or
other arrangement, without, in each case, the prior written
consent of Credit Suisse First Boston LLC for a period of
180 days after the date of this prospectus, except
(a) any common stock acquired in the open market after the
date of this prospectus and (b) if a selling stockholder is
a partnership, limited liability company or corporation,
(i) transfers of common stock to an affiliate of such
selling stockholder or (ii) distributions by such selling
stockholder to its partners, members or shareholders (including
by way of redemption or liquidation); provided, however,
that, in the case of this clause (b), each recipient of
such common stock shall have, prior to any such transfer or
distribution, entered into a written lock-up agreement that is
identical in all material respects to the lock-up agreement
signed by the selling stockholder with respect to the
then-remaining portion of the lock-up period. The initial
lock-up period will commence on the date of this prospectus and
will continue and include the date 180 days after the date
of this prospectus or such earlier date that Credit Suisse First
Boston LLC consents to in writing; provided,
however, that if (1) during the last 17 days of the
initial 180-day lock-up period, we release earnings results or
material news or a material event relating to us occurs or
(2) prior to the expiration of the initial 180-day lock-up
period, we announce that we will release earnings results during
the 16-day period beginning on the last day of the initial
180-day lock-up period, then in each case the lock-up period
will be extended until the expiration of the 18-day period
163
beginning on the date of release of the earnings results or the
occurrence of the material news or material event, as
applicable, unless Credit Suisse First Boston LLC waives,
in writing, such extension.
14,020,847 shares of common stock are subject to the
lock-up provisions. Credit Suisse First Boston LLC does not have
any current intention to release shares of common stock or other
securities subject to the lock-up. Any determination to release
any shares subject to the lock-up would be based on a number of
factors at the time of any such determination, including the
market price of the common stock, the liquidity of the trading
market for the common stock, general market conditions, the
number of shares proposed to be sold and the timing, purpose and
terms of the proposed sale.
The underwriters have reserved for sale at the initial public
offering price up to 5.0% of the shares of common stock being
offered for employees, directors and other persons associated
with us who have expressed an interest in purchasing common
stock in the offering.
The number of shares available for sale to the general public in
the offering will be reduced to the extent these persons
purchase the reserved shares. Any reserved shares not so
purchased will be offered by the underwriters to the general
public on the same terms as the other shares.
We and the selling stockholders have agreed to indemnify the
underwriters against liabilities under the Securities Act, or
contribute to payments that the underwriters may be required to
make in that respect.
Our common stock has been approved for quotation on the Nasdaq
National Market under the symbol CNSL, subject to
the official notice of issuance.
There has been no public market for our common stock prior to
this offering. We and the underwriters will negotiate the
initial public offering price. The factors that will be
considered include:
|
|
|
|
|
prevailing market conditions; |
|
|
|
the history of and prospects for our industry; |
|
|
|
an assessment of our management; |
|
|
|
our present operations; |
|
|
|
our historical results of operations; |
|
|
|
the trend of our revenues and earnings; and |
|
|
|
our earnings prospects. |
We and the underwriters will consider these and other relevant
factors in relation to the price of similar securities of
generally comparable companies. Neither we nor the selling
stockholders nor the underwriters can assure investors that an
active trading market will develop for our common stock, or that
our common stock will trade in the public market at or above the
initial public offering price.
In connection with this offering and the related transactions,
the underwriters may engage in stabilizing transactions,
over-allotment transactions, syndicate covering transactions,
and penalty bids in accordance with Regulation M under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying
security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a
specified maximum. |
|
|
|
Over-allotment involves sales by the underwriters of shares in
excess of the number of shares the underwriters are obligated to
purchase, which creates a syndicate short position. The short
position may be either a covered short position or a naked short
position. In a covered short position, the number of shares
over-allotted by the underwriters is not greater than the number
of shares that they may purchase in the over-allotment option.
In a naked short position, the number of shares involved is
greater than the number of shares in the over-allotment option.
The underwriters may close out any covered short position by
either exercising their over-allotment option or purchasing
shares in the open market. |
164
|
|
|
|
|
Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the common
stock in the open market after the distribution has been
completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. In
determining the source of shares to close out the short
position, the underwriters will consider, among other things,
the price of shares available for purchase in the open market as
compared to the price at which they may purchase shares through
the over-allotment option. If the underwriters sell more shares
than could be covered by the over- allotment option, a naked
short position, the position can only be closed out by buying
shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely
to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there could
be downward pressure on the price of the shares in the open
market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who
purchase in the offering. |
|
|
|
Penalty bids permit the representatives to reclaim a selling
concession from a syndicate member when the common stock
originally sold by the syndicate member is purchased in a
stabilizing or syndicate covering transaction to cover syndicate
short positions. |
These stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions
and penalty bids may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of our common stock or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of the common stock. As a result
the price of our common stock may be higher than the price that
might otherwise exist in the open market. These transactions may
be effected on the Nasdaq National Market or otherwise and, if
commenced, may be discontinued at any time.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available by one
or more of the underwriters, or selling group members, if any,
participating in this offering, and one or more of the
underwriters participating in this offering may distribute
prospectuses electronically. The representatives may agree to
allocate a number of shares to underwriters and selling group
members for sale to their online brokerage account holders.
Internet distributions will be allocated by the underwriters and
selling group members that will make Internet distributions on
the same basis as other allocations.
Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates
have, from time to time, performed, and may in the future
perform, various financial advisory and investment banking
services for us, for which they received or will receive
customary fees and expenses. Affiliates of Credit Suisse First
Boston LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Deutsche Bank
Securities Inc. are expected to act as lenders and agents under,
and in connection therewith will receive customary fees and
expenses in connection with, our amended and restated credit
facilities and affiliates of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. will receive a portion of the
prepayment of the term loan A facility. See
Description of Indebtedness Amended and
Restated Credit Facilities.
The decision of each of Credit Suisse First Boston LLC,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
to distribute the shares of our common stock in this offering
was made independent of the lender with which it is affiliated.
That lender had no involvement in determining whether or when to
distribute the shares of our common stock under this offering or
the terms of this offering. The underwriters will not receive
any benefit from this offering other than the underwriting
discounts and commissions described in the prospectus.
Each of the underwriters has represented and agreed that
(i) it has not offered or sold, and will not offer or sell
any shares to persons in the United Kingdom, except to persons
who have professional experience in investments or whose
ordinary activities involve them in acquiring, holding, managing
or disposing of investments (as principal or agent) for the
purposes of their business or otherwise in circumstances which
have not resulted and will not result in an offer to the public
in the United Kingdom within the meaning of the Public Offers of
Securities Regulations 1995; (ii) it has complied and will
comply with all applicable provisions of the Financial Services
Act 1986 and all applicable provisions of the Financial Services
and Markets Act 2000, or FSMA, with respect to anything done by
it in relation to the shares in, from or otherwise involving the
United Kingdom; and (iii) it has only communicated or
caused to be communicated and will only communicate or cause to
be communicated any invitation or inducement to engage in
investment activity (within the meaning of the FSMA) received by
it in connection with the issue or sale of the shares in
circumstances in which Section 21(1) of the FSMA does not
apply to us.
165
Each underwriter has acknowledged that (i) it has not
offered or sold, and will not offer or sell, the shares to any
investors in Switzerland other than on a non-public basis;
(ii) this prospectus does not constitute a prospectus
within the meaning of Article 652a and Art. 1156 of
the Swiss Code of Obligations (Schweizerisches
Obligationenrect); and (iii) neither this offering nor
the shares has been or will be approved by any Swiss regulatory
authority.
VALIDITY OF THE COMMON STOCK
The validity of the shares of common stock being offered will be
passed upon for CCI Holdings by King & Spalding
llp. Certain legal
matters relating to this offering will be passed upon for the
underwriters by Cahill Gordon &
Reindel llp.
EXPERTS
The consolidated financial statements of Homebase Acquisition,
LLC (doing business as Consolidated Communications) at
December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2004 and for the
years then ended, appearing in this Prospectus and Registration
Statement, have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP,
independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in
their report thereon appearing elsewhere herein, and are
included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of
such firm as experts in accounting and auditing. The combined
financial statements of Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company
and Related Businesses (as predecessor company to Homebase
Acquisition, LLC) at December 30, 2002 and for the year
then ended appearing in this prospectus and the registration
statement of which this prospectus forms a part have been
audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered
public accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon
appearing elsewhere herein, and are included in reliance upon
such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of TXU Communications Ventures Company
and Subsidiaries as of April 13, 2004, December 31,
2003 and 2002, and the period from January 1, 2004 to
April 13, 2004 and each of the three years ended
December 31, 2003 included in this prospectus have been
audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report
appearing herein (which report expresses an unqualified opinion
and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption
of the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets), and has
been so included in reliance upon the report of such firm given
upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
The financial statements of GTE Mobilnet of Texas #17 Limited
Partnership as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and for each
of the three years ended December 31, 2004 included in this
prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP,
an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report appearing herein, and are included in reliance upon
the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
166
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed a registration statement on Form S-1 with the
SEC regarding this offering. This prospectus, which is part of
the registration statement, does not contain all of the
information included in the registration statement, and you
should refer to the registration statement and its exhibits to
read that information. As a result of the effectiveness of the
registration statement, we are subject to the informational
reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and, under that Exchange Act, we will file reports,
proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may
read and copy the registration statement, the related exhibits
and the reports, proxy statements and other information we file
with the SEC at the SECs public reference facilities
maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E.,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You can also request copies of those
documents, upon payment of a duplicating fee, by writing to the
SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further
information on the operation of the public reference rooms. The
SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy
and information statements and other information regarding
issuers that file with the SEC. The sites Internet address
is www.sec.gov.
You may also request a copy of these filings, at no cost, by
writing or telephoning us at:
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.
121 South 17th Street
Mattoon, Illinois 61938-3987
Attention: Secretary
Telephone: (217) 235-3311
167
INDEX TO
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
P-1
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements are based upon the historical consolidated financial
statements of Homebase. The unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated statements of operations give effect to the two
groups of transactions described below. The unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated balance sheet gives effect only to the
initial public offering and related transactions described
below. All capitalized terms that are used but not defined in
these pro forma financial statements have the meanings assigned
to them in the other parts of this prospectus.
TXUCV Acquisition
The first group of transactions consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the contribution by the existing equity investors of
$89.0 million in cash in exchange for additional
Class A preferred shares of Homebase, the distribution by
CCI, a wholly owned subsidiary of Homebase, of
$63.4 million to Homebase and the contribution by Homebase
of $152.4 million to Consolidated Communications Texas
Holdings, Inc. of the aggregate proceeds of such distribution
and contribution; |
|
|
|
the TXUCV acquisition by Texas Holdings, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Homebase, on April 14, 2004, pursuant to
which Texas Holdings acquired all of the capital stock of TXUCV
for $524.1 million in cash, net of cash acquired and
including transaction costs; |
|
|
|
the refinancing and termination of the CoBank credit facilities
of CCI, and the entering into, and borrowing under, the existing
credit facilities; |
|
|
|
the issuance of $200.0 million of the senior notes; and |
|
|
|
the payment of related fees and expenses. |
The TXUCV acquisition was accounted for as a purchase in
accordance with Statements of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS 141). Following the closing of the TXUCV
acquisition, the total purchase price was allocated to the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed of TXUCV based on their
respective fair values in accordance with the purchase method of
accounting.
We engaged independent appraisers to assist in determining the
fair values of tangible and intangible assets acquired in the
TXUCV acquisition. We allocated the total purchase price to the
assets and liabilities using estimates of their fair value based
on work performed to date by the independent appraisers.
The existing credit facilities provided financing of
$467.0 million, consisting of
|
|
|
|
|
A $122.0 million term loan A facility with a six year
maturity; |
|
|
|
A $315.0 million term loan B facility with a seven year and
six-month maturity; and |
|
|
|
A $30.0 million revolving credit facility with a six year
maturity, all of which remains available for general corporate
purposes. |
On October 22, 2004 we amended and restated the existing
credit facilities to, among other things, convert all borrowings
then outstanding under the term loan B facility into
approximately $314.0 million of aggregate borrowings under
a new term loan C facility. The term loan C facility is
substantially identical to the term loan B facility, except that
the applicable margin for borrowings under the term loan C
facility through April 1, 2005 was 1.50% with respect to
base rate loans and 2.50% with respect to LIBOR loans.
Thereafter, provided certain credit ratings are maintained, the
applicable margin for borrowings under the term loan C facility
is 1.25% with respect to base rate loans and 2.25% with respect
to LIBOR loans.
P-2
The borrowings under the existing credit facilities have borne
interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at the
borrowers option, either a base rate or a LIBOR rate. The
current applicable margin for borrowings under the existing
credit facilities are:
|
|
|
|
|
in respect of the term loan A facility and the revolving credit
facility, 1.25% with respect to base rate loans and 2.25% with
respect to LIBOR loans; and |
|
|
|
in respect of the term loan C facility, 1.50% with respect to
base rate loans and 2.50% with respect to LIBOR loans. |
Cash Distribution to the Existing Equity Investors;
Initial Public Offering and Related Transactions
The second group of transactions will consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
$37.5 million cash dividend paid to our existing equity
investors on June 7, 2005, including approximately
$0.4 million of expenses incurred to amend our existing
credit facilities to permit this distribution; |
|
|
|
the reorganization of Homebase, Illinois Holdings and
Consolidated Communications Texas Holdings, Inc., pursuant to
which first Consolidated Communications Texas Holdings, Inc. and
then Homebase will merge with and into Illinois Holdings, in
each case with Illinois Holdings surviving the merger, and
thereafter Illinois Holdings will change its name to
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc., or CCI Holdings; |
|
|
|
Our existing stockholders receipt from Homebase of shares of CCI
Holdings common stock representing 100% of the outstanding
common stock of CCI Holdings; |
|
|
|
the initial public offering of common stock of CCI Holdings and
the sale by the selling stockholders of additional shares of
their common stock; |
|
|
|
the amendment and restatement of the existing credit facilities
to provide for, among other things, the repayment in full of our
term loan A and C facilities and to borrow $425.0 million
under a new term loan D facility. See Description of
Indebtedness Amended and Restated Credit
Facilities. |
|
|
|
the amendment of the restricted share plan to eliminate the call
provision and to accelerate the vesting schedule; |
|
|
|
the redemption of 32.5% of the aggregate principal amount of our
senior notes and payment of the associated redemption premium of
9.75% of the principal amount to be redeemed, together with
accrued and unpaid interest through the date of redemption; and |
|
|
|
the payment of related fees and expenses. |
The amended and restated credit facilities are expected to
provide financing of up to $455.0 million and consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
a new term loan D facility of up to $425.0 million maturing
on October 14, 2011; and |
|
|
|
$30.0 million revolving credit facility maturing on
April 14, 2010. |
We expect that the interest rates and commitment fee on the
amended and restated credit facilities will be the same as those
as the existing credit facilities. The amended and restated
credit facilities have not yet been agreed upon, and the
descriptions set forth in this prospectus represent our current
expectations regarding the terms of the credit facilities.
In connection with the offering, the two professional service
fee agreements that Homebase entered into with its existing
equity investors will automatically terminate. The first
agreement required CCI to pay to Mr. Lumpkin, Providence
Equity and Spectrum Equity an annual professional services fee
in the aggregate amount of $2.0 million for consulting,
advisory and other professional services provided to CCI and its
subsidiaries. The second agreement, entered into in connection
with the TXUCV acquisition, required Consolidated Communications
Acquisition Texas, Inc., or Texas Holdings, to pay
Mr. Lumpkin
P-3
and Providence Equity and Spectrum Equity an annual professional
services fee in the aggregate amount of $3.0 million for
consulting, advisory and other professional services provided to
Texas Holdings and its subsidiaries.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial
statements were prepared to illustrate the estimated effects of
the transactions described above. The pro forma adjustments and
the assumptions on which they are based are described in the
accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated financial statements. You should read the unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes in conjunction with the information contained
in Use of Proceeds, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations CCI Holdings and CCI
Texas and the consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance sheet as
of March 31, 2005 gives effect to the transactions
described above, except for the impact of the TXUCV acquisition,
since the acquisition occurred on April 14, 2004 and is
included in Homebases historical consolidated financial
statements as of March 31, 2005.
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 and
the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 give effect
to the transactions described above as if they had occurred on
January 1, 2004.
In connection with this offering and the related transactions,
we will record certain charges in our financial statements at
the time such transactions are consummated. As these charges are
non-recurring in nature, we have not recorded any pro forma
effect in the pro forma condensed consolidated statements of
operations. These non-recurring charges, which total
approximately $15.4 million, include approximately
$6.4 million to recognize non-cash compensation expense
associated with the amendment and restatement of our restricted
share plan, $2.3 million of unamortized deferred financing
costs related to the redemption of a portion of our senior
notes, $0.4 million of expenses incurred to amend our
existing credit facilities to permit the cash distribution to
our existing equity investors and $6.3 million related to
the 9.75% redemption premium associated with the senior note
redemption.
The company anticipates that it will incur additional costs
related to being a public company of approximately
$1.0 million per year. No adjustment has been made in the
accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
statements of operations for these costs.
The pro forma adjustments are based upon available information
and certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable. The
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated financial statements
do not necessarily indicate the results that would have actually
occurred if the transactions described above had been in effect
on the date indicated or that may occur in the future.
P-4
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCI Texas | |
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Pro Forma as | |
|
and IPO | |
|
as Adjusted | |
|
|
Homebase | |
|
January 1 - | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Adjusted for | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
for Acquisition | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
April 13 | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
and IPO | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
269,608 |
|
|
$ |
53,855 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
323,463 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
323,463 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below)
|
|
|
80,572 |
|
|
|
15,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,868 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
87,955 |
|
|
|
24,138 |
|
|
|
(1,118 |
)(2) |
|
|
110,975 |
|
|
|
(5,000 |
)(7) |
|
|
108,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,142 |
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
54,522 |
|
|
|
8,124 |
|
|
|
4,875 |
(3) |
|
|
67,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,521 |
|
|
Intangible impairment charges
|
|
|
11,578 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
234,627 |
|
|
|
47,546 |
|
|
|
3,757 |
|
|
|
285,930 |
|
|
|
(2,858 |
) |
|
|
283,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
34,981 |
|
|
|
6,309 |
|
|
|
(3,757 |
) |
|
|
37,533 |
|
|
|
2,858 |
|
|
|
40,391 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(39,935 |
) |
|
|
(1,244 |
) |
|
|
(3,484 |
)(4) |
|
|
(44,663 |
) |
|
|
44,663 |
(9) |
|
|
(36,956 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,956 |
)(9) |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment penalty on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
Partnership income
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
1,174 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,462 |
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
2,698 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(911 |
) |
|
|
4,256 |
|
|
|
(7,241 |
) |
|
|
(3,896 |
) |
|
|
10,565 |
|
|
|
6,669 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
(3,012 |
)(5) |
|
|
(307 |
) |
|
|
5,286 |
(10) |
|
|
4,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,143 |
) |
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
(4,229 |
) |
|
|
(3,589 |
) |
|
|
5,279 |
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
Dividends on redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
(14,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,225 |
)(6) |
|
|
(17,190 |
) |
|
|
17,190 |
(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(16,108 |
) |
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
|
$ |
(6,454 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,779 |
) |
|
$ |
22,469 |
|
|
$ |
1,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(1.79 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(2.31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares for calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
9,000,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,687,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
P-5
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
|
|
and IPO | |
|
as Adjusted | |
|
|
Homebase | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
for Acquisition | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
and IPO | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
79,772 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
79,772 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below)
|
|
|
24,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,417 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
26,196 |
|
|
|
(1,250 |
)(7) |
|
|
25,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536 |
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
67,431 |
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
66,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
12,341 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
13,055 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(11,694 |
) |
|
|
11,694 |
(9) |
|
|
(9,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,922 |
)(9) |
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership income
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
2,486 |
|
|
|
3,773 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
1,336 |
(10) |
|
|
1,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
Dividends on redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
(4,623 |
) |
|
|
4,623 |
(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(3,922 |
) |
|
$ |
5,773 |
|
|
$ |
1,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares for calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
9,250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,687,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
P-6
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CCI Texas | |
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
|
|
Historical | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Pro Forma as | |
|
and IPO | |
|
as Adjusted | |
|
|
Homebase | |
|
January 1 - | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
Adjusted for | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
for Acquisition | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
March 31 | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
Acquisition | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
and IPO | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
34,067 |
|
|
$ |
45,366 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
79,433 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
79,433 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below)
|
|
|
12,374 |
|
|
|
13,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,508 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,589 |
|
|
|
15,086 |
|
|
|
(977 |
)(2) |
|
|
24,698 |
|
|
|
(1,250 |
)(7) |
|
|
23,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
536 |
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
8,150 |
|
|
|
4,260 |
(3) |
|
|
17,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
28,329 |
|
|
|
36,370 |
|
|
|
3,283 |
|
|
|
67,982 |
|
|
|
(714 |
) |
|
|
67,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
5,738 |
|
|
|
8,996 |
|
|
|
(3,283 |
) |
|
|
11,451 |
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
12,165 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,829 |
) |
|
|
(1,140 |
) |
|
|
(7,023 |
)(4) |
|
|
(10,992 |
) |
|
|
10,992 |
(9) |
|
|
(9,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,076 |
)(9) |
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
857 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
8,698 |
|
|
|
(10,306 |
) |
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
2,630 |
|
|
|
3,963 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
(4,164 |
)(5) |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
(10) |
|
|
1,515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
5,475 |
|
|
|
(6,142 |
) |
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
Dividends on redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
(2,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,003 |
)(6) |
|
|
(4,277 |
) |
|
|
4,277 |
(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(510 |
) |
|
$ |
5,475 |
|
|
$ |
(8,145 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,180 |
) |
|
$ |
5,628 |
|
|
$ |
2,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares for calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
9,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,687,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
P-7
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
March 31, 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and IPO | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
|
Homebase | |
|
Pro Forma | |
|
as Adjusted | |
|
|
Historical | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
for IPO | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
56,538 |
|
|
$ |
(37,921 |
)(11) |
|
$ |
13,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,545 |
(12) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73,568 |
)(13) |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
32,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,148 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
12,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
103,916 |
|
|
|
(42,944 |
) |
|
|
60,972 |
|
Intangibles and other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
353,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
353,060 |
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
43,261 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,261 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
318,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
318,481 |
|
|
Customer lists, net
|
|
|
146,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146,236 |
|
|
Tradenames, net
|
|
|
14,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,546 |
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
18,507 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
(14) |
|
|
19,583 |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
4,005 |
(16) |
|
|
8,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,002,243 |
|
|
$ |
(37,863 |
) |
|
$ |
964,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
41,242 |
|
|
$ |
(40,706 |
)(13) |
|
$ |
536 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
9,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,621 |
|
|
Accrued expenses and advance billings and customer deposits
|
|
|
41,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
92,772 |
|
|
|
(40,706 |
) |
|
|
52,066 |
|
Long-term debt less current maturities
|
|
|
583,667 |
|
|
|
(63,850 |
)(13) |
|
|
560,523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,706 |
(13) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
68,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,192 |
|
Pension and post retirement obligations and other liabilities
|
|
|
66,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
|
810,725 |
|
|
|
(63,850 |
) |
|
|
746,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,457 |
|
Redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
210,092 |
|
|
|
(37,500 |
)(11) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(172,592 |
)(12) |
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297 |
(12) |
|
|
297 |
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
240,840 |
(12) |
|
|
247,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,427 |
(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(23,033 |
) |
|
|
(11,485 |
)(15) |
|
|
(34,518 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(21,031 |
) |
|
|
236,079 |
|
|
|
215,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
1,002,243 |
|
|
$ |
(37,863 |
) |
|
$ |
964,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
P-8
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollars in thousands)
PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS FOR TXUCV ACQUISITION
The consolidated historical financial statements include the
results of operations of the TXUCV acquisition since the
April 14, 2004 acquisition date. The adjustments described
in notes 2 through 6 have been made to the accompanying
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of
operations to reflect the results of operations as if this
acquisition occurred on January 1, 2004 (amounts in
thousands):
In connection with the TXUCV acquisition on April 14, 2004,
we acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
a 2.34% interest in GTE Mobilnet of South, Texas, LP
(South Texas); |
|
|
|
a 17.02% interest in GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17, LP
(RSA #17); and |
|
|
|
a 39.06% interest in Fort Bend Fibernet, LP
(Fort Bend). |
Prior to the date of the TXUCV acquisition, TXUCV accounted for
each of these partnership investments using the equity method of
accounting. Under this method of accounting, partnership income
(or loss) was recognized based upon TXUCVs pro rata
share of the income (or loss) from each partnership. For
periods subsequent to the date of the TXUCV acquisition, we
determined (in accordance with Topic D-46: Accounting
for Limited Partnership Investments) to continue
to account for RSA #17 and Fort Bend using the equity
method, but to account for South Texas using the cost method.
The decision to change from the equity method to the cost method
was based upon several factors, including our small ownership
interest and our limited ability to influence South Texas
operating and financial policies.
As a result of the change from the equity method to the cost
method, the partnership income recognized from South Texas
during the period it was owned by TXUCV will not continue in the
future. Instead, under the cost method, we will only recognize
income when we receive a cash distribution from South Texas, and
then only to the extent such distribution represents earnings
from South Texas rather than a return of capital.
For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the three months
ended March 31, 2004, our unaudited pro forma condensed
statement of operations included $661 and $463 of partnership
income and $1,806 and $0 of dividend income, respectively, from
our investment in South Texas. However, had we accounted for our
investment in South Texas on the cost method, our unaudited pro
forma condensed statement of operations would have included $0
of partnership income and $2,467 and $2,269 of dividend income
over these same periods.
|
|
2. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
The pro forma adjustments to selling, general and administrative
expenses reflect a reduction in costs resulting from the
termination of TXUCV employees that occurred in connection with
the TXUCV acquisition and was recognized in accordance with
EITF 95-3, Recognition of Liabilities in
Connection with a Purchase Business Combination, and
incremental professional service fees to be paid to
P-9
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
Mr. Lumpkin, Providence Equity and Spectrum Equity pursuant
to the second professional services agreement entered into in
connection with the TXUCV acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Effect of TXUCV acquisition related headcount reductions
|
|
$ |
(1,983 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,733 |
) |
Incremental professional service fees
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,118 |
) |
|
$ |
(977 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Depreciation and Amortization |
The pro forma adjustments to depreciation and amortization
reflect (a) the removal of the historical basis of depreciation
and amortization of the TXUCV assets and (b) based on the
write-up of these assets to fair value in accordance with SFAS
141, the increase in depreciation and amortization expense for
of property and equipment, capitalized software, and intangible
assets acquired in the TXUCV acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Removing historical depreciation and amortization
|
|
$ |
(62,646 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,516 |
) |
Recording new depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
67,521 |
|
|
|
17,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,875 |
|
|
$ |
4,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The pro forma adjustments to interest expense are based on the
amounts borrowed and the rates assumed to be in effect at the
closing of the TXUCV transaction. Amounts outstanding under the
term loan facilities A and C bear interest at 225 and
250 basis points above LIBOR respectively.
In connection with the TXUCV acquisition, the Company issued
$200 million of
93/4% Senior
Notes due in 2012.
P-10
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
A summary of the pro forma adjustment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Estimated | |
|
Estimated | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Principal | |
|
Interest | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Rates | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Removal of historical interest expense including amortization of
deferred financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
41,179 |
|
|
$ |
3,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording of new interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan A
|
|
$ |
122,000 |
|
|
|
LIBOR + 2.50% |
|
|
|
(4,892 |
) |
|
|
(1,125 |
) |
|
Term loan B
|
|
|
315,000 |
|
|
|
LIBOR + 2.75% |
|
|
|
(13,419 |
) |
|
|
(3,103 |
) |
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
9.750% |
|
|
|
(19,500 |
) |
|
|
(4,875 |
) |
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
6.500% |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
Revolver commitment fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
Net effect of interest rate hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,733 |
) |
|
|
(1,109 |
) |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,900 |
) |
|
|
(725 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total new interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44,663 |
) |
|
|
(10,992 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustment to interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(3,484 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average LIBOR rates for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the three months ended March 31,
2004 were 1.51% and 1.19%, respectively.
The blended effective tax rate applied to the pro forma
adjustments related to the TXUCV acquisition and the related
financing is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve months ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
41.6 |
% |
Three months ended March 31, 2004
|
|
|
40.4 |
% |
|
|
6. |
Dividends on Preferred Shares |
At closing of the TXUCV acquisition, we issued an additional
$89,000 of Class A redeemable preferred shares with a 9%
annual preferred dividend.
P-11
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
IPO PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS FOR OFFERING AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS
|
|
7. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses |
Pro forma selling, general and administrative expenses prior to
the offering for the year ended December 31, 2004 and for
the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2005 included
$5,000, $1,250 and $1,250, respectively in aggregate
professional services fees paid to Mr. Lumpkin, Providence
Equity and Spectrum Equity pursuant to the two professional
services agreements. Under the professional service fee
agreements, Mr. Lumpkin, Providence Equity and Spectrum
Equity have provided consulting, advisory and other professional
services to CCI and Texas Holdings. The parties, by virtue of
the fees being paid, were available to assist with significant
transactions such as the TXUCV acquisition, debt offering and
IPO on a day-to-day basis. Upon the closing of the offering,
these professional service agreements will automatically
terminate. Entries have been made to the accompanying unaudited
pro forma condensed consolidated statements of operations to
eliminate the payment of these fees. Following the closing of
this offering, we expect that these services will not be needed
to the extent previously provided. If and when significant
transactions arise, we believe that the services will either be
performed by company personnel, who now have substantially more
experience in these matters since December 2002 when the first
agreement was entered into, or we will retain these or other
professionals to assist us.
In connection with this offering, we will incur an estimated
non-cash charge of $6,427 to reflect compensation expense
related to the amendment and restatement of our restricted share
plan. The amendment and restatement will change the accounting
treatment from a variable plan, for which expense is recognized
based on a specified formula, to a fixed plan for which expense
is recognized for the intrinsic value on the date of grant. The
amendment and restatement represents a modification to the terms
of the equity awards, resulting in a new measurement date.
Concurrently with the amendment and restatement and immediately
prior to this offering, the vesting schedule will be accelerated
such that 25% of the outstanding restricted shares will
immediately vest. As a result, 50% of the restricted shares
granted in 2003 and 25% of the restricted shares granted in 2004
will become vested. The $6,427 charge represents the value of
the vested shares as of the new measurement date.
The amendment and restatement also adjusts the vesting period
for the remaining restricted shares such that they will vest in
three equal installments on each of next three calendar year
ends. The pro forma adjustment for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and the three months ended March 31,
2005 and March 31, 2004 is $2,142, $536 and $536
respectively. This amount reflects non-cash compensation expense
based on the vesting schedule under the amended and restated
restricted share plan. The pro forma adjustment to paid in
capital is $6,427 reflecting the impact of this one-time charge.
Although we recorded a charge of $6,427 to accumulated deficit
for pro forma purposes, this amount plus the amount of the
charge associated with the vesting of restricted shares in 2005,
will be expensed in our 2005 results of operations upon the
amendment and restatement of our restricted share plan.
The pro forma adjustments to interest expense, net and the
amortization of deferred financing costs are based on the
estimated net changes to outstanding debt and interest expense
as a result of the offering and the related transactions, which
are estimated to be (a) the redemption of $65,000 in aggregate
principal amount of senior notes and (b) the elimination of the
existing amortization of, and the creation
P-12
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
of new, deferred financing costs relating to the amendment and
restatement of the existing credit facilities. A summary of
these entries follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
Three Months | |
|
|
Estimated | |
|
|
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
Ended | |
|
|
Principal | |
|
Estimated | |
|
December 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Interest Rates | |
|
2004 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Removal of pro forma interest expense prior to the offering
including amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
44,663 |
|
|
$ |
10,992 |
|
|
$ |
11,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan D
|
|
|
$425,000 |
|
|
|
LIBOR +2.5 |
% |
|
|
(17,043 |
) |
|
|
(3,921 |
) |
|
|
(5,674 |
) |
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
9.750 |
% |
|
|
(13,163 |
) |
|
|
(3,291 |
) |
|
|
(3,291 |
) |
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
6.500 |
% |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
Revolver commitment fee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
Net effect of interest rate hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,733 |
) |
|
|
(1,109 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,798 |
) |
|
|
(700 |
) |
|
|
(700 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total new interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36,956 |
) |
|
|
(9,076 |
) |
|
|
(9,922 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net adjustment to interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,707 |
|
|
$ |
1,916 |
|
|
$ |
1,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average LIBOR rates for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2004 and 2005 were 1.51%, 1.19% and 2.84%
respectively.
As of March 31, 2005, we had a balance of $18,507 for
deferred financing costs relating to our existing credit
facilities and the senior notes. We will write off $2,304 of
deferred financing costs associated with the redemption of
senior notes and we will incur $3,380 of deferred financing
costs to amend and restate the existing credit facilities. CCI
Holdings will amortize the pro forma balance of $19,583 deferred
financing costs over the term of the respective debt agreements.
The blended effective tax rate applied for CCI Holdings pro
forma adjustments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve months ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
41.6 |
% |
Three months ended March 31, 2004
|
|
|
40.4 |
% |
Three months ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
44.2 |
% |
Non-cash compensation charges of $2,142, $536 and $536 for the
year ended December 31, 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2004 and 2005 is not deductible for tax purposes.
|
|
11. |
Cash Distribution to Existing Equity Investors |
A cash distribution of $37,500 was made to our existing equity
investors on June 7, 2005. This distribution will result in
a reduction of $37,500 in the outstanding balance of redeemable
preferred shares. The distribution, as well as fees totaling
$421 incurred in connection with the amendment of our existing
credit facilities to permit this distribution, were funded with
existing cash on our balance sheet.
P-13
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
12. |
Reorganization and Offering |
Pro forma adjustments to cash are derived from the effect of the
reorganization and the offering.
To effect the reorganization, first Consolidated Communications
Texas Holdings, Inc. and then Homebase will merge with and into
CCI Holdings. In connection with the mergers described in the
preceding sentence, our existing stockholders will receive
shares of common stock of CCI Holdings representing 100% of the
outstanding common stock of CCI Holdings.
In the offering, CCI Holdings expects to issue $78,000 of common
stock, or 6,000,000 shares in this offering. CCI Holdings
will not receive any proceeds from the sale by the selling
stockholders of 9,666,666 shares in this offering. Upon the
consummation of this offering, redeemable preferred shares of
Homebase which include a preferred return on the holders
capital contributions at the rate of 9% per annum, will be
converted into 13,710,318 shares of common stock. As of
March 31, 2005, the balance of the redeemable preferred
shares was $210,092. On June 7, 2005, a cash distribution
of $37,500 was made to our existing equity investors. This
distribution will result in a $37,500 reduction in the balance
of redeemable preferred shares to $172,592. Entries have been
made to the accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet to reflect the adjustment to cash and
to record the following for the issuance of the new shares of
common stock in this offering as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Gross cash proceeds
|
|
$ |
78,000 |
|
Less transaction fees and expenses
|
|
|
(9,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash proceeds
|
|
$ |
68,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$ |
297 |
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid in capital
|
|
$ |
77,703 |
|
Conversion of redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
172,592 |
|
Less transaction fees and expenses
|
|
|
(9,455 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Paid in capital
|
|
$ |
240,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
Amendment and Restatement of Existing Credit Facilities and
Redemption of Senior Notes |
Pro forma adjustments to cash are derived from the effect of the
amendment and restatement of the existing credit facilities and
the redemption of a portion of our senior notes. We expect the
amendment and restatement will consist of the use of $2,230 of
cash on hand and borrowings of $425,000 under the new term
loan D facility. These funds will be used for the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement of the $112,000 term loan A facility |
|
|
|
Retirement of the $311,850 term loan C facility |
|
|
|
The payment of $3,380 of deferred financing costs associated
with the amended and restated credit facilities |
We will use $71,338 of the net proceeds of the offering to
redeem $65,000 in aggregate principal amount of senior notes and
to pay the associated $6,338 redemption premium.
Entries have been made in the accompanying unaudited pro forma
condensed consolidated financial statements to reflect these
transactions.
P-14
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands)
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of term loan A facility
|
|
$ |
(112,000 |
) |
Payment of term loan C facility
|
|
|
(311,850 |
) |
New term loan D facility
|
|
|
425,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings on loan facilities
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
Senior notes redemption
|
|
|
(65,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to long-term debt
|
|
$ |
(63,850 |
) |
Redemption premium
|
|
|
(6,338 |
) |
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(3,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used
|
|
$ |
(73,568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
We anticipate that our amended and restated credit facilities
will not require the borrowers to make scheduled amortization
payments in respect of the term loan D facility.
Accordingly, $40,706 of term loan A amortization included
in the current portion of long term debt has been reclassified
to long-term debt.
|
|
14. |
Deferred Financing Costs |
We will write off $2,304 of deferred financing costs associated
with the redemption of senior notes and incur $3,380 of deferred
financing costs to amend and restate the credit facilities as
described in note 11. Entries have been made in the
accompanying unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements to reflect these transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
Write-off of pro rata share of deferred financing costs
associated with the redemption of senior notes
|
|
$ |
(2,304 |
) |
Recording of new deferred financing costs associated with the
amendment and restatement of existing credit facilities
|
|
|
3,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
The pro forma accumulated deficit reflects the non-recurring
charges as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Charge to reflect expense for 50% vesting of restricted shares
|
|
$ |
(6,427 |
) |
Expensing of the redemption premium on senior notes, net of tax
|
|
|
(3,537 |
) |
Write-off of the pro rata share of the deferred financing costs
associated with the redemption of senior notes, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,286 |
) |
Expenses incurred to amend our existing credit facilities in
connection with cash distribution to existing equity investors
|
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(11,485 |
) |
|
|
|
|
This pro forma adjustment reflects the tax effect, using a 44.2%
effective tax rate on the redemption premium on the senior notes
($2,801), write-off of the pro-rata share of the deferred
financing costs associated with the redemption of a portion of
the senior notes ($1,018) and expenses incurred to amend our
existing credit facilities in connection with the cash
distribution to our existing equity investors ($186).
P-15
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
Audited Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
|
|
|
F-33 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-35 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-36 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-37 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-38 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-39 |
|
|
|
|
F-50 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-51 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-52 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-54 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-55 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-56 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-57 |
|
|
|
|
F-79 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-80 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-81 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-82 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-83 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-84 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-85 |
|
Unaudited Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-92 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-93 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-94 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-95 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-96 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-97 |
|
F-1
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED
December 31, 2004 and 2003
With Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors
Homebase Acquisition, LLC
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Homebase Acquisition, LLC (the Company) as of December 31,
2004 and December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, members deficit, and cash flows
for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Companys internal control over financial
reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of the Company at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of
their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended,
in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
Chicago, Illinois
March 11, 2005
F-3
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
52,084 |
|
|
$ |
10,142 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2,613 and $1,837,
respectively
|
|
|
33,817 |
|
|
|
18,701 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,529 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
6,179 |
|
|
|
5,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
98,887 |
|
|
|
39,631 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
360,760 |
|
|
|
104,580 |
|
Intangibles and other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
42,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
318,481 |
|
|
|
99,554 |
|
|
Customer lists, net
|
|
|
149,805 |
|
|
|
53,559 |
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
14,546 |
|
|
|
15,863 |
|
|
Deferred financing costs and other assets
|
|
|
20,736 |
|
|
|
4,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,006,099 |
|
|
$ |
317,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS DEFICIT |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
41,079 |
|
|
$ |
10,300 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
11,176 |
|
|
|
5,518 |
|
|
Advance billings and customer deposits
|
|
|
11,061 |
|
|
|
6,368 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
34,251 |
|
|
|
12,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
97,567 |
|
|
|
34,828 |
|
Long-term debt less current maturities
|
|
|
588,342 |
|
|
|
170,100 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
66,641 |
|
|
|
1,114 |
|
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations
|
|
|
61,361 |
|
|
|
12,595 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
972 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
817,134 |
|
|
|
219,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A, redeemable preferred shares, $1 par value,
182,000 shares authorized, 182,000 and 93,000 shares
issued and outstanding, respectively; liquidation preference of
$205,469 and $101,504, respectively
|
|
|
205,469 |
|
|
|
101,504 |
|
Common members deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, no par value, 10,000,000 shares, authorized,
10,000,000 and 9,975,000 shares issued and outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in capital
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(19,111 |
) |
|
|
(3,003 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common members deficit
|
|
|
(18,795 |
) |
|
|
(3,518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members deficit
|
|
$ |
1,006,099 |
|
|
$ |
317,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-4
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
269,608 |
|
|
$ |
132,330 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below)
|
|
|
80,572 |
|
|
|
46,305 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
87,955 |
|
|
|
42,495 |
|
|
Intangible assets impairment
|
|
|
11,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
54,522 |
|
|
|
22,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
34,981 |
|
|
|
21,054 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(39,935 |
) |
|
|
(11,975 |
) |
|
Partnership income
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
2,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
(911 |
) |
|
|
9,218 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
3,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(1,143 |
) |
|
|
5,501 |
|
Dividends on redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
(14,965 |
) |
|
|
(8,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(16,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(1.79 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-5
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON MEMBERS
DEFICIT
Years Ended December 31, 2004 and 2003
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount |
|
Paid in Capital | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
Total | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, January 1, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,501 |
|
|
|
5,501 |
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
9,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued under employee plan
|
|
|
975,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of ($344) of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
9,975,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,003 |
) |
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
(3,518 |
) |
|
$ |
4,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,143 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,143 |
) |
Shares issued under employee plan
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends on redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net of ($174) of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(283 |
) |
Unrealized loss on marketable securities, net ($33) of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of $1,090 of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
(19,111 |
) |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
(18,795 |
) |
|
$ |
(370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-6
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(1,143 |
) |
|
$ |
5,501 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
54,522 |
|
|
|
22,476 |
|
|
|
Provision for bad debt losses
|
|
|
4,666 |
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
3,388 |
|
|
|
Asset impairment
|
|
|
11,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership income
|
|
|
(1,288 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
6,476 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(3,499 |
) |
|
|
(9,799 |
) |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,401 |
|
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(2,689 |
) |
|
|
(2,267 |
) |
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
6,463 |
|
|
|
6,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
79,766 |
|
|
|
28,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(30,010 |
) |
|
|
(11,296 |
) |
|
|
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(524,090 |
) |
|
|
(284,834 |
) |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(554,100 |
) |
|
|
(296,132 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions from investors
|
|
|
89,058 |
|
|
|
93,000 |
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term obligations
|
|
|
637,000 |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
Payments made on long-term obligations
|
|
|
(190,826 |
) |
|
|
(10,193 |
) |
|
|
Payment of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(18,956 |
) |
|
|
(4,602 |
) |
|
|
Proceeds from sale of building
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
516,276 |
|
|
|
277,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
41,942 |
|
|
|
10,142 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
10,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
52,084 |
|
|
$ |
10,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$ |
27,758 |
|
|
$ |
11,463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes paid (refunded)
|
|
$ |
(509 |
) |
|
$ |
2,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-7
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
1. |
Description of Business |
Homebase Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(Homebase or the Company), was formed on
June 26, 2002, and commenced operations in Illinois on
December 31, 2002, with its acquisition of Illinois
Consolidated Telephone Company and the related businesses
(collectively, ICTC) and in Texas on April 14,
2004 with its acquisition of TXU Communications Ventures Company
(TXUCV). Homebase is a holding company with no
income from operations or assets except for the capital stock of
Consolidated Communications Illinois Holdings, Inc.
(Illinois Holdings) and Consolidated Communications
Texas Holdings, Inc. (Texas Holdings). Homebase and
its wholly owned subsidiaries operate under the name
Consolidated Communications.
Illinois Holdings is a holding company with no income from
operations or assets except for the capital stock of
Consolidated Communications, Inc. (CCI). Illinois
Holdings operates its business through, and receives all of its
income from, CCI and its subsidiaries. CCI was formed for the
sole purpose of acquiring ICTC. Texas Holdings is a holding
company with no income from operations or assets except for the
capital stock of Consolidated Communications Texas, Inc.
(Texas Acquisition). Texas Holdings and Texas
Acquisition were formed for the sole purpose of acquiring TXUCV,
which was subsequently renamed Consolidated Communications
Ventures Company (CCV). Texas Holdings operates its
business through, and receives all of its income from, CCV and
its subsidiaries.
The Company provides local telephone, long-distance and network
access services, and data and Internet products to both
residential and business customers. The Company also provides
operator services, telecommunications services to state prison
facilities, telecommunications equipment sales and maintenance,
inbound/outbound telemarketing and fulfillment services, and
paging services.
|
|
2. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
|
Principles of Consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Homebase and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and subsidiaries in
which it has a controlling financial interest. All material
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform previously
reported data to the current presentation. Line costs totaling
$17,800 and $16,244 for the years ended December 31, 2004
and 2003, respectively, were reclassified from general and
administrative expenses to cost of services.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could
differ from the estimates and assumptions used.
F-8
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Certain wholly owned subsidiaries, ICTC, Consolidated
Communications of Texas Company and Consolidated Communications
of Fort Bend Company, are independent local exchange
carriers (ILECs) which follow the accounting for
regulated enterprises prescribed by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 71, Accounting for the
Effects of Certain Types of Regulation
(SFAS No 71). SFAS No. 71 permits
rates (tariffs) to be set at levels intended to recover
estimated costs of providing regulated services or products,
including capital costs. SFAS No. 71 requires the
ILECs to depreciate wireline plant over the useful lives
approved by the regulators, which could be different than the
useful lives that would otherwise be determined by management.
SFAS No. 71 also requires deferral of certain costs
and obligations based upon approvals received from regulators to
permit recovery of such amounts in future years. Criteria that
would give rise to the discontinuance of SFAS No. 71
include (1) increasing competition restricting the wireline
business ability to establish prices to recover specific
costs and (2) significant changes in the manner by which
rates are set by regulators from cost-base regulation to another
form of regulation.
Cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly liquid
investments with a remaining maturity of three months or less
when purchased.
Investments in equity securities that have readily determinable
fair values are categorized as available for sale securities and
are carried at fair value. The unrealized gains or losses on
securities classified as available for sale are included as a
separate component of common members equity. Investments
in equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair
values are carried at cost.
Investments in affiliated companies that Homebase does not
control but does have the ability to exercise significant
influence over operations and financial policies are accounted
for using the equity method. Investments in affiliated companies
that Homebase does not control and does not have the ability to
exercise significant influence over such affiliated
companies operations and financial policies are accounted
for using the cost method.
To determine whether an impairment of an investment exists, the
Company monitors and evaluates the financial performance of the
business in which it invests and compares the carrying value of
the investee to quoted market prices if available or the fair
value of similar investments, which in certain circumstance, is
based on traditional valuation models utilizing multiple of cash
flows. When circumstances indicate that a decline in the fair
value of the investment has occurred and the decline is other
than temporary, the Company records the decline in value as
realized impairment loss and a reduction in the cost of the
investment.
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts |
Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts due to the
Company from normal activities. Accounts receivable are
determined to be past due when the amount is overdue based on
the payment terms with the customer. In certain circumstances,
the Company requires deposits from customers to mitigate
potential risk associated with receivables. The Company
maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect
managements best estimate of probable losses inherent in
the accounts receivable balance. Management determines the
allowance balance based on known troubled accounts, historical
experience and other currently available evidence. Accounts
receivable are charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts
when management of the Company determines that the receivable
will not be collected.
F-9
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Inventory consists mainly of copper and fiber cable that will be
used for network expansion and upgrades and materials and
equipment used in the maintenance and installation of telephone
systems. Inventory is stated at the lower of average cost or
market.
|
|
|
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142), goodwill and
intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives are not
amortized but rather are tested annually for impairment.
Tradenames have been determined to have indefinite lives; thus
they are not being amortized but are tested annually for
impairment using discounted cash flows based on a relief from
royalty method. The Company evaluates the carrying value of
goodwill in the fourth quarter of each year. As part of the
evaluation, the Company compares the carrying value of the
goodwill for each reporting unit with their fair value to
determine whether impairment exists. If impairment is determined
to exist, any related impairment loss is calculated based upon
fair value.
SFAS 142 also provides that assets which have finite lives
be amortized over their useful lives. Customer lists are being
amortized over their estimated useful lives based upon the
Companys historical experience with customer attrition and
the recommendation of an independent appraiser. The estimated
lives range from 10 to 13 years.
|
|
|
Property, Plant, and Equipment |
Property, plant, and equipment are recorded at cost. The cost of
additions, replacements, and major improvements is capitalized,
while repairs and maintenance are charged to expense.
Depreciation is determined based upon the assets estimated
useful lives using either the group or unit method.
The group method is used for depreciable assets dedicated to
providing regulated telecommunication services, including the
majority of the network and outside plant facilities. Under the
group method, a specific asset group has an average life. A
depreciation rate is developed based on the average useful life
for the specific asset group as approved by regulatory agencies.
This method requires periodic revision of depreciation rates.
When an individual asset is sold or retired under the group
method, the difference between the proceeds, if any, and the
cost of the asset is charged or credited to accumulated
depreciation, without recognition of a gain or loss.
The unit method is primarily used for buildings, furniture,
fixtures and other support assets. Under the unit method, assets
are depreciated on the straight-line basis over the estimated
useful life of the individual asset. When an individual asset is
sold or retired under the unit method, the cost basis of the
asset and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the
accounts and any associated gain or loss is recognized.
Estimated useful lives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years | |
|
|
| |
Buildings
|
|
|
15-35 |
|
Network and outside plant facilities
|
|
|
5-30 |
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
|
|
3-17 |
|
F-10
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Wireline local access revenues are recognized over the period
that the service is provided. Nonrecurring installation revenues
are deferred upon service activation and are recognized over the
shorter of three to five years or the determined useful life.
The associated costs are recorded in the period in which they
are incurred. Revenues from other telecommunications services,
including network access charges, custom calling feature
revenues, billing and collection services, long distance and
private line services, Internet service provider charges,
operator services, and paging services are recognized monthly as
services are provided.
Telephone equipment revenues generated from retail channels are
recorded at the point of sale. Telecommunications systems and
structured cabling project revenues are recognized upon
completion and billing of the project. Maintenance services are
provided on both a contract and time and material basis and are
recorded when the service is provided.
Teleservices revenues include both inbound and outbound calling
as well as fulfillment services. All revenues are recorded as
program activity is completed.
Print advertising and publishing revenues are recognized ratably
over the life of the related directory, generally twelve months.
The costs of advertising are charged to expense as incurred.
Advertising expenses totaled $1,521 and $1,839 in 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
Illinois Holdings and its subsidiaries and Texas Holdings and
its subsidiaries file separate consolidated federal income tax
returns and East Texas Fiber Line Incorporated files a separate
federal income tax return. State income tax returns are filed on
a consolidated or separate legal entity basis depending on the
state. Federal and state income tax expense or benefit is
allocated to each subsidiary based on separately determined
taxable income or loss.
Amounts in the financial statements related to income taxes are
calculated using the principles of Financial Accounting
Standards Board Statement No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes (FAS 109). Deferred income taxes are
provided for the temporary differences between assets and
liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such
amounts recognized for tax purposes as well as loss
carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. We record a valuation
allowance related to our deferred income tax assets when, in the
opinion of management, it is more likely than not that deferred
tax assets would not be realized.
Provisions for federal and state income taxes are calculated on
reported pre-tax earnings based on current tax law and also
include, in the current period, the cumulative effect of any
changes in tax rates from those used previously in determining
deferred tax assets and liabilities. Such provisions differ from
the amounts currently receivable or payable because certain
items of income and expense are recognized in different time
periods for financial reporting purposes than for income tax
purposes. Significant judgment is required in determining income
tax provisions and evaluating tax positions. We establish
reserves for income tax when, despite the belief that our tax
positions are fully supportable, there remain certain
F-11
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
positions that are probable to be challenged and possibly
disallowed by various authorities. The consolidated tax
provision and related accruals include the impact of such
reasonably estimable losses. To the extent that the probable tax
outcome of these matters changes, such changes in estimate will
impact the income tax provision in the period in which such
determination is made.
The Company maintains a restricted share plan to award certain
employees of the Company restricted common shares of the Company
as an incentive to enhance their long-term performance as well
as an incentive to join or remain with the Company. The Company
accounts for its employee restricted share plan in accordance
with Accounting Principles Board No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB No. 25) and related interpretations.
The restricted share plan contains a call provision whereby upon
termination of employment, the Company may elect to repurchase
the shares held by the former employee. The purchase price is
based upon the lesser of fair value or a formula specified in
the plan. The existence of the employer call provision for a
purchase price that is below fair value results in the plan
being accounted for as variable, with compensation expense, if
any, determined based upon the formula rather than fair value.
At December 31, 2004, the formula computation results in a
negative value being ascribed to the common shares. As a result,
no stock compensation expense has been recognized in these
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
Financial Instruments and Derivatives |
As of December 31, 2004, the Companys financial
instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable, investments, accounts payable and long-term debt
obligations. At December 31, 2004, the carrying value of
these financial instruments approximated their fair values.
Derivative instruments are accounted for in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activity (SFAS No. 133).
SFAS No. 133 provides comprehensive and consistent
standards for the recognition and measurement of derivative and
hedging activities. It requires that derivatives be recorded on
the consolidated balance sheet at fair value and establishes
criteria for hedges of changes in fair values of assets,
liabilities or firm commitments, hedges of variable cash flows
of forecasted transactions and hedges of foreign currency
exposures of net investments in foreign operations. To the
extent that the derivatives qualify as a cash flow hedge, the
gain or loss associated with the effective portion is recorded
as a component of Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). Changes in
the fair value of derivatives that do not meet the criteria for
hedges are recognized in the consolidated statement of income.
Upon termination of interest rate swap agreements, any resulting
gain or loss is recognized over the shorter of the remaining
original term of the hedging instrument or the remaining life of
the underlying debt obligation. Since the Companys
interest swap agreements are with major financial institutions,
the Company does not anticipate any nonperformance by any
counterparty.
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In December 2003, the U.S. Congress enacted the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003
(the Medicare Act) that will provide a prescription
drug subsidy beginning in 2006 to companies that sponsor
post-retirement health care plans that provide drug benefits.
Additional legislation is anticipated that will clarify whether
a company is eligible for the subsidy, the amount of the subsidy
available and the procedures to be following in obtaining the
subsidy. In May 2004, the FASB
F-12
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
issued Staff Position 106-2, Accounting Disclosure
Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003
(SAP 106-2), that provides guidance on the
accounting and disclosure for the effects of the Medicare Act.
The Companys post-retirement prescription drug plans are
actuarially equivalent and accordingly, the Company began
reflecting the Medicare Acts impact on July 1, 2004,
without a material adverse effect on the financial condition or
results of operations of the Company.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R, which replaces
SFAS 123 and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25.
SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in
the financial statements based on their fair values beginning
for public companies with the first annual period after
June 15, 2005, with early adoption encouraged. The pro
forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123 no
longer will be an alternative to financial statement
recognition. The Company is required to adopt SFAS 123R
beginning January 1, 2006. Under SFAS 123R, the
Company must determine the appropriate fair market value model
to be used for valuing share-based payments, the amortization
method for compensation cost and the transition method to be
used at date of adoption. As disclosed in the summary of
significant accounting policies, the Companys restricted
share plan contains a call provision whereby upon termination of
employment, the Company may elect to repurchase the shares held
by the former employee. The purchase price is based upon the
lesser of fair value or a formula specified in the plan. The
existence of the employer call provision for a purchase price
that is below fair value results in the plan being accounted for
as variable, with compensation expense, if any, determined based
upon the formula rather than fair value. The Company is
currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of
SFAS 123R will have on the financial condition or results
of operations of the Company but does not expect it to have a
material impact.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets An
Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions (SFAS 153).
SFAS 153 eliminates the exception from fair value
measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive
assets in paragraph 21 (b) of APB Opinion No. 29,
Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, and replaces it with an
exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance.
SFAS 153 specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has
commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are
expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange.
SFAS 153 is effective for the fiscal periods beginning
after June 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by us in
the three months ended September 30, 2005. The Company is
currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of
SFAS 153 will have on the financial condition or results of
operations of the Company but does not expect it to have a
material impact.
|
|
|
Acquisition of ICTC and Related Businesses |
On December 31, 2002, the Company, through its wholly owned
subsidiary CCI, acquired all of the outstanding common stock of
ICTC, McLeodUSA Public Services, Inc., and Consolidated Market
Response, Inc, as well as substantially all of the assets of
three other related telecom lines of business (or divisions)
which were all owned by McLeodUSA and its affiliates. The
purchase price for the businesses acquired totaled $284,834,
including acquisition costs, and was funded with proceeds from
the issuance of redeemable preferred stock and debt. The Company
accounted for the acquisition using the purchase method of
accounting; accordingly the financial statements reflect the
allocation of the total purchase price
F-13
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, based on
their respective fair values. The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the results of operations of the
acquired businesses from the date of acquisition.
The allocation of the purchase price to the assets acquired and
liabilities assumed is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
25,802 |
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
118,057 |
|
Customer lists
|
|
|
59,517 |
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
15,863 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
99,554 |
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(33,959 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net purchase price
|
|
$ |
284,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill represents the residual aggregate purchase price after
all tangible and identified intangible assets have been valued,
offset by the value of liabilities assumed. The aggregate
purchase price was derived from a competitive bidding process
and negotiations and was influenced by our assessment of the
value of the overall acquired business. The significant goodwill
value reflects our view that the acquired business can generate
strong cash flow and sales and earnings following acquisition.
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, the tradenames and
goodwill acquired are not amortized but are tested for
impairment at least annually. The customer lists are amortized
over their weighted average estimated useful lives of ten years.
The Company made an election under the Internal Revenue Code
that resulted in the tax basis of goodwill and other intangible
assets associated with this acquisition to be deductible for tax
purposes ratably over a 15-year period.
On April 14, 2004, Homebase, through its wholly owned
subsidiary Texas Acquisition, acquired all of the capital stock
of TXUCV from Pinnacle One Partners L.P. (Pinnacle
One). By acquiring all of the capital stock of TXUCV,
Homebase acquired substantially all of the telecommunications
assets of TXU Corp., including two rural local exchange carriers
(RLECs), that together serve markets in Conroe, Katy
and Lufkin, Texas, a directory publishing business, a transport
services business that provides connectivity within Texas and
minority interests in cellular partnerships.
In connection with the closing of the TXUCV acquisition, the
Company, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, issued $200,000
in the aggregate principal amount of
93/4% Senior
Notes due 2012, entered into a new $437,000 bank credit
facility, repaid its existing credit facility and entered into
certain related transactions. The indenture governing the notes
and the new credit facility contain covenants, events of default
and other provisions (see Note 14).
The Company accounted for the TXUCV acquisition using the
purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the financial
statements reflect the allocation of the total purchase price to
the net tangible and intangible assets acquired based on their
respective fair values. The purchase price, including
F-14
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
acquisition costs and net of $9,897 of cash acquired, was
allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
27,478 |
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
268,706 |
|
Customer list
|
|
|
108,200 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
228,792 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
43,291 |
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(152,376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price, net of cash acquired
|
|
$ |
524,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate purchase price was derived from a competitive
bidding process and negotiations and was influenced by the
Companys assessment of the value of the overall TXUCV
business. The significant goodwill value reflects the
Companys view that the TXUCV business can generate strong
cash flow and sales and earnings following the acquisition. In
accordance with SFAS 142, the $228,792 in goodwill recorded
as part of the TXUCV acquisition will not be amortized and will
be tested for impairment at least annually. The customer list
will be amortized over its estimated useful life of thirteen
years. The goodwill and other intangibles associated with this
acquisition did not qualify under the Internal Revenue Code as
deductible for tax purposes.
The Companys consolidated financial statements include the
results of operations for the TXUCV acquisition since the
April 14, 2004, acquisition date. Unaudited pro forma
results of operations data for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003 as if the acquisition had occurred at the
beginning of each period presented are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
323,463 |
|
|
$ |
327,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$ |
37,533 |
|
|
$ |
29,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proforma net loss
|
|
$ |
(2,956 |
) |
|
$ |
(15,431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proforma net loss applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(20,146 |
) |
|
$ |
(31,945 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(2.24 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Prepaids and other current assets |
Prepaids and other current assets consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred charges
|
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
1,138 |
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
3,492 |
|
|
|
1,991 |
|
Income tax receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,002 |
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,179 |
|
|
$ |
5,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
5. |
Property, plant and equipment |
Property, plant, and equipment, net consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Property, plant and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
$ |
49,567 |
|
|
$ |
15,487 |
|
|
Network and outside plant facilities
|
|
|
641,913 |
|
|
|
209,927 |
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
68,360 |
|
|
|
29,145 |
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
7,783 |
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
767,623 |
|
|
|
257,198 |
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(406,863 |
) |
|
|
(152,618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant and equipment
|
|
$ |
360,760 |
|
|
$ |
104,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense totaled $42,652 and $16,518 in 2004 and
2003, respectively.
Investments consist of the following as of December 31,
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies
|
|
$ |
1,708 |
|
Cost method investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited Partnership
|
|
|
21,450 |
|
|
CoBank, ACB stock
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
Rural Telephone Bank stock
|
|
|
5,921 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
19 |
|
Equity method investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited Partnership (17.02%
owned)
|
|
|
11,759 |
|
|
Fort Bend Fibernet Limited Partnership (39.06% owned)
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
42,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company obtained 2.34% ownership of GTE Mobilnet of South
Texas Limited Partnership (the Mobilnet South
Partnership) in connection with the acquisition of TXUCV
on April 14, 2004. The principal activity of the Mobilnet
South Partnership is providing cellular service in the Houston,
Galveston and Beaumont, Texas metropolitan areas. The Company
has very limited influence on the operating and financial
policies of this partnership and accounts for this investment on
the cost basis. The cost basis of $22,850 as of April 14,
2004 was determined with the help of an independent appraiser.
During the period from April 14, 2004 through
December 31, 2004 the Company received $3,206 of cash
distributions from the Mobilnet South Partnership. These
distributions exceeded the Companys share of earnings in
the Mobilnet South Partnership by $1,400. Accordingly, $1,400
was applied as a reduction in the carrying amount of the
investment and $1,806 was recognized as dividend income in 2004.
The Company previously accounted for this investment under the
equity method of accounting. Upon subsequent review, the Company
determined the cost method to be appropriate. Accordingly, the
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004
have been restated to reflect the change in accounting policy.
The change in accounting policy resulted in no change to the
balance sheet and $1,806 of previously recorded
F-16
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
partnership income was reclassified to dividend income in the
Consolidated Statement of Operations. The reduction of
partnership income is also reflected in the statement of cash
flows.
The CoBank investment represents purchases of CoBank stock as
required by the CoBank loan agreement and patronage
distributions from CoBank in the form of stock. CoBank operates
on a cooperative basis with a portion of the bank earnings
returned to the owners in the form of patronage refunds. For
2004, the Companys allocation of patronage capital from
CoBank was $380, of which $152 was in cash and $228 in patronage
capital certificates. The Company will be receiving annual
refunds of a portion of the stock only when their stock balances
reaches 10% of the five-year moving average of CoBank loan
balance. Cash dividends are recorded as reduction of interest
expense and the patronage distribution in form of stock are
recorded as other income in the consolidated statements of
operations.
The Rural Telephone Bank stock consists of 5,921 shares of
$1,000 par value Class C stock which is stated at
original cost plus a gain recognized at conversion of
Class B to Class C.
The Company received partnership distributions totaling $340
and $78 from GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA # 17 Limited
Partnership and Fort Bend Fibernet Limited Partnership,
respectively, for the period from April 14, 2004 through
December 31, 2004.
Summarized
financial information for significant investments
The Company obtained 17.02% ownership of GTE Mobilnet of Texas
RSA #17 Limited Partnership (the Mobilnet RSA
Partnership) in connection with the acquisition of TXUCV
on April 14, 2004. The principal activity of the Mobilnet
RSA Partnership is providing cellular service to a limited rural
area in Texas. The Company has some influence on the operating
and financial policies of this partnership and accounts for this
investment on the equity basis. Summarized 100 percent
financial information for the Mobilnet RSA Partnership was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
35,203 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
9,636 |
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
10,116 |
|
Net income or loss
|
|
|
10,116 |
|
Current assets
|
|
|
6,443 |
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
22,494 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
Non current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership equity
|
|
|
27,204 |
|
Homebase has recorded its pro rata share of the equity earnings
from this investment since the date of the TXUCV acquisition on
April 14, 2004, through December 31, 2004.
East Texas Fiber Line, Inc. (ETFL) is a joint
venture owned 63% by the Company and 37% by Eastex Celco. ETFL
provides connectivity to certain customers within Texas over a
fiber optic transport network.
F-17
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
8. |
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
In accordance with SFAS 142, goodwill and tradenames are
not amortized but are subject to an annual impairment test, or
to more frequent testing if circumstances indicate that they may
be impaired. In 2004, the Company completed its annual
impairment test and determined that goodwill was impaired in one
of its reporting units within the Other Operations segment of
the Company and a resulting finalized goodwill impairment charge
of $10,147 was recognized. The fair value of each reporting unit
was determined by discounting their respective projected cash
flows. The goodwill impairment was limited to our Operator
Services reporting unit, and was due to a decline in current and
projected cash flows for this reporting unit. Operator Services
has also reduced its pricing to retain certain customers at the
time of contract renewal, as well as, offered lower rates to
attract new customers in the face of increasing competition due
to automation and cheaper offshore call center alternatives
available to our customers.
The following table presents the carrying amount of goodwill by
segment at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Operations | |
|
Operations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at January 1, 2004
|
|
$ |
78,443 |
|
|
$ |
21,111 |
|
|
$ |
99,554 |
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,147 |
) |
|
|
(10,147 |
) |
Finalization of ICTC and related businesses purchase accounting
|
|
|
2,292 |
|
|
|
(2,010 |
) |
|
|
282 |
|
TXUCV acquisition
|
|
|
228,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
309,527 |
|
|
$ |
8,954 |
|
|
$ |
318,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys most valuable tradename is the federally
registered mark CONSOLIDATED, which is used in association with
our telephone communication services and is a design of
interlocking circles. The Companys corporate branding
strategy leverages a CONSOLIDATED naming structure. All business
units and several product/services names incorporate the
CONSOLIDATED name. These tradenames are indefinitely renewable
intangibles. In 2004, the Company completed its annual
impairment test and determined that the recorded value of its
tradename was impaired in two of its reporting units within the
Other Operations segment of the Company, and a resulting
impairment charge of $1,431 was recognized. The fair value of
the tradenames was determined using discounted cash flow
analysis based on a relief from royalty method. The tradename
impairment was limited to our Operator and Mobile Services
reporting units, and were due to lower than previously
anticipated revenues within these two reporting units. The
following table presents the carrying amount of tradenames by
segment at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Operations | |
|
Operations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at January 1, 2004
|
|
$ |
10,046 |
|
|
$ |
5,817 |
|
|
$ |
15,863 |
|
Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,431 |
) |
|
|
(1,431 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
10,046 |
|
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
|
$ |
14,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Companys customer lists consist of an established core
base of customers that subscribe to its services. The carrying
amount of customer lists is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Gross carrying amount
|
|
$ |
167,633 |
|
|
$ |
59,517 |
|
Less: accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(17,828 |
) |
|
|
(5,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount
|
|
$ |
149,805 |
|
|
$ |
53,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate amortization expense associated with customer
lists for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 was
$11,870 and $5,958, respectively. Customer lists are being
amortized using a weighted average life of 11.8 years. The
estimated amortization expense for each of the next five years
ended December 31, is a follows: 2004 $14,266,
2005 $14,266, 2006 $14,266,
2007 $14,266, and 2008 $14,266.
|
|
9. |
Affiliated Transactions |
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have entered into
two professional services fee agreements, each effective
April 14, 2004, with its existing equity investors. One
agreement requires CCI to pay to Richard A. Lumpkin,
Chairman of the Company, Providence Equity and Spectrum Equity
an annual professional services fee in the aggregate amount of
$2,000, to be divided equally among them, for consulting,
advisory and other professional services provided to CCI and its
subsidiaries relating to the Illinois operations. The other
agreement requires Texas Holdings to pay to Richard A.
Lumpkin, Providence Equity and Spectrum Equity an annual
professional services fee in the aggregate of $3,000, to be
divided equally among them, for consulting, advisory and other
professional services provided to Texas Holdings and its
subsidiaries relating to the Texas operations. The professional
services fees are generally payable in cash. The professional
services fees, however, must be paid in the form of Class A
preferred shares if payment in cash is prohibited by the
existing credit facilities or if consolidated Earnings Before
Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization
(EBITDA), as determined in accordance with the
existing credit facilities, is less than or equal to
$106.0 million. The Company recognized fees of $4,135 and
$2,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, associated with these agreements. These fees are
included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Agracel, Inc., or Agracel, is a real estate investment company
of which Mr. Lumpkin, together with his family,
beneficially owns 49.7%. In addition, Mr. Lumpkin is a
director of Agracel. Agracel is the sole managing member and 50%
owner of LATEL LLC. Mr. Lumpkin directly owns the remaining
50% of LATEL. Effective December 31, 2002, the Company sold
five of its buildings and associated land to LATEL, LLC for the
aggregate purchase price of $9,180, and then entered into an
agreement to leaseback the same facilities for general office
and warehouse functions. The initial term of both leases was for
one year. Each lease automatically renews for successive one
year terms through 2013, unless either ICTC or Consolidated
Market Response (CMR) provides on year prior written
notice that it intends to terminate its respective leases. The
leases are triple net lease that require the Company to continue
to pay substantially all expenses associated with general
maintenance and repair, utilities, insurance and taxes. The
Company recognized operating lease expenses of $1,251 and $1,221
during 2004 and 2003, respectively, in connection with the LATEL
leases. There is no associated lease payable balance outstanding
at December 31, 2004.
F-19
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Agracel is the sole managing member and 66.7% owner of MACC,
LLC, or MACC. Mr. Lumpkin, together with his family, owns
the remainder of MACC. In 1997, CMR entered into a lease
agreement to rent office space for a period of five years. The
parties extended the lease for an additional five years
beginning October 14, 2002. CMR recognized rent expense in
the amount of $123 in both 2004 and 2003 in connection with the
MACC lease.
Mr. Lumpkin, together with members of his family,
beneficially owns 100% of SKL Investment Group, LLC or SKL. The
Company charged SKL $77 and $74 in 2004 and 2003, respectively,
for use of office space, computers, telephone service and for
other office related services.
Mr. Lumpkin also has an ownership interest in First
Mid-Illinois Bancshares, Inc. (First Mid-Illinois)
which provides CCI Illinois with general banking services,
including depository, disbursement and payroll accounts and
retirement plan administrative services, on terms comparable to
those available to other large business accounts. The Company
provides certain telecommunications products and services to
First Mid-Illinois. Those services are based upon standard
prices for strategic business customers. Following is summary of
the transactions between the Company and First Mid-Illinois:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Fees charged from First Mid-Illinois for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking fees
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
401K plan administration
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Interest income earned by the Company on deposits at First
Mid-Illinois
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Fees charged by the Company to First Mid-Illinois for
telecommunication services
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
The components of the income tax provision charged to expense
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
State
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
3,252 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
(529 |
) |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(834 |
) |
|
|
3,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
|
|
$ |
232 |
|
|
$ |
3,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Following is a reconciliation between the statutory federal
income tax rate and the Companys overall effective tax
rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Statutory federal income tax rate (benefit)
|
|
|
(35.0 |
)% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State income taxes, net of federal effect
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Other permanent differences
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Other
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
40.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid (refunded) for federal and state income taxes was
$(509,000) and $2,000,000 during years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively.
Net deferred taxes consist of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for uncollectible accounts
|
|
$ |
1,020 |
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
|
Accrued vacation pay deducted when paid
|
|
|
1,504 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
Accrued expenses and deferred revenue
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
1,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
|
2,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
21,866 |
|
|
|
2,253 |
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and post retirement obligations
|
|
|
23,402 |
|
|
|
3,691 |
|
|
Minimum tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(17,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,784 |
|
|
|
6,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,641 |
) |
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
(547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership investment
|
|
|
(6,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(87,348 |
) |
|
|
(5,761 |
) |
|
Basis in investment
|
|
|
(1,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(96,425 |
) |
|
|
(7,402 |
) |
Net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(66,641 |
) |
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets (liabilities)
|
|
$ |
(63,363 |
) |
|
$ |
1,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets,
management considers whether it is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be
realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is
dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during
the periods in which those temporary differences become
deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of
deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and
tax planning strategies in making this assessment. In
F-21
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
order to fully realize the gross deferred tax assets, the
Company will need, to generate future taxable income in
increments sufficient to recognize net operating loss
carryforwards prior to expiration as described below. Based upon
the level of historical taxable income and projections for
future taxable income over the periods that the deferred tax
assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely
than not that the Company will realize the benefits of these
deductible differences, net of the existing valuation allowance
at December 31, 2004. The amount of the deferred tax assets
considered realizable, however, could be reduced in the near
term if estimates of future taxable income during the
carryforward period are reduced. There is an annual limitation
on the use of the NOL carryforwards, however the amount of
projected future taxable income is expected to be lower than the
amount of the limitation calculated. Amounts and expiration
dates of carryforwards are as follows:
Illinois Holdings and its subsidiaries, which file a
consolidated federal income tax return, estimates it has
available NOL carryforwards of approximately $15.0 million
for federal and state income tax purposes to offset against
future taxable income. The federal NOL carryforwards expire from
2022 to 2024 and state NOL carryforwards expire from 2015 to
2022.
Texas Holdings and its subsidiaries, which file a consolidated
federal income tax return, estimates it has available NOL
carryforwards of approximately $26.4 million for federal
income tax purposes and $108.2 million for state income tax
purposes to offset against future taxable income. The federal
NOL carryforwards expire from 2020 to 2022 and state NOL
carryforwards expire from 2005 to 2009.
East Texas Fiber Line Incorporated, a nonconsolidated subsidiary
for federal income tax return purposes, estimates it has
available NOL carryforwards of approximately $9.0 million
for federal income tax purposes and $6.5 million for state
income tax purposes to offset against future taxable income. The
federal NOL carryforwards expire from 2007 to 2024 and state NOL
carryforwards expire from 2005 to 2009.
The valuation allowance is attributed to tax loss carryforwards
for which no tax benefit is expected to be utilized. If it
becomes evident that sufficient taxable income will be available
in the jurisdictions where these deferred tax assets exist, the
Company would release the valuation allowance accordingly.
During 2004, the valuation allowance decreased by $1,314 from
the April 14, 2004 Texas Acquisition opening balance sheet
amount of $18,450 to $17,136 at December 31, 2004.
Accrued expenses consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
$ |
9,191 |
|
|
$ |
2,542 |
|
Taxes payable
|
|
|
6,915 |
|
|
|
987 |
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
6,490 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
11,655 |
|
|
|
8,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,251 |
|
|
$ |
12,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-22
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
12. |
Pension Costs and Other Postretirement Benefits |
The Company has several defined benefit pension plans covering
substantially all of its hourly employees and certain salaried
employees, primarily those located in Texas. The plans provide
retirement benefits based on years of service and earnings. The
pension plans are generally noncontributory. The Companys
funding policy is to contribute amounts sufficient to meet the
minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee benefit
and tax laws.
The Company currently provides other postretirement benefits
(Other Benefits) consisting of health care and life
insurance benefits for certain groups of retired employees.
Retirees share in the cost of health care benefits. Retiree
contributions for health care benefits are adjusted periodically
based upon either collective bargaining agreements for former
hourly employees and as total costs of the program change for
former salaried employees. The Companys funding policy for
retiree health benefits is generally to pay covered expenses as
they are incurred. Postretirement life insurance benefits are
fully insured.
The Company used a September 30 measurement date for its
plans in Illinois and a December 31 measurement date for
its plans in Texas.
F-23
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The following tables present the benefit obligation, plan assets
and funded status of the plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
December 31 | |
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Change in benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
55,528 |
|
|
$ |
49,637 |
|
|
$ |
8,951 |
|
|
$ |
7,966 |
|
TXUCV acquisition
|
|
|
60,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5,902 |
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Plan participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,652 |
) |
|
|
454 |
|
Plan curtailment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(7,237 |
) |
|
|
(3,403 |
) |
|
|
(1,747 |
) |
|
|
(692 |
) |
Administrative expenses paid
|
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain)/ loss
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
5,317 |
|
|
|
2,612 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation, end of period
|
|
$ |
117,640 |
|
|
$ |
55,528 |
|
|
$ |
35,747 |
|
|
$ |
8,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
105,451 |
|
|
$ |
51,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
50,704 |
|
|
$ |
45,446 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
TXUCV acquisition
|
|
|
40,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
6,715 |
|
|
|
7,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
3,887 |
|
|
|
857 |
|
|
|
1,589 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Plan participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Administrative expenses paid
|
|
|
(410 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(7,237 |
) |
|
|
(3,403 |
) |
|
|
(1,747 |
) |
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of period
|
|
$ |
94,292 |
|
|
$ |
50,704 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$ |
(23,348 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,824 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,747 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,951 |
) |
Employer contributions after measurement date and before fiscal
year end
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit cost
|
|
$ |
(23,525 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,662 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,669 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
$ |
(23,982 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,662 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,669 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,933 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$ |
(23,525 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,662 |
) |
|
$ |
(34,669 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-24
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Companys pension plans weighted average asset
allocations by investment category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Plan assets by category at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
54.8 |
% |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
Debt securities
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
44.5 |
|
Other
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys investment strategy is to maximize long-term
return on invested plan assets while minimizing risk of market
volatility. Accordingly, the Company targets it allocation
percentage at 50% to 60% in equity funds with the remainder in
fixed income funds and cash equivalents.
The Company expects to contribute $2,215 to its pension plans
and $1,820 to its other postretirement plans in 2005. The
expected future benefit payments to be paid during the years
ended December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension | |
|
Other | |
|
|
Benefits | |
|
Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
5,388 |
|
|
$ |
1,820 |
|
2006
|
|
|
5,587 |
|
|
|
1,924 |
|
2007
|
|
|
5,864 |
|
|
|
2,085 |
|
2008
|
|
|
6,101 |
|
|
|
2,129 |
|
2009
|
|
|
6,481 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
2010 through 2014
|
|
|
40,217 |
|
|
|
12,555 |
|
The following table presents the components of net periodic
benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
2,930 |
|
|
$ |
770 |
|
|
$ |
989 |
|
|
$ |
165 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5,902 |
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(6,434 |
) |
|
|
(3,507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
2,396 |
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
2,549 |
|
|
$ |
718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The weighted average assumptions used in measuring the
Companys benefit obligations as of December 31, 2004
and 2003 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension | |
|
|
|
|
Benefits | |
|
Other Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Compensation rate increase
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial healthcare cost trend rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
Ultimate healthcare cost trend rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Year ultimate trend rate is reached
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 to 2012 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Weighted average actuarial assumptions used to determine the net
periodic benefit cost for 2004 and 2003 are as follows: discount
rate 6.0% and 6.8%, expected long-term rate of return on plan
assets 8.3% and 8.0%; and rate of compensation increases 3.9%
and 3.5%, respectively.
In determining the discount rate, the Company considers the
current yields on high quality corporate fixed income
investments with maturities corresponding to the expected
duration of the benefit obligations. The expected return on plan
assets assumption was based upon the categories of the assets
and the past history of the return on the assets. The
Compensation rate increase is based upon past history and
long-term inflationary trends. A one percentage point change in
the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following
effects on the Companys other postretirement benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% Increase | |
|
1% Decrease | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Effect on 2004 service and interest costs
|
|
$ |
581 |
|
|
$ |
(452 |
) |
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligations as of
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
4,424 |
|
|
|
(3,565 |
) |
|
|
13. |
Employee 401k Benefit Plans and Deferred Compensation
Agreements |
The Company sponsors several 401(k) defined contribution
retirement savings plans. Virtually all employees are eligible
to participant in one of these plans. Each employee may elect to
defer a portion of his or her compensation, subject to certain
limitations. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the
Company matched 50% or 100% of employee contributions up to a
maximum of 3% or 4% for hourly employees depending upon the
particular plan and matched 100% of employee contributions up to
a maximum of 2% or 4% for salaried employees, depending upon the
particular plan. During the year ended December 31, 2003,
the Company matched employee contributions up to a maximum of 4%
for hourly employees and matched employee contributions up to 2%
for salaried employees. Total Company contributions to the plans
were $1,223 and $496 in 2004 and 2003, respectively.
|
|
|
Deferred Compensation Agreements |
The Company has deferred compensation agreements with the former
members of the board of directors of TXUCVs predecessor
company, Lufkin-Conroe Communications, and certain former
employees. The benefits are payable for up to 15 years and
may begin as early as age 65 or upon the death of the
participant.
F-26
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Deferred compensation expense was $208 for the period from
April 14, 2004 through December 31, 2004. Payments
related to deferred compensation agreements were $336 for the
period from April 14, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
The remaining obligation totaled $2,710 as of December 31,
2004 and is included in pension and postretirement benefit
obligations in the accompanying balance sheet.
The Company maintains life insurance policies on certain of the
participating former directors and employees. The excess of the
cash surrender value of life insurance policies over the notes
payable balances related to these policies totaled $1,708 as of
December 31, 2004 and is included in investments in the
accompanying balance sheet. These plans do not qualify under the
Internal Revenue Code and therefore, federal income tax
deductions are allowed only when benefits are paid.
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Senior Secured Credit Facility Revolving loan
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Term loan A
|
|
|
115,333 |
|
|
|
110,400 |
|
|
Term loan B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
Term loan C
|
|
|
312,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
629,421 |
|
|
|
180,400 |
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(41,079 |
) |
|
|
(10,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
588,342 |
|
|
$ |
170,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility |
The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, maintains
credit agreements with various financial institutions, which
provides for aggregate borrowings of $466,000 consisting of a
$122,000 term loan A facility, a $314,000 term loan C
facility and a $30,000 revolving credit facility. Borrowings
under the credit facility are secured by substantially all of
the assets of CCI and Texas Acquisition, other than ICTC.
ICTCs guarantee (and the corresponding security interest
in ICTCs assets) of $195,000 of total borrowing under the
credit facility is contingent upon obtaining the consent of the
Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC).
The term loans are due in quarterly installments, which increase
annually, with all borrowings under term loan A and term
loan C due April 14, 2010 and October 14, 2011,
respectively. The revolving credit facility matures on
April 14, 2010. Within 90 days after the end of the
Companys fiscal year, commencing on December 31,
2004, the Company shall be obligated to repay the loans in an
amount equal to 50% of the excess cash flow for such fiscal
year, provided that certain leverage ratios are maintained at
the end of the fiscal year. As of December 31, 2004, the
Company estimated that the excess cash flow repayment will be
approximately $22,556. In addition, subject to certain
exceptions, the Company is required to prepay the outstanding
term loans with 100% of the net proceeds of all non-ordinary
course of business asset sales and any
F-27
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
insurance or condemnation proceeds not reinvested within a
required time period, 100% of the net proceeds of certain
occurrences of indebtedness and 50% of the net proceeds from
certain issuances of equity.
At the Companys election, borrowings bear interest at
fluctuating interest rates based on: (a) a base rate (the
highest of the administrative agents base rate in effect
on such day, 0.5% per annum above the latest three week
moving average of secondary market morning offering rates in the
United States for three month certificates of deposit or 0.5%
above the Federal Funds rate); or (b) the London Interbank
Offered Rate, or LIBOR plus, in either case, an applicable
margin within the relevant range of margins (0.75% to 2.50%)
provided for in the credit agreement. The applicable margin is
based upon the Companys total leverage ratio. As of
December 31, 2004, the margins for interest rates on LIBOR
based loans was 2.25% on the term loan A facility and 2.50%
under the term loan C facility. At December 31, 2004,
the weighted average rate, including swaps, of interest on the
Companys term debt facilities was 5.23% per annum.
Interest is payable at least quarterly.
The credit agreement contains various provisions and covenants,
which include, among other items, restrictions on the ability to
pay dividends, incur additional indebtedness, and issue capital
stock, as well as, limitations on future capital expenditures.
The Company has also agreed to maintain certain financial
ratios, including interest coverage, fixed charge coverage and
leverage ratios, all as defined in the credit agreement.
On April 14, 2004, the Company, through its wholly owned
subsidiaries, issued $200,000 of
93/4% Senior
Notes due on April 1, 2012. The senior notes pay interest
semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The senior notes
may be redeemed on or prior to October 6, 2005 using all or
a portion of the proceeds of a qualified income depository
security offering. The redemption price plus accrued interest
will be, as a percentage of the principal amount, 107.313%
through April 10, 2004, and 109.75% between April 1,
2005 and October 6, 2005.
Up to 35% of the senior notes may be redeemed using the proceeds
of certain equity offerings completed on or prior to
April 1, 2007 at a price of 109.75%. Some or all of the
senior notes may be redeemed on or after April 1, 2008. The
redemption price plus accrued interest will be, as a percentage
of the principal amount, 104.875% in 2008, 102.438% in 2009 and
100% in 2010 and thereafter. In addition, holders may require
the repurchase of the notes upon a change in control, as such
term is defined in the indenture governing the senior notes, at
101%. The indenture contains certain provisions and covenants,
which include, among other items, restrictions on the ability to
issue certain types of stock, incur additional indebtedness,
make restricted payments, pay dividends and enter other lines of
business.
Future maturities of long-term debt as of December 31, 2004
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calendar year 2005
|
|
$ |
41,079 |
|
Calendar year 2006
|
|
|
22,463 |
|
Calendar year 2007
|
|
|
23,248 |
|
Calendar year 2008
|
|
|
26,900 |
|
Calendar year 2009
|
|
|
33,400 |
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
482,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
629,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Company entered into interest rate swap agreements that
effectively convert a portion of the floating-rate debt to a
fixed-rate basis, thus reducing the impact of interest rate
changes on future interest expense. At December 31, 2004,
the Company has interest rate swap agreements covering $217,809
in aggregate principal amount of its variable rate debt at fixed
LIBOR rates ranging from 2.99% to 3.35%. The swap agreements
expire on December 31, 2006, May 19, 2007, and
December 31, 2007. The fair value of the Companys
derivative instruments, comprising interest rate swaps, amounted
to an asset of $1,060 and liability of $859 at December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively. The $1,060 is included in other
current assets at December 31, 2004. The $859 is included
in accrued expenses at December 31, 2003. The Company
recognized a net loss of $228 in interest expense during 2004
related to its derivative instruments. The after tax change in
the market value of derivative instruments is recorded in other
comprehensive income. The Company recognized comprehensive
income of $1,105 and a comprehensive loss of $515 during 2004
and 2003 respectively, related to these derivative instruments.
|
|
15. |
Redeemable Preferred Shares and Members Equity |
The Company has authorized 182,000 Class A Preferred Shares
of which 182,000 and 93,000 shares were issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The preferred shares are redeemable to the holders with a
preferred return on their capital contributions at the rate of
9% per annum. The preferred return is cumulative and
compounded annually in arrears on December 31, of each
year. At any time on or after June 30, 2007, certain
members have the right to require the Company to redeem all of
their Class A Preferred Shares. Preferred shares are
redeemable at a price equal to $1,000 per share plus any
accrued but unpaid preferred return.
The Company has authorized 10,000,000 Common Shares of which
10,000,000 and 9,975,000 shares were issued and outstanding
at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. At any time on
or after June 30, 2007, certain members have the right to
require the Company to redeem all of their common shares. Common
shares are redeemable based upon an appraised value by a third
party.
|
|
16. |
Restricted Share Plan |
In August 2003, the Company established the 2003 Restricted
Share Plan, which provides for the issuance of 1,000,000 common
shares to key employees as an incentive to enhance their
long-term performance as well as an incentive to join or remain
with the Company. In November 2003, the Company granted
975,000 shares of its common stock to certain Company
executives. In April 2004, the remaining 25,000 shares of
common stock were sold to certain Company executives at
$2.32 per share. These shares generally vest with the
individuals every December 31, beginning December 31
2004 through December 31, 2007. As of December 31,
2004, 250,000 of these shares were vested.
The restricted share plan contains a call provision whereby upon
termination of employment, the Company may elect to repurchase
the shares held by the former employee. The purchase price is
based upon the lesser of fair value or a formula specified in
the plan. The existence of the employer call provision for a
purchase price that is potentially below fair value results in
the plan being accounted for as variable, with compensation
expense, if any, determined based upon the formula rather than
fair value. At
F-29
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
December 31, 2004, the formula computation results in a
negative value being ascribed to the common shares. As a result,
no stock compensation expense has been recognized in these
consolidated financial statements.
|
|
17. |
Environmental Remediation Liabilities |
Environmental remediation liabilities were $914 and $931 at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. These liabilities
relate to anticipated remediation and monitoring costs in
respect of two sites, are undiscounted and are included in
accrued expenses in the accompanying balance sheet.
|
|
18. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
From time to time the Company is involved in litigation and
regulatory proceedings arising out of its operations. The
Company is not currently a party to any legal proceedings, the
adverse outcome of which, individually or in aggregate,
management believes would have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial position or results of operations.
The Company has entered into several operating lease agreements
covering buildings and office space and office equipment. The
terms of these agreements generally range from three to five
years. Rent expense totaled $4,515 and $2,043 in 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
Future minimum lease payments under existing agreements for each
of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter
are as follows: 2005 $4,860, 2006
$3,896, 2007 $3,169, 2008 $2,601,
2009 $2,571, thereafter $8,395.
|
|
19. |
Net Loss per Common Share |
The following table sets forth the computation of net loss per
common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net loss applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(16,108 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,003 |
) |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
9,000,685 |
|
|
|
9,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share
|
|
$ |
(1.79 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested shares issued pursuant to the Restricted Share Plan
(Note 16) are not considered outstanding for the basic net
loss per common share and are not included in the computation of
diluted net loss per share as their effect was anti-dilutive.
The Company is viewed and managed as two separate, but highly
integrated, reportable business segments, Telephone
Operations and Other Operations. Telephone
Operations consists of local telephone, long-distance and
network access services, and data and Internet products provided
to both residential and business customers. All other business
activities comprise Other Operations including
operator services products, telecommunications services to state
prison facilities, equipment sales and
F-30
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
maintenance, inbound/outbound telemarketing and fulfillment
services, and paging services. Management evaluates the
performance of these business segments based upon revenue, gross
margins, and net operating income.
The business segment reporting information as of and for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Operations | |
|
Operations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Year ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$ |
230,401 |
|
|
$ |
39,207 |
|
|
$ |
269,608 |
|
Cost of services and products
|
|
|
56,339 |
|
|
|
24,233 |
|
|
|
80,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,062 |
|
|
|
14,974 |
|
|
|
189,036 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
77,123 |
|
|
|
10,832 |
|
|
|
87,955 |
|
Intangible assets impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,578 |
|
|
|
11,578 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
49,061 |
|
|
|
5,461 |
|
|
|
54,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
47,878 |
|
|
$ |
(12,897 |
) |
|
$ |
34,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
28,779 |
|
|
$ |
1,231 |
|
|
$ |
30,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$ |
90,282 |
|
|
$ |
42,048 |
|
|
$ |
132,330 |
|
Cost of services and products
|
|
|
21,762 |
|
|
|
24,543 |
|
|
|
46,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,520 |
|
|
|
17,505 |
|
|
|
86,025 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
32,987 |
|
|
|
9,508 |
|
|
|
42,495 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,488 |
|
|
|
5,988 |
|
|
|
22,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
$ |
19,045 |
|
|
$ |
2,009 |
|
|
$ |
21,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
9,117 |
|
|
$ |
2,179 |
|
|
$ |
11,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
309,527 |
|
|
$ |
8,954 |
|
|
$ |
318,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
936,545 |
|
|
$ |
69,554 |
|
|
$ |
1,006,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
78,443 |
|
|
$ |
21,111 |
|
|
$ |
99,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
245,855 |
|
|
$ |
71,740 |
|
|
$ |
317,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
21. |
Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31 | |
|
June 30 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
34,067 |
|
|
$ |
72,538 |
|
|
$ |
84,405 |
|
|
$ |
78,598 |
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and products
|
|
|
12,374 |
|
|
|
22,401 |
|
|
|
23,223 |
|
|
|
22,574 |
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,589 |
|
|
|
22,441 |
|
|
|
27,768 |
|
|
|
27,157 |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
15,176 |
|
|
|
16,942 |
|
|
|
17,038 |
|
|
|
Asset impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
28,329 |
|
|
|
60,018 |
|
|
|
67,933 |
|
|
|
78,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
5,738 |
|
|
|
12,520 |
|
|
|
16,472 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
2,797 |
|
|
|
12,984 |
|
|
|
10,143 |
|
|
|
9,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (loss)
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
|
6,329 |
|
|
|
(9,717 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
(357 |
) |
|
|
2,842 |
|
|
|
(3,430 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
3,487 |
|
|
|
(6,287 |
) |
Dividends on redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
(2,274 |
) |
|
|
(4,019 |
) |
|
|
(4,330 |
) |
|
|
(4,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(510 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,126 |
) |
|
$ |
(843 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,629 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.46 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
31,772 |
|
|
$ |
33,224 |
|
|
$ |
33,741 |
|
|
$ |
33,593 |
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and products
|
|
|
11,081 |
|
|
|
12,028 |
|
|
|
12,355 |
|
|
|
10,841 |
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,090 |
|
|
|
10,114 |
|
|
|
10,348 |
|
|
|
11,943 |
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,494 |
|
|
|
5,938 |
|
|
|
5,698 |
|
|
|
5,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
26,665 |
|
|
|
28,080 |
|
|
|
28,401 |
|
|
|
28,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
5,107 |
|
|
|
5,144 |
|
|
|
5,340 |
|
|
|
5,463 |
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
3,131 |
|
|
|
2,889 |
|
|
|
2,961 |
|
|
|
2,855 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,186 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
1,427 |
|
|
|
1,535 |
|
Dividends on redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
(2,119 |
) |
|
|
(2,119 |
) |
|
|
(2,119 |
) |
|
|
(2,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(933 |
) |
|
$ |
(766 |
) |
|
$ |
(692 |
) |
|
$ |
(613 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 30, 2002
with Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
F-33
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors
Consolidated Communications, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying combined balance sheet as of
December 30, 2002, of the corporations and lines of
business listed in Note 1 (then owned by McLeodUSA Inc.),
and the related combined statements of income, changes in parent
company investment, and cash flows for the year then ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the combined financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to
above present fairly, in all material respects, the combined
financial position at December 30, 2002, of the
corporations and lines of business listed in Note 1, and
the combined results of their operations and their cash flows
for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 3 to the combined financial
statements, effective January 1, 2002, the corporations and
lines of business listed in Note 1 discontinued the
amortization of goodwill in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and
Other Intangible Assets.
Chicago, Illinois
March 8, 2004
F-34
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,089 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,850
|
|
|
14,107 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2,204 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
1,399 |
|
|
Deferred directory costs and other charges
|
|
|
369 |
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,914 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
23,204 |
|
Investments
|
|
|
18 |
|
Property, plant, and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
24,162 |
|
|
Network and outside plant facilities
|
|
|
200,481 |
|
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
|
|
|
32,614 |
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
3,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,587 |
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
155,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
105,061 |
|
Intangibles and other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
101,324 |
|
|
Other intangibles
|
|
|
6,463 |
|
|
Deferred charges and other assets
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total intangibles and other assets
|
|
|
108,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
236,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARENT COMPANY INVESTMENT |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
$ |
479 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
7,306 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
6,725 |
|
|
Advance billings and customer deposits
|
|
|
5,307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
19,817 |
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized investment tax credits
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
10,815 |
|
|
Pension benefit obligations and other postretirement obligations
|
|
|
9,471 |
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
903 |
|
|
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities
|
|
|
20,593 |
|
|
Long-term capital lease obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
|
|
42,102 |
|
Parent company investment
|
|
|
174,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and parent company investment
|
|
$ |
236,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-35
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
COMBINED STATEMENT OF INCOME
Year Ended December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois Telephone Operations
|
|
$ |
76,745 |
|
|
Other Illinois Operations
|
|
|
33,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
109,904 |
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below)
|
|
|
35,820 |
|
|
Selling, general, and administrative
|
|
|
35,616 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
24,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
95,980 |
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
13,924 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,652 |
) |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
(1,218 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
12,706 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
4,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
8,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-36
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
COMBINED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARENT COMPANY INVESTMENT
Year Ended December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2002
|
|
$ |
178,142 |
|
Net income
|
|
|
8,036 |
|
Net settlement with parent
|
|
|
(11,694 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 30, 2002
|
|
$ |
174,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-37
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
COMBINED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
8,036 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
24,544 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(4,933 |
) |
|
Other deferred credits, net
|
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
Changes in net operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
805 |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
Advance billings and customer deposits
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
Accrued income taxes and liabilities
|
|
|
(3,604 |
) |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
28,537 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment expenditures
|
|
|
(14,137 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(14,137 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(68 |
) |
Deferred charges and other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
19 |
|
Settle intercompany receivables, net
|
|
|
(16,515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(16,564 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,164 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
3,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$ |
1,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment additions
|
|
$ |
4,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
1,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
F-38
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
Consolidated Communications, Inc., or CCI, is a direct, wholly
owned subsidiary of Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.
or Illinois Holdings. Illinois Holdings, in turn, is a direct,
wholly owned subsidiary of Homebase Acquisition, LLC, or
Homebase.
Homebase, a Delaware limited liability company that was formed
on June 26, 2002, entered into a sale and purchase
agreement with McLeodUSA, Inc. in July 2002 and the transaction
was concluded on December 31, 2002. CCI was formed on
August 6, 2002 to acquire a highly integrated group of
companies and lines of business as described below. The
accompanying combined financial statements include the accounts
of Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company and the Related
Businesses (the Business). During the periods covered by these
financial statements the Business operated under the ownership
of McLeodUSA, Inc., or McLeodUSA. The Business comprised of the
following entities and lines of business:
Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company (ICTC) provides a
broad range of local exchange telecommunications services
including local dialtone and central office based vertical
services features, private line services, data services
(including DSL), intraLATA toll and carrier access services.
Operations are subject to regulation by the Illinois Commerce
Commission and the Federal Communications Commission.
Consolidated Communications Operator Services provides both live
and automated local and long distance assistance as well as
national directory assistance on a wholesale and retail basis.
CCOS also provides specialized message center services and
corporate and governmental attendant services.
McLeodUSA Public Services, Inc. primarily offers managed local
and long distance automated calling from county jails and state
prison facilities in Illinois. These inmate services include
fraud control, customer service, call management, and technical
field support.
Consolidated Communications Business Systems sells and installs
telecommunications equipment, and performs cabling, wiring, and
equipment maintenance services to business and residential
customers within the ICTC service territory and to business
customers in adjacent markets.
Consolidated Market Response, Inc. is a full service
teleservices business providing inbound and outbound
telemarketing and backend fulfillment services to corporate
clients from diverse industry segments.
Consolidated Communications Mobile Services provides one-way
messaging service for both personal and business accounts. The
basic paging service has been supplemented with complimentary
mobile information services including Internet, 800 service,
info text and voice mail.
The Business has two reportable segments, Illinois Telephone
Operations and Other Illinois Operations (see note 14,
Business Segments). ICTC is represented in Illinois Telephone
Operations while all other entities and lines of business are
reflected in Other Illinois Operations.
These combined financial statements present, on an historical
cost basis, the combined assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses related to the entities and businesses as if the
Business had existed as an entity separate from McLeodUSA. The
historical cost basis includes the allocation of goodwill and
other intangible assets resulting from McLeodUSAs purchase
of the Business in 1997. As such, the accompanying combined
financial statements are not intended to be a complete
representation of the debt and equity structure of the Business
on a stand-alone basis. All material transactions between
businesses included in these financial statements have been
eliminated. Comprehensive income is equivalent to net
F-39
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
income for all periods presented. Line costs totaling $17,980
for 2002 were reclassified from general and administrative
expenses to cost of services.
|
|
3. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
ICTC, an independent local exchange carrier, follows the
accounting for regulated enterprises prescribed by Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71,
Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of
Regulation which permits rates (tariffs) to be
set at levels intended to recover estimated costs of providing
regulated services or products, including capital costs.
SFAS No. 71 requires ICTC to depreciate wireline plant
over the useful lives approved by the regulators, which could be
different than the useful lives that would otherwise be
determined by management. SFAS No. 71 also requires
deferral of certain costs and obligations based upon approvals
received from regulators to permit recovery of such amounts in
future years. Criteria that would give rise to the
discontinuance of SFAS No. 71 include
(1) increasing competition restricting the wireline
business ability to establish prices to recover specific
costs and (2) significant changes in the manner by which
rates are set by regulators from cost-based regulation to
another form of regulation.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could
differ from the estimates and assumptions used.
Cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly liquid
investments with an original maturity of three months or less.
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts |
Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts due to the
Business from normal activities. Accounts receivable are
determined to be past due when the amount is overdue based on
the payment terms with the customer. In certain circumstances,
the Business requires deposits from customers to mitigate
potential risk associated with receivables. The Business
maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect
managements best estimate of probable losses inherent in
the accounts receivable balance. Management determines the
allowance balance based on known troubled accounts, historical
experience and other currently available evidence. Accounts
receivable are charged to the allowance for doubtful accounts
when we have determined that the receivable will not be
collected.
Inventory consists mainly of copper and fiber cable that will be
used for ICTC network expansion and upgrades as well as
materials and equipment used in the maintenance and installation
of telephone systems. All inventory is stated at the lower of
average cost or market.
Investments primarily consist of the net cash surrender value of
variable whole life insurance policies to cover deferred
compensation liabilities for certain executives. These
investments are carried at fair
F-40
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
value. The deferred compensation arrangement was terminated in
January 2002, and accordingly, proceeds received from the
insurance policies were used to pay the deferred compensation
obligations.
|
|
|
Intangible Assets and Goodwill |
Goodwill is stated at cost and was amortized using the
straight-line method over thirty years. Effective
January 1, 2002, the Business adopted
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets (SFAS 142), at which time amortization
ceased. The Company will test annually for impairment as part of
its annual business planning cycle in the fourth quarter.
Impairment will be tested using the discounted cash flow method
to determine the fair value at the reporting unit level.
Intangible assets are stated at cost and consist of customer
relationships, tradenames, and software and are being amortized
over their useful lives which range from five to ten years.
|
|
|
Property, Plant, and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. The cost of
additions, replacements and major improvements is capitalized,
while repairs and maintenance are charged to expense. When
property, plant and equipment are retired from ICTC, the
original cost, net of salvage, is charged against accumulated
depreciation, with no gain or loss recognized in accordance with
the composite group remaining life methodology used for
regulated telephone plant assets. When property applicable to
non-regulated operations is sold or retired, the assets and
related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts
and the associated gain or loss is recognized.
The provision for depreciation of regulated property and
equipment is computed using rates and lives approved by the
Illinois Commerce Commission. The provision is equivalent to
annual composite depreciation rates of 5.59% for 2002.
The provision for depreciation of nonregulated property and
equipment is recorded using the straight-line method based upon
the following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years | |
|
|
| |
Buildings
|
|
|
15-20 |
|
Telecommunications networks
|
|
|
5-15 |
|
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
|
|
|
3-10 |
|
Depreciation of assets recorded under capital leases is included
within depreciation and amortization expense.
Wireline local access revenues are recognized over the period
that the service is provided. Nonrecurring installation revenues
are deferred upon service activation and are recognized over the
shorter of three to five years or the determined useful life.
The associated costs are recorded in the period in which they
are incurred. Revenues from other telecommunications services,
including network access charges, custom calling feature
revenues, billing and collection services, long distance and
private line services, Internet service provider charges,
operator services, and paging services are recognized monthly as
services are provided.
Telephone equipment revenues generated from retail channels are
recorded at the point of sale. Telecommunications systems and
structured cabling project revenues are recognized upon
completion and billing of the project. Maintenance services are
provided on both a contract and time and material basis and are
recorded when the service is provided.
F-41
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
Teleservices revenues include both inbound and outbound calling
as well as fulfillment services. All revenues are recorded as
program activity is completed.
The costs of advertising are charged to expense as incurred.
Advertising expenses totaled $1,758 in 2002.
At December 30, 2002, the Business financial
instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts
receivable and payable, long-term debt and capital lease
obligations. The fair values of the financial instruments were
not materially different from their carrying value except for
long-term debt. The aggregate fair value of the Business
long-term debt (including current maturities) was approximately
$24,212 at December 30, 2002. Fair values for the long-term
debt were determined using discounted cash flow analyses based
on the Business current incremental interest rates for
similar instruments.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the
tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts.
The Business follows the provisions of Accounting Principle
Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stocks Issued
to Employees (APB No. 25) and related
interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options.
In September 1997, McLeodUSA granted 837,245 stock options to
the Business employees at an exercise price of
$24.50 per share. The aggregate intrinsic value of these
options at the date of grant exceeded the aggregate exercise
price by approximately $9,000. As a result, the Business has
amortized the stock compensation expense over the four-year
vesting period of the options. There is no charge for
stock-based compensation in 2002.
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations (SFAS 143). SFAS 143 requires
companies to record liabilities equal to the fair value of their
asset retirement obligations when they are incurred. When the
liability is initially recorded, companies capitalize an
equivalent amount as part of the cost of the asset. The Business
is required to adopt SFAS 143 on January 1, 2003, and
it does not believe that the adoption of this new standard will
have a material effect on the 2003 consolidated financial
statements.
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. SFAS 144 retains
the requirement to recognize an impairment loss only where the
carrying value of a long-lived asset is not recoverable from its
undiscounted cash flows and to measure such loss as the
difference between the carrying amount and fair value of the
asset. SFAS 144, among other things, changes the criteria
that have to be met in order to classify an asset held-for-sale
and requires that operating losses from discontinued operations
be recognized in the period that the losses are incurred rather
than as of the measurement date. SFAS 144 was adopted for
the Business 2002 accounting period and did not have a
material impact on the combined financial statements.
F-42
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146, Accounting
for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.
Under SFAS 146, a liability for costs associated with an
exit or disposal activity should be recognized when the
liability is incurred. Previously, such a liability was
recognized at the date of commitment to an exit plan.
SFAS 146 also makes some changes to the timing of
recognizing severance pay costs where benefit arrangements
require employees to render future service beyond a minimum
retention period. SFAS 146 is effective for exit or
disposal activities that are initiated after December 31,
2002. The Business is required to adopt SFAS 146 on
January 1, 2003, and it does not believe that the adoption
of this new standard will have a material effect on the 2003
consolidated financial statements.
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45
(FIN 45), Guarantors Accounting and
Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others. FIN 45
requires certain guarantees to be recorded at fair value, which
is different from current practice, which is generally to record
a liability only when a loss is probable and reasonably
estimable. FIN 45 also requires a guarantor to make certain
new disclosures in the financial statements; these disclosure
requirements are effective for the Business 2002 reporting
period. The Business is required to adopt the recognition and
measurement provisions of FIN 45 on a prospective basis
with respect to guarantees issued or modified after
December 31, 2002. The Business does not believe the
adoption of FIN 45 will have a material effect on its 2003
consolidated financial statements.
Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46), Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities, was issued by the FASB
in January 2003. FIN 46 requires a company to consolidate a
variable interest entity if the company is subject to a majority
of the risk of loss from the variable interest entitys
activities or is entitled to receive a majority of the
entitys residual returns. The interpretation also requires
disclosures about variable interest entities that the company is
not required to consolidate but in which it has a significant
variable interest. FIN 46 is immediately effective for
variable interest entities created on or after January 31,
2003. For variable interest entities created or acquired prior
to February 1, 2003, the provisions of FIN 46 will
become effective for the periods after March 15, 2004,
except for Special Purpose Entities, to which the provisions
apply as of December 31, 2003. The Business has not yet
determined the effect of adopting FIN 46, if any, on its
statement of income or financial position.
|
|
4. |
Affiliated Transactions |
McLeodUSA provided corporate communications, human resources,
treasury and other general and administrative services. In
accordance with the cost allocation manual filed with the ICC,
the following allowable methods were used to apportion costs to
ICTC: corporate of communications departmental time
study; human resources total company wages;
treasury departmental time study; and general and
administrative general allocation factor. We believe
these methods were reasonable and the charges were
representative of what would have been incurred on a stand-alone
basis. Allocations of the costs incurred were charged to ICTC
and amounted to $910 in 2002, which has been recorded in general
and administrative expense.
The 2002 line items net settlement with the parent
reflected in the Combined Statement of Changes in Parent Company
Investment for Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company and
Related Businesses depict specifically the settlement of the
intercompany receivables and payables and the associated cash
distribution to the parent company.
|
|
5. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
Effective January 1, 2002, the Business adopted
SFAS 142. Accordingly, goodwill and other indefinite lived
intangibles are no longer amortized but are subject to an annual
impairment test. Other intangible assets will continue to be
amortized over their useful lives. We have determined that
software and
F-43
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
customer lists have a useful life of five years. The
Business tradenames have an estimated useful life of ten
years. Amortization of tradenames will continue for the next
five years. The amortization expense will be $1,360 during each
of the next four years through 2006, and $1,022 in 2007.
For federal income tax purposes, the Business was included in a
consolidated tax return along with other companies in the
McLeodUSA group during 2002. For the purpose of these combined
financial statements, the provision for income taxes has been
computed on a stand-alone basis as if the Business had filed a
separate return for the periods presented and was not a member
of a group. However, due to the fact that the McLeodUSA group
had a consolidated net operating loss, the Business did not make
any cash payments for income taxes during 2002. Therefore,
income taxes that would be payable on a stand-alone basis have
been settled as an increase in parent company investment.
The components of the income tax provision charged to expense
for 2002 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
8,628 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current
|
|
|
9,868 |
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(4,297 |
) |
|
State
|
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total Deferred
|
|
|
(4,933 |
) |
|
Investment tax credit amortized
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense
|
|
$ |
4,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a reconciliation between the statutory federal
income tax rate and the Business overall effective tax
rate:
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
Other
|
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Effective overall income tax rate
|
|
|
36.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
F-44
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
The temporary differences which give rise to significant
portions of the net deferred tax liability at December 30,
2002, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued vacation
|
|
$ |
582 |
|
|
Reserve for uncollectible accounts
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
Deferred revenue and regulatory reserves
|
|
|
1,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
2,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and post retirement expense
|
|
|
3,771 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
4,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciable property
|
|
|
(11,740 |
) |
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
(2,685 |
) |
|
Regulatory liabilities
|
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total noncurrent deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
(14,906 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net noncurrent deferred income tax liability
|
|
|
(10,815 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total net deferred tax liability
|
|
$ |
(7,401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Pension Costs and Other Postretirement Benefits |
ICTC maintains a noncontributory defined pension and death
benefit plan covering substantially all of its hourly employees.
The pension benefit formula used in the determination of pension
cost is based on the highest five consecutive calendar
years base earnings within the last ten calendar years
immediately preceding retirement or termination. It is
ICTCs policy to fund pension costs as they accrue subject
to any applicable Internal Revenue Code limitations.
The changes in benefit obligation for 2002 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
47,379 |
|
Service cost
|
|
|
807 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3,240 |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(3,374 |
) |
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$ |
49,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in plan assets for 2002 relate to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
50,769 |
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,949 |
) |
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(3,374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
$ |
45,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-45
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
The reconciliations of the funded status of the pension plans as
of December 30, 2002, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$ |
(4,191 |
) |
Unrecognized net actuarial gain
|
|
|
(220 |
) |
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
2,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized at period-end
|
|
$ |
(1,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The components of net periodic benefit cost for 2002 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
807 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
3,240 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(3,940 |
) |
Amortization of prior service costs
|
|
|
482 |
|
Recognized actuarial gain
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
|
|
|
The assets of the plan consist principally of equity and fixed
income securities. Actuarial assumptions used to calculate the
projected benefit obligation included a discount rate of 6.75%.
Future compensation level increases were estimated to be 4.0%.
The assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets was 8.0%.
In addition to providing pension benefits, ICTC provides an
optional retiree medical program to its salaried and union
retirees and spouses under age 65 and life insurance
coverage for the salaried retirees. All retirees are required to
contribute to the cost of their medical coverage while the
salaried life insurance is provided at no cost to the retiree.
The following postretirement benefit plan disclosures relate to
ICTC and Related Businesses. The changes in the postretirement
benefit obligation for 2002 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
7,710 |
|
Service cost
|
|
|
143 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
520 |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
Actuarial gain
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
$ |
7,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in plan assets for 2002 relate to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
393 |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
The reconciliations of the funded status of the postretirement
benefit plan as of December 30, 2002 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
$ |
(7,966 |
) |
Contributions made after measurement date and before fiscal year
end
|
|
|
111 |
|
Unrecognized net actuarial gain
|
|
|
(1,018 |
) |
Unrecognized transition obligation
|
|
|
2,796 |
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
(1,519 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized at period-end
|
|
$ |
(7,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
The components of postretirement benefit cost for 2002 are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
520 |
|
Amortization of prior service costs
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
Amortization of transitional obligation
|
|
|
388 |
|
Recognized actuarial gain
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
851 |
|
|
|
|
|
The postretirement benefit obligation is calculated assuming
that health-care costs increased by 12.0% in 2002, and that the
rate of increase thereafter (the health-care cost trend rate)
will decline to 6.0% in 2008 and subsequent years. The
health-care cost trend rate has a significant effect on the
amounts reported for costs each year as well as on the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation. For example, a
one percentage point increase each year in the health-care cost
trend rate would increase the accumulated postretirement benefit
obligation as of December 30, 2002, by approximately $643
and the aggregate of the service and interest cost components of
the net periodic postretirement benefit cost by
approximately $62. A one percentage point decrease each
year in the health-care cost trend rate would decrease the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of
December 30, 2002, by approximately $529 and the aggregate
of the service and interest cost components of the net periodic
postretirement benefit cost by approximately $50. The
weighted-average discount rate used in determining the benefit
obligation was 6.75%.
The Business provides a 401(k) defined contribution retirement
savings plan made available to virtually all employees. Each
employee may elect to defer a portion of his or her compensation
subject to certain limitations. During the periods covered in
this report, for all hourly employees participating in the plan,
the Business matched employee contributions up to a maximum of
4%. For salaried employees during the same periods, McLeodUSA
contributed a matching amount in McLeodUSA company stock. The
Business contributions towards the hourly plan totaled
$329 in 2002.
ICTCs first mortgage bonds are collateralized by
substantially all real and personal property. The Series K
Bonds and Series L Bonds provide for early redemption by
payment of the principal amount to be redeemed, any accrued
interest and a make-whole amount as described in the indenture.
As a result of the Series K Bond and Series L Bond
issues, ICTC is restricted from declaring or paying any
dividends or distributions, subject to certain exceptions, that
would reduce the retained earnings balance below $915.
F-47
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
CMR entered into a $1,250 mortgage on their building in
Charleston, Illinois, on March 18, 1994. A floating
interest rate was set at 100 basis points above the Harris
Bank prime with a floor and cap of 5% and 9%, respectively. The
note matures on March 18, 2004.
Long-term debt consisted of the following at December 31,
2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICTC First mortgage bonds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series K, 8.620%, due September 1, 2022
|
|
$ |
10,000 |
|
|
Series L, 7.050%, due October 1, 2013
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
CMR mortgage bond
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
As disclosed in Note 15 below, the long-term debt balances
were settled immediately following the acquisition of the
Business by Homebase Acquisition LLC on December 31, 2002.
|
|
10. |
Environmental Remediation Liabilities |
Environmental remediation liabilities totaled $931 at
December 30, 2002. These liabilities relate to anticipated
remediation and monitoring costs in respect of two sites and are
undiscounted.
The Business has operating lease agreements covering buildings
and office space and office equipment. The terms of these
agreements generally range from three to five years. Rent
expense totaled $1,195 in 2002.
Future minimum lease payments under existing agreements for each
of the next five years ending December 31 and thereafter
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease | |
Year |
|
Payments | |
|
|
| |
2003
|
|
$ |
675 |
|
2004
|
|
|
457 |
|
2005
|
|
|
419 |
|
2006
|
|
|
364 |
|
2007
|
|
|
312 |
|
2008 and thereafter
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Business has capital lease agreements for desktop computing
equipment. The terms of these agreements range from
20 months to 39 months, with the remaining open leases
expiring in 2003. The gross amount of assets recorded under
capital leases was $605 at December 30, 2002. The related
accumulated amortization at December 30, 2002 was $458.
Lease payments related to these obligations totaled $357 during
2002. The minimum lease payments in 2003 under these existing
agreements totaled $153.
F-48
ILLINOIS CONSOLIDATED TELEPHONE COMPANY AND RELATED
BUSINESSES
NOTES TO COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
December 30, 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
The Business is viewed and managed as two separate, but highly
integrated, reportable business segments, Illinois
Telephone Operations and Other Illinois
Operations. Illinois Telephone Operations consists of
local telephone, long-distance and network access services, and
data products provided to both residential and business
customers in central Illinois. ICTC is included in Telephone
Operations during the periods covered in these combined
financial statements. All other entities and lines of business
comprise Other Illinois Operations. Services include
operator services products, telecommunications services to state
prison facilities, equipment sales and maintenance,
inbound/outbound telemarketing and fulfillment services, and
paging services. Management evaluates the performance of these
business segments based upon revenue, gross margins, and net
operating income. The business segment reporting information is
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Illinois | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Telephone | |
|
Illinois | |
|
|
|
|
Operations | |
|
Operations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating revenues
|
|
$ |
76,745 |
|
|
$ |
33,159 |
|
|
$ |
109,904 |
|
Cost of services and products
|
|
|
17,980 |
|
|
|
17,840 |
|
|
|
35,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,765 |
|
|
|
15,319 |
|
|
|
74,084 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
28,967 |
|
|
|
6,649 |
|
|
|
35,616 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
20,074 |
|
|
|
4,470 |
|
|
|
24,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
$ |
9,724 |
|
|
$ |
4,200 |
|
|
$ |
13,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
222,380 |
|
|
$ |
14,023 |
|
|
$ |
236,403 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
81,059 |
|
|
|
20,265 |
|
|
|
101,324 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
12,005 |
|
|
|
2,132 |
|
|
|
14,137 |
|
|
|
14. |
Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 31 | |
|
June 30 | |
|
September 30 | |
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating revenues
|
|
$ |
27,155 |
|
|
$ |
27,998 |
|
|
$ |
27,610 |
|
|
$ |
27,141 |
|
Cost of services and products
|
|
|
8,837 |
|
|
|
9,188 |
|
|
|
8,518 |
|
|
|
9,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,318 |
|
|
|
18,810 |
|
|
|
19,092 |
|
|
|
17,864 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
8,733 |
|
|
|
7,782 |
|
|
|
8,752 |
|
|
|
10,349 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
6,135 |
|
|
|
6,136 |
|
|
|
6,136 |
|
|
|
6,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income
|
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
|
4,892 |
|
|
|
4,204 |
|
|
|
1,378 |
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
(341 |
) |
Income taxes
|
|
|
1,183 |
|
|
|
2,127 |
|
|
|
1,639 |
|
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
2,015 |
|
|
$ |
2,460 |
|
|
$ |
2,245 |
|
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective December 31, 2002, Homebase purchased the
entities and lines of business that comprise the Business for a
total consideration of $271,200 (excluding acquisition-related
expenses) from McLeodUSA. As a result of the acquisition, the
Business long-term debt of approximately $20,593 was
immediately extinguished. These financial statements do not
include any adjustments that would be required to reflect this
acquisition transaction in the Business combined balance
sheet.
F-49
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Dallas, Texas
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
with Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
F-50
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
TXU Communications Ventures Company
Irving, TX
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
TXU Communications Ventures Company and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of April 13, 2004,
December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss),
shareholders equity, and cash flows for the period from
January 1, 2004 to April 13, 2004 and each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2003. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Company at April 13, 2004, December 31, 2003 and 2002,
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
period from January 1, 2004 to April 13, 2004 and each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2003 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As discussed in Note N to the consolidated financial statements,
effective January 1, 2002, the Company changed its method
of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets to
conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
Dallas, Texas
October 15, 2004
F-51
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 13, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$ |
9,897 |
|
|
$ |
11,464 |
|
|
$ |
12,427 |
|
|
Accounts Receivable net of allowance of $1,316 in
2004, $1,501 in 2003 and $5,021 in 2002
|
|
|
17,555 |
|
|
|
15,778 |
|
|
|
18,825 |
|
|
Short-Term Investments
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
Prepaid Federal Income Taxes
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,615 |
|
|
Materials and Supplies
|
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
2,379 |
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
3,974 |
|
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
34,145 |
|
|
Assets Held for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,030 |
|
|
Other Current Assets
|
|
|
4,467 |
|
|
|
3,519 |
|
|
|
3,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
37,058 |
|
|
|
34,515 |
|
|
|
86,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NONCURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
36,862 |
|
|
|
36,118 |
|
|
|
35,260 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
304,336 |
|
|
|
304,336 |
|
|
|
317,536 |
|
|
Prepaid Pension Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
3,669 |
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
16,033 |
|
|
|
39,525 |
|
|
|
15,709 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL NONCURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
358,062 |
|
|
|
381,937 |
|
|
|
372,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant in Service
|
|
|
341,238 |
|
|
|
333,607 |
|
|
|
326,243 |
|
|
Plant Under Construction
|
|
|
7,147 |
|
|
|
8,595 |
|
|
|
5,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
348,385 |
|
|
|
342,202 |
|
|
|
331,492 |
|
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
118,343 |
|
|
|
110,795 |
|
|
|
90,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT NET
|
|
|
230,042 |
|
|
|
231,407 |
|
|
|
240,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
625,162 |
|
|
$ |
647,859 |
|
|
$ |
700,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-52
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$ |
7,712 |
|
|
$ |
9,223 |
|
|
$ |
14,043 |
|
|
Accounts Payable Affiliates
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
2,314 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
Advance Billing and Payments
|
|
|
4,163 |
|
|
|
2,954 |
|
|
|
3,438 |
|
|
Customer Deposits
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
98,247 |
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
12,105 |
|
|
|
18,518 |
|
|
|
18,234 |
|
|
Liabilities Related to Assets Held for Sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,661 |
|
|
Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
3,485 |
|
|
|
4,594 |
|
|
|
4,078 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
31,099 |
|
|
|
136,589 |
|
|
|
46,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, LESS CURRENT MATURITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,136 |
|
|
|
163,203 |
|
OTHER LIABILITIES AND DEFERRED CREDITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Postretirement and Pension Benefits
|
|
|
31,173 |
|
|
|
27,669 |
|
|
|
28,072 |
|
|
Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
33,513 |
|
|
|
54,486 |
|
|
|
39,458 |
|
|
Other Deferred Credits and Liabilities
|
|
|
5,868 |
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
|
5,145 |
|
|
Regulatory Liabilities
|
|
|
8,283 |
|
|
|
8,405 |
|
|
|
8,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OTHER LIABILITIES AND DEFERRED CREDITS
|
|
|
78,837 |
|
|
|
96,416 |
|
|
|
81,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
109,936 |
|
|
|
235,141 |
|
|
|
291,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MINORITY INTEREST
|
|
|
1,964 |
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock No par value, 1,000 shares
authorized, 1,000 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In Capital
|
|
|
636,868 |
|
|
|
534,749 |
|
|
|
530,459 |
|
|
Accumulated Deficit
|
|
|
(117,463 |
) |
|
|
(119,246 |
) |
|
|
(116,905 |
) |
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
(6,143 |
) |
|
|
(4,643 |
) |
|
|
(5,959 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
513,262 |
|
|
|
410,860 |
|
|
|
407,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$ |
625,162 |
|
|
$ |
647,859 |
|
|
$ |
700,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-53
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period From | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
January 1, 2004 | |
|
| |
|
|
To April 13, 2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
OPERATING REVENUES
|
|
$ |
53,855 |
|
|
$ |
194,818 |
|
|
$ |
214,709 |
|
|
$ |
207,451 |
|
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network Operating Costs (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below)
|
|
|
15,296 |
|
|
|
58,415 |
|
|
|
76,891 |
|
|
|
95,663 |
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
24,138 |
|
|
|
75,365 |
|
|
|
109,401 |
|
|
|
88,671 |
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
8,124 |
|
|
|
32,875 |
|
|
|
40,990 |
|
|
|
50,177 |
|
|
Restructuring, Asset Impairment and Other Charges
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
101,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill Impairment Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
47,546 |
|
|
|
180,103 |
|
|
|
346,672 |
|
|
|
234,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
6,309 |
|
|
|
14,715 |
|
|
|
(131,963 |
) |
|
|
(27,060 |
) |
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-payment Penalty on Extinguishment of Debt
|
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
(5,422 |
) |
|
|
(7,669 |
) |
|
|
(11,625 |
) |
|
(Loss)/Gain on Sale of Property and Investments
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
6,158 |
|
|
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
Partnership Income
|
|
|
1,174 |
|
|
|
2,693 |
|
|
|
2,332 |
|
|
|
3,151 |
|
|
Minority Interest
|
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(872 |
) |
|
|
8,048 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
(980 |
) |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL (EXPENSE) OTHER INCOME
|
|
|
(2,053 |
) |
|
|
(4,601 |
) |
|
|
3,937 |
|
|
|
(1,136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
4,256 |
|
|
|
10,114 |
|
|
|
(128,026 |
) |
|
|
(28,196 |
) |
|
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
|
|
|
2,473 |
|
|
|
12,455 |
|
|
|
(38,261 |
) |
|
|
(6,304 |
) |
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
(2,341 |
) |
|
|
(89,765 |
) |
|
|
(21,892 |
) |
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment, Net of Tax
|
|
|
(1,494 |
) |
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
(6,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (Loss) Gain on Marketable Securities, Net of Tax
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$ |
283 |
|
|
$ |
(1,025 |
) |
|
$ |
(95,929 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-54
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
| |
|
Paid In | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Loss | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance, January 1, 2001
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
495,701 |
|
|
$ |
(5,248 |
) |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized Gain on Marketable Securities, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2001
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
523,485 |
|
|
|
(27,140 |
) |
|
|
205 |
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89,765 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,028 |
) |
|
Unrealized Loss on Marketable Securities, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2002
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
530,459 |
|
|
|
(116,905 |
) |
|
|
(5,959 |
) |
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,341 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534,749 |
|
|
|
(119,246 |
) |
|
|
(4,643 |
) |
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,494 |
) |
|
Unrealized Loss on Marketable Securities, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, April 13, 2004
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
636,868 |
|
|
$ |
(117,463 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-55
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
to April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
|
$ |
(2,341 |
) |
|
$ |
(89,765 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,892 |
) |
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Cash Provided by
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-payment Penalty on Extinguishment of Debt
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Income Tax
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
22,428 |
|
|
|
(38,908 |
) |
|
|
(9,368 |
) |
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
8,124 |
|
|
|
32,875 |
|
|
|
40,990 |
|
|
|
50,177 |
|
|
Provision for Postretirement Benefits
|
|
|
3,007 |
|
|
|
3,583 |
|
|
|
9,160 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
Loss/(Gain) on Disposition of Property and Investments
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(558 |
) |
|
|
(6,158 |
) |
|
Restructuring, Asset Impairment and Other Charges
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
101,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill Impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership Income
|
|
|
(1,174 |
) |
|
|
(2,693 |
) |
|
|
(2,332 |
) |
|
|
(3,151 |
) |
|
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
Minority Interest
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
(8,048 |
) |
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
Provision for Bad Debt Losses
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
(804 |
) |
|
|
10,200 |
|
|
|
3,981 |
|
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
(2,319 |
) |
|
|
3,851 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
(7,287 |
) |
|
Materials and Supplies
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
3,048 |
|
|
Prepaid Federal Income Tax
|
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
6,615 |
|
|
|
(4,664 |
) |
|
|
12,299 |
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
(1,164 |
) |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(2,075 |
) |
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
|
(1,051 |
) |
|
|
(2,858 |
) |
|
|
(15,003 |
) |
|
|
(14,520 |
) |
|
Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
|
|
|
(5,429 |
) |
|
|
(1,323 |
) |
|
|
12,637 |
|
|
|
(2,772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
5,319 |
|
|
|
75,055 |
|
|
|
34,714 |
|
|
|
6,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
|
|
|
(6,735 |
) |
|
|
(18,189 |
) |
|
|
(27,374 |
) |
|
|
(66,976 |
) |
|
Business Assets Purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,467 |
) |
|
Proceeds From Sale-Leaseback Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds From Investments
|
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
Proceeds From Sale of Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
9,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(6,303 |
) |
|
|
(14,251 |
) |
|
|
(21,272 |
) |
|
|
(59,946 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Paid-In Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
Proceeds From TXU Investment Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,290 |
|
|
|
6,974 |
|
|
|
27,784 |
|
|
Proceeds From Long-Term Obligations
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
5,895 |
|
|
|
23,319 |
|
|
|
40,620 |
|
|
Minority Interest Equity Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-payment Penalty on Extinguishment of Debt
|
|
|
(1,914 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Made on Long-Term Obligations
|
|
|
(16,669 |
) |
|
|
(71,714 |
) |
|
|
(34,724 |
) |
|
|
(24,619 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities
|
|
|
(583 |
) |
|
|
(61,767 |
) |
|
|
(4,431 |
) |
|
|
46,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(1,567 |
) |
|
|
(963 |
) |
|
|
9,011 |
|
|
|
(6,878 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS BEGINNING
|
|
|
11,464 |
|
|
|
12,427 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
10,294 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS ENDING
|
|
$ |
9,897 |
|
|
$ |
11,464 |
|
|
$ |
12,427 |
|
|
$ |
3,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt for Equity Swap with TXU Investment Co.
|
|
$ |
102,119 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Interest Paid
|
|
$ |
1,045 |
|
|
$ |
6,045 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
11,820 |
|
|
Taxes Paid (Refunds) Received
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
(16,329 |
) |
|
$ |
(153 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,333 |
) |
|
Capital Leases
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,761 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated
financial statements.
F-56
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note A Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
TXU Communications Ventures Company (TXUCV) is a
direct, wholly owned subsidiary of Pinnacle One Partners, L.P.
(Pinnacle One). TXU Corp. owns a 100% voting
interest in Pinnacle One. In May 2003, TXU Corp. acquired, for
$150 million in cash, its joint venture partners
interest in Pinnacle One under a put/call agreement that was
executed in February, 2003. Also in May 2003, TXU Corp.
finalized a formal plan to dispose of TXUCV by sale. On
January 15, 2004, Consolidated Communications Acquisition
Texas Corp. (Texas Acquisition), a subsidiary of
Homebase Acquisition, LLC, and Pinnacle One, an indirect, wholly
owned subsidiary of TXU Corp., entered into a stock purchase
agreement providing for the purchase by Texas Acquisition of all
of the capital stock of TXUCV. Texas Acquisition is a Delaware
corporation formed solely for the purpose of entering into the
stock purchase agreement and closing the transactions
contemplated in the agreement. The purchase transaction closed
on April 14, 2004. By acquiring all the capital stock of
TXUCV, Texas Acquisition acquired substantially all of TXU
Corps telecommunications business, for a cash price of
$527 million, subject to certain upward or downward
adjustments (see Note O Sale of TXUCV).
Principles of Consolidation The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of TXUCV
and its wholly owned subsidiaries, TXU Communications Services
Company (TXU Services), TXU Communications Telephone
Company (TXUCV Telephone), TXU Communications
Telecom Services Company (TXUCV Telecom), TXU
Communications Transport Company (Transport
Services), Fort Bend Telephone Company
(Fort Bend Telephone), Fort Bend Long
Distance Company (Fort Bend LD), Fort Bend
Wireless Company (Fort Bend Wireless), Telcon,
Inc. (Telcon) and FBCIP, Inc. (FBCIP).
Transport Services include East Texas Fiber Line Incorporated
(ETFL), a 63%-owned affiliate. Fort Bend
Telephone includes Fort Bend Cellular, Inc.
(Fort Bend Cellular), a wholly owned
subsidiary. All material intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
Description of Business TXUCV is the
parent company to TXU Services, TXUCV Telephone (now known as
Consolidated Communications of Texas Company), TXUCV Telecom,
Transport Services, Fort Bend Telephone (now known as
Consolidated Communications of Fort Bend Company),
Fort Bend LD, Fort Bend Wireless, Telcon and FBCIP.
TXUCV is a rural local exchange company that provides
communications services to residential and business customers in
east Texas and rural and suburban areas surrounding Houston. As
of April 13, 2004, TXUCV was the 18th largest local
telephone company in the United States, based on industry
sources, with approximately 171,000 local access lines and
11,000 digital subscriber lines, or DSL lines, in service.
TXUCVs main sources of revenue are its local telephone
businesses in Texas, which offer an array of services, including
local dial tone, custom calling features, private line services,
long distance, dial-up and high-speed Internet access and
carrier access services, including access charges for the use of
its network and its billing and collection system.
Each of the subsidiaries through which TXUCV operates its local
telephone businesses is classified as a Rural Local Exchange
Carrier, commonly referred to as an RLEC, under the
Telecommunications Act of 1996. These subsidiaries are
Fort Bend Telephone and TXUCV Telephone. For ease of
reference, we refer to these subsidiaries as the Texas RLECs.
TXUCV also sells directory advertising and publishes yellow and
white pages directories in and around our Texas RLECs
service areas and provides connectivity to customers within
Texas over a fiber optic transport network consisting of
approximately 2,500 route-miles of fiber. This transport network
supports TXUCVs long distance, Internet access and data
services and provides bandwidth on a wholesale basis to third
party customers, including national long distance and wireless
carriers. The transport network includes fiber owned by
Transport Services, a wholly owned subsidiary of TXUCV, ETFL, a
corporation in
F-57
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
which TXUCV owns a 63% equity interest, and Fort Bend
Fibernet, a partnership in which Transport Services is the
managing partner and owns a 39% equity interest.
In addition, TXUCV holds equity interests in the following two
cellular partnerships:
|
|
|
|
|
GTE Mobilnet of South Texas, which serves the greater Houston
metropolitan area. TXUCV owns 2% of the equity of this
partnership. |
|
|
|
GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17, which serves rural areas in
and around Conroe, Texas. TXUCV owns 17% of the equity of this
partnership. |
San Antonio MTA, L.P., a wholly owned partnership of Cellco
Partnership (doing business as Verizon Wireless), is the general
partner for both partnerships.
Telcon and TXU Services provide information management, human
resources, accounting, executive and other administrative
services to TXUCV affiliate companies.
Fort Bend Cellular, Fort Bend Wireless, and FBCIP had
no significant activity during the period from January 1,
2004 to April 13, 2004 and the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.
Use of Estimates The preparation of
the TXUCV consolidated financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts disclosed in
the consolidated financial statements. Due to the prospective
nature of estimates, actual results could differ.
Accounting and Regulatory Guidelines
TXUCV Telephone and Fort Bend Telephone follow the
accounting for regulated enterprises prescribed by
SFAS No. 71, Accounting for the Effects of Certain
Types of Regulation, which permits rates (or tariffs) to be set
to levels intended to recover estimated costs of providing
regulated services or products, including capital costs.
SFAS 71 requires our Texas RLECs to depreciate wireline
plant over the useful lives approved by the regulators, which
could be different than the useful lives that would otherwise be
determined by management. SFAS 71 also requires deferral of
certain costs and obligations based upon approvals received from
regulators to permit recovery of such amounts in future years.
Criteria that would give rise to the discontinuance of
SFAS 71 include (1) increasing competition restricting
the wireline business ability to establish prices to
recover specific costs and (2) significant changes in the
manner in which rates are set by regulators from cost-based
regulation to another form of regulation. Management believes
the company is consistent in the application of these provisions
and does not foresee regulatory, economic, or competitive
changes in the near future that would necessitate a change in
its method of accounting. In analyzing the effects of
discontinuing the application of SFAS 71, management has
determined that the useful lives of plant assets used for
regulatory and financial reporting purposes are consistent with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
and, therefore, any adjustments to telecommunications plant
would be immaterial, as would be the write-off of regulatory
assets and liabilities.
There are two different forms of incentive regulation designated
by the Texas Public Utility Regulatory Act: Chapter 58 and
Chapter 59. Generally under either election, the access
rates an ILEC may charge for basic local services cannot be
increased from the amounts on the date of election without PUCT
approval. Even with PUCT approval, increases can only occur in
very specific situations. Pricing flexibility under
Chapter 59 is extremely limited. In contrast,
Chapter 58 allows greater pricing flexibility on non-basic
network services, customer specific contracts and new services.
Initially, both Texas RLECs elected incentive regulation under
Chapter 59 and fulfilled the applicable infrastructure
requirements to maintain their election status. TXUCV Telephone
made its election on August 17, 1997. Fort Bend
Telephone made its election on May 12, 2000. On
March 25, 2003, both
F-58
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Texas RLECs changed their election status from Chapter 59
to Chapter 58. The rate freezes for basic services with
respect to the current Chapter 58 elections are due to
expire on March 24, 2007.
In connection with the 2003 election by each of our Texas RLECs
to be governed under an incentive network access rate regime,
our Texas RLECs were obligated to fulfill certain infrastructure
requirements. While our Texas RLECs have met the current
infrastructure requirements, the PUCT could impose additional or
other restrictions of this type in the future.
The FCC regulates levels of interstate network access charges by
imposing price caps on Regional Bell Operating Companies and
large Incumbent Local Exchange Companies (ILECs).
These price caps can be adjusted based on various formulae, such
as inflation and productivity, and otherwise through regulatory
proceedings. Small ILECs may elect to base network access
charges on price caps, but are not required to do so. Our Texas
RLECs elected not to apply federal price caps. Instead, our
RLECs employ rate-of-return regulation for their network
interstate access charges, whereby they earn a fixed return on
their investment over and above operating costs. The FCC
determines the profits our RLECs can earn by setting the
rate-of-return on their allowable investment base, which is
currently 11.25%.
Our Texas RLECs also receive federal and state subsidy payments
designed to preserve and advance widely available, quality
telephone service at affordable prices in rural areas.
Property, Plant, Equipment and Depreciation
Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical
cost. Allowance for funds used during construction
(AFUDC) is a cost accounting concept whereby amounts
based upon interest charges on borrowed funds and a return on
equity capital used to finance construction are added to
telecommunications plant cost. Depreciation is generally
computed on the straight-line method.
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash
equivalents are short-term, highly liquid investments readily
convertible to known amounts of cash and which are so near
maturity, generally 30 days, that there is no significant
risk of changes in value resulting from changes in market
interest rates.
Investments Investments in equity
securities that have readily determinable fair values are
categorized as available-for-sale securities and are carried at
fair value. The unrealized gains or losses on securities
classified as available-for-sale are included as a separate
component of shareholders equity. TXUCV uses the equity
method of accounting for investments where the ability to
exercise significant influence over such entities exists.
Goodwill Amounts paid for assets of
other companies in excess of fair value are charged to goodwill.
Prior to January 1, 2002, goodwill was amortized over its
useful life, normally 15 to 40 years. In June 2001, the
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142
(SFAS No. 142), Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, which is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2001. SFAS No. 142
addresses how intangible assets that are acquired individually
or with a group of other assets should be accounted for in the
financial statements upon their acquisition and after they have
been initially recognized in the financial statements.
SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and intangible
assets that have indefinite useful lives not be amortized but
rather be tested at least annually for impairment, and
intangible assets that have finite useful lives be amortized
over their useful lives. SFAS No. 142 provides
specific guidance for testing goodwill and intangible assets
that will not be amortized for impairment. In addition,
SFAS No. 142 expands the disclosure requirements about
goodwill and other intangible assets in the years subsequent to
their acquisition. TXUCV adopted this standard as of
January 1, 2002 and recognized no impairment as of the
adoption date. TXUCV conducted impairment tests on
October 1, 2003 and October 1, 2002 and, as a result
of TXU Corp.s decision in 2003 to sell TXUCV for a known
price and TXUCVs decision to exit the CLEC and Transport
businesses, recognized on its consolidated financial statements,
impairment losses of $13.2 million and $18 million,
respectively for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002
(see
F-59
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note N Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets).
No impairment tests were required for the period from
January 1, 2004 to April 13, 2004, and consequently no
impairment charges were recorded.
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 144
(SFAS No. 144), Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
SFAS No. 144 addresses financial accounting and
reporting for the impairment of long-lived assets and for
long-lived assets to be disposed of. The provisions of
SFAS No. 144 are generally effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2001. TXUCV adopted this standard as of
January 1, 2002 and recognized no impairment as of the
adoption date. TXUCV conducted an impairment test on
October 1, 2002, as a result of TXUCVs decision to
exit certain businesses, and recognized on its consolidated
financial statements, an impairment loss of $99.3 million
for the year ended December 31, 2002 (see
Note M Restructuring and Impairment Charges).
Impairment tests are conducted whenever events or changes in
circumstances pertaining to TXUCV or its assets indicate that
the carrying amount of TXUCVs long-lived assets is not
recoverable. No test was required during 2003 and for the period
ended April 13, 2004.
Materials and Supplies Inventories of
materials and supplies are valued at the lower of cost or
market. Cost is determined by a moving weighted average method.
Indefeasible Rights of Use (IRU)
TXUCV entered into several agreements that entitle it to
a long-term lease, or an IRU, of local and long-haul dark fiber
of another company. Generally, each agreement required TXUCV to
pay an aggregate price consisting of an initial payment,
followed by installments during the construction period based
upon achieving certain milestones (e.g., commencement of
construction, conduit installation and fiber installation). The
final payment for each segment was made at the time of
acceptance of the fiber for use by TXUCV.
Additionally, TXUCV entered into several agreements that entitle
another party to a long-term lease, or an IRU, of certain local
and long-haul dark fiber of TXUCV. In some cases, the agreement
was classified as a service agreement, in which case revenue is
recognized ratably over the life of the lease. In other cases an
exchange of similar fiber was deemed to have occurred with
another transport provider with similar fiber. In this case, no
gain or loss was recognized on the exchange.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits
Pension benefits are provided for substantially all
employees of TXUCV. TXUCV generally funds the pension plan to
the extent that contributions are deductible for federal income
tax purposes. TXUCV also has deferred compensation agreements
with the former board of directors and certain key employees.
Postretirement benefits expense is accrued on a current basis
using actuarially determined cost estimates. In addition,
employees may become eligible for certain health care and life
insurance benefits after retirement.
Federal Income Taxes and Deferred Credits
TXUCV and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal
income tax return. ETFL files a separate federal income tax
return. Federal income tax expense or benefit is allocated to
each subsidiary based on separately determined taxable income or
loss.
Income taxes are provided based on taxable income or loss as
reported for financial statement purposes. The provision for
income taxes differs from the amounts currently payable because
of temporary differences in the recognition of certain income
and expense items for financial reporting and tax reporting
purposes. Investment tax credits (ITC) used to
offset income tax for tax reporting purposes are deferred and
amortized over the lives of the related assets for financial
reporting.
Deferred federal income taxes are provided for the temporary
differences between assets and liabilities recognized for
financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for tax
purposes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. TXUCV records a
F-60
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
valuation allowance related to its deferred income tax assets
when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not
that deferred tax assets would not be realized.
TXUCV has recorded a regulatory liability to recognize the
cumulative effects of anticipated ratemaking activities. For
financial statement purposes, deferred ITC and excess deferred
federal income taxes related to depreciation of regulated assets
are being amortized as a reduction of the provision for income
taxes over the estimated useful or remaining lives of the
related property, plant and equipment.
ETFL had no current or deferred federal income taxes at
April 13, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and 2002.
Revenue Recognition Revenues are
generally recognized and earned when evidence of an arrangement
exists, service has been rendered and collectibility is
reasonably assured. Local telephone service revenue is recorded
based on tariffed rates. Telephone network access and long
distance service revenues are derived from access and toll
charges and settlement arrangements. Revenues on billings to
customers for services in advance of providing such services are
deferred and recognized when earned. Print advertising and
publishing revenues are recognized ratably over the life of the
related directory, which is generally 12 months.
Operating Segments
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, requires that public
business enterprises report certain information about operating
segments in complete sets of financial statements of the
enterprise. SFAS No. 131 defines an operating segment
as a component of the organization (1) that engages in
business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur
expenses (2) whose operating results are regularly reviewed
by the enterprises chief operating decision maker to make
decisions about performance and resource allocation; and
(3) for which discrete financial information is available.
Notwithstanding this definition, SFAS No. 131 provides
the criteria for aggregating segments with similar economic
characteristics such as the nature of product and services, the
nature of production processes, the type or class of customers,
the distribution method for products or services, and the nature
of regulatory environment. TXUCV identified two operating
segments ILEC and Transport Operations; however,
Transport does not meet the quantitative threshold for
separately reportable business segments.
Guarantees In November 2002, the FASB
issued Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.
Interpretation No. 45 requires that at the time a company
issues a guarantee, the company must recognize an initial
liability for the fair value, or market value, of the
obligations it assumes under that guarantee. This interpretation
is applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or
modified after December 31, 2002. While TXUCV has various
guarantees included in contracts in the normal course of
business, primarily in the form of indemnities, these guarantees
do not represent significant commitments or contingent
liabilities related to the indebtedness of others.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In
January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46
(FIN No. 46) Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities. Until this interpretation, a company
generally included another entity in its consolidated financial
statements only if it controlled the entity through voting
interests. FIN No. 46 requires a variable interest entity
to be consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a
majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest
entitys activities or entitled to receive a majority of
the entitys residual returns. In December 2003, the FASB
revised and re-released FIN No. 46 as FIN
No. 46®. The provisions of FIN No. 46®
were effective for TXUCV beginning in the first quarter of 2004
and the related disclosure requirements were previously
effective immediately. The impact of this interpretation did not
have a material effect on the financial condition or results of
operations of TXUCV.
F-61
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
In December 2003, the U.S. Congress enacted the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003
(Act) that will provide a prescription drug subsidy,
beginning in 2006, to companies that sponsor postretirement
health care plans that provide drug benefits. Additional
legislation is anticipated that will clarify whether a company
is eligible for the subsidy, the amount of the subsidy available
and the procedures to be followed in obtaining the subsidy. In
May 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position 106-2 Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription
Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 that
provides guidance on the accounting and disclosure for the
effects of the Act. The Company has determined that its
postretirement prescription drug plan is actuarially equivalent
and will begin reflecting the impact on July 1, 2004.
Note B Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 13, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
Estimated |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
Useful Life |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
4,228 |
|
|
$ |
4,280 |
|
|
$ |
4,433 |
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
25,209 |
|
|
|
24,922 |
|
|
|
24,938 |
|
|
15-35 years |
Telephone Plant
|
|
|
264,352 |
|
|
|
258,000 |
|
|
|
242,934 |
|
|
5-30 years |
Furniture and Office Equipment
|
|
|
41,455 |
|
|
|
40,327 |
|
|
|
45,420 |
|
|
5-17 years |
Automotive and Other Equipment
|
|
|
5,994 |
|
|
|
6,078 |
|
|
|
8,518 |
|
|
3-7 years |
Construction in Progress
|
|
|
7,147 |
|
|
|
8,595 |
|
|
|
5,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348,385 |
|
|
|
342,202 |
|
|
|
331,492 |
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
118,343 |
|
|
|
110,795 |
|
|
|
90,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
230,042 |
|
|
$ |
231,407 |
|
|
$ |
240,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $8.1 million, $32.8 million,
$40.8 million and $36.5 million for the period from
January 1, 2004 to April 13, 2004 and for the years
ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.
Note C Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 13, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
TXU Corp. Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
80,867 |
|
|
$ |
144,066 |
|
CoBank Mortgage Notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,429 |
|
|
|
18,071 |
|
Capital Leases
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
4,009 |
|
Debentures Payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
100,383 |
|
|
|
166,202 |
|
Less: Current Maturities
|
|
|
2,847 |
|
|
|
98,247 |
|
|
|
2,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,136 |
|
|
$ |
163,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the 2000 formation of Pinnacle One, TXU Corp. provided a
$200 million revolving credit facility (the
Revolver) to TXUCV with a term of four years.
Interest is payable by TXUCV at a rate equal to the London
Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.5%, in effect
as of the beginning of each
F-62
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
credit facility advance. The interest rate of each advance is
calculated for one, two, three, or six-month periods, as elected
by TXUCV, at the end of which the interest rate is reset to the
current LIBOR rate plus 1.5%. The principal balance was
effectively paid off on April 13, 2004 through TXU
Corp.s conversion of amounts outstanding under this
arrangement into paid-in-capital and the credit facility was
terminated as called for in the stock purchase agreement
referenced in Note A above.
TXUCV was required to repay all of its outstanding indebtedness
at or prior to the closing of the transactions, other than
capital leases that are subject to purchase price adjustments
and inter-company indebtedness relating to contracts that will
continue following the closing of the transactions. As a
consequence, all of the remaining CoBank notes were retired in
April 2004 and a pre-payment penalty of $1.9 million was
incurred.
The Capital Lease amount results from the two Master Lease
Agreements with General Electric Capital Corporation
(GECC), which are described below (see
Note G Capital Leases).
Scheduled principal maturities on long-term debt for the five
years subsequent to April 13, 2004 are as follows (dollars
in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
$ |
711 |
|
2005
|
|
|
952 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
2007
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$ |
2,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
Note D Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes consists of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period From | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
January 1, 2004 | |
|
| |
|
|
To April 13, 2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
(9,704 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,018 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,951 |
) |
|
State
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
83 |
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
|
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
21,435 |
|
|
|
(31,819 |
) |
|
|
(3,610 |
) |
|
State
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
(2,766 |
) |
|
|
(311 |
) |
Amortization of Investment Tax Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(301 |
) |
Amortization of Excess Deferred Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)
|
|
$ |
2,473 |
|
|
$ |
12,455 |
|
|
$ |
(38,261 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-63
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The income tax expense (benefit) differs from amounts computed
at statutory rates primarily because of basis adjustments and
nondeductible change in the valuation reserve. The following is
a reconciliation of the income tax expense (benefit) reported on
the consolidated statements of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period From | |
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
January 1, 2004 | |
|
| |
|
|
To April 13, 2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) at U.S. Federal Statutory Rate
|
|
$ |
1,488 |
|
|
$ |
3,540 |
|
|
$ |
(44,809 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,101 |
) |
State Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
(3,841 |
) |
|
|
(355 |
) |
State Income Tax Refunds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(866 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,752 |
|
Goodwill Impairment
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
4,704 |
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interest
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
(2,817 |
) |
|
|
(177 |
) |
Amortization of Investment Tax Credit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(301 |
) |
Amortization of Excess Deferred Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(214 |
) |
Increase in Valuation Reserve
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
3,084 |
|
|
|
9,080 |
|
|
|
(270 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(929 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Permanent Differences
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)
|
|
$ |
2,473 |
|
|
$ |
12,455 |
|
|
$ |
(38,261 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of deductible
temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts
used for income tax purposes. The tax effects of significant
items comprising TXUCVs net deferred income taxes consist
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Deferred Tax Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating Losses
|
|
$ |
8,649 |
|
|
$ |
9,625 |
|
|
$ |
19,437 |
|
|
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts Receivable
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
Accrued Vacation
|
|
|
2,127 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
939 |
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
|
|
14,833 |
|
|
|
13,164 |
|
|
|
12,496 |
|
|
Deferred Franchise Tax
|
|
|
4,183 |
|
|
|
3,918 |
|
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
Prior Year Minimum Tax Credit
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,347 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL DEFERRED ASSETS
|
|
$ |
32,338 |
|
|
$ |
29,761 |
|
|
$ |
67,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franchise Tax
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3,600 |
) |
|
Partnership Investment
|
|
|
(2,212 |
) |
|
|
(1,698 |
) |
|
|
(1,151 |
) |
|
Basis in Investment
|
|
|
(1,632 |
) |
|
|
(1,632 |
) |
|
|
(1,632 |
) |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(29,669 |
) |
|
|
(26,691 |
) |
|
|
(42,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL DEFERRED LIABILITIES
|
|
|
(33,513 |
) |
|
|
(30,021 |
) |
|
|
(48,387 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VALUATION ALLOWANCE
|
|
|
(12,331 |
) |
|
|
(12,174 |
) |
|
|
(9,090 |
) |
NET DEFERRED TAX (LIABILITY) ASSET
|
|
$ |
(13,506 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,434 |
) |
|
$ |
10,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-64
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
TXUCV has established a valuation allowance relating to ETFL,
Telcon, Fort Bend LD and TXUCV.
Telecom for net operating losses (NOL) and franchise
taxes not expected to be realized in the future. TXUCV has
determined that certain state net operating losses are not
likely to be realized; therefore, TXUCV has established a
valuation allowance against the expected future tax benefit of
these certain state net operating losses.
The net deferred tax liability is classified on the balance
sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Current Deferred Income Tax Asset
|
|
$ |
3,974 |
|
|
$ |
2,527 |
|
|
$ |
34,145 |
|
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax Asset
|
|
|
16,033 |
|
|
|
39,525 |
|
|
|
15,709 |
|
Noncurrent Deferred Income Tax Liability
|
|
|
(33,513 |
) |
|
|
(54,486 |
) |
|
|
(39,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY (ASSET)
|
|
$ |
(13,506 |
) |
|
$ |
(12,434 |
) |
|
$ |
10,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ETFL, a nonconsolidated subsidiary for federal income tax return
purposes, has NOL carryforwards of approximately
$8.7 million to offset against future taxable income. The
NOLs expire from 2007 to 2024.
TXUCV and its subsidiaries, which file a consolidated federal
income tax return, have NOL carryforwards of approximately
$16.0 million to offset against future taxable income. The
NOL may be carried forward for 20 years and will expire
from 2022 to 2024, if not utilized.
Note E Postretirement Benefit Plans
Pension Plan
TXUCV provides pension benefits through the TXU Communications
Retirement Plan (Retirement Plan), the TXU
Communications Supplemental Retirement Plan (Supplemental
Plan) and the TXU Deferred Compensation Plan for Emerging
Businesses (Deferred Compensation Plan).
The Retirement Plan is a noncontributory defined benefit plan
that provides benefits to substantially all employees. Benefit
provisions are subject to collective bargaining. TXUCVs
funding policy for this plan is to contribute amounts sufficient
to meet minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee
benefit and tax laws. Employees who became participants prior to
January 1, 2002 earn benefits based on their length of
service and final average pay. Employees who become participants
on or after January 1, 2002 earn cumulative benefits based
on their age and a percentage of their monthly pay.
Telcon, Fort Bend Telephone and Fort Bend LD elected
to participate in the Retirement Plan effective January 1,
2002. Employees who became participants on or after
January 1, 2002 earn cumulative benefits based on their age
and a percentage of their monthly pay.
The Supplemental Plan is a noncontributory pay-as-you-go plan
providing supplementary retirement benefits primarily to
higher-level employees.
The Deferred Compensation Plan is a contributory salary deferral
plan offered on a voluntary participation basis primarily to
higher-level employees.
Changes to the projected benefit obligation, the fair value of
assets and the underlying actuarial assumptions for the
Retirement Plan and Supplemental Plan are shown below.
F-65
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Health Care and Life Insurance Benefits: TXUCV Services,
TXUCV Telephone, TXUCV Telecom and Transport Services
TXUCV provides certain postretirement health care and life
insurance benefits for employees who retire from TXUCV after
reaching age 55 and accruing at least 15 years of
service. Retirees share in the cost of health care benefits.
Benefit provisions are subject to collective bargaining. Funding
policy for retiree health benefits is generally to pay covered
expenses as they are incurred. Postretirement life insurance
benefits are fully insured.
Historically, TXUCV used a December 31 measurement date for
its plans; however, due to the sale of TXUCV, the Company
additionally measured its plans at April 13, 2004.
Obligations and Funded Status are reflected as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Change in benefit obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
56,966 |
|
|
$ |
51,534 |
|
|
$ |
45,838 |
|
|
$ |
24,320 |
|
|
$ |
18,701 |
|
|
$ |
14,240 |
|
Service cost
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
3,321 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
3,480 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit vesting due to partial plan termination
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
4,624 |
|
|
|
3,672 |
|
|
|
1,701 |
|
|
|
5,743 |
|
|
|
4,561 |
|
Curtailment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,250 |
) |
|
|
(2,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,933 |
) |
|
|
(1,606 |
) |
Assumption change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(768 |
) |
|
|
(2,115 |
) |
|
|
(2,191 |
) |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
(976 |
) |
|
|
(722 |
) |
Administrative expenses paid
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of period
|
|
|
60,984 |
|
|
|
56,966 |
|
|
|
51,533 |
|
|
|
26,629 |
|
|
|
24,320 |
|
|
|
18,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period
|
|
|
40,399 |
|
|
|
35,468 |
|
|
|
41,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
5,667 |
|
|
|
(3,375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(763 |
) |
|
|
(2,099 |
) |
|
|
(2,191 |
) |
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
(976 |
) |
|
|
(723 |
) |
Administrative expenses paid
|
|
|
(108 |
) |
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of period
|
|
|
40,633 |
|
|
|
40,399 |
|
|
|
35,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
(20,351 |
) |
|
|
(16,567 |
) |
|
|
(16,065 |
) |
|
|
(26,629 |
) |
|
|
(24,320 |
) |
|
|
(18,701 |
) |
Unrecognized net actuarial loss
|
|
|
19,687 |
|
|
|
17,255 |
|
|
|
19,291 |
|
|
|
9,251 |
|
|
|
7,665 |
|
|
|
4,153 |
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
302 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$ |
(362 |
) |
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
$ |
3,669 |
|
|
$ |
(17,378 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,655 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,548 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-66
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position
consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
(Accrued) Prepaid benefit cost
|
|
$ |
(362 |
) |
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
$ |
3,669 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
|
(10,324 |
) |
|
|
(7,921 |
) |
|
|
(10,176 |
) |
|
|
(17,378 |
) |
|
|
(16,655 |
) |
|
|
(14,548 |
) |
Intangible assets
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
10,013 |
|
|
|
7,603 |
|
|
|
9,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$ |
(362 |
) |
|
$ |
997 |
|
|
$ |
3,669 |
|
|
$ |
(17,378 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,655 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,548 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit
obligation in excess of plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
60,984 |
|
|
$ |
56,966 |
|
|
$ |
51,533 |
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
51,197 |
|
|
|
47,323 |
|
|
|
41,975 |
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
40,633 |
|
|
|
40,399 |
|
|
|
35,468 |
|
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
Period from | |
|
|
|
|
Jan. 1, 2004 | |
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
Jan. 1, 2004 | |
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
to April 13, | |
|
| |
|
to April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
928 |
|
|
$ |
2,973 |
|
|
$ |
3,321 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
|
$ |
1,205 |
|
|
$ |
1,129 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
3,480 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,002 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
(3,066 |
) |
|
|
(3,478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net actuarial loss recognition
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
1,364 |
|
|
$ |
4,288 |
|
|
$ |
3,405 |
|
|
$ |
988 |
|
|
$ |
2,989 |
|
|
$ |
2,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for
Pensions, required TXUCV to record an additional minimum
pension liability of $10.3, $7.9 million and
$10.2 million at April 13, 2004 and December 31,
2003 and 2002, respectively. This liability represents the
amount by which the accumulated benefit obligation exceeded the
sum of the fair market value of plan assets and accrued amounts
previously recorded. The additional minimum pension liability
was offset by $0.3 million, $0.3 million and
$0.5 million of intangible assets at April 13, 2004
and December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and resulted
in a $1.5 million charge, a $1.3 million credit, and a
$6.0 million charge to comprehensive income, net of related
tax benefit of $0.9 million, tax expense of
$0.8 million and tax benefit of $3.7 million for the
period from January 1, 2004 to April 13, 2004 and the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The
intangible assets are included in other noncurrent assets in
TXUCVs consolidated balance sheet at April 13, 2004
and December 31, 2003 and 2002.
TXUCV recorded a reduction in earnings of $106,000 in 2003 and a
credit to earnings of $243,000 in 2002 for pension and
postretirement termination benefits due to a large reduction in
workforce. There was no similar event for the period from
January 1, 2004 to April 13, 2004. The 2003 reduction
to earnings
F-67
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
was due to a curtailment loss resulting from recognition of
prior service costs for pension benefits. The December 31,
2002 credit was the net of a $494,000 curtailment gain
recognized for postretirement healthcare and life insurance
benefits offset by a $251,000 curtailment loss due to the
recognition of prior service costs related to pension benefits.
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations at April 13, 2004 and December 31, 2003
and 2002 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic
benefit cost for the period ended April 13, 2004 and the
year ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.75%/6.50% |
* |
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
|
|
7.25 |
% |
Expected long-term return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
8.50% |
|
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
4.30% |
|
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
6.75% from 1/1/2003 - 8/1/2003
6.5% from 8/1/2003 - 12/31/2004
for qualified plan only |
The expected return on plan assets assumption was based on the
categories of the assets and the past history of the return on
the assets.
Assumed health care cost trend rates at April 13, 2004 and
December 31, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
11.00 |
% |
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the
ultimate trend rate)
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect
on the amounts reported for the health care plan. A
one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend
rates would have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-Percentage- | |
|
1-Percentage- | |
|
|
Point Increase | |
|
Point Decrease | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Effect on total of service and interest cost
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
$ |
(135 |
) |
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation
|
|
$ |
4,061 |
|
|
$ |
(3,215 |
) |
F-68
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Plan Assets
The Companys pension plan weighted-average asset
allocations by asset category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Assets | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Asset Category
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
55% |
|
|
|
55% |
|
|
|
49% |
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
40% |
|
|
|
40% |
|
|
|
47% |
|
Other
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
5% |
|
|
|
4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys investment strategy at April 13, 2004
was to target its allocation percentage at 50% equity funds and
50% fixed income funds.
The Company expects to contribute $2.9 million to its
pension plan and $0.9 million to its other postretirement
plan from April 14, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future
service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension | |
|
Other | |
|
|
Benefits | |
|
Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in | |
|
|
thousands) | |
4/14 12/31/2004
|
|
$ |
1,452 |
|
|
$ |
647 |
|
2005
|
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
2006
|
|
|
2,353 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
2007
|
|
|
2,594 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
2008
|
|
|
2,790 |
|
|
|
1,239 |
|
Years 2009-2013
|
|
|
18,759 |
|
|
|
7,357 |
|
Deferred Compensation Agreements: TXUCV Services, TXUCV
Telephone, TXUCV Telecom and Transport Services
TXUCV has deferred compensation agreements with the former board
of directors of TXUCVs predecessor company, Lufkin-Conroe
Communications, and certain former employees. The benefits are
payable for up to 15 years and may begin as early as
age 65 or upon the death of the participant.
TXUCV has purchased life insurance policies on certain former
directors and key employees. The excess of the cash surrender
value of life insurance policies over the notes payable balances
related to these policies is reflected in TXUCVs financial
statements. These plans do not qualify under the Internal
Revenue Code (the Code) and therefore, federal
income tax deductions are allowed only when benefits are paid.
Payments relating to deferred compensation agreements were
$0.1 million for the period from January 1, 2004 to
April 13, 2004 and $0.4 million for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001. Accrued costs were
$0.2 million for the period from January 1, 2004 to
April 13, 2004 and $0.5 million for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 and $0.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2001. Accrued liability amounted to
$3.5 million at April 13, 2004, $3.4 million at
December 31, 2003 and $3.3 million at
December 31, 2002.
F-69
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
401(k) Plans
|
|
|
Nonbargaining: TXUCV Services, TXUCV Telephone, TXUCV
Telecom, Transport Services, Telcon, Fort Bend Telephone
and Fort Bend LD |
TXUCV sponsors a 401(k) plan for all nonbargaining employees
(Nonbargaining TXUCV Plan) who have completed
90 days of full-time service (or at least 1,000 hours
of service in any year) and are age 21 or older. On
December 31, 2001, the nonbargaining 401(k) plan covering
Telcon, Fort Bend Telephone and Fort Bend LD was
merged into this plan. The plan allows participants to
contribute up to 15% of their eligible annual compensation to
the plan, up to the maximum permitted by the Code. TXUCV matches
100% of the first 3% of employee contributions. TXUCVs
matching contributions to the plan amounted to $0.3 million
for the period from January 1, 2004 to April 13, 2004
and $0.5 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million
for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. TXUCV recognized a
$0.5 million loss in 2003 resulting from a partial plan
termination of the 401(k) plan in which affected participants
became fully vested in accrued benefits.
|
|
|
Bargaining: TXUCV Services, TXUCV Telephone, TXUCV Telecom
and Transport Services |
TXUCV sponsors a 401(k) plan for all bargaining employees
(Bargaining TXUV Plan) who have completed one year
of full-time service (or at least 1,000 hours of service in
any year) and are age 21 or older. For the period from
January 1, 2004 to April 13, 2004 and years 2003 and
2002, the plan allowed participants to contribute up to 15% of
their eligible annual compensation to the plan, up to the
maximum permitted by the Code. Beginning in 2002, TXUCV matched
50% of the first 3% of employee contributions, in accordance
with the terms of the collective bargaining agreement. In 2001,
TXUCV matched 40% of the first 3% of employee contributions.
TXUCVs matching contributions to the plan amounted to
$30,000 for the period from January 1, 2004 to
April 13, 2004 and $0.1 million for years 2003, 2002
and 2001.
|
|
|
Nonbargaining: Telcon, Fort Bend Telephone and
Fort Bend LD |
TXUCV sponsored a 401(k) plan for all employees who had
completed at least one month of full-time service and who were
at least 21 years of age. Effective December 31, 2001,
the plan was merged into the 401(k) savings plan for
nonbargaining employees of TXUCV. Participants accounts
and participation eligibility were transferred to the TXUCV plan
effective January 1, 2002. Employees who became eligible on
or after January 1, 2002 participated in the Nonbargaining
TXUCV plan. The plan allowed participants to contribute up to 8%
of their eligible annual compensation to the plan, up to the
maximum permitted by the Code. TXUCV matched 50% of the first 8%
of eligible employee contributions. TXUCVs matching
contributions to the plan amounted to $0.7 million for 2001.
The plan provided for discretionary TXUCV-paid profit sharing
contributions of up to 15% of each eligible employees
total compensation. Discretionary profit sharing contributions
to the plan, which were accrued during the year and paid
following the close of the year, amounted to $0.2 million
for 2001.
On December 8, 2003, President Bush signed into law the
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of
2003 (The Act). The Act expanded Medicare to
include, for the first time, coverage for prescription drugs.
TXUCV sponsors retiree medical programs for certain of its
locations. In May 2004, the FASB issued guidance for the
accounting and disclosure effects of the Act. TXUCV has
determined that its postretirement prescription drug plan is
actuarially equivalent and will begin reflecting the impact on
July 1, 2004.
F-70
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note F Operating Leases
TXUCV is the lessor of fiber optic systems, agreements to lease
capacity to customers over fiber optic lines. The leases,
accounted for as operating leases, provide for minimum future
rentals to be received for the remainder of the lease period and
in the aggregate as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiber Optic | |
As of April 13, 2004 |
|
Systems | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in | |
|
|
thousands) | |
4/14-12/31/2004
|
|
$ |
827 |
|
2005
|
|
|
1,131 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
Following is a summary of property on lease:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Fiber Optic System
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
222 |
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note G Capital Leases
TXUCV leases certain furniture, fixtures, equipment and
leasehold improvements at its current corporate headquarters in
Irving pursuant to two Master Lease Agreements with between
TXUCV and GECC.
The leasehold improvement lease had an initial term of
30 months that ended on October 1, 2004. At the
termination of the initial term of this lease, TXUCV elected to
purchase the scheduled leasehold improvement for
$1.1 million.
At the termination of the initial term of the second lease for
furniture, fixtures and equipment, TXUCV elected to extend the
term of the agreement until April 1, 2007, at which time
the company will have an option to purchase the equipment for
its then fair market value.
During the period from January 1, 2004 to April 13,
2004, TXUCV paid a total of $0.2 million to GECC pursuant
to these capital leases. As of April 13, 2004 the
outstanding principal amount of these capital leases was
$2.8 million. These leases require Texas Acquisition to
maintain a specified debt rating. Texas Acquisition is not in
compliance with this covenant, although we are not aware of the
delivery of any notice of default. Upon a default under these
leases, GECC may take possession of the scheduled equipment and
require TXUCV to pay certain stipulated loss amounts. These
capital lease obligations have been classified as current
liabilities on the balance sheet.
F-71
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note H Investments in Nonaffiliated Companies
Marketable equity securities have been categorized as available
for sale and, as a result, are stated at fair value. Unrealized
gains and losses are included as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive income until realized.
For the purpose of determining gross unrealized gains and
losses, marketable securities include the following at
April 13, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Unrealized Gain | |
|
Realized Gain | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
4/13/04 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
4/13/04 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
4/13/04 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
4/13/04 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Other Marketable Equity Securities
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
125 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
230 |
|
The following investments are accounted for using the equity
method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Owned | |
|
Investment Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
GTE Mobilnet of South Texas Limited Partnership
|
|
|
2.34 |
% |
|
|
2.34 |
% |
|
|
2.34 |
% |
|
$ |
24,045 |
|
|
$ |
23,384 |
|
|
$ |
22,332 |
|
GTE Mobilnet of Texas RSA #17 Limited Partnership
|
|
|
17.02 |
% |
|
|
17.02 |
% |
|
|
17.02 |
% |
|
$ |
3,731 |
|
|
$ |
3,794 |
|
|
$ |
3,629 |
|
Fort Bend Fibernet Limited Partnership
|
|
|
39.06 |
% |
|
|
39.06 |
% |
|
|
39.06 |
% |
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
731 |
|
The following investments are accounted for using the cost
method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
CoBank, ACB Stock
|
|
$ |
1,452 |
|
|
$ |
1,347 |
|
|
$ |
1,230 |
|
Rural Telephone Bank Stock
|
|
$ |
5,921 |
|
|
$ |
5,921 |
|
|
$ |
5,921 |
|
The CoBank stock represents purchases of CoBank stock as
required by the CoBank loan agreement and patronage
distributions from CoBank in the form of stock. Although there
is no CoBank loan balance outstanding at April 13, 2004,
TXUCV will begin receiving annual refunds of a portion of this
stock only when its stock balance reaches 11.5% of the five-year
moving average of CoBank loan balance. The CoBank stock is owned
by TXUCV, now known as Consolidated Communications Ventures
Company.
Fort Bend Telephone owns 5,921 shares of
$1,000 par value Class C Rural Telephone Bank, which
is stated at original cost plus a gain recognized at conversion
of Class B to Class C stock.
Note I Minority Interest
During 1990, Transport Services, in a joint venture with Eastex
Celco (ETC), formed ETFL. Transport Services and ETC
own 63% and 37%, respectively, of the outstanding stock of ETFL.
F-72
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note J Transactions with Related Parties
Following is a summary of transactions with related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Prepaid to Oncor for Transmission Fees
|
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable TXU
|
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
2,314 |
|
|
$ |
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable Oncor
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt Payable TXU
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
80,867 |
|
|
$ |
144,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Contributions Pinnacle
|
|
$ |
102,119 |
|
|
$ |
4,290 |
|
|
$ |
6,974 |
|
|
$ |
27,784 |
|
Interest Expense Paid to TXU
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
|
$ |
3,597 |
|
|
$ |
5,059 |
|
|
$ |
8,501 |
|
Billings From Oncor for Transmission Line Fees
|
|
$ |
1,139 |
|
|
$ |
1,458 |
|
|
$ |
1,324 |
|
|
$ |
1,184 |
|
Billings From TXU for Management Fees
|
|
$ |
2,350 |
|
|
$ |
2,647 |
|
|
$ |
3,331 |
|
|
$ |
5,594 |
|
Billings From TXU for Services
|
|
$ |
660 |
|
|
$ |
1,487 |
|
|
$ |
2,427 |
|
|
$ |
1,885 |
|
Note K Commitments and Contingencies
TXUCV and its subsidiaries are subject to various claims and
lawsuits, including property damage claims, which arise from
time to time in the normal course of business. It is the opinion
of management and counsel that the disposition or ultimate
determination of such claims and lawsuits will not have a
material effect on the financial position, results of operations
or liquidity of TXUCV, since TXUCV has insurance to cover such
claims.
On November 25, 2002, TXUCV entered into a 60-month
High-Capacity Term Payment Plan agreement with Southwestern Bell
(SWB). The agreement requires TXUCV to make monthly
purchases of at least $33,000 from SWB on a take-or-pay basis.
The agreement also provides for an early termination charge of
45% of the monthly minimum commitment multiplied by the number
of months remaining through the expiration date of
November 25, 2007. As of April 13, 2004, the potential
early termination charge is approximately $0.6 million.
TXUCV is also a party to another take-or-pay agreement with
Grande Communications to provide certain directory
assistance-related services to the TXUCV. The agreement which
was entered into on August 28, 2001, for an initial
12-month term, has an automatic 12-month renewal provision with
a minimum monthly commitment of $8,950. This agreement is still
in effect at April 13, 2004.
TXUCV has executed various building space leases, with terms
ranging from 36 to 84 months and monthly payments ranging
from $0.1 million to $0.3 million. All but one of the
leases contains provisions for escalation of the monthly
payments. TXUCVs consolidated financial statements for the
period from January 1, 2004 to April 13, 2004 and the
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002 include
$0 million, $0.6 million, and $0.3 million of
charges, respectively, representing obligations on leased
facilities that were sublet to unrelated parties for amounts
less than the related obligations. TXUCV also has executed
several equipment leases with varying terms up to 36 months
and monthly payments totaling approximately $0.1 million.
F-73
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The future minimum payments required by capital and operating
leases for the next five years are as follows (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
4/14 - 12/31/2004
|
|
$ |
2,827 |
|
2005
|
|
$ |
3,451 |
|
2006
|
|
$ |
2,747 |
|
2007
|
|
$ |
1,546 |
|
2008
|
|
$ |
1,368 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
$ |
3,038 |
|
Rent expense on operating leases was $1.0 million for the
period from January 1, 2004 to April 13, 2004,
$4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003,
$3.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 and
$2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Note L Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the
fair value of each of the material financial instruments for
which it is practicable to estimate the value:
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term
Investments Cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments are valued at their carrying amounts,
which are reasonable estimates of their fair value because of
the short maturity of those instruments.
Long-Term Investments The fair value of
investments is estimated based on the quoted market price for
that investment. Other investments for which there are no quoted
market prices because the stocks are not publicly traded are
carried at cost since reasonable estimates of fair value could
not be made without incurring excessive costs. These investments
include $1.5 million of CoBank stock and $5.9 million
of Rural Telephone Bank stock.
Long-Term Debt The fair value of TXUCVs
long-term debt, including current maturities, is estimated based
on the current rates offered to TXUCV for debt of the same
remaining maturities.
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of TXUCVs
material financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
|
Dec. 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Long-Term Investments For Which It Is Not Practicable To
Estimate Fair Value
|
|
$ |
36,862 |
|
|
$ |
34,585 |
|
|
$ |
33,884 |
|
|
$ |
36,862 |
|
|
$ |
34,585 |
|
|
$ |
33,884 |
|
Debt
|
|
$ |
2,847 |
|
|
$ |
100,383 |
|
|
$ |
166,202 |
|
|
$ |
2,663 |
|
|
$ |
102,077 |
|
|
$ |
166,202 |
|
Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance Policies
|
|
$ |
1,526 |
|
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
|
$ |
1,376 |
|
|
$ |
1,526 |
|
|
$ |
1,533 |
|
|
$ |
1,376 |
|
Note M Restructuring and Impairment Charges
Beginning in 1999, TXUCV began operating a CLEC in a number of
local markets within Texas. In late 2001, TXUCV decided to
refocus its business strategy on the Texas RLECs. In December
2002, TXUCV made a decision to hold its CLEC and Transport
assets for sale. TXUCV examined the value of the assets held for
sale based on third party sale negotiations and similar recent
sales transactions and recorded an impairment charge of
$90.9 million ($56.6 million after taxes and minority
interest). In
F-74
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
addition, TXUCV recorded restructuring charges of
$2.1 million under the provisions of Emerging Issues Task
Force Abstract 94-3.
Impairment Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLEC | |
|
Transport | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
PPE Net Book Value
|
|
$ |
27,512 |
|
|
$ |
70,831 |
|
|
$ |
98,343 |
|
Estimated Cost of Sale
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,744 |
|
|
|
71,191 |
|
|
|
98,935 |
|
Less: Estimated FMV
|
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
7,083 |
|
|
|
8,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Held For Sale Impairment Charges
|
|
$ |
26,797 |
|
|
|
64,108 |
|
|
$ |
90,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring Charges
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Separations
|
|
$ |
736 |
|
Facility Closure Costs
|
|
|
916 |
|
Other Contractual Commitments
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee separation restructuring charges relate to 55 affected
employees. These restructuring costs were all paid in 2003.
Earlier in 2002, TXUCV recorded impairment charges of
$8.4 million related to certain CLEC information technology
and collocation assets. The evaluation occurred in conjunction
with exiting certain unprofitable activities and decommissioning
non-strategic collocation sites. The information technology
assets were fully written-off and taken out of service. The
collocation assets were valued at fair market value based on
third party pricing. This impairment occurred prior to the
decision to hold those assets for sale.
Assets Held for Sale
In late 2001, TXUCV decided to refocus its business strategy on
the Texas RLECs. During the subsequent 18 months, TXUCV
systematically exited certain less profitable CLEC markets,
ceased service to residential customers and focused solely on
business customers within limited geographic markets. In
December 2002, TXUCV decided to exit the CLEC business entirely
and placed its CLEC assets and customer base for sale. In March
2003, TXUCV sold the majority of its remaining CLEC assets and
customer base to Texas-based Grande Communications for
$1.2 million. TXUCV also anticipated selling its Transport
Services activities in the near term and as a result, the assets
and liabilities related to the CLEC and Transport assets held
for sale were presented separately in the assets and liabilities
sections of the consolidated balance sheets at December 31,
2002. The assets held for sale consisted of $8.0 million of
property, plant and equipment recorded at fair market value
based on the estimated sales price. The liabilities represented
estimated costs to sell of $0.6 million and restructuring
charges of $2.1 million.
In June 2003, in light of the decision to sell the entire
company, TXUCV decided that it would no longer attempt to sell
the transport network separately. Consequently, in accordance
with the provisions of SFAS No. 144, these assets were
reclassified from assets held for sale to assets held and used
and are reported on the consolidated balance sheet at the lower
of fair market value or adjusted carrying amount. The resulting
$0.3 million loss on long-lived assets converted to held
and used is reflected in TXUCVs results of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2003.
F-75
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note N Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Amounts paid for assets of other companies in excess of fair
value are recorded as goodwill. Goodwill was amortized over its
useful life, normally 15 to 40 years through
December 31, 2001.
SFAS No. 142 became effective for TXUCV on
January 1, 2002. SFAS No. 142 requires, among
other things, the allocation of goodwill to reporting units
based upon the current fair value of the reporting units, and
the discontinuance of goodwill amortization. The amortization of
TXUCV goodwill ($13.6 million in 2001) ceased effective
January 1, 2002.
In addition, SFAS No. 142 required completion of a
transitional goodwill impairment test within six months from the
date of adoption. It established a new method of testing
goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or on an interim
basis if an event occurs or circumstances change that would
reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying
value. TXUCV completed the transitional impairment test in the
second quarter of 2002, the results of which indicated no
impairment of goodwill at that time. In conjunction with
TXUCVs decision to exit the CLEC and Transport businesses,
additional evaluations were performed as of October 1, 2003
and 2002, TXUCVs annual impairment test date. The testing,
utilizing the discounted cash flow methodology, resulted in an
impairment charge of $13.2 million and $18 million for
the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
There were no impairment charges for the period from
January 1, 2004 to April 13, 2004.
There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the
period from January 1, 2004 to April 13, 2004. Changes
in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002 is summarized as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, January 1
|
|
$ |
317,536 |
|
|
$ |
335,536 |
|
Less impairment
|
|
|
13,200 |
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31
|
|
$ |
304,336 |
|
|
$ |
317,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below reflects what reported net income would have
been in the 2001 period, exclusive of goodwill amortization
expense recognized for consolidated entities in those periods
compared to the period from January 1, 2004 to
April 13, 2004, 2003, 2002 and 2001:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
April 13, | |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Reported Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
|
$ |
(2,341 |
) |
|
$ |
(89,765 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,892 |
) |
Add: Goodwill Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,419 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proforma Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$ |
1,783 |
|
|
$ |
(2,341 |
) |
|
$ |
(89,765 |
) |
|
$ |
(13,473 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note O Sale of TXUCV
On January 15, 2004, Consolidated Communications
Acquisition Texas Corp. (Texas Acquisition), a
subsidiary of Homebase Acquisition, LLC, and Pinnacle One, an
indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of TXU Corp., entered into a
stock purchase agreement providing for the purchase by Texas
Acquisition of all of the capital stock of TXUCV. Texas
Acquisition is a Delaware corporation formed solely for the
purpose of entering into the stock purchase agreement and
closing the transactions contemplated by that
F-76
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
agreement. By acquiring the capital stock of TXUCV, Texas
Acquisition acquired substantially all of TXU Corp.s
telecommunications business, which includes the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Fort Bend Telephone (now known as Consolidated
Communications of Fort Bend Company) and TXUCV Telephone
(now known as Consolidated Communications of Texas Company), two
RLECs, which together serve markets in Conroe, Katy and Lufkin,
Texas; |
|
|
|
TXUCVs investments in the cellular partnership (see
Note H Investments in Nonaffiliated Companies); |
|
|
|
a telephone directory publishing business; and |
|
|
|
a transport services business. |
The cash purchase price for the sale of TXUCVs capital
stock was $527.0 million, subject to the following
adjustments:
The purchase price was reduced by $2.8 million, the
outstanding principal amount of the capital lease obligations
between TXUCV and GECC.
The purchase price assumed $4.6 million of cash on the
balance sheet of TXUCV at closing and was adjustable upward (or
downward) by the amount cash on the balance sheet at closing
greater than (or less than) $4.6 million.
The purchase price was also adjustable upward (or downward) to
the extent that TXUCVs working capital was greater than
(or less than) negative $2.8 million. At April 13,
2004, TXUCVs adjusted working capital (as defined in the
stock purchase agreement) was negative $3.9 million. As a
result of differences in assumed working capital (including
cash) and other balances and related actual balances at
April 13, 2004, Homebase Acquisition, LLC made an
additional cash payment to TXU Corp. of $5.1 million.
TXUCV was required to repay all of its outstanding indebtedness
at or prior to the closing of the transactions, other than
capital leases that were subject to the purchase price
adjustment described above and affiliate indebtedness relating
to contracts that continued following the closing of the
transaction. Accordingly, all indebtedness deemed to be affected
by the stock purchase agreement was reflected in the current
liabilities section of TXUCVs balance sheet as of
December 31, 2003 and subsequently extinguished prior to or
as of April 13. 2004. In addition, Pinnacle One was to bear
the first $5.1 million of any severance and similar
expenses associated with work force reductions occurring between
the date of the signing of the stock purchase agreement on
January 15, 2004 and the closing of the transactions.
The stock purchase agreement contained customary representations
and warranties, covenants and indemnification provisions. Most
representations and warranties expire on the later of the first
anniversary of the closing of the transactions and
April 30, 2005.
TXU Corp. agreed to guarantee the payment obligations of
Pinnacle One for up to the purchase price and further agreed to
guarantee certain tax indemnification obligations up to, and in
excess of, the purchase price.
The stock purchase agreement further provided that certain
agreements and arrangements between TXU Corp. and TXUCV and its
subsidiaries, and all the related liabilities and obligations of
TXUCV and its subsidiaries automatically terminate in their
entirety effective as of the closing without any further actions
by the parties and thereby be deemed voided, cancelled and
discharged in their entirety.
F-77
TXU COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Note P Subsequent Events
The sale of TXUCV to Texas Acquisition closed on April 14,
2004. In association with the close of the sale, Texas
Acquisition and other subsidiaries of Homebase Acquisition, LLC
issued $200 million of Senior Notes and entered into a new
$437 million credit facility.
The initial terms of the two GECC leases expired on
October 1, 2004. As provided under the terms of the lease
agreements, TXUCV, now known as Consolidated Communications
Ventures Company, elected to purchase the leasehold improvements
under one lease for $1.1 million and extend the term of the
furniture, fixtures and equipment under the second lease through
April 1, 2007.
F-78
GTE MOBILNET OF TEXAS #17, Limited Partnership
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
With Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
F-79
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Partners of GTE Mobilnet of
Texas #17 Limited Partnership:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of GTE Mobilnet
of Texas #17 Limited Partnership (the
Partnership) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
and the related statements of operations, changes in
partners capital, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Partnerships management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required
to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Partnerships internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Partnership as
of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
April 29, 2005
F-80
GTE MOBILNET OF TEXAS #17 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2004 and 2003
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $268 and $244
|
|
$ |
2,061 |
|
|
$ |
1,920 |
|
|
Unbilled revenue
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
Due from General Partner
|
|
|
3,659 |
|
|
|
7,513 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
6,443 |
|
|
|
9,979 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Net
|
|
|
22,494 |
|
|
|
13,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
28,937 |
|
|
$ |
23,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL |
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
1,193 |
|
|
$ |
1,117 |
|
|
Advance billings
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
1,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (see Notes 6 and 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARTNERS CAPITAL
|
|
|
27,204 |
|
|
|
22,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL
|
|
$ |
28,937 |
|
|
$ |
23,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-81
GTE MOBILNET OF TEXAS #17 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
OPERATING REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues
|
|
$ |
32,687 |
|
|
$ |
28,324 |
|
|
$ |
24,525 |
|
|
Equipment and other
|
|
|
2,516 |
|
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
35,203 |
|
|
|
30,459 |
|
|
|
26,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of service (excluding depreciation and amortization related
to network assets included below)
|
|
|
9,899 |
|
|
|
8,316 |
|
|
|
8,724 |
|
Cost of equipment
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
|
1,172 |
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
10,144 |
|
|
|
9,344 |
|
|
|
8,389 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,034 |
|
|
|
2,886 |
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
25,567 |
|
|
|
22,830 |
|
|
|
20,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
9,636 |
|
|
|
7,629 |
|
|
|
5,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income, net
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$ |
10,116 |
|
|
$ |
7,994 |
|
|
$ |
5,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allocation of Net Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners
|
|
$ |
8,093 |
|
|
$ |
6,396 |
|
|
$ |
4,329 |
|
|
General partner
|
|
$ |
2,023 |
|
|
$ |
1,598 |
|
|
$ |
1,084 |
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-82
GTE MOBILNET OF TEXAS #17 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS CAPITAL
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner | |
|
Limited Partners | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
San | |
|
Eastex | |
|
|
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
|
San | |
|
|
|
|
Antonio | |
|
Telecom | |
|
Telecom | |
|
Communications | |
|
ALLTEL | |
|
Antonio | |
|
Total | |
|
|
MTA, | |
|
Investments, | |
|
Supply, | |
|
Transport | |
|
Communications | |
|
MTA, | |
|
Partners | |
|
|
L.P. | |
|
L.P. | |
|
Inc. | |
|
Company | |
|
Investments, Inc. | |
|
L.P. | |
|
Capital | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
BALANCE
January 1, 2002
|
|
$ |
3,536 |
|
|
$ |
3,009 |
|
|
$ |
3,009 |
|
|
$ |
3,009 |
|
|
$ |
3,009 |
|
|
$ |
2,109 |
|
|
$ |
17,681 |
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
921 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
5,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2002
|
|
|
4,220 |
|
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
21,094 |
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(1,402 |
) |
|
|
(1,191 |
) |
|
|
(1,191 |
) |
|
|
(1,191 |
) |
|
|
(1,191 |
) |
|
|
(834 |
) |
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,598 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
7,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2003
|
|
|
4,416 |
|
|
|
3,760 |
|
|
|
3,760 |
|
|
|
3,760 |
|
|
|
3,760 |
|
|
|
2,632 |
|
|
|
22,088 |
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
(851 |
) |
|
|
(596 |
) |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
1,722 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
10,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
5,439 |
|
|
$ |
4,631 |
|
|
$ |
4,631 |
|
|
$ |
4,631 |
|
|
$ |
4,631 |
|
|
$ |
3,241 |
|
|
$ |
27,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-83
GTE MOBILNET OF TEXAS #17 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
10,116 |
|
|
$ |
7,994 |
|
|
$ |
5,413 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,034 |
|
|
|
2,886 |
|
|
|
2,688 |
|
|
|
Net loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
Provision for losses on accounts receivable
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
Changes in certain assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and unbilled revenue
|
|
|
(1,113 |
) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(671 |
) |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
Advance billings and other current liabilities
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
12,993 |
|
|
|
11,141 |
|
|
|
8,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures, including purchases from affiliates, net
|
|
|
(11,847 |
) |
|
|
(2,654 |
) |
|
|
(3,225 |
) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (Increase) in Due from General Partner
|
|
|
3,854 |
|
|
|
(1,487 |
) |
|
|
(3,317 |
) |
|
Distributions to partners
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,146 |
) |
|
|
(8,487 |
) |
|
|
(5,317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHANGE IN CASH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH Beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH End of year
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-84
GTE MOBILNET OF TEXAS #17 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
1. |
Organization and Management |
GTE Mobilnet of Texas #17 Limited
Partnership GTE Mobilnet of Texas #17
Limited Partnership (the Partnership) was formed on
June 13, 1989. The principal activity of the Partnership is
providing cellular service in the Texas #17 rural service
area.
The partners and their respective ownership percentages as of
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Antonio MTA, L.P.*
|
|
|
20.0000 |
% |
Limited Partners:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eastex Telecom Investments, L.P.
|
|
|
17.0213 |
% |
|
Telecom Supply, Inc.
|
|
|
17.0213 |
% |
|
Consolidated Communications Transport Company
|
|
|
17.0213 |
% |
|
ALLTEL Communications Investments, Inc.
|
|
|
17.0213 |
% |
|
San Antonio MTA, L.P.*
|
|
|
11.9148 |
% |
|
|
* |
San Antonio MTA, L.P. (General Partner) is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Cellco Partnership
(Cellco) doing business as Verizon Wireless. |
On behalf of the General Partner, Cellco provides accounting,
administrative, sales and marketing, engineering and other
general support services to the Partnership. In addition, Cellco
performs all of its cash, inventory, investing and financing
activities. Costs related to such services are either allocated
or directly charged to the Partnership.
All wireless licenses issued by the Federal Communications
Commission (FCC) that authorize the Partnership to
provide cellular services are held by Cellco. On January 1,
2005, the Partnership entered into a Spectrum leasing agreement
with Cellco. If the fair value of the aggregated wireless
licenses is less than the aggregated carrying amount of the
licenses, an impairment loss will be recognized by Cellco. Any
impairment loss recognized by Cellco may be allocated to the
Partnership based upon a reasonable methodology.
|
|
2. |
Significant Accounting Policies |
Use of Estimates The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. Estimates are used for, but not limited to, the
accounting for: allocations, allowance for uncollectible
accounts receivable, unbilled revenue, fair value of financial
instruments, depreciation and amortization, useful lives and
impairment of assets, accrued expenses, and contingencies.
Estimates and assumptions are periodically reviewed and the
effects of any material revisions are reflected in the financial
statements in the period that they are determined to be
necessary.
Reclassifications Certain
reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial
statements to conform to the current year presentation.
F-85
GTE MOBILNET OF TEXAS #17 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenue Recognition The Partnership
earns revenue by providing access to the network (access
revenue) and for usage of the network (airtime/usage revenue),
which includes roaming and long distance revenue. In general,
access revenue is billed one month in advance and is recognized
when earned; the unearned portion is classified in advance
billings. Airtime/usage revenue, roaming revenue and long
distance revenue are recognized when service is rendered and
included in unbilled revenue until billed. Equipment sales
revenue associated with the sale of wireless handsets and
accessories is recognized when the products are delivered to and
accepted by the customer, as this is considered to be a separate
earnings process from the sale of wireless services. The
Partnerships revenue recognition policies are in
accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commissions
(SEC) Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)
No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements, and SAB No. 104, Revenue
Recognition. The roaming rates charged by the Partnership
to Cellco do not necessarily reflect current market rates. The
Partnership continues to re-evaluate the rates and expects these
rates to be reduced in the future consistent with market trends
and the terms of the limited partnership agreement (See
Note 5).
Operating Expenses Operating expenses
include expenses incurred directly by the Partnership, as well
as an allocation of certain administrative and operating costs
incurred by Cellco or its affiliates on behalf of the
Partnership (see note 5). Services performed on behalf of
the Partnership are provided by employees of Cellco. These
employees are not employees of the Partnership and therefore,
operating expenses include direct and allocated charges of
salary and employee benefit costs for the services provided to
the Partnership. The General Partner believes such allocations,
principally based on the Partnerships percentage of total
customers, customer gross additions or minutes-of-use, are
reasonable. The roaming rates charged to the Partnership by
Cellco do not necessarily reflect current market rates. The
Partnership continues to re-evaluate the rates and expects these
rates to be reduced in the future consistent with market trends
and the terms of the limited partnership agreement (See
Note 5).
Income Taxes The Partnership is not a
taxable entity for federal and state income tax purposes. Any
taxable income or loss is apportioned to the partners based on
their respective partnership interests and would be reported by
them individually.
Inventory Inventory is owned by Cellco
and held on consignment by the Partnership. Such consigned
inventory is not recorded on the Partnerships financial
statements. Upon sale, the related cost of the inventory is
transferred to the Partnership at Cellcos cost basis and
included in the accompanying Statements of Operations.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The
Partnership maintains allowances for uncollectible accounts
receivable for estimated losses resulting from the inability of
customers to make required payments. Estimates are based on the
aging of the accounts receivable balances and the historical
write-off experience, net of recoveries.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment primarily represents costs
incurred to construct and expand capacity and network coverage
on Mobile Telephone Switching Offices (MTSOs) and
cell sites. The cost of property, plant and equipment is
depreciated over its estimated useful life using the
straight-line method of accounting. Leasehold improvements are
amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or
the term of the related lease. Major improvements to existing
plant and equipment are capitalized. Routine maintenance and
repairs that do not extend the life of the plant and equipment
are charged to expense as incurred.
Upon the sale or retirement of property, plant and equipment,
the cost and related accumulated depreciation or amortization is
eliminated from the accounts and any related gain or loss is
reflected in the Statements of Operations.
F-86
GTE MOBILNET OF TEXAS #17 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Network engineering costs incurred during the construction phase
of the Partnerships network and real estate properties
under development are capitalized as part of property, plant and
equipment and recorded as construction-in-progress until the
projects are completed and placed into service.
FCC Licenses The Federal
Communications Commission (FCC) issues licenses that
authorize cellular carriers to provide service in specific
cellular geographic service areas. The FCC grants licenses for
terms of up to ten years. In 1993, the FCC adopted specific
standards to apply to cellular renewals, concluding it will
reward a license renewal to a cellular licensee that meets
certain standards of past performance. Historically, the FCC has
granted license renewals routinely.
Valuation of Assets Long-lived assets,
including property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
with finite lives, are reviewed for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
the asset may not be recoverable. The carrying amount of a
long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the
undiscounted cashflows expected to result from the use and
eventual disposition of the asset. The impairment loss, if
determined to be necessary, would be measured as the amount by
which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of
the asset. The FCC license, including the Partnership license,
recorded on the books of Cellco are evaluated for impairment, by
Cellco, under the guidance set forth in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
The FCC licenses are treated as an indefinite life intangible
asset under the provisions of SFAS No. 142 and are not
amortized, but rather are tested for impairment annually or
between annual dates, if events or circumstances warrant. All of
the licenses in Cellcos nationwide footprint are tested in
the aggregate for impairment under SFAS No. 142. When
testing the carrying value of the wireless licenses for
impairment, Cellco determines the fair value of the aggregated
wireless licenses by subtracting from enterprise discounted cash
flows (net of debt) the fair value of all of the other net
tangible and intangible assets of Cellco, including previously
unrecognized intangible assets. This approach is generally
referred to as the residual method. In addition, the fair value
of the aggregated wireless licenses is then subjected to a
reasonableness analysis using public information of comparable
wireless carriers. If the fair value of the aggregated wireless
licenses as determined above is less than the aggregated
carrying amount of the licenses, an impairment will be
recognized by Cellco. Any impairment loss recognized by Cellco
may be allocated to its subsidiaries based upon a reasonable
methodology. No impairment was recognized in 2004, 2003 and 2002.
On September 29, 2004, the SEC issued a Staff Announcement
regarding the Use of the Residual Method to Value Acquired
Assets other than Goodwill. The Staff Announcement
requires SEC registrants to adopt a direct value method of
assigning value to intangible assets, including wireless
licenses, acquired in a business combination under
SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations,
effective for all business combinations completed after
September 29, 2004. Further, all intangible assets,
including wireless licenses, valued under the residual method
prior to this adoption are required to be tested for impairment
using a direct value method no later than the beginning of
fiscal year ended after January 1, 2005. Any impairment of
intangible assets recognized upon application of a direct value
method by entities previously applying the residual method
should be reported as a cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle. Under this Staff Announcement, the
reclassification of recorded balances from wireless licenses to
goodwill prior to the adoption of this Staff Announcement is
prohibited. Cellco has evaluated its wireless licenses for
potential impairment using a direct value methodology effective
January 1, 2005. The valuation and analyses prepared in
connection with the adoption of a direct value method resulted
in no adjustment to the carrying value of its wireless licenses,
and accordingly, had no effect on its results of operations and
financial position. Future tests for impairment will be
performed by Cellco at least annually and more often if events
or circumstances warrant.
F-87
GTE MOBILNET OF TEXAS #17 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Concentrations To the extent the
Partnerships customer receivables become delinquent,
collection activities commence. No single customer is large
enough to present a significant financial risk to the
Partnership. The Partnership maintains an allowance for losses
based on the expected collectibility of accounts receivable.
Cellco and the General Partner rely on local and long distance
telephone companies, some of whom are related parties, and other
companies to provide certain communication services. Although
management believes alternative telecommunications facilities
could be found in a timely manner, any disruption of these
services could potentially have an adverse impact on the
Partnerships operating results.
Although Cellco and the General Partner attempt to maintain
multiple vendors for, each required product, their network
assets and inventory, which are important components of their
operations, they are currently acquired from only a few sources.
Certain of these products are in turn utilized by the
Partnership and are important components of the
Partnerships operations. If the suppliers are unable to
meet Cellcos needs as it builds out its network
infrastructure and sells service and equipment, delays and
increased costs in the expansion of the Partnerships
network infrastructure or losses of potential customers could
result, which would adversely affect operating results.
Financial Instruments The
Partnerships trade receivables and payables are short-term
in nature, and accordingly, their carrying value approximates
fair value.
Segments The Partnership has one
reportable business segment and operates domestically only. The
Partnerships products and services are materially
comprised of wireless telecommunications services.
Due from General Partner Due from
General Partner principally represents the Partnerships
cash position. Cellco manages, on behalf of the General Partner,
all cash, inventory, investing and financing activities of the
Partnership. As such, the change in due from General Partner is
reflected as a financing activity in the Statements of Cash
Flows. Additionally, administrative and operating costs incurred
by Cellco on behalf of the General Partner, as well as the
transfer of property, plant, and equipment with affiliates, are
charged to the Partnership through this account. Interest income
is based on the average monthly outstanding balance in this
account and is calculated by applying the General Partners
average cost of borrowing from Verizon Global Funding, a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Verizon Communications, Inc., which
was approximately 5.9%, 5.0% and 5.0% for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Included in
net interest income is $488, $365 and $252 for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, related to
the due from General Partner.
Distributions The Partnership is
required to make distributions to its partners on a quarterly
basis based upon the Partnerships operating results, cash
availability and financing needs as determined by the General
Partner at the date of the distribution.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Non monetary
Assets An Amendment of APB Opinion
No. 29. This standard eliminates the exception from
fair value measurement for non-monetary exchanges of similar
productive assets. A non monetary exchange shall be measured
based on the recorded amount of the non monetary asset(s)
relinquished, and not on the fair values of the exchanged
assets, if a) the fair value is not determinable,
b) the exchange transaction is to facilitate sales to
customers, or c) the exchange transaction lacks commercial
substance. This statement specifies that a non-monetary exchange
has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity
are expected to change significantly as a result of the
exchange. The Partnership will adopt the standard effective
January 1, 2006. The Partnership does not expect the impact
of the adoption of SFAS No. 153 to have a material
effect on the Partnerships financial statements.
F-88
GTE MOBILNET OF TEXAS #17 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
3. |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment consists of the following as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Buildings and improvements (10-40 years)
|
|
$ |
6,858 |
|
|
$ |
5,422 |
|
Cellular plant equipment (3-15 years)
|
|
|
34,259 |
|
|
|
24,134 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment (2-5 years)
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Leasehold improvements (5-10 years)
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,692 |
|
|
|
29,824 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
19,198 |
|
|
|
16,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
22,494 |
|
|
$ |
13,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment includes the following:
Capitalized network engineering costs of $257 and $62 were
recorded during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
Construction-in-progress included in certain of the
classifications shown above, principally cellular plant
equipment, amounted to $408 and $350 at December 31, 2004
and 2003, respectively.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $3,034, $2,886 and
$2,688, respectively.
|
|
4. |
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities consist of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
481 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
Non-income based taxes and regulatory fees
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
605 |
|
Accrued commissions
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
$ |
1,193 |
|
|
$ |
1,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
Transactions with Affiliates |
Significant transactions with affiliates and other related
parties, including allocations and direct charges, are
summarized as follows for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Service revenues(a)
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
(76 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Equipment and other revenues(b)
|
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
197 |
|
Cost of service(c)
|
|
|
4,137 |
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
Equipment costs(d)
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses(e)
|
|
|
5,430 |
|
|
|
5,143 |
|
|
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Service revenues include long distance, paging, data and
allocated contra revenues including revenue concessions;
excluding roaming revenue, see below. |
|
(b) |
|
Equipment and other revenues include sales of handsets and
accessories and allocated contra revenues including equipment
concessions and coupon rebates. |
F-89
GTE MOBILNET OF TEXAS #17 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Cost of service includes cost of telecom, long distance, paging,
and handset applications; excluding roaming costs, see below. |
|
(d) |
|
Equipment costs include warehousing, freight, handsets,
accessories, and upgrades. |
|
(e) |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses include office
telecom, customer care, billing, salaries, sales and marketing,
advertising, and commissions. |
Revenues and expenses were allocated based principally on the
Partnerships percentage of total customers, customer gross
additions or minutes of use where applicable. The Partnership
believes the allocations are reasonable.
The Partnership also receives roaming revenue from affiliates
for use of the Partnerships network and incurs roaming
costs for use of affiliates networks. Roaming revenues
were $11,608, $9,592 and $8,001 for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Roaming
costs were $4,761, $5,020 and $6,128 for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Substantially all of these roaming revenue and cost transactions
were with affiliates. The roaming rates charged do not
necessarily reflect current market rates. The Partnership
continues to re-evaluate the rates and expects these rates to be
reduced in the future consistent with market trends and the
terms of the limited partnership agreement.
The Partnership had transfers and purchases involving plant,
property, and equipment with affiliates having a net cost of
$8,050, $1,116 and $1,333 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
During 2004, the methodology to charge shared switch costs to
the Partnership from an affiliate of the General Partner was
revised. The methodology change resulted in an increase in the
Partnerships switch costs in 2004. In 2004, 2003 and 2002,
the Partnership recorded switch sharing costs of $1,615, $336
and $336, respectively. These costs are included above in
Cost of service. The switch rates charged to the
Partnership do not necessarily reflect current market rates.
On January 1, 2005, the Partnership entered into a lease
agreement for the right to use additional Spectrum owned by
Cellco. The annual lease commitment of $76 represents the costs
of financing the Spectrum, and does not necessarily reflect the
economic value of the services received. No additional Spectrum
purchases or lease commitments, other than the $76, have been
entered into by the Partnership as of December 31, 2004.
The General Partner, on behalf of the Partnership, and the
Partnership itself have entered into operating leases for
facilities and equipment used in its operations. Lease contracts
include renewal options that include rent expense adjustments
based on the Consumer Price Index as well as annual and
end-of-lease term adjustments. Rent expense is recorded on a
straight-line basis. The noncancellable lease term used to
calculate the amount of the straight-line rent expense is
generally determined to be the initial lease term, including any
optional renewal terms that are reasonably assured. Leasehold
improvements related to these operating leases are amortized
over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the
noncancellable lease term. For the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, the Partnership recognized a total of $988,
$751 and $676, respectively, as rent expense related to payments
under these operating leases, which is included in cost of
service and selling, general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying Statements of Operations.
F-90
GTE MOBILNET OF TEXAS #17 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating
leases, including maintenance fees and excluding renewal options
not reasonably assured for the years shown are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
1,077 |
|
2006
|
|
|
985 |
|
2007
|
|
|
929 |
|
2008
|
|
|
891 |
|
2009
|
|
|
827 |
|
2010 and thereafter
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum payments
|
|
$ |
4,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
Additions | |
|
Write-offs | |
|
Balance at | |
|
|
Beginning | |
|
Charged to | |
|
Net of | |
|
End | |
|
|
of the Year | |
|
Operations | |
|
Recoveries | |
|
of the Year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Accounts Receivable Allowances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
$ |
793 |
|
|
$ |
(769 |
) |
|
$ |
268 |
|
|
2003
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
(572 |
) |
|
|
244 |
|
|
2002
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
(850 |
) |
|
|
320 |
|
Cellco is subject to various lawsuits and other claims including
class actions, product liability, patent infringement,
antitrust, partnership disputes, and claims involving relations
with resellers and agents. Cellco is also defending lawsuits
filed against itself and other participants in the wireless
industry alleging various adverse effects as a result of
wireless phone usage. Various consumer class action lawsuits
allege that Cellco breached contracts with consumers, violated
certain state consumer protection laws and other statutes and
defrauded customers through concealed or misleading billing
practices. Certain of these lawsuits and other claims may impact
the Partnership. These litigation matters may involve
indemnification obligations by third parties and/or affiliated
parties covering all or part of any potential damage awards
against Cellco and the Partnership and/or insurance coverage.
The Partnership may be allocated a portion of the damages that
may result upon adjudication of these matters if the claimants
prevail in their actions. Consequently, the ultimate liability
with respect to these matters at December 31, 2004 cannot
be ascertained. The potential effect, if any, on the financial
condition and results of operations of the Partnership, in the
period in which these matters are resolved, may be material.
In addition to the aforementioned matters, Cellco is subject to
various other legal actions and claims in the normal course of
business. While Cellcos legal counsel cannot give
assurance as to the outcome of each of these matters, in
managements opinion, based on the advice of such legal
counsel, the ultimate liability with respect to any of these
actions, or all of them combined, will not materially affect the
financial position or operating results of the Partnership.
F-91
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31, 2005
F-92
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
56,538 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2,795
|
|
|
32,148 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
3,202 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
3,278 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
8,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
103,916 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
353,060 |
|
Intangibles and other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
43,261 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
318,481 |
|
|
Customer lists, net
|
|
|
146,236 |
|
|
Tradenames
|
|
|
14,546 |
|
|
Deferred financing costs and other assets
|
|
|
22,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
1,002,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS DEFICIT |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
41,242 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
9,621 |
|
|
Advance billings and customer deposits
|
|
|
10,466 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
31,443 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
92,772 |
|
Long-term debt less current maturities
|
|
|
583,667 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
68,192 |
|
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations
|
|
|
62,924 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
810,725 |
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests
|
|
|
2,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable preferred shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A, redeemable preferred shares, $1 par value,
182,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding;
liquidation preference of $210,092
|
|
|
210,092 |
|
Common members deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, no par value, 10,000,000 shares, authorized,
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid in capital
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(23,033 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total common members deficit
|
|
|
(21,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and members deficit
|
|
$ |
1,002,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-93
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
79,772 |
|
|
$ |
34,067 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and products (exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below)
|
|
|
24,417 |
|
|
|
12,374 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
26,196 |
|
|
|
10,589 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,818 |
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
12,341 |
|
|
|
5,738 |
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(11,694 |
) |
|
|
(2,829 |
) |
|
Partnership income
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
1,764 |
|
Dividends on redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
(4,623 |
) |
|
|
(2,274 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(3,922 |
) |
|
$ |
(510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-94
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN COMMON
MEMBERS DEFICIT
Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount |
|
Paid in Capital | |
|
Deficit | |
|
Income | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance, January 1, 2005
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
(19,111 |
) |
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
$ |
(18,795 |
) |
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
701 |
|
Dividends on redeemable preferred shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,623 |
) |
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2005
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
(23,033 |
) |
|
$ |
1,944 |
|
|
$ |
(21,031 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-95
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
701 |
|
|
$ |
1,764 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
16,818 |
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
Provision for bad debt losses
|
|
|
1,579 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership income
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(1,278 |
) |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(3,574 |
) |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,555 |
) |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
(1,893 |
) |
|
|
(2,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
14,612 |
|
|
|
5,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(5,533 |
) |
|
|
(2,737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(5,533 |
) |
|
|
(2,737 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments made on long-term obligations
|
|
|
(4,512 |
) |
|
|
(2,575 |
) |
|
|
Payment of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(4,625 |
) |
|
|
(2,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,454 |
|
|
|
558 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
52,084 |
|
|
|
10,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
56,538 |
|
|
$ |
10,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
F-96
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
1. |
Description of Business |
Homebase Acquisition, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(Homebase or the Company), was formed on
June 26, 2002, and commenced operations in Illinois on
December 31, 2002, with its acquisition of Illinois
Consolidated Telephone Company and the related businesses
(collectively, ICTC) and in Texas on April 14,
2004 with its acquisition of TXU Communications Ventures Company
(TXUCV). Homebase is a holding company with no
income from operations or assets except for the capital stock of
Consolidated Communications Illinois Holdings, Inc.
(Illinois Holdings) and Consolidated Communications
Texas Holdings, Inc. (Texas Holdings). Homebase and
its wholly owned subsidiaries operate under the name
Consolidated Communications.
Illinois Holdings is a holding company with no income from
operations or assets except for the capital stock of
Consolidated Communications, Inc. (CCI). Illinois
Holdings operates its business through, and receives all of its
income from, CCI and its subsidiaries. CCI was formed for the
sole purpose of acquiring ICTC. Texas Holdings is a holding
company with no income from operations or assets except for the
capital stock of Consolidated Communications Acquisition Texas,
Inc. (Texas Acquisition). Texas Holdings and Texas
Acquisition were formed for the sole purpose of acquiring TXUCV,
which was subsequently renamed Consolidated Communications
Ventures Company (CCV). Texas Holdings operates its
business through, and receives all of its income from, CCV and
its subsidiaries.
The Company provides local telephone, long-distance and network
access services, and data and Internet products to both
residential and business customers. The Company also provides
operator services, telecommunications services to state prison
facilities, telecommunications equipment sales and maintenance,
inbound/outbound telemarketing and fulfillment services, and
paging services.
|
|
2. |
Presentation of Interim Financial Statements |
These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of Homebase and its wholly owned
subsidiaries and subsidiaries in which it has a controlling
financial interest. All material intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These
interim statements have been prepared in accordance with
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) guidelines
and do not include all of the information and footnotes required
by generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP)
for complete financial statements. These interim financial
statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair presentation of its financial
position and results of operations for the interim periods. All
such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Interim
results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may
be expected for the entire year. These interim financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and related notes for the year ended
December 31, 2004, which are included as part of this
registration statement.
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to
previously reported data to the current presentation. Line costs
totaling $4,531 for the three months ended March 31, 2004
were reclassified from general and administrative expenses to
cost of services.
|
|
3. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In December 2003, the U.S. Congress enacted the Medicare
Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003
(the Medicare Act) that will provide a prescription
drug subsidy beginning
F-97
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
in 2006 to companies that sponsor post-retirement health care
plans that provide drug benefits. Additional legislation is
anticipated that will clarify whether a company is eligible for
the subsidy, the amount of the subsidy available and the
procedures to be following in obtaining the subsidy. In May
2004, the FASB issued Staff Position 106-2,
Accounting Disclosure Requirements Related to the
Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of
2003 (SAP 106-2), that provides
guidance on the accounting and disclosure for the effects of the
Medicare Act. The Companys post-retirement prescription
drug plans are actuarially equivalent and accordingly, the
Company began reflecting the Medicare Acts impact on
July 1, 2004, without a material adverse effect on the
financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS 123R, which replaces
SFAS 123 and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25.
SFAS 123R requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in
the financial statements based on their fair values beginning
with the first fiscal year after June 15, 2005, with early
adoption encouraged. The pro forma disclosures previously
permitted under SFAS 123 no longer will be an alternative
to financial statement recognition. The Company is required to
adopt SFAS 123R beginning January 1, 2006. Under
SFAS 123R, the Company must determine the appropriate fair
market value model to be used for valuing share-based payments,
the amortization method for compensation cost and the transition
method to be used at date of adoption. The Company is currently
evaluating the effect that the adoption of SFAS 123R will
have on the financial condition or results of operations of the
Company but does not expect it to have a material impact.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets-An Amendment of APB
Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions (SFAS 153).
SFAS 153 eliminates the exception from fair value
measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive
assets in paragraph 21 (b) of APB Opinion No. 29,
Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, and replaces it with an
exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance.
SFAS 153 specifies that a nonmonetary exchange has
commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are
expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange.
SFAS 153 is effective for the fiscal periods beginning
after June 15, 2005 and is required to be adopted by us in
the three months ended September 30, 2005. The Company is
currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of
SFAS 153 will have on the financial condition or results of
operations of the Company but does not expect it to have a
material impact.
On April 14, 2004, Homebase, through its wholly owned
subsidiary Texas Acquisition, acquired all of the capital stock
of TXUCV from Pinnacle One Partners L.P. (Pinnacle
One). By acquiring all of the capital stock of TXUCV,
Homebase acquired substantially all of the telecommunications
assets of TXU Corp., including two rural local exchange carriers
(RLECs), that together serve markets in Conroe, Katy
and Lufkin, Texas, a directory publishing business, a transport
services business that provides connectivity within Texas and
minority interests in cellular partnerships.
In connection with the closing of the TXUCV acquisition, the
Company, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, issued $200,000
in the aggregate principal amount of
93/4% Senior
Notes due 2012, entered into a new $437,000 bank credit
facility, repaid its existing credit facility and entered into
certain related
F-98
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
transactions. The indenture governing the notes and the new
credit facility contain covenants, events of default and other
provisions (see Note 7).
The Company accounted for the TXUCV acquisition using the
purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the financial
statements reflect the allocation of the total purchase price to
the net tangible and intangible assets acquired based on their
respective fair values. The purchase price, including
acquisition costs and net of $9,897 of cash acquired, was
allocated to assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$ |
27,478 |
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
268,706 |
|
Customer list
|
|
|
108,200 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
228,792 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
43,291 |
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(152,377 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net purchase price
|
|
$ |
524,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate purchase price was derived from a competitive
bidding process and negotiations and was influenced by the
Companys assessment of the value of the overall TXUCV
business. The significant goodwill value reflects the
Companys view that the TXUCV business can generate strong
cash flow and sales and earnings following the acquisition. In
accordance with SFAS 142, the $228,792 in goodwill recorded
as part of the TXUCV acquisition will not be amortized and will
be tested for impairment at least annually. The customer list
will be amortized over its estimated useful life of thirteen
years. The goodwill and other intangibles associated with this
acquisition did not qualify under the Internal Revenue Code as
deductible for tax purposes.
The Companys consolidated financial statements include the
results of operations for the TXUCV acquisition since the
April 14, 2004, acquisition date. Unaudited pro forma
results of operations data for the three months ended
March 31, 2004 as if the acquisition had occurred as of
January 1, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$ |
79,433 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
$ |
11,451 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proforma net income
|
|
$ |
1,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
Summarized financial information for significant
investments |
The Company obtained 17.02% ownership of GTE Mobilnet of Texas
RSA #17 Limited Partnership (the Mobilnet RSA
Partnership) in connection with the acquisition of TXUCV
on April 14, 2004. The principal activity of the Mobilnet
RSA Partnership is providing cellular service to a limited rural
area in Texas. The Company has some influence on the operating
and financial policies of this partnership and
F-99
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
accounts for this investment on the equity basis. Summarized
100 percent financial information for the Mobilnet RSA
Partnership was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2005 Unaudited First Quarter |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
9,352 |
|
Operating income
|
|
|
2,173 |
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
Net income or loss
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
Current assets
|
|
|
8,037 |
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
23,078 |
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Partnership equity
|
|
|
29,429 |
|
|
|
6. |
Pension Costs and Other Postretirement Benefits |
The Company has several defined benefit pension plans covering
substantially all of its hourly employees and certain salaried
employees, primarily those located in Texas. The plans provide
retirement benefits based on years of service and earnings. The
pension plans are generally noncontributory. The Companys
funding policy is to contribute amounts sufficient to meet the
minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee benefit
and tax laws.
The Company currently provides other postretirement benefits
(Other Benefits) consisting of health care and life
insurance benefits for certain groups of retired employees.
Retirees share in the cost of health care benefits. Retiree
contributions for health care benefits are adjusted periodically
based upon either collective bargaining agreements for former
hourly employees and as total costs of the program change for
former salaried employees. The Companys funding policy for
retiree health benefits is generally to pay covered expenses as
they are incurred. Postretirement life insurance benefits are
fully insured.
The following table presents the components of net periodic
benefit cost for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
1,233 |
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(2,888 |
) |
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other, net
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
1,038 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
874 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-100
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
Senior Secured Credit Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving loan
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Term loan A
|
|
|
112,000 |
|
|
Term loan C
|
|
|
311,850 |
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
624,909 |
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
(41,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
583,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility |
The Company, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, maintains
credit agreement with various financial institutions, which
provides for aggregate borrowings up to $466,000 consisting of a
$122,000 term loan A facility, a $314,000 term loan C
facility and a $30,000 revolving credit facility. Borrowings
under the credit facility are secured by substantially all of
the assets of CCI and Texas Acquisition, other than ICTC.
ICTCs guarantee (and the corresponding security interest
in ICTCs assets) of $195,000 of total borrowing under the
credit facility is contingent upon obtaining the consent of the
Illinois Commerce Commission (ICC).
The term loans are due in quarterly installments, which increase
annually, with all borrowings under term loan A and term
loan C due April 14, 2010 and October 14, 2011,
respectively. The revolving credit facility matures on
April 14, 2010. Within 90 days after the end of the
Companys fiscal year, commencing on December 31,
2004, the Company shall be obligated to repay the loans in an
amount equal to 50% of the excess cash flow for such fiscal
year, provided that certain leverage ratios are maintained at
the end of the fiscal year. As of March 31, 2005, the
Company estimated that the excess cash flow repayment would be
approximately $22,556. In addition, subject to certain
exceptions, the Company is required to prepay the outstanding
term loans with 100% of the net proceeds of all non-ordinary
course of business asset sales and any insurance or condemnation
proceeds not reinvested within a required time period, 100% of
the net proceeds of certain occurrences of indebtedness and 50%
of the net proceeds from certain issuances of equity.
At the Companys election, borrowings bear interest at
fluctuating interest rates based on: (a) a base rate (the
highest of the administrative agents base rate in effect
on such day, 0.5% per annum above the latest three week
moving average of secondary market morning offering rates in the
United States for three month certificates of deposit or 0.5%
above the Federal Funds rate); or (b) the London Interbank
Offered Rate, or LIBOR plus, in either case, an applicable
margin within the relevant range of margins (0.75% to 2.50%)
provided for in the credit agreement. The applicable margin is
based upon the Companys total leverage ratio. As of
March 31, 2005, the margins for interest rates on LIBOR
based loans was 2.25% on
F-101
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
the term loan A facility and 2.50% under the term
loan C facility. At March 31, 2005 the weighted
average rate, including swaps, of interest on the Companys
term debt facilities was 5.42% per annum, respectively.
Interest is payable at least quarterly.
The credit agreement contains various provisions and covenants,
which include, among other items, restrictions on the ability to
pay dividends, incur additional indebtedness, and issue capital
stock, as well as, limitations on future capital expenditures.
The Company has also agreed to maintain certain financial
ratios, including interest coverage, fixed charge coverage and
leverage ratios, all as defined in the credit agreement.
Amended and Restated Credit Facilities
Concurrently with the closing of its initial public offering as
outlined in this registration statement, the Company will amend
and restate its existing credit agreement. The closing of this
offering is conditioned upon the closing of the amended and
restated credit facilities.
The amended and restated credit facilities will provide
financing of up to $455.0 million, consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
a new term loan D facility of up to $425.0 million
available at closing and maturing on October 14,
2011; and |
|
|
|
a $30.0 million revolving credit facility maturing on
April 14, 2010. |
Each of CCI and Texas Holdings will be a borrower under the
amended and restated credit facilities. The borrowers
obligations under the amended and restated credit facilities
will be joint and several.
The outstanding balance under our amended and restated credit
facilities will decrease by $43.5 million due to the
repayment of $112.0 million of the term loan A facility and
$311.9 million of the term loan C facility with cash on
hand of $5.7 million and borrowings of $423.9 million
under the new term loan D facility. The Company expects the term
loan D facility will provide for up to $425.0 million
in commitments by the lenders and to borrow approximately
$423.9 million on the closing of this offering based on our
March 31, 2005 cash balance. If, at the closing, the
Companys cash balance is less than its cash balance on
March 31, 2005, the Company could borrow up to the entire
amount of the term loan D facility. The revolving credit
facility will not change materially from the Companys
existing revolving credit facility, and will continue to include
a subfacility for letters of credit as well as a swingline
subfacility. The Company currently expect that the revolving
credit facility will be undrawn on the closing of the offering
and will remain available for general corporate purposes.
On April 14, 2004, the Company, through its wholly owned
subsidiaries, issued $200,000 of
93/4% Senior
Notes due on April 1, 2012. The senior notes pay interest
semi-annually on April 1 and October 1. The senior notes
may be redeemed on or prior to October 6, 2005 using all or
a portion of the proceeds of a qualified income depository
security offering. The redemption price plus accrued interest
will be, as a percentage of the principal amount, 107.313%
through April 10, 2004, and 109.75% between April 1,
2005 and October 6, 2005.
Up to 35% of the senior notes may be redeemed using the proceeds
of certain equity offerings completed on or prior to
April 1, 2007. Some or all of the senior notes may be
redeemed on or after
F-102
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
April 1, 2008. The redemption price plus accrued interest
will be, as a percentage of the principal amount, 104.875% in
2008, 102.438% in 2009 and 100% in 2010 and thereafter. In
addition, holders may require the repurchase of the notes upon a
change in control, as such term is defined in the indenture
governing the senior notes. The indenture contains certain
provisions and covenants, which include, among other items,
restrictions on the ability to issue certain types of stock,
incur additional indebtedness, make restricted payments, pay
dividends and enter other lines of business. Upon completion of
the equity offering, the Company plans to redeem 35% of the
aggregate amount of our senior notes or $70,000. The cost of the
redemption, including the redemption premium, will be $76,800.
Future maturities of long-term debt as of March 31, 2005
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1 - December 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
36,567 |
|
Calendar year 2006
|
|
|
22,463 |
|
Calendar year 2007
|
|
|
23,248 |
|
Calendar year 2008
|
|
|
26,900 |
|
Calendar year 2009
|
|
|
33,400 |
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
482,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
624,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company entered into interest rate swap agreements that
effectively convert a portion of the floating-rate debt to a
fixed-rate basis, thus reducing the impact of interest rate
changes on future interest expense. At March 31, 2005, the
Company has interest rate swap agreements covering $215,617 in
aggregate principal amount of its variable rate debt at fixed
LIBOR rates ranging from 2.99% to 3.35%. The swap agreements
expire on December 31, 2006, May 19, 2007, and
December 31, 2007. The fair value of the Companys
derivative instruments, comprising interest rate swaps, amounted
to an asset of $3,786 at March 31, 2005. The fair value is
included in other current assets. The Company recognized a net
loss of $50 and zero in interest expense during the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, related to its
derivative instruments. The after tax change in the market value
of derivative instruments is recorded in other comprehensive
income. The Company recognized comprehensive income of $1,686
and zero during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively related to these derivative instruments.
In August 2003, the Company established the 2003 Restricted
Share Plan, which provides for the issuance of 1,000,000 common
shares to key employees as an incentive to enhance their
long-term performance as well as an incentive to join or remain
with the Company. In November 2003, the Company granted
975,000 shares of its common stock to certain Company
executives. In April 2004, the remaining 25,000 shares of
common stock were sold to certain Company executives at
$2.32 per share. These shares generally vest with the
individuals every December 31, beginning December 31
2004 through December 31, 2007. These consolidated
financial statements do not include any expense related to these
shares. As of March 31, 2005, 250,000 of these shares were
vested. No shares were vested at March 31, 2004.
The restricted share plan contains a call provision whereby upon
termination of employment, the Company may elect to repurchase
the shares held by the former employee. The purchase price is
based upon the lesser of fair value or a formula specified in
the plan. The existence of the employer call provision for a
purchase price that could be below fair value results in the
plan being accounted for as
F-103
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
variable, with compensation expense, if any, determined based
upon the formula rather than fair value. At March 31, 2005
and 2004, the formula computation results in a negative value
being ascribed to the common shares. As a result, no stock
compensation expense has been recognized in these consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
9. |
Net Loss per Common Share |
The following table sets forth the computation of net loss per
common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net loss applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$ |
(3,922 |
) |
|
$ |
(510 |
) |
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
9,250,000 |
|
|
|
9,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per common share
|
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested shares issued pursuant to the Restricted Share Plan
(Note 8) are not considered outstanding for the basic net
loss per share and are not included in the computation of
diluted net loss per share as their effect was anti-dilutive.
The following table sets forth the components of comprehensive
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net income
|
|
$ |
701 |
|
|
$ |
1,764 |
|
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
2,387 |
|
|
$ |
1,764 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is viewed and managed as two separate, but highly
integrated, reportable business segments, Telephone
Operations and Other Operations. Telephone
Operations consists of local telephone, long-distance and
network access services, and data and Internet products provided
to both residential and business customers. All other business
activities comprise Other Operations including
operator services products, telecommunications services to state
prison facilities, equipment sales and maintenance,
inbound/outbound telemarketing and fulfillment services, and
paging services. Management evaluates the performance of these
business segments based upon revenue, gross margins, and net
operating income.
F-104
HOMEBASE ACQUISITION, LLC
Doing Business as
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The business segment reporting information is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Operations | |
|
Operations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Three months ended March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$ |
71,019 |
|
|
$ |
8,753 |
|
|
$ |
79,772 |
|
Cost of services and products
|
|
|
18,809 |
|
|
|
5,608 |
|
|
|
24,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,210 |
|
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
55,355 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
23,625 |
|
|
|
2,571 |
|
|
|
26,196 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
15,547 |
|
|
|
1,271 |
|
|
|
16,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
13,038 |
|
|
$ |
(697 |
) |
|
$ |
12,341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
5,145 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
|
$ |
5,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$ |
22,883 |
|
|
$ |
11,184 |
|
|
$ |
34,067 |
|
Cost of services and products
|
|
|
5,640 |
|
|
|
6,734 |
|
|
|
12,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,243 |
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
|
|
21,693 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
7,829 |
|
|
|
2,760 |
|
|
|
10,589 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,930 |
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating income (loss)
|
|
$ |
6,484 |
|
|
$ |
(746 |
) |
|
$ |
5,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
2,190 |
|
|
$ |
547 |
|
|
$ |
2,737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
309,527 |
|
|
$ |
8,954 |
|
|
$ |
318,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
956,991 |
|
|
$ |
45,252 |
|
|
$ |
1,002,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On June 7, 2005, the Company made a cash distribution of
$37,500 to holders of its Class A Preferred Shares.
F-105