---

---

(a)	On March 13, 2012, the Board of Directors increased the Firm’s quarterly stock dividend from $0.25 to $0.30 per share.

(b)

Tangible book value per share and ROTCE are non-GAAP financial ratios. ROTCE measures the Firm’s earnings as a percentage of tangible common equity. Tangible book value per share represents the Firm’s tangible common equity divided by period-end common shares. For further discussion of these ratios, see Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firm’s Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 15–16 of this Form 10-Q.

(c)	Share prices shown for JPMorgan Chase’s common stock are from the New York Stock Exchange. JPMorgan Chase’s common stock is also listed and traded on the London Stock Exchange and the Tokyo Stock Exchange.

(d)	Return on Basel I risk-weighted assets is the annualized earnings of the Firm divided by its average risk-weighted assets.

(e)	Basel I Tier 1 common capital ratio (“Tier 1 common ratio”) is Tier 1 common capital (“Tier 1 common”) divided by risk-weighted assets. The Firm uses Tier 1 common capital along with the other capital measures to assess and monitor its capital position. For further discussion of Tier 1 common capital ratio, see Regulatory capital on pages 59–61 of this Form 10-Q.

(f)	Excludes the impact of residential real estate purchased credit-impaired (“PCI”) loans. For further discussion, see Allowance for credit losses on pages 93–95 of this Form 10-Q.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Included litigation expense of $790 million and $1.3 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $3.8 billion and $4.3 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

---

(a)	Predominantly recognized in IB and CB business segments and Corporate/Private Equity.

---

(a)	Represents deferred tax liabilities related to tax-deductible goodwill and to identifiable intangibles created in nontaxable transactions, which are netted against goodwill and other intangibles when calculating TCE.

(a)	Includes core lending, investing and deposit-raising activities on a managed basis, across RFS, Card, CB, TSS, AM and Corporate/Private Equity, as well as IB loans.

(b)	Interest includes the effect of related hedging derivatives. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable.

(c)	For a reconciliation of net interest income on a reported and managed basis, see reconciliation from the Firm’s reported U.S. GAAP results to managed basis on page 15.

---

---

(a)	Corporate/Private Equity includes an adjustment to offset IB’s inclusion of a credit allocation income/(expense) to TSS in total net revenue; TSS reports the credit allocation as a separate line item on its income statement (not within total net revenue).

---

(a)	Principal transactions included DVA related to derivatives and structured liabilities measured at fair value. DVA gains/(losses) were $(211) million and $1.9 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and $(363) million and $2.0 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(b)	All other income included lending- and deposit-related fees. In addition, IB manages traditional credit exposures related to Global Corporate Bank (“GCB”) on behalf of IB and TSS, and IB and TSS share the economics related to the Firm’s GCB clients. IB recognizes this sharing agreement also within all other income.

(c)

Total net revenue included tax-equivalent adjustments, predominantly due to income tax credits related to affordable housing and alternative energy investments as well as tax-exempt income from municipal bond investments of $492 million and $440 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and $1.5 billion and $1.4 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(d)	Return on common equity excluding DVA, a non-GAAP financial measure, was 17% and 5% for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and 18% and 16% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(e)	Compensation expense as a percentage of total net revenue excluding DVA, a non-GAAP financial measure, was 32% and 41% for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 respectively, and 34% and 39% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 respectively.

---

(a)

Fixed income markets primarily includes revenue related to market-making across global fixed income markets, including foreign exchange, interest rate, credit and commodities markets. Included DVA gains/(losses) of $(41) million and $529 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and $(152) million and $688 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(b)	Equity markets primarily includes revenue related to market-making across global equity products, including cash instruments, derivatives, convertibles and Prime Services. Included DVA gains of $29 million and $377 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and $99 million and $383 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(c)

Credit portfolio revenue includes net interest income, fees and loan sale activity, as well as gains or losses on securities received as part of a loan restructuring, for IB’s credit portfolio. Credit portfolio revenue also includes the results of risk management related to the Firm’s lending and derivative activities. Included DVA gains/(losses) of $(199) million and $979 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and $(310) million and $933 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. See pages 72–81 of the Credit Risk Management section of this Form 10-Q for further discussion.

(d)	IB manages traditional credit exposures related to GCB on behalf of IB and TSS, and IB and TSS share the economics related to the Firm’s GCB clients. IB recognizes this sharing agreement also within Credit Portfolio.

---

(a)	Loans retained includes credit portfolio loans, leveraged leases and other held-for-investment loans.

(b)

Adjusted assets, a non-GAAP financial measure, equals total assets minus: (1) securities purchased under resale agreements and securities borrowed less securities sold, not yet purchased; (2) assets of consolidated variable interest entities (“VIEs”); (3) cash and securities segregated and on deposit for regulatory and other purposes; (4) goodwill and intangibles; and (5) securities received as collateral. The amount of adjusted assets is presented to assist the reader in comparing IB’s asset and capital levels to other investment banks in the securities industry. Asset-to-equity leverage ratios are commonly used as one measure to assess a company’s capital adequacy. IB believes an adjusted asset amount that excludes the assets discussed above, which were considered to have a low risk profile, provides a more meaningful measure of balance sheet leverage in the securities industry.

---

(a)	Allowance for loan losses of $177 million and $320 million was held against these nonaccrual loans at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(b)	Prior to the first quarter of 2012, reported amounts had only included defaulted derivatives; effective in the first quarter of 2012, reported amounts in all periods include both defaulted derivatives as well as derivatives that have been risk rated as nonperforming.

(c)

On July 2, 2012, CIO transferred its synthetic credit portfolio, other than a portion aggregating to approximately $12 billion of notional, to IB. During the third quarter of 2012, the Firm applied a new value-at-risk (“VaR”) model to calculate VaR for the synthetic credit portfolio. The Firm believes this new model, which was applied to both the portion of the synthetic credit portfolio held by IB, as well as the portion that was retained by CIO, more appropriately captures the risk of the portfolio. This new VaR model resulted in a reduction to the average fixed income and average total trading and credit portfolio VaR of $26 million and $28 million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

(d)	Average VaR and period-end VaR was less than the sum of the VaR of the components described above, due to portfolio diversification. The diversification effect reflects the fact that the risks were not perfectly correlated.

(e)

Trading VaR includes substantially all market-making and client-driven activities as well as certain risk management activities in IB, including the credit spread sensitivities of certain mortgage products and syndicated lending facilities that the Firm intends to distribute; however, particular risk parameters of certain products are not fully captured, for example, correlation risk. Trading VaR does not include the DVA on derivative and structured liabilities to reflect the credit quality of the Firm. See VaR discussion on pages 96–99 and the DVA sensitivity table on page 100 of this Form 10-Q for further details.

(f)	Credit portfolio VaR includes the derivative credit valuation adjustments (“CVA”), hedges of the CVA and the fair value of hedges of the retained loan portfolio, which are all reported in principal transactions revenue. This VaR does not include the retained loan portfolio, which is not reported at fair value.

---

(a)

Source: Dealogic. Global Investment Banking fees reflects ranking of fees and market share. Remainder of rankings reflects transaction volume and market share. Global announced M&A is based on transaction value at announcement; because of joint M&A assignments, M&A market share of all participants will add up to more than 100%. All other transaction volume-based rankings are based on proceeds, with full credit to each book manager/equal if joint.

(b)	Global Investment Banking fees rankings exclude money market, short-term debt and shelf deals.

(c)	Long-term debt rankings include investment-grade, high-yield, supranationals, sovereigns, agencies, covered bonds, asset-backed securities (“ABS”) and mortgage-backed securities; and exclude money market, short-term debt, and U.S. municipal securities.

(d)	Global Equity and equity-related ranking includes rights offerings and Chinese A-Shares.

(e)	Announced M&A reflects the removal of any withdrawn transactions. U.S. announced M&A represents any U.S. involvement ranking.

(a)	Regional revenue is based primarily on the domicile of the client and/or location of the trading desk.

(b)	Includes retained loans based on the domicile of the client.

---

(a)

RFS uses the overhead ratio (excluding the amortization of core deposit intangibles (“CDI”)), a non-GAAP financial measure, to evaluate the underlying expense trends of the business. Including CDI amortization expense in the overhead ratio calculation would result in a higher overhead ratio in the earlier years and a lower overhead ratio in later years; this method would therefore result in an improving overhead ratio over time, all things remaining equal. This non-GAAP ratio excluded Consumer & Business Banking’s CDI amortization expense related to prior business combination transactions of $51 million and $60 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $152 million and $180 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

---

(a)	Predominantly consists of prime mortgages originated with the intent to sell that are accounted for at fair value and classified as trading assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(a)

Net charge-offs and net charge-off rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, included $825 million of incremental charge-offs of Chapter 7 loans. Excluding these incremental charge-offs, net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2012 would have been $706 million and the net charge-off rate for the same period excluding these incremental charge-offs and purchased credit-impaired loans would have been 1.77%.

(b)	Excludes PCI loans. Because the Firm is recognizing interest income on each pool of PCI loans, they are all considered to be performing.

(c)	Certain of these loans are classified as trading assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(d)

At September 30, 2012 and 2011, nonperforming assets excluded: (1) mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $11.0 billion and $9.5 billion, respectively, that are 90 or more days past due; and (2) real estate owned insured by U.S. government agencies of $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively. These amounts were excluded from nonaccrual loans as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally. For further discussion, see Note 13 on pages 154–175 of this Form 10-Q, which summarizes loan delinquency information.

(e)	At September 30, 2012, included $1.7 billion of Chapter 7 loans as well as $1.3 billion of performing junior liens that are subordinate to senior liens that are 90 days or more past due. See Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 82–92 of this Form 10-Q for further details.

(f)	Loans held-for-sale and loans accounted for at fair value were excluded when calculating the net charge-off rate.

(g)	An allowance for loan losses of $5.7 billion and $4.9 billion was recorded for PCI loans at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively; these amounts were also excluded from the applicable ratios.

---

(a)	Consumer & Business Banking uses the overhead ratio (excluding the amortization of CDI), a non-GAAP financial measure, to evaluate the underlying expense trends of the business. See footnote (a) to the selected income statement data table on page 24 of this Form 10-Q for further details.

---

---

(a)	Default and core servicing expense include an aggregate of approximately $300 million and $1.7 billion for foreclosure-related matters for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

---

(a)	Represents the aggregate impact of changes in model inputs and assumptions such as costs to service, home prices, mortgage spreads, ancillary income, and assumptions used to derive prepayment speeds, as well as changes to the valuation models themselves.

---

(a)	Predominantly represents prime loans repurchased from Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) pools, which are insured by U.S. government agencies. See further discussion of loans repurchased from Ginnie Mae pools in Mortgage repurchase liability on pages 55–58 of this Form 10-Q.

(b)	Predominantly consists of prime mortgages originated with the intent to sell that are accounted for at fair value and classified as trading assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(a)	At September 30, 2012 and 2011, excluded mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $12.1 billion and $10.5 billion, respectively, that are 30 or more days past due. These amounts were excluded as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally. For further discussion, see Note 13 on pages 154–175 of this Form 10-Q which summarizes loan delinquency information.

(b)

At September 30, 2012 and 2011, nonperforming assets excluded: (1) mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $11.0 billion and $9.5 billion, respectively, that are 90 or more days past due; and (2) real estate owned insured by U.S. government agencies of $1.5 billion and $2.4 billion, respectively. These amounts were excluded from nonaccrual loans as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally. For further discussion, see Note 13 on pages 154–175 of this Form 10-Q which summarizes loan delinquency information.

(c)	Includes rural housing loans sourced through brokers and correspondents, which are underwritten and closed with pre-funding loan approval from the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Development, which acts as the guarantor in the transaction.

(d)	Represents the ratio of MSR net carrying value (ending) to third-party mortgage loans serviced (ending) divided by the ratio of annualized loan servicing-related revenue to third-party mortgage loans serviced (average).

---

---

---

(a)	Net charge-offs and net charge-off rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 included $825 million of incremental charge-offs of Chapter 7 loans. See Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 82–92 of this Form 10-Q for further details.

(b)	The delinquency rate for PCI loans was 20.65% and 24.44% at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(c)	Excludes PCI loans. Because the Firm is recognizing interest income on each pool of PCI loans, they are all considered to be performing.

(d)	At September 30, 2012, included $1.7 billion of Chapter 7 loans as well as $1.3 billion of performing junior liens that are subordinate to senior liens that are 90 days or more past due. See Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 82–92 of this Form 10-Q for further details.

---

---

---

(a)

Net charge-offs and net charge-off rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, included $55 million of incremental charge-offs of Chapter 7 loans. Excluding these incremental charge-offs, net charge-offs for the third quarter of 2012 would have been $35 million, and the net charge-off rate for the same period would have been 0.29%. Nonperforming assets at September 30, 2012, included $65 million of Chapter 7 loans.

(b)	Average credit card loans included loans held-for-sale of $109 million and $1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $569 million and $1.1 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These amounts were excluded when calculating the net charge-off rate.

(c)	Period-end credit card loans included loans held-for-sale of $106 million and $94 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. No allowance for loan losses was recorded for these loans. These amounts were excluded when calculating delinquency rates and the allowance for loan losses to period-end loans.

(d)	Excluded student loans insured by U.S. government agencies under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”) of $910 million and $995 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, that are 30 or more days past due. These amounts were excluded as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally.

(e)	Nonperforming assets excluded student loans insured by U.S. government agencies under the FFELP of $536 million and $567 million at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, that are 90 or more days past due. These amounts were excluded as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally.

---

---

(a)	CB client revenue from investment banking products and commercial card transactions is included in all other income.

(b)

Total net revenue included tax-equivalent adjustments from income tax credits related to equity investments in designated community development entities that provide loans to qualified businesses in low-income communities, as well as tax-exempt income from municipal bond activity, totaling $115 million and $90 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $308 million and $222 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(c)

Effective July 1, 2012, certain Treasury Services product sales staff supporting CB were transferred from TSS to CB. As a result, compensation expense for these sales staff is now reflected in CB’s compensation expense rather than as an allocation from TSS in noncompensation expense. CB’s and TSS’s previously reported headcount, compensation expense and noncompensation expense have been revised to reflect this transfer.

(d)	Represents the total revenue related to investment banking products sold to CB clients.

---

---

(a)	Effective July 1, 2012, certain Treasury Services product sales staff supporting CB were transferred from TSS to CB. For further discussion of this transfer, see footnote (c) on page 38 of this Form 10-Q.

(b)	Allowance for loan losses of $148 million and $257 million was held against nonaccrual loans retained at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(c)	Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were excluded when calculating the net (recovery)/charge-off rate.

---

(a)	IB manages traditional credit exposures related to GCB on behalf of IB and TSS, and IB and TSS share the economics related to the Firm’s GCB clients. Included within this allocation are net revenue, provision for credit losses and expenses. IB recognizes this credit allocation as a component of all other income.

(b)	Effective July 1, 2012, certain Treasury Services product sales staff supporting CB were transferred from TSS to CB. For further discussion of this transfer, see footnote (c) on page 38 of this Form 10-Q.

---

(a)	Loan balances include trade finance loans and wholesale overdrafts.

(b)	Effective July 1, 2012, certain Treasury Services product sales staff supporting CB were transferred from TSS to CB. For further discussion of this transfer, see footnote (c) on page 38 of this Form 10-Q.

(c)	Consists of mutual funds, unit investment trusts, currencies, annuities, insurance contracts, options and nonsecurities contracts.

---

(a)	Total net revenue, average liability balances, trade finance loans and AUC are based on the domicile of the client. In the second quarter of 2012, the methodology for allocating the data by region was refined. Prior period was not revised due to immateriality.

---

(a)

TSS firmwide metrics include revenue recorded in CB, Consumer & Business Banking and AM lines of business and net TSS FX revenue (it excludes TSS FX revenue recorded in IB). In order to capture the firmwide impact of TS and TSS products and revenue, management reviews firmwide metrics in assessing financial performance of TSS. Firmwide metrics are necessary in order to understand the aggregate TSS business.

(b)	IB executes FX transactions on behalf of TSS customers under revenue sharing agreements. FX revenue generated by TSS customers is recorded in TSS and IB. TSS total FX revenue reported above is the gross (pre-split) FX revenue generated by TSS customers. However, TSS firmwide revenue includes only the FX revenue booked in TSS, i.e., it does not include the portion of TSS FX revenue recorded in IB.

(c)	Firmwide liability balances include liability balances recorded in CB.

(d)	International electronic funds transfer includes non-U.S. dollar Automated Clearing House (“ACH”) and clearing volume.

(e)	Wholesale cards issued and outstanding include stored value, prepaid and government electronic benefit card products.

---

---

(a)	Effective January 1, 2012, the previously disclosed separate metric for client advisors and JPMorgan Securities brokers were combined into one metric that reflects the number of Private Banking client-facing representatives.

(b)	Derived from Morningstar for the U.S., the U.K., Luxembourg, France, Hong Kong and Taiwan; and Nomura for Japan.

(c)	Quartile ranking sourced from: Lipper for the U.S. and Taiwan; Morningstar for the U.K., Luxembourg, France and Hong Kong; and Nomura for Japan.

(d)	Includes $8.9 billion of prime mortgage loans reported in the Consumer loan portfolio at September 30, 2012.

---

---

(a)	Regional revenue is based on the domicile of the client.

---

(a)	Total net revenue included tax-equivalent adjustments, predominantly due to tax-exempt income from municipal bond investments of $109 million and $73 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $326 million and $206 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(b)	Included litigation expense of $685 million and $1.0 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $3.5 billion and $2.6 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

---

---

(a)	Reflects repositioning of the Corporate investment securities portfolio.

(b)	The investment securities portfolio includes the AFS portfolio in Treasury and CIO.

(a)	Unrealized gains/(losses) contain reversals of unrealized gains and losses that were recognized in prior periods and have now been realized.

(b)	Included in principal transactions revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

(c)	For more information on the Firm’s policies regarding the valuation of the private equity portfolio, see Note 3 on pages 119–133 of this Form 10-Q.

(d)	Unfunded commitments to third-party private equity funds were $398 million and $789 million at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively.

---

(a)	Revenue is based predominantly on the domicile of the client, the location from which the client relationship is managed, or the location of the trading desk.

(b)	Total headcount includes all employees, including those in service centers, located in the region.

(c)	Significant clients are defined as companies with over $1 million in revenue over a trailing 12-month period in the region (excludes private banking clients).

(d)	Deposits are based on the location from which the client relationship is managed.

(e)	Loans outstanding are based predominantly on the domicile of the borrower and exclude loans held-for-sale and loans carried at fair value.

---

---

---

---

(a)

Represents repurchase demands received from parties other than the GSEs that have been presented to the Firm by trustees who assert authority to present such claims under the terms of the underlying sale or securitization agreement, and excludes repurchase demands asserted in or in connection with pending repurchase litigation. All mortgage repurchase demands associated with private-label securitizations are separately evaluated by the Firm in establishing its litigation reserves.

(b)	Because the GSEs and others may make repurchase demands based on mortgage insurance rescission notices that remain unresolved, certain loans may be subject to both an unresolved mortgage insurance rescission notice and an outstanding repurchase demand.

---

(a)	Mortgage insurance rescissions typically result in a repurchase demand from the GSEs. This table includes mortgage insurance rescission notices for which the GSEs or others also have issued a repurchase demand.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Excludes federal funds purchased.

(b)	Includes long-term structured repurchase agreements of $7.4 billion and $6.6 billion as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

---

(a)	Other securitizations includes securitizations of residential mortgages, auto loans and student loans.

---

---

(a)	Refers to “Ratings Watch Negative” on long-term ratings.

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Represents loans held-for-sale primarily related to syndicated loans and loans transferred from the retained portfolio, and loans at fair value.

(b)

Excludes the synthetic credit portfolio. Represents the net notional amounts of protection purchased and sold, through credit derivatives used to manage the credit exposures; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. The ratings profile shown is based on the rating of the derivative counterparty; the counterparties to these positions are predominantly investment-grade banks and finance companies.

(c)	The maturity profiles of retained loans and lending-related commitments are based on the remaining contractual maturity. The maturity profiles of derivative receivables are based on the maturity profile of average exposure. For further discussion of average exposure, see Derivative receivables on pages 141–143 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2011 Annual Report.

---

---

(a)	The industry rankings presented in the table as of December 31, 2011, are based on the industry rankings of the corresponding exposures at September 30, 2012, not actual rankings of such exposures at December 31, 2011.

(b)

In addition to the credit risk exposure to states and municipal governments (both U.S. and non-U.S.) at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, noted above, the Firm held $17.7 billion and $16.7 billion, respectively, of trading securities and $22.4 billion and $16.5 billion, respectively, of AFS securities issued by U.S. state and municipal governments. For further information, see Note 3 and Note 11 on pages 119–133 and 148–153, respectively, of this Form 10-Q.

(c)	Credit exposure is net of risk participations and excludes the benefit of “Credit Portfolio Management derivatives notional, net” held against derivative receivables or loans and “Liquid securities and other cash collateral held against derivative receivables”.

(d)	As of September 30, 2012, exposures deemed criticized correspond to special mention, substandard and doubtful categories as defined by bank regulatory agencies. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation.

(e)	Represents the net notional amounts of protection purchased and sold through credit derivatives to manage the credit exposures; these derivatives do not qualify for hedge accounting under U.S. GAAP. The All other category includes purchased credit protection on certain credit indices. Credit Portfolio Management derivatives excludes the synthetic credit portfolio.

(f)	Prior to the first quarter of 2012, reported amounts had only included defaulted derivatives; effective in the first quarter of 2012, reported amounts in all periods include both defaulted derivatives as well as derivatives that have been risk rated as nonperforming.

---

(a)	At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, the Firm held an allowance for loan losses of $370 million and $496 million, respectively, related to nonaccrual retained loans resulting in allowance coverage ratios of 22% and 21%, respectively. Wholesale nonaccrual loans represented 0.63% and 0.91% of total wholesale loans at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively.

(b)	Prior to the first quarter of 2012, reported amounts had only included defaulted derivatives; effective in the first quarter of 2012, reported amounts in all periods include both defaulted derivatives as well as derivatives that have been risk rated as nonperforming.

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, excluded operating lease-related assets of $4.6 billion and $4.4 billion, respectively.

(b)	Charge-offs are not recorded on PCI loans until actual losses exceed estimated losses that were recorded as purchase accounting adjustments at the time of acquisition. To date, no charge-offs have been recorded for these loans.

(c)

Credit card and home equity lending-related commitments represent the total available lines of credit for these products. The Firm has not experienced, and does not anticipate, that all available lines of credit would be used at the same time. For credit card and home equity commitments (if certain conditions are met), the Firm can reduce or cancel these lines of credit by providing the borrower notice or, in some cases, without notice as permitted by law.

---

(d)	Receivables from customers primarily represent margin loans to retail brokerage customers, which are included in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(e)	Includes accrued interest and fees net of an allowance for the uncollectible portion of accrued interest and fee income.

(f)

At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, nonaccrual loans excluded: (1) mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $11.0 billion and $11.5 billion, respectively, that are 90 or more days past due; and (2) student loans insured by U.S. government agencies under the FFELP of $536 million and $551 million, respectively, that are 90 or more days past due. These amounts were excluded from nonaccrual loans as reimbursement of insured amounts are proceeding normally. In addition, the Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance.

(g)	Excludes PCI loans. Because the Firm is recognizing interest income on each pool of PCI loans, they are all considered to be performing.

(h)	At September 30, 2012, included $1.7 billion of Chapter 7 loans as well as $1.3 billion of performing junior liens that are subordinate to senior liens that are 90 days or more past due. See Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 82–92 of this Form 10-Q for further details.

(i)

Charge-offs and net charge-off rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, included incremental net charge-offs of Chapter 7 loans of $93 million for senior lien home equity, $625 million for junior lien home equity, $46 million for prime mortgage, including option ARMs, $61 million for subprime mortgage and $55 million for auto loans. Net charge-off rates for the for the three months ended September 30, 2012, excluding these incremental net charge-offs would have been 0.81%, 2.80%, 0.53%, 4.13% and 0.29% for the senior lien home equity, junior lien home equity, prime mortgage, including option ARMs, subprime mortgages and auto loans, respectively. See Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 82–92 of this Form 10-Q for further details.

(j)	Average consumer loans held-for-sale were $109 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and $570 million and $1.2 billion, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. These amounts were excluded when calculating net charge-off rates.

---

---

---

(a)	Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated current property value. Current property values are estimated at least quarterly based on home valuation models that utilize nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates; such models incorporate actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available.

(b)	Represents current estimated combined LTV for junior home equity liens, which considers all available lien positions related to the property. All other products are presented without consideration of subordinate liens on the property.

(c)	Net carrying value includes the effect of fair value adjustments that were applied to the consumer PCI portfolio at the date of acquisition and is also net of the allowance for loan losses of $1.9 billion for home equity, $1.9 billion for prime mortgage, $1.5 billion for option ARMs, and $380 million for subprime mortgage at both September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Includes risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status and loans that have been modified in a TDR.

(b)	The Firm’s policy is generally to exempt credit card loans from being placed on nonaccrual status as permitted by regulatory guidance.

(c)	Charge-offs are not recorded on PCI loans until actual losses exceed estimated losses recorded as purchase accounting adjustments at the time of acquisition.

(d)	Excludes the impact of PCI loans acquired as part of the Washington Mutual transaction.

(e)	Net charge-offs and net charge-off rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, included $880 million of incremental charge-offs of Chapter 7 loans. See Consumer Credit Portfolio on pages 82–92 of this Form 10-Q for further details.

---

---

---

(a)	Average portfolio VaR and period-end portfolio VaR were less than the sum of the VaR of the components described above, which is due to portfolio diversification. The diversification effect reflects the fact that the risks were not perfectly correlated.

(b)	Designated as not meaningful (“NM”), because the minimum and maximum may occur on different days for different risk components, and hence it is not meaningful to compute a portfolio-diversification effect.

(c)	Reference is made to CIO synthetic credit portfolio update on page 10 of this Form 10-Q regarding the Firm’s restatement of its 2012 first quarter financial statements. The CIO VaR amount has not been recalculated for the first quarter to reflect the restatement. The nine months VaR does not include recalculated amounts for the first quarter of 2012.

(d)

On July 2, 2012, CIO transferred its synthetic credit portfolio, other than a portion aggregating approximately $12 billion notional, to IB; CIO’s retained portfolio was effectively closed out during the three months ended September 30, 2012. During the third quarter of 2012, the Firm applied a new VaR model to calculate VaR for both the portion of the synthetic credit portfolio held by IB, as well as the portion that was retained by CIO which was effectively closed out at September 30, 2012.

(e)	Total IB trading and credit portfolio VaR increased from $74 million on June 30, 2012 to $113 million on July 2, 2012, due to the transfer of a portion of the synthetic credit portfolio from CIO.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)

Lending includes loans and accrued interest receivable, deposits with banks, acceptances, other monetary assets, issued letters of credit net of participations, and undrawn commitments to extend credit. Amounts are presented net of the allowance for credit losses of $112 million (Spain), $57 million (Italy), $3 million (Ireland), $18 million (Portugal), and $12 million (Greece) specifically attributable to these countries. Includes $2.4 billion of unfunded lending exposure at September 30, 2012. These exposures consist typically of committed, but unused corporate credit agreements, with market-based lending terms and covenants.

(b)	Both the notional and the fair value of AFS securities were approximately $0.8 billion at September 30, 2012.

(c)

Primarily includes: $18.5 billion of counterparty exposure on derivative and securities financings, $3.3 billion of issuer exposure on debt and equity securities held in trading, $(5.8) billion of net protection from credit derivatives, including $(4.3) billion related to the synthetic credit portfolio managed by IB. Securities financings of approximately $15.6 billion were collateralized with approximately $17.3 billion of cash and marketable securities as of September 30, 2012.

(d)	Beginning on March 31, 2012, the Firm’s country risk reporting reflects enhanced measurement of tranched credit derivatives.

(e)	Includes cash and marketable securities pledged to the Firm, of which approximately 98% of the collateral was cash at September 30, 2012.

(f)	Reflects net protection purchased through the Firm’s credit portfolio management activities, which are managed separately from its market-making activities. Predominantly includes single-name CDS and also includes index credit derivatives and short bond positions. It does not include the synthetic credit portfolio.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	The following other-than-temporary impairment losses are included in securities gains for the periods presented.

---

---

(a)	The following table presents information on assets and liabilities related to VIEs that are consolidated by the Firm at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011. The difference between total VIE assets and liabilities represents the Firm’s interests in those entities, which were eliminated in consolidation.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, included total U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations of $110.4 billion and $122.4 billion, respectively, which were predominantly mortgage-related.

---

(b)

At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, included within trading loans were $22.9 billion and $20.1 billion, respectively, of residential first-lien mortgages, and $2.3 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively, of commercial first-lien mortgages. Residential mortgage loans include conforming mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell to U.S. government agencies of $13.8 billion and $11.0 billion, respectively, and reverse mortgages of $4.0 billion and $4.0 billion, respectively.

(c)

Physical commodities inventories are generally accounted for at the lower of cost or market. “Market” is a term defined in U.S. GAAP as not exceeding fair value less costs to sell (“transaction costs”). Transaction costs for the Firm’s physical commodities inventories are either not applicable or immaterial to the value of the inventory. Therefore, market approximates fair value for the Firm’s physical commodities inventories. When fair value hedging has been applied (or when market is below cost), the carrying value of physical commodities approximates fair value, because under fair value hedge accounting, the cost basis is adjusted for changes in fair value. For a further discussion of the Firm’s hedge accounting relationships, see Note 5 on pages 136–144 of this Form 10-Q. To provide consistent fair value disclosure information, all physical commodities inventories have been included in each period presented.

(d)	Balances reflect the reduction of securities owned (long positions) by the amount of securities sold but not yet purchased (short positions) when the long and short positions have identical Committee on Uniform Security Identification Procedures numbers (“CUSIPs”).

(e)

As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and derivative payables and the related cash collateral received and paid when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. For purposes of the tables above, the Firm does not reduce derivative receivables and derivative payables balances for this netting adjustment, either within or across the levels of the fair value hierarchy, as such netting is not relevant to a presentation based on the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability. Therefore, the balances reported in the fair value hierarchy table are gross of any counterparty netting adjustments. However, if the Firm were to net such balances within level 3, the reduction in the level 3 derivative receivables and payables balances would be $9.6 billion and $11.7 billion at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively; this is exclusive of the netting benefit associated with cash collateral, which would further reduce the level 3 balances.

(f)	Private equity instruments represent investments within the Corporate/Private Equity line of business. The cost basis of the private equity investment portfolio totaled $8.5 billion and $9.5 billion at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively.

(g)

Includes investments in hedge funds, private equity funds, real estate and other funds that do not have readily determinable fair values. The Firm uses net asset value per share when measuring the fair value of these investments. At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, the fair values of these investments were $5.0 billion and $5.5 billion, respectively, of which $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively were classified in level 2, and $3.9 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively, in level 3.

(h)

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, there were no significant transfers between levels 1 and 2 and from level 2 into level 3. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, transfers from level 3 into level 2 included $1.2 billion of derivative payables based on increased observability of certain structured equity derivatives and $1.6 billion of long-term debt due to a decrease in valuation uncertainty of certain equity structured notes. There were no significant transfers from level 3 into level 2 during the three months ended September 30, 2012. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, transfers from level 3 into level 2 were not significant. All transfers are assumed to occur at the beginning of the reporting period.

---

(a)	The categories presented in the table have been aggregated based upon product type which may differ from their classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(b)	The unobservable inputs and associated input ranges for approximately $1.4 billion in credit derivative receivables and $1.3 billion in credit derivative payables with underlying mortgage risk have been included in the inputs and ranges provided for commercial mortgage-backed securities and loans.

(c)	Approximately 19% of instruments in this category include price as an unobservable input. This balance includes certain securities and illiquid trading loans, which are generally valued using comparable prices and/or yields for similar instruments.

(d)

Collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) are securities backed by corporate loans. At September 30, 2012, $26.2 billion of CLOs were held in the available–for–sale (“AFS”) securities portfolio and $3.9 billion were included in asset-backed securities held in the trading portfolio. Substantially all of the securities are rated “AAA”, “AA” and “A”. For a further discussion of CLOs held in the AFS securities portfolio, see Note 11 on pages 148–153 of this Form 10-Q.

(e)

Long-term debt, other borrowed funds, and deposits include structured notes issued by the Firm that are financial instruments containing embedded derivatives. The estimation of the fair value of structured notes is predominantly based on the derivative features embedded within the instruments. The significant unobservable inputs are broadly consistent with those presented for derivative receivables.

(f)	The range has not been disclosed due to the wide range of possible values given the diverse nature of the underlying investments.

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Level 3 liabilities as a percentage of total Firm liabilities accounted for at fair value (including liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis) were 19% and 22% at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively.

(b)	Predominantly reported in principal transactions revenue, except for changes in fair value for Retail Financial Services (“RFS”) mortgage loans and lending-related commitments originated with the intent to sell, which are reported in mortgage fees and related income.

(c)	Realized gains/(losses) on AFS securities, as well as other-than-temporary impairment losses that are recorded in earnings, are reported in securities gains. Unrealized gains/

---

(d)	Changes in fair value for RFS mortgage servicing rights are reported in mortgage fees and related income.

(e)	Predominantly reported in other income and principal transactions revenue.

(f)	Loan originations are included in purchases.

(g)	All transfers into and/or out of level 3 are assumed to occur at the beginning of the reporting period.

---

---

(a)

Fair value is typically estimated using a discounted cash flow model that incorporates the characteristics of the underlying loans (including principal, contractual interest rate and contractual fees) and other key inputs, including expected lifetime credit losses, interest rates, prepayment rates, and primary origination or secondary market spreads. For certain loans, the fair value is measured based on the value of the underlying collateral. The difference between the estimated fair value and carrying value of a financial asset or liability is the result of the different methodologies used to determine fair value as compared with carrying value. For example, credit losses are estimated for a financial asset’s remaining life in a fair value calculation but are estimated for a loss emergence period in a loan loss reserve calculation; future loan income (interest and fees) is incorporated in a fair value calculation but is generally not considered in the allowance for loan losses. For a further discussion of the Firm’s methodologies for estimating the fair value of loans and lending-related commitments, see Note 3 on pages 184–198 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2011 Annual Report and pages 119–133 of this Note.

(a)	Represents the allowance for wholesale lending-related commitments. Excludes the current carrying values of the guarantee liability and the offsetting asset, each of which are recognized at fair value at the inception of guarantees.

---

(a)	Balances reflect the reduction of securities owned (long positions) by the amount of securities sold, but not yet purchased (short positions) when the long and short positions have identical CUSIP numbers.

(b)	Primarily represent securities sold, not yet purchased.

---

(a)

Total changes in instrument-specific credit risk related to structured notes were $8 million and $901 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and $(45) million and $1.1 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These totals include adjustments for structured notes classified within deposits and other borrowed funds, as well as long-term debt.

(b)	Structured notes are debt instruments with embedded derivatives that are tailored to meet a client’s need. The embedded derivative is the primary driver of risk. Although the risk associated with the structured notes is actively managed, the gains/(losses) reported in this table do not include the income statement impact of such risk management instruments.

(c)	Reported in mortgage fees and related income.

(d)	Reported in other income.

---

(a)	There were no performing loans which were ninety days or more past due as of September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively.

(b)

Remaining contractual principal is not applicable to nonprincipal-protected notes. Unlike principal-protected structured notes, for which the Firm is obligated to return a stated amount of principal at the maturity of the note, nonprincipal-protected structured notes do not obligate the Firm to return a stated amount of principal at maturity, but to return an amount based on the performance of an underlying variable or derivative feature embedded in the note.

(c)	Where the Firm issues principal-protected zero-coupon or discount notes, the balance reflected as the remaining contractual principal is the final principal payment at maturity.

---

(a)	Includes a limited number of single-name credit derivatives used to mitigate the credit risk arising from specified AFS securities.

---

(a)	Primarily consists of credit default swaps. For more information on volumes and types of credit derivative contracts, see the Credit derivatives discussion on pages 143–144 of this Note.

(b)	Represents the sum of gross long and gross short third-party notional derivative contracts.

---

(a)	Balances exclude structured notes for which the fair value option has been elected. See Note 4 on pages 133–135 of this Form 10-Q for further information.

(b)	Excludes $11 million of foreign currency-denominated debt designated as a net investment hedge at December 31, 2011. There was no such hedge designation at September 30, 2012.

(c)	As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and derivative payables and the related cash collateral received and paid, respectively, when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists.

---

(a)	Primarily consists of hedges of the benchmark (e.g., London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”)) interest rate risk of fixed-rate long-term debt and AFS securities. Gains and losses were recorded in net interest income.

(b)	Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of long-term debt and AFS securities for changes in spot foreign currency rates. Gains and losses related to the derivatives and the hedged items, due to changes in foreign currency rates, were recorded in principal transactions revenue and net interest income.

(c)	Consists of overall fair value hedges of physical commodities inventories that are generally carried at the lower of cost or market (market approximates fair value). Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue.

(d)	Included $(2.7) billion and $6.4 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $(1.2) billion and $1.4 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, of revenue related to certain foreign exchange trading derivatives designated as fair value hedging instruments.

(e)	Hedge ineffectiveness is the amount by which the gain or loss on the designated derivative instrument does not exactly offset the gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk.

(f)	Certain components of hedging derivatives are permitted to be excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, such as forward points on foreign exchange forward contracts. Amounts related to excluded components are recorded in current-period income.

---

(a)	Primarily consists of benchmark interest rate hedges of LIBOR-indexed floating-rate assets and floating-rate liabilities. Gains and losses were recorded in net interest income.

(b)	Primarily consists of hedges of the foreign currency risk of non-U.S. dollar-denominated revenue and expense. The income statement classification of gains and losses follows the hedged item – primarily noninterest revenue and compensation expense.

(c)	The Firm did not experience any forecasted transactions that failed to occur for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

(d)	Hedge ineffectiveness is the amount by which the cumulative gain or loss on the designated derivative instrument exceeds the present value of the cumulative expected change in cash flows on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk.

---

(a)

Certain components of hedging derivatives are permitted to be excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness, such as forward points on foreign exchange forward contracts. Amounts related to excluded components are recorded in current-period income. The Firm measures the ineffectiveness of net investment hedge accounting relationships based on changes in spot foreign currency rates, and therefore there was no ineffectiveness for net investment hedge accounting relationships during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

(a)	Primarily relates to interest rate derivatives used to hedge the interest rate risks associated with the mortgage pipeline, warehouse loans and MSRs. Gains and losses were recorded predominantly in mortgage fees and related income.

(b)

Relates to credit derivatives used to mitigate credit risk associated with lending exposures in the Firm’s wholesale businesses, and single-name credit derivatives used to mitigate credit risk arising from certain AFS securities. These derivatives do not include the synthetic credit portfolio or credit derivatives used to mitigate counterparty credit risk arising from derivative receivables, both of which are included in gains and losses on derivatives related to market-making activities and other derivatives below. Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue.

(c)	Primarily relates to hedges of the foreign exchange risk of specified foreign currency-denominated liabilities. Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue and net interest income.

(d)	Primarily relates to commodity derivatives used to mitigate energy price risk associated with energy-related contracts and investments. Gains and losses were recorded in principal transactions revenue.

---

(a)	The current period presentation excludes contracts with contingent credit features that were in a net receivable position. Prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation.

(a)	As permitted under U.S. GAAP, the Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and derivative payables and the related cash collateral received and paid when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists.

(b)	Represents cash collateral received and paid that is not subject to a legally enforceable master netting agreement, and liquid securities collateral held and transferred.

(c)

Represents liquid securities and cash collateral held and transferred at the initiation of derivative transactions, which is available as security against potential exposure that could arise should the fair value of the transactions move, as well as collateral held and transferred related to contracts that have non-daily call frequency for collateral to be posted, and collateral that the Firm or a counterparty has agreed to return but has not yet settled as of the reporting date. These amounts were not netted against the derivative receivables and payables in the tables above, because, at an individual counterparty level, the collateral exceeded the fair value exposure at both September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011.

---

(a)	Primarily consists of total return swaps and CDS options.

(b)	Represents the total notional amount of protection purchased where the underlying reference instrument (single-name, portfolio or index) is identical to the reference instrument on protection sold; the notional amount of protection purchased for each individual identical underlying reference instrument may be greater or lower than the notional amount of protection sold.

(c)	Does not take into account the fair value of the reference obligation at the time of settlement, which would generally reduce the amount the seller of protection pays to the buyer of protection in determining settlement value.

(d)	Represents protection purchased by the Firm on referenced instruments (single-name, portfolio or index) where the Firm has not sold any protection on the identical reference instrument.

---

(a)	The ratings scale is based on the Firm’s internal ratings, which generally correspond to ratings as defined by S&P and Moody’s.

(b)	Amounts are shown on a gross basis, before the benefit of legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral received by the Firm.

---

---

(a)	Includes various defined benefit pension plans which are individually immaterial.

---

(a)	Included litigation expense of $790 million and $1.3 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and $3.8 billion and $4.3 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

---

(a)	Proceeds from securities sold were within approximately 6% and 4% of amortized cost for the three and nine months ended September 2012, respectively, and 4% for both the three and nine months ended September 2011.

(b)	Includes OTTI losses recognized in income on certain prime mortgage-backed securities for the three months ended September 30, 2012, certain obligations of U.S. states and municipalities and prime mortgage-backed securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, and on certain prime mortgage-backed securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.

(c)	Represents the excess of the amortized cost over the fair value of certain non-U.S. corporate debt, non-U.S. government debt and certain asset-backed securities the Firm intends to sell.

(d)	During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the Firm realized losses of $24 million on sales of corporate debt securities that had been reported as an OTTI loss in prior periods due to the intention to sell the securities.

(a)	Includes total U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations with fair values of $79.8 billion and $89.3 billion at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively.

---

(b)	Consists primarily of bank debt including sovereign government-guaranteed bank debt.

(c)

Includes a total of $154 million and $91 million (pretax) of unrealized losses related to prime mortgage-backed securities and obligations of U. S. states and municipalities for which credit losses have been recognized in income at September 30, 2012, and prime mortgage-backed securities for which credit losses have been recognized in income at December 31, 2011, respectively. These unrealized losses are not credit-related and remain reported in AOCI.

---

---

---

---

(a)	U.S. government-sponsored enterprises were the only issuers whose securities exceeded 10% of JPMorgan Chase’s total stockholders’ equity at September 30, 2012.

(b)

The average yield is calculated using the effective yield of each security at the end of the period, weighted based on the amortized cost of each security. The effective yield includes the contractual coupon, amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts, and the effect of related hedging derivatives. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable. The effective yield excludes unscheduled principal prepayments; and accordingly, actual maturities of securities may differ from their contractual or expected maturities as certain securities may be prepaid.

(c)

Includes securities with no stated maturity. Substantially all of the Firm’s residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations are due in 10 years or more, based on contractual maturity. The estimated duration, which reflects anticipated future prepayments based on a consensus of dealers in the market, is approximately three years for agency residential mortgage-backed securities, two years for agency residential collateralized mortgage obligations and three years for nonagency residential collateralized mortgage obligations.

---

(a)	Includes loans reported in IB, CB, TSS and AM business segments and in Corporate/Private Equity.

(b)	Includes loans reported in RFS, auto and student loans reported in Card, and residential real estate loans reported in the AM business segment and in Corporate/Private Equity.

(c)	Includes auto and business banking risk-rated loans that apply the wholesale methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses; these loans are managed by Card and RFS, respectively, and therefore, for consistency in presentation, are included with the other consumer loan classes.

(d)

Prior to January 1, 2012, the Credit card portfolio segment was reported as two classes: Chase, excluding Washington Mutual, and Washington Mutual. The Washington Mutual class is a run-off portfolio that has been declining since the Firm acquired the portfolio in 2008. Effective January 1, 2012, management determined that the Washington Mutual portfolio class is no longer significant, and therefore, the Credit card portfolio segment is now being reported as one class of loans.

---

(a)	Includes billed finance charges and fees net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts.

(b)	Loans (other than PCI loans and those for which the fair value option has been selected) are presented net of unearned income, unamortized discounts and premiums, and net deferred loan costs of $2.7 billion at both September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011.

(a)	Excludes sales related to loans accounted for at fair value.

---

(a)	As of September 30, 2012, exposures deemed criticized correspond to special mention, substandard and doubtful categories as defined by bank regulatory agencies. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation.

(b)	The U.S. and non-U.S. distribution is determined based predominantly on the domicile of the borrower.

(c)	The credit quality of wholesale loans is assessed primarily through ongoing review and monitoring of an obligor’s ability to meet contractual obligations rather than relying on the past due status, which is generally a lagging indicator of credit quality. For a discussion of more significant risk factors, see Note 14 on page 235 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2011 Annual Report.

(d)	Represents loans that are considered well-collateralized and therefore still accruing interest.

(e)	Other primarily includes loans to SPEs and loans to private banking clients. See Note 1 on pages 182–183 of JPMorgan Chase’s 2011 Annual Report for additional information on SPEs.

(a)	As of September 30, 2012, exposures deemed criticized correspond to special mention, substandard and doubtful categories as defined by bank regulatory agencies. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation.

---

---

(a)	When the discounted cash flows, collateral value or market price equals or exceeds the recorded investment in the loan, then the loan does not require an allowance. This typically occurs when the impaired loans have been partially charged-off and/or there have been interest payments received and applied to the loan balance.

(b)	Represents the contractual amount of principal owed at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011. The unpaid principal balance differs from the impaired loan balances due to various factors, including charge-offs; interest payments received and applied to the carrying value; net deferred loan fees or costs; and unamortized discount or premiums on purchased loans.

(a)	The related interest income on accruing impaired loans and interest income recognized on a cash basis were not material for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

---

---

(a)	Sales and other are largely sales and paydowns, but also includes performing loans restructured at market rates that were removed from the reported TDR balance of $3 million and $54 million during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $43 million and $132 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(b)	Includes loans to Financial institutions, Government agencies and Other.

---

---

(a)	Individual delinquency classifications included mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies as follows: current includes $3.4 billion and $3.0 billion; 30–149 days past due includes $2.3 billion and $2.3 billion; and 150 or more days past due includes $9.8 billion and $10.3 billion at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively.

(b)

These balances, which are 90 days or more past due but insured by U.S. government agencies, are excluded from nonaccrual loans. In predominately all cases, 100% of the principal balance of the loans is insured and interest is guaranteed at a specified reimbursement rate subject to meeting agreed-upon servicing guidelines. These amounts are excluded from nonaccrual loans because reimbursement of insured and guaranteed amounts is proceeding normally. At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, these balances included $7.2 billion and $7.0 billion, respectively, of loans that are no longer accruing interest because interest has been curtailed by the U.S. government agencies although, in predominantly all cases, 100% of the principal is still insured. For the remaining balance, interest is being accrued at the guaranteed reimbursement rate.

(c)

At September 30, 2012, included an incremental $1.7 billion of loans recorded in accordance with regulatory guidance requiring loans discharged under Chapter 7 bankruptcy and not reaffirmed by the borrower to be reported as nonaccrual loans, regardless of their delinquency status. This $1.7 billion consisted of $480 million, $340 million, $481 million, and $356 million for home equity - senior lien, home equity - junior lien, prime mortgage, including option ARMs, and subprime mortgages, respectively. Certain of these individual loans have previously been reported as performing TDRs (e.g., loans that were previously modified under one of the Firm’s loss mitigation programs and that have made at least six payments under the modified payment terms).

(d)

Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated current property value. Current property values are estimated, at a minimum, quarterly, based on home valuation models using nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates incorporating actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. These property values do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral values; as such, the resulting ratios are necessarily imprecise and should be viewed as estimates.

(e)	Junior lien represents combined LTV, which considers all available lien positions related to the property. All other products are presented without consideration of subordinate liens on the property.

(f)	Refreshed FICO scores represent each borrower’s most recent credit score, which is obtained by the Firm at least on a quarterly basis.

(g)	At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, included mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $15.5 billion and $15.6 billion, respectively.

(h)	Includes $1.3 billion of performing junior liens at September 30, 2012, that are subordinate to senior liens that are 90 days or more past due; such junior liens are now being reported as nonaccrual loans based upon regulatory guidance issued in the first quarter of 2012. Of the total, $1.2 billion were current at September 30, 2012. Prior periods have not been restated.

(i)	At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, excluded mortgage loans insured by U.S. government agencies of $12.1 billion and $12.6 billion, respectively. These amounts were excluded as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally.

---

---

---

(a)	Represents collateral-dependent residential mortgage loans, including Chapter 7 loans, that are charged off to the fair value of the underlying collateral less cost to sell.

(b)

At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, $7.1 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively, of loans modified subsequent to repurchase from Government National Mortgage Association (“Ginnie Mae”) in accordance with the standards of the appropriate government agency (i.e., Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), Rural Housing Services (“RHS”)) are not included in the table above. When such loans perform subsequent to modification in accordance with Ginnie Mae guidelines, they are generally sold back into Ginnie Mae loan pools. Modified loans that do not re-perform become subject to foreclosure.

(c)	At September 30, 2012, included $1.7 billion of Chapter 7 loans, consisting of $507 million of senior lien home equity loans, $398 million of junior lien home equity loans, $493 million of prime including option ARMs, and $254 million of subprime mortgages. Certain of these individual loans were previously reported as nonaccrual loans (e.g., based upon the delinquency status of the loan).

(d)	Represents the contractual amount of principal owed at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011. The unpaid principal balance differs from the impaired loan balances due to various factors, including charge-offs, net deferred loan fees or costs; and unamortized discounts or premiums on purchased loans.

(e)	At September 30, 2012, included $2.9 billion of Chapter 7 loans, consisting of $696 million of senior lien home equity loans, $1.1 billion of junior lien home equity loans, $764 million of prime, including option ARMs, and $401 million of subprime mortgages.

(a)

Generally, interest income on loans modified in TDRs is recognized on a cash basis until such time as the borrower has made a minimum of six payments under the new terms. As of September 30, 2012 and 2011, $2.7 billion and $997 million, respectively, were loans on which the borrowers had not yet made six payments under their modified terms and other TDRs placed on nonaccrual status under regulatory guidance.

---

(a)	Any permanent modification of a loan previously reported as a new TDR as the result of a trial modification is not also reported as a new TDR.

(b)

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, included $1.7 billion of Chapter 7 loans consisting of $507 million of senior lien home equity loans, $398 million of junior lien home equity loans, $493 million of prime, including option ARMs, and $254 million of subprime mortgages. Certain of these individual loans were previously reported as nonaccrual loans (e.g., based upon the delinquency status of the loan).

(c)	Includes charge-offs on unsuccessful trial modifications.

---

(a)	As a percentage of the number of loans modified. The sum of the percentages exceeds 100% because predominantly all of the modifications include more than one type of concession.

(b)	Represents variable interest rate to fixed interest rate modifications.

---

(a)

Represents loans permanently modified in TDRs that experienced a payment default in the period presented, and for which the payment default occurred within one year of the modification. The dollar amounts presented represent the balance of such loans at the end of the reporting period in which they defaulted. For residential real estate loans modified in TDRs, payment default is deemed to occur when the loan becomes two contractual payments past due. In the event that a modified loan redefaults, it is probable that the loan will ultimately be liquidated through foreclosure or another similar type of liquidation transaction. Redefaults of loans modified within the last 12 months may not be representative of ultimate redefault levels.

---

(a)	Loans insured by U.S. government agencies under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”) are included in the delinquency classifications presented based on their payment status.

(b)	These amounts represent student loans, which are insured by U.S. government agencies under the FFELP. These amounts were accruing as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally.

(c)	For risk-rated business banking and auto loans, the primary credit quality indicator is the risk rating of the loan, including whether the loans are considered to be criticized and/or nonaccrual.

(d)	At September 30, 2012, included $65 million of Chapter 7 auto loans.

(e)	September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, excluded loans 30 days or more past due and still accruing, which are insured by U.S. government agencies under the FFELP, of $910 million and $989 million, respectively. These amounts were excluded as reimbursement of insured amounts is proceeding normally.

---

(a)	When discounted cash flows, collateral value or market price equals or exceeds the recorded investment in the loan, then the loan does not require an allowance. This typically occurs when the impaired loans have been partially charged off and/or there have been interest payments received and applied to the loan balance.

(b)	At September 30, 2012, included $81 million of Chapter 7 auto loans. Certain of these individual loans were previously reported as nonaccrual loans (e.g. based upon the delinquency status of the loan).

(c)	At September 30, 2012, included $159 million of Chapter 7 auto loans.

(d)	Represents the contractual amount of principal owed at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011. The unpaid principal balance differs from the impaired loan balances due to various factors, including charge-offs; interest payments received and applied to the principal balance; net deferred loan fees or costs; and unamortized discounts or premiums on purchased loans.

(e)	There were no impaired student and other loans at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011.

(a)	There were no impaired student and other loans for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

(b)	The related interest income on impaired loans, including those on a cash basis, was not material for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

(a)	These modifications generally provided interest rate concessions to the borrower or deferral of principal repayments.

(b)	Additional commitments to lend to borrowers whose loans have been modified in TDRs as of September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, were immaterial.

(c)	At September 30, 2012, included $81 million of Chapter 7 auto loans. Certain of these individual loans were previously reported as nonaccrual loans (e.g., based upon the delinquency status of the loan).

(d)	There were no student and other loans modified in TDRs at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011.

---

(a)	At September 30, 2012, included $81 million of Chapter 7 auto loans. Certain of these individual loans were previously reported as nonaccrual loans (e.g., based upon the delinquency status of the loan).

---

(a)	Carrying value includes the effect of fair value adjustments that were applied to the consumer PCI portfolio at the date of acquisition.

(b)	Management concluded as part of the Firm’s regular assessment of the PCI loan pools that it was probable that higher expected credit losses would result in a decrease in expected cash flows. As a result, an allowance for loan losses for impairment of these pools has been recognized.

(c)

Represents the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans divided by the estimated current property value. Current property values are estimated, at a minimum, quarterly, based on home valuation models using nationally recognized home price index valuation estimates incorporating actual data to the extent available and forecasted data where actual data is not available. These property values do not represent actual appraised loan level collateral values; as such, the resulting ratios are necessarily imprecise and should be viewed as estimates. Current estimated combined LTV for junior lien home equity loans considers all available lien positions related to the property.

(d)	Refreshed FICO scores, which the Firm obtains at least quarterly, represent each borrower’s most recent credit score.

---

(a)	In general, HELOCs are revolving loans for a 10-year period, after which time the HELOC converts to a loan with a 20-year amortization period.

(b)	Substantially all undrawn HELOCs within the revolving period have been closed.

(c)	Predominantly all of these loans have been modified to provide a more affordable payment to the borrower.

(a)

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by the impact of modifications, but also related to changes in prepayment assumptions. For the three months ended September 30, 2011, other changes in expected cash flows were predominately driven by the impact of modifications. For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, other changes in expected cash flows were largely driven by the impact of modifications, but also related to changes in prepayment assumptions.

---

---

---

(a)	Includes risk-rated loans that have been placed on nonaccrual status and loans that have been modified in a TDR.

(b)	Consumer, excluding credit card, charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 included $825 million of incremental charge-offs for Chapter 7 residential real estate loans and $55 million of incremental charge-offs for Chapter 7 auto loans.

(c)	The asset-specific credit card allowance for loan losses is related to loans that have been modified in a TDR; such allowance is calculated based on the loans’ original contractual interest rates and does not consider any incremental penalty rates.

---

---

(a)	Excludes U.S. government agency securitizations. See pages 182–183 of this Note for information on the Firm’s loan sales to U.S. government agencies.

(b)	Includes Alt-A loans.

(c)	Consists of securities backed by commercial loans (predominantly real estate) and non-mortgage-related consumer receivables purchased from third parties. The Firm generally does not retain a residual interest in its sponsored commercial mortgage securitization transactions.

(d)	Prior period amounts have been revised to conform with the current presentation methodology.

(e)

The table excludes the following: retained servicing (see Note 16 on pages 184–187 of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of MSRs); securities retained from loans sales to U.S. government agencies; interest rate and foreign exchange derivatives primarily used to manage interest rate and foreign exchange risks of securitization entities (See Note 5 on pages 136–144 of this Form 10-Q for further information on derivatives); senior and subordinated securities of $303 million and $168 million, respectively, at September 30, 2012, and $110 million and $8 million, respectively, at December 31, 2011, which the Firm purchased in connection with IB’s secondary market-making activities.

(f)	Includes interests held in re-securitization transactions.

(g)

As of September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, 69% and 68%, respectively, of the Firm’s retained securitization interests, which are carried at fair value, were risk-rated “A” or better, on an S&P-equivalent basis. The retained interests in prime residential mortgages consisted of $165 million and $136 million of investment-grade and $388 million and $427 million of noninvestment-grade retained interests at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively. The retained interests in commercial and other securitizations trusts consisted of $4.0 billion and $3.4 billion of investment-grade and $195 million and $283 million of noninvestment-grade retained interests at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively.

---

---

(a)	Represents the excess/(deficit) of the fair values of municipal bond assets available to repay the liquidity facilities, if drawn.

(b)	The ratings scale is based on the Firm’s internal risk ratings and is presented on an S&P-equivalent basis.

---

(a)	Excludes intercompany transactions which were eliminated in consolidation.

(b)	Includes residential and commercial mortgage securitizations as well as re-securitizations.

(c)	Primarily comprises student loan securitization entities. The Firm consolidated $3.8 billion and $4.1 billion of student loan securitization entities as of September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively.

(d)	Includes assets classified as cash, derivative receivables, AFS securities, and other assets within the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(e)	The assets of the consolidated VIEs included in the program types above are used to settle the liabilities of those entities. The difference between total assets and total liabilities recognized for consolidated VIEs represents the Firm’s interest in the consolidated VIEs for each program type.

(f)

The interest-bearing beneficial interest liabilities issued by consolidated VIEs are classified in the line item on the Consolidated Balance Sheets titled, “Beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities.” The holders of these beneficial interests do not have recourse to the general credit of JPMorgan Chase. Included in beneficial interests in VIE assets are long-term beneficial interests of $34.4 billion and $39.7 billion at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively. The maturities of the long-term beneficial interests as of September 30, 2012, were as follows: $13.0 billion under one year, $15.0 billion between one and five years, and $6.4 billion over five years.

(g)	Includes liabilities classified as accounts payable and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

---

(a)

Proceeds from commercial mortgage securitizations were received in the form of securities. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, $1.0 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively, of commercial mortgage securitizations were classified in level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, $1.2 billion and $681 million, respectively, and $3.8 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, of commercial mortgage securitizations were classified in levels 2 and 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

(b)	Includes cash paid by the Firm to reacquire assets from off–balance sheet, nonconsolidated entities – for example, loan repurchases due to representation and warranties and servicer clean-up calls.

(c)	Includes prime, Alt-A, subprime, and option ARMs. Excludes sales for which the Firm did not securitize the loan (including loans sold to Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac).

(d)	There were no residential mortgage securitizations during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.

(e)	Includes commercial and student loan securitizations.

(f)	Includes $851 million of principal and $859 million of proceeds from commercial securitizations co-sponsored by third parties for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

---

---

(a)

Total assets held in securitization-related SPEs were $313.0 billion and $340.0 billion, respectively, at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011. The $236.0 billion and $261.2 billion, respectively, of loans securitized at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, excludes: $72.6 billion and $74.4 billion, respectively, of securitized loans in which the Firm has no continuing involvement, and $4.4 billion and $4.4 billion, respectively, of loan securitizations consolidated on the Firm’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011.

(b)	Includes Alt-A loans.

(c)	Includes securitized loans that were previously recorded at fair value and classified as trading assets.

(a)	Reflects gross goodwill balances as the Firm has not recognized any impairment losses to date.

(b)	Includes foreign currency translation adjustments and other tax-related adjustments.

---

(a)	Represents the aggregate impact of changes in model inputs and assumptions such as costs to service, home prices, mortgage spreads, ancillary income, and assumptions used to derive prepayment speeds, as well as changes to the valuation models themselves.

(b)	Includes changes related to commercial real estate of $(3) million and $(3) million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and $(8) million and $(7) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(c)	Includes $23 million and $33 million related to commercial real estate at September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

(d)

Represents amounts the Firm pays as the servicer (e.g., scheduled principal and interest to a trust, taxes and insurance), which will generally be reimbursed within a short period of time after the advance from future cash flows from the trust or the underlying loans. The Firm’s credit risk associated with these advances is minimal because reimbursement of the advances is senior to all cash payments to investors. In addition, the Firm maintains the right to stop payment for certain types of advances with certain investors if the collateral is insufficient to cover the advance.

---

(a)	Represents the aggregate impact of changes in model inputs and assumptions such as costs to service, home prices, mortgage spreads, ancillary income, and assumptions used to derive prepayment speeds, as well as changes to the valuation models themselves.

---

(a)	The decrease in the gross amount and accumulated amortization from December 31, 2011, was due to the removal of fully amortized assets.

(b)	Includes intangible assets of approximately $600 million consisting primarily of asset management advisory contracts, which were determined to have an indefinite life and are not amortized.

(a)	Includes $195 million, $81 million, $182 million, and $108 million of amortization expense related to purchased credit card relationships, other credit card-related intangibles, core deposit intangibles and other intangibles, respectively, recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

---

---

(a)	Represents the after-tax difference between the fair value and amortized cost of securities accounted for as AFS.

(b)	Included after-tax unrealized losses not related to credit on debt securities for which credit losses have been recognized in income of $(94) million at September 30, 2012, $(101) million at July 1, 2012, $(56) million at January 1, 2012, $(57) million at September 30, 2011, $(62) million at July 1, 2011 and $(81) million at January 1, 2011.

(c)	The net change for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, was predominantly driven by declining interest rates and the tightening of spreads across the portfolio, partially offset by sales.

(d)	The net change for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, was predominantly driven by increased market value on agency MBS and municipal securities, partially offset by the widening of spreads on non-U.S. corporate debt and realization of gains.

---

---

(a)

JPMorgan Chase redeemed $9.0 billion of trust preferred capital debt securities effective July 12, 2012. At September 30, 2012, trust preferred capital debt securities included in Tier 1 capital were $10.2 billion and $600 million, for JPMorgan Chase and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., respectively. If these securities were excluded from the calculation at September 30, 2012, Tier 1 capital would be $144.5 billion and $106.8 billion, respectively, and the Tier 1 capital ratio would be 11.1% and 9.6%, respectively. At September 30, 2012, Chase Bank USA, N.A. had no trust preferred capital debt securities.

(b)

RWA consist of on– and off–balance sheet assets that are assigned to one of several broad risk categories and weighted by factors representing their risk and potential for default. On–balance sheet assets are risk-weighted based on the perceived credit risk associated with the obligor or counterparty, the nature of any collateral, and the guarantor, if any. Off–balance sheet assets such as lending-related commitments, guarantees, derivatives and other applicable off–balance sheet positions are risk-weighted by multiplying the contractual amount by the appropriate credit conversion factor to determine the on–balance sheet credit-equivalent amount, which is then risk-weighted based on the same factors used for on–balance sheet assets. RWA also incorporate a measure for the market risk related to applicable trading assets–debt and equity instruments, and foreign exchange and commodity derivatives. The resulting risk-weighted values for each of the risk categories are then aggregated to determine total RWA.

(c)	Includes off–balance sheet RWA at September 30, 2012, of $307.8 billion, $297.6 billion and $15 million, and at December 31, 2011, of $301.1 billion, $291.0 billion and $38 million, for JPMorgan Chase, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Chase Bank USA, N.A., respectively.

(d)	Adjusted average assets, for purposes of calculating the leverage ratio, include total quarterly average assets adjusted for unrealized gains/(losses) on securities, less deductions for disallowed goodwill and other intangible assets, investments in certain subsidiaries, and the total adjusted carrying value of nonfinancial equity investments that are subject to deductions from Tier 1 capital.

(e)	Asset and capital amounts for JPMorgan Chase’s banking subsidiaries reflect intercompany transactions; whereas the respective amounts for JPMorgan Chase reflect the elimination of intercompany transactions.

(f)	As defined by the regulations issued by the Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC.

(g)	Represents requirements for banking subsidiaries pursuant to regulations issued under the FDIC Improvement Act. There is no Tier 1 leverage component in the definition of a well-capitalized bank holding company.

(h)	The minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio for bank holding companies and banks is 3% or 4%, depending on factors specified in regulations issued by the Federal Reserve and OCC.

Note:

Rating agencies allow measures of capital to be adjusted upward for deferred tax liabilities, which have resulted from both nontaxable business combinations and from tax-deductible goodwill. The Firm had deferred tax liabilities resulting from nontaxable business combinations totaling $319 million and $414 million at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively; and deferred tax liabilities resulting from tax-deductible goodwill of $2.5 billion and $2.3 billion at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively.

---

---

(a)

At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, reflects the contractual amount net of risk participations totaling $589 million and $1.1 billion, respectively, for other unfunded commitments to extend credit; $18.2 billion and $19.8 billion, respectively, for standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees; and $913 million and $974 million, respectively, for other letters of credit. In regulatory filings with the Federal Reserve these commitments are shown gross of risk participations.

(b)

At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, included credit enhancements and bond and commercial paper liquidity commitments to U.S. states and municipalities, hospitals and other not-for-profit entities of $45.7 billion and $48.6 billion, respectively. These commitments also include liquidity facilities to nonconsolidated municipal bond VIEs; for further information, see Note 15 on pages 177–184 of this Form 10-Q.

(c)	At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, included unissued standby letters of credit commitments of $44.4 billion and $44.1 billion, respectively.

(d)	At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, JPMorgan Chase held collateral relating to $43.3 billion and $41.5 billion, respectively, of standby letters of credit; and $795 million and $1.3 billion, respectively, of other letters of credit.

(e)	At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, collateral held by the Firm in support of securities lending indemnification agreements was $184.5 billion and $186.3 billion, respectively. Securities lending collateral comprises primarily cash and securities issued by governments that are members of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) and U.S. government agencies.

(f)

At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, the amount of commitments related to forward-starting reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing agreements were $8.8 billion and $14.4 billion, respectively. Commitments related to unsettled reverse repurchase agreements and securities borrowing agreements with regular-way settlement periods were $32.7 billion and $25.5 billion, at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, respectively.

(g)

The Firm’s mortgage repurchase liability is intended to cover losses associated with all loans previously sold in connection with loan sale and securitization transactions with the GSEs, regardless of when those losses occur or how they are ultimately resolved (e.g., repurchase, make-whole payment). For additional information, see Loan sale and securitization-related indemnifications on pages 195–196 of this Note.

(h)

At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, included unfunded commitments of $398 million and $789 million, respectively, to third-party private equity funds; and $1.6 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively, to other equity investments. These commitments included $359 million and $820 million, respectively, related to investments that are generally fair valued at net asset value as discussed in Note 3 on pages 119–133 of this Form 10-Q. In addition, at September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, included letters of credit hedged by derivative transactions and managed on a market risk basis of $4.5 billion and $3.9 billion, respectively.

(i)	For lending-related products, the carrying value represents the allowance for lending-related commitments and the guarantee liability; for derivative-related products, the carrying value represents the fair value.

---

(a)	The ratings scale is based on the Firm’s internal ratings which generally correspond to ratings as defined by S&P and Moody’s.

(b)

At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, reflects the contractual amount net of risk participations totaling $18.2 billion and $19.8 billion, respectively, for standby letters of credit and other financial guarantees; and $913 million and $974 million, respectively, for other letters of credit. In regulatory filings with the Federal Reserve these commitments are shown gross of risk participations.

(c)	At September 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, included unissued standby letters of credit commitments of $44.4 billion and $44.1 billion, respectively.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)

In addition to analyzing the Firm’s results on a reported basis, management reviews the Firm’s lines of business results on a “managed basis,” which is a non-GAAP financial measure. The Firm’s definition of managed basis starts with the reported U.S. GAAP results and includes certain reclassifications as discussed below that do not have any impact on net income as reported by the lines of business or by the Firm as a whole.

(b)	IB manages traditional credit exposures related to the Global Corporate Bank (“GCB”) on behalf of IB and TSS, and IB and TSS share the economics related to the Firm’s GCB clients. Included within this allocation are net revenue, provision for credit losses and expenses. IB recognizes this credit allocation as a component of all other income.

(c)	Segment managed results reflect revenue on a FTE basis with the corresponding income tax impact recorded within income tax expense/(benefit). These adjustments are eliminated in reconciling items to arrive at the Firm’s reported U.S. GAAP results. FTE adjustments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, were as follows.

---

---

(a)	Negative yield for the three months ended September 30, 2012, is a result of increased client-driven demand for certain securities combined with the impact of low interest rates; the offset of this matched book activity is reflected as lower net interest expense reported within Trading liabilities - debt, short-term borrowings and other liabilities.

(b)	Includes margin loans.

(c)	Includes brokerage customer payables.

(d)	Interest includes the effect of related hedging derivatives. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable.

(e)	For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the annualized rates for AFS securities, based on amortized cost, were 2.17% and 2.71%, respectively.

---

(a)	Includes margin loans.

(b)	Includes brokerage customer payables.

(c)	Interest includes the effect of related hedging derivatives. Taxable-equivalent amounts are used where applicable.

(d)	For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the annualized rates for AFS securities, based on amortized cost, were 2.43% and 2.93%, respectively.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

(a)	Includes $86 million of repurchases in December 2011, which settled in early January 2012.

(b)	Excludes $60 million of repurchases in March 2012, which settled in early April 2012.

(c)	Includes $60 million of repurchases in March 2012, which settled in early April 2012.

(d)	Excludes commissions cost.

(e)	The amount authorized by the Board of Directors excludes commissions cost.

(f)	The unused portion of the prior $15.0 billion program was canceled when the new $15.0 billion program was authorized.

(g)	Dollar value remaining under the new $15.0 billion program.

---

---

---