UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12 |
Bank of America Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
PAYMENT OF FILING FEE (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | No fee required. | |||
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |||
1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| |||
4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| |||
5) Total fee paid: | ||||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was previously paid. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
1) | Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
3) | Filing Party:
| |||
4) | Date Filed:
|
March 13, 2019
Letter from our Chairman and
|
Letter from our
| |||
Dear Fellow Stockholders:
We are pleased to invite you to the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, to be held April 24, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., Eastern time, at the Hilton Charlotte Center City on 222 East Third Street in Charlotte, North Carolina.
During the meeting, we will provide an update on the company and how Responsible Growth delivered for stockholders in 2018. Its also a good opportunity for us to hear directly from you.
Your voice and your vote are important. For the 2019 annual meeting of stockholders, Bank of America again will make a $1 charitable donation for every stockholder account that votes.
This year, we will make contributions to the American Red Cross. Your voting participation in the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders resulted in our contributing $919,000 to Habitat for Humanity.
Please read the proxy materials and follow the voting instructions to ensure your shares are represented at the meeting.
Sincerely,
Brian Moynihan Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
Dear Fellow Stockholders:
The independent directors and I join Brian in inviting you to attend our companys 2019 annual meeting of stockholders.
The Board values input from our stockholders as the company executes our long-term strategy. As the Boards Lead Independent Director, I meet regularly with investors. I share investors viewpoints with the Board, and that input enhances our decision-making.
During 2018, our dialogue again covered broad-ranging topics, including the companys financial success; the Boards governance practices and composition; the Boards role in strategic planning, risk management, and in overseeing the companys Responsible Growth execution; the companys environmental and social initiatives; and my role as Lead Independent Director.
So that all stockholders have the opportunity to hear directly from our Board members, video interviews of each director discussing our companys governance practices and what Responsible Growth means to us are available at www.bankofamerica.com/annualmeeting.
I encourage you to read our 2019 Proxy Statement, our 2018 Annual Report, and the other proxy materials.
Our Board remains committed to building long-term value in the company and returning excess capital to our stockholders. On behalf of the directors, I join Brian and the management team in thanking you for choosing to invest in Bank of America.
Sincerely,
Jack O. Bovender, Jr. Lead Independent Director |
NOTICE OF 2019 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
Date and Time: | Place: | |
April 24, 2019 10:00 a.m., Eastern time |
Hilton Charlotte Center City 222 East Third Street Charlotte, North Carolina 28202 |
Matters to be Voted on:
🌑 | Electing the 16 directors named in the proxy statement |
🌑 | A proposal approving our executive compensation (an advisory, non-binding Say on Pay resolution) |
🌑 | A proposal ratifying the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm for 2019 |
🌑 | A proposal amending our key employee equity plan |
🌑 | Stockholder proposals, if they are properly presented at our annual meeting |
🌑 | Any other business that may properly come before our annual meeting |
Record date. Bank of America stockholders as of the close of business on March 4, 2019 will be entitled to vote at our annual meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.
Your vote is very important. Please submit your proxy as soon as possible by the Internet, telephone, or mail. Submitting your proxy by one of these methods will ensure your representation at the annual meeting regardless of whether you attend the meeting.
To express our appreciation for your participation, Bank of America will make a $1 charitable donation to the American Red Cross on behalf of every stockholder account that votes.
Please refer to page 88 of this proxy statement for additional information on how to vote your shares and attend our annual meeting.
By order of the Board of Directors,
Ross E. Jeffries, Jr.
Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
March 13, 2019
Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on
April 24, 2019: Our 2019 Proxy Statement and 2018 Annual Report to stockholders are available at
www.bankofamerica.com/annualmeeting
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
|
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
HOW TO VOTE YOUR SHARES
You may vote if you were a stockholder as of the close of business on March 4, 2019.
|
Online www.proxyvote.com |
|
By Mail Complete, sign, date, and return your proxy card in the envelope provided
| |||
|
By Phone Call the phone number located on the top of your proxy card
|
|
In Person Attend our annual meeting and vote by ballot
|
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Bank of America will make a $1 charitable donation to the American Red Cross(1) on behalf of every stockholder account that votes. As we conclude two consecutive years of record-breaking and devastating disasters that left communities shattered, the American Red Cross was there to provide food, shelter, relief supplies, emotional support, and long-term recovery planning to help communities devastated by six major back-to-back hurricanes in the U.S. and certain U.S. territories, the most destructive wildfires in California history, six tragic shootings across the U.S., and more than 73,000 households affected by a home fire. As part of the worlds largest humanitarian network, the American Red Cross also provided humanitarian aid to more than 18 countries, including financial support, lifesaving supplies, and trained disaster responders. |
|
Bank of America and our employees have donated more than $4.5 million to the American Red Cross in support of its disaster relief efforts over the last five years.
By voting, you can join our efforts in support of the American Red Cross.
PROPOSALS FOR YOUR VOTE |
BOARD VOTING RECOMMENDATION |
PAGE | |||||
1. Electing Directors |
FOR each nominee
|
2 | |||||
2. Approving Our Executive Compensation
|
FOR | 42 | |||||
3. Ratifying the Appointment of Our
|
FOR | 70 | |||||
4. Approving the Amendment of the
|
FOR | 72 | |||||
5. Stockholder Proposals |
AGAINST |
80 |
If you are a beneficial (or street name) holder and you would like to vote in person at the meeting, you must also present a written legal proxy from the broker, bank, or other nominee. See Voting and Other Information on page 88 for more information on voting your shares.
To review our 2019 Proxy Statement and 2018 Annual Report online, go to www.bankofamerica.com/annualmeeting.
ANNUAL MEETING ADMISSION
Annual meeting admission is limited to our registered holders and beneficial owners as of the record date and persons holding valid proxies from these stockholders. Admission to our annual meeting requires proof of your stock ownership as of the record date and valid, government-issued photo identification. Security measures may include bag, metal detector, and hand-wand searches. The use of cameras, recording devices, phones, and other electronic devices is strictly prohibited. See Voting and Other InformationAttending our Annual Meeting on page 91.
(1) | The American Red Cross name, emblems and copyrighted materials are used with its permission and are not an endorsement of Bank of America and its goods and services. |
2019 Proxy Statement | i |
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
|
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES
What would you like the power to do?
At Bank of America, we ask this question every day of all those we serve. It is at the core of how we live our values, deliver our purpose and achieve responsible growth.
| ||||||
Our values
🌑 Deliver together
🌑 Act responsibly
🌑 Realize the power of
🌑 Trust the team |
Our purpose
To help make financial lives |
Responsible growth
🌑 We must grow and win
🌑 We must grow with our customer-focused strategy |
🌑 We must grow within
🌑 We must grow in a sustainable manner |
Eight lines of businesshow we serve the core financial needs of people, companies, and institutions
ii |
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
|
GOVERNANCE OBJECTIVES
Our Board of Directors oversees the development and execution of our strategy. The Board has adopted robust governance practices and procedures focused on Responsible Growth. Our Board has implemented a number of measures to enrich Board composition, enhance independent oversight, and increase their effectiveness. These measures align our corporate governance structure with achieving our strategic objectives, and enable our Board to effectively communicate and oversee our culture of compliance and rigorous risk management.
Thoughtful, Interconnected Governance Processes
Key Statistics about Our Director Nominees
6.6
years average tenure, below the 8.4-year S&P 500 average(1) |
15 of 16
are independent |
31%
are women |
44%
are ethnically and gender diverse |
63%
have CEO-level experience |
38%
have senior executive experience at financial institutions
|
(1) | Our director nominees average tenure is calculated by full years of completed service based on date of initial election as of our annual meeting date; source for S&P 500 average: 2018 Spencer Stuart Board Index. |
2019 Proxy Statement | iii |
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
|
OUR STOCKHOLDERS INFORM AND GUIDE ACHIEVEMENT OF GOVERNANCE OBJECTIVES
Our investor relations and management regularly meet with investors, prospective investors, and investment analysts to discuss our business and strategy. Our Board and management also routinely engage with and listen to our stockholders. In addition to the investor relations meetings, throughout 2018 and into 2019, we provided direct updates about our Board and our company to stockholders and key stakeholders representing approximately 54% of our shares outstanding. Our Board and management met with stockholders and stakeholders representing approximately 35% of our shares outstanding to solicit their input on important governance, executive compensation, human capital management, regulatory, environmental, social, and other matters. This continued dialogue has informed our Boards meeting agendas, and contributes to governance enhancements that help us address the issues that matter most to stockholders and key stakeholders. This engagement process complements our Responsible Growth, and will assist us in achieving our strategic objectives, creating long-term value, maintaining our culture of compliance, and contributing to our environmental, social, and governance activities.
Our Board-driven Stockholder Engagement Process
See Stockholder Engagement on page 28 for more information on our stockholder engagement philosophy and activities.
iv |
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
|
COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS
Pay-for-Performance Compensation Philosophy
Continued Dedication to Responsible Growth Drove Record Results in 2018
2018 Net Income
$28.1 billion
|
2018 Revenue
$91.2 billion 4% from 2017
|
2018 Noninterest Expense
2% from 2017
|
Quarterly Positive Operating Leverage 4 Consecutive Years
| ||||||||||||||||||
In recognition of our Responsible Growth results, overall company performance, and the CEOs individual performance, the Compensation and Benefits Committee and the Boards independent directors determined the following compensation for our CEO:
🌑 Total compensation, inclusive of base salary and equity-based incentives, of $26.5 million |
| ||||
🌑 94.3% of Mr. Moynihans total compensation is variable and directly linked to company performance. All CEO variable compensation was awarded in equity (as it has been since 2010) | |||||
🌑 Half of Mr. Moynihans variable compensation is performance restricted stock units (PRSUs) that must be re-earned based on sustained three-year average performance of key metrics (return on assets and growth in adjusted tangible book value) | |||||
🌑 The remainder of the CEOs variable pay is cash-settled restricted stock units (CRSUs) and time-based restricted stock units (TRSUs) settled in stock | |||||
🌑 Based on stockholder input and our Boards assessment, this overall pay structure is consistent with prior years | |||||
🌑 Mr. Moynihan must hold 50% of net after-tax shares received from equity-based awards until one year after retirement |
Compensation Risk Management Features
🌑 Mix of fixed and variable pay
🌑 Balanced, risk-adjusted performance measures
🌑 Pay-for-performance process that bases individual awards on actual results and how those results were achieved
🌑 Review of independent control function feedback in performance
🌑 Deferral of a majority of variable pay through equity-based awards
🌑 Robust stock ownership requirements, and executive officers must hold 50% of net after-tax shares received from equity-based awards until retirement
🌑 Use of multiple cancellation and clawback features for equity-based awards |
Historical Say on Pay Votes
Our Compensation and Benefits Committee believes the results of last years Say on Pay vote and input from our stockholder engagement affirmed our stockholders support of our companys executive compensation program. This informed our decision to maintain a consistent overall approach in setting executive compensation for 2018.
|
See Compensation Discussion and Analysis on page 42 and Executive Compensation on page 57.
(1) | Total compensation pay components do not equal 100% due to rounding. |
2019 Proxy Statement | v |
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
|
RESPONSIBLE GROWTH |
Responsible Growth means we must grow, no excuses. We have to do it by focusing on delivering for clients within our risk parameters. And it must be sustainable. To be sustainable, we want to be the best place to work for our team, we focus on sharing success, and we drive operational excellence.
Brian Moynihan Chairman and CEO
|
What would you like the power to do? At Bank of America, we ask this question every day of all those we serve. It is at the core of how we live our values, deliver our purpose, and achieve Responsible Growth.
We deliver on our purposeto help make financial lives better through the power of every connectionthrough Responsible Growth. A tenet of Responsible Growth is that growth has to be sustainable. This means (1) we share our success, including through our focus on environment, social, and governance (ESG) leadership; (2) we invest in our talent and capabilities by focusing on continuous improvement through operational excellence; and (3) we focus on the resources and benefits needed to be a great place to work for our teammates. These business practices enable us to address some of the key challenges facing the world today while also creating business opportunities, allowing us to create shared success with our employees, clients, and communities around the world. | |||||
As a result of this work, we are helping to advance the global economy in sustainable wayscreating jobs, developing infrastructure, and addressing societal challenges, while managing risk, developing talent, and providing returns to our investors, clients, and for our business. To learn more, visit http://bankofamerica.com/responsiblegrowth.
Driving ESG Leadership
Our ESG approach is integrated into each of our eight lines of business and helps define how we pursue growing business opportunities and manage risk. Our management-level ESG Committee is comprised of senior executives across every line of business and support function who help guide the companys efforts and enable ESG progress. The committee identifies and discusses ESG issues material to our businessincluding our human capital management practices, products and service offerings, client selection, and investments in creating a sustainable global economy. It helps set and monitor our progress against these ESG goals, reports regularly to our Board through the Corporate Governance Committee, and oversees disclosure to investors, stakeholders, and clients through annual ESG reporting in our Annual Report and on our companys website.
In addition, the chair of our ESG Committee, Vice Chairman Anne Finucane, and her team engage with consumer advocates, community advisors, and other stakeholders for their advice and guidance in shaping our ESG policies and practices. In 2005, we founded our National Community Advisory Council, a forum for senior leaders from social justice, consumer advocacy, community development, environmental, research, and advocacy organizations, and senior executives meet with the council at least twice annually for external perspectives on our business policies, practices, and products.
Being a Great Place to Work
Another way we facilitate sustainable Responsible Growth is by being a great place to work. We do this by listening to our employees so that our programs and resources enhance their experience and further their careers with us. We deliver on our commitment to be a great place to work by being an inclusive workplace for our employees around the world, creating opportunities for employees to grow and develop, recognizing and rewarding performance, and supporting employees physical, emotional and financial wellness. Through this lens, we provide compensation, benefits, and resources to employees that reflect our commitment to be a great place to work. This is not only the right thing to do, it is core to achieving Responsible Growth in a sustainable manner.
Our focus on being a great place to work has been recognized across the world, including:
FORTUNE. Named as one of the 100 Best Companies to Work For, and as #4 and the only financial services company on the inaugural list of seven Best Big Companies to Work For list
|
Euromoney. Named Worlds Best Bank for Diversity and Inclusion, 2018 and 2016 |
Bloomberg Gender Equality Index. Included as a leader in gender equality, 2016-2019 |
Catalyst. Awarded the 2019 Catalyst Award, recognizing companies who display innovative organizational efforts to advance women in the workplace |
|||||||||||||
See Responsible Growth on page 30.
vi |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
We mailed or emailed to most of our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of our proxy materials with instructions on how to access our proxy materials online and how to vote. If you are a registered holder and would like to change the method of delivery of your proxy materials, please contact our transfer agent, Computershare, P.O. Box 505005, Louisville, KY 40233; Toll free: 800-642-9855; or at www.computershare.com/bac. You may do the same as a beneficial owner by contacting the bank, broker, or other nominee where your shares are held.
Proxy Statement Availability
We are providing or making available this proxy statement to solicit your proxy to vote on the matters presented at our annual meeting. We commenced providing and making available this proxy statement on March 13, 2019. Our Board requests that you submit your proxy by the Internet, telephone, or mail so that your shares will be represented and voted at our annual meeting.
2019 Proxy Statement | 1 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
Our Board is presenting 16 nominees for election as directors at our annual meeting. All nominees currently serve as directors on our Board. Other than Dr. Clayton S. Rose, who was appointed to our Board in October 2018, all nominees were elected by you at our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders. Each director elected at the meeting will serve until our 2020 annual meeting or until a successor is duly elected and qualified. Each director nominee has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serving as a director if elected. If any nominee is unable to stand for election for any reason, the shares represented at our annual meeting may be voted for another candidate proposed by our Board, or our Board may choose to reduce its size.
NOMINEE/AGE(1)
|
PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION
|
DIRECTOR
|
INDEPENDENT
|
OTHER
|
COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP (C = CHAIR)
| ||||||||||||||
Sharon L. Allen, 67 |
Former Chairman, Deloitte LLP |
2012 | Yes | 1 | Audit (C) Corporate Governance | ||||||||||||||
Susan S. Bies, 71 |
Former Member, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System |
2009 | Yes | None | Corporate Governance Enterprise Risk | ||||||||||||||
Jack O. Bovender, Jr., 73 |
Lead Independent Director, Bank of America Corporation; Former Chairman and CEO, HCA Inc. |
2012 | Yes | None | None | ||||||||||||||
Frank P. Bramble, Sr., 70 |
Former Executive Vice Chairman, MBNA Corporation |
2006 | Yes | None | Corporate Governance Enterprise Risk (C) | ||||||||||||||
Pierre J.P. de Weck, 68 |
Former Chairman and Global Head of Private Wealth Management, Deutsche Bank AG |
2013 | Yes | None | Audit Compensation and Benefits | ||||||||||||||
Arnold W. Donald, 64 |
President and CEO, Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc |
2013 | Yes | 2 | Audit Compensation and Benefits | ||||||||||||||
Linda P. Hudson, 68 |
Chairman and CEO, The Cardea Group, LLC; Former President and CEO, BAE Systems, Inc. |
2012 | Yes | 1 | Compensation and Benefits Enterprise Risk | ||||||||||||||
Monica C. Lozano, 62 |
CEO, College Futures Foundation; Former Chairman, US Hispanic Media Inc. |
2006 | Yes | 1 | Compensation and Benefits (C) Enterprise Risk | ||||||||||||||
Thomas J. May, 72 |
Former Chairman and CEO, Eversource Energy; Chairman, Viacom Inc. |
2004 | Yes | 1 | Corporate Governance (C) Enterprise Risk | ||||||||||||||
Brian T. Moynihan, 59 |
Chairman and CEO, Bank of America Corporation |
2010 | No | None | None | ||||||||||||||
Lionel L. Nowell III, 64 |
Former SVP and Treasurer, PepsiCo, Inc. |
2013 | Yes | 2 | Audit Corporate Governance | ||||||||||||||
Clayton S. Rose, 60 |
President, Bowdoin College |
2018(2) | Yes | None | Audit Compensation and Benefits | ||||||||||||||
Michael D. White, 67 |
Former Chairman, President and CEO, DIRECTV |
2016 | Yes | 2 | Audit Compensation and Benefits | ||||||||||||||
Thomas D. Woods, 66 |
Former Vice Chairman and SEVP, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce; Chairman, Hydro One Limited |
2016 | Yes | None | Corporate Governance Enterprise Risk | ||||||||||||||
R. David Yost, 71 |
Former CEO, AmerisourceBergen Corporation |
2012 | Yes | 2 | Audit Compensation and Benefits | ||||||||||||||
Maria T. Zuber, 60 |
Vice President for Research and E.A. Griswold Professor of Geophysics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
|
2017 | Yes | 1 | Corporate Governance Enterprise Risk |
NUMBER OF BOARD AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS HELD IN 2018(3) |
19 Board |
13 Audit |
7 Compensation and Benefits |
7 Corporate Governance |
11 Enterprise Risk |
(1) | Age as of annual meeting date. |
(2) | Dr. Rose previously served as a member of our Board from 2013 to 2015. |
(3) | In addition to the number of formal meetings reflected from time to time the Board and/or its committees also held educational and/or informational sessions. The number of formal Board meetings reflected includes the Boards stand-alone risk oversight meetings. |
2 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
Identifying and Evaluating Director Candidates
Board Composition
Our Board oversees the business and affairs of the company.
Our Board believes our directors best serve our company and |
Core Director Attributes
| |||||
|
High Personal Integrity | |||||
|
Strong Business Judgment | |||||
|
Demonstrated Achievement in Public or Private Sectors | |||||
|
Proven Leadership and Management Ability | |||||
|
DedicatedAble to Devote Necessary Time to Oversight Duties and Represent Stockholders Interests
| |||||
|
Free of Potential Conflicts of Interests | |||||
|
Collegial Manner |
Our Board seeks directors whose complementary knowledge, experience, and skills provide a broad range of perspectives and leadership expertise in financial services and other global, highly complex and regulated industries, strategic planning and business development, business operations, marketing and distribution, technology/cybersecurity, risk management and financial controls, human capital management, corporate governance, and public policy, and other areas important to our companys strategy and oversight. Our Board also assesses directors age and tenure, and Board continuity; it strives to achieve a balance between the perspectives of new directors and those of longer-serving directors with industry and institutional insights.
Our Board views diversity as a priority and seeks representation across a range of attributes, including race, gender, ethnicity, and professional experience, and regularly assesses our Boards diversity when identifying and evaluating director candidates. In addition, our Corporate Governance Committee follows applicable regulations in confirming that our Board includes members who are independent, possess financial literacy and expertise, and an understanding of risk management principles, policies, and practices, and have experience in identifying, assessing, and managing risk exposures.
Our current Board, comprised of the 16 director nominees, reflects the Boards commitment to identify, evaluate, and nominate candidates who possess personal qualities, qualifications, skills, and diversity of backgrounds, and provide a mix of tenures that, when taken together, best serve our company and our stockholders. See Our Director Nominees on page 5.
Succession Planning and the Director Recruitment Process
Our Board regularly reviews and renews its composition. Our Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and recommending director candidates to our Board for nomination using a director selection process that has been reviewed and acknowledged by our primary bank regulators. The Board, in coordination with the Corporate Governance Committee, also regularly considers Board leadership succession planning and committee membership.
2019 Proxy Statement | 3 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
Assess. The Committee regularly reviews our mix of individual directors on the Board to assess the overall Board composition. Among other factors, the Committee considers our companys strategy and needs; our directors experiences, gender, race, ethnicity, tenure, and age; and the attributes and qualifications our Board identifies in its self-evaluations to develop criteria for potential candidates and whether these attributes and qualifications are additive to our overall Board composition.
To maintain a vibrant mixture of viewpoints and benefit from the fresh perspectives brought by new directors and the institutional knowledge and industry insights of directors having longer experience on our Board, the Committee reviews measures that enhance the Boards refreshment process, including the appropriate retirement age and related tenure limitations, and ability to commit the time necessary to our company. For additional information on the average tenure of directors serving on our Board and each directors tenure, see Our Director Nominees on page 5.
Identify. To drive effective Board renewal, refreshment, and Board leadership succession planning, the Committee has a regularly recurring agenda item to develop and review a diverse group of potential director candidates. Based on the factors and criteria developed in the assessment phase, the Committee engages third-party search firms to identify potential candidates for review. It considers and provides feedback on the then-current pool of director talent identified by search firms; and the search firms periodically update the lists of potential director candidates based on Committee and Board input.
In 2018, the Committee continued to develop the pool of potential director candidates using two external search firms. In its work with the external search firms, the Committee emphasizes the importance of diversity in its consideration of director candidates. Potential director candidates possess professional experiences and the gender, racial, and ethnic diversity aligned with Committee-specified criteria and with the qualities identified by our Board in recent self-evaluations. See Board Evaluation on page 19 for additional information on our Boards self-evaluation process. The Committee also considers candidates proposed by management and our stockholders.
Dr. Rose, a director on our Board from 2013 to 2015, was identified by the Chairman of the Board, reviewed by an external search firm for inclusion in the pool of potential director candidates, and appointed to the Board following Committee evaluation and nomination. He did not stand for reelection at the 2015 annual meeting in order to focus his time on his then-new position as President of Bowdoin College.
Evaluate. The Committee has an established process for evaluating director candidates that it follows regardless of who recommends the candidate for consideration. During this process, the Committee reviews available information regarding each candidate, including qualifications, experience, skills, and integrity, as well as race, gender, and ethnicity. The Committee also reviews the candidates independence, absence of conflicts, and any reputational risks.
Our Board understands the significant time commitment involved in serving on the Board and its committees. The Committee evaluates whether candidates and serving directors are able to devote the time necessary to discharge their duties as directors, taking into account primary occupations, memberships on other boards, and other responsibilities. Prior to the annual renomination of currently serving directors, the Committee also assesses these factors. Once elected, directors are expected to seek Committee approval prior to joining the board of another public company. Directors who change principal occupations must offer to resign from the Board, subject to further evaluation by the Committee and the Lead Independent Director.
|
Director Commitment
Our Corporate Governance Committee and Board nominate only candidates who they believe are capable of devoting the necessary time to discharge their duties, taking into account principal occupations, memberships on other boards, attendance at Board and committee meetings, and other responsibilities. Our Corporate Governance Committee assesses directors time commitment to the Board throughout the year, including through the annual formal self-evaluation process.
Through our Corporate Governance Committee, the Board regularly reviews and closely monitors stockholders views on the appropriate number of public company boards on which directors may serve. The Committee considers: the proxy voting guidelines of our major stockholders; input from our stockholders during our engagement discussions; voting policies of the major proxy advisory firms; corporate governance guidelines adopted by other public companies; board trends at peer and other significant public companies; and advice from outside advisors. In 2016, at the Committees recommendation, our Board amended the Corporate Governance Guidelines to reduce the maximum number of public company boards on which a director on our Board may serve from six to four public companies (including our Board), and to specify that any public company chief executive officer who serves as a director on our Board may not serve on the boards of more than three public companies (including our Board). All of our directors and director nominees comply with this policy.
|
4 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
Recommend. The Board selected our 16 director nominees based on their satisfaction of the core attributes described on page 3, and the belief that each can make substantial contributions to our Board and company. Our Board believes our nominees breadth of experience and their mix of attributes strengthen our Boards independent leadership and effective oversight of management, in the context of our companys businesses, our industrys operating environment, and our companys long-term strategy.
Our director nominees represent a diverse range of qualifications and skills. They:
🌑 | are seasoned leaders who have held an array of diverse leadership positions in complex, highly regulated businesses (including banks and other financial services organizations), and with one of our primary regulators |
🌑 | have served as chief executives and in senior positions in the areas of risk, operations, finance, technology, and human resources |
🌑 | bring deep and diverse experience in public and private companies, financial services, academia, the public sector, nonprofit organizations, and other domestic and international businesses |
🌑 | are experienced in regulated, non-financial services industries and organizations, adding to our Boards understanding of overseeing a business subject to governmental oversight, and enhancing the diversity of our Board with valuable insights and fresh perspectives that complement those of our directors with specific experience in banking or financial services |
🌑 | represent diverse backgrounds and viewpoints |
🌑 | strengthen our Boards oversight capabilities by having varied lengths of tenure that provide historical and new perspectives about our company |
Highlights | ||||||||||||
|
Strategic Planning. For oversight of managements development and implementation of strategic priorities
Audit/Financial Reporting. For oversight of our companys audit function and preparation of financial statements
Environmental, Social, and Governance. For insight into how these principles define how we deliver Responsible Growth
Human Capital Management and Succession Planning. For insight into our focus on talent development and our commitment to being a great place to work |
|
Financial Services Experience. For insight into key issues affecting our company
Consumer, Corporate, and Investment Businesses. For experience across our business and its development
Government, Public Policy, and Regulatory Affairs. For insight into the key role of regulatory issues and government affairs in our business
Public Company Board Service and Corporate Governance. For knowledge of public company governance issues and policies to enhance our Board practices |
|
Risk Management. For oversight of management in its comprehensive and rigorous approach to risk management
Experience in Complex, Highly Regulated Businesses. For a deep understanding of the many factors involved in operating our business
Cybersecurity, Technology, and Information Security. For oversight of managements efforts to maintain our customers trust and protect the security of their information
Global Perspective. For insight into the many factors involved in overseeing management of our companys global footprint
|
|
2019 Proxy Statement | 5 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
Our Board recommends a vote "FOR" each of the 16 nominees listed below for election as a director (Proposal 1).
Set forth below are each nominees name, age as of our annual meeting date, principal occupation, business experience, and U.S.-listed public company directorships held during the past five years. We also discuss the qualifications, attributes, and skills that led our Board to nominate each for election as a Bank of America director.
SHARON L. ALLEN
|
AGE: 67
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: AUGUST 2012
| ||||
|
Former Chairman, Deloitte
Other U.S.-Listed Public Company Directorships First Solar, Inc. |
Ms. Allens responsibility for audit and consulting services in various positions with Deloitte LLP (Deloitte) enables her to bring extensive audit, financial reporting, and corporate governance experience to our Board. Her leadership positions with Deloitte give her broad management experience with large, complex businesses and an international perspective on risk management and strategic planning.
|
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Served as Chairman of Deloitte, a firm that provides audit, consulting, financial advisory, risk management, and tax services, as the U.S. member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited from 2003 to 2011 |
🌑 | Employed at Deloitte for nearly 40 years in various leadership roles, including Partner and Regional Managing Partner, responsible for audit and consulting services for a number of Fortune 500 and large private companies |
🌑 | Member of the Global Board of Directors, Chair of the Global Risk Committee, and U.S. Representative on the Global Governance Committee of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited from 2003 to 2011 |
🌑 | Member of the Board of Directors of a food and drug retailer seeking to become a public company under the name Albertsons Companies, Inc. |
🌑 | Director of First Solar, Inc., Chair of its Audit Committee, and member of its Technology Committee |
Other Leadership Experience and Service:
🌑 | Former Director and Chair of the National Board of Directors of the YMCA of the USA, a leading nonprofit organization for youth development, healthy living, and social responsibility |
🌑 | Former Vice Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Autry National Center, the governing body of the Autry Museum of the American West |
🌑 | Appointed by President George W. Bush to the Presidents Export Council, which advised the President on export enhancement |
6 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
SUSAN S. BIES
|
AGE: 71
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: JUNE 2009
| ||||
|
Former Member, Federal Reserve Board of Governors |
Ms. Biess role as a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board) and her tenure with First Tennessee National Corporation (First Tennessee) enables her to bring deep experience in risk management, consumer banking, and insights regarding financial regulation to our Board. In particular, Ms. Bies focused on enterprise financial and risk management during her career with First Tennessee and further developed her regulatory expertise by serving on the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Emerging Issues Task Force. Her experience working at a primary regulator of our industry, along with her other regulatory and public policy experience, gives her unique and valuable perspective relevant to our companys business, financial performance, and risk oversight. She brings an international perspective through her service on the Board of Directors of Merrill Lynch International (MLI) and prior service on the Board of Directors of Zurich Insurance Group Ltd. (Zurich Insurance).
|
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Senior Advisory Board Member to Oliver Wyman Group, a management consulting subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., February 2009 to March 2018 |
🌑 | Member of the Federal Reserve Board from 2001 to 2007, including a role as Chair of the Committee on Supervisory and Regulatory Affairs |
🌑 | Represented the Federal Reserve Board on the Financial Stability Board and led the Federal Reserve Boards efforts to modernize the Basel capital accord |
🌑 | Served as a member of the FASBs Emerging Issues Task Force from 1996 to 2001 |
🌑 | Served as Executive Vice President of Risk Management; Auditor; Chief Financial Officer; and Chair of the Asset Liability Management and the Executive Risk Management Committees at First Tennessee, a regional bank holding company, between 1979 and 2001 |
🌑 | Employed at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis as a regional and banking structure economist at the start of her career |
🌑 | Director of and former Chair, Risk Committee for Zurich Insurance; director of Zurich American Insurance Company, Zurich Insurances North American subsidiary |
🌑 | Chair, Board of Directors of MLI |
Other Leadership Experience and Service:
🌑 | Served in leadership roles in various organizations, including the Committee on Corporate Reporting of the Financial Executives Institute; the End Users of Derivatives Association; the American Bankers Association; and the Bank Administration Institute |
🌑 | Served in numerous roles with many professional, academic, civic, and charitable organizations, such as the American Economic Association; Institute of Management Accountants; International Womens Forum; University of Memphis; Memphis Area Chamber of Commerce; Memphis Youth Initiative; and Memphis Partners |
2019 Proxy Statement | 7 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
JACK O. BOVENDER, JR.
|
AGE: 73
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: AUGUST 2012
| ||||
|
Lead Independent
Former Chairman and |
Mr. Bovenders roles as former Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Operating Officer of HCA Inc. (HCA) enable him to bring his extensive experience leading a large, regulated, complex business to our Board. Mr. Bovenders experience with HCA and service on the Board of Trustees of Duke University, including as Chair and as former Chair of its Presidential Search Committee and its Audit Committee, provide him with insight into board leadership, risk management, operational risk, and strategic planning, and valuable perspective on corporate governance issues. |
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of HCA, the largest investor-owned hospital operator in the U.S. and a Fortune 100 company owning and operating hospitals and surgery centers, from January 2002 to December 2009, and Chief Executive Officer from January 2001 to January 2009 |
🌑 | During a 32-year tenure at HCA, held several senior-level positions including President and Chief Operating Officer |
🌑 | 40-year veteran of the healthcare industry starting with hospital administration for the U.S. Navy |
Other Leadership Experience and Service:
🌑 | Chair of the Duke University Board of Trustees and chair of the Executive Committee; serves on the Duke University Health System Board; and an Emeritus member of the Board of Visitors at the Duke University Fuqua School of Business |
🌑 | Recipient of Duke Universitys Distinguished Alumni Award in 2012 |
🌑 | Served on the Board of Governors of the American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE); recipient of ACHEs Gold Medal Award recognizing significant career-long contributions to the healthcare profession |
FRANK P. BRAMBLE, SR.
|
AGE: 70
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: JANUARY 2006
| ||||
|
Former Executive Vice Chairman, MBNA Corporation |
Mr. Bramble brings broad-ranging financial services experience, international experience, and historical insight to our Board, having held leadership positions at two financial services companies acquired by our company (MBNA Corporation, acquired in 2006, and MNC Financial Inc., acquired in 1993). As a former executive officer of one of the largest credit card issuers in the U.S. and a major regional bank, Mr. Bramble has dealt with a wide range of issues important to our company, including risk management, credit cycles, sales and marketing to consumers, and audit and financial reporting. |
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees from July 2014 to June 2016 and Interim President from July 2013 to June 2014 of Calvert Hall College High School in Baltimore, Maryland |
🌑 | Served as Executive Vice Chairman from July 2002 to April 2005 and Advisor to the Executive Committee from April 2005 to December 2005 of MBNA Corporation, a financial services company acquired by Bank of America in January 2006 |
🌑 | Previously served as the Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer at Allfirst Financial, Inc.; MNC Financial Inc.; Maryland National Bank; American Security Bank; and Virginia Federal Savings Bank |
🌑 | Served as a director, from April 1994 to May 2002, and Chairman, from December 1999 to May 2002, of Allfirst Financial, Inc. and Allfirst Bank, U.S. subsidiaries of Allied Irish Banks, p.l.c. |
🌑 | Began his career as an audit clerk at the First National Bank of Maryland |
Other Leadership Experience and Service:
🌑 | Emeritus member of the Board of Visitors of Towson University and guest lecturer in business strategy and accounting from 2006 to 2008 |
8 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
PIERRE J.P. DE WECK
|
AGE: 68
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: JULY 2013
|
||||||
|
Former Chairman and Global Head of Private |
Mr. de Wecks experience as an executive with UBS AG (UBS) and Deutsche Bank AG (Deutsche Bank) enables him to bring extensive knowledge of the global financial services industry to our Board. As a former Chairman and Global Head of Private Wealth Management and member of the Group Executive Committee of Deutsche Bank, Mr. de Weck has broad experience in risk management and strategic planning and brings a valuable international perspective to our companys business activities, including through his service on the Board of Directors of Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited. Mr. de Wecks service as Chief Credit Officer of UBS provides him with further credit risk management experience.
|
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Served as the Chairman and Global Head of Private Wealth Management and as a member of the Group Executive Committee of Deutsche Bank from 2002 to May 2012 |
🌑 | Served on the Management Board of UBS from 1994 to 2001; as Head of Institutional Banking from 1994 to 1997; as Chief Credit Officer and Head of Private Equity from 1998 to 1999; and as Head of Private Equity from 2000 to 2001 |
🌑 | Held various senior management positions at Union Bank of Switzerland, a predecessor firm of UBS, from 1985 to 1994 |
🌑 | Currently serves on the Board of Directors of MLI and as chair of its Risk Committee, and as Chair of the Board of Directors of our French broker-dealer subsidiary, BofA Securities Europe S.A. |
ARNOLD W. DONALD
|
AGE: 64
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: JANUARY 2013
|
||||||
|
President and
Chief
Other
U.S.-Listed Public Carnival; Crown Past Five Years: The |
Mr. Donalds roles as President and Chief Executive Officer of Carnival Corporation and Carnival plc (Carnival), as a former senior executive at Monsanto Company (Monsanto), and as the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Merisant Company (Merisant), enable him to bring his extensive experience in strategic planning and operations in regulated, consumer, retail, and distribution businesses to our Board. His board service with public companies gives him experience with risk management, global operations, and regulated businesses. His experience heading The Executive Leadership Council and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International gives him a distinct perspective on governance matters, social responsibility, and diversity.
|
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | President and Chief Executive Officer of Carnival, a cruise and vacation company, since July 2013 |
🌑 | Served as President and Chief Executive Officer from November 2010 to June 2012 of The Executive Leadership Council, a nonprofit organization providing a professional network and business forum to African-American executives at major U.S. companies |
🌑 | President and Chief Executive Officer of the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International from January 2006 to February 2008 |
🌑 | Served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Merisant from 2000 to 2003, a privately-held global manufacturer of tabletop sweeteners, and remained as Chairman until 2005 |
🌑 | Joined Monsanto in 1977 and held several senior leadership positions with global responsibilities, including President of its Agricultural Group and President of its Nutrition and Consumer Sector, over a more than 20-year tenure |
🌑 | Director of Crown Holdings, Inc. and member of its Compensation Committee |
Other Leadership Experience and Service:
🌑 | Appointed by President Clinton and re-appointed by President George W. Bush to the Presidents Export Council |
2019 Proxy Statement | 9 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
LINDA P. HUDSON
|
AGE: 68
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: AUGUST 2012
|
||||||
|
Executive Officer, The Cardea Group, LLC
Former President and Chief Executive Officer, BAE
Other U.S.-Listed Public Company Directorships Ingersoll-Rand plc Past Five Years: The Southern Company
|
Ms. Hudsons role as a former President and Chief Executive Officer of BAE Systems, Inc. (BAE) enables her to bring her broad experience in strategic planning and risk management to our Board. Further, with her service as an executive director of BAE Systems plc (BAE Systems), Ms. Hudsons background provides her with international perspective, geopolitical insights, and experience as a leader of a large, international, highly regulated, complex business. Ms. Hudsons career in the defense and aerospace industry gives her knowledge of technology risks such as cybersecurity risk. |
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of The Cardea Group, LLC, a management consulting business, May 2014 to present |
🌑 | Served as CEO Emeritus of BAE, a U.S.-based subsidiary of BAE Systems, a global defense, aerospace, and security company headquartered in London, from February 2014 to May 2014, and as President and Chief Executive Officer of BAE from October 2009 until January 2014 |
🌑 | Served as President of BAE Systems Land and Armaments operating group, the worlds largest military vehicle and equipment business, from October 2006 to October 2009 |
🌑 | Prior to joining BAE, served as Vice President of General Dynamics Corporation and President of its Armament and Technical Products business; held various positions in engineering, production operations, program management, and business development for defense and aerospace companies |
🌑 | Served as a member of the Executive Committee and as an executive director of BAE Systems from 2009 until January 2014 and as a member of the Board of Directors of BAE from 2009 to April 2015; served as Director of The Southern Company and member of its Nominating, Governance and Corporate Responsibility Committee and its Operations, Environmental and Safety Committee from 2014 to July 2018 |
🌑 | Director of Ingersoll-Rand plc and member of its Governance, Compensation, and Technology and Innovation Committees |
Other Leadership Experience and Service:
🌑 | Member of the Board of Directors of the University of Florida Foundation, Inc. and the University of Florida Engineering Leadership Institute, and a former member of the Charlotte Center Executive Board for the Wake Forest University School of Business and of the Board of Trustees of Discovery Place, a nonprofit education organization dedicated to inspiring exploration of the natural and social world |
🌑 | Elected member to the National Academy of Engineering, one of the highest professional honors accorded an engineer |
10 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
MONICA C. LOZANO
|
AGE: 62
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: APRIL 2006
|
||||||
|
Chief Executive Officer, College Futures Foundation
Former Chairman,
Other U.S.-Listed Public Company Directorships Target Corporation Past Five Years: The Walt Disney Company |
Ms. Lozanos roles as the Chief Executive Officer of College Futures Foundation, a charitable foundation working to increase the rate of college graduation for low-income California students, and as the former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ImpreMedia LLC (ImpreMedia), a leading Hispanic news and information company, enable her to bring her experience in broad leadership management over areas such as operations, marketing, and strategic planning to our Board. Ms. Lozano has a deep understanding of issues that are important to the Hispanic community, a growing U.S. demographic. Her public company board service for Target Corporation, her past public company board service for The Walt Disney Corporation, and her past roles with the University of California and the University of Southern California give her board-level experience overseeing large organizations with diversified operations on matters such as governance, executive compensation, risk management, and financial reporting. Ms. Lozanos experience as a member of President Obamas Council on Jobs and Competitiveness also provided her with valuable perspective on important public policy, societal, and economic issues relevant to our company.
|
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Chief Executive Officer of College Futures Foundations since December 2017. College Futures Foundation is a charitable foundation focused on increasing the rate of bachelors degree completion among California student populations who are low-income and have had a historically low college success rate |
🌑 | Served as Chair of the Board of Directors of U.S. Hispanic Media Inc., the parent company of ImpreMedia, a leading Hispanic news and information company, from June 2014 to January 2016 |
🌑 | Served as Chairman of ImpreMedia from July 2012 to January 2016, Chief Executive Officer from May 2010 to May 2014, and Senior Vice President from January 2004 to May 2010 |
🌑 | Served as Publisher of La Opinion, a subsidiary of ImpreMedia and the leading Spanish-language daily print and online newspaper in the U.S., from 2004 to May 2014, and Chief Executive Officer from 2004 to July 2012 |
🌑 | Director of Target Corporation and member of its Audit and Finance Committee, and Nominating and Governance Committee |
Other Leadership Experience and Service:
🌑 | Served as a member of President Obamas Council on Jobs and Competitiveness from 2011 to 2012 and served on President Obamas Economic Recovery Advisory Board from 2009 to 2011 |
🌑 | Currently serves as Chair of the Board of Directors of the Weingart Foundation; served as the Chair of the Board of Regents of the University of California, as a member of the Board of Trustees of The Rockefeller Foundation, as a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Southern California, and as a member of the State of California Commission on the 21st Century Economy |
THOMAS J. MAY
|
AGE: 72
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: APRIL 2004
|
||||||
|
Chairman, Viacom Inc.
Former Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, Eversource Energy
Other U.S.-Listed Public Company Directorships Viacom Inc. Past Five Years: Eversource Energy
|
Mr. Mays roles as former Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of Eversource Energy enable him to bring his extensive experience with regulated businesses, operations, risk management, business development, strategic planning, board leadership, and corporate governance matters to our Board and gives him insight into the issues facing our companys businesses. Having experience as a Certified Public Accountant, Mr. May brings extensive accounting and financial skills, and a professional perspective on financial reporting and enterprise and operational risk management. |
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Served as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Eversource Energy, one of the nations largest utilities, from October 2013 to May 2017 |
🌑 | Served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Eversource Energy from April 2012 until retirement in May 2016 |
🌑 | Served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of NSTAR, which merged with Northeast Utilities (now Eversource Energy), from 1999 to April 2012, and was President from 2002 to April 2012; also served as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer at NSTAR |
🌑 | Currently serves on the Board of Directors of Liberty Mutual Holding Company, Inc. and as the non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Viacom Inc. |
2019 Proxy Statement | 11 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
BRIAN T. MOYNIHAN
|
AGE: 59
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: JANUARY 2010
|
||||||
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, Bank of America Corporation
|
As our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Moynihan conceived of and leads our approach to Responsible Growth, based on driving a straightforward business model serving three customer and client groups with core financial services, which has delivered record earnings and significant capital return to stockholders. Mr. Moynihan has demonstrated leadership qualities, management capability, knowledge of our business and industry, and a long-term strategic perspective. In addition, he has many years of international and domestic financial services experience, including wholesale and retail businesses.
|
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors of Bank of America Corporation in October 2014 and President and Chief Executive Officer in January 2010. Prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Moynihan ran each of the companys operating units |
🌑 | Chairman of the Board of Directors of Bank Policy Institute (formerly Financial Services Roundtable); prior Chairman of Financial Services Forum; member (and prior Chairman) of the Supervisory Board of The Clearing House Association L.L.C.; member of Business Roundtable; Chairman of the World Economic Forums International Business Council; member of the Federal Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve Board |
🌑 | Member of Board of Fellows of Brown University; member of Advisory Council of Smithsonians National Museum of African American History and Culture; Chairman of Charlotte Executive Leadership Council |
LIONEL L. NOWELL III
|
AGE: 64
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: JANUARY 2013
|
||||||
|
Former Senior Vice
President
Other U.S.-Listed Public Company Directorships American Electric Power Company, Inc.; Ecolab Inc. Past Five Years: British American Tobacco p.l.c.; HD Supply Holdings, Inc.; Reynolds American, Inc.; Darden Restaurants, Inc.
|
Mr. Nowells role as former Treasurer of PepsiCo, Inc. (Pepsi) enables him to bring his strong financial expertise and extensive global perspective in risk management and strategic planning to our Board. Through his public company board service, he has experience in governance, financial reporting, accounting of large international and regulated businesses, and board leadership. Mr. Nowells membership on the advisory council at a large, public university provides him with further experience with the oversight of large, complex organizations. |
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Served as Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Pepsi, a leading global food, snack, and beverage company, from 2001 to May 2009; and as Chief Financial Officer of The Pepsi Bottling Group and Controller of Pepsi |
🌑 | Served as Senior Vice President, Strategy and Business Development at RJR Nabisco, Inc. from 1998 to 1999 |
🌑 | Held various senior financial roles at the Pillsbury division of Diageo plc, including Chief Financial Officer of its Pillsbury North America, Pillsbury Foodservice, and Häagen-Dazs divisions, and also served as Controller and Vice President of Internal Audit of the Pillsbury Company |
🌑 | Director of American Electric Power Company, Inc., Chair of its Audit Committee and member of its Committee on Directors & Corporate Governance, Executive Committee, Finance Committee, and Policy Committee; director of Ecolab Inc. and member of its Audit Committee and Finance Committee |
Other Leadership Experience and Service:
🌑 | Serves on the Deans Advisory Council at The Ohio State University Fisher College of Business |
🌑 | Served as Lead Director of the Board of Directors of Reynolds American, Inc. from January 2017 to July 2017 and as a Board member from September 2007 to July 2017 |
12 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
CLAYTON S. ROSE
|
AGE: 60
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: OCTOBER 2018
|
||||||
|
President, Bowdoin College
Other U.S.-Listed Public Company Directorships Past Five Years: XL Group, plc; Bank of America Corporation (2013-2015) |
Dr. Roses service as a senior executive at JPMorgan Chase & Co. and predecessor company J.P. Morgan & Co. (collectively, JPMorgan Chase), including leadership positions in investment banking, equities, securities, derivatives, and corporate finance businesses enables him to bring deep financial, international, and leadership experience to our board, in addition to broad experience in risk management and strategy with a financial services company. Dr. Roses service as President of Bowdoin College and as professor at Harvard Business School, Columbia University, and New York University has provided him with opportunities to lead a large and complex organization and to research and analyze current issues in the financial services industry, giving him a valuable and unique perspective on our companys businesses. Dr. Roses extensive financial industry board service gives him further insight into key issues facing financial institutions.
|
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | President of Bowdoin College, 2015 to present |
🌑 | Held various other roles in academia, including Professor of Management Practice at Harvard Business School |
🌑 | Served as Vice Chairman, headed two lines of business Global Investment Banking and Global Equities and was a member of JPMorgan Chases senior management team during his approximately 20-year tenure at JPMorgan Chase |
🌑 | Served on the Boards of Directors of XL Group, plc, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), and Mercantile Bankshares Corp. |
Other Leadership Experience and Service:
🌑 | Serves on the Board of Trustees for the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and chairs its Audit and Compensation Committee |
🌑 | Served on the companys Board of Directors from 2013 to 2015; member of Enterprise Risk Committee and Corporate Governance Committee |
MICHAEL D. WHITE
|
AGE: 67
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: JUNE 2016
|
||||||
|
Former Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer of DIRECTV
Other U.S.-Listed Public Company Directorships Kimberly-Clark Corporation; Whirlpool Corporation Past Five Years: DIRECTV
|
Mr. Whites roles as the former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of DIRECTV enable him to bring his experience in technology, consumer businesses, and financial expertise to our Board. Mr. White has experience leading a large and highly regulated business. Through his position as Chief Executive Officer of PepsiCo International, Mr. White has international experience as well as broad knowledge of retail and distribution issues. Through his service on public company boards, he has board-level experience overseeing large, complex public companies in various industries, which provides him with valuable insights on the compensation practices and accounting of large, international businesses. |
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of DIRECTV, a leading provider of digital television entertainment services, from January 2010 to August 2015, and as a Director of the company from November 2009 until August 2015 |
🌑 | Chief Executive Officer of PepsiCo International from February 2003 until November 2009; and served as Vice Chairman and director of PepsiCo from March 2006 to November 2009, after holding positions of increasing importance with PepsiCo since 1990 |
🌑 | Served as Senior Vice President at Avon Products, Inc. |
🌑 | Served as a Management Consultant at Bain & Company and Arthur Andersen & Co. |
🌑 | Director of Kimberly-Clark Corporation, Chair of its Audit Committee and member of its Executive Committee; director of Whirlpool Corporation, Chair of its Audit Committee, and member of its Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee |
Other Leadership Experience and Service:
🌑 | Member of the Boston College Board of Trustees |
🌑 | Chairman of the Partnership for Drug-Free Kids and Vice-Chairman of the Mariinsky Foundation of America, which supports the Mariinsky Opera, Ballet, and Orchestra and the Academy for young singers and the young musicians orchestra |
2019 Proxy Statement | 13 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
THOMAS D. WOODS
|
AGE: 66
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: APRIL 2016
| ||||
|
Chairman, Hydro One
Limited; Former Vice Chairman and Senior Executive |
Mr. Woodss career at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC) enables him to bring his deep experience in risk management, corporate strategy, finance, and the corporate and investment banking businesses to our Board. As Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of CIBC during the financial crisis, Mr. Woods focused on risk management and CIBCs risk culture. Mr. Woods chaired CIBCs Asset Liability Committee, served as CIBCs lead liaison with regulators, and was an active member of CIBCs business strategy group. |
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Served as Vice Chairman and Senior Executive Vice President of CIBC, a leading Canada-based global financial institution, from July 2013 until his retirement in December 2014 |
🌑 | Served as Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer of CIBC from 2008 to July 2013, and Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CIBC from 2000 to 2008 |
🌑 | Employed at Wood Gundy, a CIBC predecessor firm, starting in 1977; served in various senior leadership positions, including as Controller of CIBC, as Chief Financial Officer of CIBC World Markets (CIBCs investment banking division), and as the Head of CIBCs Canadian Corporate Banking division |
Other Leadership Experience and Service:
🌑 | Serves as Chair of the Board of Directors of Hydro One Limited, an electricity transmission and distribution company serving the Canadian province of Ontario, and publicly traded and listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange |
🌑 | Serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Alberta Investment Management Corporation, a Canadian institutional investment fund manager, and on the investment committee of Cordiant Capital Inc., a fund manager specializing in emerging markets |
🌑 | Former member of the Board of Directors of Jarislowsky Fraser Limited, a global investment management firm, from 2016 to 2018, former member of the Boards of Directors of DBRS Limited and DBRS, Inc., an international credit rating agency, from 2015 to 2016, and former member of the Board of Directors of TMX Group Inc., a Canada-based financial services company, from 2012 to 2014 |
🌑 | Serves on the board of advisors of the University of Torontos Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering |
R. DAVID YOST
|
AGE: 71
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: AUGUST 2012
| ||||
|
Former Chief Executive Officer, AmerisourceBergen
Other U.S.-Listed Public Company Directorships Johnson Controls International plc; Marsh & McLennan Past Five Years: Exelis Inc.
|
Mr. Yosts roles as the former Chief Executive Officer of AmerisourceBergen Corporation (AmerisourceBergen) and its predecessor company enable him to bring his broad experience in strategic planning, risk management, and operational risk to our Board. In addition, Mr. Yost has experience leading a large, complex business. Through his service on public company boards, he has board-level experience overseeing large, complex public companies in various industries, which provides him with valuable insights on corporate governance and risk management. |
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Served as Chief Executive Officer of AmerisourceBergen, a pharmaceutical services company providing drug distribution and related services to healthcare providers and pharmaceutical manufacturers, from 2001 until his retirement in July 2011, and as President from 2001 to 2002 and again from September 2007 to November 2010 |
🌑 | Held various positions at AmerisourceBergen and its predecessor companies during a nearly 40-year career, including Chief Executive Officer from 1997 to 2001 and Chairman from 2000 to 2001 of Amerisource Health Corporation |
🌑 | Director of Johnson Controls International plc and member of its Compensation Committee; director of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., Chair of its Corporate Responsibility Committee, and member of its Compensation Committee |
14 |
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTING DIRECTORS
MARIA T. ZUBER
|
AGE: 60
|
DIRECTOR SINCE: DECEMBER 2017
|
||||||
|
Vice President for Research and E. A. Griswold Professor of Geophysics, MIT
Other U.S.-Listed Public Company Directorships Textron Inc. |
In her role as Vice President for Research at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Dr. Zuber oversees multiple laboratories and research centers and is also responsible for intellectual property and research integrity and compliance, as well as research relationships with the federal government. Dr. Zubers role as Senior Research Scientist and experiences in leadership roles on nine space exploratory missions with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) enable her to bring a breadth of risk management, geopolitical insights, and strategic planning proficiencies to our Board. |
Professional Highlights:
🌑 | Vice President for Research at MIT, a leading research institution, since 2013 |
🌑 | Senior Research Scientist at NASA since 2010, serving in 2012 as Principal Investigator of the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory, or GRAIL, mission, which was designed to create the most accurate gravitational map of the moon to date and give scientists insight into the moons internal structure, composition, and evolution |
🌑 | Served as a Professor at MIT since 1995, and was Head of the Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Department from 2003 to 2011 |
🌑 | Served as Scientist at NASA from 1993 to 2010, and as a Geophysicist from 1986 to 1992 |
🌑 | Director of Textron Inc., a diversified manufacturer, and member of its Nominating and Corporate Governance, and Organization and Compensation Committees |
Other Leadership Experience and Service:
🌑 | Appointed by President Obama in 2013 and reappointed by President Trump in 2018 to the National Science Board, a 25-member panel that serves as the governing board of the National Science Foundation and as advisors to the President and Congress on policy matters relating to science and engineering; served as Board Chair from 2016 to 2018 |
🌑 | Serves as a member of the Board of Directors of The Massachusetts Green High Performance Computing Center, a joint venture by Massachusetts universities, which provides infrastructure for computationally intensive research |
🌑 | Serves on the Board of Fellows of Brown University |
Any stockholder who wishes to recommend a director candidate for consideration by our Corporate Governance Committee must submit a written recommendation to our Corporate Secretary at Bank of America Corporation, Hearst Tower, 214 North Tryon Street, NC1-027-18-05, Charlotte, North Carolina 28255. For our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders, the Committee will consider recommendations received by October 15, 2019. The recommendation must include the information set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are published on our website at http://investor.bankofamerica.com.
2019 Proxy Statement | 15 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards require a majority of our directors and each member of our Audit, Compensation and Benefits, and Corporate Governance Committees to be independent. The Federal Reserve Boards Enhanced Prudential Standards require the chair of our Enterprise Risk Committee to be independent. In addition, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require a substantial majority of our directors to be independent. Our Board has adopted Director Independence Categorical Standards (Categorical Standards), published on our website at http://investor.bankofamerica.com, to assist it in determining each directors independence. Our Board considers a director or director nominee independent if he or she meets the criteria for independence in both the NYSE listing standards and our Categorical Standards.
In early 2019, our Board, in coordination with our Corporate Governance Committee, evaluated the relevant relationships between each director/director nominee (and his or her immediate family members and affiliates) and Bank of America Corporation and its subsidiaries and affirmatively determined that all of our directors/director nominees are independent, except for Mr. Moynihan due to his employment by our company. Specifically, the following 15 of our 16 directors/director nominees are independent under the NYSE listing standards and our Categorical Standards: Ms. Allen, Ms. Bies, Mr. Bovender, Mr. Bramble, Mr. de Weck, Mr. Donald, Ms. Hudson, Ms. Lozano, Mr. May, Mr. Nowell, Dr. Rose, Mr. White, Mr. Woods, Mr. Yost, and Dr. Zuber.
In making its independence determinations, our Board considered the following ordinary course, non-preferential relationships that existed during the preceding three years and those transactions reported under Related Person and Certain Other Transactions on page 36, and determined that none of the relationships constituted a material relationship between the director/director nominee and our company:
🌑 | Our company or its subsidiaries provided ordinary course financial products and services to all of our directors/director nominees. Our company or its subsidiaries also provided ordinary course financial products and services to some of these directors/director nominees immediate family members and entities affiliated with some of our directors/director nominees or their immediate family members (Mr. de Weck, Mr. Donald, Mr. May, and Dr. Rose). In each case, the fees we received for these products and services were below the thresholds of the NYSE listing standards and our Categorical Standards, and, where applicable, were less than 2% of the consolidated gross annual revenues of our company and of the other entity. |
16 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
🌑 | Our company or its subsidiaries purchased products or services in the ordinary course from entities where some of our directors/director nominees are executive officers or employees or their immediate family members serve or served in the past three years as executive officers (Mr. Donald, Mr. May, Dr. Rose, and Mr. Woods). In each case, the fees paid to each of these entities were below the thresholds of the NYSE listing standards and our Categorical Standards. |
Our Board is committed to objective, independent leadership for our Board and each of its committees. Our Board views the active, objective, independent oversight of management as central to effective Board governance, to serving the best interests of our company and our stockholders, and to executing our strategic objectives and creating long-term value. This commitment is reflected in our companys governing documents, including our Bylaws, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the governing documents of each of the Boards committees.
Our Board believes that its optimal leadership structure may change over time to reflect our companys evolving needs, strategy, and operating environment; changes in our Boards composition and leadership needs; and other factors, including the perspectives of stockholders and other stakeholders. In accordance with a 2014 amendment to our Bylaws, which our stockholders ratified at a special meeting in 2015, our Board has the flexibility to determine the Board leadership structure best suited to the needs and circumstances of our company and our Board. At each of our 2017 and 2018 annual meetings of stockholders, our stockholders reaffirmed their support for allowing this flexibility by voting over two-thirds of votes cast against stockholder proposals seeking Bylaw amendments requiring an independent Chairman.
Under our Boards current leadership structure, we have a Chairman and a Lead Independent Director. Our Lead Independent Director is empowered with, and exercises, robust, well-defined duties. Our Board is composed of experienced and committed independent directors (with all non-management nominees being independent), and our Board committees have objective, experienced chairs and members. Our Board is committed to engaging with stockholders and other stakeholders. All directors are required to stand for election annually.
Our Board believes that these factors, taken together, provide for objective, independent Board leadership, effective engagement with and oversight of management, and a voice independent from management and accountable to stockholders and other stakeholders.
|
Periodic Review of Board Leadership Structure
At least annually, our Board, in coordination with our Corporate Governance Committee, deliberates on and discusses the appropriate Board leadership structure, including the considerations described above. Based on that assessment and on input from stockholders, our Board believes that the existing structure, with Mr. Moynihan as Chairman and Mr. Bovender as Lead Independent Director, continues to be the optimal leadership framework at this time. As a highly regulated global financial services company, we and our stockholders benefit from an executive Chairman with deep experience and leadership in and knowledge of the financial services industry, our company, its businesses, and our focus on Responsible Growth, and a strong, active Lead Independent Director who exercises robust, well-defined duties. Our Lead Independent Director, together with the other independent directors, exemplifies objective independent Board leadership, and effectively engages and oversees management.
The Board believes in having a Lead Independent Director who is empowered with robust, well-defined duties. The Lead Independent Director is joined by experienced, independent Board members and a Chairman who, as CEO, serves as the primary voice to articulate our long-term strategy and our Responsible Growth. The independent directors provide objective oversight of management, review the CEOs performance and approve CEO compensation, help to establish the long-term strategy and regularly assess its effectiveness, and serve the best interests of our company and our stockholders by overseeing managements work to create long-term value.
|
In 2017, our Board updated our Corporate Governance Guidelines to include an emergency succession plan for our Lead Independent Director and Board Chairman that provides for an orderly, interim succession process in the event of extraordinary circumstances. In addition, our Corporate Governance Committee has a process for implementing an orderly independent Director leadership transition for our Lead Independent Director.
2019 Proxy Statement | 17 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Robust and Well-defined Lead Independent Director Duties
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines establish robust and well-defined duties for the independent leader of our Board. Our Boards support of the current leadership structure is premised on these duties being transparently disclosed, comprehensive in nature, and actively exercised.
Well-defined Duties of our Lead Independent Director |
Board Leadership
🌑 In the case of the Chairman, presiding at all meetings of our Board and, in the case of the Lead Independent Director, presiding at all meetings of our Board at which the Chairman is not present, including at executive sessions of the independent directors
🌑 Calling meetings of the independent directors, as appropriate
🌑 In the case of the Lead Independent Director, if our CEO is also Chairman, providing Board leadership if the CEO/Chairmans role may be (or may be perceived to be) in conflict |
Board Culture
🌑 Serving as a liaison between the CEO and the independent directors
🌑 Establishing a close relationship and trust with the CEO, providing support, advice, and feedback from our Board while respecting executive responsibility
🌑 Acting as a sounding board and advisor to the CEO |
Board Focus
🌑 Board Focus: In consultation with our Board and executive management, providing that our Board focuses on key issues and tasks facing our company, and on topics of interest to our Board
🌑 Corporate Governance: Assisting our Board, our Corporate Governance Committee, and management in complying with our Corporate Governance Guidelines and promoting corporate governance best practices
🌑 CEO Performance Review and Succession Planning: Working with our Corporate Governance Committee, our Compensation and Benefits Committee, and members of our Board, contributing to the annual performance review of the CEO and participating in CEO succession planning |
Board Meetings
🌑 In coordination with the CEO and the other members of our Board, planning, reviewing, and approving meeting agendas for our Board
🌑 In coordination with the CEO and the other members of our Board, approving meeting schedules to provide for sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items
🌑 Advising the CEO of the information needs of our Board and approving information sent to our Board
🌑 Developing topics of discussion for executive sessions of our Board |
Board Performance and Development
🌑 Board Performance: Together with the CEO and the other members of our Board, promoting the efficient and effective performance and functioning of our Board
🌑 Board Evaluation: Consulting with our Corporate Governance Committee on our Boards annual self-evaluation
🌑 Director Development: Providing guidance on the ongoing development of directors
🌑 Director Assessment/Nomination: With our Corporate Governance Committee and the CEO, consulting in the identification and evaluation of director candidates qualifications (including candidates recommended by directors, management, third-party search firms, and stockholders) and consulting on committee membership and committee chairs |
Stockholders and Other Stakeholders
🌑 Being available for consultation and direct communication, to the extent requested by major stockholders
🌑 Having regular communication with primary bank regulators (with or without management present) to discuss the appropriateness of our Boards oversight of management and our company |
18 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Highly Engaged Lead Independent Director
The formalized list of duties of the Lead Independent Director does not fully capture Mr. Bovenders active role in serving as our Boards independent leader. Among other things, Mr. Bovender:
🌑 holds quarterly calls with our primary bank regulators to discuss any issues of concern
🌑 regularly speaks with our CEO and holds bi-weekly calls to discuss Board meeting agendas and discussion topics, schedules, and other Board governance matters
🌑 attends meetings of all of the Board committees
🌑 speaks with each Board member at least quarterly to receive input on Board agendas, Board effectiveness, Board planning matters, and other related topics of management oversight
🌑 meets at least quarterly with management members, including the Chief Administrative Officer; Chief Financial Officer; Chief Risk Officer; Chief Human Resources Officer; and Global Compliance, Operational Risk, Reputational Risk and Control Function Risk Executive
🌑 plays a leading role in our stockholder engagement process, representing our Board and independent directors in investor meetings. In 2018 and in early 2019, Mr. Bovender met with many of our largest stockholders and stakeholders, often in person, and in aggregate, personally met with investors who own approximately 26% of all outstanding shares
|
Our Board and our Boards Audit, Compensation and Benefits, Corporate Governance, and Enterprise Risk Committees continuously evaluate their own effectiveness throughout the year. The evaluation is a multi-faceted process that includes quarterly one-on-one discussions with our Lead Independent Director, individual director input on Board and Committee meeting topical agenda subjects, executive sessions without management present, periodic input to our CEO and senior management on topical agendas and enhancements to Board and committee effectiveness, and an annual formal self-evaluation developed and administered under the direction of the Corporate Governance Committee.
One-on-One Discussions with the Lead Independent Director
In addition to the formal annual Board and committee evaluation process, our Lead Independent Director speaks with each Board member at least quarterly, and receives input regarding Board and committee practices and management oversight. Throughout the year, committee members also have the opportunity to provide input directly to committee chairs or to management.
2019 Proxy Statement | 19 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Formal Self-Evaluation
Information from research commissioned by the Board on the characteristics of highly effective and efficient boards identified five key areas where the research suggested high functioning boards and committees excelled. Our Corporate Governance Committee developed the formal 2018 self-evaluation to solicit director feedback on these key areas, the results of which are shared with management as appropriate. The Committee also considered industry trends, practices of our peers, feedback from stockholders and regulatory developments. As in prior years, for the formal 2018 self-evaluation, our Corporate Governance Committee solicited director views on actions taken in response to the prior years evaluation results. As part of its ongoing review of Board and committee composition, our Corporate Governance Committee also continued to seek input on the Boards director succession planning process. |
Key Areas: Highly Effective Boards
| |||||
|
Board and Committee Composition
Board Culture
Board and Committee Focus
Board Process
Information and Resources |
Composition. Through the self-evaluation process, our Board identifies qualities, relevant skills, and experience of potential director candidates that are consistent with the companys current strategy, and that would add to the Boards diversity.
Board Culture. Our Board considers its role in setting the standard for the companys culture and values by forging a collegial and collaborative dynamic that values independent judgment and emphasizes accountability. As part of this review, our Board evaluates its working relationship with management, including the importance of challenging and holding management accountable, and its processes of seeking stockholder and stakeholder input.
Focus. Our Board and committees consider their critical oversight responsibilities, including risk, strategy, and succession planning. Risk focused meetings cover a range of topicsboth ongoing considerations relating to the seven key risk types identified in our Risk Framework, and emerging risks in areas including cyber and information security, macroeconomic trends, and geopolitics. Our Board continues to engage in dialogue and solicit feedback from management, stockholders, and stakeholders, and receive third-party perspectives on the competitive environment and opportunities for growth.
Process. As part of the self-evaluation process, directors review overall Board and committee structure, meeting materials, agenda topics, and other meeting processes. Each of our directors meets with management and with our Lead Independent Director through a combination of executive sessions, smaller group sessions, and one-on-one meetings. Board and committee meetings are structured to allow ample time for discussion, debate, and in-depth review of key topics and trends.
Information and Resources. Through the self-evaluation process, our Board continues to highlight the need for clear, comprehensive, and concise information to effectively support its oversight responsibilities. In particular, directors have highlighted the importance of well-organized, streamlined, and accessible materials that identify key issues in a timely manner.
Enhancements Made in Response to Formal Board Self-Evaluations
In response to feedback solicited from our Board and committees in 2018, we continue to:
🌑 | Streamline meeting materials to better highlight important information, while maintaining completeness |
🌑 | Allow sufficient time during Board and committee meetings for discussion, debate, in-depth reviews, and executive sessions |
🌑 | Enhance discussion about areas of emerging risk at Board and Enterprise Risk Committee meetings, including deep dives on key topics at Board Risk Oversight sessions |
🌑 | Provide directors opportunities to engage with employees throughout the organization, to become better acquainted with top talent and senior leaders below our executive management level, and to engage in employee leadership events and affinity network activities |
🌑 | Provide opportunities for one-on-one discussions between directors and management on critical issues and continued opportunities for dialogue at our annual Board strategic planning session |
🌑 | Provide educational opportunities during regularly scheduled meetings and through third-party programs |
🌑 | Provide third-party perspectives on the company, peers, industry, economy, and stockholder and stakeholder feedback in Board and committee meeting materials, and discussions and through additional resources |
20 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Our Board believes that director education is vital to the ability of directors to fulfill their roles, and supports Board members in their continuous learning. The Board encourages directors to participate annually in external continuing director education programs, and our company reimburses directors for their expenses associated with this participation. Our directors also attend forums and conferences convened by our primary banking regulators. Continuing director education is also provided during Board meetings and other Board discussions as part of the formal meetings, and as stand-alone information sessions outside of meetings. Among other topics, during 2018, our Board heard from our primary banking regulators; third-party advisors on topics including the impact of geopolitics and macroeconomic trends, governance matters, ESG capital deployment projects, and regulatory developments; and from management on numerous subjects, including learnings from our stockholder engagement activities, stockholder activism, economic updates, regulatory developments, lending technologies, payment systems, and cybersecurity.
All new directors also participate in our director orientation program during their first six months on our Board. New directors have a series of meetings over time with management representatives from all of our business and staff areas to review and discuss, with increasing detail, information about our company, industry, and regulatory framework. Based on input from our directors, we believe this gradual on-boarding approach over the first six months of Board service, coupled with participation in regular Board and committee meetings, provides new directors with a strong foundation in our companys businesses, connects directors with members of management with whom they will interact and oversee, and accelerates their effectiveness to engage fully in Board deliberations. Directors have access to additional orientation and educational opportunities upon acceptance of new or additional responsibilities on the Board and in committees.
Board Meetings, Committee Membership, and Attendance
Directors are expected to attend our annual meetings of stockholders and our Board and committee meetings. Each of our incumbent directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate meetings of our Board and the committees on which they served during 2018. In addition, with the exception of Mr. de Weck, all of the directors serving on our Board at the time of our 2018 annual meeting attended the meeting.
Our independent directors meet privately in executive session without our Chairman and CEO or other members of management present at each regularly scheduled Board meeting and held 13 such executive sessions in 2018. Our Lead Independent Director leads these Board executive sessions.
Our Board has five committees. Charters describing the responsibilities of each of the Audit, Compensation and Benefits, Corporate Governance, and Enterprise Risk Committees can be found at http://investor.bankofamerica.com, and their membership is set forth on page 2. Our Boards fifth committee, the Corporate Development Committee, was formed by our Board in 2013 as the result of a litigation settlement to oversee certain transactions. (1)
Stockholders and other parties may communicate with our Board, any director (including our Chairman of the Board or Lead Independent Director), independent members of our Board as a group, or any committee. Communications should be addressed to our Corporate Secretary at Bank of America Corporation, Hearst Tower, 214 North Tryon Street, NC1-027-18-05, Charlotte, North Carolina 28255. Depending on the nature of the communication, the correspondence either will be forwarded to the director(s) named or the matters will be presented periodically to our Board. The Corporate Secretary or the secretary of the designated committee may sort or summarize the communications as appropriate. Communications that are personal grievances, commercial solicitations, customer complaints, incoherent, or obscene will not be communicated to our Board or any director or committee of our Board. For further information, refer to the Contact the Board of Directors section under the heading Corporate GovernanceOfficers and Directors on our website at http://investor.bankofamerica.com.
(1) | Our Corporate Development Committee assists our Board in overseeing our companys consideration of potential mergers and acquisitions valued at greater than $2 billion. Mr. Bovender chairs the Committee and Mr. Nowell and Mr. Yost are members; they are independent under the NYSE listing standards and our Categorical Standards. This Committee did not meet in 2018. |
2019 Proxy Statement | 21 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Our Board committees regularly make recommendations and report on their activities to the entire Board. Each committee may obtain advice from internal or external financial, legal, accounting, or other advisors at their discretion. Our Board, in considering the recommendations of our Corporate Governance Committee, reviews our committee charters and committee membership at least annually. The duties of our committees are summarized below:
Audit
Key Responsibilities
🌑 Oversees qualifications, performance, and independence of our companys independent registered public accounting firm
🌑 Oversees performance of our companys corporate audit function
🌑 Oversees integrity of our companys consolidated financial statements preparation
🌑 Oversees our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements
🌑 Makes inquiries of management or of the Chief Audit Executive to assess the scope and resources necessary for the corporate audit function to execute its responsibilities
Independence / Qualifications
🌑 All Committee members are independent under the NYSE listing standards and our Categorical Standards and the heightened independence requirements applicable to audit committee members under Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules
🌑 All Committee members are financially literate in accordance with NYSE listing standards
🌑 All Committee members qualify as audit committee financial experts under SEC rules
|
Enterprise Risk
Key Responsibilities
🌑 Oversees our companys overall risk framework, risk appetite, and management of key risks
🌑 Approves the Risk Framework and Risk Appetite Statement and further recommends each to the Board for approval
🌑 Oversees managements alignment of our companys risk profile to our strategic and financial plans
🌑 Oversees managements progress in developing our companys Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review submission to the Federal Reserve Board, and reviews and recommends our companys Capital Plan to the Board for approval
🌑 Reviews and recommends our companys Resolution and Recovery Plans to the Board for approval
Independence / Qualifications
🌑 All Committee members are independent under the NYSE listing standards and our Categorical Standards
🌑 All Committee members satisfy the risk expertise requirements for directors of a risk committee under the Federal Reserve Boards Enhanced Prudential Standards |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Compensation and Benefits
Key Responsibilities
🌑 Oversees establishing, maintaining, and administering our compensation programs and employee benefit plans
🌑 Approves and recommends our CEOs compensation to the Board for further approval by all independent directors, and reviews and approves all of our other executive officers compensation
🌑 Recommends director compensation for Board approval
🌑 Reviews human capital management practices
Independence / Qualifications
🌑 All Committee members are independent under the NYSE listing standards and our Categorical Standards and the independence requirements applicable to compensation committee members under NYSE rules and the heightened independence requirements (same as those applicable to Audit Committee members under SEC rules) |
Corporate Governance
Key Responsibilities
🌑 Oversees the Boards governance processes
🌑 Identifies and reviews the qualifications of potential Board members; recommends nominees for election to the Board
🌑 Leads the Board and its committees in their formal annual self-evaluations
🌑 Reviews and reports to the Board on our ESG activities
🌑 Reviews and assesses stockholder input and our stockholder engagement process
Independence / Qualifications
🌑 All Committee members are independent under the NYSE listing standards and our Categorical Standards |
|||||||
22 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
CEO and Senior Management Succession Planning
Our Board oversees CEO and senior management succession planning, which is formally reviewed at least annually; two such planning sessions were held in 2018. Our CEO and our Chief Human Resources Officer provide our Board with recommendations and evaluations of potential CEO successors, and review their development plans. Our Board reviews potential internal senior management candidates with our CEO and our Chief Human Resources Officer, including the qualifications, experience, and development priorities for these individuals. Directors engage with potential CEO and senior management successors at Board and committee meetings and in less formal settings to allow directors to personally assess candidates. Further, our Board periodically reviews the overall composition of our senior managements qualifications, tenure, and experience.
Our Board also establishes steps to address emergency CEO and senior management succession planning in extraordinary circumstances. Our emergency CEO succession planning is intended to enable our company to respond to unexpected position vacancies, including those resulting from a major catastrophe, by continuing our companys safe and sound operation and minimizing potential disruption or loss of continuity to our companys business and operations.
At Bank of America, we are guided by a common purpose to make financial lives better by connecting those we serve with the resources they need to be successful. Our purpose and values form the foundation of our culturea culture that is rooted in accountability, disciplined risk management, and delivering together as a team to better serve our clients, strengthen our communities, and deliver value to our stockholders. This all comes together as an engine for sustainable Responsible Growth. Our culture comes from how we run the company every day, by acting responsibly and managing risk well, which includes our commitments to ethical behavior, acting with integrity, and complying with laws, rules, regulations, and policies that reinforce such behavior. Managing risk is central to everything we do. Our success relies on the intellectual curiosity and sound judgment of every employee across the company.
Conduct and Culture
Our Board and its committees play a key role in oversight of our culture, setting the tone at the top and holding management accountable for its maintenance of high ethical standards and effective policies and practices to protect our reputation, assets, and business. Our Board and its committees do this in a number of ways, including by:
🌑 | focusing on the character, integrity, and qualifications of their respective members, and their respective leadership structures and composition; |
🌑 | overseeing managements identification, measurement, monitoring, and control of our material risks, including compliance risk and conduct risk; |
🌑 | regularly requesting and receiving briefings from senior management on matters relating to compliance and business conduct risk; |
🌑 | holding management accountable for the timely escalation of issues for review with the Board and its committees; and |
🌑 | overseeing our incentive plan design and governance processes to provide for an appropriate balance of risk and compensation outcomes. |
Our Risk Governance Documents
Risk is inherent in all of our business activities. One of the tenets of Responsible Growth is we must grow within our risk framework. We execute on that strategy through our commitment to responsible and rigorous risk management and through a comprehensive approach with a defined Risk Framework and a well-articulated Risk Appetite Statement. The Risk Framework and Risk Appetite Statement are regularly reviewed with an eye towards enhancements and improvements. The Risk Framework sets forth clear roles, responsibilities, and accountability for the management of risk and describes how our Board oversees the establishment of our risk appetite and of both quantitative limits and qualitative statements and objectives for our activities. This framework of objective, independent Board oversight and managements robust risk management better enables us to serve our customers, deliver long-term value for our stockholders, and achieve our strategic objectives.
Our Risk Framework serves as the foundation for consistent and effective risk management. It outlines the seven types of risk that our company faces: strategic risk; credit risk; market risk; liquidity risk; operational risk (including model, conduct, and cyber risk); compliance risk; and reputational risk. It describes components of our risk management approach, including our culture of managing risk well, risk appetite, and risk management processes, with a focus on the role of all employees in managing risk. It also outlines our risk management governance structure, including the roles of our Board, management, lines of business, independent risk management, and corporate audit within the governance structure.
Our Risk Appetite Statement defines the aggregate levels and types of risk our Board and management believe appropriate to achieve our companys strategic objectives and business plans.
2019 Proxy Statement | 23 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Our Risk Governance Structure
Our directors bring relevant risk management oversight experience; see Our Director Nominees on page 5. Our Chief Risk Officer, the companys senior-most risk manager, reports jointly to the CEO and Enterprise Risk Committee, and participates in Board and Enterprise Risk Committee meetings. This governance structure is designed to complement our Boards commitment to maintaining an objective, independent Board and committee leadership structure, and to fostering integrity over risk management throughout our company and further demonstrates our commitment to a strong culture of compliance, governance, and ethical conduct.
We believe our holistic, ongoing Board and committee risk oversight process provides the foundation for consistent and effective management of risks facing our company and demonstrates our commitment to a culture of rigorous risk management and compliance. Details of our companys risk management policies and practices are described in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our 2018 Annual Report.
24 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Board Oversight of Cybersecurity and Information Security Risk
Our Board recognizes the importance of maintaining the trust and confidence of our customers, clients, and employees. As a part of its objective, independent oversight of the key risks facing our company, the Board devotes significant time and attention to data and systems protection, including cybersecurity and information security risk.
The Board oversees managements approach to staffing, policies, processes, and practices sufficient to gauge and address cybersecurity and information security risk effectively. Our Board and Enterprise Risk Committee each receive regular presentations and reports throughout the year on cybersecurity and information security risk from management. These presentations and reports address a broad range of topics, including updates on technology trends, regulatory developments, legal issues, policies and practices, the threat environment and vulnerability assessments, and specific and ongoing efforts to prevent, detect, and respond to internal and external critical threats. At least twice each year, the Board discusses cybersecurity and information security risks with our Chief Operations and Technology Officer and our Chief Information Security Officer. |
Cybersecurity Governance Highlights |
|||||||
|
Comprehensive reporting to our Board and Enterprise Risk Committees (both scheduled and real-time) in response to key developments |
|||||||
|
Cross-functional approach to addressing cybersecurity risk, with global technology & operations, risk, legal, and corporate audit functions presenting on key topics |
|||||||
|
Global presence, with employees and 24/7 cyber threat operations centers around the world |
|||||||
|
Collaborative approach, working with a wide range of key stakeholders to manage risk, and share and respond to intelligence
|
|||||||
Additionally, our Board receives real-time reports from management on key developments across our industry, as well as specific information about peers, vendors, and other significant incidents. In 2018, our Board participated in a site visit and educational session at our primary Cyber Threat Operations Center.
Our Enterprise Risk Committee also annually reviews and approves our Global Information Security Program and our Information Security Policy, including administrative, technical, and physical safeguards designed to protect the security, confidentiality, and integrity of customer information in accordance with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and the interagency guidelines issued thereunder. Our Enterprise Risk Committees charter makes explicit the Committees responsibility for reviewing cybersecurity and information security risk, as well as steps taken by management to understand and mitigate such risk.
Under the Boards oversight, management works closely with key stakeholders, including regulators, government agencies, peer institutions, and industry groups, and develops and invests in talent and innovative technology in order to manage cybersecurity and information security risk. Our company has information security employees across the globe, enabling us to monitor and promptly respond to threats and incidents, maintain oversight of third-parties, innovate and adopt new technologies, as appropriate, and drive industry efforts to address shared cybersecurity risks. Each of our employees receives comprehensive education on responsible information security, data security, and cybersecurity practices and how to protect data against cyber threats through our Security Awareness for Everyone program.
Compensation Governance and Risk Management
Key Practices in Compensation Governance and Risk Management | ||
🌑 |
The independent members of the Board approve CEO compensation, and the Compensation and Benefits Committee approves compensation for all other executive officers | |
🌑 |
The Boards Enterprise Risk Committee and Audit Committee further review and approve compensation for the Chief Risk Officer and Chief Audit Executive, respectively | |
🌑 |
Independent control functionsincluding corporate audit, compliance, finance, human resources, legal, and riskprovide direct feedback to the Compensation and Benefits Committee on executive officer performance and the pay-for-performance process | |
🌑 |
Our incentive plan design and governance processes appropriately balance risks with compensation outcomes | |
🌑 |
Senior management and independent control functions, including risk, annually review and certify our incentive plans
|
2019 Proxy Statement | 25 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Compensation Governance
Our Compensation and Benefits Committee follows procedures intended to promote strong governance of our pay-for-performance philosophy. The Committee regularly reviews: (i) company performance; (ii) our executive compensation strategy, approach, trends, and regulatory developments; and (iii) other related topics, as appropriate. Each year, the Committee reviews, and makes available to our Board, an executive compensation statement, or tally sheet, for each executive officer. The tally sheets reflect each executive officers total compensation, including base salary, cash and equity-based incentive awards, the value of prior restricted stock unit awards (including the status of achieving any performance goals), qualified and nonqualified retirement and deferred compensation benefit accruals, and the incremental cost to our company of the executives perquisites. The Committee uses this information to evaluate all elements of compensation and benefits provided to an executive officer. Annually, the Committee reviews with our Board its compensation decisions (including cash and equity-based incentive awards, if applicable) for executives who report directly to our CEO. With respect to the CEOs compensation, the Committee makes a recommendation that is further reviewed and approved by the independent members of the Board. The CEO does not participate in Committee or Board deliberations about his compensation. Additionally, for our Chief Risk Officer and Chief Audit Executive, the Committees pay recommendations are further reviewed and approved by our Boards Enterprise Risk Committee and Audit Committee, respectively.
Executive officers do not engage with the Committee in setting the amount or form of their own individual compensation. During annual performance reviews for executive officers other than our CEO, the Committee considers our CEOs perspective and incentive award recommendations before approving compensation for each of these executive officers. In addition, the Committee considers the performance of our various lines of business, business segments and functions, as well as performance feedback from our Chief Human Resources Officer and our independent control functions (corporate audit, compliance, finance, human resources, legal, and risk).
The Committee has the sole authority and responsibility under its charter to approve engaging any compensation consultant it uses and the fees for those services. The Committee retained Farient Advisors LLC (Farient Advisors) as its 2018 independent compensation consultant. Farient Advisors business with us is limited to providing independent executive and director compensation consulting services. Farient Advisors does not provide any other services to our company. For 2018, Farient Advisors provided the Committee external market and performance comparisons, advised the Committee on senior executive, CEO, and director compensation, assisted in evaluating program design, and assisted with other executive and director compensation-related matters. In performing these services, Farient Advisors met regularly with the Committee without management and privately with the Chair of the Committee.
The Committee may delegate to management certain duties and responsibilities regarding our benefit plans. Significant Committee delegations to management include authority to: (i) the Management Compensation Committee to direct the compensation for all of our employees except for our CEO and his direct reports, and (ii) the Corporate Benefits Committee to oversee substantially all of our employee benefit plans. See Compensation Governance Structure on the next page.
Compensation Risk Management Policies and Practices
We believe that our company applies prudent risk management practices to its incentive compensation programs across the enterprise. Our Compensation and Benefits Committee is committed to a compensation governance structure that effectively contributes to our companys overall risk management policies.
Compensation Governance Policy. The Committee has adopted and annually reviews our Compensation Governance Policy, which governs our incentive compensation decisions and defines the framework for oversight of enterprise-wide incentive compensation program design. Consistent with global regulatory initiatives, our Compensation Governance Policy requires that our incentive compensation plans do not encourage excessive risk-taking, and addresses our:
🌑 | Definition and process for identifying risk-taking employees |
🌑 | Key goals and process for incentive compensation plan design and governance to appropriately balance risks with compensation outcomes, including: |
O | funding incentive compensation pools |
O | determining individual incentive compensation awards |
O | use of discretion as part of those processes |
🌑 | Policies on incentive compensation plan effectiveness through testing and monitoring to confirm that the plans appropriately balance risks with compensation outcomes, including developing processes to administer cancellations and clawbacks |
🌑 | Policies that provide for the independence of our companys independent control functions and their appropriate input to the Committee |
26 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Compensation Governance Structure. Our compensation governance structure allocates responsibility so that our Board, Compensation and Benefits Committee, or the appropriate management-level governing body makes compensation decisions with documented input from the independent control functions. This approach promotes effective oversight and review, and facilitates the appropriate governance to balance risk and reward. Below is an illustration of our compensation governance structure, which is influenced by internal considerations and external factors:
Incentive Plan Certification Process. Pursuant to our Compensation Governance Policy, our annual incentive plan certification and review process provides for a comprehensive review, analysis, and discussion of incentive design and operation. As part of the governance for incentive plans, each of the CEOs direct reports, along with their management teams and independent control functions (including their respective risk officers), meet periodically to discuss how business strategy, performance, and risk align to compensation. The relevant participants certify that the incentive programs they review: (i) are aligned with the applicable lines of business and our companys business strategy and performance objectives, (ii) do not encourage excessive or imprudent risk-taking beyond our companys ability to effectively identify and manage risk, (iii) are compatible with effective controls and risk management, and (iv) do not incentivize impermissible proprietary trading. Our Chief Risk Officer also certifies all incentive plans across our company as part of the Management Compensation Committees governance process. Farient Advisors and the Compensation and Benefits Committee review these management certifications.
Incentive Plan Audit Reviews. Corporate audit reviews all incentive plans at least every three years, using a risk-based approach that includes reviewing governance, payment, and processing against each incentive plans design, and validating incentive plan design and operation against regulatory requirements.
Conduct Reviews. As part of our compensation governance practices, management reviews conduct incidents so they are consistently and appropriately considered in performance assessments and pay decisions across the company. These performance and pay outcomes are reviewed at least annually by the Committee.
Independent Control Function Feedback. In addition to reviewing the individual incentive compensation awards for executive officers and other senior executives who report directly to the CEO, the Committee also reviews the outcomes of our control function feedback process and individual incentive compensation awards for certain highly compensated employees. As part of its governance process, the Committee meets with the heads of our independent control functions and business lines during a half-day meeting to discuss their feedback on the pay-for-performance process, including how risk management and conduct matters were factored into compensation decisions.
As a result of these processes and reviews, and in combination with the risk management and clawback features of our compensation programs, we believe that our compensation policies and practices appropriately hold employees accountable, while balancing risks and rewards in a way that does not encourage excessive or imprudent risk-taking or create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.
Additional Corporate Governance Information
More information about our corporate governance can be found on our website at http://investor.bankofamerica.com under the heading Corporate Governance, including our: (i) Certificate of Incorporation; (ii) Bylaws; (iii) Corporate Governance Guidelines (including our related person transactions policy and our Director Independence Categorical Standards); (iv) Code of Conduct and related materials; and (v) composition and charters of each of our Audit, Compensation and Benefits, Corporate Governance, and Enterprise Risk Committees. This information is also available in print, free of charge, upon written request addressed to our Corporate Secretary at Bank of America Corporation, Hearst Tower, 214 North Tryon Street, NC1-027-18-05, Charlotte, North Carolina 28255.
2019 Proxy Statement | 27 |
STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
We interact with our investors in a variety of ways. Our investor relations team regularly meets with investors, prospective investors, and investment analysts. Often these meetings include our Chairman and CEO, CFO, or line of business leaders. These meetings are generally focused on company performance, strategy, and Responsible Growth. Our Board and management also regularly engage with our stockholders to solicit their views and input on important performance; corporate governance; ESG matters, including human capital management and executive compensation matters; and other topics of interest to our stockholders. The combination of information received in investor relations meetings and stockholder engagement meetings provides the Board and management with insights into a comprehensive scope of topics important to our stockholders.
🌑 | Board-Driven Engagement. Our Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for overseeing the stockholder engagement process and the periodic review and assessment of stockholder input. Both our Chairman and our Lead Independent Director play a central role in our Boards stockholder engagement efforts, and our directors regularly participate in meetings with stockholders and consider input received from investors. |
🌑 | Commitment Codified in Governing Documents. Reflecting our Boards understanding of the critical role stockholder engagement plays in our governance, this commitment and our Boards oversight of stockholder engagement were codified in 2016 in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Corporate Governance Committees charter. |
🌑 | Year-Round Engagement and Board Reporting. Our corporate secretary, investor relations, ESG, and human resources teams, together with executive management members and directors, conduct outreach to stockholders throughout the year to obtain their input on key matters and to inform our management and our Board about the issues that our stockholders tell us matter most to them. |
🌑 | Transparent and Informed Governance Enhancements. Our Board routinely reviews our governance practices and policies, including our stockholder engagement practices, with an eye towards continual improvement and enhancements. Stockholder input is regularly shared with our Board, its committees, and management, facilitating a dialogue that provides stockholders with transparency into our governance practices and considerations, and informs our companys enhancement of those practices. In addition to stockholder sentiments, our Board considers trends in governance practices and regularly reviews the voting results of our meetings of stockholders, the governance practices of our peers and other large companies, and current trends in governance. See the next page for additional detail on recent governance enhancements our Board implemented. |
Our directors and management met with stockholders and key stakeholders throughout 2018 and in early 2019 to obtain their input and to discuss their views on, among other things, our Boards independent oversight of management, our Boards composition, director succession planning and recruitment, and self-evaluations, and our Boards oversight of strategic planning, risk management, human capital management, environmental initiatives, and other issues important to our stockholders. These views were shared with our Board and its committees, where applicable, for their consideration.
In addition to engaging with our institutional stockholders, in 2018 we made available video interviews with our directors, which have been updated in March 2019, to provide all stakeholders, including our retail stockholders, with the opportunity to hear directly from our Board. The videos address the Boards governance practices, oversight of management, and our companys Responsible Growth; they are available at www.bankofamerica.com/annualmeeting.
By the Numbers: Stockholder Engagement in 2018 and Early 2019
28 |
STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
What We Learned From our Meetings with Stockholders
🌑 | Stockholders are supportive of our approach to Board composition and refreshment and our deliberate process for director succession planning |
🌑 | Stockholders understand our approach to Responsible Growth and the important role our ESG practices have in making Responsible Growth sustainable. They appreciated the breadth and depth of our disclosures in these areas, including our commitment to environmental and human capital matters |
🌑 | A strong majority of the institutional stockholders we spoke with believe that our Board should retain the flexibility to determine its leadership structure and that our current Board leadership structure and practices provide appropriate independent oversight of management |
🌑 | Stockholders appreciated meeting with our Lead Independent Director and hearing directly from him regarding our Boards oversight of the companys strategy, risk management practices, our ESG initiatives, and our drive for Responsible Growth |
🌑 | Stockholders appreciated the broad access to senior management subject matter experts regarding company performance, corporate governance, and environmental, social, and human capital management matters |
🌑 | Stockholders were interested in the culture of our Board and how directors influence managements execution of our companys values and risk management practices |
Governance Enhancements Informed by Stockholder Input
Our Board evaluates and reviews input from our stockholders in considering their independent oversight of management and our long-term strategy. As part of our commitment to constructive engagement with investors, we evaluate and respond to the views voiced by our stockholders, including vote results at our annual meetings of stockholders. Our dialogue has led to enhancements in our corporate governance, ESG, and executive compensation practices, which our Board believes are in the best interest of our company and our stockholders. For example, after considering input from stockholders and other stakeholders, our company:
🌑 | Continued to refine our stockholder engagement process to connect stockholders and key stakeholders with our Lead Independent Director, Chairman, other independent directors, and executive management |
🌑 | Enhanced our ESG disclosure, including in our 2018 and 2019 proxy statements (see page 30), continuing to add information to our 2017 and 2018 annual reports discussing Responsible Growth, our work to drive Responsible Growth daily in our business, and highlighting certain of our ESG accomplishments |
🌑 | Continued our active participation in the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and our work with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosure (TCFD), including through the service of our Chief Accounting Officer on the SASB Foundation Board of Directors |
🌑 | Provided updated information regarding our commitment to being a great place to work, including being an inclusive workplace worldwide, which is core to Responsible Growth (see page 32) |
🌑 | Expanded the disclosure of our focus on workplace diversity and equal pay for equal work (see page 34) |
🌑 | Continued to actively consider board succession planning and refreshment, holding robust discussions during our Corporate Governance Committee meetings, and adding a director to our Board in October 2018 (see Identifying and Evaluating Director Candidates on page 3) |
🌑 | Updated our corporate governance disclosure regarding our Board and its practices, including regarding our directors qualifications and skills, their self-evaluation process, and their oversight of risk |
🌑 | Further expanded our political activities and public policy engagement disclosures in 2019 to include a more detailed discussion of our participation in the public policy engagement process. See the Political Activities page of our website at http://investor.bankofamerica.com |
Also see Stockholder Engagement & Say on Pay Results on page 43 for a discussion of our compensation-related stockholder engagement and our historical Say on Pay vote results.
2019 Proxy Statement | 29 |
RESPONSIBLE GROWTH
We deliver on our purposeto help make financial lives better through the power of every connectionthrough Responsible Growth. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) principles help define how Bank of America delivers Responsible Growth and contributes to the work we do to help drive the global economy. Our ESG leadership enables us to pursue growing business opportunities and manage risk associated with addressing the worlds biggest environmental and social challenges. It defines how we deploy our capital and resources, informs our business practices, and helps determine how and when we use our voice in support of our values. Integrated across our eight lines of business, our ESG focus reflects how we hold ourselves accountable and allows us to create shared success with our clients and communities.
Our management-level Global ESG Committee, which is led by our Vice Chairman Anne Finucane, is comprised of senior executives from across the company who are actively engaged in managing our ESG approach and strengthening our ESG governance. The committee engages in dialogue and debate on social and environmental issues that are material to the business, including our human capital management practices, product and service offerings, and investments with the goal of creating a sustainable economy. The committee, which is accountable to the CEO, convenes six times a year and reports regularly to the Corporate Governance Committee.
In addition, Vice Chairman Anne Finucane and her team engage with stockholders, consumer advocates, community advisors, and other stakeholders for their advice and guidance in shaping our ESG policies and practices. In 2005, we founded our National Community Advisory Council, a forum for senior leaders from social justice, consumer advocacy, community development, environmental, research, and advocacy organizations, and senior executives meet with the council at least twice annually for external perspectives on our business policies, practices and products.
ESG underscores how we seek growth within our Risk Framework, including how we engage external stakeholders and provide strong oversight of environmental and social risks that present themselves through our business activities. This includes the responsible products and services delivered to clients; how we evaluate business opportunities; and how we help enable social progress and economic mobility in local communities around the world. Ultimately, through our commitment to ESG principles we build trust and credibility as a company people want to work for, invest in, and do business with.
Deploying Capital for Sustainable Growth
One important aspect of our ESG focus is how we can help mobilize participants across the financial system to increase the flow of capital to address the major global challenges broadly articulated by the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). We refer to our efforts as Capital Deploymenthow we contribute to the global need for sustainable finance through our own business activities and by developing innovative partnerships and financial structures. This enterprise-wide initiative is designed to unlock and provide the necessary financing to address major global and local challenges such as affordable housing, sustainable energy, clean water and sanitation, education, and healthcare. In 2018 alone we deployed more than $50 billion in capital to address these issues.
Highlights of our Capital Deployment work in 2018 include:
🌑 | Environmental Business Commitment: Deployed $21.5 billion in capital to support low-carbon, sustainable business activities through lending, investing, capital raising, advisory services, and developing financial solutions for clients around the world, as part of our Environmental Business Commitment to deploy $125 billion by 2025. Since 2013, we have delivered nearly $105 billion towards this goal. |
🌑 | Community Development Banking: Provided more than $4.7 billion in loans, tax credit equity investments, and other real estate development solutions to help build strong communities by financing affordable housing, charter schools, and economic development across the United States. |
🌑 | Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs): Originated $200 million in loans as part of our $1.5 billion CDFI portfolio, which includes 255 CDFIs, also known as local loan centers. This extends our ability to lend to communities throughout the U.S. to finance affordable housing, small businesses, economic development projects, and other community facilities. |
🌑 | Blended Finance Catalyst Pool: In November 2018, launched a new financing initiative to provide $60 million in capital to support deals that would ordinarily fall outside the scope of our Risk Framework, but by which, through our participation, we can drive significant leverage and impact. |
🌑 | Philanthropy: Advanced economic mobility in local communities around the world by deploying more than $200 million in philanthropic capital from the Bank of America Charitable Foundation. |
(1) | Company goals are aspirational and not guarantees or promises that all goals will be met. Statistics and metrics included in this Responsible Growth section are estimates and may be based on assumptions or developing standards. Content available at websites and in documents referenced in this section are not incorporated herein and are not part of this proxy statement. |
30 |
RESPONSIBLE GROWTH
Other 2018 ESG highlights:
🌑 | We were named top Global Bank and #3 overall to Fortunes 2018 Change the World list |
🌑 | In June 2018, we announced a $20 million Veteran Entrepreneur Lending Program to connect veteran business owners with affordable capital through participating CDFIs to help grow their businesses |
🌑 | We issued our fourth and largest green bond for $2.25 billion in May 2018, becoming the first U.S. financial institution to issue four green bonds. According to the Environmental Finance green bond database, our company has been the leader in green bond underwriting globally since 2007 |
🌑 | We issued our first social bond for $500 million in January 2019, highlighting our companys commitment to deploying capital to address global issues outlined in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals; the bonds proceeds will refinance the companys investments in affordable housing and community development financial institutions (CDFIs) |
🌑 | We twice convened the National Community Advisory Council, a diverse group of nonprofit and private-sector leaders to receive input on business practices, products, and risks |
🌑 | Demonstrated our commitment to transparency and disclosure through commitment to TCFD, integrated reporting, and improved ESG ratings |
🌑 | In June 2018, we committed to hiring 10,000 individuals from low- and moderate-income neighborhoods in our Consumer and Small Business division, through our Pathways program, over the next five years |
🌑 | We have achieved nearly 90% of our multi-year commitment to hire 10,000 veterans, guard, and reservists |
🌑 | 2018 marked the 15th year of our Neighborhood Builders® program, which advances nonprofit leaders addressing economic mobility and social progress in the communities we serve. We have invested more than $220 million in more than 1,000 nonprofits and provided leadership development to more than 2,000 nonprofit leaders |
🌑 | We held a Global Ambassadors Program in Dublin, Ireland to support women entrepreneurs through mentoring and skills-building. Partnering with Vital Voices, 18 programs have taken place since 2012, connecting 150 women mentees from more than 60 countries to share expertise in building their businesses |
🌑 | As one of the worlds leading arts funders, we support more than 2,000 nonprofit cultural institutions around the world through several programs, partnerships, and exhibitions. In 2018, the Bank of America Art Conversation Project provided grants to fund 21 conservation projects in nine countries to conserve paintings, sculptures, and archaeological pieces that are important to cultural heritage |
We benchmark our ESG performance across a number of industry measures. In each of these ratings, our company outperforms or is in line with industry peers:
One of 138 companies on A List rating
|
79th percentile
|
BB
|
World Index (top 10% of banks) & North America Index
|
|||||||||||||
CDP (Climate) of 2,418 companies |
Sustainalytics (ESG) of 333 banks |
MSCI (ESG) | Dow Jones Sustainability Index (ESG) of 3,500 companies |
|||||||||||||
2019 Proxy Statement | 31 |
RESPONSIBLE GROWTH
Central to sustainable Responsible Growth are the actions we take to be a great place to work for our teammates. Our culture reflects how we run our company every day. We put the customer first, emphasize integrity and responsibility, and actively encourage all employees to bring their whole selves to work. When we create a workplace where our colleagues are engaged, empowered, and committed for the long term, we are better positioned to help our clients improve their financial lives.
Being an inclusive workplace for our employees around the world | Recognizing and rewarding performance
| |||||||||
🌑 Our Global Diversity & Inclusion Council, chaired by our CEO, is comprised of leaders representing every line of business and region, and is responsible for setting and upholding diversity and inclusion goals and practices
🌑 We are a diverse and inclusive company. Currently, our global workforce is more than 50% female; and more than 45% of the U.S.-based workforce are people of color. Our senior leadership is also diverse; seven of our 16 Board members and seven of our CEOs 13 direct reports are women and/or people of color
🌑 Our most recent global campus recruiting class was more than 40% female; and more than 45% of the U.S. recruiting class was people of color
🌑 We host courageous conversations, group and one-on-one discussions that encourage employees to have open dialogue on topics that are important to them. These dialogues foster inclusion, understanding, empathy, and positive action by creating awareness of employees experiences and perspectives related to differences in thought, style, sexual orientation, gender identity, race, ethnicity, disability, culture, and experience
🌑 We have a range of programs to connect employees, executives, and thought leaders across our company, including 11 Employee Networks with more than 250 chapters made up of over 120,000 members worldwide
🌑 Our company was recognized for the second year in a row by Fortune Magazine on its 100 Best Workplaces for Diversity List, by Euromoney as the Best Bank for Diversity, and by Catalyst with the 2019 Catalyst Award for our efforts focused on investing in women
|
🌑 All of our compensation plans are reviewed and certified annually by our risk management function
🌑 We have an enhanced performance review process for senior leaders and employees who have the ability to expose our company to material risk
🌑 We have been an industry leader in establishing an internal minimum rate of pay for our U.S. hourly employees and have made regular increases over many years. Two years ago, we raised our minimum wage to $15 per hour and our minimum wage is higher today. Our average rate for all U.S. hourly employees is significantly above this level
🌑 We pay our employees competitively based on market rates for their roles and how they perform, and we regularly benchmark against other companies both within and outside our industry to ensure our pay is competitive in the market for comparable roles
🌑 Our company is committed to compensating all of our employees fairly and equitably based on performance, with equal pay for equal work, regardless of race or gender. See page 34
🌑 In addition to merit-based salary increases and applicable incentive compensation, to share our success in 2018, we again provided special compensation awards to recognize the contributions of our employees to our progress and record performance, and reflect the continuing benefits of last years U.S. tax reform. Approximately 95% of our teammates received special awards as a result of 2018 performance. Over the last 2 years, we awarded more than $1 billion in shared success awards to our teammates
🌑 We use a standard U.S. practice restricting how we solicit compensation information when hiring, so we determine compensation levels for new hires based on individual qualifications and roles, rather than how they may have been compensated in the past
| |||||||||
32 |
RESPONSIBLE GROWTH
Creating opportunities for employees to grow and develop |
||||
|
🌑 We provide multiple internal job search/career planning tools to better facilitate career growth at our company. For example, in our Consumer & Small Business organization we offer The Academy to increase focus on skill and career path development. Last year, we launched an enhanced Career Path Tool that integrated skill development and internal movement between jobs. We have had high employee adoption using the tool, with more than 27,000 unique users and more than 855,000 total page views since the relaunch. More broadly, all of our career tools, resources and programs across the enterprise have helped support more than 17,000 employees finding new roles within the company in 2018
🌑 In 2018, 27,000 new teammates joined our company, including more than 3,500 future leaders from college campuses
🌑 We support the professional growth and development of our managers through programs like Manager Excellence, which helps managers develop their skills with practical tips on professional topics. In 2018, more than 86% of eligible managers participated in some form of manager development program
🌑 Our tuition reimbursement program provides employees up to $5,250 per year for courses related to current or future roles at our company
|
|||
Supporting employees physical, emotional, and financial wellness
|
||||
🌑 We are focused on offering innovative and affordable benefits and programs that meet the diverse needs of our employees and their families, including up to 16 weeks of paid parental leave (maternity, paternity, and adoption), competitive 401(k) benefits, and backup child and adult care
🌑 We are focused on supporting our employees physical, emotional, and financial well-being. We offer competitive health insurance benefits to U.S.-based employees who regularly work 20 or more hours per week and their eligible family members with multiple coverage options
🌑 We align the cost of health coverage with compensation through progressive premiums to provide affordable coverage. For U.S. employees making less than $50,000 in compensation, we reduced annual family coverage medical premiums by 50% in 2011 and have kept those premiums flat since 2012
🌑 Our approach is built on the things we can do together with our employees to address health risks and manage health care costs, including focusing on wellness, providing education and support, and partnering with efficient and accountable health care providers. On average, 70,000 teammates have participated annually in our voluntary global Get Active! physical wellness campaign over the past four years, and 85% of eligible U.S. employees have taken the time to learn about their health each year since 2013
🌑 We have industry-leading paid bereavement leave that supports full-time employees across the globe to take up to 20 days of time off for the loss of a spouse, partner, or child
🌑 In 2018, we doubled the number of free, in-person confidential counseling sessions available through our Employee Assistance Program for our U.S. employees and eligible family members
🌑 For the moments when employees and their families need support the most our internal, highly specialized Life Event Services (LES) group provides personalized support to them. Nearly 85,000 team members have worked with the highly trained and empathetic LES team members for needs around survivor support, domestic violence, natural and man-made disasters, transition related to military service, and other major life events. The team provides resources, benefits, counseling and other support, tapping experts inside and outside the company |
||||
2019 Proxy Statement | 33 |
RESPONSIBLE GROWTH
Our Focus on Equal Pay for Equal Work and Workplace Diversity
|
||
🌑 To be a great place to work, we focus on providing an inclusive and rewarding experience for all employeesthis includes fair and equitable pay
🌑 Our company compensates our employees fairly and equitably based on performance, with equal pay for equal work, regardless of race or gender:
O We maintain robust policies and practices reinforcing our commitment, including analyses and reviews with oversight from our Board and senior leaders
O We have had a rigorous process and analysis from outside experts in place for over a decade which examines employee pay before year-end compensation decisions are finalized, and we adjust compensation where appropriate
🌑 In 2018, we continued to enhance our efforts to compensate our employees fairly and equitably:
O We expanded our review from the U.S. and U.K. to include France, Ireland, Hong Kong, Singaporecovering our regional leadership hubs. Our review now covers 82% of our global workforce
O Results of this review of employee total compensation showed that compensation received by women is on average greater than 99% of that received by men
O Results also showed that in the U.S. compensation received by people of color is on average greater than 99% of non-people of color teammates
O We will continue to conduct reviews annually and will expand our analysis into additional geographies in the future
🌑 We focus significant resources on recruiting and retaining female talent. Accordingly, we have robust policies and programs to provide women with opportunities for professional development and advancement
🌑 We are recognized as a global leader in developing and supporting our female employees, including recent recognition by Catalyst, awarding us the 2019 Catalyst Award for our investment in women
🌑 We are focused on diversity at all levels in the company:
O More than 50% of our global workforce is female, and more than 45% of our U.S.-based workforce are people of color
O Our Board is over 30% women and our management team is over 45% women, which is more than double the 16% industry benchmark as reported in the most recent Oliver Wyman Women in Financial Services report
O More than 40% of our global managers are female and approximately 45% of our senior level employees are female
O Senior leadership is similarly diversemore than 40% of our Board is female and/or people of color (seven of our 16 Board members are women and/or people of color); additionally, seven of the CEOs direct reports are women and/or persons of color
🌑 We have also increased Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino representation (over time and year-over-year) in key Equal Employment Opportunity Commission categoriesExecutive and Senior Level Officials and managers and first and mid-level officials and managers
🌑 In addition to senior leadership and management, we are increasing diversity in areas with historically low representation across the industry. As a result of our efforts, we have seen significant movement in the diversity of our pipeline overall (gender and people of color) but particularly in core businesses like the Global Banking and Markets full-time recruiting class and the Financial Advisor development program over the last five years
|
34 |
RESPONSIBLE GROWTH
Recognition Received for Being A Great Place to Work |
More information on our commitment to ESG, including our human capital management practices, is available on our website at http://bankofamerica.com/responsiblegrowth.
2019 Proxy Statement | 35 |
RELATED PERSON AND CERTAIN OTHER TRANSACTIONS
RELATED PERSON AND CERTAIN OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Our related person transactions policy in our Corporate Governance Guidelines sets forth our policies and procedures for reviewing and approving or ratifying any transaction with related persons (directors, director nominees, executive officers, stockholders holding 5% or more of our voting securities, or any of their immediate family members or affiliated entities). Our policy covers any transactions where the aggregate amount involved will or may be expected to exceed $120,000 in any fiscal year, our company is a participant, and a related person has or will have a direct or indirect material interest.
Under our related person transactions policy, our Corporate Governance Committee must approve or ratify any related person transactions, and when doing so, consider: the related persons interest in the transaction; whether the transaction involves arms-length bids or market prices and terms; the transactions materiality to each party; the availability of the product or services through other sources; the implications of our Code of Conduct or reputational risk; whether the transaction would impair a directors or executive officers judgment to act in our companys best interest; the transactions acceptability to our regulators; and in the case of an independent director, whether the transaction would impair his or her independence or status as an outside or non-employee director.
Our Board has determined that certain types of transactions do not create or involve a direct or indirect material interest on the part of the related person and therefore do not require review or approval under the policy. These include transactions involving financial services, including loans and brokerage, banking, insurance, investment advisory or asset management services, and other financial services we provide to any related person, if the services are provided in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for comparable services provided to non-affiliates and comply with applicable law, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Federal Reserve Board Regulation O.
A number of our directors, director nominees, and executive officers, their family members, and certain business organizations associated with them are or have been customers of our banking subsidiaries. All extensions of credit to these persons have been made in the ordinary course of business on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time in comparable transactions with persons not related to our company and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectability.
Occasionally, we may have employees who are related to our executive officers, directors, or director nominees. We compensate these individuals in a manner consistent with our practices that apply to all employees. The sister of Mr. Thong M. Nguyen, an executive officer, and the brother of Dr. Zuber, a director and nominee, are each employed by the company in non-executive, non-strategic positions, and each received compensation in 2018 of approximately $180,000 and $320,000, respectively. Dr. Zubers brothers compensation is primarily commissions based. The methodology through which his compensation is calculated is consistent with that used for other financial advisors in similar roles. The compensation and other terms of employment of both Mr. Nguyens sister and Dr. Zubers brother are determined on a basis consistent with the companys human resources policies.
Our company and Mr. Moynihan are parties to an aircraft time-sharing agreement, as disclosed in prior proxy statements and approved by our Corporate Governance Committee in December 2010.
Based on information contained in separate Schedule 13G filings with the SEC, each of Warren E. Buffett/Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (Berkshire Hathaway), BlackRock, Inc. (BlackRock), and The Vanguard Group (Vanguard) reported that it beneficially owned more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock as of December 31, 2018 (see Stock Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers, and Certain Beneficial Owners on the next page).
In the ordinary course of our business during 2018, our subsidiaries provided and are expected to continue to provide financial advisory, sales and trading, treasury, and other financial or administrative services to Berkshire Hathaway and its affiliates, BlackRock and its affiliates and clients, and Vanguard and its affiliates. These transactions were entered into on an arms-length basis and contain customary terms and conditions. Our company and its subsidiaries may also, in the ordinary course, invest in BlackRock or Vanguard funds or other products or buy or sell assets to or from BlackRock or Vanguard funds and separate accounts.
36 |
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
Our voting securities are our common stock, Series B Preferred Stock, and Series 1, 2, 4, and 5 Preferred Stock. The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of March 4, 2019 by: (i) each director, (ii) each named executive officer, (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group, and (iv) beneficial owners of more than 5% of any class of our voting securities (as determined under SEC rules). As of that date, none of our directors and executive officers owned any shares of any class of our voting securities, other than as reported in the table below, or had any outstanding options or warrants for such shares. Each director, each named executive officer, and all directors and executive officers as a group beneficially owned less than 1% of our outstanding common stock. Unless otherwise noted, all shares of our common stock are subject to the sole voting and investment power of the directors and executive officers. The table below also contains information about other stock units that are not deemed beneficially owned under SEC rules.
OTHER STOCK UNITS |
||||||||||||||||||||
NAME |
COMMON STOCK BENEFICIALLY |
DEFERRED DIRECTOR STOCK AWARDS(1) |
UNVESTED RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS(2) |
TOTAL | ||||||||||||||||
Directors |
||||||||||||||||||||
Sharon L. Allen(3) |
80,133 | | | 80,133 | ||||||||||||||||
Susan S. Bies |
160,831 | | | 160,831 | ||||||||||||||||
Jack O. Bovender, Jr. |
111,757 | | | 111,757 | ||||||||||||||||
Frank P. Bramble, Sr.(4) |
99,917 | 148,014 | | 247,931 | ||||||||||||||||
Pierre J.P. de Weck |
53,181 | | | 53,181 | ||||||||||||||||
Arnold W. Donald |
68,910 | 6,311 | | 75,221 | ||||||||||||||||
Linda P. Hudson |
19,507 | 55,214 | | 74,721 | ||||||||||||||||
Monica C. Lozano |
3,000 | 148,613 | | 151,613 | ||||||||||||||||
Thomas J. May(5) |
2,142 | 287,554 | | 289,696 | ||||||||||||||||
Lionel L. Nowell III |
3,930 | 89,387 | | 93,317 | ||||||||||||||||
Clayton S. Rose(6) |
25,515 | 4,789 | | 30,304 | ||||||||||||||||
Michael D. White(7) |
85,650 | 29,566 | | 115,216 | ||||||||||||||||
Thomas D. Woods(8) |
66,541 | | | 66,541 | ||||||||||||||||
R. David Yost |
64,153 | 101,777 | | 165,930 | ||||||||||||||||
Maria T. Zuber |
10,811 | | | 10,811 | ||||||||||||||||
Named Executive Officers |
||||||||||||||||||||
Brian T. Moynihan(9) |
1,554,739 | | 1,860,356 | 3,415,095 | ||||||||||||||||
Paul M. Donofrio |
614,933 | | 643,691 | 1,258,624 | ||||||||||||||||
Dean C. Athanasia(10) |
262,062 | | 512,666 | 774,728 | ||||||||||||||||
Geoffrey S. Greener |
750,675 | | 620,664 | 1,371,339 | ||||||||||||||||
Thomas K. Montag(11) |
2,936,081 | | 1,023,601 | 3,959,682 | ||||||||||||||||
Thong M. Nguyen |
240,664 | | 512,666 | 753,330 | ||||||||||||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (27 persons)(12) |
8,806,914 | 871,225 | 7,130,976 | 16,809,116 |
NAME |
COMMON STOCK |
PERCENT OF CLASS | ||||||||
Certain Beneficial Owners |
||||||||||
Warren E. Buffett/Berkshire Hathaway Inc.(13) |
918,900,000 | 9.5% | ||||||||
The Vanguard Group(14) |
660,112,645 | 6.8% | ||||||||
BlackRock, Inc.(15) |
597,087,279 | 6.2% |
2019 Proxy Statement | 37 |
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
(1) | For non-management directors, includes stock units credited to their accounts pursuant to deferrals made under the terms of the Director Deferral Plan. These stock units do not have voting rights and are not considered beneficially owned under SEC rules. Each unit has a value equal to the fair market value of a share of our common stock. These units, which are held in individual accounts in each directors name, will be paid in cash upon the directors retirement if vested at that time. |
(2) | Includes the following stock units, which are not treated as beneficially owned under SEC rules because the holder does not have the right to acquire the underlying stock within 60 days of March 4, 2019 and/or the stock units will be paid in cash and therefore do not represent the right to acquire stock: |
NAME | TIME- BASED RSUS (TRSUS) |
CASH- SETTLED RSUS (CRSUS) |
PERFORMANCE RSUS (PRSUS) |
TOTAL STOCK UNITS | ||||||||||||||||
Brian T. Moynihan
|
|
319,777
|
|
|
262,055
|
|
|
1,278,524
|
|
|
1,860,356
|
| ||||||||
Paul M. Donofrio
|
|
241,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
402,554
|
|
|
643,691
|
| ||||||||
Dean C. Athanasia
|
|
200,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,034
|
|
|
512,666
|
| ||||||||
Geoffrey S. Greener
|
|
234,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
385,960
|
|
|
620,664
|
| ||||||||
Thomas K. Montag
|
|
384,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
639,044
|
|
|
1,023,601
|
| ||||||||
Thong M. Nguyen
|
|
200,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,034
|
|
|
512,666
|
| ||||||||
All executive officers as a group
|
|
2,713,110
|
|
|
262,055
|
|
|
4,155,811
|
|
|
7,130,976
|
|
Each stock unit has a value equal to the fair market value of a share of our common stock, but does not confer voting rights. TRSUs include the right to receive dividend equivalents and will be paid in shares of our common stock or cash at vesting or, in certain circumstances, after termination of employment. CRSUs do not include the right to receive dividend equivalents and will be paid in cash. PRSUs include the right to receive dividend equivalents and vest subject to attaining pre-established performance goals. To the extent earned, PRSUs granted in February 2016, February 2017, February 2018, and February 2019 will be settled 100% in shares of our common stock, and PRSUs granted in February 2015 will be settled 100% in cash. For unearned PRSUs, the stock units shown include the number of PRSUs granted assuming 100% of the award will be earned; however, the actual number of stock units earned may vary depending upon achieving performance goals. Because they are economically comparable to owning shares of our common stock, certain of these stock units currently qualify for purposes of compliance with our stock ownership and retention requirements, excluding PRSUs that have not been earned. |
(3) | Includes 1,000 shares of our common stock for which Ms. Allen shares voting and investment power with her spouse. |
(4) | Includes 50,000 shares of our common stock for which Mr. Bramble shares voting and investment power with his spouse. |
(5) | Includes 23,999 stock units held by Mr. May under the FleetBoston Director Stock Unit Plan, 3,332 stock units held under the Bank Boston Director Retirement Benefits Exchange Program, and 5,854 stock units held under the Bank Boston Director Stock Award Plan. |
(6) | Includes 25,515 shares of our common stock for which Mr. Rose shares voting and investment power with his spouse. |
(7) | Includes 77,000 shares of our common stock for which Mr. White shares voting and investment power with his spouse. |
(8) | Includes 50,003 shares of our common stock for which Mr. Woods shares voting and investment power with his spouse. |
(9) | Includes 58,376 shares of our common stock for which Mr. Moynihan shares voting and investment power with his spouse. |
(10) | Includes 262,062 shares of our common stock for which Mr. Athanasia shares voting and investment power with his spouse. |
(11) | Includes 812,061 shares of our common stock held by Mr. Montag in a family trust for which Mr. Montag shares investment power with his spouse, who is trustee. |
(12) | Such persons have sole voting and investment power over 7,813,061 shares of our common stock and shared voting or investment power or both over 1,865,079 shares of our common stock. |
(13) | Consists of common stock held indirectly by Warren E. Buffett, 3555 Farnam Street, Omaha, NE 68131 and Berkshire Hathaway Inc., 3555 Farnam Street, Omaha, NE 68131. According to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019, Mr. Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. had shared voting and investment power with respect to all 918,900,000 shares. Information about other entities deemed to share beneficial ownership of the shares, including their voting and investment power, is disclosed in the Schedule 13G/A. |
(14) | Consists of common stock held by The Vanguard Group, 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355. According to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019, The Vanguard Group had sole voting power with respect to 10,716,141 shares, sole investment power with respect to 647,513,948 shares, shared voting power with respect to 2,103,005 shares, and shared investment power with respect to 12,598,697 shares. |
(15) | Consists of common stock held by BlackRock, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055. According to a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2019, BlackRock, Inc. had sole voting power with respect to 517,094,137 shares and sole investment power with respect to 597,087,279 shares. |
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) requires our directors, executive officers, and anyone holding 10% or more of a registered class of our equity securities (reporting persons) to file reports with the SEC showing their holdings of, and transactions in, these securities. Based solely on a review of copies of such reports, and written representations from each reporting person that no other reports are required, we believe that for 2018 all reporting persons filed the required reports on a timely basis under Section 16(a).
38 |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Our director compensation philosophy is to appropriately compensate our non-management directors for the time, expertise, and effort required to serve as a director of a large, complex, and highly regulated global company, and to align the interests of directors and long-term stockholders.
Annual payments are made after the non-management directors are elected by stockholders. Non-management directors who begin their Board or committee chair service other than at the annual meeting of stockholders receive a prorated amount of annual compensation. Mr. Moynihan receives no compensation for his services as our sole management director.
2018 Director Pay Components
The primary elements of annual compensation and incremental awards for our non-management directors for 2018 are provided in the table below. Incremental awards recognize additional responsibilities and the time commitment of these critical Board leadership roles.
ANNUAL AWARD COMPONENTS |
INCREMENTAL AWARDS FOR BOARD LEADERSHIP | |||||||||||||||||||
NON- MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS ($) |
LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR ($) |
AUDIT & ENTERPRISE RISK COMMITTEE CHAIRS ($) |
COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS & CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE CHAIRS ($) | |||||||||||||||||
Cash Award |
100,000 | 50,000 | 40,000 | 30,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Restricted Stock Award |
250,000 | 100,000 | N/A | N/A |
The annual restricted stock award in 2018 was made pursuant to the Bank of America Corporation Directors Stock Plan (Directors Stock Plan). The number of restricted shares awarded is equal to the dollar value of the award divided by the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date, rounded down to the next whole share, with cash paid for any fractional share. Dividends are paid on the award when they are paid on shares of our common stock. The annual restricted stock award is subject to a one-year vesting requirement. If a director retires before the one-year vesting date, a prorated amount of the award vests based on the number of days the director served during the vesting period before retirement. Any unvested amount of the award is forfeited.
2018 Director Compensation Review
Our Compensation and Benefits Committee annually reviews and periodically recommends updates to the director compensation program to our Board for approval. The Committees recommendation takes into account our director compensation philosophy, changes in market practices, and consultation with the Committees independent compensation consultant, Farient Advisors.
No changes were made to the form or amount of director compensation as part of the 2018 review. However, the Board determined that, beginning in 2019, awards of restricted stock to directors will be made from the Bank of America Key Employee Equity Plan (KEEP), instead of the Directors Stock Plan, to simplify plan administration. The terms of the 2019 annual awards from the KEEP will be consistent with those of prior awards under the Directors Stock Plan. See also Proposal 4 for additional information about the KEEP.
Director Deferral Plan
Non-management directors may elect to defer all or a portion of their annual restricted stock or cash awards through the Bank of America Corporation Director Deferral Plan (Director Deferral Plan). When directors elect to defer their restricted stock award, their stock account is credited with stock units equal in value to the restricted stock award and subject to the same vesting requirement applicable to restricted stock awards to directors. Each stock unit is equal in value to a share of our common stock but because it is not an actual share of our common stock it does not have any voting rights. When directors elect to defer their cash award, they may choose to defer into either a stock account or a cash account. Deferrals into a stock account are credited with dividend equivalents in the form of additional stock units and deferrals into the cash account are credited with interest at a long-term bond rate. Following retirement from our Board and depending on the directors selection, a non-management director may receive the stock account balance (to the extent vested) and cash account balance in a single lump sum cash payment or in a series of cash installment payments.
2019 Proxy Statement | 39 |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Stock Retention Requirements and Hedging Prohibition for Non-management Directors
🌑 | Under our stock retention requirements, non-management directors are required to hold and cannot sell the restricted stock they receive as compensation (except as necessary to pay taxes on taxable events such as vesting) until termination of their service. All non-management directors are in compliance with these requirements |
🌑 | Our Code of Conduct prohibits our directors from hedging and speculative trading of company securities |
2018 Director Compensation
The following table shows the compensation paid to our non-management directors for their services in 2018:
DIRECTOR |
FEES EARNED OR PAID IN CASH ($)(1) |
STOCK AWARDS ($)(2) |
ALL
OTHER ($)(3) |
TOTAL ($) | ||||||||||||||||
Sharon L. Allen
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,000
|
| ||||||||
Susan S. Bies
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
134,268
|
|
|
484,268
|
| ||||||||
Jack O. Bovender, Jr.
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
| ||||||||
Frank P. Bramble, Sr.
|
|
140,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
390,000
|
| ||||||||
Pierre J.P. de Weck
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
168,223
|
|
|
518,223
|
| ||||||||
Arnold W. Donald
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
| ||||||||
Linda P. Hudson
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
| ||||||||
Monica C. Lozano
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,000
|
| ||||||||
Thomas J. May
|
|
130,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,000
|
| ||||||||
Lionel L. Nowell III
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
355,000
|
| ||||||||
Clayton S. Rose(4)
|
|
49,860
|
|
|
124,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,510
|
| ||||||||
Michael D. White
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
| ||||||||
Thomas D. Woods
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
| ||||||||
R. David Yost
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
355,000
|
| ||||||||
Maria T. Zuber
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
(1) | The amounts in this column represent the annual cash award plus any Lead Independent Director or committee chair cash retainers paid in 2018, including amounts deferred under the Director Deferral Plan. For 2018 cash awards deferred into the stock account under the Director Deferral Plan, our directors were credited with the stock units shown in the table below based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of deferral: |
DIRECTOR |
STOCK UNITS (#) |
VALUE OF DEFERRED STOCK UNITS ($) | ||||||||
Thomas J. May
|
4,313.21
|
130,000
| ||||||||
Lionel L. Nowell III
|
3,317.85
|
100,000
| ||||||||
R. David Yost
|
3,317.85
|
100,000
|
(2) | The amounts in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards granted during 2018, whether or not those awards were deferred under the Director Deferral Plan. The grant date fair value is based on the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE on the grant date. As of December 31, 2018, our non-management directors held the number of unvested shares of restricted stock or, if deferred, unvested stock units shown in the table below: |
DIRECTOR |
UNVESTED SHARES OF RESTRICTED STOCK | ||||
Sharon L. Allen
|
|
8,294
|
| ||
Susan S. Bies
|
|
8,294
|
| ||
Jack O. Bovender, Jr.
|
|
11,612
|
| ||
Frank P. Bramble, Sr.
|
|
8,295
|
| ||
Pierre J. P. de Weck
|
|
8,294
|
| ||
Arnold W. Donald
|
|
8,294
|
| ||
Linda P. Hudson
|
|
8,295
|
|
40 |
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
DIRECTOR |
UNVESTED SHARES OF RESTRICTED STOCK | ||||
Monica C. Lozano
|
|
8,295
|
| ||
Thomas J. May
|
|
8,295
|
| ||
Lionel L. Nowell III
|
|
8,295
|
| ||
Clayton S. Rose
|
|
4,759
|
| ||
Michael D. White
|
|
8,295
|
| ||
Thomas D. Woods
|
|
4,478
|
| ||
R. David Yost
|
|
8,295
|
| ||
Maria T. Zuber
|
|
8,294
|
|
(3) | Our directors are eligible to participate in our matching gifts program, under which our charitable foundation matches up to $5,000 in donations made by our employees and active directors to approved charitable organizations. This program is also available to all U.S.-based, benefits eligible employees. The values in this column reflect that $5,000 was donated to charities in 2018 on behalf of Messrs. Nowell and Yost under the matching gifts program. |
This column excludes the amounts of any perquisites received by our directors with a value of less than $10,000 in aggregate, as permitted under SEC rules. |
Ms. Bies serves as chair of the board of directors of Merrill Lynch International (MLI), a United Kingdom broker-dealer subsidiary of Bank of America. For her services as a non-management director of MLI in 2018, Ms. Bies received an annual cash retainer totaling £100,000, which was paid monthly. The retainer paid in 2018 is reported in the table above based on a weighted average exchange rate of approximately 0.74 pounds sterling to one dollar. The exchange rate used for each payment was based on the average exchange rate for the month prior to the month of payment. |
Mr. de Weck was appointed a member of the board of directors of MLI on June 4, 2018. For his services as a non-management director of MLI and chair of the risk committee, Mr. de Weck received an annual cash retainer totaling £100,000, which was prorated in 2018 due to his mid-year appointment. Mr. de Weck also served as a member of the board of directors of Bank of America Merrill Lynch International Limited (BAMLI), a United Kingdom banking subsidiary of Bank of America, until December 1, 2018. For his services as a non-management director of BAMLI, he received an annual cash retainer totaling £75,000, which was paid monthly and prorated for his period of service. The retainers paid in 2018 are reported in the table above based on a weighted average exchange rate of approximately 0.75 pounds sterling to one dollar. The exchange rate used for each payment was based on the average exchange rate for the month prior to the month of payment. |
In addition, Mr. de Weck was appointed chair of the board of directors of BofA Securities Europe S.A., a French broker-dealer subsidiary of Bank of America, on January 21, 2019. For his services as chair of the board of directors of BofA Securities Europe S.A., Mr. de Weck will receive an annual cash retainer totaling 85,000, which is not reflected in the table above. |
(4) | Dr. Rose became a director in October 2018. The amount for Dr. Rose reflects a prorated award for his period of service. |
2019 Proxy Statement | 41 |
PROPOSAL 2: APPROVING OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (AN ADVISORY, NON-BINDING SAY ON PAY RESOLUTION)
PROPOSAL 2: APPROVING OUR EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (AN ADVISORY, NON-BINDING SAY ON PAY RESOLUTION)
We are seeking an advisory vote to approve our executive compensation for 2018. At our 2017 annual meeting of stockholders, a majority of stockholders voted to have a Say on Pay vote each year. As a result, we will conduct an advisory vote on executive compensation annually at least until the next stockholder advisory vote on the frequency of such votes.
Although the Say on Pay vote is advisory and is not binding on our Board, our Compensation and Benefits Committee will take into consideration the outcome of the vote when making future executive compensation decisions. At the 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, nearly 95% of the votes cast favored our Say on Pay proposal. The Committee considered this result and input from investors during our stockholder engagement process, and in light of the strong support, maintained a consistent overall approach for 2018.
Our Board believes that our current executive compensation program appropriately links compensation realized by our executive officers to our performance and properly aligns the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders. The details of this compensation for 2018, and the reasons we awarded it, are described in Compensation Discussion and Analysis, starting below.
Our Board recommends a vote "FOR" approving our executive compensation (an advisory, non-binding "Say on Pay" resolution) (Proposal 2).
Our Board recommends that our stockholders vote in favor of the following resolution:
Resolved, that our stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our companys named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the accompanying narrative discussion disclosed in this proxy statement.
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
42 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
a. Executive Compensation Philosophy
Our compensation philosophy is to pay for performance over the long-term, as well as on an annual basis. Our performance considerations include both financial and non-financial measuresincluding the manner in which results are achievedfor the company, line of business, and the individual. These considerations reinforce and promote Responsible Growth and maintain alignment with our risk framework. Our executive compensation program provides a mix of salary, incentives, and benefits paid over time to align executive officer and stockholder interests. Our Compensation and Benefits Committee has the primary responsibility for approving our compensation strategy and philosophy, and the compensation programs applicable to our named executive officers listed below. With respect to Mr. Moynihans compensation, our Compensation and Benefits Committee makes a recommendation that is further reviewed and approved by the independent members of the Board.
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
| ||
Brian T. Moynihan
|
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
| |
Paul M. Donofrio
|
Chief Financial Officer
| |
Dean C. Athanasia
|
President, Retail and Preferred & Small Business Banking
| |
Geoffrey S. Greener
|
Chief Risk Officer
| |
Thomas K. Montag
|
Chief Operating Officer
| |
Thong M. Nguyen
|
Vice Chairman, Bank of America
| |
Terrence P. Laughlin
|
Former Vice Chairman and Head of Global Wealth & Investment Management
|
Some of the information presented in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis may not apply to the compensation of Mr. Laughlin, who passed away on October 25, 2018.
b. 2018 Executive Compensation Highlights
🌑 | Our design is aligned with our focus on Responsible Growth and has been consistent for more than six years, receiving an average of 94.3% stockholder support during that period: |
O | Mix of fixed and variable pay |
O | Cancellation and clawback features in all equity-based incentives |
O | Deferral of majority of variable pay through equity-based incentives |
🌑 | Risk management practices that encourage sustainable performance over time |
🌑 | Total compensation awarded to Mr. Moynihan of $26.5 million for 2018, compared to $23 million for 2017 |
🌑 | 94.3% of Mr. Moynihans total compensation is variable and directly linked to company performance |
🌑 | Half of Mr. Moynihans variable pay was awarded as performance restricted stock units and must be re-earned based on three-year average performance of key metrics (return on assets and growth in adjusted tangible book value) |
O | Increased the return on assets standard by 10 basis points (bps) in order to achieve the maximum 100% payout |
🌑 | 50% of net after-tax shares Mr. Moynihan receives as compensation must be retained until one year after retirement |
c. Stockholder Engagement & Say on Pay Results
We conduct stockholder engagement throughout the year and provide stockholders with an annual opportunity to cast an advisory Say on Pay vote. At our 2018 annual meeting of stockholders, nearly 95% of the votes cast favored our Say on Pay proposal. Additionally in 2018 and early 2019, management and directors met with investors owning approximately 35% of our outstanding common shares and discussed our executive compensation program, human capital management, and other compensation-related matters. These discussions, together with the 2018 Say on Pay results, indicated strong support for our 2017 compensation program and influenced our decision to maintain a consistent overall approach for 2018. |
Historical Say on Pay Votes
|
2019 Proxy Statement | 43 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
2. 2018 Company & Segment Performance
From our continued dedication to Responsible Growth, we achieved record results in 2018. We continue focusing on what we control and drive: creating operating leverage by managing expenses, growing loans and deposits, and doing more business with our clients. We are doing this responsibly and within our Risk Framework while listening to our clients, communities, and employees when they answer the question: What would you like the power to do?. We believe we are well positioned to continue delivering Responsible Growth in 2019.
Following are financial highlights and key measures of company and line of business performance that our Compensation and Benefits Committee considered in evaluating the 2018 performance of our named executive officers.
a. Company Performance
2018 Net Income
$28.1 billion
|
2018 Revenue
$91.2 billion 4% from 2017
|
2018 Noninterest Expense
2% from 2017
|
Quarterly Positive Operating Leverage 4 Consecutive Years
| ||||||||||||||||||
🌑 Net income of $28.1 billion, or $2.61 per diluted share, grew 54% compared to $18.2 billion, or $1.56 per diluted share in 2017
🌑 Return on average assets (ROA) of 1.21%, return on average common shareholders equity of 11.04%, and return on average tangible common shareholders equity of 15.55%*
🌑 Noninterest expense decreased 2% in 2018 and is down $30 billion since 2010; efficiency ratio improved to 58.5% in 2018 from 62.7% in 2017; continued focus on expenses while investing in new capabilities and growth
🌑 Net charge-off ratios remaining near historic lows
🌑 Book value per share increased to $25.13 in 2018; and tangible book value per share increased to $17.91 in 2018*
🌑 Common equity tier 1 ratio of 11.6%, remaining above the 2019 regulatory requirement of 9.5%
🌑 Business referrals increased 11% to 7.1 million in 2018 from 6.4 million in 2017 reflecting improved client and customer activity
🌑 Returned $25.5 billion in capital to our common stockholders through dividends and share repurchases; up over 50% from 2017
🌑 Total stockholder return above primary competitor group average on a 1-year, 3-year and 5-year basis
* Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. |
|
Total stockholder return above primary peer group average on a 1-year, 3-year and 5-year basis
|
| ||
b. Segment Performance
BUSINESS ($ in millions) |
TOTAL REVENUE(1) |
PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES |
NONINTEREST EXPENSE |
NET INCOME (LOSS) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | 2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer Banking |
37,523 | 34,521 | 3,664 | 3,525 | 17,713 | 17,795 | 12,029 | 8,202 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global Wealth & Investment Management |
19,338 | 18,590 | 86 | 56 | 13,777 | 13,556 | 4,079 | 3,093 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global Banking |
19,644 | 19,999 | 8 | 212 | 8,591 | 8,596 | 8,173 | 6,953 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global Markets |
16,063 | 15,951 | | 164 | 10,686 | 10,731 | 3,979 | 3,293 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All Other(2) |
(711 | ) | (784 | ) | (476 | ) | (561 | ) | 2,614 | 4,065 | (113 | ) | (3,309 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Corporation |
91,247 | 87,352 | 3,282 | 3,396 | 53,381 | 54,743 | 28,147 | 18,232 |
(1) | Bank of America Corporation reports its results of operations, including total revenue, for each business segment and All Other on a fully-taxable equivalent (FTE) basis. Total revenue for Bank of America Corporation on an FTE basis was $91,857 million for 2018 and $88,277 million for 2017, which is not a generally accepted accounting principle financial measure. FTE basis adjustments were $610 million and $925 million in 2018 and 2017. See Appendix A for more information about total revenue of Bank of America Corporation on an FTE basis. |
(2) | All Other is not a business segment. It consists of asset and liability management activities, equity investments, non-core mortgage loans and servicing activities, the net impact of periodic revisions to the MSR (mortgage servicing right) valuation model for core and non-core MSRs and the related economic hedge results, liquidating businesses, and residual expense allocations. Total Revenue and Net Income (Loss) in 2017 include a downward valuation adjustment of $946 million and a charge of $2.9 billion, respectively, due to enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act). |
44 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
Segment Highlights
The Compensation and Benefits Committee believes the company and segment performance highlights discussed below, as well as other company and business results, reflect that management is delivering Responsible Growth, continuing to streamline and simplify our company, and driving operational excellence.
(1) | Represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. |
CONSUMER BANKING Consumer Banking offers a diversified range of credit, banking, and investment products and services to consumers and small businesses-includes Retail Banking and Preferred and Small Business Banking. Average loans and leases up 7% to $284 billion Average deposits up 5% to $684 billion Merrill Edge brokerage assets of $182 billion, including full-year client flows of $25 billion Efficiency ratio improved to 47% from 52% in 2017 26.4 million mobile banking users, up 9% o 5.7 billion mobile logins in 2018 # 1 in mobile banking, online banking and digital sales functionality o Digital banking has won 30+ digital awards in the last two years o Online and Mobile certified by JD Power as providing "Outstanding Customer Experience" $12.0 billion Net income, 47% increase GLOBAL WEALTH & INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT Global Wealth & Investment Management (GWIM) provides investment and wealth management solutions to our affluent and ultra-high net worth clients-includes Merrill Lynch Wealth Management and U.S. Trust. Pretax margin increased to 29% Full-year client balance flows of $56 billion Average loans and leases increased 6% to $161 billion Accelerated organic wealth management household growth o Net new Merrill Lynch relationships up more than 4 times the 2017 level o U.S. Trust new relationships up 9% in 2018 Number of wealth advisors increased 1% to 19,459 as we continue to invest in client-facing roles #1 wealth management firm for the 10th consecutive year by Barron's $4.1 billion Net income, 32% increase $8.1 billion Net income, 18% increase GLOBAL BANKING Global Banking provides a wide range of lending-related products and services, integrated working capital management and treasury solutions to clients, and underwriting and advisory services-includes Global Corporate Banking, Global Commercial Banking, Business Banking, and Global Investment Banking. Average loans and leases increased 2% to $354 billion Average deposits increased 8% to $336 billion Total Corporation investment banking fees, excluding self-led deals, of $5.3 billion o Ranked #4 by Dealogic in Investment Banking Fees Business Lending revenue decreased 6% to $8.6 billion Global Transaction Services revenue increased 10% to $7.9 billion Efficiency ratio remained low at 44% North America's Best Bank for Small to Medium-sized Enterprises by Euromoney GLOBAL MARKETS $4.0 billion Net income, 21% increase Global Markets offers sales and trading services, including research, to institutional clients across fixed-income, credit, currency, commodity, and equity businesses. Sales and trading revenue of $13.1 billion, including net debit valuation adjustment (DVA) losses of $162 million Excluding net DVA, sales and trading revenue of $13.2 billion o Equities up 18% to $4.9 billion o Fixed-income, currencies and commodities down 8% to $8.3 billion Return on average allocated capital of 11%, up from 9% in 2017 Noninterest expense decreased $45 million to $10.7 billion #1 Equity Portfolio Trading Share North American Institutions, by Greenwich
2019 Proxy Statement | 45 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
3. Executive Compensation Program Features
a. Executive Pay Components & Variable Pay Mix
Our Compensation and Benefits Committee determines the pay for our named executive officers for each performance year. For the CEO, a portion of the compensation is delivered as base salary and the remainder as restricted stock units. For named executive officers other than the CEO, a portion of the compensation is delivered as base salary and the remainder as annual cash incentive and restricted stock units. Restricted stock units are divided into two components: time-based and performance-based. Our time-based awards vest ratably over three years except for the CEOs cash-settled restricted stock units that vest over one year. Our performance-based awards are re-earned following initial grant only by the sustained three-year average achievement of performance metrics. Consequently, for our named executive officers to realize the full value of their performance-based awards, the future performance of our company must be at or above the standards set for this award. This pay-for-performance structure, which emphasizes variable pay, helps motivate our executives to deliver sustained stockholder value and Responsible Growth.
The following chart provides an overview of the 2018 pay components for our active named executive officers:
Performance Year 2018 Pay Components
DESCRIPTION
|
HOW IT PAYS
| |
Base Salary |
||
🌑 Determined based on job scope, experience, and market comparable positions; provides fixed income to attract and retain executives and balance risk-taking |
🌑 Semi-monthly cash payment through 2018 | |
Annual Cash Incentiveexcept CEO |
||
🌑 Provides short-term variable pay for the performance year for non-CEO executives |
🌑 Single cash payment in February 2019 | |
Cash-Settled Restricted Stock Units (CRSUs)CEO only |
||
🌑 Track stock price performance over 1-year vesting period 🌑 Vest in 12 equal installments from March 2019 February 2020 |
🌑 Granted in February 2019 🌑 Cash-settled upon vesting | |
Performance Restricted Stock Units (PRSUs) |
||
🌑 Vest based on future achievement of specific return on assets and growth in adjusted tangible book value standards over 3-year performance period 🌑 Track company and stock price performance 🌑 Encourage sustained earnings during the performance period |
🌑 Granted in February 2019 🌑 If performance standards are achieved, grants will be re-earned at the end of the performance period (2021) 🌑 100% is the maximum that can be re-earned 🌑 If both threshold standards are not achieved, the entire award is forfeited 🌑 Stock-settled to the extent re-earned | |
See Results for Performance Restricted Stock Units on page 55 for the vesting and value of prior awards | ||
Time-Based Restricted Stock Units (TRSUs) |
||
🌑 Track stock price performance over 3-year vesting period 🌑 Align with sustained longer-term stock price performance |
🌑 Granted in February 2019 🌑 Vest in three equal annual installments beginning in February 2020 🌑 Stock-settled upon vesting |
Performance Year 2018 Variable Pay Mix
🌑 | A majority of variable pay is delivered as equity-based awards that reflect the balance between short-term and long-term results |
🌑 | The charts below illustrate the variable pay mix for our CEO and other active named executive officers |
46 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
b. Compensation Risk Management Features
Our Compensation and Benefits Committee believes that the design and governance of our executive compensation program encourage executive performance consistent with the highest standards of risk management.
Highlighted below are the key features of our compensation program for executive officers, including the pay practices we have implemented to drive Responsible Growth, encourage executive retention, and align executive and stockholder interests. We also identify certain pay practices we have not implemented because we believe they do not serve our risk management standards or stockholders long-term interests.
What We Do |
|
Pay for performance and allocate individual awards based on actual results and how results were achieved
| ||||
|
Use balanced, risk-adjusted performance measures
| |||||
|
Review feedback from independent control functions in performance evaluations and compensation decisions
| |||||
|
Provide appropriate mix of fixed and variable pay to reward company, line of business, and individual performance
| |||||
|
Defer a majority of variable pay as equity-based awards
| |||||
|
Apply clawback features to all executive officer variable pay
| |||||
|
Require stock ownership and retention to retirement of a significant portion of equity-based awards
| |||||
|
Engage with stockholders on governance and compensation
| |||||
|
Prohibit hedging and speculative trading of company securities
| |||||
|
Grant equity-based awards on a pre-established date to avoid any appearance of coordination with the release of material non-public information | |||||
What We Dont Do |
|
Change in control agreements for executive officers
| ||||
|
Severance agreements for executive officers
| |||||
|
Multi-year guaranteed incentive awards for executive officers
| |||||
|
Severance benefits to our executive officers exceeding two times base salary and bonus without stockholder approval per our policy
| |||||
|
Accrual of additional retirement benefits under any supplemental executive retirement plans
| |||||
|
Excise tax gross-ups upon change in control
| |||||
|
Discounting, reloading, or repricing stock options without stockholder approval
| |||||
|
Single-trigger vesting of equity-based awards upon change in control
| |||||
|
Adjust PRSU results for the impact of litigation, fines, and penalties, or passage of the Tax Act
| |||||
Additionally, it is not our policy to provide for the accelerated vesting of equity awards upon an employees voluntary resignation to enter government service. We do not anticipate changing our approach.
The Compensation Governance and Risk Management discussion beginning on page 25 contains more information about our Compensation Governance Policy and our compensation risk management practices. That section describes our Chief Risk Officers review and certification of our incentive compensation programs and our Chief Audit Executives risk-based review of our incentive plans. We also describe the extent to which our CEO participates in determining executive officer compensation, and the role of Farient Advisors, the Committees independent compensation consultant.
2019 Proxy Statement | 47 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
ii. Multiple Cancellation & Clawback Features
Our equity-based awards are subject to three separate and distinct features that can result in the awards being cancelled or prior payments being clawed back in the event of certain detrimental conduct or financial losses. We believe these features encourage appropriate behavior and manage risk in our compensation program. Our named executive officers are subject to all three cancellation and clawback features.
DETRIMENTAL
CONDUCT
|
PERFORMANCE-BASED CANCELLATION
|
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
| ||||
Who |
🌑 Applies to approximately 21,200 employees who received equity-based awards as part of their 2018 incentive compensation, as well as all recipients of our special equity-based awards granted in March 2018 |
🌑 Applies to approximately 4,200 employees who are deemed to be risk takers and received equity-based awards as part of their 2018 compensation
🌑 Risk takers defined according to banking regulations and company policies
|
🌑 Applies to all of our executive officers
🌑 Our policy covers a broader group of executives than required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which covers only the CEO and Chief Financial Officer | |||
When | 🌑 An employee engages in certain detrimental conduct, including:
O illegal activity
O breach of a fiduciary duty
O intentional violation or grossly negligent disregard of our policies, rules, and procedures
O trading positions that result in a need for restatement or significant loss
O conduct constituting cause |
🌑 Our company, a line of business, a business unit, or an employee experiences a loss outside of the ordinary course of business and the employee is found to be accountable based on:
O the magnitude of the loss
O the decisions that may have led to the loss
O the employees overall performance |
🌑 When fraud or intentional misconduct by an executive officer causes our company to restate its financial statements | |||
What |
🌑 All unvested equity awards will be cancelled
🌑 Any previously vested award may be recouped, depending on the conduct |
🌑 All or part of the outstanding award may be cancelled |
🌑 Any incentive compensation may be recouped as determined by the Board or a Board committee
🌑 Any action necessary to remedy the misconduct and prevent its recurrence may be taken |
Since 2011, all of our equity-based awards provide that they are subject to any final rules implementing the compensation clawback provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act) that the SEC and NYSE may adopt. We intend to update our policies to reflect any applicable rules implementing the Dodd-Frank Act clawback requirements that are finalized, released, and become effective.
Pursuant to our Incentive Compensation Forfeiture & Recoupment Disclosure Policy, we will disclose publicly the incentive forfeitures or clawbacks recovered from certain senior executives in the aggregate pursuant to our Detrimental Conduct and Incentive Compensation Recoupment policies described above, subject to certain privacy, privilege, and regulatory limitations.
iii. Stock Ownership & Retention Requirements
Our stock ownership and retention requirements align executive officer and stockholder interests by linking the value realized from equity-based awards to sustainable company performance. Beginning with awards granted for 2012, our Corporate Governance Guidelines require:
MINIMUM SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OWNED
|
RETENTION
| |||
Chief Executive Officer |
500,000 shares |
50% of net after-tax shares received from equity-based awards retained until one year after retirement
| ||
Other Executive Officers |
300,000 shares |
50% of net after-tax shares received from equity-based awards retained until retirement
|
New executive officers have up to five years to be in compliance with these requirements. Full-value shares and units owned, awarded, or deemed beneficially owned are included in the stock ownership calculations; PRSUs are included only when earned and stock options are not included. Our Code of Conduct prohibits our executive officers and employees from hedging and speculative trading of company securities. None of our named executive officers have sold any shares of our common stock since 2015.
48 |
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
4. Compensation Decisions and Rationale
a. Pay Evaluation & Decision Process
Each year, our Compensation and Benefits Committee reviews our named executive officers performance using a balanced and disciplined approach to determine their base salaries and variable compensation awards. The approach for 2018 included a range of performance and governance considerations as inputs into compensation decisions.
Performance Considerations The Committee considers various factors that collectively indicate successful management of our business, including: Company, line of business, and individual performance, including financial and non-financial measures The manner in which results are achieved, adherence to risk and compliance policies, and the quality of earnings Accountability in driving a strong risk management culture and other core values of our company Our year-over-year performance relative to our established risk metrics Our performance relative to our primary competitor group The Committees evaluation includes a robust review of performance scorecards, which are aligned to the four tenets of Responsible Growth: Grow and win in the market Grow with our customer- focused strategy Grow within our Risk Framework Grow in a sustainable manner For each tenet of Responsible Growth, the scorecard includes metrics tailored for each named executive officer based on company, line of business, risk financial, and strategic priorities. Pages [.] through [.] provide material factors aligned to each of the four tenets the Committee considered. Market Practices and Governance Considerations The Committee reviews market pay practices and governance practices to inform compensation decisions: Market pay practices, including market compensation benchmarks from our primary peers are reviewed annually Additionally, practices at leading international financial institutions and global companies headquartered in the U.S. spanning all industries of similar size and scope are considered The Committee reviews feedback from our independent control functions (i.e., audit, compliance, finance, human resources, legal, and risk) as part of their assessment of performance The Chief Financial Officer and Chief Risk Officer join the Committee to discuss full-year financial and risk performance The Committee considers our CEOs perspective on executive performance and pay for our Named Executive Officers and other key executives The Committees independent consultant, Farient, Advisors provides perspectives on company performance and market pay practices for our NEOs as an input into our compensation decisions Compensation Decisions and Approvals: After taking all of these various inputs into consideration, the Committee applies its business judgment and discretion to determine the appropriate compensation for the named executive officers As part of the compensation decisions, the Committee evaluates the relevant facts and circumstances so it may judiciously assess pay for performance alignment, potentially resulting in an increase or decrease to compensation Compensation decisions are generally determined on a year-over-year basis without preset target levels of total compensation, without assigning weightings, and without formulaic benchmarking The Committee believes this use of business judgment is in the stockholders' best interests as it enables the Committee to appropriately respond to qualitative factors in our Responsible Growth and the dynamic nature of our businesses and industry For the CEO and the Chief Risk Officer, the Committee's pay recommendations are further reviewed and approved by the independent members of our Board and the Enterprise Risk Committee, respectivelyPerformance Considerations The Committee considers various factors that collectively indicate successful management of our business, including: Company, line of business, and individual performance, including financial and non-financial measures The manner in which results are achieved, adherence to risk and compliance policies, and the quality of earnings Accountability in driving a strong risk management culture and other core values of our company Our year-over-year performance relative to our established risk metrics Our performance relative to our primary competitor group The Committees evaluation includes a robust review of performance scorecards, which are aligned to the four tenets of Responsible Growth: Grow and win in the market Grow with our customer- focused strategy Grow within our Risk Framework Grow in a sustainable manner For each tenet of Responsible Growth, the scorecard includes metrics tailored for each named executive officer based on company, line of business, risk financial, and strategic priorities. Pages [.] through [.] provide material factors aligned to each of the four tenets the Committee considered. Market Practices and Governance Considerations The Committee reviews market pay practices and governance practices to inform compensation decisions: Market pay practices, including market compensation benchmarks from our primary peers, are reviewed annually Additionally, practices at leading international finan