Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders

PROXY STATEMENT

Voting Information

Election of Directors (Item 1)

Information About Directors

Board Leadership

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

Board Organization and Committees; Other Governance Provisions

Compensation of Directors

Director Compensation Table

Stock Ownership

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Executive Compensation Tables

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Report of the Compensation Committee

Report of the Audit Committee

Principal Accounting Firm Fees

Audit Committee Policies and Procedures for Preapproval of Audit and Non-Audit Services

Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors (Item 2)

Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Item 3)

General Information

Shareholder Proposals for 2014 Annual Meeting

Director Nominations for 2014 Annual Meeting

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Householding of Annual Meeting Materials

Annual Report to Shareholders

TIME AND DATE

9:00 a.m. Central Time on April 25, 2013

PLACE

The auditorium at 1111 Louisiana, Houston, Texas

ITEMS OF BUSINESS

•    elect the seven nominees named in the Proxy Statement as directors to hold office until the 2014 annual meeting;

•    ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for 2013;

•    conduct an advisory vote on executive compensation; and

•    conduct other business if properly raised.

RECORD DATE

Shareholders of record at the close of business on February 25, 2013 are entitled to vote.

PROXY VOTING

Each share entitles the holder to one vote. You may vote either by attending the meeting or by proxy. For specific voting information, please see “Voting Information” beginning on page 1 of the Proxy Statement that follows. Even if you plan to attend the meeting, please sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card or submit your proxy using the Internet or telephone procedures described on the proxy card.

Who may vote?

Shareholders recorded in our stock register at the close of business on February 25, 2013 may vote at the meeting. As of that date, there were 427,918,272 shares of our common stock outstanding.

How many votes do I have?

You have one vote for each share of our common stock you owned as of the record date for the meeting.

How do I vote?

Your vote is important. You may vote in person at the meeting or by proxy. We recommend you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the meeting. You may always change your vote at the meeting if you are a holder of record or have a proxy from the record holder. Giving us your proxy means that you authorize us to vote your shares at the meeting in the manner you indicated on your proxy card. You may also provide your proxy using the Internet or telephone procedures described on the proxy card.

You may vote for or against each director nominee and the proposals under Item 2 (ratification of appointment of independent auditors), and Item 3 (advisory vote on executive compensation), or you may abstain from voting on these items. If you give us your proxy but do not specify how to vote, we will vote your shares in accordance with the Board’s recommendations.

What are the Board’s recommendations?

The Board’s recommendations are set forth together with the description of each item in this proxy statement. In summary, the Board and, with respect to the ratification of the independent auditors, the Audit Committee, recommends a vote as follows:

•    FOR the election of the seven nominees named in this proxy statement as directors;

•    FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors for 2013; and

•    FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation paid to our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement.

If any other matters properly come before the annual meeting, we will vote the shares in accordance with our best judgment and discretion.

What if I change my mind

after I have voted?

You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by submitting a new proxy card with a later date, by voting in person at the meeting, or by giving written notice to Mr. Scott E. Rozzell, Corporate Secretary, at CenterPoint Energy’s address shown above.

Do I need a ticket to attend the meeting?

Proof of ownership of our common stock and proof of identification are needed for you to be admitted to the meeting. If you plan to attend the meeting and your shares are held by banks, brokers, stock plans or other holders of record (in “street name”), you will need to provide proof of ownership. Examples of proof of ownership include a recent brokerage statement or letter from your broker or bank. All shareholders will be required to present valid picture identification, such as a drivers license, before being admitted to the meeting.

What constitutes a quorum?

In order to carry on the business of the meeting, we must have a quorum. This means at least a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding as of the record date must be represented at the meeting, either by proxy or in person. Shares of common stock owned by CenterPoint Energy are not voted and do not count for this purpose.

Abstentions and proxies submitted by brokers that do not indicate a vote because they do not have discretionary authority and have not received instructions as to how to vote on a proposal (so-called “broker non-votes”) will be considered as present for quorum purposes.

Brokers holding shares must vote according to specific instructions they receive from the beneficial owners of those shares. If brokers do not receive specific instructions, brokers may in some cases vote the shares in their discretion. However, the New York Stock Exchange precludes brokers from exercising voting discretion on certain proposals without specific instructions from the beneficial owner. Importantly, NYSE rules expressly prohibit brokers holding shares in “street name” for their beneficial holder clients from voting on behalf of the clients in uncontested director elections or on matters that relate to executive compensation without receiving specific voting instructions from those clients. Under NYSE rules, brokers will have discretion to vote only on Item 2 (ratification of appointment of independent auditors). Brokers cannot vote on Item 1 (election of directors), and Item 3 (advisory vote on executive compensation), without instructions from the beneficial owners. If you do not instruct your broker how to vote with respect to Item 1 or Item 3, your broker will not vote for you with respect to those items.

What vote is required to approve each of

the proposals?

Under our bylaws, directors are elected by a majority of the votes cast at the meeting. This means that the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote. For additional information on the election of directors, see “Election of Directors—Information About Directors—Majority Voting in Director Elections.”

Each of the ratification of the appointment of independent auditors (Item 2) and approval of the resolution included in Item 3 (advisory vote on executive compensation) requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of common stock entitled to vote and voted for or against this item. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the vote on these items.

Information About Directors

Each of our directors will be elected at this year’s meeting to a one-year term expiring at the annual meeting in 2014.

If any nominee becomes unavailable for election, the Board of Directors can name a substitute nominee, and proxies will be voted for the substitute nominee pursuant to discretionary authority.

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, when we refer to periods prior to September 1, 2002, CenterPoint Energy should be understood to mean or include the public companies that were its predecessors.

Listed below are the biographies of each director nominee. The biographies include information regarding each individual’s service as a director of the Company, business experience, director positions at public companies held currently or at any time during the last five years, and the experiences, qualifications, attributes or skills that caused the Governance Committee and the Board to determine that the person should serve as a director for the Company.

Nominees for Directors

We currently have ten directors. However, current directors Donald R. Campbell, O. Holcombe Crosswell and Sherman M. Wolff are scheduled to retire from the Board when their terms expire at the 2013 annual meeting. Accordingly, the size of the Board of Directors will be reduced, and seven directors are to be elected at the 2013 annual meeting to each serve a one-year term expiring on the date of the annual meeting of shareholders to be held in 2014. The seven nominees for election in 2013 are listed below.

Milton Carroll, age 62, has been a director since 1992 and Chairman since September 2002. Mr. Carroll is Chairman and founder of Instrument Products, Inc., an oil-tool manufacturing company in Houston, Texas. He has served as a director of Halliburton Company since 2006, Western Gas Holdings, LLC, general partner of Western Gas Partners, LP, since 2008, LyondellBasell Industries N.V. since July 2010, and LRE GP, LLC, general partner of LRR Energy, L.P., since November 2011. He has served as a director of Healthcare Service Corporation since 1998 and as its chairman since 2002. Mr. Carroll previously served as a director of EGL, Inc. from 2003 to 2007. The Board determined that Mr. Carroll should be nominated for election as a director due to his extensive knowledge of the Company and its operations gained in over 20 years of service as a director of the Company, its predecessors and affiliates. The Board values Mr. Carroll’s knowledge of the oil and natural gas industries, board leadership skills and corporate governance expertise.

Michael P. Johnson, age 65, has been a director since July 2008. Mr. Johnson is President and Chief Executive Officer of J&A Group, LLC, a management and business consulting company. He served from 2002 until his retirement in March 2008 as Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of The Williams Companies, Inc., a publicly held natural gas producer, processor and transporter. Prior to joining the Williams Companies, he served in various executive capacities with Amoco Corporation, including vice

president of human resources. He has served as a director of Patriot Coal Corporation since 2008, Buffalo Wild Wings, Inc. since 2006, and QuikTrip Corporation, a private company, since 2001. He also serves on the Oklahoma Advisory Board of Health Care Service Corporation and on the boards of several charitable organizations and foundations. The Board determined that Mr. Johnson should be nominated for election as a director due to his extensive management and leadership experience as a senior executive officer of major international companies. The Board values Mr. Johnson’s knowledge of the oil and gas industry and expertise in corporate governance and human resources matters.

Janiece M. Longoria, age 60, has been a director since 2005. Ms. Longoria is a partner in the law firm of Ogden, Gibson, Broocks, Longoria & Hall, L.L.P. in Houston, Texas and has a concentration of experience in commercial and securities-related litigation and regulatory matters. She has served as a director of Patriot Coal Corporation since January 2011, as commissioner of the Port of Houston Authority since 2002 and as its chairman since January 2013. She previously served as a member of The University of Texas System Board of Regents and the University of Texas Investment Management Company from February 2008 to February 2011. She also previously served as the treasurer and a director of the Houston Convention Center Hotel Corporation from 1999 to 2004. The Board determined that Ms. Longoria should serve as a director due to her extensive legal and regulatory expertise and her experience serving as a commissioner or in a similar oversight position on boards of major governmental and civic organizations. The Board also values her service on boards of charitable organizations and extensive community involvement.

David M. McClanahan, age 63, has served as a director and as President and Chief Executive Officer of CenterPoint Energy since 2002. He served as Vice Chairman of our predecessor company from October 2000 to September 2002 and as President and Chief Operating Officer of its Delivery Group from 1999 to September 2002. Previously, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of our predecessor company’s Houston Lighting & Power Company division from 1997 to 1999. He has served in various executive officer capacities with us since 1986. He currently serves on the boards of the Edison Electric Institute, the American Gas Association and the Greater Houston Partnership, where he was named chairman in January 2013. The Board determined that Mr. McClanahan should be nominated for election as a director due to his extensive knowledge of the industry and the Company, its operations and people, gained in over 40 years of service with the Company and its predecessors in positions of increasing responsibility. The Board benefits from Mr. McClanahan’s financial and accounting expertise and industry leadership.

Susan O. Rheney, age 53, has been a director since July 2008. Ms. Rheney is a private investor. From 2002 until March 2010, she served as a director of Genesis Energy, Inc., the general partner of Genesis Energy, LP, a publicly traded limited partnership. From 2003

to 2005, she was a director of Cenveo, Inc. and served as chairman of the board from January to August 2005. She also served until 2001 as a principal with The Sterling Group, a private financial and investment organization. The Board determined that Ms. Rheney should be nominated for election as a director due to her financial management and accounting expertise and experience as a director of a mid-stream oil and gas company. The Board benefits from her experience implementing strategic and operational initiatives at a variety of firms.

R. A. Walker, age 56, has been a director since April 2010. He was named Chief Executive Officer and a director of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation in May 2012, in addition to the role of President, which he assumed in February 2010. In February 2013, Anadarko announced that Mr. Walker was elected as Chairman of the Board, effective at the end of the Anadarko annual meeting on May 14, 2013. He previously served as Chief Operating Officer from March 2009 until his appointment as Chief Executive Officer. He served as Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer from September 2005 until his appointment as Chief Operating Officer. He served as a director of Western Gas Holdings, LLC from August 2007 until March 2013, Western Gas Equity Holdings, LLC from September 2012 until March 2013, and Temple-Inland, Inc. from November 2008 until February 2012. Mr. Walker serves on the board of trustees for the Houston Museum of Natural Science and previously served as a trustee for the United Way of Greater Houston. The Board determined that Mr. Walker should be nominated for election as a director due to his extensive experience in the energy industry, including finance, institutional investing, mergers and acquisitions and as a director of several other public companies.

Peter S. Wareing, age 61, has been a director since 2005. Mr. Wareing is a co-founder and partner of the private equity firm Wareing, Athon & Company and is involved in a variety of businesses. He is the Chairman of the Board of Gulf Coast Pre-Stress, Ltd. in Pass Christian, Mississippi. He also currently serves as a trustee of Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston. The Board determined that Mr. Wareing should be nominated for election as a director due to his expertise in financial, business and corporate strategy development matters. The Board also values his civic leadership and involvement in the Houston business community.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the nominees as directors.

Director Nomination Process

In assessing the qualifications of candidates for nomination as director, the Governance Committee and the Board consider, in addition to qualifications set forth in our bylaws, each potential nominee’s:

personal and professional integrity, experience, reputation and skills;

ability and willingness to devote the time and effort necessary to be an effective board member; and

commitment to act in the best interests of CenterPoint Energy and its shareholders.

Consideration is also given to the requirements under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange for a majority of independent directors, as well as qualifications applicable to membership on Board committees under the listing standards and various regulations.

In addition, the Governance Committee and the Board take into account the Board’s desire that the directors possess a broad range of business experience, diversity, professional skills, geographic representation and other qualities they consider important in light of our business plan. The Governance Committee periodically reviews the overall composition of the Board, the skills represented by incumbent directors and the need for new directors to replace retiring directors or to expand the Board. In seeking new director candidates, the Governance Committee and the Board consider the skills, expertise and qualities that will be required to effectively oversee management of the business and affairs of the Company. The Governance Committee and the Board also consider the diversity of the Board in terms of the geographic, gender, age, and ethnic makeup of its members. The Board evaluates the makeup of its membership in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group that can effectively work together using its diversity of experience to see that the Company is well-managed and represents the interests of the Company and its shareholders.

Suggestions for potential nominees for director can come to the Governance Committee from a number of sources, including incumbent directors, officers, executive search firms and others. If an executive search firm is engaged for this purpose, the Governance Committee has sole authority with respect to the engagement. The Governance Committee will also consider director candidates recommended by shareholders. The extent to which the Governance Committee dedicates time and resources to the consideration and evaluation of any potential nominee brought to its attention depends on the information available to the Committee about the qualifications and suitability of the individual, viewed in light of the needs of the Board, and is at the Committee’s discretion. The Governance Committee and the Board evaluate the desirability for incumbent directors to continue on the Board following the expiration of their respective terms, taking into account their contributions as Board members and the benefit that results from increasing insight and experience developed over a period of time.

Shareholders may submit the names and other information regarding individuals they wish to be considered for nomination as directors by writing to the Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the first page of this proxy statement. In order to be considered for nomination by the Board of Directors, submissions of potential nominees should be made no later than November 15 in the year prior to the meeting at which the election is to occur.

Director Independence

The Board of Directors determined that Messrs. Campbell, Carroll, Crosswell, Johnson, Walker, Wareing and Wolff, and Mses. Longoria and Rheney are independent within the meaning of the listing

standards for general independence of the New York Stock Exchange. Under the listing standards, a majority of our directors must be independent, and the Audit, Compensation and Governance Committees are each required to be composed solely of independent directors. The standards for audit committee and compensation committee membership include additional requirements under rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Board has determined that all of the members of these three committees meet the applicable independence requirements. The listing standards relating to general independence consist of both a requirement for a board determination that the director has no material relationship with the listed company and a listing of several specific relationships that preclude independence.

As contemplated by New York Stock Exchange Rules then in effect, the Board adopted categorical standards in 2004 to assist in making determinations of independence. Under the rules then in effect, relationships falling within the categorical standards were not required to be disclosed or separately discussed in the proxy statement in connection with the Board’s independence determinations.

The categorical standards cover two types of relationships. The first type involves relationships of the kind addressed in either:

the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission requiring proxy statement disclosure of relationships and transactions; or

the New York Stock Exchange listing standards specifying relationships that preclude a determination of independence.

For those relationships, the categorical standards are met if the relationship neither requires disclosure nor precludes a determination of independence under either set of rules.

The second type of relationship is one involving charitable contributions by CenterPoint Energy to an organization in which a director is an executive officer. In that situation, the categorical standards are met if the contributions do not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the organization’s gross revenue in any of the last three years.

In making its subjective determination regarding the independence of Messrs. Campbell, Carroll, Crosswell, Johnson, Walker, Wareing and Wolff and Mses. Longoria and Rheney, the Board reviewed and discussed additional information provided by the directors and the Company with regard to each of the director’s business and personal activities as they related to the Company and Company management. The Board considered the transactions in the context of the New York Stock Exchange’s objective listing standards, the categorical standards noted above and the additional standards established for members of audit, compensation and governance committees.

In connection with its determination as to the independence of Mr. Carroll, the Board has considered that Mr. Carroll receives additional director compensation for serving as non-executive

Chairman of the Board. This position involves a substantial commitment of time over and above regular service as a Board member and member of committees of the Board. The Board also considered a relationship in which a company on whose board Mr. Carroll serves as a non-employee director and non-executive chairman provides services to CenterPoint Energy. Mr. Carroll had no role in initiating the relationship with this service provider. Because the business relationship is of a nature and magnitude not requiring proxy statement disclosure under Securities and Exchange Commission rules, it falls within the categorical standards described above. The Board has concluded that these circumstances and relationships do not adversely affect Mr. Carroll’s ability and willingness to act in the best interests of CenterPoint Energy and its shareholders or otherwise compromise his independence.

In connection with its determination as to the independence of Mr. Walker, the Board considered ordinary course transactions between the Company and Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, for which Mr. Walker serves as President and Chief Executive Officer and director. During 2012, subsidiaries of CenterPoint Energy purchased or sold natural gas in transactions with subsidiaries of Anadarko totaling approximately $24 million. These payments represent less than one-half of one percent of the consolidated gross revenues for 2012 for both the Company and Anadarko. These transactions were on standard terms and conditions, and Mr. Walker did not have any involvement in negotiating the terms of the purchases nor interest in the transactions. Additionally, the Board considered that Company subsidiaries may purchase natural gas from and provide natural gas related transportation services to Anadarko in the future. The Board believes that these transactions and relationships do not adversely affect Mr. Walker’s ability or willingness to act in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders or otherwise compromise his independence, nor are similar transactions in the future expected to adversely affect Mr. Walker’s independence.

Code of Ethics and Ethics and Compliance Code

We have a Code of Ethics for our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers, which group consists of our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Controller. We will post information regarding any amendments to, or waivers of, the provisions of this code applicable to these officers at the website location referred to below under “Website Availability of Documents.”

We also have an Ethics and Compliance Code applicable to all directors, officers and employees. This code addresses, among other things, issues required to be addressed by a code of business conduct and ethics under New York Stock Exchange listing standards. Any waivers of this code for executive officers or directors may be made only by the Board of Directors or a committee of the Board and must be promptly disclosed to shareholders. In 2012, no waivers of our Code of Ethics or our Ethics and Compliance Code were granted.

Conflicts of Interest and Related-Party Transactions

The Governance Committee will address and resolve any issues with respect to related-party transactions and conflicts of interest involving our executive officers, directors or other “related persons” under the applicable disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Our Ethics and Compliance Code provides that all directors, executive officers and other employees should avoid actual conflicts of interest as well as the appearance of a conflict of interest, and our Code of Ethics for our Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers similarly obligates the employees covered by that Code of Ethics (our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, Treasurer and Assistant Controller) to handle actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships in an ethical manner. Under our Ethics and Compliance Code, prior approval is required for any significant financial interest with suppliers, partners, subcontractors, or competitors. Any questionable situation is required to be disclosed to the Law Department or an employee’s direct manager. Pursuant to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Governance Committee Charter, the Board has delegated to the Governance Committee the responsibility for reviewing and resolving any issues with respect to related-party transactions and conflicts of interests involving executive officers or directors of the Company or other related persons under the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines require that (i) each director shall promptly disclose to the Chairman any potential conflicts of interest he or she may have with respect to any matter involving the Company and, if appropriate, recuse himself or herself from any discussions or decisions on any of these matters, and (ii) the Chairman shall promptly advise the Governance Committee of any potential conflicts of interest he or she may have with respect to any matter involving the Company and, if appropriate, recuse himself or herself from any discussions or decisions on any of these matters.

The Office of the Corporate Secretary periodically gathers information from directors and executive officers regarding matters involving potential conflicts of interest or related-party transactions and provides that information to the Governance Committee for review. Directors and executive officers are also required to inform the Company immediately of any changes in the information provided concerning related-party transactions that such director or executive officer or other related person was, or is proposed to be, a participant. In each case, the standard applied in approving the transaction is the best interests of CenterPoint Energy and its shareholders.

There were no related-party transactions in 2012 that were required to be reported pursuant to the applicable disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Majority Voting in Director Elections

Our amended and restated bylaws include a majority voting standard in uncontested director elections. This standard applies to the election of directors at this meeting. To be elected, a nominee must receive

more votes cast “for” that nominee’s election than votes cast “against” that nominee’s election. In contested elections, the voting standard will be a plurality of votes cast. Under our bylaws, contested elections occur where, as of a date that is 14 days in advance of the date we file our definitive proxy statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (regardless of whether or not thereafter revised or supplemented), the number of nominees exceeds the number of directors to be elected.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines include director resignation procedures. In brief, these procedures provide that:

Incumbent director nominees must submit irrevocable resignations that become effective upon and only in the event that (1) the nominee fails to receive the required vote for election to the Board at the next meeting of shareholders at which such nominee faces re-election and (2) the Board accepts such resignation;

Each director candidate who is not an incumbent director must agree to submit such an irrevocable resignation upon election or appointment as a director;

Upon the failure of any nominee to receive the required vote, the Governance Committee makes a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation;

The Board takes action with respect to the resignation and publicly discloses its decision and the reasons therefor within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results; and

The resignation, if accepted, will be effective at the time specified by the Board when it determines to accept the resignation, which effective time may be deferred until a replacement director is identified and appointed to the Board.

Our amended and restated bylaws and our Corporate Governance Guidelines can be found on our website at www.centerpointenergy.com.

Board Leadership

The offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are currently separate and have been separate since the formation of the Company as a new holding company in 2002. The Board believes that the separation of the two roles provides, at present, the best balance of these important responsibilities with the Chairman directing board operations and leading the board in its oversight of management, and the Chief Executive Officer focusing on developing and implementing the Company’s board-approved strategic vision and managing its day-to-day business. The Board believes that the independent board chairman helps provide an opportunity for the Board members to provide more direct input to management in shaping the organization and strategy of the Company and strengthening the Board’s independent oversight of management.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board has ultimate oversight responsibility for the Company’s system of enterprise risk management as provided in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Board also approves overall corporate

risk limits. Management is responsible for developing and implementing the Company’s program of enterprise risk management. The Company’s Chief Risk Officer periodically reports to the Audit Committee concerning the Company’s risk management process, the major risks facing the Company and steps taken to mitigate those risks. The Audit Committee reviews, and reports to the Board regarding, the risk management process developed and implemented by management. Each board committee has responsibility for monitoring any enterprise risks assigned to it by the Board. A risk oversight committee, which is composed of senior executives from across the Company, monitors and oversees compliance with the Company’s risk control policy. The Company’s Chief Risk Officer, who reports to the Chief Financial Officer, facilitates risk oversight committee meetings, and provides daily risk assessment and control oversight for commercial activities.

The Board believes that the administration of its risk oversight function has not affected its leadership structure. In reviewing the Company’s compensation program, the Compensation Committee has made an assessment of whether compensation policies and practices create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company and has concluded that they do not create such risks as presently constituted.

Board Organization and Committees; Other Governance Provisions

The Board oversees the management of the Company’s business and affairs. The Board appoints committees to help carry out its duties. Last year, the Board met nine times and the current standing committees met a total of 25 times. Each director attended more than 75% of the meetings of the Board of Directors and each of the committees on which he or she served. Messrs. Carroll and McClanahan do not serve on any standing committees. The following table sets forth the standing committees of the Board and their members as of the date of this proxy statement, as well as the number of meetings each committee held during 2012:

Donald R. Campbell

O. Holcombe Crosswell

Michael P. Johnson

Janiece M. Longoria

Susan O. Rheney

R. A. Walker

Peter S. Wareing

Sherman M. Wolff

Number of Meetings

        Held in 2012

Audit Committee

The primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee are to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility for the integrity of our financial statements, the qualifications, independence and

performance of our independent auditors, the performance of our internal audit function, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and our systems of disclosure controls and internal controls, and our system of enterprise risk management. The Audit Committee has sole responsibility to appoint and, where appropriate, replace our independent auditors and to approve all audit engagement fees and terms. The Audit Committee’s report is on page 66.

The Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Rheney is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Compensation Committee

The primary responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are to oversee compensation for our senior officers, including salary and short term and long term incentive awards, administer incentive compensation plans, evaluate Chief Executive Officer performance and review management succession planning and development. For information concerning policies and procedures relating to the consideration and determination of executive compensation, including the role of the Compensation Committee, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 21 and for the report of the Compensation Committee concerning the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, see “Report of the Compensation Committee” on page 65.

Finance Committee

The primary responsibilities of the Finance Committee are to assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility with respect to the financial affairs of CenterPoint Energy and its subsidiaries. The Finance Committee reviews our financial objectives and policies, financing strategy and requirements, capital structure, and liquidity and related financial risk. The Finance Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board regarding our dividend policy and actions, approves specific debt and equity offerings and other capital transactions within limits set by the Board, and reviews the capital structure, financing plans and credit exposures of our major subsidiaries.

Governance Committee

The primary responsibilities of the Governance Committee are to identify, evaluate and recommend, for the approval of the entire Board of Directors, potential nominees for election to the Board; recommend membership on standing committees of the Board; address and resolve any issues with respect to related-party transactions and conflicts of interest involving our executive officers, directors or other “related persons”; oversee annual evaluations of the Board and management; review and recommend fee levels and other elements of compensation for non-employee directors; evaluate whether to accept a conditional resignation of an incumbent director who does not receive a majority vote in favor of election in an uncontested election; and establish, periodically review and recommend to the Board any changes to our Corporate Governance Guidelines. For information concerning policies and procedures relating to the consideration and determination of compensation of our directors, including the role of the Governance Committee, see “Compensation of Directors” beginning on page 13.

Executive Sessions of the Board

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the members of the Board of Directors who are not officers of CenterPoint Energy will hold regular executive sessions without management participation. If at any time the non-management directors include one or more directors who do not meet the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange for general independence, the Board must hold an executive session at least once each year including only the non-management directors who are also independent. An executive session is currently scheduled in conjunction with each regular meeting of the Board of Directors. Currently, the Chairman of the Board (Mr. Carroll) presides at these sessions.

Shareholder Communications with Directors

Interested parties who wish to make concerns known to the non-management directors may communicate directly with the non-management directors by making a submission in writing to “Board of Directors (independent members)” in care of our Corporate Secretary at the address indicated on the first page of this proxy statement. Aside from this procedure for communications with the non-management directors, the entire Board of Directors will receive communications in writing from shareholders. Any such communications should be addressed to the Board of Directors in care of the Corporate Secretary at the same address.

Attendance at Meetings of Shareholders

Directors are expected to attend annual meetings of shareholders. All directors attended the 2012 annual meeting.

Website Availability of Documents

CenterPoint Energy’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Corporate Governance Guidelines, the charters of the Audit Committee, Finance Committee, Compensation Committee and Governance Committee, the Code of Ethics, and the Ethics and Compliance Code can be found on our website at www.centerpointenergy.com. Unless specifically stated herein, documents and information on our website are not incorporated by reference in this proxy statement.

Compensation of Directors

The Governance Committee of the Board oversees fee levels and other elements of compensation for CenterPoint Energy’s non-employee directors, including the Company’s non-executive Chairman of the Board.

Directors receive a cash retainer and fees for attending meetings of the Board of Directors and each of its standing committees and are eligible to receive annual grants of our common stock under our Stock Plan for Outside Directors. Participation in a plan providing split-dollar life insurance coverage has been discontinued for directors commencing service after 2000.

Stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors were adopted in February 2011. Under these guidelines, each non-employee director is required to own shares of CenterPoint Energy common stock with a value equal to at least three times the director’s regular annual cash retainer. Current directors have four years from the date of adoption of the ownership guidelines to acquire the specified amount of common stock. New directors are required to attain the specified level of ownership within four years of joining the Board.

Retainer and Meeting Fees

In 2012, each non-employee director received an annual retainer of $50,000. The current level of the cash retainer paid to directors was set in June 2004. Fees for attending meetings of the Board and each of its standing committees are set at $2,000 per meeting. The Chairmen of the Audit and Compensation Committees each receive a supplemental annual retainer of $15,000 for service as committee chairmen. The Chairmen of the Finance and Governance committees each receive a supplemental annual retainer of $10,000 for service as committee chairmen. Ms. Longoria and Messrs. Carroll, Wareing and Wolff are members of a special CEO Succession Planning Committee and receive an annual retainer of $20,000 for service on that Committee. Mr. Carroll serves as chairman of the special committee and receives no additional compensation for serving as the committee’s chairman. Fees earned or paid in 2012 are set forth in the Fees Earned or Paid in Cash column of the Director Compensation Table on page 17.

Chairman’s Supplemental Retainer and Special Awards

Under an arrangement approved by the Board of Directors in April 2010, Mr. Carroll receives the compensation payable to other non-employee directors and certain supplemental compensation for agreeing to serve as the non-executive Chairman of the Board through May 2013, a position that involves a substantial commitment of time over and above regular service as a Board member and member of committees of the Board. Under this arrangement, Mr. Carroll receives a supplemental monthly retainer of $30,000 payable beginning June 30, 2010 and continuing thereafter until the earlier of May 31, 2013 or the termination of Mr. Carroll’s service as non-executive Chairman of the Board. In addition, Mr. Carroll was entitled to annual cash awards on June 1, 2010, June 1, 2011 and June 1, 2012. The amount of each annual cash award was equal to the product of (i) 25,000 and (ii) the closing sales price per share of our common stock on the consolidated transaction reporting system for the New York Stock Exchange on the respective award date, or if there had been no such sales so reported on that date, on the date immediately preceding the respective award date on which such a sale was so reported. Mr. Carroll had the option to elect on or prior to the award date of a particular annual cash award to receive 25,000 fully vested shares of CenterPoint Energy common stock in lieu of a cash award (subject to applicable holding period and resale restrictions under federal securities laws). Under this arrangement, we issued 25,000 shares of CenterPoint Energy common stock to Mr. Carroll on each of June 1, 2010 and June 1, 2011 in lieu of cash awards on those dates. On June 6, 2012, Mr. Carroll received a cash award under this arrangement. In conjunction with his duties as non-executive Chairman of the Board, we also provide Mr. Carroll office space and administrative assistant services.

Stock Plan for Outside Directors

Under the Stock Plan for Outside Directors, each non-employee director may be granted an annual stock award of up to 5,000 shares of CenterPoint Energy common stock. The number of shares of common stock granted to non-employee directors is set by the Board annually. Each non-employee director serving as of May 1, 2012 received an award of 5,000 shares of common stock. Grants made

under this plan on or after April 22, 2010 vest on the first anniversary of the grant date. Grants made under this plan prior to April 22, 2010 vest in one-third increments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. Grants fully vest in the event of the director’s death or upon a change in control (defined in substantially the same manner as in the change in control agreements for certain officers described in “Potential Payments upon Change in Control or Termination” beginning on page 58). Upon vesting of the shares, each director receives, in addition to the shares, a cash payment equal to the amount of dividend equivalents earned since the date of grant. If a director’s service on the Board is terminated for any reason other than death or a change in control, the director forfeits all rights to the unvested portion of the outstanding grants as of the termination date. If the director is 70 years of age or older when he or she ceases to serve on the Board of Directors, the director’s termination date is deemed to be December 31st of the year in which he or she leaves the Board. In addition to the annual grant, a non-employee director may receive a one-time grant of up to 5,000 shares of common stock upon commencing service as a director, subject to the same vesting schedule described above. No awards have been made under the provision allowing one-time initial grants. The aggregate number of outstanding unvested stock awards is set forth in footnote (2) to the Director Compensation Table.

Deferred Compensation Plan

We maintain a deferred compensation plan that permits directors to elect each year to defer all or part of their annual retainer, supplemental annual retainer for committee chairmanship and meeting fees. The supplemental monthly retainer for service as Chairman of the Board is not eligible for deferral under this plan. Interest accrues on deferrals at a rate adjusted annually equal to the average yield during the year of the Moody’s Long-Term Corporate Bond Index plus two percent. Directors participating in this plan may elect at the time of deferral to receive distributions of their deferred compensation and interest in three ways:

an early distribution of either 50% or 100% of their account balance in any year that is at least four years from the year of deferral or, if earlier, the year in which they attain age 70;

a lump sum distribution payable in the year after they reach age 70 or upon leaving the Board of Directors, whichever is later; or

15 annual installments beginning on the first of the month coincident with or next following age 70 or upon leaving the Board of Directors, whichever is later.

The deferred compensation plan is a nonqualified, unfunded plan, and the directors are general, unsecured creditors of CenterPoint Energy. No fund or other assets of CenterPoint Energy have been set aside or segregated to pay benefits under the plan. Refer to “Rabbi Trust” under “Potential Payments upon Change in Control or Termination” on page 58 for funding of the deferred compensation plan upon a change in control.

The amounts deferred by directors in 2012 are described in footnote (1) to the Director Compensation Table. The above market earnings are reported in the Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column of the Director Compensation Table.

Executive Life Insurance Plan

Non-employee directors who were elected to the Board before 2001 (Messrs. Carroll and Crosswell) participate in an executive life insurance plan. This plan provides endorsement split-dollar life insurance with a death benefit equal to six times the director’s annual retainer, excluding any supplemental retainer, with coverage continuing after the director’s retirement from the Board. Due to limits on the increases in the death benefit under this plan, the death benefit for the current eligible directors remains at $180,000. The annual premiums on the policies are payable solely by CenterPoint Energy, and in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code, the directors must recognize imputed income based upon the insurer’s one-year term rates. The director is also provided a tax gross-up payment for all taxes due on the imputed income associated with the policy value so that coverage is provided at no cost to the director. The applicable amounts are set forth in footnote (5) to the All Other Compensation column of the Director Compensation Table. Upon the death of the insured, the director’s beneficiaries will receive the specified death benefit, and we will receive any balance of the insurance proceeds.

Name

Donald R. Campbell

Milton Carroll

O. Holcombe Crosswell

Michael P. Johnson

Janiece M. Longoria

Susan O. Rheney

R. A. Walker

Peter S. Wareing

Sherman M. Wolff

Includes annual retainer, supplemental retainer, Board meeting fees and Committee meeting fees for each director as more fully explained under “Compensation of Directors—Retainer and Meeting Fees” and “Compensation of Directors—Chairman’s Supplemental Retainer and Special Awards” above.

Reported amounts in the table represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 as of the grant date. For purposes of the table above, the effects of estimated forfeitures are excluded.

The Board does not grant stock options or non-equity incentive plan compensation to non-employee directors.

In 2012, Messrs. Carroll, Crosswell, Wareing and Wolff and Ms. Longoria accrued above-market earnings on their deferred compensation account balances of $26,404, $80,016, $21,672, $30,784 and $8,037, respectively.

The following table sets forth the premium paid by CenterPoint Energy and the tax gross-up payments made to our directors who participated in the executive life insurance plan in 2012:

Name

Carroll

Crosswell

Name

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC

2200 Ross Avenue, 31st Floor

Dallas, Texas 75201

Vanguard Windsor Funds—Vanguard Windsor II Fund

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

Northern Trust Corporation

50 South LaSalle Street

Chicago, Illinois 60603

BlackRock, Inc.

40 East 52^nd Street

New York, New York 10022

State Street Corporation.

One Lincoln Street

Boston, MA 02111

Donald R. Campbell

Milton Carroll

O. Holcombe Crosswell

C. Gregory Harper

Michael P. Johnson

Janiece M. Longoria

David M. McClanahan

Susan O. Rheney

Scott E. Rozzell

Thomas R. Standish

R. A. Walker

Peter S. Wareing

Gary L. Whitlock

Sherman M. Wolff

All executive officers and directors as a group (17 persons)

This information is as of December 31, 2012 and is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2013 by Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC. This represents 8.76% of the outstanding common stock of CenterPoint Energy. The Schedule 13G reports sole voting power for 6,239,215 shares of common stock, shared voting power for 31,198,238 shares of common stock and sole dispositive power for 37,437,453 shares of common stock.

This information is as of December 31, 2012 and is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2013 by Vanguard Windsor Funds—Vanguard Windsor II Fund. This represents 6.01% of the outstanding common stock of CenterPoint Energy. The Schedule 13G/A reports sole voting power for 25,726,413 shares of common stock.

This information is as of December 31, 2012 and is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 12, 2013 by The Vanguard Group, Inc. This represents 5.98% of the outstanding common stock of CenterPoint Energy. The Schedule 13G/A reports sole voting power of 919,102 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power for 24,891,782 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power of 699,281 shares of common stock.

This information is as of December 31, 2012 and is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 14, 2013 by Northern Trust Corporation and certain of its subsidiaries. This represents 5.91% of the outstanding common stock of CenterPoint Energy. The Schedule 13G/A reports sole voting power for 545,667 shares of common stock, shared voting power for 24,686,278 shares of common stock, sole dispositive power for 2,943,260 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power for 2,517,062 shares of common stock. CenterPoint Energy understands that the shares reported include 19,732,131 shares of common stock held as trustee of CenterPoint Energy’s savings plan which provides for pass-through voting by plan participants.

This information is as of December 31, 2012 and is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 8, 2013 by BlackRock, Inc. This represents 5.76% of the outstanding common stock of CenterPoint Energy. The Schedule 13G/A reports sole voting power for 24,613,696 shares of common stock, no shared voting power for shares of common stock and sole dispositive power for 24,613,696 shares of common stock.

This information is as of December 31, 2012 and is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2013 by State Street Corporation. This represents 5.2% of the outstanding common stock of CenterPoint Energy. The Schedule 13G reports shared voting power for 22,392,341 shares of common stock and shared dispositive power for 22,392,341 shares of common stock.

Includes shares scheduled to vest under the Stock Plan for Outside Directors as follows: 5,000 shares on May 1, 2013 for each of Messrs. Campbell, Carroll, Crosswell, Johnson, Walker, Wareing and Wolff and Mses. Longoria and Rheney.

Includes 10,000 shares pledged to secure loans.

Includes shares held by spouse.

Includes shares of CenterPoint Energy common stock held under CenterPoint Energy’s savings plan, for which the participant has sole voting power (subject to such power being exercised by the plan’s trustee in the same proportion as directed shares in the savings plan are voted in the event the participant does not exercise voting power).

Includes shares covered by CenterPoint Energy stock options held as of March 1, 2013 that are exercisable within 60 days of that date as follows: Mr. McClanahan, 106,100 shares; Mr. Whitlock, 35,200 shares; and the group, 141,300 shares.

Includes 159,722 shares pledged to secure loans.

Includes shares held in trust for benefit of spouse, as to which Mr. Wareing disclaims beneficial interest.

Includes shares held in trust for benefit of spouse of which Mr. Wolff is a trustee.

The compensation of our named executive officers is reviewed and established annually by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors, consisting entirely of independent directors.

To assist in carrying out its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee retains a consultant to provide independent advice on executive compensation matters.

We target the market median (50th percentile) for each major element of compensation because we believe the market median is a generally accepted benchmark of external competitiveness.

Actual compensation in a given year will vary based on CenterPoint Energy’s performance, and to a lesser extent, on qualitative appraisals of individual performance.

We believe that a substantial portion of the compensation for our executives should be “at risk,” meaning that the executives will receive a certain percentage of their total compensation only to the extent CenterPoint Energy and the executive accomplish goals established by the Compensation Committee.

We expect our named executive officers to have a higher percentage of their total compensation at risk than our other executives.

We do not maintain executive employment agreements with any of our named executive officers, and our named executive officers are not entitled to guaranteed severance payments upon a termination of employment except under change in control agreements that contain a “double trigger” term, or pursuant to the terms of grants made under our short term and long term incentive plans for named executive officers who satisfy the retirement provisions under the plans.

We do not negotiate the terms of our change in control agreements with our executive officers. Instead, the terms of the agreements are approved by the Board of Directors based on the recommendation of the Compensation Committee with input from the Committee’s consultant, and then offered to the executives to accept or decline.

The Board of Directors has determined that it will no longer include an excise tax gross-up payment in new and materially amended change in control agreements with our officers.

We have established executive stock ownership guidelines applicable to all of our officers in order to appropriately align the interests of our officers with our shareholders’ interests for CenterPoint Energy common stock. Effective January 1, 2012, we revised our executive stock ownership guidelines in order to increase the amount of CenterPoint Energy common stock to be owned by our Chief Executive Officer from four times base salary to five times base salary, and to provide that unvested performance share awards will no longer be counted towards the guidelines for all of our officers. In addition, the ownership requirement will be determined annually based on the executive’s current base salary. Prior to 2012, the ownership requirement was determined based on the executive’s base salary at the time he or she became covered by the guidelines or at the time of promotion to a higher level covered by the guidelines.

As part of our insider trading policy, we have a policy prohibiting all of our officers and directors from hedging the risk of stock ownership by purchasing, selling or writing options on CenterPoint Energy securities or engaging in transactions in other third-party derivative securities with respect to CenterPoint Energy stock.

The Board of Directors has implemented a policy for the recoupment of short term and/or long term incentive payments in the event an officer is found to have engaged in any fraud, intentional misconduct or gross negligence that leads to a restatement of all, or a portion of, our financial results. This policy permits us to pursue recovery of incentive payments if the payment would have been lower based on the restated financial results.

CenterPoint Energy has prepared and reviewed with the members of the Compensation Committee pro forma as of December 31 tally sheets for each named executive officer in order to show how various compensation and benefit amounts are interrelated and to help the Compensation Committee better understand the impact of its compensation decisions before they are finalized.

None of our named executive officers received perquisites valued in excess of $10,000 during 2012, and we do not consider perquisites to be a significant element of our executive compensation program.

The Compensation Committee reviewed the base salary and short term and long term incentive targets (expressed as a percentage of base salary earned during the year) for Mr. McClanahan and determined (i) not to change his base salary and short term incentive target from the levels established for 2011 compensation, and (ii) to increase his long term incentive target effective as of January 1, 2012 to 225% from the 200% level established for 2011 compensation.

The Compensation Committee reviewed and approved increases to the base salaries of Messrs. Whitlock, Rozzell, Standish and Harper ranging from 3.0% to 5.4%.

The Compensation Committee reviewed, but did not change, the short term and long term incentive targets for each of Messrs. Whitlock, Rozzell, Standish and Harper from the target levels established for 2011 and 2010 incentive compensation.

Based on the analysis and recommendation of Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“Cook & Co.”), the Compensation Committee’s independent executive compensation consultant, the peer group of publicly traded utility companies used in connection with determining the compensation of our named executive officers in 2011 was also used in connection with determining the compensation of our named executive officers in 2012. See “Role of Compensation Committee—Decisions Made by the Compensation Committee” for additional information about the peer group.

The Compensation Committee determined that 2012 long term incentive compensation awards would again be allocated between performance shares and stock awards on a 70% and 30% basis, respectively. However, the Committee determined that 2012 performance share awards would be made in two separate, equal grants, with the payout opportunity for the first grant based on total shareholder return over the three-year performance cycle as compared to that of a subset of the S&P Utility Index and the payout opportunity for the second grant based on achieving specified earnings per share goals over the three-year performance cycle. In recent years, the Committee had granted performance shares in three separate, equal awards with payout opportunities based on total shareholder return, core operating income and modified cash flow goals. It was determined that this change in performance metrics was appropriate following the final resolution of the Company’s true-up appeal in 2011 and the related improvement in the Company’s balance sheet and liquidity.

The Compensation Committee granted 25,000 restricted stock units to each of Messrs. Whitlock, Rozzell and Standish on February 22, 2012 in recognition of their consistently exceptional leadership and performance since the formation of CenterPoint Energy in 2002. Under the terms of the grants, 50% of each award will vest upon each of the first two anniversaries of the grant date, provided that the executive remains continuously employed until such date, and subject to the other vesting and forfeiture terms described in the immediately following bullet for restricted stock unit awards with service-based vesting.

The Compensation Committee approved new forms of award agreements under the long term incentive plan for performance share awards, restricted stock unit awards with performance goals and restricted stock unit awards with service-based vesting. The newly approved forms of agreements for performance share awards and restricted stock unit awards with performance goals provide that a “retirement eligible” participant (age 55 or greater with at least five years of service) will not receive a payment if he or she retires within the first six months of the calendar year in which the award was made. The newly approved form of agreement for restricted stock unit awards with service-based vesting provides that such awards would be subject to earlier full vesting upon a change in control of the Company or pro-rata vesting upon the recipient’s earlier separation from service due to death, disability or retirement, provided that the recipient will not receive a payment if he or she retires within the first six months of the calendar year in which the award was made.

American Electric Power Company, Inc.

PG&E Corporation

CMS Energy Corporation

Pinnacle West Capital Corporation

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Progress Energy, Inc.

DTE Energy Company

SCANA Corporation

Duke Energy Corporation

Southern Company

Integrys Energy Group, Inc.

TECO Energy, Inc.

NiSource Inc.

Wisconsin Energy Corporation

Northeast Utilities

Xcel Energy Inc.

Pepco Holdings, Inc.

a three-to-five year period is a typical performance measurement period for this type of compensation element;

we have traditionally used a three-year period;

three years is of sufficient duration so that high or low performance in one year should neither guarantee nor preclude a payout; and

three years’ duration also helps assure participants that their performance will influence a payout during the measurement period.

Name

Base Salary
effective 04/01/12

Short Term Incentive

Target % as of 01/01/12

(No change)

David M. McClanahan

$1,130,000

(No change)

Gary L. Whitlock

Increase of $16,000

to $556,000

(No change)

Scott E. Rozzell

Increase of $15,000

to $520,000

(No change)

Thomas R. Standish

Increase of $15,000

to $502,000

(No change)

C. Gregory Harper

Increase of $20,000

to $390,000

(No change)

reviewed the base salary and short term and long term incentive targets (expressed as a percentage of base salary earned during the year) for Mr. McClanahan and determined not to change his base salary or short term and long term incentive targets from the target levels established for 2012 compensation;

reviewed and approved increases to the base salaries of Messrs. Whitlock, Rozzell, Standish and Harper ranging from 1.9% to 2.7% as shown in the table below;

reviewed, but did not change, the short term and long term incentive targets for each of Messrs. Whitlock, Rozzell, Standish and Harper from the target levels established for 2012 incentive compensation; and

determined that 2013 long term incentive compensation awards would again be allocated between performance shares and stock awards on a 70% and 30% basis, respectively. Consistent with 2012, the Committee determined that 2013 performance share awards would be made in two separate, equal grants, with the payout opportunity for the first grant based on total shareholder return over the three-year performance cycle as compared to that of a subset of the S&P Utility Index and the payout opportunity for the second grant based on achieving specified earnings per share goals over the three-year performance cycle. In recent years prior to 2012, the Committee had granted performance shares in three separate, equal awards with payout opportunities based on total shareholder return, core operating income and modified cash flow goals.

Name

Base Salary
effective 04/01/13

Short Term Incentive

Target % as of 01/01/13

(No change)

David M. McClanahan

$1,130,000

(No change)

Gary L. Whitlock

Increase of $15,000

to $571,000

Scott E. Rozzell

Increase of $10,000

to $530,000

Thomas R. Standish

Increase of $10,000

to $512,000

C. Gregory Harper

Increase of $8,000

to $398,000

Name and Principal Position

David M. McClanahan

President and Chief

Executive Officer

Gary L. Whitlock

Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer

Scott E. Rozzell

Executive Vice President,

General Counsel and

Corporate Secretary

Thomas R. Standish

Executive Vice President

and Group President,

Corporate and Energy

Services

C. Gregory Harper

Senior Vice President

and Group President,

Pipelines and Field Services

The 2011 bonus for Mr. Rozzell represents a discretionary payment in addition to the amount earned pursuant to achieved performance goals under our short term incentive plan. This bonus was awarded in recognition of Mr. Rozzell’s exceptional leadership and performance in connection with the regulatory proceedings and associated litigation related to CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, LLC’s ultimate recovery of over $4 billion related to the restructuring of the electric industry in Texas.

Reported amounts in the table above represent the aggregate grant date fair value of awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 based on the probable achievement level of the underlying performance conditions as of the grant date. For purposes of the tables above and below, the effects of estimated forfeitures are excluded. Please also refer to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2012 table on page 40 and the accompanying footnotes.

Name

McClanahan

Whitlock

Rozzell

Standish

Harper

CenterPoint Energy has not granted stock options since 2004.

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation represents short term incentive awards earned with respect to performance in the designated year and paid in the following year. For more information on the 2012 short term incentive awards, refer to the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2012 table on page 40 and the accompanying footnotes.

The two components of the 2012 Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings are as follows:

The Change in Pension Value is the increase or decrease in the present value of accumulated benefits under our retirement plan and the related benefit restoration plans from December 31, 2011 to December 31, 2012. Benefits are assumed to commence as of the earliest age that an individual could retire without a reduction in benefits. The present value as of December 31, 2011 assumed a discount rate of 4.90% and lump sum conversion interest rates of 3.90%, 4.65% and 4.90% for benefits paid within the first 5 years, 6th through 20th years, and all remaining years, respectively. The present value as of December 31, 2012 assumed a discount rate of 4.00% and lump sum conversion interest rates of 3.00%, 3.75% and 4.00% for benefits paid within the first 5 years, 6th through 20th years, and all remaining years, respectively. Refer to the narrative accompanying the Pension Benefits table on page 53 for a more detailed discussion of the present value calculation.

Above Market Earnings consist of the amounts that exceed 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate at the time the interest rate was set. In 1985, CenterPoint Energy entered into corporate-owned life insurance policies on the lives of Messrs. McClanahan and Standish who contributed to the 1985 deferred compensation plan. These policies were entered into with their consent. Proceeds upon their deaths are payable to CenterPoint Energy and are available to offset the benefit payments from the plan.

The following table sets forth the elements of All Other Compensation for 2012:

Name^(a)

McClanahan

Whitlock

Rozzell

Standish

Harper

None of the named executive officers received perquisites valued in excess of $10,000 during 2012.

The tax reimbursement amounts shown are gross-up payments equal to the after-tax cost of imputed income that the named executive officers are required to recognize as a result of coverage under the executive life insurance plan described in footnote (e) below. The gross-up payment is provided in accordance with the terms of each officer’s agreement. The gross-up payments are calculated assuming the highest individual income tax rate is applicable.

These amounts represent CenterPoint Energy’s contributions to the savings plan, which is described under “Savings Plan and Savings Restoration Plans” on page 54.

These amounts represent benefits accrued under the savings restoration plan, which is described under “Savings Plan and Savings Restoration Plans” on page 54.

The insurance premium amounts include annual premiums we pay to provide life insurance coverage, long-term disability coverage and coverage under an executive life insurance plan providing split-dollar life insurance. The executive life insurance plan provides endorsement split-dollar life insurance, with coverage continuing after the executive’s termination of service at age 65 or later. If the participant leaves after age 55 and prior to age 65, benefits under the plan will cease unless the Compensation Committee elects to continue the coverage. With the exception of Mr. Harper, all named executive officers have single-life coverage equal to two times current salary. Upon the death of the insured, CenterPoint Energy will receive any balance of the insurance proceeds payable in excess of the specified death benefit.

These amounts include the estimated aggregate incremental benefit during 2012 of providing benefits under our executive benefit plan for Messrs. McClanahan and Standish who participate in this plan pursuant to individual contractual agreements originally entered into in 1986 and 1993, respectively. If death occurs during active employment, the plan provides for a benefit of 100% of the executive’s current base salary for one year and then 50% of base salary for nine years. The plan also provides that if the executive retires after reaching age 65, CenterPoint Energy will pay an annual benefit equal to 50% of the executive’s annual base salary at the time of retirement for six years after his death. If the executive terminates employment prior to reaching age 65, all benefits are forfeited. Benefits have been calculated assuming retirement at age 65 and using base salary in effect at the end of the year for which the calculation was made. No pre-retirement mortality or terminations are assumed. In 1986, CenterPoint Energy entered into a corporate-owned life insurance policy on the life of Mr. McClanahan who participates in the executive benefit plan. This policy was entered into with his consent. Proceeds upon his death are payable to CenterPoint Energy and are available to offset the benefit payments from the plan.

Name

David M. McClanahan

Gary L. Whitlock

Scott E. Rozzell