UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): November 2, 2011
UNITIL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
New Hampshire | 1-8858 | 02-0381573 | ||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) |
(Commission File Number) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) | ||
6 Liberty Lane West, Hampton, New Hampshire | 03842-1720 | |||
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (603) 772-0775
N/A
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
¨ | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
¨ | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
¨ | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure
On November 2, 2011, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) issued its decision (the Decision) vacating an order (the Order) issued on November 2, 2009 by the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (MDPU) in which the MDPU ordered Unitil Corporations Massachusetts electric and natural gas distribution utility, Fitchburg Gas and Electric Light Company d/b/a Unitil (the Company) to refund $4.6 million of natural gas costs, plus carrying charges. The SJCs Decision vacates the MDPUs penalty of $4.6 million, plus interest, in favor of a penalty of $0.2 million, plus interest. The Company had previously recorded a pre-tax charge to earnings and recognized a Regulatory Liability of $4.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2009 based on the MDPUs original Order. As a result of the Decision, the Regulatory Liability will be adjusted and the Company expects to recognize a gain, net of litigation costs, of approximately $4.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2011.
The MDPUs original Order issued in 2009 found that the Company had engaged in certain price stabilization practices for the 2007 / 2008 and 2008 / 2009 heating seasons without the MDPUs prior approval and that the Companys natural gas purchasing practices were imprudent. The Company appealed the MDPUs decision to the SJC. The SJC concluded that no statute or precedent required the Company to seek preapproval of its natural gas purchasing plan and that the MDPUs order to the contrary was an error of law. The SJC also reversed the MDPUs imprudence findings with respect to the price-locking purchases of natural gas made during the summer of 2007 and during February through August 2008, finding that this determination was unsupported by record evidence. The SJC upheld the MDPUs finding of imprudence with respect to a single purchase of natural gas made on November 25, 2008, finding that, while well-intentioned, the type of purchase undertaken by the Company was improperly designed to take advantage of one-time market conditions. The SJC calculated that, as a result of this purchase, the Company incurred $0.2 million in unreasonable natural gas costs and required the Company to refund this amount, with interest, to customers.
Attached as Exhibit 99.1 is the Slip Opinion of the SJC.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
(d) | Exhibits |
Number | Exhibit | |
99.1 | SJC Slip Opinion |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
UNITIL CORPORATION
By: | /s/ Mark H. Collin | |
Mark H. Collin | ||
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Date: November 3, 2011
EXHIBIT INDEX
Number | Exhibit | |
99.1 | SJC Slip Opinion |