UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2006
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number 0-21422
OPTi Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in Its charter)
CALIFORNIA | 77-0220697 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporated or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3430 W. Bayshore Road, Suite 103 Palo Alto, California | 94303 | |
(Address of principal executive office) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (650) 213-8550
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one).
Large Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated Filer ¨ Non-Accelerated Filer x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12(b)-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock as of January 31, 2007 was 11,633,903.
INDEX
3 | ||||
ITEM 1: | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) | 3 | ||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
ITEM 2: | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 11 | ||
13 | ||||
ITEM 3: | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | 13 | ||
ITEM 4: | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | 13 | ||
15 | ||||
ITEM 1: | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 15 | ||
ITEM 1A: | RISK FACTORS | 16 | ||
ITEM 2: | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS | 17 | ||
ITEM 3: | DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES | 17 | ||
ITEM 4: | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS | 17 | ||
ITEM 5: | OTHER INFORMATION | 17 | ||
ITEM 6: | EXHIBITS | 18 | ||
SIGNATURES | 19 |
2
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands)
December 31, 2006 |
March 31, 2006* |
|||||||
(unaudited) | (Note 1) | |||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 18,727 | $ | 12,917 | ||||
Short-term investments |
2,000 | | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
104 | 22 | ||||||
Total current assets |
20,831 | 12,939 | ||||||
Property and equipment, at cost |
||||||||
Machinery and equipment |
34 | 34 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
34 | 23 | ||||||
68 | 57 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(53 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||
15 | 8 | |||||||
Other assets |
18 | 14 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 20,864 | $ | 12,961 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 120 | $ | 256 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
493 | 371 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
| 1 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
613 | 628 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value |
||||||||
Authorized shares 5,000 |
||||||||
No shares issued or outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock |
||||||||
Authorized shares 50,000 |
||||||||
Issued and outstanding 11,634 at December 31, and March 31, 2006 |
15,056 | 15,053 | ||||||
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
5,195 | (2,720 | ) | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
20,251 | 12,333 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 20,864 | $ | 12,961 | ||||
* | The balance sheet as of March 31, 2006 has been derived from the audited financial statements. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended December 31, |
Nine Months Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
License and other revenue |
$ | | $ | | $ | 11,000 | $ | | |||||||
Total revenue |
| | 11,000 | | |||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
|||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
753 | 584 | 3,498 | 1,365 | |||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
753 | 584 | 3,498 | 1,365 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations |
(753 | ) | (584 | ) | 7,502 | (1,365 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income and other |
253 | 127 | 600 | 336 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes |
(500 | ) | (457 | ) | 8,102 | (1,029 | ) | ||||||||
Income tax provision |
46 | | 187 | 1 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (546 | ) | $ | (457 | ) | $ | 7,915 | $ | (1,030 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss) per share: |
|||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.68 | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.68 | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||||
Weighted-average shares used in computing net income (loss) per common share |
|||||||||||||||
Basic |
11,634 | 11,634 | 11,634 | 11,634 | |||||||||||
Diluted |
11,634 | 11,634 | 11,642 | 11,634 | |||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2006 | 2005 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 7,915 | $ | (1,030 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
4 | 4 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
3 | | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(86 | ) | (104 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable |
(136 | ) | (55 | ) | ||||
Accrued expenses |
122 | 120 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
7,821 | (1,066 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchase of equipment |
(11 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Purchase of available-for-sale investments |
(6,500 | ) | | |||||
Maturities of available-for-sale investments |
4,500 | | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(2,011 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
| | |||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
| | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
5,810 | (1,067 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
12,917 | 14,457 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 18,727 | $ | 13,390 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2006
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The information at December 31, 2006 and for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, are unaudited, but include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which the Companys management believes to be necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year.
The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2006, which are included in the annual report on Form 10-K filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Stock-based compensation
Prior to April 1, 2006, we accounted for our stock-based employee compensation arrangements under the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB No. 25), as allowed by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation (SFAS No. 123), as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure (SFAS No. 148). As a result, no expense was recognized for options to purchase our common stock that were granted with an exercise price equal to fair market value at the date of grant and no expense was recognized in connection with purchases under our employee stock purchase plan for periods prior to April 1, 2006. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) Share-Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R), which replaces SFAS No. 123 and supersedes APB No. 25. SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values beginning with the first interim or annual period after June 15, 2005. Subsequent to the effective date, the pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS No. 123 are no longer an alternative to financial statement recognition. Effective April 1, 2006, we have adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective method. Under this method, compensation cost recognized during the three-month period ended December 31, 2006, includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of April 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123 amortized on an straight line basis over the options vesting period, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to April 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R amortized on a straight-line basis over the options vesting period. No options were granted during the three months ended December 31, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 123R had no impact on cash flows from operations or financing. Further, the stock based compensation expense was $1,000 and $3,000 for the three and nine-months ended December 31, 2006 and accordingly did not have a material impact net loss or net loss per share for the three and nine-months ended December 31, 2006. There was no capitalized stock-based employee compensation cost as of December 31, 2006. There were no recognized tax benefits during the quarter ended December 31, 2006.
6
The following table illustrates the effect on net loss and net loss per share had we applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to account for our employee stock option and employee stock purchase plans for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2005 because stock-based employee compensation was not accounted for using the fair value recognition method during that period. For purposes of pro forma disclosure, the estimated fair value of the stock awards, as prescribed by SFAS No. 123, is amortized to expense over the vesting period of such awards (in thousands, except per share data):
Three Months Ended December 31, 2005 |
Nine Months Ended December 31, 2005 |
|||||||
Net loss: |
||||||||
As reported |
$ | (457 | ) | $ | (1,030 | ) | ||
Add: Total stock-based employee compensation expense under the fair value based methods for all awards |
1 | 3 | ||||||
Pro forma net loss |
$ | (458 | ) | $ | (1,033 | ) | ||
Pro forma basic and diluted net loss per share |
$ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||
Note that the above pro forma disclosure was not presented for the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2006 because stock-based employee compensation has been accounted for using the fair value recognition method under SFAS No. 123R for this period.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. The interpretation contains a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 109. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefits as the largest amount, which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The provisions are effective for the company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The company is currently evaluating the impact this statement will have on its consolidated financial statements.
2. License Revenue
On August 3, 2006, the Company entered into a license and settlement agreements between the Company and nVidia. Under the agreements the Company agreed to dismiss its patent infringement lawsuit against nVidia and licensed certain patents to nVidia. nVidia made a non-refundable, non-creditable fully earned payment of $11 million to the Company. There is no future performance obligation. In accordance with the Companys revenue recognition policy $11 million was recorded as revenue during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery has occurred and there are no future performance obligations, fees are fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
The agreement also provides that the Company shall receive quarterly royalty payments of $750,000 from nVidia, so long as nVidia continues to use the Companys Predictive Snoop technology, commencing in February 2007 up to a maximum of 12 such payments in exchange for a license for future use of the Pre-Snoop patents. As an alternative to the quarterly payments, at any time prior to or on January 31, 2008, nVidia can elect to pay OPTi a lump sum of $7,000,000 less any quarterly royalty payments already paid. Royalties will be recorded as revenue when earned and received.
On February 5, 2007, the Company announced that it had received a notice from nVidia that nVidia had ceased use of the licensed technology and, accordingly, that no payments were due for future use. The Company has notified nVidia that it is reviewing the situation.
7
3. Net Income (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed based on the weighted average shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average shares outstanding and, if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares consist of the incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options. The dilutive effect of outstanding stock options is computed based upon the application of the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months ended December 31, |
Nine Months ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (546 | ) | $ | (457 | ) | $ | 7,915 | $ | (1,030 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
11,634 | 11,634 | 11,634 | 11,634 | |||||||||||
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share |
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.68 | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
11,634 | 11,634 | 11,634 | 11,634 | |||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|||||||||||||||
Employee stock options |
| | 8 | | |||||||||||
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per share |
11,634 | 11,634 | 11,642 | 11,634 | |||||||||||
Diluted net income (loss) per share |
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | 0.68 | $ | (0.09 | ) | ||||
4. Taxes
The Company recorded a tax provision of $46,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and no tax provision for the comparable period in 2005. The Company recorded a tax provision of $187,000 for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2006 and $1,000 for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2005. The Companys effective tax rate differed from the federal and state statutory rates during all periods presented due to the use of prior year net operating losses. The Companys tax rate for all periods presented is calculated using alternative minimum taxes based on the net income for the periods.
Due to uncertainty associated with our prospective ability to realize the benefits of our tax assets, we have fully reserved the value of our deferred tax assets. In addition, utilization of the net operating loss and credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The annual limitations may result in the expiration of net operating loss carryforwards before utilization.
5. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Total comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and other comprehensive income or loss. There was no other comprehensive income or loss for all the periods presented. Accordingly, total comprehensive income (loss) for the first three and nine-months ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $(0.5) million, $7.9 million, $(0.5) million and $(1.0) million, respectively.
6. Stock Based Compensation
The Companys 1993 Stock Option Plan (the 1993 Plan), which was adopted in February 1993, provides for the granting of 8,066,478 incentive stock options to employees or for the granting of nonstatutory stock options to employees and consultants of the Company. The Board of Directors determines the term of each option, the option price and the condition under which the option becomes exercisable. The options generally vest over four years from the date of grant and expire ten years from the date of grant.
8
The Companys 1995 Stock Option Plan (the 1995 Plan), which was adopted in August 1995, provides for the granting of up to 2,500,000 nonstatutory stock options to employees and consultants of the Company. The Board of Directors determines the term of each option, the option price and the condition under which the option becomes exercisable. The options generally vest over four years from the date of grant and expire ten years from the date of grant.
In February 1993, the Company adopted the 1993 Director Stock Option Plan (the Director Plan) and reserved 50,000 shares of common stock for issuance thereunder. Under this plan, non-employee directors are granted options to purchase common stock at 100% of fair market value on dates specified in the plan. The options generally vest over four years from the date of grant and expire ten years from the date of grant. In May 1996, the Companys shareholders authorized an additional 50,000 shares for grant under the plan.
At December 31, 2006, the Company had no shares of common stock reserved for future issuance.
Activity under our Stock Option Plans is summarized as follows:
Number of Shares |
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) | ||||||||
Outstanding at April 1, 2006 |
150,666 | $ | 4.90 | ||||||||
Options granted |
| $ | | ||||||||
Options exercised |
| $ | | $ | | ||||||
Options canceled |
(26,666 | ) | $ | 7.50 | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2006 |
124,000 | $ | 4.34 | 2.32 | $ | 256 | |||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2006 |
122,000 | $ | 4.39 | 2.26 | $ | 246 |
There were no options granted during the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.
9
7. Subsequent Events
On January 16, 2007, the Company announced that it had filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Apple Inc. (Apple) for infringement of three U.S. patents. The three patents at issue in the lawsuit are U.S. Patent No. 5,710,906, U.S. Patent No. 5,813,036 and U.S. Patent No. 6,405,291; all entitled Predictive Snooping of Cache Memory for Master-Initiated Accesses. The complaint alleges that Apple has infringed the patents by making, selling, and offering for sale desktop and portable computers and servers incorporating Predictive Snooping technology. OPTi has requested a jury trial in this matter.
On February 5, 2007 the Company announced that it had received a letter from NVIDIA Corporation (NVIDIA) stating that NVIDIA has discontinued the use of the Predictive Snooping technology that it had licensed from the Company pursuant to the terms of the license agreement between NVIDIA Corporation and OPTi Inc., dated August 3, 2006. The letter from NVIDIA also states that NVIDIA will not be remitting to the Company the quarterly royalty payment originally scheduled for February 2007.
The Company is in discussions with NVIDIA as to whether NVIDIA is entitled to omit the February 2007 payment and has requested additional information from NVIDIA to validate the claim NVIDIA has discontinued use of the Predictive Snooping technology.
10
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
Information set forth in this report constitutes and includes forward looking information made within the meaning of Section 27A of the Security Act of 1933, as amended and Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve risks and uncertainties. The Companys actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including the Companys ongoing efforts to enforce its intellectual property rights including its current litigation efforts, the willingness of the parties it believes are infringing its patents to settle its claims against them, the amount of litigation costs the Company must incur in pursuing its patent infringement claims, the degree to which technology subject to the Companys intellectual property rights is used by other companies in the personal computer and semiconductor industries and our ability to obtain license revenues from them, changes in intellectual property law in such industries and in general and other matters. Readers are encouraged to refer to Factors Affecting Earnings and Stock Price.
OPTi was founded in 1989 as an independent supplier of semiconductor products to the personal computer market. During fiscal 2003, the Company sold its product fabrication, distribution and sales operations to Opti Technologies, Inc., an unrelated third party. As a result of this transaction the Companys future revenues are expected to be generated through royalties or from the licensing of the Companys intellectual property. The Company does not expect to receive additional significant revenue other than through the pursuit of its patent infringement cases and associated licensing efforts.
The Companys current strategy is to pursue licensing opportunities as a means of resolving potential infringement of its proprietary intellectual property in the core logic area. During the nine months ended December 31, 2006, the Company entered into a license arrangement for $11,000,000 on its patented technology with nVidia in connection with the settlement of its patent infringement suit against nVidia. If nVidia continues to use the Companys Predictive Snooping technology, the License Agreement provides that the Company shall receive quarterly royalty payments of $750,000 from nVidia, commencing in February 2007, up to a maximum of 12 such payments in exchange for a license for future use of the Pre-Snoop patents. As an alternative to the quarterly royalty payments, at any time prior to or on January 31, 2008, nVidia can elect to pay OPTi a lump sum of $7,000,000 less any quarterly royalty payments already paid. Prior to the nVidia agreement, the Company had previously entered into one-time license arrangements, with two other companies, relating to possible unauthorized use of the Companys patents in 2000 for $13.3 million and 2003 for $500,000. The Company believes that there may be additional companies that may be infringing its patents. The Company is actively working to explore all possible arrangements to settle such infringement. Although the Company continues to pursue license revenues related to the unauthorized use of its intellectual property, there can be no assurance whether or when revenues will result from the pursuit of such claims.
On November 15, 2006, the Company announced that it had filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) for infringement of three U.S. patents relating TO ITS Predictive Snooping technology.
On January 16, 2007, the Company announced that it had filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Apple Inc. (Apple) for infringement of three U.S. patents. The three patents at issue in the lawsuit are U.S. Patent No. 5,710,906, U.S. Patent No. 5,813,036 and U.S. Patent No. 6,405,291; all entitled Predictive Snooping of Cache Memory for Master-Initiated Accesses. The complaint alleges that Apple has infringed the patents by making, selling, and offering for sale desktop and portable computers and servers incorporating Predictive Snooping technology. OPTi has requested a jury trial in this matter.
See also Item 1 Legal Proceedings below. The AMD and Apple cases are continuing parts of the Companys strategy for pursuing its patent infringement claims and their outcome will have a significant effect on the Companys ability to realize ongoing licensing revenue through its intellectual property licensing efforts.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies, which incorporate our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, are the same as those described in Part II, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2006, except for Revenue Recognition. Revenue from license arrangements is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred and there are no future performance obligations, fees are fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Royalties are recorded as revenue when earned.
11
The preparation of financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reported periods. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form our basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Fiscal 2007 Compared to 2006
Revenues
The Company had no revenue for the three-month periods ended December 31, 2006 and 2005. The Company had net revenue of $11,000,000 for the nine-month period ending December 31, 2006 as compared to no revenue for the nine-month period ending December 31, 2005. This increase in net revenue relates to the licensing and settlement agreements with nVidia in August 2006.
The agreements, with nVidia, also provides that the Company receive quarterly royalty payments of $750,000 from nVidia, so long as nVidia continues to use the Companys Predictive Snoop technology, commencing in February, 2007 up to a maximum of 12 such payments in exchange for a license for future use of the Pre-Snoop patents. As an alternative to the quarterly payments, at any time prior to or on January 31, 2008, nVidia can elect to pay OPTi a lump sum of $7,000,000 less any quarterly royalty payments already paid. Royalties will be recorded as revenue when earned. The Companys future revenues depend on the success of our strategy of pursuing license claims on our intellectual property position and the continued use of our patented technologies by licensed third parties.
On February 5, 2007, the Company announced that it had received a notice from nVidia that nVidia had ceased use of the licensed technology and, accordingly, that no payments were due for future use. The Company has notified nVidia that it is reviewing the situation.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 were $753,000 as compared to $584,000 for the quarter ended December 31, 2005. General and administrative expenses for nine-month period ended December 31, 2006 were $3,498,000 as compared to $1,365,000 for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2005. The increase in general and administrative costs for the nine-month period ended December 31, 2006 as compared to comparable periods in 2005 was mainly attributable to increased costs relating to the nVidia litigation and settlement and infringement analysis work on potential future claims.
Interest and Other Income, Net
Net interest and other income for the three-month period ending December 31, 2006 was $253,000 as compared to $127,000 for the three-months ended December 31, 2005. Interest and other income, net were $600,000 and $336,000 for the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The increase in net interest and other income in the three and nine-month periods ended December 31, 2006 as compared to the comparable periods in 2005 were due to an increase in interest income due to larger average cash balances and higher interest rates during the periods.
Income Taxes
The Company recorded a tax provision of $46,000 for the three months ended December 31, 2006 and no tax provision for the comparable period in 2005. The Company recorded a tax provision of $187,000 for
12
the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2006 and $1,000 for the nine-month periods ended December 31, 2005. The Companys effective tax rate differed from the federal and state statutory rates during all periods presented due to the use of prior year net operating losses. The Companys tax rate for all periods presented is calculated using alternative minimum taxes based on the net income for the periods.
Due to uncertainty associated with our prospective ability to realize the benefits of our tax assets, we have fully reserved the value of our deferred tax assets. In addition, utilization of the net operating loss and credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions. The Annual limitations may result in the expiration of net operating loss carryforwards before utilization.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash, cash equivalents and investments increased to $20.7 million at December 31, 2006 from $12.9 million at March 31, 2006. The increase in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $7.8 million from March 31, 2006 to December 31, 2006, primarily relates to the net income for the period, which resulted from license and settlement arrangements with nVidia, offset, in part, by an increase in short-term investments. Working capital as of December 31, 2006 increased to $20.2 million from $12.3 million at March 31, 2006. During the first nine-months of fiscal 2007, operating activities provided approximately $7.8 million of cash. Cash provided from operating activities was primarily due to net income during the nine-month period of $7.9 million, offset, in part; by a decrease in accounts payable and an increase in accrued expenses and prepaid expenses. The Company had investing activity of $2.0 million for the three and nine-month period ended December 31, 2006. This investing activity relates to the net purchase of short-term investments. The Company had no financing activities during the nine-month period ended December 31, 2006.
As of December 31, 2006, the Companys principal sources of liquidity included cash, cash equivalents and investments of approximately $20.7 million and working capital of approximately $20.2 million. The Company believes that the existing sources of liquidity will satisfy the Companys projected working capital and other cash requirements through at least the next twelve months.
The Companys current building lease agreement is scheduled to end on December 31, 2009. The total remaining commitment under the lease at December 31, 2006 is approximately $304,000.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We maintain our cash and cash equivalents primarily in money market funds. We do not have any derivative financial instruments. As of December 31, 2006, all of our investments mature in less than thirty days. Accordingly, we do not believe that our investments have significant exposure to interest rate risk.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
(a) | We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 13a-15 as of the end of the Companys fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer along with our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level. |
(b) | There have been no significant changes (including corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation referenced in paragraph (a) above. |
13
We intend to review and evaluate the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures on an ongoing basis and to improve our controls and procedures over time and to correct any deficiencies that we may discover in the future. Our goal is to ensure that our senior management has timely access to all material financial and non-financial information concerning our business. While we believe the present design of our disclosure controls and procedures is effective to achieve our goal, future events affecting our business may cause us to significantly modify our disclosure controls and procedures.
14
OPTi Inc.
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
On November 15, 2006, the Company announced that it had filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) for infringement of three U.S. patents. The three patents at issue in the lawsuit are U.S. Patent No. 5,710,906, U.S. Patent No. 5,813,036 and U.S. Patent No. 6,405,291, all entitled Predictive Snooping of Cache Memory for Master-Initiated Accesses. The complaint alleges that AMD infringes the patents by making, selling, and offering for sale CPUs and core logic products based on and incorporating Predictive Snooping technology and inducing and contributing to the infringement of the patents by others. OPTi has requested a jury trial in this matter. The Company in its case against AMD is seeking an injunction and damages or other monetary relief, including pre-judgment interest and awarding OPTis attorney fees.
On January 16, 2007, the Company announced that it had filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Apple Inc. (Apple) for infringement of three U.S. patents. The three patents at issue in the lawsuit are U.S. Patent No. 5,710,906, U.S. Patent No. 5,813,036 and U.S. Patent No. 6,405,291; all entitled Predictive Snooping of Cache Memory for Master-Initiated Accesses. The complaint alleges that Apple has infringed the patents by making, selling, and offering for sale desktop and portable computers and servers incorporating Predictive Snooping technology. OPTi has requested a jury trial in this matter.
15
Additionally, the Company from time to time has been notified of claims that it may be infringing patents, maskwork rights, or copyrights owned by third parties. There can be no assurance that the Company will not become involved in litigation regarding the alleged infringements by the Company of third party intellectual property rights.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors |
Trading of OPTi Common Stock on the OTC Bulletin Board
Our common stock is currently traded over-OTC Bulletin Board. Some investors may be less likely to invest in stocks that are not traded on recognized national markets and listing services such as NASDAQ. Therefore, investors in our common stock may experience reduced liquidity when attempting to trade shares of our common stock.
Dependence on Intellectual Property Position
The success of the Companys current strategy of resolving potential infringement of its patented core logic technology can be affected by new developments in intellectual property law generally and with respect to semiconductor patents in particular and upon the Companys success in defending its patent position. Even though the Markman hearing in relation to the nVidia settlement and license agreements largely supported the Companys patent positions, other parties against whom OPTi may pursue infringement claims may challenge the Companys intellectual property position on other grounds and the Company may not have similar success in asserting its position with respect to other patents. It is difficult to predict developments and changes in intellectual property law. However, such changes could have an adverse impact on the Companys ability to pursue infringement claims on its previously developed technology.
Uncertain Revenue Stream
Royalty payments from Opti Technologies, Inc., an unrelated third party to whom the Company sold rights to its product lines in September 2002 were completed during the first quarter of 2005 when OPTi received the remaining $52,000 of revenue from the agreement. No further revenue is expected from Opti Technologies, Inc. and the Companys future revenues, if any, depend on the success of our strategy of pursuing license claims to our intellectual property position.
Although the Company continues to pursue license revenues relating to the unauthorized use of its intellectual property, there can be no assurances whether or when revenues will result from the pursuit of such claims.
In addition, the Companys focus on pursuing claims related to its intellectual property position can result in one time payments that may increase revenues during a single fiscal period but may not be repeated in future periods. For example, in the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, the Company reached a settlement of certain claims and with nVidia that included, among other things, a one-time cash payment to the Company. Consequently, settlements of these claims will cause our operating results to fluctuate from period to period and revenues that we may receive from such a settlement should not be viewed as indicative of future trends in our operating results.
nVidia Royalty Stream
On August 3, 2006, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement by and between the Company and nVidia and the Pre-Snoop License Agreement, by and between the Company and nVidia. The Settlement Agreement provides that in exchange for the Company agreeing to dismiss its lawsuit against nVidia and agreeing to enter into the License Agreement, nVidia will make payments of $10,000,000 to OPTi and $1,000,000 for a fully paid-up license on the Compact ISA-Bus Interface patents within five business days of the date of the agreement.
16
If nVidia continues to use the Companys Predictive Snooping technology, the License Agreement provides that the Company shall receive quarterly royalty payments of $750,000 from nVidia, commencing in February 2007, up to a maximum of 12 such payments in exchange for a license for future use of the Pre-Snoop patents. As an alternative to the quarterly royalty payments, at any time prior to or on January 31, 2008, nVidia can elect to pay OPTi a lump sum of $7,000,000 less any quarterly royalty payments already paid.
The Companys actual results including the total amount paid to OPTi from nVidia pursuant to the royalty payments may vary as a result of a number of factors, including the level of continuing use of OPTis Predictive Snooping technology by nVidia.
On February 5, 2007, the Company announced that it had received a notice from nVidia that nVidia had ceased use of the licensed technology and, accordingly, that no payments were due for future use. The Company has notified nVidia that it is reviewing the situation.
Outcome of AMD and Apple Legal Actions
On November 15, 2006 and January 16, 2007, the Company announced that it had filed patent infringement lawsuits in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) and Apple Inc. (Apple), respectively, for infringement of three U.S. patents relating to its Predictive Snooping technology. See Item 1 Legal Proceedings above. The AMD and Apple cases are a continuing part of the Companys strategy for pursuing its patent infringement claims and their outcomes will have a significant effect on the Companys ability to realize ongoing licensing revenue through its intellectual property licensing efforts.
Fluctuations in Operating Results
The Company has experienced significant fluctuations in its operating results in the past and expects that it will experience such fluctuations in the future. In the past, these fluctuations have been caused by a variety of factors including settlement and licensing agreements and litigation expenses. In the future, the Companys operating results will largely be dependent on its ability to generate revenue from its pursuit of license and patent infringement claims.
Limited Trading Volume
Daily trading volume in our shares has varied from zero to over one hundred thousand shares during the last two years. Therefore, investors in our stock may find liquidity in our shares to be limited and difficult to predict.
Possible Volatility of Stock Price
There can be no assurances as to the Companys operating results in any given period. The Company expects that the trading price of its common stock will continue to be subject to significant volatility.
Item 2. | Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Not applicable and has been omitted.
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
Not applicable and has been omitted.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Shareholders |
Not applicable and has been omitted.
Item 5. | Other Information |
Not applicable and has been omitted
17
Item 6. | Exhibits |
10.19 Lease between the Registrant and John Arrillaga or his Successor, dated November 21, 2006.
31.1 and 31.2 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer in accordance with 8 U.S. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 and 32.2 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer in accordance with rule 15d-14, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(1) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 9, 2006 (SEC File Number 000-21422). |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 9, 2006 (SEC File Number 000-21422). |
18
OPTi Inc.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OPTi Inc. | ||||
Date: February 14, 2007 | By: | /s/ Michael Mazzoni | ||
Michael Mazzoni | ||||
Signed on behalf of the Registrant and as Chief Financial Officer |
19