Edgar Filing: EXPONENT INC

Form 10-Q

FORM 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-18655

EXPONENT, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


DELAWARE		77-0218904
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

149 COMMONWEALTH DRIVE,

MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA

94025

(Address of principal executive office)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (650) 326-9400

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer x Non-accelerated filer ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class		Outstanding at August 4, 2006
Common Stock $.001 par value		15,272,137 shares

EXPONENT, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CO NTENTS


		Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets June 30, 2006 and December 30, 2005	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income Quarters and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income Quarters and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005	5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005	6

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	26

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	26

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	27

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	28

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	29

Item 6.	Exhibits	30

Signatures		31

- 2 -

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

EXPONENT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

June 30, 2006 and December 30, 2005

(in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)


	June 30, 2006			December 30, 2005
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,229		$	13,216
Short-term investments		56,660			55,682
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,570 and $1,222 at June 30, 2006 and December 30, 2005, respectively		51,427			46,211
Prepaid expenses and other assets		3,142			2,900
Deferred income taxes		2,581			2,156

Total current assets		119,039			120,165
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net		29,803			29,839
Goodwill		8,607			8,607
Other assets		7,912			5,630

	$	165,361		$	164,241

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	6,357		$	4,136
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		18,441			19,910
Deferred revenues		2,072			2,364

Total current liabilities		26,870			26,410
Other liabilities		3,809			3,487
Deferred rent		1,126			1,144

Total liabilities		31,805			31,041

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 16,426,664 and 16,191,826 shares issued at June 30, 2006 and December 30, 2005, respectively		16			16
Additional paid-in capital		49,647			44,955
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		10			(93	)
Retained earnings		95,573			88,322
Treasury stock, at cost, 724,936 and 0 shares held at June 30, 2006 and December 30, 2005, respectively		(11,690	)		—

Total stockholders’ equity		133,556			133,200

	$	165,361		$	164,241

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 3 -

EXPONENT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

For the Quarters and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005

(in thousands, except per share data)

(unaudited)


	Quarters Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2006		July 1, 2005		June 30, 2006		July 1, 2005
Revenues:
Revenues before reimbursements	$	39,053	$	36,674	$	78,672	$	73,603
Reimbursements		2,601		3,176		5,009		5,443

Revenues		41,654		39,850		83,681		79,046

Operating expenses:
Compensation and related expenses		26,044		23,642		52,790		47,523
Other operating expenses		4,967		4,600		9,732		9,264
Reimbursable expenses		2,601		3,176		5,009		5,443
General and administrative expenses		2,714		2,161		5,432		4,490

Total operating expenses		36,326		33,579		72,963		66,720

Operating income		5,328		6,271		10,718		12,326

Other income, net:
Interest income, net		533		274		1,031		508
Miscellaneous income, net		123		232		501		346

Total other income, net		656		506		1,532		854

Income before income taxes		5,984		6,777		12,250		13,180
Income taxes		2,334		2,683		4,778		5,219

Net income	$	3,650	$	4,094	$	7,472	$	7,961

Net income per share:
Basic	$	0.22	$	0.25	$	0.45	$	0.49
Diluted	$	0.21	$	0.23	$	0.42	$	0.46

Shares used in per share computations:
Basic		16,357		16,160		16,427		16,104
Diluted		17,631		17,438		17,711		17,396

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 4 -

EXPONENT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

For the Quarters and Six Months Ended July 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005

(in thousands)

(unaudited)


	Quarters Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005
Net income	$	3,650		$	4,094		$	7,472		$	7,961
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax		108			(130	)		122			(171	)
Unrealized (loss) gain on investments, net of tax		(12	)		39			(19	)		2

Comprehensive income	$	3,746		$	4,003		$	7,575		$	7,792

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 5 -

EXPONENT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005

(in thousands)

(unaudited)


	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	7,472		$	7,961
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and leasehold improvements		1,780			1,669
Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts of short-term investments		309			584
Contribution to deferred compensation plan		(1,000	)		—
Amortization of contribution to deferred compensation plan		36			—
Deferred rent expense		(18	)		47
Provision for doubtful accounts		780			600
Stock-based compensation		2,126			1,129
Deferred income tax provision		(1,295	)		(1,469	)
Tax benefit for stock option plans		(628	)		733
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(5,996	)		(9,107	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(373	)		(236	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		1,741			2,815
Accrued payroll and employee benefits		(844	)		(332	)
Deferred revenues		(292	)		1,012

Net cash provided by operating activities		3,798			5,406

Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(1,730	)		(1,792	)
Other assets		63			8
Purchase of short-term investments		(76,889	)		(42,639	)
Sale/maturity of short-term investments		75,567			43,325

Net cash used in investing activities		(2,989	)		(1,098	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments of borrowings and long-term obligations		(23	)		(34	)
Tax benefit for stock option plans		628			—
Purchases of treasury stock		(11,112	)		(4,307	)
Issuance of treasury stock		309			1,854
Issuance of common stock		1,313			430

Net cash used in financing activities		(8,885	)		(2,057	)

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		89			(47	)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(7,987	)		2,204
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		13,216			4,680

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	5,229		$	6,884

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

- 6 -

EXPONENT, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the Fiscal Quarters Ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005

Note 1: Basis of Presentation

Exponent, Inc. (referred to as the “Company” or “Exponent”) is an engineering and scientific consulting firm that provides solutions to complex problems. The Company operates on a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Friday closest to the last day of December.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments which are necessary for the fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements have been included and all such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. The operating results for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 are not necessarily representative of the results of future quarterly or annual periods.

Stock Split. On May 24, 2006, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation to (i) increase the number of authorized shares of common stock to 100,000,000, (ii) increase the number of authorized shares of preferred stock to 5,000,000, and (iii) effect a two-for-one stock split. As a result of the stock split, each shareholder of record at the close of business on May 24, 2006, received one additional share of common stock. For periods prior to the stock split, all share and per share data in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split.

The Company has committed to stockholders to limit its use of the increased authorized capital stock to 40 million common shares, and 2 million preferred shares, unless the approval of the Company’s stockholders is obtained subsequently, such as through a further amendment to the Company’s authorized capital stock.

Stock-Based Compensation. During the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payments” (“SFAS 123(R)”), which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and restricted stock unit grants based on estimated fair values. SFAS 123(R) supersedes the Company’s previous accounting under Accounting Principles Board Option No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” and amends Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 95, “Statement of Cash Flows”. In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”) relating to SFAS 123(R). The Company has applied the provisions of SAB 107 in its adoption of SFAS 123(R).

Stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. The Company elected the modified-prospective method, under which prior periods are not revised for comparative purposes. Under this transition method of adoption, stock-based compensation expense for the first six months of fiscal 2006 includes compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 30, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provision of SFAS 123. Stock-based compensation expense for all stock-based compensation awards granted after December 30, 2005 is based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R).

SFAS 123(R) requires that the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow. As a result, the adoption of SFAS 123(R) reduces net operating cash flows and increases net financing cash flows in the periods after the effective date. Total cash flow will remain unchanged from what would have been reported. SFAS 123(R) also requires that the

- 7 -

Company estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest and to revise the estimate as actual forfeitures differ from that estimate. Previously, the Company accounted for forfeitures under the provisions of SFAS 123, wherein the Company recognized forfeitures as they occurred. The Company estimated the forfeiture rate for the six months ended June 30, 2006, based on its historical experience.

As a result of adopting SFAS 123(R), the Company’s income before income taxes and net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, were $182,000 and $142,000 lower, respectively, than if the Company had continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB 25. Income taxes for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 were $40,000 lower due to the adoption of SFAS 123(R). The impact on both basic and diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 was a decrease of $0.01 per share. For the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the Company’s income before income taxes and net income were $824,000 and $575,000 lower, respectively, than if the Company continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB 25. Income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were $249,000 lower due to the adoption of SFAS 123(R). The impact on basic and diluted earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was a decrease of $0.04 per share and $0.03 per share, respectively. See Note 4 for further information regarding the Company’s stock-based compensation assumptions and expenses, including pro-forma disclosures for prior periods as if the Company had recorded stock-based compensation expense.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications. Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. In connection with the adoption of SFAS 123(R) the prior period balances for deferred stock-based compensation and stock-based compensation expense were reclassified.

Note 2: Revenue Recognition

The Company derives its revenues primarily from professional fees earned on consulting engagements and fees earned for the use of its equipment and facilities, as well as reimbursements for outside direct expenses associated with the services that are billed to its clients.

Exponent reports revenues net of subcontractor fees. The Company has determined that it is not the primary obligor with respect to its subcontractors because:

•

its clients are directly involved in the subcontractor selection process;

•

the subcontractor is responsible for fulfilling the scope of work; and

•

the Company passes through the costs of subcontractor agreements with only a minimal fixed percentage mark-up to compensate it for processing the transactions.

Reimbursements, including those related to travel and other out-of-pocket expenses, and other similar third-party costs such as the cost of materials, are included in revenues, and an equivalent amount of reimbursable expenses are included in operating expenses. Any mark-up on reimbursable expenses is included in revenues.

Substantially all of the Company’s engagements are performed under time and material or fixed-price billing arrangements. On time and material and fixed-price projects, revenue is generally recognized as the services are performed. For substantially all of the Company’s fixed-price engagements, it recognizes revenue based on the relationship of incurred labor hours at standard rates and expenses to its estimate of the total labor hours at standard rates and expenses it expects to incur over the term of the contract. The Company believes this methodology achieves a reliable measure of the revenue from the consulting services it provides to its customers under fixed-price contracts given the nature of the consulting services the Company provides and the following additional considerations:

•

the Company considers labor hours at standard rates and expenses to be incurred when pricing its contracts;

- 8 -

•

the Company generally does not incur set-up costs on its contracts;

•

the Company does not believe that there are reliable milestones to measure progress toward completion;

•

if either party terminates the contract early, the customer is required to pay the Company for time at standard rates plus materials incurred to date;

•

the Company does not recognize revenue for award fees or bonuses until specific contractual criteria are met;

•

the Company does not include revenue for unpriced change orders until the customer agrees with the changes;

•

historically the Company has not had significant accounts receivable write-offs or cost overruns; and

•

its contracts are typically progress billed on a monthly basis.

Gross revenues and reimbursements for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005 are as follows:


	Quarters Ended				Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006		July 1, 2005		June 30, 2006		July 1, 2005
Gross revenues	$	43,208	$	45,106	$	86,162	$	86,776
Less: Subcontractor fees		1,554		5,256		2,481		7,730

Revenues		41,654		39,850		83,681		79,046
Reimbursements:
Out-of-pocket travel reimbursements		1,209		1,034		2,201		1,849
Other outside direct expenses		1,392		2,142		2,808		3,594

		2,601		3,176		5,009		5,443

Revenues before reimbursements	$	39,053	$	36,674	$	78,672	$	73,603

Significant management judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with the revenue recognized in any accounting period. These judgments and estimates include an assessment of collectibility and, for fixed-price engagements, an estimate as to the total effort required to complete the project. If the Company made different judgments or utilized different estimates, the amount and timing of its revenue for any period could be materially different.

All consulting contracts are subject to review by management, which requires a positive assessment of the collectibility of contract amounts. If, during the course of the contract, the Company determines that collection of revenue is not reasonably assured, it does not recognize the revenue until its collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash. The Company assesses collectibility based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the client and project manager, as well as the creditworthiness of the client. Losses on fixed-price contracts are recognized during the period in which the loss first becomes evident. Contract losses are determined to be the amount by which the estimated total costs of the contract exceeds the total fixed price of the contract.

Note 3: Net Income Per Share

Basic per share amounts are computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted per share amounts are calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period and, when dilutive, the weighted-average number of potential common shares from the issuance of common stock to satisfy outstanding restricted stock units and the exercise of outstanding options to purchase common stock using the treasury stock method.

- 9 -

The following schedule reconciles the shares used to calculate basic and diluted net income per share:


	Quarters Ended		Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006	July 1, 2005	June 30, 2006	July 1, 2005
Shares used in basic per share computation	16,357	16,160	16,427	16,104
Effect of dilutive common stock options outstanding	1,102	1,216	1,136	1,242
Effect of dilutive restricted stock units outstanding	172	62	148	50

Shares used in diluted per share computation	17,631	17,438	17,711	17,396

Common stock options to purchase 0 and 5,000 shares were excluded from the diluted per share calculation for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, respectively, due to their antidilutive effect. The weighted-average exercise price for the antidilutive shares was $13.76 for the quarter ended July 1, 2005. Common stock options to purchase 58,516 and 5,000 shares were excluded from the diluted per share calculation for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, respectively, due to their antidilutive effect. Weighted-average exercise prices for the antidilutive shares were $15.65 and $13.76 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, respectively.

Note 4: Stock-Based Compensation

Restricted Stock Units

The Company grants restricted stock units to employees and outside directors under the 1999 Restricted Stock Plan. These restricted stock unit grants are designed to attract and retain employees, and to better align employee interests with those of the Company’s stockholders. For a select group of employees, up to 30% of their annual bonus is settled with fully vested restricted stock unit awards. Under these fully vested restricted stock unit awards, the holder of each award has the right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock for each fully vested restricted stock unit four years from the date of grant. Each individual who received a fully vested restricted stock unit award is also granted a matching number of unvested restricted stock unit awards. These unvested restricted stock unit awards cliff vest four years from the date of grant, at which time the holder of each award will have the right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock for each restricted stock unit award provided the holder of each award has met certain employment conditions.

The value of these restricted stock unit awards is determined based on the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The value of fully vested restricted stock unit awards issued is recorded as a reduction to accrued bonuses. The portion of bonus expense that the Company expects to settle with fully vested restricted stock unit awards is recorded as stock-based compensation during the period the bonus is earned. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense associated with accrued bonus awards of $391,000 and $441,000 during the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense associated with accrued bonus awards of $825,000 and $865,000, respectively. The value of the unvested restricted stock unit awards issued is recognized over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense associated with the unvested restricted stock unit awards of $238,000 and $167,000 during the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, respectively. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense associated with the unvested restricted stock unit awards of $795,000 and $264,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, respectively.

Stock Options

The Company currently grants stock options under the 1999 Stock Option Plan and the 1998 Stock Option Plan. Options are granted for terms of ten years and generally vest ratably over a four-year period from the grant date. The Company grants options at exercise prices equal to the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 the Company recorded stock-based

- 10 -

compensation expense of $197,000 and $458,000, respectively, associated with stock options granted prior to, but not yet vested as of December 30, 2005. During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense of $29,000 and $48,000 respectively, associated with stock options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006. There was no stock-based compensation expense associated with stock options during the quarter and six months ended July 1, 2005.

Stock Compensation

Beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R). See Note 1 for a description of the adoption of SFAS 123(R). The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of options granted. The determination of the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by the Company’s stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include expected stock price volatility over the term of the award, actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, the risk-free interest rate and expected dividends.

The Company used historical exercise and post-vesting forfeiture and expiration data to estimate the expected term of options granted. The historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over a period of time equal to the expected term of the options granted was used to estimate expected volatility. The risk-free interest rate used in the option-pricing model was based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with remaining terms similar to the expected term on the options. The Company does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and therefore used an expected dividend yield of zero in the option-pricing model. The Company is required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Historical data was used to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and stock-based compensation expense was recorded only for those awards that are expected to vest. All share based payment awards are recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards.

The assumptions used to value option grants for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005 are as follows:


	Stock Option Plan
	June 30, 2006		July 1 2005
	June 30, 2006		July 1 2005
Expected life (in years)	6.6		4.8
Risk-free interest rate	4.6	%	3.8	%
Volatility	39	%	43	%
Dividend yield	0	%	0	%

There were no options granted during the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005. The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005 were $7.47 and $5.45 respectively.

- 11 -

The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized in our consolidated statements of income for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005 is as follows:


	Quarters Ended				Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006		July 1, 2005		June 30, 2006		July 1, 2005
Compensation and related expenses:
Restricted stock units	$	616	$	594	$	1,586	$	1,102
Stock option grants		226		—		506		—

Sub-total		842		594		2,092		1,102

General and administrative expenses:
Restricted stock units		13		14		34		27

Sub-total		13		14		34		27

Total stock-based compensation expense	$	855	$	608	$	2,126	$	1,129

The following table sets forth the pro-forma amounts of net income and net income per share, for the quarter and six months ended July 1, 2005, that would have resulted if the Company had accounted for its stock option plans under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123(R):


	Quarter Ended			Six Months Ended
(In thousands, except per share data)	July 1, 2005			July 1, 2005
Reported net income:	$	4,094		$	7,961

Add back: Intrinsic value stock-based compensation expense, net of tax		367			682
Deduct: Fair value stock-based compensation expense, net of tax		(715	)		(1,424	)

Adjusted net income:	$	3,746		$	7,219

Net income per share:
As reported:
Basic	$	0.25		$	0.49
Diluted	$	0.23		$	0.46
Adjusted:
Basic	$	0.23		$	0.45
Diluted	$	0.22		$	0.42

Shares used in per share calculations:
As reported:
Basic		16,160			16,104
Diluted		17,438			17,396
Adjusted:
Basic		16,160			16,104
Diluted		17,268			17,226

As of June 30, 2006, there was $2.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost, expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.8 years, related to unvested restricted stock unit awards and $1.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost, expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.1 years, related to unvested stock options. Total unrecognized compensation cost will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures.

- 12 -

Activity under the restricted stock plan is as follows:


	Awards available for grant		Number of awards outstanding		Weighted- average fair value
Balance of unvested restricted stock units as of December 30, 2005	1,467,730		224,838		$	11.93
Additional awards authorized	320,000		—			—
Awards granted	(195,068	)	195,068			15.50
Awards vested	—		(100,144	)		15.31
Awards cancelled	218		(218	)		14.08

Balance of unvested restricted stock units as of June 30, 2006	1,592,880		319,544		$	13.05

Activity under the stock option plans is as follows:


	Options available for grant		Number of options outstanding		Weighted- average exercise price		Weighted- average remaining contractual term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Outstanding as of
December 30, 2005	1,462,818		2,613,612		$	5.65
Additional shares reserved	480,000		—			—
Options granted	(75,000	)	75,000			15.65
Options exercised	—		(252,038	)		5.43
Options cancelled	1,500		(3,000	)		4.97

Outstanding as of June 30, 2006	1,869,318		2,433,574		$	5.98	4.64	$	26,573

Vested and expected to vest at June 30, 2006			2,405,501		$	5.90	4.70	$	26,456

Exercisable at June 30, 2006			2,034,574		$	5.05	4.01	$	24,103

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2006 was $535,000 and $2,616,000, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the quarter ended June 30, 2006, and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on June 30, 2006. This amount changes based on the fair-value of the Company’s stock.

- 13 -

A summary of the Company’s unvested stock options is as follows:


	Unvested options outstanding		Weighted- average fair value
Balance of unvested stock options as of December 30, 2005	609,038		$	4.58
Options granted	75,000			7.47
Options vested	(283,538	)		4.06
Options forfeited	(1,500	)		3.83

Balance of unvested stock options as of June 30, 2006	399,000		$	5.50

Note 5: Repurchase of Common Stock

On April 4, 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized $35 million for stock repurchases. The Company repurchased 757,292 shares of its common stock for $12.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2006. The Company repurchased 362,030 shares of its common stock for $4.3 million during the six months ended July 1, 2005. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had remaining authorization under its stock repurchase plan of $23.2 million to repurchase shares of common stock.

Note 6: Deferred Compensation Plan

The Company maintains a nonqualified deferred compensation plan for the benefit of a select group of highly compensated employees. The purpose of the plan is to offer those employees an opportunity to elect to defer the receipt of compensation in order to provide for termination of employment and related benefits. Under this plan participants may elect to defer up to 100% of their compensation. Employee deferrals were $294,000 and $545,000 during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Employee deferrals were $502,000 and $1,629,000 during the quarter and six months ended July 1, 2005.

In connection with the hiring of an executive officer during the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the Company made a discretionary contribution of $1,000,000 to the non-qualified deferred compensation plan. One-eighth of this contribution will vest on each three-month anniversary of this executive officer’s date of hire, provided that this individual remains a full-time employee. The value of this contribution is recognized over the requisite service period on a straight-line basis. Compensation expense for this contribution was $36,000 during the quarter ended June 30, 2006.

Company assets that are earmarked to pay benefits under the plan are held in a rabbi trust and are subject to the claims of the Company’s creditors. As of June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, the invested amounts under the plan totaled $4.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively, and were recorded as a long-term asset on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet. These assets are classified as trading securities and are recorded at fair market value with changes recorded as adjustments to other income and expense. As of June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, vested amounts due under the plan totaled $3.7 million and $3.0 million, respectively, and were recorded as a long-term other liability on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet. Changes in the liability are recorded as adjustments to compensation expense. During the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, the Company recognized a compensation benefit of $55,000 and compensation expense of $78,000, respectively, as a result of changes in the market value of the trust assets, with the same amount being recorded as other income or expense. During the six months ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, the Company recognized compensation expense of $139,000 and $41,000, respectively, as a result of an increase in the market value of the trust assets, with a corresponding amount being recorded as other income.

- 14 -

Note 7: Supplemental Cash Flow Information

The following is supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:


	Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005
Cash paid during period:
Interest	$	2		$	3
Income taxes	$	3,858		$	3,993
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Capital lease for equipment	$	—		$	11
Unrealized (loss) gain on short-term investments	$	(19	)	$	2
Vested stock unit awards issued to settle accrued bonuses	$	1,450		$	1,340
Stock repurchases payable to broker	$	1,108		$	—

Note 8: Accounts Receivable, Net

At June 30, 2006 and December 30, 2005, accounts receivable, net was comprised of the following:


	June 30, 2006			December 30, 2005
(In thousands)
Billed accounts receivable	$	35,405		$	32,482
Unbilled accounts receivable		17,592			14,951
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(1,570	)		(1,222	)

Total accounts receivable, net	$	51,427		$	46,211

Note 9: Inventory

At June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005, the Company had $600,000 and $725,000, respectively, of work-in-process inventory included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Note 10: Segment Reporting

The Company has two operating segments based on two primary areas of service. One operating segment is a broad service group providing technical consulting in different practices primarily in the areas of impending litigation and technology development. The Company’s other operating segment provides services in the area of environmental, epidemiology and health risk analysis. This operating segment provides a wide range of consulting services relating to environmental hazards and risks and the impact on both human health and the environment.

Segment information for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005 follows:

Revenues



	Quarters Ended				Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006		July 1, 2005		June 30, 2006		July 1, 2005
Other scientific and engineering	$	32,578	$	30,039	$	64,800	$	59,913
Environmental and health		9,076		9,811		18,881		19,133

Total revenues	$	41,654	$	39,850	$	83,681	$	79,046

- 15 -

Operating income


	Quarters Ended						Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005
Other scientific and engineering	$	8,444		$	7,437		$	17,077		$	15,412
Environmental and health		1,435			2,136			3,604			4,489

Total segment operating income		9,879			9,573			20,681			19,901
Corporate operating expense		(4,551	)		(3,302	)		(9,963	)		(7,575	)

Total operating income	$	5,328		$	6,271		$	10,718		$	12,326

Capital Expenditures


	Quarters Ended				Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006		July 1, 2005		June 30, 2006		July 1, 2005
Other scientific and engineering	$	410	$	678	$	1,073	$	1,333
Environmental and health		91		8		185		51

Total segment capital expenditures		501		686		1,258		1,384
Corporate capital expenditures		369		10		472		408

Total capital expenditures	$	870	$	696	$	1,730	$	1,792

Depreciation and Amortization


	Quarters Ended				Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006		July 1, 2005		June 30, 2006		July 1, 2005
Other scientific and engineering	$	607	$	576	$	1,210	$	1,128
Environmental and health		40		43		70		86

Total segment depreciation and amortization		647		619		1,280		1,214
Corporate depreciation and amortization		251		232		500		455

Total depreciation and amortization	$	898	$	851	$	1,780	$	1,669

No single customer comprised more than 10% of the Company’s revenues for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2006 and July 1, 2005.

Note 11: Related Party Transactions

The Company has a software licensing contract with an organization owned by the husband of one of Exponent’s Practice Directors. The Company recorded software licensing expenses related to this contract for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006 of approximately $25,000 and $50,000, respectively. The Company recorded software licensing expenses related to this contract for the quarter and six months ended July 1, 2005 of approximately $33,750 and $67,500, respectively.

- 16 -

Note 12: Goodwill

Below is a breakdown of goodwill reported by segment as of June 30, 2006:


	Environmental and health		Other scientific and engineering
(In thousands)	Environmental and health		Other scientific and engineering		Total
Goodwill	$	8,099	$	508	$	8,607

There were no changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006.

Note 13: Mortgage Note

The Company has a revolving reducing mortgage note (the “Mortgage Note”) secured by its Silicon Valley headquarters building. The Mortgage Note had an initial borrowing amount up to $30.0 million and is subject to automatic annual reductions in the amount available to be borrowed of between $1.3 million to $2.1 million approximately per year until January 31, 2008. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had $0 outstanding and available borrowings of $19.4 million. The Mortgage Note is subject to two interest rate options of either prime less 1.5% or the fixed LIBOR plus 1.25% with a term of one month, two months, three months, nine months, or twelve months.

- 17 -

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included herein and with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2005, which are contained in our fiscal 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain “forward-looking” statements (as such term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and the rules promulgated pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended thereto) that are based on the beliefs of the Company’s management, as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to the Company’s management. Such forward-looking statements are subject to the safe harbor created by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this document and in the documents incorporated herein by reference, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to the Company or its management, identify such forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current views of the Company or its management with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, the Company’s actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such material differences include the possibility that the demand for our services may decline as a result of changes in general and industry specific economic conditions, the timing of engagements for our services, the effects of competitive services and pricing, the absence of backlog related to our business, our ability to attract and retain key employees, the effect of tort reform and government regulation on our business and liabilities resulting from claims made against us. Additional risks and uncertainties are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in the report. The inclusion of such forward-looking information should not be regarded as a representation by the Company or any other person that the future events, plans, or expectations contemplated by the Company will be achieved. The Company does not intend to release publicly any updates or revisions to any such forward-looking statements.

Business Overview

Exponent, Inc. is an engineering and scientific consulting firm that provides solutions to complex problems. Our multidisciplinary team of scientists, physicians, engineers and business consultants brings together more than 70 different technical disciplines to solve complicated issues facing industry and business today. Our services include analysis of product development, product recall, regulatory compliance, discovery of potential problems related to products, people or property and impending litigation, as well as the development of highly technical new products.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

In preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements, we make assumptions, judgments and estimates that can have a significant impact on our revenue, operating income and net income, as well as on the value of certain assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet. We base our assumptions, judgments and estimates on historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. On a regular basis we evaluate our assumptions, judgments and estimates and make changes accordingly. We believe that the assumptions, judgments and estimates involved in revenue recognition, estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts, accounting for income taxes, valuing goodwill and accounting for stock-based compensation have the greatest potential impact on our consolidated financial statements, so we consider these to be our critical accounting policies. Historically, our assumptions, judgments and estimates relative to our critical accounting policies have not differed materially from actual results. Policies covering revenue recognition, estimating the allowance for doubtful accounts, accounting for income taxes and valuing goodwill are described in our 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K under “Critical Accounting Estimates” and Note 1 (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Due to the adoption of FAS 123(R), our accounting policy covering stock-based compensation is described below.

- 18 -

Stock-based compensation. We adopted the provisions of, and accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with, SFAS 123(R) during the six months ended June 30, 2006. We elected the modified-prospective method, under which prior periods are not revised for comparative purposes. Under the fair value recognition provisions of this statement, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

We currently use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options. The determination of the fair value of stock options on the date of grant using an option-pricing model is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include the expected term of the options, our expected stock price volatility over the term of the options, risk-free interest rate and expected dividends.

We use historical exercise and post-vesting forfeiture and expiration data to estimate the expected term of options granted. The historical volatility of our common stock over a period of time equal to the expected term of the options granted is used to estimate expected volatility. We base the risk-free interest rate that we use in the option-pricing model on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with remaining terms similar to the expected term on the options. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and therefore use an expected dividend yield of zero in the option-pricing model. We are required to estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest. All share based payment awards are amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the awards.

If factors change and we employ different assumptions for estimating stock-based compensation expense in future periods or if we decide to use a different valuation model, the future periods may differ significantly from what we have recorded in the current period and could materially affect our operating income, net income and net income per share.

RESULTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS

Overview of the Quarter Ended June 30, 2006

During the second quarter of 2006 we had a 4.5% increase in revenues and a 6.5% increase in revenues before reimbursements as compared to the same period last year. This growth was driven primarily by our biomechanics, civil engineering, construction consulting, and electrical & semiconductors practices. This growth was offset by lower revenues in our technology development practice due to a decrease in the number of large projects with the United States Department of Defense.

- 19 -

Our consolidated revenue growth was driven by an increase in billable hours. Billable hours for the second quarter of 2006 increased 6.7% to 191,000 as compared to 179,000 during the same period last year. Technical full-time equivalents increased 11.9% to 565 during the second quarter of 2006 as compared to 505 during the same period last year. This increase in technical full-time equivalents was due to our continuing recruiting and retention efforts. Utilization decreased to 65% for the first quarter of fiscal 2006 as compared to 68% during the same period last year. The decrease in utilization was due to the integration of our recently hired technical consultants.

The decrease in utilization negatively impacted our operating income and net income. Operating income decreased 15.0% during the second quarter of 2006 to $5.3 million as compared to $6.3 million during the same period last year. Net income decreased 10.8% during the second quarter of 2006 to $3.7 million as compared to $4.1 million during the same period last year. As a result of adopting SFAS 123(R) our operating and net income for the second quarter of fiscal 2006 were $182,000 and $142,000 lower, respectively, than if we had continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB 25.

Fiscal Quarter Ended June 30, 2006 compared to Fiscal Quarter Ended July 1, 2005

Revenues


	Quarters Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
Engineering and other scientific	$	32,578		$	30,039		8.5	%
Percentage of total revenues		78.2	%		75.4	%
Environmental and health		9,076			9,811		(7.5	)%
Percentage of total revenues		21.8	%		24.6	%

Total revenues	$	41,654		$	39,850		4.5	%

The increase in revenues for our engineering and other scientific segment was the result of an increase in billable hours. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006 billable hours for this segment increased by 9.6% to 148,000 as compared to 135,000 during the same period last year. Technical full-time equivalents increased 12.1% to 417 from 372 for the same period last year due to our recruiting efforts. Utilization decreased to 68% for the second quarter of fiscal 2006 as compared to 70% during the same period last year. The decrease in utilization was due to the integration of our recently hired technical consultants and a decrease in activity in our technology development practice.

The decrease in revenues for our environmental and health segment was the result of a decrease in reimbursable expenses of $443,000 and a decrease in billable hours. During the second quarter of fiscal 2006 billable hours for this segment decreased by 2.3% to 43,000 as compared to 44,000 during the same period last year. The decrease in billable hours was due to a decrease in demand for services in our health sciences practice. Technical full-time equivalents increased 11.3% to 148 from 133 during same period last year due to our continued recruiting efforts. Utilization decreased to 56% for the second quarter of fiscal 2006 as compared to 64% during the same period last year. The decrease in utilization was due to a decrease in demand for services in our health sciences practice and the integration of our recently hired technical consultants.

Compensation and Related Expenses


	Quarters Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
Compensation and related expenses	$	26,044		$	23,642		10.2	%
Percentage of total revenues		62.5	%		59.3	%

- 20 -

The increase in compensation and related expenses was due to an increase in payroll expense, an increase in fringe benefits and an increase in stock-based compensation partially offset by a decrease in bonus expense. Payroll expense increased by $2.1 million due to an increase in technical full-time equivalent employees and the impact of our annual salary increase. Fringe benefits increased by $407,000 due to the increase in technical full-time equivalent employees. Stock-based compensation expense related to matching restricted stock units and stock options increased by $298,000 due primarily to the adoption of SFAS 123(R) during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Bonus expense decreased by $428,000 due to a decrease in profitability. We expect compensation and related expenses to increase due to the anticipated hiring of additional staff and the impact of future annual salary increases.

Other Operating Expenses


	Quarters Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
Other operating expenses	$	4,967		$	4,600		8.0	%
Percentage of total revenues		11.9	%		11.5	%

Other operating expenses primarily include facilities related costs, technical materials, computer-related expenses and depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and leasehold improvements. Occupancy expenses increased $125,000 due to expansion in certain offices. Computer-related expenses increased $74,000, technical materials increased $65,000 and depreciation increased $52,000 due to the costs associated with our increase in technical full-time equivalent employees.

Reimbursable Expenses


	Quarters Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
Reimbursable expenses	$	2,601		$	3,176		(18.1	)%
Percentage of total revenues		6.2	%		8.0	%

The decrease in reimbursable expenses was primarily due to a decrease in project related costs in our food and chemicals practice and a decrease in purchases of project-related materials in our technology development practice. The amount of reimbursable expenses will vary from quarter to quarter depending on the nature of our projects.

General and Administrative Expenses


	Quarters Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
General and administrative expenses	$	2,714		$	2,161		25.6	%
Percentage of total revenues		6.5	%		5.4	%

The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase in travel and meals of $165,000, an increase in bad debt of $146,000 and an increase in marketing and promotion of $83,000. The increase in travel and meals was primarily due to our increase in technical full-time equivalent employees and an increase in business development activities. The increase in bad debt expense was due to an in increase in our allowance for doubtful accounts driven by an increase in days sales outstanding to 106 days during the second quarter of fiscal 2006 as compared to 97 days during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. The increase in marketing and promotion was due to the increase in our business development activities.

- 21 -

Other Income, Net


	Quarters Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
Other income, net	$	656		$	506		29.6	%
Percentage of total revenues		1.6	%		1.3	%

Other income, net, consists primarily of investment income earned on available cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, changes in the value of assets associated with our deferred compensation plan and rental income from leasing excess space in our Silicon Valley facility. The increase in other income, net, was primarily due to an increase in interest income of $259,000 and an increase in rental income of $40,000 partially offset by a decrease in other income of $158,000 associated with the change in fair value of deferred compensation plan assets. The increase in interest income was due to higher average balances of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and an increase in short-term interest rates. Rental income increased due to the addition of new tenants in our Silicon Valley facility.

Income Taxes


	Quarters Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
Income taxes	$	2,334		$	2,683		(13.0	)%
Percentage of total revenues		5.6	%		6.7	%
Effective tax rate		39.0	%		39.6	%

The decrease in our effective tax rate was due to an increase in tax-exempt interest income, which was the result of higher average balances of short-term investments and cash equivalents and an increase in short-term interest rates.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 compared to Six Months Ended July 1, 2005

Revenues


	Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
Engineering and other scientific	$	64,800		$	59,913		8.2	%
Percentage of total revenues		77.4	%		75.8	%
Environmental and health		18,881			19,133		(1.3	)%
Percentage of total revenues		22.6	%		24.2	%

Total revenues	$	83,681		$	79,046		5.9	%

The increase in revenues for our engineering and other scientific segment was the result of an increase in billable hours. During the first six months of fiscal 2006 billable hours for this segment increased by 9.3% to 295,000 as compared to 270,000 during the same period last year. Technical full-time equivalents increased 10.2% to 410 from 372 for the same period last year. Utilization decreased to 69% from 70% from the same period last year.

Billable hours for our environmental and health segment were 91,000 during the first six months of fiscal 2006 and 2005. Technical full-time equivalents increased 9.7% to 147 from 134 during same period last year. Utilization decreased to 59% for the first six months of fiscal 2006 as compared to 65% during the same period last year. The decrease in utilization was due to a decrease in demand for services in our health sciences practice and the integration of our recently hired technical consultants.

- 22 -

Compensation and Related Expenses


	Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
Compensation and related expenses	$	52,790		$	47,523		11.1	%
Percentage of total revenues		63.1	%		60.1	%

The increase in compensation and related expenses was due to an increase in payroll expense, an increase in fringe benefits and an increase in stock-based compensation partially offset by a decrease in bonus expense. Payroll expense increased by $4.0 million due to an increase in technical full-time equivalent employees and the impact of our annual salary increase. Fringe benefits increased by $602,000 due to the increase in technical full-time equivalent employees. Stock-based compensation expense related to matching restricted stock units and stock options increased by $1.0 million due primarily to the adoption of SFAS 123(R) during the first quarter of fiscal 2006. Bonus expense decreased by $411,000 due to a decrease in profitability. We expect compensation and related expenses to increase due to the anticipated hiring of additional staff and the impact of future annual salary increases.

Other Operating Expenses


	Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
Other operating expenses	$	9,732		$	9,264		5.1	%
Percentage of total revenues		11.6	%		11.7	%

Other operating expenses primarily include facilities related costs, technical materials, computer-related expenses and depreciation and amortization of property, equipment and leasehold improvements. Occupancy expenses increased $137,000 due to expansion in certain offices. Depreciation increased $116,000, computer-related expenses increased $111,000 and technical materials increased $89,000 due to the costs associated with our increase in technical full-time equivalent employees.

Reimbursable Expenses


	Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
Reimbursable expenses	$	5,009		$	5,443		(8.0	)%
Percentage of total revenues		6.0	%		6.9	%

- 23 -

General and Administrative Expenses


	Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
General and administrative expenses	$	5,432		$	4,490		21.0	%
Percentage of total revenues		6.5	%		5.7	%

The increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase in travel and meals of $325,000, an increase in outside consulting services of $291,000 and an increase in marketing and promotion of $149,000. The increase in travel and meals was primarily due to our increase in technical full-time equivalent employees and an increase in business development activities. The increase in outside consulting services was due to $216,000 in sub-contractor fees related to a potential project with the United Stated government that was not fully executed by the end of fiscal 2004. This project was executed during the first quarter of fiscal 2005 and the sub-contractor fees previously expensed were recovered. The recovery of these expenses during the first six months of fiscal 2005 contributed to the period-to-period increase in outside consulting services. The increase in marketing and promotion was due to the increase in our business development activities.

Other Income, Net


	Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
Other income, net	$	1,532		$	854		79.4	%
Percentage of total revenues		1.8	%		1.1	%

Other income, net, consists primarily of investment income earned on available cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, changes in the value of assets associated with our deferred compensation plan and rental income from leasing excess space in our Silicon Valley facility. The increase in other income, net, was primarily due to an increase in interest income of $523,000, an increase in other income of $74,000 associated the change in fair value of deferred compensation plan assets and an increase in rental income of $72,000. The increase in interest income was due to higher average balances of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and an increase in short-term interest rates. Rental income increased due to the addition of new tenants in our Silicon Valley facility.

Income Taxes


	Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005			Percent Change
Income taxes	$	4,778		$	5,219		(8.4	)%
Percentage of total revenues		5.7	%		6.6	%
Effective tax rate		39.0	%		39.6	%

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In July 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in tax positions. This interpretation requires that companies recognize in their financial statements the impact of a tax position, if that position is more likely than not of being sustained on audit, based on the technical merits of the position. The provisions of FIN 48 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting FIN 48 on our financial statements.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of June 30, 2006, our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were $61.9 million compared to $68.9 million at December 30, 2005. We financed our business for the current period principally through operating cash.

- 24 -


(In thousands)	Six Months Ended
(In thousands)	June 30, 2006			July 1, 2005
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	3,798		$	5,406
Net cash used in investing activities		(2,989	)		(1,098	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(8,885	)		(2,057	)

The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the same period last year was primarily due to a decrease in deferred revenue, an increase in contributions to our deferred compensation plan, a smaller increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, a decrease in tax benefit for stock option plans and a decrease in net income partially offset by a smaller increase in accounts receivable. Deferred revenues decreased by $292,000 during the first six months of 2006 as compared to an increase of $1.0 million during the same period in 2005. The decrease in deferred revenues was due to a decrease in pre-billed projects. During the first six months of 2006 we contributed $1.0 million to our deferred compensation plan. There were no employer contributions to our deferred compensation plan during the first six months of 2005. Accounts payable and accrued liabilities increased by $1.7 million during the first six months of 2006 as compared to an increase of $2.8 million during the same period in 2005. The smaller increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities was due to the timing of payments to vendors and a decrease in the use of sub-contractors. During the first six months of 2005 the tax benefit for stock option plans of $733,000 was classified as cash from operating activities. This benefit was classified as cash from financing activities during the first six months of 2006 due to the adoption of SFAS 123(R). Accounts receivable increased $6.0 million during the first six months of 2006 as compared to an increase of $9.1 million during the same period in 2005. The smaller increase in accounts receivable was due to a larger beginning balance in 2006 as compared to 2005. Days sales outstanding increased to 106 days during the second quarter of 2006 as compared to 93 days during the second quarter of 2005.

The increase in net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to the purchase and sale of short-term investments. During the first six months of 2006 net purchases of short-term investments were $1.3 million as compared to net sales of short-term investments of $686,000 during the same period in 2005.

The increase in net cash used in financing activities was primarily due to an increase in repurchases of our common stock under our stock repurchase programs during the first six months of 2006 as compared to 2005.

We expect to continue our investing activities, including purchases of short-term investments and capital expenditures. Furthermore, cash reserves may be used to repurchase common stock under our stock repurchase program or strategically acquire professional services firms that are complementary to our business.

The following schedule summarizes our principal contractual commitments as of June 30, 2006 (in thousands):


Fiscal year	Operating lease commitments		Capital leases		Purchase obligations		Total
2006	$	2,621	$	28	$	1,271	$	3,920
2007		4,263		49		—		4,312
2008		3,253		8		—		3,261
2009		3,017		2		—		3,019
2010		2,044		—		—		2,044
Thereafter		2,904		—		—		2,904

	$	18,102	$	87	$	1,271	$	19,460

We have a revolving reducing mortgage note with a total available borrowing amount of $19.4 million and an outstanding balance of $0 as of June 30, 2006. We believe that our existing revolving note, together with funds generated from operations, will provide adequate cash to fund our anticipated operating cash needs through at least the next twelve-month period.

- 25 -

In addition, we believe that the funds available under the revolving reducing mortgage note, together with funds generated from operations, will provide adequate cash to fund our anticipated long-term cash needs beyond the next twelve-month period; however, we intend to grow our business by pursuing potential acquisitions, which could increase the need for additional sources of funds over the long term.

As permitted under Delaware law, we have agreements whereby we indemnify our officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was, serving at our request in such capacity. The indemnification period covers all pertinent events and occurrences during the officer’s or director’s lifetime. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, we have director and officer insurance coverage that reduces our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Exponent is exposed to interest rate risk associated with our balances of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. We manage our interest rate risk by maintaining an investment portfolio primarily consisting of debt instruments with high credit quality and relatively short average effective maturities in accordance with the Company’s investment policy. The maximum effective maturity of any issue in our portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term investments is 3 years and the maximum average effective maturity of the portfolio cannot exceed 12 months. Our exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our short-term investments. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our short-term investment portfolio. Notwithstanding our efforts to manage interest rate risk, there can be no assurances that we will be adequately protected against the risks associated with interest rate fluctuations.

We are exposed to some foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with our foreign operations. Given the limited nature of these operations, we believe that any exposure would be minimal. Currently, we do not employ a foreign currency hedging program to mitigate our foreign currency exchange risk as we believe the risks to date have not been significant.

Exponent has a revolving reducing mortgage note (the “Mortgage Note”) secured by our Silicon Valley headquarters building. The Mortgage Note had an initial borrowing amount up to $30.0 million and is subject to automatic annual reductions in the amount available to be borrowed of between $1.3 million to $2.1 million approximately per year until January 31, 2008. As of June 30, 2006 we had $0 outstanding and available borrowings of $19.4 million. The Mortgage Note is subject to two interest rate options of either prime less 1.5% or the fixed LIBOR plus 1.25% with a term of one month, two months, three months, nine months, or twelve months.

Any borrowings under the Mortgage Note would expose us to some interest rate risk. Our general policy for selecting among interest rate options and related terms will be to minimize interest expense. However, given the risk of interest rate fluctuations, we cannot be certain that the lowest rate option will always be obtained, thereby consistently minimizing our interest expense. No sensitivity analysis was performed on our exposure to interest rate fluctuations; however, given the historical low volatility of both the prime and LIBOR interest rates, we believe that any exposure would be minimal.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer, and the Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

- 26 -

We intend to review and evaluate the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures on an ongoing basis, to improve our controls and procedures over time, and to correct any deficiencies that we may discover in the future. Our goal is to ensure that our senior management has timely access to all material financial and non-financial information concerning our business. While we believe the present design of our disclosure controls and procedures is effective to achieve our goal, future events affecting our business may cause us to significantly modify our disclosure controls and procedures.

(b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

FACTORS AFFECTING OPERATING RESULTS AND MARKET PRICE OF STOCK

Exponent operates in a rapidly changing environment that involves a number of uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. These uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those mentioned elsewhere in this report and those set forth below. There are no material changes to the risk factors set forth below relative to those included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2005.

Absence of Backlog

Revenues are primarily derived from services provided in response to client requests or events that occur without notice, and engagements, generally billed as services are performed, are terminable or subject to postponement or delay at any time by clients. As a result, backlog at any particular time is small in relation to our quarterly or annual revenues and is not a reliable indicator of revenues for any future periods. Revenues and operating margins for any particular quarter are generally affected by staffing mix, resource requirements and timing and size of engagements.

Attraction and Retention of Key Employees

Exponent’s business involves the delivery of professional services and is labor intensive. Our success depends in large part upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified technical and managerial personnel. Qualified personnel are in great demand and are likely to remain a limited resource for the foreseeable future. We cannot provide any assurance that we can continue to attract sufficient numbers of highly qualified technical and managerial personnel and to retain existing employees. The loss of a significant number of our employees could have a material adverse impact on our business, including our ability to secure and complete engagements.

Competition

The markets for our services are highly competitive. In addition, there are relatively low barriers to entry into our markets and we have faced, and expect to continue to face, additional competition from new entrants into our markets. Competitive pressure could reduce the market acceptance of our services and result in price reductions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

- 27 -

Customer Concentration

We currently derive, and believe that we will continue to derive, a significant portion of our revenues from clients, organizations and insurers related to the transportation industry and the government sector. The loss of any large client, organization or insurer could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Economic Uncertainty

The markets that we serve are cyclical and subject to general economic conditions, particularly in light of the labor-intensive nature of our business and our relatively high compensation expenses. If the economy in which we operate, which is predominantly in the U.S., were to experience a prolonged slowdown, demand for our services could be reduced considerably.

Regulation

Public concern over health, safety and preservation of the environment has resulted in the enactment of a broad range of environmental and/or other laws and regulations by local, state and federal lawmakers and agencies. These laws and regulations affect nearly every industry, as well as the agencies of federal, state and local governments charged with their enforcement. To the extent changes in such laws, regulations and enforcement or other factors significantly reduce the exposures of manufacturers, owners, service providers and others to liability; the demand for our services may be significantly reduced.

Tort Reform

Several of our practices have a significant concentration in litigation support consulting services. To the extent tort reform reduces the exposure of manufacturers, owners, service providers and others to liability, the demand for our litigation support consulting services may be significantly reduced.

Variability of Quarterly Financial Results

Variations in our revenues and operating results occur from time to time, as a result of a number of factors, such as the significance of client engagements commenced and completed during a quarter; the timing of engagements; the number of working days in a quarter; employee hiring and utilization rates; and integration of companies acquired. Because a high percentage of our expenses, particularly personnel and facilities related, are relatively fixed in advance of any particular quarter, a variation in the timing of the initiation or the completion of our client assignments can cause significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table provides information on the Company’s share repurchases during the second quarter of 2006:


(In thousands, except price per share)	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program ⁽¹⁾
April 1 to April 28	358	$	16.34	358	$	29,562
April 29 to May 26	89	$	15.68	89	$	28,171
May 27 to June 30	310	$	16.03	310	$	23,194

Total	757	$	16.14	757

⁽¹⁾	In April 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan to repurchase up to $35 million of the Company’s common stock. The plan has no expiration date.

- 28 -

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

At the Company’s 2006 Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 24, 2006 (the “Annual Meeting”), the following individuals were elected to the Board of Directors:


	Votes For	Votes Withheld
Samuel H. Armacost	7,040,950	723,001
Barbara M. Barrett	7,136,393	627,558
Leslie G. Denend, Ph.D.	6,983,842	780,109
Michael R. Gaulke	7,078,104	685,847
Jon R. Katzenbach	5,229,036	2,534,915
Roger L. McCarthy, Ph.D.	7,190,339	573,612
Stephen C. Riggins	7,126,047	637,904

The stockholders at the Company’s Annual Meeting approved the following proposals:

1.	Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 29, 2006.


For		7,591,803
Against		169,929
Abstain		2,219
Broker non-votes		0

2.	To approve an amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation to (i) increase the number of authorized shares of common stock to 100,000,000 and (ii) increase the number of authorized shares of preferred stock to 5,000,000.


For		4,246,043
Against		2,350,415
Abstain		5,214
Broker non-votes		1,162,279

3.	To approve an amendment to the Company’s certificate of incorporation to effect a two-for-one stock split of the Company’s common stock.


For		7,268,853
Against		458,867
Abstain		3,804
Broker non-votes		32,427

- 29 -

Item 6. Exhibits

(a)

Exhibits


Exhibit 10.21		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as filed with the Secretary of State of Delaware on May 24, 2006.

Exhibit 10.22		Employment offer letter between Exponent, Inc. and Dr. Elizabeth Anderson dated May 15, 2006.

Exhibit 31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Exhibit 31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Exhibit 32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

Exhibit 32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

Exhibit 99.1		Exponent Commitment to Limit Use of Common and Preferred Shares.

- 30 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


		EXPONENT, INC.
		(Registrant)

Date: August 9, 2006

		/s/ Michael R. Gaulke
		Michael R. Gaulke, President and Chief Executive Officer

		/s/ Richard L. Schlenker
		Richard L. Schlenker, Chief Financial Officer

- 31 -

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents