UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number |
811-7154 | |||||||
| ||||||||
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund, Inc. | ||||||||
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) | ||||||||
| ||||||||
280 Park Avenue, New York, NY |
|
10017 | ||||||
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip code) | ||||||
| ||||||||
Tina M. Payne Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. 280 Park Avenue New York, New York 10017 | ||||||||
(Name and address of agent for service) | ||||||||
| ||||||||
Registrants telephone number, including area code: |
(212) 832-3232 |
| ||||||
| ||||||||
Date of fiscal year end: |
December 31 |
| ||||||
| ||||||||
Date of reporting period: |
December 31, 2012 |
| ||||||
Item 1. Reports to Stockholders.
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
To Our Shareholders:
We would like to share with you our report for the year ended December 31, 2012. The net asset value (NAV) at that date was $12.98 per common share. The Fund's common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and its share price can differ from its NAV; at year end, the Fund's closing price on the NYSE was $14.72.
The total returns, including income, for the Fund and its comparative benchmarks were:
Six Months Ended December 31, 2012 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
||||||||||
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund at NAVa |
2.73 |
% |
16.66 |
% |
|||||||
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund at Marketa |
18.70 |
% |
36.74 |
% |
|||||||
FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Indexb |
2.74 |
% |
18.06 |
% |
|||||||
Blended benchmark80% FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Index, 20% BofA Merrill Lynch REIT Preferred Indexb |
2.52 |
% |
15.74 |
% |
|||||||
S&P 500 Indexb |
5.95 |
% |
16.00 |
% |
The performance data quoted represent past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The investment return and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate and shares, if sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Current total returns of the Fund can be obtained by visiting our website at cohenandsteers.com. The Fund's returns assume the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at prices obtained under the Fund's dividend reinvestment plan. Index performance does not reflect the deduction of any fees, taxes or expenses. An investor cannot invest directly in an index. Performance figures for periods shorter than one year are not annualized.
Managed Distribution Policy
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund, Inc. (the Fund), acting in accordance with an exemptive order received from the Securities and Exchange Commission and with approval of its Board of Directors (the Board), adopted a managed distribution policy under which the Fund intends to include long-term
a As a closed-end investment company, the price of the Fund's NYSE-traded shares will be set by market forces and at times may deviate from the NAV per share of the Fund.
b The FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Index is an unmanaged, market-capitalization-weighted index of all publicly traded REITs that invest predominantly in the equity ownership of real estate. The index is designed to reflect the performance of all publicly traded equity REITs as a whole. The BofA Merrill Lynch REIT Preferred Index is an unmanaged index of real estate preferred securities. The S&P 500 Index is an unmanaged index of common stocks that is frequently used as a general measure of stock market performance.
1
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
capital gains, where applicable, as part of the regular quarterly cash distributions to its shareholders (the Plan). The Plan will give the Fund greater flexibility to realize long-term capital gains and to distribute those gains on a regular quarterly basis. In accordance with the Plan, the Fund currently distributes $0.22 per share on a quarterly basis.
The Fund may pay distributions in excess of the Fund's investment company taxable income and realized gains. This excess would be a "return of capital" distributed from the Fund's assets. Distributions of capital decrease the Fund's total assets and, therefore, could have the effect of increasing the Fund's expense ratio. In addition, in order to make these distributions, the Fund may have to sell portfolio securities at a less than opportune time.
Shareholders should not draw any conclusions about the Fund's investment performance from the amount of these distributions or from the terms of the Fund's Plan. The Fund's total return based on net asset value is presented in the table above as well as in the Financial Highlights table.
The Plan provides that the Board may amend or terminate the Plan at any time without prior notice to Fund shareholders; however, at this time, there are no reasonably forseeable circumstances that might cause the termination. The termination of the Plan could have the effect of creating a trading discount (if the Fund's stock is trading at or above net asset value) or widening an existing trading discount.
The Fund implements fair value pricing when the daily change in a specific U.S. market index exceeds a predetermined percentage. Fair value pricing adjusts the valuation of certain non-U.S. holdings to account for such index change following the close of foreign markets. This standard practice has been adopted by a majority of the fund industry. In the event fair value pricing is implemented on the first and/or last day of a performance measurement period, the Fund's return may diverge from the relative performance of its benchmark index, which does not use fair value pricing.
Investment Review
U.S. real estate securities had strong absolute performance in 2012 and outperformed the wider equity market for the fourth consecutive year. REITs continued to benefit from modest demand growth and scant new supply creation within a slowly recovering domestic economy. These fundamentals generally allowed for increases in rents that contributed to rising cash flows for landlords. As the Federal Reserve kept interest rates low while expanding the monetary base, REITs' funding costs declined across the quality spectrum, resulting in improved balance sheets and greater access to capital. In this environment, a number of real estate companies were able to make accretive property acquisitions.
Performance was positive for all property types, led by industrial (total return of 31.3% in the indexc), regional mall (28.2%) and shopping center (25.0%) owners. These sectors benefited from strong demand from retailers as consumer spending improved, aided by early signs of a recovery in the housing market. Within the industrial sector, Prologis was a standout, rebounding sharply from a
c Sector returns as measured by the FTSE NAREIT Equity REIT Index.
2
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
decline in 2011. The company reported solid revenue growth due to occupancy gains, including surprising resiliency in its European assets.
Simon Property Group was a leader among regional mall companies, as it continued to exhibit solid leasing execution. Simon also remained active on the deal front, including taking a 29% stake in Klépierre, a French retail landlord. The company quickly funded the $3 billion transaction through a capital raising via issuance of equity and unsecured debt. General Growth Properties was another strong performer, lifted by speculation that the mall operator could be an acquisition candidate.
The office sector (14.2%) was restrained by a softer demand outlook, particularly in Washington, D.C. and New York, which were overshadowed by uncertainty in the government and financial sectors, respectively. These worries also weighed on Vornado Realty in the diversified property sector (12.2%), as the company owns offices in both markets.
The apartment sector (6.9%) underperformed after a strong run in recent years, as investors took profits anticipating that an improving housing market could lessen the demand for rental units. Despite these concerns, operating fundamentals for apartments continued at a solid pace, as continued job growth and climbing rent and occupancy levels drove strong revenue growth.
In apartment news, Equity Residential and AvalonBay Communities announced in November that they would purchase apartment building owner Archstone in a $16.3 billion transaction. Expectations of an IPO by Archstone had weighed on the apartment sector. The deal removed this concern, but introduced a new overhang from the $3.8 billion in equity the companies will issue as part of the acquisition. Taking a long-term view, we believe the transaction will prove beneficial for both acquirers.
REIT preferred securities also advanced
Preferred securities issued by REITs had a total return of 6.3% in the period as measured by the BofA Merrill Lynch REIT Preferred Index. The group was aided by the factors that lifted real estate common shares (relatively stable and visible cash flows and a low cost of capital), and by demand for quality income in a low-yield environment.
Fund performance
The Fund had a positive total return and outperformed its blended benchmark for the period. Factors that aided relative performance based on NAV included favorable security selection within the Fund's allocation to REIT preferreds. With regard to common stocks, performance was helped by security selection in the office and shopping center sectors.
Our overweight in apartment stocks detracted from relative performance. Our underweight in health care property companies (20.4% total return in the index) also hindered relative performance, although favorable stock selection in the sector partly offset the effect.
The Fund employed a modest covered call option overlay strategy to enhance the portfolio's income. This strategy did not have a material effect on the Fund's performance.
3
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
Investment Outlook
U.S. REITs continue to exhibit strong access to capital, and have been using this access to issue equity and debt at historically low rates. We believe the combination of continued low financing costs and very limited new supply will enable companies to see continued cash flow growth, as long as the economy remains on its path of modest expansion. In our view, slow but steady advances in GDP can prevail in 2013; however, with the tax-related portion of the "fiscal cliff" having been settled for now, federal spending negotiations will be a source of uncertainty and we are closely monitoring developments.
With most U.S. REITs trading near parity to net asset values, our focus is on companies with valuations that, in our view, do not reflect their strong cash flow growth potential. Among property sectors, we continue to like Class A malls, self-storage, well-positioned industrial assets and offices on the West Coast. We have also added incrementally to companies that we believe are likely to benefit from the housing recovery and potential cap-rate compression. Furthermore, we retain a favorable outlook on apartment REITs, as we believe that new-home construction will not be strong enough to absorb increasing demand for rental units, provided that job creation and household formation continue to improve.
With respect to REIT preferred securities, we believe real estate credit fundamentals will remain favorable, which should continue to support preferred prices. While we see some scope for price appreciation, we continue to expect the majority of total returns to come from income, given the relative scarcity of call protection on REIT preferreds and security prices that, in many cases, are at or above par.
4
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
Sincerely,
|
|
||||||
MARTIN COHEN |
ROBERT H. STEERS |
||||||
Co-chairman |
Co-chairman |
||||||
|
|
||||||
JOSEPH M. HARVEY |
WILLIAM F. SCAPELL |
||||||
Portfolio Manager |
Portfolio Manager |
||||||
|
|
||||||
THOMAS N. BOHJALIAN |
JASON YABLON |
||||||
Portfolio Manager |
Portfolio Manager |
The views and opinions in the preceding commentary are subject to change and are as of the date of publication. There is no guarantee that any market forecast set forth in the commentary will be realized. This material represents an assessment of the market environment at a specific point in time, should not be relied upon as investment advice and is not intended to predict or depict performance of any investment.
Visit Cohen & Steers online at cohenandsteers.com
For more information about any of our funds, visit cohenandsteers.com, where you will find daily net asset values, fund fact sheets and portfolio highlights. You can also access newsletters, education tools and market updates covering the global real estate, commodities, global natural resource equities, listed infrastructure, utilities, large cap value and preferred securities sectors.
In addition, our website contains comprehensive information about our firm, including our most recent press releases, profiles of our senior investment professionals and an overview of our investment approach.
5
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
December 31, 2012
Top Ten Holdings
(Unaudited)
Security |
Value |
% of Net Assets |
|||||||||
Simon Property Group |
$ |
12,434,885 |
10.0 |
||||||||
Ventas |
5,975,986 |
4.8 |
|||||||||
Vornado Realty Trust |
5,634,429 |
4.5 |
|||||||||
Prologis |
5,592,202 |
4.5 |
|||||||||
Equity Residential |
5,567,317 |
4.5 |
|||||||||
Public Storage |
4,438,675 |
3.6 |
|||||||||
HCP |
4,363,710 |
3.5 |
|||||||||
SL Green Realty Corp. |
2,726,057 |
2.2 |
|||||||||
General Growth Properties |
2,528,473 |
2.0 |
|||||||||
AvalonBay Communities |
2,505,432 |
2.0 |
Sector Breakdown
(Based on Net Assets)
(Unaudited)
6
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
December 31, 2012
Number of Shares |
Value |
||||||||||||||
COMMON STOCKREAL ESTATE |
79.8% |
||||||||||||||
DIVERSIFIED |
7.4% |
||||||||||||||
American Assets Trust |
33,170 |
$ |
926,438 |
||||||||||||
Colony Financial |
46,900 |
914,550 |
|||||||||||||
Coresite Realty Corp. |
19,200 |
531,072 |
|||||||||||||
Forest City Enterprises, Class Aa |
34,100 |
550,715 |
|||||||||||||
Societe Fonciere Lyonnaise SA (France)b |
14,100 |
662,533 |
|||||||||||||
Vornado Realty Trust |
70,360 |
5,634,429 |
|||||||||||||
9,219,737 |
|||||||||||||||
HEALTH CARE |
8.3% |
||||||||||||||
HCP |
96,585 |
4,363,710 |
|||||||||||||
Ventas |
92,336 |
5,975,986 |
|||||||||||||
10,339,696 |
|||||||||||||||
HOTEL |
5.2% |
||||||||||||||
Hersha Hospitality Trust |
311,307 |
1,556,535 |
|||||||||||||
Host Hotels & Resorts |
72,943 |
1,143,017 |
|||||||||||||
Hyatt Hotels Corp., Class Aa |
28,742 |
1,108,579 |
|||||||||||||
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust |
30,800 |
711,480 |
|||||||||||||
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide |
17,100 |
980,856 |
|||||||||||||
Strategic Hotels & Resorts Worldwidea |
145,788 |
933,043 |
|||||||||||||
6,433,510 |
|||||||||||||||
INDUSTRIALS |
5.7% |
||||||||||||||
DCT Industrial Trust |
135,853 |
881,686 |
|||||||||||||
First Industrial Realty Trusta |
30,442 |
428,623 |
|||||||||||||
First Potomac Realty Trust |
11,289 |
139,532 |
|||||||||||||
Prologis |
153,253 |
5,592,202 |
|||||||||||||
7,042,043 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
7
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
December 31, 2012
Number of Shares |
Value |
||||||||||||||
OFFICE |
11.3% |
||||||||||||||
Boston Properties |
23,117 |
$ |
2,446,010 |
||||||||||||
Brookfield Office Properties (Canada) |
22,961 |
390,566 |
|||||||||||||
Corporate Office Properties Trust |
34,656 |
865,707 |
|||||||||||||
Douglas Emmett |
63,416 |
1,477,593 |
|||||||||||||
Highwoods Properties |
38,600 |
1,291,170 |
|||||||||||||
Hudson Pacific Properties |
101,754 |
2,142,939 |
|||||||||||||
Kilroy Realty Corp. |
13,659 |
647,027 |
|||||||||||||
Parkway Properties |
70,200 |
982,098 |
|||||||||||||
SL Green Realty Corp. |
35,565 |
2,726,057 |
|||||||||||||
Washington REIT |
38,972 |
1,019,118 |
|||||||||||||
13,988,285 |
|||||||||||||||
OFFICE/INDUSTRIAL |
0.6% |
||||||||||||||
PS Business Parks |
11,803 |
766,959 |
|||||||||||||
RESIDENTIALAPARTMENT |
14.6% |
||||||||||||||
American Campus Communities |
13,950 |
643,514 |
|||||||||||||
Apartment Investment & Management Co. |
86,444 |
2,339,175 |
|||||||||||||
AvalonBay Communities |
18,478 |
2,505,432 |
|||||||||||||
Colonial Properties Trust |
71,600 |
1,530,092 |
|||||||||||||
Education Realty Trust |
77,988 |
829,792 |
|||||||||||||
Equity Residential |
98,241 |
5,567,317 |
|||||||||||||
Essex Property Trust |
8,300 |
1,217,195 |
|||||||||||||
Mid-America Apartment Communities |
20,254 |
1,311,446 |
|||||||||||||
UDR |
89,984 |
2,139,820 |
|||||||||||||
18,083,783 |
|||||||||||||||
SELF STORAGE |
5.1% |
||||||||||||||
CubeSmart |
50,400 |
734,328 |
|||||||||||||
Public Storage |
30,620 |
4,438,675 |
|||||||||||||
Sovran Self Storage |
19,300 |
1,198,530 |
|||||||||||||
6,371,533 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
8
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
December 31, 2012
Number of Shares |
Value |
||||||||||||||
SHOPPING CENTERS |
20.0% |
||||||||||||||
COMMUNITY CENTER |
6.6% |
||||||||||||||
Acadia Realty Trust |
36,898 |
$ |
925,402 |
||||||||||||
DDR Corp. |
122,100 |
1,912,086 |
|||||||||||||
Federal Realty Investment Trust |
6,200 |
644,924 |
|||||||||||||
Kimco Realty Corp. |
66,500 |
1,284,780 |
|||||||||||||
Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust |
52,786 |
702,582 |
|||||||||||||
Regency Centers Corp. |
51,138 |
2,409,622 |
|||||||||||||
Tanger Factory Outlet Centers |
8,865 |
303,183 |
|||||||||||||
8,182,579 |
|||||||||||||||
REGIONAL MALL |
13.4% |
||||||||||||||
CBL & Associates Properties |
15,145 |
321,226 |
|||||||||||||
General Growth Properties |
127,379 |
2,528,473 |
|||||||||||||
Glimcher Realty Trust |
119,200 |
1,321,928 |
|||||||||||||
Simon Property Group |
78,657 |
12,434,885 |
|||||||||||||
16,606,512 |
|||||||||||||||
TOTAL SHOPPING CENTERS |
24,789,091 |
||||||||||||||
SPECIALTY |
1.6% |
||||||||||||||
Digital Realty Trust |
24,620 |
1,671,452 |
|||||||||||||
DuPont Fabros Technology |
14,900 |
359,984 |
|||||||||||||
2,031,436 |
|||||||||||||||
TOTAL COMMON STOCK (Identified cost$71,015,210) |
99,066,073 |
||||||||||||||
PREFERRED SECURITIES$25 PAR VALUE |
15.2% |
||||||||||||||
BANKS |
0.6% |
||||||||||||||
Ally Financial, 7.375%, due 12/16/44 |
30,000 |
746,400 |
|||||||||||||
BANKSFOREIGN |
0.3% |
||||||||||||||
National Westminster Bank PLC, 7.76%, Series C (United Kingdom) |
13,358 |
331,011 |
|||||||||||||
INSURANCEMULTI-LINEFOREIGN |
0.3% |
||||||||||||||
ING Groep N.V., 7.375% (Netherlands) |
15,000 |
374,850 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
9
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
December 31, 2012
Number of Shares |
Value |
||||||||||||||
REAL ESTATE |
14.0% |
||||||||||||||
DIVERSIFIED |
4.8% |
||||||||||||||
Capital Lease Funding, 8.125%, Series A |
20,000 |
$ |
500,600 |
||||||||||||
Colony Financial, 8.50%, Series A |
20,000 |
522,600 |
|||||||||||||
Cousins Properties, 7.75%, Series A |
26,725 |
675,608 |
|||||||||||||
DuPont Fabros Technology, 7.875%, Series A |
20,000 |
531,600 |
|||||||||||||
DuPont Fabros Technology, 7.625%, Series B |
20,000 |
533,400 |
|||||||||||||
EPR Properties, 9.00%, Series E (Convertible) |
20,000 |
593,000 |
|||||||||||||
Forest City Enterprises, 7.375%, due 2/1/34 |
38,000 |
925,680 |
|||||||||||||
Lexington Realty Trust, 6.50%, Series C ($50 Par Value) |
22,800 |
1,086,648 |
|||||||||||||
Lexington Realty Trust, 7.55%, Series D |
16,500 |
412,665 |
|||||||||||||
Urstadt Biddle Properties, 7.125%, Series F |
8,800 |
228,712 |
|||||||||||||
6,010,513 |
|||||||||||||||
HOTEL |
3.5% |
||||||||||||||
Ashford Hospitality Trust, 9.00%, Series E |
30,000 |
804,000 |
|||||||||||||
Chesapeake Lodging Trust, 7.75%, Series A |
20,000 |
529,600 |
|||||||||||||
Hersha Hospitality Trust, 8.00%, Series B |
25,000 |
633,750 |
|||||||||||||
Hospitality Properties Trust, 7.125%, Series D |
10,000 |
266,000 |
|||||||||||||
Pebblebrook Hotel Trust, 7.875%, Series A |
35,000 |
906,850 |
|||||||||||||
Strategic Hotels & Resorts, 8.25%, Series B |
20,000 |
500,000 |
|||||||||||||
Sunstone Hotel Investors, 8.00%, Series D |
25,000 |
637,750 |
|||||||||||||
4,277,950 |
|||||||||||||||
INDUSTRIALS |
1.2% |
||||||||||||||
First Potomac Realty Trust, 7.75%, Series A |
15,000 |
385,050 |
|||||||||||||
Monmouth Real Estate Investment Corp., 7.875%, Series Bc |
20,000 |
519,600 |
|||||||||||||
Prologis, 6.75%, Series R |
25,000 |
631,250 |
|||||||||||||
1,535,900 |
|||||||||||||||
OFFICE |
0.2% |
||||||||||||||
Hudson Pacific Properties, 8.375%, Series B |
8,500 |
227,503 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
10
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
December 31, 2012
Number of Shares |
Value |
||||||||||||||
RESIDENTIAL |
0.8% |
||||||||||||||
APARTMENT |
0.4% |
||||||||||||||
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, 7.00%, Series D |
19,000 |
$ |
508,250 |
||||||||||||
MANUFACTURED HOME |
0.4% |
||||||||||||||
Equity Lifestyle Properties, 6.75%, Series C |
19,060 |
490,604 |
|||||||||||||
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL |
998,854 |
||||||||||||||
SHOPPING CENTERS |
3.5% |
||||||||||||||
COMMUNITY CENTER |
1.9% |
||||||||||||||
Cedar Realty Trust, 7.25%, Series B |
20,000 |
489,000 |
|||||||||||||
DDR Corp., 7.375%, Series H |
19,900 |
498,097 |
|||||||||||||
DDR Corp., 6.50%, Series J |
25,200 |
616,392 |
|||||||||||||
Kite Realty Group Trust, 8.25%, Series A |
10,000 |
256,500 |
|||||||||||||
Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust, 7.25%, Series D ($50 Par Value)(Convertible) |
10,000 |
538,600 |
|||||||||||||
2,398,589 |
|||||||||||||||
REGIONAL MALL |
1.6% |
||||||||||||||
CBL & Associates Properties, 7.375%, Series D |
49,998 |
1,252,450 |
|||||||||||||
Pennsylvania REIT, 8.25%, Series A |
25,000 |
657,000 |
|||||||||||||
1,909,450 |
|||||||||||||||
TOTAL SHOPPING CENTERS |
4,308,039 |
||||||||||||||
TOTAL REAL ESTATE |
17,358,759 |
||||||||||||||
TOTAL PREFERRED SECURITIES$25 PAR VALUE (Identified cost$16,622,931) |
18,811,020 |
||||||||||||||
PREFERRED SECURITIESCAPITAL SECURITIES |
1.2% |
||||||||||||||
BANKS |
0.5% |
||||||||||||||
Farm Credit Bank of Texas, 10.00%, due 12/15/20, Series I |
500 |
624,219 |
|||||||||||||
BANKSFOREIGN |
0.2% |
||||||||||||||
Barclays Bank PLC, 7.625%, due 11/21/22 (United Kingdom) |
250,000 |
250,313 |
|||||||||||||
INSURANCEMULTI-LINE |
0.5% |
||||||||||||||
American International Group, 8.175%, due 5/15/58, (FRN) |
500,000 |
653,750 |
|||||||||||||
TOTAL PREFERRED SECURITIESCAPITAL SECURITIES (Identified cost$1,280,923) |
1,528,282 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
11
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
December 31, 2012
Principal Amount |
Value |
||||||||||||||
CORPORATE BONDS |
1.7% |
||||||||||||||
INSURANCEPROPERTY CASUALTY |
0.3% |
||||||||||||||
Liberty Mutual Insurance, 7.697%, due 10/15/97, 144Ad |
$ |
375,000 |
$ |
387,104 |
|||||||||||
INTEGRATED TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES |
0.4% |
||||||||||||||
CenturyLink, 7.65%, due 3/15/42 |
500,000 |
524,119 |
|||||||||||||
REAL ESTATESHOPPING CENTERS |
1.0% |
||||||||||||||
BR Malls International Finance Ltd., 8.50%, due 1/29/49, 144A (Brazil)c,d |
500,000 |
552,500 |
|||||||||||||
General Shopping Finance Ltd., 10.00%, due 11/29/49, 144A (Cayman Islands)c,d |
620,000 |
608,687 |
|||||||||||||
1,161,187 |
|||||||||||||||
TOTAL CORPORATE BONDS (Identified cost$1,964,531) |
2,072,410 |
||||||||||||||
COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS |
0.5% |
||||||||||||||
Commercial Mortgage Trust, due 11/15/45, Series 2012-CR3, Class E 144A (FRN)c,d |
700,000 |
630,995 |
|||||||||||||
TOTAL COLLATERALIZED MORTGAGE OBLIGATIONS (Identified cost$612,511) |
630,995 |
||||||||||||||
Number of Shares |
|||||||||||||||
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS |
0.9% |
||||||||||||||
MONEY MARKET FUNDS |
|||||||||||||||
BlackRock Liquidity Funds: FedFund, 0.01%e |
550,063 |
550,063 |
|||||||||||||
Federated Government Obligations Fund, 0.01%e |
550,079 |
550,079 |
|||||||||||||
TOTAL SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS (Identified cost$1,100,142) |
1,100,142 |
||||||||||||||
TOTAL INVESTMENTS (Identified cost$92,596,248) |
99.3 |
% |
123,208,922 |
||||||||||||
OTHER ASSETS IN EXCESS OF LIABILITIES |
0.7 |
929,501 |
|||||||||||||
NET ASSETS (Equivalent to $12.98 per share based on 9,567,313 shares of common stock outstanding) |
100.0 |
% |
$ |
124,138,423 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
12
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS(Continued)
December 31, 2012
Glossary of Portfolio Abbreviations
FRN Floating Rate Note
REIT Real Estate Investment Trust
Note: Percentages indicated are based on the net assets of the Fund.
a Non-income producing security.
b Fair valued security. This security has been valued at its fair value as determined in good faith under procedures established by and under the general supervision of the Fund's Board of Directors. Aggregate fair valued securities represent 0.5% of the net assets of the Fund, all of which have been fair valued pursuant to foreign equity fair value pricing procedures approved by the Board of Directors.
c Illiquid security. Aggregate holdings equal 1.9% of the net assets of the Fund.
d Resale is restricted to qualified institutional investors. Aggregate holdings equal 1.8% of the net assets of the Fund, of which 1.5% are illiquid.
e Rate quoted represents the seven-day yield of the fund.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
13
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
STATEMENT OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
December 31, 2012
ASSETS: |
|||||||
Investments in securities, at value (Identified cost$92,596,248) |
$ |
123,208,922 |
|||||
Cash |
22,469 |
||||||
Receivable for: |
|||||||
Investment securities sold |
1,212,080 |
||||||
Dividends and interest |
565,060 |
||||||
Other assets |
3,019 |
||||||
Total Assets |
125,011,550 |
||||||
LIABILITIES: |
|||||||
Payable for: |
|||||||
Investment securities purchased |
723,162 |
||||||
Investment advisory fees |
74,633 |
||||||
Directors' fees |
871 |
||||||
Other liabilities |
74,461 |
||||||
Total Liabilities |
873,127 |
||||||
NET ASSETS |
$ |
124,138,423 |
|||||
NET ASSETS consist of: |
|||||||
Paid-in capital |
$ |
92,545,735 |
|||||
Accumulated undistributed net investment income |
353,450 |
||||||
Accumulated undistributed net realized gain |
626,564 |
||||||
Net unrealized appreciation |
30,612,674 |
||||||
$ |
124,138,423 |
||||||
NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE: |
|||||||
($124,138,423 ÷ 9,567,313 shares outstanding) |
$ |
12.98 |
|||||
MARKET PRICE PER SHARE |
$ |
14.72 |
|||||
MARKET PRICE PREMIUM TO NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE |
13.41 |
% |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
14
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
Investment Income: |
|||||||
Dividend income (net of $5,319 of foreign withholding tax) |
$ |
3,379,748 |
|||||
Interest income |
302,303 |
||||||
Total Income |
3,682,051 |
||||||
Expenses: |
|||||||
Investment advisory fees |
886,652 |
||||||
Professional fees |
121,474 |
||||||
Shareholder reporting expenses |
55,024 |
||||||
Custodian fees and expenses |
36,188 |
||||||
Administration fees |
26,281 |
||||||
Transfer agent fees and expenses |
21,971 |
||||||
Directors' fees and expenses |
10,927 |
||||||
Miscellaneous |
39,725 |
||||||
Total Expenses |
1,198,242 |
||||||
Net Investment Income |
2,483,809 |
||||||
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain: |
|||||||
Net realized gain on: |
|||||||
Investments |
11,522,903 |
||||||
Options |
10,193 |
||||||
Foreign currency transactions |
153 |
||||||
Net realized gain |
11,533,249 |
||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation on investments |
5,790,058 |
||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain |
17,323,307 |
||||||
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations |
$ |
19,807,116 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
15
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||
Change in Net Assets: |
|||||||||||
From Operations: |
|||||||||||
Net investment income |
$ |
2,483,809 |
$ |
2,133,610 |
|||||||
Net realized gain |
11,533,249 |
7,145,778 |
|||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
5,790,058 |
(2,599,041 |
) |
||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations |
19,807,116 |
6,680,347 |
|||||||||
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders from: |
|||||||||||
Net investment income |
(2,475,385 |
) |
(2,313,157 |
) |
|||||||
Net realized gain |
(10,976,862 |
) |
(6,029,039 |
) |
|||||||
Total dividends and distributions to shareholders |
(13,452,247 |
) |
(8,342,196 |
) |
|||||||
Capital Stock Transactions: |
|||||||||||
Increase in net assets from Fund share transactions |
763,434 |
814,661 |
|||||||||
Total increase (decrease) in net assets |
7,118,303 |
(847,188 |
) |
||||||||
Net Assets: |
|||||||||||
Beginning of year |
117,020,120 |
117,867,308 |
|||||||||
End of yeara |
$ |
124,138,423 |
$ |
117,020,120 |
a Includes accumulated undistributed net investment income of $353,450 and $289,439, respectively.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
16
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
The following table includes selected data for a share outstanding throughout each year and other performance information derived from the financial statements. It should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto.
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share Operating Performance: |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
2008 |
||||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, beginning of year |
$ |
12.30 |
$ |
12.48 |
$ |
11.06 |
$ |
8.45 |
$ |
13.93 |
|||||||||||||
Income from investment operations: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
0.27 |
0.24 |
0.29 |
0.36 |
0.44 |
||||||||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) |
1.82 |
0.46 |
2.56 |
2.78 |
(4.58 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||
Total from investment operations |
2.09 |
0.70 |
2.85 |
3.14 |
(4.14 |
) |
|||||||||||||||||
Less dividends and distributions to shareholders from: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income |
(0.26 |
) |
(0.24 |
) |
(0.27 |
) |
(0.37 |
) |
(0.41 |
) |
|||||||||||||
Net realized gain |
(1.15 |
) |
(0.64 |
) |
(1.17 |
) |
|
(0.18 |
) |
||||||||||||||
Tax return of capital |
|
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
(0.76 |
) |
||||||||||||||||
Total dividends and distributions to shareholders |
(1.41 |
) |
(0.88 |
) |
(1.44 |
) |
(0.53 |
) |
(1.35 |
) |
|||||||||||||
Anti-dilutive effect from the issuance of shares |
0.00 |
a |
0.00 |
a |
0.01 |
0.00 |
a |
0.01 |
|||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value |
0.68 |
(0.18 |
) |
1.42 |
2.61 |
(5.48 |
) |
||||||||||||||||
Net asset value, end of year |
$ |
12.98 |
$ |
12.30 |
$ |
12.48 |
$ |
11.06 |
$ |
8.45 |
|||||||||||||
Market value, end of year |
$ |
14.72 |
$ |
11.91 |
$ |
14.88 |
$ |
9.68 |
$ |
7.35 |
|||||||||||||
Total net asset value returnb |
16.66 |
%c |
5.91 |
%d |
25.41 |
%d |
40.21 |
% |
32.15 |
% |
|||||||||||||
Total market value returnb |
36.74 |
% |
14.13 |
% |
71.12 |
% |
41.08 |
% |
37.72 |
% |
|||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets, end of year (in millions) |
$ |
124.1 |
$ |
117.0 |
$ |
117.9 |
$ |
103.7 |
$ |
79.1 |
|||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average daily net assets |
0.95 |
% |
0.91 |
% |
0.96 |
% |
1.13 |
% |
1.00 |
% |
|||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average daily net assets |
1.96 |
% |
1.78 |
% |
1.99 |
% |
3.79 |
% |
3.62 |
% |
|||||||||||||
Portfolio turnover rate |
65 |
% |
72 |
% |
101 |
% |
101 |
% |
33 |
% |
a Amount is less than $0.005.
b Total net asset value return measures the change in net asset value per share over the period indicated. Total market value return is computed based upon the Fund's New York Stock Exchange market price per share and excludes the effects of brokerage commissions. Dividends and distributions are assumed, for purposes of these calculations, to be reinvested at prices obtained under the Fund's dividend reinvestment plan.
c Does not reflect adjustments in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The net asset value for financial reporting purposes and the returns based upon that net asset value differ from the net asset value and returns reported on December 31, 2012.
d Does not reflect adjustments in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The net asset value for financial reporting purposes and the returns based upon that net asset value differ from the net asset value and returns reported on December 31, 2010.
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
17
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1. Significant Accounting Policies
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund, Inc. (the Fund) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Maryland on September 4, 1992 and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as a non-diversified, closed-end management investment company. The Fund's investment objective is high total return.
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies consistently followed by the Fund in the preparation of its financial statements. The policies are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Portfolio Valuation: Investments in securities that are listed on the New York Stock Exchange are valued, except as indicated below, at the last sale price reflected at the close of the New York Stock Exchange on the business day as of which such value is being determined. If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at the mean of the closing bid and ask prices on such day or, if no ask price is available, at the bid price. Exchange traded options are valued at their last sale price as of the close of options trading on applicable exchanges on the valuation date. In the absence of a last sale price, options are valued at the average of the quoted bid and ask prices as of the close of business. Over-the-counter options are valued by the respective counterparty.
Securities not listed on the New York Stock Exchange but listed on other domestic or foreign securities exchanges are valued in a similar manner. Securities traded on more than one securities exchange are valued at the last sale price reflected at the close of the exchange representing the principal market for such securities on the business day as of which such value is being determined. If after the close of a foreign market, but prior to the close of business on the day the securities are being valued, market conditions change significantly, certain foreign securities may be fair valued pursuant to procedures established by the Board of Directors.
Readily marketable securities traded in the over-the-counter market, including listed securities whose primary market is believed by Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (the advisor) to be over-the-counter, are valued at the last sale price on the valuation date as reported by sources deemed appropriate by the Board of Directors to reflect their fair market value. If there has been no sale on such day, the securities are valued at the mean of the closing bid and ask prices on such day or, if no ask price is available, at the bid price. However, certain fixed-income securities may be valued on the basis of prices provided by a pricing service when such prices are believed by the advisor, pursuant to delegation by the Board of Directors, to reflect the fair market value of such securities.
Short-term debt securities with a maturity date of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost, which approximates value. Investments in open-end mutual funds are valued at their closing net asset value.
18
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The policies and procedures approved by the Fund's Board of Directors delegate authority to make fair value determinations to the advisor, subject to the oversight of the Board of Directors. The advisor has established a valuation committee (Valuation Committee) to administer, implement and oversee the fair valuation process according to the policies and procedures approved annually by the Board of Directors. Among other things, these procedures allow the Fund to utilize independent pricing services, quotations from securities and financial instrument dealers and other market sources to determine fair value.
Securities for which market prices are unavailable, or securities for which the advisor determines that the bid and/or ask price or a counterparty valuation does not reflect market value, will be valued at fair value, as determined in good faith by the Valuation Committee, pursuant to procedures approved by the Fund's Board of Directors. Circumstances in which market prices may be unavailable include, but are not limited to, when trading in a security is suspended, the exchange on which the security is traded is subject to an unscheduled close or disruption or material events occur after the close of the exchange on which the security is principally traded. In these circumstances, the Fund determines fair value in a manner that fairly reflects the market value of the security on the valuation date based on consideration of any information or factors it deems appropriate. These may include, but are not limited to, recent transactions in comparable securities, information relating to the specific security and developments in the markets.
Foreign equity fair value pricing procedures utilized by the Fund may cause certain foreign securities to be fair valued on the basis of fair value factors provided by a pricing service to reflect any significant market movements between the time the Fund values such securities and the earlier closing of foreign markets.
The Fund's use of fair value pricing may cause the net asset value of Fund shares to differ from the net asset value that would be calculated using market quotations. Fair value pricing involves subjective judgments and it is possible that the fair value determined for a security may be materially different than the value that could be realized upon the sale of that security.
Fair value is defined as the price that the Fund would expect to receive upon the sale of an investment or expect to pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction with an independent buyer in the principal market or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the investment or liability. The hierarchy of inputs that are used in determining the fair value of the Fund's investments is summarized below.
• Level 1quoted prices in active markets for identical investments
• Level 2other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, credit risk, etc.)
• Level 3significant unobservable inputs (including the Fund's own assumptions in determining the fair value of investments)
The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities.
For movements between the levels within the fair value hierarchy, the Fund has adopted a policy of recognizing the transfer at the end of the period in which the underlying event causing the movement
19
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
occurred. Changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers into or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 securities during the year ended December 31, 2012.
The following is a summary of the inputs used as of December 31, 2012 in valuing the Fund's investments carried at value:
Total |
Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Investments (Level 1) |
Other Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)a |
||||||||||||||||
Common StockReal Estate Diversified |
$ |
9,219,737 |
$ |
8,557,204 |
$ |
662,533 |
$ |
|
|||||||||||
Common StockOther |
89,846,336 |
89,846,336 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Preferred Securities $25 Par Value |
18,811,020 |
18,811,020 |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Preferred Securities Capital Securities Banks |
624,219 |
|
|
624,219 |
b |
||||||||||||||
Preferred Securities Capital Securities Other Industries |
904,063 |
|
904,063 |
|
|||||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds Real Estate Shopping Centers |
1,161,187 |
|
|
1,161,187 |
b |
||||||||||||||
Corporate Bonds Other Industries |
911,223 |
|
911,223 |
|
|||||||||||||||
Collateralized Mortgage Obligations |
630,995 |
|
630,995 |
|
|||||||||||||||
Money Market Funds |
1,100,142 |
|
1,100,142 |
|
|||||||||||||||
Total Investmentsc |
$ |
123,208,922 |
$ |
117,214,560 |
$ |
4,208,956 |
$ |
1,785,406 |
a Certain of the Fund's investments are categorized as Level 3 and were valued utilizing third party pricing information without adjustment. Such valuations are based on significant unobservable inputs. A change in the significant unobservable inputs could result in a significantly lower or higher value in such Level 3 investments.
b Valued by a pricing service which utilized independent broker quotes.
c Portfolio holdings are disclosed individually on the Schedule of Investments.
20
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Following is a reconciliation of investments for which significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) were used in determining fair value:
Total Investments in Securities |
Preferred Securities Capital Securities Banks |
Corporate Bonds Real Estate Shopping Centers |
|||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2011 |
$ |
621,550 |
$ |
|
$ |
621,550 |
|||||||||
Change in unrealized depreciation |
(12,863 |
) |
|
(12,863 |
) |
||||||||||
Transfers into Level 3a |
1,176,719 |
624,219 |
552,500 |
||||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2012 |
$ |
1,785,406 |
$ |
624,219 |
$ |
1,161,187 |
The change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) attributable to securities owned on December 31, 2012 which were valued using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) amounted to $(12,863).
a As of December 31, 2011, the Fund used significant observable inputs in determining the value of certain investments. As of December 31, 2012, the Fund used significant unobservable inputs in determining the value of the same investments.
Security Transactions and Investment Income: Security transactions are recorded on trade date. Realized gains and losses on investments sold are recorded on the basis of identified cost. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Discounts are accreted and premiums are amortized over the life of the respective securities. Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date, except for certain dividends on foreign securities, which are recorded as soon as the Fund is informed after the ex-dividend date. Distributions from Real Estate Investment Trusts ("REITs") are recorded as ordinary income, net realized capital gain or return of capital based on information reported by the REITs and management's estimates of such amounts based on historical information. These estimates are adjusted when the actual source of distributions is disclosed by the REITs and actual amounts may differ from the estimated amounts.
Options: The Fund writes covered call options on securities and may write put or call options on an index and put options on securities with the intention of earning option premiums. Option premiums may increase the Fund's realized gains and therefore may help increase distributable income. When the Fund writes (sells) an option, an amount equal to the premium received by the Fund is recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as a liability. The amount of the liability is subsequently marked-to-market to reflect the current market value of the option written. When an option expires, the Fund realizes a gain on the option to the extent of the premium received. Premiums received from writing options which are exercised or closed are added to or offset against the proceeds or amount paid on the transaction to determine the realized gain or loss. If a put option on a security is exercised, the premium reduces the cost basis of the security purchased by the Fund. If a call option is exercised, the premium is added to the proceeds of the security sold to determine the realized gain or loss. The Fund,
21
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
as writer of an option, bears the market risk of an unfavorable change in the price of the underlying index or security. Other risks include the possibility of an illiquid options market or the inability of the counterparties to fulfill their obligations under the contracts.
Foreign Currency Translation: The books and records of the Fund are maintained in U.S. dollars. Investment securities and other assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon prevailing exchange rates on the date of valuation. Purchases and sales of investment securities and income and expense items denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars based upon prevailing exchange rates on the respective dates of such transactions. The Fund does not isolate that portion of the results of operations resulting from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates on investments from the fluctuations arising from changes in market prices of securities held. Such fluctuations are included with the net realized and unrealized gain or loss on investments.
Net realized foreign exchange gains or losses arise from sales of foreign currencies, including gains and losses on forward foreign currency exchange contracts, currency gains or losses realized between the trade and settlement dates on securities transactions, and the difference between the amounts of dividends, interest, and foreign withholding taxes recorded on the Fund's books and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the amounts actually received or paid. Net unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses arise from changes in the values of assets and liabilities, other than investments in securities, on the date of valuation, resulting from changes in exchange rates. Pursuant to U.S. federal income tax regulations, certain foreign currency gains/losses included in realized and unrealized gain/loss are included in or are a reduction of ordinary income for federal income tax purposes.
Foreign Securities: The Fund may directly purchase securities of foreign issuers. Investing in securities of foreign issuers involves special risks not typically associated with investing in securities of U.S. issuers. The risks include possible revaluation of currencies, the ability to repatriate funds, less complete financial information about companies and possible future adverse political and economic developments. Moreover, securities of many foreign issuers and their markets may be less liquid and their prices more volatile than securities of comparable U.S. issuers.
Dividends and Distributions to Shareholders: Dividends from net investment income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with U.S. federal income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. Dividends from net investment income, if any, are declared and paid quarterly. Net realized capital gains, unless offset by any available capital loss carryforward, are typically distributed to shareholders at least annually. Dividends and distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date and are automatically reinvested in full and fractional shares of the Fund in accordance with the Fund's Reinvestment Plan, unless the shareholder has elected to have them paid in cash.
On December 13, 2011, the Fund's Board of Directors announced that the Fund implemented a managed distribution policy in accordance with exemptive relief issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission. This policy gives the Fund greater flexibility to realize long-term capital gains throughout the year and to distribute those gains on a more regular basis to shareholders. Therefore, regular quarterly distributions throughout the year may include a portion of estimated realized long-term capital gains, along with net investment income, short-term capital gains and return of capital, which is not taxable. In accordance with the relief, the Fund is required to adhere to certain conditions in order to
22
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
distribute long-term capital gains during the year. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the Fund paid distributions from both net investment income and net realized capital gains.
Income Taxes: It is the policy of the Fund to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company, if such qualification is in the best interest of the shareholders, by complying with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies, and by distributing substantially all of its taxable earnings to its shareholders. Accordingly, no provision for federal income or excise tax is necessary. Dividend and interest income from holdings in non-U.S. securities is recorded net of non-U.S. taxes paid. Management has analyzed the Fund's tax positions taken on federal income tax returns as well as its tax positions in non-U.S. jurisdictions in which it trades for all open tax years and has concluded that as of December 31, 2012, no additional provisions for income tax are required in the Fund's financial statements. The Fund's tax positions for the tax years for which the applicable statutes of limitations have not expired are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service, state departments of revenue and by foreign tax authorities.
Note 2. Investment Advisory Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Investment Advisory Fees: The advisor serves as the Fund's investment advisor pursuant to an investment advisory agreement (the investment advisory agreement). Under the terms of the investment advisory agreement, the advisor provides the Fund with day-to-day investment decisions and generally manages the Fund's investments in accordance with the stated policies of the Fund, subject to the supervision of the Board of Directors.
For the services provided to the Fund, the advisor receives a fee, accrued daily and paid monthly, at the annual rate of 0.70% of the average daily net assets of the Fund.
Directors' and Officers' Fees: Certain directors and officers of the Fund are also directors, officers, and/or employees of the advisor. The Fund does not pay compensation to directors and officers affiliated with the advisor except for the Chief Compliance Officer, who received compensation from the advisor which was reimbursed by the Fund in the amount of $1,737 for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Note 3. Purchases and Sales of Securities
Purchases and sales of securities, excluding short-term investments, for the year ended December 31, 2012, totaled $80,733,447 and $89,460,317, respectively.
23
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Transactions in written options during the year ended December 31, 2012 were as follows:
Number of Contracts |
Premium |
||||||||||
Options outstanding at December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
|
||||||||
Options written |
196 |
27,815 |
|||||||||
Options exercised |
(85 |
) |
(17,622 |
) |
|||||||
Options expired |
(111 |
) |
(10,193 |
) |
|||||||
Options outstanding at December 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
|
Note 4. Derivative Investments
The following table presents the effect of derivatives held during the year ended December 31, 2012, along with the respective location in the financial statements. The volume of activity for written options for the year ended December 31, 2012 is summarized in Note 3.
Statement of Operations |
|||||||||||||||
Derivatives |
Location |
Realized Gain |
Change in Unrealized Appreciation |
||||||||||||
Equity contracts |
Net Realized and Unrealized Gain |
$ |
10,193 |
|
Note 5. Income Tax Information
The tax character of dividends and distributions paid was as follows:
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||
2012 |
2011 |
||||||||||
Ordinary income |
$ |
6,407,432 |
$ |
2,313,157 |
|||||||
Long-term capital gain |
7,044,815 |
6,029,039 |
|||||||||
Total dividends and distributions |
$ |
13,452,247 |
$ |
8,342,196 |
24
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
As of December 31, 2012, the tax-basis components of accumulated earnings and the federal tax cost were as follows:
Cost for federal income tax purposes |
$ |
93,448,955 |
|||||
Gross unrealized appreciation |
$ |
30,039,142 |
|||||
Gross unrealized depreciation |
(279,175 |
) |
|||||
Net unrealized appreciation |
$ |
29,759,967 |
|||||
Undistributed long-term capital gains |
$ |
1,479,267 |
As of December 31, 2012, the Fund had temporary book/tax differences primarily attributable to wash sales on portfolio securities and permanent book/tax differences primarily attributable to prior year REIT adjustments and sales of passive foreign investment companies. To reflect reclassifications arising from the permanent differences, accumulated undistributed net realized gain was charged $55,587 and accumulated undistributed net investment income was credited $55,587. Net assets were not affected by this reclassification.
Note 6. Capital Stock
The Fund is authorized to issue 100 million shares of common stock at a par value of $0.001 per share.
During the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Fund issued 55,456 and 64,667 shares of common stock, respectively, for the reinvestment of dividends.
On December 11, 2012, the Board of Directors approved the continuation of the delegation of its authority to management to effect repurchases, pursuant to management's discretion and subject to market conditions and investment considerations, of up to 10% of the Fund's common shares outstanding ("Share Repurchase Program") as of January 1, 2013 through the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Fund did not effect any repurchases.
Note 7. Other
In the normal course of business, the Fund enters into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Fund's maximum exposure under these arrangements is dependent on claims that may be made against the Fund in the future and, therefore, cannot be estimated; however, based on experience, the risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.
25
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Note 8. New Accounting Pronouncement
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued an Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11, "Balance Sheet (Topic 210)Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs" ("ASU 2011-11"). ASU 2011-11 requires additional disclosures on financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either offset in accordance with existing accounting guidance or are subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The new requirements do not change the accounting guidance on netting, but rather enhance the disclosures to more clearly show the impact of netting arrangements on a company's financial position.
Management is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this pronouncement will have on the Fund's financial statements. ASU 2011-11 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after January 1, 2013.
Note 9. Subsequent Events
Management has evaluated events and transactions occurring after December 31, 2012 through the date that the financial statements were issued, and has determined that no additional disclosure in the financial statements is required.
26
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund, Inc.
In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the schedule of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund, Inc. (the "Fund") at December 31, 2012, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as "financial statements") are the responsibility of the Fund's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at December 31, 2012 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
February 22, 2013
27
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL RETURNS
(periods ended December 31, 2012) (Unaudited)
Based on Net Asset Value |
Based on Market Value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Year |
Five Years |
Ten Years |
Since Inception (09/27/93) |
One Year |
Five Years |
Ten Years |
Since Inception (09/27/93) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
16.66 |
% |
8.07 |
% |
10.61 |
% |
10.09 |
% |
36.74 |
% |
12.04 |
% |
11.48 |
% |
10.40 |
% |
The performance data quoted represent past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. The investment return will vary and the principal value of an investment will fluctuate and shares, if sold, may be worth more or less than their original cost. Current performance may be lower or higher than the performance data quoted. Current total returns of the Fund can be obtained by visiting our website at cohenandsteers.com. The Fund's returns assume the reinvestment of all dividends and distributions at prices obtained under the Fund's dividend reinvestment plan.
TAX INFORMATION2012 (Unaudited)
Pursuant to the Jobs and Growth Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003, the Fund designates qualified dividend income of $270,243. Additionally, 0.9% of the ordinary dividends qualified for the dividends received deduction available to corporations. Also, the Fund designates a long-term capital gain distribution of $6,787,313 at the 15% rate and $257,502 at the 25% rate or maximum allowable.
REINVESTMENT PLAN
The Fund has a dividend reinvestment plan commonly referred to as an "opt-out" plan (the "Plan"). Each common shareholder who participates in the Plan will have all distributions of dividends and capital gains ("Dividends") automatically reinvested in additional common shares by Computershare as agent (the "Plan Agent"). Shareholders who elect not to participate in the Plan will receive all Dividends in cash paid by check mailed directly to the shareholder of record (or if the shares are held in street or other nominee name, then to the nominee) by the Plan Agent, as dividend disbursing agent. Shareholders whose common shares are held in the name of a broker or nominee should contact the broker or nominee to determine whether and how they may participate in the Plan.
The Plan Agent serves as agent for the shareholders in administering the Plan. After the Fund declares a Dividend, the Plan Agent will, as agent for the shareholders, either: (i) receive the cash payment and use it to buy common shares in the open market, on the NYSE or elsewhere, for the participants' accounts or (ii) distribute newly issued common shares of the Fund on behalf of the participants.
The Plan Agent will receive cash from the Fund with which to buy common shares in the open market if, on the Dividend payment date, the net asset value ("NAV") per share exceeds the market price per share plus estimated brokerage commissions on that date. The Plan Agent will receive the Dividend in newly issued common shares of the Fund if, on the Dividend payment date, the market price per share plus estimated brokerage commissions equals or exceeds the NAV per share of the Fund on that date. The number of shares to be issued will be computed at a per share rate equal to the greater of (i) the NAV or (ii) 95% of the closing market price per share on the payment date.
28
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
If the market price per share is less than the NAV on a Dividend payment date, the Plan Agent will have until the last business day before the next ex-dividend date for the common stock, but in no event more than 30 days after the Dividend payment date (as the case may be, the "Purchase Period"), to invest the Dividend amount in shares acquired in open market purchases. If at the close of business on any day during the Purchase Period on which NAV is calculated the NAV equals or is less than the market price per share plus estimated brokerage commissions, the Plan Agent will cease making open market purchases and the uninvested portion of such Dividends shall be filled through the issuance of new shares of common stock from the Fund at the price set forth in the immediately preceding paragraph.
Participants in the Plan may withdraw from the Plan upon notice to the Plan Agent. Such withdrawal will be effective immediately if received not less than ten days prior to a Dividend record date; otherwise, it will be effective for all subsequent Dividends. If any participant elects to have the Plan Agent sell all or part of his or her shares and remit the proceeds, the Plan Agent is authorized to deduct a $15.00 fee plus $0.10 per share brokerage commissions.
The Plan Agent's fees for the handling of reinvestment of Dividends will be paid by the Fund. However, each participant will pay a pro rata share of brokerage commissions incurred with respect to the Plan Agent's open market purchases in connection with the reinvestment of Dividends. The automatic reinvestment of Dividends will not relieve participants of any income tax that may be payable or required to be withheld on such Dividends.
The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan. All correspondence concerning the Plan should be directed to the Plan Agent at 800-432-8224.
OTHER INFORMATION
A description of the policies and procedures that the Fund uses to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-330-7348, (ii) on our website at cohenandsteers.com or (iii) on the Securities and Exchange Commission's website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the Fund's proxy voting record for the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available by August 31 of each year (i) without charge, upon request, by calling 800-330-7348 or (ii) on the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The Fund's Forms N-Q are available (i) without charge, upon request by calling 800-330-7348, or (ii) on the SEC's website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, the Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 800-SEC-0330.
Please note that distributions paid by the Fund to shareholders are subject to recharacterization for tax purposes and are taxable up to the amount of the Fund's investment company taxable income and net realized gains. Distributions in excess of the Fund's net investment company taxable income and realized gains are a return of capital distributed from the Fund's assets. To the extent this occurs, the Fund's shareholders of record will be notified of the estimated amount of capital returned to shareholders for each such distribution and this information will also be available at cohenandsteers.com. The final tax treatment of all distributions is reported to shareholders on their 1099-DIV forms, which are
29
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
mailed after the close of each calendar year. Distributions of capital decrease the Fund's total assets and, therefore, could have the effect of increasing the Fund's expense ratio. In addition, in order to make these distributions, the Fund may have to sell portfolio securities at a less than opportune time.
Notice is hereby given in accordance with Rule 23c-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 that the Fund may purchase, from time to time, shares of its common stock in the open market.
Change to the Portfolio Management Team
Jason A. Yablon was added to the Fund's portfolio management team in 2012. Mr. Yablon is vice president of the Advisor and Cohen & Steers and serves as an analyst specializing in real estate securities in Brazil and Mexico. Prior to joining the Advisor in 2004, Mr. Yablon was a sell-side analyst at Morgan Stanley for four years, focusing on apartment and health care REITs.
Change to Investment Policies
Effective September 19, 2012, the Board of Directors approved the Fund's investments in mortgage- and asset-backed securities. Mortgage-backed securities are mortgage-related securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, its agencies and instrumentalities, or issued by non-government entities. Mortgage related securities represent pools of mortgage loans assembled for sale to investors by various government agencies, as well as by non-government issuers such as commercial banks, savings and loan institutions, mortgage bankers and private mortgage insurance companies. Although certain mortgage-related securities are guaranteed by a third party or otherwise similarly secured, the market value of the security, which may fluctuate, is not guaranteed.
Other asset-backed securities are structured like mortgage-backed securities, but instead of mortgage loans or interests in mortgage loans, the underlying assets may include such items as motor vehicle installment sales or installment loan contracts, leases of various types of real and personal property, and receivables from credit card agreements and from sales of personal property. Regular payments received in respect of such securities include both interest and principal. Asset-backed securities typically have no U.S. Government backing. Additionally, the ability of an issuer of asset-backed securities to enforce its security interest in the underlying assets may be limited.
If a Fund purchases a mortgage-backed or other asset-backed security at a premium, that portion may be lost if there is a decline in the market value of the security whether resulting from changes in interest rates or prepayments in the underlying collateral. As with other interest-bearing securities, the prices of such securities are inversely affected by changes in interest rates. Although the value of a mortgage-backed or other asset-backed security may decline when interest rates rise, the converse is not necessarily true, since in periods of declining interest rates the mortgages and loans underlying the securities are prone to prepayment, thereby shortening the average life of the security and shortening the period of time over which income at the higher rate is received. When interest rates are rising, the rate of prepayment tends to decrease, thereby lengthening the period of time over which income at the lower rate is received. For these and other reasons, a mortgage-backed or other asset-backed security's average maturity may be shortened or lengthened as a result of interest rate fluctuations and, therefore, it is not possible to predict accurately the security's return.
30
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
MANAGEMENT OF THE FUND
The business and affairs of the Fund are managed under the direction of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors approves all significant agreements between the Fund and persons or companies furnishing services to it, including the Fund's agreements with its advisor, administrator, co-administrator, custodian and transfer agent. The management of the Fund's day-to-day operations is delegated to its officers, the advisor, administrator and co-administrator, subject always to the investment objective and policies of the Fund and to the general supervision of the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors and officers of the Fund and their principal occupations during at least the past five years are set forth below. The statement of additional information (SAI) includes additional information about fund directors and is available, without charge, upon request by calling 800-330-7348.
Name, Address1 and Age |
Position(s) Held With Fund |
Term of Office2 |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years (Including Other Directorships Held) |
Number of Funds Within Fund Complex Overseen by Director (Including the Fund) |
Length of Time Served3 |
||||||||||||||||||
Interested Director4 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert H. Steers Age: 59 |
Director and Co-Chairman |
Until next election of directors |
Co-Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (the Advisor) since 2003 and its parent, Cohen & Steers, Inc. since 2004. Vice President of Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC. |
20 |
1991 to present | ||||||||||||||||||
Martin Cohen Age: 64 |
Director and Co-Chairman |
Until next election of directors |
Co-Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Advisor since 2003 and Cohen & Steers, Inc. since 2004. Prior to that, President of the Advisor; Vice President of Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC. |
20 |
1991 to present | ||||||||||||||||||
Disinterested Directors |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Michael G. Clark Age: 47 |
Director |
Until next election of directors |
From May 2006 to June 2011, President and Chief Executive Officer of DWS Funds and Managing Director of Deutsche Asset Management. |
20 |
June 2011 to present |
(table continued on next page)
31
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
(table continued from previous page)
Name, Address1 and Age |
Position(s) Held With Fund |
Term of Office2 |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years (Including Other Directorships Held) |
Number of Funds Within Fund Complex Overseen by Director (Including the Fund) |
Length of Time Served3 |
||||||||||||||||||
Bonnie Cohen5 Age: 70 |
Director |
Until next election of directors |
Consultant. Board Member DC Public Library Foundation since 2012; Board Member, United States Department of Defense Business Board since 2010; Board Member, Teluride Mountain Film Festival since 2010; Advisory Board Member, Posse Foundation since 2004; Trustee, H. Rubenstein Foundation since 1996; Trustee, District of Columbia Public Libraries since 2004. |
20 |
2001 to present | ||||||||||||||||||
George Grossman Age: 59 |
Director |
Until next election of directors |
Attorney-at-law |
20 |
1993 to present | ||||||||||||||||||
Richard E. Kroon Age: 70 |
Director |
Until next election of directors |
Member of Investment Committee, Monmouth University since 2004; Former Director, Retired Chairman and Managing Partner of Sprout Group venture capital funds, then an affiliate of Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette Securities Corporation from 1981 to 2001. Former chairman of the National Venture Capital Association for the year 2000. |
20 |
2004 to present |
(table continued on next page)
32
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
(table continued from previous page)
Name, Address1 and Age |
Position(s) Held With Fund |
Term of Office2 |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years (Including Other Directorships Held) |
Number of Funds Within Fund Complex Overseen by Director (Including the Fund) |
Length of Time Served3 |
||||||||||||||||||
Richard J. Norman Age: 69 |
Director |
Until next election of directors |
Private Investor. Member, District of Columbia Department of Corrections Chaplains Corps from 2008 to February 2010; Member, Montgomery County, Maryland Department of Corrections Volunteer Corps since February 2010; Liason for Business Leadership, Salvation Army World Service Organization (SAWSO) since 2010; Advisory Board Member, The Salvation Army since 1985; Financial Education Fund Chair, The Foundation Board of Maryland Public Television since 2009; Former President, Executive Committee, Chair of Investment Committee, The Foundation Board of Maryland Public Television from 1997 to 2008. Prior thereto, Investment Representative of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter from 1966 to 2000.f |
20 |
2001 to present | ||||||||||||||||||
Frank K. Ross Age: 69 |
Director |
Until next election of directors |
Visiting Professor of Accounting, Howard University School of Business since 2004; Board member and Audit Committee Chair and Human Resources and Compensation Committee Member, Pepco Holdings, Inc. (electric utility) since 2004. Formerly, Midatlantic Area Managing Partner for Assurance Services at KPMG LLP and Managing Partner of its Washington, DC offices from 1977 to 2003. |
20 |
2004 to present |
(table continued on next page)
33
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
(table continued from previous page)
Name, Address1 and Age |
Position(s) Held With Fund |
Term of Office2 |
Principal Occupation During At Least The Past 5 Years (Including Other Directorships Held) |
Number of Funds Within Fund Complex Overseen by Director (Including the Fund) |
Length of Time Served3 |
||||||||||||||||||
C. Edward Ward Jr. Age: 66 |
Director |
Until next election of directors |
Member of The Board of Trustees of Manhattan College, Riverdale, New York since 2004. Formerly Director of closed-end fund management for the New York Stock Exchange, where he worked from 1979 to 2004. |
20 |
2004 to present |
1 The address for each director is 280 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017.
2 On March 12, 2008, the Board of Directors adopted a mandatory retirement policy stating a Director must retire from the Board on December 31st of the year in which he or she turns 75 years of age.
3 The length of time served represents the year in which the director was first elected or appointed to any fund in the Cohen & Steers fund complex.
4 "Interested person", as defined in the 1940 Act, of the fund because of affiliation with CSCM (Interested Directors).
5 Martin Cohen and Bonnie Cohen are not related.
34
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
The officers of the Fund (other than Messrs. Cohen and Steers, whose biographies are provided above), their address, their ages and their principal occupations for at least the past five years are set forth below.
Name, Address and Age1 |
Position(s) Held With Fund |
Principal Occupation During At Least the Past 5 Years |
Length of Time Served2 |
||||||||||||
Adam M. Derechin Age: 48 |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Chief Operating Officer of CSCM (since 2003) and CNS (since 2004). Prior to that, Senior Vice President of CSCM and Vice President and Assistant Treasurer of the Cohen & Steers funds. |
Since 2005 |
||||||||||||
Joseph M. Harvey Age: 49 |
Vice President |
President and Chief Investment Officer of CSCM (since 2003) and President of CNS (since 2004). Prior to that, Senior Vice President and Director of Investment Research of CSCM. |
Since 2004 |
||||||||||||
William F. Scapell Age: 45 |
Vice President |
Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2003. Prior to that, chief strategist for preferred securities at Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. |
Since 2003 |
||||||||||||
Thomas N. Bohjalian Age: 47 |
Vice President |
Executive Vice President (since 2012). Prior to that, Senior Vice President of the Advisor. |
Since 2006 |
||||||||||||
Yigal Jhirad Age: 48 |
Vice President |
Senior Vice President of CSCM since 2007. Prior to that, executive director at Morgan Stanley and head of prime brokerage equity product marketing responsible for developing and marketing quantitative and derivatives product to hedge funds. |
Since 2007 |
||||||||||||
Francis C. Poli Age: 50 |
Secretary |
Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel of CSCM and CNS since March 2007. Prior thereto, General Counsel of Allianz Global Investors of America LP. |
Since 2007 |
||||||||||||
James Giallanza Age: 46 |
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
Senior Vice President of CSCM since September 2006. Prior thereto, Deputy Head of the US Funds Administration and Treasurer & CFO of various mutual funds within the Legg Mason (formally Citigroup Asset Management) fund complex from August 2004 to September 2006. |
Since 2006 |
||||||||||||
Lisa D. Phelan Age: 44 |
Chief Compliance Officer |
Senior Vice President and Director of Compliance of CSCM since 2007 and prior to that, Vice President since 2006. Chief Compliance Officer of CSSL since 2004. Prior to that, Compliance Officer of CSCM since 2004. Chief Compliance Officer, Avatar Associates & Overture Asset Managers, 2003-2004. |
Since 2006 |
1 The address of each officer is 280 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10017.
2 Officers serve one-year terms. The length of time served represents the year in which the officer was first elected to that position in any fund in the Cohen & Steers fund complex. All of the officers listed above are officers of one or more of the other funds in the complex.
35
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
Cohen & Steers Privacy Policy
Facts |
What Does Cohen & Steers Do With Your Personal Information? |
||||||
Why? |
Financial companies choose how they share your personal information. Federal law gives consumers the right to limit some but not all sharing. Federal law also requires us to tell you how we collect, share, and protect your personal information. Please read this notice carefully to understand what we do. |
||||||
What? |
The types of personal information we collect and share depend on the product or service you have with us. This information can include: • Social Security number and account balances • Transaction history and account transactions • Purchase history and wire transfer instructions |
||||||
How? |
All financial companies need to share customers' personal information to run their everyday business. In the section below, we list the reasons financial companies can share their customers' personal information; the reasons Cohen & Steers chooses to share; and whether you can limit this sharing. |
Reasons we can share your personal information |
Does Cohen & Steers share? |
Can you limit this sharing? |
|||||||||
For our everyday business purposes such as to process your transactions, maintain your account(s), respond to court orders and legal investigations, or reports to credit bureaus |
Yes |
No |
|||||||||
For our marketing purposes to offer our products and services to you |
Yes |
No |
|||||||||
For joint marketing with other financial companies |
No |
We don't share |
|||||||||
For our affiliates' everyday business purposes information about your transactions and experiences |
No |
We don't share |
|||||||||
For our affiliates' everyday business purposes information about your creditworthiness |
No |
We don't share |
|||||||||
For our affiliates to market to you |
No |
We don't share |
|||||||||
For non-affiliates to market to you |
No |
We don't share |
Questions? Call 800-330-7348
36
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
Cohen & Steers Privacy Policy(Continued)
Who we are |
|||||||
Who is providing this notice? |
Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc., Cohen & Steers Asia Limited, Cohen & Steers UK Limited, Cohen & Steers Europe SA, Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC, Cohen & Steers Private Funds and Cohen & Steers Open and Closed-End Funds (collectively, "Cohen & Steers"). |
||||||
What we do |
|||||||
How does Cohen & Steers protect my personal information? |
To protect your personal information from unauthorized access and use, we use security measures that comply with federal law. These measures include computer safeguards and secured files and buildings. We restrict access to your information to those employees who need it to perform their jobs, and also require companies that provide services on our behalf to protect your information. |
||||||
How does Cohen & Steers collect my personal information? |
We collect your personal information, for example, when you: • Open an account or buy securities from us • Provide account information or give us your contact information • Make deposits or withdrawals from your account We also collect your personal information from other companies. |
||||||
Why can't I limit all sharing? |
Federal law gives you the right to limit only: • sharing for affiliates' everyday business purposesinformation about your creditworthiness • affiliates from using your information to market to you • sharing for non-affiliates to market to you State law and individual companies may give you additional rights to limit sharing. |
||||||
Definitions |
|||||||
Affiliates |
Companies related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. • Cohen & Steers does not share with affiliates. |
||||||
Non-affiliates |
Companies not related by common ownership or control. They can be financial and nonfinancial companies. • Cohen & Steers does not share with non-affiliates. |
||||||
Joint marketing |
A formal agreement between non-affiliated financial companies that together market financial products or services to you. • Cohen & Steers does not jointly market. |
37
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
Cohen & Steers Investment Solutions
COHEN & STEERS GLOBAL REALTY SHARES
• Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in global real estate equity securities
• Symbols: CSFAX, CSFBX*, CSFCX, CSSPX
COHEN & STEERS INSTITUTIONAL REALTY SHARES
• Designed for institutional investors seeking total return, investing primarily in U.S. real estate securities (REITs)
• Symbol: CSRIX
COHEN & STEERS REALTY INCOME FUND
• Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in U.S. real estate securities (REITs)
• Symbols: CSEIX, CSBIX*, CSCIX, CSDIX
COHEN & STEERS INTERNATIONAL REALTY FUND
• Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in international non-U.S. real estate securities
• Symbols: IRFAX, IRFCX, IRFIX
COHEN & STEERS
EMERGING MARKETS REAL ESTATE FUND
• Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in emerging markets real estate securities
• Symbols: APFAX, APFCX, APFIX
COHEN & STEERS REALTY SHARES
• Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in U.S. real estate securities (REITs)
• Symbol: CSRSX
COHEN & STEERS
INSTITUTIONAL GLOBAL REALTY SHARES
• Designed for institutional investors seeking total return, investing primarily in global real estate securities
• Symbol: GRSIX
COHEN & STEERS GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE FUND
• Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in global infrastructure securities
• Symbols: CSUAX, CSUBX*, CSUCX, CSUIX
COHEN & STEERS DIVIDEND VALUE FUND
• Designed for investors seeking long-term growth of income and capital appreciation, investing primarily in dividend paying common stocks and preferred securities
• Symbols: DVFAX, DVFCX, DVFIX
COHEN & STEERS
PREFERRED SECURITIES AND INCOME FUND
• Designed for investors seeking total return, investing primarily in preferred and debt securities
• Symbols: CPXAX, CPXCX, CPXIX
COHEN & STEERS REAL ASSETS FUND
• Designed for investors seeking total return and the maximization of real returns during inflationary environments by investing primarily in real assets
• Symbols: RAPAX, RAPCX, RAPIX, RAPRX, RAPZX
Distributed by Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC.
COHEN & STEERS GLOBAL REALTY MAJORS ETF
• Designed for investors who seek a relatively low-cost "passive" approach for investing in a portfolio of real estate equity securities of companies in a specified index
• Symbol: GRI
Distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc.
ISHARES COHEN & STEERS
REALTY MAJORS INDEX FUND
• Designed for investors who seek a relatively low-cost "passive" approach for investing in a portfolio of real estate equity securities of companies in a specified index
• Symbol: ICF
Distributed by BlackRock Investments, LLC
* Class B shares are no longer offered except through dividend reinvestment and permitted exchanges by existing Class B shareholders.
Please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the fund carefully before investing. A summary prospectus and prospectus containing this and other information can be obtained by calling 800-330-7348 or by visiting cohenandsteers.com. Please read the summary prospectus and prospectus carefully before investing.
38
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC.
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Robert H. Steers
Director and co-chairman
Martin Cohen
Director and co-chairman
Michael G. Clark
Director
Bonnie Cohen
Director
George Grossman
Director
Richard E. Kroon
Director
Richard J. Norman
Director
Frank K. Ross
Director
C. Edward Ward, Jr.
Director
Adam M. Derechin
President and chief executive officer
Joseph M. Harvey
Vice president
William F. Scapell
Vice president
Thomas N. Bohjalian
Vice president
Yigal D. Jhirad
Vice president
Francis C. Poli
Secretary
James Giallanza
Treasurer and chief financial officer
Lisa D. Phelan
Chief compliance officer
KEY INFORMATION
Investment Advisor
Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc.
280 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10017
(212) 832-3232
Co-Administrator and Custodian
State Street Bank and Trust Company
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111
Transfer Agent
Computershare
480 Washington Boulevard
Jersey City, NJ 07310
(866) 227-0757
Legal Counsel
Ropes & Gray LLP
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
New York Stock Exchange Symbol: RFI
Website: cohenandsteers.com
This report is for shareholder information. This is not a prospectus intended for use in the purchase or sale of Fund shares. Performance data quoted represents past performance. Past performance is no guarantee of future results and your investment may be worth more or less at the time you sell your shares.
39
COHEN & STEERS
TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND
280 PARK AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10017
eDelivery NOW AVAILABLE
Stop traditional mail delivery; receive your shareholder reports and prospectus online.
Sign up at cohenandsteers.com
Annual Report December 31, 2012
Cohen & Steers Total Return Realty Fund
RFIAR
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The Registrant has adopted an Amended and Restated Code of Ethics that applies to its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer. The Code of Ethics was in effect during the reporting period. The Registrant has not amended the Code of Ethics as described in Form N-CSR during the reporting period. The Registrant has not granted any waiver, including an implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Ethics as described in Form N-CSR during the reporting period. Upon request, a copy of the Code of Ethics can be obtained free of charge by calling 800-330-7348 or writing to the Secretary of the Registrant, 280 Park Avenue, 10th floor, New York, NY 10017.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The registrants board has determined that Michael G. Clark and Frank K. Ross, each a member of the boards Audit Committee, are each an audit committee financial expert. Mr. Clark and Mr. Ross are each independent, as such term is defined in Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) (d) Aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the registrants principal accountant were as follows:
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
44,910 |
|
$ |
43,600 |
|
Audit-Related Fees |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
Tax Fees |
|
$ |
6,200 |
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
All Other Fees |
|
$ |
0 |
|
$ |
0 |
|
Tax fees were billed in connection with the preparation of tax returns, calculation and designation of dividends and other miscellaneous tax services.
(e)(1) The registrants audit committee is required to pre-approve audit and non-audit services performed for the registrant by the principal accountant. The audit committee also is required to pre-approve non-audit services performed by the registrants principal accountant for the registrants investment advisor (not including any sub-advisor whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment advisor) and/or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the registrants investment advisor that provides ongoing services to the registrant, if the engagement for services relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of the registrant.
The audit committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members who are independent members of the board of directors of the registrant. The member or members to whom such authority is delegated shall report any pre-approval decisions to the audit committee at its next scheduled meeting. The audit committee may not delegate its responsibility to pre-approve services to be performed by the registrants principal accountant to the investment advisor.
(e) (2) No services included in (b) (d) above were approved by the audit committee pursuant to paragraphs (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) Not applicable.
(g) For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the aggregate fees billed by the registrants principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant and for non-audit services rendered to the registrants investment advisor (not including any sub-advisor whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment advisor) and/or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the registrants investment advisor that provides ongoing services to the registrant were:
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
Registrant |
|
$ |
6,200 |
|
$ |
6,000 |
|
Investment Advisor |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
(h) The registrants audit committee considered whether the provision of non-audit services that were rendered to the registrants investment advisor (not including any sub-advisor whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment advisor) and/or to any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the registrants investment advisor that provides ongoing services to the registrant that were not required to be pre-approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(ii) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X was compatible with maintaining the principal accountants independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
The registrant has a separately-designated standing audit committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The members of the committee are Frank K. Ross (chairman), Michael G. Clark, Bonnie Cohen, George Grossman and Richard E. Kroon.
Item 6. Schedule of Investments.
Included in Item 1 above.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
The registrant has delegated voting of proxies in respect of portfolio holdings to Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc., in accordance with the policies and procedures set forth below.
COHEN & STEERS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.
STATEMENT OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES REGARDING THE VOTING OF SECURITIES
This statement sets forth the policies and procedures that Cohen & Steers, Inc. and its affiliated advisors (Cohen & Steers, we or us) follow in exercising voting rights with respect to securities held in its client portfolios. All proxy-voting rights that are exercised by Cohen & Steers shall be subject to this Statement of Policy and Procedures
A. General Proxy Voting Guidelines
Objectives
Voting rights are an important component of corporate governance. Cohen & Steers has three overall objectives in exercising voting rights:
· Responsibility. Cohen & Steers shall seek to ensure that there is an effective means in place to hold companies accountable for their actions. While management must be accountable to its board, the board must be accountable to a companys shareholders. Although accountability can be promoted in a variety of ways, protecting shareholder voting rights may be among our most important tools.
· Rationalizing Management and Shareholder Concerns. Cohen & Steers seeks to ensure that the interests of a companys management and board are aligned with those of the companys shareholders. In this respect, compensation must be structured to reward the creation of shareholder value.
· Shareholder Communication. Since companies are owned by their shareholders, Cohen & Steers seeks to ensure that management effectively communicates with its owners
about the companys business operations and financial performance. It is only with effective communication that shareholders will be able to assess the performance of management and to make informed decisions on when to buy, sell or hold a companys securities.
General Principles
In exercising voting rights, Cohen & Steers shall conduct itself in accordance with the general principles set forth below.
· The ability to exercise a voting right with respect to a security is a valuable right and, therefore, must be viewed as part of the asset itself.
· In exercising voting rights, Cohen & Steers shall engage in a careful evaluation of issues that may materially affect the rights of shareholders and the value of the security.
· Consistent with general fiduciary principles, the exercise of voting rights shall always be conducted with reasonable care, prudence and diligence.
· In exercising voting rights on behalf of clients, Cohen & Steers shall conduct itself in the same manner as if Cohen & Steers were the constructive owner of the securities.
· To the extent reasonably possible, Cohen & Steers shall participate in each shareholder voting opportunity.
· Voting rights shall not automatically be exercised in favor of management-supported proposals.
· Cohen & Steers, and its officers and employees, shall never accept any item of value in consideration of a favorable proxy voting decision.
General Guidelines
Set forth below are general guidelines that Cohen & Steers shall follow in exercising proxy voting rights:
· Prudence. In making a proxy voting decision, Cohen & Steers shall give appropriate consideration to all relevant facts and circumstances, including the value of the securities to be voted and the likely effect any vote may have on that value. Since voting rights must be exercised on the basis of an informed judgment, investigation shall be a critical initial step.
· Third Party Views. While Cohen & Steers may consider the views of third parties, Cohen & Steers shall never base a proxy voting decision solely on the opinion of a third
party. Rather, decisions shall be based on a reasonable and good faith determination as to how best to maximize shareholder value.
· Shareholder Value. Just as the decision whether to purchase or sell a security is a matter of judgment, determining whether a specific proxy resolution will increase the market value of a security is a matter of judgment as to which informed parties may differ. In determining how a proxy vote may affect the economic value of a security, Cohen & Steers shall consider both short-term and long-term views about a companys business and prospects, especially in light of our projected holding period on the stock (e.g., Cohen & Steers may discount long-term views on a short-term holding).
Specific Guidelines
Uncontested Director Elections
Votes on director nominees should be made on a case-by-case basis using a mosaic approach, where all factors are considered in director elections and where no single issue is deemed to be determinative. For example, a nominees experience and business judgment may be critical to the long-term success of the portfolio company, notwithstanding the fact that he or she may serve on the board of more than four public companies. In evaluating nominees, we consider the following factors:
· Whether the nominee attended less than 75 percent of the board and committee meetings without a valid excuse for the absences;
· Whether the nominee is an inside or affiliated outside director and sits on the audit, compensation, or nominating committees;
· Whether the board ignored a significant shareholder proposal that was approved by a (i) majority of the shares outstanding or (ii) majority of the votes cast for two consecutive years;
· Whether the board, without shareholder approval, to our knowledge instituted a new poison pill plan, extended an existing plan, or adopted a new plan upon the expiration of an existing plan during the past year;
· Whether the nominee is an inside or affiliated outside director and the full board serves as the audit, compensation, or nominating committee or the company does not have one of these committees;
· Whether the nominee is an insider or affiliated outsider on boards that are not at least majority independent;
· Whether the nominee is the CEO of a publicly-traded company who serves on more than two public boards;
· Whether the nominee is the chairperson of more than one publicly-traded company;
· Whether the nominee serves on more than four public company boards;
· Whether the nominee serves on the audit committee where there is evidence (such as audit reports or reports mandated under the Sarbanes Oxley Act) that there exists material weaknesses in the companys internal controls;
· Whether the nominee serves on the compensation committee if that director was present at the time of the grant of backdated options or options the pricing or the timing of which we believe may have been manipulated to provide additional benefits to executives;
· Whether the nominee has a material related party transaction or is believed by us to have a material conflict of interest with the portfolio company;
· Whether the nominee (or the overall board) in our view has a record of making poor corporate or strategic decisions or has demonstrated an overall lack of good business judgment, including, among other things, whether the companys total shareholder return is in the bottom 25% of its peer group over the prior five years;
· Material failures of governance, stewardship, risk oversight, or fiduciary responsibilities at the company;
· Failure to replace management as appropriate; and
· Egregious actions related to a directors service on other boards that raise substantial doubt about his or her ability to effectively oversee management and serve the best interests of shareholders at any company.
Proxy Access
We recognize the importance of shareholder access to the ballot process as a means to ensure that boards do not become self-perpetuating and self-serving. However, we are also aware that some proposals may promote certain interest groups and could be disruptive to the nomination process. We will generally vote against proxy access except in instances where companies have displayed a lack of shareholder accountability and where the proposal is specifically defined (i.e. minimum ownership threshold, duration, etc.).
Proxy Contests
Director Nominees in a Contested Election
By definition, this type of board candidate or slate runs for the purpose of seeking a significant change in corporate policy or control. Therefore, the economic impact of the vote in favor of or in opposition to that director or slate must be analyzed using a higher standard such as is normally applied to changes in control. Criteria for evaluating director nominees as a group or
individually should also include: the underlying reason why the new slate (or individual director) is being proposed; performance; compensation; corporate governance provisions and takeover activity; criminal activity; attendance at meetings; investment in the company; interlocking directorships; inside, outside and independent directors; number of other board seats; and other experience. It is impossible to have a general policy regarding director nominees in a contested election.
Reimbursement of Proxy Solicitation Expenses
Decisions to provide full reimbursement for dissidents waging a proxy contest should be made on a case-by-case basis.
Ratification of Auditors
We vote for proposals to ratify auditors, unless an auditor has a financial interest in or association with the company, and is therefore not independent; or there is reason to believe that the independent auditor has rendered an opinion that is neither accurate nor indicative of the companys financial position.
Generally, we vote against auditor ratification and withhold votes from audit committee members if non-audit fees exceed audit fees.
We vote on a case-by-case basis on auditor rotation proposals. Criteria for evaluating the rotation proposal include, but are not limited to: tenure of the audit firm; establishment and disclosure of a renewal process whereby the auditor is regularly evaluated for both audit quality and competitive price; length of the rotation period advocated in the proposal; and any significant audit related issues.
Generally, we vote against auditor indemnification and limitation of liability; however we recognize there may be situations where indemnification and limitations on liability may be appropriate.
Takeover Defenses
While we recognize that a takeover attempt can be a significant distraction for the board and management to deal with, the simple fact is that the possibility of a corporate takeover keeps management focused on maximizing shareholder value. As a result, Cohen & Steers opposes measures that are designed to prevent or obstruct corporate takeovers because they can entrench current management. The following are our guidelines on change of control issues:
Shareholder Rights Plans
We acknowledge that there are arguments for and against shareholder rights plans, also known as poison pills. Companies should put their case for rights plans to shareholders.
We review on a case-by-case basis management proposals to ratify a poison pill. We generally look for shareholder friendly features including a two- to three-year sunset provision, a permitted bid provision and a 20 percent or higher flip-in provision.
Greenmail
We vote for proposals to adopt anti-greenmail charter or bylaw amendments or otherwise restrict a companys ability to make greenmail payments.
Unequal Voting Rights
Generally, we vote against dual-class recapitalizations as they offer an effective way for a firm to thwart hostile takeovers by concentrating voting power in the hands of management or other insiders.
Classified Boards
We generally vote in favor of shareholder proposals to declassify a board of directors, although we acknowledge that a classified board may be in the long-term best interests of a company in certain situations, such as continuity of a strong board and management team or for certain types of companies. In voting on shareholder proposals to declassify a board of directors, we evaluate all facts and circumstances surrounding such proposal, including whether the shareholder proposing the de-classification has an agenda in making such proposal that may be at odds with the long-term best interests of the company or whether it would be in the best interests of the company to thwart a shareholders attempt to control the board of directors.
Cumulative Voting
Having the ability to cumulate our votes for the election of directors that is, cast more than one vote for a director about whom they feel strongly generally increases shareholders rights to effect change in the management of a corporation. However, we acknowledge that cumulative voting promotes special candidates who may not represent the interests of all, or even a majority, of shareholders. In voting on proposals to institute cumulative voting, we therefore evaluate all facts and circumstances surrounding such proposal and we generally vote against cumulative voting where the company has good corporate governance practices in place, including majority voting for board elections and de-staggered boards.
Shareholder Ability to Call Special Meeting
Cohen & Steers votes on a case-by-case basis for shareholder proposals requesting companies to amend their governance documents (bylaws and/or charter) in order to allow shareholders to call special meetings. We recognize the importance on shareholder ability to call a special meeting and generally will vote for such shareholder proposals where the shareholder(s) making such proposal hold at least 20% of the companys outstanding shares. However, we are also aware that some proposals are put forth in order to promote the agenda(s) of certain special interest groups and could be disruptive to the management of the company, and in those cases we will vote against such shareholder proposals.
Shareholder Ability to Act by Written Consent
We generally vote against proposals to allow or facilitate shareholder action by written consent. The requirement that all shareholders be given notice of a shareholders meeting and matters to
be discussed therein seems to provide a reasonable protection of minority shareholder rights.
Shareholder Ability to Alter the Size of the Board
We generally vote for proposals that seek to fix the size of the board and vote against proposals that give management the ability to alter the size of the board without shareholder approval. While we recognize the importance of such proposals, we are however also aware that these proposals are sometimes put forth in order to promote the agenda(s) of certain special interest groups and could be disruptive to the management of the company.
Miscellaneous Board Provisions
Board Committees
Boards should delegate key oversight functions, such as responsibility for audit, nominating and compensation issues, to independent committees. The chairman and members of any committee should be clearly identified in the annual report. Any committee should have the authority to engage independent advisors where appropriate at the companys expense.
Audit, nominating and compensation committees should consist solely of non-employee directors, who are independent of management.
Separate Chairman and CEO Positions
We will generally vote for proposals looking to separate the CEO and Chairman roles. We do acknowledge, however, that under certain circumstances, it may be reasonable for the CEO and Chairman roles to be held by a single person.
Lead Directors and Executive Sessions
In cases where the CEO and Chairman roles are combined, we will vote for the appointment of a lead (non-insider) director and for regular executive sessions (board meetings taking place without the CEO/Chairman present).
Majority of Independent Directors
We vote for proposals that call for the board to be composed of a majority of independent directors. We believe that a majority of independent directors can be an important factor in facilitating objective decision making and enhancing accountability to shareholders.
Independent Committees
We vote for shareholder proposals requesting that the boards audit, compensation, and nominating committees consist exclusively of independent directors.
Stock Ownership Requirements
We support measures requiring senior executives to hold a minimum amount of stock in a company (often expressed as a percentage of annual compensation), which may include restricted stock or restricted stock units.
Term of Office
We vote against shareholder proposals to limit the tenure of outside directors. Term limits pose artificial and arbitrary impositions on the board and could harm shareholder interests by forcing experienced and knowledgeable directors off the board.
Director and Officer Indemnification and Liability Protection
Proposals concerning director and officer indemnification and liability protection should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
Board Size
We generally vote for proposals to limit the size of the board to 15 members or less.
Majority Vote Standard
We generally vote for proposals asking for the board to initiate the appropriate process to amend the companys governance documents (charter or bylaws) to provide that director nominees shall be elected by the affirmative vote of the majority of votes cast at an annual meeting of shareholders. We would generally review on a case-by-case basis proposals that address alternative approaches to a majority vote requirement.
Confidential Voting
We vote for shareholder proposals requesting that companies adopt confidential voting, use independent tabulators, and use independent inspectors of election as long as the proposals include clauses for proxy contests as follows: in the case of a contested election, management should be permitted to request that the dissident group honor its confidential voting policy. If the dissidents agree, the policy remains in place. If the dissidents do not agree, the confidential voting policy is waived.
We also vote for management proposals to adopt confidential voting.
Bundled Proposals
We review on a case-by-case basis bundled or conditioned proxy proposals. In the case of items that are conditioned upon each other, we examine the benefits and costs of the packaged items. In instances where the joint effect of the conditioned items is not in shareholders best interests, we vote against the proposals. If the combined effect is positive, we support such proposals. In the case of bundled director proposals, we will vote for the entire slate only if we would have otherwise voted for each director on an individual basis.
Date/Location of Meeting
We vote against shareholder proposals to change the date or location of the shareholders meeting. No one site will meet the needs of all shareholders.
Adjourn Meeting if Votes are Insufficient.
Open-end requests for adjournment of a shareholder meeting generally will not be supported. However, where management specifically states the reason for requesting an adjournment and the requested adjournment is necessary to permit a proposal that would otherwise be supported under this policy to be carried out, the adjournment request will be supported.
Disclosure of Shareholder Proponents
We vote for shareholder proposals requesting that companies disclose the names of shareholder proponents. Shareholders may wish to contact the proponents of a shareholder proposal for additional information.
Capital Structure
Increase Additional Common Stock
We generally vote for increases in authorized shares, provided that the increase is not greater than three times the number of shares outstanding and reserved for issuance (including shares reserved for stock-related plans and securities convertible into common stock, but not shares reserved for any poison pill plan).
Votes generally are cast in favor of proposals to authorize additional shares of stock except where the proposal:
· creates a blank check preferred stock; or
· establishes classes of stock with superior voting rights.
Blank Check Preferred Stock
Votes generally are cast in opposition to management proposals authorizing the creation of new classes of preferred stock with unspecific voting, conversion, distribution and other rights, and management proposals to increase the number of authorized blank check preferred shares. We may vote in favor of this type of proposal when we receive assurances to our reasonable satisfaction that (i) the preferred stock was authorized by the board for the use of legitimate capital formation purposes and not for anti-takeover purposes, and (ii) no preferred stock will be issued with voting power that is disproportionate to the economic interests of the preferred stock. These representations should be made either in the proxy statement or in a separate letter from the company to Cohen & Steers.
Pre-emptive Rights
We believe that the governance and regulation of public equity markets allow for adequate shareholder protection against dilution. Further, we believe that companies should have more
flexibility to issue shares without costly and time constraining rights offerings. As such, we do not believe that pre-emptive rights are necessary and as such, we generally vote for the issuance of equity shares without pre-emptive rights. On a limited basis, we will vote for shareholder pre-emptive rights where such pre-emptive rights are necessary, taking into account the best interests of the companys shareholders.
We acknowledge that international local practices typically call for shareholder pre-emptive rights when a company seeks authority to issue shares (e.g., UK authority for the issuance of only up to 5% of outstanding shares without pre-emptive rights). While we would prefer that companies be permitted to issue shares without pre-emptive rights, in deference to international local practices, in markets outside the US we will approve issuance requests without pre-emptive rights for up to 100% of a companys outstanding capital.
Dual Class Capitalizations
Because classes of common stock with unequal voting rights limit the rights of certain shareholders, we vote against adoption of a dual or multiple class capitalization structure.
Restructurings/Recapitalizations
We review proposals to increase common and/or preferred shares and to issue shares as part of a debt restructuring plan on a case-by-case basis. In voting, we consider the following issues:
· dilutionhow much will ownership interest of existing shareholders be reduced, and how extreme will dilution to any future earnings be?
· change in controlwill the transaction result in a change in control of the company?
· bankruptcygenerally, approve proposals that facilitate debt restructurings unless there are clear signs of self-dealing or other abuses.
Share Repurchase Programs
Boards may institute share repurchase or stock buy-back programs for a number of reasons. Cohen & Steers will generally vote in favor of such programs where the repurchase would be in the long-term best interests of shareholders, and where the company is not thought to be able to use the cash in a more useful way.
We will vote against such programs when shareholders interests could be better served by deployment of the cash for alternative uses, or where the repurchase is a defensive maneuver or an attempt to entrench management.
Targeted Share Placements
These shareholder proposals ask companies to seek stockholder approval before placing 10% or more of their voting stock with a single investor. The proposals are typically in reaction to the placement by various companies of a large block of their voting stock in an ESOP, parent capital fund or with a single friendly investor, with the aim of protecting themselves against a hostile
tender offer. These proposals are voted on a case-by-case basis after reviewing the individual situation of the company receiving the proposal.
Executive and Director Compensation
Executive Compensation (Say on Pay)
Votes regarding shareholder say on pay are determined on a case-by-case basis. Generally, we believe that executive compensation should be tied to the long-term performance of the executive and the company both in absolute and relative to the peer group. We therefore monitor the compensation practices of portfolio companies to determine whether compensation to these executives is commensurate to the companys total shareholder return (TSR) (i.e., we generally expect companies that pay their executives at the higher end of the pay range to also be performing commensurately well).
Further, pay elements that are not directly based on performance are generally evaluated on a case-by-case basis considering the context of a companys overall pay program and demonstrated pay-for-performance philosophy. The following list highlights certain negative pay practices that carry significant weight in this overall consideration and may result in adverse vote recommendations:
· Repricing or replacing of underwater stock options/SARS without prior shareholder approval (including cash buyouts and voluntary surrender of underwater options);
· Excessive perquisites or tax gross-ups;
· New or extended agreements that provide for:
· CIC payments exceeding 3 times base salary and bonus;
· CIC severance payments without involuntary job loss or substantial diminution of duties (single or modified single triggers);
· CIC payments with excise tax gross-ups (including modified gross-ups).
Also, we generally vote for shareholder proposals that seek additional disclosure of executive and director pay information.
Frequency of Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation (Say When on Pay)
We generally vote for annual advisory votes on compensation as we note that executive compensation is also evaluated on an annual basis by the companys compensation committee.
Stock-based Incentive Plans
Votes with respect to compensation plans should be determined on a case-by-case basis. The analysis of compensation plans focuses primarily on the transfer of shareholder wealth (the dollar cost of pay plans to shareholders). Other matters included in our analysis are the amount of the companys outstanding stock to be reserved for the award of stock options or restricted stock, whether the exercise price of an option is less than the stocks fair market value at the date
of the grant of the options, and whether the plan provides for the exchange of outstanding options for new ones at lower exercise prices. Every award type is valued. An estimated dollar cost for the proposed plan and all continuing plans is derived. This cost, dilution to shareholders equity, will also be expressed as a percentage figure for the transfer of shareholder wealth and will be considered along with dilution to voting power. Once the cost of the plan is estimated, it is compared to an allowable industry-specific and market cap-based dilution cap.
If the proposed plan cost is above the allowable cap, an against vote is indicated. If the proposed cost is below the allowable cap, a vote for the plan is indicated unless the plan violates the repricing guidelines. If the company has a history of repricing options or has the express ability to reprice underwater stock options without first securing shareholder approval under the proposed plan, the plan receives an against vote even in cases where the plan cost is considered acceptable based on the quantitative analysis.
We vote against equity plans that have high average three year burn rates, unless the company has publicly committed to reduce the burn rate to a rate that is comparable to its peer group (as determined by Cohen & Steers).
Approval of Cash or Cash-and-Stock Bonus Plans
We vote for cash or cash-and-stock bonus plans to exempt the compensation from limits on deductibility under the provisions of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Reload/Evergreen Features
We will generally vote against plans that enable the issuance of reload options and that provide an automatic share replenishment (evergreen) feature.
Golden Parachutes
In general, the guidelines call for voting against golden parachute plans because they impede potential takeovers that shareholders should be free to consider. In particular, we oppose the use of employment contracts that result in cash grants of greater than three times annual compensation (salary and bonus) and generally withhold our votes at the next shareholder meeting for directors who to our knowledge approved golden parachutes.
Voting on Golden Parachutes in an Acquisition, Merger, Consolidation, or Proposed Sale
We vote on a case-by-case basis on proposals to approve the companys golden parachute compensation. Features that may lead to a vote against include:
· Potentially excessive severance payments (cash grants of greater than three times annual compensation (salary and bonus));
· Recently adopted or materially amended agreements that include excessive excise tax gross-up provisions (since prior annual meeting);
· Recently adopted or materially amended agreements that include modified single triggers (since prior annual meeting);
· Single trigger payments that will happen immediately upon a change in control, including cash payment and such items as the acceleration of performance-based equity despite the failure to achieve performance measures;
· Single-trigger vesting of equity based on a definition of change in control that requires only shareholder approval of the transaction (rather than consummation);
· Recent amendments or other changes that may make packages so attractive as to influence merger agreements that may not be in the best interests of shareholders;
· In the case of a substantial gross-up from pre-existing/grandfathered contract: the element that triggered the gross-up (i.e., option mega-grants at low point in stock price, unusual or outsized payments in cash or equity made or negotiated prior to the merger); or
· The companys assertion that a proposed transaction is conditioned on shareholder approval of the golden parachute advisory vote.
401(k) Employee Benefit Plans
We vote for proposals to implement a 401(k) savings plan for employees.
Employee Stock Purchase Plans
We support employee stock purchase plans, although we generally believe the discounted purchase price should be at least 85% of the current market price.
Option Expensing
We vote for shareholder proposals to expense fixed-price options.
Vesting
We believe that restricted stock awards normally should vest over at least a two-year period.
Option Repricing
Stock options generally should not be re-priced, and never should be re-priced without shareholder approval. In addition, companies should not issue new options, with a lower strike price, to make up for previously issued options that are substantially underwater. Cohen & Steers will vote against the election of any slate of directors that, to its knowledge, has authorized a company to re-price or replace underwater options during the most recent year without shareholder approval.
Stock Holding Periods
Generally vote against all proposals requiring executives to hold the stock received upon option exercise for a specific period of time.
Transferable Stock Options
Review on a case-by-case basis proposals to grant transferable stock options or otherwise permit the transfer of outstanding stock options, including cost of proposal and alignment with shareholder interests.
Recoup Bonuses
We vote on a case-by-case on shareholder proposals to recoup unearned incentive bonuses or other incentive payments made to senior executives if it is later determined that fraud, misconduct, or negligence significantly contributed to a restatement of financial results that led to the awarding of unearned incentive compensation.
Incorporation
Reincorporation Outside of the United States
Generally, we will vote against companies looking to reincorporate outside of the U.S.
Voting on State Takeover Statutes
We review on a case-by-case basis proposals to opt in or out of state takeover statutes (including control share acquisition statutes, control share cash-out statutes, freezeout provisions, fair price provisions, stakeholder laws, poison pill endorsements, severance pay and labor contract provisions, antigreenmail provisions, and disgorgement provisions). In voting on these shareholder proposals, we evaluate all facts and circumstances surrounding such proposal, including whether the shareholder proposing such measure has an agenda in making such proposal that may be at odds with the long-term best interests of the company or whether it would be in the best interests of the company to thwart a shareholders attempt to control the board of directors.
Voting on Reincorporation Proposals
Proposals to change a companys state of incorporation are examined on a case-by-case basis. In making our decision, we review managements rationale for the proposal, changes to the charter/bylaws, and differences in the state laws governing the companies.
Mergers and Corporate Restructurings
Mergers and Acquisitions
Votes on mergers and acquisitions should be considered on a case-by-case basis, taking into account factors including the following: anticipated financial and operating benefits; offer price (cost vs. premium); prospects of the combined companies; how the deal was negotiated; and changes in corporate governance and their impact on shareholder rights.
We vote against proposals that require a super-majority of shareholders to approve a merger or other significant business combination. We support proposals that seek to lower super-majority voting requirements.
Nonfinancial Effects of a Merger or Acquisition
Some companies have proposed a charter provision which specifies that the board of directors may examine the nonfinancial effect of a merger or acquisition on the company. This provision would allow the board to evaluate the impact a proposed change in control would have on employees, host communities, suppliers and/or others. We generally vote against proposals to adopt such charter provisions. We feel it is the directors fiduciary duty to base decisions solely on the financial interests of the shareholders.
Corporate Restructuring
Votes on corporate restructuring proposals, including minority squeezeouts, leveraged buyouts, going private proposals, spin-offs, liquidations, and asset sales, should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Spin-offs
Votes on spin-offs should be considered on a case-by-case basis depending on the tax and regulatory advantages, planned use of sale proceeds, market focus, and managerial incentives.
Asset Sales
Votes on asset sales should be made on a case-by-case basis after considering the impact on the balance sheet/working capital, value received for the asset, and potential elimination of diseconomies.
Liquidations
Votes on liquidations should be made on a case-by-case basis after reviewing managements efforts to pursue other alternatives, appraisal value of assets, and the compensation plan for executives managing the liquidation.
Appraisal Rights
We vote for proposals to restore, or provide shareholders with, rights of appraisal. Rights of appraisal provide shareholders who are not satisfied with the terms of certain corporate transactions the right to demand a judicial review in order to determine a fair value for their shares.
Changing Corporate Name
We vote for changing the corporate name.
Shareholder Rights
Our position on the rights of shareholders is as follows:
· Shareholders should be given the opportunity to exercise their rights. Notification of opportunities for the exercise of voting rights should be given in good time.
· Shareholders are entitled to submit questions to company management.
· Minority shareholders should be protected as far as possible from the exercise of voting rights by majority shareholders.
· Shareholders are entitled to hold company management as well as the legal person or legal entity accountable for any action caused by the company or company management for which the company, company management or legal entity should bear responsibility.
Environmental and Social Issues
We recognize that the companies in which we invest can enhance shareholder value and long-term profitability by adopting policies and procedures that promote corporate social and environmental responsibility. Because of the diverse nature of environmental and social shareholder proposals and the myriad ways companies deal with them, these proposals should be considered on a case-by-case basis. All such proposals are scrutinized based on whether they contribute to the creation of shareholder value, are reasonable and relevant, and provide adequate disclosure of key issues to shareholders. When evaluating social and environmental shareholder proposals, we tend to focus on the financial aspects of the social and environmental proposals, and we consider the following factors (in the order of importance as set forth below):
· Whether adoption of the proposal is likely to have significant economic benefit for the company, such that shareholder value is enhanced or protected by the adoption of the proposal;
· Whether the issues presented are more appropriately/effectively dealt with through governmental or company-specific action, as many social and environmental issues are more properly the province of government and broad regulatory action;
· Whether the subject of the proposal is best left to the discretion of the board;
· Whether the company has already responded in some appropriate manner to the request embodied in the proposal;
· Whether the information requested concerns business issues that relate to a meaningful percentage of the companys business as measured by sales, assets, and earnings;
· The degree to which the companys stated position on the issues raised in the proposal could affect its reputation or sales, or leave it vulnerable to a boycott or selective purchasing;
· Whether implementation of the proposals request would achieve the proposals objectives;
· Whether the requested information is available to shareholders either from the company or from a publicly available source; and
· Whether providing this information would reveal proprietary or confidential information that would place the company at a competitive disadvantage.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Investment Companies.
Information pertaining to the portfolio managers of the registrant, as of December 31, 2012, is set forth below.
Martin Cohen
· Director and co-chairman
· Portfolio manager since inception |
|
Co-founder, co-chairman and co-chief executive officer of Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. (C&S) and its parent company, Cohen & Steers, Inc. (CNS). Vice president and director of Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC. Director and co-chairman of each of the Cohen & Steers funds. Previously, president of C&S and each of the Cohen & Steers funds. |
|
|
|
Robert Steers
· Director and co-chairman
· Portfolio manager since inception |
|
Co-founder, co-chairman and co-chief executive officer of C&S and CNS. Vice President and Director of Cohen & Steers Securities, LLC. Director and co-chairman of each of the Cohen & Steers funds. Previously, chairman of C&S and each of the Cohen & Steers funds. |
|
|
|
Joseph Harvey
· Vice president
· Portfolio manager since 2004 |
|
President of C&S and CNS. Previously, senior vice president of C&S and director of research. |
|
|
|
Thomas N. Bohjalian
· Vice president
· Portfolio manager since 2006 |
|
Executive vice president of C&S. Previously, senior vice president of C&S.
|
|
|
|
William F. Scapell
· Vice president
· Portfolio manager since 2005 |
|
Senior vice president of C&S. Previously, chief strategist for preferred securities at Merrill Lynch & Co.
|
|
|
|
Jason A. Yablon
· Vice president
· Portfolio manager since 2012 |
|
Vice President of C&S. Previously, sell-side analyst at Morgan Stanley. |
C&S utilizes a team-based approach in managing the registrant. Mr. Cohen and Mr. Steers are the leaders of this team and they act in a supervisory capacity. Mr. Harvey, Mr. Bohjalian and Mr. Yablon direct and supervise the execution of the registrants investment
strategy, and lead and guide the other members of the team. Mr. Scapell manages the registrants preferred securities investments.
Each portfolio manager listed above manages other investment companies and/or investment vehicles and accounts in addition to the registrant. The following tables show, as of December 31, 2012, the number of accounts each portfolio manager managed in each of the listed categories and the total assets in the accounts managed within each category. Two (2) of the 36 other accounts managed by Messrs. Cohen, Steers and Harvey, with total assets of $105.89 million, are subject to performance-based fees.
Martin Cohen
|
|
Number of accounts |
|
Total assets |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Registered investment companies |
|
17 |
|
$ |
17,821,187,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Other pooled investment vehicles |
|
36 |
|
$ |
15,677,710,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Other accounts |
|
36 |
|
$ |
4,787,765,000 |
|
Robert Steers
|
|
Number of accounts |
|
Total assets |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Registered investment companies |
|
17 |
|
$ |
17,821,187,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Other pooled investment vehicles |
|
36 |
|
$ |
15,677,710,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Other accounts |
|
36 |
|
$ |
4,787,765,000 |
|
Joseph Harvey
|
|
Number of accounts |
|
Total assets |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Registered investment companies |
|
17 |
|
$ |
17,821,187,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Other pooled investment vehicles |
|
36 |
|
$ |
15,677,710,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Other accounts |
|
36 |
|
$ |
4,787,765,000 |
|
William F. Scapell
|
|
Number of accounts |
|
Total assets |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Registered investment companies |
|
9 |
|
$ |
9,302,501,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Other pooled investment vehicles |
|
2 |
|
$ |
8,620,068,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Other accounts |
|
4 |
|
$ |
676,775,000 |
|
Thomas Bohjalian
|
|
Number of accounts |
|
Total assets |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Registered investment companies |
|
8 |
|
$ |
12,101,015,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Other pooled investment vehicles |
|
7 |
|
$ |
11,906,303,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Other accounts |
|
20 |
|
$ |
2,312,402,000 |
|
Jason A. Yablon
|
|
Number of accounts |
|
Total assets |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Registered investment companies |
|
5 |
|
$ |
3,136,496,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Other pooled investment vehicles |
|
1 |
|
$ |
396,697,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
· Other accounts |
|
3 |
|
$ |
792,072,000 |
|
Share Ownership. The following table indicates the dollar range of securities of the registrant owned by the registrants portfolio managers as of December 31, 2012:
|
|
Dollar Range of Securities Owned |
Martin Cohen |
|
$100,001 - $500,000 |
Robert Steers |
|
$500,001 - $1,000,000 |
Joseph Harvey |
|
None |
Thomas Bohjalian |
|
None |
William F. Scapell |
|
None |
Jason A. Yablon |
|
None |
Conflicts of Interest. It is possible that conflicts of interest may arise in connection with the portfolio managers management of the registrant's investments on the one hand and the investments of other accounts or vehicles for which the portfolio managers are responsible on the other. For example, a portfolio manager may have conflicts of interest in allocating management time, resources and investment opportunities among the registrant and the other accounts or vehicles he advises. In addition, due to differences in the investment strategies or restrictions among the registrant and the other accounts, a portfolio manager may take action with respect to another account that differs from the action taken with respect to the registrant.
In some cases, another account managed by a portfolio manager may provide more revenue to the Advisor. While this may appear to create additional conflicts of interest for the portfolio manager in the allocation of management time, resources and investment opportunities, the Advisor strives to ensure that portfolio managers endeavor to exercise their discretion in a manner that is equitable to all interested persons. In this regard, in the absence of specific account-related impediments (such as client-imposed restrictions or lack of available cash), it is the policy of the Advisor to allocate investment ideas pro rata to all accounts with the same primary investment objective.
In addition, certain of the portfolio managers may from time to time manage one or more accounts on behalf of the Advisor and its affiliated companies (the CNS Accounts). Certain securities held and traded in the CNS Accounts also may be held and traded in one or more client accounts. It is the policy of the Advisor however not to put the interests of the CNS Accounts ahead of the interests of client accounts. The Advisor may aggregate orders of client accounts with those of the CNS Accounts; however, under no circumstances will preferential treatment be given to the CNS Accounts. For all orders involving the CNS Accounts, purchases or sales will be allocated prior to trade placement, and orders that are only partially filled will be allocated across all accounts in proportion to the shares each account, including the CNS Accounts, was designated to receive prior to trading. As a result, it is expected that the CNS Accounts will receive the same average price as other accounts included in the aggregated order. Shares will not be allocated or re-allocated to the CNS Accounts after trade execution or after the average price is known. In the event so few shares of an order are executed that a pro-rata allocation is not practical, a rotational system of allocation may be used; however, the CNS Accounts will never be part of that rotation or receive shares of a partially filled order other than on a pro-rata basis.
Because certain CNS Accounts are managed with a cash management objective, it is possible that a security will be sold out of the CNS Accounts but continue to be held for one or more client accounts. In situations when this occurs, such security will remain in a client account only if the portfolio manager, acting in its reasonable judgment and consistent with its fiduciary duties, believes this is appropriate for, and consistent with the objectives and profile of, the client account.
C&S Compensation Structure. Compensation of C&Ss portfolio managers and other investment professionals has three primary components: (1) a base salary, (2) an annual cash bonus and (3) long-term stock-based compensation consisting generally of restricted stock units of C&Ss parent, CNS. C&Ss investment professionals, including the portfolio managers, also receive certain retirement, insurance and other benefits that are broadly available to all of its employees. Compensation of C&Ss investment professionals is reviewed primarily on an annual basis. Cash bonuses, stock-based compensation awards, and adjustments in base salary are typically paid or put into effect in the January following the fiscal year-end of CNS.
Method to Determine Compensation. C&S compensates its portfolio managers based primarily on the scale and complexity of their portfolio responsibilities and the total return performance of funds and accounts managed by the portfolio manager versus appropriate peer groups or benchmarks. C&S uses a variety of benchmarks to evaluate the portfolio managers performance for compensation purposes, including the NAREIT Equity REIT Index with respect to Messrs. Cohen, Steers, Harvey, Bohjalian and Yablon and the Merrill Lynch Fixed Rate Preferred Index
with respect to Mr. Scapell. In evaluating the performance of a portfolio manager, primary emphasis is normally placed on one- and three-year performance, with secondary consideration of performance over longer periods of time. Performance is evaluated on a pre-tax and pre-expense basis. In addition to rankings within peer groups of funds on the basis of absolute performance, consideration may also be given to risk-adjusted performance. For funds and accounts with a primary investment objective of high current income, consideration will also be given to the funds and accounts success in achieving this objective. For managers responsible for multiple funds and accounts, investment performance is evaluated on an aggregate basis. C&S has three funds or accounts with performance-based advisory fees. Portfolio managers are also evaluated on the basis of their success in managing their dedicated team of analysts. Base compensation for portfolio managers of C&S varies in line with the portfolio managers seniority and position with the firm.
Salaries, bonuses and stock-based compensation are also influenced by the operating performance of the Advisor and CNS. While the annual salaries of the Advisors portfolio managers are fixed, cash bonuses and stock based compensation may fluctuate significantly from year to year, based on changes in manager performance and other factors.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrants Board implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to this Item.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrants principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the registrants disclosure controls and procedures are reasonably designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, based upon such officers evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.
(b) There were no changes in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) Not Applicable.
(a) (2) Certifications of principal executive officer and principal financial officer as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(b) Certifications of chief executive officer and chief financial officer as required by Rule 30a- 2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
(c) Registrants notices to shareholders pursuant to Registrants exemptive order granting an exemption from Section 19(b) of the 1940 Act and Rule 19b-1 thereunder regarding distributions pursuant to the Registrants Managed Distribution Plan.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
COHEN & STEERS TOTAL RETURN REALTY FUND, INC. | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
By: |
/s/ Adam M. Derechin |
| |
|
|
Name: Adam M. Derechin |
| |
|
|
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
Date: March 8, 2013 |
| ||
| ||||
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. | ||||
| ||||
| ||||
|
By: |
/s/ Adam M. Derechin |
| |
|
|
Name: |
Adam M. Derechin |
|
|
|
Title: |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ James Giallanza |
| |
|
|
Name: |
James Giallanza |
|
|
|
Title: |
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: March 8, 2013 |
|