Use these links to rapidly review the document
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
VMware, Inc. | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
VMWARE, INC.
NOTICE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO BE HELD ON MAY 25, 2011
To the Stockholders of VMware, Inc.:
Notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of VMware, Inc., a Delaware corporation, will be held at VMware's principal executive offices at 3401 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304, on Wednesday, May 25, 2011, at 9:00 a.m. local time. We will also offer a webcast of the annual meeting on the investor relations page of our website at http://ir.vmware.com. The webcast will be available on our website for approximately 30 days following our meeting.
We are holding the meeting for the following purposes:
All stockholders of record of our common stock at the close of business on March 31, 2011, the record date, are entitled to notice of and to vote at this meeting and any adjournments thereof.
Class A common stockholders may cast their votes by completing a proxy. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please cast your vote as instructed in the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials and in "Voting Over the Internet or by Telephone" on page 4 of the proxy statement, over the Internet or by telephone, as promptly as possible. You may also request a paper proxy card to submit your vote by mail, if you prefer. We encourage you to vote via the Internet. Internet voting is convenient, helps reduce the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting and saves us significant postage and processing costs.
By order of the Board of Directors
S.
DAWN SMITH
Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary
Palo Alto, California
April 12, 2011
VMWARE, INC.
3401 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, California 94304
PROXY STATEMENT
INFORMATION CONCERNING SOLICITATION AND VOTING
General
This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies of stockholders by the Board of Directors of VMware, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("VMware," "we," "our" or "us"), for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of VMware to be held on Wednesday, May 25, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. local time (the "Annual Meeting"), and any continuation, postponement or adjournments thereof, for the purposes set forth in this proxy statement and the attached Notice of the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Notice of Annual Meeting"). The Annual Meeting will be held at VMware's principal executive offices at 3401 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304.
Internet Availability of Proxy Materials
Under the rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), we are furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders on the Internet, rather than mailing printed copies of those materials to each stockholder. If you received a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials unless you request one. Instead, the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials will instruct you as to how you may access and review the proxy materials on the Internet. The Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials also instructs you as to how you may access your proxy card to vote on the Internet. If you received a Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials by mail and would like to receive a printed copy of our proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials.
We intend to make this proxy statement available on the Internet and to mail the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to our stockholders on or about April 12, 2011.
Outstanding Shares
We have two classes of authorized common stock: Class A common stock and Class B common stock. As of the close of business on March 31, 2011, the record date for the Annual Meeting, VMware had outstanding and entitled to vote 418,070,113 shares of common stock, of which 118,070,113 shares are Class A common stock and 300,000,000 shares are Class B common stock. As of March 31, 2011, EMC Corporation ("EMC"), our parent and controlling stockholder, holds all of the outstanding Class B common stock and 33,466,190 shares, or 28.34%, of the outstanding Class A common stock. Four members of our Board of DirectorsJoseph M. Tucci, Michael W. Brown, John R. Egan and David N. Strohmalso serve as members of the board of directors of EMC. Mr. Tucci, the Chairman of our Board of Directors, is also the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of EMC. Additionally, a fifth member of our Board of Directors, David I. Goulden, is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of EMC.
Quorum
In order to conduct any business at the Annual Meeting, a quorum must be present in person or represented by valid proxies. Except with respect to the election of our Class I, Group I directors, holders of shares representing a majority of the total outstanding shares of our common stock on
1
March 31, 2011 entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting, represented in person or by proxy, constitute a quorum. For the election of the Class I, Group I directors nominated for election at the Annual Meeting, holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our Class B common stock, represented in person or by proxy, constitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes, as defined below, are considered present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.
Voting
Only Class A and Class B common stockholders of record on the close of business on March 31, 2011 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.
The holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock will vote together as a single class on all matters described in the proxy materials for which Class A common stockholder votes are being solicited. The election of the Class I, Group I directors nominated for election at the Annual Meeting will be voted on solely by the holders of Class B common stock. The holders of Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share on all matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting, except in relation to the election of the Class I, Group II director, in which they are entitled to only one vote per share. The holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting for which Class A common stockholder votes are being solicited. We encourage you to register your vote via the Internet.
Based on its ownership of 79.76% of the outstanding shares of VMware's common stock, as of the close of business on March 31, 2011 representing 97.29% of the combined voting power of our common stock, EMC has the voting power to adopt and approve all proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.
Your shares may be voted at the Annual Meeting only if you are present in person or represented by a legal proxy. If your shares are held in street name (i.e., held by a brokerage firm or other agent), you are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. However, because you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the meeting unless you request and obtain a legal proxy from your bank, brokerage firm or other agent and bring it with you to the Annual Meeting.
If your shares were held in street name on the close of business on March 31, 2011 and you do not instruct your broker on how to vote your shares, your broker may either leave your shares unvoted or vote your shares in its discretion on matters treated as routine under applicable rules and regulations. If a broker, bank, custodian, nominee or other record holder of Class A common stock indicates on a proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote certain shares on a particular matter, these shares (called "broker non-votes") will be counted as present in determining whether we have a quorum but will not be counted for the purpose of determining the number of votes cast on a specific proposal.
We expect that Proposals 1, 2 and 3 will be treated as non-routine matters and result in broker non-votes if you do not provide instructions on how you wish your shares to be voted. We expect that Proposal 4 (ratifying the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm) will be treated as a routine matter. Therefore, the brokerage firm that holds your shares may vote your shares in its discretion on Proposal 4, even if it does not receive instructions from you on how to vote your shares. If your broker votes on your behalf on Proposal 4, your shares also will be counted as present for the purpose of determining a quorum. If your broker considers Proposal 4 to be a non-routine matter, it will not be able to vote your shares without your instruction. The impact of broker non-votes, as well as abstentions, on the outcome of each proposal is discussed below.
If the enclosed form of proxy is properly signed and returned or a proxy is voted via the Internet or by telephone, the shares of Class A common stock represented thereby will be voted as specified in
2
the proxy. If you do not specify in the proxy how your shares are to be voted, the shares will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors.
Under our bylaws, no business may be brought before our annual meeting except pursuant to our notice of meeting, by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, or by a stockholder who was a stockholder of record as of the record date for the annual meeting who complies with the applicable notice provisions set forth in our bylaws. However, EMC is entitled to propose business to be considered by the stockholders at any meeting of stockholders without compliance with the notice requirements and procedures of our bylaws. The enclosed proxy gives each of Mark S. Peek, our Chief Financial Officer and Co-President, Business Operations, and S. Dawn Smith, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary, discretionary authority to vote your shares in accordance with his or her best judgment with respect to all additional matters that might come before the Annual Meeting, provided that the enclosed form of proxy is properly authorized by you.
Recommendations of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors recommends that our stockholders vote:
The Board of Directors expects EMC, the sole holder of our Class B common stock, to vote in accordance with the recommendations made by our Board of Directors for each of the four proposals.
Votes Required to Approve Each Proposal
Proposal 1Election of Directors
3
Proposal 2Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation
This proposal must receive "For" votes from the holders of shares of Class A and Class B common stock representing at least a majority of the votes cast on the matter, although such vote is non-binding. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote, and each share of Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes, on this proposal. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will have any effect upon the outcome of voting with respect to this proposal.
Proposal 3Frequency of Voting regarding Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation
Shares of Class A and Class B common stock may vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers every one, two or three years or such shares may abstain from voting. The frequency of holding the advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers will be decided by a plurality of the votes cast, although such vote will be non-binding. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote, and each share of Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes, on this proposal. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will have any effect upon the outcome of voting with respect to this proposal.
Proposal 4Ratification of the selection by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011
This proposal must receive "For" votes from the holders of shares of Class A and Class B common stock representing at least a majority of the votes cast on the matter. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote, and each share of Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes, on this proposal. Neither abstentions nor broker non-votes will have any effect upon the outcome of voting with respect to this proposal.
Voting Over the Internet or by Telephone
All Class A common stockholders have three options for submitting their vote prior to the Meeting:
If you vote this year's proxy via the Internet, you may also elect to receive future proxy and other materials electronically by following the instructions when you vote. You may vote using the Internet and telephone voting facilities until 11:59 p.m., E.T. on May 24, 2011. We encourage you to register your vote via the Internet. If you vote via the Internet, you should be aware that you may incur costs to access the Internet, such as usage charges from telephone companies or Internet service providers, and that these costs must be borne by you. If you vote via the Internet or telephone, then you do not need to return a proxy card by mail. If your shares are held by a bank, broker or other agent, please refer to the instructions they provide for voting your shares.
Counting of Votes
Votes will be counted by the inspector of election appointed by the Board of Directors for the meeting, who will separately count "For" and "Against" votes, votes on the frequency of an advisory vote on executive compensation, abstentions and broker non-votes.
4
Changing or Revoking Your Proxy
You have the right to revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the meeting by:
Please note, as mentioned above, if you are a beneficial owner, and not a holder of record of shares, you may not vote your shares in person at the meeting unless you request and obtain a legal proxy from your bank, brokerage firm or other agent who holds your shares in street name.
If your shares are held by your bank, brokerage firm or other agent as a nominee or agent, you should follow the instructions provided by your bank, brokerage firm or agent.
Annual Meeting Admission
Stockholders who wish to attend the annual meeting will be required to present verification of ownership of VMware common stock, such as a bank or brokerage firm account statement. All stockholders who attend the meeting will be required to present valid government-issued picture identification, such as a driver's license or passport. Registration will begin at 8:15 a.m. local time.
Other Business
As of the date of this proxy statement, VMware has no knowledge of any business to be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting other than the proposals described in the Notice of Annual Meeting. The deadline under VMware's bylaws for Class A common stockholders to notify VMware of any director nominations or proposals to be presented at the Annual Meeting passed on February 20, 2011. However, EMC is entitled to propose business to be considered by the stockholders at any meeting of stockholders without compliance with the notice requirements and procedures of our bylaws. If any other business should properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons appointed by the enclosed form of proxy shall have discretionary authority to vote all such proxies as they shall decide.
A complete list of stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be available for inspection by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the Annual Meeting for ten days prior to the Annual Meeting during ordinary business hours at our headquarters located at 3401 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304.
Expenses of the Proxy Solicitation
The expenses of preparing, printing and assembling the materials used in the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors will be borne by VMware. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by use of the mail, VMware may use the services of certain of its officers and employees (who will receive no compensation therefor in addition to their regular salaries) to solicit proxies personally and by mail, telephone and electronic means from brokerage firms and other stockholders.
5
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND NOMINEES
Our Board of Directors is currently composed of eight members. The number of directors constituting our Board of Directors may be set by resolution of the Board of Directors from time to time. However, the Board of Directors may not consist of less than six directors or more than twelve directors.
The Board of Directors is divided into two groups, Group I and Group II. Holders of Class B common stock, voting separately as a class, are entitled to elect directors representing a minimum of 80% of the total number of the directors constituting our Board of Directors, without vacancies. These directors are Group I directors. Holders of Class A common stock and holders of Class B common stock, voting together as a single class, are entitled to elect the remaining number of directors. These directors are Group II directors.
Our Board of Directors is also divided into three classes, with each class serving for a staggered three-year term. The Board of Directors consists of three Class I directors, two Class II directors and three Class III directors. At each annual meeting of stockholders, a class of directors is elected for a three-year term to succeed the directors of the same class whose terms are then expiring. The terms of the Class I directors, Class II directors and Class III directors expire upon the election and qualification of successor directors at the annual meeting of stockholders held during the calendar years 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The following table shows the members of our Board of Directors, the committees, group and class to which they belong and designates which directors our Board of Directors determined to be independent under the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") corporate governance standards ("NYSE Rules"):
Director
|
Audit Committee Member |
Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee Member |
Mergers and Acquisitions Committee Member |
Independent Directors of VMware |
Director Group |
Director Class |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paul A. Maritz |
ü | Group I | Class III | |||||||||||||
Joseph M. Tucci |
ü |
Group I |
Class I |
|||||||||||||
Michael W. Brown |
ü |
(C) |
ü |
ü |
Group I |
Class II |
||||||||||
John R. Egan |
ü |
(C) |
Group I |
Class I |
||||||||||||
David I. Goulden |
ü |
Group I |
Class III |
|||||||||||||
Renee J. James |
ü |
ü |
Group II |
Class I |
||||||||||||
Dennis D. Powell |
ü |
ü |
(VC) |
ü |
Group I |
Class II |
||||||||||
David N. Strohm |
ü |
(C) |
ü |
ü |
Group I |
Class III |
Directors Standing For Election
Each of the incumbent Class I directors has been nominated by the Board of Directors for election at the Annual Meeting, and each of them has agreed to stand for election for an additional three-year term.
6
Information concerning the nominees is presented below:
Joseph M. Tucci
Class I, Group I
Term expires: 2011 Annual Meeting
Mr. Tucci, age 63, has been Chairman of the Board of Directors of VMware since April 2007. Mr. Tucci has been the Chairman of the board of directors of EMC since January 2006 and has been its Chief Executive Officer and a director since January 2001. Mr. Tucci is a member of EMC's Finance Committee and EMC's Mergers and Acquisitions Committee. Mr. Tucci has served as EMC's President since January 2000. He also served as EMC's Chief Operating Officer from January 2000 to January 2001. Prior to joining EMC, Mr. Tucci served as Deputy Chief Executive Officer of Getronics N.V., an information technology services company, from June 1999 through December 1999 and as Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Wang Global, an information technology services company, from December 1993 to June 1999. Mr. Tucci is also a director of Paychex, Inc., a provider of payroll, human resources and benefits outsourcing solutions, where he is Chair of the Governance and Compensation Committee.
Mr. Tucci has spent more than 40 years in the technology industry in senior roles at large, complex and global technology companies. Mr. Tucci's deep knowledge of all aspects of EMC's business, combined with his drive for innovation and excellence, position him well to serve on our Board of Directors. In addition, Mr. Tucci's service on other public company boards provides him with valuable experience.
John R. Egan
Class I, Group I
Term expires: 2011 Annual Meeting
Mr. Egan, age 53, has been a director of VMware since April 2007. Mr. Egan is also a member of the board of directors of EMC, on which he has served since May 1992. Mr. Egan is a member of EMC's Finance Committee and chair of EMC's Mergers and Acquisitions Committee. Mr. Egan has been a managing partner and general partner in EganManaged Capital, a venture capital firm, since October 1998. From May 1997 to September 1998, Mr. Egan served as Executive Vice President, Products and Offerings of EMC. From January 1992 to June 1996, he served as Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing of EMC. From October 1986 to January 1992, he served in a number of executive positions with EMC, including Executive Vice President, Operations and Executive Vice President, International Sales. Mr. Egan resigned as an executive officer of EMC in September 1998 and as an employee of EMC in July 2002. Mr. Egan is also a director of NetScout Systems, Inc., a provider of network and application performance management solutions, where he is Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee and a member of the Audit Committee.
Mr. Egan has spent his entire career in the information technology industry. His broad experience ranges from venture capital investments in early-stage technology companies to extensive sales and marketing experience, to executive leadership and management roles. Mr. Egan brings to the Board of Directors business acumen, substantial operational experience and expertise in corporate strategy development, as well as a deep understanding of information technology products acquired over 28 years of involvement with EMC. In addition, Mr. Egan's service on other public company boards provides him with valuable experience.
Renee J. James
Class I, Group II
Term expires: 2011 Annual Meeting
Ms. James, age 46, has been a director of VMware since September 2007. Ms. James joined Intel Corporation, where she is currently Senior Vice President and General Manager of the Software and
7
Services Group, in 1987. Ms. James was Vice President and General Manager of Intel's Software and Services Group from 2005 to January 2010. Ms. James was Vice President and General Manager of Intel's Microsoft Program Office from 2000 to 2005 and the Director and Chief Operating Officer of Intel Online Solutions, Intel's internet application hosting business, from 1998 to 2000. Ms. James also served for four years as technical assistant to then-Intel Chair and Chief Executive Officer, Andrew S. Grove. Ms. James is also a director of Vodafone Group Plc.
With more than 20 years of experience at Intel, Ms. James's current responsibilities include delivering software and support across Intel's product line as well as developing next generation software with an organization that operates globally. As such, she brings to the Board of Directors deep understanding of long-term development issues, technical skills and significant knowledge of the complex operational issues facing companies in the global marketplace.
Directors Not Standing For Election
Information concerning our continuing directors is presented below:
Michael W. Brown
Class II, Group I
Term expires: 2012 Annual Meeting
Mr. Brown, age 65, has been a director of VMware since April 2007. Mr. Brown is also a member of the board of directors of EMC, on which he has served since 2005. Mr. Brown is a member of EMC's Leadership and Compensation Committee, Mergers and Acquisitions Committee and Audit Committee and chair of EMC's Finance Committee. From August 1994 until his retirement in July 1997, Mr. Brown served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Microsoft Corporation. He was Vice President, Finance, of Microsoft from April 1993 to August 1994. He joined Microsoft in December 1989 and served as Treasurer from January 1990 to April 1993. After retiring from Microsoft, Mr. Brown served as Chair of the NASDAQ Stock Market board of directors and as a past governor of the National Association of Securities Dealers. Prior to joining Microsoft, Mr. Brown spent 18 years with Deloitte & Touche LLP in various positions. Mr. Brown is also a director of Administaff, Inc., a professional employer organization providing services such as payroll and benefits administration, where he is a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Finance, Risk Management and Audit Committee. He is also a director of Stifel Financial Corp, an investment banking firm (which acquired Thomas Weisel Partners Group, where Mr. Brown was Chair of the Audit Committee).
Mr. Brown brings to the Board of Directors substantial financial expertise that includes extensive knowledge of the complex financial and operational issues facing large companies, and a deep understanding of accounting principles and financial reporting rules and regulations. He acquired this knowledge in the course of serving as the chief financial officer of a global technology company, working with a major international accounting and consulting firm for 18 years and serving as a member of the audit committees of three other public company boards. Mr. Brown's experience as an independent auditor provides the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee with significant insight into the preparation of financial statements and knowledge of audit procedures. Through his senior management positions, including as Chair of The NASDAQ Stock Market and as a past governor of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Mr. Brown has demonstrated his leadership and business acumen.
8
Dennis D. Powell
Class II, Group I
Term expires: 2012 Annual Meeting
Mr. Powell, age 63, has been a director of VMware since November 2007. Mr. Powell served as an Executive Advisor at Cisco Systems, Inc. from February 2008 to September 2010. Prior to that, Mr. Powell served as Cisco's Chief Financial Officer from May 2003 to February 2008. In that position, Mr. Powell served as Cisco's Executive Vice President from August 2007 and, previously, as its Senior Vice President since May 2003. From June 2002 to May 2003, Mr. Powell served as Cisco's Senior Vice President, Corporate Finance. Prior to that, from January 1997 to June 2002, he served as Cisco's Vice President, Corporate Controller. Prior to joining Cisco, Mr. Powell had a 26-year tenure at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, where he was engagement lead for several global clients, was a national SEC reviewer and had regional responsibilities for audit quality assurance in the United States. Mr. Powell is also a director of Applied Materials, Inc., a provider of fabrication services, equipment and software, where he serves as Chair of the Audit Committee and is a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, Investment Committee and Stockholder Rights Committee. Mr. Powell is also a director of Intuit Inc., a provider of business, financial management and tax solutions for small businesses, consumers and accountants, where he serves as Chair of the Audit & Risk Committee and is a member of the Acquisition Committee.
Mr. Powell's experience serving in various executive positions at a global corporation provides him a deep understanding of the issues we face. Mr. Powell brings to the Board of Directors substantial financial expertise that includes extensive knowledge of the complex financial and operational issues facing large companies, and a deep understanding of accounting principles and financial reporting rules and regulations. He acquired this knowledge in the course of serving as the chief financial officer of a global technology company, working with a major international accounting and consulting firm for 26 years and serving as a member of the audit committee and nominating and corporate governance committee of two other public company boards. Additionally, Mr. Powell's experience as an independent auditor provides the Board of Directors and Audit Committee with significant insight into the preparation of financial statements and knowledge of audit procedures.
David I. Goulden
Class III, Group I
Term expires: 2013 Annual Meeting
Mr. Goulden, age 51, has been a director of VMware since April 2007. Mr. Goulden has served as EMC's Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since August 2006. He served as its Executive Vice President, Customer Operations from April 2004 to August 2006 and as its Executive Vice President, Customer Solutions and Marketing and New Business Development from November 2003 to April 2004. Mr. Goulden also served as EMC's Executive Vice President, Global Marketing and New Business Development from July 2002 to November 2003. Prior to joining EMC, Mr. Goulden served as a member of the board of management, President and Chief Operating Officer for the Americas and Asia Pacific of Getronics N.V. from April 2000 to July 2002, as President and Chief Operating Officer for the Americas of Getronics N.V. from June 1999 to April 2000 and in a number of executive positions at Wang Global from September 1990 to June 1999.
Mr. Goulden has over 20 years of experience in the information technology services sector, with extensive knowledge of financial and marketing issues as well as business development and customer relations. Mr. Goulden's oversight of worldwide finance operations with responsibility for financial reporting, balance sheet management, foreign exchange, audit, tax and investment banking programs provides the Board of Directors with a broad range of expertise on various financial issues facing a global organization.
9
Paul A. Maritz
Class III, Group I
Term expires: 2013 Annual Meeting
Mr. Maritz, age 56, has been the Chief Executive Officer and a Director of VMware since July 2008. Mr. Maritz also served as VMware's President from July 2008 to January 2011. Prior to joining VMware, he was President of EMC's Cloud Infrastructure and Services Division after EMC acquired Pi Corporation in February 2008. Mr. Maritz was a founder of Pi and served as its Chief Executive Officer. Pi was a software company focused on building cloud-based solutions. Before founding Pi, he spent 14 years working at Microsoft, where he served as a member of the five-person Executive Committee that managed the overall company. As Vice President of the Platform Strategy and Developer Group, among other roles, he oversaw the development and marketing of System Software Products (including Windows 95, Windows NT, and Windows 2000), Development Tools (Visual Studio) and Database Products (SQL Server) and the complete Office and Exchange Product Lines. Prior to Microsoft, he spent five years working at Intel as a software and tools developer.
As Chief Executive Officer of VMware, Mr. Maritz has in depth knowledge of our business and brings to the Board of Directors insight and knowledge of our operations and strategic opportunities. In addition, Mr. Maritz's experience in the information technology sector ranging from development of software products to being part of the executive management team of a global software company and founding a company developing cloud computing software provides the Board of Directors with significant expertise on a variety of issues important to our business.
David N. Strohm
Class III, Group I
Term expires: 2013 Annual Meeting
Mr. Strohm, age 62, has been a director of VMware since April 2007. Mr. Strohm is also a member of the board of directors of EMC, on which he has served since October 2003, and has served as Lead Director since January 2006. Mr. Strohm is a member of EMC's Mergers and Acquisitions Committee and chair of EMC's Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. He has been a Venture Partner of Greylock Partners, a venture capital firm, since January 2001 and was a General Partner of Greylock from 1980 to 2001. He is also a General Partner of several partnerships formed by Greylock. Mr. Strohm is a former director of DoubleClick, Inc. (where he was Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee), Internet Security Systems, Inc. (where he was Lead Director, Chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee) and SuccessFactors, Inc. (where he was Chairperson of the Board, Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Chair of the Compensation Committee).
Mr. Strohm has 30 years of experience as an early-stage venture capital investor, principally in the information technology industry. He has been a primary investor, and served in board leadership roles, in several companies that grew to become publicly-traded. This experience has provided a deep understanding of the information technology industry, and the drivers of structural change and high-growth opportunities in information technology. He has also gained significant experience overseeing corporate strategy, assessing operating plans and evaluating and developing business leaders. His service as board chair, lead director and committee chair for several public companies has given him a broad experience base for serving on our Board of Directors.
Selection and Nomination of Directors
Our entire Board of Directors is responsible for nominating members for election to the Board of Directors and for filling vacancies on the Board of Directors that may occur between annual meetings of the stockholders.
10
The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee identifies, evaluates and recommends candidates to the entire Board of Directors for addition to the Board of Directors. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee reviews and assesses the skills and characteristics it believes are or may be required on the Board of Directors based on the needs of our business. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee will identify director candidates through numerous sources, including recommendations from directors, executive officers and stockholders of VMware. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee will identify those individuals most qualified to serve as members of the Board of Directors and will consider many factors with regard to each candidate, including judgment, integrity, diversity, prior experience, the interplay of the candidate's experience with the experience of other members of the Board of Directors, the extent to which the candidate would be desirable as a member of any committees of the Board of Directors and the candidate's willingness to devote substantial time and effort to the Board of Directors. As such, the Board of Directors believes that diversity of viewpoint and experience is an important consideration in determining the composition of the Board of Directors, and the effectiveness of the Board of Directors' efforts to recruit members with appropriate skill sets and experience and promote the exchange of differing viewpoints is reviewed as part of the Board of Directors' periodic assessment process. The Board of Directors believes that membership of no fewer than six and no more than twelve directors permits needed expertise, diversity of experience and independence without hindering effective discussion or diminishing individual accountability. In considering candidates, the Board of Directors considers the entirety of each candidate's credentials in the context of these standards. With respect to the nomination of continuing directors for re-election, the individual's contributions to the Board of Directors are also considered.
Our stockholders may recommend individuals to the Board of Directors for consideration as potential director candidates by submitting their names and appropriate background and biographical information to the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee at VMware Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee, 3401 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304. Assuming that the appropriate information has been timely provided, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee will consider these candidates substantially in the same manner as it considers other candidates it identifies.
Our stockholders also may nominate director candidates by following the advance notice provisions of VMware's bylaws. For additional information, see "Advance Notice Procedures."
11
Our Class A common stock began trading on the NYSE following our initial public offering ("IPO") in 2007. For purposes of the NYSE Rules, VMware is a "controlled company" because more than 50% of the voting power of VMware is held by EMC. Accordingly, pursuant to section 303A.00 of the NYSE Rules, we are exempt from certain NYSE corporate governance requirements and have elected to avail ourselves of these exemptions. In particular, as a controlled company under the NYSE Rules, we are exempt from the requirements to have:
In light of our position as a controlled company, we have opted to establish a single Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee, instead of a separate Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Governance Committee. However, we have voluntarily caused the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee to be comprised entirely of independent directors, in compliance with the NYSE Rules, although we are not required to maintain the independent composition of this committee.
Our Board of Directors is committed to maintaining strong corporate governance practices. Our Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines to provide a framework for the effective governance of VMware. Additionally, at the time of our IPO, our Board of Directors adopted written charters for its standing committees (Audit, Compensation and Corporate Governance, and Mergers and Acquisitions), as well as Business Conduct Guidelines applicable to all directors, officers and employees. Our Board of Directors reviews the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the committee charters and the Business Conduct Guidelines periodically and implements changes as appropriate. Information about our corporate governance practices and copies of the Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters and Business Conduct Guidelines are available on the investor relations page of our company website at http://ir.vmware.com. VMware will provide stockholders with a copy of its Corporate Governance Guidelines, committee charters and Business Conduct Guidelines, without charge, upon written request to our Investor Relations Department, VMware, Inc., 3401 Hillview Avenue, California 94304.
Our Board of Directors has adopted corporate governance practices that the Board of Directors believes are in the best interests of VMware and our stockholders as well as compliant with the rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE. Highlights include:
12
13
Governance Committee has established stock ownership guidelines for such directors that require the directors to own at least 5,000 shares of our Class A common stock and hold at least 50% of the net shares acquired from us in compensation for their Board of Directors service until they reach such ownership level. Non-employee directors who do not receive compensation for their service on our Board of Directors are exempt from our stock ownership guidelines.
Our Leadership Structure
Our current leadership structure separates the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the Company and the day to day leadership and performance of the Company, while the Chairman of the Board of Directors provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer, sets the agenda for Board of Directors meetings and presides over meetings of the full Board of Directors. We believe that this structure allows the Board of Directors to best address governance issues because the presence of a separate chair provides a more effective channel for the Board of Directors to express its views to management and provide feedback to the Chief Executive Officer on company performance. The Board of Directors' administration of risk oversight has not affected the leadership structure of the Board of Directors.
Communications with the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors provides a process for VMware stockholders and other interested parties to send communications to the Board of Directors, including the non-management directors. Any person who desires to contact the non-management directors or the entire Board of Directors may do so by sending an e-mail to ContactTheBoard@vmware.com. Under a process approved by the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee, VMware's Secretary is responsible for the review of all communications received by VMware and addressed to the Board of Directors, including the non-management members, and each quarter prepares for the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee a summary report of all communications and copies of all communications, other than spam, junk mail, mass mailings, product complaints or inquiries, job inquiries, surveys, business solicitations or advertisements, or patently offensive or otherwise inappropriate material. Communications deemed by the Secretary to be of an urgent nature are reported promptly to the Chair of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee. Directors may at any time review a log of all correspondence received by VMware that is addressed to members of the Board of Directors and request copies of any correspondence.
Our Audit Committee also provides a process to send communications directly to the committee about VMware's accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters. Any person who desires to contact the Audit Committee regarding such matters may do so by sending an e-mail to AuditCommitteeChair@vmware.com.
Oversight of Risk Management
The Board of Directors' role in the Company's risk oversight process includes receiving regular reports from members of senior management on areas of material risk to the Company, including operational, financial, legal and regulatory, and strategic and reputational risks. Our Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee has primary oversight responsibility for matters relating to enterprise risk. As such, the charter for our Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee provides for the committee to periodically review and discuss our practices and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management with a management risk committee which consists of our Chief Financial Officer and our General Counsel. Our Mergers and Acquisitions Committee assesses risks to the Company in connection with proposed acquisitions, divestitures and investments. The Mergers and Acquisitions Committee reviews management's assessment of potential risks raised during due diligence
14
and management's risk mitigation plans before granting approval to enter into definitive transaction agreements. Our Audit Committee oversees management of financial risk exposures, including the integrity of our accounting and financial reporting processes and controls. As part of this responsibility, the Audit Committee meets periodically with the independent auditors, our internal auditors and our financial and accounting personnel to discuss significant financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor, control and report such exposures. Additionally, the Audit Committee reviews significant findings prepared by the independent auditors and our internal auditors, together with management's response.
Our management also reviewed the compensation plans and programs that could have a material impact on VMware for each of our functional groups with the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee. Our management review considered whether any of these plans or programs may encourage inappropriate risk-taking, whether any plan may give rise to risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us, and whether it would recommend any changes to the plans. Management also reviewed with the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee risk-mitigating controls such as our compensation recovery policy for executive officer bonus and equity compensation, the degree of committee and senior management oversight of each program and the level and design of internal controls over such programs. Based on this review, we concluded that our compensation plans and programs are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS INDEPENDENCE AND COMMITTEES
Board of Directors Independence
As a controlled company, under the NYSE Rules, we are exempt from the requirement to have a majority of independent directors on our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that four of our eight directors are independent of VMware under the NYSE Rules. Specifically, each of Michael W. Brown, Renee J. James, Dennis D. Powell and David N. Strohm are independent directors. The Board of Directors considered all facts and circumstances it deemed relevant in making such determinations of independence, including business relationships, as well as the relationships with EMC, Intel and Cisco discussed below:
15
and paid each other royalties for integration of each other's technology in product sales to third party end users. Revenue from these transactions, in the aggregate, constituted less than 1% of the annual revenues of each company. Further discussion of these transactions can be found under "Transactions With Related PersonsOther Transactions With Related Persons."
The Board of Directors affirmatively concluded that, based on the facts and circumstances, none of these relationships are of a material nature or are of a nature that would preclude such directors from being deemed independent under NYSE Rules. In making its determination, the Board of Directors also reviewed the business relationships between VMware and companies on which our independent directors serve as board members.
Ownership interests of our directors or officers in the common stock of EMC, or service as both a director of EMC and VMware, or as a director of VMware and an officer or employee of EMC could create, or appear to create potential conflicts of interest when directors and officers are faced with decisions that could have different implications for us and EMC. In order to address potential conflicts of interest between us and EMC with respect to corporate opportunities, our certificate of incorporation contains provisions regulating and defining the conduct of our affairs as they may involve EMC and its officers and directors, and our powers, right, duties and liabilities and those of our officers, directors and stockholders in connection with our relationship with EMC. Our certificate of incorporation also contains provisions limiting the liability of our directors or officers who are also directors or officers of EMC in the event they learn of a transaction that may be a corporate opportunity for both VMware and EMC, provided they comply with the policies set forth in our certificate of incorporation. For more information, see "Transactions with Related PersonsOur Relationship with EMC Corporation." Additionally, transactions with EMC are subject to review by our Audit Committee pursuant to our policy for the review of transactions with related persons. For more information, see "Review and Approval of Transactions with Related Persons."
Attendance at Board of Directors, Committee and Annual Stockholder Meetings
Our Board of Directors expects that each director will prepare for, attend and participate in all Board of Directors and applicable committee meetings and that each director will ensure that other commitments do not materially interfere with his or her service on the Board of Directors. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, our Board of Directors held nine meetings. Each director attended at least 75% of the Board of Directors meetings and committee meetings that were held during the period in which he or she was a director of VMware and in which he or she was a member of such committees. VMware's Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that each director is expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All members of the Board of Directors attended our 2010 Annual Meeting.
16
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our Board of Directors has established three standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee and the Mergers and Acquisitions Committee. Each committee operates pursuant to a written charter that is available on the investor relations page of our website at http://ir.vmware.com. The current membership of each committee is listed below.
Audit Committee | Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee |
Mergers and Acquisitions Committee |
||
---|---|---|---|---|
Michael W. Brown(C)* | Michael W. Brown* | John R. Egan(C) | ||
Renee J. James* | Dennis D. Powell* | David I. Goulden | ||
Dennis D. Powell(VC)* | David N. Strohm(C)* | Paul A. Maritz | ||
David N. Strohm* | ||||
Joseph M. Tucci |
Audit Committee
Michael W. Brown (Chair), Renee J. James and Dennis D. Powell were members of the Audit Committee throughout 2010. Our Board of Directors has determined that our Audit Committee is comprised solely of independent directors within the meaning of the applicable SEC rules and regulations and the NYSE Rules.
Our Board of Directors has determined that all current Audit Committee members meet the additional, heightened independence criteria of Rule 10A-3 of the SEC applicable to audit committee members. Our Board of Directors has also determined that each of Messrs. Brown and Powell is an "audit committee financial expert" as defined by the SEC and that all Audit Committee members are financially literate under the current listing standards of the NYSE.
The Audit Committee held eight meetings in 2010. This committee reviews with management and our auditors, our financial statements, the accounting principles applied in their preparation, the scope of the audit, any comments made by our independent auditors on our financial statements and our accounting controls and procedures, the independence of our auditors, our internal controls, our policy pertaining to related person transactions, the other matters as set forth in the Audit Committee charter, as adopted by the Board of Directors, and such other matters as the committee deems appropriate.
In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent auditors for the purpose of preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services for us and pre-approves such audit, review or attest engagements. The Audit Committee also pre-approves non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditors in accordance with the committee's pre-approval policy. Pursuant to its charter, our Audit Committee recommends, establishes and monitors procedures designed to facilitate the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints relating to accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the receipt of confidential, anonymous submissions by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. The Audit Committee also oversees management of financial risk exposures, including the integrity of our accounting and financial reporting processes and controls.
17
During 2010, senior members of our financial and legal management participated in each of the Audit Committee's regularly scheduled meetings. During the course of the year, the Audit Committee had separate executive sessions with our Chief Financial Officer and members of his staff, our General Counsel, the head of our internal audit department and our independent auditors at which candid discussions regarding legal matters, financial reporting, internal controls and accounting systems and processes took place. The Audit Committee discussed with VMware's independent auditors the overall scope and plans for its audit.
The Audit Committee has met, reviewed and discussed our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 with our management and our independent auditors. The meeting included a discussion of the quality and not just the acceptability of the accounting principles applied, the reasonableness of the significant accounting judgments and estimates and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements.
In performing all of these functions, the Audit Committee acts in an oversight capacity. The Audit Committee reviews our quarterly and annual reports on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K prior to filing with the SEC. In its oversight role, the Audit Committee relies on the work and assurances of our management, which has the primary responsibility for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for preparing the financial statements. The Audit Committee also relies on the work and assurances of our independent auditors who are engaged to audit and report on our consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.
Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee
David N. Strohm (Chair), Michael W. Brown and Dennis D. Powell were members of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee throughout 2010. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee held 16 meetings in 2010. In accordance with its charter, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates and sets compensation for our executive officers and monitors our general compensation programs. Subject to the terms of our compensation plans and the consent of the holders of our Class B common stock to the aggregate size of the annual equity award pool pursuant to the terms of our certificate of incorporation, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee has discretion to determine the amount, form, structure and implementation of compensation payable to our executive officers, including, where appropriate, discretion to increase or decrease awards or to award compensation absent the attainment of performance goals and to award discretionary cash compensation outside of the parameters of our compensation plans. In exercising such discretion, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee consults with our management. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee approves transactions under our equity plans and has the authority to administer and interpret the provisions of our equity and other compensation plans. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee is also responsible for overseeing and reporting to the Board of Directors on succession planning for the Chief Executive Officer and other senior management positions. Additionally, the Compensation and Governance Committee reviews compensation of our non-employee directors and recommends changes for approval by our Board of Directors. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee also oversees our non-employee director stock ownership guidelines.
Our Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee is also responsible for overseeing and advising the Board of Directors with respect to corporate governance matters, assisting the Board of Directors in identifying and recommending qualified candidates for nomination to the Board of Directors, making recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to assignments to committees of the Board of Directors and overseeing the evaluation of the Board of Directors. Additionally, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee has primary oversight responsibility for matters relating to enterprise risk. As such, the charter for our Compensation and
18
Corporate Governance Committee provides for the committee to periodically review and discuss our practices and policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management with a management risk committee which consists of our Chief Financial Officer and our General Counsel.
The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee has engaged an independent consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co. ("FWC") to advise the Committee on an as needed basis with respect to executive compensation decisions. FWC reports directly to the Compensation and Governance Committee and does not provide services to VMware management. More information on the processes and procedures followed by the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee for the consideration and determination of executive compensation can be found under "Compensation Discussion and Analysis."
Mergers and Acquisitions Committee
John R. Egan (Chair), David I. Goulden, Paul A. Maritz , David N. Strohm and Joseph M. Tucci were members of the Mergers and Acquisitions Committee throughout 2010. The Mergers and Acquisitions Committee held ten meetings in 2010. Pursuant to its charter, this committee reviews and assesses, with our management, potential acquisitions, divestitures and investments and, where appropriate, will make recommendations to the Board of Directors regarding potential target candidates. In connection with such review and assessment, our Mergers and Acquisitions Committee may approve acquisitions, divestitures and investments up to a specified applicable dollar limit and in accordance with any other relevant parameters previously established by the Board of Directors. The Mergers and Acquisitions Committee includes an assessment of risks to the Company in connection with proposed acquisitions, divestitures and investments.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During fiscal 2010, our Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee was comprised of Messrs. Brown, Powell and Strohm.
No executive officer of VMware during 2010 served, or currently serves, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board of Directors or our Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee.
19
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Stockholders are being asked to elect three Class I directors, of which two directors are Group I directors and one is a Group II director, each to serve for an additional three-year term. The current Class I directors' term of office expires at the Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors has nominated the three following persons, all incumbent Class I directors, for election as Class I directors at the Annual Meeting:
Ms. James, the Class I, Group II nominee, must be elected by a majority of the aggregate of the votes of the Class A and Class B common stock cast with respect to each nominee at the Annual Meeting, with each Class A and Class B share entitled to one vote per share in such election.
Messrs. Egan and Tucci, the two Class I, Group I nominees, must be elected by a majority of the votes of the Class B common stock cast with respect to such nominee at the Annual Meeting.
We expect each nominee for election as a director at the Annual Meeting to be able to accept such nomination. Information about the nominees is provided under the heading "Our Board of Directors and Nominees" above.
Each Class I Director elected at the 2011 Annual Meeting will serve until the 2014 Annual Meeting or special meeting in lieu thereof and until that director's successor is elected and qualified.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote for "FOR" the election of the Class I, Group I nominees and the Class I, Group II nominee listed above.
PROPOSAL 2
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, we are asking our stockholders to vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. This proposal, commonly known as a "say-on-pay" proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on the compensation of our named executive officers.
The objectives of our executive compensation program are:
To achieve these objectives, we have implemented and maintained compensation plans that tie a substantial portion of our executive compensation to the achievement of pre-determined performance goals and increases in total stockholder return. Stockholders are urged to read the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this proxy statement for greater detail about our executive compensation programs, including our compensation philosophy, policies and practices and information about the fiscal year 2010 compensation of our named executive officers.
20
We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement by voting in favor of the following resolution:
"RESOLVED: That the stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the Summary Compensation Table, and the other related tables as set forth in the proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the Company's 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders."
Even though your vote is advisory and therefore will not be binding on the Company, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote for "FOR" approval of the compensation of the Company's named executive officers.
PROPOSAL 3
ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF AN ADVISORY VOTE
ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In accordance with Section 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, we are asking our stockholders to provide their input with regard to the frequency of future stockholder advisory votes on our executive compensation programs, such as the proposal contained in Proposal 2 above. This proposal, commonly known as a "say-on-frequency" proposal, gives our stockholders the opportunity to express their views on whether an advisory vote on executive compensation should occur once every year, every two years or every three years.
After considering this item, our Board of Directors has determined that a vote every year on executive compensation is appropriate. By providing an advisory vote on executive compensation on an annual basis, our stockholders will be able to provide us with direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement every year.
When you vote in response to the resolution set forth below, you may cast your vote on your preferred voting frequency by choosing among the following four options: once every one year, two years or three years, or you may abstain from voting. Our Board of Directors recommends that the advisory vote on executive compensation be held every year.
"RESOLVED: That the option of once every year, two years, or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast for this resolution will be determined to be the preferred frequency with which the Company is to hold an advisory vote by stockholders to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the tabular disclosure regarding such compensation and the accompanying narrative disclosure."
The option of one year, two years or three years that receives the highest number of votes cast will be deemed the frequency of the vote on the compensation of our named executive officers that has been approved by stockholders on an advisory basis. Even though your vote is advisory and therefore will not be binding on the Company, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors value the opinions of our stockholders. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board of Directors may decide in the future that it is in our best interests and in the best interests of our stockholders to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently, as applicable, than the option approved by our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote in its decisions.
21
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote for "ONE YEAR" as the frequency with which stockholders are provided an advisory vote on executive compensation.
PROPOSAL 4
RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We are asking our stockholders to ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PWC") as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.
PWC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has served as our independent auditors since December 2002. We expect that representatives of PWC will be present at the Annual Meeting and will be given the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and to respond to appropriate questions. PWC is also the independent auditors of EMC, our parent company. We are required by the Master Transaction Agreement we entered into with EMC at the time of our IPO to use our reasonable best efforts to use the same independent registered public accountant selected by EMC until such time as EMC is no longer required to consolidate our results of operations and financial position, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") consistently applied. For further information, see "Transactions with Related PersonsOur Relationship with EMC Corporation."
Although ratification by the stockholders is not required by law, the Board of Directors has determined that it is desirable to request approval of this selection by the stockholders as a matter of good corporate governance. In the event the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment of PWC, the Audit Committee will consider this factor when making any determinations regarding PWC. Even though your vote is advisory and therefore will not be binding on the Company, the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors value the opinions of our stockholders.
The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote for "FOR" the ratification of the selection of PWC as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011.
Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services
During 2010, the Audit Committee approved all audit, review and attest services performed by PWC.
In accordance with the Audit Committee's pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee pre-approves permissible non-audit services and audit, review or attest engagements. The Audit Committee has delegated to its Chair the authority to pre-approve any specific non-audit service that was not previously pre-approved by the Audit Committee, provided that any decisions of the Chair to pre-approve non-audit services shall be presented to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. During 2010, the Audit Committee pre-approved all non-audit services in accordance with the policy set forth above.
22
For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, fees for services provided by PWC were as follows:
|
Audit Fees(1) ($) |
Audit Related Fees(2) ($) |
Tax Fees(3) ($) |
All Other Fees(4) ($) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 |
4,637,899 | 1,812,567 | 147,840 | 129,914 | |||||||||
2009 |
4,172,721 | 381,075 | 32,814 | 3,000 |
23
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2010. Our equity compensation plans include our 2007 Equity and Incentive Plan (the "2007 Plan") and our 2007 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Only shares of Class A common stock may be issued under these plans.
Plan Category
|
Number Of Securities To Be Issued Upon Exercise Of Outstanding Options, Warrants And Rights |
Weighted- Average Exercise Price Per Share Of Outstanding Options, Warrants And Rights |
Number Of Securities Remaining Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected In Column (a)) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
|||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
36,012,147 | (1) | $ | 33.93 | (2) | 24,810,158 | (3) | |||
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
|
|
|||||||
Total: |
36,012,147 | $ | 33.93 | 24,810,158 |
Excludes shares assumed under:
24
as well as the weighted-average exercise prices of the options outstanding under each such plan, are set forth in the following table.
Plan Name
|
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options |
Weighted-Average Exercise Price ($) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B-Hive 102 Plan |
21,768 | 5.96 | |||||
B-Hive 3(i) Plan |
49 | 0.36 | |||||
B-Hive US Plan |
1,841 | 1.49 | |||||
SpringSource US Plan |
301,969 | 5.17 | |||||
SpringSource UK Plan |
314 | 4.76 | |||||
Integrien Plan |
41,752 | 5.17 |
25
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth information, as of March 1, 2011, about the beneficial ownership of Class A common stock and Class B common stock by (i) EMC, (ii) each person who is known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of either class of our common stock, (iii) each of our directors and nominees for director, (iv) each of our Named Executive Officers (as defined below) and (v) by all directors and executive officers of VMware as a group.
Applicable percentage ownership is based on 118,462,369 shares of Class A common stock and 300,000,000 shares of Class B common stock outstanding at March 1, 2011. In computing the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we deemed outstanding shares of common stock subject to options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges held by that person that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 1, 2011. We did not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
Only EMC, its successor-in-interest or its majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries may hold shares of Class B common stock unless and until such time as EMC distributes its shares of Class B common stock in a distribution under section 355 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), following which distribution the Class B common stock may be held by EMC, the distributees and their transferees. The rights of the holders of Class A and Class B common stock are identical, except with respect to voting, the election of directors, conversion and certain actions that require the consent of holders of Class B common stock and other protective provisions as set forth in our certificate of incorporation. Each share of Class B common stock is convertible into one share of Class A common stock at any time, at EMC's election. However, if EMC distributes its shares of Class B common stock in a distribution under section 355 of the Code (a "Distribution"), such right to convert Class B common stock into Class A common stock will terminate upon such distribution.
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Number of Class B Shares Beneficially Owned(1) |
Percent of Outstanding Class B Shares |
Percentage of Total Vote(2) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Five Percent Beneficial Owners |
|||||||||||
EMC Corporation |
300,000,000 | 100.00 | % | 96.20 | % | ||||||
176 South Street, Hopkinton, MA 01748 |
|
Number of Class A Shares Beneficially Owned(1) |
Percent of Outstanding Class A Shares |
Percentage of Total Vote(2) |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Five Percent Beneficial Owners | |||||||||||
EMC Corporation | 33,066,050 | (3) | 27.91 | % | 1.06 | % | |||||
Prudential Financial, Inc.(4) |
11,294,184 |
9.53 |
% |
** |
|||||||
751 Broad Street, Newark, NJ 071020 | |||||||||||
Cisco Systems International B.V.(5) |
6,500,000 |
5.49 |
% |
** |
|||||||
Haarlerbergpark Haarlerbergweg 13-19 1101 | |||||||||||
CH Amsterdam The Netherlands |
26
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Number of Class A Shares Beneficially Owned(1) |
Percent of Outstanding Class A Shares |
Percentage of Total Vote(2) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Directors and Named Executive Officers |
||||||||||
Michael W. Brown(6) |
62,000 | ** | ** | |||||||
John R. Egan*(7) |
62,000 | ** | ** | |||||||
Carl M. Eschenbach(8) |
33,447 | ** | ** | |||||||
David I. Goulden(9) |
0 | ** | ** | |||||||
Renee J. James* |
0 | ** | ** | |||||||
Paul A. Maritz(10) |
1,482,486 | 1.24 | % | ** | ||||||
Richard J. McAniff(11) |
153,832 | ** | ** | |||||||
T. Tod Nielsen(12) |
98,777 | ** | ** | |||||||
Mark S. Peek(13) |
146,164 | ** | ** | |||||||
Dennis D. Powell(14) |
36,000 | ** | ** | |||||||
S. Dawn Smith(15) |
3,750 | ** | ** | |||||||
David N. Strohm(16) |
56,600 | ** | ** | |||||||
Joseph M. Tucci*(17) |
0 | ** | ** | |||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group (14 persons)(18) |
2,201,055 | 1.83 | % | ** |
The address of all persons listed above, other than EMC, Prudential and Cisco is c/o VMware, Inc., 3401 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304.
27
the benefit and on behalf of its clients. Prudential Financial, Inc. is the parent holding company and the direct or indirect parent of The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Prudential Investment Management, Inc., Jennison Associates LLC, Prudential Bache Asset Management, Inc., Prudential Investments LLC, Prudential Private Placement Investors, L.P., Pruco Securities, LLC, Prudential Investment Management Services LLC, AST Investment Services, Inc., Prudential Annuities Distributors, Inc., Quantitative Management Associates LLC, Prudential International Investments Advisers, LLC, Global Portfolio Strategies, Inc., Prudential Bache Securities, LLC and Prudential Bache Commodities, LLC. None of the reporting persons affirm the existence of a group within the meaning of Rule 13d-5(b)(1). Prudential Financial, Inc. reported that it has sole voting power with respect to 328,154 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 10,996,030 shares. Jennison Associates LLC filed a separate Schedule 13G on February 11, 2011 with the SEC, reporting beneficial ownership of 11,291,014 shares of Class A common stock. However, these shares have not been listed separately because they are included in the shares reported by Prudential Financial, Inc. which indirectly owns 100% equity interest in Jennison Associates LLC.
28
29
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section ("CD&A") discusses the compensation programs and policies for our named executive officers. The CD&A also provides an overview of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee's role in the design and administration of these programs and policies and its role in making specific compensation decisions for our named executive officers.
Named Executive Officers
Our named executive officers for 2010 set forth in the proxy statement are Paul A. Maritz, Chief Executive Officer; Mark S. Peek, Chief Financial Officer and Co-President, Business Operations; Carl M. Eschenbach, Co-President, Customer Operations; Richard J. McAniff, Co-President, Products and Chief Development Officer; T. Tod Nielsen, Co-President, Application Platform; and S. Dawn Smith, Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary. These individuals are referred to as our "Named Executive Officers."
Objectives of our Executive Compensation Program
The objectives of our executive compensation program are to:
To achieve these objectives, we have implemented and maintained compensation plans that tie a substantial portion of our executive compensation to the achievement of pre-determined performance goals and increases in total stockholder return. We may adopt other arrangements from time to time to best meet our compensation objectives.
In addition to the foregoing objectives, we believe that the mix and design of the elements of our executive compensation are well balanced and do not encourage management to assume excessive risk. As detailed below, our pay mix is balanced among base salary, short-term performance bonus awards and equity compensation. Executive officer compensation is heavily weighted towards long-term, equity-based incentive compensation, which we believe discourages excessive short-term risk taking and strongly aligns executive officer interests with the creation of long-term increased stockholder value. Our policies against the purchase of hedging instruments help to maintain the alignment of executive officer interests with long-term changes in stockholder value by prohibiting executive officers from purchasing financial instruments that trade off the potential for upside gain in order to lock in the current market value of our securities. Additionally, as discussed below, our executive compensation plans also include compensation recovery provisions that enable us to recover performance bonuses, as well as gains on equity awards, that were earned due to activity detrimental to the Company.
Corporate Performance During 2010
Our executive compensation programs are designed to reward strong corporate performance, and our compensation decisions reflect both our performance and our outlook. During 2010, our operating results were very strong. Revenue increased by 41% over 2009, and non-GAAP operating margin rose from 23.9% in 2009 to 28.5% in 2010 while we continued to invest in our long-term strategic initiatives. Total stockholder return as of December 31, 2010 increased by 109% from the beginning of the year.
30
Our Executive Compensation Program2010 Highlights
Overview of Compensation Setting Process
Compensation actions for our Named Executive Officers are determined by our Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee makes its determinations in consultation with management. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee has engaged Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. ("FWC") as its independent consultant to advise it on an as needed basis with respect to executive compensation decisions. FWC reports directly to the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee and does not provide services to VMware management.
During 2010, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee commissioned FWC to perform a comprehensive market analysis of our executive compensation program, focusing on the following:
31
In its market analysis, FWC compared our executive compensation structure and levels to those of comparable companies using data from Radford Consulting ("Radford") covering software companies with annual revenue greater than $1 billion to supplement data from proxy and other SEC filings. In addition to the Radford survey data, FWC recommended a peer group which was approved by the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee for executive compensation benchmarking. The weightings between the peer group and the Radford survey data were based on FWC's subjective assessment of the applicability and quality of each data source. The peer group consisted of the following companies: Adobe Systems, Amazon.com, Autodesk, BMC Software, CA, Citrix Systems, Cognizant Technology Solutions, eBay, Electronic Arts, Intuit, McAfee, NetApp, Red Hat, Salesforce.com, Synopsys, Symantec, VeriSign and Yahoo. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee determined that this group of peer companies was representative of our executive talent pool and our product and market profile and appropriate from a size perspective. During 2010, we added NetApp to the peer group based on its size, growth and overall profile, taking into account similarities in overall revenues, operating income and employee population. The table below reflects VMware's positioning with respect to key metrics in comparison to our peer company group.
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Revenue |
2010 Revenue Growth |
2010 Operating Income Growth |
Number of Employees |
Market Capitalization as of December 31, 2010 |
2010 Shareholder Return |
||||||
|
||||||||||||
Top Quartile |
VMware | VMware | VMware | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Second Quartile |
VMware | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Third Quartile |
VMware | VMware | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Bottom Quartile |
||||||||||||
|
The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee evaluated 2010 Named Executive Officer compensation decisions in light of the FWC analysis to ensure that our Named Executive Officer compensation is competitive with the identified peer group and sufficient to recruit and retain qualified executives. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee does not target or benchmark compensation to any particular percentile of compensation paid by other companies, but rather considers peer group compensation as one factor in making its compensation decisions. Other factors include our performance and an individual's contribution, experience, potential and compensation history. After taking these factors into account, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee exercises its judgment in making compensation decisions. We believe that this approach gives us the flexibility to make compensation decisions based upon all of the facts and circumstances.
Compensation Components
The compensation packages of our Named Executive Officers include a mix of cash and equity-based compensation. The major compensation components are:
32
Consistent with the objectives of our executive compensation program, cash generally constitutes a lesser portion of our compensation packages and is divided into base salary and annual performance-based bonus awards. We emphasize long-term equity incentives consistent with our focus on delivering superior stockholder returns. However, we also review cash compensation against our peer group to ensure that our total target cash compensation remains competitive in order to promote retention.
Cash Compensation
During 2010, there were two primary components to cash compensation paid to our Named Executive Officersbase salary and annual performance-based bonuses paid under our 2010 Executive Bonus Program.
Base salary serves as the primary form of fixed compensation for our Named Executive Officers. Base salary can also impact other compensation and benefit opportunities, including annual bonuses, as such opportunities are expressed as a percentage of base salary. During 2010, we continued our focus on long-term incentive awards in the form of equity grants. In general, we increased base salary for our Named Executive Officers in order to generally remain within the competitive median range (as discussed below) of our peer group and also to improve compensation parity among our senior executive team. Accordingly, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee increased Mr. McAniff's base salary from $390,000 to $450,000, Mr. Peek's from $400,000 to $475,000 and Ms. Smith's from $400,000 to $410,000. Consistent with our emphasis on long-term incentive compensation, and in light of the competitive peer group data provided by FWC, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee did not make any further changes to either base salary or annual bonus target amounts for our Named Executive Officers.
In comparison to the identified peer group, we believe that our decisions with respect to overall cash compensation (including both base salary and their annual performance-based bonuses) for Messrs. McAniff, Nielsen and Peek and Ms. Smith resulted in cash compensation positioned between the 50th and 75th percentiles of our peer group, whereas Mr. Eschenbach's total cash compensation is positioned above the 75th percentile. Mr. Maritz declined to receive a salary increase, and his total cash compensation is positioned in the bottom quartile of our peer group.
Annual Performance-Based Bonus
Each of our Named Executive Officers is eligible to earn cash bonuses tied to our financial results and individual performance under our executive bonus program. We believe it is important to provide rewards for specific results and behaviors that support our overall long-term business strategy. In 2010, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee determined that bonuses would be paid based on performance metrics applied separately to each half of the year. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee retained negative discretion to reduce actual payouts below the amounts calculated under the plan formulas and, as discussed below, applied negative discretion in consultation with management to reduce payouts to our Named Executive Officers during 2010.
33
The following table provides the target bonus amounts for 2010, expressed as a percentage of base salary at the start of the first and second halves of the year, for each of our Named Executive Officers under our executive bonus program:
Named Executive Officer
|
Target Bonus (as percentage of base salary) |
H1 2010 Target Bonus Amount |
H2 2010 Target Bonus |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paul A. Maritz |
100 | % | $ | 375,000 | $ | 375,000 | ||||
Mark S. Peek |
100 | % | $ | 200,000 | $ | 237,500 | ||||
Carl M. Eschenbach |
100 | % | $ | 275,000 | $ | 275,000 | ||||
Richard J. McAniff |
100 | % | $ | 195,000 | $ | 205,000 | ||||
T. Tod Nielsen |
100 | % | $ | 300,000 | $ | 300,000 | ||||
S. Dawn Smith |
75 | % | $ | 150,000 | $ | 153,750 |
Threshold payments were set at 80% of target bonus amounts, and maximum payments were set at 200% of target amounts. For each Named Executive Officer, 75% of his or her bonus opportunity for 2010 was tied to the achievement of corporate financial metrics, while 25% was tied to the achievement of individual goals. For any bonus amount to be paid out, a threshold level of achievement of each of the pre-established corporate financial objectives was required. Upon reaching the threshold, actual bonus amounts for the 75% of the bonus program tied to achievement of corporate financial metrics were determined based upon the degree of achievement above and below the target amounts. Once bonus amounts for the achievement of corporate financial measures was determined, bonus amounts for the 25% of the bonus program tied to achievement of individual goals are funded at the same percentage level, subject to reduction based upon the degree of achievement of the individual goals.
Corporate Financial Metrics
The portion of our Named Executives Officers' bonuses tied to the achievement of corporate financial metrics for 2010 was based on the achievement of pre-established corporate revenue and operating margin goals. In 2010, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee set corporate revenue and non-GAAP operating margin targets for the first and second halves of the year in February and August of 2010, respectively. The following table shows the revenue and non-GAAP operating margin targets for each half year. Non-GAAP operating margin was calculated by excluding stock-based compensation and the net effect of the amortization and capitalization of software development costs, employer payroll taxes on employee stock transactions, amortization of intangible assets and acquisition-related items from our operating margin calculated in accordance with GAAP. Results were also adjusted to eliminate any impact on revenues and non-GAAP operating margin of acquisitions and foreign exchange rate fluctuations not provided for in VMware's operating plan. Accordingly, the actual performance metrics calculated for purposes of the bonus program listed in the table below differ from VMware's reported financial results for the periods shown.
|
H1 2010 | H2 2010 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Target | Actual* | Target | Actual* | ||||
Revenue |
$1.247 billion | $1.303 billion* | $1.505 billion | $1.544 billion* | ||||
Non-GAAP Operating Margin |
25.3% | 27.6%* | 28.8% | 30.1%* |
The thresholds for minimum bonus payments were set at achievement of 80.0% and 90.0% of the first and second half revenue targets, respectively, and 92.1% and 89.6% of the first and second half non-GAAP operating margin targets, respectively. Maximum bonus amounts would become payable upon achievement of 112.5% and 120.0% of first and second half revenue targets, respectively, and
34
139.9% of non-GAAP operating margin for the first half of 2010 and 138.9% for the second half of 2010. The increase in the level of revenue achievement for the threshold payout in the second half of the year reflected an increased emphasis placed upon building revenue performance. The second half performance objectives were also set at levels that management believed would be more difficult to achieve than the first half objectives. Additionally, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee determined that regardless of operating margin performance, payouts in excess of 100% of the target bonus amounts would be paid only if revenue exceeded 97% of the performance target.
Revenue and operating margin performance for the first and second halves of 2010 yielded percentage bonus payouts of 128.8% and 111.0% of target amounts, respectively. For the first half of 2010, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee adopted management's recommendation to reduce the bonus payment percentages to 125.0% of target to match the level at which the bonus program for the general employee population was funded. Bonus payments for the second half of 2010 were made at the same level111.0%yielded by the bonus program calculations.
|
H1 Corporate Performance Bonus Amounts |
H2 Corporate Performance Bonus Amounts |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Named Executive Officer
|
Target Amount |
Bonus Calculated per Formula @ 128.8% |
Approved Bonus @ 125.0% |
Target Amount |
Bonus Calculated per Formula @ 111.0% |
Approved Bonus @ 111.0% |
|||||||||||||
Paul A. Maritz |
$ | 281,250 | $ | 362,250 | $ | 351,563 | $ | 281,250 | $ | 312,187 | $ | 312,187 | |||||||
Mark S. Peek |
$ | 150,000 | $ | 193,200 | $ | 187,500 | $ | 178,125 | $ | 197,719 | $ | 197,719 | |||||||
Carl M. Eschenbach |
$ | 206,250 | $ | 265,650 | $ | 257,813 | $ | 206,250 | $ | 228,938 | $ | 228,938 | |||||||
Richard J. McAniff |
$ | 146,250 | $ | 188,370 | $ | 182,813 | $ | 153,750 | $ | 170,663 | $ | 170,663 | |||||||
T. Tod Nielsen |
$ | 225,000 | $ | 289,800 | $ | 281,250 | $ | 225,000 | $ | 249,750 | $ | 249,750 | |||||||
S. Dawn Smith |
$ | 112,500 | $ | 144,900 | $ | 140,625 | $ | 115,313 | $ | 127,997 | $ | 127,997 |
Individual Performance Assessments
For Named Executive Officers, individual performance assessments were based on performance against overall corporate objectives, including customer experience, defining and executing on the Company's technology strategies, establishing the Company as a thought and technical leader in cloud computing, delivery on organizational goals and promoting organizational development. Mr. Maritz's and Mr. Nielsen's performance was evaluated by the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee with respect to overall company-wide performance against each of the objectives listed above. Individual performance goals for each of the other Named Executive Officers to further the above company-wide goals were set at the beginning of each half of the year. Mr. Peek's performance was evaluated with respect to objectives relating to communicating and delivering on the Company's financial and operational plans and goals, integration of acquired businesses and oversight of information technology implementations. Mr. McAniff's performance was evaluated with respect to objectives relating to implementation of our research and product development initiatives, strategies and processes, integration of acquired technologies into the Company's portfolio and alignment of the Company's research and development groups with its product marketing strategy. Mr. Eschenbach's performance was evaluated with respect to objectives relating to bookings and pricing, go to market strategies and development of field operations and personnel. Ms. Smith's performance was evaluated with respect to objectives relating to corporate compliance, streamlining legal processes, protection of intellectual property and continuing development of the legal organization.
Our 2010 Executive Bonus Program provided that payouts for individual performance would be funded, subject to the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee's potential use of negative discretion, at the same ratio as payouts based on the corporate financial metrics if threshold achievement of corporate financial goals sufficient to trigger a minimum payout, as discussed above, was reached. There were no formulas or weightings assigned to individual performance objectives, and
35
achievement was assessed overall on a holistic basis that also took into account overall individual and company performance. As discussed above, during 2010, corporate financial goals above the threshold levels were achieved and the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee determined in consultation with management that payouts for achievement of individual performance should be funded at the same ratio as the payout for corporate financial achievement.
|
H1 Individual Performance Bonus Amounts |
H2 Individual Performance Bonus Amounts |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Named Executive Officer
|
Target Amount |
Approved Bonus @ 125.0% |
Target Amount |
Approved Bonus @ 111.0% |
|||||||||
Paul A. Maritz |
$ | 93,750 | $ | 117,188 | $ | 93,750 | $ | 104,063 | |||||
Mark S. Peek |
$ | 50,000 | $ | 62,500 | $ | 59,375 | $ | 65,906 | |||||
Carl M. Eschenbach |
$ | 68,750 | $ | 85,938 | $ | 68,750 | $ | 76,313 | |||||
Richard J. McAniff |
$ | 48,750 | $ | 60,938 | $ | 51,250 | $ | 56,888 | |||||
T. Tod Nielsen |
$ | 75,000 | $ | 93,750 | $ | 75,000 | $ | 83,250 | |||||
S. Dawn Smith |
$ | 37,500 | $ | 46,875 | $ | 38,438 | $ | 42,666 |
Discretionary Bonuses
The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee has the authority to approve discretionary bonuses outside of the executive bonus program in the event that circumstances arise that were not contemplated at the beginning of the year when the annual bonus plan structure was approved. There were no discretionary bonuses paid to our Named Executive Officers for 2010.
Long-Term Incentives
We strongly believe that equity awards further align the interests of our Named Executive Officers with those of our stockholders. Equity awards are also an important part of the compensation packages that we use to recruit new executive hires.
During 2010, VMware continued its annual broad-based equity program for employees, including each of our Named Executive Officers. The purpose of the program is to promote employee retention and maintain alignment between long-term employee incentives and the interests of our stockholders. In 2010, VMware revised the program to grant solely restricted stock units instead of a mix of stock options and restricted stock units. We believe that restricted stock unit grants can serve as a better long-term retention vehicle than stock option grants because restricted stock unit grants will provide value to employees upon vesting while the level of the value received remains directly aligned with long term stockholder returns. Restricted stock units also reduce stockholder dilution because restricted stock unit grants are typically comprised of half or less the number of shares than a stock option grant of equivalent value. Our shift to restricted stock units also reflects current trends in the compensation practices of companies with which we compete for key employees and executives.
Shifting to restricted stock unit grants also enabled us to revise our grant process to more readily base grants to employees and officers on the dollar value of the annual grants, with the number of shares in each grant determined by dividing the dollar value of the awards by a 45-day trailing average of VMware's stock price. We believe that basing restricted stock unit grants on a dollar value enables us to clearly communicate the value of our long term equity awards to employees, thereby enabling us to compete more effectively for talented individuals and key employees with experience in the enterprise software industry.
In connection with the program, in November 2010 we granted restricted stock unit awards of 49,103 shares to each of Messrs. Maritz, Eschenbach, McAniff, Nielsen and Peek. The grant date fair value for each award, calculated in accordance with applicable accounting standards, was $3,866,370.
36
Ms. Smith received a restricted stock unit award of 18,413 shares, with a grant date fair value of $1,449,840. The grants each vest ratably over four years with an initial 12-month cliff and thereafter on each subsequent six-month anniversary until fully vested in November 2014.
Mr. Maritz recommended, and the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee awarded, grants of equal size to Messrs. Eschenbach, McAniff, Nielsen and Peek that were at above-market levels relative to our peer group in order to help ensure stability and promote parity in the long term compensation of the senior management team who will provide leadership for the Company in its next phase of growth and in recognition of the increased responsibilities they were being asked to undertake. In determining the size of the grants to our Named Executive Officers, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee also took into account a number of factors, including Radford survey data, data from FWC on grant values for long term incentive grants awarded to executives in similar positions at companies in our peer group, total Named Executive Officer compensation, the value of then-outstanding grants held by each Named Executive Officer and the retention value of the grants.
At Mr. Maritz's request, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee awarded him an equity award of the same size as the grants he recommended for Messrs. Eschenbach, McAniff, Nielsen and Peek rather than the larger grant premium typically awarded to a chief executive officer. Doing so enabled the committee to make top percentile grants as measured in value when compared against our competitive peer group to Messrs. Eschenbach, McAniff, Nielsen and Peek while keeping the aggregate value of grants to the entire leadership team in the third quartile, as Mr. Maritz' grant was at the 25th percentile in value and Ms. Smith's grant was in the median range.
Other than as discussed above, no other equity grants were made to our Named Executive Officers during 2010.
Benefits and Perquisites
We do not generally provide executive-level benefits or perquisites to our Named Executive Officers.
Post-Termination Compensation
As discussed above, stock-based awards are an important element of the compensation packages that we offer to recruit and retain executive officers. In order to induce certain of our Named Executive Officers to forego their compensation benefits with their former employers to join us, we agreed to accelerate the equity award grants made to them in connection with their hiring under certain circumstances should they be involuntarily terminated. Mr. Nielsen's agreement with us entitles him to acceleration of vesting of one-half of the equity awards that were granted to him in connection with his hiring that remain unvested if within the first 12 months following a change in control, he is terminated without "cause" or he terminates his employment for "good reason" (each as defined in his offer letter). Both Mr. McAniff's and Ms. Smith's agreements with us provide that if there is a change in control, and we terminate the Named Executive Officer's employment without "cause" or the Named Executive Officer terminates his or her employment for "good reason" (each as defined in their offer letters) during the 12 months following the change in control, all unvested equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officer in connection with his or her hiring will become fully vested. In addition, both agreements provide for acceleration of vesting of one-half of all equity awards granted to the Named Executive Officer in connection with his or her hiring in the event of his or her termination without cause or his or her termination of employment for good reason. We currently do not have any change in control or severance arrangements with Messrs. Maritz, Eschenbach and Peek.
37
We provide death benefits and disability insurance to all of our employees including our Named Executive Officers. VMware stock options and restricted stock units also fully vest in the event of death or termination of employment due to disability.
Tax Deductibility
Section 162(m) of the Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public corporations for compensation greater than $1 million paid for any fiscal year to the corporation's chief executive officer and certain other executive officers. However, performance-based compensation is not subject to the $1 million deduction limit if certain requirements are met. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee may consider the impact of Section 162(m) when designing our cash and equity bonus program, but may elect to provide compensation that is not fully deductible as a result of Section 162(m) if it determines this is in our best interests. The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee structured our 2010 Executive Bonus Plan for our Named Executive Officers to allow it to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m). The restricted stock units granted in 2010 do not qualify as performance-based compensation.
Hedging Policy
We have adopted a policy prohibiting any of our directors or employees, including our Named Executive Officers, from "hedging" their ownership in shares of our common stock or other equity-based interests in us, including by engaging in short sales or trading in derivative securities relating to our common stock and the common stock of EMC.
Compensation Recovery Policies
Our 2010 Executive Bonus Program for our executive officers, including our Named Executive Officers, was adopted as a sub-plan of the 2007 Equity and Incentive Plan. The 2007 Plan includes provisions that allow us to cancel outstanding equity awards or "clawback" the value of cash bonus awards recently realized if an officer, including each of our Named Executive Officers, engages in activity determined to be detrimental to VMware. Additionally, our 2010 Executive Bonus Program includes an incentive compensation recovery provision under which we can require reimbursement of any bonus paid under the plan where payment was predicated on financial results that were subject to a significant restatement and the individual engaged in fraud or misconduct that caused or partially caused the restatement. The policy applies to payments made within three years of the date when the applicable restatement is disclosed.
38
COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The table below summarizes the compensation information for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 for our Named Executive Officersour Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer, the three other most highly compensated individuals who were serving as executive officers of VMware at the end of fiscal year 2010 and one additional person, who served as an executive officer during a portion of 2010 and would have been among VMware's three other most highly compensated officers had he been an executive officer at the end of the fiscal year. The amounts shown in the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns do not reflect compensation actually received by the Named Executive Officer, but instead include the aggregate grant date value of awards computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards.
Name and Principal Position
|
Year | Salary ($)(1) |
Bonus ($) |
Stock Awards(2) ($) |
Option Awards(2) ($) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(3) ($) |
All Other Compensation ($) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paul A. Maritz |
2010 | 750,000 | 0 | 3,866,370 | 0 | 885,000 | 0 | 5,501,370 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
2009 | 778,518 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 925,125 | 31,624 | 1,735,267 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2008 | 358,178 | 0 | 0 | 26,060,171 | 405,557 | 15,944 | 26,839,850 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mark S. Peek |
2010 |
456,250 |
0 |
3,866,370 |
0 |
513,625 |
3,500 |
(4) |
4,839,745 |
|||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer and |
2009 | 418,654 | 0 | 0 | 951,550 | 443,400 | 21,750 | 1,835,354 | ||||||||||||||||||
Co-President, Business |
2008 | 400,000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 195,350 | 89,705 | 685,055 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carl M. Eschenbach |
2010 |
550,000 |
0 |
3,866,370 |
0 |
649,000 |
10,516 |
(6) |
5,075,886 |
|||||||||||||||||
Co-President, Customer |
2009 | 622,981 | 50,000 | 0 | 475,775 | 678,425 | 750 | 1,827,931 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operations(5) |
2008 | 525,000 | 0 | 935,105 | 870,081 | 244,188 | 16,943 | 2,591,317 | ||||||||||||||||||
Richard J. McAniff |
2010 |
410,000 |
0 |
3,866,370 |
0 |
471,300 |
0 |
4,747,670 |
||||||||||||||||||
Co-President, Products and |
2009 | 308,625 | 550,000 | 7,059,400 | 2,250,031 | 393,800 | 18,822 | 10,580,678 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chief Development Officer |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
T. Tod Nielsen |
2010 |
600,000 |
0 |
3,866,370 |
0 |
708,000 |
7,940 |
(7) |
5,182,310 |
|||||||||||||||||
Co-President, Applications |
2009 | 612,829 | 120,000 | 5,018,000 | 3,155,960 | 733,470 | 265,576 | 9,905,835 | ||||||||||||||||||
Platform |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S. Dawn Smith |
2010 |
407,500 |
0 |
1,449,840 |
0 |
358,163 |
3,500 |
(4) |
2,219,003 |
|||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President, |
2009 | 104,615 | 148,038 | 1,576,750 | 1,197,792 | 113,613 | 0 | 3,140,808 | ||||||||||||||||||
General Counsel, Chief |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compliance Officer and |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secretary |
39
The following table sets forth information concerning non-equity incentive plan grants to our Named Executive Officers under our 2010 Executive Bonus Program during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and stock awards and option awards to our Named Executive Officers granted during 2010. For further information on our non-equity incentive plan grants, see "Compensation Discussion and AnalysisAnnual Performance-Based Bonus." The actual amounts realized in respect of the non-equity plan incentive awards during the 2010 fiscal year are reported in the Summary Compensation Table under the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column.
|
|
|
Estimated Possible Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) |
|
|||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Type | Grant Date | Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($)(2) |
|||||||||||||||
Paul A. Maritz |
H1 Bonus | 2/8/10 | 225,000 | 375,000 | 750,000 | ||||||||||||||||
|
H2 Bonus | 8/4/10 | 225,000 | 375,000 | 750,000 | ||||||||||||||||
|
RSU Grant | 11/15/10 | 49,103 | 3,866,370 | |||||||||||||||||
Mark S. Peek |
H1 Bonus |
2/8/10 |
120,000 |
200,000 |
400,000 |
||||||||||||||||
|
H2 Bonus | 8/4/10 | 142,500 | 237,500 | 475,000 | ||||||||||||||||
|
RSU Grant | 11/15/10 | 49,103 | 3,866,370 | |||||||||||||||||
Carl M. Eschenbach |
H1 Bonus |
2/8/10 |
165,000 |
275,000 |
550,000 |
||||||||||||||||
|
H2 Bonus | 8/4/10 | 165,000 | 275,000 | 550,000 | ||||||||||||||||
|
RSU Grant | 11/15/10 | 49,103 | 3,866,370 | |||||||||||||||||
Richard J. McAniff |
H1 Bonus |
2/8/10 |
117,000 |
195,000 |
390,000 |
||||||||||||||||
|
H2 Bonus | 8/4/10 | 123,000 | 205,000 | 410,000 | ||||||||||||||||
|
RSU Grant | 11/15/10 | 49,103 | 3,866,370 | |||||||||||||||||
T. Tod Nielsen |
H1 Bonus |
2/8/10 |
180,000 |
300,000 |
600,000 |
||||||||||||||||
|
H2 Bonus | 8/4/10 | 180,000 | 300,000 | 600,000 | ||||||||||||||||
|
RSU Grant | 11/15/10 | 49,103 | 3,866,370 | |||||||||||||||||
S. Dawn Smith |
H1 Bonus |
2/8/10 |
90,000 |
150,000 |
300,000 |
||||||||||||||||
|
H2 Bonus | 8/4/10 | 92,250 | 153,750 | 307,500 | ||||||||||||||||
|
RSU Grant | 11/15/10 | 18,413 | 1,449,840 |
40
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth information concerning stock options and stock awards held by our Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2010.
The market values for unvested stock awards are calculated based on a market value of $88.91 of our Class A common stock (the closing market price of VMware's Class A common stock on December 31, 2010) multiplied by the number of shares subject to the award.
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Option Expiration Date |
Grant Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock Held That Have Not Vested (#) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock Held That have Not Vested ($) |
|||||||||||||||||
Paul A. Maritz |
9/10/08 | (1) | 562,499 | 437,501 | 33.95 | 9/10/14 | 11/15/10 | (3) | 49,103 | 4,365,748 | |||||||||||||||
|
8/12/09 | (2) | 731,723 | 708,283 | 31.59 | 8/12/15 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mark S. Peek |
6/8/07 |
(4) |
5,208 |
31,251 |
23.00 |
6/8/13 |
11/15/10 |
(3) |
49,103 |
4,365,748 |
|||||||||||||||
|
6/15/09 | (5) | 37,499 | 62,501 | 30.80 | 6/15/15 | |||||||||||||||||||
Carl M. Eschenbach |
5/3/06 |
(6) |
0 |
15,290 |
21.87 |
5/3/16 |
9/10/08 |
(9) |
50,000 |
4,445,500 |
|||||||||||||||
|
6/8/07 | (7) | 0 | 43,751 | 23.00 | 6/8/13 | 11/15/10 | (3) | 49,103 | 4,365,748 | |||||||||||||||
|
6/15/09 | (8) | 0 | 31,251 | 30.80 | 6/15/15 | |||||||||||||||||||
Richard J. McAniff |
4/14/09 |
(10) |
52,916 |
137,084 |
30.04 |
4/14/15 |
4/14/09 |
(11) |
176,250 |
15,670,388 |
|||||||||||||||
|
11/15/10 | (3) | 49,103 | 4,365,748 | |||||||||||||||||||||
T. Tod Nielsen |
2/13/09 |
(12) |
8,334 |
216,667 |
25.09 |
2/13/15 |
2/13/09 |
(13) |
150,000 |
13,336,500 |
|||||||||||||||
|
11/15/10 | (3) | 49,103 | 4,365,748 | |||||||||||||||||||||
S. Dawn Smith |
10/14/09 |
(14) |
0 |
63,751 |
45.05 |
10/14/15 |
10/14/09 |
(15) |
26,250 |
2,333,888 |
|||||||||||||||
|
11/15/10 | (16) | 18,413 | 1,637,100 |
41
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth information regarding stock options and stock awards exercised and vested, respectively, for our Named Executive Officers during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
|
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized Upon Exercise ($)(1) |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) |
Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2) |
|||||||||
Paul A. Maritz |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Mark S. Peek |
213,541 | 10,071,698 | 144,405 | 9,754,558 | |||||||||
Carl M. Eschenbach |
136,121 | 6,580,784 | 25,000 | 2,039,500 | |||||||||
Richard J. McAniff |
45,000 | 2,551,050 | 58,750 | 3,328,188 | |||||||||
T. Tod Nielsen |
174,999 | 9,885,323 | 50,000 | 2,327,000 | |||||||||
S. Dawn Smith |
26,249 | 819,515 | 8,750 | 701,313 |
42
VMware does not provide pension benefits to its Named Executive Officers.
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
VMware's Named Executive Officers are not provided with a nonqualified deferred compensation plan.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The information below describes the compensation and benefits due to each of our Named Executive Officers in the event of termination of employment or a change in control under the circumstances described below. Except as noted below, all unvested stock awards will terminate upon any termination of employment. The vested portions of all stock options generally remain exercisable for a period of three months following the date of termination unless termination is for cause, in which case any unexercised stock options terminate immediately.
Voluntary Termination
A Named Executive Officer who voluntarily terminates employment is not entitled to any compensation or benefits other than those that are paid to all employees upon any termination of employment.
Involuntary Termination For Cause
A Named Executive Officer whose employment is terminated for cause is not entitled to any compensation or benefits other than those that are paid to all employees upon any termination of employment.
Involuntary Termination Without Cause or Resignation For Good Reason
Except as provided in their employment offer letters, a Named Executive Officer whose employment is involuntarily terminated without cause or who terminates his or her employment for good reason is not entitled to any benefits other than those that are paid to all employees upon any termination of employment. The employment offer letters for Ms. Smith and Mr. McAniff provide for the acceleration of vesting of one-half of the unvested equity awards granted to them in connection with their hiring in the event of involuntary termination without cause or termination of employment for good reason. The provision of any additional compensation and benefits would be made at the discretion of the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee.
Change in Control
Our Named Executive Officers do not have change in control agreements. However, certain of our Named Executive Officers are contractually entitled to compensation or benefits if they are involuntarily terminated other than for cause or terminate their employment for good reason following a change in control.
Mr. Nielsen's offer letter provides that if there is a change in control of VMware, and we terminate his employment other than for cause or he terminates his employment for good reason during the 12 months following the change in control, one-half of the unvested equity awards granted to him in connection with his hiring will become fully vested.
Both Mr. McAniff's and Ms. Smith's offer letters provide that if there is a change in control of VMware, and we terminate the officer's employment other than for cause or the officer terminates his
43
or her employment for good reason during the 12 months following the change in control, all unvested equity awards granted to the officer in connection with his or her hiring will become fully vested.
Death
Upon an employee's death, the employee's survivors will continue to receive the employee's base salary for six months, and we will make a $10,000 contribution to a tax-qualified education fund in respect of each of the deceased employee's minor children. This benefit is provided to all employees generally. For those employees who hold equity awards granted under our 2007 Plan, including our Named Executive Officers, unvested stock options and stock awards will immediately vest and all options held by the employee prior to his or her death will remain exercisable for three years thereafter.
Disability
We do not have guidelines for providing compensation or benefits upon an employee's disability other than providing the benefits that are provided to all employees generally upon any termination of employment. For those employees who hold equity awards granted under the 2007 Plan, including our Named Executive Officers, unvested stock options and stock awards will immediately vest, and all options held by an employee prior to his or her termination for disability will remain exercisable for three years thereafter.
Retirement
We do not provide any retirement benefits to our Named Executive Officers, other than matching 401(k) plan contributions to the extent that they are provided to all employees who participate in our 401(k) plan. Effective July 2010, the maximum matching contribution available to all employees participating in our 401(k) plan is $1,000 per fiscal quarter.
44
Potential Payments Tables
The following table shows the potential payments and benefits that would have been provided upon termination under each of the scenarios discussed above if such termination had occurred on December 31, 2010. The actual amounts to be paid can only be determined at the time of the termination of employment. Excluded are benefits of equal value provided to all employees, such as payments upon an employee's death.
|
Cash Severance ($) |
VMware In-the- Money Value of Accelerated Stock Options ($)(1) |
VMware Value of Accelerated Restricted Stock Units ($)(2) |
Total Value: Incremental Benefits ($) |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Paul A. Maritz |
||||||||||||||
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following Change in Control |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
Death or Disability |
0 | 64,643,837 | 4,365,748 | 69,009,585 | ||||||||||
Mark S. Peek |
||||||||||||||
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following Change in Control |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
Death or Disability |
0 | 5,691,687 | 4,365,748 | 10,057,435 | ||||||||||
Carl M. Eschenbach |
||||||||||||||
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following Change in Control |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
Death or Disability |
0 | 5,724,666 | 8,811,248 | 14,535,914 | ||||||||||
Richard J. McAniff |
||||||||||||||
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason |
0 | 4,035,068 | 7,835,194 | 11,870,262 | ||||||||||
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following Change in Control |
0 | 8,070,135 | 15,670,388 | 23,740,523 | ||||||||||
Death or Disability |
0 | 8,070,135 | 20,036,135 | 28,106,270 | ||||||||||
T. Tod Nielsen |
||||||||||||||
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following Change in Control |
0 | 6,913,844 | 6,668,250 | 13,582,094 | ||||||||||
Death or Disability |
0 | 13,827,688 | 17,702,248 | 31,529,936 | ||||||||||
S. Dawn Smith |
||||||||||||||
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason |
0 | 1,398,059 | 1,166,944 | 2,565,003 | ||||||||||
Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason following Change in Control |
0 | 2,796,119 | 2,333,888 | 5,130,007 | ||||||||||
Death or Disability |
0 | 2,796,119 | 3,970,987 | 6,767,106 |
45
Indemnification Agreements and Director and Officer Insurance
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws generally provide for mandatory indemnification of directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by law. We have also entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and executive officers that will generally provide for mandatory indemnification to the fullest extent permitted by law. In addition, our executive officers and directors are insured under an officers and directors liability insurance policy.
46
COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE REPORT
The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material," to be "filed" with the SEC or be subject to Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C (other than as provided in Item 407 of Regulation S-K) or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC except to the extent that VMware specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee of VMware, Inc. has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on such review and discussions, the Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.
COMPENSATION AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE David N. Strohm, Chair Michael W. Brown Dennis D. Powell |
47
The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates the appropriate level and form of compensation for non-employee directors at least annually and recommends changes to the Board of Directors when appropriate. During 2010, non-employee directors were eligible for the following compensation:
We also reimburse our directors for reasonable expenses in connection with performing their duties as directors, such as attendance at Board of Directors and committee meetings.
In addition, during 2010, non-employee directors were eligible to receive the following equity grants:
Effective as of our 2011 Annual Meeting, non-employee directors will be eligible for the following annual compensation and equity grant:
The Compensation and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted stock ownership guidelines for our non-employee directors. Under the guidelines, each non-employee director who receives equity grants from us is required to hold 5,000 shares of our Class A common stock. If a director does not yet meet the holding requirement, the director must hold an amount of shares equal to 50% of the net shares acquired from us as compensation for director services. As of the date of this proxy statement, the holdings of each non-employee director are sufficient to comply with this policy.
We do not provide compensation to Mr. Tucci and Mr. Goulden for their service on our Board of Directors because they are officers of EMC. Additionally, Ms. James, who was initially elected to our Board of Directors after being designated for her position pursuant to an agreement we entered into with Intel in connection with Intel Capital's investment in us, has elected not to receive compensation for her service on our Board of Directors. Accordingly, Mr. Tucci, Ms. James and Mr. Goulden are not subject to the stock ownership guidelines established for our non-employee directors.
48
The table below summarizes the compensation paid by us to non-employee directors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010:
Name
|
Fees Paid(1) ($) |
Option Awards(2) ($) |
Restricted Stock Unit Awards(2) ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joseph M. Tucci(3) |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Michael W. Brown(4)(5)(6)(7) |
81,164 | 108,236 | 120,680 | 310,080 | |||||||||
John R. Egan(3)(6)(7) |
66,164 | 108,236 | 120,680 | 295,080 | |||||||||
David I. Goulden(3) |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Renee J. James(4) |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Dennis D. Powell(4)(5)(7) |
68,664 | 108,236 | 120,680 | 297,580 | |||||||||
David N. Strohm(3)(5)(6)(7) |
76,164 | 108,236 | 120,680 | 305,080 |
The table below shows the aggregate numbers of unvested VMware stock awards and option awards outstanding for each non-employee director as of December 31, 2010.
Name
|
Unvested Restricted Stock Unit Awards |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joseph M. Tucci |
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Michael W. Brown |
1,000 | 15,000 | 3,000 | |||||||
John R. Egan |
1,000 | 15,000 | 3,000 | |||||||
David I. Goulden |
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Renee J. James |
0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Dennis D. Powell |
1,000 | 27,000 | 3,000 | |||||||
David N. Strohm |
1,000 | 15,000 | 3,000 |
49
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
From time to time, we may enter into transactions in which "related persons" (as defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K adopted by the SEC under the federal securities laws) could be deemed to have a direct or indirect material interest. Related persons include our directors and executive officers, their immediate family members and stockholders beneficially owning more than five percent of either class of our common stock. We may enter into such transactions in the ordinary course of business in connection with the design, development, marketing, sales and distribution of our products and in the administration and oversight of our business operations.
We have adopted a written policy and procedures for the review, approval and ratification of transactions involving related persons. We recognize that transactions with related persons may present potential or actual conflicts of interest or an appearance of impropriety. Additionally, such transactions must be fair to us in accordance with applicable Delaware corporate law. Accordingly, as a general matter, it is our policy to closely assess and evaluate transactions with related persons. Our policy provides that transactions with related persons are subject to review by our Audit Committee.
The policy covers all transactions, arrangements or relationships (or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships), in which we or any of our subsidiaries is or will be a participant, in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and in which any related person has or may have a direct or indirect material interest. An investor may obtain a written copy of this policy by sending a request to Attention: Legal Department, VMware Inc., 3401 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304.
Additionally, ownership interests of our directors or officers in the common stock of EMC, or service as both a director of EMC and VMware, or as a director of VMware and an officer or employee of EMC could create, or appear to create potential conflicts of interest when directors and officers are faced with decisions that could have different implications for us and EMC. In order to address potential conflicts of interest between us and EMC with respect to corporate opportunities, our certificate of incorporation contains provisions regulating and defining the conduct of our affairs as they may involve EMC and its officers and directors, and our powers, rights, duties and liabilities and those of our officers, directors and stockholders in connection with our relationship with EMC. Our certificate of incorporation also contains provisions limiting the liability of our directors or officers who are also directors or officers of EMC in the event they learn of a transaction that may be a corporate opportunity for both us and EMC, provided they comply with the policies set forth in our certificate of incorporation. For more information, see "Transactions with Related PersonsOur Relationship with EMC Corporation."
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
Our Relationship with EMC Corporation
Prior to our IPO in August 2007, we operated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of EMC. EMC continues to be our majority stockholder and we are considered a "controlled company" under the NYSE Rules. EMC has the power, acting alone, to approve any action requiring a vote of the majority of our voting shares and to elect all our directors. In addition, until the first date on which EMC or its successor-in-interest ceases to beneficially own 20% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock, the prior affirmative vote or written consent of EMC as the holder of our Class B common stock or its successor-in-interest will be required for us to authorize a number of significant actions.
As described in "Our Board of Directors and Nominees," two members of our Board of Directors are executive officers of EMC. The Chairman of our Board, Joseph Tucci, is the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of EMC and David Goulden is the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of EMC.
50
Overview
We operated as a wholly owned subsidiary of EMC from January 2004 to August 17, 2007, the closing date of our IPO. In April 2007, we declared an $800 million dividend to EMC in the form of a note payable. The note matures in April 2012 and bears an interest rate of the 90-day LIBOR plus 55 basis points (0.85% as of December 31, 2010), with interest payable quarterly in arrears, commencing June 30, 2007. The interest rate on the note payable resets quarterly, two business days prior to the first day of each fiscal quarter. We may repay the note, without penalty, at any time commencing July 2007. In August 2007, we used a portion of the net proceeds from our IPO of Class A common stock to repay to EMC $350 million of this note payable. In 2010, we recorded $4.1 million of interest expense related to the note in our financial statements.
Subsequent to our IPO, we continue to be a majority-owned and controlled subsidiary of EMC, our results of operations and financial position are consolidated with EMC's financial statements, we continue to receive various administrative services from EMC, we have entered into agreements regarding EMC's and our intellectual property and real estate and we and EMC sell goods and services as vendors to one another. Additionally, in geographic areas where we have not established our own subsidiaries, we contract with EMC subsidiaries for support services and EMC employees who are managed by our personnel. As described further below, our relationship with EMC includes the following aspects:
As reported in our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 28, 2011, during 2010:
51
$144.3 million of income taxes receivable due from EMC, which is included in other current assets on our consolidated balance sheets.
EMC as our Controlling Stockholder
As of the close of business on March 31, 2011, EMC owned approximately 79.76% of our common stock (approximately 28.34% of our Class A common stock and 100% of our Class B common stock) and controlled approximately 97.29% of the combined voting power of our common stock. For as long as EMC or its successor-in-interest continues to control more than 50% of the combined voting power of our common stock, EMC or its successor-in-interest will be able to direct the election of all the members of our Board of Directors and exercise control over our business and affairs, including any determinations with respect to mergers or other business combinations involving us, the acquisition or disposition of assets, the incurrence of indebtedness, the issuance of any additional common stock or other equity securities, and the payment of dividends with respect to our common stock. Similarly, EMC or its successor-in-interest will have the power to determine matters submitted to a vote of our stockholders without the consent of our other stockholders, will have the power to prevent a change in control of us and will have the power to take other actions that might be favorable to EMC or its successor-in-interest.
Certain of EMC's rights as our majority stockholder arise from being the sole holder of our Class B common stock, which has certain voting rights greater than the voting rights of our Class A common stock. Holders of our Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share of Class B common stock on all matters except for the election of our Group II directors, in which case they are entitled to one vote per share, whereas holders of our Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share of Class A common stock in all cases. The holders of Class B common stock, voting separately as a class, are entitled to elect 80% of the total number of directors on our Board of Directors that we would have if there were no vacancies on our Board of Directors at the time. These are our Group I directors. The holders of Class A common stock and the holders of Class B common stock, voting together as a single class, are entitled to elect our remaining directors, which at no time will be less than one directorour Group II director(s). Accordingly, the holders of our Class B common stock currently are entitled to elect 7 of our 8 directors. If EMC transfers shares of our Class B common stock to any party other than a successor-in-interest or a subsidiary of EMC (other than in a distribution to its stockholders under Section 355 of the Code, or in transfers following such a distribution), those shares will automatically convert into Class A common stock. For so long as EMC or its successor-in-interest beneficially owns shares of our common stock representing at least a
52
majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of outstanding voting stock, EMC will be able to elect all of the members of our Board of Directors.
Our certificate of incorporation also contains provisions that require that as long as EMC beneficially owns at least 20% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock, the prior affirmative vote or written consent of EMC (or its successor-in-interest) as the holder of the Class B common stock is required (subject in each case to certain exceptions) in order to authorize us to:
Beneficial ownership of at least 80% of the total voting power and value of our outstanding common stock is required in order for EMC to continue to include us in its consolidated group for federal income tax purposes (the "Consolidated Group"), and beneficial ownership of at least 80% of the total voting power is required in order for EMC to effect a tax-free spin-off of us or certain other tax-free transactions. We have been included in EMC's consolidated group for U.S. federal income tax purposes. We have agreed that for so long as EMC or its successor-in-interest continues to own greater than 50% of the voting control of our outstanding common stock, we will not knowingly take or fail to take any action that could reasonably be expected to preclude EMC's or its successor-in-interest's ability to undertake a tax-free spin-off.
In order to address potential conflicts of interest between us and EMC with respect to corporate opportunities that are otherwise permitted to be undertaken by us, our certificate of incorporation contains provisions regulating and defining the conduct of our affairs as they may involve EMC and its officers and directors, and our powers, rights, duties and liabilities and those of our officers, directors and stockholders in connection with our relationship with EMC. In general, these provisions recognize that, subject to the limitations related to our technology and product development and marketing activities, we and EMC may engage in the same or similar business activities and lines of business, may have an interest in the same areas of corporate opportunities and will continue to have contractual and business relations with each other. It is also contemplated that officers and directors of EMC may also serve as officers and directors of VMware, and vice versa.
Our certificate of incorporation provides that, subject to the limitations related to our technology and product development and marketing activities, EMC will have no duty to refrain from:
Our certificate of incorporation provides that if EMC acquires knowledge of a potential transaction or matter which may be a corporate opportunity for both us and EMC, EMC will have no
53
duty to communicate or present such corporate opportunity to us, and we will, to the fullest extent permitted by law, renounce any interest or expectancy in any such opportunity and waive any claim that such corporate opportunity be presented to us. EMC will have satisfied its fiduciary duty with respect to such a corporate opportunity and will not be liable to us or our stockholders for breach of any fiduciary duty as our stockholder by reason of the fact that EMC acquires or seeks the corporate opportunity for itself, directs that corporate opportunity to another person or does not present that corporate opportunity to us.
If one of our directors or officers who is also a director or officer of EMC learns of a potential transaction or matter that may be a corporate opportunity for both us and EMC and which may be properly pursued by us pursuant to the limitations related to our technology and product development and marketing activities, our certificate of incorporation provides that the director or officer will have satisfied his or her fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders, will not be liable for breach of fiduciary duties to us and our stockholders with respect to such corporate opportunity, and will be deemed not to have derived an improper personal economic gain from such corporate opportunity if the director or officer acts in good faith in a manner consistent with the following policy:
The foregoing limitation of liability provisions are not intended to be an allocation of corporate opportunities between us and EMC. For purposes of our certificate of incorporation, "corporate opportunities" are limited to business opportunities permitted by the provisions related to our technology and product development and marketing activities and, subject to this limitation, include business opportunities which we are financially able to undertake, which are, from their nature, in our line of business, are of practical advantage to us and are ones in which we have an interest or a reasonable expectancy, and in which, by embracing the opportunities, the self-interest of EMC or its officers or directors will be brought into conflict with our self-interest.
The corporate opportunity provisions in our certificate of incorporation will continue in effect until the later of (1) EMC or its successor-in-interest ceasing to beneficially own 20% or more of the outstanding shares of our common stock and (2) the date upon which no VMware officer or director is also an officer or director of EMC or its successor-in-interest. The vote of at least 80% of the votes entitled to be cast are required to amend, alter, change or repeal these corporate opportunity provisions.
54
Master Transaction Agreement and Ancillary Agreements
At the time of our IPO, we and EMC entered into certain agreements governing various interim and ongoing relationships between us. These agreements include:
The agreements summarized below were filed as exhibits to the registration statement relating to our IPO. You are encouraged to read the full text of these material agreements. We entered into these agreements with EMC in the context of our relationship with EMC as our parent and controlling stockholder. The prices and other terms of these agreements were designed to be consistent with the requirements of Section 482 of the Code and related U.S. Treasury Regulations with respect to transactions between related parties.
Master Transaction Agreement
The master transaction agreement contains key provisions relating to our ongoing relationship with EMC. Unless otherwise required by the specific provisions of the agreement, the master transaction agreement will terminate on a date that is five years after the first date on which EMC ceases to own shares representing at least 20% of our common stock. The provisions of the master transaction agreement related to our cooperation with EMC in connection with future litigation will survive seven years after the termination of the agreement, and provisions related to confidential information and indemnification by us and EMC will survive indefinitely.
Registration Rights. Pursuant to the master transaction agreement, at the request of EMC, we will use our reasonable best efforts to register shares of our common stock that are held or subsequently acquired by EMC for public sale under the 1933 Securities Act, as amended (the "Securities Act"). EMC may request up to two registrations in any calendar year. We also provide EMC with "piggy-back" rights to include its shares in future registrations by us of our securities under the Securities Act. There is no limit on the number of these "piggy-back" registrations in which EMC may request its shares be included.
EMC may not transfer its registration rights other than to an affiliate. EMC's registration rights will terminate on the earlier of the date on which EMC has sold or transferred all of its shares of our common stock deemed "restricted securities" or our common stock held by EMC may be sold without restriction pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act.
We have agreed to cooperate in these registrations and related offerings. All expenses payable in connection with such registrations will be paid by us, including the fees and expenses of one firm of legal counsel chosen by EMC, except that EMC will pay all its own internal administrative costs and underwriting discounts and commissions applicable to the sale of its shares of our common stock.
55
Future Distributions. Additionally, we have agreed to cooperate, at our expense, with EMC to accomplish a distribution by EMC of our common stock, and we have agreed to promptly take any and all actions necessary or desirable to effect any such distribution. EMC will determine, in its sole discretion, whether such distribution shall occur, the date of the distribution and the form, structure, and all other terms of any transaction to effect the distribution. A distribution may not occur at all. At any time prior to completion of the distribution, EMC may decide to abandon the distribution, or may modify or change the terms of the distribution, which could have the effect of accelerating or delaying the timing of the distribution.
Anti-Dilution Option. Pursuant to the master transaction agreement, we have granted EMC a continuing right to purchase from us shares of Class A common stock and Class B common stock at fair market value as determined in accordance with the agreement in order to maintain EMC's respective percentage ownership interests in our Class A common stock and Class B common stock following our IPO. This option may not be exercised by EMC in connection with any issuance by us of any shares pursuant to any stock option or other executive or employee compensation plan, except where such issuance would cause EMC's percentage ownership of common stock to fall below 80.1%.
Restrictive Covenants. Under the master transaction agreement, we have agreed to obtain the consent of the holders of our Class B common stock prior to taking certain actions, including those set forth above as requiring approval under our certificate of incorporation.
Indemnification. The master transaction agreement provides for cross-indemnities that generally will place the financial responsibility on us and our subsidiaries for all liabilities associated with the current and historical VMware business and operations, and generally will place on EMC the financial responsibility for liabilities associated with all of EMC's other current and historical businesses and operations, in each case regardless of the time those liabilities arise. The master transaction agreement also contains indemnification provisions under which we and EMC each indemnify the other with respect to breaches of the master transaction agreement or any intercompany agreement.
In addition to the general indemnification obligations described above relating to the current and historical VMware and EMC businesses and operations, we and EMC have agreed to cross-indemnify each other against liabilities arising from any misstatements or omissions in one another's SEC filings and from information each of us provides to the other specifically for inclusion in the other party's annual or quarterly reports, but only to the extent that the information pertains to the party providing the information or its business or to the extent the party filing the SEC report provides the party supplying the information with prior written notice that the information will be included in its annual or quarterly reports and the liability does not result from the action or inaction of the party filing the report.
Accounting Matters; Legal Policies. Under the master transaction agreement, we agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to use the same independent auditors selected by EMC and to maintain the same fiscal year as EMC until such time as EMC is no longer required to consolidate our results of operations and financial position (determined in accordance with GAAP consistently applied). We also agreed to use our reasonable best efforts to complete our audit and provide EMC with all financial and other information on a timely basis such that EMC may meet its deadlines for its filing annual and quarterly financial statements.
Additionally, for as long as EMC is providing us with legal services under the administrative services agreement, the master transaction agreement will require us to comply with all EMC policies and directives identified by EMC as critical to legal and regulatory compliance and to not adopt legal or regulatory policies or directives inconsistent with the policies identified by EMC.
56
Administrative Services Agreement
Under the administrative services agreement, EMC may provide us with services and resources, including tax, accounting, treasury, legal and human resources services. For such time as the administrative services agreement is in effect, EMC and VMware may agree on additional services to be included in the administrative services agreement. EMC is to provide us with services with substantially the same degree of skill and care as such services are performed within EMC. We will pay fees to EMC for the services rendered based on the number and total cost of the EMC employees required to provide services, or as may otherwise be agreed.
The initial term of the administrative services agreement expired on September 30, 2007 and extends automatically for additional three-month terms unless terminated by one of the parties. We have the right to terminate any of the services provided by EMC under the administrative services agreement at any time upon 30 day prior written notice of termination to EMC.
Furthermore, we have agreed in the administrative services agreement that we will be responsible for, and will indemnify EMC with respect to, our own losses for property damage or personal injury in connection with the services provided, except to the extent that such losses are caused by the gross negligence, breach, bad faith or willful misconduct of EMC. As of December 31, 2010, we provide most of the services subject to the Administrative Services Agreement for ourselves. However, the agreement has not been terminated and remains in effect.
Tax Sharing Agreement
We have been included in the Consolidated Group as well as in certain consolidated, combined or unitary groups that include EMC and/or certain of its subsidiaries (a "Combined Group") for state and local income tax purposes. We entered into a new tax sharing agreement that became effective upon consummation of our IPO. Pursuant to the tax sharing agreement, we and EMC generally will make payments to each other such that, with respect to tax returns for any taxable period in which we or any of our subsidiaries are included in the Consolidated Group or any Combined Group, the amount of taxes to be paid by us is determined, subject to certain adjustments, as if we and our subsidiaries included in the Consolidated Group or Combined Group filed our own consolidated, combined or unitary tax return. EMC prepares pro forma tax returns for us with respect to any tax return filed with respect to the Consolidated Group or any Combined Group in order to determine the amount of tax sharing payments under the tax sharing agreement. We are responsible for any taxes with respect to tax returns that include only us and our subsidiaries. During the first quarter of 2011, we amended the tax sharing agreement to provide that intercompany payments due to one another under the tax sharing agreement would be made on a quarterly, rather than annual, basis.
EMC is primarily responsible for controlling and contesting any audit or other tax proceeding with respect to the Consolidated Group or any Combined Group. Disputes arising between the parties relating to matters covered by the tax sharing agreement are subject to resolution through specific dispute resolution provisions.
We are included in the Consolidated Group for periods in which EMC owned at least 80% of the total voting power and value of our outstanding stock. EMC, during any part of a consolidated return year, is liable for the tax on the consolidated return of such year, except for such taxes related to (i) our separate tax liability and (ii) our business and operations, of such year and for any subsequently determined deficiency thereon. Similarly, in some jurisdictions, each member of a consolidated, combined or unitary group for state, local or foreign income tax purposes is jointly and severally liable for the state, local or foreign income tax liability of each other member of the consolidated, combined or unitary group. Accordingly, although the tax sharing agreement allocates tax liabilities between us and EMC, for any period in which we were included in the Consolidated Group or a Combined Group,
57
we could be liable in the event that any income tax liability was incurred, but not discharged, by any other member of the Consolidated Group or a Combined Group.
Our and EMC's respective rights, responsibilities and obligations with respect to any possible spin-off of our stock to EMC stockholders are set forth in the tax sharing agreement. If EMC were to decide to pursue a possible spin-off, we have agreed to cooperate with EMC and to take any and all actions reasonably requested by EMC in connection with such a transaction. We have also agreed not to knowingly take or fail to take any actions that could reasonably be expected to preclude EMC's ability to undertake a tax-free spin-off. In the event EMC completes a spin-off, we have agreed not to take certain actions, such as asset sales or contributions, mergers, stock issuances or stock sales within the two years following the spin-off without first obtaining the opinion of tax counsel or an Internal Revenue Service ruling to the effect that such actions will not result in the spin-off failing to qualify as a tax-free spin-off. In addition, we generally would be responsible for, among other things, any taxes resulting from the failure of a spin-off to qualify as a tax-free transaction to the extent such taxes are attributable to, or result from, any action or failure to act by us or certain transactions involving us following a spin-off and a percentage of such taxes to the extent such taxes are not attributable to, or do not result from, any action or failure to act by either us or EMC.
Insurance Matters Agreement
We also entered into an insurance matters agreement with EMC in conjunction with our IPO. Pursuant to the insurance matters agreement, EMC maintains insurance policies covering, and for the benefit of, us and our directors, officers and employees. The insurance policies maintained by EMC under the insurance matters agreement are comparable to those maintained by EMC and covering us prior to our IPO. Except to the extent that EMC allocates a portion of its insurance costs to us, we must reimburse EMC, as the case may be, for premium expenses, deductibles or retention amounts, and all other costs and expenses that EMC may incur in connection with the insurance coverage EMC maintains for us. We are responsible for any action against VMware in connection with EMC's maintenance of insurance coverage for us, including as a result of the level or scope of any insurance, the creditworthiness of any insurance carrier, the terms and conditions of any policy, or the adequacy or timeliness of any notice to an insurance carrier in connection with a claim or potential claim or otherwise, during the term of the insurance matters agreement, except to the extent that such action arises out of or is related to the breach by EMC of the insurance matters agreement or the related insurance policies, or the gross negligence, bad faith or willful misconduct of EMC in connection with the insurance matters agreement or the related insurance policies.
The term of the insurance matters agreement will expire on a date which is 45 days after the date upon which EMC owns shares of our common stock representing less than a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by all holders of our common stock.
Employee Benefits Agreement
We have also entered into an employee benefits agreement with EMC. The employee benefits agreement allocates liabilities and responsibilities relating to employee compensation and benefit plans and programs and other related matters, including the treatment of outstanding EMC equity awards which may be held by our employees and the allocation of certain retirement plan assets and liabilities and the ownership of work product developed for our benefit.
Intellectual Property Agreement
The terms of the intellectual property agreement formalize the relationship between us and EMC with respect to our use of certain EMC source code and associated intellectual property rights, as well as EMC's use of certain VMware source code and associated intellectual property rights.
58
Under the terms of the intellectual property agreement, we and EMC fully release one another from claims resulting from any acts of infringement that might have occurred prior to the date our IPO was completed. Going forward, EMC will provide to us license rights under certain source code and associated intellectual property rights to design, develop, distribute, service and support our existing products, as well as any updates, upgrades and future versions of those products, and the implementation of interoperability between future VMware products and EMC products. These rights exclude our ability to use EMC's intellectual property to create certain types of products.
We, in turn, will provide to EMC license rights under certain source code and associated intellectual property rights to design, develop, distribute, service and support EMC's existing products, any updates, upgrades and future versions of those products, as well as EMC's future products. These rights exclude the ability of EMC to use our intellectual property to create certain types of products. The scope of the patent rights we provide to EMC and the scope of products with which EMC may use our intellectual property rights will be initially narrowed at such time as EMC no longer owns 50% of our common stock, and further narrowed at such time as EMC no longer owns 20% of our common stock. The scope of products with which EMC may use our intellectual property rights will also be narrowed if there is a change in control of EMC at such time as EMC no longer owns 50% of our common stock. EMC will indemnify us for any losses arising out of any use by EMC of the intellectual property rights we provide to EMC under the intellectual property agreement, and we will indemnify EMC for any losses arising out of any use by us of the intellectual property rights EMC provides to us under the intellectual property agreement.
Real Estate Agreements
We entered into a real estate license agreement with EMC in conjunction with our IPO. The real estate license agreement governs the terms under which we may use the space we share, and will continue to share, with EMC at certain properties that EMC currently leases. The real estate license agreement did not materially change other arrangements we have with EMC related to shared space or the amounts we are charged for use of such space.
Support from EMC Subsidiaries in Certain Geographic Regions
Prior to our IPO, we had entered into several agreements with EMC with respect to international marketing, call center support, and research and development services. EMC has continued to provide these services to us following our IPO pursuant to these agreements and similar subsequent arrangements. In certain circumstances where we do not have an established legal entity, EMC employees managed by our personnel have provided services on our behalf.
We have entered into various geographically-specific marketing services agreements with certain of EMC's subsidiaries. During 2010, these agreements involved the following countries: Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Chile, Columbia, the Czech Republic, Dubai, Finland, France, India, Italy, Portugal, Korea, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey and United Arab Emirates. The terms of these agreements are substantially similar and under such agreements, the signing EMC subsidiaries have agreed to provide us, upon our request, with services that include promoting our products, developing our customer base, and acting as a liaison to certain customers. Under the provisions of the agreements, we are charged by such EMC subsidiaries in performing services under these agreements. EMC subsidiaries provided these services to us on similar terms before such time as we entered into written agreements. The agreements are effective until terminated by either party upon 30 day written notice.
59
Ongoing and Ordinary Course of Business Agreements
In 2010, we entered into various software licensing and support agreements with EMC covering the purchase of approximately $23.2 million in VMware products and services by EMC for its internal use and approximately $1.6 million in EMC products and services by VMware for our internal use. Additionally, during 2010, pursuant to reseller arrangements between VMware and EMC, EMC entered into agreements with third party customers for their purchase of VMware products and professional services with an aggregate value of approximately $164.5 million.
We also entered into various licensing, technology and marketing partnering agreements with EMC during 2010 relating primarily to furthering the interoperability of our respective technologies. These agreements provided for deployment of the internal resources of both companies with an estimated value in excess of $5.9 million.
Asset Acquisition from EMC
In April 2011, we entered into an agreement with EMC to acquire certain assets relating to EMC's Mozy cloud-based data storage and datacenter services, including certain datacenter assets and a license to certain intellectual property, for approximately $8.8 million. We also entered into an operational support agreement with EMC pursuant to which we will take over responsibility for operating the Mozy service on behalf of EMC. We will hire all of the approximately 350 Mozy employees and, pursuant to the support agreement, costs incurred by us to support EMC's Mozy services, plus a mark-up intended to approximate third-party costs, will be reimbursed to us by EMC. EMC retains ownership of the Mozy business and its remaining assets and continues to be responsible to Mozy customers for Mozy products and services.
Investment in Joint Venture with EMC and Cisco
Since the start of 2010, we have invested an additional $11.1 million as part of our minority interest in VCE LLC (formally Acadia Enterprises, LLC), a joint venture between EMC and Cisco formed in 2009. EMC and Cisco are the lead investors in VCE, which is focused on accelerating customer build-outs of information technology infrastructures through end-to-end enablement of service providers and large enterprise customers. During the period, we also entered into an agreement with VCE to enable them to resell VMware products on a non-exclusive basis.
Other Transactions with Related Persons
Based on our review of public filings, we believe that Cisco held 6,500,000 shares of our Class A common stock, representing, as of March 1, 2011, 5.49% of our Class A common stock, approximately 1.55% of our total outstanding common stock and less than 1% of our total voting power.
We have in the past done business, and expect to continue to do business, with Cisco, including its subsidiaries, on a regular, arm's-length basis, on the same or similar terms as would be negotiated with unrelated third parties. During 2010, both we and Cisco engaged in purchases of products and services from each other and paid each other royalties for integration of each other's technology in product sales to third party end users. All such transactions with Cisco were in the ordinary course of business on the same or similar terms as would be negotiated with unrelated third parties.
In addition, from time to time, we may purchase or sell goods and services in the ordinary course of business with financial institutions that beneficially own 5% or more of our Class A common stock. We have in the past done business, and expect to continue to do business, with entities affiliated with UBS AG, FMR LLC and Prudential Financial, financial institutions that reported in public filings that they beneficially owned 5% or more of our Class A common stock during all or a portion of 2010, on a regular, arm's-length basis, on the same or similar terms as would be negotiated with unrelated third parties.
60
The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material," to be "filed" with the SEC or be subject to Regulation 14A or Regulation 14C (other than as provided in Item 407 of Regulation S-K) or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in future filings with the SEC except to the extent that VMware specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with VMware's management and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the audited consolidated financial statements of VMware contained in VMware's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the 2010 fiscal year. The Audit Committee has also discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP the matters required to be discussed by SAS No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1. AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.
The Audit Committee has received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Accounting Oversight Board regarding PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence from VMware.
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in VMware's Annual Report on Form 10-K for its 2010 fiscal year for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Submitted by the Audit Committee
Michael
W. Brown, Chair
Dennis D. Powell, Vice Chair
Renee J. James
61
To be eligible for inclusion in VMware's proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, stockholder proposals must be received at VMware's principal executive offices no later than December 14, 2011. Stockholder proposals should be addressed to: Attention: Legal Department, VMware Inc., 3401 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304, or sent via facsimile to the attention of the Legal Department at (650) 427-5023.
Under our bylaws, nominations for a director may be made only by the Board of Directors, a nominating committee of the Board of Directors, a person appointed by the Board of Directors or by a stockholder entitled to vote who has delivered notice to the Secretary; Legal Department at the principal executive offices of VMware (containing certain information specified in the bylaws) (i) not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary date of the preceding year's annual meeting, or (ii) if the meeting is called for a date more than thirty days before or after such anniversary date, not earlier than the close of business on 120 days prior to such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of (a) 90 days prior to such annual meeting and (b) the tenth day following the date of public announcement of such meeting is first made by VMware. The bylaws also provide that no business may be brought before an annual meeting except as specified in the notice of the annual meeting or as otherwise brought before the annual meeting by or at the direction of the Board of Directors, the presiding officer or by a stockholder entitled to vote at such annual meeting who has delivered notice to the Secretary at the principal executive offices of VMware (containing certain information specified in our bylaws) within the periods prior to the meeting specified in the preceding sentence. In each case, stockholders must also comply with the procedural requirements in our bylaws.
Any holder of our Class A common stock who wishes to bring a proposal or nominate a person for election to the Board of Directors at VMware's 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must provide written notice of the proposal or nomination to VMware's Secretary; Legal Department, at our address specified above, on or after January 26, 2012 and no later than February 25, 2012.
Our bylaws also provide that until such time that EMC ceases to hold at least a majority of the voting power of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock voting together as a single class, EMC shall be entitled to propose business to be considered at any meeting of stockholders and to nominate persons for election to the Board of Directors without compliance with the notice procedure described in the two preceding paragraphs.
These requirements are separate and apart from the requirements that a stockholder must meet in order to have a stockholder proposal included in VMware's proxy statement under Rule 14a-8 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 discussed in "Stockholder Proposals." A copy of the full text of the bylaw provisions discussed above may be obtained by through the investor relations page of our website at http://ir.vmware.com. Our bylaws are also on file with the SEC and are available through its website at http://www.sec.gov.
SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires VMware's executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of the common stock, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC and the NYSE. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with all copies of Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on our review of these forms and written representations from the officers and directors received by us, we believe that during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, all filing
62
requirements were complied with in a timely fashion, except, due to clerical errors, with respect to Mark S. Peek, our Chief Financial Officer and Co-President, Business Operations, and Robynne D. Sisco, our Chief Accounting Officer. On February 16, 2010, Mr. Peek exercised a stock option for 15,000 shares of our Class A common stock. A Form 4 reporting this transaction was filed on March 26, 2010. On July 15, 2010, Ms. Sisco forfeited 2,293 shares of our Class A common stock to VMware to cover VMware's tax withholding obligations triggered by vesting of a restricted stock unit award. A Form 4 reporting this transaction was filed on July 26, 2010.
If you and other residents with the same last name at your mailing address own shares of common stock in street name, your broker or bank may have sent you a notice that your household will receive only one annual report and proxy statement for each company in which you hold stock through that broker or bank. This practice of sending only one copy of proxy materials is known as "householding." If you received a householding communication, your broker will send one copy of VMware's 2011 proxy statement to your address unless contrary instructions were given by any stockholder at that address. If you received more than one copy of the proxy materials this year and you wish to reduce the number of reports you receive in the future and save VMware the cost of printing and mailing these reports, your broker will discontinue the mailing of reports on the accounts you select if you mark the designated box on your proxy card, or follow the instructions provided when you vote over the Internet.
You may revoke your consent to householding at any time by contacting Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. ("Broadridge"), either by calling toll free at (800) 542-1061 or by writing to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717. The revocation of your consent to householding will be effective 30 days following its receipt. In any event, if your household received a single set of proxy materials for this year, but you would prefer to receive your own copy, we will promptly send a copy to you if you go to www.proxyvote.com and request a copy, or if you address your written request to the Investor Relations Department, VMware Inc., 3401 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304, or call us at (877) 486-9273.
A copy of VMware's Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the financial statements and schedules thereto, required to be filed with the SEC for VMware's most recently completed fiscal year, may be found on the investor relations page of our website at http://ir.vmware.com. In addition, VMware will provide each beneficial owner of its securities with a copy of the Annual Report on Form 10-K without charge, upon the written request of any such person. Such requests should be sent to the Investor Relations Department, VMware, Inc., 3401 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304.
By order of the Board of Directors | ||
S. DAWN SMITH Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary |
Palo Alto, California
April 12, 2011
63
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: Signature (Joint Owners) Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Date 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0000095942_1 R1.0.0.11699 VMWARE, INC. 3401 Hillview Ave Palo Alto, CA 94304 VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. Electronic Delivery of Future PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following nominee: For Against Abstain 1. Election of Directors Nominees 1. Renee J. James The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: For Against Abstain 2. Advisory vote on executive compensation, as described in VMware's Proxy Statement. The Board of Directors recommends you vote for "1 YEAR" on the following proposal: 1 year 2 years 3 years Abstain 3. Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, as described in VMware's Proxy Statement. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following proposal: For Against Abstain 4. To ratify the selection by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. NOTE: The proposals to be voted on may also include such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. |
0000095942_2 R1.0.0.11699 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The NOTICE AND PROXY STATEMENT WITH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K is/are available at www.proxyvote.com . ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, MAY 25, 2011 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned hereby appoints Mark S. Peek, our Chief Financial Officer and Co-President, Business Operations, and S. Dawn Smith, our Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer and Secretary, and each of them, proxies with full power of substitution to each, to represent and to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of VMware Inc., a Delaware corporation, to be held on May 25, 2011, at 9:00 a.m., local time, at VMware's offices at 3401 Hillview Ave, Palo Alto, California 94304 and at any adjournments thereof, all the shares of Class A common stock, par value $.01 per share, of VMware that the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present. The undersigned instructs such proxies or their substitutes to act on the following matters as specified by the undersigned, and to vote in such manner as such proxies or their substitutes may determine on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting. THE PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED. IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, THEN THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED "FOR" THE NOMINEE FOR DIRECTOR (PROPOSAL 1), "FOR" AN ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (PROPOSAL 2), FOR "1 YEAR" ON AN ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (PROPOSAL 3) AND "FOR" RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS VMWARE'S INDEPENDENT AUDITORS FOR 2011 (PROPOSAL 4). IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING AND ANY ADJOURNMENTS THEREOF. PLEASE MARK, DATE AND SIGN ON REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN PROMPLY IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE. Continued on reverse side |